Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis
ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENT NOTICE
This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this Report) contains forward looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, principally in
the sections entitled “Description of Business,” “Risk Factors,” and “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” All statements other than statements of historical fact contained in
this Quarterly Report, including statements regarding future events, our future financial performance, business strategy and plans and
objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. We have attempted to identify forward-looking statements
by terminology including “anticipates,” “believes,” “can,” “continue,” “could,”
“estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “potential,”
“predicts,” “should,” or “will” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. Although
we do not make forward-looking statements unless we believe we have a reasonable basis for doing so, we cannot guarantee their accuracy.
These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the risks outlined
under “Risk Factors” or elsewhere in this Quarterly Report, which may cause our or our industry’s actual results, levels
of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive
and rapidly changing environment. New risks emerge from time to time and it is not possible for us to predict all risk factors, nor can
we address the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause our actual
results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements included in this
document are based on information available to us on the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking
statements.
You
should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement, each of which applies only as of the date of this Quarterly Report
on Form-10-Q. Before you invest in our securities, you should be aware that the occurrence of the events described in the section entitled
“Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report could negatively affect our business, operating results, financial
condition and stock price. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any of the forward-looking
statements after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form-10-Q to conform our statements to actual results or changed expectations.
Business
Overview
Relmada
Therapeutics, Inc. (Relmada or the Company, we or us) (a Nevada corporation), is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on the
development of esmethadone (d-methadone, dextromethadone, REL-1017), an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist. Esmethadone
is a new chemical entity (NCE) that potentially addresses areas of high unmet medical need in the treatment of central nervous system
(CNS) diseases and other disorders.
Our lead product candidate, esmethadone, is being
developed as a rapidly acting, oral agent for the treatment of depression and other potential indications. On October 15, 2019 we reported
top-line data from study REL-1017-202. This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2 clinical trial evaluating the safety, tolerability
and efficacy of two oral doses of REL-1017, 25 mg once a day and 50 mg once a day, as an adjunctive treatment in patients with major depressive
disorder (MDD), who experienced an inadequate response to 1 to 3 treatments with an antidepressant medication.
In
the REL-1017-202 study, 62 subjects, average age 49.2 years, with an average Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score of 25.3 and an average
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score of 34.0 (severe depression), were randomized. Other demographic characteristics
were balanced across all arms. After an initial screening period, subjects were randomized to one of three arms: placebo, REL-1017 25
mg or REL-1017 50 mg, in addition to stable background antidepressant therapy. Subjects in the REL-1017 treatment arms received one loading
dose of either 75 mg (25 mg arm) or 100 mg (50 mg arm) of REL-1017. Subjects were treated inpatient for 7 days and discharged home at
Day 9. They returned for follow-up visits at Day 14 and Day 21. Efficacy was measured on Days 2, 4 and 7 in the dosing period and on
Day 14, one week after treatment discontinuation. 61 subjects received all treatment doses and were included in the per-protocol population
(PPP) treatment analysis; 57 subjects completed all visits. All 62 randomized subjects were part of the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis.
No differences were observed between the ITT and PPP analyses and results.
17
Key
findings:
We
observed that subjects in both the REL-1017 25 mg and 50 mg treatment groups experienced statistically significant improvement on efficacy
measures tested as compared to subjects in the placebo group, including: the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS); the Clinical
Global Impression – Severity (CGI-S) scale; the Clinical Global Impression – Improvement (CGI-I) scale; and the Symptoms
of Depression Questionnaire (SDQ).
Improvements on the MADRS endpoint appeared on
Day 4 in both REL-1017 dose groups and continued through Day 7 and Day 14, seven days after treatment discontinuation, with P values<
0.03 and large effect sizes (a measure of quantifying the difference between two groups), ranging from 0.7 to 1.0. Similar findings emerged
from the CGI-S and CGI-I scales.
MADRS:
Analysis of Change from Baseline to Day 7 and to Day 14 ITT Population
Day
2
Day
4
Day
7
Day
14
LS
Means
Difference
P-value
d
LS
Means
Difference
P-value
d
LS
Means
Difference
P-value
d
LS
Means
Difference
P-value
d
REL-1017
25mg vs Placebo
-1.9
0.4340
0.3
-7.9
0.0087
0.9
-8.7
0.0122
0.8
-9.4
0.0103
0.9
REL-1017
50mg vs Placebo
-0.3
0.9092
0.0
-7.6
0.0096
0.8
-7.2
0.0308
0.7
-10.4
0.0039
1.0
LS
= Least Squares; d = Cohen’s effect size
The
study also confirmed the tolerability profile of REL-1017, which was observed in the Phase 1 studies. Subjects experienced only mild
and moderate adverse events (AEs), and no serious adverse events, without significant differences between placebo and treatment groups.
