5 unchanged sentences
As of December 31, 2025, we offered skilled nursing, senior living and rehabilitative care services through 373 skilled nursing and senior living facilities.
−Removed: Of the 327 facilities, we operated 231 facilities under long-term lease arrangements and have options to purchase 12 of those 231 facilities.
−Removed: Our real estate portfolio consists of 129 owned real estate properties, which included 96 facilities operated and managed by us, 33 operations leased to and operated by third-party operators, and the Service Center's California location.
+Added: Of the 373 facilities, we operate 253 facilities under long-term lease arrangements and have options to purchase 8 of those 253 facilities.
+Added: Our real estate portfolio consists of 158 owned real estate properties, which includes 120 facilities operated and managed by us, 38 operations leased to and operated by third-party operators, and the Service Center's California location.
Of the 38 third-party operations, one senior living operation is located on the same real estate property as a skilled nursing operation that we own and operate.
15 unchanged sentences
In the past, we have spun-off our owned real estate properties into a public real estate investment trust (REIT).
−Removed: Currently, we plan to continue to expand our real estate portfolio.
+Added: We view owning and expanding our real estate portfolio as a key component of our long-term strategy, aimed at driving sustained growth for the organization.
We own 158 real estate properties, including 38 real estate properties that are leased to third parties under triple-net long-term leases.
We manage and operate the remaining real estate properties, including the Service Center's California location.
−Removed: We are committed to growing our real estate portfolio, which we believe will further enhance our earnings and maximize long-term shareholder value.
−Removed: To continue with our growth strategy on our real estate portfolio, in January 2022, we formed Standard Bearer.
+Added: We are committed to further growing our real estate portfolio, which we believe will strengthen our earnings and long-term value for our stockholders.
+Added: As part of our strategy to expand our real estate portfolio, in January 2022, we formed Standard Bearer.
Standard Bearer owns and manages our real estate business.
−Removed: The REIT structure allows us to better demonstrate the growing value of our owned real estate and provides us with an efficient vehicle for future acquisitions of properties that could be operated by our independent subsidiaries or other third parties.
+Added: The REIT structure allows us to effectively highlight the growing value of our owned real estate and provides us with an efficient vehicle for future acquisitions of properties that could be operated by our independent subsidiaries or other third parties.
We believe this structure gives us new pathways to growth with transactions we would not have considered in the past.
2 unchanged sentences
The real estate portfolio in Standard Bearer consists of 152 of our 158 owned real estate properties.
−Removed: During the year ended December 31, 2024, Standard Bearer acquired the real estate of 11 stand-alone skilled nursing facilities, three stand-alone senior living facilities, and three campus operations.
−Removed: Of these additions, the 11 skilled nursing facilities and three campus operations acquired are operated by the Company's independent subsidiaries .
−Removed: The senior living operations are leased to a third-party operator.
+Added: During the year ended December 31, 2025, Standard Bearer acquired the real estate of 25 stand-alone skilled nursing operations, one stand-alone senior living operation and two campus operations.
+Added: Of these additions , four stand-alone skilled nursing operations are leased to third-party operators and the remaining additions are operated by the Company's independent subsidiaries.
For further details on the Standard Bearer REIT, refer to Note 6, Standard Bearer , in Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
1 unchanged sentence
(1) skilled services, which includes the operation of skilled nursing facilities and rehabilitation therapy services and (2) Standard Bearer, which is comprised of select properties owned by us through our captive REIT and leased to skilled nursing and senior living operations, including our own independent subsidiaries and third-party operators.
−Removed: We also report an “all other” category that includes operating results from our senior living operations, mobile diagnostics, transportation, other real estate and other ancillary operations.
−Removed: These businesses are neither significant individually, nor in aggregate, and therefore do not constitute a reportable segment.
−Removed: Our Chief Executive Officer, who is our chief operating decision maker, or CODM, reviews financial information at the operating segment level.
−Removed: We have presented our segment results in this Annual Report on Form 10-K on a comparative basis to conform to the segment structure.
+Added: We also report an “all other” category that includes operating results from our senior living operations, other real estate, other ancillary operations and the Service Center.
+Added: Services included in the “All Other” category are insignificant individually and therefore do not constitute a reportable segment.
+Added: Our Chief Executive Officer, who is our chief operating decision maker, or CODM, reviews segment income for each operating segment to evaluate performance and allocate capital resources.
For more information about our operating segments, as well as financial information, see Part II., Item 7.
1 unchanged sentence
Skilled Services
−Removed: As of December 31, 2024, our skilled nursing companies provided skilled nursing care at 316 operations, with 33,547 operational beds, in Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, Nevada, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Washington and Wisconsin.
+Added: As of December 31, 2025, our skilled nursing companies provided skilled nursing care at 357 operations, with 37,911 operational beds, in Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, Nevada, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Washington and Wisconsin.
We provide short and long-term nursing care services for patients with chronic conditions, prolonged illness, and the elderly.
10 unchanged sentences
We generate rental revenue primarily by leasing post-acute care properties we acquired to healthcare operators under triple-net lease arrangements, whereby the tenant is solely responsible for the costs related to the property, including property taxes, insurance and maintenance and repair costs, subject to certain exceptions.
−Removed: As of December 31, 2024, our real estate portfolio within Standard Bearer is comprised of 124 real estate properties located in Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, Nevada, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Washington and Wisconsin.
+Added: As of December 31, 2025, our real estate portfolio within Standard Bearer is comprised of 152 real estate properties located in Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, Nevada, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Washington and Wisconsin.
Of these properties, 116 are leased to our independent subsidiaries and 37 are leased to operations wholly owned and managed by third-party operators.
3 unchanged sentences
Senior Living — As of December 31, 2025, we had an aggregate of 3,402 senior living units across 47 operations, of which 31 were located on the same site location as our skilled nursing care operations.
−Removed: Our senior living communities located in Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, Texas, Utah and Washington, provide residential accommodations, activities, meals, housekeeping and assistance in the activities of daily living to seniors who are independent or who require some support, but not the level of nursing care provided in a skilled nursing operation.
+Added: Our senior living communities located in Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Nebraska, Oregon, Texas, Utah and Washington, provide residential accommodations, activities, meals, housekeeping and assistance in the activities of daily living to seniors who are independent or who require some support, but not the level of nursing care provided in a skilled nursing operation.
Our independent living units are non-licensed independent living apartments in which residents are independent and require no support with the activities of daily living.
4 unchanged sentences
We have invested in and are exploring new business lines that are complementary to our existing skilled services and senior living services.
−Removed: These new business lines consist of mobile ancillary services, including digital x-ray, ultrasound, electrocardiograms, sub-acute services, dialysis, respiratory, long-term care pharmacy and patient transportation to people in their homes or at long-term care facilities.
+Added: These new business lines consist of mobile ancillary services, including digital x-ray, ultrasound, electrocardiograms, dialysis, respiratory, durable medical equipment, long-term care pharmacy and patient transportation to people in their homes or at long-term care facilities.
To date, these businesses were not meaningful contributors to our operating results.
4 unchanged sentences
From January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2025, we acquired 145 facilities, which added 14,739 operational skilled nursing beds and 1,148 senior living units to our independent subsidiaries.
−Removed: The following table summarizes cumulative skilled nursing and senior living operations, operational skilled nursing beds and senior living unit counts for each of the last five years to reflect our growth over a five-year period as a result of the acquisition of these facilities:
+Added: The following table summarizes cumulative skilled nursing and senior living operations, operational skilled nursing beds and senior living unit counts at the end of the last five years:
+Added: 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Cumulative number of skilled nursing and senior living operations 245 271 297 327 373
1 unchanged sentence
Cumulative number of senior living units 2,237 3,021 3,121 3,088 3,402
−Removed: (1) Number of operational beds and number of operations for 2020-2023 include operational beds and operations that we no longer operate.
−Removed: The number of operations and operational beds do not include the closed facilities beginning in the year of their closures.
We have also invested in new business lines that are complementary to our existing businesses, such as ancillary services.
2 unchanged sentences
• increasing the overall percentage or “mix” of higher acuity patients;
−Removed: • focusing on organic growth and internal operating efficiencies;
+Added: • focusing on organic growth and operating efficiencies;
• continuing to acquire additional operations in existing and new markets;
4 unchanged sentences
In addition, this program includes other lines of business that are closely related to the skilled nursing industry.
−Removed: The New Ventures program encourages our local leaders to evaluate service offerings with the goal of establishing an operating platform in new markets and new businesses.
+Added: The New Ventures program encourages our local leaders to evaluate service offerings with the goal of establishing an operating platform in new businesses.
We believe that this program will not only continue to drive growth, but will also provide a valuable training ground for our next generation of leaders, who will have experienced the challenges of growing and operating a new business.
OPERATION EXPANSIONS
−Removed: During the year ended December 31, 2024, we expanded through a combination of long-term leases and real estate purchases, with the addition of 28 stand-alone skilled nursing operations and three campus operations.
−Removed: Of these additions, Standard Bearer acquired the real estate of 11 of the stand-alone skilled nursing operations and three campus operations, which were leased back to Ensign's independent subsidiaries.
−Removed: These new operations added a total of 3,030 operational skilled nursing beds and 218 operational senior living units to be operated by our independent subsidiaries.
−Removed: Additionally, we invested in new ancillary services that are complementary to our existing businesses.
−Removed: Subsequent to December 31, 2024, we expanded through a combination of a long-term lease and a real estate purchase, with the addition of seven stand-alone skilled nursing operations totaling 682 operational skilled nursing beds to be operated by our independent subsidiaries, including one in a new state, Alabama.
−Removed: For further discussion of our acquisitions, see Note 7, Operation Expansions in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
+Added: During the year ended December 31, 2025, we expanded our operations with the addition of 40 stand-alone skilled nursing operations, five stand-alone senior living operations and one campus operation.
+Added: These new operations added a total of 4,175 operational skilled nursing beds and 313 operational senior living units to be operated by the Company's independent subsidiaries.
+Added: Subsequent to December 31, 2025, we expanded our operations with the addition of five stand-alone skilled nursing operations.
+Added: Standard Bearer had previously purchased the real estate for two of these operations, which were subsequently transferred from third-party operators to the Company’s independent subsidiaries.
+Added: These new operations added 582 operational skilled nursing beds to be operated by the Company's independent subsidiaries.
+Added: For further discussion of our acquisitions, see Note 1, Description of Business in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
QUALITY OF CARE MEASURES
−Removed: Improvement in Acquired Facilities — The Five-Star Quality Rating System introduced by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) intends to help consumers, their families and caregivers compare nursing homes more easily.
−Removed: The Five-Star Quality Rating System gives each skilled nursing operation a rating between one and five stars in various categories including health inspections, staffing and quality measures (QM).
+Added: Improvement in Acquired Facilities — The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) developed the Five-Star Quality Rating System to help patients, their families and caregivers compare nursing homes more easily.
+Added: The Five-Star Quality Rating System gives each skilled nursing operation a rating from one to five stars across various categories including health inspections, staffing and quality measures (QM).
We have a strong history of quickly improving the quality of care in the facilities we acquire.
Thus, as new assessments are conducted post-acquisition, the star ratings see consistent improvement.
−Removed: At the time of acquisition, the majority of our facilities have 1 and 2-Star ratings.
−Removed: Over the last few years, CMS has modified the star rating requirements.
−Removed: These changes have been significant and made it more difficult to achieve a 4 or 5-Star rating, resulting in certain skilled nursing operations losing stars in their "Quality" and "Staffing" ratings, which negatively impacted the "Overall" ratings.
−Removed: Nevertheless, we continue to demonstrate strong performance in the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
+Added: At the time of acquisition, the majority of our facilities typically hold 1 and 2-Star ratings.
+Added: Over the last few years, CMS has implemented substantial changes to the star rating requirements, making it more challenging to achieve a 4 or 5-Star rating.
+Added: These adjustments have resulted in certain skilled nursing operations experiencing declines in their "Quality" and "Staffing" ratings, which in turn has negatively impacted their "Overall" ratings.
+Added: Despite these challenges, we continue to demonstrate strong performance in the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
We believe compliance and quality outcomes are precursors to outstanding financial performance.
4 unchanged sentences
Starting in October 2024, CMS replaced the short-stay functionality QM with the new cross-setting functionality QM, which is used in the SNF Quality Reporting Program (QRP).
−Removed: The remaining three measures will continue to be frozen until January 2025 while the data for the equivalent measures are collected.
+Added: The remaining three measures were frozen until January 2025 while the data for the equivalent measures were collected.
Additionally, beginning in April of 2024, CMS revised the staffing rating methodology to give the lowest possible score for staffing turnover measures to providers who fail to submit staffing data or submit erroneous data.
+Added: Effective in January 2026, CMS replaced the existing long-stay antipsychotic medication quality measure with an updated measure that incorporates Medicare and Medicaid claims data and Medicare Advantage encounter data to supplement MDS data.
Therefore, the predictability and movement in the QM ratings will not necessarily be consistent with our current quality performance.
5 unchanged sentences
4 and 5-Star Quality Rated skilled nursing facilities 114 113 130 129 153
−Removed: Above-Average Ratings — As of October 2024, despite the fact that Ensign’s acquisition of facilities with 1 or 2-Star ratings skews our company-wide ratings, our mean score on the Five-Star Quality Rating System is 62.5%, which exceeds the national average score of 56.9%.
−Removed: Our average cycle 1 health inspections for all of our facilities, which is based on the latest inspections, is 8.1% better than the national average.
+Added: Above-Average Ratings — As of December 2025, despite the fact that our acquisition of facilities with 1 or 2-Star ratings skews our company-wide ratings, our average score on the Overall Star Rating on the CMS Five-Star Quality Rating System for all of our facilities is 6.8% better than the national average.
+Added: Our average quality measure (QM) rating for all of our facilities is 18.2% better than the national average.
INDUSTRY TRENDS
21 unchanged sentences
A significant goal of U.S.
−Removed: federal health care reform is to transform the delivery of health care by changing reimbursement to reflect and support a focus on equity, payment for value and efficacious delivery of person-centered care.
−Removed: Reimbursement models and demonstrations that increase accountability and provide financial incentives to encourage efficiency, affordability and high-quality care, have been developed and implemented by government and commercial third-party payers.
−Removed: Special focus is placed on increasing the number of beneficiaries in care relationships with accountability for quality and total cost of care, improvements in care coordination, reducing inequities at the population level and supporting care innovation to close care gaps and increase access.
