What changed in this filing

/stocks — the workspaceLOADING

Item 1. Business

2021-03-09 compared with 2020-03-10 · 628 added, 529 removed, 711 unchanged (62% of the section changed)

American Public Education, Inc., or APEI, provides online and on-campus postsecondary education to approximately 82,600 students through two wholly owned institutions.

American Public Education, Inc., or APEI, provides online and on-campus postsecondary education to approximately 92,500 students through two subsidiary institutions.

In this Annual Report, “we,” “our,” “us,” “the Company” and similar terms refer to APEI and its educational institutions of higher learning collectively unless the context indicates otherwise.

2 unchanged sentences

COMPANY OVERVIEW

APEI seeks to maximize a student’s return on their educational investment.

Our institutions of higher learning offer programs designed to help students advance in their current occupation, or prepare for their next career, and develop the competencies that enable them to make meaningful contributions to their profession and society.

We seek to maximize a student’s return on their educational investment, which we call Higher Ed Return on Investment or “HEROI TM ”.

Our institutions of higher learning offer programs designed to prepare individuals for productive contributions to their profession and society and to offer opportunities that may advance students in their current professions or help them prepare for their next career.

Our institutions are:

10 unchanged sentences

As of December 31, 2020, approximately 61% of APUS’s students self-reported that they served in the military on active duty at the time of initial enrollment and approximately 13% of APUS’s students self-reported being a military veteran.

National Education Seminars, Inc., which we refer to as Hondros College of Nursing, or HCN, which provides nursing education to approximately 1,600 students at five campuses in Ohio in the suburban areas of Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, Dayton, and Toledo.

In the second quarter of 2020, HCN will begin offering classes at an additional campus in Indianapolis, Indiana.

HCN serves the needs of local nursing and healthcare communities and addresses the persistent supply-demand gap of nurses that is evident nation-wide.

HCN offers a Diploma in Practical Nursing, or PN, and an Associate Degree in Nursing, or ADN.

In October 2019, HCN began offering a new Direct Entry ADN option that offers an accelerated graduation pathway for students who transfer at least 32 college credits to HCN and meet certain academic and entrance exam requirements.

Portions of the PN and ADN Programs are online.

HCN is institutionally accredited by the Accrediting Bureau for Health Education Schools, or ABHES, and HCN’s locations and programs are approved by the Ohio State Board of Career Colleges and Schools, or the Ohio State Board.

HCN’s PN and ADN Programs are approved by the Ohio Board of Nursing, or OBN, and the PN Program is accredited by the National League for Nursing Commission for Nursing Education Accreditation, or NLN CNEA.

HCN has also obtained or is in the process of obtaining all necessary approvals to offer postsecondary nursing education programs in connection with a new campus in Indianapolis, Indiana.

The campus has been authorized by the Indiana Board for Proprietary Education/Indiana Commission for Higher Education to offer instruction in Indiana.

The Indiana State Board of Nursing has voted to grant initial accreditation and authorize the admission of

the first cohort of students in the PN Program at the Indianapolis campus, where classes will begin in the second quarter of 2020.

• National Education Seminars, Inc., which we refer to as Hondros College of Nursing, or HCN, which provides nursing education to approximately 2,100 students at five campuses in Ohio in the suburban areas of Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, Dayton, and Toledo and, beginning in April 2020, to students enrolled at a campus in Indianapolis, Indiana.

In April 2021, HCN will begin offering classes at a new campus in Akron, Ohio.

HCN serves the needs of local nursing and healthcare communities and addresses the persistent supply-demand gap for nurses that is evident nation-wide.

HCN offers a Diploma in Practical Nursing, or PN, an Associate Degree in Nursing, or ADN, and a Direct Entry ADN option that offers an accelerated graduation pathway for students who meet certain transfer , academic and entrance exam requirements.

Portions of the PN and ADN Programs are taught online.

Upon completion of the PN and ADN programs, our HCN students are eligible to take the NCLEX-PN® and NCLEX-RN® exams, respectively, that are administered by National Council Licensure Exams for the licensing of nurses in the United States, Canada, and Australia.

HCN is institutionally accredited by the Accrediting Bureau for Health Education Schools, or ABHES.

HCN’s Ohio locations and programs are approved by the Ohio State Board of Career Colleges and Schools, or the Ohio State Board, the Ohio Board of Nursing, or OBN, and the PN Program is accredited by the National League for Nursing Commission for Nursing Education Accreditation, or NLN CNEA.

In April 2020, HCN began classes for the first cohort of students enrolled in the PN Program at HCN’s new campus in Indianapolis, Indiana.

The Indiana Board for Proprietary Education/Indiana Commission for Higher Education has authorized HCN to offer instruction at its campus in Indiana, and the Indiana State Board of Nursing granted initial accreditation and authorized the admission of the first cohort of students.

HCN has also notified NLN CNEA of the opening of the Indianapolis campus.

While NLN CNEA approval is not required to begin classes, NLN CNEA may accept the notification or take other actions, such as requesting follow-up information or imposing conditions.

We expect a response from NLN CNEA prior to the beginning of classes.

NLN CNEA approval was not required to begin classes.

In January 2021, NLN CNEA completed a virtual focused site visit at HCN’s Indianapolis campus.

Based upon the outcome of this focused site visit, NLN CNEA notified HCN that accreditation was granted to HCN’s PN program effective January 13, 2021.

On October 28, 2020, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire Rasmussen University, a nursing- and health sciences-focused institution serving over 18,000 students at its 24 campuses across six states and online, which we refer to as the Rasmussen Acquisition.

Pursuant to the terms of a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, we agreed to purchase from FAH Education, LLC, all of the units of membership interests in Rasmussen LLC, Rasmussen University’s parent company, for $300 million in cash and $29 million in shares of a new series of non-voting preferred stock to be issued at the closing of the Rasmussen Acquisition (or, at our election, up to an additional $29 million in cash in lieu thereof), subject to customary adjustments, including for net working capital, cash and debt of the acquired companies.

The Rasmussen Acquisition is expected to close in the third quarter of 2021, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of closing conditions that include, among others, regulatory review by ED, approval by the HLC, and approval by or notices to other regulatory and accrediting bodies.

We are relying on the availability of financing under a commitment letter for debt financing, or alternative financing, to fund a portion of the purchase price for the Rasmussen Acquisition.

For additional information regarding this transaction, please refer to “– Regulatory Environment – Regulatory Actions and Restrictions on Operations – Rasmussen Acquisition Regulatory Review,” “Risk Factors – Risks Related to Our Business,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Overview – Rasmussen Acquisition,” and “Note 3.

Acquisition Activity” included in our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report.

Reporting Segments

4 unchanged sentences

This segment reflects the operational activities of HCN.

Our consolidated revenue for the year ended December 31, 2019 decreased 3.8% to $286.3 million from $297.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 .

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2019 decreased 60.9% to $10.0 million from $25.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 .

Financial information regarding each of our reporting segments, including information regarding segment revenue, net income, and total assets for each of the last three fiscal years, can be found in our Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Annual Report.

Additional financial information is reported in this Annual Report in “Selected Financial Data,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

In November 2018, HLC approved APUS’s application for a change in structure related to APUS’s proposal to enter into a shared services model with APEI.

We subsequently entered into an intercompany agreement to implement the shared services model.

As required by HLC policy, HLC conducted a focused site visit in May 2019.

The site visit team found that evidence of compliance with APUS’s commitments made in its application and with HLC’s Eligibility Requirements Criteria for Accreditation was sufficiently demonstrated and no further follow up was recommended.

In August 2019, HLC notified APUS that the Institutional Actions Council of the HLC, which conducts reviews and takes action on accreditation recommendations, concurred with the site visit team’s findings.

Our consolidated revenue for the year ended December 31, 2020 increased 12.4% to $321.8 million from $286.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2020 increased 88.0% to $18.8 million from $10.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Additional financial information is reported in this Annual Report in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

COVID-19 Pandemic

On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the novel coronavirus COVID-19 a global pandemic and recommended containment and mitigation measures worldwide.

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in widespread disruptions in higher education, particularly with respect to institutions that engage in on-ground delivery of education, and a number of related regulatory developments.

In March 2020, in response to the pandemic, we implemented our business continuity plan, at APEI and APUS, and employees not already remote transitioned to a remote workforce.

APUS saw no interruption in academic instruction due to this transition.

HCN, leveraging the expertise of APUS, temporarily closed all its campuses without interruption to student academic progression and then shifted to a blended model with online delivery of its courses and on-campus delivery of certain labs.

HCN later fully reopened its campuses, using smaller in person classes with screening, social distancing, and masking requirements while continuing to offer courses in a virtual setting for those that prefer remote course learning, but reverted to online courses and limited on-campus labs in November 2020 following spikes in COVID-19 cases in Ohio.

In addition, in October 2020, HCN began temporarily expanding certain campuses through short-term leases of additional space to be used as lab space in order to accommodate student demand and in compliance with COVID-related public health measures that effectively limit the number of students in each lab class.

Despite these challenges, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, APUS experienced an increase in net course registrations, which we believe may have been due in part to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and HCN experienced an increase in new student

enrollment, which we believe was due in part to an increase in demand for nursing education and a change in the competitive environment due to COVID-19.

For more information on the impacts of COVID-19 on our business and related risks, please refer to the sections entitled “Risk Factors – Risks Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this Annual Report.

On March 27, 2020, Ohio enacted a COVID-19 emergency relief law that allows individuals who have successfully completed a nursing education program approved by OBN to receive a temporary license to practice as an RN or LPN before taking the NCLEX.

Graduates of OBN-approved nursing education programs, such as HCN’s programs, were permitted to apply for a temporary license that was valid until March 1, 2021, at which time it expired.

In March 2020, Congress passed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, or the CARES Act, in response to COVID-19 and its related effects.

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, many higher education institutions shifted to distance learning as campuses shut down as a result of the public health emergency.

The CARES Act includes provisions designed to provide relief to higher education institutions in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic.

The CARES Act created the Higher Education Emergency Relief Fund, or HEERF, that includes $12.6 billion in funding for higher education institutions.

The CARES Act authorizes ED to allocate funding based on a statutory formula that accounts for the relative share of full-time students who are Pell Grant recipients.

Students who were enrolled exclusively in distance education courses prior to the COVID-19 emergency are excluded from this calculation and, therefore, wholly online institutions were not eligible to receive an allocation of funding under the HEERF.

ED allocated $3.1 million for HCN and in May 2020, HCN received its HEERF allocation, 100% of which was subsequently disbursed to eligible students.

No allocation of HEERF funds was made to APUS by ED.

The CARES Act requires recipient institutions to use at least 50% of their HEERF funds to provide emergency grants to students for expenses related to the disruption of campus operations due to COVID-19.

The CARES Act also permits institutions to use up to 50% of their HEERF funds to cover any costs associated with significant changes to the delivery of instruction due to COVID-19, so long as such costs do not include payment to contractors for the provision of pre-enrollment recruitment activities, endowments, or capital outlays associated with facilities related to athletics, sectarian instruction, or religious worship.

Although HCN incurred costs to shift its operations and delivery of instruction in light of COVID-19, it chose to distribute its entire HEERF allocation directly to eligible students.

By June 30, 2020, HCN had distributed its entire allocation of $3.1 million in HEERF funds to eligible students.

HCN has timely made required reports regarding use of its HEERF allocation under the CARES Act.

The CARES Act also includes waivers of certain Higher Education Act provisions related to the federal student financial aid programs in order to provide regulatory flexibility to institutions in connection with COVID-19-related disruptions.

The CARES Act modifies processes related to the return of unearned Title IV funds in connection with student withdrawals during the COVID-19 pandemic, extends time limits for Pell Grants and Direct Loans as a result of withdrawals during this period, allows for flexibility in measuring the satisfactory academic progress of students, and permits institutions to continue making federal work study payments to students who can no longer meet work study obligations during the pandemic.

In December 2020, Congress passed the omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, or the CAA, which included the Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act, or the CRRSAA, which contained several education-related provisions.

The CRRSAA appropriated an additional $22.7 billion for the HEERF to be distributed to higher education institutions.

The CRRSAA allocation formula differs from the CARES Act formula in several ways, including new allocations for institutions on the basis of the number of students enrolled exclusively in distance education.

Under this formula, ED allocated approximately $600,000 for APUS and $2.0 million for HCN.

Each institution has until April 15, 2021, to accept its allocation.

The CRRSAA places limitations on the expenditure of funds that were not applicable to CARES Act funds.

Specifically, the CRRSAA requires proprietary institutions to spend their entire new HEERF allocation on direct financial aid grants.

The CRRSAA further specifies that institutions should provide grants based on financial need, with special emphasis on grants to students eligible for Pell Grants.

However, the CRRSAA is also more flexible than the CARES Act in that it explicitly authorizes the allocation of financial aid grants to students enrolled in distance education.

The CAA also includes additional provisions related to higher education.

Relevant changes include an increase in the maximum Pell Grant for the 2021-2022 award year and significant shortening of the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA).

ED has issued several guidance documents regarding the appropriate use of HEERF funds and related reporting requirements and regarding regulatory flexibility in the administration of federal student aid as a result of challenges related to COVID-19.

These guidance documents provide institutions further information on allowable practices for the administration of federal work study, measurement of satisfactory academic progress, and proper return of unearned federal student aid to ED.

ED has also extended a temporary freeze on payments and interest for federal student loans until at least September 30, 2021.

We cannot predict the extent to which the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic or related regulatory activity or legislative may impact us or our institutions.

Postsecondary Education Market Characteristics

The postsecondary education market in the United States is large (with over 4,500 institutions), diverse in its business models, and fragmented such that no one institution has a significant market share.

Most postsecondary institutions, including for-profit postsecondary institutions, regardless of where they are located, how they are organized, and who they serve, face significant challenges, including:

Most postsecondary institutions, including for-profit postsecondary institutions, regardless of where they are located, how they are organized, or who they serve, face significant challenges, including:

• Enrollment Declines:

In the United States, student enrollment declined in the fall of 2019 by 1.3% at postsecondary institutions participating in Title IV programs and 2.1% among four-year for-profit institutions, as compared to the same period the previous year.

In the United States, student enrollment declined in the fall of 2020 by 2.5% at postsecondary institutions participating in the student financial aid programs authorized under Title IV of the HEA, or Title IV programs, as compared to the same period the previous year.

Although four-year for-profit institution student enrollment increased 5.3% in the fall of 2020, this follows declines in prior years.

• Affordability:

There is a continued focus on the cost of a college education and a resulting impact on access as well as on the high level of college student indebtedness.

Postsecondary institutions face questions from lawmakers, the media, potential students and others about the quality of academic programs.

Competition exists from lower cost alternatives and from non-traditional competitors, such as those offering competency-based education, or CBE, programs, coding bootcamps, credentialing programs, micro-credentials, corporate training and other alternative educational paths.

Postsecondary institutions face questions from lawmakers, the media, potential students, and others about the quality of academic programs, and face additional questions in light of the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on postsecondary education.

• Competition:

Challenges exist regarding the ability to translate the value of a postsecondary education into economic mobility.

Postsecondary institutions must prepare students with relevant skills to work in new and rapidly changing industries and respond to technological change and need to support employers in efforts to optimize and advance their workforce.

Accessibility:

Postsecondary institutions must prepare students with relevant skills to work in new and rapidly changing industries, respond to technological change, and support employers in efforts to optimize and advance their workforce.

• Flexibility:

Postsecondary institutions must address the needs of students who are balancing education with other demands on their time.

• Technological Demands:

Rapidly evolving technology is transforming the education industry in ways that were unpredictable even at the beginning of 2020.

This transformation has been accelerated by the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, which has forced institutions, their employees and their students to adapt to widespread remote learning and has challenged institutions in particular to do so effectively, efficiently and securely.

Despite these challenges, postsecondary institutions, and the credentials they grant, have an important role to play in enabling social and economic mobility.

According to the U.S.

Bureau of Labor Statistics, occupations that require a postsecondary credential are projected to grow at a faster rate through 2026 than those that do not require a postsecondary education, and most of the fastest-growing occupations will need postsecondary education.

Institutions who predominantly serve adult learners must address the particular needs of that population.

Occupations that require a postsecondary credential have been projected by the U.S.

Bureau of Labor Statistics to grow at a faster rate through 2026 than those that do not require a postsecondary education, and most of the fastest-growing occupations will need postsecondary education.

Institutions that predominantly serve adult learners must address the particular needs of that population.

According to the Lumina Foundation, approximately 38% of students enrolled in U.S.

6 unchanged sentences

• only 19 percent of these adults reported that they were no longer interested in completing or did not need to complete their education;

cost and time pressures continued to be barriers that keep people from re-enrolling.

Opportunities for APU

employers are increasingly reporting significant gaps between required job skills and the current capabilities of their workforce.

In a 2019 survey on behalf of CareerBuilder, the Harris Poll found that 50% of human resource managers surveyed had jobs they could not fill because they could not find qualified talent.

Working adults also recognize the need to be lifelong learners.

Udemy’s 2018 Skills Gap Report found that 84% of workers surveyed said that they believe there is a skills gap in the U.S.

and 72% thought skills needed for their jobs would change.

The makeup of the labor market is also contributing to the need for more skilled workers.

High-skill occupations, defined as those where at least 80% of online job postings for that position request a bachelor’s degree or higher, have 25% more openings than available workers, according to Burning Glass Technologies’ report Different Skills, Different Gaps:

Measuring & Closing the Skills Gap, March 2018.

This report also noted a need for improved alignment between educators and employers, and a rapidly changing labor market.

We believe a growing number of employers and professional associations will seek partnerships with academic institutions to advance the skills and productivity of their workforce through higher education and training programs.

Opportunities for AMU

With nearly 2.2 million active duty military and reservists, we believe the U.S.

• cost and time pressures continued to be barriers preventing these adults from re-enrolling.

Opportunities

Opportunities for APUS

With nearly 2.2 million active duty military and reservists, the U.S.

military community will continue to be an important market segment for online education.

2 unchanged sentences

As part of their longstanding tradition, military leaders often encourage service members to use their earned education benefits, and to enhance their qualifications, for purposes of the military’s compensation, promotion, assignment, and performance systems.

The Department of Defense, or DoD, uniform tuition assistance program offers active duty, National Guard and reserve component service members a variety of education and financial aid options.

The Department of Defense, or DoD, uniform tuition assistance program, or TA, offers active duty, National Guard and reserve component service members a variety of education and financial aid options.

Additionally, veterans (and certain service members) are entitled to educational benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs, or VA.

1 unchanged sentence

military is demonstrating increased levels of support for credentials other than degrees.

Credentialing Opportunities On-Line, or COOL, is a program from each of the military branches that links experience with certification.

Credentialing Opportunities Online, or COOL, is a program for each of the military branches and DoD civilians that links experience with certification.

While benefits vary by service, service members may be eligible for assistance in paying for certifications, including by vouchers, reimbursement, or grants.

Students must meet certain eligibility requirements in order to receive credentialing assistance, including in some cases service time, experience and DoD tuition assistance eligibility requirements.

The Army is now offering an expanded credentialing program called the Army Credentialing Assistance Program, or CA.

CA is a program designed to support soldiers who wish to pursue civilian credentials, licenses, and certifications that lead directly to a specific job, particularly in areas outside of a soldier’s Military Occupational Specialty (MOS).

Students must meet certain eligibility requirements in order to receive credentialing assistance, including in some cases service time, experience, and eligibility requirements for military tuition assistance, or TA, benefit programs.

The Army offers an expanded credentialing program called the Army Credentialing Assistance Program, or CA.

CA is a program designed to support soldiers who wish to pursue civilian credentials, licenses, and certifications that may lead directly to a specific job, particularly in areas outside of a soldier’s Military Occupational Specialty (MOS).

Through CA, soldiers can receive reimbursement for fees associated with qualifying programs listed on Army COOL.

The US Army began a limited user test for CA at Fort Hood, Texas, in September 2018, expanded the test in 2019, and began an Army-wide implementation in January 2020.

APUS became an approved training provider for CA programs in October 2019.

We believe other service branches may

follow the Army’s example or pursue other approaches to enhancing support for credentialing.

Students in the Army may use both DoD tuition assistance and credentialing assistance for CA, subject to a combined cap on benefit amounts.

We believe that military veterans represent another important market segment for online education.

APUS became an approved training provider for CA programs in October 2019, while CA was in an expanded user test, and Army-wide implementation of CA began in January 2020.

We believe other service branches may follow the Army’s example or pursue other approaches to enhancing support for credentialing.

Students in the Army utilizing both TA and CA are subject to a combined cap on benefit amounts.

We believe that military veterans represent another important addressable market for online education.

Census Bureau estimated that there were 1.5 million veterans aged 18 to 34 and another 4.0 million veterans aged 35 to 54 in 2019.

Furthermore, of the 9.0 million veterans aged 18 to 64, approximately 77% are part of the labor force, but only approximately 29% have a bachelor’s degree or higher.

Of the 9.0 million veterans aged 18 to 64, approximately 77% were part of the labor force, but only approximately 29% had a bachelor’s degree or higher.

We believe that our military heritage, affordability, and online offerings are attractive to veterans in the pursuit of career advancement and employment outside of the military.

Veterans and their dependents pursuing a program of education on a more than half-time basis at an on-campus location are eligible for a monthly housing allowance equal to the basic allowance for housing available to service members who are at a military pay grade E-5, or $1,789 per month.

Veterans pursuing a program of education solely through distance education on a more than half-time basis are eligible to receive half of that monthly housing allowance, or $895 per month.

Elected and private-industry leaders are heavily promoting new policies and campaigns to facilitate the hiring of veterans, supporting a transition from military service to the workforce and stimulating demand for online education.

As these policies lower barriers to non-military jobs and facilitate veteran-owned businesses winning federal contracts, online universities offer valuable educational opportunities for veterans regardless of where they live, work, or learn.

Elected and private-industry leaders are heavily promoting new policies and campaigns to facilitate the hiring of veterans, supporting a transition from military service to the workforce.

As these policies lower barriers to non-military jobs and facilitate veteran-owned businesses, online universities offer valuable educational opportunities for veterans regardless of where they live, work, or learn.

More broadly, U.S.

employers are increasingly reporting significant gaps between required job skills and the current capabilities of their workforce.

