Item 1A. Risk Factors
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS
An
investment in our Common Stock involves risks. You should carefully consider the risks described below, together with all of the other
information included in this Annual Report, as well as in our other filings with the SEC, in evaluating our business. If any of the following
risks actually occur, our business, financial condition, operating results and future prospects could be materially and adversely affected.
In that case, the trading price of our Common Stock may decline and you might lose all or part of your investment. The risks described
below, which are the risks we judge (rightly or wrongly) to be the most significant to investors, are not the only ones we face. Additional
risks that we currently do not judge to be among the “most significant” may also impair our business, financial condition,
operating results and prospects.
Risks
Related to Our Business
We
have a history of negative cash flows and will require additional financing to execute our business strategy.
We
have incurred recurring losses and experienced negative cash flows from operations. We incurred net loss of $16.9 million for the
year ended December 31, 2025. As of December 31, 2025, we remain in a development and investment stage with respect to our digital
asset and software initiatives and have not generated material revenue from these initiatives. Our ability to continue developing
and deploying our software platforms depends on our ability to obtain additional financing. There can be no assurance that such
financing will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to secure sufficient capital when needed, we may be
required to delay, reduce, or eliminate development activities, reduce operating expenses, or otherwise materially modify our
business plans. Any equity financing may result in substantial dilution to our stockholders, and debt or convertible debt financing
may impose restrictive covenants that could adversely affect our operations.
We
are in an early-stage development phase under our current business model.
Following
the divestiture of our prior diagnostics business , we transitioned to a digital asset–focused software strategy. Our RWA + EAI initiatives remain in development phases and have not generated material revenue. We have limited operating history under
our current business model, and investors have limited historical information upon which to evaluate our prospects. Our future success
depends on our ability to successfully develop, deploy, and commercialize new software platforms in competitive and evolving markets.
Our
future growth may be limited.
Our
ability to grow depends on several factors, including successful product development, user adoption, access to capital, technological
performance, regulatory developments, and market conditions affecting digital assets. If we are unable to successfully execute our development
plans, attract users, or compete effectively, our growth prospects may be limited. Additionally, evolving regulatory frameworks, economic
conditions, or declines in digital asset market activity may constrain our ability to expand operations or generate revenue.
Our
customer-facing platforms may not achieve user adoption or generate revenue.
The
success of BesTrade and our planned RWA + EAI initiatives depends on our ability to attract and retain users. User adoption may be adversely
affected by competition, market volatility, technological limitations, regulatory changes, or security concerns. If we are unable to
achieve sufficient user engagement, our ability to generate subscription-based or other revenue from these platforms may be materially
impaired.
Our
software development efforts may be delayed, exceed budget, or fail to perform as intended.
The
development of BesTrade and RWA + EAI involves technical complexity, integration challenges, and evolving product requirements. Development
timelines may be extended due to technical obstacles, changes in regulatory requirements, resource constraints, or unforeseen operational
issues. Internally developed systems may contain errors, defects, or vulnerabilities that could result in operational disruption, reputational
harm, or financial loss.
Our
AI Blockchain platform is internally developed and may not function as intended.
AI
Blockchain is used internally to support digital asset portfolio monitoring, analytics, and operational oversight. As an internally developed
and evolving system, it may contain errors, design limitations, or cybersecurity vulnerabilities. Failures or deficiencies in internal
systems could impair decision-making, result in inaccurate reporting, or expose us to financial or operational risk.
We
are exposed to significant digital asset price volatility.
We
maintain digital assets as part of our treasury and investment activities, including our internally managed C10 portfolio. Digital asset
markets have historically experienced significant price volatility. Market fluctuations may materially impact the fair value of our holdings
and could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Digital asset prices may be influenced by factors beyond
our control, including regulatory developments, macroeconomic conditions, market sentiment, technological changes, and security events.
The
regulatory environment surrounding digital assets, tokenization, and AI-enabled financial tools is evolving and uncertain.
