Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
ITEM
8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SPORTSQUEST,
INC.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Page
INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM:
F-1
Kramer,
Weiseman and Associates LLP
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
Consolidated
Balance Sheet at May 31, 2008
F-2
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the period ended May 31, 2008
F-3
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the period ended May 31, 2008
F-4
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the period ended May 31, 2008
F-5
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
F-6
26
REPORT
OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To
the
Board of Directors and Stockholders of
SPORTSQUEST,
INC.
We
have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of SportsQuest, Inc. and
Subsidiaries as of May 31, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, changes in shareholders' deficiency and cash flows for the year
then
ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits. The financial statements of
SportsQuest, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of May 31, 2007 were audited by other
auditors whose report dated August 8, 2008, expressed an unqualified opinion,
with an explanatory paragraph relating to the assumption the Company will
continue as a going concern, on those statements.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we
plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provided a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In
our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of SportsQuest, Inc., Inc
and
Subsidiaries, as of May 31, 2008, and the results of their operations and their
cash flows for the period then ended in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
These
consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company
will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated
financial statements, the Company has operating and liquidity concerns, has
incurred an accumulated deficit of approximately $2,852,972 through the period
ended May 31, 2008, and current liabilities exceeded current assets by
approximately $3,854,841 at May 31, 2008. These conditions raise substantial
doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's
plans as to these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated
financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible
future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts
and classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome of these
uncertainties.
Kramer
Weisman and Associates LLP
Davie,
Florida
September
15, 2008
F-1
SPORTSQUEST,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCES SHEETS
FOR
PERIOD ENDED MAY 31, 2008
2008
ASSETS:
CURRENT
ASSETS
Cash
$
13,553
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
125,043
Total
current assets
138,595
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT, net
7,099
Due
from affiliate
717,077
Intangible
assets - media content
10,000,000
Investment
in unconsolidated subsidary
3,903,750
TOTAL
ASSETS
$
14,766,521
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
CURRENT
LIABILITIES:
Accounts
payable
$
73,739
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities
15,947
Notes
from affiliates
3,903,750
Total
current liabilities
3,993,436
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES:
-
Convertible
note payable
255,205
Bond
payable
733,308
Total
liabilities
4,981,950
STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY:
Preferred
stock, $.0001 par value, 1,200,000 shares authorized, 100,000 issued
as of
May 31, 2008
10
Common
stock, $.0001 par value, 98,800,000 shares authorized, 12,397,594
issued
and outstanding as of May 31, 2008
1,240
Treasury
stock
(10,000
)
Additional
Paid-in capital
9,833,995
Common
stock subscribed, not issued
2,812,300
Accumulated
deficit
(2,852,972
)
Total
stockholders' equity
9,784,572
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
$
14,766,521
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-2
SPORTSQUEST,INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR
PERIOD ENDED MAY 31, 2008
2008
REVENUES:
Revenue
$
15,750
15,750
OPERATING
EXPENSES:
General
and administrative expenses
994,708
Sales
and marketing expenses
-
Depreciation
and amortization
394
Total
operating expenses
995,102
OPERATING
LOSS
(979,352
)
OTHER
(INCOME) AND EXPENSES
Interest
expense
245,653
Impairment
of assets
189,534
Gain
on the sale of assets
(7,743
)
Total
other expense
427,444
NET
(LOSS)
$
(1,406,796
)
NET
(LOSS) INCOME PER SHARE:
Basic
and diluted:
$
(0.12
)
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING:
Basic
and diluted:
12,147,594
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-3
SPORTSQUEST,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR
PERIOD ENDED MAY 31, 2008
Additional
Common Stock
Preferred Stock
Common Stock
Treasury
Paid-in
Subscribed
Accumulated
Shares
Amount
Shares
Amount
Stock
Capital
Note Issued
Deficit
Total
OCTOBER
31, 2007
-
$
-
11,897,594
$
1,190
$
-
$
8,784,245
$
-
$
(1,446,177
)
$
7,339,258
Bond
issuance
170,000
170,000
Purchase
of treasury stock
(10,000
)
(10,000
)
Warrantes
issued
804,800
804,800
Preferred
stock issued
100,000
10
10
Common
stock issued for compensation
500,000
50
74,950
75,000
Common
stock subscribed, not issued
2,812,300
2,812,300
Net
loss
(1,406,796
)
(1,406,796
)
MAY
31, 2008
100,000
$
10
12,397,594
$
1,240
$
(10,000
)
$
9,833,995
$
2,812,300
$
(2,852,972
)
$
9,784,572
F-4
SPORTSQUEST,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR
PERIOD ENDED MAY 31, 2008
2008
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net
(loss)
$
(1,406,796
)
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
Depreciation
and amortization
394
Purchase
of treasury stock
(10,000
)
Commons
stock issued for services
75,000
Impairments
of assets
189,534
Preferred
stock issued
10
Warrants
issued
804,800
Bond
issued
170,000
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
Prepaid
and other current assets
(40,350
)
Accounts
payable
(30,500
)
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities
(64,580
)
Net
cash (used) in operating activities
(312,489
)
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Note
receivable affiliates
(179,937
)
Net
cash (used in) by investing activities
(179,937
)
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Cash
received on bond payable
70,448
Proceeds
from the sale of assets
2,257
Cash
received on loans payable
255,205
Net
cash provided by financing activities
327,910
(DECREASE)
IN CASH
(164,516
)
CASH,
BEGINNING OF YEAR
178,069
CASH,
END OF YEAR
$
13,553
2008
SUPPLEMENTAL
CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Interest
paid
$
245,643
Common
stock issued for services
$
75,000
Value
of warrants from convertible note payable
$
804,800
Preferred
stock issued as compensation
$
10
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-5
SPORTSQUEST,
INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 2008
NOTE
1 – BACKGROUND
SportsQuest,
Inc .
