Item 1. Business
Item 1. Business
Overview
SunCoke Energy, Inc. (“SunCoke Energy,” “SunCoke,” “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us”) is the largest independent producer of high-quality coke in the Americas, as measured by tons of coke produced each year, and has more than 60 years of coke production experience. Coke is produced by heating metallurgical coal in a refractory oven, which releases certain volatile components from the coal, thus transforming the coal into coke. Our coke is primarily used as a principal raw material in the blast furnace steelmaking process as well as in the foundry production of casted iron, and the majority of our sales are derived from blast furnace coke sales made under long-term, take-or-pay agreements. We also sell coke produced utilizing capacity in excess of that reserved for our long-term, take-or-pay agreements to customers in both the export and North American domestic coke markets seeking high-quality product for their blast furnaces. We have designed, developed and built, and we currently own and operate five cokemaking facilities in the United States (“U.S.”) with collective nameplate capacity to produce approximately 4.2 million tons of blast furnace coke per year. Additionally, we designed and currently operate one cokemaking facility in Brazil under licensing and operating agreements on behalf of ArcelorMittal Brasil S.A. (“ArcelorMittal Brazil”), which has approximately 1.7 million tons of annual cokemaking capacity.
We also own and operate a logistics business that provides export and domestic material handling and/or mixing services to steel, coke (including some of our domestic cokemaking facilities), electric utility, coal producing and other manufacturing based customers. Our logistics terminals, which are strategically located to reach Gulf Coast, East Coast, Great Lakes and international ports, have the collective capacity to mix and/or transload more than 40 million tons of product annually and have storage capacity of approximately 3 million tons.
We report our business results through three reportable segments: Domestic Coke, Brazil Coke and Logistics.
Domestic Coke
Our Domestic Coke segment consists of cokemaking facilities and heat recovery operations at our Jewell, Indiana Harbor, Haverhill, Granite City and Middletown plants. Our core business model is predicated on providing steelmakers an alternative to investing capital in their own captive coke production facilities and to serve as the long-term supplier of high quality coke by investing in our facilities with leading technology, as well as safety and environmental performance. Our cokemaking ovens utilize efficient, modern heat recovery technology designed to combust the coal’s volatile components during the cokemaking process and use the hot flue gas to generate steam and electricity for sale through steam generation facilities or cogeneration plants, respectively. This differs from by-product cokemaking, which repurposes the coal’s volatile components for other uses. Steam generated is generally sold to customers pursuant to steam supply and purchase agreements, and electricity generated is generally sold into the regional power market or to customers pursuant to energy sales agreements.
We believe our advanced heat recovery cokemaking process has numerous advantages over by-product cokemaking, including producing higher quality coke, using waste heat to generate derivative energy for resale, and reducing the environmental footprint. The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 specifically directed the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) to evaluate our heat recovery coke oven technolog y as a basis for establishing Maximum Achievable Control Technology (“MACT”) standards for new cokemaking facilities. In addition, each of the four cokemaking facilities that we have built since 1990 has either met or exceeded the applicable Best Available Control Technology (“BACT”), or Lowest Achievable Emission Rate (“LAER”) standards, as applicable, set forth by the EPA for cokemaking facilities. We have constructed the only greenfield cokemaking facilities in the U.S. in over 35 years and are the only North American coke producer that utilizes heat recovery technology in the cokemaking process.
1
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth information about our cokemaking facilities:
Facility Location Year of
Start Up Use of Waste Heat Number of
Coke Ovens Annual Cokemaking Nameplate
Capacity (1)
(thousands of tons)
Customer (3)
Contract Expiration Contract Volume
(thousands of tons)
Owned and Operated:
Middletown (2)
Middletown, Ohio 2011 Power generation 100 550 Cliffs Steel December 2032 Capacity
Haverhill II Franklin Furnace, Ohio 2008 Power generation 100 550 Cliffs Steel June 2025 Capacity (4)
Granite City Granite City, Illinois 2009 Steam for power generation 120 650 U.S. Steel June 2025
Capacity (5)
Indiana Harbor East Chicago, Indiana 1998 Heat for power generation 268 1,220 Cliffs Steel September
2035 Capacity
Jewell Vansant, Virginia 1962 Partially used for coal drying 142 720 Cliffs Steel/
Algoma Steel (6)
December 2025/
December 2026 400 / 165
Haverhill I Franklin Furnace, Ohio 2005 Process steam 100 550
Total 830 4,240
Operated:
Vitória Vitória, Brazil 2007 Steam for power generation 320 1,700 ArcelorMittal Brazil January 2028 Capacity
Total 1,150 5,940
(1) Cokemaking nameplate capacity represents stated capacity for production of blast furnace coke equivalent production. The production of foundry coke tons does not replace blast furnace coke tons on a ton for ton basis, as foundry coke requires longer coking time.
(2) The Middletown coke sales agreement provides for coke sales on a “run of oven” basis, which includes both blast furnace coke and small coke. Middletown nameplate capacity on a “run of oven” basis is 578 thousand tons per year.
(3) Customers under long-term, take-or-pay agreements include Cleveland-Cliffs Steel Holding Corporation and Cleveland-Cliffs Steel LLC, both subsidiaries of Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. and collectively referred to as “ Cliffs Steel ”, United States Steel Corporation ( “ U.S. Steel ” ), and Algoma Steel Inc. ( “ Algoma Steel ” ).
(4) Non-contracted blast coke produced utilizing capacity in excess of that reserved for the long-term, take-or-pay agreement is sold into the export and North American spot coke markets.
(5) In October 2024, the Granite City long-term, take-or-pay agreement with U.S. Steel was extended through June 30, 2025, with an option for U.S. Steel to extend for an additional six months. Under the terms of the extension, Granite City will operate at a turn-down capacity, supplying 295 thousand tons of coke to U.S. Steel during the initial six-month term. See further discussion in “ Management's Discussion and Analysis Financial Condition and Results of Operations. ”
(6) Under the long-term, take-or-pay agreement with Cliffs Steel, Jewell and Haverhill I supply a combined 400 thousand tons annually through 2025. Additionally, the long-term, take-or-pay agreement between Haverhill I and Algoma Steel provides for coke supply to shift to Jewell. Non-contracted blast coke produced utilizing capacity in excess of that reserved for our long-term, take-or-pay agreements at Jewell and Haverhill I is generally sold into the foundry, export and North American spot coke markets.
