RTX Corp 10-Q

Item 1. Financial Statements RTX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited) Quarter Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, (dollars in millions, except per share amounts) 2025 2024 2025 2024 Net Sales: Products sales $ 15,551 $ 14,562 $ 30,142 $ 28,865 Services sales 6,030 5,159 11,745 10,161 Total net sales 21,581 19,721 41,887 39,026 Costs and Expenses: Cost of sales - products 12,989 12,625 25,272 24,841 Cost of sales - services 4,216 3,516 8,123 7,044 Research and development 697 706 1,334 1,375 Selling, general, and administrative 1,573 1,449 3,021 2,843 Total costs and expenses 19,475 18,296 37,750 36,103 Other income (expense), net 40 ( 896 ) 44 ( 524 ) Operating profit 2,146 529 4,181 2,399 Non-operating expense (income), net: Non-service pension income ( 351 ) ( 374 ) ( 717 ) ( 760 ) Interest expense, net 457 475 900 880 Total non-operating expense, net 106 101 183 120 Income before income taxes 2,040 428 3,998 2,279 Income tax expense 315 253 648 361 Net income 1,725 175 3,350 1,918 Less: Noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries’ earnings 68 64 158 98 Net income attributable to common shareowners $ 1,657 $ 111 $ 3,192 $ 1,820 Earnings Per Share attributable to common shareowners: Basic $ 1.24 $ 0.08 $ 2.38 $ 1.37 Diluted 1.22 0.08 2.36 1.36 See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements 4 Table of Contents RTX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Unaudited) Quarter Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, (dollars in millions) 2025 2024 2025 2024 Net income $ 1,725 $ 175 $ 3,350 $ 1,918 Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax: Foreign currency translation adjustments 863 ( 68 ) 1,362 ( 189 ) Pension and postretirement benefit plans adjustments ( 181 ) ( 46 ) ( 256 ) ( 97 ) Change in unrealized cash flow hedging 138 21 282 ( 52 ) Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax 820 ( 93 ) 1,388 ( 338 ) Income tax benefit (expense) related to items of other comprehensive income (loss) ( 4 ) 10 ( 24 ) 39 Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax 816 ( 83 ) 1,364 ( 299 ) Comprehensive income 2,541 92 4,714 1,619 Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest 68 64 158 98 Comprehensive income attributable to common shareowners $ 2,473 $ 28 $ 4,556 $ 1,521 See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements 5 Table of Contents RTX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (Unaudited) (dollars in millions) June 30, 2025 December 31, 2024 Assets Current Assets Cash and cash equivalents $ 4,782 $ 5,578 Accounts receivable, net 12,385 10,976 Contract assets, net 15,686 14,570 Inventory, net 14,012 12,768 Other assets, current 7,792 7,241 Total current assets 54,657 51,133 Customer financing assets 2,104 2,246 Fixed assets 33,947 32,783 Accumulated depreciation ( 17,742 ) ( 16,694 ) Fixed assets, net 16,205 16,089 Operating lease right-of-use assets 1,869 1,864 Goodwill 53,327 52,789 Intangible assets, net 32,748 33,443 Other assets 6,229 5,297 Total assets $ 167,139 $ 162,861 Liabilities, Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest, and Equity Current Liabilities Short-term borrowings $ 1,635 $ 183 Accounts payable 13,433 12,897 Accrued employee compensation 2,133 2,620 Other accrued liabilities 15,861 14,831 Contract liabilities 19,186 18,616 Long-term debt currently due 2,084 2,352 Total current liabilities 54,332 51,499 Long-term debt 38,259 38,726 Operating lease liabilities, non-current 1,617 1,632 Future pension and postretirement benefit obligations 2,038 2,104 Other long-term liabilities 6,646 6,942 Total liabilities 102,892 100,903 Commitments and contingencies (Note 16) Redeemable noncontrolling interest 41 35 Shareowners’ Equity: Common stock 37,680 37,434 Treasury stock ( 26,995 ) ( 27,112 ) Retained earnings 54,104 53,589 Accumulated other comprehensive loss ( 2,391 ) ( 3,755 ) Total shareowners’ equity 62,398 60,156 Noncontrolling interest 1,808 1,767 Total equity 64,206 61,923 Total liabilities, redeemable noncontrolling interest, and equity $ 167,139 $ 162,861 See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements 6 Table of Contents RTX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) Six Months Ended June 30, (dollars in millions) 2025 2024 Operating Activities: Net income $ 3,350 $ 1,918 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 2,128 2,131 Deferred income tax provision 121 185 Stock compensation cost 224 223 Net periodic pension income ( 636 ) ( 666 ) Share-based 401(k) matching contributions 307 146 Gain on sale of business, net of transaction costs (Note 2) — ( 415 ) Change in: Accounts receivable ( 1,137 ) 587 Contract assets ( 1,190 ) ( 1,457 ) Inventory ( 1,197 ) ( 1,361 ) Other current assets ( 100 ) 217 Accounts payable and accrued liabilities ( 141 ) 1,245 Contract liabilities 343 512 Other operating activities, net ( 309 ) ( 190 ) Net cash flows provided by operating activities 1,763 3,075 Investing Activities: Capital expenditures ( 1,043 ) ( 1,004 ) Dispositions of businesses, net of cash transferred — 1,283 Increase in other intangible assets ( 226 ) ( 318 ) Receipts (payments) from settlements of derivative contracts, net 145 ( 29 ) Other investing activities, net ( 63 ) 28 Net cash flows used in investing activities ( 1,187 ) ( 40 ) Financing Activities: Repayment of long-term debt ( 789 ) ( 1,700 ) Change in commercial paper, net (Note 9) 1,432 — Change in other short-term borrowings, net 18 43 Dividends paid ( 1,750 ) ( 1,592 ) Repurchase of common stock ( 50 ) ( 100 ) Other financing activities, net ( 270 ) ( 242 ) Net cash flows used in financing activities ( 1,409 ) ( 3,591 ) Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 54 ( 12 ) Net decrease in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash ( 779 ) ( 568 ) Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, beginning of period 5,606 6,626 Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, end of period 4,827 6,058 Less: Restricted cash, included in Other assets, current and Other assets 45 47 Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 4,782 $ 6,011 See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements 7 Table of Contents RTX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (Unaudited) Quarter Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, (dollars in millions, except per share amounts; shares in thousands) 2025 2024 2025 2024 Equity beginning balance $ 63,307 $ 62,100 $ 61,923 $ 61,410 Common Stock Beginning balance 37,515 37,108 37,434 37,055 Common stock plans activity 99 117 106 111 Share-based 401(k) matching contributions 66 77 140 136 Ending balance 37,680 37,302 37,680 37,302 Treasury Stock Beginning balance ( 27,069 ) ( 27,029 ) ( 27,112 ) ( 26,977 ) Share-based 401(k) matching contributions 74 — 167 — Common stock repurchased — ( 51 ) ( 50 ) ( 103 ) Ending balance ( 26,995 ) ( 27,080 ) ( 26,995 ) ( 27,080 ) Retained Earnings Beginning balance 54,277 53,052 53,589 52,154 Net income attributable to common shareholders 1,657 111 3,192 1,820 Dividends on common stock ( 1,740 ) ( 1,646 ) ( 2,543 ) ( 2,415 ) Dividends on ESOP common stock ( 80 ) ( 30 ) ( 117 ) ( 44 ) Other ( 10 ) 1 ( 17 ) ( 27 ) Ending balance 54,104 51,488 54,104 51,488 Unearned ESOP Shares Beginning balance — ( 11 ) — ( 15 ) Share-based 401(k) matching contributions — 4 — 8 Ending balance — ( 7 ) — ( 7 ) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Beginning balance ( 3,207 ) ( 2,635 ) ( 3,755 ) ( 2,419 ) Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax 816 ( 83 ) 1,364 ( 299 ) Ending balance ( 2,391 ) ( 2,718 ) ( 2,391 ) ( 2,718 ) Noncontrolling Interest Beginning balance 1,791 1,615 1,767 1,612 Net income 68 64 158 98 Less: Redeemable noncontrolling interest net income ( 4 ) ( 4 ) ( 6 ) ( 4 ) Dividends attributable to noncontrolling interest ( 47 ) ( 10 ) ( 111 ) ( 41 ) Ending balance 1,808 1,665 1,808 1,665 Equity at June 30 $ 64,206 $ 60,650 $ 64,206 $ 60,650 Supplemental share information Shares of common stock issued under employee plans, net 1,535 1,219 4,438 4,378 Shares of common stock repurchased — 486 396 1,046 Treasury shares reissued related to 401(k) matching contributions 1,053 — 2,376 — Dividends declared per share of common stock $ 1.360 $ 1.260 $ 1.990 $ 1.850 See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements 8 Table of Contents RTX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) Note 1: Basis of Presentation The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements at June 30, 2025 and for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 are unaudited, and in the opinion of management include adjustments of a normal recurring nature necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods. The results reported in these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should not necessarily be taken as indicative of results that may be expected for the entire year. The financial information included herein should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes in our 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “we,” “our,” “us,” “the Company,” and “RTX” mean RTX Corporation and its subsidiaries. References to “Raytheon Company” mean Raytheon Company, which became a wholly owned subsidiary of RTX on April 3, 2020 during an all-stock merger transaction between United Technologies Corporation and Raytheon Company (the surviving company of which is RTX Corporation). We reclassified certain immaterial prior period amounts within our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity related to our share-based 401(k) matching contributions to conform to our current period presentation. Raytheon follows a 4-4-5 fiscal calendar while Collins Aerospace (Collins) and Pratt & Whitney use a calendar quarter end. Throughout this Form 10-Q, when we refer to the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 with respect to Raytheon, we are referring to their June 29, 2025 and June 30, 2024 fiscal quarter ends, respectively. Legal Matters. As previously disclosed, in 2024 the Company resolved several outstanding legal matters, herein referred to as “Resolution of Certain Legal Matters.” See “Note 16: Commitments and Contingencies” for additional information. Note 2: Acquisitions and Dispositions Dispositions. On June 30, 2025, we entered into a definitive agreement to sell the Simmonds Precision Products business within our Collins segment for approximately $ 0.8 billion in cash. The closing of this transaction is subject to required regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions. On March 29, 2024, we completed the sale of our Cybersecurity, Intelligence and Services (CIS) business within our Raytheon segment for proceeds of approximately $ 1.3 billion in cash, resulting in an aggregate pre-tax gain, net of transaction and other related costs, of $ 0.4 billion ($ 0.2 billion after tax), primarily recognized in Other income (expense), net within the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. On July 20, 2023, we entered into a definitive agreement to sell the actuation and flight control business within our Collins segment to Safran S.A. for gross proceeds of approximately $ 1.8 billion. During the fourth quarter of 2024, as a result of progress towards regulatory approvals, held for sale criteria was met. At June 30, 2025, assets of approximately $ 1.6 billion and liabilities of approximately $ 0.6 billion are held for sale. Held for sale assets primarily include $ 0.7 billion of goodwill and intangible assets presented in Other assets and $ 0.3 billion of inventory presented in Other assets, current, within the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Held for sale liabilities primarily include $ 0.4 billion of contract liabilities and other accrued liabilities presented in Other accrued liabilities within the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. We completed the sale of this business for gross proceeds of $ 1.8 billion on July 21, 2025. 