Item 1. Business
Item
1. Business.
Our
Company
DocGo
is redefining on-demand access to healthcare. We deliver high-quality, cost-effective healthcare mobility solutions and are
unlocking further promise and potential of telehealth treatment through our “last-mile” care capabilities. We do so
by leveraging our proprietary technology platform powered by artificial intelligence (“AI”), and our network of healthcare
professionals spanning more than 26 states and the United Kingdom. We often provide our services in collaboration with leading
healthcare organizations, via long-term relationships that drive meaningful revenue, ensure efficient and effective capital
allocation, and create low-risk opportunities for significant growth.
Our
mission is to transform medical transportation and mobile healthcare, outside the traditional “brick-and-mortar” facilities,
with more accessible, affordable, and efficient patient-centered care. Since our founding in 2015, through more than 6.2 million
patient interactions, we have created an unmatched medical transportation network that can provide better care outside of the physical
walls of the healthcare system. We began by developing a state-of-the-art, intuitive platform to drive greater efficiency and improved
access to patient care. Our innovative technology can change the way healthcare facilities manage patient transportation, and eliminate
many of the common obstacles faced when scheduling service, ultimately freeing medical professionals to focus more time and their valuable
resources on what they do best — providing patient care. Additionally, in certain markets, our Mobile Health in-person care
model facilitates medical treatment directly to patients in the comfort of their homes, workplaces, and other non-traditional locations.
Working under the guidance of prescribing physicians, our network (which includes both company employees and agency staff) of more than
4,000 medical clinicians including Emergency Medical Technicians (“EMTs”), paramedics, licensed practical nurses (“LPNs”),
registered nurses (“RNs”)and support staff, provides a wide range of tests, procedures and interventions that, until now,
required a visit to a traditional healthcare setting.
Our
Segments
Transportation
Services
DocGo’s
on-demand medical mobility solutions are offered under the Ambulnz brand. We enable reliable, efficient access to local clinical
services, including primary and specialty care, dialysis treatments for chronic care management, and transfers between clinical
settings. Every vehicle in our fleet is equipped with our proprietary technology platform, which is integrated with some of the
nation’s largest electronic medical record (“EMR”) systems.
1
This
integration enables seamless transfer of electronic patient information and discharge data to our healthcare provider customers, which
improves order speed and accuracy, and helps eliminate a myriad of manual processes. Consequently, our healthcare facility customers are
better able to order, track and manage transportation requests and patient movement, thereby improving utilization of resources and cost.
Our Ambulnz ShareLink technology provides our healthcare partners and patients with real-time vehicle locations and accurate ETAs,
delivering valuable peace of mind. As of December 31, 2021, we had 294 ambulances in service throughout the United States,
and 32 in the United Kingdom. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, we generated approximately 26.4% of our revenues
from our mobility solutions delivered by this segment.
Mobile
Health Solutions
The
traditional healthcare model requires patients to interact with many levels of healthcare providers — including
receptionists, nurses, lab technicians and physicians — for even the most routine tests, procedures and interventions.
We recognized that a number of these services could easily be performed by EMTs or paramedics under the guidance of physicians,
but in the comfort of a patient’s home or workplace. Our patient-centered approach helps limit the need for individuals
to seek routine treatment in more expensive and environmentally exposed, less comfortable settings such as emergency departments
and urgent care clinics. In addition to providing greater convenience to patients, our Mobile Health solutions help
reduce unnecessary burdens on healthcare systems, by freeing up their finite, in-person resources to address more urgent
and critical patient needs. DocGo’s Mobile Health on-demand telehealth clinical services, which we expanded into the
home and workplace in 2020, facilitate medical care via a turnkey suite of integrated, “last-mile” solutions. We offer
a range of services, including on-site evaluation, diagnostics, triage, and treatment as detailed in the following table:
As
adoption of telehealth continues to climb, we believe our virtual care-enabling solutions are poised for significant growth, by delivering
in-person patient care previously inaccessible outside of the more traditional healthcare settings. We partner with leading national
health systems, insurance carriers, private organizations and employers, state and local governments and managed care organizations, to
provide our Mobile Health solutions, including NYC Health + Hospitals, Mount Sinai Health System and Carnival Corporation. For the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2021, we generated approximately 73.6% of our revenues from the solutions provided by our Mobile Health
segment.