Digital
asset markets and tokenization initiatives are subject to evolving regulatory frameworks in the United States and internationally. Regulatory
authorities may impose new or additional requirements relating to securities laws, commodities laws, anti-money laundering compliance,
custody requirements, or other regulatory regimes. Changes in applicable regulations or regulatory interpretations could limit our ability
to operate our platforms as currently contemplated, increase compliance costs, or require modification of our business model.
9
Our
platforms could be subject to regulatory classification that imposes additional obligations.
BesTrade
is designed to provide analytics and informational tools and does not operate as a broker, exchange, custodian, or trading venue. However,
regulatory authorities may interpret aspects of our activities differently. If regulators were to determine that our activities require
registration, licensing, or compliance with additional regulatory requirements, we could incur substantial costs, face operational limitations,
or be required to modify or discontinue certain activities.
We
depend on third-party service providers for technology infrastructure and digital asset custody.
We
rely on third-party providers for hosting infrastructure, data services, and, where applicable, digital asset custody and related services.
The failure, disruption, or insolvency of these providers, or cybersecurity incidents affecting them, could adversely affect our operations,
financial condition, and reputation.
Our
business and operations could suffer in the event of computer system failures, cyberattacks, or deficiencies in our cybersecurity.
Our
operations depend on the secure and reliable performance of our technology systems and infrastructure. Cybersecurity incidents, including
unauthorized access, malware attacks, system disruptions, or data breaches, could result in operational interruptions, loss of digital
assets, regulatory scrutiny, litigation, or reputational harm. As our platforms develop and potentially expand user engagement, our exposure
to cybersecurity risk may increase.
Our
“C10” Treasury strategy subjects our financial condition to extreme market volatility.
We
hold a concentrated basket of digital assets. Because our Common Stock may trade as a high-beta proxy for these assets, our stock
price may fluctuate significantly based on global crypto market swings, completely independent of our AI infrastructure.
Concentration
of Control and Sole Custody of Digital Assets May Expose the Company to Significant Financial and Operational Risks
●
Crypto-Centric
Treasury : Pursuant to the Lead Investor Agreement, the Company is required to adopt a Treasury Reserve Policy that establishes
cryptocurrencies as our primary ongoing treasury reserve asset.
●
Concentrated
Operational Control: The Faraday-appointed Co-Chief Executive Officer has been granted sole responsible for all of the Company’s
business operations, including crypto-related businesses, with the sole exception of the legacy medical-related business.
●
Sole
Access to Digital Assets: The Lead Investor Agreement states that the Faraday-appointed Co-CEO shall have sole access to all crypto-related
accounts of the Company, subject to delegation.
●
Single
Point of Failure: If the Co-CEO becomes incapacitated, or if there is a security breach, loss of credentials, or misappropriation
involving these specific accounts, we do not have an immediate, native backup mechanism to access our own treasury assets. Such an
event could result in the total and irretrievable loss of our primary treasury assets, materially harming our financial condition
and operational viability.
We may fail to execute our pivot from therapeutics to Web3 .
We are undergoing a transition from a clinical-stage oncology company (Qualigen) to an AI and digital asset infrastructure ecosystem provider. There is no guarantee that our management’s historical experience will translate to success in the decentralized infrastructure space.
10
We
have in the past, and may in the future, enter into partnerships, collaborations, joint ventures, or strategic alliances with third parties.
If we are unsuccessful in establishing or maintaining strategic relationships with these third parties or if these third parties fail
to deliver certain services, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be adversely affected.