In a 2019 survey on behalf of CareerBuilder, the Harris Poll found that 50% of human resource managers surveyed had jobs they could not fill because they could not find qualified talent.

Working adults also recognize the need to be lifelong learners.

Udemy’s 2019/2020 Global Skills Gap Report found that 83% of workers surveyed said that they believe there is a skills gap and 62% thought skills needed for their jobs would change.

The makeup of the labor market is also contributing to the need for more skilled workers.

This report also noted a need for improved alignment between educators and employers, and a rapidly changing labor market.

Opportunities for Hondros

On a national level, the expanding need for healthcare coupled with a nursing shortage is driving demand for nursing education.

Job opportunities for licensed practical nurses and registered nurses are expected to grow faster than the average growth for all occupations, or approximately 11%, between 2018 and 2028, according to the U.S.

Job opportunities for registered nurses and licensed practical nurses are expected to grow between approximately 7% and 9% annually from 2019 to 2029, faster than the average growth for all other occupations according to the U.S.

Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Occupational Outlook Handbook , 2020-21 Edition.

The demand for nurses in Ohio is similar to national demand:

job opportunities for licensed practical nurses and registered nurses in Ohio are expected to grow 9.5% and 14.2% through 2026, respectively, according to the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services’ 2026 Ohio Job Outlook report.

However, despite the anticipated growth in job opportunities, over 75,000 qualified applications were not accepted by entry-level baccalaureate and graduate nursing programs in 2018, according to a 2019 report from the American Association of Colleges of Nursing.

job opportunities for licensed practical nurses and registered nurses in Ohio are expected to grow between

approximately 9.5% and 14.2% annually from 2016 to 2026 according to the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services’ 2026 Ohio Job Outlook report.

However, despite the anticipated growth in job opportunities, over 80,000 qualified applications nationwide were not accepted by entry-level baccalaureate and graduate nursing programs in 2019, according to a 2020 report from the American Association of Colleges of Nursing.

These statistics suggest there may be unmet demand from qualified students for nursing educational programs.

Competition for APUS

Within the postsecondary education market, APUS competes primarily with not-for-profit, public and private two-year and four-year colleges as well as other for-profit schools, particularly those that offer online learning programs.

We believe APUS’s primary competitors include Arizona State University, Capella University, DeVry University, Grand Canyon University, Purdue Global, Southern New Hampshire University, Strayer University, University of Maryland Global Campus (formerly University of Maryland University College), University of Phoenix, and flagship and mid-size state universities offering degree programs online.

We believe that the competitive factors in the U.S.

We believe APUS’s primary competitors include Arizona State University, University of Arizona Global Campus (formerly Ashford University), Capella University, Grand Canyon University, Liberty University, Penn State University, Purdue Global, Southern New Hampshire University, Strayer University, University of Maryland Global Campus (formerly University of Maryland University College), University of Phoenix, and flagship and mid-size state universities offering degree programs online.

We believe the competitive factors in the U.S.

postsecondary education market include:

6 unchanged sentences

• level of support for student success;

• career counseling and placement services;

• reputation among prospective students, employers, and other stakeholders;

1 unchanged sentence

• track record of strong compliance.

HCN’s programs are offered as campus-based programs to residents in the geographic areas surrounding its campuses.

In these geographic areas, HCN competes with other schools offering similar programs, including for-profit and not-for-profit public and private colleges.

Because of its relatively local focus, HCN’s competitive environment is impacted by various factors that are specific not only to Ohio and Indiana but also to the particular areas of Ohio and Indiana where HCN’s campuses are located, including local supply and demand dynamics for nurses and nursing schools.

HCN’s results are therefore more susceptible to the actions of single competitors than the results of an institution that draws from a broader geographical area.

For example, a particularly effective or ineffective marketing approach by another school, or the opening or closing of another school, could have unanticipated detriments or benefits to HCN’s competitive position.

Due to the seventh straight annual enrollment decline in the United States our institutions could face increased competition as fewer students pursue degree-based postsecondary education.

Furthermore, we anticipate increased competition from postsecondary institutions as they continue to increase the number of online degree programs and develop more non-traditional programs for working adult students.

Due to the increase in online postsecondary offerings, which has accelerated as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, coupled with continued postsecondary enrollment declines in the United States, APUS could face increased competition as fewer students pursue degree-based postsecondary education from a wider selection of online offerings.

Furthermore, we anticipate increased competition from campus-based postsecondary institutions as they continue to increase the number of online degree programs and develop more non-traditional programs for working adult students.

Increased competition for college-ready students has led to an increase in the cost of advertising in certain marketing channels.

Continued increases in the cost of advertising may adversely impact our ability to attract our fair share of college-ready students and/or increase our student acquisition costs.

Continued increases in the cost of advertising may adversely impact our ability to attract college-ready students and/or increase our student acquisition costs.

Moreover, institutions who charge higher tuition than APUS are generally in a position to make larger investments in marketing, specifically in student acquisition.

In recent years, other providers have started providing non-traditional, credit-bearing, and non-credit-bearing education programs without charge or at a low cost, including:

institutions offering CBE programs, which permit students to control their own pace and progress in a program by demonstrating that they have achieved certain skills or knowledge rather than by earning credit hours;

• institutions offering competency-based education, or CBE, programs, which permit students to control their own pace and progress in a program by demonstrating that they have achieved certain skills or knowledge rather than by earning credit hours;

• non-traditional competitors, such as entities providing coding bootcamps and micro-credentials;

• non-traditional competitors that are partnering with universities to offer new alternative educational paths.

Increased availability of federal student financial aid for CBE programs could create additional competition and drive additional students toward non-traditional education programs.

In addition, regulatory changes have increased the availability of federal student financial aid for CBE programs and could create additional competition and drive additional students toward non-traditional education programs.

Most public institutions are aided by substantial government subsidies.

3 unchanged sentences

APUS has focused on serving the military community since its founding as AMU, and the military market continues to be the primary market for APUS.

Within the military market, there are more than 2,400 institutions that serve military students and receive funds through the DoD tuition assistance program.

Within the military market, there are more than 2,500 institutions that serve military students and receive funds through the DoD TA program.

The primary competitors for military students are other institutions offering online instruction, and colleges and universities offering on-campus instruction located near military installations.

Over the last several years, a number of APUS’s competitors have expanded their outreach and marketing efforts directed at active duty and reserve service members, as well as veterans.

We believe that APUS will continue to see increased competition in the military community from both not-for-profit and for-profit schools.

We believe that APUS will continue to see increased competition in the military community from both not-for-profit and for-profit schools as well as from the Armed Forces themselves.

For example, in March 2020, the Navy announced a new “Education Strategy for Seapower 2020” that is intended to be a new comprehensive education strategy.

As part of this strategy, the Navy, in cooperation with the U.S.

Marine Corps and the U.S.

Coast Guard, in January 2021 began piloting online courses for the new United States Naval Community College, a community college supporting naval education for enlisted service members, with plans to enroll as many as 5,000 students into targeted associate’s degree programs with partner colleges and universities in a second pilot phase beginning in 2022.

The Armed Forces may also begin offering distance learning through their own institutions.

As traditional not-for-profit public and private schools advance their online capabilities, they will present increasing levels of competition for APUS.

At the same time, we believe for-profit schools will continue to market to students eligible for DoD tuition assistance programs and VA education benefits, rather than ED’s Title IV programs, in an attempt to comply with an ED regulatory requirement known as the 90/10 Rule (a rule that imposes sanctions on participating institutions that derive more than 90% of their total revenue on a cash accounting basis from Title IV programs as calculated under ED’s regulations).

This regulatory requirement is described more fully below in “Regulatory Environment - Student Financing Sources and Related Regulations/Requirements - Department of Education - Regulation of Title IV Financial Aid Programs - The ‘90/10 Rule’.”

Within the non-military market, including service professionals, law enforcement personnel or other first responders, and other working adults with extended and irregular work schedules, APUS faces broad competition with not-for-profit public and private two-year and four-year colleges as well as other for-profit schools, particularly those that offer online learning programs.

Many of these competitors, whether for-profit, not-for-profit, or public, are also able to leverage their greater scale and size to more efficiently compete.

At the same time, we believe for-profit schools will continue to market to students eligible for TA and VA education benefits, rather than ED’s Title IV programs, in an attempt to comply with an ED regulatory requirement known as the 90/10 Rule (a rule that imposes sanctions on participating institutions that derive more than 90% of their total revenue on a cash accounting basis from Title IV programs as calculated under ED’s regulations).

This regulatory requirement and certain proposed changes are described more fully below in “Regulatory Environment - Student Financing Sources and Related Regulations/Requirements - Department of Education - Regulation of Title IV Financial Aid Programs - The ‘90/10 Rule’.” In addition, the Armed Forces have established, and may in the future establish, their own postsecondary education programs.

Competition for Hondros

Although HCN has shifted at times to online delivery of its courses and on-campus delivery of certain labs during the COVID-19 pandemic, HCN’s programs are typically offered as campus-based programs to residents in the geographic areas surrounding its campuses.

In these geographic areas, HCN competes with other schools offering similar programs, including for-profit and not-for-profit public and private colleges.

HCN’s results are therefore more susceptible to the actions of single competitors than the results of an institution that draws from a broader geographical area.

Competitive Strengths

2 unchanged sentences

• Affordable Tuition.

Affordable tuition has been a priority of APUS since its founding, when APUS set undergraduate tuition to align with tuition assistance programs available to members of the military.

Today, tuition at APUS remains among the lowest in the four-year for-profit sector.

Affordable tuition has been a priority of APUS since its founding.

APUS’s low tuition rates mean that its students are not required to take on as much debt as they might at another institution.

To support APUS’s active duty military students using TA, effective with courses beginning January 2020, APUS increased the tuition grant for those master’s students and their spouses and dependents.

As a result, undergraduate and master’s students who are eligible for TA benefits and their spouses and dependents will pay a net tuition of $250 per credit hour.

The combined tuition and fees at APUS are generally less expensive for undergraduate and graduate students than the average in-state cost at a public university.

APUS’s low tuition and fees, in combination with APUS’s tuition grants, and its book grant that is provided to all undergraduate students, and beginning in January 2020, active-duty military students and their spouses and dependents at the master’s level, result in significant savings for students.

APUS has provided approximately $140 million in book grant savings to undergraduate students since 2001, and will provide approximately $0.4 million to $0.6 million in book grant savings to graduate students in 2020.

Today, tuition at APUS remains among the lowest in the four-year for-profit sector.

To support APUS’s active duty military students using TA, APUS set undergraduate tuition to align with tuition assistance programs available to members of the military, and, effective with courses beginning January 2020, APUS increased its own tuition grant for those master’s students and their spouses and dependents using military TA.

As a result, undergraduate and master’s students who are eligible for TA benefits and their spouses and dependents will pay a net tuition of $250 per credit hour, which when combined with the APUS funded book grant means that active duty military utilizing TA may attain a degree at APUS for no out-of-pocket cost.

APUS’s low tuition and fees, in combination with APUS funded tuition grants and book grant provided to all undergraduate students, and beginning in

January 2020, active-duty military students and their spouses and dependents at the master’s level, result in significant savings for students.

Since 2001, APUS has provided approximately $144 million in books and materials savings to students from its APUS-funded book grant.

Tuition and fees at HCN are also designed to be affordable and competitive with those of similar institutions offering the same level of flexibility, accessibility, and student experience.

We believe that, given broad concerns about rising tuition and student loan debt in higher education, there are opportunities to create awareness and attract college-ready students with the primary message of affordability and value.

• Relevant Offerings Aligned with Student and Employer Demands.

2 unchanged sentences

Our institutions are committed to continually assessing and enhancing our academic programs and our student services to offer a high-quality education and facilitate successful outcomes for our students and graduates.

offers healthcare, technology, business, cybersecurity, nursing, and health information management programs;

offers a liberal arts curriculum that supports the development of the soft skills in demand by employers;

utilizes Industry Advisory Councils to evaluate its current curriculum and inform the career relevance of programs and degrees, which facilitates efforts to connect APUS’s curriculum to the industries and the students it serves and to deliver a high-quality academic product.

APUS offers healthcare, technology, business, cybersecurity, and health information management programs, offers a liberal arts curriculum that supports the development of critical thinking and soft skills in demand by employers, and utilizes Industry Advisory Councils to evaluate its current curriculum and inform the career relevance of programs and degrees, which facilitates efforts to connect APUS’s curriculum to the industries and the students it serves and to deliver a high-quality academic product.

Similarly, HCN focuses on educational relevance and excellence by hiring experienced nurses and other industry professionals as faculty members while enhancing student services to assist students with courses, labs, and clinical offerings.

1 unchanged sentence

HCN has invested in an innovative concept-based curriculum and simulation labs to enhance the student learning experience and improve student success.

As a pre-licensure educator, HCN creates new nurses to meet the significant imbalance of supply and demand that exists for nurses.

• Military Market Leader:

APUS traces its roots to AMU, which was founded in 1991 as a distance-learning, graduate-level institution for military officers seeking an advanced degree in military studies.

Since its founding, APUS has broadened its focus to include other military communities, veterans, and public service and service-minded communities, with a focus on a broad purpose of “educating those who serve.” Today, APUS is a market leader among active duty military professionals and is listed as the top provider of postsecondary education to active duty service members using DoD tuition assistance.

APUS is the top provider of education for the U.S.

military and veterans, based on the fiscal 2019 TA and VA recipient student enrollment data, as reported by Military Times.

As of December 31, 2020, approximately 61% of APUS’s students self-reported that they served in the military on active duty at the time of initial enrollment.

2 unchanged sentences

Our academic support offerings, from advising and mentoring to library services and career planning, are individualized to students’ needs, designed to support them at each step of their education journey in a format that works best for them.

Because students are located worldwide, APUS focuses on providing asynchronous, interactive education to students that fits their busy

Because students are located worldwide, APUS provides asynchronous, interactive education to students that fits their busy lives.

HCN offers programs that accommodate working adults by offering blended online and in-person courses for the PN and ADN Programs, as well as daytime and evening/weekend options at convenient campus locations.

Strategic Approach

In an effort to grow revenue and improve our financial performance, we are focused on accomplishing the following goals and have commissioned a growth study to help prioritize investments and actions:

Increase Enrollment at APUS.

Growing student enrollment at APUS while maintaining a high quality academic experience is a priority.

We aim to increase enrollment of new and returning college-ready students and further improving student retention and completion.

This includes improving enrollments from operational improvements in enrollment management, student-onboarding, student service, and marketing, including a planned marketing campaign focusing on affordability and return on investment learners.

Our efforts may also include seeking additional and expanding existing academic partnerships, with a focus on healthcare and community colleges, expanding our offerings, and launching new initiatives, including in the business-to-business space.

Maintain APUS’s Leading Position in the Military Market and Expand Our Presence in the Veteran Market.

The combination of our online model, market-focused curriculum, and outreach to military and veterans has enabled APUS to maintain a leadership position against more established institutions, many of which are traditional schools offering on-campus instruction that have served the military market for longer periods.

In an effort to continue to strengthen our position, we are taking strides to, among other things, work with military schoolhouses to better align APUS programs with military schoolhouse curriculum in order to maximize transfer credit.

In addition, our commitment to providing exceptional service and support to the military, military-affiliated, and veteran communities will increasingly require that we offer job-ready credentials and other non-degree offerings as a complement to degree programs, as evidenced by the US Army’s expansion of its credentialing assistance program.

Increase APUS’s Share of the Non-Military Market.

APUS’s programs are particularly responsive to learners in public service communities, including public safety, intelligence, and security professions.

Today’s adult learners, regardless of their specific career requirements, are looking for a highly tailored educational experience that prepares them for success.

We believe APUS’s academic offerings are attractive options for students seeking high quality, affordable, and flexible programs.

Utilize Innovative Education Technology.

At APUS, we provide a personalized online learning environment that leverages existing and proprietary technologies, as well as emerging technologies, for the purpose of enhancing student services, classroom instruction, learning outcomes, and the overall student experience.

We utilize various technologies to encourage student persistence and engagement with an emphasis on the mobile experience.

Our intention is to deliver a next-generation student experience from point of inquiry to graduation and beyond, leveraging enhanced levels of personalization in order to address student expectations informed by market-leading customer experiences online, while operating with agility and efficiency.

In 2019, we initiated an information technology transformation program focusing on specific information technology projects, including replacements of our learning management and customer relationship management systems, with the goal of improving service delivery to internal and external customers.

Add New Campus Locations and Programs at HCN.

Given the persistent gap between demand for nurses, and the supply of qualified graduates of nursing schools, we will continue to pursue both organic and inorganic growth opportunities for HCN.

In the second quarter of 2020, HCN will begin offering classes at a new campus in Indianapolis, Indiana.

HCN will continue exploring opportunities to add campus locations, aligned with accreditor requirements, to meet the needs of students and marketplace demands, as well as new nursing and healthcare education programs, such as the Direct Entry ADN option.

To complement these efforts, we may also seek opportunities to expand through acquisition of nursing schools or other organizations focused on healthcare education.

Increase Enrollment at HCN’s ADN Program.

Enrollments in HCN’s ADN Program for 2019 were significantly lower than planned.

We plan to continue to review and refine our academic and admissions standards, including changes implemented during the year that we believe have impacted student enrollment, to work to improve negative perceptions from current and prospective student cohorts, and to implement new initiatives to improve the current and prospective student experiences such as by extending the hours of the customer service team and launching a direct-entry ADN program.

Expand Strategic Partnerships .

Our institutions partner with corporations, government agencies, professional associations, and non-profit organizations to support their professional and workforce development initiatives.

APUS provides more than 200 partner organizations with a range of services to maximize strategic workforce development goals, including tailored learning programs, dedicated client services, admissions support, custom program webpages, direct payment options for eligible institutions, and tuition grants.

HCN partners with more than 40 healthcare facilities and community partners, through corporate and local agreements, to provide clinical experiences for HCN students, meet partners’ workforce needs, and work collaboratively to chart the future of nursing education in a community advisory capacity.

Further Increase Alignment to Job Market Needs.

Our institutions will continue exploring opportunities to enhance degree offerings to meet emerging needs and marketplace demands, with a focus on fields of study exhibiting higher than average job growth and new degree programs that are relevant to the workplace.

Our institutions will also continue to consider alternatives and non-traditional offerings, including corporate training and credentialing programs aligned to the job market and requiring less time and expense to complete, possibly including through acquisitions of training or corporate learning companies serving high growth industries such as healthcare, technology and STEM fields.

To support growth in our existing businesses and to diversify our business model, we will continue to assess and pursue strategic investments and acquisitions.

In addition, in 2020, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, HCN adjusted by shifting its typically in-person courses to a blended model with online delivery of its courses and on-campus delivery of certain labs to the extent required.

APEI, through its subsidiary institutions, is focused on providing a Higher Education Return on Investment.

We call this HEROI TM to reflect not only the value proposition that we make to our prospective and enrolled students but also to recognize the importance of the real “heroes” in the primary student segments that we serve – individuals who serve the country and society at large.

APEI’s heritage is one of “educating those who serve” including military and veterans, public service communities like police, firefighters, first responders, nurses, and those who serve the country in fields like homeland security, intelligence, cybersecurity, information technology, and related fields.

In September 2019, Angela Selden became our Chief Executive Officer.

Since then, APEI began and has continued the process of resetting and re-positioning the company for growth.

This first phase of the reset and re-positioning was focused on stabilizing and returning the core businesses to growth as well as identifying APEI’s path forward.

Results in 2020 reflected strong progress towards these goals, as APUS grew net student registrations by 11.5%, made investments in technology to improve the student experience, and allocated additional marketing resources to focus on students for whom our value proposition is highly attractive.

At HCN, student enrollments grew 18%, which we believe reflects not just the secular demand for nursing, but the improvements in processes, outcomes, and offerings that HCN implemented.

As we transform the enterprise to focus on sustainable growth, we are also transforming how we think about and define high quality outcomes.

As an enterprise that predominantly serves working and/or adult learners, our students are intensely focused on initial job attainment or progression and advancement in a current career path, and we are focused on providing skills and training that can help facilitate that path to employment for our students.

As part of this phase of our transformation for growth, our strategy is organized around areas where we believe we have “the right to win.” That means that we will draw on our heritage of “educating those who serve” to help define our opportunities.

• At APUS, we will continue to focus on being the top educator to active-duty military and veterans.

APUS, through AMU, enjoys strong brand recognition with the veterans’ community, and we plan to make our unique value proposition more widely known and accessible to the veterans and military-affiliated communities.

• At HCN, we believe we are well positioned to serve society’s growing need for nurses.

We are focused on expanding the nursing opportunities at Hondros through both geographic campus expansion as well as programmatic expansion.

In April 2020, HCN began offering classes at a new campus in Indianapolis, Indiana, and in April 2021, HCN will begin offering classes at an additional campus in Akron, Ohio.

Consistent with the themes of HEROI TM , “educating those who serve”, and being deliberate about where APEI can win in the marketplace, during 2020 we focused on nursing education with an emphasis on pre-licensure programs.

Pre-licensure nursing education today is estimated to be approximately 50% of the total nursing education market and is expected to grow at a compounded annual growth rate of approximately 25% over the next four years as reported in Technavio Nursing Education Report 2020.

This focus led to our agreement to acquire Rasmussen University.

Upon closing of the transaction, which is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of closing conditions, the acquisition of Rasmussen will create what we believe is the largest pre-licensure national nursing platform in the United States.

Rasmussen has over 8,000 nursing students at its 24 campuses across six states and online with over 90% of those students pursuing a pre-licensure nursing degree at the PN, ADN, or BSN (Bachelor of Science, Nursing) level.

On its own, Rasmussen enrolls the largest number of ADN students in the United States and together with HCN’s nearly 2,100 nursing students, APEI will oversee what we believe is the largest population of PN and ADN students in the country.

Collectively, following the closing of the transaction and assuming the opening of a new campus at Rasmussen in Dallas, Texas and HCN’s new campus in Akron, Ohio, APEI’s nursing footprint will cover 32 campuses across nine states.

We believe that the collective scale, programmatic and educational expertise, and regulatory understanding, positions us well to serve society and the medical system needs for nurses.

Both HCN and Rasmussen are primarily focused on “creating new nurses” by preparing and training nursing students to enter the nursing profession as licensed nurses as opposed to furthering the credentials of already-licensed nurses.

