What changed in this filing

/stocks — the workspaceLOADING

Item 1A. Risk Factors

2021-11-08 compared with 2021-08-09 · 38 added, 8 removed, 26 unchanged (64% of the section changed)

11 unchanged sentences

The Army included AMU and APU on the list of institutions that had taken the steps necessarily to support enrollment of students through the new system, and on July 19, 2021, the ArmyIgnitED system went live for soldiers seeking to use TA for courses at APUS.

There is no assurance that the new portal will work correctly or efficiently or will not have other impacts on soldiers’ ability to participate in the TA programs or receive funds under those programs.

While the transition did not adversely affect registrations and revenue for the quarter ended March 31, 2021, there was an adverse impact on registrations and revenue for the quarter ending June 30, 2021, and we expect the impact to continue for the quarter ending September 30, 2021.

We continue to experience challenges related to system performance, process changes and software defects, and there is no assurance that the new portal will ever work correctly or efficiently or will not have continuing impacts on soldiers’ ability to participate in the TA programs or receive funds under those programs.

There was an adverse impact on registrations and revenue for the quarters ended June 30, 2021 and September 30, 2021, and we expect some impact to continue for the remainder of 2021.

The inability of soldiers to participate in TA programs, or continued or additional limitations on their ability to apply and participate, would have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition, particularly because soldiers make up the largest group of TA participants at APUS.

1 unchanged sentence

As a result, it is possible that we could incur bad debt expenses if soldiers who expect to receive TA do not receive it and do not otherwise pay the tuition for their courses.

The disruption to the Army’s systems has also adversely impacted APUS’s ability to invoice the Army for Army registrations and has adversely impacted accounts receivable, and may impact future registrations, revenue and accounts receivable balances and cash flow from operations.

The disruption to the Army’s systems has also adversely impacted APUS’s ability to invoice the Army for Army registrations and has adversely impacted accounts receivable, and may continue to impact future registrations, revenue and accounts receivable balances and cash flow from operations.

Moderating demand for our programs as a result of the abatement of the COVID-19 pandemic could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

In 2020, we experienced an increase in net course registrations at APUS and an increase in student enrollment at HCN.

We believe the increase in net course registrations at APUS was in part due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and that the increase in student enrollment at HCN was due in part to an increase in demand for nursing education and a change in the competitive environment due to COVID-19.

There is no assurance that the increases will be sustained, and as the COVID-19 pandemic abates, we believe near-term demand for our programs could moderate further.

In 2020, we experienced an increase in net course registrations at APUS and an increase in student enrollment at HCN, and Rasmussen University similarly experienced an increase in its enrollments.

We believe the increase in net course registrations at APUS was in part due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and that the increase in student enrollment at Rasmussen University and HCN was due in part to an increase in demand for nursing education and a change in the competitive environment due to COVID-19.

There is no assurance that the increases will be sustained, and recent trends at APUS and Rasmussen University show a moderation in registration and enrollments.

As the COVID-19 pandemic abates, we believe near-term demand for our programs could moderate further.

Rasmussen University is currently on provisional certification with the Department of Education, including because of the recent Rasmussen Acquisition, and the terms of that provisional certification could limit its potential for growth.

In July 2021, ED notified Rasmussen University that in connection with Rasmussen University’s March 2019 change in ownership, ED was imposing certain temporary growth restrictions on the institution, which include maintaining limitations on new programs and locations that were already in place and imposing a cap on the number of students that participate in Title IV programs that can be enrolled.

Additionally, ED continued to require Rasmussen University to submit periodic financial and enrollment reports, a requirement that it had imposed on RU in connection with the financial responsibility letter of credit previously imposed on Rasmussen University.

On September 9, 2021, Rasmussen University timely submitted a change in ownership and control application to ED seeking approval to participate in the Title IV programs under our ownership.

ED and Rasmussen University entered into a Temporary Provisional Program Participation Agreement, or TPPPA, effective as of October 14, 2021, that allows Rasmussen University to continue disbursing Title IV funds during the period of ED’s review of the change in ownership application.

The TPPPA continues the growth restrictions that ED imposed as a result of the March 2019 change in ownership, including the same enrollment cap.

The TPPPA specifies that after ED reviews and accepts financial statements and compliance audits that cover one complete fiscal year of RU’s Title IV participation under APEI’s ownership, RU may seek to have the enrollment cap removed and may seek approval for new programs that replace current programs.

The TPPPA also specifies that at least until after ED reviews and accepts financial statements and compliance audits that cover the second complete fiscal year of RU’s Title IV participation under APEI’s ownership, RU must seek pre-approval for new locations, new programs that are not replacing current programs, and other changes.

These growth restrictions could limit or adversely affect Rasmussen University’s growth opportunities, including restricting its ability to serve additional students, particularly additional nursing students, and limiting its ability to continue to evolve to address current needs by providing new or changed programs.

The growth restrictions could also have an adverse effect on our ability to grow revenues or meet investors’ and financial analysts’ expectations for financial performance.

