2 unchanged sentences
De-Chu Christopher Tang (“Plaintiff”) against us in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.
+Added: The Plaintiff amended the complaint in February 2020 to include Vipin K.
+Added: Garg and David J.
+Added: Drutz as defendants, in addition to the Company (Dr.
+Added: Drutz, and the Company are collectively referred to as “Defendants”).
See Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements appearing in Item 1 of this report for further details.
−Removed: A prior lawsuit filed by the Plaintiff against us in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, resulted in the entry of a Final Consent Judgment and Permanent Injunction on August 25, 2016 (the “Alabama Judgment”).
−Removed: In the Alabama Judgment, the court declared, among other things, that we owned the DVD technology that Plaintiff had developed during his employment with us, and enjoined Plaintiff from “using or disclosing any Proprietary Information or Innovations relating to the DVD technology and any associated intellectual property rights” without our written consent.
+Added: There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 25, 2021.
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.