(“SportsQuest”) is a majority, 79%, owned subsidiary of DoMark. The Sportsquest
business was created to develop, own and manage high end sports events and
their
operating entities, as well as executing a growth strategy involving acquisition
of diverse and effective sports marketing platforms. SportsQuest was
incorporated in April 3, 1986 in Delaware under the name Bay Head Ventures,
Inc.
The Company has been managing the US Pro Golf Tour and anticipates it will
continue to manage USPGT for the foreseeable future. SportsQuest trades on
the
Pink Sheets under “SPQS.PK”. SportsQuest holds significant value in content
media and is refocusing is business model.
On
August
17, 2007,SportsQuest, Inc. entered into a Stock Issuance, Assumption and Release
Agreement (the “Assumption Agreement”), by and among SportsQuest, Inc. and
Greens
Worldwide Incorporated
(“Greens”) and AJW Partners, LLC, AJW Offshore, Ltd., AJW Qualified Partners,
LLC and New Millennium Capital Partners II, LLC (collectively, the “Greens
Worldwide Investors”). The transactions contemplated by the Assumption Agreement
include the following:
The
issuance by Greens of 390,000 shares of its Series A Convertible
Preferred
Stock, par value $10.00 per share, to SportsQuest, Inc.;
and;
The
assumption by SportsQuest of 50% of Greens indebtedness to the Greens
Worldwide Investors under a Securities Purchase Agreement, dated
as of
March 22, 2007, by and among Greens and the Greens Worldwide Investors
(the “Greens Worldwide Agreement”).
Greens
is
an unconsolidated subsidiary of SportsQuest, Inc.
NOTE
2 -
GOING CONCERN
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America which
contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. However, the Company
has year end losses from operations and had minimal revenues from operations
in
2008. During the year ended May 31, 2008 the Company incurred net loss of
$1,406,796. Further, the Company has inadequate working capital to maintain
or
develop its operations, and is dependent upon funds from private investors
and
the support of certain stockholders.
These
factors raise substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue
as
a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that
might result from the outcome of these uncertainties. In this regard, Management
is planning to raise any necessary additional funds through loans and additional
sales of its common stock. There is no assurance that the Company will be
successful in raising additional capital.
NOTE
3 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The
Company prepares its financial statements in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Significant
accounting policies are as follows:
F-6
Principles
of Consolidation
The
accompanying financial statements represent the consolidated financial position
and results of operations of the Company and include the accounts and results
of
operations of the Company and its majority owned subsidiary. The accompanying
financial statements include only the active entity of SportsQuest, Inc.
Use
of
Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of
the financial statements. These estimates and assumptions also affect the
reported amounts of revenues, costs and expenses during the reporting period.
Management evaluates these estimates and assumptions on a regular basis. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
The
primary management estimates included in these financial statements are the
impairment reserves applied to various long-lived assets, allowance for doubtful
accounts for gateway access fees and licensing fees, and the fair value of
its
stock tendered in various non-monetary transactions.
Reclassification
Certain
prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year
presentations.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The
Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of
three months or less to be cash equivalents. At May 31, 2008, cash and cash
equivalents include cash on hand and cash in the bank.
Property
and Equipment
Property
and equipment is recorded at cost and depreciated over the estimated useful
lives of the assets using principally the straight-line method. When items
are
retired or otherwise disposed of, income is charged or credited for the
difference between net book value and proceeds realized thereon. Ordinary
maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred, and replacements
and
betterments are capitalized. The range of estimated useful lives used to
calculated depreciation for principal items of property and equipment are as
follow:
Asset Category
Depreciation/
Amortization Period
Computer Equipment
3
Years
Office
equipment
5
Years
Income
Taxes
Deferred
income taxes are provided based on the provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes" ("SFAS No. 109"),
to
reflect the tax effect of differences in the recognition of revenues and
expenses between financial reporting and income tax purposes based on the
enacted tax laws in effect at May 31, 2008.
F-7
Net
Loss Per Share
Basic
earnings per share is computed in accordance with FASB No. 128 Earnings
Per Share,
by
dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted
earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if stock
options and other commitments to issue common stock were exercised or equity
awards vest resulting in the issuance of common stock that could share in the
earnings of the Company. As of May 31, 2008, there were no potential dilutive
instruments that could result in share dilution .
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The
fair
value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could
be
exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties other than in a
forced sale or liquidation.
The
following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each
class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that
value:
Cash
and
cash equivalents, licensing receivable, prepaid expenses, other assets, and
accounts payable, income tax payable, and other current liabilities carrying
amounts approximate fair value due to their most maturities.
Stock-Based
Compensation
Financial
Statement Position (“FSP”) FAS No. 123(R)-5 was issued on October 10, 2006. The
FSP provides that instruments that were originally issued as employee
compensation and then modified, and that modification is made to the terms
of
the instrument solely to reflect an equity restructuring that occurs when the
holders are no longer employees, then no change in the recognition or the
measurement (due to a change in classification) of those instruments will result
if both of the following conditions are met: (a). There is no increase in fair
value of the award (or the ratio of intrinsic value to the exercise price of
the
award is preserved, that is, the holder is made whole), or the antidilution
provision is not added to the terms of the award in contemplation of an equity
restructuring; and (b). All holders of the same class of equity instruments
(for
example, stock options) are treated in the same manner. The provisions in this
FSP shall be applied in the first reporting period beginning after the date
the
FSP is posted to the FASB website. The Company has adopted SP FAS No. 123(R)-5
but it did not have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations
and financial condition.