9 Table of Contents Note 3: Goodwill and Intangible Assets Goodwill. Changes in our goodwill balances for the six months ended June 30, 2025 were as follows: (dollars in millions) Balance as of December 31, 2024 Acquisitions and Divestitures Foreign Currency Translation and Other Balance as of June 30, 2025 Collins Aerospace (1) $ 32,223 $ ( 256 ) $ 793 $ 32,760 Pratt & Whitney 1,563 — — 1,563 Raytheon 18,986 — 1 18,987 Total Segments 52,772 ( 256 ) 794 53,310 Eliminations and other 17 — — 17 Total $ 52,789 $ ( 256 ) $ 794 $ 53,327 (1) The reduction in Acquisitions and Divestitures includes the reclassification of goodwill to held for sale and presented in Other assets within the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. Intangible Assets. Identifiable intangible assets are comprised of the following: June 30, 2025 December 31, 2024 (dollars in millions) Gross Amount Accumulated Amortization Gross Amount Accumulated Amortization Amortized: Collaboration assets $ 6,248 $ ( 2,138 ) $ 6,159 $ ( 1,996 ) Exclusivity assets 3,780 ( 246 ) 3,692 ( 361 ) Developed technology and other 1,190 ( 726 ) 1,197 ( 698 ) Customer relationships 29,379 ( 13,219 ) 29,388 ( 12,401 ) 40,597 ( 16,329 ) 40,436 ( 15,456 ) Indefinite-lived: Trademarks and other 8,480 — 8,463 — Total $ 49,077 $ ( 16,329 ) $ 48,899 $ ( 15,456 ) Amortization of intangible assets for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 was $ 508 million and $ 1,009 million and $ 534 million and $ 1,060 million, respectively. The following is the expected amortization of intangible assets for the remainder of 2025 through 2030: (dollars in millions) Remaining 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Amortization expense $ 1,069 $ 2,000 $ 1,890 $ 1,819 $ 1,679 $ 1,642 Note 4: Earnings Per Share Quarter Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, (dollars and shares in millions, except per share amounts) 2025 2024 2025 2024 Net income attributable to common shareowners $ 1,657 $ 111 $ 3,192 $ 1,820 Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding 1,340.6 1,331.8 1,338.8 1,330.5 Stock awards and equity units (share equivalent) 13.4 10.3 14.1 9.2 Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding 1,354.0 1,342.1 1,352.9 1,339.7 Earnings Per Share attributable to common shareowners: Basic $ 1.24 $ 0.08 $ 2.38 $ 1.37 Diluted 1.22 0.08 2.36 1.36 10 Table of Contents The computation of diluted earnings per share (EPS) excludes the effect of the potential exercise of stock awards, including stock appreciation rights and stock options, when the average market price of the common stock is lower than the exercise price of the related stock awards during the period because the effect would be anti-dilutive. In addition, the computation of diluted EPS excludes the effect of the potential release or exercise of stock awards when the awards’ assumed proceeds exceed the average market price of the common shares during the period. For the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2025, the number of stock awards excluded from the computation was 1.8 million and 2.5 million, respectively. For the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2024, the number of stock awards excluded from the computation was 3.9 million and 9.6 million, respectively. Note 5: Changes in Contract Estimates at Completion We review our Estimates at Completion (EACs) at least annually or when a change in circumstances warrants a modification to a previous estimate. For significant contracts, we review our EACs more frequently. Due to the nature of the work required to be performed on many of the Company’s performance obligations, the estimation of total revenue and cost at completion is complex, subject to many inputs, and requires significant judgment by management on a contract by contract basis. As part of this process, management reviews information including, but not limited to, any outstanding key contract matters, progress towards completion and the related program schedule, identified risks and opportunities, and the related changes in estimates of revenues and costs. The risks and opportunities relate to management’s judgment about the ability and cost to achieve the schedule, consideration of customer-directed delays or reductions in scheduled deliveries, technical requirements, customer activity levels, such as flight hours or aircraft landings, and related variable consideration. Management must make assumptions and estimates regarding contract revenues and costs, including estimates of labor productivity and availability, the complexity and scope of the work to be performed, the availability and cost of materials including any impact from changing costs or inflation, the length of time to complete the performance obligation, execution by our subcontractors, the availability and timing of funding from our customer, overhead cost rates, and current and past maintenance cost and frequency driven by estimated aircraft and engine utilization and estimated useful lives of components, among others. In particular, fixed-price development programs involve significant management judgment, as development contracts by nature have elements that have not been done before and thus, are highly subject to future unexpected cost changes. Cost estimates may also include the estimated cost of satisfying our industrial cooperation agreements, sometimes in the form of either offset obligations or in-country industrial participation (ICIP) agreements, required under certain contracts. These obligations may or may not be distinct depending on their nature. If cash is paid to a customer to satisfy our offset obligations it is recorded as a reduction in the transaction price. Changes in estimates of net sales, cost of sales, and the related impact to operating profit on contracts recognized over time are recognized on a cumulative catch-up basis, which recognizes the cumulative effect of the profit changes on current and prior periods based on a performance obligation’s percentage-of-completion in the current period. A significant change in one or more of these estimates could affect the profitability of one or more of our performance obligations. Our EAC adjustments also include the establishment of, and changes to, loss provisions for our contracts accounted for on a percentage-of-completion basis. Net EAC adjustments had the following impact on our operating results: Quarter Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, (dollars in millions, except per share amounts) 2025 2024 2025 2024 Total net sales $ ( 99 ) $ 3 $ ( 145 ) $ ( 15 ) Operating profit ( 117 ) ( 62 ) ( 275 ) ( 224 ) Income attributable to common shareowners (1) ( 92 ) ( 49 ) ( 217 ) ( 177 ) Diluted earnings per share attributable to common shareowners (1) $ ( 0.07 ) $ ( 0.04 ) $ ( 0.16 ) $ ( 0.13 ) (1) Amounts reflect a U.S. statutory tax rate of 21%, which approximates our tax rate on our EAC adjustments. In addition to the amounts included in the table above, during the quarter ended June 30, 2024, Raytheon initiated the termination of a fixed price development contract with a foreign customer, herein referred to as “Raytheon Contract Termination.” As a result of this action, Raytheon recognized a $ 0.6 billion charge related to the estimated impact of this termination. This charge included the write-off of remaining contract assets and the estimated settlement with the customer. The Raytheon Contract Termination was completed, including customer settlement, during the fourth quarter of 2024, in line with previously accrued amounts. 11 Table of Contents Note 6: Accounts Receivable, Net Accounts receivable, net consisted of the following: (dollars in millions) June 30, 2025 December 31, 2024 Accounts receivable $ 12,722 $ 11,265 Allowance for expected credit losses ( 337 ) ( 289 ) Total accounts receivable, net $ 12,385 $ 10,976 Note 7: Contract Assets and Liabilities Contract assets reflect revenue recognized and performance obligations satisfied in advance of customer billings. Contract liabilities relate to payments received in advance of the satisfaction of performance under the contract. We receive payments from customers based on the terms established in our contracts. Total contract assets and contract liabilities were as follows: (dollars in millions) June 30, 2025 December 31, 2024 Contract assets, net $ 15,686 $ 14,570 Contract liabilities ( 19,186 ) ( 18,616 ) Net contract liabilities $ ( 3,500 ) $ ( 4,046 ) Contract assets, net, increased $ 1.1 billion during the six months ended June 30, 2025 primarily due to sales in excess of billings on certain contracts at Pratt & Whitney, partially offset by an increase in the allowance for expected credit losses due to a customer bankruptcy recorded at Pratt & Whitney in the second quarter of 2025. Contract liabilities increased $ 0.6 billion during the six months ended June 30, 2025 primarily due to advances received and billings in excess of sales on certain contracts at Pratt & Whitney. We recognized revenue of $ 2.0 billion and $ 5.0 billion during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2025 related to contract liabilities outstanding as of January 1, 2025 and recognized revenue of $ 1.8 billion and $ 4.4 billion during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2024, related to contract liabilities outstanding as of January 1, 2024. Contract assets are net of an allowance for expected credit losses of $ 0.7 billion and $ 0.5 billion as of June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively. The increase in allowance for expected credit losses as of June 30, 2025 as compared to December 31, 2024 was primarily related to an increase in reserves as a result of a customer bankruptcy recorded at Pratt & Whitney in the quarter ended June 30, 2025. Note 8: Inventory, net Inventory, net consisted of the following: (dollars in millions) June 30, 2025 December 31, 2024 Raw materials $ 4,559 $ 4,164 Work-in-process 4,822 4,493 Finished goods 4,631 4,111 Total inventory, net $ 14,012 $ 12,768 Note 9: Borrowings and Lines of Credit As of June 30, 2025, we had a revolving credit agreement with various banks permitting aggregate borrowings of up to $ 5.0 billion, which expires in August 2028. As of June 30, 2025, there were no borrowings outstanding under this agreement. From time to time, we use commercial paper borrowings for general corporate purposes, including the funding of potential acquisitions, pension contributions, debt refinancing, dividend payments, and repurchases of our common stock. The commercial paper notes have original maturities of not more than 364 days from the date of issuance. At December 31, 2024, we had no commercial paper borrowings outstanding. As of June 30, 2025, our maximum commercial paper borrowing limit was $ 5.0 billion as the commercial paper is backed by our $ 5.0 billion revolving credit agreement. At June 30, 2025 we had $ 1.4 billion of commercial paper borrowings outstanding. At June 30, 2025, short-term commercial paper borrowings outstanding had a weighted-average interest rate of 4.7 %. There were no new borrowings and no new repayments of commercial paper with maturities greater than 90 days during the six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024. 