Item 3. Legal Proceedings
ITEM
3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
As of the date of this Annual Report, to our knowledge, there are no legal
proceedings or regulatory actions material to us to which we are a party, or have been a party to, or of which any of our property is
or was the subject matter of, and no such proceedings or actions are known by us to be contemplated except as provided below:
Due to the misrepresentations and
omissions of SuperGreen, Calvin C. Cao and Michael H. Cao, among other reasons, the Company filed a complaint in the U.S. District
Court, Central District of California on February 2, 2023 against SuperGreen, Michael H. Cao, Linh T. Dao, Calvin C. Cao and
entities affiliated with them alleging fraud-concealment, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty-duty of good faith, breach of
fiduciary duty-undivided loyalty, conversion and violation of California Penal Code Sec. 496 (the “Cao Lawsuit”). This
lawsuit seeks compensatory damages of at least $33.6 million, treble and punitive damages, imposition of a constructive trust over
the defendants assets, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, attorney’s fees and such other relief as determined by the
court.
Effective February 20, 2023, the
Company, together with its wholly owned subsidiary Bitech Mining Corporation entered into a Confidential Settlement, Mutual Release,
and Share Transfer Agreement (the “C. Cao Settlement Agreement”) with Calvin Cao (“C. Cao”) and SuperGreen
Energy Corporation (“SuperGreen,” together with C. Cao, the “C. Cao Parties”). The C. Cao Settlement
Agreement settles as to the C. Cao Parties, the Cao Lawsuit. Pursuant to the C. Cao
Settlement Agreement, the C. Cao Parties terminated the Patent & Technology Exclusive and Non-Exclusive License Agreement
between Bitech Mining Corporation and SuperGreen dated January 15, 2021 as amended on January 15, 2021 and on March 26, 2022 (the
“License Agreement”) and SuperGreen canceled 51,507,749 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per
share issued by the Company to SuperGreen pursuant to the License Agreement. In addition, the parties to the Settlement Agreement
agreed to a mutual general release of liabilities against each other, refrain from making any disparaging remarks about each other
and the Company’s filing a dismissal with prejudice of the Cao Lawsuit as to the C. Cao Parties. The Settlement Agreement also
contains additional covenants, representations and warranties that are customary of litigation settlement agreements. The Company
intends to continue to pursue the Cao Lawsuit as to the remaining defendants in that case, namely Michael Cao, B&B Investment
Holding, LLC (“B&B Investment”) and Linh Dao.
On March 6, 2023, Michael Cao and
Linh Dao filed, without an attorney, a pro se Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. No hearing has been set for this motion.
On March 23, 2023, the Court entered a default against B&B Investment for failing to appear or otherwise defend itself in the
case. B&B Investment is an affiliate of Michael Cao.
The Company intends to vigorously prosecute this case
and believes the basis for the motion to dismiss the case lack merit. We cannot predict the outcome of this lawsuit, however.
Litigation Assessment
We have evaluated the foregoing Cao Lawsuit to assess the likelihood of
any unfavorable outcome and to estimate, if possible, the amount of potential loss as it relates to the litigation. Based on this assessment
and estimate, which includes an understanding of our intention to vigorously prosecute the Cao Lawsuit, we believe that the potential
defenses of any of the remaining defendants lack merit, however, and we cannot predict the likelihood of any recoveries by any of our
claims against the remaining defendants. This assessment and estimate is based on the information available to management as of the date
of this Annual Report and involves a significant amount of management judgment, including the inherent difficulty associated with assessing
litigation matters in their early stages. As a result, the actual outcome or loss may differ materially from those envisioned by the current
assessment and estimate. Our failure to successfully prosecute, defend or settle the Cao Litigation with the remaining defendants could
have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, revenue and profitability and could cause the market value of our common stock
to decline.
ITEM
4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not
Applicable.
7
Table of Contents
PART
II
Text extracted from the filing as submitted to EDGAR. Formatting, tables and exhibits are simplified for reading; the original document is authoritative for anything you rely on.