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
The
Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS No.”) No. 142,
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets ,
effective July 1, 2002. As a result, the Company discontinued amortization
of
goodwill, and instead annually evaluates the carrying value of goodwill and
other intangible assets for impairment, in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 142. There was no impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets
in
Fiscal 2008
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
In
accordance with SFAS No. 144, long-lived assets, such as property, plant, and
equipment, and purchased intangibles, are reviewed for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an
asset
may not be recoverable. Goodwill and other intangible assets are tested for
impairment annually. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured
by
a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future
cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of
an
asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is
recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds
the
fair value of the asset. There were no events or changes in circumstances that
necessitated a review of impairment of long lived assets.
F-8
Concentration
of Credit Risk
The
Company maintains its operating cash balances in banks in Oviedo Florida. The
Federal Depository Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insures accounts at each
institution up to $100,000.
Financial
instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit
risk are primarily trade accounts receivable. The trade accounts receivable
are
due primarily from small business customers in numerous geographical locations
throughout the United States.
The
Company estimates and provides an allowance for uncollectible accounts
receivable.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue
includes sponsorship and media sales. The Company recognizes revenue from
product sales in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 104,
“Revenue Recognition in Financial Statement” which is at the time customers are
invoiced at shipping point, provided title and risk of loss has passed to the
customer, evidence of an arrangement exists, fees are contractually fixed or
determinable, collection is reasonably assured through historical collection
results and regular credit evaluations, and there are no uncertainties regarding
customer acceptance.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
Determining
Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are
Participating Securities
In
June 2008, the FASB issued FSP Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue
No. 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment
Transactions Are Participating Securities.” The FSP addresses whether
instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating
securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need to be included in the earnings
allocation in computing earnings per share under the two-class method. The
FSP
affects entities that accrue dividends on share-based payment awards during
the
awards’ service period when the dividends do not need to be returned if the
employees forfeit the award. This FSP is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2008. The Company is currently assessing the impact of
FSP EITF 03-6-1 on its consolidated financial position and results of
operations.
Determining
Whether an Instrument (or an Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an entity's Own
Stock
In
June
2008, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 07-5, "Determining Whether an Instrument
(or an Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity's Own Stock" (EITF 07-5).
EITF
07-5 provides that an entity should use a two step approach to evaluate whether
an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to its
own stock, including evaluating the instrument's contingent exercise and
settlement provisions. It also clarifies on the impact of foreign currency
denominated strike prices and market-based employee stock option valuation
instruments on the evaluation. EITF 07-5 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2008. The Company is currently assessing the impact of EITF
07-5 on its consolidated financial position and results of
operations.
F-9
Accounting
for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion
(Including Partial Cash Settlement)
In
May 2008, the FASB issued FSP Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion
No. 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be
Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement).” The FSP
clarifies the accounting for convertible debt instruments that may be settled
in
cash (including partial cash settlement) upon conversion. The FSP requires
issuers to account separately for the liability and equity components of certain
convertible debt instruments in a manner that reflects the issuer's
nonconvertible debt (unsecured debt) borrowing rate when interest cost is
recognized. The FSP requires bifurcation of a component of the debt,
classification of that component in equity and the accretion of the resulting
discount on the debt to be recognized as part of interest expense in our
consolidated statement of operations. The FSP requires retrospective application
to the terms of instruments as they existed for all periods presented. The
FSP
is effective as of January 1, 2009 and early adoption is not permitted. The
Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of FSP APB 14-1 upon its
consolidated financial statements.
The
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
In
May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, "The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles" (FAS No.162). SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of
accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in
the
preparation of financial statements. SFAS No. 162 is effective 60 days following
the SEC's approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments
to AU Section 411, "The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles". The implementation of this standard will not
have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position and
results of operations.
Determination
of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets
In
April
2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Staff
Position on Financial Accounting Standard (“FSP FAS”) No. 142-3, “Determination
of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets”, which amends the factors that should
be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine
the useful life of intangible assets under SFAS No. 142 “Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets”. The intent of this FSP is to improve the consistency
between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142
and
the period of the expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the
asset under SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007) “Business Combinations” and other U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles. The Company is
currently evaluating the potential impact of FSP FAS No. 142-3 on its
consolidated financial statements.
Disclosure
about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
In
March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “ Disclosure
about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities ,
an
amendment of SFAS No. 133”, (SFAS 161). This statement requires that objectives
for using derivative instruments be disclosed in terms of underlying risk and
accounting designation. The Company is required to adopt SFAS No. 161 on January
1, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of SFAS No.
161 on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Delay
in Effective Date
In
February 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB
Statement No. 157”. This FSP delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for
all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually)
to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods
within those fiscal years. The impact of adoption was not material to the
Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of
operations.
F-10
Business
Combinations
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R) “Business Combinations” (SFAS
141(R)). This Statement replaces the original SFAS No. 141. This Statement
retains the fundamental requirements in SFAS No. 141 that the acquisition
method of accounting (which SFAS No. 141 called the purchase
method )
be used
for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each
business combination. The objective of SFAS No. 141(R) is to improve the
relevance, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides
in its financial reports about a business combination and its effects. To
accomplish that, SFAS No. 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for
how
the acquirer:
a.
Recognizes
and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired,
the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the
acquiree.
b.
Recognizes
and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or
a gain
from a bargain purchase.
c.
Determines
what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements
to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business
combination.