12 Table of Contents We made the following repayments of long-term debt during the six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024: Date Description of Notes Aggregate Principal Balance (in millions) May 7, 2025 3 Month SOFR plus 1.225 % term loan due 2025 $ 750 May 7, 2024 3 Month SOFR plus 1.225 % Term Loan due 2025 250 April 17, 2024 3 Month SOFR plus 1.225 % Term Loan due 2025 250 April 4, 2024 3 Month SOFR plus 1.225 % Term Loan due 2025 250 March 15, 2024 3.200 % notes due 2024 950 Long-term debt consisted of the following: (dollars in millions) June 30, 2025 December 31, 2024 3 Month SOFR plus 1.225 % term loan due 2025 $ — $ 750 3.950 % notes due 2025 (1) 1,500 1,500 5.000 % notes due 2026 (1) 500 500 2.650 % notes due 2026 (1) 719 719 3 Month SOFR plus 1.225 % term loan due 2026 2,000 2,000 5.750 % notes due 2026 (1) 1,250 1,250 3.125 % notes due 2027 (1) 1,100 1,100 3.500 % notes due 2027 (1) 1,300 1,300 7.200 % notes due 2027 (1) 382 382 7.100 % notes due 2027 135 135 6.700 % notes due 2028 285 285 7.000 % notes due 2028 (1) 185 185 4.125 % notes due 2028 (1) 3,000 3,000 5.750 % notes due 2029 (1) 500 500 7.500 % notes due 2029 (1) 414 414 2.150 % notes due 2030 (€ 500 million principal value) (1) 580 520 2.250 % notes due 2030 (1) 1,000 1,000 6.000 % notes due 2031 (1) 1,000 1,000 1.900 % notes due 2031 (1) 1,000 1,000 2.375 % notes due 2032 (1) 1,000 1,000 5.150 % notes due 2033 (1) 1,250 1,250 6.100 % notes due 2034 (1) 1,500 1,500 5.400 % notes due 2035 (1) 446 446 6.050 % notes due 2036 (1) 410 410 6.800 % notes due 2036 (1) 117 117 7.000 % notes due 2038 148 148 6.125 % notes due 2038 (1) 575 575 4.450 % notes due 2038 (1) 750 750 5.700 % notes due 2040 (1) 553 553 4.875 % notes due 2040 (1) 600 600 4.700 % notes due 2041 (1) 425 425 4.500 % notes due 2042 (1) 3,500 3,500 4.800 % notes due 2043 (1) 400 400 4.200 % notes due 2044 (1) 300 300 4.150 % notes due 2045 (1) 850 850 3.750 % notes due 2046 (1) 1,100 1,100 13 Table of Contents (dollars in millions) June 30, 2025 December 31, 2024 4.050 % notes due 2047 (1) 600 600 4.350 % notes due 2047 (1) 1,000 1,000 4.625 % notes due 2048 (1) 1,750 1,750 3.125 % notes due 2050 (1) 1,000 1,000 2.820 % notes due 2051 (1) 1,000 1,000 3.030 % notes due 2052 (1) 1,100 1,100 5.375 % notes due 2053 (1) 1,250 1,250 6.400 % notes due 2054 (1) 1,750 1,750 Other (including finance leases) 192 232 Total principal long-term debt 40,416 41,146 Other (fair market value adjustments, (discounts)/premiums, and debt issuance costs) ( 73 ) ( 68 ) Total long-term debt 40,343 41,078 Less: current portion 2,084 2,352 Long-term debt, net of current portion $ 38,259 $ 38,726 (1) We may redeem these notes, in whole or in part, at our option pursuant to their terms prior to the applicable maturity date. The average maturity of our long-term debt as of June 30, 2025 is approximately 12 years. Note 10: Employee Benefit Plans Pension and Postretirement Plans. We sponsor both funded and unfunded domestic and foreign defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit (PRB) plans and defined contribution plans. Contributions to our plans were as follows: Quarter Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, (dollars in millions) 2025 2024 2025 2024 U.S. qualified defined benefit plans $ — $ — $ — $ — International defined benefit plans 11 10 14 12 PRB plans 1 4 11 13 Defined contribution plans 340 339 741 734 The amounts recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet consist of: (dollars in millions) June 30, 2025 December 31, 2024 Non-current pension assets (included in Other assets) $ 2,358 $ 1,819 Current pension and PRB liabilities (included in Accrued employee compensation) 257 256 Future pension and postretirement benefit obligations 2,038 2,104 The amounts recognized in Future pension and postretirement benefit obligations consist of: (dollars in millions) June 30, 2025 December 31, 2024 Non-current pension liabilities $ 1,473 $ 1,532 Non-current PRB liabilities 498 523 Other pension and PRB related items 67 49 Future pension and postretirement benefit obligations $ 2,038 $ 2,104 14 Table of Contents The components of net periodic income for our defined pension plans were as follows: Quarter Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, (dollars in millions) 2025 2024 2025 2024 Operating expense Service cost $ 42 $ 47 $ 84 $ 94 Non-operating expense Interest cost 586 596 1,169 1,192 Expected return on plan assets ( 921 ) ( 936 ) ( 1,838 ) ( 1,873 ) Amortization of prior service credit ( 36 ) ( 42 ) ( 75 ) ( 85 ) Recognized actuarial net loss 5 5 10 10 Net settlement, curtailment, and special termination benefit (gain) loss 14 3 14 ( 4 ) Non-service pension income ( 352 ) ( 374 ) ( 720 ) ( 760 ) Total net periodic pension income $ ( 310 ) $ ( 327 ) $ ( 636 ) $ ( 666 ) We have set aside assets in separate trusts, which we expect to be used to pay for certain nonqualified defined benefit and defined contribution plan obligations in excess of qualified plan limits. These assets are included in Other assets in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. The fair value of marketable securities held in trusts was as follows: (dollars in millions) June 30, 2025 December 31, 2024 Marketable securities held in trusts $ 679 $ 786 Note 11: Income Taxes Our effective tax rate for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2025 was 15.4 % and 16.2 %, respectively, as compared to 59.1 % and 15.8 % for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2024. The effective tax rate for the quarter ended June 30, 2025 includes a tax benefit of $ 33 million associated with the conclusion of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) examination of RTX’s 2020 tax year. The effective tax rate for the quarter ended June 30, 2024 includes the impact of the $ 918 million charge associated with the Resolution of Certain Legal Matters where no related tax benefit was recorded in the quarter. The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2024 are relatively consistent. However, the effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2025 includes the impact from the IRS examination noted above and the effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2024 includes a $ 275 million tax benefit recognized from the conclusion of the examination phases of the RTX and Rockwell Collins audits, a $ 143 million tax cost associated with the sale of the CIS business, and the impact of the $ 918 million charge associated with the Resolution of Certain Legal Matters. We conduct business globally and, as a result, RTX or one or more of our subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions. In the normal course of business, we are subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world, including such major jurisdictions as Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Poland, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to U.S. federal, state, and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations for years before 2014. In connection with certain IRS audits, the Company has previously filed protests with respect to certain IRS proposed adjustments for RTX (formerly United Technologies Corporation) tax years 2017 and 2018, pre-acquisition Rockwell Collins tax years 2016, 2017, and 2018, and pre-merger Raytheon Company tax years 2017, 2018, and 2019 as well as certain refund claims of Raytheon Company for tax years 2014, 2015, and 2016 filed prior to the Raytheon merger. The Company is in the process of disputing these adjustments at the Appeals Division of the IRS. The Company expects resolution at the Appeals Division for the RTX and Rockwell tax years within the next twelve months. The timing of any resolution at the Appeals Division for the Raytheon Company tax years is uncertain. During the quarter ended March 31, 2025, the Company received an unfavorable decision from the Appeals Committee of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) General Secretariat of the Tax Committees (GTSC) and recorded the net income impact of this decision. The Company continues to believe the position of the KSA tax authority is not supported by the facts in question or KSA tax law and is pursuing available options to seek reversal of the GSTC’s decision. 15 Table of Contents Note 12: Financial Instruments We enter into derivative instruments primarily for risk management purposes, including derivatives designated as hedging instruments and those utilized as economic hedges. We operate internationally and, in the normal course of business, are exposed to fluctuations in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and commodity prices. These fluctuations can increase the costs of financing, investing, and operating the business. We have used derivative instruments, including swaps, forward contracts, and options, to manage certain foreign currency, interest rate, and commodity price exposures. The present value of the aggregate notional principal of our outstanding foreign currency hedges was $ 21 billion and $ 17 billion at June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively. The following table summarizes the fair value and presentation in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet for derivative instruments: (dollars in millions) Balance Sheet Location June 30, 2025 December 31, 2024 Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: Foreign exchange contracts Other assets, current $ 473 $ 177 Other accrued liabilities 291 350 Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: Foreign exchange contracts Other assets, current $ 17 $ 10 Other accrued liabilities 16 101 At June 30, 2025, all derivative contracts accounted for as cash flow hedges will m ature by May 2036. Cash receipts or payments on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges are recorded in Other operating activities, net within the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. The Company utilizes the critical terms match method for cash flow hedges in assessing derivatives for hedge effectiveness. Gains or losses attributable to cash flow hedging contract activity are primarily recorded as a component of Products sales when reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive loss. During the quarter ended June 30, 2025, the Company entered into forward exchange contracts to partially hedge its net investment in certain foreign subsidiaries denominated in EUR and CAD. The Company assesses the effectiveness of its net investment hedges using the spot method. Cash receipts or payments on derivatives designated as net investment hedges are recorded as investing cash flows within the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. As of December 31, 2024, we had € 320 million of our € 500 million principal value of euro-denominated long-term debt designated as a net investment hedge against our investments in European businesses. At March 31, 2025, this was no longer designated as a net investment hedge. For the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2025, the effects are reflected within Other income (expense), net. The effect of cash flow hedging and net investment hedging relationships on Accumulated other comprehensive loss and on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations in the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 are presented in “Note 17: Equity.” The hedged items and derivatives designated as hedging instruments are highly effective. The effect of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments is included within Other income (expense), net, on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations and is not significant. Cash receipts or payments related to the settlement of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments are recorded as investing cash flows within the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. Note 13: Fair Value Measurements The following tables provide the valuation hierarchy classification of assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value and measured on a recurring basis in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet: June 30, 2025 (dollars in millions) Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Recurring fair value measurements: Marketable securities held in trusts $ 679 $ 609 $ 70 $ — Derivative assets 490 — 490 — Derivative liabilities 307 — 307 — 16 Table of Contents December 31, 2024 (dollars in millions) Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Recurring fair value measurements: Marketable securities held in trusts $ 786 $ 721 $ 65 $ — Derivative assets 187 — 187 — Derivative liabilities 451 — 451 — Valuation Techniques. Our derivative assets and liabilities include foreign exchange contracts that are measured at fair value using internal models based on observable market inputs such as forward rates, interest rates, our own credit risk, and our counterparties’ credit risks. As of June 30, 2025, there has not been any significant impact to the fair value of our derivative liabilities due to our own credit risk. Similarly, there has not been any significant adverse impact to our derivative assets based on our evaluation of our counterparties’ credit risks. The following table provides carrying amounts and fair values of financial instruments that are not carried at fair value in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet: June 30, 2025 December 31, 2024 (dollars in millions) Carrying Amount Fair Value Carrying Amount Fair Value Long-term debt (excluding finance leases) $ 40,262 $ 37,877 $ 40,991 $ 37,956 The following tables provide the valuation hierarchy classification of assets and liabilities that are not carried at fair value in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet: June 30, 2025 (dollars in millions) Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Long-term debt (excluding finance leases) $ 37,877 $ — $ 35,845 $ 2,032 December 31, 2024 (dollars in millions) Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Long-term debt (excluding finance leases) $ 37,956 $ — $ 35,180 $ 2,776 The fair value of our Short-term borrowings approximates the carrying value due to their short-term nature, with commercial