12 unchanged sentences
The CAFC found in favor of the Company and has vacated and remanded all of the PTAB findings with the exception of their finding that the ‘027 patent met the prima facia test for obviousness, which was affirmed.
−Removed: SRAM has appealed to the CAFC to rehear the case en banc.
The CAFC has declined to rehear the case and has issued the final remand order sending the case back to the PTAB.
−Removed: The PTAB has issued an opinion in the ‘250 Patent petition case stating that the Company has not shown the claims of the ‘250 Patent to be obvious.
−Removed: The Company has appealed that PTAB opinion to the CAFC and the CAFC ruling is pending.
+Added: The PTAB has issued an opinion in the ‘250 Patent case stating that the Company has not shown the claims of the ‘250 Patent to be obvious.
+Added: The Company has appealed that PTAB opinion to the CAFC and the CAFC has affirmed the PTAB opinion.
In a separate action, the Company filed a lawsuit on January 29, 2016 in the U.S.
14 unchanged sentences
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.