Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS.
The
following discussion should be read in conjunction with the attached financial
statements and notes thereto. Except for the historical information contained
herein, the matters discussed below are forward-looking statements that involve
certain risks and uncertainties, including, among others, the risks and
uncertainties discussed below.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our
critical accounting policies are those that are most important to the portrayal
of our financial condition and results of operations, and require our
management's significant judgments and estimates and such consistent application
fairly depicts our financial condition and results of operations for all periods
presented. Our critical accounting policies are described below.
Revenue Recognition –
Flint recognizes revenues based upon contract terms and completion of the sales
process in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, a codification of
revenue recognition. Revenue is generated from the sale of telecom services to
the Company’s partners. The Company recognizes the revenue when the service is
provided and payment is collected either through credit cards or through
payments by check. The appropriate partner revenue allocation is deducted from
those accounts that pay Flint directly. Other accounts that pay the partners
directly, Flint recognizes the portion of the revenue share that relates to it
and invoices the Partner for this. The invoice becomes a receivable from the
Partner when raised.
Cost of Revenue –
Costs directly related to the production of revenue are categorized as a cost of
revenue. These costs are the cost of call generation, including transmission and
termination, network charges including access costs, lease and right-of-way
charges and other third party fulfillment costs, and other telecommunication
fees, such as emergency 911 service fees.
Earnings (loss) per share
- Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income
(loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the
potential dilution, using the treasury stock method or the if converted method,
that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were
exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common
stock that then shared in the earnings of the Company. Any dilutive security
issued, that would create an anti-dilutive effect, is not included in the
weighted average share calculation for that period.
Stock Compensation Expense –
Flint adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123
(revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment,” requiring us to recognize expense related
to the fair value of our employee stock option awards. We recognize the cost of
all share-based awards on a straight line vesting basis over the vesting period
of the award. Total stock compensation expense recognized by us during the three
and six months ended December 31, 2008 was $3,045,249.
Income taxes - The
Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109,
“Accounting for Income Taxes.” Under SFAS No. 109, income taxes are
recognized for the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year
and deferred tax liabilities and assets are recognized for the future tax
consequences of transactions that have been recognized in the Company’s
financial statements or tax returns. A valuation allowance is provided when it
is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will
not be realized.
Cash and Cash
Equivalents – The
Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of
three months or less or money market funds from substantial financial
institutions to be cash equivalents. The Company places substantially all of its
cash and cash equivalents in interest bearing demand deposit accounts with one
financial institution and in amounts that are insured either by the Irish
government for Euro deposits or by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation for
U.S deposits.
Concentrations of Credit
Risk - Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to
concentrations of risk consist principally of trade and other receivables. The
Company extends credit to its customers in the ordinary course of business and
periodically reviews the credit levels extended to customers, estimates the
collectability and creates an allowance for doubtful accounts, as needed. The
Company does not require cash collateral or other security to support customer
receivables. Provision is made for estimated losses on uncollectible
accounts.
The
Company estimates its allowance for doubtful accounts by applying estimated loss
percentages against its aging of accounts receivable balances. The estimated
loss percentages are updated periodically and are based on the Company’s
historical write-off experience, net of recoveries. Changes to allowances may be
required if the financial condition of the Company’s customers improves or
deteriorates or if the Company adjusts its credit standards for new customers,
thereby resulting in write-off patterns that differ from historical
experience.
Estimates - The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Certain significant estimates were made in connection with preparing the
Company’s financial statements. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Fair value of financial
instruments - The carrying amounts of financial instruments, including
cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and short term
notes approximate fair value because of their short maturity as of December 31,
2008.
The
Convertible Notes were recorded at face value as of the issuance date. Those
Convertible Notes issued in the Euro currency were translated at the Euro – U.S.
Dollar exchange rate as of the transaction date and are adjusted for exchange
rate changes on a quarterly basis. The Convertible Notes approximate fair value
since they are a long term liability with a fixed interest rate, adjusted for
exchange rates if required and will be held until maturity or until converted
into common stock.
Foreign Currency
Transactions - Exchange adjustments resulting from foreign currency
transactions are generally recognized in operations. Flint has a bank account
and convertible notes that are in the Euro currency. Net foreign currency
transaction losses were $269,571 for the six months ended December 31,
2008.
Property and
Equipment – These assets are stated at cost, net of accumulated
depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is provided on the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, generally three to
seven years. Amortization on capital leases is over the lesser of the estimated
useful life or term of the lease if shorter, and is included in depreciation and
amortization expense in the statement of operations. Ordinary course repairs and
maintenance on fixed assets are expensed as incurred.