2
Merger
with Motion Acquisition Corp.
On
November 5, 2021 (the “Closing Date”), DocGo Inc., a Delaware corporation (formerly known as Motion Acquisition
Corp. “Motion”) (prior to the Closing Date, “Motion” and after the Closing Date, “DocGo”,
) consummated the previously announced business combination (the “Closing”) pursuant to that certain Agreement
and Plan of Merger dated March 8, 2021 (the “Merger Agreement”), by and among Motion Acquisition Corp., a
Delaware corporation (“Motion”), Motion Merger Sub Corp., a Delaware corporation and a direct wholly owned
subsidiary of Motion (“Merger Sub”), and Ambulnz, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Ambulnz”). In
connection with the Closing, the registrant changed its name from Motion Acquisition Corp. to DocGo Inc. As contemplated by
the Merger Agreement and as described in Motion’s definitive proxy statement/consent solicitation/prospectus filed with
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on October 14, 2021 (the “Prospectus”),
Merger Sub was merged with and into Ambulnz, with Ambulnz continuing as the surviving corporation (the “Merger”
and, together with the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, the “Business Combination”). As a
result of the Merger, Ambulnz is a wholly-owned subsidiary of DocGo and each share of Series A preferred stock of Ambulnz, no
par value (“Ambulnz Preferred Stock”), Class A common stock of Ambulnz, no par value (“Ambulnz Class A
Common Stock”), and Class B common stock of Ambulnz, no par value (“Ambulnz Class B Common Stock”, together
with Ambulnz Class A Common Stock, “Ambulnz Common Stock”) was cancelled and converted into the right to receive
a portion of merger consideration issuable as common stock of DocGo, par value $0.0001 (“Common Stock”), pursuant
to the terms and conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement.
In
connection with the Business Combination, the Company raised $158.0 million, net of transaction costs of $20.0 million. This amount was
comprised of $43.4 million of cash held in Motion’s trust account from its initial public offering, net of DocGo’s transaction
costs and underwriters’ fees of $9.6 million, and $114.6 million of cash in connection with the PIPE Financing, net of $10.4 million
in transaction costs. These transaction costs consisted of banking, legal, and other professional fees which were recorded as a reduction
to additional paid-in capital.
Human
Capital Resources
We
strive to hire the best talent across our industry, with a focus on inspiring performance. As of December 31, 2021, we had over 2,900
employees, including revenue-generating healthcare professionals, field management personnel and corporate support staff, as represented
in the table below. Healthcare professionals consist of EMTs, paramedics, LPNs, RNs, clinicians and related support staff; field management
personnel includes supervisors and managers; and corporate support staff includes software development, billing, finance, sales, marketing,
and executives.
Full-time
Part-time
Total
Healthcare Professionals
1295
1205
2500
Field Management
169
9
178
Corporate Support
242
4
246
Total
1706
1218
2924
None
of our employees is represented by a labor union or subject to any collective bargaining agreement. In addition to the employees
above, as of December 31, 2021, the Company engaged the services of approximately 2,100 people, primarily in the healthcare professional
area, through a variety of subcontracted labor agencies.
Recruiting
We
consider our employees to be our most valuable assets. Our employee experience begins with identifying and attracting people who
embody our core values and share our vision to provide high-quality patient care. We are committed to building a company that
our employees are proud to be a part of, and fostering an environment in which our employees can grow, evolve and discover their
existing and untapped potential. We believe our focused approach to recruiting and developing talent allows us to attract strong
candidates to continue growing and scaling our business.
3
Compensation
and Benefits
Ongoing
evolution in the healthcare system and an aging population mean EMTs, paramedics and nurses are more critical to medical care
than ever before, yet EMTs and paramedics remain the lowest paid professionals in the chain of care. Most companies in the industry
pay an hourly wage only, and offer no benefits, often resulting in low employee morale, high turnover, and ultimately a less efficient
business. We take pride in our high-quality medical professionals, and have created an attractive compensation model that demonstrates
their vital importance to our business, and motivates them to deliver exceptional care.