Given the state and regulatory approvals necessary, the investment in physical campus facilities, the specialized programmatic knowledge and related accreditations, clinical placement requirements, the time to receive approval to grow nursing enrollments and various standards that nursing schools must meet, we believe nursing education – and in particular first or pre-licensure nursing education - provides us with opportunities to distance ourselves from our competitors.

In addition to its concentration in pre-licensure programs, Rasmussen has developed what we believe to be a comprehensive “ladder” of nursing programs and degrees.

This ladder includes the PN, ADN and BSN pre-licensure programs, as well as the post-licensure RN to BSN, MSN and Doctorate of Nurse Practice post-licensure programs, with a Masters programs in Advanced Nurse Practitioner expected to be launched in 2021.

We believe that these post-licensure programs offer additional opportunities to serve the nursing profession especially as licensed nurses move into nursing education and nursing administration, often later in their careers.

We anticipate future growth across the nursing platform to come from geographic

campus expansion, both in existing states and new states, programmatic offering expansion as well as potentially through additional acquisitions.

In our next phase of transforming APEI for growth, we intend to focus on expanding on the ways in which we deliver on our goal of “Purpose Made Possible”.

We expect to continue to focus on career training and degrees that provide real skills and provide pathways to employment in identifiable jobs.

To support growth in our existing businesses and to diversify our business model, we plan to continue to assess and pursue strategic investments and acquisitions in addition to the Rasmussen Acquisition.

Our investment and acquisition strategy includes a focus on investing in nursing and healthcare education as well as investing in companies that bridge postsecondary education to employment, to improve economic mobility for adult learners, in particular those in the military, national security and public service communities, through a combination of educational offerings and workforce-related solutions.

8 unchanged sentences

Our website is www.apei.com.

The information on our website is not incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We make available, free of charge through our website, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC.

Information on or available through our website is not incorporated by reference in this Annual Report.

OUR INSTITUTIONS

2 unchanged sentences

Department of Education, or ED, to participate in student financial aid programs authorized under Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, or Title IV.

APEI performs certain business functions, including human resources, marketing, legal services, finance, facilities services, information technology and strategic analytics and research on a shared basis for the benefit of APUS and in some cases HCN, with the capability to expand those shared services to other entities in the future.

We believe that the shared services model promotes the efficient use of resources, allowing our institutions to continue to focus on meeting applicable accreditation standards and maintaining control over the academic and core operational functions necessary to the functioning of an institution of higher learning.

We implemented this model for APUS following a multi-year planning and investment process and HLC’s November 2018 approval of APUS’s application for a change in structure related to adoption of the model.

As required by HLC policy and ED regulation, HLC conducted a focused site visit in May 2019.

The site visit team found sufficient evidence of compliance with the commitments APUS made in its application and with HLC’s Eligibility Requirements and Criteria for Accreditation and did not recommend further follow-up.

In August 2019, HLC notified APUS that HLC’s Institutional Actions Council, which conducts reviews and takes action on accreditation recommendations, concurred with the site visit team’s findings.

American Public University System

APUS is based in Charles Town, West Virginia and has institutional accreditation from HLC, a regional accrediting agency.

As mentioned above, APUS traces its roots to AMU, which was founded in 1991 as a distance-learning, graduate-level institution for military officers seeking an advanced degree in military studies.

APUS has gradually broadened its focus to include other military communities, veterans, and public service and public service-minded communities with a focus on educating those who serve.

As mentioned in “Competitive Strengths” above, APUS traces its roots to AMU, which was founded in 1991 as a distance-learning, graduate-level institution for military officers seeking an advanced degree in military studies.

APUS broadened its focus to include other military communities, veterans, and public service and public service-minded communities with a focus on educating those who serve.

In 2002, APUS was organized into a university system with two components:

1 unchanged sentence

APU is focused on educating career-focused working adults with an emphasis on educating professionals working in service-related communities.

APUS is an online institution of higher learning, which we believe is well-suited to its students, especially its military, public service and working adult students, many of who serve in positions requiring extended and irregular work schedules, are on call for rapid response missions, participate in extended deployments and exercises, travel or relocate frequently, must balance family and work demands or are single parents with limited financial resources.

APUS is an online institution of higher learning, which we believe is well-suited to its students, especially its military, public service and working adult students, many of whom serve in positions requiring extended and irregular work schedules, are on call for rapid response missions, participate in extended deployments and exercises, travel or relocate frequently, must balance family and work demands or are single parents with limited financial resources.

Many APUS students have significant prior education and career experiences;

9 unchanged sentences

APUS’s programs are as follows:

Programs Number

Doctoral Degrees 2

3 unchanged sentences

Total Degree Programs:

Certificates Number

Undergraduate 57

4 unchanged sentences

Students may earn either discrete certificates or certificates in combination with work toward a degree program.

APUS currently offers limited enrollment in our four Momentum CBE programs, which focus on the achievement of knowledge and skills, providing a more flexible degree path to non-traditional students seeking an alternative to prevailing schedule and tuition constraints.

APUS currently offers limited enrollment in our four Momentum TM CBE programs, which focus on the achievement of knowledge and skills, providing a more flexible degree path to non-traditional students seeking an alternative to prevailing schedule and tuition constraints.

In addition, APUS offers several “Learning Tracks” that are comprised of three academic courses in a related area of interest.

Like a microcredential, a Learning Track allows students to pursue a course of study without having to commit to a degree or certificate program.

For a full list of our degree and certificate programs, please see http://catalog.apus.edu.

The information on our website is expressly not incorporated by reference in this Annual Report.

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, 23% of APUS students were enrolled in security and global studies programs, 24% in business, and 22% in arts and humanities, with the remainder of students in science, technology, education and math, health sciences, and education programs.

For a full list of our degree and certificate programs, please see catalog.apus.edu.

Information on or available through our website is not incorporated by reference in this Annual Report.

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, 24% of APUS students were enrolled in business, 22% in security and global studies programs, and 22% in arts and humanities, with the remainder of students in science, technology, education and

math, and health sciences.

During that period, 59% of students were enrolled in a bachelor’s degree program, 17% in an associate degree program, 15% in a master’s degree program, and 9% in certificate or other programs.

Student Recruitment and Marketing

APUS’s relationship-based marketing strategy focuses on building long-term, mutually beneficial relationships with organizations and individuals in the military, military-affiliated, and service communities.

We rely on outreach teams, which serve these communities and foster long-standing relationships, as the core of this strategy.

5 unchanged sentences

Increased competition in paid marketing channels has resulted in higher advertising costs in certain marketing channels and could lead to increased student acquisition costs.

To better manage costs and focus marketing efforts on prospective student audiences most likely to matriculate and succeed, APUS put in place tools to provide new insights connecting individual student performance data with third-party audience insights and the marketing touch points that attracted them.

To better manage costs and focus marketing efforts on prospective student audiences most likely to matriculate and succeed, APUS utilizes tools to provide new insights connecting individual student performance data with third-party audience insights and the marketing touch points that attracted them.

APUS is using these insights and other highly personalized approaches to improve future decisions with respect to marketing mix allocation, audience targeting, new initiatives, relevant messaging, and creative decisions, as well as to more effectively and deeply leverage platform tools that support scalable advertising development, delivery, and testing.

APUS also provides more than 200 partner organizations with a range of services to maximize strategic workforce development goals, including dedicated client services, admissions support, custom program webpages, direct payment options for eligible institutions, and tuition grants.

APUS is beginning to attract greater numbers of adult learners who are younger and from more diverse backgrounds.

Digital data signals tell us that our programs, designed to help to advance purpose-driven career goals, resonate strongly with this audience’s desire to make a difference in the world.

Our commitment to affordability, particularly compared to that of other four-year public and private institutions, also strongly resonates given this audience’s deep concern for saving money and their reluctance to take on debt.

APUS has a long-standing commitment to affordability.

Comparably, APUS costs are about 30% less than the average in-state full-time undergraduate tuition, fees, and books at public universities, according to the final 2018-19 institutional data reported to the U.S.

Department of Education through The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System.

Undergraduate full-time tuition, fees, and average book costs are based on a course load of 24 credit hours per year.

APUS’s tuition changed effective January 1, 2020, as discussed below.

Based on data obtained from digital research and direct audience insights, we believe that APUS’s affordability and value proposition is highly attractive to purpose-driven adult learners who seek affordable, accessible education offerings that are aligned with in-demand fields where they can make a difference.

In 2020, we launched a new marketing campaign focusing on affordability and higher education return on investment for learners.

Our commitment to affordability, particularly compared to that of other four-year public and private institutions, strongly resonates given this audience’s deep concern for saving money and their reluctance to take on debt.

Learners are looking for a practical solution;

one that provides a return for their educational investment and fits their lifestyle and values.

APUS is recognized among education providers in this respect.

In fact, according to a 2019 Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce study titled, “A First Try at ROI:

Ranking 4,500 colleges” , based on 40-year net present value, we were ranked in the top 2 percent for return-on-investment.

We believe APUS is recognized among education providers in this respect.

In fact, APUS ranks in the top 2% for return on investment compared to colleges and universities nationwide, according to the Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce report, “ A First Try at ROI:

Ranking 4,500 Colleges ,” based on the 40-year net present value for completers who received federal financial aid.

APUS continues to work to enhance the student learning experience to attract students who are more likely to persist and succeed in its programs and will continue to work to identify and implement changes and initiatives in an effort to more effectively attract and enroll more college-ready students on average.

3 unchanged sentences

The student body of APUS consists of approximately 90,400 enrolled students, most of whom hold full-time employment.

Student enrollment is defined as the number of unique active students, including those who take an approved leave of absence for up to two years, who have reached the eighth day of their first course or who have completed at least one course within the last 12 months for which a grade was received.

Student enrollment is defined as the number of unique active students, including those who take an approved leave of absence, who are currently attending a course or have completed at least one course within the last 12 months.

APUS is focused on executing initiatives that will more effectively support its students and help improve those students’ educational outcomes, including through faculty engagement initiatives and co-curricular initiatives to increase the level of engagement and collaboration in the classroom and strengthen the bond between APUS and its students.

2 unchanged sentences

APUS has institutional accreditation from HLC, a regional institutional accrediting agency recognized by ED.

The status and meaning of this accreditation is described more fully below in “Regulatory Environment - Accreditation.” The next comprehensive evaluation for reaffirmation of accreditation is scheduled for the 2020-2021 academic year.

In addition to accreditation by HLC, certain programs offered by APUS have received specialized accreditations or professional recognition.

For example, the Accreditation Council for Business Schools and Programs (ACBSP), accredits 21 different academic programs, including the following:

• Associate of Science, Bachelor of Science and Master of Science in Accounting;

• Associate of Arts, Bachelor and Master of Business Administration;

• Associate of Arts and Bachelor of Arts in Hospitality Management;

• Associate of Arts, Bachelor of Arts, and Master of Arts in Management;

• Associate of Arts in Real Estate Studies;

• Associate of Arts and Bachelor of Arts in Retail Management;

• Bachelor of Arts and Master of Arts in Reverse Logistics Management;

• Bachelor of Arts and Master of Arts in Entrepreneurship;

• Bachelor of Arts in Marketing;

• Bachelor of Arts and Master of Arts in Transportation and Logistics Management.

In addition to the general ACBSP accreditation, our Bachelor of Science and Master of Science in Accounting hold specialized accounting accreditation from ACBSP.

The Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education, or CCNE, accredits the Bachelor and Masters of Science in Nursing programs.

For example, the Accreditation Council for Business Schools and Programs, or ACBSP, generally accredits 21 different business-focused academic programs offered by APUS and accredits two APUS accounting programs under a specialized accounting accreditation.

The Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education, or CCNE, accredits the Bachelor and Master of Science in Nursing programs.

In addition, APUS has obtained professional recognition for its program concentrations in Human Resources from the Society for Human Resource Management, for certain courses in the Sports and Health Sciences program from the American Sport Education Program for Bronze Level Certification and the National Academy of Sports Medicine Performance Enhancement Specialist, for the Information Systems Security program from the National Security Agency - Information Assurance Courseware Evaluation, and for certain courses in the Human Development and Family Studies program from the National Council on Family Relations for the Certified Family Life Educator.

Our Master of Public Health program holds accreditation from the Council on Education for Public Health, or CEPH.

In addition, the International Fire Service Accreditation Congress, or IFSAC, has accredited five APUS programs, including:

• Associate of Science in Fire Science;

• Bachelor of Science in Fire Science Management;

• Bachelor and Master of Arts in Emergency and Disaster Management;

• Dual Master of Arts in Emergency and Disaster Management and Homeland Security.

APUS’s Master of Public Health program holds accreditation from the Council on Education for Public Health, or CEPH.

In addition, the International Fire Service Accreditation Congress, or IFSAC, has accredited five APUS programs.

Student Admissions

6 unchanged sentences

We believe that APUS’s commitment to maximizing a student’s return on their educational investment is one of its competitive strengths.

We are focused on offering our students affordable programs, and many APUS students also transfer a significant number of previously earned academic credit hours, which reduces the length of time required to earn their degrees, and therefore reduces the cost of the degree.

In October 2019, APUS announced the following tuition changes for undergraduate and master’s course registrations made on or after January 1, 2020:

We are focused on offering our students affordable programs, and many APUS students also transfer a significant number of previously earned academic credit hours, which reduces the remaining credit hours required to earn their degrees, and therefore reduces the cost of the degree.

Effective January 1, 2020, APUS implemented the following tuition changes for undergraduate and master’s course registrations:

• The tuition for undergraduate level courses increased $15 per credit hour to $285 per credit hour.

1 unchanged sentence

• The technology fee increased from $50 to $65 per class.

The January 2020 tuition increase is APUS’s first increase since July 2015 and is intended to help support increased investments in academic learning and student operations.

The January 2020 tuition increase was APUS’s first increase since July 2015 and was intended to help support increased investments in academic learning and student operations.

Prior to the 2015 increase, APUS had not raised undergraduate tuition for 15 years or graduate tuition for four years.

1 unchanged sentence

The combined tuition, fees, and books at APUS are designed to be less expensive for undergraduate and graduate students than the average in-state cost at a public university.

Undergraduate students and, effective January 1, 2020, all active duty military students and their spouses and dependents, enrolled in courses for academic credit receive their textbooks and certain course materials at no additional cost to them through an institutional book-grant program.

This book grant represents an approximate savings over the course of a student’s undergraduate degree program of $5,000 as compared to public four-year colleges and universities according to comparative information from The College Board’s Trends in College Pricing 2019 report.

APUS also utilizes open access and online library materials where appropriate and works with various publishers to reduce the cost of textbooks and course materials for both students receiving the book grant and for graduate students who pay for textbooks and course materials.

To support APUS's active duty military students using TA, APUS increased the tuition grant for those undergraduate students and their spouses and dependents from $20 to $35 per credit hour to keep the cost at $250 per credit hour, and increased the tuition grant for those master’s students and their spouses and dependents from $25 to $120 per credit hour to reduce the cost from $325 per credit hour to $250 per credit hour for active duty military students.

This book grant represents an approximate savings over the

course of a student’s undergraduate degree program of $1,240 annually as compared to public four-year colleges and universities, according to comparative information from The College Board’s Trends in College Pricing 2020 report.

APUS also utilizes open access and online library materials where appropriate and works with various publishers to reduce the cost of textbooks and course materials for both graduate students who pay for textbooks and course materials and for APUS who funds the book grant.

To support APUS's active duty military students using TA, effective January 1, 2020, APUS increased its APUS funded tuition grant for those undergraduate students and their spouses and dependents from $20 to $35 per credit hour to keep the cost at $250 per credit hour, and increased its APUS funded tuition grant for those master’s students and their spouses and dependents from $25 to $120 per credit hour to reduce the cost from $325 per credit hour to $250 per credit hour for active duty military students.

As a result, undergraduate and master’s students who are eligible for TA benefits and their spouses and dependents will pay a net tuition of $250 per credit hour.

APUS also extended its book grant, previously available only to all undergraduate students, to active-duty military students and their spouses and dependents at the master’s level.

The net effect of these price and grant adjustments is that for active duty military students using TA, an undergraduate or graduate degree at APUS may be attained for no out-of-pocket cost.

APUS estimates that the tuition grant will apply to approximately 60% of its total net course registrations made on or after January 1, 2020.

APUS also extended its APUS funded book grant, previously available only to all undergraduate students, to active-duty military students and their spouses and dependents at the master’s level.

The net effect of these price and APUS funded grant adjustments is that for active duty military students using TA, an undergraduate or graduate degree at APUS may be attained for no out-of-pocket cost.

APUS’s tuition grant applied to approximately 78% and 68% of its total net course registrations in 2019 and 2020, respectively.

APUS’s tuition grant for veterans expired at the end of 2019.

3 unchanged sentences

The programs meet a need for higher-level education and research combined with professional practice in these fields.

The doctoral degrees tuition and residency costs are currently $5,600 per term and include a book grant for course materials.

The doctoral degrees tuition and residency costs are currently $5,600 per term and include an APUS funded book grant for course materials.

APUS doctoral degrees may be earned for approximately $50,000 in tuition at current tuition rates.

1 unchanged sentence

Because APUS is an exclusively online institution, there are no required resident fees, such as for parking, food service, student union, and recreation.

APUS charges students a technology fee, but provides a grant to cover the technology fee for students using DoD tuition assistance programs.

APUS charges students a technology fee but provides a grant to cover the technology fee for students using TA.

When applicable, APUS students are charged certain additional fees, such as graduation, late registration, transcript request, and comprehensive examination fees.

DoD tuition assistance programs cover $250 per credit hour for military students, and these students may also be able to use VA education benefits or aid from ED’s Title IV programs to cover any remaining cost, as described more fully below in “Sources of Student Financing” and “Regulatory Environment - Student Financing Sources and Related Regulations/Requirements.” APUS has set its tuition grant so that the DoD tuition assistance program covers the full tuition cost of undergraduate and graduate courses for members of the military up to the annual maximum benefit.

TA covers $250 per credit hour for military students, and these students may also be able to use VA education benefits or aid from ED’s Title IV programs to cover any remaining cost, as described more fully below in “Sources of Student Financing” and “Regulatory Environment - Student Financing Sources and Related Regulations/Requirements.” APUS has set its tuition grant so that the TA covers the full tuition cost of undergraduate and graduate courses for members of the military up to the annual maximum allowable benefit.

Sources of Student Financing

APUS’s students finance their education through a combination of individual resources, DoD tuition assistance programs, ED’s Title IV programs, VA education benefits, private loans, state and federal grants, and corporate reimbursement programs.

APUS’s students finance their education through a combination of individual resources, TA, VA education benefits, ED’s Title IV programs, private loans, state and federal grants, and corporate reimbursement programs.

Most students rely on some form of financial aid in addition to their individual resources.

Students utilizing DoD’s tuition assistance programs accounted for 39%, those utilizing ED’s Title IV programs 25%, and those using VA education benefits 23% of APUS’s net course registrations in 2019.

Students utilizing DoD’s tuition assistance programs accounted for 43%, those using VA education benefits 22%, and those utilizing ED’s Title IV programs 21% of APUS’s net course registrations in 2020.

We believe that the ability of our students to participate in these programs is essential to APUS’s success.

Participation in the DoD tuition assistance programs, ED’s Title IV programs and VA education benefits add to APUS’s regulatory burden, as described more fully below in “Regulatory Environment - Student Financing Sources and Related Regulations/Requirements.”

Participation in TA, VA education benefits and ED’s Title IV programs add to APUS’s regulatory burden, as described more fully below in “Regulatory Environment – Student Financing Sources and Related Regulations/Requirements.”

Federal legislative activity, including government shutdowns and other budgetary actions, as well as actions by ED and DoD, may adversely impact the ability of our students to obtain loans, grants, and other forms of tuition financing.

2 unchanged sentences

The potential risks associated with these and similar events are described more fully below in “Risk Factors – Risks Related to Our Business.”

Faculty and Staff

APUS’s faculty consists of approximately 1,780 full and part-time faculty members with relevant teaching and practitioner experience.

The institution also employs professional staff of approximately 860 non-faculty APUS and APEI employees to administer APUS’s academic, technology, service, and business operations.

Most of APUS’s non-faculty employees are based at either its headquarters in Charles Town, West Virginia, or at its administrative offices in Manassas, Virginia.

None of APUS’s employees are parties to any collective bargaining arrangement.

We believe that APUS has a good relationship with its employees.

APUS has approximately 340 full-time faculty members with the remainder designated as part-time.

APUS establishes full-time and part-time positions based on program and course enrollment.

Many of APUS’s full-time faculty began their careers with APUS as part-time faculty.

We expect that APUS’s faculty headcount and the composition of full-time and part-time faculty will vary with fluctuations in enrollment.

We believe that APUS’s well-regarded faculty, which includes many former and current practitioners in their fields, attracts new students to APUS.

A significant majority of APUS’s graduate faculty members hold terminal degrees or doctorates in their relevant fields, and virtually all undergraduate faculty members hold graduate degrees.

Exceptions have been granted for a limited number of APUS’s faculty members who do not meet degree standards and who provide evidence of significant experience and achievement in the field of study that they teach, in accordance with APUS’s faculty quality guidelines.

Many APUS faculty members have relevant experience at other universities and within military, corporate, and government institutions.

We believe that the quality of APUS’s faculty is critical to the student experience and student outcomes and is therefore vital to APUS’s success.

APUS regularly reviews the performance of its faculty by, among other things, monitoring the online contact that faculty have with students, reviewing student feedback, and evaluating the learning outcomes achieved by students.

If APUS determines that a faculty member is not performing at an acceptable level, it works with the faculty member to improve performance by assigning the faculty member a mentor, providing additional training and/or coaching the faculty member for success.

If the faculty member’s performance does not improve, APUS will no longer employ that faculty member to teach.

APUS does not offer tenure to faculty members.

We believe that the composition of APUS’s student body and curriculum are particularly attractive to potential faculty members because of the opportunity to teach relevant material to students who can implement higher education learning at their workplaces.

APUS recruits faculty members through referrals by current faculty members, advertisements in higher education and trade association journals and its internet presence.

Upon selection for a position, APUS requires each new faculty member to complete an orientation and training program that leads to their certification to teach at APUS and assignment to courses.

