Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Asset/Liability Management of Interest Rate Risk
A fundamental risk in banking is exposure to market risk, specifically interest rate risk, since a bank’s earnings are largely dependent on net interest income. The Bank’s ALCO formulates and monitors the management of interest rate risk through policies and guidelines established by it and overseen by the Audit Committee and the full Board of Directors and through review of detailed reports discussed quarterly. In its consideration of risk limits, the ALCO considers the impact on earnings and capital, the level and direction of interest rates, liquidity, local economic conditions, outside threats and other factors. Banking is generally a business of managing the maturity and repricing mismatch inherent in its asset and liability cash flows to provide stable net interest income growth consistent with the Company’s profit objectives.
During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company's net interest margin remained relatively flat at 2.37% when compared to the same period in 2024 and continues to manage its overall interest rate risk position.
The Company, through its ALCO and ongoing financial management practices, monitors the interest rate environment in which it operates and adjusts the rates and maturities of its assets and liabilities to remain competitive and to achieve its overall financial objectives subject to established risk limits.
Eagle Bancorp, Inc 2025 Form 10-K
71
Table of Contents
Management's Discussion and Analysis | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
During 2025, the U.S. Treasury yield curve steepened from the 2 year and 10 year points, while remaining inverted in very short tenors less than a year. As compared to the year 2024, the average two year U.S. Treasury rate in 2025 decreased by 56 basis points from 4.37% to 3.81%. The average five year U.S. Treasury rate decreased by 21 basis points from 4.13% to 3.92% while the average ten year U.S. Treasury rate increased by 8 basis points from 4.21% to 4.29%. The Company’s cost of interest bearing deposits decreased by 47 basis points across its interest-bearing deposits, which comprise 84% of its total deposits, as of December 31, 2025.
The loan portfolio decreased 8.2% during the twelve months ended 2025. The re-pricing duration on the loan portfolio was 9 months as of December 31, 2025 and 11 months as of December 31, 2024, with fixed-rate loans amounting to 33.4% and 38.1% of total loans as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Variable and adjustable rate loans comprised 66.6% and 61.9% of total loans as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Variable rate loans are generally indexed to the Secured Overnight Funding Rate ("SOFR") or the Wall Street Journal prime interest rate, while adjustable rate loans are indexed primarily to the five year U.S. Treasury interest rate.
As of December 31, 2025, the amortized cost basis, net of allowance, of the investment portfolio decreased by $437.7 million, or 18.6%, as compared to the balance as of December 31, 2024. The table below presents the percentage mix of securities in the investment portfolio.
As of
December 31, 2025
December 31, 2024
Mortgage-backed securities
69% 62%
U.S. agency securities
18% 25%
Municipal bonds 6% 6%
Corporate bonds 7% 6%
U.S. treasury bonds —% 1%
Total 100% 100%
Duration of the investment portfolio (in years) 3.8 4.2
In the current and expected future interest rate environment, the Company has been maintaining its investment portfolio to manage the balance between yield and risk in its portfolio of MBS. Further, the Company has been principally collecting cash flows from the investment portfolio to reduce brokered deposits. As of December 31, 2025, the amortized cost less allowance of the investment portfolio decreased by $437.7 million, or 18.6%, as compared to the balance as of December 31, 2024.
The duration of the deposit portfolio increased to 22 months as of December 31, 2025 from 11 months as of December 31, 2024. This increase was attributable to a shift in deposit mix, an increase in time deposits and modeling assumption updates. The Company experienced a total deposit increase of $2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to a total loan decrease of $654.4 million for the same period. Refer to the "Deposits and Other Borrowings" section above for further discussion of deposits and borrowings.
The net unrealized loss before income tax on the AFS securities portfolio was $78.4 million and $141.5 million as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. As of December 31, 2025, the net unrealized loss position represented 7.4% of the investment portfolio's book value.
Management relies on the use of models in order to measure the expected future impact on interest income of various interest rate environments, as described below. Through its modeling, the Company makes certain estimates that may vary from actual results. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully achieve its optimal asset liability mix, given competitive pressures, customer preferences and the inability to forecast future interest rates and movements with complete accuracy.
In 2025, the Federal Reserve instituted 75 basis points of interest rate cuts. Yields on interest-earning assets and interest-bearing deposits decreased as a result of the Federal Reserve rate cuts. Refer to the MD&A section "Net Interest Income and Net Interest Margin" for a detailed discussion on net interest income and yields on interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.