This
Statement applies prospectively to business combinations for which the
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting
period beginning on or after December 15, 2008 and may not be applied before
that date. The Company does not expect the effect that its adoption of SFAS
No.
141(R) will have on its consolidated results of operations and financial
condition.
Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No.
51
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160 “Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements – an amendment of ARB No. 51” (SFAS No.
160). This Statement amends the original Accounting Review Board (ARB) No.
51
“Consolidated Financial Statements” to establish accounting and reporting
standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest
in
a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should
be
reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. This Statement
is
effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years,
beginning on or after December 15, 2008 and may not be applied before that
date.
The does not expect the effect that its adoption of SFAS No. 160 will have
on
its consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
Fair
Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities – Including an amendment of SFAS No.
115” (SFAS No. 159), which becomes effective for the Company on February 1,
2008, permits companies to choose to measure many financial instruments and
certain other items at fair value and report unrealized gains and losses in
earnings. Such accounting is optional and is generally to be applied instrument
by instrument. The Company does not anticipate that the election, of this
fair-value option will have a material effect on its consolidated financial
condition, results of operations, cash flows or disclosures.
F-11
Fair
Value Measurements
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements" (SFAS
No. 157). SFAS No. 157 provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets
and liabilities. SFAS No. 157 addresses the requests from investors for expanded
disclosure about the extent to which companies’ measure assets and liabilities
at fair value, the information used to measure fair value and the effect of
fair
value measurements on earnings. SFAS No. 157 applies whenever other standards
require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value, and
does
not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. SFAS No. 157 is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007 and will be adopted by the Company in the first quarter of
fiscal year 2008. The Company is unable at this time to determine the effect
that its adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on its consolidated results of
operations and financial condition.
Accounting
Changes and Error Corrections
In
May
2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, "Accounting Changes and Error Corrections"
(SFAS No. 154), which replaces Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No.
20,
"Accounting Changes," and SFAS No. 3, "Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim
Financial Statements - An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 28”. SFAS No. 154
provides guidance on the accounting for and reporting of accounting changes
and
error corrections, and it establishes retrospective application, or the latest
practicable date, as the required method for reporting a change in accounting
principle and the reporting of a correction of an error. SFAS No. 154 is
effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company adopted SFAS No. 154 in the
first
quarter of fiscal year 2007 and does not expect it to have a material impact
on
its consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
NOTE
4 -
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property
and equipment, net at May 31, consist of the following:
Years
2008
Computer
Equipment
3
$
8,100
Total
property and equipment
8,100
Less:
accumulated depreciation
(1,001
)
$
7,099
The
depreciation expense for the years ended May 31, 2008 was $394.
NOTE
5 – INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Property
and equipment, net at May 31, consist of the following:
Years
2008
Media
content
3
$
10,000,000
Total
intangible assets
10,000,000
Less:
accumulated amortization
(-
)
$
10,000,000
The
Company has not amortized these assets as they were purchased late in the year
and have not been placed in services as of May 31, 2008.
F-12
NOTE
6 –
NOTE PAYABLE
Notes
payable comprise the following:
·
On
February 26, 2008, SportsQuest, Inc. entered into a Securities Purchase
Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”), by and among SportsQuest, Inc.
(“Parent”), and SportsQuest Management Group, Inc. (the “Subsidiary”). The
Parent SportsQuest, Inc., and Subsidiary, SQ Mgt Group are collectively
referred to as the “Company” and the secured party’s signatory and their
respective endorsees, transferees and assigns are collectively the
“Secured Party”. The transactions contemplated by the Purchase Agreement
resulted in a funding of a total of $250,000 into the
Company.
The
Callable Secured Convertible Notes issued for the $250,000 resulted in a
beneficial conversion factor that was valued at $170,000 on the date of issuance
which was accounted for as additional paid in capital and the value of this
beneficial conversion factor will be amortized over the conversion or when
a
note is converted during the period available for conversion.
The
Purchase Agreement provided that the Parent shall issue to the Secured Party
certain of SportsQuest 8% Callable Secured Convertible Notes, due three years
from the date of issue, which are convertible into shares of SportsQuest Common
Stock, par value $0.0001 per share and the Parent shall issue the Secured Party
certain Common Stock purchase warrants.
AJW
Master Fund or its registered assigns, is entitled to purchase from SportsQuest
2,000,000 fully paid and non-assessable shares of the Company’s Common Stock,
par value $0.0001 per share, at an exercise price per share equal to
$0.003.
AJW
Partners, LLC or its registered assigns, is entitled to purchase from
SportsQuest 2,000,000 fully paid and non-assessable shares of the Company’s
Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, at an exercise price per share equal
to $0.003.
New
Millennium Capital Partners II, LLC or its registered assigns, is entitled
to
purchase from the Company SportsQuest, Inc. 6,000,000 fully paid and
non-assessable shares of Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, at an
exercise price per share equal to $0.003.
·
On
August 16, 2007, SportsQuest, Inc. entered into a Securities Purchase
Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”), by and among the Company and AJW
Partners, LLC, AJW Master Fund, Ltd. and New Millennium Capital Partners
II, LLC (collectively, the “Air Brook Investors”). The transactions
contemplated by the Purchase Agreement will result in a funding of
a total
of $1,500,000 into the Company.
