LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
−Removed: Camber is periodically named in legal actions arising from normal business activities.
−Removed: Camber evaluates the merits of these actions and, if it determines that an unfavorable outcome is probable and can be reasonably estimated, Camber will establish the necessary reserves.
−Removed: The Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims that have not been fully resolved and that have arisen in the ordinary course of business.
−Removed: We are not currently involved in legal proceedings that could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition or results of operations.
−Removed: except as described in “ Part I.
−Removed: Financial Information – Item 1.
−Removed: Financial Statements ” – “Note 10 – Commitments and Contingencies” – “ Legal Proceedings ”, of this Form 10-Q.
−Removed: We may become involved in material legal proceedings in the future.
−Removed: The outcome of litigation is inherently uncertain.
−Removed: If one or more legal matters were resolved against the Company in a reporting period for amounts in excess of management’s expectations, the Company’s financial condition and operating results for that reporting period could be materially adversely affected.
+Added: From time to time, the Company may be involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of commercial operations in the normal course of business.
+Added: As of March 31, 2023, there were no pending or threatened lawsuits that could reasonably be expected to have a material effect on the results of operations.
+Added: The Company was the target of a “short” report issued by Kerrisdale Capital in early October, 2021, and as a result of such short report, on October 29, 2021, a Class Action Complaint (i.e.
+Added: C.A.No.4:21-cv-03574) was filed against the Company, its CEO and CFO by Ronald E.
+Added: Coggins, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v.
+Added: Camber Energy, Inc., et al .;
+Added: District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division, pursuant to which the Plaintiffs are seeking to recover damages alleged to have been suffered by them as a result of the defendants’ violations of federal securities laws.
+Added: The defendants deny the allegations contained in the Class Action Complaint and have engaged Baker Botts L.L.P.
+Added: to defend the action.
+Added: On or about June 30, 2022, the Company was made aware of a Shareholder Derivative Complaint filed in the U.S.
+Added: District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division (Case No.
+Added: 4:22-cv-2167) against the Company, its current directors, and certain of its former directors (the “Houston Derivative Complaint” and, together with the Nevada Derivative Complaint, the “Derivative Complaints”).
+Added: The allegations contained in the Houston Derivative Complaint involve state-law claims for breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment and a federal securities claim under Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
+Added: On January 20, 2023, the U.S.
+Added: District Court held that certain claims brought by the plaintiff relating to director actions and statements made in proxy statements prior to June 30, 2019, were time barred, but did not dismiss certain claims brought by plaintiff relating to director actions and statements made in proxy statements after June 30, 2019.
+Added: Pursuant to Article 6 of the Amended and Restated Bylaws, on February 15, 2023, the Company’s Board formed a Special Litigation Committee to investigate, analyze, and evaluate the remaining allegations in the Houston Derivative Complaint.
+Added: The Special Litigation Committee’s investigation and evaluation remains ongoing.
+Added: At this time, we are not able to predict the outcome of the Special Litigation Committee investigation or these claims.
+Added: The defendants deny the allegations contained in the Class Action Complaint and Houston Complaint and have engaged Baker Botts L.L.P.
+Added: to defend the actions.
+Added: On or about April 18, 2022, the Company was made aware of a Shareholder Derivative Complaint filed with the District Court in Clark County, Nevada (Case No.:
+Added: A-22-848486-B) against the Company and its directors, and on or about May 4, 2022 the Company was made aware of a second Shareholder Derivative Complaint filed with the District Court in Clark County, Nevada (Case No.
+Added: A-22-852069-B) against the Company and its directors.
+Added: On July 18, 2022, the shareholder plaintiff in Case No.
+Added: A-22-848486-B voluntarily dismissed his lawsuit, and on December 12, 2022 the shareholder plaintiff in Case No.
+Added: A-22-852069-B voluntarily dismissed his lawsuit.
+Added: As a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company is not required to provide the information under this item.
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.