Blast Furnace Coke
Our blast furnace coke sales are primarily made pursuant to long-term, take-or-pay agreements with the customers noted in the table above. These agreements require us to produce the contracted volumes of coke and require our customers to purchase such volumes of coke up to a specified tonnage or pay the contract price for any tonnage they elect not to take. As a result, our ability to produce the contracted coke volume is a key determinant of our profitability. Our domestic capacity is largely consumed by these long-term agreements, which do not have exposure to the fluctuations in domestic and global spot prices for blast furnace coke.
2
Table of Contents
Our long-term, take-or-pay coke sales agreements contain pass-through provisions for costs we incur in the cokemaking process, including coal and coal procurement costs, subject to meeting contractual coal-to-coke yields, operating and maintenance expenses, costs related to the transportation of coke to our customers, taxes (other than income taxes) and costs associated with changes in regulation. When targeted coal-to-coke yields are achieved, the price of coal is not a significant determining factor in the profitability of our long-term, take-or-pay coke sales agreements, although it does affect our revenue and cost of sales for these facilities in approximately equal amounts. However, to the extent that the actual coal-to-coke yields are less than the contractual standard, we are responsible for the cost of the excess coal used in the cokemaking process. Conversely, to the extent our actual coal-to-coke yields are higher than the contractual standard, we realize gains. As coal prices increase, the benefits associated with favorable coal-to-coke yields also increase. These features of our long-term, take-or-pay coke sales agreements reduce our exposure to variability in coal price changes and inflationary costs over the remaining terms of these agreements.
Coke prices in our long-term, take-or-pay agreements also include both an operating cost component and a fixed fee component. During 2024, operating costs under four of our coke sales agreements are fixed subject to an annual adjustment based on an inflation index. Under our other three coke sales agreements, operating costs are passed through to the respective customers subject to an annually negotiated budget, in some cases subject to a cap annually adjusted for inflation, and we share any difference in costs from the budgeted amounts with our customers. Accordingly, actual operating costs in excess of caps or budgets can have a significant impact on the profitability of all of our domestic cokemaking facilities. The fixed fee component for each ton of coke sold to the customer is determined at the time the coke sales agreement is signed and is effective for the term of each sales agreement. The fixed fee is intended to provide an adequate return on invested capital and may differ based on investment levels and other considerations. The actual return on invested capital at any facility is based on the fixed fee per ton and favorable or unfavorable performance on pass-through cost items.
We also sell non-contracted blast furnace coke tons into the North American spot coke and export coke markets, utilizing capacity in excess of that reserved for our long-term, take-or-pay agreements. These non-contracted blast coke sales are generally sold on a spot basis at the current market price, and do not contain the same provisions as our long-term, take-or-pay agreements discussed above.
Foundry Coke
While the revenues in our Domestic Coke segment are primarily tied to blast furnace coke sales made under long-term, take-or-pay agreements, we also produce and sell foundry coke out of our Jewell cokemaking facility. Foundry coke is a high-quality type of coke that is used at foundries to melt iron and various metals in cupola furnaces, which is further processed via casting or molding into products used in various industries such as construction, transportation and industrial products. Foundry coke sales are generally made under annual agreements with our customers for an agreed upon price and do not contain take-or-pay volume commitments.
Brazil
Our Brazil segment consists of our cokemaking operations located in Vitória, Brazil, where we operate the ArcelorMittal Brazil cokemaking facility for a Brazilian subsidiary of ArcelorMittal S.A. Revenues from the Brazilian cokemaking facility are derived from licensing and operating fees, which are based upon the level of production required by our customer and full pass-through of the operating costs of the facility.
Logistics
Our Logistics segment consists of Convent Marine Terminal ( “ CMT ” ), Kanawha River Terminal ( “ KRT ” ) and SunCoke Lake Terminal ( “ Lake Terminal ” ). Our terminals act as intermediaries between our customers and end users by providing transloading and mixing services. Materials are transported in numerous ways, including rail, truck, barge or ship. We do not take possession of materials handled but instead derive our revenues by providing handling and/or mixing services to our customers on a per ton basis. CMT is located in Convent, Louisiana, with strategic access to seaborne markets for coal and other industrial materials. The terminal provides loading and unloading services and has direct rail access and the current capability to transload 15 million tons annually with its top of the line ship loader. The facility serves coal mining customers as well as other merchant business, including aggregates (crushed stone), petroleum coke and iron ore. CMT's efficient barge unloading capabilities complement its rail and truck offerings and provide the terminal with the ability to transload and mix a significantly broader variety of materials, including coal, petroleum coke and other materials from barges at its dock. KRT is a leading metallurgical and thermal coal mixing and handling terminal service provider with collective capacity to mix and transload 25 million tons annually through its operations in Ceredo and Belle, West Virginia. Lake Terminal provides coal handling and mixing services to SunCoke's Indiana Harbor cokemaking operations.
3
Table of Contents
Market Discussion and Competition
Cokemaking
The majority of our current production from our cokemaking business is committed under long-term, take-or-pay agreements. As a result, competition mainly affects our ability to obtain new contracts supporting development of additional cokemaking capacity, including foundry coke, re-contracting existing facilities, as well as the sale of non-contracted blast coke tons in the North American spot coke and export coke markets. We direct our marketing efforts principally towards these areas.
The cokemaking market is highly competitive. Competitors include merchant coke producers as well as the cokemaking facilities owned and operated by blast furnace steel companies. The principal competitive factors affecting our cokemaking business include coke quality and price, reliability of supply, proximity to market, access to metallurgical coals and environmental performance. Most of the world’s coke production capacity is owned by blast furnace steel companies. The international merchant coke market is largely supplied by Chinese and Colombian producers, among others, but it can be challenging to maintain high quality coke in the export market, and when coupled with transportation costs, coke imports into the U.S. are often not economical. However, the supply of coke from international merchants does impact our ability to sell tons in excess of those contracted under out long-term, take-or-pay agreements into the export coke market.
We believe we are well-positioned to compete with other coke producers. In recent years, our Domestic Coke segment has accounted for approximate ly 38 percent of the U.S. blast furnace coke market capacity. We are the only coke producer who has built new cokemaking facilities in the U.S. in over 30 years, which will allow us to absorb additional market share from aging by-product coke batteries owned by other coke producers. Additionally, our facilities and ovens were constructed using proven, industry-leading technology with many proprietary features allowing us to produce consistently higher quality coke than our competitors produce. Our technology also allows us to produce heat that can be converted into steam or electrical power.
We monitor the development of competing technologies carefully, such as steelmakers' growing use of electronic arc furnaces as an alternative to blast furnace technology, which requires less or alternatives to coke. We also monitor ferrous technologies, such as direct reduced iron production, as these could indirectly impact our blast furnace customers.