All faculty members participate in annual faculty-development opportunities and requirements.

Intellectual Property

6 unchanged sentences

APUS has secured rights to trademarks for various names and terms used in its business, including “American Public University System,” “American Military University,” “American Public University” and logos incorporating the foregoing terms and acronyms of those terms, as well as “Ready When You Are,” “Educating Those Who Serve,” “RESPECTED.

ONLINE.,” “COMMITTED TO YOUR FUTURE,” “MASTERS OF DISASTER,” “MOMENTUM,” “MyMomentum” and the term “Partnership At a Distance.” These trademarks and brand names are central to a number of APUS’s marketing efforts and we believe they are important to how prospective students identify APUS.

ONLINE.,” “COMMITTED TO YOUR FUTURE,” “MASTERS OF DISASTER,” “MOMENTUM,” “HEROI”, “MyMomentum”, and the term “Partnership At a Distance.” These trademarks and brand names are central to a number of APUS’s marketing efforts and we believe they are important to how prospective students identify APUS.

APUS also owns rights to more than 200 internet domain names pertaining to APEI, APUS, AMU, APU, and other unique descriptors.

1 unchanged sentence

HCN’s programs are designed to prepare individuals for productive careers in the field of nursing.

HCN’s students principally receive on-campus instruction at one of HCN’s Ohio campuses.

In 2019, HCN had five campuses, which are located in the suburban areas of Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, Dayton, and Toledo, and an administrative office located in suburban Columbus.

HCN has also obtained or is in the process of obtaining all necessary approvals to offer postsecondary nursing education programs in connection with a new campus in Indianapolis, Indiana beginning in the second quarter of 2020, initially in the PN Program.

Growth beyond an initial cohort of up to 30 students for the first year is subject to HCN’s ability to petition to increase the number of admissions after a site visit that will occur upon graduation of the first cohort.

HCN is institutionally accredited by ABHES.

HCN provides nursing education to students enrolled at five campuses in Ohio, which are located in the suburban areas of Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, Dayton, and Toledo, and, in April 2020, HCN began offering courses at a new campus in Indianapolis, Indiana.

The initial enrollment at the Indianapolis campus was limited to 30 students per year by the Indiana State Board of Nursing.

Growth beyond an initial 30 student limit is subject to HCN’s ability to petition to increase the number of admissions after a site visit that will occur upon graduation of the first cohort.

In addition, in April 2021, HCN will begin offering classes at a new campus in Akron, Ohio.

HCN is institutionally accredited by ABHES, a national accreditor.

Curriculum and Scheduling

HCN offers on-campus instruction leading to a Diploma in PN and an ADN.

Portions of the PN and ADN Programs are taught online.

Graduates of the PN Program are eligible to seek licensure as a Licensed Practical Nurse, or LPN, after passing the NCLEX-PN exam.

Graduates of the ADN Program are eligible to seek licensure as a Registered Nurse, or RN, after passing the NCLEX-RN exam.

HCN voluntarily discontinued new enrollments in its online Registered Nurse to Bachelor of Science in Nursing, or RN-to-BSN, program after the start of the July 2018 term.

A teach-out of the remaining students in the program was completed in December 2019 and HCN notified CCNE and the Ohio State Board in February 2020 that it had completed the teach-out and would enroll no new students in the RN-to-BSN program.

In April 2019, HCN began offering courses in a Medical Laboratory Technician program, or MLT Program, at its Cincinnati and Columbus campuses.

Due to low enrollment, HCN ceased enrolling new students and offered MLT Program students the opportunity to transfer to HCN’s other programs.

Academic terms for the PN and ADN Programs begin four times each year, with courses starting in January, April, July, and October.

Approximately 63% of enrollments for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 were in the PN Program, while 37% were in the ADN Program.

HCN’s students principally receive on-campus instruction at one of HCN’s campuses;

however, in March 2020, in response to the novel coronavirus COVID-19 global pandemic, HCN, leveraging the expertise of APUS, shifted to a blended model with online delivery of its courses and on campus delivery of certain labs.

HCN thereafter fully reopened its campuses, using smaller in person classes with screening, social distancing and masking requirements while continuing to offer courses in a virtual setting for those that prefer remote course learning, and then reverted to online courses and limited on-campus labs in November 2020 following spikes in COVID-19 cases.

There can be no assurance when on-campus courses will resume more broadly or to what degree, or that thereafter HCN will not need to again further limit campus interactions or close its campuses in response to the COVID-19 pandemic or as a result of location regulations.

Student Body and Enrollment

HCN provides nursing education to approximately 1,600 students at five campuses in Ohio.

HCN provides nursing education to approximately 2,100 students at five campuses in Ohio and one campus in Indiana.

The average HCN student is 30 years old and 93% of HCN students are female.

2 unchanged sentences

ABHES informed HCN in February 2020 that based on review of the visit report from its recently completed unannounced visit to HCN’s Columbus campus, the response to the report, and ABHES program approval information, it had acted to affirm the institution’s accreditation, which continues through February 28, 2021.

The next comprehensive evaluation for renewal of accreditation, which will include HCN’s submission of evidence related to its compliance with ABHES standards and a series of site visits, is scheduled for April 2020.

HCN’s next comprehensive evaluation for renewal of accreditation by ABHES had been scheduled for April 2020 but was postponed due to the pandemic and related disruptions.

ABHES held virtual site visits in lieu of the regular process.

In August and September 2020, ABHES conducted virtual site visits to HCN’s campuses to assess compliance with ABHES accreditation standards.

The visits resulted in findings that student satisfaction with the ADN and PN Programs at HCN’s Toledo campus and the PN program at HCN’s Cincinnati, Columbus, and Dayton campuses was below expected levels, which ABHES associated with the transition to online courses as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, and a finding at the Indianapolis and Columbus campuses related to the composition of an advisory board.

HCN has formally responded to each of the findings, and ABHES has taken no further action.

In February 2021, ABHES granted HCN continued accreditation through February 2027 for all programs at all campuses.

For additional information related to HCN’s accreditation, including a discussion of recent correspondence from ABHES related to retention and placement rates at HCN, refer to “Regulatory Environment - Accreditation.”

1 unchanged sentence

On January 29, 2019, HCN submitted a required progress report to NLN CNEA addressing certain quality indicators.

NLN CNEA may accept the report or take certain follow-up actions, such as request additional information or conduct a site visit.

NLN CNEA may accept the report or take certain follow-up actions, such as requesting additional information or conducting a site visit.

In December 2020, HCN submitted a response to an NLN CNEA request for additional information regarding a program quality indicator, which was accepted.

In January 2021, NLN CNEA completed a virtual focused site visit at HCN’s Indianapolis campus.

Based upon the outcome of this focused site visit, NLN CNEA notified HCN that accreditation was granted to HCN’s PN program effective January 13, 2021.

Student Recruitment and Marketing

7 unchanged sentences

HCN’s programs also have program-specific admissions requirements.

Applicants for the PN Program and the ADN Program are required to complete an interview with an admissions representative, and complete and pass a criminal background check.

PN Program applicants are also generally required to take and pass the Health Education Systems Admissions Assessment.

Portions of the PN and ADN Programs are online.

Beginning with the term that started in January 2019, HCN implemented enhanced ADN Program admissions requirements, requiring external ADN applicants to have an active unencumbered PN license and to have graduated from an approved PN program.

All ADN applicants must take math and reading entrance exams.

Applicants that do not meet the minimum placement scores may be required to take additional reading and math prerequisites or denied admission.

Applicants for the PN Program and the ADN Program are required to complete an interview with an admissions representative and pass a criminal background check.

PN Program applicants are also generally required to pass the Health Education Systems Admissions Assessment.

Under enhanced ADN Program admissions requirements implemented in 2019, HCN requires external ADN applicants to have an active unencumbered PN license and to have graduated from an approved PN program.

ADN Program applicants who apply to start in the quarter immediately following their graduation from HCN’s PN Program may be admitted prior to possessing an active unencumbered PN license but must obtain an active unencumbered PN license prior to the start of their second term.

Beginning with the April 2019 term, HCN further changed its admissions standards to remove certain entrance exam requirements.

HCN has also made multiple changes to the assessment process since its original implementation and may further modify it in the future in order to better identify college-ready students.

HCN offers a Direct Entry ADN option that offers an accelerated graduation pathway for students who transfer at least 32 college credits to HCN and meet certain academic and entrance exam requirements.

Direct Entry ADN applicants are not required to hold an active PN license.

HCN has also made multiple changes to the admissions assessment process since its original implementation and may further modify it in the future in order to better identify college-ready students.

These initiatives require significant time, energy, and resources, and if our efforts are not successful, they may adversely impact our results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition.

While we believe changes in admissions and academic achievement requirements are beneficial for our students and will result in a better and more positive educational experience and improved testing pass rates in the long term, we believe some of the changes have contributed to a decline in enrollment and have had a negative impact on our results of operations.

While we work on identifying an appropriate balance of admissions requirements, academic achievement requirements and attracting appropriate students, there may continue to be a negative impact on enrollments at HCN.

Even if these initiatives lead to the identification and enrollment of students who are likely to succeed and improve the student experience, they could result in adverse impacts on HCN enrollments.

While we believe changes in admissions and academic achievement requirements are beneficial for our students and will result in a better and more positive educational experience and improved testing pass rates in the long term, we believe some of the changes contributed to a decline in enrollment in previous years and have had a negative impact on our results of operations.

We continue to work on identifying an appropriate balance of admissions requirements, academic achievement requirements and attracting appropriate students.

However, even if these initiatives lead to the identification and

enrollment of students who are likely to succeed and improve the student experience, they could result in adverse impacts on HCN enrollments.

Cost of Attendance and Financial Aid

HCN’s tuition costs vary among its programs.

HCN’s PN Program may be completed for approximately $19,750 in tuition and fees and the ADN Program may be completed for approximately $28,500 in tuition and fees.

Fees include the cost of

examination review materials, lab fees, test review fees, and fees for applications with OBN, among others.

HCN’s PN Programs may be completed for approximately $20,000 in tuition and fees and the ADN Program may be completed for approximately $28,500 in tuition and fees, depending on the campus location.

Fees include the cost of examination review materials, lab fees, test review fees, and fees for applications with OBN, among others.

Some of these costs are payable to HCN and others are payable to third parties.

3 unchanged sentences

Sources of Student Financing

HCN’s students finance their education through a combination of individual resources, VA education benefits, ED’s Title IV programs, private loans, state and federal grants, corporate reimbursement programs, and HCN’s extended payment plan options.

Most HCN students rely on some form of financial aid in addition to their individual resources.

The substantial majority of HCN’s revenue is derived from students utilizing ED’s Title IV programs, which results in increased regulatory scrutiny, as discussed more fully below in “Regulatory Environment - Student Financing Sources and Related Regulations/Requirements - Department of Education - Regulation of Title IV Financial Aid Programs - The ‘90/10 Rule.’” As a result, HCN’s management may find it necessary to decrease HCN’s enrollment of students utilizing the Title IV programs or pursue other approaches, any of which could have a negative impact on its operating results and financial condition.

HCN offers extended payment plan options to its students, including an additional extended payment program newly available for the term beginning in January 2020.

The extended payment plan options are designed to assist students with educational costs consisting of tuition, textbooks, and fees, and are only available after all other student financial assistance has been applied to those costs.

HCN offers an extended payment plan option to its students.

The extended payment plan option is designed to assist students with educational costs consisting of tuition, textbooks, and fees, and are only available after all other student financial assistance has been applied to those costs.

Payment plans require monthly payments while the student is enrolled in a program and extend for a period up to six months after the last day of attendance or graduation.

To the extent interest is applied, it is generally fixed and does not accrue until the student departs the program or graduates.

The extended payment plans do not impose any origination fees.

Participants are advised about the terms of the extended payment plans and counseled to use all federal funding options.

In November 2019, HCN entered into a memorandum of understanding, or MOU, to participate in the DoD tuition assistance program and is therefore subject to such program’s requirements and restrictions.

The MOU and these requirements and restrictions are more fully discussed in the “Regulatory Environment - Student Financing Sources and Related Regulations/Requirements” and “Risk Factors” sections of this Annual Report.

In addition, beginning January 1, 2020, HCN began offering an institutional grant to students demonstrating financial need to cover the difference between the total cost of tuition and fees less the amount of all eligible financial aid resources.

The extended payment plan option does not impose any origination fees.

Participants are advised about the terms of the extended payment plan option and counseled to use all federal funding options first.

Beginning January 1, 2020, HCN began offering an institutional affordability grant to students demonstrating financial need to cover the difference between the total cost of tuition and fees less the amount of all eligible financial aid resources.

The grant is designed to limit a student’s monthly payment to $200 through an award of up to $200 per month, or $600 per term after consideration of financial aid, employer tuition reimbursement, and other financial resources.

Faculty and Staff

HCN ’s faculty consists of approximately 130 faculty members with relevant teaching and nursing or healthcare practitioner experience.

HCN also employs approximately 110 professional staff members who administer HCN’s academic, technology, service, and business operations.

HCN’s faculty and staff largely work at one of its five campuses.

None of HCN’s employees are party to any collective bargaining arrangement.

We believe that HCN has a good relationship with its employees.

HCN has approximately 100 full-time faculty members with the remainder designated as part-time.

All faculty whose instruction is focused within the PN Program must have earned the minimum of a bachelor’s degree in nursing.

All faculty whose instruction is focused within the ADN Program must have earned the minimum of a master’s degree.

All HCN faculty whose instruction is nursing theory-based must have an active license to practice as a Registered Nurse.

In addition to the formal education of HCN’s faculty members, many have also obtained specialized certifications in the field of nursing.

We believe that selecting well-educated and qualified faculty members is a key component to HCN’s success.

In addition to having the necessary educational requirements, HCN seeks faculty members who have demonstrated experience in the field of nursing.

Almost all faculty who teach HCN’s nursing courses have nursing experience in a clinical setting, which we believe helps teach HCN’s students the skills needed to be effective and safe caregivers.

HCN trains and develops new faculty through a formal, structured on-boarding, training, and mentoring program.

All new HCN faculty members receive a 90-day on-boarding experience, which includes a formal orientation to the organization, policies and procedures, teaching strategies, performance expectations, and role responsibilities.

Intellectual Property

In connection with our acquisition of HCN, we received the right to the corporate name National Education Seminars, Inc.

and a royalty-free, irrevocable, exclusive, transferable, sublicensable license to use the name “Hondros College of Nursing” and, instead of “Nursing,” any other qualifier directly related to nursing, medicine, or healthcare in connection with the business and operations of HCN.

In connection with our acquisition of HCN, we received a royalty-free, irrevocable, exclusive, transferable, sublicensable license to use the name “Hondros College of Nursing” and, instead of “Nursing,” any other qualifier directly related to nursing, medicine, or healthcare in connection with the business and operations of HCN.

HCN exercises rights associated with copyrights, trademarks, service marks, domain names, agreements, and registrations to protect its intellectual property.

1 unchanged sentence

Information technology systems are an essential part of our student experience and our business operations.

As part of our implementation of the shared services model discussed in “Reporting Segments” above, we began providing information technology services to APUS and HCN through APEI.

APEI provides information technology services to APUS and HCN through the shared services model that we implemented following HLC’s November 2018 approval of APUS’s application for a change in structure related to adoption of the model.

Previously, APUS had managed its own information technology infrastructure and services and provided information technology services to HCN through an intercompany arrangement.

We believe we will need to continue, and potentially increase, our investment of capital, time, and resources in technology operations and enhancements to support our systems and mission.

We believe we will need to continue, and potentially increase, our investment of time and money in technology operations and enhancements to support our systems and mission.

We continue to make investments in information technology.

We recently embarked on a multi-year technology transformation program in an effort to enable APUS to better accommodate new flexible learning modalities, improve the operational effectiveness of our enterprise, and enhance the learning experience for students and faculty.

The first cohort of students began studies on APUS’ new learning management system in March 2020

• The first cohort of students began studies on APUS’ new learning management system in March 2020, and we have largely completed migration to the new system.

• In January 2020, APUS signed a contract to consolidate its customer relationship management systems onto a single platform.

• We are actively evaluating migration of key applications, systems, and data to the cloud rather than in our own co-located data centers.

Our legacy systems include a customized student information and services system that we refer to as Partnership At a Distance™, or PAD, and proprietary information systems and processes to support PAD, into which we have invested significant capital and resources.

PAD is APUS’s platform for interacting with our students.

1 unchanged sentence

PAD is used by APUS to manage admissions, online orientation, course registrations, tuition payments, grade reporting, progress toward degrees, and various other functions.

We continually evaluate PAD for possible changes and upgrades.

APUS and HCN use Sakai Collaboration and Learning Environment, or Sakai CLE, an open-source learning management system, for their online classroom to support teaching, learning, research, and collaboration.

We intend to replace Sakai as our learning management system in 2020.

PAD and Sakai CLE are our two core enterprise systems.

We continually evaluate PAD for possible changes and upgrades and anticipate that we will eventually make significant changes to this system, as well.

APUS and HCN historically used Sakai Collaboration and Learning Environment, or Sakai CLE, an open-source learning management system, for their online classroom to support teaching, learning, research, and collaboration.

We began replacing Sakai with a cloud-based commercial system as our learning management system in 2020 and have largely completed the APUS migration to the new system.

HCN anticipates completing its migration in 2021.

PAD and our learning management system are our two core enterprise systems.

We also have several other systems that are used in the online campus, and to support the student experience, financial aid processing, financial management, human resources processes, marketing, and decision support.

The backbone of our information technology infrastructure consists of two co-location data centers:

one in Virginia, and one in Texas.

The backbone of our information technology infrastructure currently consists of two co-location data centers.

Our technology environment is managed internally.

Student access to our systems is provided through redundant data carriers in both data centers.

Our continued investment in our institutions’ information technology may place a strain on resources that could adversely affect our systems, controls, and operating efficiency, and those of our institutions, and as a result of unsuccessful development efforts, or a result of replacing outdated technology, software or other technology related assets, we may have assets that become impaired.

We have begun migrating and intend to migrate much of our infrastructure and core applications, in addition to our learning management system, to a cloud computing model with the goal of improving the reliability, scalability, agility, and security of our core infrastructure and applications.

Our continued investments of time and money on our institutions’ information technology may place a strain on our organization that could adversely affect our systems, controls, and operating efficiency, and those of our institutions, and as a result of unsuccessful development efforts, or a result of replacing outdated technology, software, or other technology related assets, we may have assets that become impaired.

In addition, as a result of our reliance on information technology, system disruptions and security breaches could adversely affect our reputation and our operations.

1 unchanged sentence

For more information on these investments and their effects on our results of operations, refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Overview.”

Human Capital

“Purpose Made Possible.” Our ability to deliver on our corporate mission and our enterprise transformation is tightly aligned with our human capital strategy.

Our performance largely depends on the talents, experience, and efforts of our employees, and by our ability to foster a culture and practice of high performance, innovation, cooperation, integrity, and respect.

During 2020, our key human capital efforts were focused on building our leadership strength by hiring new executives and working to create a culture of high performance by launching actions to attract, retain and develop high quality talent.

We employ various human resource programs in support of these objectives.

We hired a new Chief Human Resources Officer, which reflects the importance we place on our people and our commitment to supporting them in their efforts to help us achieve our mission.

We launched processes to evaluate our reward and recognition systems and are evaluating market competitive compensation and benefit practices to attract new employees and reward current ones.

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we worked to ensure a safe and seamless transition to remote working for APUS and APEI and blended working for HCN in March 2020.

We believe diversity and inclusion are at the core of our values and reflect the expectations of the students we serve.

We champion equality and work to create ethical, safe, and supportive workplaces where our employees thrive.

We believe a diverse and inclusive workplace results in business growth and encourages increased innovation, retention of talent and a more engaged workforce.

We measure employee engagement on an ongoing basis to solicit feedback and understand views of our employees, faculty and culture.

The results from engagement surveys are used to implement programs and processes designed to enhance employee and faculty engagement and improve the experience.

Workforce Demographics

We have approximately 2,940 employees, including 1,930 full- and part-time faculty members, 450 of which are full-time, and 1,010 other professional staff to administer academic, technology, service, and business operations.

APUS employs approximately 1,790 full- and part-time faculty members and APEI and APUS employ approximately 890 other professional staff.

HCN employs approximately 140 full- and part-time faculty members and approximately 120 other professional staff.

At APUS, approximately 67% of our full-time faculty have a terminal degree in their field of study.

At HCN, all nursing faculty have earned a Bachelor of Science in Nursing or higher.

None of our employees are parties to a collective bargaining agreement, and management considers employee relations to be good.

Our employees have diverse backgrounds, influenced in part by the geography in which our headquarters, administrative facilities, and campuses are located, and by the communities we serve, in particular nursing, military, military-affiliated, and veteran communities.

As of December 31, 2020, approximately 65% of our faculty and staff at APEI and APUS were female and 19% of these positions were held by persons self-identifying as ethnically diverse.

At HCN, approximately 76% of our faculty and staff are female and 27% of these positions are held by persons self-identifying as ethnically diverse.

Talent Development

Our strategic initiatives require our management, faculty, staff, and skilled personnel to perform at a high level and to adapt and learn new skills and capabilities.

APUS requires each new faculty member to complete an orientation and training program that leads to their certification to teach at APUS and assignment to courses.

All faculty members participate in annual faculty-development opportunities and requirements.

Faculty retention at APUS is high, which we believe is primarily due to the online, asynchronous nature of APUS instruction.

HCN trains and develops new faculty through a formal, structured on-boarding, training, and mentoring program.

HCN competes with both nursing schools and traditional employers of healthcare professionals for open faculty positions.

Due to COVID-19, there has been an increase in demand for nursing professionals, impacting our ability to recruit and retain faculty at HCN.

APUS and HCN regularly review the performance of faculty by, among other things, monitoring the contact that faculty have with students, reviewing student feedback, and evaluating the learning outcomes achieved by students.

Impact of COVID-19

We are committed to the health and well-being of our employees.

In March 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we implemented our business continuity plan and substantially all of our APEI and APUS employees transitioned to a remote workforce, using digital platforms and virtual collaboration tools to communicate with one another and our institutions’ students.

