Levels // end-of-day data · as of 2026-10-19

CHEC resistance levels

Close$10.33
High since Nov 11, 2025$10.56
Low since Nov 11, 2025$9.91

Next resistance areas above the price

Prices above the last close where CHEC made swing highs and turned lower before, nearest first.

show the nextareas above the close
#AreaAbove closeWhat happened thereVolume
1$10.46 to $10.47+1.3%
8.9 ATR
1 swing high: Apr 14, 2026 at $10.46
2 sessions traded up into it and closed below it; last traded in Apr 14, 2026 (71 sessions ago).
0.0%
2$10.56 to $10.56+2.2%
15.2 ATR
1 swing high: Nov 24, 2025 at $10.56
1 session traded up into it and closed below it; last traded in Nov 24, 2025 (117 sessions ago).
0.0%

Showing 2 of 5: only 2 areas sit above the close in our data. We don’t fill the list with estimated levels.

#1 $10.46#2 $10.56Nov 11, 2025Oct 19, 2026

For context, not areas: high since Nov 11, 2025 $10.56 · 50-day average $10.23 (averages move every day).

Built from 127 daily sessions, Nov 11, 2025 to Oct 19, 2026 (end-of-day data; our history starts Jul 1, 2024). A swing high is the highest high within 5 sessions on each side, so the last 5 sessions cannot form one yet. Swing highs within half an ATR of each other form one area (ATR $0.0150, the average daily range over 14 sessions). Volume share spreads each session’s volume evenly across its high-low range, so it is an approximation.

do these areas stop price? we tested it
On 136 stocks, when price reached the nearest area within 20 sessions, it then failed to close above it over the next 5 sessions 33.4% of the time (427 of 1,277). At random bands of the same width and a similar distance, it was 33.3% (408 of 1,227). The difference is within noise (95% range -3.2% to +3.5%), so we found no measurable effect. Traders watch these prices, which is why they are listed; the history alone does not show them acting as ceilings. Measured 2026-10-05 on daily data since Jul 1, 2024. Not a recommendation.

Formula pivots by timeframe

Arithmetic on each prior period’s high, low and close. No trading took place at these prices.

TimeframeS3S2S1PivotR1R2R3
Daily$10.27$10.28$10.29$10.29$10.30$10.31$10.32
Weekly$10.27$10.27$10.29$10.29$10.31$10.31$10.33
Monthly$10.17$10.20$10.24$10.27$10.31$10.34$10.38
Yearly
partial, from Nov 11, 2025
$9.08$9.50$9.73$10.15$10.38$10.80$11.03

Every formula level vs the current price

PriceSideFrom
$9.08supportYearly S3
$9.50supportYearly S2
$9.73supportYearly S1
$9.91support52-week low
$10.15supportYearly Pivot
$10.17supportMonthly S3
$10.20supportMonthly S2
$10.24supportMonthly S1
$10.27supportWeekly S3
$10.27supportMonthly Pivot
$10.27supportWeekly S2
$10.27supportDaily S3
$10.28supportDaily S2
$10.29supportWeekly S1

Keep going: CHEC workspace · CHEC max pain & open interest · look up another ticker · SMA 200 trend

CHEC resistance & support FAQ

What are CHEC's resistance levels?

As of Oct 19, 2026, the nearest resistance area above CHEC's $10.33 close is $10.46 to $10.47, 1.3% higher, where it made 1 swing high. 2 areas sit above the close in our data; the table lists up to 25, nearest first.

How are the resistance areas found?

From the stock’s own daily trading since Jul 1, 2024, adjusted for splits. A swing high is the highest high within 5 sessions on each side; swing highs within half an average daily range (ATR) of each other form one area. Each area lists the dates it was made, how many sessions traded into it and closed below it, and the share of volume traded inside it. No score is blended from these.

Do these areas predict where price will stop?

No, and we tested it. On 136 stocks, price that reached the nearest area failed to close above it within 5 sessions 33.4% of the time (427 of 1277), against 33.3% at random bands of the same width (408 of 1227). That is no measurable difference. They describe where price turned before; they are not a forecast or a recommendation.

How are the pivots calculated?

Classic floor-trader pivots: the pivot point is the average of the prior period’s high, low and close, and the support and resistance rungs are symmetric multiples around it. They are arithmetic, so no trading took place at those prices.