+Added: federal health care reform is to transform and improve how health care is delivered by changing payment systems to reflect and support a focus on equity, payment for value and efficacious delivery of person-centered care.
+Added: New reimbursement models have been created by both government and commercial third-party payers to encourage providers to deliver efficient, affordable and high-quality care.
+Added: These models reward providers with greater accountability for quality and total cost of care and emphasis on improvements in care coordination, reducing inequities at the population level and supporting care innovation to close care gaps and increase access.
The most prominent value-based models designed to accomplish these aims include Accountable Care Models (e.g., MSSP ACOs, ACO REACH) and Disease-Specific & Episode-Based Models (e.g., BPCI Advanced, GUIDE Model, CJR).
26 unchanged sentences
We intend to continue to focus on enhancing our care offerings to accommodate more high acuity patients.
−Removed: We received revenues from Medicaid in all the states in which we operate, with approximately 90% coming from Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Texas, Utah and Washington.
+Added: We received revenues from Medicaid in all the states in which we operate.
As a result, we are sensitive to potential changes in state-based revenue programs, such as Medicaid, as well as regulatory, economic, environmental, and competitive changes in those states.
While the Medicaid spending of each state reflects its own population size, trends and public health challenges, the broad trend across our largest states in 2025 was either stable or increasing rate growth.
−Removed: With some states even electing to make the temporary Covid funding part of their long term budgets.
−Removed: Over the long term, Medicaid spending is expected to increase across all states as a result of the increases in costs of care and the increase in population eligible for Medicaid benefits.
−Removed: For example, California projected its Medicaid spending to increase from current levels through the state’s 2028-2029 budget period.
−Removed: However, the increased Medicaid spending may not directly translate into rate increases for care.
−Removed: Additionally, we have seen that some state budgets continue to be pressured by budget shortfalls.
−Removed: For example, in Colorado, recent budget shortfalls have caused the state to propose provider compensation that is stagnant despite increases in costs for the 2025-2026 budget period.
+Added: In the short term, Medicaid spending may face variability, as each state untangles the implications of the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB) passed in July 2025 and the impact to overall state Medicaid budgets from changes to providers taxes and beneficiary eligibility.
+Added: As an example, California is projecting an overall two-year budget shortfall, while Texas is expecting a significant budget surplus.
+Added: Recent budget shortfalls in Colorado have caused the state to propose provider compensation that is stagnant despite increases in costs for the 2025-2026 budget period.
This is an area we monitor closely and will continue to follow as it affects the success of our independent facilities and overall business.
13 unchanged sentences
SKILLED SERVICES REVENUE BY PAYOR
−Removed: Payor Sources as a Percentage of Skilled Services — The following table sets forth our percentage of skilled nursing patient days by payor source:
+Added: Percentage of Skilled Services — The following table sets forth our percentage of skilled nursing patient days:
Year Ended December 31,
18 unchanged sentences
Reimbursement for Senior Living — Senior living facility revenue is primarily derived from private pay patients at rates we established, with the secondary source of revenue derived from state-specific programs such as Medicaid.
−Removed: Reimbursement for Other Ancillary Services — Other ancillary revenue, such as mobile diagnostics and medical transportation, is primarily derived from Medicare Part B, Medicaid, managed care and private payors at rates we establish based upon the services we provide and market conditions in the area of operation.
+Added: Reimbursement for Other Ancillary Services — Other ancillary revenue, such as mobile diagnostics and medical transportation, is primarily derived from Medicare, Medicaid, managed care and private payors at rates we establish based upon the services we provide and market conditions in the area of operation.
RENTAL REVENUE
14 unchanged sentences
Increasingly, we are competing with home health and community-based providers who have developed programs designed to provide services to seniors outside a facility-based setting, potentially decreasing the time they need the higher level of care provided in a skilled nursing facility.
−Removed: Competitiveness may vary significantly from location to location, depending upon factors such as the number of competing facilities, availability of services, expertise of staff, and the physical appearance and amenities of each location.
+Added: Competition may vary significantly from location to location, depending upon factors such as the number of facilities, availability of services, expertise of staff, and the physical appearance and amenities of each location.
We believe that the primary competitive factors in the post-acute care industry are:
21 unchanged sentences
These leaders operate as separate local businesses.
−Removed: With broad local control, these talented leaders and their care staffs are able to quickly meet the needs of their patients and residents, employees and local communities, without waiting for permission to act or being bound to a “one-size-fits-all” corporate strategy.
+Added: With local control, these talented leaders and their care staffs are able to quickly meet the needs of their patients and residents, employees and local communities, without waiting for permission to act or being bound to a “one-size-fits-all” corporate strategy.
Unique Incentive Programs — We believe that our employee compensation programs are unique within the industry.
−Removed: Employee stock options and performance bonuses, based on achieving target clinical quality, cultural, compliance and financial benchmarks, represent a significant component of total compensation for our operational leaders.
+Added: Employee stock options and performance bonuses, based on achieving clinical quality, cultural, compliance and financial benchmarks, represent a significant component of total compensation for our operational leaders.
We believe that these compensation programs assist us in encouraging our leaders and key employees to act with a shared ownership mentality.
9 unchanged sentences
rather, we operate service centers to support the efforts of each operation.
−Removed: Our Service Center is a dedicated service organization that acts as a resource and provides centralized information technology, human resources, accounting, payroll, legal, risk management, educational and other back-office support services, so that local leaders can focus on delivering top-quality care and efficient business operations.
+Added: Our Service Centers are dedicated service organizations that act as resources and provide centralized information technology, human resources, accounting, payroll, legal, risk management, educational and other back-office support services, so that local leaders can focus on delivering top-quality care and efficient business operations.
Our Service Center approach allows individual operations to function with the strength, synergies and economies of scale found in larger organizations, but without what we believe are the disadvantages of a top-down management structure or corporate hierarchy.
2 unchanged sentences
Our acquisition strategy is driven by our operations team.
−Removed: Prospective leaders are included in the decision-making process and compensated as these acquired operations reach pre-established clinical quality and financial benchmarks, helping to ensure that we only undertake acquisitions that key leaders believe can become clinically sound and contribute to our financial performance.
+Added: Prospective leaders are included in the decision-making process and compensated as these acquired operations reach clinical quality and financial benchmarks, helping to ensure that we only undertake acquisitions that key leaders believe can become clinically sound and contribute to our financial performance.
As of December 31, 2025, we have expanded to 373 facilities with an aggregate of 37,911 operational skilled nursing beds and 3,402 senior living units, through both long-term leases and real estate purchases.
27 unchanged sentences
To develop these leaders, we have a rigorous “CEO-in-Training Program” that attracts proven business leaders from various industries and backgrounds, and provides them the knowledge and hands-on training they need to successfully lead one of our independent subsidiaries.
−Removed: We generally have between 55 and 65 prospective administrators progressing through the various stages of this training program, which is generally much more rigorous, hands-on and intensive than the minimum 1,000 hours of training mandated by the licensing requirements of most states where we do business.
+Added: We generally have between 70 to 80 prospective administrators progressing through the various stages of this training program, which is generally much more rigorous, hands-on and intensive than the minimum 1,000 hours of training mandated by the licensing requirements of most states where we do business.
Once administrators are licensed and assigned to an operation, they continue to learn and develop in our operational Chief Executive Officer Program (CEO Program), which facilitates the continued development of these talented business leaders into outstanding operational chief executive officers, through regular peer review, our leadership development tools and on-the-job training.
24 unchanged sentences
In addition, we have targeted facilities that we believed were performing and operations that were underperforming, where we believed we could improve service delivery, occupancy rates and cash flow.
−Removed: With experienced leaders in place at the community level and demonstrated success in significantly improving operating conditions at acquired facilities, we believe that we are well positioned for continued growth.
+Added: With experienced leaders in place at the local level and demonstrated success in significantly improving operating conditions at acquired facilities, we believe that we are well positioned for continued growth.
While the integration of underperforming facilities generally has a negative short-term effect on overall operating margins, these facilities are typically accretive to earnings within 12 to 18 months following their acquisition.
12 unchanged sentences
We seek to manage our labor costs by improving staff retention, improving operating efficiencies, maintaining competitive wage rates and benefits and reducing reliance on overtime compensation and temporary nursing agency services.
−Removed: The Service Center's Chief Human Capital Officer, together with the Unity Committee, oversee the following human capital initiatives:
+Added: We have several human capital initiatives:
Our Culture — The operation of our skilled nursing and senior living facilities requires a large number of highly skilled healthcare professionals and support staff.
11 unchanged sentences
We aim to have an enduring impact on the communities in which we live and work.
−Removed: We partner with Elevate Charities, a non-profit organization that is dedicated to elevating the condition and quality of life for members of the senior healthcare community, employees, caregivers, family members, patients and residents.
+Added: We partner with Elevate Charities and Insignia Pathway, public charities that are dedicated to enhancing the quality of care for seniors and those who serve them.
+Added: Elevate Charities elevates the condition and quality of life for members of the senior healthcare community, employees, caregivers, family members, patients and residents.
Elevate Charities has three unique funds:
7 unchanged sentences
Since 2018, we have partnered with public charities who have awarded 332 scholarships to employees in our workforce.
−Removed: Lastly, the Emergency Fund is a way of passing the hat to help long term care staff whose lives are affected by tragedy.
−Removed: This program is funded for our team members by our team members.
+Added: The Emergency Fund is a way of passing the hat to help long term care staff whose lives are affected by tragedy.
All team members are encouraged to contribute to the fund either through a one-time donation or by recurring payroll deduction.
In 2025, approximately 89% of those employed by our independent subsidiaries contributed to Elevate Charities Emergency Fund.
−Removed: In 2024, the public charity distributed approximately $4.8 million in grants to members of our independent subsidiaries.
−Removed: To date, the Emergency Fund has distributed over 19,400 grants totaling almost $20.6 million to members of our independent subsidiaries in their time of need.
+Added: Lastly, Insignia Pathway (Insignia) , formed in 2024, is a charity focused on creating new pathways for expansion of the U.S.
+Added: post-acute care workforce.
+Added: It is dedicated to inspiring the current and next generation to choose careers in the long term care field.
+Added: In its first year of operation, the charity awarded over $1.0 million in grants to Registered Nurses from 23 countries who have committed to work for U.S.-based skilled nursing providers.
+Added: Insignia's goal is to attract and retain more caregivers to serve the needs of the nation’s most vulnerable senior patient populations.
For additional information on human capital matters, please see our most recent proxy statement or ESG report, each of which is available on our website at www.ensigngroup.net.
11 unchanged sentences
In the ordinary course of business, federal or state regulatory authorities may issue notices to the operations alleging deficiencies in certain regulatory practices, which may require corrective action to regain and maintain compliance.
−Removed: In some cases, federal or state regulators may impose other remedies including imposition of directed in-service training, state monitoring, civil monetary penalties, temporary admission and/or payment bans, loss of certification as a provider in the Medicare or Medicaid program, or revocation of a state operating license.
+Added: In some cases, federal or state regulators may impose other remedies including imposition of directed in-service training, state monitoring, civil monetary penalties, temporary admission and/or payment bans, loss of certification as a provider in the Medicare or Medicaid programs, or revocation of a state operating license.
We believe that the regulatory environment surrounding the healthcare industry subjects providers to intense scrutiny.
In the ordinary course of business, providers are subject to inquiries, investigations and audits by federal and state agencies related to compliance with participation and payment rules under government payment programs.
−Removed: These inquiries may originate from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office of the Inspector General (OIG), state Medicaid agencies, state Attorney Generals, local and state ombudsman offices and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Recovery Audit Contractors, among other agencies.
−Removed: In response to the inquiries, investigations and audits, federal and state agencies continue to impose citations for regulatory deficiencies and other regulatory penalties, including demands for refund of overpayments, expanded civil monetary penalties that extend over long periods of time and date back to incidents prior to surveyor visits, Medicare and Medicaid payment bans and terminations from those programs, which may be temporary or permanent in nature.
+Added: These inquiries may originate from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office of the Inspector General (OIG), state Medicaid agencies, state Attorney Generals, local and state ombudsman offices and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Recovery Audit Contractors, among other agencies.
+Added: In response to the inquiries, investigations and audits, federal and state agencies may impose citations for regulatory deficiencies and other regulatory penalties, including demands for refund of overpayments, expanded civil monetary penalties that extend over long periods of time and date back to incidents prior to surveyor visits, Medicare and Medicaid payment bans and terminations from those programs, which may be temporary or permanent in nature.
We vigorously contest each such regulatory outcome when appropriate;
2 unchanged sentences
Proposed, Anticipated and Recently Issued Rulemaking and Administrative Actions
−Removed: The federal government, through CMS rulemaking, Presidential executive actions or Congressional legislation, and state and local governments have recently released the following proposed rulemaking or administrative actions that may have an impact on our independent Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNFs) or Assisted Living Facilities (ALFs):
−Removed: Biden-Harris Administration's Nursing Home Care Priorities — The Biden-Harris Administration sought reform around reimbursement, staffing levels, standards of care, increased transparency and public disclosure of ownership, and enhanced civil remedies as a means of enforcement against those facilities that do not satisfy CMS’s standards.
−Removed: Through rules that were proposed and finalized beginning 2023, including those highlighted below, the Biden-Harris Administration directed the government to exercise greater oversight of SNFs and ALFs receiving federal reimbursement.
−Removed: For example, the SNF PPS FY 2025 Final Rule grants CMS greater sanctioning authority for ongoing or persistent deficiencies in Medicare-participating SNFs.
−Removed: These increased sanctioning authorities will take effect in the 2025 federal fiscal year, beginning October 1, 2024.
−Removed: With the new administration, it currently is unknown whether any of these rules will be reduced in their scope or application, or whether they will be increased in any respects.
−Removed: The individuals anticipated to be nominated to serve as the Secretary of HHS and Director of CMS, respectively, have not yet provided any indication what their priorities of anticipated future actions would be in this area.
−Removed: Ownership Transparency Final Rule — CMS' final rule published in November 2023 requires SNFs to publicly disclose certain additional information regarding their ownership and managerial relationships, including the identity of any person or legal entity that:
−Removed: (1) exercises financial, operational, or managerial control over any facility or part of a facility, or provides services to a facility that include its policies and procedures or cash management services;
−Removed: (2) leases or subleases real property to the facility, or owns 5% or more of the real property’s total value;
−Removed: and (3) provides any management or administrative services (or consults regarding the same), or provides accounting or financial services to SNFs.