Eagle Bancorp, Inc 2025 Form 10-K
72
Table of Contents
Management's Discussion and Analysis | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
A portion of the of the Company's variable and adjustable rate loans may contain interest rate floors and may provide asset yield protection in a low-interest rate environment; however, they are also expected to delay the impact of increases to market rates on interest income until such floors have been exceeded. In the year ended December 31, 2025, interest rate floors have not been relevant in the current interest rate environment since most variable rate loans are well above their floor rate. The weighted average rate of the Company's variable rate loans had a decrease of approximately 56 basis poin ts from December 31, 2024 to December 31, 2025.
As of December 31, 2025, the Company had a portfolio of $2.5 billion of variable and adjustable rate loans that were subject to interest rate floors with a weighted average rate of 6.66%, which was a 58 basis points decrease from December 31, 2024. As of December 31, 2025, $300.2 million or 4.12% of loans held by the Company were earning interest at their floor rate, as compared to $123.6 million or 1.56% as of December 31, 2024.
The Company employs a net interest income simulation model on a monthly basis to monitor its interest rate sensitivity and risk and to model its balance sheet cash flows and the effects in different interest rate scenarios. The model utilizes current balance sheet data and attributes and is adjusted for assumptions as to investment maturities including prepayments, loan prepayments, interest rates, and deposit decay rates. The data is then subjected to a "shock test" which assumes a simultaneous change in interest rates up and down 100, 200, 300 and 400 basis points, along the entire yield curve, but not below zero. The results are analyzed as to the impact on net interest income over the next twelve and twenty-four month periods and the economic value of equity. Further discussion of the limitations of this analysis are listed below and in Item 1A. Risk Factors, and in other periodic and current reports filed by the Company with the SEC.
Our rate risk modeling showed minimal net interest margin expansion in an increased interest rate environment while showing moderate net interest margin compression in a declining interest rate environment. The model's prediction in a rising rate environment is the result of increases in both interest income on variable and adjustable rate loans and interest expense on its deposit liabilities, based on our funding needs, market conditions and certain contractual obligations but with no changes in the mix of assets or liabilities or the spreads we are able to earn. The opposite is true in a falling interest rate environment as decreases in both interest income on variable and adjustable rate loans and interest expense on deposit liabilities drive modest margin compression. The model also assumes a stable interest rate environment after the programmed changes in the yields, which assumes repricing of assets and liabilities as scheduled in a stable environment, which may be quite different than real world conditions.
For the analysis presented below, as of December 31, 2025, the change in interest rates on interest-bearing deposits was less than the change in market interest rates with a floor of 0 basis points. The Bank also has deposits with contractual rate terms that mean these deposits will change 100 basis points for every 100 basis points change in market rates. Thus, the overall measure of the correlation between all deposit costs and market rate changes is less than 100%. The Company previously utilized the assumption for its analysis as of December 31, 2024 that all deposit rates changed 100 basis point for a 100 basis point change in market rates.
Because competitive market behavior does not necessarily track the trend of interest rates but at times moves ahead of financial market influences, the change in the cost of liabilities may be different than anticipated by the interest rate risk model. If this were to occur, the effects of a rising or declining interest rate environment may not be in accordance with management’s expectations.
As quantified in the table below, the Company’s analysis as of December 31, 2025 shows the effect on net interest income over the next 12 months, as well as the effect on the economic value of equity when interest rates are shocked up and down 100, 200, 300 and 400 basis points. As of December 31, 2025, the repricing duration of (a) the investment portfolio was 3.8 years, (b) the loan portfolio 0.8 years, (c) the interest-bearing deposit portfolio was 1.2 years, and (d) the borrowed funds portfolio was 3.1 years.
Eagle Bancorp, Inc 2025 Form 10-K
73
Table of Contents
Management's Discussion and Analysis | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The table below displays the result of the simulation analysis on the asset and liability balances.
As of December 31, 2025
Net Interest Income
Economic Value of Equity
Change in interest
rates (basis points) Percentage change in 12-month
Policy limits
Percentage change in 12-month
Policy limits
+400 1.7% (25)% 4.1% (32)%
+300 1.1% (20)% 3.1% (25)%
+200 0.6% (15)% 2.1% (20)%
+100 0.2% (8)% 1.1% (10)%
— — — — —
(100) (2.4)% (8)% (1.9)% (10)%
(200) (5.6)% (15)% (4.2)% (20)%
(300) (9.0)% (20)% (7.7)% (25)%
(400) (10.4)% (25)% (15.3)% (32)%
The decrease in 12-month net interest income of 2.4% given a 100 basis point decrease in market interest rates as of December 31, 2025 compared to a increase of 0.9% for the same period in 2024. In contrast to 2024, primarily due to modeling enhancements and balance sheet composition changes, our analysis shows that we will experience an increase in our economic value of equity and in net interest income with an increase in interest rates. The changes in net interest income and the economic value of equity in higher, and lower, interest rate shock scenarios as of December 31, 2025 are not believed to be excessive and are within policy limits.
