Western Uranium & Vanadium Corp. 10-K

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark One) ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31 , 2025 or ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ______________to ______________ Commission File Number 000-55626 WESTERN URANIUM & VANADIUM CORP. (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) Ontario, Canada 98-1271843 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) 5 Church Street Toronto , Ontario , Canada M5E 1M2 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) (970) 864-2125 (Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Trading Symbol(s) Name of exchange on which registered N/A Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Shares (Title of Class) Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer ☐ Accelerated filer ☐ Non-accelerated filer ☒ Smaller reporting company ☒ Emerging growth company ☒ If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐ If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐ Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒ As of June 30, 2025, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common shares held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $ 31.5 million, based on the closing price of the registrant’s common shares of $0.59 per share. As of April 14, 2026, 71,853,888 of the registrant’s no par value common shares were outstanding.   WESTERN URANIUM & VANADIUM CORP. FORM 10-K TABLE OF CONTENTS USE OF NAMES ii CURRENCY ii FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND INTRODUCTION ii CAUTIONARY NOTE TO INVESTORS CONCERNING DISCLOSURE OF MINERAL RESOURCES & RESERVES ii GLOSSARY v GLOSSARY OF REGULATORY AGENCIES AND EXCHANGES vii PART I 1 ITEM 1. BUSINESS 1 ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS 14 ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS 25 ITEM 1C. CYBERSECURITY 26 ITEM 2. PROPERTIES 27 ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 46 ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES 46 PART II 47 ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES 47 ITEM 6. [RESERVED] 47 ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS 48 ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK 60 ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA 60 ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE 60 ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES 60 ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION. 61 ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS. 61 PART III 62 ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 62 ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION 65 ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS 67 ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE 70 ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES 71 PART IV 72 ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES 72 ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY 73 SIGNATURES 74   i USE OF NAMES As used in this Form 10-K annual report, unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” “Western” and “WUC”, or the “Company” refer to Western Uranium & Vanadium Corp., an Ontario Canadian corporation, and its subsidiaries. CURRENCY The accounts of the Company are reported in U.S. dollars. Unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts referenced in this Form 10-K annual report and the consolidated financial statements are stated in U.S. dollars. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND INTRODUCTION The statements contained in this document that are not purely historical are “forward-looking statements.” Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements, including those regarding future operations, are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and they involve various risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements contained in this document include statements regarding our proposed services, market opportunities and acceptance, expectations for revenues, cash flows and financial performance, and intentions for the future. Such forward-looking statements are included under Item 1. “Business” and Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”. All forward-looking statements included in this document are made as of the date hereof, based on information available to us as of such date, and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statement. It is important to note that such statements may not prove to be accurate and that our actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations are those described under Item 1. “Business,” Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by this section and other factors included elsewhere in this document. CAUTIONARY NOTE TO INVESTORS CONCERNING DISCLOSURE OF MINERAL RESOURCES & RESERVES On September 16, 2015, Western completed its acquisition of Black Range Minerals Limited (“Black Range”). Under United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) rules, this transaction triggered the Company being deemed a United States domestic issuer and losing its foreign private issuer exemption. On April 29, 2016, the Company filed a Form 10 registration statement with the Commission after converting its basis of accounting from International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”). On June 28, 2016, the Company’s registration statement became effective and Western became a United States reporting issuer. On June 30, 2023, Western re-qualified as a foreign private issuer as that term is defined in Rule 3b-4(c) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). As a result, the Company may now utilize certain accommodations made to foreign private issuers, including (1) an exemption from complying with the Commission’s proxy rules, (2) an exemption from the Company’s insiders having to comply with the reporting and short-swing trading liability provisions of Section 16 under the Exchange Act, (3) the ability to make periodic filings with the Commission on the Form 20-F and Form 6-K foreign issuer forms, and (4) the ability to offer and sell unrestricted securities outside of the United States pursuant to Rule 903 of Regulation S. The Company plans to take advantage of these accommodations. However, the Company currently has decided to voluntarily continue to file periodic reports with the Commission using domestic issuer forms including filing annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K. On the subsequent measurement date, June 30, 2024, Western reconfirmed its qualification as a foreign private issuer for periods ended through December 31, 2025. On October 31, 2018, the SEC adopted the Modernization of Property Disclosures for Mining Registrants (the “New Rule”), introducing significant changes to the existing mining disclosure framework to better align it with international industry and regulatory practice, including Canadian National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”), a rule developed by the Canadian Securities Administrators (the “CSA”) that establishes standards for all public disclosure an issuer makes of scientific and technical information concerning mineral projects. The New Rule was codified as 17 CFR Subpart 220.1300 and 229.601(b)(96) (collectively, “S-K 1300”) and replaced SEC Industry Guide 7. Pursuant to the New Rule, issuers are required to comply with S-K 1300 as of their annual reports for the first fiscal year beginning on or after January 1, 2021.   ii Unless otherwise indicated, the following terms, when used in this Form 10-K annual report, have the meanings given them in S-K 1300. The applicable S-K 1300 definitions are copied below. S-K 1300 Terms and Definitions: ● Exploration stage issuer is an issuer that has no material property with mineral reserves disclosed. ● Exploration stage property is a property that has no mineral reserves disclosed. ● Feasibility study is a comprehensive technical and economic study of the selected development option for a mineral project, which includes detailed assessments of all applicable modifying factors, as defined in S-K 1300, together with any other relevant operational factors, and detailed financial analyses that are necessary to demonstrate, at the time of reporting, that extraction is economically viable. The results of the study may serve as the basis for a final decision by a proponent or financial institution to proceed with, or finance, the development of the project. (1) A feasibility study is more comprehensive, and with a higher degree of accuracy, than a pre-feasibility study, as defined in S-K 1300. It must contain mining, infrastructure, and process designs completed with sufficient rigor to serve as the basis for an investment decision or to support project financing. (2) The confidence level in the results of a feasibility study is higher than the confidence level in the results of a pre-feasibility study. Terms such as full, final, comprehensive, bankable, or definitive feasibility study are equivalent to a feasibility study. ● Indicated mineral resource is that part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade or quality are estimated on the basis of adequate geological evidence and sampling. The level of geological certainty associated with an indicated mineral resource is sufficient to allow a qualified person to apply modifying factors in sufficient detail to support mine planning and evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Because an indicated mineral resource has a lower level of confidence than the level of confidence of a measured mineral resource, an indicated mineral resource may only be converted to a probable mineral reserve. ● Inferred mineral resource is that part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade or quality are estimated on the basis of limited geological evidence and sampling. The level of geological uncertainty associated with an inferred mineral resource is too high to apply relevant technical and economic factors likely to influence the prospects of economic extraction in a manner useful for evaluation of economic viability. Because an inferred mineral resource has the lowest level of geological confidence of all mineral resources, which prevents the application of the modifying factors in a manner useful for evaluation of economic viability, an inferred mineral resource may not be considered when assessing the economic viability of a mining project, and may not be converted to a mineral reserve. ● Measured mineral resource is that part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade or quality are estimated on the basis of conclusive geological evidence and sampling. The level of geological certainty associated with a measured mineral resource is sufficient to allow a qualified person to apply modifying factors, as defined in S-K 1300, in sufficient detail to support detailed mine planning and final evaluation of the economic viability of the deposit. Because a measured mineral resource has a higher level of confidence than the level of confidence of either an indicated mineral resource or an inferred mineral resource, a measured mineral resource may be converted to a proven mineral reserve or to a probable mineral reserve, each as defined in S-K 1300.   