What changed in this filing

/stocks — the workspaceLOADING

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

2003-11-14 compared with 2003-08-14 · 32 added, 20 removed, 13 unchanged (80% of the section changed)

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Earthlink lawsuit as previously reported in the Company's Form 10K for the

year ended March 31, 2003 has been settled.

On May 19, 2003, the parties reached

a settlement and signed a settlement and mutual general release agreement, in

which Earthlink agreed to pay to

WizShop a total sum of $210,000.

We are also a party to other legal proceedings in the normal course of business.

Based on evaluation of these matters and discussions with counsel, we believe

that any potential liabilities arising from these matters will not have a

material adverse effect on our consolidated results of operations or financial

The Company is not a party to any legal proceedings.

CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

1 unchanged sentence

Act of 1933, as amended, as follows:

During the Quarter ended June 30, 2003, the Company did not issue any shares of

its common stock to suppliers of services to the Company.

However, the Company

did issue 187,500 shares of common stock to Kathleen Wold on May 21, 2003

pursuant to an Amendment to the Agreement of Merger between Semotus, Acquisition

Wireless, Inc., Cross Communications and Kathleen Wold in which the share price

guarantee provision of the Merger Agreement was accelerated, and each party was

released of any and all other remaining obligations.

On May 1, 2003, Brown Simpson exercised 846,154 warrants by remitting $8,461.54

to Semotus, and Brown Simpson was issued 846,154 shares of common stock.

During the Quarter ended September 30, 2003, the Company issued 89,282 shares of

common stock to two third-party vendors in order to settle certain outstanding

With respect to these transactions, the Company relied on Section 4(2) of the

7 unchanged sentences

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

We held our Annual Meeting of Stockholders on September 25, 2003, for the

purpose of (1) electing four directors, and (2) ratifying the appointment of

Burr, Pilger & Mayer LLP as the Company's independent accountants for the fiscal

year ending March 31, 2004.

The following summarizes the voting results:

Stockholders elected Anthony N.

LaPine, Robert Lanz, Mark Williams and

Laurence Murray each until the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until

their successors have been duly elected and qualified.

The vote for each

director was as follows:

------------------------------------ ---------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------

DIRECTORS VOTES FOR % OF SHARES VOTED VOTES WITHHELD

------------------------------------ ---------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------

LaPine 16,818,857 99.3% 117,129

------------------------------------ ---------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------

Robert Lanz 16,801,907 99.2% 134,079

------------------------------------ ---------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------

Mark Williams 16,801,867 99.2% 134,119

------------------------------------ ---------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------

Laurence Murray 16,791,472 99.1% 144,514

------------------------------------ ---------------------- ------------------------ ------------------------

The appointment of Burr, Pilger & Mayer LLP as the Company's

independent accountants for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2004 was approved.

------------------------ ---------------------------------------- ------------------ ------------------------

VOTES FOR % OF SHARES VOTED VOTES AGAINST VOTES ABSTAINED

------------------------ ---------------------------------------- ------------------ ------------------------

16,854,040 99.5% 29,529 52,417

------------------------ ---------------------------------------- ------------------ ------------------------

Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.

What changed 10-Q

Item 1. Legal Proceedings