4 unchanged sentences
On November 6, 2023, the
−Removed: Company filed a motion to move the case to the United States District Courthouse, Eastern District of New York for an Order to dismiss
−Removed: with prejudice.
+Added: Company filed a motion to move the case to the United States District Court, Eastern District of New York for an Order to dismiss with
+Added: On July 29, 2024, Complaint was dismissed by the Eastern District of New York.
+Added: However, Plaintiff was granted leave to file
+Added: an amended complaint within 30 days after entry of the order.
+Added: Subsequently, the Plaintiff filed an amended complaint against the Company
+Added: and the Company has moved to dismiss the amended complaint.
+Added: On July 8, 2024, China Supply
+Added: and Marketing Agricultural Products Co., Ltd.
+Added: (“China Supply and Marketing”)filed a lawsuit against Shandong Yunchu, Li Honghu,
+Added: the legal representative of Shandong Yunchu International Trade Co., Ltd.
+Added: (“Qingdao Sirun”), and Jiayi Technologies.
+Added: Yunchu and Qingdao Sirun entered into two entrusted import contracts with China Supply and Marketing in 2021 and 2022, respectively.
+Added: Supply and Marketing made phased payments to the foreign suppliers, while Shandong Yunchu and Qingdao Sirun paid China Supply and Marketing
+Added: and collected part of the goods.
+Added: However, an outstanding amount of RMB 7,012,335.38 (equivalent to $960,686) remained, consisting of unpaid
+Added: balances and uncollected goods.
+Added: It is claimed that, on September 13, 2023, Shandong Yunchu, Qingdao Sirun, and China Supply and Marketing
+Added: entered into a debt transfer agreement, under which Shandong Yunchu assumed all remaining debt obligations of Qingdao Sirun, including
+Added: outstanding payments and uncollected goods.
+Added: Li Honghu, the legal representative of Shandong Yunchu, signed the debt transfer agreement
+Added: as a guarantor and affixed his fingerprint.
+Added: Jiayi Technology, as the sole shareholder of Shandong Yunchu, was included in the lawsuit
+Added: under corporate law, with China Supply and Marketing seeking joint liability from Jiayi Technology for Shandong Yunchu’s debts.
+Added: Shandong Yunchu contended that it never agreed to assume Qingdao Sirun’s debt obligations and never signed any debt transfer agreement.
+Added: It further argued that the debt transfer agreement presented by the plaintiff contained a forged signature and fingerprint of Li Honghu,
+Added: and requested a forensic examination to verify the authenticity of the document.
+Added: Jiayi Technology claimed that it had already fulfilled
+Added: its capital contribution to Shandong Yunchu and should not bear any joint liability.
+Added: Yongan Construction Engineering
+Added: filed a lawsuit against Xianning Bozhuang over outstanding construction project payments.
+Added: On April 22, 2024, the court ruled
+Added: that Xianning Bozhuang must pay RMB 867,326 (equivalent to $118,823) in construction project fees along with interest calculated at an
+Added: annual rate of 3.8% from January 1, 2022, until the full amount is settled.
+Added: The judgment took effect on May 7, 2024, and Xianning Bozhuang
+Added: is currently in the process of making payments toward the outstanding debt.
+Added: Jianfa Logistics (Fuzhou)
+Added: sued Shandong Yunchu for failing to pay RMB 2,817,441.28 (equivalent to $385,988) under an agency import contract, along with
+Added: a penalty of RMB 375,294.16 (equivalent to $51,415).
+Added: Additionally, Jianfa Logistics sought to hold Shandong Yunchu’s shareholder,
+Added: Xianning Jiayi, jointly liable for the debt.
+Added: On November 11, 2024, the court ruled that Shandong Yunchu is responsible for repaying the
+Added: outstanding amount, with Xianning Jiayi assuming joint liability.
+Added: However, Xianning Jiayi argued that it had already fulfilled its capital
+Added: contribution obligations and should not bear any joint liability.
+Added: As a result, it has filed an appeal with the higher court.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
1 unchanged sentence
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.