The AEs observed in the Phase 2a clinical study were of the same nature as those observed in the Phase 1 clinical studies of d-Methadone,
and there was no evidence of either treatment induced psychotomimetic and dissociative AEs or withdrawal signs and symptoms upon treatment
discontinuation.
Phase
3 Program
On December 20, 2020, Relmada announced that the
first patient had been enrolled in the first Phase 3 clinical trial (RELIANCE I) for the Company’s lead product candidate, REL-1017,
as an adjunctive treatment for MDD.
Following discussions with the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA), Relmada’s adjunctive MDD Phase 3 program includes the following key attributes:
●
The Phase 3 program consists of two sister, two-arm, placebo-controlled
clinical trials. Each trial will be conducted in 55 clinical sites in the United States and will include planned enrollment of 364 MDD
patients with inadequate response to standard antidepressants in their current depression episode. Patients will add either a 25
mg oral dose of REL-1017 once per day or placebo to their ongoing antidepressant treatment.
●
The primary endpoint to be evaluated will be the change from baseline on the MADRS score at day-28 for REL-1017 compared to placebo. Success on this endpoint with the collection of sufficient safety data could support the use of REL-1017 for chronic treatment, if approved.
●
The change from baseline and the 7-day MADRS score will serve as a key secondary endpoint and will provide information on the time to treatment effect.
18
On
April 1, 2021, Relmada announced the initiation of RELIANCE II, the second of two sister pivotal Phase 3 clinical trials (RELIANCE I
and RELIANCE II) for the Company’s lead product candidate, REL-1017, as an adjunctive treatment for MDD. Patients who complete
RELIANCE I and RELIANCE II are eligible to rollover into the long-term, open-label study, which also includes subjects who had not previously
participated in a REL-1017 clinical trial.
On October 4, 2021, Relmada announced RELIANCE
III, the ongoing monotherapy trial for the Company’s lead product candidate, REL-1017, aims to randomize 364 patients and it is
expected to be completed in second quarter of 2022.
In addition, in order to support potential regulatory
submissions seeking approval for REL-1017 as monotherapy and adjunctive treatment, the FDA confirmed that, based on what is known at this
time, Relmada will not be required to conduct a two-year carcinogenicity study of REL-1017, as sufficient clinical data have been generated
to date. The FDA also confirmed that Relmada does not need to conduct a TQT cardiac study in humans to support cardiac safety in potential
regulatory submissions for REL-1017, as the data provided so far and the data generated by the Phase 3 program will be adequate to evaluate
the cardiac safety profile of REL-1017.
Psilocybin
License Agreement
In July 2021, we executed a License Agreement
with Arbomentis, LLC which gives us the development and commercial rights to a novel psilocybin and derivate program. Under the terms
of the agreement, we paid Arbormentis, LLC an up-front fee of $12.7 million consisting of a mix of cash and warrants to purchase the Company’s
common stock, in addition to potential milestone payments totaling up to approximately $160 million related to pre-specified development
and commercialization milestones. Arbormentis, LLC is also eligible to receive a low single digit royalty on net sales of any commercialized
therapy resulting from this agreement. The license agreement is terminable by us but is perpetual and not terminable by the licensor absent
material breach of its terms by us. We will collaborate with Arbormentis, LLC on the development of new therapies targeting neurological
and psychiatric disorders, leveraging its understanding of neuroplasticity, and focusing on this emerging new class of drugs targeting
the neuroplastogen mechanism of action. Importantly, neuroplasticity plays a key role in the activity of REL-1017, Relmada’ s lead
program. Dr. Paolo Manfredi, our Acting Chief Scientific Officer and co-inventor of REL-1017, and Dr. Marco Pappagallo, our Acting Chief
Medical Officer, are among the scientists affiliated with Arbormentis, LLC.
Human
Abuse Potential (HAP) Study top-line results:
On
July 27, 2021, we announced top-line results that showed that all three doses of REL-1017 (25 mg, 75 mg and 150 mg, the therapeutic,
supratherapeutic and maximum tolerated doses, respectively) tested in recreational opioid users, demonstrated a highly statistically
significant difference vs. the active control drug, oxycodone 40 mg. The study’s primary endpoint was a measure of “likability”
with the subjects rating the maximum effect (or Emax) for Drug Liking “at the moment”, using a 1=100 bipolar rating scale (known
as a visual analog scale or VAS), with 100 as the highest likability, 50 as neutral (placebo-like), and 0 the highest dislike. In summary,
all tested doses of REL-1017, including the maximum tolerated dose, showed a highly statistically significant difference in abuse potential
versus oxycodone with p-values less than 0.001.