We
offer a pay package which we believe is innovative within our industry and elevates our employee compensation levels above national
averages and those of our peers. In addition to base hourly wages, DocGo also offers employees bonuses based on certain performance
metrics, medical insurance, paid time off, and an equity incentive plan for our frontline clinicians — an industry
leading program that provides the opportunity to acquire an ownership stake in our company. We believe that this approach makes
us a more attractive employer and supports a strong pipeline of top-tier talent across all levels of our company.
Training
We
have also created a number of programs to foster the professional development of our employees and to continue to attract top-tier
talent. To help our staff continue to build clinical skills, we created a Medical Mentorship Program whereby EMTs and paramedics
can learn advanced medical techniques including phlebotomy, mobile ultrasound, EKG training, Point of Care testing, vaccine administration,
and wound care. Once certified, our employees can put these newly acquired skills to use while providing our Mobile Health services.
Our
staff of ten training coordinators runs a robust, in-person onboarding program to ensure that employees are trained and up to
date in relevant procedures and protocols. We are an official American Heart Association Training Site, and offer all of our employees
in-house basic life support (BLS), advanced cardiovascular life support (ACLS), and pediatric advanced life support (PALS)
training and certification.
We
have also implemented a virtual training program for company policy and procedures training, mandated OSHA training courses, hazardous
materials awareness, FEMA Incident Command Systems training (100, 200, 700, 800), clinical skills, customer service, diversity,
HIPAA regulations, safety and compliance, on-site traffic control, and annual documentation training.
Our
drivers are additionally trained in emergency vehicle operator course (EVOC) and Coaching the Emergency Vehicle Operator (CEVO)
4 driver training, vehicle maintenance incident reporting, transport risk assessment, critical care transport orientation, and
fatigue abatement. Our system is utilized for credential tracking and Continuous Quality Improvement, so that our staff maintains
all required credentials relevant to their positions with our company.
With
constant reporting, employees and their supervisors are automatically notified at designated times of recertification deadlines.
Course completion, assignments, and other compliance requirements are tracked in this system as well. Verification monitoring
ensures that all employees meet current state requirements. This tool verifies Office of Inspector General (“OIG”)
of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) exclusions at the state and federal levels, and performs
sanction screening for licensed personnel and 24/7 monitoring of state board licenses.
Our
comprehensive training programs utilize a full range of resources, including print materials, training modules, webinars, seminars,
and videos provided by the CDC, and federal, state, and local entities, medical institutions, and public health agencies.
In
December 2021, we announced the launch of DocGo Academy and DocGo EMS Academy, two full-service programs dedicated to recruiting
and training clinicians, EMS workers and other healthcare professionals. Combining classroom education with practical hands-on
learning, the programs are designed to help existing healthcare professionals advance their careers and provide aspiring entry-level
workers with the opportunity to enter the healthcare industry. DocGo Academy focuses on uptraining clinicians, while DocGo EMS
Academy is tailored to EMS workers, from EMTs to paramedics. The comprehensive training programs are available in select states,
with plans for national expansion in the coming months. Tuition is free for students who continue their employment with DocGo,
which we anticipate will assist us in our recruiting efforts.
4
Competition
The
U.S. healthcare industry is highly competitive, and we compete with a broad and diverse set of companies spanning both of
our businesses. The competitive landscape is highly fragmented for both medical mobility services and “last-mile”
healthcare solutions, ranging in each case from small, locally owned and operated providers to large national organizations. While
we do not believe that any single competitor offers our full suite of mobility solutions and “last-mile” healthcare
services, numerous companies offer components of medical mobility transportation and/or telehealth services that compete with
our solutions.
Competition
in the medical transportation industry is based primarily on the ability to improve customer service, such as on-time performance
and efficient call intake; to provide comprehensive clinical care; and to recruit, train and motivate employees, particularly
ambulance crews who have direct contact with patients and healthcare personnel. Pricing, billing and reimbursement expertise are
also critical. Competitors within the industry vary considerably in type and identify by market, with our primary competitors
being small, locally owned operators as well as local fire departments and other local government providers. Larger private provider
competitors include Rural/Metro Corporation, Falck, American Medical Response (AMR), Southwest Ambulance, Paramedics Plus and
Acadian Ambulance.
