Item 1A. Risk Factors
Item 1A. Risk Factors
An investment
in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the material risks described below, which we believe represent
the material risks related to our securities, together with the other information contained in this Report, before making a decision to
invest in our securities. This Report also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results
could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a result of specific factors, including the risks
described below.
Risks
Relating our Search for, and Consummation of or Inability to Consummate, a Business Combination
Our
public shareholders may not be afforded an opportunity to vote on our proposed initial business combination, and even if we hold a vote,
(i) holders of our founder shares will participate in such vote, which means we may complete our initial business combination even though
a majority of our public shareholders do not support such a combination and (ii) if the non-managing sponsor investors vote in favor of
an initial business combination, we may not need any public shares sold to other investors to be voted in favor of the initial business
combination.
We
may choose not to hold a shareholder vote to approve our initial business combination unless the business combination would require shareholder
approval under applicable law or stock exchange listing requirements. In such case, the decision as to whether we will seek shareholder
approval of a proposed business combination or will allow shareholders to sell their shares to us in a tender offer will be made by us,
solely in our discretion, and will be based on a variety of factors, such as the timing of the transaction and whether the terms of the
transaction would otherwise require us to seek shareholder approval. Even if we seek shareholder approval, (i) the holders of our founder
shares will participate in the vote on such approval and, accordingly, we may complete our initial business combination even if holders
of a majority of our ordinary shares do not approve of the business combination we complete and (ii) if the non-managing sponsor investors
vote in favor of an initial business combination, we may not need any public shares sold to other investors to be voted in favor of the
initial business combination.
If
we seek shareholder approval of our initial business combination, our sponsor and management team have agreed to vote in favor of such
initial business combination, regardless of how our public shareholders vote.
Our
sponsor owns 25% of our outstanding ordinary shares (not including the Class A ordinary shares comprising part of the private placement
units and the Class A ordinary shares underlying the private placement warrants). Our sponsor and management team may also from time
to time purchase Class A ordinary shares prior to our initial business combination. Our amended and restated memorandum and articles of
association provide that, if we seek shareholder approval of an initial business combination, such initial business combination will be
approved if we receive an ordinary resolution under Cayman Islands law and our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association,
which requires the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the votes cast by such shareholders as, being entitled to do so, vote in
person or, where proxies are allowed, by proxy at the applicable general meeting of the company. As a result, in addition to our sponsor’s
founder shares and private placement shares, we would need 7,319,167, or approximately 31.82%, of the 23,000,000 public shares outstanding
to be voted in favor of an initial business combination in order to have our initial business combination approved, assuming all outstanding
shares are voted, the underwriters’ private placement shares are voted in favor of the initial business combination, and the parties
to the letter agreement do not acquire any Class A ordinary shares. Assuming that only the holders of one third of our issued and outstanding
ordinary shares, representing a quorum under our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association, vote their ordinary shares
at a general meeting of the company, we would not need any of the 23,000,000 public shares in addition to our founder shares and private
placement shares to be voted in favor of an initial business combination in order to approve an initial business combination. However,
if our initial business combination is structured as a statutory merger or consolidation with another company under Cayman Islands law,
the approval of our initial business combination will require a special resolution, which requires the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds
of the votes cast by such shareholders as, being entitled to do so, vote in person or, where proxies are allowed, by proxy at the applicable
general meeting of the company. Accordingly, if we seek shareholder approval of our initial business combination, the agreement by our
sponsor and management team to vote in favor of our initial business combination will increase the likelihood that an ordinary resolution
will be passed, being the requisite shareholder approval for such initial business combination.
14
Your
only opportunity to effect your investment decision regarding a potential business combination may be limited to the exercise of your
right to redeem your shares from us for cash.
Since
our board of directors may complete a business combination without seeking shareholder approval, public shareholders may not have the
right or opportunity to vote on the business combination, unless we seek such shareholder vote. Accordingly, your only opportunity to
effect your investment decision regarding our initial business combination may be limited to exercising your redemption rights within
the period of time (which will be at least 20 business days) set forth in our tender offer documents mailed to our public shareholders
in which we describe our initial business combination. The per share amount we will distribute to shareholders who properly exercise their
redemption rights will not be reduced by the deferred underwriting commissions and after such redemptions, the per-share value of shares
held by non-redeeming shareholders will reflect our obligation to pay the deferred underwriting commissions.
The
ability of our public shareholders to redeem their shares for cash may make our financial condition unattractive to potential business
combination targets, which may make it difficult for us to enter into a business combination with a target.
We may seek
to enter into a business combination transaction agreement with a minimum cash requirement for (i) cash consideration to be paid to the
target or its owners, (ii) cash for working capital or other general corporate purposes or (iii) the retention of cash to satisfy other
conditions. If too many public shareholders exercise their redemption rights, we would not be able to meet such closing condition and,
as a result, would not be able to proceed with the business combination. A portion of the deferred underwriting commissions payable to
the underwriters will be based on the percentage of public shares outstanding immediately prior to the consummation of our initial business
combination, net of public shares submitted for redemption and net of any public shares held by public shareholders that have entered
into forward purchase agreements or other arrangements whereby we have a contractual obligation to repurchase such shares after the closing
of the initial business combination, and will be released to the underwriters only upon the completion of an initial business combination.
If we are able to consummate an initial business combination, the per-share value of shares held by non-redeeming shareholders will reflect
our obligation to pay and the payment of the corresponding deferred underwriting commissions. Consequently, if accepting all properly
submitted redemption requests would not allow us to satisfy a closing condition as described above, we would not proceed with such redemption
and the related business combination and may instead search for an alternate business combination. Prospective targets will be aware of
these risks and, thus, may be reluctant to enter into a business combination transaction with us.
The
ability of our public shareholders to exercise redemption rights with respect to a large number of our shares and the amount of deferred
underwriting compensation may not allow us to complete the most desirable business combination or optimize our capital structure, and
may substantially dilute your investment in us.
At the time
we enter into an agreement for our initial business combination, we will not know how many shareholders may exercise their redemption
rights, and therefore will need to structure the transaction based on our expectations as to the number of shares that will be submitted
for redemption. If our initial business combination agreement requires us to use a portion of the cash in the trust account to pay the
purchase price, or requires us to have a minimum amount of cash at closing, we will need to reserve a portion of the cash in the trust
account to meet such requirements, or arrange for third party financing. In addition, if a larger number of shares are submitted for redemption
than we initially expected, we may need to restructure the transaction to reserve a greater portion of the cash in the trust account or
arrange for third party financing. Raising additional third party financing may involve dilutive equity issuances or the incurrence of
indebtedness at higher than desirable levels. Furthermore, this dilution would increase to the extent that the anti-dilution provision
of the Class B ordinary shares results in the issuance of Class A ordinary shares on a greater than one-to-one basis upon conversion of
the Class B ordinary shares at the time of our initial business combination. In addition, a portion of the deferred underwriting commissions
payable to the underwriters will be based on the percentage of public shares outstanding immediately prior to the consummation of our
initial business combination, net of public shares submitted for redemption and net of any public shares held by public shareholders that
have entered into forward purchase agreements or other arrangements whereby we have a contractual obligation to repurchase such shares
after the closing of the initial business combination, and will be released to the underwriters only upon the completion of an initial
business combination. The per share amount we will distribute to shareholders who properly exercise their redemption rights will not be
reduced by the deferred underwriting commissions and after such redemptions, the amount held in trust will continue to reflect our obligation
to pay the corresponding deferred underwriting commissions. The above considerations may limit our ability to complete the most desirable
business combination available to us or optimize our capital structure. As a result, our obligations to redeem public shares for which
redemption is requested and to pay the deferred underwriting commissions may not allow us to complete the most desirable business combination
or optimize our capital structure.
15
In addition,
raising additional third-party financing may involve dilutive equity issuances or the incurrence of indebtedness at higher than desirable
levels. Furthermore, this dilution would increase to the extent that the anti-dilution provisions of the Class B ordinary shares result
in the issuance of Class A ordinary shares on a greater than one-to-one basis upon conversion of the Class B ordinary shares at the time
of our business combination. The above considerations may limit our ability to complete the most desirable business combination available
to us or optimize our capital structure and may result in substantial dilution from your purchase of our Class A ordinary shares. The
effect of this dilution will be greater for shareholders who do not redeem. The amount of the deferred underwriting compensation payable
to the underwriters will not be adjusted for any shares that are redeemed in connection with an initial business combination, which may
further dilute your investment. The per-share amount we will distribute to shareholders who properly exercise their redemption rights
will not be reduced by the deferred underwriting compensation and after such redemptions, the per-share value of shares held by non-redeeming
shareholders will reflect our obligation to pay the deferred underwriting compensation. We may not be able to generate sufficient value
from the completion of our initial business combination in order to overcome the dilutive impact of these and other factors, and, accordingly,
you may incur a net loss on your investment.
The
ability of our public shareholders to exercise redemption rights with respect to a large number of our shares could increase the probability
that our initial business combination would be unsuccessful and that you would have to wait for liquidation in order to redeem your shares.
If our initial
business combination agreement requires us to use a portion of the cash in the trust account to pay the purchase price, or requires us
to have a minimum amount of cash at closing, the probability that our initial business combination would be unsuccessful is increased.
If our initial business combination is unsuccessful, you would not receive your pro rata portion of the funds in the trust account until
we liquidate the trust account. If you are in need of immediate liquidity, you could attempt to sell your shares in the open market; however,
at such time our shares may trade at a discount to the pro rata amount per share in the trust account. In either situation, you may suffer
a material loss on your investment or lose the benefit of funds expected in connection with your exercise of redemption rights until we
liquidate or you are able to sell your shares in the open market.
The
requirement that we complete our initial business combination within the completion window may give potential target businesses leverage
over us in negotiating a business combination and may limit the time we have in which to conduct due diligence on potential business combination
targets, in particular as we approach our dissolution deadline, which could undermine our ability to complete our initial business combination
on terms that would produce value for our shareholders.
Any potential
target business with which we enter into negotiations concerning a business combination will be aware that we must complete our initial
business combination within the completion window. Consequently, such target business may obtain leverage over us in negotiating a business
combination, knowing that if we do not complete our initial business combination with that particular target business, we may be unable
to complete our initial business combination with any target business. This risk will increase as we get closer to the timeframe described
above. In addition, we may have limited time to conduct due diligence and may enter into our initial business combination on terms that
we would have rejected upon a more comprehensive investigation. The length of time it may take us to complete our diligence and negotiate
a business combination may reduce the amount of time available for us to ultimately complete an initial business combination should such
diligence or negotiations not lead to a consummated initial business combination.
16
We
may engage one or more of our underwriters or one of their respective affiliates to provide additional services to us, which may include
acting as M&A advisor in connection with an initial business combination or as placement agent in connection with a related financing
transaction. Our underwriters are entitled to receive deferred underwriting commissions that will be released from the trust account only
upon a completion of an initial business combination. These financial incentives may cause them to have potential conflicts of interest
in rendering any such additional services to us after our initial public offering, including, for example, in connection with the sourcing
and consummation of an initial business combination.
We may engage
one or more of our underwriters or one of their respective affiliates to provide additional services to us, including, for example, identifying
potential targets, providing M&A advisory services, acting as a placement agent in a private offering or arranging debt financing
transactions. We may pay such underwriter or its affiliate fair and reasonable fees or other compensation that would be determined at
that time in an arm’s length negotiation; provided that no agreement will be entered into with any of the underwriters or their
respective affiliates and no fees or other compensation for such services will be paid to any of the underwriters or their respective
affiliates prior to the date that is 60 days from the effective date of our registration statement, unless such payment would not be deemed
underwriters’ compensation in connection with our initial public offering.
The underwriters
are also entitled to receive deferred underwriting commissions that are conditioned on the completion of an initial business combination.
The underwriters’ or their respective affiliates’ financial interests tied to the consummation of a business combination transaction
may give rise to potential conflicts of interest in providing any such additional services to us, including potential conflicts of interest
in connection with the sourcing and consummation of an initial business combination. The underwriters are under no obligation to provide
any further services to us in order to receive all or any part of the deferred underwriting commissions.
We
may not be able to complete our initial business combination within the completion window, in which case we would redeem our public shares.
We may not
be able to find a suitable target business and complete our initial business combination within the completion window. Our ability to
complete our initial business combination may be negatively impacted by general market conditions, volatility in the capital and debt
markets and the other risks described herein. If we have not completed our initial business combination within such time period, we will
(i) cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up, (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten business
days thereafter (and subject to lawfully available funds therefor), redeem the public shares, at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal
to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account, including interest earned on the funds held in the trust account (which
interest shall be net of taxes (excluding any excise tax, or similar tax, imposed on us) and less up to $100,000 of interest to pay dissolution
expenses), divided by the number of then-outstanding public shares, which redemption will completely extinguish public shareholders’
rights as shareholders (including the right to receive further liquidating distributions, if any), subject to applicable law, and (iii)
as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of our remaining shareholders and our board of directors,
liquidate and dissolve, subject in each case to our obligations under Cayman Islands law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements
of other applicable law. In such case, our public shareholders may only receive $10.00 per share, or possibly less, and our warrants will
expire without value to the holder. In certain circumstances, our public shareholders may receive less than $10.00 per share on the redemption
of their shares.
We
may decide not to extend the term we have to consummate our initial business combination, in which case we would redeem our public shares,
and the warrants may be worthless.
We have until
the date that is 24 months from the closing of our initial public offering or until such earlier liquidation date as our board of directors
may approve, to consummate our initial business combination. If we anticipate that we may be unable to consummate our initial business
combination within such period, we may seek shareholder approval to amend our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association
to extend the date by which we must consummate our initial business combination. However, we may decide not to seek to extend the date
by which we must consummate our initial business combination. If we do not seek to extend the date by which we must consummate our initial
business combination, and we are unable to consummate our initial business combination within the applicable time period, we will (i)
cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up, (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten business days
thereafter (and subject to lawfully available funds therefor), redeem the public shares, at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal
to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account, including interest earned on the funds held in the trust account (which
interest shall be net of taxes (excluding any excise tax, or similar tax, imposed on us) and less up to $100,000 of interest to pay dissolution
expenses), divided by the number of then-outstanding public shares, which redemption will completely extinguish public shareholders’
rights as shareholders (including the right to receive further liquidating distributions, if any), subject to applicable law, and (iii)
as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of our remaining shareholders and our board of directors,
liquidate and dissolve, subject in each case, to our obligations under Cayman Islands law to provide for claims of creditors and the requirements
of other applicable law. In such event, the warrants may be worthless.
17
If
we seek shareholder approval of our initial business combination, our sponsor, directors, officers, advisors and their respective affiliates
may elect to purchase shares or public warrants from public shareholders, which may influence a vote on a proposed business combination
and reduce the public “float” of our Class A ordinary shares or public warrants.
If we seek
shareholder approval of our initial business combination and we do not conduct redemptions in connection with our initial business combination
pursuant to the tender offer rules, our sponsor, directors, officers, advisors and their respective affiliates may purchase public shares
or warrants in privately negotiated transactions or in the open market either prior to or following the completion of our initial business
combination, although they are under no obligation or duty to do so. Such a purchase may include a contractual acknowledgment that such
shareholder, although still the record holder of our shares is no longer the beneficial owner thereof and therefore agrees not to exercise
its redemption rights. In the event that our sponsor, directors, officers, advisors and their respective affiliates purchase shares in
privately negotiated transactions from public shareholders who have already elected to exercise their redemption rights, such selling
shareholders would be required to revoke their prior elections to redeem their shares. It is intended that, if Rule 10b-18 would apply
to purchases by sponsor, directors, officers, advisors and their respective affiliates, then such purchases will comply with Rule 10b-18
under the Exchange Act, to the extent it applies, which provides a safe harbor for purchases made under certain conditions, including
with respect to timing, pricing and volume of purchases.
Additionally,
at any time at or prior to our initial business combination, subject to applicable securities laws (including with respect to material
nonpublic information), our sponsor, directors, officers, advisors and their respective affiliates may enter into transactions with investors
and others to provide them with incentives to acquire public shares, vote their public shares in favor of our initial business combination
or not redeem their public shares. However, they have no current commitments, plans or intentions to engage in such transactions and have
not formulated any terms or conditions for any such transactions. None of the funds in the trust account will be used to purchase public
shares or warrants in such transactions.
The purpose
of any such transactions could be to (1) reduce the number of public warrants outstanding and/or increase the likelihood of approval on
any matters submitted to the public warrant holders for approval in connection with our initial business combination or (2) satisfy a
closing condition in an agreement with a target that requires us to have a minimum net worth or a certain amount of cash at the closing
of our initial business combination, where it appears that such requirement would otherwise not be met. Any such purchases of our securities
may result in the completion of our initial business combination that may not otherwise have been possible.
In addition,
if such purchases are made, the public “float” of our securities may be reduced and the number of beneficial holders of our
securities may be reduced, which may make it difficult to maintain or obtain the quotation, listing or trading of our securities on a
national securities exchange. Any such purchases will be reported pursuant to Section 13 and Section 16 of the Exchange Act to the extent
such purchasers are subject to such reporting requirements. Additionally, in the event our sponsor, directors, officers, advisors and
their respective affiliates were to purchase public shares or warrants from public shareholders, such purchases would be structured in
compliance with the requirements of Rule 14e-5 under the Exchange Act including, in pertinent part, through adherence to the following:
●
our registration statement/proxy statement filed for
our business combination transaction would disclose the possibility that our sponsor, directors, officers, advisors and their respective
affiliates may purchase public shares or warrants from public shareholders outside the redemption process, along with the purpose of such
purchases;
●
if our sponsor, directors, officers, advisors and their
respective affiliates were to purchase public shares or warrants from public shareholders, they would do so at a price no higher than
the price offered through our redemption process;
●
our registration statement/proxy statement filed for
our business combination transaction would include a representation that any of our securities purchased by our sponsor, directors, officers,
advisors and their respective affiliates would not be voted in favor of approving the business combination transaction;
●
our sponsor, directors, officers, advisors and their
respective affiliates would not possess any redemption rights with respect to our securities or, if they do acquire and possess redemption
rights, they would waive such rights; and
18
●
we would disclose in a Form 8-K, before our security
holder meeting to approve the business combination transaction, the following material items:
●
the amount of our securities purchased outside of
the redemption offer by our sponsor, directors, officers, advisors and their respective affiliates, along with the purchase price;
●
the purpose of the purchases by our sponsor, directors,
officers, advisors and their respective affiliates;
●
the impact, if any, of the purchases by our sponsor,
directors, officers, advisors and their respective affiliates on the likelihood that the business combination transaction will be approved;
●
the identities of our security holders who sold to
our sponsor, directors, officers, advisors and their respective affiliates (if not purchased on the open market) or the nature of our
security holders (e.g., 5% security holders) who sold to our sponsor, directors, officers, advisors and their respective affiliates; and
●
the number of our securities for which we have received
redemption requests pursuant to our redemption offer.
If
a shareholder fails to receive notice of our offer to redeem our public shares in connection with our initial business combination, or
fails to comply with the procedures for submitting or tendering its shares, such shares may not be redeemed.
We will comply
with the proxy rules or tender offer rules, as applicable, when conducting redemptions in connection with our initial business combination.
Despite our compliance with these rules, if a shareholder fails to receive our proxy materials or tender offer documents, as applicable,
such shareholder may not become aware of the opportunity to redeem its shares. In addition, proxy materials or tender offer documents,
as applicable, that we will furnish to holders of our public shares in connection with our initial business combination will describe
the various procedures that must be complied with in order to validly tender or submit public shares for redemption. For example, we intend
to require our public shareholders seeking to exercise their redemption rights, whether they are record holders or hold their shares in
“street name,” to, at the holder’s option, either deliver their share certificates to our transfer agent, or to deliver
their shares to our transfer agent electronically prior to the date set forth in the proxy materials or tender offer documents, as applicable.
In the case of proxy materials, this date may be up to two business days prior to the scheduled vote on the proposal to approve the initial
business combination. In addition, if we conduct redemptions in connection with a shareholder vote, we intend to require a public shareholder
seeking redemption of its public shares to also submit a written request for redemption to our transfer agent two business days prior
to the scheduled vote in which the name of the beneficial owner of such shares is included. In the event that a shareholder fails to comply
with these or any other procedures disclosed in the proxy or tender offer materials, as applicable, its shares may not be redeemed.
You
will not be entitled to protections normally afforded to investors of other blank check companies subject to Rule 419 of the Securities
Act.
Since the
net proceeds of our initial public offering and the sale of the private placement units are intended to be used to complete one or more
initial business combinations with a target business or businesses that have not been selected, we may be deemed to be a “blank
check” company under the United States securities laws. However, because we currently have net tangible assets in excess of $5,000,000
and have filed a Current Report on Form 8-K, including an audited balance sheet demonstrating this fact, we are exempt from rules promulgated
by the SEC to protect investors in blank check companies, such as Rule 419. Accordingly, investors will not be afforded the benefits or
protections of those rules. Among other things, this means our units are currently tradable and we have a longer period of time to complete
our business combinations than do companies subject to Rule 419.