Since then, we have cautiously allowed certain employees to return to an office work setting, following all Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and local guidelines and regulations.

Employees are continuing to follow a blended model of working onsite and remotely, and we have committed to determining the optimal mix of site-based, flexible, and fully remote models on a department and role basis for a post-pandemic environment.

Faculty and Staff for APEI and APUS

APUS’s faculty consists of approximately 1,790 full and part-time faculty members with relevant teaching and practitioner experience.

APEI and APUS also employ approximately 890 professional non-faculty staff to administer APUS’s academic, technology, service, and business operations.

Most of APEI’s and APUS’s non-faculty employees are based at its headquarters in Charles Town, West Virginia.

APUS has approximately 350 full-time faculty members with the remainder designated as part-time.

APUS establishes full-time and part-time positions based on program and course enrollment.

Many of APUS’s full-time faculty began their careers with APUS as part-time faculty.

We expect that APUS’s faculty headcount and the composition of full-time and part-time faculty will vary with fluctuations in enrollment.

We believe that APUS’s well-regarded faculty, which includes many former and current practitioners in their fields, attracts new students to APUS.

A significant majority of APUS’s graduate faculty members hold terminal degrees or doctorates in their relevant fields, and virtually all undergraduate faculty members hold graduate degrees.

Exceptions have been granted for a limited number of APUS’s faculty members who do not meet degree standards, but who provide evidence of significant experience and achievement in the field of study that they teach, in accordance with APUS’s faculty quality guidelines.

Many APUS faculty members have relevant experience at other universities and within military, corporate, and government institutions.

We believe that the quality of APUS’s faculty is critical to the student experience and student outcomes and is therefore vital to APUS’s success.

If the faculty member’s performance does not improve, APUS will no longer employ that faculty member to teach.

APUS does not offer tenure to faculty members.

APUS recruits faculty members through referrals by current faculty members, advertisements in higher education and trade association journals and its internet presence.

Upon selection for a position, APUS requires each new faculty member to complete an orientation and training program that leads to their certification to teach at APUS and assignment to courses.

All faculty members participate in annual faculty-development opportunities and requirements.

Faculty and Staff for Hondros

HCN’s faculty consists of approximately 140 faculty members with relevant teaching and nursing or healthcare practitioner experience.

HCN also employs approximately 120 professional staff members who administer HCN’s academic, technology, service, and business operations.

HCN has approximately 104 full-time faculty members with the remainder designated as part-time.

All faculty whose instruction is focused within the PN Program must have earned the minimum of a bachelor’s degree in nursing.

All faculty whose instruction is focused within the ADN Program must have earned the minimum of a master’s degree.

All HCN faculty whose instruction is nursing theory-based must have an active license to practice as a Registered Nurse.

In addition to the formal education of HCN’s faculty members, many have also obtained specialized certifications in the field of nursing.

We believe that selecting well-educated and qualified faculty members is important to HCN’s opportunity for success.

In addition to having the necessary educational requirements, HCN seeks faculty members who have demonstrated experience in the field of nursing.

HCN trains and develops new faculty through a formal, structured on-boarding, training, and mentoring program.

Information About our Executive Officers

Set forth below is certain information concerning our executive officers serving as of the date of this Annual Report.

Angela Selden

President and Chief Executive Officer

President of APUS

Sunderland, Jr., CPA

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

Executive Vice President, Chief Technology Officer

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Amy Bevilacqua

Senior Vice President, Chief Innovation Officer

Senior Vice President, Chief Operations Officer, APUS

Elizabeth LaGuardia Cooper

Senior Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer

Senior Vice President, Provost, APUS

Name Age Position

Angela Selden 55 President and Chief Executive Officer

Sunderland, Jr., CPA 60 Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

Dyberg 57 Executive Vice President, Chief Technology Officer

Beckett 53 Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Elizabeth LaGuardia Cooper 48 Senior Vice President, Chief Marketing Officer

Manning 53 Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer

Dyke 63 President of APUS

Gay 60 Senior Vice President, Chief Operations Officer, APUS

Smith 56 Senior Vice President, Provost, APUS

Angela Selden joined us in September 2019 as President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board of Directors.

10 unchanged sentences

Selden spent 18 years at Accenture, including serving as the Managing Partner, leading Accenture’s North American West Consumer and Industrial Products group to significant growth.

Boston joined us in September 2002 as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of APUS.

From June 2004 through September 2019, Dr.

Boston served as APEI President and Chief Executive Officer, and since October 2017, Dr.

Boston has served as President of APUS.

Boston will continue to serve as President of APUS through June 30, 2020 when he plans to retire.

Boston previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of APUS from June 2004 to July 2016.

Boston has served on our Board and as a Trustee of APUS since June 2004.

From 2001 to 2002, Dr.

Boston served as Chief Financial Officer of Sun Healthcare Group.

From 1998 to2001, Dr.

Boston served as Chief Operating Officer and, later, President of NeighborCare, Inc.

From 1993 to 1998, Dr.

Boston served as Vice President of Finance and later, Senior Vice President of Acquisitions and Development of Manor Healthcare Corporation (now HCR ManorCare).

From 1985 to 1992, Dr.

Boston served as Chief Financial Officer of Meridian Healthcare.

Sunderland, Jr., CPA joined us in February 2011 as a consultant and became Senior Vice President of Finance of APUS in December 2012.

25 unchanged sentences

Beckett is on the board of directors of Shenandoah Telecommunications Company, a wireless telephone and cable services company.

Amy Bevilacqua joined us in May 2016 as Senior Vice President and Chief Innovation Officer.

Bevilacqua previously founded and served as Managing Director of Bevilacqua Advisors LLC, an education equity investment advisory firm, from 2010 to 2014 and from October 2015 to April 2016.

Additionally, Ms.

Bevilacqua served as President of National Education Initiative from 2014 to September 2015.

Bevilacqua has also served as an Adjunct Instructor at University of Pennsylvania and as a member of multiple education focused councils and alumni boards.

Earlier in her career, Ms.

Bevilacqua served as a Senior Director for Public Broadcasting Service, Chief Marketing Officer for an early learning company and led the global rollout of a SaaS solution for McCann Worldgroup, the world’s largest network of advertising agencies.

Bevilacqua also served as General Manager for Films Media Group, a portfolio company for the private equity firm KKR, shepherding its sale to a strategic buyer, and was a Principal Consultant for PricewaterhouseCoopers’ entertainment and media consulting practice.

Gay joined APUS in December 2016 as Senior Vice President and Chief Operations Officer of APUS.

Prior to joining APUS, Mr.

Gay was a Senior Vice President at Maguire Associates, a research-based consulting firm serving educational institutions, from 2011 to November 2016.

Gay previously served as Vice President of Enrollment at The New School from 2008 to 2012, Executive Vice President of Operations and Enrollment Management at Cardean Learning Group from 2005 to 2007, and as the first Vice President of Enrollment Management at the University of Maryland University College from 2003 to 2005.

Prior to entering higher education, Mr.

Gay spent 17 years in the communications industry, serving in various senior management positions with MCI Communications Corp., LCC International, Inc.

and Solectron Global Services.

Elizabeth LaGuardia Cooper joined us in November 2003 as Vice President, Marketing of APUS, and became Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer of APUS in December 2017.

2 unchanged sentences

Prior to joining APUS, Ms.

Cooper was a Product Manager for NICE Systems, Inc., an enterprise software solutions company, from 2001 to 2003.

Cooper was a Product Manager for NICE

Systems, Inc., an enterprise software solutions company, from 2001 to 2003.

Prior to this, Ms.

2 unchanged sentences

Cooper also served as an Associate Promotion Manager from 1995 to 1999 at the United States Chamber of Commerce.

Smith joined APUS in November 2016 as Senior Vice President and Provost.

Manning joined us in June 2020 as Chief Human Resources Officer.

Prior to joining us, Ms.

Manning spent more than 16 years with Cisco Systems serving various roles, including most recently, Vice President of Human Resources.

Manning was an executive sponsor for Cisco’s Conscious Culture Initiative, designed to ensure an inclusive and collaborative working environment.

Manning also held various positions at PerkinElmer, GE Capital, and ABB Inc.

Dyke joined us in August 2020 as President of APUS.

Prior to joining us, Mr.

Dyke served as Chief Executive Officer since January 2017 of Great Hearts Academies, a charter school network with nearly 19,000 students.

Previously, Mr.

Dyke was with Kaplan University (now known as Purdue Global University) from January 2008 until October 2016, serving as the Vice President until 2010 and the President until 2016.

Prior to Kaplan University, Mr.

Dyke served as the Chief Executive Officer of Milestone Education, an education consulting firm that specializes in curriculum design, professional development, and college readiness strategies, from 2005 through 2007.

Gay joined us in December 2016 as Senior Vice President and Chief Operations Officer of APUS.

Prior to joining APUS, Mr.

Gay was a Senior Vice President at Maguire Associates, a research-based consulting firm serving educational institutions, from 2011 to November 2016.

Prior to entering higher education, Mr.

Gay spent 17 years in the communications industry, serving in various senior management positions with MCI Communications Corp., LCC International, Inc.

and Solectron Global Services.

Smith joined us in November 2016 as Senior Vice President and Provost of APUS.

Prior to joining APUS, Dr.

Smith was Vice Provost of distributed learning and Associate Professor of Practice at the Gladys L.

Benerd School of Education for the University of the Pacific from June 2014 to October 2016.Dr.

Benerd School of Education for the University of the Pacific from June 2014 to October 2016.

Smith served as founding Chief Academic Officer and Provost at MyCollege Foundation, where he oversaw the successful launch of Portmont College at Mount St.

2 unchanged sentences

REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT

In the United States, postsecondary education institutions are regulated by (i) accrediting agencies, (ii) state regulatory bodies, and (iii) the federal government through the U.S.

Department of Education, or ED.

In the United States, postsecondary education institutions are regulated by (i) accrediting agencies, (ii) state regulatory bodies, and (iii) the federal government through ED.

APUS and HCN are approved to participate in military tuition assistance programs administered by the U.S.

5 unchanged sentences

The postsecondary education regulatory environment has changed and may change in the future as a result of U.S.

federal elections.

For example, ED, under new leadership, acted in 2017 to delay the implementation of certain

regulations promulgated during the prior administration.

In the meantime, ED also has initiated new rulemaking processes to alter and in some cases rescind existing regulations and could act to change other existing ED policies and practices.

The relevant committees in Congress have held hearings and considered various policy and legislative proposals related to reauthorization of the Higher Education Act of 1964, as amended, or the HEA.

We cannot predict the extent to which the Executive Branch and Congress will act to reauthorize the HEA or change or eliminate ED regulations, policies, and practices, nor can we predict the form that new legislation, regulations, policies, or practices may take.

federal elections, including as a result of the U.S.

federal elections that took place in November 2020.

As a result of this election, Democrats, who tend to support more regulation of and restrictions on for-profit institutions, gained control of the executive branch and both houses of Congress.

The new Presidential administration and new Congress may act to change or eliminate currently effective legislation and ED regulations, or to enact new legislation, and ED, under new leadership, could initiate new rulemaking processes to alter existing regulations and could act to change existing ED policies and practices with respect to matters related to postsecondary education institutions.

For example, the Trump Administration delayed the implementation of, repealed, and amended certain regulations promulgated during the prior administration.

We cannot predict the extent to which the new Presidential Administration and new Congress will act to change or eliminate or to implement new ED regulations, policies, and practices, nor can we predict the form that new regulations, policies, or practices may take.

The relevant committees in the previous Congress held hearings and considered various policy and legislative proposals related to reauthorization of the Higher Education Act of 1964, as amended, or the HEA.

We cannot predict the

extent to which the Executive Branch and new Congress will act to reauthorize the HEA or change or eliminate ED regulations, policies, and practices, nor can we predict the form that new legislation, regulations, policies, or practices may take.

We cannot predict the extent to which any potential regulatory or legislative activity may impact us or our institutions, nor can we predict the possible associated burdens and costs.

Additional information regarding the regulatory and legislative environment and potential risks associated with it is available below and in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report.

Accreditation

3 unchanged sentences

An institution or program that does not meet the criteria may have its accreditation limited, revoked, or not renewed.

Accreditation by an accrediting agency recognized by ED is necessary to participate in the student financial aid programs authorized under Title IV of the HEA, or Title IV programs, and the DoD tuition assistance programs.

Accreditation by an accrediting agency recognized by ED is necessary to participate in Title IV and TA programs.

To be recognized by ED, accrediting agencies must adopt specific standards and procedures.

1 unchanged sentence

In 2016, NACIQI voted to recommend that ED renew ABHES’s recognition for five years and in February 2018, NACIQI voted to recommend that ED renew HLC’s recognition for five years.

If one of our institutions’ institutional accreditors was to lose its recognition as an accrediting agency and the institution was unable to obtain recognition from another recognized accrediting agency, the institution could lose its eligibility to participate in Title IV programs and DoD tuition assistance programs.

In October 2018, ED announced that it would establish a negotiated rulemaking committee broadly focused on accreditation and innovation, or the Accreditation and Innovation Committee, to prepare proposed regulations related to, among other things, ED’s recognition of accrediting agencies and related institutional eligibility issues.

On November 1, 2019, ED published final regulations, portions of which relating to accreditation generally will be effective on July 1, 2020.

On November 1, 2019, ED published final regulations, portions of which relating to accreditation generally went into effect on July 1, 2020.

The final regulations revise ED’s process for recognition and review of accrediting agencies and the criteria used by ED to recognize accrediting agencies.

4 unchanged sentences

HLC most recently reaffirmed the accreditation status of APUS in July 2011.

The next comprehensive evaluation for reaffirmation of accreditation is scheduled for the 2020-2021 academic year.

In August 2016, HLC adopted a policy that permits HLC to designate publicly an institution as “in financial distress” or “under governmental investigation” where such situations could impact the institution’s operations and HLC believes the public should have this information in making a decision to attend or continue to attend the institution.

A designated institution must undergo special monitoring, and HLC may deny or defer an application from such an institution to make substantive changes in its business.

A designation typically will extend for not more than two years and may be removed when HLC determines the institution has resolved the issues that led to the designation.

In February 2018, HLC imposed a “governmental investigation” designation on APUS in connection with a Civil Investigative Demand, or CID, issued to APUS in July 2017 by the Attorney General of Massachusetts, which is discussed more fully below in this section in “Consumer Protection.” In August 2018, APUS notified HLC that the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and APUS voluntarily entered into an Assurance of Discontinuance, or AOD, to resolve the CID, and HLC notified APUS that in light of the AOD, HLC had removed the designation.

In November 2018, HLC approved APUS’s application for a change in structure related to APUS’s proposal to enter into a shared services model with APEI, and we entered into an intercompany agreement to implement the shared services model.

As required by HLC policy and ED regulation, HLC conducted a focused site visit in May 2019.

The site visit team found that evidence of compliance with the commitments APUS made in its application and with HLC’s Eligibility Requirements and Criteria for Accreditation was sufficiently demonstrated and no further follow up was

In connection with a routine mid-cycle review of APUS, HLC required APUS to submit an interim report on leadership of APEI and APUS.

APUS timely submitted the report in April 2019.

HLC accepted the first interim report and requested that APUS submit a second interim report, which APUS timely submitted in November 2019.

The next comprehensive evaluation for reaffirmation of accreditation is scheduled for the 2020-2021 academic year, with a related site visit scheduled to occur in April 2021.

• Hondros College of Nursing, or HCN, is institutionally accredited by the Accrediting Bureau of Health Education Schools, or ABHES, a national accrediting agency recognized by ED.

In June 2018, ABHES granted HCN initial institutional accreditation through February 28, 2021.

At that time, HCN was accredited by the Accrediting Council of Independent Colleges and Schools, or ACICS.

In September 2018, ED approved HCN’s application to designate ABHES, rather than ACICS, as its institutional accrediting agency for purposes of participation in the Title IV programs.

On October 1, 2018, HCN voluntarily withdrew from ACICS accreditation.

The next comprehensive evaluation for renewal of ABHES accreditation, which will include HCN’s submission of evidence related to its compliance with ABHES standards and a series of site visits, is scheduled for April 2020.

(Prior to June 2018, HCN was accredited by the Accrediting Council of Independent Colleges and Schools, or ACICS.) The comprehensive evaluation for renewal of ABHES accreditation, which would include HCN’s submission of evidence related to its compliance with ABHES standards and a series of site visits, was scheduled for April 2020 but was postponed due to the pandemic and related disruptions.

In August and September 2020, ABHES conducted virtual site visits to HCN’s campuses to assess compliance with ABHES accreditation standards.

HCN has formally responded to each of the findings, and ABHES has taken no further action.

In February 2021, ABHES granted HCN continued accreditation through February 2027 for all programs at all campuses.

ABHES annually reviews student achievement indicators, including retention rate, placement rate, and licensing and credentialing examination pass rate.

Under ABHES policy, ABHES may withdraw accreditation at any time if it determines that an institution fails to demonstrate at least a 70% retention rate for each program, a 70% placement rate for each program, and a 70% pass rate on mandatory licensing and credentialing examinations, or fails to meet the state-mandated results for credentialing or licensure.

Under ABHES policy, ABHES may withdraw accreditation at any time if it

determines that an institution fails to demonstrate at least a 70% retention rate for each program, a 70% placement rate for each program, and a 70% pass rate on mandatory licensing and credentialing examinations or fails to meet the state-mandated results for credentialing or licensure.

Alternatively, ABHES may in its discretion provide an opportunity for a program to come into compliance within a period of time specified by ABHES, and ABHES may extend the period for achieving compliance if a program demonstrates improvement over time or other good cause.

For the reporting year ended June 30, 2018, several HCN programs did not satisfy ABHES’s threshold requirements for retention rates or placement rates.

As a result, in February 2019, ABHES directed HCN to provide evidence to ABHES that the relevant programs had achieved a retention rate of at least 70% for the period from July 1, 2018 through March 31, 2019 and a placement rate of at least 70% for the reporting year ended June 30, 2018, along with additional documentation and analysis related to those rates and pertinent action plans.

HCN timely submitted the required progress report.

For the reporting year ended June 30, 2019, each of HCN’s programs at each of HCN’s campuses satisfied ABHES’s placement rate requirements but failed to satisfy ABHES’s threshold requirements for retention rates.

4 unchanged sentences

ABHES notified HCN that the relevant programs at the Cleveland, Dayton, and Toledo campuses must come into compliance by May 1, 2020 and that the PN Program at the Columbus campus must come into compliance by May 1, 2021.

In October 2019, HCN notified ABHES that the PN Programs at each of the Dayton, Toledo, and Columbus campuses failed to satisfy ABHES’s threshold requirements for retention rates for the reporting year ended June 30, 2019.

In February 2020, ABHES notified HCN that it had taken additional actions with respect to certain HCN programs at certain locations related to those programs’ performance in relation to ABHES student achievement indicators.

2 unchanged sentences

(ii) removed the ADN programs at the Cleveland and Toledo campuses from outcomes reporting status after placement rates for those programs at those locations met the 70% compliance threshold;

(iii) continued outcomes reporting status for the PN program at the Columbus campus because it has not met the retention rate compliance threshold and reconfirmed that it has until May 1, 2021 to do so;

(iii) continued outcomes reporting status for the PN program at the Columbus campus because it has not met the retention rate compliance threshold and confirmed that it has until May 1, 2021 to do so;

and (iv) directed HCN to provide evidence to ABHES that the ADN programs at each of the Columbus, Cleveland, Cincinnati, Dayton, and Toledo campuses and the PN programs at the Cleveland and Cincinnati campuses met the retention rate compliance threshold for the period from July 1, 2019 through March 31, 2020, and informed HCN that those programs must meet the compliance threshold by May 1, 2021.

There can be no assurance that HCN will be able to demonstrate compliance by the relevant deadlines in all cases.

If HCN is unable to bring the programs into compliance during the timeframe established by ABHES, unless such timeframe is extended for good cause, ABHES may take other action, up to and including withdrawing accreditation for those programs.

In addition, adverse actions taken by ABHES may trigger reporting requirements and ED action under ED’s Borrower Defense Regulations, see “Regulatory Environment - Student Financing Sources and Related Regulations/Requirements - Department of Education - Regulation of Title IV Financial Aid Programs - Borrower Defenses.”

On April 22, 2020, HCN notified ABHES that, as of March 31, 2020, HCN met the 70% retention rate threshold at each campus location.

For the reporting year July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020, HCN’s programs satisfied ABHES’s threshold requirements for retention rate, placement rate, and mandatory licensure and credentialing examination pass rates.

There can be no assurance that HCN will be able to continue to demonstrate compliance in all cases.

If HCN fails to meet the student achievement indicators and is unable to maintain compliance during any timeframe established by ABHES, unless such timeframe is extended for good cause, ABHES may take other action, up to and including withdrawing accreditation for those programs.

On August 12, 2020, ABHES requested that HCN provide ABHES with a financial improvement plan that details HCN’s financial objectives, outlines HCN’s financial improvement plans, including a specific timeline, and addresses the net loss for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019.

The plan was timely submitted to ABHES.

ABHES has taken no additional action regarding this matter since the plan was submitted.

Adverse actions taken by ABHES may trigger reporting requirements and ED action under ED’s Borrower Defense Regulations.

See “Regulatory Environment - Student Financing Sources and Related Regulations/Requirements - Department of Education - Regulation of Title IV Financial Aid Programs - Borrower Defenses.”

Institutional accreditation is an important attribute of our institutions.

1 unchanged sentence

Students and sponsors of tuition reimbursement programs look to accreditation for quality assurance, and employers rely on institutions’ accreditation status when evaluating a candidate’s credentials.

In addition, the loss of institutional accreditation would result in the loss of eligibility to participate in Title IV programs and DoD tuition assistance programs.

In addition to institutional accreditation, our institutions have obtained specialized accreditation or professional recognition for certain programs, as described more fully above in each reporting segment’s section under “Our Institutions” entitled “Accreditation.” If one of our institutions fails to satisfy the standards of these specialized accrediting agencies or professional organizations, the relevant programs could lose the specialized accreditation or professional recognition, which could result in materially reduced student enrollments in those programs, prevent the institution from offering the programs in certain states where programmatic accreditation is required, or prevent our students from seeking and obtaining licensure or employment.

