Item 1. Business
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Introduction
As used in this report,
unless otherwise stated or the context requires otherwise, the “Company” and terms such as “we,” “us”
“our,” and “AIRI” refer to Air Industries Group, a Nevada corporation, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.
We are an aerospace
and defense company. We manufacture and design structural parts and assemblies that focus on flight safety, including landing gear,
arresting gear, engine mounts, flight controls, throttle quadrants, components for jet engines and other components. Our products
are currently deployed on a wide range of high-profile military and commercial aircraft including Sikorsky’s UH-60 Black
Hawk, Lockheed Martin’s F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, Northrop Grumman’s E2 Hawkeye, Boeing’s 777, Airbus’
380 commercial airliners, the US Navy F-18 and USAF F-16 fighter aircraft. Our Turbine Engine segment makes components for jet
engines that are used on the USAF F-15, the Airbus A-330 and A-380, and the Boeing 777, in addition to a number of ground turbine
applications.
We conduct our operations
through our wholly-owned subsidiaries: Air Industries Machining (“AIM”); Nassau Tool Works (“NTW”); and
The Sterling Engineering Corporation (“Sterling”). AIM and NTW comprise our Complex Machining segment and Sterling
represents our Turbine Engine Components segment. AIM has manufactured components and subassemblies for the defense and commercial
aerospace industry for over 50 years and has established long-term relationships with leading defense and aerospace manufacturers.
We
are currently focused on positioning our business to obtain profitability, achieve positive cash flow and we remain resolute on
meeting customers’ needs. We believe that an unyielding focus on our customers will allow us to execute on our existing backlog
in a timely fashion. As part of our effort to increase our operating efficiencies, we relocated our headquarters to our main campus
in Bay Shore, New York and consolidated the operations of NTW with those of AIM. In
2020, in order to take advantage of the long-term growth opportunities we see in our markets, we made significant capital investments
in new equipment. Additionally, we expanded our operations and manufacturing cells located in our Connecticut facility which houses
the operations of Sterling. We believe these investments will increase the volume and efficiency of production, increase the size
and diversity of products we can make and allow us to offer additional services to our customers. We are pleased with the positive
responses received from our customers to date.
Our Market
We operate primarily
in the military and, to a lesser degree, commercial aviation industries. Defense revenues represent a preponderance of our sales.
Our principal customers include Sikorsky Aircraft, Goodrich Landing Gear Systems, Northrop Grumman, the United States Department
of Defense, GKN Aerospace, Lockheed, Boeing, Raytheon, Piper Aircraft, M7 Aerospace, Vought Aerospace, Ametek/Hughes-Treitler and
Airbus.
Our products are incorporated
into many aircraft platforms, the majority of which remain in production, and of which there are a substantial number of operating
aircraft in fleets maintained by the military and commercial airlines. Many of our products are “flight critical,”
essential to aircraft performance and safety on takeoff, during flight and when landing. These products require advanced certifications
as a condition to being a supplier. For many of our products we are the sole or one of a limited number of sources of supply. Many
of the parts we supply are subject to wear and tear or fatigue and are routinely replaced on aircraft on a time in service or flight
cycle basis. Replacement demand for these products will continue, albeit at perhaps a lower rate, so long as an aircraft remains
in service, which is usually many years after production has stopped.
1
Sales and Marketing
Our approach to sales
and marketing can be best understood through the concept of customer alignment. The aerospace industry is dominated by a small
number of large prime contractors and equipment manufacturers. These customers rely heavily upon subcontractors to supply quality
parts meeting specifications on a timely and cost effective basis. These customers and other customers we supply routinely rate
their suppliers based on a variety of performance factors. One of our principal goals is to be highly rated and thus relied upon
by all of our customers.
The large prime contractors
are increasingly seeking subcontractors who can supply and are qualified to integrate the fabrication of larger, more complex and
more complete subassemblies. We seek to position ourselves within the supply chain of these contractors and manufacturers to be
selected for subcontracted projects. Successful positioning requires that we qualify to be a preferred supplier by achieving and
maintaining independent third party quality approval certifications, specific customer quality system approvals and top supplier
ratings through strong performance on existing contracts.
During our sales and
marketing efforts we let customers know that we have employees with the talent and experience to manage the manufacture of sections
of aircraft structures to be delivered to the final assembly phase of the aircraft manufacturing cycle, and customers have now
engaged us for these services.
Initial contracts are
usually obtained through competitive bidding against other qualified subcontractors, while follow-on contracts are usually retained
by successfully performing initial contracts. Our long term business generally benefits from barriers to entry resulting from investments,
certifications, familiarization with the needs and systems of customers, and manufacturing techniques developed during the initial
manufacturing phase. We endeavor to develop each of our relationships to one of a “partnership” where we participate
in the resolution of pre-production design and build issues, and initial contracts are obtained as single source awards and follow-on
pricing is determined through negotiations. Our ability to interact with our customers was hampered during 2020 as a result of
the cancellation of industry-wide events and the difficulties in scheduling meetings with our customers as many of their personnel
worked from home. In response, we have adapted our business development efforts to increase our use of social media and online
presentations.
Our Backlog
The production cycle
of products we manufacture can extend from several months to a year or longer. This gives rise to significant backlogs as customers
must order product with sufficient lead time to ensure timely delivery.