During 2024, our domestic coke plants continued to operate at full capacity. Our long-term, take-or-pay Domestic Coke sales agreements, which largely consume our capacity, are not impacted by the fluctuations of global coke prices. Non-contracted blast coke, which is produced utilizing capacity in excess of that reserved for long-term, take-or-pay Domestic Coke sales agreements, is sold in the global market and can be impacted by fluctuations of global coke prices.
Logistics
Our principal competitors of CMT are located on the U.S. Gulf Coast or U.S. East Coast. CMT is one of the largest export terminals on the U.S. Gulf Coast and provides strategic access to seaborne markets for coal and other bulk materials. Additionally, CMT is the largest bulk material terminal in the lower U.S. with direct rail access on the Canadian National Railway. In 2024, CMT accounted for ap proximately 38 per cent of U.S. thermal coal exports from the U.S. Gulf Coast and approxim ately 16 pe rcent of total U.S. thermal coal exports. CMT has a state-of-the-art ship loader, the largest of its kind in the world. We believe this ship loader has the fastest loading rate available in the Gulf Region, which should allow our customers to benefit from lower shipping costs. Additionally, CMT has a strategic alliance with a company that performs barge unloading services for the terminal, which provides CMT with the ability to transload and mix a significantly broader variety of materials.
Our coal handling customers at CMT are impacted by seaborne export market dynamics. Fluctuations in global energy needs and the benchmark pricing for coal delivery into Europe, as referenced in the Argus/McCloskey's Coal Price Index Report ("API2 index price"), as well as coal exports out of the U.S. Gulf Coast, as referenced in the Platt's FOB New Orleans 3 percent Sulfur Coal Index, contribute to our customers' decisions to place tons into the export market and thus impacted transloading volumes through CMT during 2024. Fluctuations in benchmark pricing can be impacted by weather conditions, natural gas prices, geopolitical issues, U.S. thermal coal supply and global thermal coal demand.
Our KRT terminals serve two primary domestic markets, metallurgical coal trade and thermal coal trade. Metallurgical markets are primarily impacted by steel prices and blast furnace operating levels whereas thermal markets are impacted by natural gas prices and electricity demand. Our KRT competitors are generally located within 100 miles of our operations. KRT has fully automated and computer-controlled mixing capabilities that mix coal to within two percent accuracy of customer specifications. KRT also has the ability to provide pad storage and has access to both CSX and Norfolk Southern rail lines as well as the Ohio River system. Demand for our services at KRT increased during 2024, driven by the
4
Table of Contents
desire for certain coal suppliers to diversify transloading tons across the U.S. East Coast. This increased demand also resulted in an additional coal handling agreement and an associated capital expenditure project to be completed at KRT in 2025.
Lake Terminal provides coal handling and mixing services to our Indiana Harbor cokemaking facility and therefore, does not have any competitors.
Seasonality
Our revenues in our Domestic Coke segment are largely tied to long-term, take-or-pay agreements and as such, are not seasonal. However, our cokemaking profitability is tied to coal-to-coke yields, which improve in drier weather. Extreme weather may also challenge our operating costs and production in the winter months for our Domestic Coke segment. KRT service demand fluctuates due to changes in the domestic electricity markets. Excessively hot summer weather or cold winter weather may increase commercial and residential needs for air conditioning or heat, which in turn may increase electricity usage and the demand for thermal coal and, therefore, may favorably impact our logistics business. Additionally, operating costs at CMT are impacted by water levels on the Mississippi River, which are often higher in the spring months.
Raw Materials
Metallurgical coal is the principal raw material for our cokemaking operations. All of the metallurgical coal used to produce coke at our domestic cokemaking facilities is purchased from third-parties. We believe there is an adequate supply of metallurgical coal available in the U.S. and worldwide, and we have been able to supply coal to our domestic cokemaking facilities without any significant disruption in coke production.
Each ton of blast furnace coke produced at our facilities requires approximately 1.4 tons of metallurgical coal. We purchased 6.1 million tons of metallurgical coal in 2024. Metallurgical coal is generally purchased on an annual basis via one-year contracts with costs primarily passed through to our customers in accordance with the applicable long-term, take-or-pay coke sales agreements. Occasionally, shortfalls in deliveries by metallurgical coal suppliers require us to procure supplemental coal volumes. As with typical annual purchases, the cost of these supplemental purchases is also generally passed through to our customers. Most metallurgical coal procurement decisions are made through a coal committee structure with customer participation. The customer can generally exercise an overriding vote on most coal procurement decisions. In 2025, our metallurgical coal contracts are generally based on coke production requirements. Refer to our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) for further detail on our coal contractual obligations.
Transportation and Freight
For inbound transportation of metallurgical coal purchases, our facilities that access a single rail provider have long-term transportation agreements, and where necessary, coal-mixing agreements that run concurrently with the associated long-term, take-or-pay coke sales agreements for the facility. At facilities with multiple transportation options, including rail and barge, we enter into short-term transportation contracts from year to year. Delivery costs, and annual volume commitments included in certain agreements, are generally passed through to the customers.
For coke sales, the point of delivery varies by agreement and facility. The destination for coke sales under long-term, take-or-pay agreements from our Jewell and Haverhill cokemaking facilities is generally designated by the customer and shipments are made by railcar under long-term transportation agreements, which may include annual volume commitments, and are generally passed through to our customers. The destination for non-contracted blast coke sales is also generally designated by the customer and shipments are made by either railcar, truck, barge or ship. Transportation and freight costs associated with these sales do not contain the same pass through provisions as our long-term, take-or-pay agreements. At our Middletown, Indiana Harbor and Granite City cokemaking facilities, coke is delivered primarily by a conveyor belt leading to the customer’s blast furnace, with the customer responsible for additional transportation costs, if any. Most transportation and freight costs in our Logistics segment are paid by the customer directly to the transportation provider.
Research and Development and Intellectual Property and Proprietary Rights
Our research and development program seeks to improve existing and develop promising new cokemaking technologies, including new product development, and enhance our heat recovery processes. Over the years, this program has produced numerous patents related to our heat recovery coking design and operation, including patents for pollution control systems, oven pushing and charging mechanisms, oven flue gas control mechanisms, high quality foundry coke, higher activity foundry coke, hydrated activated carbon for removing mercury from a flue-gas desulfurization system, corrosion resistant spray dry absorber, low particulate matter quench tower design and various others. Additionally, we have continued to successfully utilize our existing coke ovens to produce foundry coke in addition to our primary product of blast furnace
5
Table of Contents
coke. As of December 31, 2024, we had 83 patents issued and 38 pending in the U.S., as well as 222 issued and 75 pending in foreign jurisdictions.