Results
are detailed in the table below.
Placebo
REL-1017
25 mg
REL-1017
75 mg
REL-1017
150 mg
Oxycodone
40 mg
Mean Emax for Drug Liking
51.7
53.0
58.2
64.9
85.0
P-value for Difference vs. oxycodone 40 mg
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
-
These statistically significant data clearly demonstrate
a very meaningful difference between REL-1017 and oxycodone at all three tested doses. These results, along with previously published
literature, support the lack of opioid effects of REL-1017.
Key
Upcoming Anticipated Milestones
We
expect multiple key milestones over the next 12-18 months. These include:
●
Results
of IV ketamine human abuse potential study in the first quarter of 2022.
●
Results of RELIANCE III monotherapy MDD rial in the second quarter
of 2022.
●
Results of RELIANCE I and RELIANCE II adjunctive MDD trials in the second half of 2022.
●
Results of RELIANCE – OLS (Long-term, Open-label) study in MDD in the second half of 2022.
19
Our
Development Program
Esmethadone
(d-Methadone, dextromethadone, REL-1017) as a treatment for MDD
Background
In
2014, the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) estimated that 15.7 million adults aged 18 or older in the United States had at
least one major depressive episode in the past year. According to data from nationally representative surveys supported by NIMH, only
about half of Americans diagnosed with major depression in a given year receive treatment. Of those receiving treatment with as many
as four different standard antidepressants, 33% of drug-treated depression patients do not achieve adequate therapeutic benefits according
to the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) trial published in the American Journal of Psychiatry.
In
addition to the high failure rate, only one of the marketed products for depression, esketamine (marketed by Johnson and Johnson as Spravato),
an in-clinic nasal spray treatment can demonstrate rapid antidepressant effects, while the other currently approved products can take
two to four weeks to show activity. The urgent need for improved, faster acting antidepressant treatments is underscored by the fact
that severe depression can be life-threatening, due to heightened risk of suicide.
Esmethadone
Overview and Mechanism of Action
Esmethadone’s
mechanism of action, as a low affinity, non-competitive NMDA channel blocker or antagonist, is fundamentally differentiated from most
currently FDA-approved antidepressants, as well as all atypical antipsychotics used adjunctively with standard, FDA-approved antidepressants.
Working through the same brain mechanisms as ketamine and esketamine but potentially lacking their adverse side effects, esmethadone
is being developed as a rapidly acting, oral agent for the treatment of depression and potentially other CNS conditions.
In
chemistry an enantiomer, also known as an optical isomer, is one of two stereoisomers that are mirror images of each other that are non-superimposable
(not identical), much as one’s left and right hands are the same except for being reversed along one axis. A racemic compound,
or racemate, is one that has equal amounts of left- and right-handed enantiomers of a chiral molecule. For racemic drugs, often only
one of a drug’s enantiomers is responsible for the desired physiologic effects, while the other enantiomer is less active or inactive.
As
a single isomer of racemic methadone, esmethadone has been shown to possess NMDA antagonist properties with virtually no traditional
opioid or ketamine-like adverse events at the expected therapeutic doses. In contrast, racemic methadone is associated with common opioid
side effects that include anxiety, nervousness, restlessness, sleep problems (insomnia), nausea, vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, drowsiness,
and others. It has been shown that the left (levo) isomer, l-methadone, is largely responsible for methadone’s opioid activity,
while the right (dextro) isomer, esmethadone, at the currently therapeutic doses used in development is virtually inactive as an opioid
while maintaining affinity for the NMDA receptor.
NMDA
receptors are present in many parts of the CNS and play important roles in regulating neuronal activity and promoting synaptic plasticity
in brain areas important for cognitive functions such as executive function, learning and memory. Based on these premises, esmethadone
could show benefits in several different CNS indications.
Esmethadone
(d-methadone, dextromethadone, REL-1017) in other indications
In addition to developing esmethadone as an adjunctive
treatment of MDD, we are evaluating the utility of esmethadone as a front line monotherapy treatment for MDD.
Additionally,
other indications that Relmada may explore in the future, include, restless leg syndrome and other glutamatergic system activation related
diseases.