If
we seek shareholder approval of our initial business combination and we do not conduct redemptions pursuant to the tender offer rules,
and if you or a “group” of shareholders are deemed to hold in excess of 15% of our Class A ordinary shares, you may lose the
ability to redeem all such shares in excess of 15% of our Class A ordinary shares.
If we seek
shareholder approval of our initial business combination and we do not conduct redemptions in connection with our initial business combination
pursuant to the tender offer rules, our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association provides that a public shareholder,
together with any affiliate of such shareholder or any other person with whom such shareholder is acting in concert or as a “group”
(as defined under Section 13 of the Exchange Act), will be restricted from redeeming its shares with respect to more than an aggregate
of 15% of the shares sold in our initial public offering, which we refer to as the “Excess Shares,” without our prior consent.
However, we would not be restricting our shareholders’ ability to vote all of their shares (including Excess Shares) for or against
our initial business combination. Your inability to redeem the Excess Shares will reduce your influence over our ability to complete our
initial business combination and you could suffer a material loss on your investment in us if you sell Excess Shares in open market transactions.
Additionally, you will not receive redemption distributions with respect to the Excess Shares if we complete our initial business combination.
And as a result, you will continue to hold that number of shares exceeding 15% and, in order to dispose of such shares, would be required
to sell your shares in open market transactions, potentially at a loss.
19
If
we are unable to complete our initial business combination, our public shareholders may receive only their pro rata portion of the funds
in the trust account that are available for distribution to public shareholders, and our warrants will expire worthless.
We expect
to encounter competition from other entities having a business objective similar to ours, including private investors (which may be individuals
or investment partnerships), other blank check companies and other entities, domestic and international, competing for the types of businesses
we intend to acquire. Many of these individuals and entities are well-established and have extensive experience in identifying and effecting,
directly or indirectly, acquisitions of companies operating in or providing services to various industries. Many of these competitors
possess similar or greater technical, human and other resources to ours or more local industry knowledge than we do and our financial
resources will be relatively limited when contrasted with those of many of these competitors. While we believe there are numerous target
businesses we could potentially acquire with the net proceeds of our initial public offering and the sale of the private placement units,
our ability to compete with respect to the acquisition of certain target businesses that are sizable will be limited by our available
financial resources. This inherent competitive limitation gives others an advantage in pursuing the acquisition of certain target businesses.
Furthermore, we are obligated to offer holders of our public shares the right to redeem their shares for cash at the time of our initial
business combination in conjunction with a shareholder vote or via a tender offer. Target companies will be aware that this may reduce
the resources available to us for our initial business combination. Any of these obligations may place us at a competitive disadvantage
in successfully negotiating a business combination. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination, our public shareholders
may receive only their pro rata portion of the funds in the trust account that are available for distribution to public shareholders,
and our warrants will expire worthless.
If
the net proceeds of our initial public offering and the sale of the private placement units not being held in the trust account are insufficient
to allow us to operate for at least the duration of the completion window, it could limit the amount available to fund our search for
a target business or businesses and complete our initial business combination, and we will depend on loans from our sponsor or management
team to fund our search and to complete our initial business combination.
Of the net
proceeds of our initial public offering, only $1,600,000 is available to us initially outside the trust account to fund our working capital
requirements. We believe that the funds available to us outside of the trust account will be sufficient to allow us to operate for at
least the duration of the completion window; however, we cannot assure you that our estimate is accurate. Of the funds available to us,
we could use a portion of the funds available to us to pay fees to consultants to assist us with our search for a target business. We
could also use a portion of the funds as a down payment or to fund a “no-shop” provision (a provision in letters of intent
or merger agreements designed to keep target businesses from “shopping” around for transactions with other companies or investors
on terms more favorable to such target businesses) with respect to a particular proposed business combination, although we do not have
any current intention to do so. If we entered into a letter of intent or merger agreement where we paid for the right to receive exclusivity
from a target business and were subsequently required to forfeit such funds (whether as a result of our breach or otherwise), we might
not have sufficient funds to continue searching for, or conduct due diligence with respect to, a target business.
In the event
that our initial public offering expenses exceed our estimate of $750,000, we may fund such excess with funds not to be held in the trust
account. In such case, the amount of funds we intend to be held outside the trust account would decrease by a corresponding amount. The
amount held in the trust account will not be impacted as a result of such increase or decrease. Conversely, in the event that the initial
public offering expenses are less than our estimate of $750,000, the amount of funds we intend to be held outside the trust account would
increase by a corresponding amount. If we are required to seek additional capital, we would need to borrow funds from our sponsor, management
team or other third parties to operate or may be forced to liquidate.
20
None of our
sponsor, officers or directors, or their respective affiliates, is under any obligation to advance funds to us in such circumstances.
Any such advances would be repaid only from funds held outside the trust account or from funds released to us upon completion of our initial
business combination. Up to $1,500,000 of such loans may be convertible into private placement units of the post-business combination
entity at a price of $10.00 per unit at the option of the lender. Such units would be identical to the private placement units. Prior
to the completion of our initial business combination, we do not expect to seek loans from parties other than our sponsor, officers or
directors, or their respective affiliates, as we do not believe third parties will be willing to loan such funds and provide a waiver
against any and all rights to seek access to funds in our trust account. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination
because we do not have sufficient funds available to us, we will be forced to liquidate the trust account. Consequently, our public shareholders
may only receive an estimated $10.00 per share, or possibly less, on our redemption of our public shares, and our warrants will expire
worthless.
If
third parties bring claims against us, the proceeds held in the trust account could be reduced and the per-share redemption amount received
by shareholders may be less than $10.00 per share.
Our placing
of funds in the trust account may not protect those funds from third party claims against us. Although we will seek to have all vendors,
service providers, prospective target businesses and other entities with which we do business execute agreements with us waiving any right,
title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies held in the trust account for the benefit of our public shareholders, such parties
may not execute such agreements, or even if they execute such agreements they may not be prevented from bringing claims against the trust
account, including, but not limited to, fraudulent inducement, breach of fiduciary responsibility or other similar claims, as well as
claims challenging the enforceability of the waiver, in each case in order to gain advantage with respect to a claim against our assets,
including the funds held in the trust account. If any third party refuses to execute an agreement waiving such claims to the monies held
in the trust account, our management will consider whether competitive alternatives are reasonably available to us and will only enter
into an agreement with such third party if management believes that such third party’s engagement would be in the best interests
of the company under the circumstances. WithumSmith+Brown, PC, our independent registered public accounting firm, and the underwriters
of our initial public offering did not execute agreements with us waiving such claims to the monies held in the trust account.
Examples of
possible instances where we may engage a third party that refuses to execute a waiver include the engagement of a third-party consultant
whose particular expertise or skills are believed by management to be significantly superior to those of other consultants that would
agree to execute a waiver or in cases where management is unable to find a service provider willing to execute a waiver. In addition,
there is no guarantee that such entities will agree to waive any claims they may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of,
any negotiations, contracts or agreements with us and will not seek recourse against the trust account for any reason. Upon redemption
of our public shares, if we are unable to complete our initial business combination within the prescribed timeframe, or upon the exercise
of a redemption right in connection with our initial business combination, we will be required to provide for payment of claims of creditors
that were not waived that may be brought against us within the 10 years following redemption. Accordingly, the per-share redemption amount
received by public shareholders could be less than the $10.00 per public share initially held in the trust account, due to claims of such
creditors Our sponsor has agreed that it will be liable to us if and to the extent any claims by a third party for services rendered or
products sold to us (except for the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm), or a prospective target business with
which we have entered into a written letter of intent, confidentiality or other similar agreement or business combination agreement, reduce
the amount of funds in the trust account to below the lesser of (i) $10.00 per public share and (ii) the actual amount per public share
held in the trust account as of the date of the liquidation of the trust account, if less than $10.00 per public share due to reductions
in the value of the trust assets, less taxes payable (excluding any excise tax, or similar tax, imposed on us), provided that such liability
will not apply to any claims by a third party or prospective target business who executed a waiver of any and all rights to the monies
held in the trust account (whether or not such waiver is enforceable) nor will it apply to any claims under our indemnity of the underwriters
of our initial public offering against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act. However, we have not asked
our sponsor to reserve for such indemnification obligations, nor have we independently verified whether our sponsor has sufficient funds
to satisfy its indemnity obligations and we believe that our sponsor’s only assets are securities of our company. Therefore, we
cannot assure you that our sponsor would be able to satisfy those obligations. As a result, if any such claims were successfully made
against the trust account, the funds available for our initial business combination and redemptions could be reduced to less than $10.00
per public share. In such event, we may not be able to complete our initial business combination, and you would receive such lesser amount
per share in connection with any redemption of your public shares. None of our officers or directors will indemnify us for claims by third
parties including claims by vendors and prospective target businesses.
21
If
our initial business combination involves a company organized under the laws of the United States (or any subdivision thereof), the excise
tax could be imposed on us in connection with any redemptions of our Class A ordinary shares after or in connection with such initial
business combination.
The Inflation
Reduction Act of 2022 provides for, among other things, the excise tax on certain repurchases (including redemptions) of stock by publicly
traded U.S. corporations after December 31, 2022, subject to certain exceptions. If applicable, the amount of excise tax is generally
1% of the aggregate fair market value of any stock repurchased by the corporation during a taxable year, net of the aggregate fair market
value of certain new stock issuances by the repurchasing corporation during the same taxable year. In addition, the U.S. Treasury Department
and IRS have released preliminary guidance that would potentially cause a non-U.S. corporation’s U.S. subsidiaries to be subject
to the excise tax with respect to any share repurchases made by the non-U.S. corporation under certain circumstances.
As an entity
incorporated as a Cayman Islands exempted company, the excise tax is currently not expected to apply to redemptions of our Class A ordinary
shares (absent any regulations or other additional guidance that may be issued in the future). However, in connection with an initial
business combination involving a company organized under the laws of the United States (or any subdivision thereof), it is possible that
we domesticate and continue as a Delaware corporation prior to certain redemptions. Because we expect that, following such a domestication,
our securities would continue to trade on Nasdaq, in such a case we could be subject to the excise tax with respect to any subsequent
redemptions (including redemptions in connection with the initial business combination) that are treated as repurchases for this purpose.
In all cases, whether and to what extent we would be subject to the excise tax will depend on a number of factors, including (i) the structure
of the initial business combination, including the extent to which the initial business combination involves a U.S. corporation and the
extent to which we issue shares in the initial business combination or otherwise during the same taxable year that are eligible to offset
any redemptions or other repurchases, (ii) the fair market value of the shares redeemed and (iii) the extent such redemptions could be
treated as dividends and not as repurchases. The applicability of the excise tax to us could be further affected by the content of any
regulations, clarifications or other additional guidance from the U.S. Treasury Department that may be issued and applicable to the redemptions.
Any excise
tax that becomes payable as a result of any redemptions of our Class A ordinary shares (or other shares into which such Class A ordinary
shares may be converted) in connection with our initial business combination or otherwise would be payable by us and not by the redeeming
holder. To the extent such taxes are applicable, the amount of cash available to pay redemptions or to transfer to the target business
in connection with our initial business combination may be reduced, which could result in our inability to meet conditions in the agreement
relating to our initial business combination related to a minimum cash requirement, if any, or otherwise result in the shareholders of
the combined company (including any of our shareholders who do not exercise their redemption rights in connection with the initial business
combination) to economically bear the impact of such excise tax.
Our
directors may decide not to enforce the indemnification obligations of our sponsor, resulting in a reduction in the amount of funds in
the trust account available for distribution to our public shareholders.
In the event
that the proceeds in the trust account are reduced below the lesser of (i) $10.00 per public share and (ii) the actual amount per public
share held in the trust account as of the date of the liquidation of the trust account if less than $10.00 per public share due to reductions
in the value of the trust assets, in each case less taxes payable (excluding any excise tax, or similar tax, imposed on us), and our sponsor
asserts that it is unable to satisfy its obligations or that it has no indemnification obligations related to a particular claim, our
independent directors would determine whether to take legal action against our sponsor to enforce its indemnification obligations. While
we currently expect that our independent directors would take legal action on our behalf against our sponsor to enforce its indemnification
obligations to us, it is possible that our independent directors in exercising their business judgment and subject to their fiduciary
duties may choose not to do so in any particular instance if, for example, the cost of such legal action is deemed by the independent
directors to be too high relative to the amount recoverable or if the independent directors determine that a favorable outcome is not
likely. If our independent directors choose not to enforce these indemnification obligations, the amount of funds in the trust account
available for distribution to our public shareholders may be reduced below $10.00 per public share.
22
We
may not have sufficient funds to satisfy indemnification claims of our directors and officers.
We have agreed
to indemnify our officers and directors to the fullest extent permitted by law, including for any liability incurred in their capacities
as such, except through their own actual fraud, willful default or willful neglect. However, our officers and directors have agreed to
waive any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies in the trust account and to not seek recourse against the trust
account for any reason whatsoever. Accordingly, any indemnification provided will be able to be satisfied by us only if (i) we have sufficient
funds outside of the trust account or (ii) we consummate an initial business combination. Our obligation to indemnify our officers and
directors may discourage shareholders from bringing a lawsuit against our officers or directors for breach of their fiduciary duty. These
provisions also may have the effect of reducing the likelihood of derivative litigation against our officers and directors, even though
such an action, if successful, might otherwise benefit us and our shareholders. Furthermore, a shareholder’s investment may be adversely
affected to the extent we pay the costs of settlement and damage awards against our officers and directors pursuant to these indemnification
provisions.
If,
after we distribute the proceeds in the trust account to our public shareholders, we file a bankruptcy or insolvency petition or an involuntary
bankruptcy or insolvency petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, a bankruptcy or insolvency court may seek to recover such
proceeds, and the members of our board of directors may be viewed as having breached their fiduciary duties to our creditors, thereby
exposing the members of our board of directors and us to claims of punitive damages.
If, after
we distribute the proceeds in the trust account to our public shareholders, we file a bankruptcy or insolvency petition or an involuntary
bankruptcy or insolvency petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, any distributions received by shareholders could be viewed
under applicable debtor/creditor and/or bankruptcy/insolvency laws as either a “preferential transfer” or a “fraudulent
conveyance, preference or disposition.” As a result, a liquidator or a bankruptcy or other court could seek to recover some or all
amounts received by our shareholders. In addition, our board of directors may be viewed as having breached its fiduciary duty to us or
our creditors and/or having acted in bad faith, thereby exposing itself and us to claims of punitive damages, by paying public shareholders
from the trust account prior to addressing the claims of creditors.
If,
before distributing the proceeds in the trust account to our public shareholders, we file a bankruptcy or insolvency petition or an involuntary
bankruptcy or insolvency petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, the claims of creditors in such proceeding may have priority
over the claims of our shareholders and the per-share amount that would otherwise be received by our shareholders in connection with our
liquidation may be reduced.
If, before
distributing the proceeds in the trust account to our public shareholders, we file a bankruptcy or insolvency petition or an involuntary
bankruptcy or insolvency petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, the proceeds held in the trust account could be subject to
applicable bankruptcy law, and may be included in our bankruptcy estate and subject to the claims of third parties with priority over
the claims of our shareholders. To the extent any bankruptcy claims deplete the trust account, the per-share amount that would otherwise
be received by our shareholders in connection with our liquidation may be reduced.
Changes
in laws or regulations, or a failure to comply with any laws and regulations, may adversely affect our business, including our ability
to negotiate and complete our initial business combination, and results of operations.
We are subject
to laws and regulations enacted by national, regional and local governments. In particular, we are required to comply with certain SEC
and other legal requirements and numerous complex tax laws. Compliance with, and monitoring of, applicable laws and regulations may be
difficult, time consuming and costly. Those laws and regulations and their interpretation and application may also change from time to
time and those changes could have a material adverse effect on our business, investments and results of operations. In addition, a failure
to comply with applicable laws or regulations, as interpreted and applied, could have a material adverse effect on our business, including
our ability to negotiate and complete our initial business combination, and results of operations.
23
On January
24, 2024, the SEC adopted a series of new rules relating to SPACs (the “SPAC Rules”) requiring, among other items, (i) additional
disclosures relating to SPAC business combination transactions; (ii) additional disclosures relating to dilution and to conflicts of interest
involving sponsors and their respective affiliates in both SPAC initial public offerings and de-SPAC transactions; (iii) the use of projections
by SPACs in SEC filings in connection with proposed business combination transactions; and (iv) both the SPAC and the target company’s
status as co-registrants on de-SPAC registration statements.
In addition,
the SEC’s adopting release provided guidance describing circumstances in which a SPAC could become subject to regulation under the
Investment Company Act, including its duration, asset composition, business purpose, and the activities of the SPAC and its management
team in furtherance of such goals. The de-SPAC transaction involves significant risk of shareholder litigation and regulatory enforcement.
Defending against such litigation or enforcement actions, even if they lack merit, can be expensive, time consuming, and a significant
distraction of management. Any resulting settlements, fines, or judgements could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
Compliance
with the SPAC Rules and related guidance may increase the costs of and the time needed to negotiate and complete an initial business combination
and may constrain the circumstances under which we could complete an initial business combination.
If
we are deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, we may be required to institute burdensome compliance requirements
and our activities may be restricted, which may make it difficult for us to complete our initial business combination.
As described
in the risk factor above entitled “Changes in laws or regulations, or a failure to comply with any laws and regulations, may adversely
affect our business, including our ability to negotiate and complete our initial business combination, and results of operations,”
the SEC’s adopting release with respect to the SPAC Rules provided guidance describing the extent to which SPACs could become subject
to regulation under the Investment Company Act and the regulations thereunder. Whether a SPAC is an investment company will be a question
of facts and circumstances. If our facts and circumstances change over time, we will update our disclosure to reflect how those changes
impact the risk that we may be considered to be operating as an unregistered investment company. We can give no assurance that a claim
will not be made that we have been operating as an unregistered investment company.
If we are
deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, we may have to change our operations, wind down our operations, or
register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. Our activities may be restricted, including:
●
restrictions on the nature of our investments; and
●
restrictions on the issuance of securities, each
of which may make it difficult for us to complete our initial business combination.
In addition,
we may have imposed upon us burdensome requirements, including:
●
registration as an investment company;
●
adoption of a specific form of corporate structure;
and
●
reporting, record keeping, voting, proxy and disclosure
requirements and other rules and regulations.
24
In order not
to be regulated as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, unless we can qualify for an exclusion, we must ensure that
we are engaged primarily in a business other than investing, reinvesting or trading in securities and that our activities do not include
investing, reinvesting, owning, holding or trading “investment securities” constituting more than 40% of our total assets
(exclusive of U.S. government securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. We are mindful of the SEC’s investment company
definition and guidance and intend to identify and complete an initial business combination with an operating business, and not with an
investment company, or to acquire minority interests in other businesses exceeding the permitted threshold.
We do not
believe that our anticipated activities will subject us to the Investment Company Act. To this end, the proceeds held in the trust account
will initially be invested only in U.S. government treasury obligations with a maturity of 185 days or less or in money market funds meeting
certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act which invest only in direct U.S. government treasury obligations;
the holding of these assets in this form is intended to be temporary and for the sole purpose of facilitating the intended business combination.
To mitigate the risk that we might be deemed to be an investment company for purposes of the Investment Company Act, which risk increases
the longer that we hold investments in the trust account, we may, at any time (based on our management team’s ongoing assessment
of all factors related to our potential status under the Investment Company Act), instruct the trustee to liquidate the investments held
in the trust account and instead to hold the funds in the trust account in cash or in an interest bearing demand deposit account at a
bank.
Pursuant to
the trust agreement, the trustee is not permitted to invest in securities or assets other than as described above. By restricting the
investment of the proceeds to these instruments, and by having a business plan targeted at acquiring and growing businesses for the long
term (rather than on buying and selling businesses in the manner of a merchant bank or private equity fund), we intend to avoid being
deemed an “investment company” within the meaning of the Investment Company Act. The trust account is intended solely as a
temporary depository for funds pending the earliest to occur of: (i) the completion of our initial business combination; (ii) the redemption
of any public shares properly submitted in connection with a shareholder vote to amend our amended and restated memorandum and articles
of association (A) in a manner that would affect the substance or timing of our obligation to redeem 100% of our public shares if we do
not complete our initial business combination within the completion window; or (B) with respect to any other material provisions relating
to the rights of holders of our Class A ordinary shares or pre-initial business combination activity; or (iii) absent an initial business
combination within the completion window, our return of the funds held in the trust account to our public shareholders as part of our
redemption of the public shares.
We are aware
of litigation claiming that certain SPACs should be considered to be investment companies. Although we believe that these claims were
without merit, we cannot guarantee that we will not be deemed to be an investment company and thus subject to the Investment Company Act.