The
Purchase Agreement provided for the sale by SportsQuest to the SportsQuest
Investors of callable secured convertible notes with an aggregate face amount
of
$1,500,000, plus interest (the “Facility Notes”). The Air Brook Investors
purchased from the Company at closing Facility Notes with an aggregate face
amount of $500,000 and are required to purchase additional Facility Notes with
an aggregate face amount of $500,000 from the Company upon each of (i) the
filing of the registration statement required by the Registration Rights
Agreement and (iii) the declaration of effectiveness of such registration
statement by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Facility Notes accrue
interest at a rate of 8% per year, require quarterly interest payments in
certain circumstances related to the market price of the Company’s common stock,
and are due and payable on August 16, 2010 (the “Maturity Date”). The Company is
not required to make any principal payments until the Maturity Date, but it
has
the option to prepay the amounts due under the Facility Notes in whole or in
part at any time, subject to the payment of varying prepayment penalties
depending on the time of such prepayment, as set forth in the Facility Notes.
The Facility Notes are convertible into common stock of the Company at a
discount to the then current fair market value of the Company’s common stock, as
set forth in the Facility Notes.
F-13
In
addition, the Purchase Agreement provided for the issuance by SportsQuest to
the
SportsQuest Investors of warrants to purchase 10,000,000 shares of SportsQuest
common stock (the “Warrants”). Each Warrant permits its holder to acquire shares
of SportsQuest common stock at an exercise price of $0.25 per share at any
time
through August 16, 2014.
SportsQuest
allocated the proceeds received between the Facility Notes issued and the
warrant based on the relative fair values at the time of issuance in accordance
with APB Opinion 14, Accounting
for Convertible Debt and Debt Issued with Stock Purchase
Warrants .
The
Company then further allocated the proceeds received to the beneficial
conversion feature in accordance with EITF Issue No. 98-5, Accounting
for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently
Adjustable Conversion Ratios ,
and the
guidance in EITF Issue No. 00-27, Application
of Issue No. 98-5 to Certain Convertible Instruments.
The fair
value of the warrant was estimated on the date of issuance using the
Black-Scholes valuation model and the assumptions described in the table below:
Fair
value of underlying stock at date of issuance
$
0.51
Exercise
price
$
0.25
Expected
life
7
years
Expected
dividend yield
0
%
Risk-free
interest rate
4.39
%
Volatility
62.08
%
As
of a
result of the above allocations, the Company recorded discounts of $833,333
related to the $1,000,000 worth of Facility Notes issued during 2007. These
discounts have been reflected as additional paid in capital in the accompany
statement of stockholders’ equity. During 2007, the Company recorded
approximately $496,193 of interest expense related to the amortization of the
discounts.
As
a
condition to entering into the Purchase Agreement, SportsQuest and the
SportsQuest Investors entered into a Registration Rights Agreement, dated as
of
August 16, 2007. As set forth in the Registration Rights Agreement, SportsQuest
has agreed to file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, within 30 days, to cover the resale by the SportsQuest Investors
of
the shares of SportsQuest common stock into which the Facility Notes are
convertible. The Company has further agreed to use its best efforts to have
such
registration statement declared effective and to keep such registration
statement effective until the earlier of (i) the date on which all of the
securities covered by the registration statement have been sold and (ii) the
date on which such securities may be immediately sold to the public without
registration or restriction. The Company has also granted piggyback registration
rights to the SportsQuest Investors, to the extent that it files a registration
statement for its own account, for the same period.
·
On
August 16, 2007, SportsQuest loaned $500,000 to Lextra Management
Group,
Inc. (“Lextra”), as set forth in a callable secured note (the “Lextra
Note”) containing terms substantially similar to the Facility Notes. The
Lextra Note, however, does not contain any provision for the outstanding
amount due under it to be converted into Lextra’s stock. This note was
satisfied during the period through the Asset Purchase Agreement
referred
to in note 9.
F-14
·
On
August 17, 2007, SportsQuest entered into a Stock Issuance, Assumption
and
Release Agreement (the “Assumption Agreement”), by and among the Company
and Greens Worldwide Incorporated (“Greens Worldwide”) and AJW Partners,
LLC, AJW Offshore, Ltd., AJW Qualified Partners, LLC and New Millennium
Capital Partners II, LLC (collectively, the “Greens Worldwide Investors”).
The transactions contemplated by the Assumption Agreement include
the
following:
•
The
issuance by Greens Worldwide of 390,000 shares of its Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock, par value $10.00 per share (the “Series A Preferred
Stock”), to SportsQuest; and
•
The
assumption by SportsQuest of 50% of Greens Worldwide’s indebtedness to the
Greens Worldwide Investors under a Securities Purchase Agreement,
dated as
of March 22, 2007, by and among Greens Worldwide and the Greens Worldwide
Investors (the “Greens Worldwide
Agreement”).
Under
the
terms of the Assumption Agreement, the Greens Worldwide Investors will release
Greens Worldwide from its obligations under the notes described above. In
consideration for such release, SportsQuest will issue to the SportsQuest
Investors (who are the successors to the Greens Worldwide Investors) callable
secured convertible notes with an aggregate face amount of $3,903,750, including
interest (collectively, the “Assumption Notes”), and Greens Worldwide will issue
to the SportsQuest Investors callable secured convertible notes with an
aggregate face amount of $3,903,750, including interest. The Assumption Notes
have the same terms and conditions as the notes described above, except that
the
Assumption Notes are convertible into SportsQuest common stock.
SportsQuest
has elected to account for the investment at cost since Greens Worldwide does
not have common shares for SportsQuest to convert its preferred and it is
unlikely that Greens Worldwide will have common shares in the short term. In
the
event that Greens Worldwide has sufficient common shares available for
conversion, and SportsQuest was to exercise its conversion rights, SportsQuest
would not own more than 50% of the voting common shares of Greens
Worldwide.