iii ● Mineral reserve is an estimate of tonnage and grade or quality of indicated and measured mineral resources that, in the opinion of the qualified person, can be the basis of an economically viable project. More specifically, it is the economically mineable part of a measured or indicated mineral resource, which includes diluting materials and allowances for losses that may occur when the material is mined or extracted. ● Mineral resource is a concentration or occurrence of material of economic interest in or on the earth’s crust in such form, grade or quality, and quantity that there are reasonable prospects for economic extraction. A mineral resource is a reasonable estimate of mineralization, taking into account relevant factors such as cut-off grade, likely mining dimensions, location or continuity that, with the assumed and justifiable technical and economic conditions, is likely to, in whole or in part, become economically extractable. It is not merely an inventory of all mineralization drilled or sampled. ● Qualified person is an individual who is: (1) a mineral industry professional with at least five years of relevant experience in the type of mineralization and type of deposit under consideration and in the specific type of activity that person is undertaking on behalf of the registrant; and (2) an eligible member or licensee in good standing of a recognized professional organization at the time the technical report is prepared. For an organization to be a recognized professional organization, it must: (i) be either: (A) an organization recognized within the mining industry as a reputable professional association; or (B) a board authorized by U.S. federal, state or foreign statute to regulate professionals in the mining, geoscience or related field; (ii) admit eligible members primarily on the basis of their academic qualifications and experience; (iii) establish and require compliance with professional standards of competence and ethics; (iv) require or encourage continuing professional development; (v) have and apply disciplinary powers, including the power to suspend or expel a member regardless of where the member practices or resides; and (vi) provide a public list of members in good standing.   iv GLOSSARY The following defined technical terms are used in this Annual Report: ● Area of influence method: Method used to calculate mineral resources that requires construct a polygon around each hole to determine an area of influence for that hole; and then the total volume directly beneath the polygon is assigned the same values as the drill hole from which we constructed the polygon. ● Assay: The testing of a metal or ore to determine its ingredients and quality. ● Copper: A red-brown metal, the chemical element of atomic number 29. ● Crosscut: A horizontal opening driven from a shaft and (or near) right angles to the strike of a vein or other orebody. ● Drift: A horizontal underground opening that follows along the length of a vein or rock formation as opposed to a crosscut which crosses the rock formation. ● Environmental Impact Assessment: A multi-step procedure done to evaluate the environmental impacts of mining projects as well as actions that can be taken to mitigate identified impacts. The assessment is prepared under the National Environmental Policy Act for a mineral project. ● eU 3 O 8 : This term refers to equivalent U 3 O 8 grade derived by gamma logging of drill holes. ● Extraction: The process of physically extracting mineralized material from the ground. Exploration continues during the extraction process and, in many cases, mineralized material is expanded during the life of the extraction activities as the exploration potential of the deposit is realized. ● Environmental Protection Plan (EPP): a plan submitted by a designated mining operation for approval as part of the operator’s or applicant’s permit for such operation pursuant to rules promulgated by the board for protection of human health or property or the environment in conformance with the duties of operators. ● Face: The surface/end of a drift, crosscut or stope in which work is taking place/advancing. ● Formation: A distinct layer of sedimentary or volcanic rock of similar composition. ● Grade: Quantity or percentage of metal per unit weight of host rock. ● Host rock: The rock containing a mineral or an ore body. ● In-situ recovery or ISR: The recovery, by chemical means, of the uranium component of a deposit without the physical extraction of uranium-bearing material from the ground. ISR utilizes injection of appropriate oxidizing chemicals into a uranium-bearing sandstone deposit by injection wells, with the uranium-bearing solution being removed by extraction wells; also referred to as “solution mining.” ● Mineral: A naturally formed chemical element or compound having a definite chemical composition and, usually, a characteristic crystal form. ● Mineralization: A natural occurrence, in rocks or soil, of one or more metal yielding minerals. ● Mineralized material: Material that contains mineralization (e.g., uranium, vanadium and/or copper) and that is not included in an SEC Reserve as it does not meet all of the criteria for adequate demonstration of economic or legal extraction.   v ● NOI: A Notice of Intent, filed by the Company to a regulatory agency as a part of a licensing or permitting action related to a mineral project. ● Open Pit: Surface mineral extraction in which the mineralized material is extracted from a pit or quarry. ● Ore: Mineral-bearing rock that can be mined, processed and concentrated profitably under current or immediately foreseeable economic conditions. A company may only refer to reserves (as that term is defined in S-K 1300) as “ore.” ● Ore body: A mostly solid and fairly continuous mass of in-ground mineralization estimated to be economically mineable. ● Plan of Operations: Plan for a mineral project prepared in accordance with applicable United States Bureau of Land Management or United States Forest Service regulations. ● Reclamation: The process by which lands disturbed as a result of mineral extraction activities are modified to support beneficial land use. Reclamation activity may include the removal of buildings, equipment, machinery, and other physical remnants of mining activities, closure of tailings storage facilities, leach pads, and other features, and contouring, covering and re-vegetation of waste rock, and other disturbed areas. ● Stope: An excavation in a mine from which ore is, or has been excavated. ● Uranium: a heavy, naturally radioactive, metallic element of atomic number 92. Uranium in its pure form is a heavy metal. Its two principal isotopes are U-238 and U-235, of which U-235 is the necessary component for the nuclear fuel cycle. However, “uranium” used in this Annual Report refers to triuraniumoctoxide, also called “U3O8” and the primary component of “yellowcake,” and is produced from uranium deposits. It is the most actively traded uranium-related commodity. ● Uranium concentrate: a yellowish to yellow-brownish powder obtained from the chemical processing of uranium-bearing material. Uranium concentrate typically contains 70% to 90% U3O8 by weight. Uranium concentrate is also referred to as “yellowcake.” ● Vanadium: A naturally occurring element within approximately 65 minerals and fossil fuel deposits. It is essentially the by-product of ores that are mined for other minerals. ● V 2 O 5 : Vanadium pentoxide, or the form of vanadium typically produced at the White Mesa Mill, also called “black flake.”   vi GLOSSARY OF REGULATORY AGENCIES AND EXCHANGES ● APCD: Colorado Air Pollution Control Division ● BLM: The U.S. Bureau of Land Management, an agency of the United States Department of the Interior. ● DRMS: Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety ● DoC: The U.S. Department of Commerce, an executive department of the federal government. ● DoE: The U.S. Department of Energy, a cabinet-level department of the United States Government. ● DEQ: Department of Environmental Quality. ● DWQ: The Utah Division of Water Quality. ● EPA: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, an independent agency of the United States government. ● MLRB: Mined Land Reclamation Board of the state of Colorado. ● MSHA: The Mine Safety and Health Administration, an agency of the U.S. Department of Labor. ● NRC: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission, an independent agency of the United States government. ● SEC: The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, an independent agency of the United States federal government. ● WQCD: Colorado Water Quality Control Division   vii PART I ITEM 1. BUSINESS CORPORATE HISTORY Western Uranium & Vanadium Corp. (“Western” or the “Company”, formerly Western Uranium Corporation) was incorporated in December 2006 under the Ontario Business Corporations Act. On November 20, 2014, the Company completed a listing process on the Canadian Securities Exchange (“CSE”). As part of that process, the Company acquired 100% of the members’ interests of Pinon Ridge Mining LLC (“PRM”), a Delaware limited liability company. The transaction constituted a reverse takeover (“RTO”) of Western by PRM. Subsequent to obtaining appropriate shareholder approvals, the Company reconstituted its board of directors and senior management team. Western is a Canadian domestic issuer and Canadian reporting issuer. On August 18, 2014, the Company closed on the purchase of certain mining properties in Colorado and Utah from Energy Fuels Holding Corp. Assets purchased included both owned and leased lands in Utah and Colorado, and all represent properties that have been previously mined for uranium to varying degrees in the past. The acquisition included the purchase of the Sunday Mine Complex (“SMC”). The Sunday Mine Complex is located in western San Miguel County, Colorado. The complex consists of the following five individual mines: the Sunday mine, the Carnation mine, the St. Jude mine, the West Sunday mine and the Topaz Mine. The operation of each of these mines requires a separate permit, and all such permits have been obtained by Western and are currently valid. Notably, for the Topaz Mine, which at the present time is permitted and is scheduled for reclamation, the process is underway for it to be re-permitted. In addition, each of the mines has good access to a paved highway, electric power to existing declines, office/storage/shop and change buildings, and an extensive underground haulage development with several vent shafts complete with exhaust fans. The Sunday Mine Complex is the Company’s core resource property and in July 2021 was assigned “Active” status when mining operations were restarted. On September 16, 2015, Western completed its acquisition of Black Range, an Australian company that was listed on the Australian Securities Exchange until