12 unchanged sentences
Defendant Youyong Zou has satisfied the judgment of $5,000 (plus interest) against him in lieu of appealing that judgment.
−Removed: On September 15, 2022, Pegasystems filed a notice of appeal, and on February 6, 2023, Pegasystems filed its opening brief with the Court of Appeals of Virginia.
−Removed: Appian expects to file its responsive brief in March 2023, to which Pegasystems will file a reply brief.
−Removed: After submission of the reply brief, the timeline of the case is solely within the control of the Court of Appeals until it rules.
+Added: On September 15, 2022, Pegasystems filed a notice of appeal to the Court of Appeals of Virginia.
+Added: Both sides have submitted their respective appeal briefs to the Court of Appeals, and the Court held a hearing on the appeal on November 15, 2023.
+Added: The timeline of the case is solely within the control of the Court of Appeals until it rules.
Pegasystems is not required to pay us the judgment, attorney’s fees, or post-judgment interest until all appeals are exhausted.
−Removed: We cannot predict the outcome of any appeals or the time it will take to resolve them.
+Added: We cannot predict the outcome of any appeals or the exact time it will take to resolve them.
Consistent with other judgments, there is no guarantee we will be able to collect all or any portion of the judgment.
6 unchanged sentences
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.