·
On
September 25, 2007, SportsQuest entered into an Exchange Agreement
that
stipulated that the Company shall pay ZCE the sum of $150,000 in
cash at
the closing (the “Closing Cash Payment”). Under the Bring Down and
Amendment, the parties acknowledged that the Closing Cash Payment
was
intended to be used to pay off certain debts of ZCE (the Debt”). Pursuant
to the Bring Down and Amendment, the parties agreed that the Closing
Cash
Payment would be paid to ZCE at closing. Instead, the parties amended
the
cash payment and SportsQuest agreed to service the Debt after closing
according to the then current monthly schedule and pursuant to the
terms
of the Bring Down and Amendment. SportsQuest agreed in the Bring
Down and
Amendment to pay off the Debt in full on the closing of the sale
of
callable secured convertible notes in the aggregate principal amount
of
$500,000 to AJW Master Fund, Ltd., AJW Partners, LLC (collectively,
“NIR”)
pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, dated August 16, 2007,
among the Company and NIR, which closing shall occur within five
business
days after the declaration of the effectiveness of the Form SB-2
registration Statement filed by the Company with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on September 14,
2007.
F-15
NOTE
7 – STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY
During
the year ended May 31, 2008 and 2007 :
Quarter Ended
Stock issued
Cash Received
Non Cash
for Cash
Stock Issued
Year Ended May 31,
2008
-
-
500,000
On
May
15, 2008, our President and Chief Executive Officer executed an agreement with
DoMar Exotic Furnishings, Inc. (the “Agreement”) whereby pursuant to the terms
and conditions of that Agreement, DoMar, Inc. purchased of 100,000 Series A
Preferred Convertible Shares of our company owned by R. Thomas Kidd which
represents approximately seventy-nine percent (79%) of our capital stock of
SportsQuest, Inc. The Closing of the transaction occurred on May 20,
2008.
In
February, 2008 500,000 common shares were issued to a Board of Director for
services rendered.
NOTE
8 – INCOME TAXES
The
provision (benefit) for income taxes from continued operations for the years
ended May 31, 2008 and 2007 consist of the following:
May
31,
2008
Current:
Federal
$
(564,264
)
State
(-
)
(564,264
)
Deferred:
Federal
564,264
State
-
564,264
Benefit
from the operating loss
carryforward
-
(Benefit)
provision for income taxes, net
$
-
The
difference between income tax expense computed by applying the federal statutory
corporate tax rate and actual income tax expense is as follows:
May
31,
2008
Statutory
federal income tax rate
34.0
%
State
income taxes and other
0.0
%
Effective
tax rate
34.
%
F-16
Deferred
income taxes result from temporary differences in the recognition of income
and
expenses for the financial reporting purposes and for tax purposes. The tax
effect of these temporary differences representing deferred tax asset and
liabilities result principally from the
following:
May 31,
2008
Net
operating loss carryforward
2,852,972
(2,852,972
)
Deferred
income tax asset
$
-
The
Company has a net operating loss carryforward of approximately $2,852,972
available to offset future taxable income through 2028.
NOTE
9 –
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On
August
23, 3007, SportsQuest entered into an Investment Agreement (the “Investment
Agreement”) with Dutchess Private Equities Fund, Ltd., a Cayman Islands exempted
company (“Dutchess”). The Investment Agreement provides for the Company’s right,
subject to certain conditions, to require Dutchess to purchase up to $50,000,000
of SportsQuest common stock at a seven percent discount to market over the
36
month period following a registration statement covering such common stock
being
declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
As
a
condition to entering into the Investment Agreement, SportsQuest and Dutchess
entered into a Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of August 23, 2007 (the
“Registration Rights Agreement”). As set forth in the Registration Rights
Agreement, the Company has agreed to file a registration statement with the
Securities and Exchange Commission within 45 days after the date of the
Registration Rights Agreement to cover the resale by Dutchess of the shares
of
the Company’s common stock issued pursuant to the Investment Agreement.
SportsQuest has agreed to initially register for resale 10,000,000 shares of
its
common stock which would be issuable on the date preceding the filing of the
registration statement based on the closing bid price of SportsQuest common
stock on such date and the amount reasonably calculated that represents common
stock issuable to other parties as set forth in the Investment Agreement except
to the extent that the Securities and Exchange Commission requires the share
amount to be reduced as a condition of effectiveness. SportsQuest has
further agreed to use all commercially reasonable efforts to cause the
registration statement to be declared effective by the Securities and Exchange
Commission within 120 days after the date of the Registration Rights Agreement
and to keep such registration statement effective until the earlier to occur
of
the date on which (a) Dutchess shall have sold all of the shares of common
stock
issued or issuable pursuant to the Investment Agreement; or (b) Dutchess has
no
right to acquire any additional shares of common stock under the Investment
Agreement.
F-17
NOTE
10-
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
ZCE,
INC.
On
September 27, 2007, the Company completed an Exchange Agreement entered into
on
August 20, 2007 with Zaring-Cioffi Entertainment, LLC, a California limited
liability company (“Zaring-Cioffi”), ZCE, Inc., a California corporation
(“ZCE”), and Q-C Entertainment, LLC, a Washington limited liability company
(“Q-C”). Pursuant to a Bring Down Agreement and Amendment (the “Bring Down and
Amendment”), dated September 25, 2007, among the Company, Zaring/Cioffi
Entertainment, Inc., Zce, David Quin (“Quin”) and Jeff Merriman Cohen (“Cohen”),
Quin and Cohen, the sole members of Q-C, assumed the rights, obligations and
liabilities of Q-C under the Exchange Agreement, as amended by the Bring Down
and Amendment. Under the terms of the Exchange Agreement, as amended by the
Bring Down and Amendment, the Company purchased 100% of the issued and
outstanding shares of Zaring-Cioffi from its shareholders, ZCE, Quin and Cohen,
in exchange for the issuance of 409,836 shares of restricted common stock of
the
Company to ZCE and 409,836 shares of restricted common stock of the Company
to
Cohen and Quin, which stock in the aggregate was valued at $500,000. In
addition, the Company issued warrants (the “Warrants”) to purchase an aggregate
400,000 shares of restricted common stock of the Company to the shareholders
of
Zaring-Cioffi according to the following Schedule:
50,000
shares to each of ZCE and Quin Cohen at a strike price of $0.50 per share
expiring December 31, 2007; 50,000 shares to each ZCE and Quin and Cohen at
a
strike price of $1.00 per share expiring December 31, 2008; and 100,000 shares
to each of ZCE and Quin and Cohen at a strike price of $1.50 per share expiring
December 31, 2009.