the acquisition was completed. The acquisition terms were pursuant to a definitive Merger Implementation Agreement entered into between Western and Black Range. Pursuant to the agreement, Western acquired all of the issued shares of Black Range by way of Scheme of Arrangement (“the Scheme”) under the Australian Corporation Act 2001 (Cth) (the “Black Range Transaction”), with Black Range shareholders being issued common shares of Western on a 1 for 750 basis. On August 25, 2015, the Scheme was approved by the shareholders of Black Range, and on September 4, 2015, Black Range received approval by the Federal Court of Australia. In addition, Western issued options to purchase Western common shares to certain employees, directors, and consultants. Such stock options were intended to replace Black Range stock options outstanding prior to the Black Range Transaction on the same 1 for 750 basis. Under United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) rules, the Black Range transaction triggered the Company being deemed a United States domestic issuer and losing its foreign private issuer exemption. On April 29, 2016, the Company filed a Form 10 registration statement with the Commission after shifting its basis of accounting from IFRS to U.S. GAAP. On June 28, 2016, the Company’s registration statement became effective and Western became a United States reporting issuer. On June 30, 2023, Western re-qualified as a foreign private issuer as that term is defined in Rule 3b-4(c) promulgated under the Exchange Act. As a result, the Company may now utilize certain accommodations made to foreign private issuers, including (1) an exemption from complying with the Commission’s proxy rules, (2) an exemption from the Company’s insiders having to comply with the reporting and short-swing trading liability provisions of Section 16 under the Exchange Act, (3) the ability to make periodic filings with the Commission on the Form 20-F and Form 6-K foreign issuer forms, and (4) the ability to offer and sell unrestricted securities outside of the United States pursuant to Rule 903 of Regulation S. The Company plans to take advantage of these accommodations. However, the Company currently has decided to voluntarily continue to file periodic reports with the Commission using domestic issuer forms including filing annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K. As of the subsequent measurement date, June 30, 2024, Western reconfirmed its qualification as a foreign private issuer for periods ended through December 31, 2025. The Company has registered offices at 5 Church Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5E 1M2, and its common shares are listed on the CSE under the symbol “WUC” and are traded on the OTCQX Best Market under the symbol “WSTRF”. Its principal business activity is the acquisition and development of uranium and vanadium resource properties in the states of Utah and Colorado in the United States of America (“United States”).   1 The Kinetic Separation process is dramatically different from conventional mining techniques. Subject to regulatory approvals for its use, Kinetic Separation is beneficial in the following ways: ● Mining, crushing, and separation of waste from minerals (uranium and vanadium), can occur underground (inside the mine), at the mine above ground, at a location between the mine and the mill, or at the mill. ● Value-added of the process is that 85%-90% of the waste is separated at earlier steps in the process thus saving costs in later steps. ● Benefits include reduced radiometric exposure, time duration of material handling is reduced, lower costs for transportation. ● Processing reduced ore quantities is beneficial at the mill stage due to the reduction in acid and power consumption, and post-milling tailings. Kinetic Separation can be used on legacy uranium stockpiles in the western United States, removing 85-90% of the uranium. This is an application through which Kinetic Separation could positively contribute to the “greening of the environment”. According to a study there are approximately 4,225 legacy uranium mines from the 1940-1970 period throughout the Western United States, most of which have waste stockpiles. At the present time, kinetically separating these legacy stockpiles is not currently planned by the Company. In the estimation of management, Kinetic Separation mining allows the cost of production of uranium to be reduced by 44-53%. Our common shares are listed on the Canadian Securities Exchange, also known as the “CSE,” under the symbol “WUC”, and are also quoted in the United States on the OTCQX Best Market under the symbol “WSTRF.” We are headquartered in Ontario, Canada with mining operations in the two U.S. states of Utah and Colorado. The mailing address of our headquarters is 5 Church Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5E 1M2, Canada, and the telephone number is (970) 864-2125. Our corporate website is located at http://www.western-uranium.com/. We are an “emerging growth company” as that term is defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (the “JOBS Act”). The JOBS Act defines an “emerging growth company” as one that had total annual gross revenues of less than $1,235,000,000 during the last fiscal year. Section 102(b) (1) of the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class of securities registered under the Securities Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standard. The JOBS Act also provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period provided by Section 102(b)(1) of the JOBS Act and comply with the requirements that apply to non-emerging growth companies but any such election to opt out is irrevocable. Our wholly-owned subsidiaries are Western Uranium Corporation (Utah) (“Western Utah”), PRM, Black Range, Black Range Copper Inc., Ranger Resources Inc., Black Range Minerals Inc., Black Range Minerals Colorado LLC, Black Range Minerals Wyoming LLC, Haggerty Resources LLC, Ranger Alaska LLC, Black Range Minerals Utah LLC, Black Range Minerals Ablation Holdings Inc., Black Range Development Utah LLC, Maverick Strategic Minerals Corp, Pinon Ridge Corporation (“PRC”) and Mustang Mineral Processing Inc (“Mustang”). OUR COMPANY Western is in the business of exploring, developing, mining and production of its uranium and vanadium resource properties in the states of Utah and Colorado in the United States of America (“United States”). Western is an exploration stage issuer for purposes of S-K 1300. Under S-K 1300, a mining company like ours can be classified as either an exploration stage issuer, a development stage issuer or a production stage issuer. Exploration stage issuers are companies that are engaged in the search for mineral deposits, which are not in either the development stage or the production stage. In order to be classified as a development stage issuer or a production stage issuer, the Company must have already established mineral reserves. The Company has not established mineral reserves for purposes of S-K 1300.   2 Our mineral properties are located in western Colorado and eastern Utah and adjacent areas of the western United States. We have committed to permitting and building our own mill to process uranium and vanadium and incorporating Kinetic Separation into our licensing. Our primary focus consists of the mining operations at the fully permitted Sunday Mine, the commercialization of Kinetic Separation, completing the permitting and construction of mineral processing facilities (uranium and vanadium), and permitting the San Rafael Project. The Sunday Mine Complex is located in western San Miguel County, Colorado. The complex consists of the following five individual mines: the Sunday mine, the Carnation mine, the Saint Jude mine, the West Sunday mine and the Topaz mine. The operation of each of these mines requires a separate permit and all such permits have been obtained by Western and are currently valid. In addition, each of the mines has good access to a paved highway, electric power to existing mine workings, office/storage/shop and change buildings, and extensive underground haulage development with multiple vent shafts complete with exhaust fans. We have acquired a license for Kinetic Separation, which provides a low cost, purely physical, method of separating uranium and vanadium mineralization from waste. No chemicals are added in the process, yet very high mineral recoveries can be achieved with considerable mass reduction; facilitating the separation of a high-value, high-grade ore product from a coarse-grained barren “clean sand” product. Application of Kinetic Separation is expected to have a very positive effect on the development of not only our Sunday Mine Complex, but also most of our and other deposits, because it significantly reduces both capital and operating costs. Extensive test work has shown that from amenable sandstone-hosted ore types, typically more than 90% of the mineralization can be separated into 10-20% of the initial sample mass. OUR STRATEGY Our vision is to become a regional uranium and vanadium developer, producer, and processor. Our strategy is to build value for shareholders by advancing our projects for further scaled-up mining production. We have committed to permitting and building our own processing plant to mill uranium and vanadium and incorporating Kinetic Separation into our licensing. Facility design and permitting have begun on parcels of land acquired in Utah and Colorado, on which we intend to develop and build our processing facilities. In 2022, Western began acquiring mining equipment and vehicles and building a mining team to put in place an in-house mining capability and to replace its previous outsourced mining contractor. During 2025 and 2024, this team was conducting mining operations at the Sunday Mine Complex developing the mine for future production and extracting ore to be stockpiled underground, to assure the availability of feedstock to baseload the mineral processing facilities. At any time we may have acquisition or partnering opportunities in various stages of active review, including, for example, our engagement of consultants and advisors to analyze particular opportunities, analysis of technical, financial and other confidential information, submission of indications of interest, participation in preliminary discussions and negotiations, and involvement as a bidder in competitive processes. Capital Raising On October 14, 2025, the Company closed a brokered private placement of 6,555,556 units at a price of $0.64 (CAD $0.90) per unit. The aggregate gross proceeds raised in the private placement amounted to $4,202,281 (CAD $5,900,000) and proceeds net of issuance costs were $3,806,270 (CAD $5,344,010). Each unit is comprised of one common share of Western and one common share purchase warrant. Each warrant is exercisable into one common share at a price of $0.85 (CAD $1.20) per share for a period of 54 months following the closing date of the private placement. A total of 6,555,556 common shares and warrants to purchase 6,555,556 common shares were issued to investors and warrants to purchase 229,444 common shares were issued to broker dealers in connection with the private placement. On June 13, 2025, the Company closed a private placement of 5,911,786 units at a price of $0.63 (CAD $0.85) per unit. The aggregate gross proceeds raised in the private placement amounted to $3,693,424 (CAD $5,025,018) and proceeds net of issuance costs were $3,331,687 (CAD $4,532,939). Each unit is comprised of one common share of Western and one common share purchase warrant. Each warrant is exercisable into one common share at a price of $0.77 (CAD $1.05) per share for a period of four years following the closing date of the private placement. A total of 5,911,786 common shares and warrants to purchase 5,911,786 common shares were issued to investors and warrants to purchase 206,913 common shares were issued to broker dealers in connection with the private placement. Of the 5,911,786 common shares and warrants issued to investors, 117,647 were issued to Mr. Glasier for his participation in the private placement.   