We
have in the past, and may in the future, enter partnerships, collaborations, joint ventures, or strategic alliances with third parties
in connection with the development, operation, and enhancement of our platform and products and the provision of our services. Identifying
strategic relationships with third parties and negotiating and documenting relationships with them may be time-consuming and complex
and may distract management. Moreover, we may be delayed, or not be successful, in achieving the objectives that we anticipate as a result
of such strategic relationships. For example, we rely on our strategic relationship with Faraday Future to fuel our decentralized AI
models and on-chain strategies. If Faraday Future experiences financial distress, supply chain disruptions, or shifts its strategic priorities
away from our partnership, we may lose access to the critical data required for our EAIRWA ecosystem. In evaluating counterparties in
connection with partnerships, collaborations, joint ventures or strategic alliances, we consider a wide range of economic, legal and
regulatory criteria depending on the nature of such relationship, including the counterparties’ reputation, operating results and
financial condition, operational ability to satisfy our and our customers’ needs in a timely manner, efficiency and reliability
of systems, certifications costs to us or to our customers, and licensure and compliance status. Despite this evaluation, third parties
may still not meet our or our customers’ needs, which may adversely affect our ability to deliver products and services to customers,
and could adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition. Counterparties to any strategic relationship may
have economic or business interests or goals that are, or that may become, inconsistent with our business interests or goals, and may
subject us to additional risks to the extent any such third party becomes the subject of negative publicity, faces its own litigation
or regulatory challenges, or faces other adverse circumstances. Conflicts may arise with our strategic partners, such as the interpretation
of significant terms under any agreement, which may result in litigation or arbitration which would increase our expenses and divert
the attention of our management. If we are unsuccessful in establishing or maintaining strategic relationships with third parties, our
ability to compete in the marketplace or to grow our revenue could be impaired and our business, operating results, and financial condition
could be adversely affected.
The
future development and growth of crypto is subject to a variety of factors that are difficult to predict and evaluate. If crypto does
not grow as we expect, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Crypto
assets built on blockchain technology were only introduced in 2008 and remain in the early stages of development. In addition, different
crypto assets are designed for different purposes. The further growth and development of any crypto assets and their underlying networks
and other cryptographic and algorithmic protocols governing the creation, transfer, and usage of crypto assets represent a new and evolving
paradigm that is subject to a variety of factors that are difficult to evaluate.
We
operate in a highly competitive industry and we compete against unregulated or less regulated companies and companies with greater financial
and other resources, and our business, operating results, and financial condition could be adversely affected if we are unable to compete
effectively.
The
crypto industry is highly innovative, rapidly evolving, and characterized by healthy competition, experimentation, changing customer
needs, frequent introductions of new products and services, and subject to uncertain and evolving industry and regulatory
requirements. We expect competition to intensify in the future as existing and new competitors introduce new products or enhance
existing products. We face significant competition from a variety of companies around the world, in particular those located outside
the United States, who at times are and may in the future be subject to significantly less stringent regulatory and compliance
requirements in their local jurisdictions. Their business models rely on being unregulated or only regulated in a small number of
lower compliance jurisdictions, whilst also offering their products in highly regulated jurisdictions, including the United States,
without necessarily complying with the relevant regulatory requirements in such jurisdictions. Given the uneven enforcement by
United States and foreign regulators, many of these competitors have been able to operate from offshore while offering large numbers
of products and services to consumers, including in the United States, without complying with the relevant licensing and other
requirements in these jurisdictions, and historically without penalty. We also have expended significant managerial, operational,
and compliance costs to comply with laws and regulations applicable to us in the jurisdictions in which we operate, and expect to
continue to incur significant costs to comply with these requirements, which these unregulated or less regulated competitors have
not had to incur. As regulations and compliance requirements in the United States become clearer, we may face increased competition
from companies based in the United States. Our current and potential competitors may establish cooperative relationships among
themselves or with third parties that may further enhance their resources. If we are unable to compete successfully, or if competing
successfully requires us to take costly actions in response to the actions of our competitors, our business, operating results, and
financial condition could be adversely affected.
11
If
we cannot keep pace with rapid industry changes to provide new and innovative products and services, the use of our products and services,
and consequently our net revenue, could decline, which could adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial
Condition.