paper classified as level 2 and other short-term borrowings classified as level 3 within the fair value hierarchy. Note 14: Variable Interest Entities Pratt & Whitney holds a 61 % program share interest in the International Aero Engines AG (IAE) collaboration with MTU Aero Engines AG (MTU) and Japanese Aero Engines Corporation (JAEC), and a 49.5 % ownership interest in IAE. IAE’s business purpose is to coordinate the design, development, manufacturing, and product support of the V2500 engine program through involvement with the collaborators. Additionally, Pratt & Whitney, JAEC, and MTU are participants in the International Aero Engines, LLC (IAE LLC) collaboration, whose business purpose is to coordinate the design, development, manufacturing, and product support for the PW1100G-JM engine for the Airbus A320neo family of aircraft. Pratt & Whitney holds a 59 % program share interest and a 59 % ownership interest in IAE LLC. IAE and IAE LLC retain limited equity with the primary economics of the programs passed to the participants. As such, we have determined that IAE and IAE LLC are variable interest entities with Pratt & Whitney as the primary beneficiary. IAE and IAE LLC have, therefore, been consolidated. Other collaborators participate in Pratt & Whitney’s program share interest in IAE and IAE LLC. Pratt & Whitney’s net program share interest in 17 Table of Contents IAE and IAE LLC, after considering its sub-collaborator share, is 57 % and 51 %, respectively. The carrying amounts and classification of assets and liabilities for variable interest entities in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet are as follows: (dollars in millions) June 30, 2025 December 31, 2024 Current assets $ 11,611 $ 10,315 Non-current assets 1,128 1,060 Total assets $ 12,739 $ 11,375 Current liabilities $ 14,130 $ 13,595 Non-current liabilities 123 140 Total liabilities $ 14,253 $ 13,735 Note 15: Guarantees We extend a variety of financial, market value, and product performance guarantees to third parties. These instruments expire on various dates through 2026. Additional guarantees of project performance for which there is no stated value also remain outstanding. A portion of our third party guarantees are subject to indemnification for our benefit for any liabilities that could arise. As of June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, the following financial guarantees were outstanding: June 30, 2025 December 31, 2024 (dollars in millions) Maximum Potential Payment Carrying Amount of Liability Maximum Potential Payment Carrying Amount of Liability Commercial aerospace financing arrangements $ 211 $ — $ 274 $ — Third party guarantees 44 — 79 1 We have made residual value and other guarantees related to various commercial aerospace customer financing arrangements. The estimated fair market values of the guaranteed assets equal or exceed the value of the related guarantees, net of existing reserves. Collaboration partners’ share of these financing guarantees was $ 0.1 billion at June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024. We also have obligations arising from sales of certain businesses and assets, including those from representations and warranties and related indemnities for environmental, health and safety, tax, and employment matters. The maximum potential payment related to these obligations is not a specified amount, as a number of the obligations do not contain financial caps. The carrying amount of liabilities related to these obligations was $ 0.1 billion at June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024. These primarily relate to environmental liabilities, which are included in our total environmental liabilities as further discussed in “Note 16: Commitments and Contingencies.” We accrue for costs associated with guarantees when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. The most likely cost to be incurred is accrued based on an evaluation of currently available facts, and where no amount within a range of estimates is more likely, the minimum is accrued. We also provide service and warranty policies on our products and extend performance and operating cost guarantees beyond our normal service and warranty policies on some of our products, particularly commercial aircraft engines. In addition, we incur discretionary costs to service our products in connection with specific product performance issues. Liabilities for performance and operating cost guarantees are based upon future product performance and durability and are largely estimated based upon historical experience. Adjustments are made to accruals as claims data and historical experience warrant. The changes in the carrying amount of service and product warranties and product performance guarantees for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 were as follows: (dollars in millions) 2025 2024 Balance as of January 1 $ 993 $ 1,091 Warranties and performance guarantees issued 152 134 Settlements ( 108 ) ( 152 ) Other 7 ( 5 ) Balance as of June 30 $ 1,044 $ 1,068 Product and service guarantees incurred in connection with long term production contracts and certain aftermarket arrangements are generally accounted for within the contract estimates at completion. 18 Table of Contents Note 16: Commitments and Contingencies Except as otherwise noted, while we are unable to predict the final outcome, based on information currently available, we do not believe that resolution of any of the following matters will have a material adverse effect upon our competitive position, results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity. Environmental. Our operations are subject to environmental regulation by federal, state, and local authorities in the United States and regulatory authorities with jurisdiction over our foreign operations. We have accrued for the costs of environmental remediation activities, including but not limited to investigatory, remediation, operating and maintenance costs, and performance guarantees, and periodically reassess these amounts. We do not expect any additional liability to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity. As of both June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, we had $ 0.8 billion reserved for environmental remediation. Commercial Aerospace Financing and Other Commitments. We had commercial aerospace financing commitments and other contractual commitments of approximately $ 13.6 billion and $ 14.1 billion as of June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively, on a gross basis before reduction for our collaboration partners’ share. Aircraft financing commitments, in the form of debt or lease financing, are provided to certain commercial aerospace customers. The extent to which the financing commitments will be utilized is not currently known, since customers may be able to obtain more favorable terms from other financing sources. We may also arrange for third-party investors to assume a portion of these commitments. The majority of financing commitments are collateralized arrangements. We may also lease aircraft and subsequently sublease the aircraft to customers under long-term non-cancelable operating leases, or pay deposits on behalf of our customers to secure production slots with the airframers (pre-delivery payments). Our financing commitments with customers are contingent upon maintenance of certain levels of financial condition by our customers. Associated risks on these commitments are mitigated due to the fact that interest rates are variable during the commitment term and are set at the date of funding based on current market conditions, the fair value of the underlying collateral, and the creditworthiness of our customers. As a result, the fair value of these financing commitments is expected to equal the amounts funded. We also have other contractual commitments to make payments to secure certain contractual rights to provide product on new aircraft platforms. The estimated amount and timing of these payments are generally based on future sales or engine flight hours. Payments made on these contractual commitments are included within intangible assets as exclusivity assets and are amortized over the term of underlying economic benefit. We have entered into certain collaboration arrangements, which may include participation by our collaboration partners in these commitments. In addition, in connection with our 2012 agreement to acquire Rolls-Royce’s ownership and collaboration interests in IAE, additional payments are due to Rolls-Royce contingent upon each hour flown through June 2027 by the V2500-powered aircraft in service as of the acquisition date. These flight hour payments are capitalized as collaboration intangible assets as payments are made. Other Financing Arrangements. We have entered into standby letters of credit and surety bonds with financial institutions to meet various bid, performance, warranty, retention, guarantee, and advance payment obligations for us or our affiliates. We enter into these agreements to assist certain affiliates in obtaining financing on more favorable terms, making bids on contracts, and performing their contractual obligations. The stated values of these letters of credit agreements and surety bonds totaled $ 3.9 billion as of June 30, 2025. Offset / Industrial Participation Obligations. We have entered into industrial cooperation agreements, sometimes in the form of either offset agreements or ICIP agreements, as a condition to obtaining orders for our products and services from certain customers in foreign countries. At June 30, 2025, the aggregate amount of these agreements, both agreed to and anticipated to be agreed to, had an outstanding notional value of approximately $ 11.5 billion. These agreements are designed to return economic value to the foreign country by requiring us to engage in activities supporting local defense or commercial industries, promoting a balance of trade, developing in-country technology capabilities, or addressing other local development priorities. Offset agreements may be satisfied through activities that do not require a direct cash payment, including transferring technology, providing manufacturing, training, and other consulting support to in-country projects, and the purchase by third parties (e.g., our vendors) of supplies from in-country vendors. These agreements may also be satisfied through our use of cash for activities such as subcontracting with local partners, purchasing supplies from in-country vendors, providing financial support for in-country projects, and making investments in local ventures. Such activities may also vary by country depending upon requirements as dictated by their governments. We typically do not commit to offset agreements until orders for our products or services are definitive. The amounts ultimately applied against our offset agreements are based on negotiations with the customers and typically require cash outlays that represent only a fraction of the notional value in the offset agreements. Offset programs usually extend over several or more years and may provide for penalties in the event we fail to perform in accordance with offset requirements. Historically, we have not been required to pay any penalties of significance. 