3 On November 20, 2024, the Company closed a private placement of 4,142,906 units at a price of $0.94 (CAD $1.32) per unit. The aggregate gross proceeds raised in the private placement amounted to $3,897,166 (CAD $5,468,636) and proceeds net of issuance costs were $3,546,870 (CAD $4,975,966). Each unit is comprised of one common share of Western and one common share purchase warrant. Each warrant is exercisable into one common share at a price of $1.27 (CAD $1.78) per share for a period of four years following the closing date of the private placement. During the year ended December 31, 2024, an aggregate of 5,198,540 warrants were exercised for total proceeds of $4,605,458 (CAD $6,238,248). On November 28, 2024, The Company’s Board approved amendments to extend the term and reduce the exercise price of 2,868,541 previously issued common share purchase warrants. These warrants, originally issued during December 2021 and January 2022, had initial exercise prices of $1.94 (CAD $2.50) and $2.00 (CAD $2.50) per share, respectively, and were set to expire three years post-issuance. Effective November 28, 2024, the term was extended to January 20, 2026, a date that is less than five years since the original date of issuance. Effective February 27, 2025 the exercise price was reduced to $1.39 (CAD $2.00), the date upon which the Canadian Securities Exchange (CSE) accepted the warrant repricing and the amended Form 13 filing was approved for filing. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company recorded an incremental fair value of $184,308 arising from the extension of the term. On February 27, 2025, the Company recorded an incremental fair value of $104,840 for the modification of the exercise price. The cost of the warrant modifications was accounted for as a cost of raising capital. This modification was granted to facilitate the raising of additional equity capital by extending the exercise period and lowering the exercise price, thereby providing warrant investors with more time and incentive to exercise their warrants. Uranium/Vanadium Production Western historically positioned itself for operational flexibility with the goal of beginning production as expeditiously as possible once market conditions for uranium and/or vanadium were favorable. Well maintained existing infrastructure from years of previous production allowed the Company to quickly advance the mine to a production ready status. The 2018 vanadium price rally catalyzed a project at the Sunday Mine Complex. Western reinitiated active mining operations during 2020 at the Sunday Mine Complex project beginning with infrastructure and exploratory work projects, which culminated in the commencement of production with the mining and stockpiling of the extracted uranium/vanadium ore. The mining team refocused on surface infrastructure projects required by the DRMS before COVID-19 stoppages caused the mines to be put back into Temporary Cessation. During 2020, COVID-19 induced mine closures began a rally in uranium prices. In 2021, catalysts continued to provide positive signals for uranium miners and investors. This catalyzed work during 2021 and 2022 at the Sunday Mine Complex project which commenced in July 2021. After completion of infrastructure work in this new area of the mine, exploration and development of the GMG ore body was the first project phase. Drifting, continuous high-grade ore was intersected, which led to the mining and underground stockpiling of over 3,000 tons of uranium/vanadium ore during the December 2021 to March 2022 period. Thereafter, Western began the acquisition of a full complement of mining equipment and personnel to take over mining operations. Western’s transition from employing a mining contractor to building an in-house mining operation has now been substantially completed. Since this transition began in spring 2022, additional employees were hired to support mining operations and mining equipment and vehicles have been acquired to support deployment of two (2) fully equipped mining teams. The equipment has been prepared for operations and readied for deployment; site infrastructure upgrades have been finished. In early 2023, the mines were reopened for ventilation and infrastructure upgrades. Mining operations restarted in April 2023 and have been continually focused on additional development in multiple areas of the mine. Underground operations were placed on temporary standby during 1Q 2026 and equipment was secured and prepared for storage. The mining operations team is continuing the completion of surface projects. When we next receive market signals to scale-up operations, the next underground projects will focus on the development of additional Sunday Mine Complex areas which have indicated defined uranium mineralization to further expand capacity. It may be difficult for many uranium mining companies to expand production in a timely manner in response to rising uranium prices, as it requires many years of permitting and development to bring new mines into production. These lead times will put further upward pressure on prices. Thus, Western has a competitive advantage, due to the aforementioned projects, because our mining properties can scale-up production on short notice.   4 The Company holds an exclusive 25-year license to use Kinetic Separation, a proven technology that we anticipate will improve the efficiency of hauling and processing ore from Western’s sandstone-hosted mines. The Company has proven that post-Kinetic Separation ore has 90% of the uranium mineralization of the pre-Kinetic Separation ore in 10% of its mass. We are planning to build a Kinetic Separation machine, with a capacity of forty tons per hour at an aggregate cost of $1.0 million dollars. The license agreement was entered into on March 17, 2015 and expires on March 16, 2040. There are no remaining license fee obligations and there are no future royalties due under the agreement. The Company has the right to sub-license the technology to third parties. The Company may not sell or assign the Kinetic Separation license; however, it could be transferred in the sale of Western or the subsidiary holding the license. Prior to the planned processing plant becoming licensed and operational, our in-house mining teams will be stockpiling uranium/vanadium mined material. When the processing plant is constructed, Western will become fully operational and begin processing the accumulated stockpiles. Western believes that its mineral resources have a reasonable prospect for economic extraction. However, the Company has not completed a preliminary economic assessment under NI 43-101 or a feasibility study or preliminary feasibility study under S-K 1300 that would be needed to establish the existence of proven or probable reserves and has instead allocated that capital to the aforementioned mining operations at the Sunday Mine Complex. Uranium/Vanadium Processing Facilities Development Mustang Mineral Processing Plant We are prioritizing the development of the Mustang Mineral Processing Plant (Mustang) in Colorado due to its close proximity to the SMC and lower hauling costs in comparison to the Maverick Minerals Processing Plant in Utah. In preparing the new licensing and permitting application, Western expects to benefit from the prior site owner’s completion of all phases of licensing and permitting of their Pinon Ridge Mill project. This facility will be designed to recover uranium and vanadium both from conventional materials mined from Company mines and materials produced by other mining companies. After permitting and construction, and subject to available financing, the processing of uranium and vanadium materials is targeted to commence in 2029. The Colorado milling license that Western is currently seeking will incorporate Kinetic Separation via an amendment to the initial license – as Western’s current plan is to submit a licensing application that is substantially identical to the application that was used previously for the Pinon Ridge Mill (which did not include the Company’s Kinetic Separation technology). Official baseline data collection at Mustang began in December 2024 for water monitoring and January 2025 for air monitoring. The required water monitoring data collection has been completed. As the air monitoring equipment required repair, we will need to continue to collect air sample data into 2Q 2026. Results to date for both water and air quality have been consistent with prior data collected by the former owners. During 2025, Western sourced digital versions of the prior Pinon Ridge Mill license application and supporting data which will result in substantial savings in the compilation of the radioactive materials license application. The team will begin preparing the application in 2Q 2026 with the goal of submitting the application during 4Q 2026. Mustang’s completion is critical for in-house yellowcake production. Maverick Minerals Processing Plant The development of the Maverick Minerals Processing Plant in Green River, Utah, has advanced since the land package acquisition was completed in 2023. Subsequently, a full team of consulting firms was chosen and engaged for their expertise in engineering / mill design, permit preparation, environmental, hydrology, and air quality. The project design and permitting activities include site evaluation work, compilation of a preliminary plant and property site plan, baseline data collection, plant and animal studies and a cultural survey. Additional consulting commitments were made to advance the licensing and development with Precision Systems Engineering (“PSE”), a leading engineering and design consulting firm headquartered in Sandy, Utah. The next steps were for PSE to complete a preliminary engineering design and cost estimate for a 500 ton per day mill and the installation of monitor wells. However, additional work has been deferred for Western to reassess its design strategy now that it has purchased a previously licensed