In addition, if ED were to determine that an institution is unable to meet its responsibilities while it is provisionally-certified, as Rasmussen and APUS currently are, ED can seek to revoke an institutions’ certification to participate in Title IV programs with fewer due process protections than if they were fully-certified.

Limitations on our institutions’ operations could, and the loss of our institutions’ certification to participate in Title IV programs would adversely affect our institutions’ enrollments, and our revenue and results of operations.

Congressional and administrative examination of for-profit institutions has resulted in and could result in further legislative and regulatory changes that may materially and adversely affect our business.

ARPA modifies the 90/10 Rule to require that a for-profit institution derive not less than 10% of its revenue from sources other than “federal education assistance funds.” Prior to going into effect, the provisions of ARPA related to the 90/10 Rule are required to go through a negotiated rulemaking process.

An ED final rule to implement the ARPA provision is not expected to go into effect until July 1, 2023 at the earliest, and we cannot predict to what extent ARPA and the final rule will affect us and our institutions.

An ED final rule to implement the ARPA provision is not expected to go into effect until July 1, 2023 for the full year ending December 31, 2023 at the earliest, and we cannot predict to what extent ARPA and the final rule will affect us and our institutions.

ARPA does not define “federal education assistance funds”.

2 unchanged sentences

This change, and any resulting actions we take to adjust the operations of our institutions to comply with the rule, could have a material adverse impact on the financial condition and operations of our institutions.

We also cannot predict the likelihood that Congress or the President will continue to modify the 90/10 Rule with respect to relevant sources of funds or other aspects of the calculation.

We cannot predict the likelihood that Congress or the President will continue to modify the 90/10 Rule with respect to relevant sources of funds or other aspects of the calculation.

For example, in recent years Congress has considered various other proposals that would modify the 90/10 Rule, including proposals to decrease the limit on Title IV funds from 90% to 85%.

2 unchanged sentences

To the extent that any additional laws or regulations, including regulations under ARPA, are adopted that limit or condition the participation of for-profit schools or distance education programs in TA or in Title IV programs, or that limit or condition the amount of TA for which for-profit schools or distance education programs are eligible to receive, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

We also cannot predict whether ED’s negotiated rulemaking process to address borrower defenses to repayment, public service student loan forgiveness programs, mandatory pre-dispute arbitration and prohibition of class-action lawsuits, among other issues, will result in regulatory changes that would harm our business.

These regulatory changes have the potential to materially and adversely affect our financial conditions and results of operations.

Finally, in October 2021, in what it termed a broad-based initiative to deter for-profit college fraud, the Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, issued informational notices to 70 for-profit higher education institutions, including APUS and Rasmussen University, informing them of certain marketing practices the FTC had previously determined to be deceptive or unfair and therefore unlawful under the FTC Act.

The informational notices were sent in furtherance of an FTC Act provision permitting penalties against those engaging in unfair or deceptive acts or practices with actual knowledge of their unfair or deceptive nature.

The informational notices informed the institutions that engaging in such practices could subject a company to civil penalties under that provision.

By providing the informational notices, the FTC is able to document that the institutions have knowledge that the FTC has found these marketing practices to be unfair or deceptive.

The FTC also announced that it would be enhancing its enforcement cooperation with other agencies with oversight of educational institutions, including ED’s Office of Student Aid and the Department of Veterans Affairs.

In addition, on October 6, 2021, ED announced that it had restored an Office of Enforcement within ED’s Office of Federal Student Aid to strengthen oversight of and enforcement actions against postsecondary institutions that participate in federal student loan, grant, and work-study programs.

Any civil penalties or enforcement actions could have a material and adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations

A failure of HCN to satisfy ABHES accreditation standards, including specific student achievement indicators, could have a material adverse impact on HCN’s student enrollment and our and HCN’s revenue, cash flows, and results of operations.

ABHES annually reviews student achievement indicators, including retention rate, placement rate, and licensing and credentialing examination pass rate.

Under ABHES policy, ABHES may withdraw accreditation at any time if it determines that an institution fails to demonstrate at least a 70% retention rate for each program, a 70% placement rate for each program, and a 70% pass rate on mandatory licensing and credentialing examinations, or fails to meet state-mandated results for credentialing or licensure.

Alternatively, ABHES may in its discretion provide an opportunity for a program to come into compliance within a period of time specified by ABHES, and ABHES may extend the period for achieving compliance if a program demonstrates improvement over time or other good cause.

For the reporting year ended June 30, 2021, several HCN programs did not satisfy ABHES’s threshold requirements for retention rates.

If any HCN campus or program fails to satisfy ABHES achievement measures, enrollment in such HCN campus or program could decline, or we could be forced to cease enrollments at that campus or in that program, which could have a material adverse impact on HCN’s student enrollment and our and HCN’s revenue, cash flows, and results of operations.

The actions HCN takes to comply with ABHES requirements may not be successful in resolving existing issues and, if those actions are targeted at specific campuses or programs, may fail to prevent additional issues arising with respect to those or other campuses or programs.

Similarly, even if HCN is successful in the long term in complying with these standards, the actions HCN takes to comply could result in increased costs or decreased enrollments, and impairment of goodwill.

Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.

What changed 10-Q

Item 1A. Risk Factors