Competition
in the telehealth industry is primarily based on scale; ease of use, convenience and accessibility; brand recognition; breadth,
depth, and efficacy of telehealth services; technology; clinical quality; customer support; cost; reputation; and customer satisfaction
and value. The major competitors include much larger, national or regional telehealth providers such as Teladoc, Livongo, Amwell,
and One Medical that generally provide telehealth on behalf of self-insured employers and insurance plans. These competitors,
however, generally do not provide direct patient care or “last-mile” care on behalf of the provider organization.
We also believe there are several smaller, private organizations providing in-home or on-site care utilizing different,
higher cost healthcare providers. Non-traditional providers and others such as payors may enter the space and/or develop
innovative technologies or business activities that could disrupt the industry. Competition could also increase from large technology
companies, such as Apple, Amazon, Facebook, Verizon, or Microsoft, who may develop their own telehealth solutions, as well as
from large retailers like Walmart, CVS and others. Despite the significant growth of telehealth services in recent years,
we believe the market is still in its infancy and new competitors with similar and novel models will enter the market as it matures.
Intellectual
Property
Our
intellectual property includes the content of our website, our proprietary platform, our mobile application, registered domain
names, software code, firmware, hardware and hardware designs, registered and unregistered common law trademarks, trademark applications,
copyrights, trade secrets, inventions (whether or not patentable), patents, and patent applications. We also license the use of
certain technology and other intellectual property rights owned and controlled by others. We believe that our intellectual property
is a valuable asset to our business that affords us a competitive advantage in the markets in which we operate.
We
protect our intellectual property primarily through a combination of copyrights, trademarks, patents, and trade secrets, intellectual
property licenses and other contractual rights and provisions (including confidentiality, non-disclosure, proprietary rights and
assignment-of-invention agreements with our employees, independent contractors, consultants and companies with which we conduct
business). We have registered the Ambulnz trademark and our corporate logo in the United States and the United Kingdom.
We have registered DocGo trademark and design in the UK, and are in the process of registering both for DocGo in the US. Generally,
registered trademarks have perpetual life, provided that they are renewed on a timely basis and continue to be used properly as
trademarks. Upon discovery of potential infringement of our intellectual property, we assess and, when necessary, take action
to protect our rights as appropriate.
Regulation
Our
operations are subject to comprehensive United States federal, state and local and comparable multiple levels of
international regulation in the jurisdictions in which we do business. The laws and rules governing our business and
interpretations of those laws and rules continue to expand, are subject to frequent change and may become more restrictive.
Our ability to operate profitably will depend in part upon our ability, and that of our healthcare provider partners, to
maintain all necessary licenses and to operate in compliance with applicable laws and rules. We therefore devote significant
resources to monitoring developments in healthcare regulation. As the applicable laws and rules change, we may be required to
make conforming modifications in our business processes from time to time. In many jurisdictions where we operate, neither
our current nor our anticipated business model, in particular with respect to our Mobile Health related services, has been
the subject of judicial or administrative interpretation. We cannot be assured that a review of our business by courts or
regulatory authorities will not result in determinations that could limit or otherwise adversely affect our operations or
that the healthcare regulatory environment will not change in a way that restricts our operations.
5
False
Claims Act
The
federal False Claims Act is a means of policing false bills or false requests for payment in the healthcare delivery system. Among
other things, the federal False Claims Act authorizes the imposition of up to three times the government’s damages and significant
per claim civil penalties on any “person” (including an individual, organization or company) who, among other acts:
● knowingly
presents or causes to be presented to the federal government a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval;
● knowingly
makes, uses or causes to be made or used a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim;
● knowingly
makes, uses or causes to be made or used a false record or statement material to an obligation to pay the government, or knowingly conceals;
● knowingly
and improperly avoids or decreases an obligation to pay or transmit money or property to the federal government; or
● conspires
to commit the above acts.
In
addition, amendments to the federal False Claims Act and Social Security Act impose severe penalties for the knowing and improper
retention of overpayments collected from government payors. Under these provisions, within 60 days of identifying and quantifying
an overpayment, a provider is required to notify the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”), or the Medicare
Administrative Contractor (“MAC”) of the overpayment and the reason for it and return the overpayment. An overpayment
impermissibly retained could subject a party to liability under the federal False Claims Act, exclusion from government healthcare
programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, and penalties under the federal Civil Monetary Penalties Law discussed below.
