What changed in this filing

/stocks — the workspaceLOADING

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

2024-07-30 compared with 2024-05-09 · 43 added, 44 removed, 5 unchanged (95% of the section changed)

Legal Proceedings

Other than as described below, neither the Company nor its property is

the subject of any current, pending, or threatened legal proceedings.

The Company is not aware of any other legal proceedings in which

any director, officer or affiliate of the Company, any owner of record or beneficially of more than 5% of any class of the Company’s

voting securities, or any associate of any such director, officer, affiliate or security holder of the Company, is a party adverse to

the Company or any of its subsidiaries or has a material interest adverse to the Company or any of its subsidiaries.

On July 28, 2021, a lawsuit was filed in the US District Court for the

District of Idaho brought by Crescent Mining, LLC (“Crescent”).

The named defendants include Placer Mining, Robert Hopper

Jr., and the Company.

The lawsuit alleges that Placer Mining and Robert Hopper Jr.

intentionally flooded the Crescent Mine during the

period from 1991 and 1994, and that the Company is jointly and severally liable with the other defendants for unspecified past and future

costs associated with the presence of AMD in the Crescent Mine.

The plaintiff has requested unspecified damages.

On September 20, 2021,

the Company filed a motion to dismiss Crescent’s claims against it, contending that such claims are facially deficient.

March 2, 2022, Chief US District Court Judge, David C.

Nye granted in part and denied in part the Company’s motion to dismiss.

court granted the Company’s motion to dismiss Crescent’s Cost Recovery claim under CERCLA Section 107(a), Declaratory Judgment,

Tortious Interference, Trespass, Nuisance and Negligence claims.

These claims were dismissed without prejudice.

The court denied the motion

to dismiss filed by Placer Mining Corp.

for Crescent’s trespass, nuisance and negligence claims.

Crescent later filed an amended

complaint on April 1, 2022.

than as described below, neither the Company nor its property is the subject of any current, pending, or threatened legal proceedings.

The Company is not aware of any other legal proceedings in which any director, officer or affiliate of the Company, any owner of record

or beneficially of more than 5% of any class of the Company’s voting securities, or any associate of any such director, officer,

affiliate or security holder of the Company, is a party adverse to the Company or any of its subsidiaries or has a material interest

adverse to the Company or any of its subsidiaries.

July 28, 2021, a lawsuit was filed in the US District Court for the District of Idaho brought by Crescent Mining, LLC (“Crescent”).

The named defendants include Placer Mining, Robert Hopper Jr., and the Company.

The lawsuit alleges that Placer Mining and Robert Hopper

intentionally flooded the Crescent Mine during the period from 1991 and 1994, and that the Company is jointly and severally liable

with the other defendants for unspecified past and future costs associated with the presence of AMD in the Crescent Mine.

The plaintiff

has requested unspecified damages.

On September 20, 2021, the Company filed a motion to dismiss Crescent’s claims against it, contending

that such claims are facially deficient.

On March 2, 2022, Chief US District Court Judge, David C.

Nye granted in part and denied

in part the Company’s motion to dismiss.

The court granted the Company’s motion to dismiss Crescent’s Cost Recovery

claim under CERCLA Section 107(a), Declaratory Judgment, Tortious Interference, Trespass, Nuisance and Negligence claims.

were dismissed without prejudice.

The court denied the motion to dismiss filed by Placer Mining Corp.

for Crescent’s trespass,

nuisance and negligence claims.

Crescent later filed an amended complaint on April 1, 2022.

Placer Mining Corp.

and Bunker Hill Mining Corp are named as co-defendants.

Bunker Hill responded to the amended

filing, refuting and denying all allegations made in the complaint except those that are assertions of fact as a matter of public record.

The Company believes Crescent’s lawsuit is without merit and is vigorously defending itself, as well as Placer Mining Corp.

to the Company’s indemnification of Placer Mining Corp in the Sale and Purchase agreement executed between the companies for the

Mine on December 15, 2021.

On October 26, 2021, the Company asserted claims against Crescent in a

separate lawsuit, which has been consolidated into the Crescent lawsuit.

and Bunker Hill Mining

Corp are named as co-defendants.

Bunker Hill responded to the amended filing, refuting and denying all allegations made in the complaint

except those that are assertions of fact as a matter of public record.

The Company believes Crescent’s lawsuit is without merit

and is vigorously defending itself, as well as Placer Mining Corp.

pursuant to the Company’s indemnification of Placer Mining Corp

in the Sale and Purchase agreement executed between the companies for the Mine on December 15, 2021.

October 26, 2021, the Company asserted claims against Crescent in a separate lawsuit, which has been consolidated into the Crescent lawsuit.

The Company commenced Bunker Hill Mining Corporation v.

Technologies Inc.

Venzee Technologies Inc.

et al, Case No.

2:21-cv-209-REP, in the US District Court for the District of Idaho on May 14, 2021.

The Company has

subsequently executed a tolling agreement with Venzee in exchange for dropping its claims against Venzee.

The Company originally filed

this lawsuit on May 14, 2021 against other parties but has since filed an amended complaint to include its claims against Crescent.

Court consolidated the two lawsuits on April 19, 2022.

The consolidated lawsuits are currently in the discovery phase, in which information

is gathered and exchanged.

2:21-cv-209-REP, in the US District

Court for the District of Idaho on May 14, 2021.

The Company has subsequently executed a tolling agreement with Venzee in exchange for

dropping its claims against Venzee.

The Company originally filed this lawsuit on May 14, 2021 against other parties but has since filed

an amended complaint to include its claims against Crescent.

The Court consolidated the two lawsuits on April 19, 2022.

The consolidated

lawsuits are currently in the discovery phase, in which information is gathered and exchanged.

have been no changes to our risk factors as reported in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023.

Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.

What changed 10-Q

Item 1. Legal Proceedings