19 Table of Contents Government Oversight. In the ordinary course of business, the Company and its subsidiaries and our properties are subject to regulatory and governmental examinations, information gathering requests, inquiries, investigations, and threatened legal actions and proceedings. For example, we are now, and believe that, in light of the current U.S. government contracting and overall enforcement environment, we will continue to be the subject of one or more U.S. government investigations. Our contracts with the U.S. government are also subject to audits. Agencies that oversee contract performance include: the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA), the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), the Inspectors General of the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and other departments and agencies, the Government Accountability Office (GAO), the Department of Justice (DOJ), and Congressional Committees. Other areas of our business operations may also be subject to audit and investigation by these and other agencies. From time to time, agencies investigate or conduct audits to determine whether our operations are being conducted in accordance with applicable requirements. Such investigations and audits may be initiated due to a number of reasons, including as a result of a whistleblower complaint. Such investigations and audits could result in administrative, civil, or criminal liabilities, including the imposition of repayment obligations, fines, treble or other damages, forfeitures, disgorgement, restitution, or penalties, the suspension of government export licenses, and/or suspension or debarment from future U.S. government contracting. They could also result in deferred prosecution agreements, administrative orders, consent agreements, guilty plea agreements, and/or imposition of an independent compliance monitor. U.S. government investigations often take years to complete. In particular, in 2024 the Company entered into a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) (DPA-1) with the DOJ and the Company settled an administrative proceeding with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (the SEC Administrative Order) to resolve the previously disclosed criminal and civil government investigations into payments made by Raytheon Company and its joint venture, Thales-Raytheon Systems (TRS), in connection with certain Middle East contracts since 2012 (Thales-Raytheon Systems and Related Matters). The Company also entered into a DPA (DPA-2) and a False Claims Act (FCA) settlement agreement with the DOJ to resolve previously disclosed criminal and civil government investigations into defective pricing claims for certain legacy Raytheon Company contracts entered into between 2011 and 2013 and in 2017 (DOJ Investigation and Contract Pricing Disputes). Under these DPAs and the SEC Administrative Order, Raytheon Company and the Company are required to retain, among other things, an independent compliance monitor satisfactory to the DOJ and the SEC (for a term ending three years from the date on which the monitor is engaged) and are required to undertake certain cooperation and disclosure obligations (for a term commencing on the effective date of DPA-1 and the SEC Administrative Order, as applicable, and ending three years from the date on which the monitor is engaged). The compliance monitor will oversee Raytheon Company’s and the Company’s compliance with their respective obligations under the DPAs and the SEC Administrative Order. In 2024, the Company also resolved certain voluntarily disclosed export controls violations primarily identified in connection with the integration of Rockwell Collins and, to a lesser extent, Raytheon Company, including certain violations that were resolved pursuant to a Consent Agreement (CA) with the Department of State (DOS). The CA, which has a three-year term, requires the Company to implement remedial compliance measures and to conduct an external audit of the Company’s International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) compliance program. The CA also requires appointment of an external, independent Special Compliance Officer (SCO). The Company appointed its SCO on September 27, 2024. As noted above, the U.S. government reserves the right to suspend or debar a contractor from receiving new government contracts for fraudulent, criminal, or other seriously improper conduct. The U.S. government could also void any contracts found to be tainted by fraud. Like many defense contractors, we have received audit reports recommending the reduction of certain contract prices because, for example, cost or pricing data or cost accounting practices used to price and negotiate those contracts may not have conformed to government regulations. Some of these audit reports recommend that certain payments be repaid, delayed, or withheld, and may involve substantial amounts. We have made voluntary refunds in those cases we believe appropriate, have settled some allegations and, in some cases, continue to negotiate and/or litigate. The Company may be, and in some cases has been, required to make payments into escrow of disputed liabilities while the related litigation is pending. If the litigation is resolved in the Company’s favor, any such payments will be returned to the Company with interest. Our final allowable incurred costs for each year are also subject to audit and have, from time to time, resulted in disputes between us and the U.S. government, with litigation resulting at the Court of Federal Claims (COFC) or the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA), or their related courts of appeals. In addition, the DOJ has, from time to time, convened grand juries to investigate possible irregularities by us. We also provide products and services to customers outside of the U.S., and those sales are subject to local government laws, regulations, and procurement policies and practices. Our compliance with such local government regulations or any applicable U.S. government regulations (e.g., Arms Export Control Act (AECA), Export Administration Regulations (EAR), Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), and ITAR) may also be investigated or audited. In addition, we accrue for liabilities associated with those matters that are probable and can be reasonably estimated. The most likely liability amount to be incurred is accrued based upon a range of estimates. Where no amount within a range of estimates is more likely, then we accrue the minimum amount. Other than as specifically disclosed in this Form 10-Q, we do not expect these audits, investigations, or disputes to have a material effect on our results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity, either individually or in the aggregate. 20 Table of Contents Tax Treatment of Carrier and Otis Dispositions. Management has determined that the distributions of Carrier and Otis on April 3, 2020, and certain related internal business separation transactions, qualified as tax-free under applicable law. In making these determinations, we applied the tax law in the relevant jurisdictions to our facts and circumstances and obtained tax rulings from the relevant taxing authorities, tax opinions, and/or other external tax advice related to the concluded tax treatment. If the completed distributions of Carrier or Otis or certain internal business separation transactions were to fail to qualify for tax-free treatment, the Company could be subject to significant liabilities, and there could be material adverse impacts on the Company’s business, results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity in future reporting periods. Pratt & Whitney Powder Metal Matter. In 2023, Pratt & Whitney determined that a rare condition in powder metal used to manufacture certain engine parts requires accelerated inspection of the PW1100G-JM (PW1100) Geared Turbofan (GTF) fleet, which powers the A320neo family of aircraft (A320neo) (herein referred to as the “Powder Metal Matter”). On August 4, 2023, Pratt & Whitney issued a special instruction (SI) to operators of PW1100 GTF powered A320neo aircraft, which required accelerated inspections and engine removals covering an initial subset of operational engines, no later than September 15, 2023. During the third quarter of 2023, through its safety management system, Pratt & Whitney continued its engineering and industrial assessment, which resulted in an updated fleet management plan for the remaining PW1100 fleet. This updated plan requires a combination of part inspections and retirements for some high pressure turbine and high pressure compressor parts made from affected raw material. Guidance to affected operators was released via service bulletins (SB) and SI in November 2023, and this guidance has been reflected in airworthiness directives issued by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Consistent with previous information, the actions are resulting in significant incremental shop visits. As a result of this matter, Pratt & Whitney expects aircraft on ground levels for the PW1100 powered A320neo fleet to remain elevated through 2026. As a result of anticipated increased aircraft on ground levels and expected compensation to customers for this disruption, as well as incremental maintenance costs resulting from increased inspections and shop visits, Pratt & Whitney recorded a pre-tax operating profit charge in the third quarter of 2023 of $ 2.9 billion, reflecting Pratt & Whitney’s net 51 % program share of the PW1100 program. This amount reflected our best estimate of expected customer compensation for the estimated duration of the disruption as well as the EAC adjustment impact of this matter to Pratt & Whitney’s long-term maintenance contracts. The incremental costs to the business’s long-term maintenance contracts include the estimated cost of additional inspections, replacement of parts, and other related impacts. The charge recorded in the third quarter of 2023 resulted in a net increase in Other accrued liabilities of $ 2.8 billion, which principally related to our 51 % share of an accrual for expected customer compensation. At June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, we had other accrued liabilities of $ 1.1 billion and $ 1.7 billion, respectively, primarily related to expected compensation to customers. The decrease in the accrual during the six months ended June 30, 2025 was primarily due to customer compensation in the form of credits issued to customers during the period. Other engine models within Pratt & Whitney’s fleet contain parts manufactured with affected powder metal, but we do not currently believe there will be any resultant significant financial impact with respect to these other engine models at this time. The financial impact of the powder metal issue is based on historical experience and is subject to various assumptions and judgments, most notably, the number and expected timing of shop visits, inspection results and scope of work to be performed, turnaround time, availability of parts, available capacity at overhaul facilities, and outcomes of negotiations with impacted customers. While these assumptions reflect our best estimates at this time, they are subject to variability. Potential changes to these assumptions and actual incurred costs could significantly affect the estimates inherent in our financial statements and could have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations for the periods in which they are recognized. Legal Proceedings. The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to various contract pricing disputes, government investigations, and litigation matters across jurisdictions, updates to certain of which are set forth below. Cost Accounting Standards Claims As previously disclosed, in April 2019, a Divisional Administrative Contracting Officer (DACO) of the United States DCMA asserted a claim against Pratt & Whitney to recover alleged overpayments of approximately $ 1.7 billion plus interest ($ 1.4 billion at June 30, 2025). The claim is based on Pratt & Whitney’s alleged noncompliance with Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) from January 1, 2007 to March 31, 2019, due to its method of allocating independent research and development costs to government contracts. Pratt & Whitney believes that the claim is without merit and filed an appeal to the ASBCA on June 7, 2019. On September 30, 2024, a DCMA DACO issued a second claim against Pratt & Whitney that similarly alleges that Pratt & Whitney was noncompliant with CAS due to its method of allocating independent research and development costs to government contracts from April 1, 2019 to December 31, 2023. The second claim demands payment of $ 1.1 billion plus interest ($ 356 million at June 30, 2025 ). Pratt & Whitney believes the second claim is without merit and filed an appeal to the ASBCA on October 15, 2024. 