The
carrying value of property and equipment is assessed annually or when factors
indicating an impairment are present. In accordance with SFAS No. 144,
“Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”, we review our
property, plant, and equipment for impairment whenever events or circumstances
indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. Impairment reviews
require a comparison of the estimated future undiscounted cash flows to the
carrying value of the asset. If the total of the undiscounted cash flows is less
than the carrying value, an impairment charge is recorded for the difference
between the estimated fair value and the carrying value of the
asset.
OVERVIEW
Management’s
objective for the first half of our fiscal year was to become public, increase
the size of the business through acquisition or other strategic business
combination structures, and to improve overall operations to reduce the need for
external financing in the difficult economic and financial
markets. We closed a reverse merger with Semotus on October 1, 2008,
which brought us public, increased the depth and breadth of operations, enhanced
the management team and identified acquisitions in the telecom, media and
technology (TMT) space. After the reverse merger with Semotus, we
continued our focus on our operations and consolidation of the two
entities. We have been actively engaged in seeking other potential
acquisition targets to further enhance the scale, depth and profitability of the
business
In the
three months ended December 31, 2008, we had a net loss of $8,548,598 ($0.21 per
share basic and diluted), as compared to a net loss of $526,113 ($0.02 per share
basic and diluted) in the three months ended December 31, 2007. We had a net
loss of $9,694,544 ($0.28 per share basic and diluted) in the six months ended
December 31, 2008, as compared to net loss of $1,072,860 ($0.04 per share basic
and diluted) in the six months ended December 31, 2007. Our overall
cash decreased by $638,392 in the six months ended December 31, 2008, compared
to an increase by $246,001 in the six months ended December 31,
2007.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008 AND
2007
REVENUES
Revenues
for the three months ended December 31, 2008 increased 816% to $2,987,042 as
compared to $326,095 for the three months ended December 31,
2007. Revenues for the six months ended December 31, 2008 increased
1,453% to $6,212,293 as compared to $399,880 for the six months ended December
31, 2007. This increase is primarily due to the growth of our
wholesale call traffic business.
COST
OF REVENUES AND GROSS MARGIN
The
overall gross loss margin has improved in both the three and six months ended
December 31, 2008 versus 2007 due to larger traffic volumes being delivered
through the call platform. The revenue increases now cover the fixed cost
component of cost of sales. The cost of revenues principally is the cost of call
generation, including transmission and termination, network charges including
access costs, lease and right-of-way charges and other third party fulfillment
costs, and other telecommunication fees, such as emergency 911 service
fees.
OPERATING
EXPENSES
Operating
expenses increased 1,563% to $7,118,899 in the three month period ended December
31, 2008 versus $428,025 for the same period in the last fiscal year, and
increased 928% to $8,182,348 in the six month period ended December 31, 2008
versus $796,082 for the same period in the last fiscal year. This
increase is mainly due to costs associated with the reverse merger with Semotus
Solutions, Inc., the growth of the telephony business, the non-cash expense of
stock and options issued to directors, officers and employees, and the
impairment of goodwill. We categorize operating expenses into three
major categories: research and development, sales and marketing, and general and
administrative. The table below summarizes the changes in these three categories
of operating expenses (unaudited):
Three
Months Ended
December
31,
Six
Months Ended
December
31,
Description
2008
2007
2008
2007
Research
and development
$55,587
$
--
$
55,587
$
--
Sales
and marketing
210,149
--
210,149
--
General
and administrative
6,853,163
428,025
7,916,612
796,082
-----------------
-----------------
------------------
-----------------
Total
$7,118,899
$428,025
$8,182,348
$796,082
Research
and development expenses are expenses incurred in developing new products and
product enhancements for current products. These expenditures are charged to
expense as incurred. These costs are solely related to the Hiplink
product in the Semotus business division.
Sales and
marketing expenses consist of costs incurred to develop and implement marketing
and sales programs for our product lines. These include costs required to staff
the marketing department and develop a sales and marketing strategy,
participation in trade shows, media development and advertising, and web site
development and maintenance. These costs also include the expenses of hiring
sales personnel and maintaining a customer support activities. These costs
incurred in 2008 are a result of an increase in sales and marketing personnel
through the Semotus Business, as well as a management fee to Flint,
Ltd.