−Removed: The rule also expands ownership and control interest disclosures to include information about each member of the facilities governing body, individuals or entities serving as officers, directors, members, partners or managing employees, and a comprehensive breakdown of the organizational structure of any additional disclosable party that is not a natural person along with a description of their relationships with the facility.
−Removed: This rule’s disclosure requirements came into effect throughout 2024, with all SNFs required to comply by November of 2024.
−Removed: Certain states have adopted laws reflecting their concerns regarding ownership transparency.
−Removed: For example, Iowa adopted laws requiring disclosure of ownership information not previously required for licensure to promote transparency in 2023.
−Removed: Additionally, in March 2024, the California Department of Health Care Access and Information of the California Health and Human Services Agency issued its notice of approval of regulatory action establishing policies and procedures that implement financial and ownership transparency requirements for California-licensed SNFs that are required by California law passed in 2021.
−Removed: Federal Legislation — The Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) Access Act (Access Act) was introduced in 2023 to expand access to and resources available for HCBS.
−Removed: The Access Act ensures that Medicaid funding is made available to individuals who provide direct home- and community-based care to adults over the age of 60 or people who have disabilities.
−Removed: This bill also provides financial resources for the training of these direct care providers, who are intended to provide services to the elderly or disabled that range from advocacy and community integration to transportation and daily assistance tasks ranging from bathing and laundry to meal preparation and housekeeping.
−Removed: As of the date of filing, no further action has been taken on the HCBS Access Act since its introduction and referral to the House of Representatives committees.
−Removed: In addition, the HCBS Relief Act introduced in 2023, provides additional funds to states to stabilize their HCBS service delivery networks, recruit and retain HCBS direct care workers, and meet long-term service and support needs of people eligible for Medicaid home and community-based services.
−Removed: To qualify for the enhanced rate, a state must commit to initiatives aimed at improving the provision of services.
−Removed: As of the date of this filing, no action has been taken on the HCBS Relief Act since its introduction and referral to the Senate Committee on Finance.
−Removed: State Legislation — Many states in which our independent subsidiaries operate have introduced or passed legislation that would create or change laws and regulations related to our business and industry.
−Removed: In the past, California had discussed issuing proposed regulations on direct care spending requirements that may have affected our business and SNFs operating within that state.
−Removed: These proposals have included requirements for healthcare facilities certified by CMS, including SNFs, to report all annual revenues to the State of California and certify that a stated percentage of all revenues should be used for direct patient-related services, including staffing and operational costs.
−Removed: California has also signed into law a bill that impacts the minimum wages of healthcare workers.
−Removed: Effective October 16, 2024, the law raised the minimum wage for California healthcare employees and set a new wage threshold for those who are considered exempt healthcare employees.
−Removed: The bill only becomes effective for SNFs if a direct care minimum spending requirement bill is also passed.
−Removed: While the existing requirement bill has not seen any traction, we anticipate a minimum spending bill could be proposed in the future, including the next California legislative session that begins in 2025.
−Removed: On April 24, 2024, the California Department of Health Care Access and Information (HCAI) announced that the Office of Health Care Affordability’s Board approved a statewide healthcare spending target of 3%, which represents a long-term reduction of current levels of statewide healthcare spending.
−Removed: The spending target will be phased in over time, initially starting at 3.5% for 2025 and 2026, the target will be lowered to 3.2% for 2027 and 2028 before ultimately reaching 3% for 2029 and beyond.
−Removed: Final Rule Fiscal Year 2025 Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System (SNF PPS) — CMS released the final rule for the SNF PPS for FY 2025 (SNF PPS FY 2025 Final Rule) in July 2024 to update the Medicare payment rates within the SNF PPS and provide significant enhancements to CMS’s enforcement capabilities within nursing homes.
−Removed: This final rule results in a net 4.2% increase in SNF payments under Medicare Part A in fiscal year 2025, which started on October 1, 2024 and will run through September 30, 2025.
−Removed: The net increase is based on the SNF market basket of 3.0%, plus a 1.7% market basket forecast error adjustment, and a negative 0.5% productivity adjustment.
−Removed: This increase does not include the SNF VBP reductions for certain SNFs subject to the net reduction in payments under the SNF VBP.
−Removed: CMS also revised the SNF market basket base year from the 2018 base year to the current 2022 base year and updated the payment rates used under the SNF PPS based on the FY 2025 market basket increase factor, which is adjusted by both the productivity adjustment and forecast error correction.
−Removed: Within this rule, CMS also updated the SNF PPS wage index using core-based statistical areas (CBSAs) to reflect regional wage costs.
−Removed: The SNF PPS FY 2025 Final Rule also includes significant enhancements to CMS’s enforcement capabilities within nursing homes, aiming to reinforce the safety and quality of care.
−Removed: The rule broadens CMS’s ability to use financial penalties to ensure sustained remediation of health and safety infractions, thereby motivating facilities to quickly comply with CMS regulations.
−Removed: The rule eliminates the restrictions of per instance (PI) for isolated violations or per day (PD) for ongoing non-compliance restrictions, allowing for more flexible imposition of both PD and PI penalties, which would not exceed statutory daily limits.
−Removed: This change is intended to provide CMS with enhanced tools to address violations more effectively and reflect the severity of the impact on residents’ health and safety.
−Removed: Additionally, the SNF PPS FY 2025 includes updates to the QRP to better account for social determinants of health, adding items to be reported regarding these social determinants of health—living situation, food, and utilities—in the minimum data set each SNF is required to report to CMS.
−Removed: The SNF PPS FY 2025 also contains an update to the SNF Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program, including how its measurements are retained or removed from use in evaluating quality of care, updates to technical measures so that measures can be updated using a sub-regulatory process, and administrative policies for updating and correcting data CMS relies on in calculating its measurements.
−Removed: 2025 Home Health and Hospice Payment Rules Affecting SNFs — CMS’s final payment rules for other modalities of care delivery also affect the operations of SNFs.
−Removed: The 2025 Home Health PPS Final Rule requires long-term care facilities, including SNFs, to make at least weekly reports to CMS regarding respiratory illnesses, including facility census, resident vaccination status for specified respiratory illnesses, confirmed resident cases and residents hospitalized from such illnesses.
−Removed: Final Rule Fiscal Year 2024 SNF PPS — The SNF PPS FY 2024 Final Rule, which was effective October 1, 2023, updated the Medicare payment rates and modified the SNF QRP and the SNF VBP Program.
−Removed: The SNF PPS FY 2024 Final Rule finalized the rates to be paid in fiscal year 2024, which started on October 1, 2023 and ran through September 30, 2024.
−Removed: The net effect of these changes was an overall 4.0% increase in payments to SNFs in FY 2024.
−Removed: The increase included a 6.4% net market basket update to the payment rates of 3.0%, plus a 3.6% market basket forecast error adjustment, less a 0.2% productivity adjustment, as well as a negative 2.3% in the FY 2024 SNF PPS rates due to the second phase of the Patient Driven Payment Model (PDPM) parity adjustment recalibration.
−Removed: In addition, this final rule also updates the SNF QRP for FY 2024 and future years, including the adoption of two new quality reporting measures, modification of one measure and removal of three measures resulting in public reporting of four QRP measures.
−Removed: Additionally, the SNF PPS FY 2024 Final Rule made changes to the SNF VBP Program, specifically adopting four new measures:
−Removed: the nursing staff turnover measure, the discharge function score measure, the long stay hospitalization measure per 1,000 resident days and the percent of residents experiencing one or more falls with a major injury (long stay);
−Removed: the existing SNF 30-day all-cause readmission measure (SNFRM) is replaced with the SNF within stay potentially preventable readmissions measure beginning in FY 2028.
−Removed: SNF PPS FY 2024 Final Rule adopted the Nursing Staff Turnover (NST) measure for the SNF VBP program beginning with the FY 2026 program year.
−Removed: This is a structural measure that has been collected and publicly reported on Care Compare, and the measure assesses the stability of the staffing within a SNF using nursing staff turnover.
−Removed: The NST measure uses facility-reported, electronic data from CMS’ Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) system to calculate annual turnover rates for nursing staff, including RNs, LPNs, and nurse assistants.
−Removed: Facilities would begin reporting this measure in FY 2024, with payment effects beginning in FY 2026.
−Removed: The NST measure looks at six consecutive quarters of data.
−Removed: It starts with a baseline quarter and the first two quarters of the performance period to identify eligible employees.
−Removed: Then, uses the next four quarters to find the number of employment cycles that ended in turnover.
−Removed: Finally, the data from the sixth quarter is validated to identify gaps in days worked that began in the last 60 days of the fifth quarter used for the measure.
−Removed: The measure score is then calculated by comparing the total number of eligible employees with 60-day gaps in working during the specified periods.
−Removed: After submission, CMS may audit the data and if discrepancies are found, the consequences may include penalties, decreased ratings and suppression of metrics for the trailing 6 quarters.
−Removed: CMS Minimum Staffing Standards Final Rule — CMS issued its final rule establishing minimum staffing standards for skilled nursing facilities (Staffing Rule) in April 2024.
−Removed: The Staffing Rule contains three primary staffing requirements and provides for a staggered and phase implementation over the next several years following the Staffing Rule’s publication.
−Removed: The initial phase, effective 90 days from the Staffing Rule's publication, which is August 8, 2024, requires facility self-assessment, which enhances the current assessment that all SNFs must perform and document annually and on an as-needed basis.
−Removed: The Staffing Rule’s requirement for enhanced self-assessments requires the following:
−Removed: 1) facilities must use evidence-based methods when planning for resident care, including accommodation of behavioral health needs;
−Removed: 2) facilities to use their self-assessment to assess the specific needs of each resident, with adjustments made for changes in the resident population;
−Removed: 3) facilities include the input of staff, including leadership, management, nurse staff and other direct care providers who render other services to residents;
−Removed: and 4) the facility’s staffing plan maximizes recruitment and retention of staff in a manner consistent with the President Biden’s April 2023 Executive Order on increasing access to high-quality care and supporting caregivers.
−Removed: The second phase, effective within two years of the Staffing Rule's publication, which is May 2026 for non-rural facilities, requires that all SNFs have a registered nurse (RN) available to provide direct resident care onsite 24 hours per day, seven days per week (24/7).
−Removed: The rule states that administrative nurses may satisfy this requirement, provided that the nurse is available to provide direct resident care.
−Removed: In addition to the 24/7 RN, the Staffing Rule requires facilities to provide a minimum of 3.48 hours per resident per day (HPRD) of direct nursing care to residents.
−Removed: The third phase, effective within three years of the Staffing Rule's publication, which is May 2027 for non-rural facilities, requires that the HPRD are satisfied through RNs providing 0.55 HPRD, nurse aides (NAs) providing 2.45 HPRD, and any combination of RNs, licensed practical nurses (LPNs), licensed vocational nurses (LVNs), or NAs to account for the final 0.48 HPRD.
−Removed: The Staffing Rule finalized the hardship exemption for the HPRD requirements.
−Removed: A facility can qualify for a temporary hardship exemption from the new minimum staffing ratios and 24/7 RN onsite staffing requirement (the self-assessment standards must still be satisfied) if it is in an area where the supply of RN, NA, or total nursing staff is insufficient to meet the needs of that area.
−Removed: This exemption is based on the provider-to-population ratio for the nursing workforce, which must be at least 20% below the national average as calculated by CMS.
−Removed: Additionally, the Staffing Rule provides a one year extension of deadlines to rural facilities on Phases 2 and 3.
−Removed: The Staffing Rule also enhances transparency for the use of Medicaid payments for facility services, referenced as Medicaid Institutional Payment Transparency Reporting provisions (MIPTR).
−Removed: The MIPTR provisions within the Staffing Rule require States to report to CMS the percentage of Medicaid payments for nursing facility services spent on direct care workers and support staff, regardless of whether such payments are made under a fee-for-service or managed care model.
−Removed: Prior to the publication of the Staffing Rule, two bills, named the Protecting America’s Seniors’ Access to Care Act and Protecting Rural Seniors’ Access to Care Act (one in the House and a companion bill in the Senate) were introduced to block the Staffing Rule from taking effect.
−Removed: Both bills have been referred to committee and are pending further action.
−Removed: These bills reason that the minimum staffing standard would endanger rural nursing facilities, subjecting them to potential fines and closures for failure to comply and might require them to discharge residents or limit the number of residents they accept in an effort to meet the requirements of the bill.
−Removed: It is uncertain if any of these bills or other legislative action will pass as well as their potential impact on the Staffing Rule.
−Removed: The Staffing Rule has been met with further opposition and proposed legislation to halt its implementation.
−Removed: On May 23, 2024, the American Health Care Association (AHCA) filed a lawsuit in the Northern District of Texas against HHS and CMS, alleging that the Staffing Rule exceeds the scope of CMS’s statutory authority and violates the Administrative Procedure Act.
−Removed: The State of Texas brought suit and was granted consolidation of its lawsuit with AHCA's in the same venue arguing the rule is “arbitrary and capricious” and in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act.
−Removed: Subsequently, over 20 additional states have filed similar suits in opposition to the rule, as well as industry groups including Leading Age and the South Dakota Association of Healthcare Organizations.
−Removed: On May 10, 2024, a joint resolution was introduced in the House of Representatives under the Congressional Review Act to overturn the Staffing Rule, which was referred to the House Ways and Means committee and its Subcommittee on Health on May 17, 2024, with no further action taken on the joint resolution since then.
−Removed: Related to the pending proposed legislation regarding the Staffing Rule, the Long-Term Care Workforce Support Act was introduced in both the Senate and House of Representatives in April of 2024 and both versions of the bill were subsequently referred to the Senate Committee on Finance and the House Ways and Means committee and its Subcommittee on Health, respectively, by April 19, 2024, with no action taken on either bill since then.
−Removed: These companion bills were introduced in order to increase the direct care workforce and improve pay, by increasing the federal match for Medicaid by up to 10% for each state across 10 years.
−Removed: The recent Supreme Court decision in Loper Bright Enterprises v.
−Removed: Raimondo ("Chevron" decision) gives courts greater authority to challenge federal agencies' statutory interpretations.
−Removed: As such, the Staffing Rule may see increased legal challenges under the new doctrine.
−Removed: (For further discussion of the Chevron case and its implications see "United States Supreme Court Decisions" section below.)
+Added: The federal government, through CMS rulemaking, Presidential executive actions or Congressional legislation, and state and local governments have recently released the following proposed or final rulemaking, or administrative actions that may have an impact on our independent Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNFs) or senior living facilities:
+Added: Controlled Substances Act Telemedicine Flexibilities — On December 31, 2025, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) in coordination with the HHS, issued a fourth extension of certain telemedicine flexibilities related to the prescribing of controlled substances, extending these provisions through December 31, 2026.