20
Our
Corporate History and Background
We are a clinical-stage, publicly traded biotechnology
company developing NCEs that potentially address areas of high unmet medical need in the treatment of depression and other CNS diseases.
Currently,
none of our product candidates have been approved for sale in the United States or elsewhere. We have no commercial products nor do we
have a sales or marketing infrastructure. In order to market and sell our products we must conduct clinical trials on patients and obtain
regulatory approvals from appropriate regulatory agencies, like the FDA in the United States, and similar organizations elsewhere in
the world.
We have not generated revenues and do not anticipate
generating revenues for the foreseeable future. We had net loss of $91,373,316 for the nine months ended September 30, 2021. At September
30, 2021, we have an accumulated deficit of $270,688,619.
Business
Strategy
Our
strategy is to leverage our considerable industry experience, understanding of CNS markets and development expertise to identify, develop
and commercialize product candidates with significant market potential that can fulfill unmet medical needs in the treatment of CNS diseases.
We have assembled a management team along with both scientific and business advisors, including recognized experts in the fields of depression,
with significant industry and regulatory experience to lead and execute the development and commercialization of esmethadone.
We plan to further develop esmethadone as our
priority program. As the drug esmethadone is an NCE, the regulatory pathway required to support an NDA submission involves a full clinical
development program. We plan to continue to generate intellectual property (IP) that will further protect our products from competition.
We will also continue to prioritize our product development activities after taking into account the resources we have available, market
dynamics and potential for adding value.
Market
Opportunity
We
believe that the market for addressing areas of high unmet medical need in the treatment of CNS diseases will continue to be large for
the foreseeable future and that it will represent a sizable revenue opportunity for us. For example, the World Health Organization (WHO)
has estimated that CNS diseases affect nearly 2 billion people globally, making up approximately 40% of total disease burden (based on
disability adjusted life years), compared with 13% for cancer and 12% for cardiovascular disease.
The
depression treatment market is segmented on the basis of antidepressants drugs, devices, and therapies. Antidepressants are the largest
and most popular market segment. The antidepressants segment consists of large pharmaceutical and generic companies, such as Eli Lilly,
Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Allergan, Sage Therapeutics and Johnson & Johnson. Some of the notable drugs produced by these companies
are Cymbalta® (Eli Lilly), Effexor® (Pfizer), Pristiq® (Pfizer), Zulresso® (Sage) and Spravato® (Johnson & Johnson).
Intellectual
Property Portfolio and Market Exclusivity
We
have over 50 issued patents and pending patent applications related to REL-1017 for multiple uses, including psychological and neurological
conditions. We have also secured an Orphan Drug Designation from the FDA for d-methadone for “the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia”,
which, upon NDA approval, carries 7-year FDA Orphan Drug marketing exclusivity. In the European Union, some of our products may be eligible
up to 10 years of market exclusivity, which includes 8 years data exclusivity and 2 years market exclusivity. In addition to any granted
patents, REL-1017 will be eligible for market exclusivity to run concurrently with the term of the patent for 5 years in the U.S. (Hatch
Waxman Act) plus additional 6 months of pediatric exclusivity and up to 10 years of in the E.U. We believe an extensive intellectual
property estate of US and foreign patents and applications, once approved, will protect our technology and products.
21
Key
Strengths
We
believe that the key elements for our market success include:
●
Compelling lead product opportunity, REL-1017 currently in Phase 3 trials for the adjunctive treatment of MDD.
●
Robust and statistically significant, efficacy seen with esmethadone
in a randomized Phase 2 trial, with the primary endpoint at 7 days, and onset of action seen at 4 days, with the effect carrying through
to 14 days (7 days post-treatment).
●
Completed Phase 1 safety studies of esmethadone and strong clinical activity signal in depression established in three independent animal models in preclinical studies.
●
Potential in additional multiple indications in underserved markets
with large patient population, such as MDD monotheraphy, other affective disorders, and cognitive disorders.
●
Scientific support of leading experts including clinicians and scientists
who are affiliated with a number of highly regarded medical institutions such as Harvard, Cornell, Yale, and University of Pennsylvania.
●
Substantial IP portfolio and market protection with approved and filed
patent applications provide coverage beyond 2033.
A vailable
Information
Reports
we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) pursuant to the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), including
annual and quarterly reports, and other reports we file, can be inspected and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by
the SEC at 100 F Street NE, Washington, D.C. 20549.
