13 unchanged sentences
On June 23, 2017, Rovi Guides, Inc.
−Removed: and TiVo Solutions Inc.
−Removed: (together, “TiVo”) filed a patent infringement complaint against Videotron Ltd.
+Added: (“Rovi”) and TiVo Solutions Inc.
+Added: (together with Rovi, “TiVo”) filed a patent infringement complaint against Videotron Ltd.
and Videotron G.P.
7 unchanged sentences
No date is set by the court to issue its judgement.
+Added: On May 21, 2021, Rovi filed a patent infringement complaint against Videotron Ltd.
+Added: in Toronto, Canada, alleging infringement of four patents.
+Added: On July 21, 2021, the Federal Court of Canada held a case management conference, shortly before which Videotron Ltd.
+Added: filed a motion to strike various portions of the statement of claim.
+Added: During the case management conference, the court set a briefing schedule for the motion to strike and set the motion hearing for August 9, 2021.
+Added: No further dates have been set.
Bell and Telus Patent Infringement Litigation
8 unchanged sentences
No date is set by the court to issue its judgement.
+Added: On July 27, 2021, Rovi filed a patent infringement complaint against Bell Canada and four of its affiliates, Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson and Ericsson Canada Inc., and MK Systems USA Inc.
+Added: and MK Mediatech Canada Inc.
+Added: in Toronto, Canada, alleging infringement of four patents.
+Added: No dates have been set yet.
NVIDIA Patent Infringement Litigation
On May 8, 2019, Invensas Corporation and Tessera Advanced Technologies, Inc.
−Removed: filed a complaint against NVIDIA Corporation (“NVIDIA”) in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging infringement of five patents, and requesting, among other things, that NVIDIA be ordered to pay compensatory damages in an amount no less than a reasonable royalty.
+Added: filed a complaint against NVIDIA Corporation (“NVIDIA”) in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging infringement of five patents,
+Added: and requesting, among other things, that NVIDIA be ordered to pay compensatory damages in an amount no less than a reasonable royalty.
NVIDIA answered the complaint on July 1, 2019 and subsequently moved to transfer the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
2 unchanged sentences
The parties stipulated to an order staying the litigation pending resolution of the IPR proceedings, and to dismissal of claims relating to two patents.
−Removed: For the remaining IPRs, oral arguments are scheduled for June 2021, and final decisions are expected in September 2021.
+Added: For the remaining IPRs, oral arguments were held June 9, 2021, and final decisions are expected in September 2021.
Management believes that there have been no significant changes to the risk factors associated with our business as compared to those disclosed in Part 1, Item 1A.
1 unchanged sentence
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.