If we were deemed to be subject to the Investment Company Act, compliance with these additional regulatory burdens would require additional
expenses for which we have not allotted funds and may hinder our ability to complete an initial business combination or may result in
our winding down our operations and our liquidation. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination, our public shareholders
may receive only approximately $10.00 per share on the liquidation of our trust account and our warrants will expire worthless, and our
public shareholders would also lose the possibility of an investment opportunity in a target company as well as any potential price appreciation
in the combined company following a business combination.
25
To
mitigate the risk that we might be deemed to be an investment company for purposes of the Investment Company Act, we may, at any time
(based on our management team’s ongoing assessment of all factors related to our potential status under the Investment Company Act),
instruct the trustee to liquidate the investments held in the trust account and instead to hold the funds in the trust account in an interest
bearing demand deposit account at a bank until the earlier of the consummation of an initial business combination or our liquidation.
As a result, following the liquidation of investments in the trust account, we will likely receive less interest on the funds held in
the trust account than we would have had the trust account remained as initially invested, such that our public shareholders would receive
less upon any redemption or liquidation of the Company than what they would have received had the investments not been liquidated.
The funds
to be held in the trust account are initially held only in U.S. government treasury obligations with a maturity of 185 days or less, in
money market funds investing solely in U.S. government treasury obligations and meeting certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 under the Investment
Company Act and in cash or cash like items (including demand deposit accounts) at a bank. However, to mitigate the risk of us being deemed
to be an unregistered investment company (including under the subjective test of Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Investment Company Act) and
thus subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act, we may, at any time (based on our management team’s ongoing assessment
of all factors related to our potential status under the Investment Company Act), instruct Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company,
the trustee with respect to the trust account, to liquidate the U.S. government treasury obligations or money market funds held in the
trust account and thereafter to hold all funds in the trust account in an interest bearing demand deposit account at a bank until the
earlier of the consummation of our initial business combination or our liquidation. Following such liquidation, we will likely receive
less interest on the funds held in the trust account than we would earn if the trust account remained invested in U.S. government treasury
obligations with a maturity of 185 days or less or in money market funds investing solely in U.S. government treasury obligations and
meeting certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act. However, interest previously earned on the funds held in
the trust account still may be released to us to pay our taxes, if any (excluding any excise tax, or similar tax, imposed on us), and
certain other expenses as permitted. As a result, any decision to liquidate the investments held in the trust account and thereafter to
hold all funds in the trust account in an interest-bearing demand deposit at a bank could reduce the dollar amount our public shareholders
would receive upon any redemption or liquidation of the Company as compared to what they would have received had the investments not been
so liquidated.
Notwithstanding
the measures set forth above, we may still be deemed to be an investment company. The longer that the funds in the trust account are held
in short-term U.S. government treasury obligations or in money market funds invested exclusively in such securities, the greater the risk
that we may be deemed to be an unregistered investment company, in which case we may be required to liquidate. If our facts and circumstances
change over time, we will update our disclosure to reflect how those changes impact the risk that we may be considered to be operating
as an unregistered investment company. As disclosed above, we may determine, in our discretion, to liquidate the securities held in the
trust account at any time and instead hold all funds in the trust account in an interest bearing demand deposit account or as cash or
cash items at a bank, which could further reduce the dollar amount our public shareholders would receive upon any redemption or liquidation
of the Company as compared to what they would have received had the investments not been so liquidated. Were we to liquidate the Company,
our warrants would expire worthless, and our securityholders would lose the investment opportunity associated with an investment in the
target company with which we could have consummated an initial business combination. In addition, upon moving the funds from the trust
account to a deposit account, we will maintain the cash items in bank accounts which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits as
guaranteed by the FDIC. While we intend to place our deposits in high-quality banks, only a small portion of the funds in our trust account
will be guaranteed by the FDIC.
Our
search for a business combination, and any target business with which we ultimately consummate a business combination, may be materially
adversely affected by new outbreaks, or continuation of any existing outbreaks, of any infectious disease (such as COVID-19), the status
of debt and equity markets and disruption of target business models or potential obsolescence by artificial intelligence.
Any new outbreaks,
or continuation of any existing outbreaks, of any infectious disease (such as COVID-19) or other events (such as terrorist attacks, armed
conflicts or natural disasters) could adversely affect the economies and financial markets worldwide, and the business of any potential
target business with which we consummate an initial business combination could be materially and adversely affected. Furthermore, we may
be unable to complete an initial business combination if concerns relating to any outbreak of a disease restricts travel or limits the
ability to have meetings with potential investors or the target company’s personnel, vendors and services providers. The extent
to which any new outbreak or the continuation of any existing situation impacts our search for an initial business combination will depend
on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted. The rapid advancement and integration of artificial intelligence
and machine learning technologies across various industries could significantly reduce the pool of viable attractive target candidates
for our initial business combination. We may acquire a target company whose core business model, products, or services face significant
disruption or rapid obsolescence due to advancement in artificial intelligence and machine learning. If any such event occurs, our ability
to consummate an initial business combination, or the operations of a target business with which we ultimately consummate an initial business
combination, may be materially adversely affected.
26
In addition,
our ability to consummate a transaction may be dependent on the ability to raise equity and debt financing, which may be impacted by outside
events (such as terrorist attacks, natural disasters or a significant outbreak of infectious diseases), including as a result of increased
market volatility, decreased market liquidity and third-party financing being unavailable on terms acceptable to us or at all.
Our search for
an initial business combination, and any target business with which we may ultimately consummate an initial business combination, may
be materially adversely affected by current global geopolitical conditions resulting from the military escalation between the United States
and Iran, the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, and other similar geopolitical conflicts.
United States and global markets are experiencing volatility and disruption
following the geopolitical instability resulting from the military escalation between the United States and Iran, the ongoing Russia-Ukraine
conflict and other similar geopolitical conflicts. Ongoing military escalation between the United States and Iran has heightened risks
to critical infrastructure, shipping routes, and energy supplies. Any further deterioration could drive sustained increases in oil prices,
disrupt global trade, contribute to macroeconomic instability, and materially height the risk of a global recession. In response to the
ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (“NATO”) deployed additional military forces to eastern
Europe, and the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union and other countries have announced various sanctions and restrictive
actions against Russia, Belarus and related individuals and entities, including the removal of certain financial institutions from the
Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) payment system. Certain countries, including the United States, have
also provided and may continue to provide military aid or other assistance to Ukraine and to Israel, or have undertaken or will undertake
military strikes in Iran and Southwest Asia, increasing geopolitical tensions among a number of nations. These global geopolitical conditions
and the resulting measures that have been taken, and could be taken in the future, by NATO, the United States, the United Kingdom, the
European Union, Israel and its neighboring states and other countries have created global security concerns that could have a lasting
impact on regional and global economies. Although the length and impact of the ongoing conflicts are highly unpredictable, they could
lead to market disruptions, including significant volatility in commodity prices, credit and capital markets, as well as supply chain
interruptions and increased cyber-attacks against U.S. companies. Additionally, any resulting sanctions could adversely affect the global
economy and financial markets and lead to instability and lack of liquidity in capital markets.
Any of the abovementioned factors, or any other negative impact on
the global economy, capital markets or other geopolitical conditions resulting from these geopolitical conditions could reduce the pool
of viable attractive target candidates for our initial business combination, adversely affect our search for an initial business combination
and any target business with which we may ultimately consummate an initial business combination.
The extent
and duration of the ongoing conflicts, resulting sanctions and any related market disruptions are impossible to predict, but could be
substantial, particularly if current or new sanctions continue for an extended period of time or if geopolitical tensions result in expanded
military operations on a global scale. Any such disruptions may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described
in this section. If these disruptions or other matters of global concern continue for an extensive period of time, our ability to consummate
an initial business combination, or the operations of a target business with which we may ultimately consummate an initial business combination,
may be materially adversely affected.
Military
or other conflicts in Ukraine, the Middle East and Southwest Asia or elsewhere may lead to increased volume and price volatility for publicly
traded securities, or affect the operations or financial condition of potential target companies, which could make it more difficult for
us to consummate an initial business combination.
Military or
other conflicts in Ukraine, the military escalation between the United States and Iran or elsewhere may lead to increased volume and price
volatility for publicly traded securities, or affect the operations or financial condition of potential target companies, and to other
company or industry-specific, national, regional or international economic disruptions and economic uncertainty, any of which could make
it more difficult for us to identify a business combination target and consummate an initial business combination on acceptable commercial
terms, or at all.
27
If
we are unable to consummate our initial business combination within the completion window, our public shareholders may be forced to wait
beyond 24 months before redemption from our trust account.
If we are
unable to consummate our initial business combination within the completion window, the proceeds then on deposit in the trust account,
including interest earned on the funds held in the trust account (less taxes payable (excluding any excise tax, or similar tax, imposed
on us) and up to $100,000 of interest to pay dissolution expenses), will be used to fund the redemption of our public shares, as further
described herein. Any redemption of public shareholders from the trust account will be effected automatically by function of our amended
and restated memorandum and articles of association prior to any voluntary winding up. If we are required to wind-up, liquidate the trust
account and distribute such amount therein, pro rata, to our public shareholders, as part of any liquidation process, such winding up,
liquidation and distribution must comply with the applicable provisions of the Companies Act. In that case, investors may be forced to
wait beyond the end of the completion window before the redemption proceeds of our trust account become available to them, and they receive
the return of their pro rata portion of the proceeds from our trust account. We have no obligation to return funds to investors prior
to the date of our redemption or liquidation unless we consummate our initial business combination prior thereto and only then in cases
where investors have sought to redeem their Class A ordinary shares. Only upon our redemption or any liquidation will public shareholders
be entitled to distributions if we are unable to complete our initial business combination.
Our
shareholders may be held liable for claims by third parties against us to the extent of distributions received by them upon redemption
of their shares.
If we are
forced to enter into an insolvent liquidation, any distributions received by shareholders could be viewed as an unlawful payment if it
was proved that immediately following the date on which the distribution was made, we were unable to pay our debts as they fall due in
the ordinary course of business. As a result, a liquidator could seek to recover some or all amounts received by our shareholders. Furthermore,
our directors may be viewed as having breached their fiduciary duties to us or our creditors and/or may have acted in bad faith, thereby
exposing themselves and our company to claims, by paying public shareholders from the trust account prior to addressing the claims of
creditors. We cannot assure you that claims will not be brought against us for these reasons. We and our directors and officers who knowingly
and willfully authorized or permitted any distribution to be paid out of our share premium account while we were unable to pay our debts
as they fall due in the ordinary course of business would be guilty of an offence and may be liable to a fine of approximately $18,000
and to imprisonment for five years in the Cayman Islands.
We
may not hold an annual general meeting until after the consummation of our initial business combination, which could delay the opportunity
for our public shareholders to discuss company affairs with management, and the holders of our Class A ordinary shares will not have the
right to vote on the appointment or removal of directors or continuing the company in a jurisdiction outside the Cayman Islands until
after the consummation of our initial business combination.
In accordance
with Nasdaq corporate governance requirements, we are not required to hold an annual general meeting until no later than one year after
our first fiscal year end following our listing on Nasdaq. There is no requirement under the Companies Act for us to hold annual or extraordinary
general meetings to appoint directors. Until we hold an annual general meeting, public shareholders may not be afforded the opportunity
to discuss company affairs with management. Our board of directors is divided into three classes with only one class of directors being
appointed in each year and each class (except for those directors appointed prior to our first annual general meeting) serving a three-year
term. In addition, as holders of our Class A ordinary shares, our public shareholders will not have the right to vote on the appointment
or removal of directors or continuing the company in a jurisdiction outside the Cayman Islands until after the consummation of our initial
business combination.
28
Because
we are neither limited to evaluating a target business in a particular industry sector nor have we selected any target businesses with
which to pursue our initial business combination, you will be unable to ascertain the merits or risks of any particular target business’s
operations.
Our efforts
to identify a prospective initial business combination target will not be limited to a particular industry, sector or geographic region.
While we may pursue an initial business combination opportunity in any industry or sector, we intend to capitalize on the ability of our
management team to identify and acquire a business or businesses that can benefit from our management team’s established global
relationships and operating experience. Our management team has extensive experience in identifying and executing strategic investments
globally and has done so successfully in a number of sectors. Our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association prohibits
us from effectuating a business combination solely with another blank check company or similar company with nominal operations.
Because we
have not yet selected any specific target business with respect to a business combination, there is no basis to evaluate the possible
merits or risks of any particular target business’s operations, results of operations, cash flows, liquidity, financial condition
or prospects. To the extent we complete our initial business combination, we may be affected by numerous risks inherent in the business
operations with which we combine. For example, if we combine with a financially unstable business or an entity lacking an established
record of sales or earnings, we may be affected by the risks inherent in the business and operations of a financially unstable or a development
stage entity. In recent years, a number of target businesses have underperformed financially post-business combination. There are no assurances
that the target business with which we consummate our initial business combination will perform as anticipated. Although our officers
and directors will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular target business, we cannot assure you that we will properly
ascertain or assess all of the significant risk factors or that we will have adequate time to complete due diligence. Furthermore, some
of these risks may be outside of our control and leave us with no ability to control or reduce the chances that those risks will adversely
impact a target business.
We also cannot
assure you that an investment in our units will ultimately prove to be more favorable to investors than a direct investment, if such opportunity
were available, in a business combination target. Accordingly, any shareholders who choose to remain shareholders following the business
combination could suffer a reduction in the value of their securities. Such shareholders are unlikely to have a remedy for such reduction
in value unless they are able to successfully claim that the reduction was due to the breach by our officers or directors of a duty of
care or other fiduciary duty owed to them, or if they are able to successfully bring a private claim under securities laws that the proxy
solicitation or tender offer materials, as applicable, relating to the business combination contained an actionable material misstatement
or material omission.
We
may seek business combination opportunities in industries or sectors that may be outside of our management’s areas of expertise.
We will consider
a business combination outside of our management’s areas of expertise if a business combination candidate is presented to us and
we determine that such candidate offers an attractive business combination opportunity for our company. Although our management will endeavor
to evaluate the risks inherent in any particular business combination candidate, we cannot assure you that we will adequately ascertain
or assess all of the significant risk factors. We also cannot assure you that an investment in our units will not ultimately prove to
be less favorable to investors than a direct investment, if an opportunity were available, in a business combination candidate. In the
event we elect to pursue a business combination outside of the areas of our management’s expertise, our management’s expertise
may not be directly applicable to its evaluation or operation, and the information contained in this Report regarding the areas of our
management’s expertise would not be relevant to an understanding of the business that we elect to acquire. As a result, our management
may not be able to ascertain or assess adequately all of the relevant risk factors. Accordingly, any shareholders who choose to remain
shareholders following our initial business combination could suffer a reduction in the value of their shares. Such shareholders are unlikely
to have a remedy for such reduction in value.
29
Although we
have identified general criteria and guidelines that we believe are important in evaluating prospective target businesses, we may enter
into our initial business combination with a target that does not meet such criteria and guidelines, and as a result, the target business
with which we enter into our initial business combination may not have attributes entirely consistent with our general criteria and guidelines.
Although we
have identified general criteria and guidelines for evaluating prospective target businesses, it is possible that a target business with
which we enter into our initial business combination will not have all of these positive attributes. If we complete our initial business
combination with a target that does not meet some or all of these guidelines, such combination may not be as successful as a combination
with a business that does meet all of our general criteria and guidelines. In addition, if we announce a prospective business combination
with a target that does not meet our general criteria and guidelines, a greater number of shareholders may exercise their redemption rights,
which may make it difficult for us to meet any closing condition with a target business that requires us to have a minimum net worth or
a certain amount of cash. In addition, if shareholder approval of the transaction is required by law, or we decide to obtain shareholder
approval for business or other reasons, it may be more difficult for us to attain shareholder approval of our initial business combination
if the target business does not meet our general criteria and guidelines. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination,
our public shareholders may only receive their pro rata portion of the funds in the trust account that are available for distribution
to public shareholders, and our warrants will expire worthless.
We
are not required to obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm or from another independent entity that commonly renders
valuation opinions, and consequently, you may have no assurance from an independent source that the price we are paying for the business
is fair to our shareholders from a financial point of view.
Unless we
complete our initial business combination with an affiliated entity or our board of directors cannot independently determine the fair
market value of the target business or businesses (including with the assistance of financial advisors), we are not required to obtain
an opinion from an independent investment banking firm or another independent entity that commonly renders valuation opinions that the
price we are paying is fair to our shareholders from a financial point of view. If no opinion is obtained, our shareholders will be relying
on the judgment of our board of directors, who will determine fair market value based on standards generally accepted by the financial
community.
Such standards
used will be disclosed in our proxy materials or tender offer documents, as applicable, related to our initial business combination.
We
may issue additional Class A ordinary shares or preference shares to complete our initial business combination or under an employee incentive
plan after completion of our initial business combination. We may also issue Class A ordinary shares upon the conversion of the founder
shares at a ratio greater than one-to-one at the time of our initial business combination as a result of the anti-dilution provisions
contained therein. Any such issuances would dilute the interest of our shareholders and likely present other risks.
Our amended
and restated memorandum and articles of association authorizes the issuance of up to 500,000,000 Class A ordinary shares, par value $0.0001
per share, 50,000,000 Class B ordinary shares, par value $0.0001 per share, and 5,000,000 preference shares, par value $0.0001 per share.
Currently, there are 476,305,000 and 42,333,333 authorized but unissued Class A ordinary shares and Class B ordinary shares, respectively,
available for issuance, which amount does not take into account shares reserved for issuance upon exercise of outstanding warrants or
shares issuable upon conversion of the Class B ordinary shares. The Class B ordinary shares are automatically convertible into Class A
ordinary shares (which such Class A ordinary shares delivered upon conversion will not have any redemption rights or be entitled to liquidating
distributions from the trust account if we fail to consummate an initial business combination) immediately prior to, concurrently with
or immediately following the consummation of our initial business combination or earlier at the option of the holder, initially at a one-for-one
ratio but subject to adjustment as set forth herein and in our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association, including
in certain circumstances in which we issue Class A ordinary shares or equity-linked securities related to our initial business combination.
30
We may issue
a substantial number of additional Class A ordinary shares or preference shares to complete our initial business combination or under
an employee incentive plan after completion of our initial business combination. We may also issue Class A ordinary shares upon conversion
of the Class B ordinary shares at a ratio greater than one-to-one at the time of our initial business combination as a result of the anti-dilution
provisions as set forth therein. However, our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association provide, among other things,
that prior to our initial business combination, except in connection with the conversion of Class B ordinary shares into Class A ordinary
shares where the holders of such shares have waived any rights to receive funds from the trust account, we may not issue additional shares
that would entitle the holders thereof to (i) receive funds from the trust account or (ii) vote as a class with public shares on any initial
business combination. These provisions of our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association, like all provisions of our
amended and restated memorandum and articles of association, may be amended with a shareholder vote. The issuance of additional ordinary
or preference shares:
●
may significantly dilute the equity interest of investors,
which dilution would increase if the anti-dilution provisions in the Class B ordinary shares resulted in the issuance of Class A ordinary
shares on a greater than one-to-one basis upon conversion of the Class B ordinary shares;
●
may subordinate the rights of holders of Class A
ordinary shares if preference shares are issued with rights senior to those afforded our Class A ordinary shares;
●
could cause a change in control if a substantial
number of Class A ordinary shares are issued, which may affect, among other things, our ability to use our net operating loss carry forwards,
if any, and could result in the resignation or removal of our present officers and directors;
●
may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change
of control of us by diluting the share ownership or voting rights of a person seeking to obtain control of us;
●
may adversely affect prevailing market prices for
our units, Class A ordinary shares and/or warrants; and
●
may not result in adjustment to the exercise price
of our warrants.
Unlike some
other similarly structured special purpose acquisition companies, our sponsor will receive additional Class A ordinary shares if we issue
certain shares to consummate an initial business combination.