In addition, the loss of institutional accreditation would result in the loss of eligibility to participate in Title IV programs and TA.

entitled “Accreditation.” If one of our institutions fails to satisfy the standards of these specialized accrediting agencies or professional organizations, the relevant programs could lose the specialized accreditation or professional recognition, which could result in materially reduced student enrollments in those programs, prevent the institution from offering the programs in certain states where programmatic accreditation is required, or prevent our students from seeking and obtaining licensure or employment.

State Licensure/Authorization

4 unchanged sentences

State laws and regulations may affect our institutions’ ability to offer educational programs, open locations, and award degrees.

If one of our institutions fails to comply with a state’s requirements, it may lose its state licensure or authorization, which would result in the institution’s inability to enroll students in that state, and could result in the institution’s inability to receive Title IV program funds and DoD tuition assistance funds, at least for students in that state.

If one of our institutions fails to comply with a state’s requirements, it may lose its state licensure or authorization, which would result in the institution’s inability to enroll students in that state and could result in the institution’s inability to receive Title IV program funds and TA funds, at least for students in that state.

Some states assert authority to regulate an institution if its educational programs are offered to residents of those states, regardless of whether the institution maintains a physical presence in the state.

The increased popularity of online education has led and may further lead to new laws and regulations and new interpretations of existing laws and regulations.

The growth of online education has led and may further lead to new laws and regulations and new interpretations of existing laws and regulations.

New laws, regulations, or interpretations could increase our cost of doing business and affect our ability to recruit students in particular states, which could negatively affect enrollments and revenue and have a material adverse effect on our business.

8 unchanged sentences

We cannot predict the extent to which states will retain membership in SARA, the manner in which SARA’s rules may be modified, interpreted and enforced, our institutions’ ability to comply with SARA’s requirements and retain eligibility, or the impact that failure to meet the SARA requirements may have on our business.

For information on our institutions’ status under SARA, see “—State Authorization/Licensure of Our Institutions” below.

Many states also have specific requirements that an individual must satisfy in order to be licensed as a professional in a specified field.

8 unchanged sentences

If ED determines that an institution does not have the required state approval, the institution will be ineligible to participate in Title IV programs.

If one of our institutions were to lose its ability to participate in Title IV programs in connection with “home” state authorization requirements, it would also lose its ability to participate in DoD tuition assistance programs.

The loss of ability of one of our institutions to participate in either Title IV programs or DoD tuition assistance programs could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

The loss of ability of one of our institutions to participate in either Title IV programs or TA could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

State Authorization of Online Education

In December 2016, ED published final regulations addressing, among other issues, state authorization of programs offered through distance education, which were scheduled to go into effect on July 1, 2018.

On June 29, 2018, ED announced that it would delay the effective date of the distance education portion of the state authorization final regulations, or the Distance Education Rule, until July 1, 2020.

In June 2018, ED announced that it would delay the effective date of the distance education portion of the state authorization final regulations, or the Distance Education Rule, until July 1, 2020.

In April 2019, a U.S.

5 unchanged sentences

In June 2019, ED published certain portions of the agreed-upon regulatory language, including those provisions related to state authorization, in a notice of proposed rulemaking.

On November 1, 2019, ED published final regulations concerning state authorization, which generally will be effective on July 1, 2020, except that institutions may in their discretion implement early regulations relating to state authorization and institutional information disclosures.

On November 1, 2019, ED published final regulations concerning state authorization, which went into effect on July 1, 2020, except that institutions may in their discretion implement early regulations relating to state authorization and institutional information disclosures.

APUS implemented early those regulations effective November 1, 2019.

3 unchanged sentences

APUS is authorized to enroll students from each of the 50 states and the District of Columbia.

APUS is headquartered in Charles Town, West Virginia, with administrative offices in Virginia.

APUS is headquartered in Charles Town, West Virginia, with administrative offices in Virginia that will be vacated at the end of June 2021.

APUS is authorized to offer its programs by the West Virginia Higher Education Policy Commission, or WVHEPC.

Under current law, if APUS were to lose its accreditation by HLC, WVHEPC may suspend, withdraw, or revoke APUS’s authorization.

Failure to comply with WVHEPC requirements could result in APUS losing its authorization from WVHEPC, its accreditation by HLC, its eligibility to participate in Title IV programs and DoD tuition assistance programs, or its ability to offer certain programs, any of which could force APUS to cease operations.

Under Virginia law, because it has administrative offices in Virginia, APUS is required to be authorized by the State Council of Higher Education for Virginia, or SCHEV.

Failure to comply with WVHEPC requirements could result in APUS losing its authorization from WVHEPC, its accreditation by HLC, its eligibility to participate in Title IV programs and TA, or its ability to offer certain programs, any of which could force APUS to cease operations.

Under Virginia law, because it currently has administrative offices in Virginia, APUS is required to be authorized by the State Council of Higher Education for Virginia, or SCHEV.

Accordingly, APUS has obtained SCHEV’s authorization to operate as an out-of-state institution.

2 unchanged sentences

HCN is headquartered in Westerville, Ohio, and has five campuses in Ohio.

Classes are expected to begin at an additional campus in Indianapolis, Indiana in the second quarter of 2020, initially only in HCN’s PN program.

In April 2020, HCN began classes for the first cohort of students enrolled in the PN Program at HCN’s new campus in Indianapolis, Indiana, and in April 2021, HCN will begin offering classes at a new campus in Akron, Ohio.

HCN is authorized to offer instruction in Ohio by the Ohio State Board.

HCN’s PN and ADN programs are approved by OBN.

HCN is authorized by the Indiana Board for Proprietary Education/Indiana Commission for Higher Education to offer instruction in Indiana, and on November 21, 2019 the Indiana State Board of Nursing voted to grant initial accreditation and authorize the admission of HCN’s first cohort of up to 30 students at its Indianapolis campus.

HCN has participated in SARA since its application was approved in April 2016.

HCN’s PN and ADN programs are approved by the Ohio Board of Nursing, or OBN.

HCN has been authorized by the Indiana Board for Proprietary Education/Indiana Commission for Higher Education to offer instruction at the campus in Indiana.

The Indiana State Board of Nursing has granted initial accreditation and authorized the admission of the first cohort of students.

HCN first began to participate in SARA in April 2016.

Its SARA approval lapsed in April 2020 and was renewed in August 2020.

To apply for licensure to practice nursing in Ohio, an applicant must have successfully completed a nursing education program approved by the OBN.

2 unchanged sentences

In March 2017, the OBN placed HCN’s ADN Program on provisional approval because the ADN Program had not met the pass rate standard for four consecutive years.

In March 2019, the OBN found that HCN’s ADN Program did not meet the OBN pass rate standard in 2018 for a sixth consecutive year, and we do not expect to meet the pass rate standard in 2019.

The OBN will consider restoring a program to Full Approval status if the program meets the pass rate standard for at least two consecutive years.

In March 2020, the OBN found that HCN’s ADN Program did not meet the OBN pass rate standard in 2019 for a seventh consecutive year, and we do not expect to meet the pass rate standard in 2020.

The OBN will consider restoring a program to Full Approval status if the program meets the pass rate standard for at least two

consecutive years.

If a program on provisional approval fails to meet OBN requirements at the end of the time period established for provisional approval, the OBN may propose to continue provisional approval for a set time period or may propose to withdraw approval.

HCN has been implementing changes, including curriculum, admissions, and academic achievement and course retake policy changes, that are designed to improve NCLEX scores over time, but there is no assurance that these changes will be successful or will not have negative effects on HCN’s enrollment.

For example, enrollments in HCN’s ADN Program in 2019 were significantly lower than HCN planned, which we believe is likely partly associated with the implementation of new academic achievement and admissions requirements that had the effect of reducing enrollments from qualified students.

For example, enrollments in HCN’s ADN Program in 2019 were significantly lower than HCN planned, which we believe was likely partly associated with the implementation of new academic achievement and admissions requirements that had the effect of reducing enrollments from qualified students.

If HCN is unable to improve NCLEX scores over time, this situation could have an adverse impact on our ability to enroll students and eventually our ability to continue HCN’s ADN Program, any of which would have an adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flow, and financial condition.

1 unchanged sentence

A program that is under initial accreditation may not be granted full accreditation if the program’s pass rate is lower than one standard deviation below the average national pass rate.

In addition, if the program’s pass rate is lower than one standard deviation below the average national pass rate for three consecutive years, the program may be required to subject to additional oversight or a change in accreditation status.

In addition, if the program’s pass rate is lower than one standard deviation below the average national pass rate for three consecutive years, the program may be subject to additional oversight or a change in accreditation status.

Failure to comply with state authorization or licensure requirements could restrict our institutions’ ability to recruit or enroll students or result in other sanctions, including fines and penalties.

2 unchanged sentences

Student Financing Sources and Related Regulations/Requirements

Our students finance their education through a combination of Title IV programs, DoD tuition assistance programs, education benefits administered by the VA, private loans, corporate reimbursement programs, individual resources and, in the case of HCN, extended payment plan options.

Participation in federal student aid programs, including those administered by DoD and VA, and the extended payment plan options at HCN, adds to the regulation of our operations.

Our students finance their education through a combination of Title IV programs, TA, education benefits administered by the VA, private loans, corporate reimbursement programs, individual resources and, in the case of HCN, institutional grants and an extended payment plan option.

Participation in federal student aid programs, including those administered by DoD and VA, and the extended payment plan option at HCN, adds to the regulation of our operations.

In particular, the HEA and related ED regulations subject us to significant scrutiny in the form of numerous standards we must satisfy in order to participate in and administer Title IV programs.

7 unchanged sentences

Pell Grants are awarded to undergraduate students who demonstrate financial need.

In accordance with applicable appropriations legislation, the maximum Pell Grant was $6,195 for the 2019-2020 award year and will be $6,345 for the 2020-2021 award year.

In accordance with applicable appropriations legislation, the maximum Pell Grant is $6,345 for the 2020-2021 award year and $6,495 for the 2021-2022 award year.

A student’s lifetime eligibility to receive a Pell Grant is 12 semesters (or its equivalent).

Students may not be able to use all of this eligibility at our

institutions based on their prior receipt of Pell Grants at other institutions.

Students may not be able to use all of this eligibility at our institutions based on their prior receipt of Pell Grants at other institutions.

Institutions may award Pell Grant funds for up to 150% of a student’s standard scheduled Pell Grant in one award year.

This provision, which commonly is referred to as “year-round Pell,” is intended to allow students to graduate more quickly and with less debt.

Some of our students may also be eligible for other Title IV grant programs, such as the Federal Supplemental Education Opportunity Grant or Teacher Education Assistance for College and Higher Education, or TEACH, Grant.

Some of our students may also be eligible for other Title IV grant programs, such as the Federal Supplemental Education Opportunity Grant .

The Title IV programs are subject to Congressional action in terms of appropriations and other legislation that may affect funding levels, student eligibility, and other requirements.

14 unchanged sentences

If ED determines that a provisionally-certified institution is unable to meet its responsibilities, it may seek to revoke the institution’s certification to participate in Title IV programs with fewer due process protections than if it were fully-certified.

APUS is certified to participate in Title IV programs through September 30, 2020 and will be required to apply timely for recertification in order to continue to participate in the Title IV programs after that date.

As discussed more fully in “Compliance with Regulatory Standards and the Effect of Regulatory Violations - Compliance Reviews,” in September 2016 ED began a program review of APUS’s administration of the Title IV programs during the 2014-2015 and 2015-2016 award years, and that program review remains open and ongoing.

If the program review and any associated liabilities remain unresolved at the time ED acts on APUS’s recertification application and ED decides to recertify APUS, we believe such recertification is likely to be on a provisional basis because of the unresolved program review and associated liabilities.

In June 2020, APUS timely applied for recertification to participate in Title IV programs.

On September 9, 2020, ED notified APUS that it had completed its review of APUS’s application and had granted APUS provisional certification until June 30, 2023.

ED issued APUS a provisional program participation agreement, or PPPA, outlining the terms of provisional certification.

As described in the PPPA, the reason ED granted approval on a provisional basis is because APUS was subject to an open program review at the time of renewal.

HCN was provisionally certified to participate in the Title IV programs from November 2013 until September 2018.

30 unchanged sentences

At the request of ED, for purposes of evaluating the financial responsibility of our institutions, including the composite score calculation, we supply consolidated financial statements to ED.

In final regulations published November 1, 2016, which we refer to as the 2016 Borrower Defense Regulations, ED modified its financial responsibility standards to provide that an institution (other than a public institution) may not be able to meet its financial or administrative obligations, and is therefore not financially responsible, if it is subject to one or more triggering events that occur on or after July 1, 2017.

On September 23, 2019, ED published new final regulations, which we refer to as the 2020 Borrower Defense Regulations, which among other things amend ED’s financial responsibility provisions in several respects.

Like the 2016 Borrower Defense Regulations, the 2020 Borrower Defense Regulations identify certain conditions or other triggering events that have or may have an adverse material effect on the institution’s financial condition, in response to which ED would or could require that the institution submit some form of financial protection, such as a letter of credit, to ED.

Under the 2020 Borrower Defense Regulations, ED will consider an institution unable to meet its financial or administrative obligations under ED’s financial responsibility regulations if the institution is subject to one of certain mandatory triggering events that ED believes have or are likely to have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the institution, some of which are the same as under the 2016 Borrower Defense Regulations.

In September 2019, ED published new final regulations, which we refer to as the 2020 Borrower Defense Regulations, which among other things amend ED’s financial responsibility provisions in several respects.

ED previously modified financial responsibility standards in regulations published in November 2016, which we refer to as the 2016 Borrower Defense Regulations, to provide that an institution (other than a public institution) may not be able to meet its financial or administrative obligations, and is therefore not financially responsible, if it is subject to one or more triggering events.

The 2020 Borrower Defense Regulations identify certain conditions or other triggering events that have or may have an adverse material effect on the institution’s financial condition, in response to which ED would or could require that the institution submit some form of financial protection, such as a letter of credit, to ED.

ED may consider an institution not to be financially responsible if ED determines that one of certain discretionary triggering events is likely to have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the institution.

The set of discretionary triggering events under the 2020 Borrower Defense Regulations includes some of the same events that are triggering events under the 2016 Borrower Defense Regulations.

If the institution is subject to two or more of these discretionary triggering events, ED will consider the institution to be subject to a mandatory triggering event and therefore unable to meet its financial or administrative obligations.

2 unchanged sentences

The 2020 Borrower Defense Regulations also implement updates to ED’s calculations of an institution’s composite score to reflect certain changes in Financial Accounting Standards Board accounting standards and to update the definitions and terms used to describe the calculation of the composite score, including leases and long-term debt.

With limited exceptions related to optional early implementation of modifications to ED’s composite score methodology, the 2016 Borrower Defense Regulations will remain in effect until the 2020 Borrower Defense Regulations take effect on July 1, 2020.

The 2020 Borrower Defense Regulations took effect on July 1, 2020.

Failure of one of our institutions to meet the “financial responsibility” requirements, because it does not satisfy the minimum composite score or is unable to establish financial responsibility on an alternative basis, or because it fails to meet other financial responsibility requirements, could cause the institution to lose access to Title IV program funding, or result in other penalties or conditions on continued participation.

4 unchanged sentences

Using the applicable 90/10 formula, the following table contains the percentage of cash-basis revenue earned from Title IV program funds:

2018 2019 2020

APUS 41% 38% 35%

HCN 82% 80% 82%

In recent years, Congress has considered various proposals that would modify the 90/10 Rule.

One current proposal would decrease the limit on Title IV funds from 90% to 85% and another current proposal would maintain the 90% limit but count DoD tuition assistance and VA education benefits toward that limit.

In contrast, a previous proposal would have eliminated the 90/10 Rule.

At this time we cannot predict whether Congress will pass legislation to modify the 90/10 Rule.

In February and March 2021, the House and Senate each passed versions of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, which each include a provision that amends the 90/10 Rule to count all federal education assistance towards the “90%” portion of the calculation.

The bill requires additional Congressional approval and Presidential signature prior to enactment.

If the bill is enacted in the form passed by the Senate, the revised 90/10 Rule would be subject to negotiated rulemaking, and we expect the Department of Education to seek in that process to define federal education assistance to include TA and VA education benefits.

Under the bill, the revised 90/10 Rule would go into effect no earlier than July 1, 2023.

At this time we cannot predict whether Congress will pass additional legislation to modify the 90/10 Rule, and what sources of funds could be counted toward the limit.

For example, some recent proposals have focused on decreasing the limit on Title IV funds from 90% to 85% but not changing the funds that count toward that limit, others have proposed maintaining the 90% limit but counting TA and VA education benefits toward that limit, and others would both decrease the limit on Title IV funds to 85% and count all federal education assistance funds toward that limit.

Such proposals, or other similar legislation, should they become law, could have a material adverse impact on the operations of our institutions.

3 unchanged sentences

ED may also fine an institution, or take administrative action to limit, suspend, revoke, deny, or terminate an institution’s eligibility to participate in the Title IV programs, if the institution violates the prohibition.

We believe that our employee compensation and third-party contractual arrangements comply with the incentive payment rule currently in effect.

However, because there are ambiguities as to how the rule is interpreted and enforced by ED, we can make no assurances that ED would not find deficiencies in our past, current, or future employee compensation plans and relevant third-party contractual arrangements.

In addition, in recent years, other postsecondary educational institutions have been named as defendants to whistleblower lawsuits, known as “qui tam” cases, brought pursuant to the Federal False Claims Act, alleging that an institution’s compensation practices did not comply with the incentive payment rule.

We have designed our employee compensation and third-party contractual arrangements to comply with the incentive payment rule currently in effect.

However, because there are ambiguities as to how the rule is interpreted and enforced by ED and because we could make errors in implementation, we can make no assurances that ED would not find deficiencies in our past, current, or future employee compensation plans and relevant third-party contractual arrangements.

In addition, in recent years, other postsecondary educational institutions have been named as defendants in whistleblower lawsuits, known as “qui tam” cases, brought pursuant to the Federal False Claims Act, alleging that an institution’s compensation practices did not comply with the incentive payment rule.

Any such litigation could be costly and could divert management’s time and attention away from the business, regardless of whether a claim has merit.

1 unchanged sentence

Under the HEA, for-profit schools are eligible to participate in Title IV programs in connection with educational programs that lead to “gainful employment in a recognized occupation,” except for certain programs leading to a bachelor’s degree in liberal arts.

Historically, this concept has not been defined in detail.

On October 31, 2014, ED published final regulations relating to gainful employment, which we refer to as the GE Regulations.

The GE Regulations went into effect on July 1, 2015, with the exception of certain disclosure requirements, which generally went into effect January 1, 2017.

The GE Regulations, among other things, establish debt-related measures for determining whether certain postsecondary education programs prepare students for gainful employment in a recognized occupation, require institutions to make certain disclosures in connection with gainful employment programs, and require institutions to make certain certifications to ED concerning gainful employment programs.

On July 1, 2019, ED published a final rule rescinding the GE Regulations.

The rescission is scheduled to take effect July 1, 2020, but in guidance issued on June 28, 2019, ED explained that the Secretary of ED would exercise her authority to designate the rescission for early implementation by institutions that elect to implement early the rescission.

Institutions that implement the rescission early will not be required to report data related to gainful employment programs to ED, comply with gainful employment disclosure requirements, or comply with related certification requirements, among other requirements.

APUS and HCN have elected to implement early the rescission of the 2014 GE Regulations.

APUS intends to continue to voluntarily make certain disclosures related to gainful employment programs.

Historically, this concept had not been defined in detail.

Regulations relating to gainful employment, which we refer to as the GE Regulations, went into effect in July 2015, with the exception of certain disclosure requirements, which generally went into effect in January 2017.

The GE Regulations, among other things, established debt-related measures for determining whether certain postsecondary education programs prepare students for gainful employment in a recognized occupation, required institutions to make certain disclosures in connection with gainful employment programs, and required institutions to make certain certifications to ED concerning gainful employment programs.

On July 1, 2019, ED rescinded the GE Regulations, effective July 1, 2020, but elective early implementation of the rescission was permitted.

Institutions that implemented the rescission early were not required to report

data related to gainful employment programs to ED, comply with gainful employment disclosure requirements, or comply with related certification requirements, among other requirements.

APUS and HCN elected to implement early the rescission of the GE Regulations.

APUS continues to voluntarily make certain disclosures related to gainful employment programs.

Student Loan Defaults.

4 unchanged sentences

The final official ED cohort default rates for APUS and HCN for the federal fiscal years 2015, 2016, and 2017 are as follows:

2015 2016 2017

APUS 23.8% 18.5% 15.2%

HCN 11.4% 11.3% 12.1%

If one or both of our institutions has a default rate in excess of allowable levels, it could result in that institution’s or those institutions’ loss of eligibility to participate in Title IV programs or incurring additional costs related to default prevention, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

As a result of the CARES Act and subsequent administrative actions, ED implemented a temporary freeze on payments and interest accruals for federal student loans.

This administrative forbearance period began on March 20, 2020 and will run until at least September 30, 2021.

During this period of temporary relief, we would expect borrowers to be substantially less likely to default on federal student loans, which may artificially lower our institutions’ cohort default rates for federal fiscal years 2018 and 2019.

Upon expiration of the temporary freeze, borrowers will again need to make repayments on loans and loans will again accrue interest, which may lead to higher cohort default rates for federal fiscal year 2020 compared to federal fiscal years that reflect the effects of the temporary freeze on payments and interest accruals.

See “Company Overview - COVID-19 Pandemic.”

Privacy of Student Personal Information and Records.

10 unchanged sentences

States also have so called “mini-FTC Acts” under which they may bring enforcement actions similar to those of the FTC as well as other applicable privacy and security laws.

A new law in California, the California Consumer Privacy Act, or the CCPA, which took effect in January 2020, imposes new disclosure obligations and contains a broad array of consumer rights relating to their personal information, including among others, the right to obtain copies of their personal information collected in the past 12 months, the ability to opt out from the sale of personal information, and the right to demand the deletion of personal information.

For example, a new law in California, the California Consumer Privacy Act, or the CCPA, which took effect in January 2020 and for which regulations were issued later in 2020, imposes new disclosure obligations and contains a broad array of consumer rights relating to their personal information, including among others, the right to obtain copies of their personal information collected in the past 12 months, the ability to opt out from the sale of personal information, and the right to demand the deletion of personal information.

