What changed in this filing

/stocks — the workspaceLOADING

Item 1A. Risk Factors

2025-08-11 compared with 2025-05-08 · 161 added, 11 removed, 3 unchanged (98% of the section changed)

In addition to the other

information contained in this Quarterly Report you should consider the risk factors and the other information in our Annual Report on

Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, including our audited financial statements and the related notes and “Management’s

Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” If any such risks actually occur, our business, financial

condition, results of operations and future growth prospects would likely be materially and adversely affected.

In these circumstances,

the market price of our common stock would likely decline and you may lose all or part of your investment.

Additional risks and uncertainties

not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may impair our business operations.

addition to the other information contained in this Quarterly Report you should consider the risk factors and the other information in

our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, including our audited financial statements and the related notes

and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” If any such risks actually

occur, our business, financial condition, results of operations and future growth prospects would likely be materially and adversely

In these circumstances, the market price of our common stock would likely decline and you may lose all or part of your investment.

Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial also may impair our business operations.

we provide in supplemental form the material changes to our risk factors that occurred during the past quarter.

Our risk factors disclosed

in Part I, Item 1A, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, provide additional disclosure for these supplemental

risks and are incorporated herein by reference.

federal government could pursue enforcement actions against us to the extent we are unable to demonstrate compliance with cGMPs and other

required regulations, the effects of which could be costly to us and could result in adverse consequences to our business.

2017, the FDA issued a MedWatch notification regarding a curcumin emulsion and two adverse events that had been associated with the use

of these emulsions by prescribing physicians.

We issued a press release on August 7, 2017, clarifying certain facts regarding the notice

which outlined our belief that the adverse events associated with the two patients occurred due to an allergic reaction caused by the

products being inappropriately administered and obtained by the prescribing physician, and our use of curcumin and excipients in our curcumin

emulsion formulation met regulatory standards required for dispensing of the curcumin emulsion.

In September 2017, the FDA released a

letter confirming that the alleged misuse of certain ingredients in our curcumin emulsions was due to mislabeling by the underlying supplier

and not of our own misdoing.

We no longer compound curcumin emulsion products.

in December 2017, we were issued a warning letter from the FDA alleging that, in its interpretation of our public communications, we had

made false or misleading claims and omitted risk and side effect information regarding certain of our ophthalmology-focused compounded

We immediately performed a full review of our public communications referenced in the warning letter and responded to the

FDA in January 2018;

notwithstanding our continued belief that our public communications were not, in fact, false and misleading, we remained

in communication with the FDA and took steps to address the items outlined in the FDA letter.

The Company received another warning letter

from the FDA in June 2022 related to our alleged marketing activities.

We immediately responded to the warning letter and the FDA sent

the Company notice in January 2023 that our corrective actions appear adequate.

2019, our New Jersey-based outsourcing facility (“NJOF”) was issued a warning letter related to an April 2017 inspection and

our use of certain active pharmaceutical ingredients in our compounded medications.

During September 2020 through January 2021, our New

Jersey based outsourcing facility was inspected by the FDA (the “2020 Inspection”) and certain observations were made by the

FDA in a Form 483.

Five observations made during the 2020 Inspection were considered repeat observations from a 2017 FDA inspection.

addition, during the 2020 inspection, the FDA noted that we were compounding drugs for which there is no change that produces a clinical

difference for an individual patient, as determined by a prescribing practitioner between a compounded drug and the comparable approved

We have responded to the FDA regarding all of their observations from the 2020 Inspection, including providing documentation from

prescribing clinicians that indicate a clinical difference between our compounded drugs and the comparable approved drugs, while also

committing to amend our order process to collect “medical necessity/clinical difference” information for each order of our

compounded drugs on a go-forward basis.

was inspected in August 2022 and received a Form 483 with several observations from the FDA.

In May 2023, our pharmacy received a warning

letter related to the inspection that occurred in August 2022.

The warning letter indicated that our corrective actions from the inspection

had appeared to be adequate;

however, the FDA could not fully evaluate the adequacy of our actions because we did not include sufficient

information or supporting documentation.

As an example, we stated that smoke studies related to airflow in our laminar airflow hoods had

been redone to satisfy FDA requirements, however, we did not provide the FDA with supporting documentation (such as smoke study protocol,

updated detailed report and/or videos).

We have responded to this warning letter and provided the FDA with additional information requested.

March 2024 through April 2024, NJOF was inspected by the FDA (the “2024 Inspection”), and the FDA issued a Form 483 with five

observations.

Since January 2025, we engaged in separate but related discussions with the federal government regarding the NJOF quality

system and the 2024 Inspection.

NJOF voluntarily recalled certain products and provided regular updates to the FDA regarding its remediation

activities and other commitments, including Project Beagle.

The government has notified us that these discussions are now closed.

regulatory actions could increase scrutiny and could create negative publicity on us as a company.

As part of our commitment to actively

work with regulators, at times, we have become aware of concerns related to certain formulations, and as a result, discontinued compounding

certain drug formulations in an attempt to help mitigate potential regulatory risk.

For other reasons, including, but not limited to,

the following, physicians may be unwilling to prescribe or patients may be unwilling to use our compounded formulations:

legal prohibitions

on our ability to discuss the efficacy or safety of our formulations with potential users to the extent applicable data is available;

our pharmacy operations are primarily operating on a cash-pay basis and reimbursement may or may not be available from third-party payors,

including the government Medicare and Medicaid programs;

and certain formulations are not required to be prepared and are not presently

being prepared in a manufacturing facility governed by cGMP requirements.