The founder
shares will automatically convert into Class A ordinary shares (which such Class A ordinary shares delivered upon conversion will not
have any redemption rights or be entitled to liquidating distributions from the trust account if we fail to consummate an initial business
combination) immediately prior to, concurrently with or immediately following the consummation of our initial business combination or
earlier at the option of the holder on a one-for-one basis, subject to adjustment for share sub-divisions, share capitalizations, reorganizations,
recapitalizations and the like, and subject to further adjustment as provided herein. In the case that additional Class A ordinary shares,
or any other equity-linked securities, are issued or deemed issued in excess of the amounts sold in our initial public offering and related
to or in connection with the closing of the initial business combination, the ratio at which Class B ordinary shares convert into Class
A ordinary shares will be adjusted (unless the holders of a majority of the outstanding Class B ordinary shares agree to waive such adjustment
with respect to any such issuance or deemed issuance) so that the number of Class A ordinary shares issuable upon conversion of all Class
B ordinary shares will equal, in the aggregate, 25% of the sum of (i) the total number of all Class A ordinary shares outstanding upon
the completion of our initial public offering (excluding the Class A ordinary shares comprising part of the private placement units and
the Class A ordinary shares underlying the private placement warrants), plus (ii) all Class A ordinary shares and equity-linked securities
issued or deemed issued, in connection with the closing of the initial business combination (excluding any shares or equity-linked securities
issued, or to be issued, to any seller in the initial business combination and any private placement-equivalent units issued to our sponsor,
officers or directors, or their respective affiliates, upon conversion of working capital loans) minus (iii) any redemptions of Class
A ordinary shares by public shareholders in connection with an initial business combination and any Class A ordinary shares redeemed by
public shareholders in connection with any amendment to our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association made prior to
the consummation of the initial business combination (A) to modify the substance or timing of our obligation to allow redemption in connection
with our initial business combination or to redeem 100% of our public shares if we do not complete our initial business combination within
the completion window or (B) with respect to any other material provisions relating to the rights of holders of Class A ordinary shares
or pre-business combination activity; provided that such conversion of founder shares will never occur on a less than one-for-one basis.
31
We
may issue our shares to investors in connection with our initial business combination at a price which is less than the prevailing market
price of our shares at that time.
In connection
with our initial business combination, we may issue shares to investors in private placement transactions (so-called PIPE transactions)
at a price of $10.00 per share or lower, or at a price that approximates the per-share amounts in our trust account at such time. The
purpose of such issuances will be to enable us to provide sufficient liquidity and capital to the post-business combination entity. The
price of the shares we issue may therefore be less, and potentially significantly less, than the market price for our shares at such time.
Any such issuances of equity securities could dilute the interests of our existing shareholders. Any financing transaction with the entities
in which related parties hold ownership interests present potential for conflicts of interest, as the interests of these entities and
their equity holders may not align with the interests of our company and our unaffiliated shareholders with respect to the negotiation
of, and certain other matters related to, financing transactions with such entities.
Since only
holders of our Class B ordinary shares will have the right to vote on the appointment of directors, upon the listing of our shares on
Nasdaq, Nasdaq will consider us to be a “controlled company” within the meaning of Nasdaq rules and, as a result, we may qualify
for exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements.
Prior to the
consummation of a business combination, only holders of our Class B ordinary shares will have the right to vote on the appointment of
directors. As a result, Nasdaq considers us to be a “controlled company” within the meaning of Nasdaq corporate governance
standards. Under Nasdaq corporate governance standards, a company of which more than 50% of the voting power for the appointment of directors
is held by an individual, group or another company is a “controlled company” and may elect not to comply with certain corporate
governance requirements, including the requirements that:
●
we have a board that includes a majority of “independent
directors,” as defined under the rules of Nasdaq; and
●
we have a compensation committee of our board that
is comprised entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities.
We currently
do not intend to rely on the “controlled company” exemption, but may do so in the future. Accordingly, if we choose to do
so, you will not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of companies that are subject to all of the Nasdaq corporate governance
requirements.
Resources
could be consumed in researching business combinations that are not completed, which could materially adversely affect subsequent attempts
to locate and acquire or merge with another business. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination, our public shareholders
may only receive their pro rata portion of the funds in the trust account that are available for distribution to public shareholders,
and our warrants will expire worthless.
We anticipate
that the investigation of each specific target business and the negotiation, drafting and execution of relevant agreements, disclosure
documents and other instruments will require substantial management time and attention and substantial costs for accountants, attorneys,
consultants and others. If we decide not to complete a specific initial business combination, the costs incurred up to that point for
the proposed transaction likely would not be recoverable. Furthermore, if we reach an agreement relating to a specific target business,
we may fail to complete our initial business combination for any number of reasons including those beyond our control. Any such event
will result in a loss to us of the related costs incurred which could materially adversely affect subsequent attempts to locate and acquire
or merge with another business. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination, our public shareholders may only receive
their pro rata portion of the funds in the trust account that are available for distribution to public shareholders, and our warrants
will expire worthless.
32
We
may engage in a business combination with one or more target businesses that have relationships with entities that may be affiliated with
our sponsor, officers, directors or existing holders which may raise potential conflicts of interest.
In light of
the involvement of our sponsor, its managing member, and our officers and directors with other entities, we may decide to acquire one
or more businesses affiliated with or competitive with our sponsor, officers, directors and their respective affiliates or existing holders.
Our directors also serve as officers and/or board members for other entities. Our sponsor and/or one or more of our directors and officers
and its affiliates may sponsor, form or participate in other blank check companies similar to ours or may pursue other business or investment
ventures during the period in which we are seeking an initial business combination. Such entities may compete with us for business combination
opportunities. Our sponsor, officers and directors are not currently aware of any specific opportunities for us to complete our initial
business combination with any entities with which they are affiliated, and there have been no substantive discussions concerning a business
combination with any such entity or entities. Although we will not be specifically focusing on, or targeting, any transaction with any
affiliated entities, we would pursue such a transaction if we determined that such affiliated entity met our criteria for a business combination
and such transaction was approved by a majority of our independent and disinterested directors. Despite our agreement to obtain an opinion
from an independent investment banking firm or another independent entity that commonly renders valuation opinions regarding the fairness
to our company from a financial point of view of a business combination with one or more domestic or international businesses affiliated
with our sponsor, officers, directors or existing holders, potential conflicts of interest still may exist and, as a result, the terms
of the business combination may not be as advantageous to our public shareholders as they would be absent any conflicts of interest.
Since
our sponsor, officers and directors, any other holder of our founder shares, including any non-managing sponsor investors, may lose their
entire investment in us if our initial business combination is not completed (other than with respect to public shares acquired during
or after the initial public offering), a conflict of interest may arise in determining whether a particular business combination target
is appropriate for our initial business combination.
On November
28, 2025, our sponsor paid an aggregate of $25,000 to cover certain of our offering costs in exchange for 5,750,000 founder shares. On
December 16, 2025, we issued an additional 1,916,667 founder shares through a share capitalization resulting in the sponsor holding 7,666,667
founder ordinary shares in the aggregate. The founder shares were purchased for approximately $0.003 per share.
Prior to the
initial investment in the company of $25,000 by the sponsor, the company had no assets, tangible or intangible. The purchase price of
the founder shares was determined by dividing the amount of cash contributed to the company by the number of founder shares issued. The
number of founder shares outstanding was determined based on the expectation that the total size of the initial public offering would
be a maximum of 23,000,000 public units if the underwriters’ over-allotment option is exercised in full, and therefore that such
founder shares would represent 25% of the outstanding shares after the initial public offering. Our public shareholders may incur material
dilution due to such anti-dilution adjustments that result in the issuance of Class A ordinary shares on a greater than one-to-one basis
upon conversion. The founder shares will be worthless if we do not complete an initial business combination, except to the extent they
receive liquidating distributions from assets outside of the trust account. In addition, our sponsor and BTIG, the representative of the
underwriters, purchased an aggregate of 695,000 private placement units, at a price of $10.00 per unit, or $6,950,000, in a private placement
that closed simultaneously with the closing of the initial public offering. Each private placement unit consists of one Class A ordinary
share and one-third of one warrant, with each whole warrant exercisable to purchase one Class A ordinary share at $11.50 per share. The
private placement units are identical to the units sold in the initial public offering, subject to certain limited exceptions as described
in the registration statement related to the initial public offering. The private placement warrants are identical to the warrants comprising
part of the units. Of those 695,000 private placement units, our sponsor purchased 465,000 private placement units and BTIG purchased
230,000 private placement units. The non-managing sponsor investors have indirectly purchased, through the purchase of non-managing sponsor
membership interests, an aggregate 415,000 of the 465,000 private placement units purchased by our sponsor at a price of $10.00 per unit
($4,150,000 in the aggregate) in a private placement that closed simultaneously with the closing of the initial public offering. In connection
with the non-managing sponsor investors’ purchase of membership interests, the private placement units allocated to it in connection
with the closing of the initial public offering, the sponsor issued membership interests at a nominal purchase price ($0.003) to the non-managing
sponsor investors reflecting interests in an aggregate of 3,320,000 founder shares held by the sponsor. The non-managing sponsor investors
are not subject to transfer restrictions or a lock-up agreement on any Class A ordinary shares that have been purchased in the initial
public offering. The private placement units (and the securities comprising such units) will be worthless if we do not complete our initial
business combination. The personal and financial interests of our officers and directors may influence their motivation in identifying
and selecting a target business combination, completing an initial business combination and influencing the operation of the business
following the initial business combination. This risk may become more acute as the end of the completion window nears, which is the deadline
for our completion of an initial business combination.
33
We
may issue notes or other debt securities, or otherwise incur substantial debt, to complete a business combination, which may adversely
affect our leverage and financial condition and thus negatively impact the value of our shareholders’ investment in us.
Although we
have no commitments as of the date of this Report to issue any notes or other debt securities, or to otherwise incur outstanding debt,
we may choose to incur substantial debt to complete our initial business combination. The incurrence of debt could have a variety of negative
effects, including:
●
default and foreclosure on our assets if our operating
revenues after an initial business combination are insufficient to repay our debt obligations;
●
acceleration of our obligations to repay the indebtedness
even if we make all principal and interest payments when due if we breach certain covenants that require the maintenance of certain financial
ratios or reserves without a waiver or renegotiation of that covenant;
●
our immediate payment of all principal and accrued
interest, if any, if the debt security is payable on demand;
●
our inability to obtain necessary additional financing
if the debt security contains covenants restricting our ability to obtain such financing while the debt security is outstanding;
●
using a substantial portion of our cash flow to pay
principal and interest on our debt, which will reduce the funds available for expenses, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general
corporate purposes;
●
limitations on our flexibility in planning for and reacting
to changes in our business and in the industry in which we operate;
●
increased vulnerability to adverse changes in general
economic, industry and competitive conditions and adverse changes in government regulation; and
●
limitations on our ability to borrow additional amounts
for expenses, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service requirements, execution of our strategy and other purposes and other disadvantages
compared to our competitors who have less debt.
We
may only be able to complete one business combination with the proceeds of our initial public offering and the sale of the private placement
units, which will cause us to be solely dependent on a single business which may have a limited number of products or services. This lack
of diversification may negatively impact our operations and profitability. The net proceeds from our initial public offering and the private
placement of units has provided us with $221,950,000 that we may use to complete our initial business combination (after taking into account
$8,050,000 of deferred underwriting commissions being held in the trust account (assuming no redemptions) and excluding $1,600,000 held
outside of the trust account for working capital).
We may effectuate
our initial business combination with a single target business or multiple target businesses simultaneously or within a short period of
time. However, we may not be able to effectuate our initial business combination with more than one target business because of various
factors, including the existence of complex accounting issues and the requirement that we prepare and file pro forma financial statements
with the SEC that present operating results and the financial condition of several target businesses as if they had been operated on a
combined basis. By completing our initial business combination with only a single entity, our lack of diversification may subject us to
numerous economic, competitive and regulatory developments. Further, we would not be able to diversify our operations or benefit from
the possible spreading of risks or offsetting of losses, unlike other entities which may have the resources to complete several business
combinations in different industries or different areas of a single industry. Accordingly, the prospects for our success may be:
●
solely dependent on the performance of a single business,
property or asset, or
●
dependent on the development or market acceptance
of a single or limited number of products, processes or services.
34
This lack
of diversification may subject us to numerous economic, competitive and regulatory risks, any or all of which may have a substantial adverse
impact upon the particular industry in which we may operate subsequent to our initial business combination.
We
may attempt to simultaneously complete business combinations with multiple prospective targets, which may hinder our ability to complete
our initial business combination and give rise to increased costs and risks that could negatively impact our operations and profitability.
If we determine
to simultaneously acquire several businesses that are owned by different sellers, we will need for each of such sellers to agree that
our purchase of its business is contingent on the simultaneous closings of the other business combinations, which may make it more difficult
for us, and delay our ability, to complete our initial business combination. With multiple business combinations, we could also face additional
risks, including additional burdens and costs with respect to possible multiple negotiations and due diligence investigations (if there
are multiple sellers) and the additional risks associated with the subsequent assimilation of the operations and services or products
of the acquired companies in a single operating business. If we are unable to adequately address these risks, it could negatively impact
our profitability and results of operations.
We
may attempt to complete our initial business combination with a private company about which little information is available, which may
result in a business combination with a company that is not as profitable as we suspected, if at all.
In pursuing
our business combination strategy, we may seek to effectuate our initial business combination with a privately held company. Very little
public information generally exists about private companies, and we could be required to make our decision on whether to pursue a potential
initial business combination on the basis of limited information, which may result in a business combination with a company that is not
as profitable as we suspected, if at all.
We
do not have a specified maximum redemption threshold. The absence of such a redemption threshold may make it possible for us to complete
our initial business combination with which a substantial majority of our shareholders do not agree.
Our amended
and restated memorandum and articles of association do not provide a specified maximum redemption threshold. Our proposed initial business
combination may impose a minimum cash requirement for (i) cash consideration to be paid to the target or its owners, (ii) cash for working
capital or other general corporate purposes or (iii) the retention of cash to satisfy other conditions. As a result, we may be able to
complete our initial business combination even though a substantial majority of our public shareholders do not agree with the transaction
and have redeemed their shares or, if we seek shareholder approval of our initial business combination and do not conduct redemptions
in connection with our initial business combination pursuant to the tender offer rules, have entered into privately negotiated agreements
to sell their shares to our sponsor, officers, directors, advisors or any of their affiliates. In the event the aggregate cash consideration
we would be required to pay for all Class A ordinary shares that are validly submitted for redemption plus any amount required to satisfy
cash conditions pursuant to the terms of the proposed business combination exceed the aggregate amount of cash available to us, we will
not complete the business combination or redeem any shares, all Class A ordinary shares submitted for redemption will be returned to the
holders thereof, and we instead may search for an alternate business combination.
35
In
order to effectuate an initial business combination, special purpose acquisition companies have, in the recent past, amended various provisions
of their charters and other governing instruments, including their warrant agreements. We cannot assure you that we will not seek to amend
our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association or governing instruments in a manner that will make it easier for us to
complete our initial business combination that our shareholders may not support.
In order to
effectuate a business combination, special purpose acquisition companies have, in the recent past, amended various provisions of their
charters and governing instruments, including their warrant agreements. For example, special purpose acquisition companies have extended
the time to consummate an initial business combination and, with respect to their warrants, amended their warrant agreements to require
the warrants to be exchanged for cash and/or other securities. Amending our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association
will require a special resolution under Cayman Islands law, which requires the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds (or, in the scenarios
described below, 90%) of the votes cast by such shareholders as, being entitled to do so, vote in person or, where proxies are allowed,
by proxy at the applicable general meeting of the company, and amending our warrant agreement will require a vote of holders of at least
50% of the public warrants and, solely with respect to any amendment to the terms of the private placement warrants or any provision of
the warrant agreement with respect to the private placement warrants (including, for the avoidance of doubt, the forfeiture or cancellation
of any private placement warrants), 50% of the then outstanding private placement warrants (including the vote or written consent of BTIG).
In addition, our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association requires us to provide our public shareholders with the opportunity
to redeem their public shares, regardless of whether they abstain, vote for, or vote against, our initial business combination, for cash
if we propose an amendment to our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association (A) to modify the substance or timing of
our obligation to allow redemption in connection with our initial business combination or to redeem 100% of our public shares if we do
not complete an initial business combination within the completion window or (B) with respect to any other material provisions relating
to shareholders’ rights or pre-initial business combination activity. To the extent any of such amendments would be deemed to fundamentally
change the nature of the securities offered through this registration statement, we would register, or seek an exemption from registration
for, the affected securities. We cannot assure you that we will not seek to amend our charter or governing instruments or extend the time
to consummate an initial business combination in order to effectuate our initial business combination.
The
provisions of our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association that relate to our pre-business combination activity (and
corresponding provisions of the agreement governing the release of funds from our trust account) may be amended with the approval of holders
of not less than two-thirds of our ordinary shares which are represented in person or by proxy and are voted at a general meeting of the
company, which is a lower amendment threshold than that of some other special purpose acquisition companies. It may be easier for us,
therefore, to amend our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association to facilitate the completion of an initial business
combination that some of our shareholders may not support.
Our amended
and restated memorandum and articles of association provide that any of its provisions related to pre-business combination activity (including
the requirement to deposit proceeds of our initial public offering and the private placement of units into the trust account and not release
such amounts except in specified circumstances, and to provide redemption rights to public shareholders as described herein, and other
than amendments relating to the provisions regulating the appointment and removal of directors and continuing the company in a jurisdiction
outside the Cayman Islands, which require a special resolution passed by the affirmative vote of at least 90% (or, where such amendment
is proposed in respect of the consummation of our initial business combination, two-thirds) of the votes cast by such shareholders as,
being entitled to do so, vote in person or, where proxies are allowed, by proxy at the applicable general meeting of the company) may
be amended if approved by special resolution, under Cayman Islands law. Except as specified above with respect to matters requiring a
90% majority, a special resolution requires the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the votes cast by such shareholders as, being
entitled to do so, vote in person or, where proxies are allowed, by proxy at the applicable general meeting of the company. Corresponding
provisions of the trust agreement governing the release of funds from our trust account may be amended if approved by the affirmative
vote of at least two-thirds of our ordinary shares which are represented in person or by proxy and are voted at a general meeting of the
company. Our sponsor, beneficially owns 25% of our ordinary shares (assuming it does not purchase any additional Class A ordinary shares
and excluding the Class A ordinary shares comprising part of the private placement units and the Class A ordinary shares underlying the
private placement warrants issued to the sponsor), will participate in any vote to amend our amended and restated memorandum and articles
of association and/or trust agreement and will have the discretion to vote in any manner they choose. As a result, we may be able to amend
the provisions of our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association which govern our pre-business combination behavior more
easily than some other special purpose acquisition companies, and this may increase our ability to complete a business combination with
which you do not agree.
36
Our sponsor,
officers and directors have agreed, pursuant to a written agreement with us, that they will not propose any amendment to our amended and
restated memorandum and articles of association (A) to modify the substance or timing of our obligation to allow redemption in connection
with our initial business combination or to redeem 100% of our public shares if we do not complete our initial business combination within
the completion window or (B) with respect to any other material provisions relating to shareholders’ rights or pre-initial business
combination activity, in each case unless we provide our public shareholders with the opportunity to redeem their Class A ordinary shares
upon approval of any such amendment at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust
account, including interest earned on the funds held in the trust account (less taxes payable (excluding any excise tax, or similar tax,
imposed on us)), divided by the number of then outstanding public shares. Our shareholders are not parties to, or third-party beneficiaries
of, these agreements and, as a result, will not have the ability to pursue remedies against our sponsor, officers or directors for any
breach of these agreements. As a result, in the event of a breach, our shareholders would need to pursue a shareholder derivative action,
subject to applicable law.
We
may be unable to obtain additional financing to complete our initial business combination or to fund the operations and growth of a target
business, which could compel us to restructure or abandon a particular business combination.
We have not
selected any specific business combination target but intend to target businesses with enterprise values that are greater than we could
acquire with the net proceeds from our initial public offering and the sale of the private placement units. As a result, if the cash portion
of the purchase price exceeds the amount available from the trust account, net of amounts needed to satisfy any redemption by public shareholders,
we may be required to seek additional financing to complete such proposed initial business combination. We cannot assure you that such
financing will be available on acceptable terms, if at all. To the extent that additional financing proves to be unavailable when needed
to complete our initial business combination, we would be compelled to either restructure the transaction or abandon that particular business
combination and seek an alternative target business candidate. Further, we may be required to obtain additional financing in connection
with the closing of our initial business combination for general corporate purposes, including for maintenance or expansion of operations
of the post-transaction businesses, the payment of principal or interest due on indebtedness incurred in completing our initial business
combination, or to fund the purchase of other companies. If we are unable to complete our initial business combination, our public shareholders
may only receive their pro rata portion of the funds in the trust account that are available for distribution to public shareholders,
and our warrants will expire worthless. In addition, even if we do not need additional financing to complete our initial business combination,
we may require such financing to fund the operations or growth of the target business. The failure to secure additional financing could
have a material adverse effect on the continued development or growth of the target business. None of our officers, directors or shareholders
is required to provide any financing to us in connection with or after our initial business combination.
Our
sponsor will control the appointment of our board of directors until consummation of our initial business combination and will hold a
substantial interest in us. As a result, it will appoint all of our directors prior to the consummation of our initial business combination
and may exert a substantial influence on actions requiring a shareholder vote, potentially in a manner that you do not support.