+Added: Under the Ryan Haight Online Pharmacy Consumer Protection Act of 2008, practitioners are generally required to conduct at least one in-person medical evaluation before prescribing controlled substances to a patient via telemedicine.
+Added: During the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency (PHE), the DEA implemented a temporary exception to this requirement, permitting practitioners to prescribe Schedules II through V controlled substances through audio-only or audio-visual telemedicine encounters, subject to specific requirements.
+Added: These exceptions also includes FDA-approved narcotic medications classified under Schedules III through V when used for maintenance or withdrawal management treatment of opioid use disorder.
+Added: Federal Government Shutdown — During the federal government shutdown in late 2025, our business operations experienced minimal disruption as both Medicare and Medicaid payments, as mandatory health programs, continued despite the lapse in appropriations.
+Added: On November 12, 2025, Congress reached an agreement that included a continuing resolution (CR), which extended current government funding through January 30, 2026, and retroactively reinstated selected health care waivers and flexibilities from October 1, 2025.
+Added: On February 3, 2026, the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2026 (CAA 2026) was passed, which further extended government funding through September 30, 2026.
+Added: Of specific importance to our businesses are:
+Added: • Telehealth Waivers:
+Added: Since the COVID-19 Pandemic, Congress has temporarily waived restrictions so Medicare beneficiaries can access telehealth services at home and outside of rural areas.
+Added: Medicare recipients can now continue using telehealth under these relaxed rules, regardless of location.
+Added: The waivers expired on September 30th but were reinstated effective October 1, 2025 and extended through December 31, 2027.
+Added: Specifically, key waivers that were restored temporarily include:
+Added: • Lifting geographic limitations for medical telehealth services, allowing them to be provided nationwide, including in a person's home such as an assisted living residence.
+Added: • Allowing physical therapists, occupational therapists and speech-language pathologists to deliver telehealth services.
+Added: • Delay the Medicare requirement for in-person visits for mental health services provided through telehealth or audio-only telecommunications technology.
+Added: • Permits telehealth to be used for face-to-face encounters required for Hospice recertification purposes.
+Added: • Work Geographic Index Floor:
+Added: Temporarily and retroactively restores nationwide the 1.0 payment floor multiplier for the work component of Medicare Part B services paid under the physician fee schedule.
+Added: This is effective October 1, 2025 through at least September 30, 2026.
+Added: • Extension of Funding for Quality Measure Endorsement, Input, and Selection:
+Added: This extends such funding through September 30, 2026.
+Added: • Sequestration :
+Added: This legislation prevents the triggering of statutory 4.0% Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 (PAYGO) sequestration cuts to Medicare ( See Sequestration of Medicare Rates below).
+Added: CMS has issued guidance instructing Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) to perform mass adjustments to any paid claims that are inconsistent with the CR and instructing Practitioners to resubmit to CMS any returned claims that were previously determined not payable during the shutdown.
+Added: One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB) — The OBBB was signed into law on July 4, 2025, implementing a range of federal reforms targeting Medicaid financing, eligibility, and payment structures.
+Added: The following provisions of the OBBB are expected to impact Medicaid reimbursement mechanisms and enrollment dynamics relevant to our business.
+Added: Moratorium on New or Increased Provider Taxes — Provider taxes, which are state taxes assessed on healthcare providers or facilities, are a commonly used by states to generate non-federal share of Medicaid payments, including payments to SNFs.
+Added: Under the ACA, provider taxes were capped at 6% of a provider's net patient revenue.
+Added: Existing federal law prohibits states Medicaid programs from guaranteeing providers that they will receive their provider taxes paid back - this is known as the hold harmless provision.
+Added: The OBBB prohibits states from imposing new provider taxes or increasing existing provider tax rates or tax bases, with specific carve outs for nursing facilities and intermediate care facilities to remain at status quo.
+Added: The OBBB reduces the hold harmless threshold in expansion states beginning in fiscal year 2028.
+Added: This threshold will decrease by 0.5% per year in ACA expansion states until the safe harbor limit is 3.5% in fiscal year 2032.
+Added: While SNFs are exempt from the moratorium, broader limitations on provider taxes could reduce overall state Medicaid financing flexibility, increasing the risk of lower SNF reimbursement rates.
+Added: Medicaid Recertification Changes and Retroactive Eligibility Cut — Beginning in the first quarter of 2027, states must conduct Medicaid eligibility redeterminations every six months, rather than annually, for individuals enrolled under Medicaid.
+Added: Additionally, the OBBB includes a provision to reduce Medicaid retroactive eligibility from 90 days to 30 days for most enrollees but is 60 days for long-term care residents and traditional Medicaid enrollees.
+Added: We believe that these provisions could create the conditions for coverage interruptions, potential delays or denied payments.
+Added: Revisions to State-Directed Payments (SDPs) — Prior to the OBBB’s passage, state Medicaid programs could require Medicaid managed care organizations (MCOs) to pay providers certain rates, make uniform rate increases, or to use certain payment methods.
+Added: These state-mandated payments by MCOs were known as SDPs, the upper limits for which generally were higher than the highest Medicare payment rate for those services, which is used in calculating Medicaid fee-for-service supplemental payments.
+Added: The OBBB limits total payments under existing CMS-approved SDPs to current levels and caps future SDPs based on whether the state has expanded its Medicaid program under the ACA.
+Added: SDPs approved prior to the OBBB’s implementation are grandfathered by the OBBB, although those grandfathered payments are reduced by 10% per year starting on January 1, 2028, until those SDPs reach the allowable Medicare-related payment limit.
+Added: For Medicaid expansion states, new SDPs may not exceed 100% of the Medicare equivalent payment rate;
+Added: for non-expansion states, the cap is 110%.
+Added: In the absence of published Medicare payment rates, the OBBB limits SDPs to the Medicaid fee-for-service payment rate.
+Added: This provision could reduce overall state Medicaid financing flexibility, increasing the risk of lower SNF reimbursement rates.
+Added: Cap on Home Equity Excluded for Long-Term Care Eligibility Determination — The OBBB establishes a limit of $1.0 million for home equity that can be exempted from calculating an individual’s eligibility for Medicaid in seeking long-term care beginning January 1, 2028.
+Added: This threshold is not indexed to inflation.
+Added: States may, however, apply different home equity limits for primary residences that are located on farms.
+Added: Reduced Federal Contributions to State Medicaid Programs – Beginning in fiscal year 2030, the OBBB requires HHS to reduce federal financial contributions to Medicaid programs in states that identified improper payments to ineligible individuals or overpayments to eligible individuals.
+Added: The OBBB expanded the scope of these improper payments to include payments where insufficient information is available to confirm the recipient’s eligibility for payment.
+Added: Home and Community Based Services (HCBS) – The OBBB allows states to obtain waivers from CMS so that Medicaid can be used to pay for HCBS rendered to beneficiaries who do not require an institutional level of care found in a SNF.
+Added: The OBBB requires these waiver applications to include a demonstration that the state’s waiver will not increase the average amount of time that beneficiaries who need institutional levels of care will have to wait for services, intending to avoid HCBS being used in lieu of adequate SNF access for Medicaid beneficiaries requiring institutional care.
+Added: Overall Impact on State Budgets – The full effect of the OBBB on state budgets remains uncertain, particularly given the anticipated reduction in federal Medicaid contributions.
+Added: A key risk to our revenue is that states may generally have fewer financial resources available without federal contributions to Medicaid.
+Added: In response to how the overall budgets of states will be impacted by the OBBB due to reduced federal Medicaid contributions, some states have already taken legislative and regulatory actions to address the provisions of the OBBB and its potential impact.
+Added: For instance, on September 17, 2025, California enacted Senate Bill 105, a comprehensive budget bill for the 2025-2026 fiscal year.
+Added: This legislation allocates funding and makes budgetary adjustments across various state agencies, with notable emphasis on specific areas.
+Added: Among its provisions, Senate Bill 105 designates targeted funding for the state’s Medicaid program, Medi-Cal, to ensure alignment with the OBBB.
+Added: Similarly, Colorado enacted Senate Bill 0001 on August 28, 2025.
+Added: This law establishes a process for the governor to implement spending reductions if the state is unable to meet its fiscal obligations.
+Added: It also requires the governor to submit proposed spending reduction plans to a legislative budget committee, which is responsible for advising the governor on these matters.
+Added: Overall, we anticipate more states may face challenging choices regarding their state budgets, which will increase the risk of lower SNF reimbursement rates.
+Added: We will continue to monitor any such developments and advocate accordingly at the federal, state and local levels.
+Added: Medicare Annual Payment Rule — On July 31, 2025, CMS released the FY 2026 Skilled Nursing Facility Prospective Payment System Final Rule (FY 2026 PPS) outlining the following key changes:
+Added: FY 2026 Final Updates to the SNF Payment Rates — For fiscal year 2026, which began on October 1, 2025 and ends on September 30, 2026, CMS has finalized a 3.2% increase to SNF PPS payment rates.
+Added: This increase is based on the final SNF market basket of 3.3%, plus a 0.6% market basket forecast error adjustment, and a negative 0.7% productivity adjustment.
+Added: This increase does not incorporate the SNF Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program reductions for certain SNFs subject to the net reduction in payments under the SNF VBP.
+Added: Patient-Driven Payment Model ( PDPM) ICD-10 code mappings – CMS finalized several technical revisions to the code mappings used to classify patients under the PDPM.
+Added: These revisions are intended to enhance the accuracy of patient classification, payment calculations and coding practices under the PDPM.
+Added: SNF Quality Reporting Program (QRP) — CMS has announced changes to the QRP that will take effect for residents admitted on or after October 1, 2025, impacting the FY 2027 SNF QRP.
+Added: Specifically, four standardized patient assessment data elements within the Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) category will be removed.
+Added: Additionally, CMS has updated the policy and process for submitting reconsideration requests, including amendments and codification of these procedures.
+Added: SNF Value-Based Purchase (VBP) Program — For the FY 2028 and FY 2029 program years, CMS has established performance standards to meet the statutory notice requirements.
+Added: Additionally, starting with the FY 2028 program year, CMS will implement the previously established scoring methodology for the SNF Within-Stay Potentially Preventable Readmission (SNF WS PPR) measure, which will be included in the program’s measure set for the first time.
+Added: To simplify the scoring process and provide clearer incentives for skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) to enhance the quality of care for all residents, CMS has decided to remove the Health Equity Adjustment.
+Added: Furthermore, beginning with the FY 2027 program year, CMS will introduce a reconsideration process.
+Added: This process will allow SNFs to request reconsideration if they are dissatisfied with CMS’s decision regarding a review and correction request.
+Added: Medicare Part B Fee Schedule — On October 31, 2025, CMS issued the CY 2026 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (CY 2026 PFS) Final Rule, which outlines significant changes aimed at modernizing Medicare, improving care quality, and reducing unnecessary spending.
+Added: Two Payment Rates Based on Advanced Alternative Payment Model (AAPM) Participation — For the first time, there are two separate conversion factors for all Medicare-participating providers which impacts reimbursement for therapeutic services (including occupational therapy, speech language therapy, and physical therapy), evaluation and management services, and other services furnished in SNFs covered by Medicare Part B.
+Added: This is required under the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) depending on whether a provider qualifies as a participant in an AAPM.
+Added: CMS finalized a qualifying AAPM participant conversion factor of $33.57, representing a 3.77% increase over the 2025 conversion factor of $32.35.
+Added: The non-AAPM participant conversion factor is $33.40, a 3.26% increase over such 2025 conversion factor.
+Added: Payment Adjustments — Under the CY 2026 PFS, CMS decreases payments by 2.5% for certain services that are not time-based, such as certain therapy services.
+Added: The rationale is that providers are expected to deliver these services more efficiently as they performed them repeatedly over time.
+Added: This reduction is designed to balance out other areas of Medicare spending increases.
+Added: Telehealth — Among other things, CMS finalized changes to the Medicare Telehealth Services List (MTSL) by adding additional services and expanding permanent flexibilities for virtual direct supervision.
+Added: One key change is the permanent lifting of frequency limits on providing subsequent nursing facility visits furnished via telehealth.
+Added: Previously, when adding some services to the MTSL, CMS has included certain frequency restrictions on how often physicians and other practitioners can furnish the service via telehealth (e.g., one subsequent nursing facility visit furnished through telehealth every 14 days).
+Added: Removing these restrictions will likely result in increased access to care and allow for additional services to be provided via telehealth.
+Added: Notably, CMS increased the originating site facility fee to $31.85 for CY 2026.
+Added: These changes could impact how SNFs deliver and bill for physician and ancillary services.
+Added: The scope of reimbursable therapy and remote care services may expand, but future payment levels could fluctuate, positively or negatively, based on broader assumptions about efficiency and practice cost.
+Added: SNFs that deliver telehealth-based care or participate in care coordination models may benefit from expanded flexibility and new billing pathways.
+Added: However, these changes may also introduce added operational complexity and new compliance requirements.
+Added: Improving Care and Access to Nurses Act (I CAN Act) – I CAN Act was introduced in the Senate on February 13, 2025 and seek to expand the role of nurse practitioners (NPs) in SNFs and nursing homes.
+Added: Under this legislation, NPs would be permitted to certify, oversee, and supervise care under Medicare and Medicaid without requiring physician oversight, subject to state law.
+Added: If enacted, the Act would grant NPs the authority to certify patient admissions, manage care plans, and provide supervision in SNFs and intermediate care facilities.
+Added: These proposed changes could potentially reduce reliance on physicians, streamline patient transitions from hospitals to long-term care, and increase access to care particularly in rural and underserved areas.
+Added: The bill was referred to the Senate Committee on Finance on February 13, 2025, and has not advanced further since then.
+Added: Biden-Harris Administration's Nursing Home Care Priorities — Prior to the change in Presidential Administration in 2025, the Biden-Harris Administration pursued reforms related to reimbursement, staffing levels, standards of care, increased transparency and public disclosure of ownership, and enhanced civil remedies as a means of enforcement against those facilities that do not satisfy CMS’s standards.
+Added: These regulations remain active and enforceable.
+Added: For instance, the FY 2025 PPS expanded CMS's authority to impose sanctions on Medicare-participating SNFs with ongoing or repeated deficiencies, with these enhanced enforcements taking effect at the start of the 2025 fiscal year, which began on October 1, 2024.