These factors and any future regulatory action could continue

to limit our production, and our ability to dispense and distribute our compounded products, which would negatively affect sales of our

compounded products.

sales depend on coverage and reimbursement from government and commercial third-party payers, and pricing and reimbursement pressures

have affected, and are likely to continue to affect, our profitability.

of our products depend on the availability and extent of coverage and reimbursement from third-party payers, including government healthcare

programs and private insurance plans.

Governments and private payers continue to pursue initiatives to manage drug utilization and contain

Further, pressures on healthcare budgets from the economic downturn and inflation continue and are likely to increase, across

the markets we serve.

Payers are increasingly focused on costs, which has resulted, and is expected to continue to result, in lower reimbursement

rates for our products and/or narrower patient populations for which payers will reimburse.

Continued intense public scrutiny of the

price of drugs and other healthcare costs, together with payer dynamics, have limited, and are likely to continue to limit, our ability

to set or adjust the price of our products based on their value, which can have a material adverse effect on our business.

In the United

States, particularly over the past few years, a number of legislative and regulatory proposals have been introduced and/or signed into

law to lower drug prices.

These include provisions in the Inflation Reduction Act that enable the U.S.

government to set prices for certain

drugs in Medicare, redesign Medicare Part D benefits to shift a greater proportion of the costs to manufacturers and health plans and

enable the U.S.

government to impose penalties if drug prices are increased at a rate faster than inflation.

Additional proposals focused

on drug pricing continue to be debated, and additional executive orders or regulatory initiatives focused on drug pricing and competition

are likely to be adopted and implemented in some form.

It is unclear what policies will advance with respect to other drug pricing proposals,

including international reference pricing or changes to healthcare regulations affecting pharmaceuticals.

Further, state government activity

has been dynamic, including certain states enacting new laws limiting drug reimbursement under state run Medicaid programs and prohibiting

restrictions on 340B Program use.

Such state laws could also eventually be adopted at the federal level.

are unable to predict which or how many policy, regulatory, administrative or legislative changes may ultimately be, or effectively estimate

the consequences to our business if, enacted and implemented.

However, to the extent that payer actions further decrease or modify the

coverage or reimbursement available for our products, require that we pay increased rebates or shift other costs to us, limit or affect

our decisions regarding the pricing of or otherwise reduce the use of our products, such actions could have a material adverse effect

on our business and results of operations.

economic conditions may negatively affect us and may magnify certain risks that affect our business.

operations and performance have been, and may continue to be, affected by global economic conditions.

The economic downturn resulting

from the COVID-19 pandemic precipitated a global recession, which was followed by high rates of inflation and actions taken by financial

regulators to raise interest rates.

Instability in the financial system, tighter lending standards and higher interest rates have added

stress that may create additional vulnerabilities in the global economy, the effects of which may be of an extended duration.

Additionally,

with higher interest rates, deficits (including those associated with the pandemic), and other fiscal pressures, governments may be unable

to sustain their previously high levels of fiscal spending.

As a result of global economic conditions, some third-party payers may delay

or be unable to satisfy their reimbursement obligations.

Job losses or other economic hardships (including inflation) may also affect

patients’ ability to afford healthcare as a result of increased co-pay or deductible obligations, greater cost sensitivity to existing

co-pay or deductible obligations, lost healthcare insurance coverage or for other reasons.

We believe such conditions could lead to reduced

demand for our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our product sales, business and results of operations.

The cumulative

effects of inflationary pressures, an uncertain trade environment with escalating and rapidly-changing tariffs, and the effects from

the armed conflict in Ukraine (including the effects of the sanctions that were implemented in response to the conflict and the resulting

impacts on the commodity market and supply chains) and the Middle East may also increase our operating expenses.

Some of our operational

costs, including the cost of energy, cost of goods, other materials, labor, distribution and our other operational costs are subject

to market conditions and have been adversely affected by inflationary pressures.

Although we monitor our distributors’, customers’

and suppliers’ financial condition and their liquidity to mitigate our business risks, some of our distributors, customers and

suppliers may become insolvent, which could have a material adverse effect on our product sales, business and results of operations.

trade policy—including the possible imposition of significant tariffs on pharmaceuticals and raw materials—could

materially increase our costs, disrupt our supply chain, and impair our competitive position.

public statements by U.S.

policymakers contemplate phased tariff rates of up to 150% (or more) on imported finished drugs, active pharmaceutical

ingredients (“APIs”), and key excipients.

Although we manufacture a significant amount of our finished ophthalmic products

in the United States, we rely on third-party suppliers, many of which source APIs, sterile bottles, dropper tips, and other critical

components from non-U.S.

jurisdictions.

If one or more rounds of tariffs are enacted, we could experience:

input costs that we may be unable to pass through to customers under existing supply and reimbursement arrangements, compressing

gross margins;

delays or shortages if overseas suppliers elect to redirect shipments to non-U.S.

customers to avoid tariff exposure;

measures by foreign governments that could hinder our ability to procure specialized equipment or to out-license our products abroad;

Working-capital

pressure, as we may need to build additional safety stock or advance-pay duties before goods clear U.S.

we are evaluating mitigation strategies—including dual-sourcing, qualifying U.S.

or free-trade-area suppliers, and tariff-engineering

options—there can be no assurance that these actions will be successful or fully offset potential cost increases.

Material tariff-related

cost inflation or supply disruptions could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.

What changed 10-Q

Item 1A. Risk Factors