Furthermore,
Quin and Cohen received, at no cost, a Bronze Level sponsorship position (or
its
equivalent) at all Zaring-Cioffi events through 2009.
Under
the
Bring Down and Amendment, the Company, Zaring-Cioffi, ZCE, Cohen and Quin also
made the representations and warranties set forth in the Exchange Agreement
as
of closing and agreed that the representations and warranties would not survive
the closing.
This
matter is presently in litigation and the Company has been assured by its
counsel that it will prevail in this matter.
NOTE
11 – NET LOSS PER SHARE
Net
loss
per share is calculated using the weighted average number of shares of common
stock outstanding during the year. The company considers the outstanding
warrants granted for diluted earnings per share for the year ended May 31,
2008
and 2007 respectively because the effect of their inclusion would be
anti-dilutive.
NOTE
12 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
On
February 15, 2008, SportsQuest issued 500,000 of its common shares to a Company
Director as compensation for a value of $75,000, or $.15 per share.
F-18
The
2007,
Air Brook Limousine notified us that it had experienced extraordinary increases
in the cost of performing the agreements and advised us of its intent to cancel
the contracts. As part of a settlement of issues, we entered into an Agreement
and Plan of Reorganization dated March 8, 2007, pursuant to which, among other
things, we agreed that A.B. Park & Fly would be merged with and into a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Air Brook Limousine, wherein the separate existence
of A.B. Park & Fly would cease. In consideration for the preceding, Air
Brook Limousine agreed to deliver to us 150,000 shares of our common stock,
which we canceled as outstanding shares. This merger was completed on March
15,
2007.
On
August
16, 2007, Lextra Management Group, Inc., an event management company, acquired
51.16% of our issued and outstanding common stock pursuant to an Agreement
dated
June 26, 2007 by and among Lextra, our company and certain of our principal
stockholders. Pursuant to the terms of this agreement, at the closing, Lextra
acquired (a) 1,165,397 shares representing 51.16% of the issued and outstanding
shares of our common stock from the selling stockholders for an aggregate
purchase price of $116,500 and (b) an outstanding accounts receivable due to
Air
Brook Limousine by us in the amount of $340,000. At the closing, Air Brook
Limousine cancelled the agreement dated August 10, 1993 under which Air Brook
Limousine stipulated that it would fund our operations for as long as Air Brook
Limousine deemed necessary and as long as it was financially
able.
The
Company has chosen to account for the acquisition of its wholly owned
subsidiary, ZCE, Inc., as an unconsolidated investment in the subsidiary as
the
Exchange Agreement and Bring Down and Amendment agreement is in question and
may
be settled or rescinded once the Company determines which course of action
is in
the best interest of the Company and its shareholders during
litigation.
On
August
16, 2007, 6,800,000 shares were issued for a value of $340,000 in exchange
for
release from debt to the Company’s affiliate.
As
of
October 31, 2007, there was a balance due to Zaring Cioffi Entertainment of
$150,000. Pursuant to the Bring Down and Amendment, the Company would service
the debt of ZCE on a monthly basis until the registration statement was declared
effective by the SEC and the Company had received its third tranche of funding
in the amount of $500,000 under the callable notes dated August 17, 2007. In
addition, the Company has the right of offset for the sum of $20,000 already
advanced to ZCE on August 30, 2007, before the closing.
NOTE
12 –
STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
The
Company issues stock options from time to time to executives, key employees
and
members of the Board of Directors. The Company has adopted the disclosure-only
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation," and continues to account for stock based
compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed by Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees".
Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for the stock options
granted to employees.
In
December 2004, the FASB issued a revision of SFAS No. 123 ("SFAS No. 123(R)")
that requires compensation costs related to share-based payment transactions
to
be recognized in the statement of operations. With limited exceptions, the
amount of compensation cost will be measured based on the grant-date fair value
of the equity or liability instruments issued. In addition, liability awards
will be re-measured each reporting period. Compensation cost will be recognized
over the period that an employee provides service in exchange for the award.
SFAS No. 123(R) replaces SFAS No. 123 and is effective as of the beginning
of
January 1, 2006. Based on the number of shares and awards outstanding as of
December 31, 2005 (and without giving effect to any awards which may be granted
in 2006), we do not expect our adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) in January 2006
to
have a material impact on the financial statements.
F-19
Financial
Statement Position (“FSP”) FAS No. 123(R)-5 was issued on October 10, 2006. The
FSP provides that instruments that were originally issued as employee
compensation and then modified, and that modification is made to the terms
of
the instrument solely to reflect an equity restructuring that occurs when the
holders are no longer employees, then no change in the recognition or the
measurement (due to a change in classification) of those instruments will result
if both of the following conditions are met: (a). There is no increase in fair
value of the award (or the ratio of intrinsic value to the exercise price of
the
award is preserved, that is, the holder is made whole), or the antidilution
provision is not added to the terms of the award in contemplation of an equity
restructuring; and (b). All holders of the same class of equity instruments
(for
example, stock options) are treated in the same manner. The provisions in this
FSP shall be applied in the first reporting period beginning after the date
the
FSP is posted to the FASB website. The Company has adopted SP FAS No. 123(R)-5
but it did not have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations
and financial condition.
