Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Item
1. Legal Proceedings.
From
time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of business. However,
litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may
harm our business.
On
August 7, 2018, we commenced an action against North Empire LLC, or North Empire, in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County
of New York for breach of a Securities Purchase Agreement or Agreement in which we are seeking damages in an amount to be determined
at trial, but in no event less than $616,000. On August 2, 2018, North Empire filed a Summons with Notice against us, also in the same
Court, in which they allege damages in an amount of $11.4 million arising from an alleged breach of the Agreement. On September 6, 2018,
North Empire filed a Notice of Discontinuance of the action it had filed on August 2, 2018. On September 27, 2018, North Empire filed
an answer and asserted counterclaims in the action commenced by us against them, alleging that we failed to deliver stock certificates
to North Empire causing damage to North Empire in the amount of $10,958,589. North Empire also filed a third-party complaint against
our CEO and now former Chairman of the Board asserting similar claims against them in their individual capacities. On October 17, 2018,
we filed a reply to North Empire’s counterclaims. On November 15, 2018, our CEO and now former Chairman of the Board filed a motion
to dismiss North Empire’s third-party complaint. On January 6, 2020, the Court granted the motion and dismissed the third-party
complaint. Discovery has been completed and both parties have filed motions for summary judgment in connection with the claims and counterclaims.
On
July 5, 2021, we were served with a legal complaint filed by Fidelity Venture Capital Ltd. and Dror Atzmon in the Magistrate’s
Court in Tel Aviv for a monetary award in an amount of NIS 1,436,679 and declaratory relief. The plaintiffs allege that we breached
our contractual obligations to pay them for services allegedly rendered to us by the plaintiffs under a certain consulting
agreement in an amount of NIS 819,000. Additionally, the plaintiffs allege that we should compensate them for losses allegedly
incurred by them following their investment in our shares issued under a certain private offering. In the alternative, the plaintiffs
move that the court will declare the investment agreement void with full restitution of plaintiffs’ original investment in an amount
of NIS 1,329,650. We filed our statement of defense
on October 25, 2021. The first preliminary court hearing of the case is scheduled for Janua1y 23 2022. At this preliminary
stage, before any fact finding and pre-trial procedures (including disclosure of documents) have been conducted, we cannot evaluate
the chances of the claim to succeed.
On September 22, 2021,
Custodian Ventures, LLC, or Custodian, commenced an action in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware
captioned, Custodian Ventures, LLC v. Mysize, Inc., C.A. No. 2021-0817-LWW , or the Delaware Action. In the Delaware
Action, Custodian sought an order from the Court of Chancery pursuant to Section 211 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware compelling us to hold an annual meeting. On November 4, 2021, we entered into a settlement agreement, or the Settlement
Agreement, with Custodian, Activist Investing LLC, David Aboudi, Partick Loney and David Natan, collectively, the Lazar Parties, settling
and dismissing the Delaware Action.
On October 19, 2021, we commenced
an action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York captioned My Size, Inc. v. David Lazar, Custodian
Ventures LLC, Activist Investing LLC, Milton C. Ault III, Ault Alpha LP, Ault Alpha GP LLC, Ault Capital Management LLC, Ault & Company
Inc., David Aboudi, Patrick Loney and David Nathan, Civil Action No, 1:21-cv-08585, pursuant to Sections 13(d) and 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and certain rules promulgated thereunder, or the SDNY Action. The complaint sought, among other things, declaratory
and injunctive relief related to defendants’ efforts to nominate a slate of directors for election at our next annual meeting of.
The complaint alleged that the defendants formed an undisclosed “group” for purposes of Section 13(d) and has misrepresented
its true purpose in purchasing My Size, Inc. stock in filings made with the SEC. In addition, the complaint alleged that the defendants
engaged in an unlawful solicitation of investors in violation of the Exchange Act proxy rules in connection with their efforts to elect
a slate of directors to our board of directors. On October 20, 2021, the Court signed an order granting a hearing on an anticipated motion
for a preliminary injunction and expedited scheduling and discovery in aid thereof, and scheduled that hearing for December 2, 2021.
On November 4, 2021, we entered into the Settlement Agreement with the Lazar Parties settling and dismissing the claims asserted in the
SDNY Action and the Delaware Action against one another. On November 8, 2021, the remaining defendants in the SDNY Action filed and answer
and counterclaim asserting a claim against us pursuant to New York Civil Rights Law Section 70-a, also known as New York’s anti-SLAPP
statute.
Item
1A. Risk Factors.
Not required for a smaller
reporting company.
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
None.
Item
3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item
4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not
applicable.
Text extracted from the filing as submitted to EDGAR. Formatting, tables and exhibits are simplified for reading; the original document is authoritative for anything you rely on.