Our sponsor
owns 25% of our issued and outstanding ordinary shares (assuming it does not purchase any additional Class A ordinary shares and excluding
the Class A ordinary shares comprising part of the private placement units and the Class A ordinary shares underlying the private placement
warrants). Accordingly, they may exert a substantial influence on actions requiring a shareholder vote, potentially in a manner that you
do not support, including amendments to our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association. This potential concentration
of influence could be disadvantageous to other shareholders with interests different from those of our sponsor. To the extent that any
non-managing sponsor investors acquire membership interests in the sponsor, they will have no right to control the sponsor or vote or
dispose of any securities held by the sponsor. In addition, the founder shares, all of which are currently held by our sponsor, will entitle
the holders to vote to appoint all of our directors prior to the consummation of our initial business combination. Holders of our public
shares will have no right to vote on the appointment or removal of directors during such time. Further, prior to the closing of our initial
business combination, only holders of our Class B ordinary shares will be entitled to vote on continuing our company in a jurisdiction
outside the Cayman Islands (including any special resolution required to amend our constitutional documents or to adopt new constitutional
documents, in each case, as a result of our approving a transfer by way of continuation in a jurisdiction outside the Cayman Islands).
These provisions of our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association may only be amended if approved by a special resolution
passed by the affirmative vote of at least 90% (or, where such amendment is proposed in respect of the consummation of our initial business
combination, two-thirds) of the votes cast by such shareholders as, being entitled to do so, vote in person or, where proxies are allowed,
by proxy at the applicable general meeting of the company. As a result, you will not have any influence over the appointment or removal
of directors prior to our initial business combination or any influence over our continuation in a jurisdiction outside the Cayman Islands
prior to our initial business combination.
37
If our sponsor
purchased any additional Class A ordinary shares in the aftermarket or in privately negotiated transactions, this would increase its control.
Neither our sponsor nor, to our knowledge, any of our officers or directors, have any current intention to purchase additional securities,
other than as disclosed in this Report. Factors that would be considered in making such additional purchases would include consideration
of the current trading price of our Class A ordinary shares. In addition, our board of directors, whose members were appointed by our
sponsor, is and will be divided into three classes, each of which will generally serve for a term for three years with only one class
of directors being appointed in each year. We may not hold an annual or extraordinary general meeting to appoint new directors prior to
the completion of our initial business combination, in which case all of the current directors will continue in office until at least
the completion of the business combination. If there is an annual general meeting, as a consequence of our “staggered” board
of directors, only a minority of the board of directors will be considered for appointment and our sponsor, because of its ownership position,
will have considerable influence regarding the outcome. In addition, since only holders of our Class B ordinary shares will have the right
to vote on directors prior to our initial business combination, our sponsor will continue to exert control at least until the completion
of our initial business combination. Accordingly, our sponsor will continue to exert control at least until the completion of our initial
business combination.
Before
a prospective target business is identified or the initial business combination is consummated, our sponsor or management may change or
divest their ownership interests in us. Such change or divestment could deprive us of key personnel and advisors, and the public shareholders
may have very limited influence over the management of the Company as a result.
Our sponsor,
Abony Sponsor I LLC, is a Delaware limited liability company, which was recently formed to invest in our company. Lorne Abony, our Chief
Executive Officer and a member of our board of directors, is the sole managing member of the sponsor and holds voting and investment discretion
with respect to the ordinary shares held of record by the sponsor. Although our sponsor is not expected to effect any direct or indirect
transfer of the founder shares or private placement units it holds during the applicable lock-up terms, certain transfers prior to the
completion of our initial business combination are permitted for the founder shares and private placement units (including the underlying
securities): (a) to our officers, directors, advisors or consultants, any affiliate or family member of any of our officers, directors,
advisors or consultants, any members or partners of the sponsor and their respective affiliates and funds and accounts advised by such
members or partners, any affiliates of the sponsor, or any employees of such affiliates; (b) in the case of an individual, as a gift to
such person’s immediate family or to a trust, the beneficiary of which is a member of such person’s immediate family, an affiliate
of such person or to a charitable organization; (c) in the case of an individual, by virtue of laws of descent and distribution upon death
of such person; (d) in the case of an individual, pursuant to a qualified domestic relations order; (e) by private sales or transfers
made in connection with any forward purchase agreement or similar arrangement, in connection with an extension of the completion window
or in connection with the consummation of a business combination at prices no greater than the price at which the shares or rights were
originally purchased; (f) pro rata distributions from our sponsor to its members, partners or shareholders pursuant to our sponsor’s
limited liability company agreement or other charter documents; (g) by virtue of the laws of the Cayman Islands or our sponsor’s
limited liability company agreement upon dissolution of our sponsor; (h) in the event of our liquidation prior to our consummation of
our initial business combination; (i) in the event that, subsequent to our consummation of an initial business combination, we complete
a liquidation, merger, share exchange or other similar transaction which results in all of our shareholders having the right to exchange
their Class A ordinary shares for cash, securities or other property; or (j) to a nominee or custodian of a person or entity to whom a
transfer would be permissible under clauses (a) through (g); provided, however, that in the case of clauses (a) through (g) and clause
(j) these permitted transferees must enter into a written agreement agreeing to be bound by these transfer restrictions and the other
restrictions contained in the letter agreements. In addition, the sponsor’s operating agreement does not permit any member of our
sponsor (including the non-managing sponsor investors) to transfer all or any portion of its membership interests in our sponsor, except
(i) with the prior written consent of the managing member of our sponsor, or (ii) after the closing of a business combination, to such
member’s affiliates, immediate family, or to a trust, the primary beneficiary(ies) of which is a member or members of such member’s
immediate family; provided that such recipient shall be required to become a member of our sponsor pursuant to the terms of our sponsor’s
operating agreement and, therefore, be bound by the restrictions on transfers as set forth therein. The foregoing restriction on the transfer
of membership interests also applies to the transfer of any non-management sponsor interests. There are no limitations or restrictions
on the terms or types of transfers that can be approved by the manager of our sponsor in our sponsor’s operating agreement.
Some permissible
transactions, such as the transfer of founder shares from our sponsor to an officer or consultant of the Company, or the transfer of the
securities of the sponsor from Mr. Abony to a third party, or the issuance of new securities of the sponsor to a third party, may change
the ownership structure or control among the sponsor and the management, or result in the control of the Company by another party. In
such scenarios, the public shareholders may have very little influence over the management of the Company.
38
In the case
that our sponsor, Mr. Abony or our management divest such person’s ownership or economic interests in us or in the sponsor, as the
case may be, before a prospective target business is identified or an initial business combination is consummated, third parties may assume
control over the sponsor or the management of the Company. Such changes may deprive us of key personnel or advisors of the Company, including
Mr. Abony, which may materially and adversely affect the Company’s ability to consummate initial business combination and the value
of your investment in the Company. In addition, because public shareholders would not have had the opportunity to consider the identities
of the persons obtaining control over us before such persons assume control, they may have limited influence over the management of the
Company.
We
may not be able to complete an initial business combination because such initial business combination may be subject to regulatory review
and approval requirements, including foreign investment regulations and review by government entities such as the Committee on Foreign
Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”), or may be ultimately prohibited.
Our initial
business combination may be subject to regulatory review and approval requirements by governmental entities, or ultimately prohibited.
For example, CFIUS has authority to review direct or indirect foreign investments in U.S. companies. Among other things, CFIUS is empowered
to require certain foreign investors to make mandatory filings, to charge filing fees related to such filings, and to self-initiate national
security reviews of foreign direct and indirect investments in U.S. companies if the parties to that investment choose not to file voluntarily.
In the case that CFIUS determines an investment to be a threat to national security, CFIUS has the power to unwind or place restrictions
on the investment. Whether CFIUS has jurisdiction to review an acquisition or investment transaction depends on — among other factors
— the nature and structure of the transaction, including the level of beneficial ownership interest and the nature of any information
or governance rights involved. While our sponsor is a limited liability company formed in Delaware and is not controlled by, nor does
it have substantial ties with, a non-U.S. person, investments that result in “control” of a U.S. business by a foreign person
are always subject to CFIUS jurisdiction. CFIUS’s expanded jurisdiction under the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act
of 2018 and implementing regulations that became effective on February 13, 2020 further includes investments that do not result in control
of a U.S. business by a foreign person but afford certain foreign investors certain information or governance rights in a U.S. business
that has a nexus to “critical technologies,” “critical infrastructure” and/or “sensitive personal data.”
If a particular
proposed initial business combination with a U.S. business falls within CFIUS’s jurisdiction, we may determine that we are required
to make a mandatory filing or that we will submit to CFIUS review on a voluntary basis, or to proceed with the transaction without submitting
to CFIUS and risk CFIUS intervention, before or after closing the transaction. CFIUS may decide to block or delay our proposed initial
business combination, impose conditions with respect to such initial business combination or request the President of the United States
to order us to divest all or a portion of the U.S. target business of our initial business combination that we acquired without first
obtaining CFIUS approval, which may limit the attractiveness of, delay or prevent us from pursuing certain target companies that we believe
would otherwise be beneficial to us and our shareholders. As a result, the pool of potential targets with which we could complete an initial
business combination may be limited and we may be adversely affected in terms of competing with other special purpose acquisition companies
which do not have any foreign ownership issues. In addition, certain federally licensed businesses may be subject to rules or regulations
that limit foreign ownership.
The process
of government review, whether by CFIUS or otherwise, could be lengthy. Because we have only a limited time to complete our initial business
combination, our failure to obtain any required approvals within the requisite time period may require us to liquidate. If we are unable
to consummate our initial business combination within the applicable time period required under our amended and restated memorandum and
articles of association, including as a result of extended regulatory review of a potential initial business combination, we will (i)
cease all operations except for the purpose of winding up, (ii) as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten business days
thereafter (and subject to lawfully available funds therefor), redeem the public shares, at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal
to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account, including interest earned on the funds held in the trust account (which
interest shall be net of taxes (excluding any excise tax, or similar tax, imposed on us) and less up to $100,000 of interest to pay dissolution
expenses and net of taxes payable), divided by the number of then-outstanding public shares, which redemption will completely extinguish
public shareholders’ rights as shareholders (including the right to receive further liquidating distributions, if any), subject
to applicable law, and (iii) as promptly as reasonably possible following such redemption, subject to the approval of our remaining shareholders
and our board of directors, liquidate and dissolve, subject in each case to our obligations under Cayman Islands law to provide for claims
of creditors and the requirements of other applicable law. In such event, our shareholders will miss the opportunity to benefit from an
investment in a target company and the appreciation in value of such investment. Additionally, our warrants may be worthless.
39
As
the number of special purpose acquisition companies evaluating targets increases, attractive targets may become scarcer and there may
be more competition for attractive targets or such attractive targets may not be interested to consummate a business combination with
a SPAC due to a negative public perception of mergers involving SPACs. This could increase the cost of our initial business combination
and could even result in our inability to find a target or to consummate an initial business combination.
In recent
years, the number of special purpose acquisition companies that have been formed has increased substantially. Many potential targets for
special purpose acquisition companies have already entered into an initial business combination, and there are still many special purpose
acquisition companies preparing for an initial public offering, as well as many such companies currently in registration. As a result,
at times, fewer attractive targets may be available to consummate an initial business combination.
In addition,
because there are more special purpose acquisition companies seeking to enter into an initial business combination with available targets,
the competition for available targets with attractive fundamentals or business models may increase, which could cause target companies
to demand improved financial terms. Attractive deals could also become scarcer for other reasons, such as economic or industry sector
downturns (including a negative public perception of mergers involving SPACs), geopolitical tensions, or increases in the cost of additional
capital needed to close business combinations or operate targets post-business combination. This could increase the cost of, delay or
otherwise complicate or frustrate our ability to find and consummate an initial business combination and may result in our inability to
consummate an initial business combination on terms favorable to our investors altogether.
Adverse
developments affecting the financial services industry, including events or concerns involving liquidity, defaults or non-performance
by financial institutions, could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations, or our prospects.
The funds
in our operating account and our trust account will initially be held in banks or other financial institutions and will be invested only
in U.S. government treasury obligations with a maturity of 185 days or less or in money market funds meeting certain conditions under
Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act which invest only in direct U.S. government treasury obligations; the holding of these assets
in this form is intended to be temporary and for the sole purpose of facilitating the intended business combination. To mitigate the risk
that we might be deemed to be an investment company for purposes of the Investment Company Act, which risk increases the longer that we
hold investments in the trust account, we may, at any time (based on our management team’s ongoing assessment of all factors related
to our potential status under the Investment Company Act), instruct the trustee to liquidate the investments held in the trust account
and instead to hold the funds in the trust account in cash or in an interest-bearing demand deposit account at a bank. Our cash held in
these accounts may exceed any applicable Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance limits. Should events, including
limited liquidity, defaults, non-performance or other adverse developments occur with respect to the banks or other financial institutions
that hold our funds, or that affect financial institutions or the financial services industry generally, or concerns or rumors about any
events of these kinds or other similar risks, the value of the assets in our trust account could be impaired, which could have a material
impact on our operating results, liquidity, financial condition and prospects. For example, on March 10, 2023, the FDIC announced that
Silicon Valley Bank had been closed by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation. We cannot guarantee that the
banks or other financial institutions that will hold our funds will not experience similar issues.
Because
we must furnish our shareholders with target business financial statements, we may lose the ability to complete an otherwise advantageous
initial business combination with some prospective target businesses.
The federal
proxy rules require that the proxy statement with respect to the vote on an initial business combination include historical and pro forma
financial statement disclosure. We will include the same financial statement disclosure in connection with our tender offer documents,
whether or not they are required under the tender offer rules. These financial statements may be required to be prepared in accordance
with, or be reconciled to, accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) or international
financial reporting standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IFRS”) depending on the circumstances
and the historical financial statements may be required to be audited in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”). These financial statement requirements may limit the pool of potential target businesses
we may acquire because some targets may be unable to provide such financial statements in time for us to disclose such statements in accordance
with federal proxy rules and complete our initial business combination within the prescribed time frame.
40
Compliance
obligations under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may make it more difficult for us to effectuate our initial business combination, require substantial
financial and management resources, and increase the time and costs of completing an initial business combination.
Section 404
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that we evaluate and report on our system of internal controls beginning with our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2027. Only in the event we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer or an accelerated filer,
and no longer qualify as an emerging growth company, will we be required to comply with the independent registered public accounting firm
attestation requirement on our internal control over financial reporting. Further, for as long as we remain an emerging growth company,
we will not be required to comply with the independent registered public accounting firm attestation requirement on our internal control
over financial reporting. The fact that we are a blank check company makes compliance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
particularly burdensome on us as compared to other public companies because a target business with which we seek to complete our initial
business combination may not be in compliance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act regarding adequacy of its internal controls.
The development of the internal control of any such entity to achieve compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may increase the time and
costs necessary to complete any such business combination.
Changes
in international trade policies, tariffs and treaties affecting imports and exports may have a material adverse effect on our search for
an initial business combination target or the performance or business prospects of a post-business combination company.
There have
recently been significant changes to international trade policies and tariffs affecting imports and exports. Any significant increases
in tariffs on goods or materials or other changes in trade policy could negatively affect our search for a target and/or our ability to
complete our initial business combination.
Recently,
the U.S. has implemented a range of new tariffs and increases to existing tariffs. In response to the tariffs announced by the U.S., other
countries have imposed, are considering imposing, and may in the future impose new or increased tariffs on certain exports from the United
States. There is currently significant uncertainty about the future relationship between the United States and other countries with respect
to trade policies, taxes, government regulations and tariffs. and we cannot predict whether, and to what extent, current tariffs will
continue or trade policies will change in the future.
Tariffs, or
the threat of tariffs or increased tariffs, could have a significant negative impact on certain businesses (either due to domestic businesses’
reliance on imported goods or dependence on access to foreign markets, or foreign businesses’ reliance on sales into the United
States). In addition, retaliatory tariffs could have a significant negative impact on foreign businesses that rely on imports from the
United States, and domestic businesses that rely on exporting goods internationally. These tariffs and threats of tariffs and other potential
trade policy changes could negatively affect the attractiveness of certain initial business combination targets, or lead to material adverse
effects on a post-business combination company. Among other things, historical financial performance of companies affected by trade policies
and/or tariffs may not provide useful guidance as to the future performance of such companies, because future financial performance of
those companies may be materially affected by new U.S. tariffs or foreign retaliatory tariffs, or other changes to trade policies. The
business prospects of a particular target for a business combination could change even after we enter into a business combination agreement,
as a result of tariffs or the threat of tariffs that may have a material impact on that target’s business, and it may be costly
or impractical for us to terminate that business combination agreement. These factors could affect our selection of a business combination
target.
We may not
be able to adequately address the risks presented by these tariffs or other potential trade policy changes. As a result, we may deem it
costly, impractical or risky to complete an initial business combination with a particular target or with a target in a particular industry
or from a particular country. Consequently, the pool of potential target companies may be reduced, which could impair our ability to identify
a suitable target and to complete an initial business combination. If we complete an initial business combination with such a target,
the post-business combination company’s operations and financial results could be adversely affected as a result of tariffs or changes
to trade policies, which may cause the market value of the securities of the post-business combination company to decline.
41
Risks
Relating to the Post-Business Combination Company
Subsequent
to our completion of our initial business combination, we may be required to take write-downs or write-offs, restructuring and impairment
or other charges that could have a significant negative effect on our financial condition, results of operations and the price of our
securities, which could cause you to lose some or all of your investment.
Even if we
conduct due diligence on a target business with which we combine, we cannot assure you that this diligence will identify all material
issues that may be present within a particular target business, that it would be possible to uncover all material issues through a customary
amount of due diligence, or that factors outside of the target business and outside of our control will not later arise. As a result of
these factors, we may be forced to later write-down or write-off assets, restructure our operations, or incur impairment or other charges
that could result in our reporting losses. Even if our due diligence successfully identifies certain risks, unexpected risks may arise
and previously known risks may materialize in a manner not consistent with our preliminary risk analysis. Even though these charges may
be non-cash items and not have an immediate impact on our liquidity, the fact that we report charges of this nature could contribute to
negative market perceptions about us or our securities. In addition, charges of this nature may cause us to violate net worth or other
covenants to which we may be subject as a result of assuming pre-existing debt held by a target business or by virtue of our obtaining
debt financing to partially finance the initial business combination or thereafter. Accordingly, any shareholders who choose to remain
shareholders following the business combination could suffer a reduction in the value of their securities. Such shareholders are unlikely
to have a remedy for such reduction in value unless they are able to successfully claim that the reduction was due to the breach by our
officers or directors of a duty of care or other fiduciary duty owed to them, or if they are able to successfully bring a private claim
under securities laws that the proxy solicitation or tender offer materials, as applicable, relating to the business combination contained
an actionable material misstatement or material omission.
The officers
and directors of an acquisition candidate may resign upon completion of our initial business combination. The loss of a business combination
target’s key personnel could negatively impact the operations and profitability of our post-combination business.
The role of
an acquisition candidate’s key personnel upon the completion of our initial business combination cannot be ascertained at this time.
Although we contemplate that certain members of an acquisition candidate’s management team will remain associated with the acquisition
candidate following our initial business combination, it is possible that members of the management of an acquisition candidate will not
wish to remain in place.
Our
management may not be able to maintain control of a target business after our initial business combination. We cannot provide assurance
that, upon loss of control of a target business, new management will possess the skills, qualifications or abilities necessary to profitably
operate such business.
We may structure
our initial business combination so that the post-transaction company in which our public shareholders own shares will own less than 100%
of the equity interests or assets of a target business, but we will only complete such business combination if the post-transaction company
owns or acquires 50% or more of the outstanding voting securities of the target or otherwise acquires a controlling interest in the target
sufficient for us not to be required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. We will not consider any transaction
that does not meet such criteria. Even if the post-transaction company owns 50% or more of the voting securities of the target, our shareholders
prior to the business combination may collectively own a minority interest in the post business combination company, depending on valuations
ascribed to the target and us in the business combination. For example, we could pursue a transaction in which we issue a substantial
number of new Class A ordinary shares in exchange for all of the outstanding capital stock, shares or other equity interests of a target.
In this case, we would acquire a 100% interest in the target. However, as a result of the issuance of a substantial number of new Class
A ordinary shares, our shareholders immediately prior to such transaction could own less than a majority of our issued and outstanding
Class A ordinary shares subsequent to such transaction. In addition, other minority shareholders may subsequently combine their holdings
resulting in a single person or group obtaining a larger share of the company’s shares than we initially acquired. Accordingly,
this may make it more likely that our management will not be able to maintain control of the target business.
42
We
may have a limited ability to assess the management of a prospective target business and, as a result, may effect our initial business
combination with a target business whose management may not have the skills, qualifications or abilities to manage a public company.