+Added: With the publication of the FY 2026 PPS, it appears the current administration does not intend to make significant changes to the scope, impact, or enforcement of these existing rules.
+Added: CMS Minimum Staffing Standards Final Rule — In April 2024, CMS issued its final rule establishing minimum staffing standards for skilled nursing facilities (Staffing Rule).
+Added: However, after significant opposition and questions on legality CMS repealed the Staffing Rule on December 2, 2025.
Medicare presently accounts for approximately 24.7% of our skilled nursing services revenue year-to-date, being our second-largest revenue payor.
3 unchanged sentences
Implementation of these and other types of measures has in the past, and could in the future, result in substantial reductions in our revenue and operating margins.
−Removed: Patient-Driven Payment Model (PDPM) — The SNF PPS Rule included a case mix model called PDPM that focuses on the patient’s condition (clinically relevant factors) and resulting care needs to determine Medicare reimbursement.
−Removed: PDPM utilizes clinically relevant factors for determining Medicare payment by using diagnosis codes and other patient characteristics as the basis for patient classification.
−Removed: PDPM makes effective use of five case-mix adjusted payment components:
−Removed: physician therapy, occupational therapy, speech language pathology, nursing and social services and non-therapy ancillary services.
−Removed: It also uses a sixth non-case mix component to cover utilization of SNFs' resources that do not vary depending on resident characteristics.
−Removed: PDPM is intended to achieve a more value-based, unified post-acute care payment system.
−Removed: For example, PDPM adjusts Medicare payments based on each aspect of a resident’s care.
−Removed: Under the SNF PPS PDPM system, the payment to SNFs and nursing homes is based heavily on the patient’s condition rather than the specific services provided by each SNF.
+Added: Patient-Driven Payment Model (PDPM) — The FY 2020 PPS implemented the PDPM, a case mix methodology that bases Medicare reimbursement on the clinical condition and care needs of each patient.
+Added: Under PDPM, diagnosis codes and various patient characteristics are used to classify residents and determine payment levels.
+Added: The model incorporates five case-mix adjusted payment components - physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech language pathology, nursing and social services and non-therapy ancillary services - to reflect the complexity of care provided.
+Added: Additionally, PDPM includes a sixth non-case mix component to account for utilization of SNFs' resources that are unrelated to individual resident characteristics.
+Added: PDPM is intended to achieve a more value-based, unified approach to post-acute care payments system.
+Added: For example, it adjusts Medicare reimbursements to reflect the specific care requirements of each resident, rather than simply the volume or type of services delivered by the facility.
+Added: As a result, payments to SNFs and nursing homes are primarily determined by the patient’s clinical profile, promoting a system that better aligns payment with patient needs.
Skilled Nursing Facility - Quality Reporting Program (SNF QRP) — The Improving Medicare Post-Acute Care Transformation Act of 2014 (IMPACT Act) provided data reporting requirements for certain Post-Acute-Care (PAC) providers.
4 unchanged sentences
CMS's rulemaking often identifies new data elements to be reported.
−Removed: CMS revised the calculation of its five-star ratings for the Nursing Home Compare website.
+Added: CMS continues to revise the calculation of its five-star ratings for the Nursing Home Compare website.
Under this methodology, points are assigned to a SNF based on its performance across six measures:
6 unchanged sentences
These six measures will be measured on a quarterly basis.
−Removed: These six new measures were included in the five-star rating starting in October 2022.
+Added: These six measures were included in the five-star rating starting in October 2022.
In addition, CMS also implemented a planned increase to the quality measure reporting thresholds, increasing each threshold by one-half of the average improvement of quality measure scores since CMS last set quality measure thresholds.
Going forward, CMS plans to implement similar rating threshold increases every six months.
−Removed: CMS has continued to refine the QRP including various measurements such as the adoption of a process measure for influenza vaccination coverage among healthcare personnel within SNFs and a Discharge Function Score (DC Function) measure, which determines the functional condition of residents by examining the proportion of SNF residents who achieve or surpass a projected discharge functionality score.
+Added: CMS has also continued to refine the QRP, including various measurements such as the adoption of a process measure for influenza vaccination coverage among healthcare personnel within SNFs and a Discharge Function Score (DC Function) measure.
+Added: The DC Function determines the functional condition of residents by examining the proportion of SNF residents who achieve or surpass a projected discharge functionality score.
The assessment includes consideration of mobility and self-care, utilizing data from the Minimum Data Set (MDS).
−Removed: The DC Function will replace the current process and is scheduled to go into effect for the FY 2025 SNF QRP.
−Removed: The SNF PPS FY 2024 Final Rule also modified the SNF QRP’s Healthcare Professional (HCP) Covid Vaccine Measure.
+Added: The DC Function replaces the current process and is in effect for the FY 2025 SNF QRP.
+Added: The FY 2024 PPS also modified the SNF QRP’s Healthcare Professional (HCP) Covid Vaccine Measure.
The measure will track the proportion of healthcare staff vaccinated for COVID-19 and have kept their vaccination status current per the CDC recommendations.
−Removed: The SNF PPS FY 2024 Final Rule also removed the Application of Functional Assessment/Care Plan measures from the SNF QRP.
−Removed: Under the SNF PPS FY 2024 Final Rule, CMS will adopt two measures for the SNF QRP starting in FY 2026.
−Removed: First, CMS will raise the Data Completion Thresholds for the MDS.
+Added: The FY 2024 PPS also removed the Application of Functional Assessment/Care Plan measures from the SNF QRP.
+Added: Under the FY 2024 PPS, CMS adopted two measures for the SNF QRP starting in FY 2026.
+Added: First, CMS raised the Data Completion Thresholds for the MDS.
SNFs must report required quality measure data and standardized resident assessment data gathered using the MDS for at least 90% of the assessments they submit to CMS.
SNFs who fail to meet this requirement will be subject to a 2.0% reduction on their applicable fiscal year payment starting in FY 2026.
−Removed: Second, CMS will adopt the Patient/Resident COVID-19 Vaccine metric.
+Added: Second, CMS adopted the Patient/Resident COVID-19 Vaccine metric.
This metric highlights the number of patient stays in which SNF patients received the COVID-19 vaccine.
−Removed: CMS’s SNF PPS FY 2025 Final Rule adopts several updates to the SNF QRP aimed at enhancing the integration of social determinants of health (SDOH) into patient assessments and ensuring the accuracy of reported data.
−Removed: Starting in fiscal year 2027, CMS will introduce four new SDOH items related to living situation, food security, and utility access, and modify an existing item on transportation availability in the MDS.
−Removed: Additionally, CMS requires that SNFs participating in the SNF QRP undergo a data validation process similar to that already implemented in the SNF VBP Program.
−Removed: Also beginning in fiscal year 2027, SNFs participating in the SNF QRP program must participate in a validation program similar to that used for SNFs participating in the SNF VBP Program.
−Removed: Medicare Annual Payment Rule — CMS is required to calculate an annual Medicare market-basket update to the payment rates.
−Removed: The SNF PPS FY 2025 Final Rule, issued on July 31, 2024 increased the Medicare payment rates to SNFs in fiscal year 2025 by 4.2%, which is based on a market basket of 3.0% plus a 1.7% market basket forecast error adjustment and a negative 0.5% productivity adjustment.
−Removed: On July 31, 2023, CMS issued the SNF PPS FY 2024 Final Rule that increased Medicare payment rates by 4.0% to SNFs in fiscal year 2024.
−Removed: This increase results from the 6.4% net market basket update to the payment rates, which is based on a 3.0% SNF market basket increase plus a 3.6% market basket forecast error adjustment, less a 0.2% productivity adjustment and a negative 2.3% adjustment as a result of the recalibrated parity adjustment.
−Removed: On July 29, 2022, CMS issued a final rule for fiscal year 2023 that increased the Medicare payment rates to aggregate net market basket by 2.7%.
−Removed: The increase results from the 5.1% update to the market basket, which is based on a 3.9% current year market basket increase plus a 1.5% market basket error adjustment, less a 0.3% productivity adjustment and a negative 2.3% adjustment as a result of the recalibrated parity adjustment.
−Removed: The recalibrated parity adjustment is being phased in at a rate of 2.3% per year on both the SNF PPS FY 2024 and FY 2023 Final Rules.
+Added: CMS’s FY 2025 PPS adopted several updates to the SNF QRP aimed at enhancing the integration of Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) into patient assessments and ensuring the accuracy of reported data.
+Added: Starting in FY 2027, CMS will introduce four new SDOH items related to living situation, food security, and utility access, and modify an existing item on transportation availability in the MDS.
+Added: Additionally, CMS requires that SNFs participating in the SNF QRP undergo a data validation process similar to that already implemented in the SNF Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program.
+Added: Starting in FY 2026, SNFs participating in the SNF QRP program will be required to take part in a validation program similar to that used for SNFs participating in the SNF VBP Program.
+Added: Each year, 1,500 SNFs will be randomly chosen to submit MDS records for review.
+Added: Facilities selected for this audit must provide the requested medical chart documentation within 45 calendar days of notification;
+Added: failure to do so will result in noncompliance and a 2% reduction in Medicare reimbursement for that fiscal year.
+Added: Additionally, as outlined in the FY 2026 PPS, four standardized patient assessment data elements within the SDOH category will be modified for residents admitted on or after October 1, 2025, impacting the FY 2027 SNF QRP.
+Added: CMS has also finalized changes to the reconsideration request policy and process, formally amending and codifying procedures related to QRP data and evaluations.
+Added: Fiscal Year SNF PPS — From October 1, 2024 through September 30, 2025, CMS' final rule for the FY 2025 PPS resulted in a net 4.2% increase in SNF payments under Medicare Part A in fiscal year 2025.
+Added: The net increase was based on the SNF market basket of 3.0%, plus a 1.7% market basket forecast error adjustment, and a negative 0.5% productivity adjustment.
+Added: This increase does not include the SNF VBP reductions for certain SNFs subject to the net reduction in payments under that program.
+Added: CMS also revised the SNF market basket base year from the 2018 base year to the 2022 base year and updated the payment rates used under the SNF PPS based on the FY 2025 market basket increase factor, which was adjusted by both the productivity adjustment and forecast error correction.
+Added: Within this rule, CMS also updated the SNF PPS wage index using core-based statistical areas (CBSAs) to reflect regional wage costs.
+Added: Home Health and Hospice Payment Rules Affecting SNFs — CMS’s final payment rules for other modalities of care delivery also affect the operations of SNFs.
+Added: Under the CY 2025 Home Health PPS, long-term care facilities, including SNFs, have been required to submit at least weekly reports to CMS on respiratory illnesses beginning January 1, 2025.
+Added: These reports must include information such as facility census, resident vaccination status for specified respiratory illnesses, confirmed resident cases and residents hospitalized from such illnesses.
Sequestration of Medicare Rates — The Budget Control Act of 2011 requires a mandatory, across the board reduction in federal spending, called sequestration.
−Removed: Medicare FFS claims with dates of service or dates of discharge on or after April 1, 2013 incur a 2.0% reduction in Medicare payments through at least 2023, unless Congress takes further action.
−Removed: Under the CAA 2023, a further 4.0% cut to Medicare spending that would have been required under the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 (PAYGO) was waived for fiscal years 2023 and 2024.
+Added: Medicare FFS claims with dates of service or dates of discharge on or after April 1, 2013, incur a 2.0% reduction in Medicare payments through at least the end of 2025, unless Congress takes further action.
+Added: Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2023 (CAA 2023), a further 4.0% cut to Medicare spending that would have been required under the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 (PAYGO) was waived for fiscal years 2023 and 2024.
Instead, the CAA 2023 deferred any further Medicare sequestration under PAYGO until fiscal year 2025.
The CAA 2023 also offset planned Medicare sequestrations that would have been as high as 4.0% and instead maintained fee schedule cuts of approximately 2.0%.
−Removed: Absent a further act by Congress, such as a consolidated appropriations act for 2025 or other bill addressing spending in fiscal year 2025 (including retroactively), the sequestration of Medicare FFS claims is expected to take effect in fiscal year 2025.
On October 29, 2024, the Medicare Patient Access and Stabilization Act of 2024 (MPASA) was introduced in the House of Representatives, seeking to increase the amount paid to physicians under Medicare by 4.73%.
−Removed: MPASA was referred to the House Ways and Means Committee and House Committee on Energy and Commerce on October 29, 2024, referred to the Subcommittee on Health on December 17, 2024 and no further action has been taken on this bill.
−Removed: Skilled Nursing Facility Value-Based Purchasing (SNF-VBP) Program — The SNF-VBP Program rewards SNFs with incentive payments based on the quality of care they provide to Medicare beneficiaries, as measured by a hospital readmissions measure.
−Removed: CMS annually adjusts its payment rules for SNFs using the SNF-VBP Program.
−Removed: The program also introduced quality measures to assess how health information is shared and adopted several standardized patient assessment data elements that assess factors such as cognitive function and mental status, special services and social determinants of health.
−Removed: CMS uses regulations to specify how it measures the performance for SNFs as well as the data that SNFs are to report to CMS.
−Removed: The deadlines for baseline period quality measure quarterly reporting and performance periods and standards began in the 2023 program year.
−Removed: The final rule for the fiscal year 2023 SNF PPS also provided for SNF-VBP program expansion beyond the use of its single, all-cause hospital readmission measure to determine payment, with the inclusion of measures in fiscal year 2026 for SNF healthcare associated infections requiring hospitalization (SNF HAI) and total nursing hours per resident day measures and in fiscal year 2027, the discharge to community post-acute care measure for SNFs, which assess the rate of successful discharges to the community from a SNF setting.
−Removed: The SNF PPS FY 2024 Final Rule elected to replace the SNFRM measure with the SNF within-stay (WS) potentially preventable readmission (PPR) measure beginning in the FY 2028 program year.
−Removed: The PPR measure assesses the risk-standardized rate of unplanned and potentially avoidable readmissions during SNF stays for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries.
−Removed: The new SNF WS PPR measure refines the original Skilled Nursing Facility 30-Day Potentially Preventable Readmission (SNFPPR) measure, which followed the requirements of the Protecting Access to Medicare Act (PAMA) of 2014.
−Removed: The refinement in the SNF WS PPR measure shifts the observation window from a fixed 30-day post-hospital discharge to the duration of the SNF stay.
−Removed: Moreover, the time gap allowed between the prior inpatient discharge and the SNF admission has been extended from one day to 30 days.