At Vitória, Brazil, where we operate one cokemaking facility on behalf of ArcelorMittal Brazil, we have intellectual property and licensing agreements in place for the entity’s use of our technology. As of December 31, 2024, we had 39 patents issued and 18 pending in Brazil.
Human Capital Management
Safety
We live by the ethos: Think Safe. Act Safe. Be Safe.
Our top priority has always been the safety and health of our employees, contractors and visitors.
Safety is so important to SunCoke that we include safety in our core values and also incorporate safety as a metric in our short-term incentive program. Our ambition is to have zero incidents and injuries in the workplace. To reach our goal, we follow our Safety Vision, which is comprised of five core components including:
• Visible safety leadership – Site and corporate leadership have made a commitment to safety as the paramount value within the Company and our site leadership practices visible safety leadership on a daily basis.
• Communication and training – All team members and contractors take responsibility for their own safety and the safety of those around them, and we train for proper safety knowledge.
• Safe work practices – All team members and contractors take the time necessary to properly identify and mitigate hazards and safely do each job.
• Incident investigation – We have a structured process for investigating incidents and perform root cause failure analyses.
Our target for Total Rec ordable Incident Rate (“TRIR”) at SunCoke for 2024 was 0.80 company-wide, which includes both employees and contractors. Our safety performance in 2024 was a 0.50 TRIR.
Our excellent safety record is best understood in comparison to industry-wide safety performance. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the TRIR of Other Petroleum and Coal Products (Coke) Manufacturing was 2.9 in 2023 and the TRIR for the Iron and Steel Mills sector was 2.1 in 2023, based on the most recent data available. Our year-over-year safety performance is consistently significantly lower than average industry-wide rates, demonstrating our strong commitment to safety.
Year Total TRIR
2022 0.69
2023 0.99
2024 0.50
Human Capital Strategy
Our human capital strategy is centered on talent retention, succession planning, workforce stability, training and total compensation. At SunCoke, we strive to create a welcoming work environment where our employees are valued, trusted, and motivated to contribute meaningfully both as individuals and as a part of the team. Company leadership and the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors are actively involved in overseeing the Company’s human capital management programs. The leadership of our Human Resources department sponsors the development and oversight of all human capital programs in the organization including: workforce composition, talent acquisition and retention, culture, workforce stability, employee development and training, benefits, talent management and total compensation. Additionally, our Legal department, including the Chief Compliance Officer, oversees matters related to ethics and compliance.
Culture and Core Values
Our culture at SunCoke is driven by our core values. SunCoke’s values of excellence, innovation, commitment, integrity and stewardship are at the heart of who we are and how we work every day. They guide our actions and decisions so we can always strive to do the right thing for our stakeholders, our business and each other.
• Excellence: expect the best from yourself, remove obstacles, inspire and support others and celebrate success.
• Innovation: master the science and process, create a better way, find a better solution and push the envelope.
6
Table of Contents
• Commitment: deliver results, be accountable, work as a team, continuously improve and grow and always communicate effectively.
• Integrity: do what is right, say what you mean, do what you say, earn trust and treat others with respect.
• Stewardship: provide safe, reliable and environmentally sound operations for our people and their families, our customers and the communities where we do business.
Workforce Composition
As of December 31, 2024, we have 868 employees in the U.S. Approximately 40 percent of our domestic employees, at our cokemaking operations, are represented by the United Steelworkers union under various local collective bargaining agreements. Additionally, approximately 3 percent of our domestic employees are represented by the International Union of Operating Engineers at our Lake Terminal facility.
As of December 31, 2024, we have 300 employees at the cokemaking facility in Vitória, Brazil, all of whom are represented by Sindimetal-ES - Union of Metallurgists under a labor agreement.
Talent Retention, Development & Training
We strive to continually attract, develop, engage, and retain a high-performing team that executes our strategy of long-term profitable growth. We are committed to employee development and helping individuals reach their full potential, by making ongoing investments in our team.
We have a continual focus on strengthening technical, professional and leadership capabilities at every level using contemporary learning strategies to foster high performance. Development occurs in the form of specialized leadership training through third-party vendors, cross training, stretch assignments, and on the job training. In 2024, frontline supervisors and first-time managers received training to strengthen their leadership skills, including training on conflict resolution, high-quality decision making, communication, coaching others, and safety and workplace performance. Strategic talent reviews occur at a minimum, twice a year, across the company through succession planning discussions and annual performance calibration.
SunCoke also provides a robust training program that is meant to meet applicable regulatory requirements. In addition to the annual interactive video-based SunCoke Code of Business Conduct and Ethics training we provide to all employees, we also provide specialized trainings on an as-needed basis for current topics throughout the year. Over the past several years, special training topics have included Active Shooter Preparedness, Harassment, Worker’s Compensation, Unconscious Bias at the Workplace, Conducting Effective Investigations, Retirement Planning, and Substance Abuse Awareness.
SunCoke’s Personal Information & Privacy Policy outlines specific procedures for employees to handle sensitive information in a secure and responsible manner. The Personal Information & Privacy Policy is updated periodically to reflect evolving data security best practices. SunCoke utilizes a variety of information security training methods, including training segments on data security best practices and periodic security awareness communications that remind employees to stay vigilant with respect to data security.
Succession Planning
We pride ourselves on being a lean workforce that focuses on developing and promoting talent internally. Our open roles are almost half filled internally. We engage in succession planning to help identify development and training opportunities for high performing talent, preparing potential successors for our most critical roles through assessment of the incumbents and equipping these employees with individualized development plans and job assignments to help them grow. We have customized leadership development plans for the immediate successors of key positions across the Company.
Compensation and Benefits
Providing competitive benefits and compensation underpins our commitment to our engaged and productive employees. Our pay-for-performance philosophy aligns employee’s individual contributions, behaviors and business results with individual rewards. Our short-term incentives include both financial metrics as well as performance-based environmental and safety metrics. The level of pay at risk increases progressively with positions of greater responsibility, with long-term cash and equity incentives with multi-year vesting periods granted at the Director, Vice President and Senior Vice President levels. Further, below the Director level, top performers may be granted long-term incentive (restricted stock units) with multi-year vesting for retention. This helps the Company to retain those identified as having the top skills and abilities that are critical to our business.