The
penalties for a violation of the federal False Claims Act range from $5,500 to $11,000 (adjusted for inflation) for each false
claim, plus up to three times the amount of damages caused by each false claim, which can be as much as the amounts received directly
or indirectly from the government for each such false claim. On June 19, 2020, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”)
issued a final rule announcing adjustments to federal False Claims Act penalties, under which the per claim range increases to
a range from $11,803 to $23,607 per claim, so long as the underlying conduct occurred after November 2, 2015.
The
federal government has used the statute to prosecute a wide variety of alleged false claims and fraud allegedly perpetrated against
Medicare and state healthcare programs, including but not limited to coding errors, billing for services not rendered, the submission
of false cost or other reports, billing for services at a higher payment rate than appropriate, billing under a comprehensive
code as well as under one or more component codes included in the comprehensive code, billing for care that is not considered
medically necessary and false reporting of risk-adjusted diagnostic codes to Medicare Advantage (or Part C) Plans. The Affordable
Care Act, as currently structured, provides that claims tainted by a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute are false
for purposes of the federal False Claims Act. Some courts have held that filing claims or failing to refund amounts collected
in violation of the Stark Law can form the basis for liability under the federal False Claims Act. In addition to the provisions
of the federal False Claims Act, which provide for civil enforcement through “qui tam” whistleblower lawsuits, the
federal government can also use several criminal statutes to prosecute persons who are alleged to have submitted false or fraudulent
claims for payment to the federal government.
Federal
Fraud and Abuse Laws
The
federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as amended by the Health Information Technology
for Economic and Clinical Health Act (“HITECH”), and their implementing regulations and related rules (collectively,
“HIPAA”), established several separate criminal penalties for making false or fraudulent claims to insurance companies
and other non-governmental payors of healthcare services. Under HIPAA, these two additional federal crimes are: “Healthcare
Fraud” and “False Statements Relating to Healthcare Matters.” The Healthcare Fraud statute prohibits knowingly
and recklessly executing a scheme or artifice to defraud any healthcare benefit program, including private payors. A violation
of this statute is a felony and may result in fines, imprisonment or exclusion from government sponsored programs. The False Statements
Relating to Healthcare Matters statute prohibits knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact
by any trick, scheme or device or making any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement in connection with the delivery
of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services. A violation of this statute is a felony and may result in fines or imprisonment.
This statute could be used by the government to assert criminal liability if a healthcare provider knowingly fails to refund an
overpayment. These provisions are intended to punish some of the same conduct in the submission of claims to private payors as
the federal False Claims Act covers in connection with governmental health programs.
6
In
addition, the Civil Monetary Penalties Law imposes civil administrative sanctions for, among other violations, inappropriate billing
of services to federally funded healthcare programs and employing or contracting with individuals or entities who are excluded
from participation in federally funded healthcare programs. Moreover, a person who offers or transfers to a Medicare or Medicaid
beneficiary any remuneration, including waivers of co-payments and deductible amounts (or any part thereof), that the person knows
or should know is likely to influence the beneficiary’s selection of a particular provider, practitioner or supplier of
Medicare or Medicaid payable items or services may be liable for civil monetary penalties of up to $20,000 for each wrongful act.
Moreover, in certain cases, providers who routinely waive co-payments and deductibles for Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries
can also be held liable under the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and federal False Claims Act, either of which can impose
additional penalties associated with the wrongful act. One of the statutory exceptions to the prohibition is non-routine, unadvertised
waivers of co-payments or deductible amounts based on individualized determinations of financial need or exhaustion of reasonable
collection efforts. The OIG emphasizes, however, that this exception should only be used occasionally to address special financial
needs of a particular patient. Although this prohibition applies only to federal healthcare program beneficiaries, the routine
waivers of co-payments and deductibles offered to patients covered by commercial payors may implicate applicable state laws
related to, among other things, unlawful schemes to defraud, excessive fees for services, tortious interference with patient contracts
and statutory or common law fraud.