−Removed: These changes, based on feedback from expert panels and a 2015 partnership, better align the measure with the IMPACT Act's provisions and enhance the reliability of tracking preventable readmissions.
−Removed: Additionally, the SNF WS PPR measure's calculations use two years of Medicare claims data to generate a provider-specific risk-standardized readmission rate.
−Removed: The SNF PPS FY 2025 Final Rule adopted several operational and administrative updates to the SNF VBP Program.
−Removed: The SNF rule adopted a policy to select, retain and remove measurements to ensure the VBP Program’s evaluation metrics remain relevant and effective for assessing care quality, as well as policies for updating technical measures and policies for reviewing and correcting data CMS relies upon to calculate its measures.
−Removed: The rule allows CMS to update the case-mix methodology for the Total Nurse Staffing measure, and its policies to allow the review and revise measures, as well as review and correct data, allow SNFs to review and correct Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) data from fiscal year 2026 and MDS data from fiscal year 2027, allowing CMS to fashion more accurate measures based on updated data.
+Added: MPASA was referred to the House Ways and Means Committee and House Committee on Energy and Commerce on October 29, 2024, and referred to the Subcommittee on Health on December 17, 2024, with no further action taken on the bill, which did not pass into law before the end of the 118th Congress in December of 2024.
+Added: As part of the CR that ended the federal government shutdown in late 2025, Congress reset the balances on PAYGO scorecard, which are used to determine whether a law creates a sufficient amount of budget deficit that it would require mandatory spending cuts like those to Medicare, to zero.
+Added: Because the OBBB's requirements were likely to result in a deficit, the 4.0% deduction required by sequestration was expected to start in January of 2026 before the CR's passage.
+Added: However, as the CR reset the PAYGO scorecards to zero, the expected 4.0% reduction of Medicare rates under sequestration will not materialize, further delaying the 4.0% reduction.
+Added: On February 3, 2026, the CAA 2026 was passed and keeps the protections from the CR in place.
+Added: Skilled Nursing Facility Value-Based Purchasing (SNF-VBP) Program — The SNF-VBP Program incentivizes SNFs by awarding payments based on the quality of care provided to Medicare beneficiaries, primarily measured through hospital readmission rates.
+Added: Each year, CMS adjusts its payment rules for SNFs using this program, which now includes additional quality measures such as sharing of health information and standardized patient assessment data elements that evaluate cognitive function and mental status, special services and social determinants of health.
+Added: CMS regulations outline both the performance metrics and the required data reporting for SNFs.
+Added: Reporting deadlines for baseline period and performance periods began with the 2023 program year.
+Added: The FY 2023 PPS expanded the SNF-VBP program beyond the single hospital readmission measure, adding new metrics for fiscal year 2026, such as healthcare associated infections requiring hospitalization (SNF HAI) and total nursing hours per resident day, and in fiscal year 2027, the discharge to community post-acute care measure for SNFs, which tracks of successful transitions from SNFs to community settings.
+Added: In the FY 2024 PPS, CMS elected to replace the SNFRM measure with the SNF WS PPR measure starting in FY 2028.
+Added: The PPR measure assesses the risk-standardized rate of unplanned, avoidable readmissions during SNF stays for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries.
+Added: This new measure refines the previous 30-Day readmission metric by extending the observation period to the entire SNF stay and increasing the allowable gap between hospital discharge and the SNF admission to 30 days.
+Added: These changes better align with the IMPACT Act and enhance the reliability of preventable readmissions tracking.
+Added: The measure uses two years of Medicare claims data to calculate provider-specific risk-standardized readmission rate.
+Added: The FY 2025 PPS adopted several operational and administrative updates to the SNF VBP Program, including policies for selecting, updating and removing measurements to ensure ongoing relevance and effectiveness for assessing care quality.
+Added: CMS also updated technical measures and procedures for reviewing and correcting data used to calculate its measures.
+Added: The FY 2026 PPS finalized several updates, including setting performance standards for the FY 2028 and FY 2029 program years to meet statutory notice requirements.
+Added: CMS will apply the previously established scoring methodology to the SNF WS PPR measure starting in FY 2028.
+Added: Additionally, CMS removed the Health Equity Adjustment to simplify scoring and clarify incentives for quality improvement.
+Added: A new reconsideration process was also adopted, enabling SNFs to request a review if they are dissatisfied with CMS’s decision on a correction request, beginning with the FY 2027 program year.
Part B Rehabilitation Requirements — A portion of our revenue is paid by the Medicare Part B program under a fee schedule.
1 unchanged sentence
Part B services are limited by a payment cap as there is one amount for physical therapy (PT) services and speech-language pathology (SLP) services combined and a separate amount for occupational therapy (OT) services.
−Removed: On November 1, 2024, CMS issued the Calendar Year (CY) 2025 Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) Final Rule (2025 PFS Final Rule).
The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (BBA) establishes coding modifier requirements to obtain payments beyond certain payment thresholds, discussed below and reaffirms the specific $3,000 claim audit threshold requirements for Medicare Administrative Contractors.
7 unchanged sentences
and (2) providers in private practice, including speech-language pathologists, who perform and bill for multiple services in a single day.
−Removed: Through the end of CY 2024, certain of our Part B services provided through telehealth would qualify for Medicare reimbursement based on flexibility first provided under the Emergency Waivers, which added physical therapy, occupational therapy and speech-language pathology to the list of approved telehealth Providers for the Medicare Part B programs provided by a SNF.
−Removed: During the Public Health Emergency (PHE), CMS added certain PT and OT services to the list of Medicare-covered telehealth services on a temporary basis, some of which were made permanent for use and new codes were added for PT, OT, or SLP telehealth services—including some “sometimes therapy” codes that were not subject to MPPR.
−Removed: The CAA 2023 extended certain, but not all, telehealth flexibilities until December 31, 2024, allowing certain telehealth flexibilities to continue after the PHE's expiration.
−Removed: The American Relief Act, 2025 extended some but not all telehealth flexibilities for an additional 3 months.
−Removed: Under the 2025 PFS Final Rule, the 2.93% increase to the CY 2024 PFS Conversion Factor (CF) expired and CMS seeks to impose an estimated 0.05% adjustment based on changes in work relative value units (RVUs) for certain services.
−Removed: As a result, the 2025 PFS Final Rule implements a reimbursement reduction of 2.83%, with a CF of $32.35, which is a reduction from the CY 2024 CF of $33.29.
−Removed: The 2025 PFS Final Rule adopts a 3.6% increase to the threshold for coding modifier requirements for PT and SLP combined, totaling $2,410 for CY 2025 with the same threshold for OT services.
−Removed: The threshold for targeted medical review for PT and OT (combined) and SLP is expected to remain at $3,000 through CY 2027.
−Removed: The 2025 PFS Final Rule also adopts a regulatory change that allows physical therapy assistants and occupational therapy assistants to be generally supervised by physical therapists and occupational therapists, respectively, in private practice, non-institutional settings, allowing greater flexibility in billing for those assistants’ services.
−Removed: Additionally, the 2025 PFS Final Rule excepts a therapist-established initial plan of care (POC) for PT, OT, or SLT services from requiring a physician or non-physician provider’s (NPP’s) signature, provided that (1) the patient’s physician or NPP referred the patient to the therapist and (2) the therapist has evidence that the POC was transmitted to the patient’s physician or NPP within 30 days of the patient’s initial evaluation.
−Removed: This flexibility applies only to the initial certification.
−Removed: Finally, the 2025 PFS Final Rule reduces COVID-19 PHE-era telehealth flexibilities beginning on January 1, 2025.
−Removed: Under this final rule, certain restrictions on telehealth that existed prior to the COVID-19 PHE will go back into effect:
−Removed: most geographic and site-of-service restrictions to telehealth will return, while physicians can still provide telehealth from home, and can provide audio-only telehealth communication in specific circumstances where the patient is unable to use video technology.
−Removed: CMS is also establishing new coding and payment for caregiver training services, including training services provided through eligible telehealth means.
−Removed: On October 29, 2024, MPASA was introduced in the House of Representatives, seeking to increase the amount paid to physicians under Medicare by 4.73%.
−Removed: MPASA was referred to the House Ways and Means Committee and House Committee on Energy and Commerce on October 29, 2024, and no further action has been taken on this bill.
−Removed: On March 9, 2024, President Biden signed the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024, which included a 2.93% update to the CY 2024 PFS CF for dates of service March 9, 2024 through December 31, 2024.
−Removed: This replaced the 1.25% update provided by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023.
−Removed: The 2024 PFS Final Rule was finalized in November 2023, which changed Medicare payments under the PFS and other Medicare Part B components.
−Removed: The CY 2024 PFS Final Rule contained a conversion factor of $32.74, which was a decrease of $1.15 from the CY 2023 PFS conversion factor of $33.89.
−Removed: This CY 2024 conversion factor was 3.4% lower than the CY 2023 conversion factor.
−Removed: The billing period started on January 1, 2024 and ran through December 31, 2024.
−Removed: The 2024 PFS Final Rule made payments when physicians and NPPs, involve caregivers in implementing an individualized plan of treatment or therapy.
−Removed: These provisions incentivize the training of caregivers and provide additional funds to offset the costs of training these caregivers.
−Removed: For PT and SLP combined, the threshold for coding modifier requirements increases to $2,330 for CY 2024 with the same threshold for OT services.
−Removed: The KX modifier is added to medical claims to indicate the providing clinician attests that the services corresponding to that claim were medically necessary and that the justification for those services is contained within the patient’s medical records.
−Removed: The 2024 PFS Final Rule allowed for general supervision of therapy assistants by PTs and OTs for remote therapeutic monitoring (RTM) services.
−Removed: This change may affect the rate of reimbursement for PT and OT services in the future.
−Removed: Additionally, the 2024 PFS Final Rule added certain health and well-being coaching services that Medicare reimbursed on a temporary basis for 2024.
−Removed: The final rule also added risk assessments for social determinants of health to the list of telehealth services Medicare would reimburse.
+Added: Certain of our Part B services provided through telehealth would qualify for Medicare reimbursement based on flexibility first provided under the emergency waivers first issued during PHE, which added physical therapy (PT), occupational therapy (OT) and speech-language pathology (SLP) to the list of approved telehealth Providers for the Medicare Part B programs provided by a SNF ( see Federal Government Shutdown above ).
+Added: During the PHE, CMS added certain PT and OT services to the list of Medicare-covered telehealth services on a temporary basis, some of which were made permanent for use and new codes were added for PT, OT, or SLP telehealth services—including some “sometimes therapy” codes that were not subject to MPPR.
+Added: The Relief Act, 2025 extended some but not all telehealth flexibilities for an additional 3 months through March 31, 2025.
+Added: On March 15, 2025, the President signed into law the Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025 that Congress passed on March 14, 2025, which extended these pandemic-era telehealth waivers for Medicare beneficiaries through September 30, 2025.
+Added: These flexibilities were most recently extended by the CAA 2026 through December 31, 2027.
+Added: Under the CY 2026 PFS, the 2.93% increase to the 2024 PFS Conversion Factor (CF) expired and CMS sought to impose an estimated 0.05% adjustment thereto based on changes in work relative value units (RVUs) for certain services.
+Added: As a result, the CY 2025 PFS implemented a reimbursement reduction of 2.83%, with a CF of $32.35, which is a reduction from the 2024 CF of $33.29.
+Added: The CY 2025 PFS adopts a 3.6% increase to the threshold for coding modifier requirements for PT and SLP combined, totaling $2,410 for 2025 with the same threshold for OT services.
+Added: The threshold for targeted medical review for PT and OT (combined) and SLP is expected to remain at $3,000 through 2027.
+Added: While the OBBB did not affect the CY 2025 PFS, the OBBB provided a one-year increase of 2.5% to the CF for services provided between January 1, 2026 and January 1, 2027.
+Added: On July 14, 2025, CMS issued the CY 2026 PFS, which proposed to increase Medicare reimbursement for provider services through a 2.5% increase in the conversion factor, as set forth in the OBBB.
+Added: The CY 2025 PFS adopted a regulatory change that allowed physical therapy assistants and occupational therapy assistants to be generally supervised by physical therapists and occupational therapists, respectively, in private practice, non-institutional settings, thus allowing greater flexibility in billing for those assistants’ services.
+Added: Additionally, the CY 2025 PFS excepted a therapist-established initial plan of care (POC) for PT, OT, or SLT services from the requirement for a physician or non-physician provider’s (NPP’s) signature, provided that (1) the patient’s physician or NPP referred the patient to the therapist and (2) the therapist has evidence that the POC was transmitted to the patient’s physician or NPP within 30 days of the patient’s initial evaluation.
+Added: This flexibility applies only to the initial certification of the POC.
+Added: The CY 2026 PFS contains numerous significant changes regarding payment and models, encourages care coordination, reduces collection and reporting of data measurements, and continues certain telehealth flexibilities that began during the PHE ( see Medicare Part B Fee Schedule above ).
Programs of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly
15 unchanged sentences
For a discussion of historic adjustments and recent changes to the Medicare program and other reimbursement rates, see Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors under the headings Risks Related to Our Business and Industry.
−Removed: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
−Removed: Various healthcare reform provisions became law upon enactment of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA).
+Added: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA)
+Added: Various healthcare reform provisions became law upon enactment of the ACA.
The reforms contained in the ACA have affected our independent subsidiaries in some manner and are directed in large part at increased quality and cost reductions.
3 unchanged sentences
The CAA 2023 revised the funds available to fund Medicare in 2023 and deferred the PAYGO sequestration of Medicare expenses.
+Added: On July 4, 2025, the OBBB was enacted into law and intends to be a budget reconciliation law that by 2028 may significantly change the automatic reenrollment process for ACA marketplace health plans and impose work requirements as a condition of Medicaid eligibility, among other things.
+Added: The OBBB reflects broader legislative efforts to roll back provisions of the ACA, and its enactment along with ongoing executive actions that run counter to the ACA, could reduce the availability of insurance coverage and may affect the population and payer mix of our independent subsidiaries.
The changes in the Presidential Administration may significantly alter the current health care regulatory framework, payment activity, and impact our business and the health care industry, including any repeals, curtailments, extensions or expansions of certain ACA provisions, included, but not limited to recent rulemaking activity regarding ACA Section 1557's anti-discrimination provisions.
4 unchanged sentences
One such requirement of participation in the Medicare and Medicaid programs involves limitations around the use of pre-dispute, binding arbitration agreements by SNFs.