Our
industry has been characterized by many rapid, significant, and disruptive products and services in recent years. We expect new services
and technologies to continue to emerge and evolve, which may be superior to, or render obsolete, the products and services that we currently
provide. For example, decentralized networks and other disruptive technologies such as generative AI may fundamentally alter the use
of our products or services in unpredictable ways. We cannot predict the effects of new services and technologies on our business. However,
our ability to grow our customer base and net revenue will depend heavily on our ability to innovate and create successful new products
and services, both independently and in conjunction with third-party developers. In particular, developing and incorporating new products
and services into our business may require substantial expenditures, take considerable time, and ultimately may not be successful. Any
new products or services could fail to attract customers, generate revenue, or perform or integrate well with third-party applications
and platforms. In addition, our ability to adapt and compete with new products and services may be inhibited by regulatory requirements
and general uncertainty in the law or other factors. Moreover, we must continue to enhance our technical infrastructure and other technology
offerings to remain competitive and maintain a platform that has the required functionality, performance, capacity, security, and speed
to attract and retain customers. As a result, we expect to incur significant costs and expenses to develop and upgrade our technical
infrastructure to meet the evolving needs of the industry. Our success will depend on our ability to develop, scale, and incorporate
new offerings and adapt to technological changes and evolving industry practices. If we are unable to do so in a timely or cost-effective
manner, our ability to successfully compete, to retain existing customers, and to attract new customers may be impacted and our business,
operating results, and financial condition could be adversely affected.
A
particular crypto asset, product or service’s status as a “security” in any relevant jurisdiction is subject to a high
degree of uncertainty and if we are unable to properly characterize a crypto asset or product offering, we may be subject to regulatory
scrutiny, inquiries, investigations, fines, and other penalties, which could adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial
condition.
Whether
or not an asset, product, or service is a security or constitutes a securities offering under federal securities laws is ultimately determined
by a federal court. The legal test for determining whether any given crypto asset, product, or service is an investment contract security
was set forth in the 1946 Supreme Court case SEC v. W.J. Howey Co. and whether any given crypto asset, product, or service is
a note in the 1990 Supreme Court case Reves v. Ernst & Young . The legal tests for determining whether any given crypto asset,
product, or service is a security requires a highly complex, fact-driven analysis. Accordingly, whether any given crypto asset, product
or service would be ultimately deemed by a federal court to be a security is uncertain and difficult to predict notwithstanding the conclusions
of the SEC or any conclusions we may draw based on our risk-based assessment regarding the likelihood that a particular crypto asset,
product or service could be deemed a “security” or “securities offering” under applicable laws.
The
theft, loss, or destruction of private keys required to access any crypto assets held in custody for our own account. If we are unable
to access our private keys or if we experience a hack or other data loss relating to our ability to access any crypto assets, it could
cause regulatory scrutiny, reputational harm, and other losses.
Crypto
assets are generally controllable only by the possessor of the unique private key relating to the digital wallet in which the crypto
assets are held. While blockchain protocols typically require public addresses to be published when used in a transaction, private keys
must be secured and kept private in order to prevent a third party from accessing the crypto assets held in such a wallet. To the extent
that any of the private keys relating to our wallets containing crypto assets held for our own account is lost, destroyed, or otherwise
compromised or unavailable, and no backup of the private key is accessible, we will be unable to access the crypto assets held in the
related wallet. Further, we cannot provide assurance that our wallets will not be hacked or compromised. Crypto assets and blockchain
technologies have been, and may in the future be, subject to security breaches, hacking, or other malicious activities.
12
Due
to our limited operating history, it may be difficult to evaluate our business and future prospects, and we may not be able to achieve
or maintain profitability in any given period .
We
began to transition our operations in 2025 and since then our business model has continued to evolve. Our limited operating history
and the volatile nature of our business make it difficult to evaluate our current business and our future prospects. We have
encountered and will continue to encounter risks and difficulties as described in this section. If we do not manage these risks
successfully, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Key
business metrics and other estimates are subject to inherent challenges in measurement and change as our business evolves, and our business,
operating results, and financial condition could be adversely affected by real or perceived inaccuracies in those metrics or any changes
in metrics we disclose.