7
Table of Contents
We offer comprehensive benefits to our employees and their families, including health care coverage, retirement benefits, life and disability insurance, vacation and leave policies. We also offer supplemental benefits programs designed to enhance the daily life and well-being of our employees, including: supplemental life insurance for all eligible family members, supplemental short-term disability, a legal services plan, an identity theft and device protection program, financial retirement planning education and coaching, paid-time off (including time for community service), tuition reimbursement, health management for chronic conditions, a 24/7 employee assistance program, telemedicine, critical illness, accident and hospital indemnity insurance.
Talent Management
We use an annual review process to evaluate employees' performance and assist in their development. Our full-year performance management process begins with setting annual goals for the Company, which guide the development of functional, local and individual employee goals. Employees and their managers are accountable for the goals and must review their performance against the goals on an ongoing basis.
Workforce Stability & Leadership Experience
Our regrettable turnover rate is approximately 1 percent in 2024. This low rate is a testament to our commitment to employee retention. The stability of our workforce is also anchored by our experienced corporate leadership team along with our General Managers that lead the day-to-day operations at our facilities. Our leaders each have an average of nearly 20 years of leadership experience and an average tenure (or length of service) of 14 years with SunCoke.
Ethics & Compliance
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of our officers, directors and employees, including senior financial officers and executives. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, along with our Core Values, establish the principles that guide our daily actions to uphold the highest standards of ethical and legal behavior. Whether working with customers, vendors, business partners or neighbors, we always strive to act with integrity. All employees must complete annual training on our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which we review and update as needed. We educate all employees to avoid potential conflicts of interest. Our Prohibited Payments and Political Contributions Policy addresses payments made to U.S. officials, including campaign contributions. Our Gifts, Entertainment and Sponsored Travel Policy provides guidance regarding business courtesies, including reporting obligations and value limitations. We also have a Human Rights Policy, which affirms our commitment to a fair living wage for all employees.
Guidance & Reporting Without Fear of Retaliation
All employees, officers and directors must report suspected policy violations of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to the Compliance Team, which is led by our Chief Compliance Officer and oversees investigations conducted by representatives from our Human Resources and Legal departments. They can do so through a variety of channels, including, but not limited to, directly reporting to a supervisor, providing email or verbal reports directly to the Compliance Team and using our confidential, third-party 24/7 reporting hotline or website. Calls and online submissions are anonymous, unless the notifying party discloses his or her identity. We take the anonymity of these communications seriously and SunCoke’s Compliance Team follows up on each submission. In addition to the anonymous hotline, hourly employees represented by a collective bargaining unit can also file a report using the applicable union grievance process. Nothing in our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is intended to prevent anonymous individuals from communicating directly with relevant government authorities about potential violations of law.
Legal and Regulatory Requirements
Our operations are subject to extensive governmental regulation, including environmental laws, which are a significant factor in our business. The following discussion summarizes the principal legal and regulatory requirements that we believe may significantly affect us.
Permitting and Bonding
• Permitting Process for Cokemaking Facilities. The permitting process for our cokemaking facilities is administered by each state individually. However, the main requirements for obtaining environmental construction and operating permits are found in the federal regulations. A construction permit allows construction and commencement of operations at the facility and is generally valid for at least 18 months. Generally, construction commences during this period, while many states allow this period to be extended in certain situations. A facility's operating permit may be a state operating permit or a Title V operating permit.
8
Table of Contents
• Air Quality. Our cokemaking facilities employ MACT standards designed to limit emissions of certain hazardous air pollutants. Specific MACT standards apply to oven door leaks, charging, oven pressure, pushing, quenching, and emissions from our main stacks and bypass vent stacks. Certain MACT standards for cokemaking facilities were developed using test data from SunCoke's facilities. Additionally, under applicable federal air quality regulations, permitting requirements may differ among facilities, depending upon whether the cokemaking facility will be located in an “attainment” area—i.e., one that meets the national ambient air quality standards (“NAAQS”) for certain pollutants, or in a “non-attainment” or "unclassifiable" area. The status of an area may change over time as new NAAQS standards are adopted, resulting in an area changing from one status or classification to another. In an attainment area, the facility must install air pollution control equipment or employ BACT. In a non-attainment area, the facility must install air pollution control equipment or employ procedures that meet LAER standards. LAER standards are the most stringent emission limitation achieved in practice by existing facilities. Unlike the BACT analysis, cost is generally not considered as part of a LAER analysis, and emissions in a non-attainment area must be offset by emission reductions obtained from other sources. Any changes in attainment status for areas where our facilities are located present a potential risk that may impact our operations and costs.
• More stringent NAAQS for ambient nitrogen dioxide (“NO2”) and sulfur dioxide (“SO2”) went into effect in 2010. In July 2013, the EPA identified or "designated" as non-attainment 29 areas in 16 states where monitored air quality showed violations of the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS. In December 2017, the EPA issued a final designation of attainment or unclassifiable for all areas where our facilities are located. These designations mean that no action is required for the facilities wi th respect to SO2 emissions at this time. However, it is possible for these areas to be redesignated in the future as non-attainment areas. There is a potential risk that any re-designations may have an impact on our operations and costs for facilities located in areas that the EPA determines to be non-attainment with the 1-hour SO2 NAAQS.
• In 2012, more stringent NAAQS for fine particulate matter (“PM”), or PM 2.5, went into effect. In January 2015, the areas where the Granite City and Indiana Harbor facilities are located were designated unclassifiable for PM 2.5, and the areas where the Haverhill and Jewell facilities are located were designated unclassifiable/attainment for PM 2.5. In April 2015, the area where the Middletown facility is located was designated unclassifiable/attainment for PM 2.5. These designations mean that no action is required for the facilities with respect to the 2012 PM 2.5 NAAQS at this time. However, on February 7, 2024, the EPA adopted a rule that lowers the annual PM 2.5 NAAQS and maintains the daily PM 2.5 standard, the daily PM 10 standard, and the secondary NAAQS for PM 10 and PM 2.5. In March 2024, a coalition of states initiated litigation against EPA regarding the legality of the new PM 2.5 standard in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which is ongoing at this time. In November 2024, the state of Ohio, which is where our Middletown facility is located, has been preliminarily designated as nonattainment under the new PM 2.5. It is possible that the areas where our other facilities are located may also be redesignated in the future as non-attainment areas as a result of this rule. If redesignated, there is a potential risk that any re-designations may have an impact on our operations and costs for facilities located in areas that the EPA determines to be non-attainment with the NAAQS if the rule is upheld in court and otherwise remains in effect.