−Removed: CMS has issued guidance and direction around arbitration that must be satisfied for any agreement to be enforceable and which may result in adverse consequences for our business if not followed.
+Added: CMS has historically issued guidance and direction around arbitration that must be satisfied for any admission agreement to be enforceable.
Phase 2 and 3 of the Requirements of Participation focuses on:
16 unchanged sentences
These updates provided more information for state surveyors to utilize when evaluating SNFs’ compliance with the Medicare Requirements of Participation, as well as included guidance for facilities on operationalizing compliance with these requirements based on how surveyors would measure and evaluate facility performance.
+Added: CMS issued comprehensive updates to the State Operations Manual (Appendix PP) that took effect on April 28, 2025.
+Added: These updates revised surveyor guidance across multiple areas, including infection control, staffing, PBJ reporting, psychotropic medication use, and medical director oversight responsibilities.
+Added: These revisions are intended to enhance survey consistency and align with CMS’s broader focus on care quality and resident outcomes.
+Added: Additionally, CMS issued guidance on March 24, 2025, clarifying that SNFs may not include pre-dispute, binding arbitration provisions or third-party financial guarantee requirements in admission agreements.
+Added: If these provisions are not removed, they may result in survey citations and potential penalties for non-compliant SNFs.
Civil and Criminal Fraud and Abuse Laws and Enforcement
5 unchanged sentences
Under the qui tam or “whistleblower” provisions of the FCA, a private individual with knowledge of fraud may bring a claim on behalf of the federal government and receive a percentage of the federal government’s recovery.
−Removed: The Biden-Harris Administration had also signaled an increasing focus on nursing home performance and the reimbursement nursing homes receive from federal healthcare payment programs.
−Removed: The change in the presidency following the 2024 presidential elections may result in a change to this focus, in whole or in part.
−Removed: There has not yet been public disclosure of the priorities of the new Presidential Administration, in addition to those of the anticipated new leaders of HHS and CMS, as they relate to SNFs and long-term care facilities.
Many states also have a false claim prohibition that mirrors or closely tracks the federal FCA.
1 unchanged sentence
CMS can recover overpayments from health care providers up to six years following the year in which payment was made.
−Removed: In 2021, the OIG released the result of an audit finding that Medicare overpaid millions of dollars for chronic care management (CCM) services.
−Removed: The OIG's 2021 report found that in calendar years 2017 and 2018, Medicare overpaid millions of dollars in CCM claims.
−Removed: In 2022, the OIG released an audit revealing that CMS had not collected $226 million, or 45%, of identified overpayments within that period, potentially affecting SNFs.
+Added: Over the years, the OIG have released the result of audit findings of Medicare overpayments, potentially affecting SNFs.
These investigatory actions by OIG demonstrate its increased scrutiny into post-hospital SNF care provided to beneficiaries and may encourage additional oversight or stricter compliance standards.
−Removed: In 2023, representatives of the DOJ speaking at certain industry events, including the American Health Law Association’s Fraud and Compliance Forum, have indicated that its healthcare enforcement trends would emphasize opioid prescribing, Medicare Advantage and managed care plan fraud, and COVID-19 related fraud, including under various relief programs available during and in conjunction with the pandemic.
−Removed: In November of 2023, OIG added to its work plan an audit of nursing homes' nurse staffing hours reported in CMS's payroll-based journal, for which OIG expects to issue a report in FY 2025.
+Added: The DOJ has indicated that its healthcare enforcement trends would emphasize opioid prescribing, Medicare Advantage and managed care plan fraud, and COVID-19 related fraud, including under various relief programs available during and in conjunction with the pandemic.
+Added: In November of 2023, OIG added to its work plan an audit of nursing homes' nurse staffing hours reported in CMS's payroll-based journal, for which OIG expected to issue a report in FY 2025.
+Added: However, the report has not yet been issued.
In addition, the OIG identified the following areas as its "key goals" for oversight:
3 unchanged sentences
and (4) supporting federal monitoring of nursing homes to mitigate risks to residents.
−Removed: In February of 2024, the OIG added to its work plan a study regarding the use of the National Background Check Program (NBCP) in conducting background checks of prospective long-term care provider employees.
−Removed: The purpose of this study will be to prepare a report regarding the cost of background checks, number of applicants who received background checks, and disqualification of employees during and after NBCP participation.
−Removed: This report will also include information regarding the cost of background checks and any unintended consequences experienced as a result of using this program.
−Removed: In April of 2024, the OIG updated its work plan to study and determine whether and how states used Medicaid supplemental payments for use in satisfying the state’s obligations to pay nursing facilities any amounts due under the state’s nursing facility upper payment limit.
−Removed: The OIG further updated its work plan in June 2024 to study and assess the implementation of the Special Focus Facility Program for nursing facilities based on facilities that participated in the program from 2013 through 2022.
+Added: In 2024, the OIG added to its work plan a series of studies that include:
+Added: (a) the use of the National Background Check Program (NBCP) in conducting background checks of prospective long-term care provider employees to prepare a report regarding the cost of background checks, number of applicants who received background checks and disqualification of employees during and after NBCP participation;
+Added: (b) the use of Medicaid supplemental payments for use in satisfying the state’s obligations to pay nursing facilities any amounts due under the state’s nursing facility upper payment limit;
+Added: and (3) the assessment of the implementation of the Special Focus Facility Program for nursing facilities based on facilities that participated in the program from 2013 through 2022.
+Added: The OIG continues to increase its oversight of skilled nursing facility operations through its active Work Plan, with several new audits and studies that may impact SNFs.
+Added: In June 2025, OIG announced a new evaluation of whether SNFs are properly engaging medical directors and accurately reporting medical directors’ hours of service in CMS’s PBJ reporting system.
+Added: This review will examine whether medical directors are meeting regulatory expectations and whether reported hours reflect actual services provided, with potential implications for regulatory compliance and reimbursement oversight.
+Added: Separately, OIG announced an audit assessing whether SNFs are inappropriately billing Medicare Part D for prescription drugs provided during a Medicare Part A stay, as the OIG previously found potential overpayments of more than $465 million in Part D payments for drugs that were already covered under Part A.
+Added: OIG is also reviewing state-level enforcement of minimum spending requirements for direct resident care in nursing facilities, which could affect state Medicaid reimbursement mechanisms and facility-level allocation of resources.
+Added: In addition, a May 2025 OIG report identified deficiencies in how CMS shares PBJ staffing data with state survey agencies, limiting surveyors’ ability to assess RN staffing compliance and potentially delaying corrective action.
+Added: Most recently, OIG announced that along with the State survey agencies it would begin assessing the effect of ownership changes on quality of care provided in nursing homes via onsite surveys, state monitoring visits, and requesting additional documentation.
Our business model is based in part on serving higher acuity patients.
Over time our overall patient mix has consistently shifted to higher acuity in most facilities we operate.
+Added: Further scrutiny of high-acuity residents and the treatment they receive may affect our business and subject us to increased governmental oversight.
We also use specialized care-delivery software that assists our caregivers in more accurately capturing and recording services in order to, among other things, increase reimbursement to levels appropriate for the care actually delivered.
These efforts may place us under greater scrutiny with the OIG, CMS, our fiscal intermediaries, recovery audit contractors and others.
−Removed: Federal Healthcare Reform
+Added: Other Federal Legislation and Healthcare Reform
Five-Star Quality Reporting Metrics — The Quality Payment Program (QPP) was created under the Medicare Access and Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) Reauthorization Act of 2015.
5 unchanged sentences
The Nursing Home Compare website is updated monthly with CMS’s refresh of survey inspection results on that website.
−Removed: Additionally, in 2022, the Nursing Home Compare website began publishing the ownership information for Medicare-enrolled nursing facilities based on disclosures made to CMS from 2016 through 2022 due to mergers, acquisitions, or other changes in ownership, to allow for the identification of common ownership of nursing facilities.
−Removed: In addition, the Five Star Quality Ratings incorporated staffing data such as staff tenure and SNF weekend staffing beginning with the October 2022 refresh of the Nursing Home Compare website.
−Removed: In July of 2024, CMS updated the Nursing Home Five-Star Quality Rating System’s Technical Users’ Guide to identify and explain a change in staffing case-mix methodology to adopt a model based on PDPM, changing the measures that CMS previously froze in April of 2024.
−Removed: This update to the Technical Users’ Guide also extended the gap period (during which no work hours are reported) for defining nurse staffing turnover from 60 days to 90 days.
−Removed: As a result of this update, for the three staffing turnover measures, individuals who no longer work in the nursing home are defined as eligible individuals who have a period of at least 90 consecutive days in which they do not work at all, increased from 60 days.
−Removed: CMS also updated the risk-adjustment models for the four claims-based measures to reflect measures of functional abilities and goals, rather than residents’ functional status.
−Removed: Finally, CMS revised the thresholds for the staffing measures and claims-based quality measures to maintain the same distribution by points for affected staffing and quality measures, maintaining the same proportions of available five- and four-star ratings for facilities.
−Removed: In April of 2024, CMS updated its Nursing Home Five-Star Quality Rating System’s Technical Users’ Guide in several respects.
−Removed: First, CMS froze four of the quality measures from any changes:
−Removed: (1) percentage of residents who made improvements in function (short stay);
−Removed: (2) percentage of residents whose need for help with activities of daily living has increased (long stay);
−Removed: (3) percentage of residents whose ability to move independently worsened (long stay);
−Removed: and (4) percentage of high-risk residents with pressure ulcers (long stay).
−Removed: All of these measures will be frozen until January 2025, while the short-stay functional improvement measure is replaced in October of 2024 with a new cross-setting function measure used in the SNF QRP.
−Removed: CMS also updated the staffing level case-mix adjustment methodology and froze three staffing level measures until July of 2024:
−Removed: (1) adjusted RN staffing (HPRD);
−Removed: (2) adjusted total nurse staffing (HPRD);
−Removed: and (3) adjusted total nurse staffing on weekends (HPRD).
−Removed: These frozen measures will not affect staff turnover measures.
−Removed: Additionally, beginning in April of 2024, CMS revised the staffing rating methodology to give the lowest possible score for staffing turnover measures to providers who fail to submit staffing data or submit erroneous data.
−Removed: In 2023, CMS revised the nursing-home level exclusion criteria used on the administrator turnover measure, adding information regarding the staff turnover measure and an updated ratings table, which identifies the points needed for each nursing facility to obtain certain star ratings.
−Removed: Under these guidelines, only 10% of nursing facilities can receive a five-star rating in the state where it operates, with the bottom 20% receiving a one-star rating and the remaining 70% receiving a distribution of two-, three-, and four-star ratings.
−Removed: State Legislation Concerning Nursing Home Supervision — California passed into law a bill which changes the limitations, or “caps,” on non-economic damages that can be awarded in medical negligence cases filed against healthcare providers (including skilled nursing and long-term care facilities).
−Removed: Beginning on January 1, 2023, non-economic damages (i.e., pain and suffering) available to plaintiffs suing healthcare providers in medical malpractice and professional negligence cases increased from $0.25 million to $0.35 million, and will then increase over the following ten years up to a $0.75 million cap.
−Removed: Once the limit reaches $0.75 million, a 2% annual inflationary adjustment will attach beginning on January 1, 2034.
−Removed: In wrongful death cases that arise from claims of medical malpractice and professional negligence, the cap on non-economic damages increased from $0.25 million to $0.50 million on January 1, 2023, and increase every year thereafter for ten years until the cap on non-economic damages in such cases is $1.0 million;
−Removed: thereafter, this cap will also be subject to an annual 2.0% increase.
−Removed: The caps are separate as to each claim, meaning that there is one cap for negligence and one cap for wrongful death.
−Removed: The new limits on non-economic damages apply prospectively to lawsuits filed on and after January 1, 2023.
−Removed: In 2022, California’s Governor signed into law the Skilled Nursing Facility Ownership and Management Reform Act of 2022.
−Removed: This law increases the oversight authority of the California Department of Public Health, and changes several provisions regarding SNF licensing in the State of California.
−Removed: This includes eliminating previous regulatory provisions that permitted SNFs to operate in advance of receiving their formal license from the State.
+Added: Additionally, the Nursing Home Compare website publishes ownership information for Medicare-enrolled nursing facilities based on disclosures made to CMS from 2016 through 2022 due to mergers, acquisitions, or other changes in ownership, to allow for the identification of common ownership of nursing facilities.
+Added: The Five Star Quality Ratings incorporated staffing data such as staff tenure and SNF weekend staffing beginning with the October 2022 refresh of the Nursing Home Compare website.
+Added: In June 2025, CMS announced upcoming modifications to Nursing Home Care Compare platform and the Five Star Quality Rating system, set to take effect on July 30, 2025.
+Added: Under these changes, CMS discontinued the use of the third most recent standard health survey in calculating the health inspection rating, relying instead on only the two latest surveys.
+Added: The most recent survey will be weighted at 75% of the total score, while the second most recent survey result will contribute to the remaining 25% of the score.
+Added: Additionally, CMS will begin publishing aggregated five-star performance metrics for nursing home chains and will remove COVID-19 vaccination measures from facility profile pages.
+Added: CMS is also updating the long-stay antipsychotic measure to incorporate data from Medicare and Medicaid claims as well as Medicare Advantage encounter records.
+Added: This updated measure, effective January 28, 2026, is expected to increase the reported national antipsychotic rates from 14.6% to 17.0%.
+Added: We expect that this change will result in varying changes to individual facilities' ratings.
+Added: Additionally, starting July 30, 2025 until October 2025, updates to Nursing Home Care Compare were temporarily paused as CMS transitions to a cloud-based Internet Quality Improvement and Evaluation System (iQIES) for survey data management.
+Added: This pause is intended to give CMS time to validate the accuracy and integrity of the data and ensure that publicly reported information meets quality standards before resuming updates to the five-star ratings.
+Added: The move to iQIES, along with the other changes, may also result in further adjustments to the rating system and could prompt additional audits by CMS or state surveyors.
+Added: In April 2024, CMS froze four quality measures and three staffing measures to prevent changes until a subsequent date.
+Added: It also updated the staffing rating methodology to assign the lowest score to facilities that fail to submit (or submit incorrect) staffing data.
+Added: However, in January of 2025, CMS unfroze four of its quality measures that it previously froze with its April 2024 refresh.
+Added: CMS updated these measures to reflect recent changes in the minimum data set collected from SNFs.
+Added: First, the measure of percentage of SNF residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge replaced the measure of percentage of residents who made improvements in function during a short stay.