State
Fraud and Abuse Laws
Various
states in which we operate have also adopted similar fraud and abuse laws as the federal laws and statutes described above. The
scope of these laws and the interpretations thereof vary from state to state and are enforced by state courts and regulatory authorities,
each with broad discretion. Some state fraud and abuse laws apply to items or services reimbursed by any payor, including patients
and commercial insurers, not just those reimbursed by a federally funded healthcare program. A determination of liability under
such state fraud and abuse laws could result in fines and penalties and restrictions on our ability to operate in these jurisdictions.
Health
Information Privacy and Security Laws
There
are numerous U.S. federal and state laws and regulations related to the privacy and security of personally identifiable information
(“PII”), including health information. In particular, HIPAA establishes privacy and security standards that limit
the use and disclosure of protected health information (“PHI”), and require the implementation of administrative,
physical, and technical safeguards to ensure the confidentiality, integrity and availability of individually identifiable health
information in electronic form. HIPAA’s requirements to “covered entities” and to their independent contractors,
agents and other “business associates” that create, receive, maintain or transmit PHI in connection with providing
services to covered entities. Although we are a covered entity under HIPAA, we are also a business associate of other covered
entities when we are working on behalf of our healthcare provider partners.
Violations
of HIPAA may result in civil and criminal penalties. The civil penalties range from $119 to $59,522 per violation, with a cap
of $1.8 million per year for violations of the same standard during the same calendar year. However, a single breach incident
can result in violations of multiple standards. We must also comply with HIPAA’s breach notification rule. Under the breach
notification rule, covered entities must notify affected individuals without unreasonable delay in the case of a breach of unsecured
PHI, which may compromise the privacy, security or integrity of the PHI. In addition, notification must be provided to HHS
and the local media in cases where a breach affects more than 500 individuals. Breaches affecting fewer than 500 individuals must
be reported to HHS on an annual basis. The regulations also require business associates of covered entities to notify the covered
entity of breaches by the business associate.
State
attorneys general also have the right to prosecute HIPAA violations committed against residents of their states. While HIPAA does
not create a private right of action that would allow individuals to sue in civil court for a HIPAA violation, its standards have
been used as the basis for the duty of care in state civil suits, such as those for negligence or recklessness in misusing personal
information. In addition, HIPAA mandates that HHS conduct periodic compliance audits of HIPAA-covered entities and their business
associates for compliance. It also tasks HHS with establishing a methodology whereby harmed individuals who were the victims of
breaches of unsecured PHI may receive a percentage of the fine paid by the violator under the Civil Monetary Penalties Law paid
by the violator. In light of recent enforcement activity, and statements from HHS, we expect increased federal and state HIPAA
privacy and security enforcement efforts.
7
HIPAA
also required HHS to adopt national standards establishing electronic transaction standards that all healthcare providers must
use when submitting or receiving certain healthcare transactions electronically.
Many
states in which we operate and in which our customers reside also have laws that protect the privacy and security of sensitive
and personal information, including health information. These laws may be similar to or even more protective than HIPAA and other
federal privacy laws. For example, the laws of the State of California, in which we operate, are more restrictive than HIPAA. Where
state laws are more protective than HIPAA, we must comply with the state laws we are subject to, in addition to HIPAA. In
certain cases, it may be necessary to modify our systems or planned operations to comply with these more stringent state laws.
Not only may some of these state laws impose fines and penalties upon violators, but also some, unlike HIPAA, may afford private
rights of action to individuals who believe their personal information has been misused. In addition, state laws are changing
rapidly, and there is discussion of a new federal privacy law or federal breach notification law, to which we may be subject.
In
recent years, there have been a number of well-publicized data breaches involving the improper use and disclosure of PII
and PHI. Many states have responded to these incidents by enacting laws requiring holders of personal information to maintain
safeguards and to take certain actions in response to a data breach, such as providing prompt notification of the breach to affected
individuals and state officials. In addition, under HIPAA and pursuant to the related contracts that we enter into with our healthcare
provider partners and other third parties, we must report breaches of unsecured PHI to our contractual partners following discovery
of the breach. Notification must also be made in certain circumstances to affected individuals, federal authorities and others.
In
addition to HIPAA, state health information privacy and state health information privacy laws, we may be subject to other state
and federal privacy laws, including laws that prohibit unfair privacy and security practices and deceptive statements about privacy
and security and laws that place specific requirements on certain types of activities, such as data security and texting.