mill site in Colorado (Mustang Mineral Processing Plant, formerly the Pinon Ridge Mill). As processing facility development efforts have been shifted, some of the Maverick site infrastructure has been relocated to the Mustang site, and notably the preliminary engineering work is also transferable. The Maverick site is located in close proximity (approximately 4 miles) to the San Rafael Uranium Project; however, it is approximately 170 miles from the Sunday Mine Complex. We are prioritizing development of the Mustang site, given its close proximity to the Sunday Mine Complex, lower hauling costs, and past licensing advances over the Maverick site. Mustang Mineral Mill Site Acquisition On October 1, 2024, Western, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Western Utah, executed a binding stock purchase agreement to purchase 100% of the shares of PRC from a private investor group and thereby acquire Mustang, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of PRC. Mustang owns an 880-acre property located in Montrose County, Colorado, where a uranium processing mill was previously licensed but never constructed. The transaction was accounted for as a purchase of an asset. The Company assumed an obligation to an unrelated third party to remit a royalty based on the volume of minerals processed through any mineral processing plant located on the property. The acquisition becomes the second property that Western has acquired, in addition to the Maverick site in Utah. It also becomes part of Western’s plans for developing and licensing one or more uranium and vanadium processing facilities to process production from its resource properties in Colorado and Utah.   5 George Glasier, the President, CEO and a director of Western, and his wife Kathleen owned 50% of the shares of PRC and Andrew Wilder, a director of Western, indirectly owned 3% of the shares of PRC, and so the transaction was considered a related party transaction. The Company’s Board of Directors established an independent committee of the Board comprised of directors who were not considered to have an interest in the transaction. The independent committee supervised the negotiation of and approved Western’s entry into the PRC agreement. The total purchase price of PRC was $1.98 million, which consisted of an aggregate of $829,167 in payments to former PRC shareholders for their equity interests and outstanding loans made to PRC and related accrued interest and a $1,148,125 payment for principal and interest to a third party in satisfaction of an assumed liability of Mustang. For the 53% ownership of PRC, $414,584 was paid to George Glasier and $24,875 was paid to an affiliate of Andrew Wilder. Uranium Ridge Project On October 8, 2025, Western, through its wholly owned subsidiary, PRM, closed on the acquisition of a package of unpatented mineral lode claims (the “Claims”). The Company paid $250,000 for the acquisition, securing a 50% ownership interest in the area covered by historic drilling. The Claims encompass a drilled-out uranium-vanadium deposit situated on ~240 acres that is located on BLM land in Montrose County, Colorado. As part of the acquisition strategy, Western has also staked additional claims surrounding the property, adding 500 acres with significant exploration potential to expand the historical resource. The Company has named this resource property the Uranium Ridge Project (“Uranium Ridge”), which is a combination of the acquired claims and the newly staked claims. The 50% of mineral claims that are not owned by PRM continue to be owned by Mr. George Glasier, the Company’s CEO. Mr. Glasier has indicated his willingness to make his personal interest available to the Company on appropriate terms if the Company deems it to be desirable. Uranium Ridge is located in close proximity to Western’s planned Mustang mineral processing plant site, which is being advanced as a key regional processing hub. By securing nearby resources, Western expects to reduce haulage costs, streamline logistics, and capture significant processing efficiencies, directly translating into increased value for shareholders. After the completion of the drill program at the Van 4, Uranium Ridge is targeted for a similar confirmation and exploration drill program. The objectives are to confirm the historic drilled-out resources and expand the resource to the newly added 500 acres of claims acquired by staking. Ore Purchase Agreement On April 8, 2025, PRM entered into an Ore Purchase Agreement (the “Ore Purchase Agreement”) with subsidiaries of Energy Fuels Inc. (“Purchaser”). The Ore Purchase Agreement was for a one year period and provided for the delivery of up to 25,000 short tons of uranium bearing ore to the White Mesa Mill in Blanding, Utah. PRM made deliveries at its own cost and the purchase price per ton will be based upon the average grade of uranium of each lot, and other qualifying conditions. Within 30 days after each lot is closed, Purchaser shall pay to PRM an 85% provisional payment (“Provisional Payment”) calculated based upon the sampled grade and an agreed upon pricing schedule. Within 30 days after each lot is fed to processing, the Purchaser shall pay to PRM a final settlement payment calculated based upon the assayed grade and the agreed upon pricing schedule, net of a royalty, pursuant to a previously existing royalty agreement with the Purchaser. During April and May 2025, the Company focused on the operational preparations required to begin hauling material. Also during this period, an additional ore pad was constructed, equipment and vehicles were prepared, and new equipment was purchased. The Company commenced deliveries in late June 2025 and during this period through September, Western delivered approximately 1,600 tons of mined material from the Sunday Mine Complex to the White Mesa Mill. Hauling capacity proved a limiting factor as all deliveries were completed by Western employees, alternating driving duties, utilizing a single Company truck to make ~20 ton deliveries. Most of the uranium-bearing feedstock utilized to make deliveries under the Ore Purchase Agreement originated from underground stockpiled materials from historical work projects. which was supplemented by a small amount of new production from the Sunday Mine Complex. During the year ended December 31, 2025, we recognized revenue from the sale of ore, net of royalty, of $297,285. As of December 31, 2025, included within other current assets on the consolidated balance sheet were receivables in the amount of $45,503 due from Purchaser. At the end of September 2025, Western made the decision to pause additional future deliveries in favor of focusing the mining staff on development projects that can increase future feedstock quantities for the Mustang Mineral Processing Plant. Additional Projects To Expand Production Capacity Looking forward, Management is considering opportunities across our property portfolio to increase production capacity through less capital intensive projects. These include re-permitting the Topaz Mine, rehabilitating the Sage Mine, reassessing the Van 4 Mine for decline/portal access rather than utilizing the previously reclaimed shaft, and additional development of the Rimrock JV mines. The project to advance permitting of the San Rafael Project is included in this group, and discussed in more detail below. Progress has been made on each of these initiatives. At the Topaz Mine, a new monitor well has been drilled and is actively being flushed in preparation for the delivery of new monitoring equipment. Once installed, we will commence the water quality sampling program. At the Sage Mine, we have now received both state and BLM approvals to commence limited work at this mine. For the Van 4 Mine, the team is preparing a vertical drill rig to begin a drilling program with both development and exploration/ resource expansion objectives.   6 URANIUM MARKET OUTLOOK World demand for clean, reliable, and affordable electricity is growing. The future demand for uranium is expected to increase due to the construction of additional nuclear reactors around the world. Multiple Japanese utilities have nuclear reactors in the process of restarting. Chinese utilities continue to aggressively build new reactors and buy uranium, with the goal of becoming the world leader in nuclear electricity generation. In total, according to the World Nuclear Association (WNA), there are many new reactors under construction in the world. Existing and new nuclear technologies are receiving unprecedented support on a global basis, as a base load electricity source with zero carbon emissions. After the 2011 Fukushima nuclear accident, uranium markets endured a decade long bear market due to excess supply created by nuclear reactor shutdowns and large quantities of new material entering the market. In recent years, this excess supply has been depleted by utility use, production curtailments, COVID-19 induced production suspensions, and financial buyers purchasing physical uranium (“U3O8”). A uranium global supply/demand imbalance had been projected by analysts to impact uranium prices in coming years. In 2020 COVID-19 induced mine closures and in 2021 Sprott Physical Uranium Trust (“SPUT”) purchased 23 million lbs of U 3 O 8 , underscoring the imbalance. Both of these catalysts have depleted excess inventories and accelerated the timing of the supply/demand impact. Demand is increasing with new reactors being built, next generation reactors being advanced, operating reactor life being extended, idle reactors being restarted, and nuclear phase-out plans being reversed. At a macro-level, the electrification transition and climate change initiatives have increased global support for nuclear. In 2022, geopolitical events became the main driver of uranium markets. During January, mass government protests in Kazakhstan were suppressed by the Collective Security Treaty Organization, a military alliance of regional allies led by Russia. Uranium markets reacted as Kazakhstan was responsible for 45% of the 2021 global uranium production. In February, the Russian invasion of Ukraine added more volatility due to Russia’s dominant position in nuclear fuel services including 38% of world conversion capacity and 46% of world enrichment capacity. These events led to new SPUT capital inflows and the purchase of 12 million lbs of U3O8 during the first quarter of 2022. With equity markets having their worst year since 2008, 2022 became a transformational year for the normally staid nuclear power and physical uranium markets as the status quo was disrupted. There was a rush on contracts for the limited available conversion and enrichment capacity which caused a price surge. Due to shrinking secondary supplies, utilities followed by signing new uranium supply contracts that increased long-term U3O8 prices from $43 to $52 during the year. The real uranium industry bull market was in the underlying fundamentals attributable to multiple factors, including: climate change, energy security, supply chain and energy scarcity initiatives. This inflection point will likely impact markets for decades as the supply/demand imbalance has flipped from a market with excess supply into a market with excess future demand. With the reduced availability of secondary supplies, utilities have added multi-year contracts with mining companies for primary supply. The drivers expanding the demand for nuclear fuel include: non-nuclear nations adding nuclear power generation, nuclear nations expanding fleets and/or extending lives of existing reactors, idled nuclear reactors being re-started, reactors being phased out and shutdowns being reversed, and the deployment of advanced reactors / SMRs. However, the challenge is in meeting increasing demand while being constrained from sourcing new material from the world’s largest suppliers. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the ensuing global energy crisis has focused attention on security of supply and supply chain risks. This has caused most of the world to re-evaluate their dependence upon nuclear fuel exported by Russia. In spite of the dominant market position of Rosatom, future deliveries potentially could be at risk due to sanctions, legislation, or a Russian embargo. Customer dependence upon the Russian supply of uranium, conversion and enrichment are being addressed slowly by governments as alternative suppliers are not currently available. Both Urenco and Orano have announced that they will invest to expand their uranium enrichment capacity respectively in the United States and France, which represents a shift away from Russia. Utilities are demonstrating their desire for increased security of their nuclear fuel supply chains. Kazakhstan is also a concern because the world’s largest uranium producing country has an unguarded and the second longest continuous land border in the world shared with Russia. The potential exists for Russia to exert influence over Kazakhstan. Additionally, Kazatomprom has put large long-term contracts in place with China. This supply is needed for China to fulfill its 15 year plan to deploy 150 new nuclear reactors. China National Nuclear Corp. (CNNC) has recently opened a uranium trading hub and warehouse facility, on the China / Kazakhstan border, with the capacity to store 60 million pounds of uranium. It has become evident that the nuclear fuel supply chain has become increasingly concentrated and interconnected in this very small area of the world. Expanding Kazakhstan uranium exports to Russia and China significantly reduces future supply for Western nuclear fuel buyers. In July 2023, the government of Niger was overthrown by its military. This is significant because the new regime is opposed to Western interests and this landlocked West African country holds the 7th largest uranium resource in the world and was producing about 5% of global production. The conflict has an anti-French sentiment, and the Junta has initiated multiple actions that are counter to French interests. Most importantly, Niger’s Junta has threatened the export of uranium to France which has serious implications because France acquires 20% of its natural uranium from Niger. In addition to the French evacuating/ being expelled from Niger, the U.S. military also departed the country. The Junta is utilizing Russian military support as a replacement. In addition, the Niger government has revoked operating permits from foreign uranium companies, including Orano in June 2024 and Goviex in July 2024. In November 2024, Orano further reported that it had lost operational control, to authorities in Niger, of another of its uranium mines. This mine was in production, but had been impacted by export restrictions imposed by the Junta.   7 During October 2023, geopolitical instabilities spread further to the Middle East after a Hamas attack on Israel triggered a counterattack by Israel on the Gaza Strip. This additional hot spot further increases volatility in the world and destabilizes the Middle East region that is highly influential on global energy prices. The Israel-Hamas hostilities have escalated over the Summer of 2024 and then spread to other countries in the Middle East. At the beginning of 2025, Israel and Hamas agreed to a ceasefire which ended in March 2025; the hostilities resumed in March and it is not clear when and if the combatants will be able to negotiate a new ceasefire or an end to military actions. In August 2025, the Israeli Prime Minister spoke of Israel’s intention to take control of the entire Gaza Strip and said that he will be seeking backing from Israeli government ministers. On June 13, 2025, Israel attacked key nuclear and military facilities in Iran with Iranian military responding with attacks on Israel soon after. The conflict escalated quickly, which raised significant concerns for the stability of the region, and oil prices increased sharply in the first days of the war. On June 22, 2025, the United States military bombed a number of Iranian nuclear sites in a move to force Iranian authorities to negotiate a nuclear treaty and end the hostilities. Subsequently, both Israel and Iran began to abide by a ceasefire, which appears to be holding. U.S. President Trump presented a 20-point Gaza ceasefire plan and pressured both sides forcing Israel and Palestinians into indirect negotiations and a ceasefire resulted. This resulted in a hostage-prisoner exchange in October 2025, when the remaining living Israeli hostages were released and exchanged for almost 2,000 Palestinian prisoners and detainees held by Israel. The hope is for a post-war governance plan that will result in a lasting ceasefire; negotiations are ongoing. In December 2023, in a show of bipartisan support, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Prohibiting Russian Uranium Imports Act. The reliance on Russian uranium, conversion and enrichment services is being viewed quite differently than it has for decades. The legislative process toward enacting a Russian uranium ban culminated in one being enacted in May 2024. However, the ban will not take full effect until 2028, and it appears that multiple waivers have been granted on preexisting contracts. Spot uranium prices reacted to longer-term supply/demand constraints and geopolitical risks hitting their peak at over $100/lb in January 2024. During 2025, term prices increased to the $80/lb range, spot uranium prices endured a slow decline from the high to the $64/lb level at the end of March 2025. During 2025, the trading range for spot uranium was $64/lb to $78/lb through August 2025. In September 2025 and October 2025 spot prices rallied above $80/lb, before declining back into the 2025 trading range in November 2025. In January 2026, uranium spot prices spiked closing above $100/lb for 2 days and above $90/lb for 5 days. After this short lived rally was over spot prices declined and settled into the $80/lb range. The uranium price trend is strong. Over the five year period from 2020 to 2025, both spot and term prices have moved up from the $30/lb range to the $80/lb range. During 2024, there were periods of notable support as giant tech companies made plans to utilize nuclear energy to support artificial intelligence (AI). AI is expected to drive increasing energy use in data centers in the future. Investors began purchasing nuclear and uranium equities as a means to create long exposure for their positive view on Artificial Intelligence (AI), due to the vast energy requirements of data centers. Many of those investors reversed their positions and began to sell these nuclear and uranium equities in the fourth quarter of 2024 and in the first quarter of 2025, and the nuclear and uranium equities that initially benefited saw a price reversal. In 2025 this investment thesis increased investment in nuclear and uranium. With the agreements signed between tech companies that sponsor AI data centers and the nuclear industry, these vast power requirements are viewed by the market as a significant new long-term demand driver for nuclear power as the best source of baseload power. Events of the last few years have set in motion uranium market and nuclear fuel opportunities for the next decade and beyond. There are positive catalysts across multiple levels of the nuclear fuel and uranium markets. This is occurring at a time when aggregate uranium inventory has declined to its lowest levels in over a decade. We believe that restocking of utility inventories, new demand and shifting demand will catalyze a uranium bull market that will increase uranium prices toward levels that will drive uranium mining company production, profits and equity prices. As a result, Western made the largest investments in the Company’s history during 2024 in advancing its operational strategy and mining operations. Nuclear Fuel and Uranium Effect from the Russian Invasion of Ukraine The start of the Russia/Ukraine war created extraordinary volatility in uranium markets during the first half of 2022. At the peak, the spot price was at an 11 year high. Prior to the invasion on February 24, 2022, uranium spot prices were in the $43 per pound range and rose to slightly over $63 per pound by April 2022; an increase of approximately $20 per pound. Later in May 2022 and June 2022, the spot price receded to $45 levels, before recovering to the $50 +/- per pound price level. This price level was maintained for an extended period as the immediate ban/sanctions anticipated by investors of nuclear fuel and services from Russia couldn’t be implemented. Equity markets followed the price action of physical uranium prices in speculation that governments worldwide would sanction and ban nuclear fuel from Russia. This was in recognition of Russia’s dominant position in nuclear fuel services including 38% of world conversion capacity and 46% of world enrichment capacity. The market position of Rosatom, Russia’s national nuclear company, was developed through decades of government subsidies. However, because of the lack of replacement capacity in the global nuclear fuel cycle, Rosatom has avoided sanctions.   