+Added: Second, the following measures have been respecified:
+Added: (1) percentage of residents whose need for help with activities of daily living has increased during a long stay, and (2) percentage of residents whose ability to walk independently worsened during a long stay.
+Added: Finally, the measure of percentage of all residents with pressure ulcers (regardless of stay duration) will replace the measure of percentage of high-risk residents with pressure ulcers during a long stay.
+Added: Additionally, CMS recalculated the scoring cut points for these four measures to obtain an even distribution of scores.
+Added: Additionally, the quality measure rating cut points were also adjusted to maintain their same overall distribution of ratings across measured facilities.
+Added: In July 2024, CMS updated the Nursing Home Five-Star Quality Rating System to reflect several key changes.
+Added: The staffing case-mix methodology now uses the PDPM model, replacing measures that were previously frozen in April.
+Added: CMS also extended the definition of staffing turnover.
+Added: Employees are now considered “turned over” if they haven’t worked for 90 consecutive days, up from 60.
+Added: Additionally, CMS revised risk-adjustment models for claims-based measures to focus on residents’ functional abilities and goals, rather than just their status.
+Added: To maintain consistency in star ratings, CMS adjusted thresholds so the distribution of 4- and 5-star ratings remains stable.
+Added: Ownership Transparency Final Rule — In November 2023, CMS finalized a rule requiring SNFs to publicly disclose information regarding their ownership and management structure.
+Added: SNF must identify any person or legal entity that:
+Added: (1) exercises financial, operational, or managerial control over any facility or part of a facility, or provides services to facility that includes its policies and procedures or cash management services;
+Added: (2) leases or subleases real property to the facility, or owns at least 5% of the real property’s total value;
+Added: and (3) provides any management or administrative services (or consult regarding the same), or provides accounting or financial services to SNFs.
+Added: The rule also requires disclosures of governing body members, officers, directors or managing employees, plus a comprehensive breakdown of the organizational structure of any additional disclosable party that is not a natural person along with a description of their relationships with the facility.
+Added: Starting in November of 2024, all SNFs must comply with these requirements by submitting a new "SNF Attachment" with CMS form 855A during revalidation.
+Added: Although CMS initially required all SNFs to complete revalidation using this new attachment by January 1, 2026, this deadline was indefinitely suspended in December 2025 by CMS until further notice.
+Added: Certain states have adopted laws reflecting their concerns regarding ownership transparency.
+Added: For example, Iowa adopted laws requiring disclosure of ownership information not previously required for licensure to promote transparency in 2023.
+Added: In California, the California Department of Health Care Access and Information of the California Health and Human Services Agency issued its notice of approval of regulatory action in March 2024, establishing policies and procedures that implement financial and ownership transparency requirements for California-licensed SNFs that are required by California law passed in 2021.
+Added: Additionally, the State of Washington enacted H.B.
+Added: 1686 in July 2025, directing state agencies to develop a plan and recommendations for creating a registry of health care entities, including SNFs.
+Added: State-level Legislation and Healthcare Reform
+Added: The states where we operate have varied legislative priorities and accordingly legislation.
+Added: These different legislative priorities vary for many reasons but ultimately result in the operations of our independent subsidiaries having different profiles for risk, regulatory burden, taxation and benefits based on the state in which the facility operates.
+Added: By way of example, in 2022, California’s Governor signed into law the Skilled Nursing Facility Ownership and Management Reform Act of 2022.
+Added: This law increased the authority of the California Department of Public Health and changed several provisions regarding SNF licensing in the State of California.
+Added: These changes include eliminating previous regulatory provisions that permitted SNFs to operate in advance of receiving their formal license from the State.
This law also requires SNF license applicants to disclose additional information in connection with a license application and evaluates more data regarding the applicant’s prior operations, including prior citations, CMS sanctions and legal proceedings against the applicant or other facilities owned or managed by the applicant before issuing a license.
−Removed: United States Supreme Court Decisions – On June 28, 2024, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Loper Bright Enterprises v.
+Added: In contrast, on June 20, 2025, Texas passed SB 457 which will allow a new operator to receive uninterrupted Medicaid payments during the change of ownership process beginning on September 1, 2025.
+Added: These examples highlight the varied approaches that occur from state to state, with different approaches making it either easier or harder for our independent subsidiaries to operate.
+Added: In addition, the impacts of the OBBB, as discussed above, will create varying approaches by state legislatures to address the provisions of such bill.
+Added: We continue to monitor and advocate for positions that protect the interest of our employees, residents and those of our independent subsidiaries at all levels of government, particularly at the state and local levels.
+Added: The Impact of United States Supreme Court Decisions
+Added: On June 28, 2024, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Loper Bright Enterprises v.
Raimondo , deciding to vacate and remand decisions by the United States Courts of Appeals that relied on the Supreme Court’s own 1984 precedent in Chevron U.S.A.
10 unchanged sentences
The Chevron doctrine is frequently implicated in litigation over healthcare regulation, ranging from rules concerning staffing requirements and the validity of arbitration provisions, to requirements for healthcare workers to be vaccinated.
−Removed: Subsequent analysis has focused on the limits of the Loper decision, including any deference that courts may still afford to administrative agencies when based on agency fact-finding and policy-making, particularly where such power is expressly delegated to the agency by statute.
+Added: Subsequent analysis has focused on the limits of the Loper decision, including any deference that courts may still afford to administrative agencies when based on agency fact-finding and policymaking, particularly where such power is expressly delegated to the agency by statute.
The Loper decision likely will have significant and lasting consequences for the promulgation and enforcement of federal regulations by HHS and CMS, and may bear on the depth and detail of future legislation that is passed and enacted as statutes by Congress so that such laws can be enforced without administrative rulemaking or agency enforcement mechanisms.
17 unchanged sentences
In October 2022, CMS increased penalties for SFFs that fail to improve their performance upon further inspection by CMS, increasing the standards SFFs must meet to graduate from the SFF program, maintaining heightened oversight of any SFF for a period of three years after it graduates and increasing the technical assistance CMS provides to SFFs.
+Added: On October 24, 2025, OIG issued a report titled "CMS's Special Focus Facility Program for Nursing Homes Has not Yielded Lasting Improvements." Within this report, OIG set out its observation that, from 2013 to 2022, SNFs that graduated from the SFF program failed to maintain the improvements achieved while in the SFF program.
+Added: The report also addresses OIG's findings on the impact of staffing on sustaining the gains seen in the SFF program and additional factors to consider such as facility ownership, and its recommendations for improving the program.
+Added: OIG recommended that CMS (1) impose more non-financial enforcement remedies to promote compliance;
+Added: (2) examine the extent to which it took enhanced enforcement actions for facilities that graduated the SFF program.
Sanctions such as denial of payment for new admissions often are scheduled to go into effect before surveyors return to verify compliance.
31 unchanged sentences
We and our independent subsidiaries have established policies and procedures to comply with HIPAA privacy and security requirements and our independent subsidiaries have adopted and implemented HIPAA compliance plans, which we believe comply with the HIPAA privacy and security regulations, which impose significant costs for ongoing compliance activities.
+Added: On February 8, 2024, HHS through the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) finalized rules that align the confidentiality of substance use disorder records (i.e., 42 CFR Part 2, also known as "Part 2") with HIPAA;
+Added: the compliance deadline for such rules is February 16, 2026.
+Added: Such rules align many Part 2 requirements with HIPAA, extend HIPAA's breach notification and enforcement regime to records subject to Part 2, and permit broader care coordination of such records while preserving heightened protections under Part 2.
+Added: In addition, such rules require us and our independent subsidiaries to include information regarding Part 2 uses and disclosures in applicable "Notice of Privacy Practices" that inform individuals of the uses and disclosures of certain health information.
There are numerous other laws and legislative and regulatory initiatives at the federal and state levels addressing privacy and security concerns.
Our independent subsidiaries are also subject to any federal or state privacy-related laws that are more restrictive than the privacy regulations issued under HIPAA.
−Removed: On January 17, 2024, CMS published the CMS Interoperability and Prior Authorization Final Rule (Interoperability Final Rule), which affects the data standards and application programming interfaces (APIs) used by entities that are payors for our services, including but not limited to Medicare Advantage organizations, Medicaid fee-for-service providers, and managed care organizations.
+Added: On January 17, 2024, CMS published the CMS Interoperability and Prior Authorization Final Rule (Interoperability Final Rule), which affects the data standards and application programming interfaces (APIs) used by entities that are payors for our services, including but not limited to Medicare Advantage organizations, Medicaid fee-for-service providers, and MCOs.
This new rule requires these payor entities to adopt new patient access APIs beginning January 1, 2026, and to complete implementation of both patient and provider access APIs by January 1, 2027, to facilitate the sharing of payor information with payors and providers.
14 unchanged sentences
As a result, these changes to the DOJ and FTC’s antitrust policies may be changed materially, not implemented, or reverted to prior statements that were withdrawn in February of 2023.
+Added: Several states in which we operate have enacted laws that mirror the Federal Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Act.
+Added: The HSR Act mandates that parties involved in certain transactions must provide advance notice to the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to obtain clearance, ensuring the transaction complies with federal antitrust regulations.
+Added: Similarly, the state-level HSR analogues require parties to notify state authorities and secure approval before finalizing mergers or acquisitions.
+Added: This regulatory trend has accelerated in 2025, with more states actively considering or enacting such legislation.
+Added: In some cases, state requirements align closely with the federal HSR Act, simply requiring that a copy of the federal HSR filing be submitted to a designated state agency.
+Added: However, other states have established distinct or more rigorous standards, sometimes necessitating state approval for transactions that would not trigger federal reporting obligations under the HSR Act.
+Added: Among the states where we operate, California implemented its relevant laws in 2024, and Washington expanded the scope of its HSR-like requirements with new legislation effective July 27, 2025.
+Added: Nevada, while it did not pass a comprehensive HSR, does require notification or approval for certain healthcare transactions prior to closing.
+Added: These evolving state regulations add new layers of compliance for mergers and acquisitions, particularly in the healthcare sector.
+Added: California Office of Health Care Affordability
+Added: The California Office of Health Care Affordability (OHCA) requires healthcare entities to provide OHCA with written notice of proposed qualifying agreements or transactions (referred to as a “Material Change Notice”) at least 90 days prior to entering into the agreement or transaction.
+Added: Reportable transactions are determined based on a variety of factors outlined in the applicable regulations.
+Added: If OHCA determines, on its own or in conjunction with other state agencies, that a proposed agreement or transaction may have a risk of significant impact on certain aspects of the healthcare market, OHCA will conduct a Cost and Market Impact Review (CMIR) to analyze the transaction in more detail.
+Added: This CMIR process involves a deeper analysis than OHCA’s initial review of the information contained in a reporting party’s Material Change Notice.
+Added: OHCA’s CMIR process has the potential to result in findings of anti-competitive effects.
+Added: If such an impact is identified, OCHA may refer the matter to the California Attorney General for further action.
+Added: Between March and September 2025, we provided OHCA with requested information regarding specific components of a proposed transaction.
+Added: Despite our ongoing cooperation, on October 10, 2025, OHCA issued an investigatory subpoena to us to produce (among other things) certain confidential and proprietary documents.
+Added: We timely responded to the investigatory subpoena and asserted objections.
+Added: We have been unable to effect resolution including attempts to narrow the scope, and limit the requests to our independent subsidiaries operating in California.
+Added: We have filed a Petition in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Orange, seeking a declaration that the CMIR regulations violate the United States Constitution and/or the California Constitution, and is void and unenforceable as applied to us.
+Added: We have also requested that OHCA be ordered to withdraw the subpoena and close the inquiry, so the underlying transaction can be completed.
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
1 unchanged sentence
The obligation to comply with the ADA and other similar laws is an ongoing obligation, and the independent subsidiaries continue to assess their facilities relative to ADA compliance and make appropriate modifications as needed.
−Removed: On January 25, 2024, the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) for HHS issued guidance to hospitals and long-term care facilities, emphasizing their obligation under CMS regulations to ensure non-discriminatory visitation policies, especially during public health emergencies.
+Added: The Office for Civil Rights (OCR) for HHS issued guidance to hospitals and long-term care facilities, emphasizing their obligation under CMS regulations to ensure non-discriminatory visitation policies, especially during public health emergencies.
This guidance, part of the U.S.
2 unchanged sentences
OCR offers assistance to facilities to obtain compliance with these standards and encourages residents and other affected individuals to file complaints with OCR for potential administrative or civil action in cases of civil rights violations.
−Removed: OCR has been increasingly involved in the monitoring and enforcement of patient and resident rights, particularly under ongoing rulemaking under Section 1557 of the ACA.
+Added: OCR has been increasingly involved in the monitoring and enforcement of patient and resident rights, particularly under rulemaking completed under Section 1557 of the ACA.
+Added: However, recent litigation and political efforts have seen a reduction in enforcement of Section 1557.
+Added: Specifically, HHS announced that it would not enforce certain regulations promulgated under Section 1557 related to discrimination based on sex, gender identity, and pregnancy status.
Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) Qualification
1 unchanged sentence
federal income tax purposes.
−Removed: Standard Bearer's qualification as a REIT will depend upon its ability to meet, on a continuing basis, various complex requirements under the Internal Revenue Code, relating to, among other things, the sources of its gross income, the composition and value of its assets, distribution levels to its shareholders and the concentration of ownership of its capital stock.
+Added: Standard Bearer's qualification as a REIT will depend upon its ability to meet, on a continuing basis, various complex requirements under the Internal Revenue Code, relating to, among other things, the sources of its gross income, the composition and value of its assets, distribution levels to its stockholders and the concentration of ownership of its capital stock.
We believe that Standard Bearer is organized in conformity with the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the Code and that its manner of operation has and will enable it to continue to meet the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT.
5 unchanged sentences
States that administer Medicaid programs for services in senior living communities are responsible for monitoring the participating communities and, as a result of the growth of senior living in recent years, these states have adopted licensing standards applicable to senior living communities.
+Added: Similarly, states that elect to provide Medicaid coverage for an expanded range of HCBS services for individuals who do not require institutional care may also offer lower rates of reimbursement for those HCBS services than services provided in SNFs.
+Added: This cost differential may make those HCBS services more attractive to Medicaid programs than SNF-based care.
CMS has continued to commence a series of actions to increase its oversight of state quality assurance programs for senior living communities and has provided guidance and technical assistance to states to improve their ability to monitor and improve the quality of services paid through Medicaid waiver programs.
49 unchanged sentences
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.