• In 2015, the EPA revised the existing NAAQS for ground level ozone to make the standard more stringent. In January 2018, the EPA designated the areas where the Haverhill and Jewell facilities are located as attainment/unclassifiable for ozone. In June 2018, the EPA designated the areas where the Granite City, Indiana Harbor, and Middletown facilities are located as marginal nonattainment for ozone. The status of the area where the Indiana Harbor facility is located was challenged in litigation and upheld in July 2020. As a result of the same litigation, the status of the area where the Granite City facility is located was remanded to the EPA, which finalized the area as nonattainment in January 2021. On June 9, 2022, the EPA redesignated the area where the Middletown facility is located as an attainment area for the 2015 ozone NAAQS. Nonattainment designations under the 2015 standard and any future more stringent standard for ozone have two potential impacts: (1) demonstrating compliance with the standard using dispersion modeling for permitting new facilities or significant new projects may be more difficult; and (2) facilities operating in areas that are classified as moderate non-attainment areas may be required to install Reasonably Available Control Technology (“RACT”) or demonstrate that they already meet RACT standards. While we are not able to determine the extent to which any new ozone standards will impact our business at this time, it presents a potential risk of having an impact on our operations and costs.
9
Table of Contents
• The EPA adopted a rule in 2010 requiring a new facility that is a major source of greenhouse gases (“GHGs”) to install equipment or employ BACT procedures. Currently, there is little information on what may be acceptable as BACT to control GHGs (primarily carbon dioxide from our facilities), but the database and additional guidance may be enhanced in the future.
• Several states have additional requirements and standards other than those in the federal statutes and regulations. Many states have lists of “air toxics” with emission limitations determined by dispersion modeling. States also often have specific regulations that deal with visible emissions, odors and nuisance. In some cases, the state delegates some or all of these functions to local agencies.
• Wastewater and Stormwater. Our heat recovery cokemaking technology does not discharge process wastewater as is typically associated with by-product cokemaking. Our cokemaking facilities, in some cases, have non-process wastewater and/or stormwater discharge permits.
• Waste. The primary solid waste product from our heat recovery cokemaking technology is calcium sulfate from flue gas desulfurization, which is generally taken to a solid waste landfill. The material from periodic cleaning of heat recovery steam generators has been disposed of off-site as hazardous waste. Our facilities only generate wastes and do not have permits for waste transportation, storage or disposal.
• U.S. Endangered Species Act. The U.S. Endangered Species Act of 1973 and certain counterpart state regulations are intended to protect species whose populations allow for categorization as either endangered or threatened. With respect to permitting additional cokemaking facilities, protection of endangered or threatened species may have the effect of prohibiting, limiting the extent of or placing permitting conditions on soil removal, road building and other activities in areas containing the affected species. Based on the species that have been designated as endangered or threatened on our properties and the current application of these laws and regulations, we do not believe that they are likely to have a material adverse effect on our operations.
• Permitting Requirements for Former Coal Mining Operations. The Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (“SMCRA”) and applicable state equivalents govern mining permits and reclamation plans, documents defining ownership and agreements pertaining to coal, minerals, oil and gas, water rights, rights of way and surface land and documents required by the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement’s (“OSM’s”) Applicant Violator System.
We currently have no applications pending for new SMCRA permits, but hold several permits for which reclamation is incomplete.
Our reclamation obligations under applicable environmental laws could be substantial. Under accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“GAAP”), we are required to account for the costs related to the closure of mines and the reclamation of the land upon exhaustion of coal reserves. The fair value of an asset retirement obligation is recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. At which time, the present value of the estimated asset retirement costs is capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. At December 31, 2024, we had an asset retirement obligation of $4.7 million related to estimated mine reclamation costs. The amounts recorded are dependent upon a number of variables, including the estimated future retirement costs, inflation rates, and the assumed credit-adjusted interest rates. Our future operati ng results would be adversely affected if these accruals were determined to be insufficient. These obligations are unfunded. Failure to comply with the regulatory requirements can result in sanctions.
• Bonding Requirements for Permits Related to Former Coal Mining Operations and Coal Terminals with Surface Mining Permits. Before a SMCRA permit or a surface mining permit is issued, a mine operator must submit a bond or other form of financial security to guarantee the payment and performance of certain long-term mine closure and reclamation obligations. The costs of these bonds or other forms of financial security have fluctuated in recent years and the market terms of surety bonds generally have become less favorable to those entities with legacy mining obligations or terminal operators and others with such permits. These changes in the terms of such bonds have been accompanied, at times, by a decrease in the number of companies willing to issue surety bonds. As of December 31, 2024, we have post ed $8.4 million in surety bonds or other forms of financial security for future reclamation.
Regulation of Operations
• Clean Air Act. The Clean Air Act (“CAA”) and similar state laws and regulations affect our cokemaking operations. These may be through permitting and/or emissions control requirements relating to criteria
10
Table of Contents
pollutants or MACT standards. These air emissions programs that may affect our operations, directly or indirectly, include, but are not limited to: the Acid Rain Program; NAAQS implementation for SO2, PM, NO2, lead, ozone, and carbon monoxide; GHG rules; the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule; MACT emissions standards for hazardous air pollutants; the Regional Haze Program; New Source Performance Standards (“NSPS”); and New Source Review.
◦ Regulation of hazardous air pollutants through the development and promulgation of various industry-specific MACT standards impacts our cokemaking facilities. We are subject to two categories of MACT standards. The first category applies to pushing, quenching, and emissions from the main stacks and bypass vent stacks. The second category applies to emissions from charging and coke oven doors. The EPA is required to periodically make a risk-based determination for certain emissions sources and determine whether additional emissions reductions would be necessary. On July 5, 2024, the EPA published a final rule that imposes various new emissions limits and other requirements under both categories of MACT standards regulating our cokemaking facilities. We had previously submitted comments for the EPA’s consideration in response to its proposed rule. Although EPA addressed certain comments we made in August 2023, we and other industry participants filed petitions for reconsideration with EPA, as well as litigation in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, in response to certain other aspects of this rule. If the rule remains intact and withstands legal challenges, compliance with some of these proposed requirements may require the installation of additional pollution control systems and presents a potential risk of having an impact on operations and costs at our facilities.