Anti-Kickback
Statute
The
federal Anti-Kickback Statute is a broadly worded prohibition on the knowing and willful offer, payment, solicitation or receipt
of any form of remuneration in return for, or to induce, (i) the referral of a person covered by Medicare, Medicaid or other
governmental programs, (ii) the furnishing or arranging for the furnishing of items or services reimbursable under Medicare,
Medicaid or other governmental programs or (iii) the purchasing, leasing or ordering or arranging or recommending purchasing,
leasing or ordering of any item or service reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid or other governmental programs. Certain federal
courts have held that the Anti-Kickback Statute can be violated if “one purpose” of a payment is to induce referrals.
In addition, a person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of this statute or specific intent to violate it to have
committed a violation, making it easier for the government to prove that a defendant had the requisite state of mind or “scienter”
required for a violation. Moreover, the government may assert that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation
of the Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the federal False Claims Act. Violations
of the Anti-Kickback Statute can result in exclusion from Medicare, Medicaid or other governmental programs as well as civil and
criminal penalties, including fines of $104,330 per violation, plus up to three times the amount of the unlawful remuneration,
and imprisonment of up to ten years. Civil penalties for such conduct can further be assessed under the federal False Claims
Act. In addition to a few statutory exceptions, the OIG has published safe harbor regulations that outline categories of activities
that are deemed protected from prosecution under the Anti-Kickback Statute provided all applicable criteria are met. The
failure of a financial relationship to meet all of the applicable safe harbor criteria does not necessarily mean that the particular
arrangement violates the Anti-Kickback Statute. However, conduct and business arrangements that do not fully satisfy each
applicable safe harbor may result in increased scrutiny by government enforcement authorities, such as the OIG.
8
Federal
Stark Law
Section 1877
of the Social Security Act, also known as the physician self-referral law and commonly referred to as the Stark Law, prohibits
a physician who has a financial relationship, or who has an immediate family member who has a financial relationship, with entities
providing certain designated health services from referring Medicare patients to such entities for the furnishing of designated
health services, unless an exception applies. Although uncertainty exists, federal agencies and at least one court have taken
the position that the Stark Law also applies to Medicaid. Designated health services are defined to include, among others, clinical
laboratory services, physical therapy services, occupational therapy services, radiology services including ultrasound services,
durable medical equipment and supplies, parenteral and enteral nutrients, equipment, and supplies, home health services, outpatient
prescription drugs, inpatient and outpatient hospital services and outpatient speech-language pathology services. The types
of financial arrangements between a physician and an entity providing designated health services that trigger the self-referral prohibitions
of the Stark Law are broad and include direct and indirect ownership and investment interests and compensation arrangements. The
Stark Law prohibits any entity providing designated health services that has received a prohibited referral from presenting, or
causing to be presented, a claim or billing for the services arising out of the prohibited referral. Similarly, the Stark Law
prohibits an entity from “furnishing” a designated health service to another entity in which it has a financial relationship
when that entity bills for the service. The Stark Law also prohibits self-referrals within an organization by its own physicians,
although broad exceptions exist. The prohibition applies regardless of the reasons for the financial relationship and the referral.
Unlike the federal Anti-Kickback Statute discussed above, the Stark Law is a strict liability statute, which means proof
of specific intent to violate the law is not required.
If
the Stark Law is implicated, the financial relationship must fully satisfy a Stark Law exception. If an exception is not satisfied,
then the parties to the arrangement could be subject to sanctions, including denial of payment for claims for services provided
in violation of the statute, mandatory refunds of amounts collected for such services, civil penalties of up to $25,820 for each
violation and twice the dollar value of each such service as well as possible exclusion from future participation in the federally
funded healthcare programs, including Medicare and Medicaid. A person who engages in a scheme to circumvent the Stark Law’s
prohibitions may be fined up to $172,137 for each applicable arrangement or scheme. Amounts collected on claims related to prohibited
referrals must be reported and refunded generally within 60 days after the date on which the overpayment was identified.
In addition, the government and some courts have taken the position that claims presented in violation of the various statutes,
including the Stark Law, and failure to return overpayments in a timely manner can form the basis for liability under the federal
False Claims Act discussed below based on the contention that a provider impliedly certifies compliance with all applicable laws,
regulations and other rules when submitting claims for reimbursement.