21 Table of Contents As previously disclosed, in December 2013, a DCMA DACO asserted a claim against Pratt & Whitney to recover alleged overpayments of approximately $ 177 million plus interest ($ 196 million at June 30, 2025). The claim is based on Pratt & Whitney’s alleged noncompliance with CAS from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2012, due to its method of determining the cost of collaborator parts used in the calculation of material overhead costs for government contracts. In 2014, Pratt & Whitney filed an appeal to the ASBCA. An evidentiary hearing was held and completed in June 2019. On November 22, 2021, the ASBCA issued its written decision sustaining in part and denying in part Pratt & Whitney’s appeal. The ASBCA rejected the DCMA’s asserted measure of the cost of collaborator parts, and ruled substantially in Pratt & Whitney’s favor on other liability issues. The ASBCA remanded the appeal to the parties for resolution of damages issues, which could require further proceedings at the ASBCA. On December 23, 2021, the DCMA filed a motion with the ASBCA seeking partial reconsideration of the November 22, 2021 decision. The motion for reconsideration was denied on August 29, 2022. On December 23, 2022, the DCMA filed an appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. We continue to believe that the ASBCA’s rejection of the DCMA’s asserted measure of the cost of collaborator parts is well supported in fact and law and likely will be sustained. In December 2018, a DCMA DACO issued a second claim against Pratt & Whitney that similarly alleges that its method of determining the cost of collaborator parts does not comply with the CAS for calendar years 2013 through 2017. This second claim, which asserts the same measure of the cost of collaborator parts rejected by the ASBCA’s November 22, 2021 decision, demands payment of $ 269 million plus interest ($ 171 million at June 30, 2025). Pratt & Whitney appealed this second claim to the ASBCA in January 2019. In December 2023, a DCMA DACO issued a third claim against Pratt & Whitney that similarly alleges that its method of determining the cost of collaborator parts does not comply with the CAS for calendar years 2018 through 2022. This third claim, which asserts the same measure of the cost of collaborator parts rejected by the ASBCA’s prior decision, demands payment of $ 277 million plus interest ($ 92 million at June 30, 2025). Pratt & Whitney appealed this third claim to the ASBCA at the end of December 2023. Although subject to further litigation at the ASBCA and potentially further appellate proceedings, we continue to believe that the November 22, 2021 decision in the first claim will apply with equal legal effect to the second and third claims. Accordingly, we believe that the amounts demanded by the DCMA as set forth in the three claims are without legal basis and that any damages owed to the U.S. government for the three claims will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity. Thales-Raytheon Systems and Related Matters As previously disclosed, in 2019, Raytheon Company received a subpoena from the SEC seeking information in connection with an investigation into whether there were improper payments made by Raytheon Company, our TRS joint venture, or anyone acting on their behalf, in connection with TRS or Raytheon Company contracts in certain Middle East countries since 2014. In the first quarter of 2020, the DOJ advised Raytheon Company it had opened a parallel criminal investigation. In the third quarter of 2020, Raytheon Company received an additional subpoena from the SEC, seeking information and documents as part of its investigation. Following the government’s and the Company’s own internal investigations, the Company engaged in resolution discussions with the DOJ and the SEC, and during the second quarter of 2024, the Company reached agreements in principle with the DOJ and the SEC as to the principal elements of such resolutions, as previously disclosed on July 25, 2024. On October 15, 2024, Raytheon Company entered into DPA-1 with the DOJ and on October 16, 2024, the Company settled an administrative proceeding with the SEC to resolve these matters. Pursuant to DPA-1, the DOJ will defer, for a period of three years , criminal prosecution of Raytheon Company related to Raytheon Company’s conspiracy to violate the anti-bribery provisions of the FCPA and conspiracy to violate the AECA by failing to make related disclosures of certain payments that qualified as fees, commissions, and/or political contributions under Part 130 of the ITAR. If Raytheon Company and the Company fully comply with all of their respective obligations under DPA-1 during its three-year term (commencing on the effective date of DPA-1 and ending three years from the date on which the monitor is engaged), the DOJ will move for dismissal with prejudice of the deferred charges against Raytheon Company. DPA-1 provides for a criminal monetary penalty and forfeiture of $ 282 million. In addition, the SEC’s Administrative Order issued in connection with the administrative proceeding settlement alleged that Raytheon Company violated the anti-bribery, books and records, and internal controls provisions of the FCPA. The order provides for a $ 102 million payment to the SEC that includes disgorgement, prejudgment interest on disgorgement, and a civil penalty. Under DPA-1, the SEC’s Administrative Order, and DPA-2 discussed in “DOJ Investigation and Contract Pricing Disputes” below, Raytheon Company and the Company are required, among other things, to retain an independent compliance monitor satisfactory to the DOJ and the SEC (for a term ending three years from the date on which the monitor is engaged) and are required to undertake certain cooperation and disclosure obligations (for a term commencing on the effective date of DPA-1 and the SEC’s Administrative Order, as applicable, and ending three years from the date on which the monitor is engaged). The compliance monitor will oversee Raytheon Company’s and the Company’s compliance with their respective obligations under DPA-1, the SEC’s Administrative Order, and DPA-2 discussed in “DOJ Investigation and Contract Pricing Disputes” below. During the fourth quarter of 2024, the Company paid $ 384 million in the aggregate for DPA-1 and the SEC's Administrative Order which was consistent with amounts accrued. The Company does not believe that these matters will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity. 22 Table of Contents DOJ Investigation and Contract Pricing Disputes As previously disclosed, on October 8, 2020, the Company received a criminal subpoena from the DOJ seeking information and documents in connection with an investigation relating to financial accounting, internal controls over financial reporting, and cost reporting regarding Raytheon Company since 2009. The investigation involved multi-year contracts subject to governmental regulation, including defective pricing claims for certain Raytheon Company contracts entered into between 2011 and 2013. As part of the same investigation, on March 24, 2021, the Company received a second criminal subpoena from the DOJ seeking documents relating to a certain contract entered into in 2017 by Raytheon Company. As previously disclosed on July 25, 2024, following the government’s and the Company’s own internal investigations, the Company engaged in resolution discussions with the DOJ, and during the second quarter of 2024, the Company reached an agreement in principle with the DOJ as to the principal elements of such resolution. In addition, the Company cooperated with the DOJ with respect to a related civil defective pricing investigation under the FCA. On October 16, 2024, Raytheon Company entered into DPA-2 and the FCA Settlement Agreement with the DOJ to resolve these matters. Pursuant to DPA-2, the DOJ will defer, for a period of three years , criminal prosecution of Raytheon Company related to two counts of major fraud against the United States by Raytheon Company involving two legacy contracts. If Raytheon Company and the Company fully comply with all of their respective obligations in DPA-2 during its three-year term (commencing on the effective date of DPA-1 and ending three years from the date on which the monitor is engaged), the DOJ will move for dismissal with prejudice of the deferred charges against Raytheon Company. DPA-2 provides for a criminal penalty in the amount of $ 147 million, plus restitution, and the FCA Settlement Agreement provides for an FCA settlement payment in the amount of $ 433 million, which includes restitution that will satisfy the criminal restitution obligation when paid. Under DPA-2 as well as DPA-1 and the SEC Administrative Order discussed in “Thales-Raytheon Systems and Related Matters” above, Raytheon Company and the Company are required, among other things, to retain an independent compliance monitor satisfactory to the DOJ and the SEC (for a term ending three years from the date on which the monitor is engaged) and are required to undertake certain cooperation and disclosure obligations (for a term commencing on the effective date of DPA-1 and the SEC’s Administrative Order, as applicable, and ending three years from the date on which the monitor is engaged). The compliance monitor will oversee Raytheon Company’s and the Company’s compliance with their respective obligations under DPA-2 as well as DPA-1 and the SEC Administrative Order discussed in “Thales-Raytheon Systems and Related Matters” above. During the fourth quarter of 2024, the Company paid $ 580 million in the aggregate for DPA-2 and the FCA Settlement Agreement which was consistent with amounts accrued plus interest. The Company does not believe that these matters, will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity. Trade Compliance Matters From time to time, we identify, investigate, remediate, and voluntarily disclose violations or potential violations of the ITAR and EAR to the relevant regulators. In May 2024, the U.S. DOS Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance (DTCC) informed the Company of its intent to seek administrative penalties for alleged violations of the AECA and the ITAR. The DTCC informed us that it considers certain of our voluntary disclosures, primarily identified in connection with the integration of Rockwell Collins and, to a lesser extent, Raytheon Company, filed since 2019 to reflect deficiencies warranting a civil penalty. On August 29, 2024, the Company entered into a CA with the DOS to resolve these matters. The CA settles certain AECA and ITAR compliance matters with the DTCC and the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls. The CA has a three-year term and provides for: (i) a civil penalty of $ 200 million, $ 100 million of which is suspended on the condition that such amount is applied to DTCC-approved remedial compliance measures; (ii) the appointment of an external Special Compliance Officer (SCO) to oversee compliance with the CA, the AECA, and the ITAR; (iii) an external audit of the Company’s AECA and ITAR compliance program; and (iv) implementation of additional remedial compliance measures related to AECA and ITAR compliance. The $ 100 million portion of the settlement that is not subject to suspension, which was accrued by the Company in the second quarter of 2024, will be paid in installments, with $ 34 million paid in September 2024, $ 33 million due by August 29, 2025, and $ 33 million due by August 29, 2026. As previously disclosed, the Company has determined that there is a probable risk of liability for potential penalties related to other export compliance matters which have been voluntarily disclosed to the cognizant regulators, but which are not subject to the CA. We have accrued $ 251 million in the aggregate as of June 30, 2025 for these matters and the matters being resolved pursuant to the CA. We are currently unable to estimate the timing or outcome of the other voluntarily disclosed export compliance matters that are not subject to the CA. However, the Company does not believe these matters will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity. UTC Equity Conversion Litigation As previously disclosed, on December 6, 2022, a shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery against the Company and certain current and former members of its Board of Directors, alleging that defendants breached their fiduciary duties in May 2020 by amending the method by which United Technologies Corporation (UTC) equity awards were converted to certain Company equity awards following the separation of UTC into three independent, publicly traded 23 Table of Contents companies. On July 23, 2024, in response to a motion to dismiss filed by defendants, the Court dismissed the shareholder derivative lawsuit in its entirety with prejudice. On May 28, 2025, the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal, concluding the case in the Company’s favor. Civil Litigation Related to Employee Hiring Practices Pratt & Whitney was one of multiple defendants in a class action lawsuit pending in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut alleging that Pratt & Whitney and the other defendants agreed to restrict the hiring and recruiting of certain engineers