We
regularly review our key business metrics to evaluate our business, measure our performance, identify trends affecting our business,
and make strategic decisions. These key business metrics are calculated using internal company data and have not been validated by an
independent third-party. While these numbers are based on what we believe to be reasonable estimates for the applicable period of measurement
at the time of reporting, there are inherent challenges in such measurements. If we fail to maintain an effective analytics platform,
our key business metrics calculations may be inaccurate, and we may not be able to identify those inaccuracies. Additionally, we may
in the future calculate certain key business metrics using third-party data. While we believe the third-party data we have used in the
past or may use in the future is reliable, we have not independently verified and may not in the future independently verify the accuracy
or completeness of the data contained in such sources and there can be no assurance that such data is free of error. Any inaccuracy in
the third-party data we use could cause us to overstate or understate our key business metrics. We generally will not update previously
disclosed key business metrics for any such inaccuracies or adjustments that are immaterial. We may change our key business metrics from
time to time, which may be perceived negatively. Given the rapid evolution of the crypto markets and our revenue sources, we regularly
evaluate whether our key business metrics remain meaningful indicators of the performance of our business. Further if investors or the
media perceive any changes to our key business metrics disclosures negatively, our business, operating results, and financial condition
could be adversely affected.
We
may suffer losses due to abrupt and erratic market movements.
The
crypto asset market has been characterized by significant volatility and unexpected price movements, and has experienced significant
declines in the past.
Adverse
economic conditions could adversely affect our business.
Our
performance is subject to general economic conditions, and their impact on the crypto asset markets and our customers. The United States
and other key international economies have experienced cyclical downturns from time to time in which economic activity declined resulting
in lower consumption rates, restricted credit, reduced profitability, weaknesses in financial markets, bankruptcies, and overall uncertainty
with respect to the economy. Adverse general economic conditions have impacted in the past, and may impact in the future, the cryptoeconomy,
although the extent of such impacts remains uncertain and dependent on a variety of factors, including market adoption of crypto assets,
global trends in the cryptoeconomy, central bank monetary policies, instability in the global banking system, volatility and disruptions
in the capital and credit markets, and other events beyond our control. Geopolitical developments, such as trade wars and foreign exchange
limitations can also increase the severity and levels of unpredictability globally and increase the volatility of global financial and
crypto asset markets. To the extent general economic conditions and crypto assets markets materially deteriorate or decline for a prolonged
period, our ability to generate revenue and to attract and retain customers could suffer and our business, operating results and financial
condition could be adversely affected. Moreover, even if general economic conditions were to improve following any such deterioration,
there is no guarantee that the cryptoeconomy would similarly improve.
If
we fail to maintain an effective system of disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over our financial reporting, our
ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements or comply with applicable regulations could be impaired.
As
a public company we incur significant legal, accounting, and other expenses. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related rules of the
SEC require, among other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting.
In order to maintain and, if required, improve our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting to
meet this standard, we have expended, and anticipate that we will continue to expend, significant resources, including accounting-related
costs and significant management oversight. If we encounter material weaknesses or deficiencies in our internal control over financial
reporting, we may not detect errors on a timely basis and our Consolidated Financial Statements may be materially misstated. Any failure
to implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could also adversely affect the results of periodic management
evaluations and annual independent registered public accounting firm attestation reports regarding the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting that are required to be included in our periodic reports filed with the SEC. Ineffective disclosure
controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting may adversely affect investor confidence in us and, as a result,
negatively impact the price of our common stock and have a material and adverse effect on our business, operating results, and
financial condition.
13
We
may require additional capital to support business growth, and this capital might not be available.
We
intend to continue to make investments in our business, which investments may require us to secure additional funds. Additional financing
may not be available on terms favorable to us, if at all, including due to general macroeconomic conditions, crypto market conditions
and any disruptions in the crypto market, instability in the global banking system, increasing regulatory uncertainty and scrutiny or
other unforeseen factors. In the event of a downgrade of our credit rating, our ability to raise additional financing may be adversely
affected and any future debt offerings or credit arrangements we propose to enter may be on less favorable terms or terms that may not
be acceptable to us.
Pending
SEC Enforcement Actions Against Our Co-CEO, Chief Advisor, and Lead Investor Could Materially Disrupt Our Operations and Restrict Access
to Our Treasury Assets.