Results
of Operations
For
the Three Months Ended September 30, 2021 versus September 30, 2020
Three Months
Ended
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2021
September 30,
2020
Increase
(Decrease)
Operating Expenses
Research and development
$ 33,993,974
$ 11,237,186
$ 22,756,788
General and administrative
8,659,661
5,946,396
2,713,265
Total
$ 42,653,635
$ 17,183,582
$ 25,470,053
Research
and Development Expense
Research and development expense for the three
months ended September 30, 2021 was approximately $33,994,000 compared to $11,237,200 for the three months ended September 30, 2020, an
increase of approximately $22,756,800. The increase was primarily driven by:
● Upfront payment to Arbormentis, LLC for $12,741,600 consisting of a
cash and warrants;
● Increase in study costs of $8,385,800 associated with the execution
of our four Phase 3 trials;
● Increase
in manufacturing and drug storage costs of $237,700;
●
Decrease in compensation expense of $194,800 due to lower employee-related costs;
● Increase in stock-based compensation expense of $80,600; and
●
Increase in other research expenses of $1,505,900 primarily associated with the addition of consultants contracted to assist in the execution of our Phase 3 trials.
General
and Administrative Expense
General and administrative expense for the three
months ended September 30, 2021 was approximately $8,659,700 compared to $5,946,400 for the three months ended September 30, 2020, an
increase of approximately $2,713,300. The increase was primarily due to:
● Decrease
in compensation expense of $86,800 due to lower employee-related costs;
● Increase
in stock-based compensation expense of $2,688,700 primarily related to options granted to
employees; and
●
Increase in other general and administrative expenses of $111,400 primarily due to an increase in consulting services.
22
Other
Income (Expense)
Interest / investment income was approximately
$297,600 and $363,300 for the three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Realized loss on short-term investments was
approximately $336,900 and $86,200 for the three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Unrealized gain on short-term
investments was approximately $86,700 and $3,900 for the three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Income
Taxes
The
Company did not provide for income taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, since there was a loss and a full valuation
allowance against all deferred tax assets.
Net
Loss
The net loss for the Company for the three months
ended September 30, 2021 and 2020 was approximately $42,606,200 and $16,902,500 respectively. The Company had loss per share, basic and
diluted of $2.44 and $1.05 for the three months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
For
the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021 versus September 30, 2020
Nine Months
Ended
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2021
September 30,
2020
Increase
(Decrease)
Operating Expenses
Research and development
$ 65,347,708
$ 21,068,923
$ 44,278,785
General and administrative
26,173,010
18,846,299
7,326,711
Total
$ 91,520,718
$ 39,915,222
$ 51,605,496
Research and Development Expense
Research and development expense for the nine months
ended September 30, 2021 was approximately $65,347,700 compared to $21,068,900 for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, an increase
of approximately $44,278,800. The increase was primarily driven by:
●
Upfront payment to Arbormentis, LLC for $12,741,600 consisting of a
cash and warrants;
●
Increase in study costs of $26,449,100 associated with the execution
of our four Phase 3 trials;
●
Increase in manufacturing and drug storage costs of $904,600;
● Decrease
in compensation expense of $418,600 due to lower employee-related costs;
● Decrease in stock-based compensation expense of $535,200; and
●
Increase in other research expenses of $5,137,300 primarily associated with the addition of consultants contracted to assist in the execution of our Phase 3 trials.
General
and Administrative Expe nse
General and administrative expense for the nine
months ended September 30, 2021 was approximately $26,173,000 compared to $18,846,300 for the nine months ended September 30, 2020, an
increase of approximately $7,326,700. The increase was primarily due to:
● Increase
in compensation expense of $430,000 related to the hiring of two additional employees;
● Increase
in stock-based compensation expense of $5,082,300 primarily related to options granted to
employees, as well as the hiring of two additional employees; and
●
Increase in other general and administrative expenses of $1,814,400 primarily due to an increase in consulting services.
23
Other
Income (Expense)
Interest / investment income was approximately
$1,040,400 and $1,175,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Realized loss on short-term investments
was approximately $513,300 and $245,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Unrealized (loss)/gain on
short-term investments was approximately $(379,700) and $291,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Income
Taxes
The
Company did not provide for income taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, since there was a loss and a full valuation
allowance against all deferred tax assets.
