25 unchanged sentences
On November 28, 2023, the Federal Court of Appeal of Canada held a hearing on the appeal and took the matter under reserve.
−Removed: There is no set date for the Federal Court of Appeal of Canada to issue its decision.
+Added: On August 6, 2024, the Federal Court of Appeal of Canada issued a judgment in the appeal in which it dismissed the appeal.
On May 21, 2021, Adeia Media filed a patent infringement complaint against Videotron in Toronto, Canada, alleging infringement of four patents (“Videotron 2”).
8 unchanged sentences
Bell 1 and Telus 1 were heard together for purposes of pre-trial and trial proceedings.
−Removed: On October 7, 2022, the Federal Court of Canada issued its decision in the two cases finding in favor of Bell and Telus and their respective IPTV services, Bell Fibe TV and Telus Optik TV.
+Added: On October 7, 2022, the Federal Court of Canada issued its decision in the two cases finding in favor of Bell and Telus and their respective IPTV services,
+Added: Bell Fibe TV and Telus Optik TV.
Specifically, the Court found invalid each of the asserted claims of the four remaining patents involved in the case.
−Removed: In Canada, the
−Removed: prevailing party in patent litigation is entitled to reimbursement of certain of its costs and expenses.
+Added: In Canada, the prevailing party in patent litigation is entitled to reimbursement of certain of its costs and expenses.
Accordingly, we paid $2.8 million for expense reimbursement in the second quarter of 2023.
3 unchanged sentences
On November 29, 2023, the Federal Court of Appeal of Canada held a hearing on the appeal and took the matter under reserve.
−Removed: There is no set date for the Federal Court of Appeal to issue its decision.
+Added: On August 6, 2024, the Federal Court of Appeal of Canada issued a judgment in the appeal in which it dismissed the appeal.
On July 27, 2021, Adeia Media filed a patent infringement complaint against Bell Canada and four of its affiliates, Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson, Ericsson Canada Inc., and MK Systems USA Inc.
24 unchanged sentences
filed its answer to the complaint, asserting a general denial of the allegations and causes of action in the complaint and asserting affirmative defenses.
−Removed: The trial date has not been set.
+Added: On July 1, 2024, Adeia filed a request for dismissal of the case with prejudice pursuant to a settlement and patent license agreement between the parties.
+Added: The case was terminated on July 1, 2024.
On November 28, 2023, X Corp.
2 unchanged sentences
On January 16, 2024, Adeia Media filed a motion to dismiss the DJ Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
+Added: On July 1, 2024, the parties filed a joint stipulation of dismissal of the DJ Complaint pursuant to a settlement and patent license agreement between the parties.
+Added: The case was terminated on July 1, 2024.
Ri sk Factors
8 unchanged sentences
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.