In
June 2025, FF (the “Lead Investor”), our Co-CEO (Jiawei Wang), and our Chief Advisor (YT Jia) received SEC Wells Notices regarding
alleged federal securities law violations. The SEC is considering seeking remedies that include barring Mr. Wang and Mr. Jia from serving
as officers or directors of a public company. Pursuant to our Lead Investor Agreement, Mr. Wang is solely responsible for our non-medical
business operations. He has also been granted sole access, subject to delegation, to all of our crypto-related accounts. If the SEC successfully
pursues a D&O bar against Mr. Wang, we could face an immediate crisis in executive leadership and potential delays or inability to
access our primary treasury reserve assets. An SEC enforcement action against Mr. Jia could impair our damage our reputation with institutional
partners. Because FF is our Lead Investor and controls significant board and operational appointments, any financial penalties,
injunctions, or reputational damage suffered by FF as a result of the SEC’s investigation could materially and adversely affect
our business, capital structure, and ability to raise future funding.
We
have been involved, and may continue to be involved, in disputes, claims or proceedings arising from our operations or class actions
from time to time, which could result in significant liabilities and reputational harm and could materially and adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations
We
may be involved in disputes, claims or proceedings arising out of our operations. In addition, we may have disagreements with regulatory
bodies in the course of our operations, which may subject us to administrative proceedings and unfavorable orders, directives or decrees
that may result in financial losses. Ongoing disputes, claims or proceedings may divert our management’s attention and consume
their time and our other resources.
In
the past, shareholders of public companies have often brought securities class action suits against an issuer following periods of instability
in the market price of an issuer’s securities, or after the publication of third-party research reports. As of the date of this
Annual Report, we are not aware of any lawsuits threatened or filed against us based on any alleged violation of securities laws. We
cannot assure you that there would not be any future claims against us or that we would successfully defend against them. Any such suit,
whether or not successful, could harm our reputation, result in share price volatility and a loss of customers, and restrict our ability
to raise capital in the future. Even if claims do not result in litigation or are resolved in our favor, these claims, and the time and
resources necessary to resolve them, could divert the resources of our management and require significant expenditures, which could prevent
us from competing effectively and could have an adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition. In addition,
if a claim is successfully made against us, we may be required to pay significant damages, which could have a material adverse effect
on our financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, any disputes, claims or proceedings which are initially not of material
importance may escalate and become important to us, due to a variety of factors, such as the facts and circumstances of the cases, the
likelihood of loss, the monetary amount at stake and the parties involved. As of the date of this Annual Report, we are not able to quantify
the likelihood or amount of exposure from any of these potential actions.
Negative
publicity arising from disputes, claims or proceedings may damage our reputation and adversely affect the image of our brands and products.
In addition, if any verdict or award is rendered against us, we could be required to pay significant monetary damages, assume other liabilities
and even to suspend or terminate the related business ventures or projects. Consequently, our business, results of operations and financial
condition may be materially and adversely affected.
14
Risks
Related to Our Intellectual Property
If
we are unable to obtain, maintain, and enforce adequate intellectual property protection for our core technologies, our competitors could
develop and commercialize similar products, which would materially and adversely affect our business.
Our
success depends in large part on our ability to protect our proprietary technology, brand, trade secrets, and institutional knowledge
globally. We rely on a combination of patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, and confidentiality and license agreements to protect
our artificial intelligence and blockchain-based innovations. These critical assets include our protocol, infrastructure, and application
layer technologies , as well as current and future developments related to our RWA and EAI ecosystem.
However,
the patent prosecution process is expensive, time-consuming, and complex, particularly within the rapidly evolving Web3 and cryptocurrency
environments. We may not be able to file, prosecute, maintain, or enforce all necessary patent applications globally at a reasonable
cost or in a timely manner. It is possible that our pending or future patent applications will not result in issued patents, or that
our intellectual property rights could be challenged, narrowed, invalidated, or circumvented by competitors developing alternative decentralized
protocols. Furthermore, changes in U.S. patent law and ongoing patent reform may increase the uncertainty and costs associated with obtaining
and defending patents.
Claims
by third parties that we infringe upon their intellectual property rights could be costly, time-consuming, and materially and adversely
affect our business.
The
artificial intelligence, cryptocurrency, and blockchain industries are characterized by rapid technological advancement, a proliferation
of patents, and frequent, complex litigation regarding intellectual property rights. As we execute our strategy, we may become subject
to adversarial proceedings if competitors or non-practicing entities assert that our products or technologiesinfringe upon their proprietary
rights.