and skilled laborers in a manner that violated federal antitrust laws. As of December 2024, all defendants, including Pratt & Whitney, reached a settlement with class counsel. The Court granted final approval of the settlement in May 2025. The case is now concluded. In April 2024, a shareholder derivative lawsuit was filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery against the Company and certain current and former officers and directors of the Company alleging that defendants breached their fiduciary duties by failing to implement and enforce a reasonable oversight mechanism for compliance with antitrust laws. Based on the information available to date, we do not believe that this matter will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity. Powder Metal Disclosure Litigation and SEC Investigation Following the Company’s disclosures of a rare condition in powder metal used to manufacture certain Pratt & Whitney engine parts, two sets of civil actions were filed against RTX. First, two putative federal securities class action lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut against the Company and certain current and former executives of the Company. The lawsuits allege that defendants violated federal securities laws by making material misstatements and omitting material facts relating to Pratt & Whitney’s GTF engine fleet, including the impact of the powder metal issue on the fleet, in various regulatory filings. The lawsuits were consolidated and remain pending. Second, multiple shareholder derivative lawsuits were filed against current and former officers and directors of the Company, all of which have now been consolidated into a single action which is pending in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The operative complaint in the consolidated action alleges that the defendants caused the Company to make materially false and misleading statements relating to Pratt & Whitney’s GTF engines, and failed to maintain an adequate system of oversight, disclosure controls and procedures, and internal controls over financial reporting. Based on the information available to date, we do not believe that either matter will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity. On November 7, 2023, January 30, 2024, and May 21, 2024, the Company received subpoenas from the SEC seeking engineering, operational, organizational, accounting, and financial documents in connection with an investigation relating to the Company’s disclosures in 2023 of issues arising from Pratt & Whitney’s use of powder metal in manufacturing various engine parts, its identification of certain risks associated with those manufacturing processes, and corrective actions identified by Pratt & Whitney to mitigate those risks. The Company is cooperating with the SEC and is responding to the subpoenas. At this time, we are unable to predict the timing or outcome of this SEC investigation. Where appropriate, we have recorded loss contingency accruals for the above-referenced matters. Unless noted above, loss contingency accruals are immaterial individually or in the aggregate. Other. As described in “Note 15: Guarantees,” we extend performance and operating cost guarantees beyond our normal warranty and service policies for extended periods on some of our products. We have accrued our estimate of the liability that may result under these guarantees and for service costs that are probable and can be reasonably estimated. We also have other commitments and contingent liabilities related to legal proceedings, self-insurance programs, and matters arising out of the normal course of business. We accrue contingencies based upon a range of possible outcomes. If no amount within this range is a better estimate than any other, then we accrue the minimum amount. In the ordinary course of business, the Company and its subsidiaries are also routinely defendants in, parties to, or otherwise subject to many pending and threatened legal actions, claims, disputes, and proceedings. These matters are often based on alleged violations of contract, product liability, warranty, regulatory, environmental, health and safety, employment, intellectual property, tax, and other laws. In some instances, claims for substantial monetary damages are asserted against the Company and its subsidiaries and could result in fines, penalties, compensatory or treble damages, or non-monetary relief. We do not believe that these matters will have a material adverse effect upon our results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity. 24 Table of Contents Note 17: Equity Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss. A summary of the changes in each component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 is provided below: (dollars in millions) Foreign Currency Translation (1) Defined Benefit Pension and Postretirement Plans Unrealized Hedging Gains (Losses) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Quarter Ended June 30, 2025 Balance at March 31, 2025 $ ( 449 ) $ ( 2,745 ) $ ( 13 ) $ ( 3,207 ) Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications, net 863 ( 143 ) 112 832 Amounts reclassified, pre-tax — ( 38 ) 26 ( 12 ) Tax benefit (expense) — 30 ( 34 ) ( 4 ) Balance at June 30, 2025 $ 414 $ ( 2,896 ) $ 91 $ ( 2,391 ) Six Months Ended June 30, 2025 Balance at December 31, 2024 $ ( 949 ) $ ( 2,679 ) $ ( 127 ) $ ( 3,755 ) Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications, net 1,362 ( 179 ) 259 $ 1,442 Amounts reclassified, pre-tax — ( 77 ) 23 $ ( 54 ) Tax benefit (expense) 1 39 ( 64 ) ( 24 ) Balance at June 30, 2025 $ 414 $ ( 2,896 ) $ 91 $ ( 2,391 ) (1) The amount of foreign currency translation recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (loss) (OCI) includes gains (losses) relating to net investment hedges, as further discussed in “Note 12: Financial Instruments”. (dollars in millions) Foreign Currency Translation Defined Benefit Pension and Postretirement Plans Unrealized Hedging Gains (Losses) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Quarter Ended June 30, 2024 Balance at March 31, 2024 $ ( 562 ) $ ( 2,065 ) $ ( 8 ) $ ( 2,635 ) Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications, net ( 68 ) ( 3 ) 20 ( 51 ) Amounts reclassified, pre-tax — ( 43 ) 1 ( 42 ) Tax benefit (expense) ( 2 ) 9 3 10 Balance at June 30, 2024 $ ( 632 ) $ ( 2,102 ) $ 16 $ ( 2,718 ) Six Months Ended June 30, 2024 Balance at December 31, 2023 $ ( 440 ) $ ( 2,026 ) $ 47 $ ( 2,419 ) Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications, net ( 189 ) ( 10 ) ( 61 ) ( 260 ) Amounts reclassified, pre-tax — ( 87 ) 9 ( 78 ) Tax benefit (expense) ( 3 ) 21 21 39 Balance at June 30, 2024 $ ( 632 ) $ ( 2,102 ) $ 16 $ ( 2,718 ) Note 18: Segment Financial Data Our operations, for the periods presented herein, are classified into three principal segments: Collins, Pratt & Whitney, and Raytheon. Our segments are generally based on the management structure of the businesses and the grouping of similar operating companies, where each management organization has general operating autonomy over diversified products and services. 25 Table of Contents RTX’s chief operating decision maker (CODM) is our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The CODM uses segment operating profit as a profitability measure to assess actual and forecasted segment performance to make decisions regarding incentive compensation and the allocation of capital and other investments. Total sales and operating profit by segment include inter-segment sales which are generally recorded at cost-plus a specified fee or at a negotiated fixed price. These pricing arrangements may result in margins different than what the purchasing segment realizes on the ultimate third-party sale. We present a FAS/CAS operating adjustment outside of segment results, which represents the difference between the service cost component of our pension and PRB expense under the Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) requirements of U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and our pension and PRB expense under U.S. government Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) primarily related to our Raytheon segment. While the ultimate liability for pension and PRB costs under FAS and CAS is similar, the pattern of cost recognition is different. Over time, we generally expect to recover the related Raytheon pension and PRB liabilities through the pricing of our products and services to the U.S. government. Collins and Pratt & Whitney generally record pension and PRB expense on a FAS basis . Acquisition accounting adjustments include the amortization of acquired intangible assets related to acquisitions, the amortization of the property, plant, and equipment fair value adjustment acquired through acquisitions, the amortization of customer contractual obligations related to loss making or below market contracts acquired, and goodwill impairment, if applicable. These adjustments are not considered part of management’s evaluation of segment results. Results for the quarters ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 are as follows: 2025 (dollars in millions) Net Sales Research and Development Other Segment Items (1) Operating Profit Operating Profit Margin Collins Aerospace $ 7,622 $ ( 329 ) $ ( 6,120 ) $ 1,173 15.4 % Pratt & Whitney 7,631 ( 249 ) ( 6,890 ) 492 6.4 % Raytheon 7,001 ( 121 ) ( 6,075 ) 805 11.5 % Total segment 22,254 $ ( 699 ) $ ( 19,085 ) 2,470 11.1 % Eliminations and other (2) ( 673 ) 24 Corporate expenses and other unallocated items — ( 47 ) FAS/CAS operating adjustment — 186 Acquisition accounting adjustments — ( 487 ) Consolidated $ 21,581 $ 2,146 9.9 % (1) Includes Cost of sales, Selling, general, and administrative expenses, and Other income (expense), net. (2) Includes the operating results of certain smaller operations. 2024 (dollars in millions) Net Sales Research and Development Other Segment Items (1) Operating Profit Operating Profit Margin Collins Aerospace $ 6,999 $ ( 354 ) $ ( 5,527 ) $ 1,118 16.0 % Pratt & Whitney 6,802 ( 274 ) ( 5,986 ) 542 8.0 % Raytheon (3) 6,511 ( 80 ) ( 6,304 ) 127 2.0 % Total segment 20,312 $ ( 708 ) $ ( 17,817 ) 1,787 8.8 % Eliminations and other (2) ( 591 ) ( 36 ) Corporate expenses and other unallocated items (4) — ( 930 ) FAS/CAS operating adjustment — 212 Acquisition accounting adjustments — ( 504 ) Consolidated $ 19,721 $ 529 2.7 % (1) Includes Cost of sales, Selling, general, and administrative expenses, and Other income (expense), net. (2) Includes the operating results of certain smaller operations. (3) Operating Profit and Margin includes a $ 0.6 billion charge in the second quarter of 2024 related to the Raytheon Contract Termination. See “Note 5: Changes in Contract Estimates at Completion” for additional information. (4) Includes a $ 0.9 billion charge in the second quarter of 2024 related to the Resolution of Certain Legal Matters. 26 Table of Contents Results for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 are as follows: 2025 (dollars in millions) Net Sales Research and Development Other Segment Items (1) Operating Profit Operating Profit Margin Collins Aerospace $ 14,839 $ ( 641 ) $ ( 11,937 ) $ 2,261 15.2 % Pratt & Whitney 14,997 ( 479 ) ( 13,446 ) 1,072 7.1 % Raytheon 13,341 ( 219 ) ( 11,639 ) 1,483 11.1 % Total segment 43,177 $ ( 1,339 ) $ ( 37,022 ) 4,816 11.2 % Eliminations and other (2) ( 1,290 ) 36 Corporate expenses and other unallocated items — ( 85 ) FAS/CAS operating adjustment — 371 Acquisition accounting adjustments — ( 957 ) Consolidated $ 41,887 $ 4,181 10.0 % (1) Includes Cost of sales, Selling, general, and administrative expenses, and Other income (expense), net. (2) Includes the operating results of certain smaller operations. 