When evaluating
the desirability of effecting our initial business combination with a prospective target business, our ability to assess the target business’s
management may be limited due to a lack of time, resources or information. Our assessment of the capabilities of the target business’s
management, therefore, may prove to be incorrect and such management may lack the skills, qualifications or abilities we suspected. Should
the target business’s management not possess the skills, qualifications or abilities necessary to manage a public company, the operations
and profitability of the post-combination business may be negatively impacted. Accordingly, any shareholders who choose to remain shareholders
following the business combination could suffer a reduction in the value of their shares. Such shareholders are unlikely to have a remedy
for such reduction in value unless they are able to successfully claim that the reduction was due to the breach by our officers or directors
of a duty of care or other fiduciary duty owed to them, or if they are able to successfully bring a private claim under securities laws
that the proxy solicitation or tender offer materials, as applicable, relating to the business combination contained an actionable material
misstatement or material omission.
We
may seek business combination opportunities with a high degree of complexity that require significant operational improvements, which
could delay or prevent us from achieving our desired results.
We may seek
business combination opportunities with large, highly complex companies that we believe would benefit from operational improvements. While
we intend to implement such improvements, to the extent that our efforts are delayed or we are unable to achieve the desired improvements,
the business combination may not be as successful as we anticipate.
To the extent
we complete our initial business combination with a large complex business or entity with a complex operating structure, we may also be
affected by numerous risks inherent in the operations of the business with which we combine, which could delay or prevent us from implementing
our strategy. Although our management team will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular target business and its operations,
we may not be able to properly ascertain or assess all of the significant risk factors until we complete our business combination. If
we are not able to achieve our desired operational improvements, or the improvements take longer to implement than anticipated, we may
not achieve the gains that we anticipate. Furthermore, some of these risks and complexities may be outside of our control and leave us
with no ability to control or reduce the chances that those risks and complexities will adversely impact a target business. Such combination
may not be as successful as a combination with a smaller, less complex organization.
Our
initial business combination and our structure thereafter may not be tax-efficient to our shareholders and warrant holders. As a result
of our business combination, our tax obligations may be more complex, burdensome and/or uncertain.
Although
we will attempt to structure our initial business combination in a tax-efficient manner, tax structuring considerations are complex, the
relevant facts and law are uncertain and may change, and we may prioritize commercial and other considerations over tax considerations.
For example, in connection with our initial business combination and subject to any requisite shareholder approval, we may: structure
our business combination in a manner that requires shareholders and/or warrant holders to recognize gain or income for tax purposes; effect
a business combination with a target company in another jurisdiction; or reincorporate in a different jurisdiction (including, but not
limited to, the jurisdiction in which the target company or business is located). We do not intend to make any cash distributions to shareholders
or warrant holders to pay taxes in connection with our business combination or thereafter. Accordingly, a shareholder or a warrant holder
may need to satisfy any liability resulting from our initial business combination with cash from its own funds or by selling all or a
portion of the shares or warrants received. In addition, shareholders and warrant holders may also be subject to additional income, withholding
or other taxes with respect to their ownership of us after our initial business combination.
43
In
addition, we may effect a business combination with a target company that has business operations outside of the United States, and possibly,
business operations in multiple jurisdictions. If we effect such a business combination, we could be subject to significant income, withholding
and other tax obligations in a number of jurisdictions with respect to income, operations and subsidiaries related to those jurisdictions.
Due to the complexity of tax obligations and filings in other jurisdictions, we may have a heightened risk related to audits or examinations
by U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. taxing authorities. This additional complexity and risk could have an adverse effect on our
after-tax profitability and financial condition.
Risks
Relating to Acquiring and Operating a Business in Foreign Countries
If
we effect our initial business combination with a company located outside of the United States, we would be subject to a variety of additional
risks that may adversely affect us.
If
we pursue a target company with operations or opportunities outside of the United States for our initial business combination, we may
face additional burdens in connection with investigating, agreeing to and completing such initial business combination, and if we effect
such initial business combination, we would be subject to a variety of additional risks that may negatively impact our operations.
If
we pursue a target a company with operations or opportunities outside of the United States for our initial business combination, we would
be subject to risks associated with cross-border business combinations, including in connection with investigating, agreeing to and completing
our initial business combination, conducting due diligence in a foreign jurisdiction, having such transaction approved by any local governments,
regulators or agencies and changes in the purchase price based on fluctuations in foreign exchange rates.
If
we effect our initial business combination with such a company, we would be subject to any special considerations or risks associated
with companies operating in an international setting, including any of the following:
●
costs and difficulties inherent
in managing cross-border business operations;
●
rules and regulations regarding
currency redemption;
●
complex corporate withholding taxes
on individuals;
●
laws governing the manner in which
future business combinations may be effected;
●
exchange listing and/or delisting
requirements;
●
tariffs and trade barriers;
●
regulations related to customs and
import/export matters;
●
local or regional economic policies
and market conditions;
●
unexpected changes in regulatory
requirements;
●
challenges in managing and staffing
international operations;
●
longer payment cycles;
●
tax issues, such as tax law changes
and variations in tax laws as compared to the United States;
44
●
currency fluctuations and exchange
controls;
●
rates of inflation;
●
challenges in collecting accounts
receivable;
●
cultural and language differences;
●
employment regulations;
●
underdeveloped or unpredictable
legal or regulatory systems;
●
corruption;
●
protection of intellectual property;
●
social unrest, crime, strikes, riots
and civil disturbances;
●
regime changes and political upheaval;
●
terrorist attacks, natural disasters,
widespread health emergencies and wars; and
●
deterioration of political relations
with the United States.
We
may not be able to adequately address these additional risks. If we were unable to do so, we may be unable to complete such initial business
combination, or, if we complete such initial business combination, our operations might suffer, either of which may adversely impact our
business, financial condition and results of operations.
We
may reincorporate in another jurisdiction, which may result in taxes imposed on shareholders or warrant holders.
We
may, in connection with our initial business combination or otherwise and, to the extent applicable, subject to requisite shareholder
approval by special resolution under the Companies Act (with respect to which only holders of Class B ordinary shares will be entitled
to vote prior to our initial business combination), reincorporate in the jurisdiction in which the target company or business is located
or in another jurisdiction. The transaction may require a shareholder or warrant holder to recognize taxable income in the jurisdiction
in which the shareholder or warrant holder is a tax resident or in which its members are resident if it is a tax transparent entity (or
may otherwise result in adverse tax consequences). We do not intend to make any cash distributions to shareholders or warrant holders
to pay such taxes. Shareholders or warrant holders may be subject to withholding taxes or other taxes with respect to their ownership
of our Class A ordinary shares or warrants after the reincorporation.
We
may reincorporate in or transfer by way of continuation to another jurisdiction in connection with our initial business combination, and
the laws of such jurisdiction may govern some or all of our future material agreements and we may not be able to enforce our legal rights.
In
connection with our initial business combination, we may relocate the home jurisdiction of our business from the Cayman Islands to another
jurisdiction. If we determine to do this, the laws of such jurisdiction may govern some or all of our future material agreements. The
system of laws and the enforcement of existing laws in such jurisdiction may not be as certain in implementation and interpretation as
in the United States. The inability to enforce or obtain a remedy under any of our future agreements could result in a significant loss
of business, business opportunities or capital.
45
We
are subject to changing law and regulations regarding regulatory matters, corporate governance and public disclosure that have increased
both our costs and the risk of non-compliance.
We
are subject to rules and regulations by various governing bodies, including, for example, the Securities and Exchange Commission, which
are charged with the protection of investors and the oversight of companies whose securities are publicly traded, and to new and evolving
regulatory measures under applicable law. Our efforts to comply with new and changing laws and regulations have resulted in and are likely
to continue to result in, increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating
activities to compliance activities.
Moreover,
because these laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, their application in practice may evolve over time
as new guidance becomes available. This evolution may result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and additional costs
necessitated by ongoing revisions to our disclosure and governance practices. If we fail to address and comply with these regulations
and any subsequent changes, we may be subject to penalty and our business may be harmed.
If
our management following our initial business combination is unfamiliar with United States securities laws, they may have to expend time
and resources becoming familiar with such laws, which could lead to various regulatory issues.
Following
our initial business combination, our management may resign from their positions as officers or directors of the company and the management
of the target business at the time of the business combination will remain in place. Management of the target business may not be familiar
with United States securities laws. If new management is unfamiliar with United States securities laws, they may have to expend time and
resources becoming familiar with such laws. This could be expensive and time-consuming and could lead to various regulatory issues which
may adversely affect our operations.
Exchange
rate fluctuations and currency policies may cause a target business’ ability to succeed in the international markets to be diminished.
In
the event we acquire a non-U.S. target, all revenues and income would likely be received in a foreign currency, and the dollar equivalent
of our net assets and distributions, if any, could be adversely affected by reductions in the value of the local currency. The value of
the currencies in our target regions fluctuate and are affected by, among other things, changes in political and economic conditions.
Any change in the relative value of such currency against our reporting currency may affect the attractiveness of any target business
or, following consummation of our initial business combination, our financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, if a
currency appreciates in value against the dollar prior to the consummation of our initial business combination, the cost of a target business
as measured in dollars will increase, which may make it less likely that we are able to consummate such transaction.
After
our initial business combination, substantially all of our assets may be located in a foreign country and substantially all of our revenue
will be derived from our operations in such country. Accordingly, our results of operations and prospects will be subject, to a significant
extent, to the economic, political and legal policies, developments and conditions in the country in which we operate.
The
economic, political and social conditions, as well as government policies, of the country in which our operations are located could affect
our business. Economic growth could be uneven, both geographically and among various sectors of the economy and such growth may not be
sustained in the future. If in the future such country’s economy experiences a downturn or grows at a slower rate than expected,
there may be less demand for spending in certain industries. A decrease in demand for spending in certain industries could materially
and adversely affect our ability to find an attractive target business with which to consummate our initial business combination and if
we effect our initial business combination, the ability of that target business to become profitable.
46
Risks
Relating to our Management Team
We
are dependent upon our officers and directors and their loss, or a reduction in the amount of time they can dedicate to our initial business
combination, could adversely affect our ability to operate.
Our
operations are dependent upon a relatively small group of individuals and, in particular, our officers and directors. We believe that
our success depends on the continued service of our officers and directors, at least until we have completed our initial business combination.
In addition, our officers and directors are not required to commit any specified amount of time to our affairs and, accordingly, will
have conflicts of interest in allocating their time among various business activities, including identifying potential business combinations
and monitoring the related due diligence. Moreover, our officers and directors, including our Chief Executive Officer, are and in the
future will be required to commit time and attention to other businesses. To the extent any conflict of interest arises between, on the
one hand, us and, on the other hand, any of such entities (including arising as a result of certain of officers and directors being required
to offer acquisition opportunities to such entities), such individuals will resolve such conflicts of interest in their sole discretion
in accordance with their then existing fiduciary, contractual and other duties and there can be no assurance that such conflict of interest
will be resolved in our favor. We do not have an employment agreement with, or key-man insurance on the life of, any of our directors
or officers. The unexpected loss of the services of one or more of our directors or officers could have a detrimental effect on us.
Our
ability to successfully effect our initial business combination and to be successful thereafter will be dependent upon the efforts of
our key personnel, some of whom may join us following our initial business combination. The loss of key personnel could negatively impact
the operations and profitability of our post-combination business.
Our
ability to successfully effect our initial business combination is dependent upon the efforts of our key personnel. The role of our key
personnel in the target business, however, cannot presently be ascertained. Although some of our key personnel may remain with the target
business in senior management or advisory positions following our initial business combination, it is likely that some or all of the management
of the target business will remain in place. While we intend to closely scrutinize any individuals we engage after our initial business
combination, we cannot assure you that our assessment of these individuals will prove to be correct. These individuals may be unfamiliar
with the requirements of operating a company regulated by the SEC, which could cause us to have to expend time and resources helping them
become familiar with such requirements.
Our
key personnel may negotiate employment or consulting agreements with a target business in connection with a particular business combination,
and a particular business combination may be conditioned on the retention or resignation of such key personnel. These agreements may provide
for them to receive compensation following our initial business combination and as a result, may cause them to have conflicts of interest
in determining whether a particular business combination is the most advantageous.
Our
key personnel may be able to remain with our company after the completion of our initial business combination only if they are able to
negotiate employment or consulting agreements in connection with the business combination. Such negotiations would take place simultaneously
with the negotiation of the business combination and could provide for such individuals to receive compensation in the form of cash payments
and/or our securities for services they would render to us after the completion of the business combination. Such negotiations also could
make such key personnel’s retention or resignation a condition to any such agreement. The personal and financial interests of such
individuals may influence their motivation in identifying and selecting a target business, subject to their fiduciary duties under Cayman
Islands law.
47
Our
officers and directors will allocate their time to other businesses thereby causing conflicts of interest in their determination as to
how much time to devote to our affairs. This conflict of interest could have a negative impact on our ability to complete our initial
business combination.
Our
officers and directors are not required to, and will not, commit their full time to our affairs, which may result in a conflict of interest
in allocating their time between our operations and our search for a business combination and their other businesses. We do not intend
to have any full-time employees prior to the completion of our initial business combination. Each of our officers is engaged in other
business endeavors for which he may be entitled to substantial compensation, and our officers are not obligated to contribute any specific
number of hours per week to our affairs. Our independent directors also serve as officers and board members for other entities. In addition,
our sponsor, officers and directors may sponsor, form or participate in other blank check companies similar to ours during the period
in which we are seeking an initial business combination. Such entities may compete with us for business combination opportunities. If
our officers’ and directors’ other business affairs require them to devote substantial amounts of time to such affairs in
excess of their current commitment levels, it could limit their ability to devote time to our affairs which may have a negative impact
on our ability to complete our initial business combination. Any such companies, businesses or investments may present additional conflicts
of interest in pursuing an initial business combination target. However, we do not believe that any such potential conflicts would materially
affect our ability to complete our initial business combination.
Our
officers and directors presently have, and any of them in the future may have additional, fiduciary or contractual obligations to other
entities, including other blank check companies, and, accordingly, may have conflicts of interest in allocating their time and in determining
to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented.
Until
we consummate our initial business combination, we intend to engage in the business of identifying and combining with one or more businesses.
Our sponsor, its managing member, and our officers and directors are, or may in the future become, affiliated with entities (such as operating
companies or investment vehicles) that are engaged in a similar business. We do not have employment contracts with our officers and directors
that will limit their ability to work at other businesses. In addition, our officers and directors and their respective affiliates in
the future may participate in the formation of, or become an officer or director of, any other blank check company prior to completion
of our initial business combination. As a result, our sponsor, officers and directors could have conflicts of interest in determining
whether to present business combination opportunities to us or to any other blank check company with which they are or may become involved.
Our sponsor, officers and directors have complete discretion, subject to applicable fiduciary duties, as to which blank check company
they choose to pursue a business combination and the order in which they pursue business combinations for any of their existing or future
blank check companies. As a result, our sponsor, officers and directors may pursue business combinations for blank check companies that
it has sponsored in any order, which could result in its more recent blank check companies completing business combinations prior to its
blank check companies that were launched earlier. Each of our officers and directors presently has, and any of them in the future may
have additional, fiduciary, contractual or other obligations or duties to one or more other entities, pursuant to which such officer or
director is or will be required to present a business combination opportunity to such entities. Accordingly, if any of our officers or
directors becomes aware of a business combination opportunity which is suitable for an entity to which he or she has then current fiduciary
or contractual obligations, he or she will honor his or her fiduciary or contractual obligations to present such business combination
opportunity to such other entity, subject to their fiduciary duties under Cayman Islands law. Our amended and restated memorandum and
articles of association will provide that, to the fullest extent permitted by law: (i) no individual serving as a director or an officer,
among other persons, shall have any duty, except and to the extent expressly assumed by contract, to refrain from engaging directly or
indirectly in the same or similar business activities or lines of business as us, and (ii) we renounce any interest or expectancy in,
or in being offered an opportunity to participate in, any potential transaction or matter which (a) may be a corporate opportunity for
any director or officer, on the one hand, and us, on the other or (b) the presentation of which would breach an existing legal obligation
of a director or officer to any other entity. We do not believe, however, that the fiduciary duties or contractual obligations of our
officers or directors will materially affect our ability to complete our initial business combination.
Our
officers, directors, security holders and their respective affiliates may have competitive pecuniary interests that conflict with our
interests.
We
have not adopted a policy that expressly prohibits our directors, officers, security holders or affiliates from having a direct or indirect
pecuniary or financial interest in any investment to be acquired or disposed of by us or in any transaction to which we are a party or
have an interest. In fact, we may enter into a business combination with a target business that is affiliated with our sponsor, our directors
or officers, although we do not intend to do so.
48
Nor
do we have a policy that expressly prohibits any such persons from engaging for their own account in business activities of the types
conducted by us. Accordingly, such persons or entities may have a conflict between their interests and ours. Any such companies, businesses
or investments may present additional conflicts of interest in pursuing an initial business combination target. However, we do not believe
that any such potential conflicts would materially affect our ability to complete our initial business combination.
The
personal and financial interests of our directors and officers may influence their motivation in timely identifying and selecting a target
business and completing a business combination. Consequently, our directors’ and officers’ discretion in identifying and selecting
a suitable target business may result in a conflict of interest when determining whether the terms, conditions and timing of a particular
business combination are appropriate and in our shareholders’ best interest. If this were the case, it would be a breach of their
fiduciary duties to us as a matter of Cayman Islands law and we or our shareholders might have a claim against such individuals for infringing
on our shareholders’ rights.
Members
of our management team and board of directors have significant experience as founders, board members, officers, executives or employees
of other companies. Certain of those persons have been, are currently, or may become, involved in litigation, investigations or other
proceedings, including related to those companies or otherwise. This may have an adverse effect on us, which may impede our ability to
consummate an initial business combination.
During
the course of their careers, members of our management team and board of directors have had significant experience as founders, board
members, officers, executives or employees of other companies. Certain of those persons have been, are currently or may in the future
become involved in litigation, investigations or other proceedings, including relating to the business affairs of such companies, transactions
entered into by such companies, or otherwise. Any such litigation, investigations or other proceedings may divert the attention and resources
of our management team and board of directors away from identifying and selecting a target business or businesses for our initial business
combination and may negatively affect our reputation, which may impede our ability to complete an initial business combination.
Members
of our management team and affiliated companies may have been, and may in the future be, involved in civil disputes or governmental investigations
unrelated to our business.
Members
of our management team have been (and intend to be) involved in a wide variety of businesses. Such involvement has, and may lead to, media
coverage and public awareness. As a result, members of our management team and affiliated companies may have been, and may in the future
be, involved in civil disputes or governmental investigations unrelated to our business. Any such claims or investigations may be detrimental
to our reputation and could negatively affect our ability to identify and complete an initial business combination and may have an adverse
effect on the price of our securities.
Our
letter agreement with our sponsor, officers and directors may be amended without shareholder approval.
Our
letter agreement with our sponsor, officers and directors contain provisions relating to transfer restrictions of our founder shares and
private placement units (and the securities comprising such units and the Class A ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of the private
placement warrants), indemnification of the trust account, waiver of redemption rights and participation in liquidating distributions
from the trust account. The letter agreement may be amended without shareholder approval (although releasing the parties from the restriction
not to transfer the founder shares for 185 days following the date of the effectiveness of the registration statement will require the
prior written consent of the underwriters). While we do not expect our board to approve any amendment to the letter agreement prior to
our initial business combination, it may be possible that our board, in exercising its business judgment and subject to its fiduciary
duties, chooses to approve one or more amendments to the letter agreement. Any such amendments to the letter agreement would not require
approval from our shareholders and may have an adverse effect on the value of an investment in our securities.
49
Risks
Relating to our Securities
You
will not have any rights or interests in funds from the trust account, except under certain limited circumstances. Therefore, to liquidate
your investment, you may be forced to sell your public shares or warrants, potentially at a loss.
Our
public shareholders will be entitled to receive funds from the trust account only upon the earliest to occur of: (i) our completion of
an initial business combination, and then only in connection with those Class A ordinary shares that such shareholder properly elected
to redeem, subject to the limitations and on the conditions described herein, (ii) the redemption of any public shares properly submitted
in connection with a shareholder vote to amend our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association (A) to modify the substance
or timing of our obligation to allow redemption in connection with our initial business combination or to redeem 100% of our public shares
if we do not complete our initial business combination within the completion window or (B) with respect to any other material provisions
relating to shareholders’ rights or pre-initial business combination activity, and (iii) the redemption of our public shares if
we are unable to complete an initial business combination within the completion window, subject to applicable law and as further described
herein. In no other circumstances will a public shareholder have any right or interest of any kind in the trust account. Holders of warrants
will not have any right to the proceeds held in the trust account with respect to the warrants. Accordingly, to liquidate your investment,
you may be forced to sell your public shares or warrants, potentially at a loss.
Nasdaq
may delist our securities from trading on its exchange, which could limit investors’ ability to make transactions in our securities
and subject us to additional trading restrictions.