Net
Loss
The net loss for the Company for the nine months
ended September 30, 2021 and 2020 was approximately $91,373,300 and $38,694,300 respectively. The Company had loss per share, basic and
diluted of $5.36 and $2.52 for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
Liquidity
As shown in the accompanying financial statements,
the Company incurred negative operating cash flows of $54,213,231 for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and has an accumulated
deficit of $270,688,619 from inception through September 30, 2021. At September 30, 2021 the Company had cash and short term investments
of $88,087,096.
Relmada has funded its past operations through equity raises and most
recently in 2021 raised net proceeds from the sale of common stock of $23,416,036 through our ATM offering, and $2,116,969 through the
exercise of warrants. The Company also raised an additional $569,427 during the nine months ended September 30, 2021 from the exercises
of options.
Management believes that it has sufficient funding
to continue ongoing operations for at least 12 months from the issuance of the accompanying condensed consolidated quarterly financial
statements.
The
following table sets forth selected cash flow information for the periods indicated below:
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2021
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2020
Cash used in operating activities
$ (54,213,231 )
$ (20,880,039 )
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities
37,064,696
(35,382,926 )
Cash provided by financing activities
26,102,432
27,529,174
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
$ 8,953,897
(28,733,791 )
For the nine months ended September 30, 2021, cash used in operating activities
was $54,213,231 primarily due to the net loss of $91,373,316, prepaid expense of $1,812,288, offset by non-cash stock compensation charges
of $32,375,229, realized and unrealized losses on investments of $893,027, an increase in accounts payable of $4,362,071, and an increase
in accrued expenses of $1,281,821.
24
For the nine months ended September 30, 2020, cash used in operating activities
was $20,880,039 primarily due to the net loss of $38,694,264, an unrealized gain of $290,973, an increase in prepaid expense of $1,825,336,
offset by non-cash stock compensation charges of $17,586,533, a realized loss of $244,972, an increase in accounts payable of $205,970,
and an increase in accrued expenses of $1,835,888.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2021,
cash provided by investing activities was $37,064,696 related to the net purchase of short-term investments.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2020,
cash used in investing activities was $35,382,926 related to the net purchase of short-term investments.
Net cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended
September 30, 2021 was $26,102,432 due to sales of common stock of $23,416,036, proceeds from warrants exercised for common stock of $2,116,969,
and proceeds from options exercised for common stock of $569,427.
Net
cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2020 was $27,529,174 due to sales of common stock of $19,816,597,
proceeds from warrants exercised for common stock of $7,186,306, and proceeds from options exercised for common stock of $636,518, partially
offset by payments of notes payable of $110,247.
Effects
of Inflation
Our
assets are primarily monetary, consisting of cash and cash equivalents. Because of their liquidity, these assets are not directly affected
by inflation. Because we intend to retain and continue to use our equipment, we believe that the incremental inflation related to replacement
costs of such items will not materially affect our operations. However, the rate of inflation affects our expenses, such as those for
employee compensation and contract services, which could increase our level of expenses and the rate at which we use our resources.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
As
part of our ongoing business, we do not participate in transactions that generate relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial
partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities (SPEs), which would have been established
for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually limited purposes. As of September 30, 2021 and
December 31, 2020, we were not involved in any SPE transactions.
Commitments
and Contingencies
Please
refer to Note 10 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020 under the heading Commitments and Contingencies.
To our knowledge there have been no material changes to the risk factors that were previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we
currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
A
critical accounting policy is one that is both important to the portrayal of a company’s financial condition and results of operations
and requires management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about
the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.
Our
unaudited consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and all applicable U.S. GAAP accounting standards
effective as of September 30, 2021 have been taken into consideration in preparing the unaudited consolidated financial statements. The
preparation of unaudited consolidated financial statements requires estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, expenses and related disclosures. Some of those estimates are subjective and complex, and, consequently, actual results
could differ from those estimates. The following accounting policies and estimates have been highlighted as significant because changes
to certain judgments and assumptions inherent in these policies could affect our consolidated financial statements:
●
Valuation of research and development expenses, and
●
Valuation of stock-based compensation expenses
We
base our estimates, to the extent possible, on historical experience. Historical information is modified as appropriate based on current
business factors and various assumptions that we believe are necessary to form a basis for making judgments about the carrying value
of assets and liabilities. We evaluate our estimates on an on-going basis and make changes when necessary. Actual results could differ
from our estimates.
25
ITEM 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
There
have been no material changes to our exposures to market risks as disclosed under the heading “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
About Market Risks” in the annual MD&A contained in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Text extracted from the filing as submitted to EDGAR. Formatting, tables and exhibits are simplified for reading; the original document is authoritative for anything you rely on.