U.S. Corporate
Practice of Medicine; Fee Splitting
The
laws and regulations relating to our operations vary from state to state and many states prohibit general business corporations, such
as us, from practicing medicine, controlling physicians’ medical decisions or engaging in some practices such as splitting professional
fees with physicians. We contract with healthcare providers, physicians or physician-owned professional associations and professional
corporations as part of our business. An important aspect of our strategy is to form contractual relationships with different third-party providers
pursuant to which we provide them or their patients with medical transportation and/or telehealth services and they pay us for those services
out of the fees they collect from patients and third-party payors. In certain instances, we also share a portion of our revenues
with our partners. These contractual relationships are subject to various state laws that prohibit fee splitting or the practice of medicine
by lay entities or persons and are intended to prevent unlicensed persons from interfering with or influencing the physician’s professional
judgment. In addition, various state laws also generally prohibit the sharing of professional services income with nonprofessional or
business interests. Activities other than those directly related to the delivery of healthcare may be considered an element of the practice
of medicine in many states. Under the corporate practice of medicine restrictions of certain states, decisions and activities such as
scheduling, contracting, setting rates and the hiring and management of non-clinical personnel may implicate the restrictions on the corporate
practice of medicine.
State
corporate practice of medicine and fee-splitting laws vary from state to state and are not always consistent. In addition, these
requirements are subject to broad powers of interpretation and enforcement by state regulators. Regulatory authorities or other
parties may assert that, despite these arrangements, we are engaged in the corporate practice of medicine or that our contractual
arrangements with affiliated third parties constitute unlawful fee splitting. In this event, failure to comply could lead to adverse
judicial or administrative action against us and/or our healthcare provider partners, civil or criminal penalties, receipt of
cease-and-desist orders from state regulators, loss of licenses, and the need to make changes to the terms of engagement with
our provider partners that interfere with our business.
9
International
Regulation
We
expect to continue to expand our operations internationally through both organic growth and acquisitions. Our international operations
are subject to different, and sometimes more stringent, legal and regulatory requirements, which vary widely by jurisdiction,
including anti-corruption laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”), and corresponding foreign laws,
including the UK Bribery Act 2010; regulation by the U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”)
and economic sanctions laws; various privacy, insurance, tax, tariff and trade laws and regulations; corporate governance, privacy,
data protection, data mining, data transfer, labor and employment, intellectual property, consumer protection and investment laws
and regulations; discriminatory licensing procedures; required localization of records and funds; and limitations on dividends
and repatriation of capital.
Other
Regulations
Our
operations are subject to various state hazardous waste and non-hazardous medical waste disposal laws. These laws do not classify
as hazardous most of the waste produced from healthcare services. Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations require
employers to provide workers who are occupationally subject to blood or other potentially infectious materials with prescribed
protections. These regulatory requirements apply to all healthcare facilities, including primary care centers, and require employers
to make a determination as to which employees may be exposed to blood or other potentially infectious materials and to have in
effect a written exposure control plan. In addition, employers are required to provide or employ hepatitis B vaccinations, personal
protective equipment and other safety devices, infection control training, post-exposure evaluation and follow-up, waste
disposal techniques and procedures and work practice controls. Employers are also required to comply with various record-keeping requirements.
Some
of our operations may be subject to compliance with certain provisions of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and comparable
statutes in many states. Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, a third-party collection company is restricted in the methods
it uses to contact consumer debtors and elicit payments with respect to placed accounts. Requirements under state collection agency
statutes vary, with most requiring compliance similar to that required under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Many of the
states in which we operate have comparable state statutes as well.
See
the section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K statement titled “ Risk Factors — Risks Related to Healthcare
Regulation. ”
Available
Information
We
file electronically with the SEC our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and
amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
or the Exchange Act. We make available on our website at www.DocGo.com, under “Investors,” free of charge, copies
of these reports as soon as reasonably practicable after filing or furnishing these reports with the SEC.
10
Text extracted from the filing as submitted to EDGAR. Formatting, tables and exhibits are simplified for reading; the original document is authoritative for anything you rely on.