As part of the Company’s ongoing enhancement of the simulation analysis, the Company has been making updates to its model to incorporate, among other things, improvements to certain assumptions, as well as assumptions related to deposits. The difference in the results of the simulation analysis between the fourth quarter of 2025 and the third quarter of 2025 is attributable to these model updates.
Certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the foregoing table. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or repricing periods, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Also, the interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in market rates. Additionally, certain assets, such as adjustable-rate mortgage loans, have features that limit changes in interest rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the loan. Further, in the event of a change in interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels could deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the tables. Finally, the ability of many borrowers to service their debt may decrease in the event of a significant interest rate increase.
While an instantaneous parallel shift in interest rates was used in this analysis to provide an estimate of exposure under these scenarios, we believe that a non-immediate parallel shifts in interest rates would have a more modest impact. Further, the earnings simulation model does not take into account factors such as future balance sheet growth, changes in product mix, changes in yield curve relationships, the various rate indexes do not move in parallel (e.g., SOFR, Fed Funds), hedging activities we might take and changing product spreads that could mitigate or exacerbate any potential beneficial or adverse impact of changes in interest rates.
Another key factor to consider is the behavior of our deposit portfolio. The projected impact on net interest income in the table above assumes no change in deposit portfolio size or mix from the baseline forecast in alternative rate environments. In higher rate scenarios, any customer activity resulting in the replacement of low-cost or noninterest-bearing deposits with higher cost deposits or market-based funding would reduce the assumed benefit of those deposits. The projected impact on net interest income in the table above also assumes a static non-maturity deposit beta which may not be an accurate predictor of actual deposit rate changes realized in scenarios of smaller and/or non-parallel interest rate movements.
Eagle Bancorp, Inc 2025 Form 10-K
74
Table of Contents
Management's Discussion and Analysis | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Each of the above analyses may not, on its own, be an accurate indicator of how our net interest income or economic value of equity will be affected by current and future changes in interest rates. Income associated with interest-earning assets and costs associated with interest-bearing liabilities may not be affected uniformly by changes in interest rates. In addition, the magnitude and duration of changes in interest rates may have a significant impact on net interest income. In addition, certain assets, such as adjustable-rate mortgage loans, have features (generally referred to as interest rate caps and floors) that limit changes in interest rates. Prepayment and early withdrawal levels also could deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the maturity of certain instruments. ALCO reviews each of the above interest rate sensitivity analyses along with several different interest rate scenarios as part of its responsibility to provide a satisfactory, consistent level of profitability within the framework of established liquidity, loan, investment, borrowing and capital policies.
Interest Rate and Balance Sheet Risk Management
Management actively monitors the Company’s exposure to interest rate risk arising from the composition and duration profile of its balance sheet. Our objective is to maintain a stable and predictable earnings and capital profile by mitigating the impact of interest‑rate volatility on both net interest income and the economic value of equity. Consistent with this objective, the Company employs a macro balance sheet hedging program designed to manage interest rate risk at the portfolio level rather than through instrument‑specific hedges.
In 2025, the Company reinitiated the use of derivative instruments to hedge macro interest rate risk. This decision reflects management’s reassessment of the Company’s asset‑liability profile. Management determined that reestablishing a macro hedging program was prudent to mitigate potential variability in earnings and capital arising from interest‑rate movements.
Hedging Strategy and Risk Management Framework
Our macro hedging approach incorporates derivatives — primarily interest rate swaps — to align the interest‑rate sensitivity of assets and liabilities with the Company’s risk appetite. Macro hedging enables management to address exposures that evolve dynamically as new assets and liabilities are originated and existing positions mature, consistent with regulatory expectations that hedging strategies reflect material trends and uncertainties affecting future performance.
Under U.S. GAAP, the Company applies the hedge accounting framework under ASC 815, as amended by ASU 2017‑12, which expands the range of permissible hedging strategies and enhances the alignment between accounting outcomes and risk management activities. The Company designates qualifying hedges where appropriate and evaluates hedge effectiveness in accordance with ASC 815’s criteria. Refer to "Note 8 – Derivatives and Hedging Activities" to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion on the Company's derivative instruments and hedging activities.
Eagle Bancorp, Inc 2025 Form 10-K
75
Table of Contents
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Text extracted from the filing as submitted to EDGAR. Formatting, tables and exhibits are simplified for reading; the original document is authoritative for anything you rely on.