General
and administrative expenses include senior management, accounting, legal,
business development consulting, rent, administrative personnel, and other
overhead related costs. This category also includes stock compensation and
option expense, the costs associated with being a publicly traded company,
including the costs of SEC filings, a management fee payable to Flint, Ltd.,
investor relations and public relations. These costs have increased during the
three and six months ended December 31, 2008 versus 2007 due to the costs
associated with becoming a publicly traded company and the stock compensation
and option expense from the stock and options issued to directors,
officers and employees. Also, we determined that the goodwill from the Semotus
acquisition was impaired due to the disposition of the Semotus Business
Division. The goodwill was mainly associated with the Hiplink family of
products.
The
non-cash charges for compensation consist mainly of the grants of stock as a
result of the reverse merger with Semotus Solutions, Inc., and of warrants
issued as part of financing loans. The common stock issued was valued at its
fair market value at the date of issuance.
OTHER
INCOME (EXPENSE)
The
$231,029 for the three months ended December 31, 2008 and $12,655 for the six
months ended December 31, 2008 in other expense is comprised mainly from the
expense related to accrued interest on the convertible and promissory notes, as
well as the amortization of the debt discounts related to those notes. The other
component is exchange gains and losses from currency transactions in the Euro
and U.S. dollar. There was no other income or expense for the three and six
months ended December 31, 2007.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overall
cash decreased by $638,392 for the six months ended December 31, 2008 due to a
continued loss from operations, purchases of equipment for the wholesale call
platform, and the reverse merger with Semotus. We were able to cover some of the
cash loss through proceeds from convertible and promissory note issuances. Cash
increased $246,001 for the six months ended December 31, 2007 due mainly to
financing from Flint Telecom Ltd. which offset the operating losses. The sources
and uses of cash are summarized as follows (unaudited):
Six
Months Ended
December
31,
2008
2007
Cash
used in operating activities
$ (2,228,501)
$ (859,541)
Cash
used in investing activities
(246,396)
--
Cash
provided by financing activities
2,106,077
1,105,542
Cash
used in foreign currency activities
(269,571)
--
--------------------
--------------------
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
$ (638,392)
$ 246,001
During
the six months ended December 31, 2008, cash used in operating activities from
continuing operations consisted principally of an operating loss of $9,694,544
resulting from a gross loss of $338,587 and operating expenses of $8,182,348.
The loss included non cash charges for stock and option compensation and
impairment of goodwill of $3,045,249 and $2,538,148, respectively. Other
non-cash expenses were depreciation and amortization of $947,735 and a loss on
the purchase of notes of $174,956.
Other
operating activities that increased cash were a decline in accounts receivable
of $53,971, an increase in accounts payable of $343,692, of accrued liabilities
of $29,361, of accrued interest of $396,525 and deferred revenue of
$38,388.
During
the six months ended December 31, 2007, cash used in operating activities from
continuing operations consisted principally of an operating loss of $1,072,860
resulting from gross loss of $276,777 and operating expenses of $796,082. Other
operating activities contributing to the increase in cash were mainly decline in
accounts receivable of $63,389 and an increase in accounts payable of $212,802,
slightly offset by a decrease in accrued liabilities of $77,565.
During
the six months ended December 31, 2008, cash used in investing activities
consisted of $329,558 of purchases of telephony equipment and $83,162
for the cash assumed in the acquisition of Semotus Solutions. During the six
months ended December 31, 2007, no cash was used in or provided by investing
activities.
Cash
provided by financing activities for the six months ended December 31, 2008
consisted of the sale of short term promissory notes, which provided $2,507,000
in cash and convertible notes payable in the amount of $150,000, which was
offset by the repayment of some short term notes in the amount of $280,000, the
repayment of $166,585 due to Flint, Ltd., and payments of $79,065 on certain
lease obligations. Cash provided by financing activities for the six months
ended December 31, 2007 consisted principally of proceeds from convertible notes
issued of $150,000 and advances from Flint, Ltd. of $955,542.
$269,571
of cash was used in foreign currency transactions for the six months ended
December 31, 2008. There were no foreign currency transactions for the six
months ended December 31, 2007.
As of
December 31, 2008, we had cash and cash equivalents of $848,629, a decrease of
$638,392 from the balance at June 30, 2008, which was $1,487,021. Our
working capital deficit increased as of December 31, 2008 to ($8,395,627) as
compared to a working capital deficit of ($2,814,281) at June 30, 2008 . We have not yet
generated sufficient revenues to cover the costs of continued product and
service development and support, sales and marketing efforts and general and
administrative expenses.
We are
still largely dependent on financing in order to generate cash to maintain its
operations. We are currently investigating the capital markets for additional
financings. However, there is no assurance that any additional capital will be
raised. We closely monitor our cash position and our operating costs
in order to maintain an adequate level of cash.