8 Because of the Ukraine invasion, new contracts are largely not being signed with Rosatom, but deliveries under existing contracts continue to be made. Customer dependencies upon the Russian supply of uranium, conversion and enrichment are being addressed slowly by governments as alternative suppliers were not currently available. However, a desire to stay away from bad actors and the threat of Russia weaponizing energy exports or a Russian embargo has elicited responses. Worldwide, utilities have accelerated their contracting of non-Russian conversion and enrichment services. New uranium supply agreements are being signed with western producers. There has been significant legislative progress favorable to increasing domestic uranium and nuclear fuel production in the United States. In advance of the United States putting in place a ban or sanctions on Russian uranium, the DOE continues to make preparations for a Russian counter-sanction terminating the flow of nuclear fuel and services from Russia. In January 2023, ban and sanction discussions intensified as Rosatom was shown to have become an active participant in the Ukraine war. An article entitled “Russia’s nuclear entity aids war effort, leading to calls for sanctions” was published by the Washington Post. Obtained documents show that the Rosatom state nuclear power conglomerate was supplying the Russian military with “components, technology, and raw materials for missile fuel” to be used in the Ukraine war. United States Ban of Russian Uranium due to Russian Invasion of Ukraine In response to Russia’s war in Ukraine, the U.S. legislature passed the Prohibiting Russian Uranium Imports Act (H.R. 1042) to ban Russian uranium imports into the United States. Unanimous passage in April 2024 by the U.S. Senate followed the U.S. House of Representatives’ passage of the bill in December 2023. Subsequently, on May 13, 2024, President Biden signed this legislation into law. The ban became effective 90 days after its enactment on August 11, 2024 and is being phased in under Department of Energy conditional waivers before becoming a complete ban on January 1, 2028. Importantly, the enactment of a Russian ban releases funding to support the American nuclear supply chain. This funding was deployed by the DOE under a new program called the Low-Enriched Uranium (LEU) – Enrichment Acquisition. The United States has the world’s largest civilian nuclear reactor fleet, and it has now taken steps to reduce its reliance on state-sponsored Russian nuclear fuel. In November 2024, in response to the U.S. ban on Russian uranium imports, Russia imposed a counter restriction on the export of enriched uranium to the United States. This was designed to create maximum uncertainty through its implementation on a shipment-by-shipment basis. Also in December 2024, Russia’s national nuclear company sold a 49% minority stake in a joint venture in a Kazakhstan uranium mine to a Chinese state-owned company. It was reported that this was done due to difficulties selling uranium to European or North American buyers due to sanctions recently imposed upon Russia. The war in Ukraine is ongoing and it is unclear at this time when and how it will end but the parties have commenced negotiations under the guidance of the Trump Administration. In the early days of the new administration, President Trump appeared to be more open toward Russia’s interests, which caused concern from traditional European allies. Recently, the Trump’s Administration position regarding the war in Ukraine has become more balanced. The earlier embrace of Russia negatively impacted the prices of uranium equities and physical uranium commodities during 2025. At this point there is less than two years until the complete ban goes into effect on January 1, 2028. The supply/demand imbalance is increasingly being highlighted as is the recognition that supply is becoming increasingly tight as secondary supplies are being depleted. In recognition of new production lead times, the Trump Administration is taking actions to support the U.S. domestic fuel cycle. During August 2025, DOE’s Office of Nuclear Energy established the Defense Production Act (DPA) Consortium. It was announced that “Under the DPA Consortium, voluntary agreements will allow industry consultation to develop action plans to ensure that the nuclear fuel supply chain capacity for mining and milling, conversion, enrichment, deconversion, fabrication, recycling and reprocessing is available to enable the continued reliable operation of the nation’s reactors.” The first meeting of the DPA Consortium was held on October 23, 2025 and the process is ongoing. The DOE Office of Nuclear Energy has organized industry-specific committees to focus on developing action plans to increase domestic capacity for mining, conversion, and enrichment to reduce reliance on foreign fuel sources. Western is a member of the Mining & Milling Committee.   9 Russian Response to Uranium Ban On May 14, 2024, the day following the ban enactment, Bloomberg reported that Russia had responded with TENEX issuing force majeure notices to U.S. utility customers. TENEX is the subsidiary of Rosatom, the state nuclear energy corporation, and the entity through which U.S. counterparties contract for Russian uranium product imports into the United States. The TENEX force majeure notices required U.S. customers to secure waivers within 60 days that exempt them from the new U.S. Russian uranium ban or risk being moved to the back of the line for uranium deliveries if they are granted a waiver later. TENEX’s notice was based on their intention to honor their contracts, but they acknowledge this could be overridden by the Kremlin. This deadline has now passed and the DOE is currently granting waivers to the ban. Multiple waivers have been partially or fully approved, however the details are not in the public domain. On May 21, 2024, the DOE published their process and instructions for requesting a waiver. The waiver process does not appear restrictive and will likely allow most of the previously contracted Russian material into the United States prior to January 1, 2028. The U.S. legislative intentions were to deprive Russia of the revenue associated with U.S. purchases of Russian nuclear fuel and counter Russia’s control of the global nuclear fuel cycle by flooding U.S. and international markets with state-supported Russian uranium and services. We continue to believe the shift away from Russia/Rosatom will be a major catalyst in the realignment of nuclear fuel markets which will benefit western producers. OVERVIEW OF THE URANIUM INDUSTRY The only significant commercial use for uranium is as a fuel for nuclear power plants for the generation of electricity. The global nuclear and uranium mining industries continue to benefit from the convergence of multiple trends and increased public, political and government support due to coming new technologies, climate change initiatives, and energy crisis shortages. These are resulting in extensions to operating lives, a large number of nuclear reactors under construction, new builds, investments in next generation nuclear technology, and in Japan, to accelerate the re-start of the nuclear reactor fleet. Additionally with the rapid expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) the demand for electricity is surging, particularly to power energy-intensive data centers. This increase in electricity consumption is driving greater reliance on nuclear power, a reliable energy source, thereby strengthening the demand for uranium as a critical fuel for nuclear reactors. The uranium market has historically been highly cyclical. In the prior bull market, spot prices rose from $21 per pound in January 2005 to a high of $136 per pound in June 2007 in anticipation of sharply higher projected demand as a result of a resurgence in nuclear power and the depletion of secondary supplies. Secondary supplies are inventories of uranium not publicly available for sale, which are primarily held by utility companies and governments. The sharp price increase was driven in part by high levels of buying by utility companies, which resulted in most utilities covering their requirements through 2009. A decrease in near-term utility demand coupled with rising levels of supplies from producers and traders led to downward pressure on uranium prices beginning in the third quarter of 2007. A rebound in uranium prices in conjunction with a recovery in commodities in 2010 was curtailed by the Fukushima disaster in Japan. Since the Fukushima disaster in 2011, uranium spot prices entered a steady decline until June 2014, when they rebounded slightly and peaked again in March 2015 at $39 per pound. After that peak, prices again began to fall steadily, reaching their lowest point of $18 per pound in November 2016. Prior to COVID-19, annual uranium production was at its lowest in over a decade, creating a global supply deficit where production was only about two-thirds of consumption. In May 2020, after COVID-19 related production shutdowns, spot prices hit a $34 per pound price before declining to close the year at $30 per pound. During 2021, market participation by the Sprott Physical Uranium Trust and other secondary market uranium buyers caused prices to rise to $42.05 per pound at December 31, 2021. Uranium prices held these levels until Russia’s invasion of Ukraine caused uranium markets to surge. Prior to the invasion on February 24, 2022, uranium spot prices were in the $43 per pound range and rose to slightly over $63 per pound by April 2022. Later in May 2022 and June 2022, the spot price receded to $45 levels, before recovering to the $50 +/- per pound price level in September 2022 to March 2023. Subsequently in July 2023, spot uranium increased from the approximately $50/lb level to over $100/lb in January 2024. Spot uranium then declined into a 2025 trading range of $64/lb to $78/lb through August 2025. In September 2025 and October 2025 spot prices rallied above $80/lb, before declining back into the 2025 trading range in November 2025. This rally was ignited in mid-September by President Trump and DOE Secretary Wright touting U.S. nuclear power and the U.S. domestic fuel cycle, which rallied uranium equity markets. In January 2026, uranium spot prices spiked closing above $100/lb for 2 days and above $90/lb for 5 days. After this short lived rally was over spot prices declined and settled into the $80/lb range. The uranium price trend is strong. Over the five year period from 2020 to 2025, both spot and term prices have moved up from the $30/lb range to the $80/lb range. Geopolitical events, technological advances, and the nuclear energy growth path provide favorable pricing factors specific to the uranium industry. As a result, we foresee a uranium pricing environment which in the coming years will allow Western to initiate full-scale production at its best properties. As a result, Western made the largest investments in the Company’s history during 2024, advancing its operational strategy and mining operations.   