There
were no options granted in the year ended May 31, 2008 and 2007 and all options
previously granted have been fully vested and therefore there is no pro forma
effect for the year then ended. The fair value of each option grant is estimated
on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
The
Company accounts for stock awards issued to nonemployees in accordance with
the
provisions of SFAS No. 123 and Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No.
96-18 Accounting
for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring,
or
in Conjunction with Selling Goods or Services .
Under
SFAS No. 123 and EITF 96-18, stock awards to nonemployees are accounted for
at
their fair value as determined under Black-Scholes option pricing model.
*
* * * *
*
ITEM
9. CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE.
Resignation
of Previous Auditor .
By
letter dated September 6, 2007, Robert G. Jeffrey, C.P.A. (“Jeffrey”), the
former auditor and accountant of SportsQuest, Inc. (formerly known as Air Brook
Airport Express, Inc.) (the “Company”), resigned, effective August 16, 2007. The
report of Jeffrey on the Company’s financial statements for the years ended
October 31, 2006 and 2005 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer
of
opinion and was not modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting
principles. The decision to change accountants was not recommended or approved
by the board of directors or audit committee of the board of directors. During
the 2005 and 2006 fiscal years and the interim period from November 1, 2006
through August 16, 2007, there were no disagreements with Jeffrey, whether
or
not resolved, on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial
statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which, if not resolved
to
Jeffrey’s satisfaction, would have caused him to make reference to the subject
matter of the disagreement in connection with his audit report.
During
the same period, there were no other events, as described in Item
304(a)(1)(iv)(B) of Regulation S-B.
Appointment
of New Auditor .
On
September 7, 2007, the Company engaged Raiche Ende Malter & Co. LLP (the
“First New Auditor”) as its independent registered public accounting firm for
the Company’s fiscal year ended October 31, 2007. The decision to engage the New
Auditor as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm was
approved by the Company’s board of directors.
The
Company did not consult with the First New Auditor, during either of the years
ended October 31, 2006 and 2005 or the interim period from November 1, 2006
to
September 7, 2007, regarding either the application of accounting principles
to
a specified transaction, either completed or contemplated, or the type of audit
opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements, or any
other matter or event described in Item 304(a)(2)(i) or (ii) of Regulation
S-B.
The Company did not have the First new Auditor review any quarterly or annual
financial statements.
27
On
February, 2007, dismissed Raiche Ende Malter & Co. LLP and retained Gately
& Associates, LLC. (the Second new Auditor”) as its independent registered
public accounting firm for the Company’s fiscal year ended October 31, 2007. The
decision to engage the Second New Auditor as the Company’s independent
registered public accounting firm was approved by the Company’s board of
directors.
The
Company has not consulted with the Second New Auditor, during either of the
years ended October 31, 2006 and 2005 or the interim period from November 1,
2006 to September 9, 2007, regarding either the application of accounting
principles to a specified transaction, either completed or contemplated, or
the
type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial
statements, or any other matter or event described in Item 304(a)(2)(i) or
(ii)
of Regulation S-B.
On
September 8, 2008, Kramer Wiseman and Associates, LLP ("KWA") was appointed
as
the independent auditor for SportsQuest, Inc. (the "Company") commencing with
the year ending May 31, 2008, and Gately & Associates, LLC. ("Gately") were
dismissed as the independent auditors for the Company as of September 8, 2008.
The decision to change auditors was approved by the Board of Directors on
September 8, 2008.
The
report of Gately on the financial statements for either of the one most recent
completed fiscal years did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of
opinion or was qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or
accounting principles, except for the following:
“The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company
will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial
statements, the accumulation of losses and shortage of capital raise substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans
concerning these matters are also described in Note 3. The financial statements
do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification
of asset carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that
might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going
concern.
During
the Company's one most recent interim quarter April 30, 2008, January 31, 2008,
and annual report October 31, 2007, there were no disagreements with Gately
on
any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement
disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreement, if not resolved
to the satisfaction of Gately, would have caused it to make reference to the
subject matter of the disagreements in connection with its report with respect
to the financial statements of the Company.
During
the Company's one most recent interim quarter April 30, 2008, January 31, 2008,
and annual report October 31, 2007, there were no "reportable events" as such
term is described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-B under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), with respect to the
Company.
During
the Company's one most recent interim quarter April 30, 2008, January 31, 2008,
and annual report October 31, 2007, the Company did not consult with KWA with
respect to the Company regarding (i) the application of accounting principles
to
a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit
opinion that might be rendered on the Company’s financial statements, (ii) any
matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as defined in Item
304(a)(1)(iv) of Regulation S-B under the Exchange Act and the related
instructions to Item 304 of Regulation S-B) or a "reportable event" (as such
term is described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-B), or (iii) any of
the
matters or events set forth in Item 304(a)(2)(i) and (ii) of Regulation S-B.
28
The
Company has furnished a copy of this Report to Gately and requested them to
furnish the Company with a letter addressed to the Securities and Exchange
Commission stating whether it agrees with the statements made by the Company
herein in response to Item 304(a) of Regulation S-K and, if not, stating the
respects in which it does not agree. The letter from Gately will be submitted
when received with an amended filing.