2024 (dollars in millions) Net Sales Research and Development Other Segment Items (1) Operating Profit Operating Profit Margin Collins Aerospace $ 13,672 $ ( 667 ) $ ( 11,038 ) $ 1,967 14.4 % Pratt & Whitney 13,258 ( 543 ) ( 11,761 ) 954 7.2 % Raytheon (3) 13,170 ( 169 ) ( 11,878 ) 1,123 8.5 % Total segment 40,100 $ ( 1,379 ) $ ( 34,677 ) 4,044 10.1 % Eliminations and other (2) ( 1,074 ) ( 41 ) Corporate expenses and other unallocated items (4) — ( 1,026 ) FAS/CAS operating adjustment — 426 Acquisition accounting adjustments — ( 1,004 ) Consolidated $ 39,026 $ 2,399 6.1 % (1) Includes Cost of sales, Selling, general, and administrative expenses, and Other income (expense), net. (2) Includes the operating results of certain smaller operations. (3) Operating Profit and Margin includes a $ 0.6 billion charge in the second quarter of 2024 related to the Raytheon Contract Termination and a $ 0.4 billion gain, net of transaction and other related costs, in the first quarter of 2024 related to the sale of our CIS business. See “Note 5: Changes in Contract Estimates at Completion” and “Note 2: Acquisitions and Dispositions,” respectively, for additional information. (4) Includes a $ 0.9 billion charge in the second quarter of 2024 related to the Resolution of Certain Legal Matters. Capital Expenditures and Depreciation and Amortization segment information for the quarters ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 are as follows: Capital Expenditures Depreciation & Amortization (dollars in millions) 2025 2024 2025 2024 Collins Aerospace $ 171 $ 147 $ 220 $ 207 Pratt & Whitney 180 207 194 192 Raytheon 134 144 135 126 Total segment 485 498 549 525 Corporate, eliminations, and other 45 39 21 20 Acquisition accounting adjustments 506 527 Consolidated $ 530 $ 537 $ 1,076 $ 1,072 27 Table of Contents Capital Expenditures and Depreciation and Amortization segment information for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 are as follows: Capital Expenditures Depreciation & Amortization (dollars in millions) 2025 2024 2025 2024 Collins Aerospace $ 283 $ 272 $ 437 $ 410 Pratt & Whitney 333 346 388 385 Raytheon 359 336 266 253 Total segment 975 954 1,091 1,048 Corporate, eliminations, and other 68 50 42 38 Acquisition accounting adjustments 995 1,045 Consolidated $ 1,043 $ 1,004 $ 2,128 $ 2,131 Total assets by segment are as follows: (dollars in millions) June 30, 2025 December 31, 2024 Collins Aerospace (1) $ 74,247 $ 72,372 Pratt & Whitney (1) 47,670 44,307 Raytheon (1) 44,855 44,936 Total segment 166,772 161,615 Corporate, eliminations, and other 367 1,246 Consolidated $ 167,139 $ 162,861 (1) Total assets include acquired intangible assets and the property, plant, and equipment fair value adjustment. Related amortization expense is included in Acquisition accounting adjustments. We disaggregate our contracts from customers by geographic region based on customer location, by type of customer, and by sales type. Our geographic region based on customer location uses end user customer location where known or practical to determine, or in instances where the end user customer is not known or not practical to determine, uses “ship to” location as the customer location. In addition, for our Raytheon segment, we disaggregate our contracts from customers by contract type. We believe these categories best depict how the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of our revenue and cash flows are affected by economic factors. Segment sales disaggregated by geographic region based on customer location for the quarters ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 are as follows: 2025 2024 (dollars in millions) Collins Aerospace Pratt & Whitney Raytheon Other Total Collins Aerospace Pratt & Whitney Raytheon Other Total United States $ 3,514 $ 3,260 $ 4,909 $ 54 $ 11,737 $ 3,406 $ 3,273 $ 4,914 $ 32 $ 11,625 Europe 1,750 1,539 916 — 4,205 1,645 1,407 536 1 3,589 Asia Pacific 934 1,870 606 — 3,410 780 1,334 547 — 2,661 Middle East and North Africa 271 150 483 — 904 195 172 424 — 791 Other regions 460 812 53 — 1,325 390 615 50 — 1,055 Consolidated net sales 6,929 7,631 6,967 54 21,581 6,416 6,801 6,471 33 19,721 Inter-segment sales 693 — 34 ( 727 ) — 583 1 40 ( 624 ) — Business segment sales $ 7,622 $ 7,631 $ 7,001 $ ( 673 ) $ 21,581 $ 6,999 $ 6,802 $ 6,511 $ ( 591 ) $ 19,721 28 Table of Contents Segment sales disaggregated by geographic region for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 are as follows: 2025 2024 (dollars in millions) Collins Aerospace Pratt & Whitney Raytheon Other Total Collins Aerospace Pratt & Whitney Raytheon Other Total United States $ 6,862 $ 6,678 $ 9,356 $ 107 $ 23,003 $ 6,727 $ 6,283 $ 9,896 $ 80 $ 22,986 Europe 3,480 3,378 1,759 1 8,618 3,260 3,077 1,083 2 7,422 Asia Pacific 1,760 3,111 1,131 — 6,002 1,471 2,528 1,088 1 5,088 Middle East and North Africa 510 325 917 — 1,752 376 310 954 — 1,640 Other regions 904 1,504 104 — 2,512 751 1,059 80 — 1,890 Consolidated net sales 13,516 14,996 13,267 108 41,887 12,585 13,257 13,101 83 39,026 Inter-segment sales 1,323 1 74 ( 1,398 ) — 1,087 1 69 ( 1,157 ) — Business segment sales $ 14,839 $ 14,997 $ 13,341 $ ( 1,290 ) $ 41,887 $ 13,672 $ 13,258 $ 13,170 $ ( 1,074 ) $ 39,026 Segment sales disaggregated by type of customer for the quarters ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 are as follows: 2025 2024 (dollars in millions) Collins Aerospace Pratt & Whitney Raytheon Other Total Collins Aerospace Pratt & Whitney Raytheon Other Total Sales to the U.S. government (1) $ 1,852 $ 1,470 $ 4,900 $ 51 $ 8,273 $ 1,630 $ 1,511 $ 4,880 $ 31 $ 8,052 Foreign military sales through the U.S. government 104 404 1,127 — 1,635 82 386 801 — 1,269 Foreign government direct commercial sales 321 180 932 — 1,433 317 160 694 — 1,171 Commercial aerospace and other commercial sales 4,652 5,577 8 3 10,240 4,387 4,744 96 2 9,229 Consolidated net sales 6,929 7,631 6,967 54 21,581 6,416 6,801 6,471 33 19,721 Inter-segment sales 693 — 34 ( 727 ) — 583 1 40 ( 624 ) — Business segment sales $ 7,622 $ 7,631 $ 7,001 $ ( 673 ) $ 21,581 $ 6,999 $ 6,802 $ 6,511 $ ( 591 ) $ 19,721 (1) Excludes foreign military sales through the U.S. government. Segment sales disaggregated by type of customer for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 are as follows: 2025 2024 (dollars in millions) Collins Aerospace Pratt & Whitney Raytheon Other Total Collins Aerospace Pratt & Whitney Raytheon Other Total Sales to the U.S. government (1) $ 3,511 $ 3,055 $ 9,335 $ 104 $ 16,005 $ 3,194 $ 3,069 $ 9,837 $ 79 $ 16,179 Foreign military sales through the U.S. government 220 783 2,103 — 3,106 163 696 1,659 — 2,518 Foreign government direct commercial sales 648 328 1,808 1 2,785 626 318 1,434 1 2,379 Commercial aerospace and other commercial sales 9,137 10,830 21 3 19,991 8,602 9,174 171 3 17,950 Consolidated net sales 13,516 14,996 13,267 108 41,887 12,585 13,257 13,101 83 39,026 Inter-segment sales 1,323 1 74 ( 1,398 ) — 1,087 1 69 ( 1,157 ) — Business segment sales $ 14,839 $ 14,997 $ 13,341 $ ( 1,290 ) $ 41,887 $ 13,672 $ 13,258 $ 13,170 $ ( 1,074 ) $ 39,026 (1) Excludes foreign military sales through the U.S. government. 29 Table of Contents Segment sales disaggregated by sales type for the quarters ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 are as follows: 2025 2024 (dollars in millions) Collins Aerospace Pratt & Whitney Raytheon Other Total Collins Aerospace Pratt & Whitney Raytheon Other Total Products $ 5,408 $ 4,123 $ 5,975 $ 45 $ 15,551 $ 5,027 $ 3,849 $ 5,657 $ 29 $ 14,562 Services 1,521 3,508 992 9 6,030 1,389 2,952 814 4 5,159 Consolidated net sales 6,929 7,631 6,967 54 21,581 6,416 6,801 6,471 33 19,721 Inter-segment sales 693 — 34 ( 727 ) — 583 1 40 ( 624 ) — Business segment sales $ 7,622 $ 7,631 $ 7,001 $ ( 673 ) $ 21,581 $ 6,999 $ 6,802 $ 6,511 $ ( 591 ) $ 19,721 Segment sales disaggregated by sales type for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 are as follows: 2025 2024 (dollars in millions) Collins Aerospace Pratt & Whitney Raytheon Other Total Collins Aerospace Pratt & Whitney Raytheon Other Total Products $ 10,518 $ 8,155 $ 11,381 $ 88 $ 30,142 $ 9,860 $ 7,806 $ 11,124 $ 75 $ 28,865 Services 2,998 6,841 1,886 20 11,745 2,725 5,451 1,977 8 10,161 Consolidated net sales 13,516 14,996 13,267 108 41,887 12,585 13,257 13,101 83 39,026 Inter-segment sales 1,323 1 74 ( 1,398 ) — 1,087 1 69 ( 1,157 ) — Business segment sales $ 14,839 $ 14,997 $ 13,341 $ ( 1,290 ) $ 41,887 $ 13,672 $ 13,258 $ 13,170 $ ( 1,074 ) $ 39,026 Raytheon segment sales disaggregated by contract type for the quarters ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 are as follows: (dollars in millions) 2025 2024 Fixed-price $ 3,991 $ 3,318 Cost-type 2,976 3,153 Consolidated net sales 6,967 6,471 Inter-segment sales 34 40 Business segment sales $ 7,001 $ 6,511 Raytheon segment sales disaggregated by contract type for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 are as follows: (dollars in millions) 2025 2024 Fixed-price $ 7,596 $ 6,611 Cost-type 5,671 6,490 Consolidated net sales 13,267 13,101 Inter-segment sales 74 69 Business segment sales $ 13,341 $ 13,170 Note 19: Remaining Performance Obligations (RPO) RPO represents the aggregate amount of total contract transaction price that is unsatisfied or partially unsatisfied. Total RPO was approximately $ 236 billion as of June 30, 2025. Of the total RPO as of June 30, 2025, we expect approximately 25 % will be recognized as revenue over the next 12 months. Approximately 45 % of our RPO relates to long-term commercial aerospace maintenance contracts at Pratt & Whitney, which are generally expected to be realized over a span of up to 20 years. Note 20: Accounting Pronouncements In November 2024, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2024-03, Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses, which requires a tabular disclosure of the amounts of specified natural expense categories included in each relevant expense caption. Additionally, ASU 2024-03 requires the disclosure of the total amount of selling expenses and, in annual reporting periods, an entity’s definition of selling expenses. The new standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, on a prospective basis. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact on our disclosures of adopting this new pronouncement. 30 Table of Contents In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, to enhance income tax reporting disclosures and require disclosure of specific categories in the tabular rate reconciliation. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024, on a prospective basis. We are currently evaluating the impact on our disclosures of adopting this new pronouncement. Other new pronouncements issued but not effective until after June 30, 2025 are not expected to have a material impact on our results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity. 31 Table of Contents With respect to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial information of RTX for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) reported that it has applied limited procedures in accordance with professional standards for a review of such information. However, its report dated July 22, 2025, appearing below, states that the firm did not audit and does not express an opinion on that unaudited condensed consolidated financial information. PwC has not carried out any significant or additional audit tests beyond those that would have been necessary if their report had not been included. Accordingly, the degree of reliance on its report on such information should be restricted in light of the limited nature of the review procedures applied. PwC is not subject to the liability provisions of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Act) for its report on the unaudited condensed consolidated financial information because that report is not a “report” or a “part” of a registration statement prepared or certified by PwC within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm To the Shareowners and Board of Directors of RTX Corporation Results of Review of Interim Financial Information We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of RTX Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of June 30, 2025, and the related condensed consolidated statements of operations, of comprehensive income, and of changes in equity for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, and the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “interim financial information”). Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying interim financial information for it to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2024, and the related consolidated statements of operations, of comprehensive income, of changes in equity, and of cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein), and in our report dated February 3, 2025, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2024, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived. Basis for Review Results This interim financial information is the responsibility of the Company’s management. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Boston, Massachusetts July 22, 2025 32 Table of Contents