Defending
against any such claims of infringement could cause us to incur substantial legal costs, divert the attention of our management and technical
personnel, and substantially increase our operating losses. If we are found to infringe a third party’s valid intellectual property
rights, we could be subject to significant monetary damages, enjoined from developing or commercializing the infringing technologies,
or forced to obtain costly licenses, which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms.
We
heavily rely on trade secrets and confidentiality agreements to safeguard our competitive advantage, and these measures may not adequately
protect our proprietary information.
In
addition to patent protection, we rely on the protection of trade secrets, know-how, and confidential proprietary information to safeguard
our AI-driven trading infrastructure and decentralized technology protocols. To maintain the confidentiality of these assets, including
the algorithms powering the [___] ’s execution, we rely in part on non-disclosure agreements with our employees, outside developers,
and partners within the AIxC Labs ecosystem.
Despite
these precautions, these agreements may not effectively prevent the unauthorized disclosure of confidential information. Enforcing a
claim of misappropriation is inherently difficult and expensive. Because we expect to rely on third parties, such as global stablecoin
issuers, the need to share confidential information increases the risk that our trade secrets could become known by competitors. If we
lose protection for our trade secrets, the value of our technology would be greatly reduced, severely harming our ability to build a
global leading ecosystem that integrates AI, crypto, and blockchain.
Limitations
on intellectual property protection in certain jurisdictions outside the United States could adversely affect our global competitive
position.
Filing,
prosecuting, and defending our intellectual property across our global digital ecosystem is prohibitively expensive. We face significant
difficulties in obtaining and enforcing our rights in jurisdictions outside the United States, where legal systems may not favor the
enforcement of such rights. Competitors may use our technology in these regions to develop competing products. Efforts to enforce our
rights abroad can be time-consuming and expose us to risks of invalidation or counterclaims, potentially reducing our commercial advantage
in key foreign markets.
15
General
Risks
The
requirements of being a public company may strain our resources and divert management’s attention.
As
a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley
Act”), the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and other applicable securities rules and regulations. The
Exchange Act requires, among other things, that we file annual and current reports with the SEC with respect to our business and operating
results. Compliance with these rules and regulations increases our legal and financial compliance costs, makes some activities more difficult,
time-consuming, or costly, and increases demand on our systems and resources.
As
a result of disclosure of information in this Annual Report and in filings required of a public company, our business and financial condition
is more visible, which we believe may result in threatened or actual litigation, including by competitors and other third parties. If
such claims are successful, our business and operating results could be harmed, and even if the claims do not result in litigation or
are resolved in our favor, these claims, and the time and resources necessary to resolve them, could divert resources of our management
and harm our business and operating results.
Periods
of rapid growth and expansion could place a significant strain on our resources, including our employee base, which could negatively
impact our operating results.
Our
recent strategic transition into the Web3 and AI sectors to become a gateway to the AI Web3 world places a significant strain and demands
on our management, our operational and financial resources, customer operations, research and development, sales and marketing, administrative,
and other resources. To manage our possible future growth effectively, we will be required to continue to improve our management, operational
and financial systems. Future growth would also require us to successfully hire, train, motivate and manage our employees. In addition,
our continued growth and the evolution of our business plan will require significant additional management, technical and administrative
resources. If we are unable to manage our growth successfully, we may not be able to effectively manage the growth and evolution of our
current business and our operating results could suffer.
Macroeconomic
and financial market disruptions may adversely affect our liquidity, operations, and results.
Disruptions
in global financial markets, including volatility in equity and digital asset prices and reduced availability of capital, could limit
our access to financing, increase our cost of capital, and disrupt our customers and partners. Stress affecting banks and payment partners,
as well as crypto market intermediaries such as exchanges, lenders, stablecoin issuers, and custodians, could impair our liquidity, reduce
customer activity, and negatively impact our operations.