◦ The Regional Haze program requires that states submit State Implementation Plans (“SIPs”) that demonstrate reasonable progress towards achieving natural visibility conditions in Class I areas. The program has been challenged by various parties. On November 5, 2020, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (“VDEQ”) requested that the Jewell facility conduct an analysis of potential controls for SO2 under the Regional Haze program. Jewell determined that the installation of new controls is not feasible and any new requirements should be limited to operating pollution controls already present at the facility. While we are not able to determine at this time the extent to which a determination by the VDEQ or the EPA requiring more significant measures would impact our business, were it to withstand legal challenges, it presents a potential risk of having an impact on our operations and costs at the Jewell facility.
◦ On April 6, 2022, the EPA proposed a Federal Implementation Plan Addressing Regional Ozone Transport for the 2015 Ozone NAAQS, which proposed requirements applicable to certain coke plant operations. SunCoke submitted comments on the proposed rule requesting clarification that the rule does not apply to our facilities. In response to comments from SunCoke and other coke manufacturers, the EPA did not regulate coke ovens under the final rule released in March 2023.
• Terminal Operations. Our terminal operations located along waterways and the Gulf of Mexico are also governed by permitting requirements under the CWA (as defined below) and the CAA. These terminals are subject to U.S. Coast Guard regulations and comparable state statutes regarding design, installation, construction, management and security.
• Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) regulates the sales of electricity from our Haverhill and Middletown facilities, including the implementation of the Federal Power Act (“FPA”) and the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (“PURPA”). The nature of the operations of the Haverhill and Middletown facilities makes each facility a qualifying facility under PURPA, which exempts the facilities and the Company from certain regulatory burdens, including the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005 (“PUHCA”), limited provisions of the FPA, and certain state laws and regulation. The FERC has granted requests for authority to sell electricity from the Haverhill and Middletown facilities at market-based rates and the entities are subject to the FERC’s market-based rate regulations, which require regular regulatory compliance filings.
• Clean Water Act of 1972. The Clean Water Act of 1972 (“CWA”) may affect our operations by requiring water quality standards generally and through the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) program. Regular monitoring, reporting requirements and performance standards are requirements of NPDES permits that govern the discharge of pollutants into water. Discharges must either meet state water quality standards or be authorized through available regulatory processes such as alternate standards or variances. Additionally, through the CWA Section 401 certification program, states have approval authority over water
11
Table of Contents
discharge permits or licenses that might result in a discharge to their waters. Similarly, for permitting or any future water intake and/or discharge projects, our facilities could be subject to the Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 permitting process.
• Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. We may generate wastes, including “solid” wastes and “hazardous” wastes that are subject to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”) and comparable state statutes. The EPA has limited the disposal options for certain wastes that are designated as hazardous wastes under the RCRA. Furthermore, it is possible that certain wastes generated by our operations that currently are exempt from regulation as hazardous wastes may in the future be designated as hazardous wastes, and therefore be subject to more rigorous and costly management, disposal and clean-up requirements. Certain of our wastes are also subject to Department of Transportation regulations for shipping of materials. Any changes to hazardous waste standards or the constituents in the wastes generated at our facilities presents a potential risk of having an impact on our operations and cost structure.
• Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), also known as Superfund, and similar state laws, responsibility for the entire cost of clean-up of a contaminated site, as well as natural resource damages, can be imposed upon current or former site owners or operators, or upon any party who released one or more designated “hazardous substances” at the site, regardless of the lawfulness of the original activities that led to the contamination. In the course of our operations we may have generated and may generate wastes that fall within the CERCLA’s definition of hazardous substances. We also may be an owner or operator of facilities at which hazardous substances have been released by previous owners or operators. Under the CERCLA, we may be responsible for all or part of the costs of cleaning up facilities at which such substances have been released and for natural resource damages. We also must comply with reporting requirements under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act and the Toxic Substances Control Act.
• Climate Change Legislation and Regulations. Our facilities are presently subject to the GHG reporting rule, which obligates us to report annual emissions of GHGs. The EPA also finalized a rule in 2010 requiring a new facility that is a major source of GHGs to install equipment or employ BACT procedures. In 2014, the Supreme Court issued a decision holding that although the EPA may not treat GHGs as a pollutant for the purpose of determining whether a source must obtain a PSD or Title V permit, the EPA may continue to require GHG limitations in permits for sources classified as major based on their emission of other pollutants. Currently there is little information as to what may constitute BACT for GHG for the cokemaking industry. Potential future modifications to our facilities could subject us to the additional permitting and other obligations related to emissions of GHGs under the New Source Review/Prevention of Significant Deterioration ("NSR/PSD") and Title V programs of the CAA based on whether the facility triggered NSR/PSD because of emissions of another pollutant such as SO2, NOx, PM, ozone or lead.
◦ The EPA has engaged in various rulemakings in recent years to regulate GHG emissions from existing and new coal fired power plants. If the EPA were to ever promulgate a similar rule that applies to our facilities, it may present a risk of having an impact on our operations and cost structure.
◦ The SEC published a final rule on March 6, 2024 requiring disclosure of certain climate change-related information. The rule is currently stayed and being challenged in federal court. If the rule survives, we expect that our operations would be subject to this final rule.
• Occupational Safety and Health ACT (OSH Act). Our facilities are subject to regulation by OSHA or MSHA under the OSH Act and other agencies with standards designed to ensure worker safety. These standards impose minimum requirements for our operations to maintain and operate sites and equipment in a safe manner.
• Security. CMT is subject to regulation by the U.S. Coast Guard pursuant to the Maritime Transportation Security Act. We have an internal inspection program designed to monitor and ensure compliance by CMT with these requirements. We believe that we are in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations regarding the security of the facility.
• Black Lung Benefits Revenue Act of 1977 and Black Lung Benefits Reform Act of 1977, as amended in 1981. Under these laws, U.S. coal mine operators must pay federal black lung benefits and medical expenses to claimants who are current and former employees and last worked for the operator after July 1, 1973. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA”), which was implemented in 2010, amended previous legislation and provides for the automatic extension of awarded lifetime benefits to surviving spouses and changes the legal criteria used to assess and award claims. SunCoke is not an active coal mine operator and does not
12
Table of Contents
perform or oversee coal mining. However, SunCoke has retained certain black lung liabilities associated with legacy coal operations. On August 13, 2024, the U.S. Department of Labor’s Division of Coal Mine Workers Compensation agreed to permanently assume responsibility for payment of the Company's black lung benefits for claims based on employment that ended prior to February 1, 2013, excluding limited exceptions, in exchange for a lump sum payment of $36.0 million. This agreement resulted in a total reduction of $45.5 million of the Company's black lung liability. See Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements for further detail. Our remaining obligation related to black lung benefits at December 31, 2024 was $13.7 million and was estimated based on various assumptions, including actuarial estimates, discount rates, number of active claims, changes in health care costs and the impact of PPACA.