We have a number of
long-term multi-year purchase agreements or LTA’s with several of our customers. These agreements specify part numbers, specifications
and prices of the covered products for an agreed upon period, but do not authorize immediate production and shipment. Production
is authorized periodically by the customer through Purchase Orders or Releases by customers.
Our “firm backlog”
includes only fully authorized orders received for products to be delivered within the forward 18-month period. As of December
31, 2020, our 18-month “firm backlog” was approximately $81.1 million.
Competition
Winning a new contract
is highly competitive. We manufacture to customer design specifications, and we compete against companies that have similar manufacturing
capabilities in a global marketplace. Consequently, the ability to obtain contracts requires providing quality products at competitive
prices. To accomplish this requires that we strive for continuous improvement in our capabilities to assure our competitiveness
and provide value to our customers. Our marketing strategy involves developing long-term ongoing working relationships with customers.
These relationships enable us to develop entry barriers to would-be competitors by establishing and maintaining advanced quality
approvals, certifications and tooling investments that are difficult and expensive to duplicate. Many of our competitors are larger
enterprises or divisions of significantly larger companies having greater financial, physical and technical resources, and the
capabilities to timelier respond under much larger contracts.
Among our competitors
are: Monitor Aerospace, a division of Stellex Aerospace; Hydromil, a division of Triumph Aerospace Group; Heroux Aerospace and
Ellanef Manufacturing, a division of Magellan Corporation.
2
Raw Materials and Replacement Parts
The manufacturing process
for certain products, particularly those for which we serve as product integrator, requires significant purchases of raw materials,
hardware and subcontracted details. As a result, much of our success in profitably meeting customer demand for these products requires
efficient and effective subcontract management. Price and availability of many raw materials utilized in the aerospace industry
are subject to volatile global markets and political conditions. Most suppliers of raw materials are unwilling to commit to long-term
contracts at fixed prices. This is a substantial risk as our strategy often involves long term fixed price commitments to our customers.
Employees
As of March 15, 2021,
we employed approximately 151 people. Of these, approximately 52 were in administration, 6 were in sales and procurement, and 93
were in manufacturing.
AIM is a party to a
collective bargaining agreement (the “Agreement”) with the United Service Workers, IUJAT, Local 355 (the “Union”)
with which we believe we maintain good relations. The Agreement was renewed as of December 31, 2018 and expires on December 31,
2021 and covers all of AIM’s production personnel, approximately 93 individuals. AIM is required to make a monthly contribution
to each of the Union’s United Welfare Fund and the United Services Worker’s Security Fund. This is the only pension
benefit required by the Agreement and the Company is not obligated for any future defined benefit to retirees. The Agreement contains
a “no-strike” clause, whereby, during the term of the Agreement, the Union will not strike and AIM will not lockout
its employees.
All of our employees
are covered under a co-employment agreement with Insperity Services, Inc., a professional employer organization (“PEO”)
that provides out-sourced human resource services.
Regulations
Environmental Regulation; Employee Safety
We are subject to regulations
administered by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, various state
agencies and county and local authorities acting in cooperation with federal and state authorities. Among other things, these regulatory
bodies impose restrictions that require us to control air, soil and water pollution, to protect against occupational exposure to
chemicals, including health and safety risks, and to require notification or reporting of the storage, use and release of certain
hazardous chemicals and substances. The extensive regulatory framework imposes compliance burdens and financial and operating risks
on us. Governmental authorities have the power to enforce compliance with these regulations and to obtain injunctions or impose
civil and criminal fines in the case of violations.
The Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”) imposes strict, joint and several liabilities on the present
and former owners and operators of facilities that release hazardous substances into the environment. The Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act of 1976 (“RCRA”) regulates the generation, transportation, treatment, storage and disposal of hazardous
waste. New York and Connecticut, the states where our production facilities are located, also have stringent laws and regulations
governing the handling, storage and disposal of hazardous substances, counterparts of CERCLA and RCRA. In addition, the Occupational
Safety and Health Act, which requires employers to provide a place of employment that is free from recognized and preventable hazards
that are likely to cause serious physical harm to employees, obligates employers to provide notice to employees regarding the presence
of hazardous chemicals and to train employees in the use of such substances.
3
Federal Aviation Administration
We are subject to regulation
by the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) under the provisions of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended.
The FAA prescribes standards and licensing requirements for aircraft and aircraft components. We are subject to inspections by
the FAA and may be subjected to fines and other penalties (including orders to cease production) for noncompliance with FAA regulations.
Our failure to comply with applicable regulations could result in the termination of or our disqualification from some of our contracts,
which could have a material adverse effect on our operations. We have never been subject to such fines or disqualifications.
Government Contract Compliance
Our government contracts
and those of many of our customers are subject to the procurement rules and regulations of the United States government, including
the Federal Acquisition Regulations. Many of the contract terms are dictated by these rules and regulations. During and after the
fulfillment of a government contract, we may be audited in respect of the direct and allocated indirect costs attributed to the
project. These audits may result in adjustments to our contract costs. Additionally, we may be subject to U.S. government inquiries
and investigations because of our participation in government procurement. Any inquiry or investigation can result in fines or
limitations on our ability to continue to bid for government contracts and fulfill existing contracts.
We believe that we
are in compliance with all federal, state and local laws and regulations governing our operations and have obtained all material
licenses and permits required for the operation of our business.
Text extracted from the filing as submitted to EDGAR. Formatting, tables and exhibits are simplified for reading; the original document is authoritative for anything you rely on.