Our
units are currently listed on Nasdaq. Following the date that the Class A ordinary shares and warrants are eligible to trade separately,
we anticipate that the Class A ordinary shares and warrants will be separately listed on Nasdaq. We cannot guarantee that our securities
will be approved for listing on Nasdaq. Although after giving effect to the initial public offering we expect to meet, on a pro forma
basis, the minimum initial listing standards set forth in Nasdaq listing standards, we cannot assure you that our securities will be,
or will continue to be, listed on Nasdaq in the future or prior to our initial business combination. In order to continue listing our
securities on Nasdaq prior to our initial business combination, we must maintain certain financial, distribution and share price levels.
Generally, we must maintain a minimum market value of listed securities (generally $50,000,000) and a minimum number of holders of our
securities (generally 400 public holders). Additionally, in connection with our initial business combination, we will be required to demonstrate
compliance with Nasdaq’s initial listing requirements, which are more rigorous than Nasdaq’s continued listing requirements,
in order to continue to maintain the listing of our securities on Nasdaq. For instance, for The Nasdaq Global Market, our share price
would generally be required to be at least $4.00 per share, the market value of listed securities would generally be required to be at
least $75 million and we would be required to have a minimum of 400 round lot holders of our securities (with at least 50% of such round
lot holders holding securities with a market value of at least $2,500). We cannot assure you that we will be able to meet those initial
listing requirements at that time. In addition, Nasdaq has broad subjective authority to deny listing or apply additional or more stringent
criteria based on any event, condition, or circumstance that makes the listing of the company inadvisable or unwarranted in the opinion
of Nasdaq. Such determination can be made even if we meet the standards forth initial or continued listing.
If
Nasdaq delists our securities from trading on its exchange and we are not able to list our securities on another national securities exchange,
we expect our securities could be quoted on an over-the-counter market. If this were to occur, we could face significant material adverse
consequences, including:
●
a limited availability of market
quotations for our securities;
●
reduced liquidity for our securities;
●
a determination that our Class A ordinary
shares are a “penny stock” which will require brokers trading in our Class A ordinary shares to adhere to more stringent rules
and possibly result in a reduced level of trading activity in the secondary trading market for our securities;
●
a limited amount of news and analyst
coverage; and
●
a decreased ability to issue additional
securities or obtain additional financing in the future.
50
The
National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996, which is a federal statute, prevents or preempts the states from regulating the sale
of certain securities, which are referred to as “covered securities.” Because we expect that our Class A ordinary shares and
warrants will be listed on Nasdaq, our units, Class A ordinary shares and warrants will qualify as covered securities under the statute.
Although the states are preempted from regulating the sale of our securities, the federal statute does allow the states to investigate
companies if there is a suspicion of fraud, and, if there is a finding of fraudulent activity, then the states can regulate or bar the
sale of covered securities in a particular case. While we are not aware of a state having used these powers to prohibit or restrict the
sale of securities issued by blank check companies, other than the State of Idaho, certain state securities regulators view blank check
companies unfavorably and might use these powers, or threaten to use these powers, to hinder the sale of securities of blank check companies
in their states. Further, if we were no longer listed on Nasdaq, our securities would not qualify as covered securities under the statute
and we would be subject to regulation in each state in which we offer our securities.
The
nominal purchase price paid by our sponsor for the founder shares may result in significant dilution to the implied value of your public
shares upon the consummation of our initial business combination, and our sponsor is likely to make a substantial profit on its investment
in us in the event we consummate an initial business combination, even if the business combination causes the trading price of our ordinary
shares to materially decline.
We
offered our units at an offering price of $10.00 per unit and the amount in our trust account is $10.00 per public share, implying an
initial value of $10.00 per public share. However, prior to the initial public offering, our sponsor paid a nominal aggregate purchase
price of $25,000 for the founder shares, or approximately $0.003 per share. As a result, the value of your public shares may be significantly
diluted upon the consummation of our initial business combination, when the founder shares are converted into public shares.
The
following table shows the public shareholders’ and our sponsor’s investment per share and how these compare to the implied
value of one Class A ordinary share upon the completion of our initial business combination. The following table assumes that (i) our
valuation is $221,950,000 (which is the amount we will have in the trust account for our initial business combination following payment
of the deferred underwriting commissions and excluding $1,600,000 held outside of the trust account for working capital), (ii) no interest
is earned on the funds held in the trust account, (iii) no public shares have been redeemed in connection with our initial business combination
and (iv) all founder shares are held by our sponsor upon completion of our initial business combination, and does not take into account
other potential impacts on our valuation at the time of the initial business combination, such as (1) the value of our public and private
placement units (and the securities comprising such units and the Class A ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of the private placement
warrants), (2) the trading price of our Class A ordinary shares, (3) the initial business combination transaction costs (other than the
payment of $8,050,000 of deferred underwriting commissions (assuming no redemptions)), (4) any equity issued or cash paid to the target’s
sellers, (5) any equity issued to other third party investors, or (6) the target’s business itself.
Public shares
23,000,000
Founder shares
7,666,667
Private placement
shares
695,000
Total shares
31,361,667
Total
funds in trust available for initial business combination
$
221,950,000
Public
shareholders’ investment per Class A ordinary share (1)
$
10.00
Sponsor’s
investment per ordinary share (2)
$
0.003
Initial implied
value per public share
$
10.00
Implied
value per public share upon consummation of initial business combination (3)
$
7.08
(1)
While the public shareholders’
investment is in both the public shares and the public warrants, for purposes of this table the full investment amount is ascribed to
the public shares only.
(2)
The total investment in the equity
of the Company by the sponsor and BTIG is $6,975,000, consisting of (i) $25,000 paid by our sponsor for the founder shares, (ii) $4,650,000
paid by the sponsor for 465,000 private placement units and (iii) $2,300,000 paid by BTIG for 230,000 private placement units. For purposes
of this table, the full investment amount is ascribed to the founder shares only.
(3)
All founder shares would automatically
convert into Class A ordinary shares upon completion of our initial business combination or earlier at the option of the holder.
51
Based
on these assumptions, each Class A ordinary share would have an implied value of $7.08 per share upon completion of our initial business
combination, representing an approximately 29.2% decrease from the initial implied value of $10.00 per public share. While the implied
value of $7.08 per Class A ordinary share upon completion of our initial business combination would represent a dilution to our public
shareholders, this would represent a significant increase in value for our sponsor relative to the price it paid for each founder share.
At $7.08 per Class A ordinary share, the 7,666,667 ordinary shares that our sponsor would own upon completion of our initial business
combination (after automatic conversion of the 7,666,667 founder shares) and 465,000 private placement shares would have an aggregate
implied value of $57,572,202. As a result, even if the trading price of our Class A ordinary share significantly declines, the value of
the founder shares held by our sponsor will be significantly greater than the amount our sponsor paid to purchase such shares. In addition,
our sponsor could potentially recoup its entire investment in our company even if the trading price of our Class A ordinary shares after
the initial business combination is as low as approximately $0.57 per share. As a result, our sponsor is likely to earn a substantial
profit on its investment in us upon disposition of its Class A ordinary shares even if the trading price of our Class A ordinary shares
declines after we complete our initial business combination. Our sponsor may therefore be economically incentivized to complete an initial
business combination with a riskier, weaker-performing or less-established target business than would be the case if our sponsor had paid
the same per share price for the founder shares as our public shareholders paid for their public shares in the initial public offering.
The non-managing sponsor investors will share in any appreciation of the founder shares through their membership interests in the sponsor
if we successfully complete a business combination. Accordingly, non-managing sponsor investors’ interests in the founder shares
owned by them indirectly through their membership interests in the sponsor may provide them with an incentive to vote any public shares
they own in favor of a business combination, and make a substantial profit on such interests, even if the business combination is with
a target that ultimately declines in value and is not profitable for other public shareholders.
This
dilution would increase to the extent that the anti-dilution provisions of the founder shares result in the issuance of Class A ordinary
shares on a greater than one-to-one basis upon conversion of the founder shares at the time of our initial business combination and would
become exacerbated to the extent that public shareholders seek redemptions from the trust for their public shares. In addition, because
of the anti-dilution protection in the founder shares, any equity or equity-linked securities issued in connection with our initial business
combination would be disproportionately dilutive to our Class A ordinary shares.
The
value of the founder shares following completion of our initial business combination is likely to be substantially higher than the nominal
price paid for them, even if the trading price of our ordinary shares at such time is substantially less than $10.00 per public share.
Our
sponsor and the non-managing sponsor investors have invested in us an aggregate of $4,675,000, comprised of the $25,000 purchase price
for the founder shares and the $4,650,000 purchase price for the private placement units. Assuming a trading price of $10.00 per public
share upon consummation of our initial business combination, the 7,666,667 founder shares and 465,000 private placement shares would have
an aggregate implied value of approximately $81.3 million. Even if the trading price of our ordinary shares were as low as approximately
$0.57 per share, and the private placement warrants are worthless, the value of the founder shares and private placement shares would
be equal to our sponsor’s, and the non-managing sponsor investors’, aggregate initial investment in us. As a result, our sponsor,
including the non-managing sponsor investors, is likely to be able to make a substantial profit on its investment in us at a time when
our public shares have lost significant value. Accordingly, members of our management team, who own interests in our sponsor, may be more
willing to pursue a business combination with a riskier or less-established target business than would be the case if our sponsor had
paid the same per share price for the founder shares as our public shareholders paid for their public shares in the initial public offering.
In addition, our non-managing sponsor investors may have different interests than other public shareholders due to their additional upfront
investment in the company and their membership interests in the sponsor.
Because
we are incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands, you may face difficulties in protecting your interests, and your ability to
protect your rights through the U.S. Federal courts may be limited.
We
are an exempted company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands. As a result, it may be difficult for investors to effect service
of process within the United States upon our directors or officers, or enforce judgments obtained in the United States courts against
our directors or officers.
52
Our
corporate affairs are governed by our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association, the Companies Act (as the same may
be supplemented or amended from time to time) and the common law of the Cayman Islands. We will also be subject to the federal securities
laws of the United States. The rights of shareholders to take action against the directors, actions by minority shareholders and the fiduciary
responsibilities of our directors to us under Cayman Islands law are to a large extent governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands.
The common law of the Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent in the Cayman Islands as well as
from English common law, the decisions of whose courts are of persuasive authority, but are not binding on a court in the Cayman Islands.
The
rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors under Cayman Islands law are different from what they would
be under statutes or judicial precedent in some jurisdictions in the United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands has a different
body of securities laws as compared to the United States, and certain states, such as Delaware, may have more fully developed and judicially
interpreted bodies of corporate law. In addition, Cayman Islands companies may not have standing to initiate a shareholders derivative
action in a Federal court of the United States.
We
have been advised by Conyers Dill & Pearman LLP, our Cayman Islands legal counsel, that the courts of the Cayman Islands are unlikely
(i) to recognize or enforce against us judgments of courts of the United States predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the
federal securities laws of the United States or any state; and (ii) in original actions brought in the Cayman Islands, to impose liabilities
against us predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States or any state, so far as
the liabilities imposed by those provisions are penal in nature. In those circumstances, although there is no statutory enforcement in
the Cayman Islands of judgments obtained in the United States, the courts of the Cayman Islands will recognize and enforce a foreign money
judgment of a foreign court of competent jurisdiction without retrial on the merits based on the principle that a judgment of a competent
foreign court imposes upon the judgment debtor an obligation to pay the sum for which judgment has been given provided certain conditions
are met. For a foreign judgment to be enforced in the Cayman Islands, such judgment must be final and conclusive and for a liquidated
sum, and must not be in respect of taxes or a fine or penalty, inconsistent with a Cayman Islands judgment in respect of the same matter,
impeachable on the grounds of fraud or obtained in a manner, or be of a kind the enforcement of which is, contrary to natural justice
or the public policy of the Cayman Islands (awards of punitive or multiple damages may well be held to be contrary to public policy).
A Cayman Islands Court may stay enforcement proceedings if concurrent proceedings are being brought elsewhere.
As
a result of all of the above, public shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions taken
by management, members of the board of directors or controlling shareholders than they would as public shareholders of a United States
company.
After
our initial business combination, it is possible that a majority of our directors and officers will live outside the United States and
all of our assets will be located outside the United States; therefore, investors may not be able to enforce federal securities laws or
their other legal rights.
It
is possible that after our initial business combination, a majority of our directors and officers will reside outside of the United States
and all of our assets will be located outside of the United States. As a result, it may be difficult, or in some cases not possible, for
investors in the United States to enforce their legal rights, to effect service of process upon all of our directors or officers or to
enforce judgments of United States courts predicated upon civil liabilities and criminal penalties on our directors and officers under
United States laws.
Provisions
in our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association may inhibit a takeover of us, which could limit the price investors
might be willing to pay in the future for our Class A ordinary shares and could entrench management.
Our
amended and restated memorandum and articles of association contain provisions that may discourage unsolicited takeover proposals that
shareholders may consider to be in their best interests. These provisions include a staggered board of directors and the ability of the
board of directors to designate the terms of and issue new series of preference shares, which may make the removal of management more
difficult and may discourage transactions that otherwise could involve payment of a premium over prevailing market prices for our securities.
53
Our
amended and restated memorandum and articles of association provide that the courts of the Cayman Islands will be the exclusive forums
for certain disputes between us and our shareholders, which could limit our shareholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial
forum for complaints against us or our directors, officers or employees.
Our
amended and restated memorandum and articles of association provide that unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative
forum, the courts of the Cayman Islands shall have exclusive jurisdiction over any claim or dispute arising out of or in connection with
our amended and restated memorandum and articles of association or otherwise related in any way to each shareholder’s shareholding
in us, including but not limited to (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, (ii) any action asserting a claim of
breach of any fiduciary or other duty owed by any of our current or former directors, officers or other employees to us or our shareholders,
(iii) any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the Companies Act or our amended and restated memorandum and articles
of association, or (iv) any action asserting a claim against us governed by the internal affairs doctrine (as such concept is recognized
under the laws of the United States of America) and that each shareholder irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts
of the Cayman Islands over all such claims or disputes. The forum selection provision in our amended and restated memorandum and articles
of association will not apply to actions or suits brought to enforce any liability or duty created by the Securities Act, Exchange Act
or any claim for which the federal district courts of the United States of America are, as a matter of the laws of the United States of
America, the sole and exclusive forum for determination of such a claim.
Our
amended and restated memorandum and articles of association also provide that, without prejudice to any other rights or remedies that
we may have, each of our shareholders acknowledges that damages alone would not be an adequate remedy for any breach of the selection
of the courts of the Cayman Islands as exclusive forum and that accordingly we shall be entitled, without proof of special damages, to
the remedies of injunction, specific performance or other equitable relief for any threatened or actual breach of the selection of the
courts of the Cayman Islands as exclusive forum.
This
choice of forum provision may increase a shareholder’s cost and limit the shareholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial
forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage lawsuits against
us and our directors, officers and other employees. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any of our shares or other
securities, whether by transfer, sale, operation of law or otherwise, shall be deemed to have notice of and have irrevocably agreed and
consented to these provisions. There is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce such provisions, and the enforceability of similar
choice of forum provisions in other companies’ charter documents has been challenged in legal proceedings. It is possible that a
court could find this type of provisions to be inapplicable or unenforceable, and if a court were to find this provision in our amended
and restated memorandum and articles of association to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated
with resolving the dispute in other jurisdictions, which could have adverse effect on our business and financial performance.
Economic
substance legislation of the Cayman Islands may adversely impact us or our operations.
The
Cayman Islands, together with several other non-European Union jurisdictions, have introduced legislation aimed at addressing concerns
raised by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (OECD) Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) initiative
as to offshore structures engaged in certain activities which attract profits without real economic activity. The International Tax Co-operation
(Economic Substance) Act, (As Revised) (the “Economic Substance Act”) contains economic substance requirements for in-scope
Cayman Islands entities which are engaged in certain “relevant activities”. As we are a Cayman Islands company, our compliance
obligations will include filing an annual notification, which need to state whether we are carrying out any relevant activities and if
so, whether we have satisfied economic substance tests to the extent required under the Economic Substance Act. If the Cayman Islands
Tax Information Authority determines that we or any of our Cayman Islands subsidiaries has failed to meet the requirements imposed by
the Economic Substance Act, we may face significant financial penalties, restriction on the regulation of its business activities and/or
may be struck off as a registered entity in the Cayman Islands.
54
As
it is still a relatively new regime, it is anticipated that the Economic Substance Act and associated guidance will evolve and may be
subject to further clarification and amendments. We may need to allocate additional resources to keep updated with these developments,
and may have to make changes to our operations in order to comply with all requirements under the Economic Substance Act. Failure to satisfy
these requirements may subject us to penalties under the Economic Substance Act.
Anti-money
laundering legislation, regulations and guidance and sanctions legislation may require us to adopt and maintain costly compliance procedures
and may adversely impact us or our financial results.
In
order to comply with legislation, regulations and guidance aimed at the prevention of money laundering, terrorist financing and proliferation
financing, and sanctions legislation, we may be required to adopt and maintain anti-money laundering procedures, and may require subscribers
and their beneficial owners, controllers or authorized persons (where applicable) (“Related Persons”) to provide evidence
to verify their identity. Where permitted, and subject to certain conditions, we may also rely on, or delegate to, a suitable person the
maintenance of our anti-money laundering procedures (including the acquisition of due diligence information).
We
reserve the right to request such information as is necessary to verify the identity of a subscriber or its Related Persons. In the event
of delay or failure on the part of the subscriber in producing any information required for verification purposes, we may refuse to accept
the application, in which case any funds received will be returned without interest to the account from which they were originally debited.
We
also reserve the right to refuse to make any redemption payment to a shareholder if directors or officers suspect or are advised that
the payment of redemption proceeds to such shareholder might result in a breach of applicable anti-money laundering, sanctions or other
laws or regulations by any person in any relevant jurisdiction, or if such refusal is considered necessary or appropriate to ensure compliance
with any such laws or regulations in any applicable jurisdiction.
If
any person in the Cayman Islands knows or suspects, or has reasonable grounds for knowing or suspecting that another person is engaged
in criminal conduct or money laundering, or is involved with terrorism or terrorist financing and property, and the information for that
knowledge or suspicion came to their attention in the course of business in the regulated sector, or other trade, profession, business
or employment, the person will be required to report such knowledge or suspicion to (i) the Financial Reporting Authority of the Cayman
Islands (“FRA”), pursuant to the Proceeds of Crime Act (As Revised) of the Cayman Islands, if the disclosure relates to criminal
conduct or money laundering, or (ii) a police officer of the rank of constable or higher, or the FRA, pursuant to the Terrorism Act (As
Revised) of the Cayman Islands, if the disclosure relates to involvement with terrorism or terrorist financing and property.
An
investment in our securities may result in uncertain U.S. federal income tax consequences.
An
investment in our securities may result in uncertain U.S. federal income tax consequences. For instance, because there are no authorities
that directly address instruments similar to the units issued in our initial public offering, the allocation an investor makes with respect
to the purchase price of a unit between the Class A ordinary share and the one-third of one warrant included in each unit could be challenged
by the IRS or courts. In addition, the U.S. federal income tax consequences of a cashless exercise of warrants included in the units issued
in our initial public offering is unclear under current law, and the adjustment to the number of ordinary shares for which the warrant
may be exercised or to the exercise price of the warrant could give rise to dividend income to U.S. Holders (as defined above in the “Certain
Terms” section) without a corresponding payment of cash. Finally, it is unclear whether the redemption rights with respect to our
Class A ordinary shares suspend the running of a U.S. Holder’s holding period for purposes of determining whether any gain or loss
realized by such holder on the sale or exchange of Class A ordinary shares is long-term capital gain or loss and for determining whether
any dividend we pay would be considered “qualified dividend income” for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
55
Whether
a redemption of Class A ordinary shares will be treated as a sale of such Class A ordinary shares for U.S. federal income tax purposes
will depend on a shareholder’s specific facts.
The
U.S. federal income tax treatment of a redemption of Class A ordinary shares will depend on whether the redemption qualifies as a sale
of such Class A ordinary shares under Section 302(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), which
will depend largely on the total number of our shares treated as held by the shareholder electing to redeem Class A ordinary shares (including
any shares constructively owned by the holder as a result of owning warrants) relative to all of our shares outstanding both before and
after the redemption. If such redemption is not treated as a sale of Class A ordinary shares for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the
redemption will instead be treated as a corporate distribution of cash from us.
We
may amend the terms of the warrants in a manner that may be adverse to holders of public warrants with the approval by the holders of
at least 50% of the then outstanding public warrants. As a result, the exercise price of your warrants could be increased, the exercise
period could be shortened and the number of Class A ordinary shares purchasable upon exercise of a warrant could be decreased, all without
your approval.