The CCPA also creates new consumer notice obligations.

The CCPA has the potential for significant civil penalties for failing to comply as well as a private right of action and statutory damages for data breaches that are the result of unreasonable security, which may increase data breach litigation, including class action litigation.

CCPA is now in effect, the California Attorney General is in the process of developing regulations, the final form of which may significantly impact the CCPA compliance measures we have or will undertake.

Our collection of personal information relating to students or other individuals who are in the European Union, or EU, may implicate the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, which took effect in May 2018.

The GDPR contains numerous requirements relating to the collection, possession, use, and disclosure of personal information, but enforcement priorities and interpretation of certain provisions remain unclear.

In November 2020, California voters passed the California Privacy Rights Act, which will expand the CCPA’s requirements when it becomes effective in 2023.

In addition, our collection of personal information relating to students or other individuals who are in the European Union, or EU, may implicate the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, which took effect in May 2018.

The GDPR contains numerous requirements

relating to the collection, possession, use, and disclosure of personal information, but enforcement priorities and interpretation of certain provisions remain unclear.

The GDPR requirements are generally stricter and more comprehensive than those of the U.S.

5 unchanged sentences

If one of our institutions is found to have violated Section 504, it may be required to modify existing content and functionality of its online classroom or other uses of technology, including through adoption of specific technical standards.

An institution that does not come into compliance with Section 504 could lose access to federal funding, including the ability to participate in the Title IV programs and DoD tuition assistance programs.

An institution that does not come into compliance with Section 504 could lose access to federal funding, including the ability to participate in the Title IV programs and TA.

College Affordability and Transparency Lists.

3 unchanged sentences

ED also posts lists of the top 10% of institutions in each of the nine categories with lowest tuition and fees or the lowest net price for the most recent academic year.

APUS was listed as the private for-profit, four-year or more undergraduate institution with the 14th lowest tuition for 2017-2018, the most recent year for which data is available, and 17th lowest net price for 2016-2017, in each case the most recent years for which data is available.

APUS was listed as the private for-profit, four-year or more undergraduate institution with the 13th lowest tuition for 2018-2019, and 14th lowest tuition for 2017-2018, in each case the most recent years for which data is available.

We cannot determine the extent to which such lists have impacted or may impact our enrollments, reputation, or operating results.

3 unchanged sentences

While a significant portion of APUS students receive Title IV program aid, they are a minority of APUS’s students.

On August 14, 2018, ED announced a plan to update the College Scorecard or a similar web-based tool to provide program-level outcomes for all higher education programs at all institutions that participate in the Title IV Programs.

In May 2019, ED updated the College Scorecard to include additional information, including more comprehensive graduation rates for full-time, part-time, first-time, and transfer students, and in November 2019 ED supplemented the College Scorecard to include program-level outcomes data such as median earnings and median loan debt.

In August 2018, ED announced a plan to update the College Scorecard or a similar web-based tool to provide program-level outcomes for all higher education programs at all institutions that participate in the Title IV Programs.

In 2019, ED updated the College Scorecard to include additional information, including more comprehensive graduation rates and program-level outcomes data such as median earnings and median loan debt.

In December 2020, ED further updated the College Scorecard to include data on average earnings two years out from graduation based on field of study and data on student loan repayment.

We cannot determine the extent to which the data collected and published by ED has impacted or may impact our enrollments, reputation, or operating results.

10 unchanged sentences

If the student withdraws after the 60% threshold, then the student has earned 100% of the Title IV program funds.

The institution

must return to the appropriate Title IV programs, in a specified order, the lesser of (i) the unearned Title IV program funds or (ii) the institutional charges incurred by the student for the period multiplied by the percentage of unearned Title IV program funds.

The institution must return to the appropriate Title IV programs, in a specified order, the lesser of (i) the unearned Title IV program funds or (ii) the institutional charges incurred by the student for the period multiplied by the percentage of unearned Title IV program

An institution must return the funds no later than 45 days after the date of the institution’s determination that a student withdrew.

2 unchanged sentences

In a Final Audit Determination letter in January 2018, ED conveyed its finding that funds had not been returned timely.

ED also noted that a similar finding had been made in an open program review with respect to which APUS has not yet received a program review report.

ED also noted that a similar finding had been made in a program review that ED subsequently closed.

In connection with the finding, ED required that APUS post an irrevocable letter of credit for approximately $700,000.

APUS posted the letter of credit March 2018 and it expired December 31, 2019.

APUS posted the letter of credit in March 2018 and it expired December 31, 2019.

If ED determines that one of our institutions has repeatedly failed to comply with ED regulations, it may take adverse action against the institution on the basis of the repeated finding or may find that the institution has failed to demonstrate administrative capability, as described above.

1 unchanged sentence

Under the HEA and its implementing regulations, ED may fine, suspend or terminate the participation in Title IV programs by an institution that engages in substantial misrepresentation regarding the nature of its educational program, its financial charges, or the employability of its graduates.

In December 2015, ED fined HCN $27,500 based on a finding that HCN had substantially misrepresented its programmatic accreditation status prior to our ownership of HCN.

HCN noted its disagreement with ED’s findings but paid the fine in order to promptly resolve the matter.

The Clery Act .

5 unchanged sentences

ED’s previous regulations permitted a borrower to assert a borrower defense to repayment of a Direct Loan if the institution’s acts or omissions give rise to a cause of action against the institution under state law.

On November 1, 2016, ED published the 2016 Borrower Defense Regulations, which concern which acts or omissions of an institution of higher education a student borrower or group of borrowers may assert as a defense to repayment of a loan made under the Direct Loan Program and certain other matters.

For Direct Loans first disbursed on or after July 1, 2017, the 2016 Borrower Defense Regulations create a new federal standard for borrower defenses to repayment of Direct Loans, new limitation periods for such claims, and new processes for resolution of such claims.

The 2016 Borrower Defense Regulations also prohibit institutions from requiring students to engage in the institutions’ internal complaint processes before contacting other agencies, prohibit the use of pre-dispute arbitration agreements by institutions, prohibit class action lawsuit waivers, and require institutions to notify ED of arbitration filings and awards, for claims that may form the basis for a borrower defense to repayment of a Direct Loan.

ED announced delays until July 1, 2019 of the implementation of certain portions of the 2016 Borrower Defense Regulations, including those portions of the regulations that would have established a new federal standard and a process for determining whether a Direct Loan borrower has a defense to repayment on a Direct Loan based on an act or omission of an institution.

However, in October 2018, a judge denied a request to delay implementation of portions of the Borrower Defense Regulations and, as a result, the 2016 Borrower Defense Regulations went into effect as of October 16, 2018.

The 2016 Borrower Defense Regulations will remain in effect until the 2020 Borrower Defense Regulations, described below, take effect on July 1, 2020 and will thereafter continue to apply to all loans made under the Direct Loan Program on or after July 1, 2017 and before July 1, 2020.

In November 2016, ED published the 2016 Borrower Defense Regulations, which concern which acts or omissions of an institution of higher education a student borrower or group of borrowers may assert as a defense to repayment of a loan made under the Direct Loan Program and certain other matters.

For Direct Loans first disbursed on or after July 1, 2017, the 2016 Borrower Defense Regulations created a new federal standard for borrower defenses to repayment of Direct Loans, new limitation periods for such claims, and new processes for resolution of such claims.

The 2016 Borrower Defense Regulations also prohibited institutions from requiring students to engage in the institutions’ internal complaint processes before contacting other agencies, prohibited the use of pre-dispute arbitration agreements by institutions, prohibit class action lawsuit waivers, and required institutions to notify ED of arbitration filings and awards, for claims that may form the basis for a borrower defense to repayment of a Direct Loan.

The implementation of certain portions of the 2016 Borrower Defense Regulations, including portions of the regulations establishing a new federal standard and a process for determining whether a Direct Loan borrower has a defense to repayment on a Direct Loan based on an act or omission of an institution, was delayed by ED and those provisions went into effect pursuant to a court order in October 2018.

The 2016 Borrower Defense Regulations remained in effect until the 2020 Borrower Defense Regulations, described below, which went into effect on July 1, 2020 and will thereafter continue to apply to all loans made under the Direct Loan Program on or after July 1, 2017 and before July 1, 2020, with certain exceptions pursuant to the 2020 Borrower Defense Regulations.

On September 23, 2019, ED published the 2020 Borrower Defense Regulations, which, among other things, modify the borrower defenses to repayment for loans made under the Direct Loan Program on or after July 1, 2020, the limitation periods for related claims, and the processes for resolution of such claims as compared to defenses and claims under the 2016 Borrower Defense Regulations.

prohibit such institutions from requiring a student to participate in arbitration or any internal dispute resolution process prior to filing a borrower defense to repayment application with ED.

The 2020 Borrower Defense Regulations generally remove the prohibitions contained in the 2016 Borrower Defense Regulations, but require institutions whose students must enter into pre-dispute arbitration agreements or class action waivers as a condition of enrollment to disclose publicly those requirements in an easily accessible format, and prohibit such institutions from requiring a student to participate in arbitration or any internal dispute resolution process prior to filing a borrower defense to repayment application with ED.

ED will have discretion to determine the appropriate amount of relief, if any.

The 2020 Borrower Defense Regulations eliminate the process available under the 2016 Borrower Defense Regulations for a group of borrowers.

The 2020 Borrower Defense Regulations eliminate the process available under the 2016 Borrower Defense Regulations for a group of borrowers for Direct Loans disbursed on or after July 1, 2020.

Under the Borrower Defense Regulations, ED may also initiate a separate proceeding to collect from an institution the amount of relief resulting from a borrower defense brought by an individual borrower.

If ED determines that borrowers of Direct Loans who attended our institutions have a defense to repayment of their Direct Loans, our repayment liability to ED could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

The 2020 Borrower Defense Regulations also make other regulatory changes, including modifying ED’s requirements with respect to the circumstances under which a borrower is eligible for a loan discharge if an institution or location closes.

If ED determines that borrowers of

Direct Loans who attended our institutions have a defense to repayment of their Direct Loans, our repayment liability to ED could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

The 2020 Borrower Defense Regulations also made other regulatory changes, including modifying ED’s requirements with respect to the circumstances under which a borrower is eligible for a loan discharge if an institution or location closes.

Department of Defense

Service members of the United States Armed Forces are eligible to receive tuition assistance from their branch of service through the Uniform Tuition Assistance Program of the DoD, or DoD tuition assistance programs.

Service members may use this tuition assistance to pursue postsecondary degrees at institutions that are accredited by accrediting agencies recognized by ED.

APUS participates in DoD tuition assistance programs, and for students in APUS undergraduate, and beginning January 2020, for students in APUS master’s programs, we have established tuition rates per credit hour that under current DoD policies can be 100% covered by DoD tuition assistance funds provided that the student does not exceed the annual limits per student.

As of November 2019, HCN also participates in DoD tuition assistance programs.

In March 2013, DoD restricted the ability of service members who have not previously taken a postsecondary education course and who are in certain duty locations outside the continental United States, or overseas locations, to receive DoD tuition assistance for courses offered by institutions of higher education that are not parties to contracts with the DoD to provide DoD voluntary education programs at those locations.

Because we do not have contracts with the DoD to provide instruction at overseas locations, service members who begin their first postsecondary education program after arrival in an applicable overseas location may not use DoD tuition assistance programs to pay for their education in our programs until after they have already successfully completed a course with an institution that has entered into a contract to provide voluntary education programs at that overseas location.

Service members who were already enrolled in one of our programs before arriving at an overseas location may continue to receive DoD tuition assistance for the in-progress program, but they will be encouraged to enroll in courses provided by institutions that provide programs at the applicable overseas duty location.

Service members of the U.S.

Armed Forces are eligible to receive tuition assistance from their branch of service through the uniform tuition assistance program of the DoD, or TA.

Service members may use TA to pursue postsecondary degrees at institutions that are accredited by accrediting agencies recognized by ED.

APUS participates in TA, and for students in APUS undergraduate, and beginning January 2020, for students in APUS master’s programs, we have established tuition rates per credit hour that under current DoD policies can be 100% covered by DoD tuition assistance funds provided that the student does not exceed the annual limits per student.

As of November 2019, HCN also participates in TA.

In March 2013, DoD restricted the ability of service members who have not previously taken a postsecondary education course and who are in certain duty locations outside the continental United States, or overseas locations, to receive TA for courses offered by institutions of higher education that are not parties to contracts with the DoD to provide DoD voluntary education programs at those locations.

Because we do not have contracts with the DoD to provide instruction at overseas locations, service members who begin their first postsecondary education program after arrival at an applicable overseas location may not use TA to pay for their education in our programs until after they have already successfully completed a course with an institution that has entered into a contract to provide voluntary education programs at that overseas location.

Service members who were already enrolled in one of our programs before arriving at an overseas location may continue to receive TA for the in-progress program, but they will be encouraged to enroll in courses provided by institutions that provide programs at the applicable overseas duty location.

DoD has issued briefings that prohibit base commanders from authorizing education institutions to hold regular or recurring office hours on installations solely to provide counseling and prohibit former military members from accessing installations to represent an educational institution using their government ID card privileges.

1 unchanged sentence

If we are not able to improve our access to military installations and our existing students on those installations, or find alternative methods to serve those students, our military enrollments may decline.

Each institution participating in DoD tuition assistance programs is required to sign a Memorandum of Understanding, or MOU outlining certain commitments and agreements between the institution and DoD prior to being permitted to participate in the DoD tuition assistance programs.

Each institution participating in TA is required to sign a Memorandum of Understanding, or MOU outlining certain commitments and agreements between the institution and DoD prior to being permitted to participate in TA.

In May 2014, DoD promulgated new regulations and a revised MOU, or the DoD MOU, which APUS signed in August 2014 and which HCN signed in November 2019.

2 unchanged sentences

comply with requirements related to readmission policies for service members;

abide by limitations on the use of funds derived from tuition assistance;

abide by limitations on the use of funds derived from TA;

provide certain academic and student support services;

disclose information about transfer of credit;

in certain circumstances, return tuition assistance funds to DoD (such as when a student ceases to attend or an institution cancels a course);

in certain circumstances, return TA funds to DoD (such as when a student ceases to attend or an institution cancels a course);

offer to service members loan counseling before private student loans are offered or recommended;

and comply with ED’s Title IV “program integrity” rules, including rules related to incentive payments and misrepresentation.

The DoD MOU also provides that an institution may only participate in DoD tuition assistance programs if it is accredited by an accrediting agency recognized by ED, approved for VA funding, and a participant in Title IV programs.

The DoD MOU also provides that an institution may only participate in TA if it is accredited by an accrediting agency recognized by ED, approved for VA funding, and a participant in Title IV programs.

Additional information regarding the potential risks associated with the DoD MOU is provided in the “Risk Factors” section of this Annual Report.

In January 2014, several federal government agencies announced an online student complaint system for service members, veterans, and their families to report negative experiences at education institutions and training programs administering the Post-9/11 GI Bill, DoD tuition assistance programs, and other military-related education benefit programs.

institution having recurring substantive complaints, or demonstrating an unwillingness to resolve complaints, may face a range of penalties, including revocation of its MOU and removal from participation in the DoD tuition assistance programs.

In addition to DoD tuition assistance, branches of the U.S.

In January 2014, several federal government agencies announced an online student complaint system for service members, veterans, and their families to report negative experiences at education institutions and training programs administering the Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2008, or Post-9/11 GI Bill, TA, and other military-related education benefit programs.

An institution having recurring substantive complaints, or demonstrating an unwillingness to resolve complaints, may face a range of penalties, including revocation of its MOU and removal from participation in TA.

In addition to TA, branches of the U.S.

military offer credentialing assistance, which links soldiers to and in many cases provides funds for approved training courses or exams related to occupational licenses or certifications, and associated books, supplies and materials.

Credentialing Opportunities On-Line, or COOL, is a program from each of the military branches that links experience with certification.

Credentialing Opportunities Online, or COOL, is a program for each of the military branches and DoD civilians that links experience with certification.

While benefits vary by service, service members may be eligible for assistance in paying for certifications, including by vouchers, reimbursement, or grants.

Students must meet certain eligibility requirements in order to receive credentialing assistance, including in some cases service time, experience and DoD tuition assistance eligibility requirements.

The Army is now offering an expanded credentialing program called the Army Credentialing Assistance Program, or CA.

Students must meet certain eligibility

requirements in order to receive credentialing assistance, including in some cases service time, experience and TA eligibility requirements.

The Army offers an expanded credentialing program called the Army Credentialing Assistance Program, or CA.

CA is a program designed to support soldiers who wish to pursue civilian credentials, licenses, and certifications that lead directly to a specific job, including in areas outside of a soldier’s Military Occupational Specialty (MOS).

Through CA, soldiers can receive reimbursement for fees associated with qualifying programs listed on Army COOL.

The US Army began a limited user test for CA at Fort Hood, Texas, in September 2018, expanded the test in 2019, and began an Army-wide implementation in January 2020.

APUS became an approved training provider for CA programs in October 2019.

APUS became an approved training provider for CA programs in October 2019 while CA was in an expanded user test, and Army-wide implementation of CA began in January 2020.

We believe other service branches may follow the Army’s example or pursue other approaches to enhancing support for credentialing .

Students in the Army may use both DoD tuition assistance and credentialing assistance for CA, subject to a combined cap on benefit amounts.

Students in the Army may use both TA and credentialing assistance for CA, subject to a combined cap on benefit amounts.

Department of Veterans Affairs

The VA administers education benefits provided by federal law, including the Montgomery GI Bill, or GI Bill, and the Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2008, or Post-9/11 GI Bill.

The VA administers education benefits provided by federal law, including the Montgomery GI Bill, or GI Bill, and the Post-9/11 GI Bill.

APUS is approved to provide education to veterans and members of the selective reserve and their dependents by the state approving agencies in West Virginia and Virginia.

Programs at each of HCN’s campuses in Ohio are approved for VA benefits by the state approving agency in Ohio.

Under current law, for the academic year from August 1, 2019 - July 31, 2020, an eligible veteran who attends a non-public U.S.

Under current law, for the 2020-2021 academic year, an eligible veteran who attends a non-public U.S.

institution may receive veterans’ education benefits to pay for tuition and fees based on the net cost to the veteran up to $25,162.14.

1 unchanged sentence

Veterans pursuing a program of education solely through distance education on a more than half-time basis are eligible to receive a monthly housing allowance equal to 50% of the basic allowance for housing available to service members who are at a military pay grade E-5 and have dependents, or $916.50 per month.

To the extent that DoD tuition assistance programs do not cover the full cost of tuition for service members, eligible service members may also use their benefits under the GI Bill or the Post-9/11 GI Bill through the “Top-Up” program.

To the extent that TA does not cover the full cost of tuition for service members, eligible service members may also use their benefits under the GI Bill or the Post-9/11 GI Bill through the “Top-Up” program.

The “Top-Up” program allows U.S.

Military active duty service members to use their GI Bill or Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to pay the difference between the total cost of a college course and the amount of DoD tuition assistance that is paid by the military for the course, but is limited to 36 months of payments.

Military active duty service members to use their GI Bill or Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to pay the difference between the total cost of a college course and the amount of TA that is paid by the military for the course, but is limited to 36 months of payments.

On January 5, 2021, the President signed into law the Johnny Isakson and David P.

Veterans Health Care and Benefits Improvement Act of 2020, which modified policies related to GI Bill and other VA-administered education funds.

The new law requires institutions to be financially responsible for all benefits paid directly to institutions in instances of overpayments that need to be returned to the VA.

Prior to this change, institutions were only responsible for some benefits while students were responsible for the remainder.

This legislation also includes requirements related to consumer disclosures, advertisements, and recruiting that align with the requirements institutions must follow in order to receive funds under ED and DOD programs.

These requirements include the provision of disclosures about cost, loan debt, graduation rates, job placement rates, and transfer credit policies;

the prohibition of incentive compensation on the basis of securing enrollments;

the prohibition of high-pressure recruitment tactics like numerous unsolicited contacts and same-day recruitment and registration.

The majority of these requirements go into effect on August 1, 2021.

Additional Sources of Student Payments

5 unchanged sentences

As part of an institution’s Title IV PPA, the institution must adopt a code of conduct pertaining to student loans, including alternative loans.

Beginning July 1, 2018, HCN began offering its students extended payment plan options, and beginning with enrollments for the term beginning in January 2020, HCN added an additional extended payment program.

Beginning in July 2018, HCN began offering its students an extended payment plan option.

The extended payment plan is designed to assist students with educational costs consisting of tuition, textbooks, and fees, and are only available after all other student financial assistance has been applied.

Payment plans require monthly payments while the student is enrolled in a program and extend for up to six months after the last day of attendance or graduation.

To the extent interest is applied, it is generally fixed and does not accrue until the student departs the program or graduates.

The extended payment plans do not impose any origination fees.

Borrowers are advised about the terms of the extended payment plans and

counseled to use all federal funding options.

The extended payment plans are subject to various federal and state laws and regulations, such as the Truth in Lending Act as implemented in Regulation Z, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act as implemented in Regulation B and the Unfair, Deceptive or Abusive Acts or Practices provisions of Title X of the Dodd-Frank Act.

The extended payment plan does not

impose any origination fees.

Borrowers are advised about the terms of the extended payment plan and counseled to use all federal funding options.

The extended payment plan is subject to various federal and state laws and regulations, such as the Truth in Lending Act as implemented in Regulation Z, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act as implemented in Regulation B and the Unfair, Deceptive or Abusive Acts or Practices provisions of Title X of the Dodd-Frank Act.

Consumer Protection

5 unchanged sentences

Many states have become more active in regulating for-profit education from a consumer protection perspective, specifically related to enforcement of consumer protection laws and implementation of new regulations by state attorneys general.

For example, the Attorney General of Massachusetts issued APUS a CID in July 2017 relating to an investigation of alleged unfair or deceptive acts or practices by AMU in connection with the recruitment and retention of students and the financing of education.

For example, the Attorney General of Massachusetts issued APUS a Civil Investigative Demand, or CID, in July 2017 relating to an investigation of alleged unfair or deceptive acts or practices by AMU in connection with the recruitment and retention of students and the financing of education.

