8 unchanged sentences
and (5) tortious interference with contract.
−Removed: In a related action, we also filed suit against the same Ascletis Defendants in the International Trade Commission for unlawful and unfair methods of competition.
+Added: In a related action, we also filed suit against the same Ascletis Defendants in the International Trade Commission, or the ITC, for unlawful and unfair methods of competition.
These legal proceedings arise at least in part from the misappropriation of our trade secrets.
−Removed: We intend to vigorously pursue all of our legal remedies in these litigations, but there is no guarantee that we will be successful in these efforts.
+Added: On October 3, 2024, the ITC’s Chief Administrative Law Judge issued a Notice of his determination in favor of Viking.
+Added: The ruling states that Ascletis Defendants misappropriated our trade secrets while under a Confidential Disclosure Agreement (“CDA”) and engaged in discovery misconduct, warranting monetary and non-monetary sanctions.
+Added: We plan to continue to vigorously pursue, as necessary, all of our legal remedies in these litigations, including through any appeals processes that the Ascletis Defendants may initiate.
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.