Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings.
On April 14, 2017, representatives for the estate of a deceased individual
filed a civil lawsuit in the Suffolk Superior Court, in Boston, Massachusetts, against the Company, Harvard Bioscience and other defendants.
The complaint alleges that the decedent’s injury and death were caused by two tracheal implants that incorporated synthetic trachea
scaffolds and a biologic component combined by the implanting surgeon with a bioreactor, and surgically implanted in the decedent in two
surgeries performed in 2012 and 2013. The civil complaint seeks a non-specific sum of money to compensate the plaintiffs. This civil lawsuit
relates to the Company’s first-generation trachea scaffold technology for which the Company discontinued development in 2014, and
not to the Company’s current Cellframe technology nor to its lead development product candidate, the CEI. The litigation is in the
discovery stage and the Company intends to vigorously defend this case. While the Company believes that such claim lacks merit, the Company
is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of such litigation. In accordance with a separation and distribution agreement between Harvard
Bioscience and the Company relating to the spin-off, the Company would be required to indemnify Harvard Bioscience against losses that
Harvard Bioscience may suffer as a result of this litigation. The Company has been informed by its insurance provider that the case has
been accepted as an insurable claim under the Company’s product liability insurance policy.
From time to time, the Company may be involved in various claims and
legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Other than the above matter, there are no such matters pending that the
Company expects to be material in relation to its business, financial condition, and results of operations or cash flows.
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not Applicable.
36
PART II
Text extracted from the filing as submitted to EDGAR. Formatting, tables and exhibits are simplified for reading; the original document is authoritative for anything you rely on.