The CID required the production of documents and information relating to recruitment, enrollment, job placement and other matters.

On August 6, 2018, APUS entered into an AOD to resolve the inquiry.

In August 2018, APUS entered into an Assurance of Discontinuance, or AOD, to resolve the inquiry.

Pursuant to the terms of the AOD, and without any finding or admission of wrongdoing on APUS’s part, APUS paid $270,000 to the Attorney General and agreed to otherwise comply with applicable Massachusetts regulations.

6 unchanged sentences

It was alleged that at least three students enrolled in the discontinued curriculum were unable to complete without transferring into the new program and incurring substantial costs and time to complete the program.

As permitted, on August 10, 2017, HCN requested a hearing before the Ohio State Board with respect to the notification.

Simultaneously, HCN submitted a proposed resolution to the Ohio State Board, which included for each of the three students a partial refund for classes in which they enrolled but earned no credit.

HCN submitted a proposed resolution to the Ohio State Board, which included for each of the three students a partial refund for classes in which they enrolled but earned no credit.

The Ohio State Board accepted HCN’s proposal.

One student accepted the partial refund, and the two others failed to return executed agreements to the Ohio State Board by their due dates.

As a result, HCN is no longer obligated to make partial refunds to those two students, and on January 8, 2018, the Ohio State Board informed those two students that it had closed their cases.

In January 2018, the Ohio State Board informed those two students that it had closed their cases.

Compliance with Regulatory Standards and the Effect of Regulatory Violations

4 unchanged sentences

In September 2016, ED began a program review of APUS’s administration of the Title IV programs during the 2014-2015 and 2015-2016 award years.

As part of the program review, ED conducted a site visit from September 12 to September 15, 2016.

As part of the program review, ED conducted a site visit in September 2016.

In general, after ED conducts its site visit and reviews data supplied by the institution, if ED identifies any instances of noncompliance, ED sends the institution a preliminary program review report to which the institution has an opportunity to respond.

1 unchanged sentence

The institution may appeal any monetary liabilities specified in the final letter.

APUS has not received a preliminary program review report or expedited final program determination letter, and the program review remains open and ongoing.

We anticipate that certain findings addressed in the 2016 Title IV compliance audit Final Audit Determination letter dated January 29, 2018 will be resolved through the program review process, including a finding that return of Title IV funds calculations were incorrectly computed for some students and a finding that APUS had incorrectly reported the students’ enrollment status to the National Student Loan Data System for some students.

At this time, we cannot predict the outcome of the program review, when it will be completed, or whether ED will place any liability or other limitations on APUS as a result of the review.

In order to participate in the DoD tuition assistance programs, institutions must agree to participate in DoD’s Voluntary Education Institutional Compliance Program, or ICP.

An institution that through the ICP is found noncompliant with DoD requirements and demonstrates an unwillingness to resolve a finding may be subject to a range of penalties from a written warning to termination of the institution’s participation in the DoD tuition assistance programs.

Upon request, in May 2017, APUS submitted a self-assessment in connection with the ICP.

On February 9, 2018, DoD issued a report that made two findings about APUS.

First, DoD found that attire worn by an individual providing testimonials on the institution’s public-facing website could be construed as similar to a distinctive part of military uniform.

Second, DoD found that APUS failed to provide sufficient information relating to the financial aid process, including a timeline for applying for financial aid.

APUS timely submitted the required corrective action plan and evidence of corrective actions taken related to both findings.

On June 15, 2018, DoD notified APUS that DoD had reviewed the corrective action plan and determined the proposed actions appear to sufficiently address DoD’s findings.

On December 19, 2018, DoD notified APUS that all corrective actions had been reviewed and accepted by DoD and no further action is required.

On January 27, 2021, ED issued the final program review determination letter closing the review of APUS’s administration of the Title IV programs during the 2014-2015 and 2015-2016 award years.

ED did not identify any findings, penalties, or requirements for further action, and the letter indicated that no further action was required with respect to findings in the 2016 Title IV compliance audit Final Audit Determination letter issued in January 2018, including a finding that return of Title IV funds calculations were incorrectly computed for some students and a finding that APUS had incorrectly reported the students’ enrollment status to the National Student Loan Data System for some students.

ED closed the program review based on the length of time that had passed since the site visit, the continued monitoring of the institution through annual compliance audits, and APUS’s assertions that it has taken corrective actions.

In June 2020, APUS timely applied for recertification to participate in Title IV programs.

On September 9, 2020, ED notified APUS that it had completed its review of APUS’s application and had granted APUS provisional certification until June 30, 2023.

ED issued APUS a PPPA outlining the terms of provisional certification.

ED approved APUS on a provisional basis due to the open program review at the time of renewal.

In order to participate in TA, institutions must agree to participate in DoD’s Voluntary Education Institutional Compliance Program, or ICP.

In February 2020, DoD informed APUS that it is one of 250 institutions selected for ICP review in 2020.

Upon request, in May 2020, APUS submitted a self-assessment in connection with the ICP.

On November 30, 2020, DoD issued a report finding that APUS did not clearly articulate certain policies or clearly make certain disclosures.

APUS has submitted its corrective action plan and is required to submit related evidentiary support by May 31, 2021.

Potential Effect of Regulatory Violations

If our institutions fail to comply with the regulatory standards governing Title IV programs, ED could impose one or more sanctions, including transferring our institutions to the reimbursement or cash monitoring system of payment, seeking to require repayment of certain Title IV program funds, requiring the posting of an irrevocable letter of credit in favor of ED as a condition for continued Title IV certification, taking emergency action against our institutions, referring the matter for criminal prosecution, or initiating proceedings to impose a fine or to limit, condition, suspend, or terminate participation in Title IV programs.

If APUS’s approval to participate in Title IV programs is terminated, APUS will also lose its ability to participate in DoD tuition assistance programs pursuant to the DoD MOU.

If APUS’s approval to participate in Title IV programs is terminated, APUS will also lose its ability to participate in TA pursuant to the DoD MOU.

If such sanctions or proceedings were imposed against our institutions and resulted in a substantial curtailment, or termination, of participation in Title IV programs, this would materially and adversely affect our enrollments, revenue, results of operations, and financial condition.

9 unchanged sentences

WVHEPC, SCHEV, HLC, ABHES, the Ohio State Board, and the Indiana Board for Proprietary Education/Indiana Commission for Higher Education generally require institutions to notify them, and sometimes require institutions to obtain their approval, in advance of opening a new location or implementing new programs.

Rasmussen Acquisition Regulatory Review

The Rasmussen Acquisition will be required to be reported to, and in some cases approved by, various education regulatory bodies.

As discussed below, an institution must obtain ED approval for a change in ownership and control in order to continue to participate in Title IV programs under the new ownership.

ED does not provide pre-closing approval but will conduct a “pre-acquisition review” of a proposed change at the request of the parties.

The parties will request a pre-acquisition review of the Rasmussen Acquisition.

Upon completion of a pre-acquisition review, ED will inform Rasmussen University whether it will be required to post a letter of credit in connection with its continued participation in Title IV programs after closing.

As required, we intend to timely notify ED about the occurrence of the change in ownership of Rasmussen University and submit an application for approval to participate in Title IV programs after the closing of the transaction.

We will also notify state agencies, accreditors, boards of nursing, and other relevant regulators of this change in ownership to the extent required.

In some instances, these bodies will require prior approval before the change in ownership can be completed.

For example, as discussed below, HLC requires approval before the closing of a transaction in order for an institution to maintain accredited status after closing.

The parties have submitted an application to HLC for pre-closing approval of the change in ownership.

Additionally, some regulators will require approval after the change in ownership in order to continue proper licensure, accreditation, approval, or authorization.

Change in Ownership Resulting in a Change of Control

12 unchanged sentences

The HEA provides that ED may temporarily provisionally certify an institution seeking approval of a change in ownership and control based on preliminary review of a materially complete application received within 10 business days after the transaction.

ED may continue such temporary provisional certification on a month-to-month basis until it has rendered a final decision on the institution’s application.

ED may continue such temporary provisional certification on a month-to-month basis until it

has rendered a final decision on the institution’s application.

If ED determines to approve the application, it issues a provisional certification, which extends for a period expiring not later than the end of the third complete award year following the date of provisional certification.

10 unchanged sentences

Many accrediting agencies require institutions of higher education to report or obtain approval for certain changes in ownership or other aspects of institutional status, but the types of and triggers for such reporting or approval vary.

HLC, the accrediting agency for APUS, requires HLC accredited institutions to inform HLC in advance of any substantive change.

HLC, the accrediting agency for APUS and Rasmussen University, requires HLC-accredited institutions to inform HLC in advance of any substantive change.

Examples of substantive changes requiring advance notice to HLC include changes in the legal status, ownership, or form of control of the institution, such as the sale of a for-profit institution.

3 unchanged sentences

Actions by, or relating to, an accredited institution, including a significant acquisition of another institution, significant changes in board composition or organizational documents, and accumulations by one stockholder of greater than 25% of the capital stock could trigger additional reviews of the institution and possible change from accredited status to candidate status, which enhances the risks associated with these types of actions.

In particular, a change from accredited status to candidate status could adversely impact an institution’s ability to participate in Title IV programs, which in turn would impact the institution’s ability to participate in DoD tuition assistance programs.

ABHES, the accrediting agency for HCN, requires its accredited institutions to notify ABHES of any substantive change.

6 unchanged sentences

In certain circumstances, state approving agencies responsible for oversight of veterans’ education benefits may require an institution to obtain approval for a change in ownership and control.

The state approving agency in Ohio approved the November 1, 2013 change of ownership of HCN.

However, there is no guarantee that relevant state approving agencies will approve future transactions.

The state approving agency in Ohio approved the November 1, 2013 change of ownership of HCN, and state approving agencies will need to approve the Rasmussen

However, there is no guarantee that the relevant state approving agencies will approve the Rasmussen Acquisition or any other future transactions.

Restrictions on Adding Locations and Educational Programs

5 unchanged sentences

The new campus location must satisfy all other applicable requirements for institutional eligibility, including approval by the relevant state authorizing agency and the institution’s accrediting agency.

Provisionally certified institutions of higher education such as APUS must seek prior approval from ED to offer new academic programs eligible for federal student aid.

In order to acquire ED approval for a new academic program, APUS as a provisionally certified institution would need to submit electronic applications to ED with evidence of accreditor and state approvals for any proposed programs.

APUS would not be able to disburse federal student aid to students in these new programs until ED adds the program to APUS’s Eligibility and Certification Approval Report.

A fully-certified degree-granting institution generally is not obligated to obtain ED’s approval of an additional program leading to a degree at the same level previously approved by ED, or of a new program that both prepares students for gainful employment in the same or related recognized occupation as an educational program that has previously been designated as an eligible program at that institution and meets certain minimum-length requirements.

However, ED could require prior approval of such programs or otherwise restrict the number of programs an institution may add.

In the event that an institution is required

to obtain ED’s approval for the addition of a new program, fails to do so, and erroneously determines that the new educational program is eligible for Title IV program funds, the institution could be liable for repayment of those Title IV program funds.

In the event that an institution is required to obtain ED’s approval for the addition of a new program, fails to do so, and erroneously determines that the new educational program is eligible for Title IV program funds, the institution could be liable for repayment of those Title IV program funds.

Other Recent Legislative and Regulatory Activity

Many of our students rely on federally funded programs, including Title IV programs, DoD tuition assistance and education benefits administered by the VA that may be affected by changes in the federal budget.

Many of our students rely on federally funded programs, including Title IV programs, TA and education benefits administered by the VA that may be affected by changes in the federal budget.

Due to the substantial amount of federal funds disbursed to schools through Title IV programs, the large number of students and institutions participating in these programs, and significant political interest in the cost of education, Congress continues to show interest in regulation and oversight of institutions of higher education, especially those that are for-profit.

3 unchanged sentences

For example, the Army now requires service members to complete one year of service after graduation from Advanced Individual Training in order to be eligible for tuition assistance, and the Army and the Coast Guard have both reduced the total per service member annual benefits.

Congressional inaction on budgetary matters has led to lapses in funding, resulting government shutdowns, and subsequent policy changes that have affected federal student aid programs at DoD.

For example, funding for the federal government, including the DoD, lapsed on each of January 20, 2018 and February 9, 2018, resulting in partial shutdowns that lasted for a few days and several hours, respectively.

Funding for some portions of the federal government, not including the DoD, lapsed on December 22, 2018, resulting in a partial government shutdown that lasted for 35 days.

The Coast Guard suspended its tuition assistance program during this partial government shutdown and the Marine Corps began to require Marines to have 24 months on active duty prior to being eligible to apply for tuition assistance.

Congressional inaction on budgetary matters has led to lapses in funding, resulting in government shutdowns, and subsequent policy changes that have affected federal student aid programs at DoD.

For example, funding for the federal government lapsed on several occasions in 2018, resulting in partial government shutdowns.

During a 35-day partial government shutdown that began in December 2018, the Coast Guard suspended its tuition assistance program.

A future government shutdown, particularly one that includes DoD or suspension or resulting modification of DoD tuition assistance programs, could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial condition.

In May 2019, the Navy announced that as a result of increased demand stemming from improvements in service delivery and higher limits on annual benefits available per sailor, tuition assistance benefits available to sailors for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2019 were exhausted by the end of May 2019, and effective May 28, 2019 the Navy ceased approving tuition assistance program funds for eligible sailors until the start of the new government fiscal year on October 1, 2019.

In addition, effective October 1, 2019, Navy service members must have a minimum of two years of service before becoming eligible to use tuition assistance or the Navy College Program for Afloat College Education, funding is capped at twelve semester hours per fiscal year, and career funding is capped at 120 semester hours.

On June 6, 2018, the Secretary of the Army issued Army Directive 2018-09, changing the Army tuition assistance eligibility policy by eliminating the one-year waiting period to pursue an undergraduate certificate or degree and the ten-year waiting period to pursue a graduate degree through use of tuition assistance.

Under the new policy, effective beginning August 5, 2018, Army soldiers are eligible for two tiers of tuition assistance depending on their current level of civilian education.

On July 12, 2018, DoD announced a change to the Post-9/11 GI Bill regarding the ability of service members to transfer their educational benefits to eligible family members.

Beginning July 12, 2019, the eligibility to transfer the educational benefits is limited to service members with at least six but fewer than 16 years of total service.

On March 2, 2020, the Navy announced a new “Education Strategy for Seapower 2020” that is intended to be a new comprehensive education strategy.

While the details and impact of this particular strategy are still uncertain, we expect each military branch and the DoD to continually evaluate their approach to education funding, and the resulting changes could have an impact on the funds available to service members to pursue their education at our institutions.

Funding shortfalls have also affected DoD federal student aid programs.

In May 2019, the Navy announced that as a result of increased demand stemming from improvements in service delivery and higher limits on annual benefits available per sailor, TA benefits available to sailors for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2019 were expected to be exhausted by the end

of May 2019, and effective May 28, 2019 the Navy ceased approving TA program funds for eligible sailors until the start of the new government fiscal year on October 1, 2019.

Further, effective October 1, 2019, Navy service members must have a minimum of two years of service before becoming eligible to use tuition assistance or the Navy College Program for Afloat College Education, funding is capped at twelve semester hours per fiscal year, and career funding is capped at 120 semester hours.

Effective October 1, 2021, the annual funding cap will increase to 18 semester hours.

We expect each military branch and the DoD to continually evaluate their approach to education funding, and the resulting changes could have an impact on the funds available to service members to pursue their education at our institutions.

Higher Education Act

1 unchanged sentence

The most recent comprehensive reauthorization occurred in 2008 when Congress reauthorized most HEA programs through the 2014 federal fiscal year.

In 2018, the House of Representatives considered proposals from Republicans and Democrats, referred to as the Promoting Real Opportunity, Success, and Prosperity through Education Reform Act, or PROSPER Act, and the Aim Higher Act, respectively, but neither proposal became law.

Congress currently is in the process of considering comprehensive legislation to reauthorize the HEA, including proposals from Republicans and Democrats, referred to as the Student Aid Improvement Act and the College Affordability Act, respectively.

The previous Congress considered comprehensive legislation to reauthorize the HEA, including proposals from Republicans and Democrats, referred to as the Student Aid Improvement Act and the College Affordability Act, respectively, and Congress could consider such legislation again in the future.

We cannot predict whether, in what form, or when, the two houses of Congress will reauthorize the HEA or whether, or when, the President will sign reauthorization legislation.

Amendments to the HEA could occur as part of reauthorization, which could require us to modify our business practices and increase administrative costs, thereby negatively impacting our results of operations.

As discussions concerning reauthorization of the HEA continue, on December 19, 2019, the Fostering Undergraduate Talent by Unlocking Resources for Education Act, or FUTURE Act, was signed into law.

On December 19, 2019, the Fostering Undergraduate Talent by Unlocking Resources for Education Act, or FUTURE Act, was signed into law.

Among other things, the FUTURE Act amends the Internal Revenue Code to allow the Internal Revenue Service to share taxpayer data directly with ED, which is intended to streamline the process of applying for Title IV program aid, reduce the need for institutions to verify students’ eligibility for Title IV program funds, and simplify the process for borrowers to enroll in income-driven repayment plans with respect to their federal loans.

1 unchanged sentence

Regulatory Reform Executive Order

Executive Order 13777, “Enforcing the Regulatory Reform Agenda,” signed by the President on February 24, 2017, directs federal agencies including ED to establish a Regulatory Reform Task Force to evaluate existing regulations and make recommendations to the agency head regarding the regulations.

The first Progress Report from the ED Regulatory Reform Task Force identified a list of over 150 ED regulations and 1,772 issues of policy-related guidance that would be reviewed by the Task Force.

Executive Order 13777, “Enforcing the Regulatory Reform Agenda,” signed by President Trump in February 2017, directed federal agencies including ED to establish a Regulatory Reform Task Force to evaluate existing regulations and make recommendations to the agency head regarding the regulations.

In October 2018, the ED Regulatory Reform Task Force announced that ED’s Office for Postsecondary Education had identified a total of 1,230 guidance documents that were out-of-date and that it intended to withdraw.

Those documents constituted nearly 80% of the Office of Postsecondary Education’s total of 1,562 guidance documents.

Federal Rulemakings

On July 1, 2019, ED published a final rule rescinding the GE Regulations.

The rescission is scheduled to take effect July 1, 2020.

For additional information, see “Gainful Employment,” above.

On September 23, 2019, ED published the 2020 Borrower Defense Regulations, which among other things, established a new federal standard for evaluating, and a new process for adjudicating, borrower defenses to repayment of loans made under the Direct Loan Program on or after July 1, 2020.

The 2016 Borrower Defense Regulations, which became effective October 16, 2018, will remain in effect until July 1, 2020 and will thereafter continue to apply to all loans made under the Direct Loan Program on or after July 1, 2017 and before July 1, 2020.

For additional information about the 2016 Borrower Defense Regulations and 2020 Borrower Defense Regulations, see “Financial Responsibility” and “Borrower Defenses,” above.

In October 2018, ED announced that it would establish the Accreditation and Innovation Committee to prepare proposed regulations related to, among other things, ED’s recognition of accrediting agencies and institutional and programmatic eligibility issues, including state authorization and courses offered through distance education, respectively.

In April 2019, The Accreditation and Innovation Committee reached consensus on proposed regulatory language.

On June 12, 2019, ED published certain portions of the agreed-upon regulatory language, including those provisions related to accreditation and state authorization, in a notice of proposed rulemaking.

On November 1, 2019, ED published final regulations concerning accreditation and state authorization, which generally will be effective on July 1, 2020, except that institutions may in their discretion implement early regulations relating to state authorization and institutional information disclosures.

APUS implemented early those regulations effective November 1, 2019.

For additional information on these final regulations, see “Accreditation” and “State Authorization of Online Education,” above.

In January 2020, the ED Regulatory Reform Task Force issued a status report outlining actions ED had taken to address the findings in prior reports, including rulemakings related to accreditation, state authorization, TEACH grants, Title IV religious freedom, distance education, innovation, and Title IX.

Other Federal Rulemakings

On December 11, 2019, in a notice of proposed rulemaking, ED published additional portions of the agreed-upon regulatory language, including provisions related to the participation of faith-based entities in the Title IV programs and certain rules related to the TEACH Grant program.

ED has indicated that it will issue an additional notice of proposed rulemaking to address other provisions in the agreed-upon regulatory language developed as part of the negotiated rulemaking, including provisions related to courses delivered by distance education.

We are unable to predict the result of any other current or future rulemakings.

The final rule, which was released on August 14, 2020 and is consistent with the proposed rule, is effective July 1, 2021.

On April 2, 2020, ED published a notice of proposed rulemaking based on consensus language agreed to by the Accreditation and Innovation Committee related to distance education.

The final rule, released on August 24, 2020, is effective July 1, 2021.

The rule provides institutions additional flexibility in offering distance education and competency-based education programs.

New proposed definitions related to “academic engagement,” “distance education,” and “regular and substantive interaction” provide further clarity regarding the instructional requirements that distance education programs must abide by in order to remain eligible for Title IV disbursements.

Failure to comply with these standards could lead to adverse actions by ED.

On November 29, 2018, ED published in the Federal Register a notice of proposed rulemaking regarding related to implementation of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in education programs that receive funding from the federal government.

The proposed regulations would define what constitutes

sexual harassment for purposes of Title IX in the administrative enforcement context, would describe what actions trigger an institution’s obligation to respond to incidents of alleged sexual harassment, and would specify how an institution must respond to allegations of sexual harassment.

We cannot predict what final regulations will be adopted as a result of this rulemaking process.

State Regulation

As discussed above in “Consumer Protection - Other Issues Related to Consumer Protection and Complaints,” many states have become more active in regulating for-profit education from a consumer protection perspective, specifically in regards to enforcement of consumer protection laws and implementation of new regulations by state attorneys general.

Since our institutions operate in many jurisdictions, our institutions may be subject to regulations promulgated by a variety of regulators.

The final rule, which was released on May 19, 2020,

took effect on August 14, 2020.

The regulations define what constitutes sexual harassment for purposes of Title IX in the administrative enforcement context, describe what actions trigger an institution’s obligation to respond to incidents of alleged sexual harassment, and specify how an institution must respond to allegations of sexual harassment.

Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.

What changed 10-K

Item 1. Business