We have a
capital lease for our telecom equipment for which future minimum lease payments
are $225,302 in fiscal 2009 and $450,605 in fiscal 2010. We have an
operating lease for our facility in New York, NY for which the future minimum
lease payments are $55,800 in fiscal 2009 and $93,000 in fiscal 2010. There are
no material commitments for capital expenditures at December 31,
2008.
RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Statement
No. 157
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued
Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”); SFAS 157 establishes
a formal framework for measuring fair value under GAAP. It defines
and codifies the many definitions of fair value included among various other
authoritative literature, clarifies and, in some instances, expands on the
guidance for implementing fair value measurements, and increases the level of
disclosure required for fair value measurements. Although SFAS 157
applies to and amends the provisions of existing FASB and AICPA pronouncements,
it does not, of itself, require any new fair value measurements, nor does it
establish valuation standards. SFAS 157 applies to all other
accounting pronouncements requiring or permitting fair value measurements,
except for; SFAS 123R, share-based payment and related pronouncements, the
practicability exceptions to fair value determinations allowed by various other
authoritative pronouncements, and AICPA Statements of Position 97-2 and 98-9
that deal with software revenue recognition. This statement is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We do not
believe that the adoption of SFAS 157 will have a material affect on our
financial statements.
Statement
No. 159
In
February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Liabilities”. This Statement permits entities to choose to
measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The
objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the
opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring
related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge
accounting provisions. The fair value option established by this
Statement permits all entities to choose to measure eligible items at fair value
at specified election dates. A business entity shall report unrealized gains and
losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings (or
another performance indicator if the business entity does not report earnings)
at each subsequent reporting date. This Statement is effective as of the
beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007.
We do not believe that the adoption of SFAS 159 will have a material affect on
our financial statements.
Statement
No. 141R
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(revised 2007), “Business
Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141R”),
which revises current purchase accounting guidance in SFAS No. 141,
“Business Combination s ”. SFAS No. 141R
requires most assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination
to be measured at their fair values as of the date of acquisition. SFAS
No. 141R also modifies the initial measurement and subsequent remeasurement
of contingent consideration and acquired contingencies, and requires that
acquisition related costs be recognized as expense as incurred rather than
capitalized as part of the cost of the acquisition. SFAS No. 141R is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and is to be
applied prospectively to business combinations occurring after adoption. The
impact of SFAS No. 141R on the Company’s consolidated financial statements
will depend on the nature and extent of the Company’s future acquisition
activities.
Statement
No. 160
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements – an Amendment of ARB No. 51”. This Statement
amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an
ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity
in the consolidated financial statements.
This
Statement changes the way the consolidated income statement is presented. It
requires consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that include the
amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest. It also
requires disclosure, on the face of
the
consolidated statement of income, of the amounts of consolidated net income
attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest. This statement is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We do not
believe that the adoption of SFAS 160 will have a material affect on our
financial statements.
Interpretation
No. 48
Financial
Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No 109, “Accounting for
Income Taxes (“FIN 48”)” is effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2006. FIN 48 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or
expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial
statements. Under FIN 48, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an
uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position
will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the
technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial
statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit
that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate
settlement. FIN 48 also provides guidance on de-recognition,
classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim
periods and requires increased disclosures. The Company is evaluating the
effects of FIN 48 for the 2008 fiscal year, but it does not believe that it has
a liability for unrecognized tax benefits.
Management
does not believe that there are any other recently-issued accounting
pronouncements, but not yet effective accounting standards, which could have a
material effect on the accompanying financial statements.
FORWARD
LOOKING STATEMENTS AND RISK FACTORS
This
report includes forward-looking statements relating to, among other things,
projections of future results of operations, our plans, objectives and
expectations regarding our future services and operations, and general industry
and business conditions applicable to us. We have based these forward-looking
statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. You
can find many of these forward-looking statements by looking for words such as
"may", "should", "believes", "expects", "anticipates", "estimates", "intends",
"projects", "goals", "objectives", or similar expressions in this document or in
documents incorporated herein. These forward-looking statements are subject to a
number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those in such forward-looking statements. Such
risks, uncertainties and assumptions include, but are not limited to, our
limited operating history, our historical losses, our ability to secure
additional sources of finance, our ability to adapt to rapid technological
changes and the other factors that we describe in the section entitled "Risk
Factors" in the Form 10KSB for the year ended March 31, 2008. We claim the
protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Text extracted from the filing as submitted to EDGAR. Formatting, tables and exhibits are simplified for reading; the original document is authoritative for anything you rely on.