Available Information
We make available free of charge on our website, www.suncoke.com, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to such reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such materials are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. The SEC maintains an Internet site (www.sec.gov) that contains our electronically filed information. Our website also includes our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, our Governance Guidelines, our Related Persons Transaction Policy and the charters of our Board Committees.
A copy of any of these documents will be provided without charge upon written request to Investor Relations, SunCoke Energy, Inc., 1011 Warrenville Road, Suite 600, Lisle, Illinois 60532. The Company may also use its website as a channel of distribution of material company information. Investors may visit www.suncoke.com to find more information. However, the Company's website is expressly not incorporated by reference herein.
Information about our Executive Officers
Our executive officers and their ages as of February 21, 2025, were as follows:
Katherine T. Gates 48 President and Chief Executive Officer
Mark W. Marinko 63 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
P. Michael Hardesty 62 Senior Vice President, Commercial Operations, Business Development, Terminals and International Coke
Karl A. Zabiello 39 Vice President, Controller
Shantanu Agrawal 38 Vice President, Finance and Treasurer
John F. Quanci 63 Vice President, Engineering and Technology and Chief Technology Officer
Patrick G. Nigl 58 Vice President, Coke Operations
Katherine T. Gates. Ms. Gates became Chief Executive Officer of SunCoke Energy, Inc. in May 2024, after being appointed as President and a director on SunCoke’s Board of Directors, in January 2023. From November 2019 until her promotion to President in January 2023, Ms. Gates served as SunCoke’s Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Chief Human Resources Officer. Ms. Gates joined SunCoke in February 2013 as Senior Health, Environment and Safety Counsel, and has held leadership positions of increasing responsibility since then, including serving as General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer from October 2015 to November 2019. She was promoted to Vice President in July 2014, and to Senior Vice President in October 2015. In addition, from October 2015 through June 2019, Ms. Gates was elected as a director of SunCoke Energy Partners GP LLC, the general partner of SunCoke Energy Partners, L.P., our former publicly traded master limited partnership subsidiary. Prior to joining SunCoke, Ms. Gates was a Partner at Beveridge & Diamond, P.C., where she served on the firm’s Management Committee and co-chaired the firm’s civil litigation practice group.
Mark W. Marinko. Mr. Marinko was appointed as SunCoke Energy, Inc.’s Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in March 2022. Prior to joining SunCoke, Mr. Marinko served as the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer with Great Lakes Dredge and Dock Corporation (the largest dredging company within the United States). Prior to joining Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation, Mr. Marinko was President of the Consumer Services division at TransUnion, LLC, a global provider of information and decision-processing services.
P. Michael Hardesty. Mr. Hardesty was appointed Senior Vice President, Commercial Operations, Business Development, Terminals and International Coke of SunCoke Energy, Inc., effective October 1, 2015. Mr. Hardesty joined SunCoke Energy, Inc. in 2011 as Senior Vice President, Sales and Commercial Operations, and has more than 30 years of experience in the mining industry. Before joining SunCoke, Mr. Hardesty served as Senior Vice President for International Coal Group, Inc. (“ICG”), where he was responsible for leading the sales and marketing functions and was a key member of the executive management team. Prior to ICG, Mr. Hardesty served as Vice President of Commercial Optimization at Arch Coal, where he developed and executed trade strategies, optimized production output and directed coal purchasing activities.
13
Table of Contents
He is a past board member and Secretary-Treasurer of the Putnam County Development Authority in West Virginia. In addition, from October 2015 through June 2019, Mr. Hardesty served as a director of SunCoke Energy Partners GP LLC, the general partner of SunCoke Energy Partners, L.P., our former master limited partnership subsidiary.
Karl A. Zabiello . Mr. Zabiello was appointed Vice President and Controller of SunCoke Energy, Inc. in April 2023. Mr. Zabiello joined the Company in 2012 and has assumed progressively more responsible financial leadership roles, most recently serving as Director, Accounting and Assistant Treasurer. Mr. Zabiello is a Certified Public Accountant and holds Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees in Accounting from Northern Illinois University. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Zabiello worked in assurance services for Crowe Horwath LLP, a global public accounting firm.
Shantanu Agrawal. Mr. Agrawal was appointed Vice President, Finance and Treasurer of SunCoke Energy, Inc. in July 2021 and subsequently also assumed responsibility for the Procurement function in January 2023. Prior to that he was Director, Financial Performance & Analysis (“FP&A”) and Investor Relations. Mr. Agrawal began his career with SunCoke as an FP&A Analyst in 2014. He has increasingly taken on more responsibilities and oversight over that period. In his current roles, Mr. Agrawal has led the Company’s finance function, including budgeting, forecasting, financial analysis, cash management, investor relations and procurement.
John F. Quanci. Dr. John F. Quanci joined SunCoke Energy, Inc. in October 2010, and was appointed to his current position as Vice President, Chief Technology Officer in May 2019. Prior to joining SunCoke, Dr. Quanci was Director, Corporate Technology of Sunoco, Inc. (a leading transportation fuel provider with interests in logistics). Dr. Quanci has over 30 years of domestic and international experience in process research, development, plant optimization, manufacturing, rebuilding/turnarounds, and taking new technologies from ideation to full production. Over the course of his career, Dr. Quanci has managed several major engineering and technology organizations both internal and external to the petroleum industry, including those of: Mobil Research, Mobil Oil, BP/Mobil, Exxon/Mobil, Rodel and Rohm and Haas Electronic Materials (now DuPont Electronic Materials). Dr. Quanci holds a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from Princeton University and is a registered Professional Engineer with over one hundred U.S. and international patents and patent applications.
Patrick G. Nigl. Mr. Nigl was appointed as SunCoke Energy, Inc.’s Vice President, Coke Operations in January 2022. Prior to that, he served as General Manager at the Company’s Indiana Harbor cokemaking operations, located in East Chicago, Indiana, from September 2015. From March 2015 to September 2015, he was Operations Manager at the Indiana Harbor facility. Since joining SunCoke in February 2011 as Maintenance Manager at the Company’s Haverhill, Ohio cokemaking facility, Mr. Nigl has progressed into leadership and oversight roles for the Company’s domestic cokemaking operations. Prior to joining SunCoke, Mr. Nigl was Machining General Manager at DMAX Ltd., an American manufacturer of diesel engines for heavy-duty trucks.