Furthermore,
persistent inflation, interest rate changes, geopolitical instability, sanctions and supply chain constraints may reduce customer spending,
trading volumes, and demand for our products and services. These conditions can also lengthen payment cycles, increase credit losses
and write-offs, and constrain working capital. If capital markets tighten, we may be unable to raise funds on acceptable terms or at
all, limiting our ability to fund operations, invest, or pursue growth opportunities, including the necessary funding to pursue our strategic
investments in the technology infrastructure or completion of our RWA tokenization initiatives involving FFAI stock. Any of these factors
could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.
Heightened
public scrutiny and negative publicity could damage our reputation and adversely affect our business and prospects.
Characteristics
of the crypto ecosystem, including decentralization, cross-border activity, and pseudonymous transactions, can attract heightened attention
from the public, regulators, and the media. As our business expands to include the Web3 Store and RWA + EAI ecosystem development, we
may face increased scrutiny from regulators in existing and new markets. Allegations or negative publicity regarding platform failures,
security incidents, or regulatory actions in the broader crypto industry, whether or not accurate, can lead to government inquiries,
increased oversight, and reputational harm. This scrutiny could deter customers and partners from utilizing our AI-driven trading infrastructure,
dampening demand for our services. Responding to inquiries or litigation can be costly and divert management’s attention, and adverse
perceptions could negatively impact the market price of our securities.
16
Certain
data and information in this Annual Report were obtained from third-party sources and were not independently verified by us.
This
Annual Report includes data and information from publicly available third party publications and reports. These sources often include
projections based on assumptions that may not materialize, and markets relevant to our business, including digital asset and financial
technology markets, may not grow at the rates projected or at all. Broader macroeconomic, regulatory, and industry specific factors discussed
in this report introduce uncertainty that could cause actual outcomes to differ materially from projections.
We
have not independently verified the third party data and information included here. Such data may have been collected using methodologies
different from our own, and while these publications often state that their information is believed to be reliable, accuracy and completeness
are not guaranteed. You should not place undue reliance on third party data or projections in this report.
Risks
Related to the Ownership of Our Securities
We
have a large number of authorized but unissued shares of our common stock which will dilute existing ownership positions when issued.
At
December 31, 2025, our authorized capital stock consists of 225 million shares of common stock, of which approximately 219.8 million
remain available for issuance, including shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of outstanding derivative securities.
Our management will continue to have broad discretion to issue shares of our common stock in a range of transactions, including capital-raising
transactions, mergers, acquisitions and other transactions, without obtaining stockholder approval, unless stockholder approval is required
under law or the rules of Nasdaq or any other trading market on which our common stock may be listed. If our management determines it
be appropriate to issue shares of our common stock from the large pool of authorized but unissued shares for any purpose in the future
and is not required to obtain stockholder approval, your ownership position would be diluted without your further ability to vote on
that transaction.
Our
common stock may be affected by limited trading volume and price fluctuations, which could adversely impact the value of our common stock.
Our
common stock has experienced, and is likely to experience in the future, significant price and volume fluctuations, which could adversely
affect the market prices of our common stock without regard to our operating performance. In addition, we believe that factors such as
quarterly fluctuations in our financial results and changes in the overall economy or the condition of the financial markets could cause
the market prices of our common stock and warrants to fluctuate substantially. These fluctuations may also cause short sellers to periodically
enter the market in the belief that we will have poor results in the future. We cannot predict the actions of market participants and,
therefore, can offer no assurances that the market for our common stock and warrants will be stable or appreciate over time.
We
may need, but be unable, to obtain additional funding on satisfactory terms, which could dilute our stockholders or impose burdensome
financial restrictions on our business.
We
have relied upon cash from financing activities, and, in the future, we hope to rely on revenues generated from operations to fund the
cash requirements of our activities. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to generate any significant cash from our
operating activities in the future. Future financing may not be available on a timely basis, in sufficient amounts or on terms acceptable
to us, if at all. Any debt financing or other financing of securities senior to the common stock will likely include financial and other
covenants that will restrict our financing and/or operational flexibility. Any failure to comply with these covenants would have a material
adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations because we could lose our existing sources of
funding, and our ability to secure new sources of funding could be impaired.