5 unchanged sentences
Our claims against these parties included various unfair competition, tortious interference, breach of contract and other related claims.
−Removed: In March 2024, the jury found that (i) Defendant Carlos Nalsen Landa (“Landa”), a former independent consultant, misappropriated the Citizens’ Companies policyholder information, (ii) Citizens’ former chief underwriter, Michael P.
−Removed: Buchweitz (“Buchweitz”) and Randall Riley (“Riley”), a former Citizens executive and son of Citizens’ founder Harold E.
−Removed: Riley, failed to comply with their Citizens’ confidentiality agreements, and (iii) both Buchweitz and Riley intentionally interfered with former Chief Actuary Jonathan Pollio’s ("Pollio") Citizens’ confidentiality agreement.
−Removed: For Buchweitz, the jury also found that he did not have a good faith belief that he was acting in the bona fide exercise of his own rights when he interfered with Pollio’s Citizens’ confidentiality agreement.
−Removed: Despite these findings, the jury did not believe that the above-mentioned actions damaged the Citizens Companies economically and thus did not assess any monetary damages against any of the above parties.
−Removed: Additionally, the jury found that Citizens should pay Alexis Delgado (“Delgado”, a former independent consultant) and Landa approximately $1.3 million for “money had and received”, an equitable theory that claimed that the Citizens Companies would be unjustly enriched if they didn’t pay past and future commissions to Delgado and Landa.
−Removed: On April 30, 2024, Defendants Riley (through his estate), Buchweitz and Delgado filed a motion against the Citizens Companies seeking approximately $3.9 million in legal fees and a hearing was held on these matters on May 21, 2024.
−Removed: On July 26, 2024, the trial court awarded Riley and Buchweitz approximately $3.5 million of their legal fees.
+Added: As previously disclosed, the jury found that Citizens should pay Alexis Delgado and Carlos Nalsen Landa, former independent consultants, approximately $1.3 million for “money had and received”, an equitable theory that claimed that the Citizens Companies would be unjustly enriched if they didn’t pay past and future commissions to Delgado and Landa.
+Added: Additionally, the trial court awarded defendants Michael P.
+Added: Buchweitz (“Buchweitz”) and Randall Riley (“Riley”) approximately $3.5 million of their legal fees.
+Added: On August 16, 2024, the judge signed a Final Judgment reflecting the jury decision and the court award of the legal fees.
We do not believe the jury properly found that Delgado or Landa were entitled to any prior or future commissions as there was no evidence that we actually held any amount of commissions that they claim they should have received.
We also do not believe that Riley or Buchweitz are entitled to legal fees because they were found to have breached the contracts whose fee shifting provisions they sought to invoke.
−Removed: We intend to appeal the judgment against us.
+Added: We intend to appeal the judgment against us and accordingly on September 16, 2024, we filed a Limited Motion for Partial New Trial on these issues.
+Added: On September 17, 2024, we filed an appeal bond with the court in order to stay any execution of the judgment against us.
Part I, Item 1A.
Risk Factors of our Form 10-K includes a discussion of our risk factors.
−Removed: There have been no material changes in the three months ended June 30, 2024 from the risk factors included in our Form 10-K .
+Added: There have been no material changes in the three months ended September 30, 2024 from the risk factors included in our Form 10-K .
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
3 unchanged sentences
Not applicable.
−Removed: June 30, 2024 | 10-Q 58
−Removed: CITIZENS, INC.
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.