Our
warrants were issued in registered form under a warrant agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as warrant agent,
and us. The warrant agreement provides that the terms of the warrants may be amended without the consent of any holder for the purpose
of (i) curing any ambiguity or to correct any defective provision or mistake, including to conform the provisions of the warrant agreement
to the description of the terms of the warrants and the warrant agreement set forth in the registration statement related to the initial
public offering, (ii) adjusting the provisions relating to cash dividends on ordinary shares as contemplated by and in accordance with
the warrant agreement or (iii) adding or changing any provisions with respect to matters or questions arising under the warrant agreement
as the parties to the warrant agreement may deem necessary or desirable and that the parties deem to not adversely affect the rights of
the registered holders of the warrants, provided that the approval by the holders of at least 50% of the then-outstanding public warrants
is required to make any change that adversely affects the interests of the registered holders of public warrants. Accordingly, we may
amend the terms of the public warrants in a manner adverse to a holder of public warrants if holders of at least 50% of the then outstanding
public warrants approve of such amendment. Although our ability to amend the terms of the public warrants with the consent of at least
50% of the then outstanding public warrants is unlimited, examples of such amendments could be amendments to, among other things, increase
the exercise price of the warrants, convert the warrants into cash or shares, shorten the exercise period or decrease the number of Class
A ordinary shares purchasable upon exercise of a warrant.
Our
warrant agreement designate the courts of the State of New York or the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by holders of our warrants, which could
limit the ability of warrant holders to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with our company.
Our
warrant agreement provides that, subject to applicable law, (i) any action, proceeding or claim against us arising out of or relating
in any way to the warrant agreement, including under the Securities Act, will be brought and enforced in the courts of the State of New
York or the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and (ii) that we irrevocably submit to such jurisdiction,
which jurisdiction shall be the exclusive forum for any such action, proceeding or claim. We will waive any objection to such exclusive
jurisdiction and that such courts represent an inconvenient forum. With respect to any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under
the Securities Act or the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, we note, however, that there is uncertainty as to whether a court
would enforce this provision and that investors cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations
thereunder. Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for state and federal courts over all suits brought to enforce
any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder.
56
Notwithstanding
the foregoing, these provisions of the warrant agreement do not apply to suits brought to enforce any liability or duty created by the
Exchange Act or any other claim for which the federal district courts of the United States of America are the sole and exclusive forum.
Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in any of our warrants shall be deemed to have notice of and to have
consented to the forum provisions in our warrant agreement. If any action, the subject matter of which is within the scope the forum provisions
of the warrant agreement, is filed in a court other than a court of the State of New York or the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York (a “foreign action”) in the name of any holder of our warrants, such holder shall be deemed
to have consented to: (x) the personal jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located in the State of New York in connection with
any action brought in any such court to enforce the forum provisions (an “enforcement action”), and (y) having service of
process made upon such warrant holder in any such enforcement action by service upon such warrant holder’s counsel in the foreign
action as agent for such warrant holder. This choice-of-forum provision may limit a warrant holder’s ability to bring a claim in
a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with our company, which may discourage such lawsuits. Alternatively, if a court
were to find this provision of our warrant agreement inapplicable or unenforceable with respect to one or more of the specified types
of actions or proceedings, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could materially
and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and result in a diversion of the time and resources of
our management and board of directors.
A
provision of our warrant agreement may make it more difficult for us to consummate an initial business combination.
If
(i) we issue additional ordinary shares or equity-linked securities for capital raising purposes in connection with the closing of our
initial business combination at a Newly Issued Price of less than $9.20 per Class A ordinary share, (ii) the aggregate gross proceeds
from such issuances represent more than 60% of the total equity proceeds, and interest thereon, available for the funding of our initial
business combination, and (iii) the Market Value of our Class A ordinary shares is below $9.20 per share, then the exercise price of the
warrants will be adjusted (to the nearest cent) in certain circumstances. This may make it more difficult for us to consummate an initial
business combination with a target business.
We
may redeem your unexpired warrants prior to their exercise at a time that is disadvantageous to you, thereby making your warrants worthless.
We
have the ability to redeem outstanding warrants at any time prior to their expiration, at a price of $0.01 per warrant, provided that
the closing price of our Class A ordinary shares equals or exceeds $18.00 per share (as adjusted for share sub-divisions, share capitalizations,
reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within a 30 trading-day period commencing at least 30 days after
completion of our initial business combination and ending on the third trading day prior to the date on which we give proper notice of
such redemption to the warrants holders and provided certain other conditions are met. We will not redeem the warrants as described above
unless a registration statement under the Securities Act covering the issuance of the Class A ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of
the warrants is then effective and a current prospectus relating to those Class A ordinary shares is available throughout the measurement
period. If and when the warrants become redeemable by us, we may not exercise our redemption right if the issuance of ordinary shares
upon exercise of the warrants is not exempt from registration or qualification under applicable state blue sky laws or we are unable to
effect such registration or qualification. We will use our best efforts to register or qualify such ordinary shares under the blue sky
laws of the state of residence in those states in which the warrants were offered by us in our initial public offering. Redemption of
the outstanding warrants could force you to (i) exercise your warrants and pay the exercise price therefor at a time when it may be disadvantageous
for you to do so, (ii) sell your warrants at the then-current market price when you might otherwise wish to hold your warrants or (iii)
accept the nominal redemption price which, at the time the outstanding warrants are called for redemption, is likely to be substantially
less than the market value of your warrants.
57
Our
warrants may have an adverse effect on the market price of our Class A ordinary shares and make it more difficult to effectuate our initial
business combination.
We
issued warrants to purchase 7,666,667 Class A ordinary shares as part of the units offered in our initial public offering and we issued
in a private placement an aggregate of 695,000 private placement units at $10.00 per unit, which units include private placement warrants
to purchase an aggregate of 231,667 Class A ordinary shares at $11.50 per share. In addition, if the sponsor or any of its affiliates
makes any working capital loans, it may convert those loans into up to an additional 150,000 private placement units, at the price of
$10.00 per unit, which units include up to an additional 50,000 private placement warrants. To the extent we issue ordinary shares to
effectuate a business transaction, the potential for the issuance of a substantial number of additional Class A ordinary shares and Class
A ordinary shares upon exercise of the warrants included as part of such units could make us a less attractive acquisition vehicle to
a target business. Such issuance will increase the number of issued and outstanding Class A ordinary shares and reduce the value of the
Class A ordinary shares issued to complete the business transaction. Therefore, our warrants may make it more difficult to effectuate
a business transaction or increase the cost of acquiring the target business.
Because
each unit contains one-third of one warrant and only a whole warrant may be exercised, the units may be worth less than units of other
special purpose acquisition companies.
Each
unit contains one-third of one warrant. Pursuant to the warrant agreement, no fractional warrants will be issued upon separation of the
units, and only whole units will trade. If, upon exercise of the warrants, a holder would be entitled to receive a fractional interest
in a share, we will, upon exercise, round down to the nearest whole number the number of Class A ordinary shares to be issued to the warrant
holder. This is different from other initial public offerings similar to ours whose units include one ordinary share and one whole warrant
to purchase one share. We have established the components of the units in this way in order to reduce the dilutive effect of the warrants
upon completion of a business combination since the warrants will be exercisable in the aggregate for one-third of the number of shares
compared to units that each contain a whole warrant to purchase one share, thus making us, we believe, a more attractive merger partner
for target businesses. Nevertheless, this unit structure may cause our units to be worth less than if it included a whole warrant to purchase
one share.
Holders
of Class A ordinary shares will not be entitled to vote on continuing the company in a jurisdiction outside of the Cayman Islands.
As
holders of our Class A ordinary shares, our public shareholders will not have the right to vote on continuing the company in a jurisdiction
outside of the Cayman Islands (including any special resolution required to amend our constitutional documents or to adopt new constitutional
documents, in each case, as a result of our approving a transfer by way of continuation in a jurisdiction outside of the Cayman Islands).
You
will not be permitted to exercise your warrants unless we register and qualify the underlying Class A ordinary shares or certain exemptions
are available.
If
the issuance of the Class A ordinary shares upon exercise of the warrants is not registered on a registration statement on Form S-1, Form
S-3, Form F-1, or Form F-3, as applicable, following our initial business combination, and qualified or exempt from registration or qualification
under the Securities Act and applicable state securities laws, holders of warrants will not be entitled to exercise such warrants and
such warrants may have no value and expire worthless. In such event, holders who acquired their warrants as part of a purchase of units
will have paid the full unit purchase price solely for the Class A ordinary shares included in the units.
58
We
registered the Class A ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants in the registration statement related to the initial public
offering because the warrants will become exercisable 30 days after the completion of our initial business combination, which may be within
one year of our initial public offering. However, because the warrants will be exercisable until their expiration date of up to five years
after the completion of our initial business combination, in order to comply with the requirements of Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities
Act following the consummation of our initial business combination under the terms of the warrant agreement, we have agreed that as soon
as practicable, but in no event later than 20 business days after the closing of our initial business combination, we will use our commercially
reasonable efforts to file with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-1, S-3, F-1, or F-3, as applicable, for the registration under
the Securities Act of the issuance of the Class A ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants, to cause the same to become
effective within 60 business days following the closing of our initial business combination and to maintain a current prospectus relating
to the ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants until the expiration of the warrants in accordance with the provisions of
the warrant agreement. We cannot assure you that we will be able to do so if, for example, any facts or events arise which represent a
fundamental change in the information set forth in the registration statement related to the initial public offering, the financial statements
contained or incorporated by reference therein are not current or correct or the SEC issues a stop order.
If
the Class A ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants are not registered on Form S-1, S-3, F-1, or F-3, as applicable, under
the Securities Act under the terms of the warrant agreement, then beginning on the 61st business day after the closing of our initial
business combination and ending upon such registration statement being declared effective by the SEC, and during any other period when
we have failed to maintain an effective registration statement covering the ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of the public warrants,
holders of public warrants who seek to exercise their warrants will have the right to exercise such public warrants on a cashless basis
in accordance with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act or another exemption.
In
no event will warrants be exercisable for cash or on a cashless basis, and we will not be obligated to issue any shares to holders seeking
to exercise their warrants, unless the issuance of the shares upon such exercise is registered or qualified under the securities laws
of the state of the exercising holder, or an exemption from registration or qualification is available.
If
our Class A ordinary shares are at the time of any exercise of a warrant not listed on a national securities exchange such that they satisfy
the definition of “covered securities” under Section 18(b)(1) of the Securities Act, we may, at our option, not permit holders
of warrants who seek to exercise their warrants to do so for cash and, instead, require them to do so on a cashless basis in accordance
with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act; in the event we so elect, we will not be required to file or maintain in effect a registration
statement or register or qualify the shares underlying the warrants under applicable state securities laws.
In
no event will we be required to net cash settle any warrant, or issue securities (other than upon a cashless exercise as described above)
or other compensation in exchange for the warrants in the event that we are unable to register or qualify the shares underlying the warrants
under the Securities Act or applicable state securities laws.
You
may only be able to exercise your public warrants on a “cashless basis” under certain circumstances, and if you do so, you
will receive fewer Class A ordinary shares from such exercise than if you were to exercise such warrants for cash.
The
warrant agreement provides that in the following circumstances holders of warrants who seek to exercise their warrants will not be permitted
to do for cash and will, instead, be required to do so on a cashless basis in accordance with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act: (i)
if the Class A ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants are not registered under the Securities Act in accordance with the
terms of the warrant agreement; (ii) if we have so elected and the Class A ordinary shares are at the time of any exercise of a warrant
not listed on a national securities exchange such that they satisfy the definition of “covered securities” under Section 18(b)(1)
of the Securities Act; and (iii) if we have so elected and we call the public warrants for redemption.
59
If
you exercise your public warrants on a cashless basis, you would pay the warrant exercise price by surrendering the warrants for that
number of Class A ordinary shares equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (x) the product of the number of Class A ordinary shares
underlying the warrants, multiplied by the excess of the “fair market value” of our Class A ordinary shares (as defined in
the next sentence) over the exercise price of the warrants by (y) the fair market value. The “fair market value” is the average
reported closing price of the Class A ordinary shares for the 10 trading days ending on the third trading day prior to the date on which
the notice of exercise is received by the warrant agent or on which the notice of redemption is sent to the holders of warrants, as applicable.
As a result, you would receive fewer Class A ordinary shares from such exercise than if you were to exercise such warrants for cash.
The
grant of registration rights to our sponsor, BTIG and other holders of our private placement units may make it more difficult to complete
our initial business combination, and the future exercise of such rights may adversely affect the market price of our Class A ordinary
shares.
Pursuant
to an agreement to be entered into concurrently with the issuance and sale of the securities in our initial public offering, our sponsor,
BTIG, and their permitted transferees can demand that we register the Class A ordinary shares into which founder shares are convertible,
holders of our private placement units and their permitted transferees can demand that we register the private placement units (and the
securities comprising such units and the Class A ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of the private placement warrants) or holders
of securities that may be issued upon conversion of working capital loans and their permitted transferees may demand that we register
such units, shares, warrants or the Class A ordinary shares issuable upon exercise of such warrants and any other securities of the company
acquired by them prior to the consummation of our initial business combination. We will bear the cost of registering these securities.
The registration and availability of such a significant number of securities for trading in the public market may have an adverse effect
on the market price of our Class A ordinary shares. In addition, the existence of the registration rights may make our initial business
combination more costly or difficult to conclude. This is because the shareholders of the target business may increase the equity stake
they seek in the combined entity or ask for more cash consideration to offset the negative impact on the market price of our Class A ordinary
shares that is expected when the ordinary shares owned by our sponsor, holders of our private placement units or holders of our working
capital loans or their respective permitted transferees are registered.
General
Risk Factors
We
are a blank check company with no operating history and no revenues, and you have no basis on which to evaluate our ability to achieve
our business objective.
We
are a blank check company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands with no operating results. Because we lack an operating history,
you have no basis upon which to evaluate our ability to achieve our business objective of completing our initial business combination.
We have no plans, arrangements or understandings with any prospective target business concerning a business combination and may be unable
to complete our initial business combination. If we fail to complete our initial business combination, we will never generate any operating
revenues.
Past
performance by our management team and their respective affiliates, including investments and transactions in which they have participated
and businesses with which they have been associated, may not be indicative of future performance of an investment in the company.
Information
regarding our management team and their respective affiliates, including investments and transactions in which they have participated
and businesses with which they have been associated, is presented for informational purposes only. Any past experience and performance
by our management team, our advisors and their respective affiliates and the businesses with which they have been associated, is not a
guarantee that we will be able to successfully identify a suitable candidate for our initial business combination, that we will be able
to provide positive returns to our shareholders, or of any results with respect to any initial business combination we may consummate.
You should not rely on the historical experiences of our management team or their respective affiliates, including investments and transactions
in which they have participated and businesses with which they have been associated, as indicative of the future performance of an investment
in us or as indicative of every prior investment by each of the members of our management team, our advisors or their respective affiliates.
The market price of our securities may be influenced by numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control, and our shareholders may
experience losses on their investment in our securities.
60
Cyber
incidents or attacks directed at us could result in information theft, data corruption, operational disruption and/or financial loss.
We
depend on digital technologies, including information systems, infrastructure and cloud applications and services, including those of
third parties with which we may deal. Sophisticated and deliberate attacks on, or security breaches in, our systems or infrastructure,
or the systems or infrastructure of third parties or the cloud, could lead to corruption or misappropriation of our assets, proprietary
information and sensitive or confidential data. As an early stage company without significant investments in data security protection,
we may not be sufficiently protected against such occurrences. We may not have sufficient resources to adequately protect against, or
to investigate and remediate any vulnerability to, cyber incidents. It is possible that any of these occurrences, or a combination of
them, could have adverse consequences on our business and lead to financial loss.
We
may be a passive foreign investment company, or “PFIC,” which could result in adverse United States federal income tax consequences
to U.S. investors.
If
we are a PFIC for any taxable year (or portion thereof) that is included in the holding period of a U.S. Holder (as defined above in the
“ Certain Terms ” section) of our Class A ordinary shares or warrants, the U.S. Holder may be subject to adverse U.S.
federal income tax consequences and may be subject to additional reporting requirements. Our PFIC status for our current and subsequent
taxable years may depend on the status of an acquired company pursuant to a business combination and whether we qualify for the PFIC start-up
exception. Depending on the particular circumstances the application of the start-up exception may be subject to uncertainty, and there
cannot be any assurance that we will qualify for the start-up exception. Accordingly, there can be no assurances with respect to our status
as a PFIC for our current taxable year or any subsequent taxable year. Our actual PFIC status for any taxable year, however, will not
be determinable until after the end of such taxable year. In addition, our U.S. counsel expresses no opinion with respect to our PFIC
status for any taxable year.
Moreover,
if we determine we are a PFIC for any taxable year, upon written request, we will endeavor to provide to a U.S. Holder such information
as the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) may require, including a PFIC annual information statement, in order to enable the
U.S. Holder to make and maintain a “qualified electing fund” election, but there can be no assurance that we will timely provide
such required information, and such election would be unavailable with respect to our warrants in all cases. We urge U.S. investors to
consult their own tax advisors regarding the possible application of the PFIC rules.
We
are an emerging growth company and a smaller reporting company within the meaning of the Securities Act, and will have reduced public
company reporting requirements. If we take advantage of certain exemptions from disclosure requirements available to emerging growth companies
or smaller reporting companies, this could make our securities less attractive to investors and may make it more difficult to compare
our performance with other public companies. Investing in our securities involves risks.
We
are an “emerging growth company” within the meaning of the Securities Act, as modified by the JOBS Act, and we may take advantage
of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies,
including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor internal controls attestation requirements of Section 404
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements,
and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden
parachute payments not previously approved. As a result, our shareholders may not have access to certain information they may deem important.
We could be an emerging growth company for up to five years, although circumstances could cause us to lose that status earlier, including
if the market value of our Class A ordinary shares held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of any June 30th before that time, in
which case we would no longer be an emerging growth company as of the following December 31st. We cannot predict whether investors will
find our securities less attractive because we will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our securities less attractive as
a result of our reliance on these exemptions, the trading prices of our securities may be lower than they otherwise would be, there may
be a less active trading market for our securities and the trading prices of our securities may be more volatile.
61
Further,
Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting
standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not
have a class of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards.
The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply
to non-emerging growth companies but any such an election to opt out is irrevocable. We have elected not to opt out of such extended transition
period which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private companies, we,
as an emerging growth company, can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised standard.
This may make comparison of our financial statements with another public company which is neither an emerging growth company nor an emerging
growth company which has opted out of using the extended transition period difficult or impossible because of the potential differences
in accounting standards used.
Additionally,
we are a “smaller reporting company” as defined in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K. Smaller reporting companies may take advantage
of certain reduced disclosure obligations, including, among other things, providing only two years of audited financial statements. We
will remain a smaller reporting company until the last day of the fiscal year in which (1) the market value of our ordinary shares held
by non-affiliates equaled or exceeded $250 million as of the prior June 30th, or (2) our annual revenues equaled or exceeded $100 million
during such completed fiscal year and the market value of our ordinary shares held by non-affiliates equaled or exceeded $700 million
as of the prior June 30. To the extent we take advantage of such reduced disclosure obligations, it may also make comparison of our financial
statements with other public companies difficult or impossible.
Certain
of our officers and directors are located outside of the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for investors to effect service
of process within the United States on our company, officers and directors, or enforce judgments obtained in the United States courts
against our company, officers and directors.
Changes
in the market for directors’ and officers’ liability insurance could make it more difficult and more expensive for us to negotiate
and complete an initial business combination.
The
market for directors’ and officers’ liability insurance for special purpose acquisition companies has changed in ways adverse
to us and our management team. Fewer insurance companies are offering quotes for directors and officers liability coverage, the premiums
charged for such policies have generally increased and the terms of such policies have generally become less favorable. These trends may
continue into the future.
The
increased cost and decreased availability of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance could make it more difficult and
more expensive for us to negotiate an initial business combination. In order to obtain directors’ and officers’ liability
insurance or modify its coverage as a result of becoming a public company, the post-business combination entity might need to incur greater
expense, accept less favorable terms or both. However, any failure to obtain adequate directors’ and officers’ liability insurance
could have an adverse impact on the post-business combination’s ability to attract and retain qualified officers and directors.
62
In
addition, even after we were to complete an initial business combination, our directors and officers could still be subject to potential
liability from claims arising from conduct alleged to have occurred prior to the initial business combination. As a result, in order to
protect our directors and officers, the post-business combination entity may need to purchase additional insurance with respect to any
such claims (“run-off insurance”). The need for run-off insurance would be an added expense for the post-business combination
entity, and could interfere with or frustrate our ability to consummate an initial business combination on terms favorable to our investors.
Recent
increases in inflation in the United States and elsewhere could make it more difficult for us to complete our initial business combination.
Recent
increases in inflation in the United States and elsewhere may lead to increased price volatility for publicly traded securities, including
ours, or other national, regional or international economic disruptions, any of which could make it more difficult for us to complete
our initial business combination.
Text extracted from the filing as submitted to EDGAR. Formatting, tables and exhibits are simplified for reading; the original document is authoritative for anything you rely on.