5 unchanged sentences
Uniondale, New York Litigation
−Removed: In September 2004, the State of New York commenced an action against us, United Gas Corp., Costa Gas Station, Inc., Vincent Costa, Sharon Irni, The Ingraham Bedell Corporation, Richard Berger and Exxon Mobil Corporation in New York Supreme Court in Albany County seeking recovery for reimbursement of investigation and remediation costs claimed to have been incurred by the New York Environmental Protection and Spill Compensation Fund relating to contamination it alleges emanated from various gasoline station properties located in the same vicinity in Uniondale, New York, including a site formerly owned by us and at which a petroleum release and cleanup occurred.
−Removed: The complaint also seeks future costs for remediation, as well as interest and penalties.
−Removed: We have served an answer to the complaint denying responsibility.
−Removed: In 2007, the State of New York commenced action against Shell Oil Company, Shell Oil Products Company, Motiva Enterprises, LLC, and related parties, in the New York Supreme Court, Albany County seeking basically the same relief sought in the action involving us.
−Removed: We have also filed a third-party complaint against Hess Corporation, Sprague Operating Resources LLC (successor to RAD Energy Corp.), Service Station Installation of NY, Inc., and certain individual defendants based on alleged contribution to the contamination that is the subject of the State’s claims arising from a petroleum discharge at a gasoline station up-gradient from the site formerly owned by us.
+Added: In September 2004, the State of New York commenced an action against us, United Gas Corp., Costa Gas Station, Inc., Vincent Costa, Sharon Irni, The Ingraham Bedell Corporation, Richard Berger and Exxon Mobil in New York Supreme Court in Albany County seeking recovery for reimbursement of investigation and remediation costs claimed to have been incurred by the New York Environmental Protection and Spill Compensation Fund relating to contamination it alleges emanated from various gasoline station properties located in the same vicinity in Uniondale, New York, including a site formerly owned by us and at which a petroleum release and cleanup occurred.
+Added: The complaint also sought future costs for remediation, as well as interest and penalties.
+Added: We served an answer to the complaint denying responsibility.
+Added: In 2007, the State of New York commenced action against Shell, Motiva, and related parties, in the New York Supreme Court, Albany County seeking basically the same relief sought in the action involving us.
+Added: We filed a third-party complaint against Hess, Sprague Operating Resources LLC (successor to RAD Energy Corp.), Service Station Installation of NY, Inc., and certain individual defendants based on alleged contribution to the contamination that is the subject of the State’s claims arising from a petroleum discharge at a gasoline station up-gradient from the site formerly owned by us.
In 2016, the various actions filed by the State of New York and our third-party actions were consolidated for discovery proceedings and trial.
−Removed: We have entered into a settlement agreement with the State of New York and the other parties to this lawsuit, which includes mutual releases.
−Removed: This settlement is in the process of being funded by the defendants, following which a stipulation of discontinuance will be filed and the lawsuit will be dismissed.
−Removed: Our settlement contribution is consistent with the amount we accrued for this lawsuit as of June 30, 2021.
−Removed: Although we believe that this case will be resolved as contemplated by the settlement agreement, until funding is fully made and the stipulation of discontinuance is filed, this case cannot be considered fully resolved.
+Added: We entered into a settlement agreement with the State of New York and the other parties to this lawsuit, which includes mutual releases.
+Added: This settlement has been fully funded by the defendants, and a Stipulation of Discontinuance has been executed by all parties, resolving the lawsuit.
+Added: The Stipulation of Discontinuance will be filed with the New York Supreme Court at which time the lawsuit will be dismissed.
+Added: Our settlement contribution was consistent with the amount we accrued for this lawsuit.
+Added: There have been no material changes to the information previously disclosed in “Item 1A.
+Added: Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 and each of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2021 and June 30, 2021.
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.