10 Nuclear Fuel and Uranium Market Conditions The uranium term price was in the $80.00 to $81.50 range between July 2024 and August 2025, until its rise to $83/lb in September 2025 and $85/lb in October 2025. The uranium spot market has experienced more volatility, peaking at $106/lb in January 2024, and declining into a 2025 trading range of $64/lb to $78/lb through August 2025. In September 2025 and October 2025 spot prices rallied above $80/lb, before declining back into the 2025 trading range in November 2025. In January 2026, uranium spot prices spiked closing above $100/lb for 2 days and above $90/lb for 5 days. After this short lived rally was over spot prices declined and settled into the $80/lb range. The uranium price trend is strong. Over the five year period from 2020 to 2025, both spot and term prices have moved up from the $30/lb range to the $80/lb range. Beginning in 2023, spot uranium prices reacted to supply/demand constraints and geopolitical risks. Positive catalysts across multiple levels of the nuclear fuel and uranium markets have set in motion uranium market and nuclear fuel opportunities for the next decade and beyond. Underlying fundamentals are the strongest in decades. This is attributable to multiple factors, including climate change, energy security, supply chain and energy scarcity initiatives. The supply/demand imbalance has flipped from a market with excess supply into a market with excess future demand. With the reduced availability of secondary supplies, utilities have begun adding multi-year contracts with mining companies for primary supply. The drivers expanding the demand for nuclear fuel include non-nuclear nations adding nuclear power generation, nuclear nations expanding fleets and/or extending lives of existing reactors, idled nuclear reactors being redeployed, the reversal of phase-outs and shutdowns, and the deployment of advanced reactors / SMRs. However, the challenge is in meeting increasing demand simultaneously with supply constraints from the world’s largest suppliers. In spite of all these favorable attributes, spot uranium prices have declined in 2025 versus 2024 levels, as have the equities of junior uranium miners. We anticipate that both will rebound to reflect the underlying positive fundamentals in the nuclear/uranium sector. Multiple market analysts have flagged low availability of mobile secondary inventories. We believe the continued draw down of inventories to be a market catalyst for uranium prices. Positive nuclear energy news has continued to highlight the global growth of future nuclear electricity generation which will drive increased nuclear fuel demand. However, due to the lead time needed for future uranium production, we are entering a phase where the supply-demand fundamentals are in a deep multi-year structural supply deficit. The future is not clear as we believe some miners, like ourselves, with available near-term production are waiting for higher price levels and/or project funding before making full start-up commitments. Utilities have also deferred contracting to understand how regulations and geopolitics will modify their future access to Russian uranium, conversion and enrichment services. However, with increasing geopolitical uncertainties, the issues of security of supply and tightening supplies have become more important. Nuclear Fuel Supply Chain Concentration Risks Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the ensuing global energy crisis has focused attention on security of supply and supply chain risks. This has caused most of the world to re-evaluate their dependence upon nuclear fuel exported by Russia. In spite of the dominant market position of Rosatom, future deliveries potentially could be at risk due to sanctions, legislation, or a Russian embargo. Customer dependence upon the Russian supply of uranium, conversion and enrichment are being addressed slowly by governments as alternative suppliers are not currently available. Both Urenco and Orano have announced that they will invest to expand their uranium enrichment capacity respectively in the United States and France, which represents a shift away from Russia. Utilities are demonstrating their desire for increased security of their nuclear fuel supply chains. Kazakhstan is also a concern because the world’s largest uranium producing country has an unguarded and the second longest continuous land border in the world shared with Russia. The potential exists for Russia to exert influence over Kazakhstan. Additionally, Kazatomprom has put large long-term contracts in place with China. This supply is needed for China to fulfill its 15 year plan to deploy 150 new nuclear reactors. China National Nuclear Corp. (CNNC) has recently opened a uranium trading hub and warehouse facility, on the China / Kazakhstan border, with the capacity to store 60 million pounds of uranium. It has become evident that the nuclear fuel supply chain has become increasingly concentrated and interconnected in this very small area of the world. Expanding Kazakhstan uranium exports to Russia and China significantly reduces future supply for Western nuclear fuel buyers. In July 2023, the government of Niger was overthrown by its military. This is significant because the new regime is opposed to Western interests and this landlocked West African country holds the 7th largest uranium resource in the world and was producing about 5% of global production. The conflict has an anti-French sentiment, and the Junta has initiated multiple actions that are counter to French interests. Most importantly, Niger’s Junta has threatened the export of uranium to France which has serious implications because France acquires 20% of its natural uranium from Niger. In addition to the French evacuating/ being expelled from Niger, the U.S. military also departed the country. The Junta is utilizing Russian military support as a replacement. In addition, the Niger government has revoked operating permits from foreign uranium companies, including Orano in June 2024 and Goviex in July 2024. In November 2024, Orano further reported that it had lost operational control, to authorities in Niger, of another of its uranium mines. This mine was in production, but had been impacted by export restrictions imposed by the Junta.   11 During October 2023, geopolitical instabilities spread further to the Middle East after a Hamas attack on Israel triggered a counterattack by Israel on the Gaza Strip. This additional hot spot further increases volatility in the world and destabilizes the Middle East region that is highly influential on global energy prices. The Israel-Hamas hostilities have escalated over the Summer of 2024 and then spread to other countries in the Middle East. At the beginning of 2025, Israel and Hamas agreed to a ceasefire which ended in March 2025; the hostilities resumed in March and it is not clear when and if the combatants will be able to negotiate a new ceasefire or an end to military actions. In August 2025, the Israeli Prime Minister spoke of Israel’s intention to take control of the entire Gaza Strip and said that he will be seeking backing from Israeli government ministers. On June 13, 2025, Israel attacked key nuclear and military facilities in Iran with Iranian military responding with attacks on Israel soon after. The conflict escalated quickly, which raised significant concerns for the stability of the region and oil prices increased sharply in the first days of the war. On June 22, 2025, the United States military bombed a number of Iranian nuclear sites in a move to force Iranian authorities to negotiate a nuclear treaty and end the hostilities. U.S. President Trump presented a 20-point Gaza ceasefire plan and pressured both sides forcing Israel and Palestinians into indirect negotiations and a ceasefire resulted. This resulted in a hostage-prisoner exchange in October 2025, when the remaining living Israeli hostages were released and exchanged for almost 2,000 Palestinian prisoners and detainees held by Israel. The hope is for a Gaza governance plan that will result in a lasting ceasefire; negotiations are ongoing. After failed diplomatic negotiations, on February 28, 2026, the United States and Israel launched a joint operation against Iran. This new conflict has caused shipping traffic disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz which are increasing energy prices and having a negative impact on world markets overall. A large portion of the Middle East daily oil production is transported through the Strait of Hormuz. This has further implications for energy-importing nations as their uranium buyers are more focused on domestic security and away from regional logistical risks. Among those at risk of an Iranian strike in Central Asia is Kazakhstan, the largest producer of uranium. In addition, Kazakhstan’s future uranium contracts and sales are increasingly going to Russia, China, and India, and thus won’t be available to North American uranium buyers. Vanadium With the exception of the Hansen/Taylor Deposit, most of the Company’s mining assets, including the Sunday Mine Complex, contain vanadium either as a stand-alone product or a co-product to uranium. Conventional and new vanadium applications include steelmaking, aerospace, stationary energy storage, batteries, and chemicals. When a very small amount of vanadium is added to steel, the hardening effect greatly increases its strength. And while steelmaking accounts for roughly 90% of all vanadium currently consumed, it is estimated that vanadium is only used in about 9% of all steels today. After steelmaking, the second largest market for vanadium is that of catalysts and chemical applications. A significant new source of demand for vanadium is from vanadium redox flow batteries (VRFB) as their adaptation grows with the stationary storage market. In 2018 there was structural change in the vanadium markets that caused prices to spike. China, the largest vanadium producer in the world, had supply disrupted by environmental monitoring and rules while domestic demand was increasing. China, which had been a net vanadium exporter, flipped and became a net vanadium importer. On the demand side, China announced a new high strength rebar standard to increase earthquake resistance in February 2018 that became effective on November 1, 2018. On the supply side, in its efforts to fight pollution, Chinese environmental inspections resulted in the closing of dirty processes in which vanadium was recovered as a byproduct. These policy changes caused a shortage and led to a surge in vanadium prices to all-time highs during the fourth quarter of 2018. Vanadium closed on December 31, 2018 at $23.15, but owing to a Chinese extension in the implementation of the new rebar standard, prices plunged to close on December 31, 2019 at $5.25. Notably, the substantial price appreciation in vanadium delayed the adaptation of VRFB applications as these batteries were no longer considered to be cost competitive. A Section 232 National Security Investigation of Imports of Vanadium was undertaken by the U.S. Department of Commerce (“DoC”) during 2020 and submitted to President Biden on February 22, 2021. The President had 90 days to decide if he concurred with the findings and recommendations and determine whether to take an action to mitigate the impairment of national security. No action was taken. The vanadium market price closed at $4.30 per pound as of December 31, 2025, which was a decrease from the December 31, 2024 closing price of $5.80 per pound. During the first quarter of 2026, vanadium prices increased to $5.43. Cyclical business activities impact price as its principal product use is as a steel hardener.   12 COMPETITION There is global competition for uranium/vanadium properties, ore processing mills, capital, customers and the employment and retention of qualified personnel. We compete with multiple exploration companies for all of these things. In the production and marketing of uranium and vanadium, there are a number of producing entities globally, some of which are government controlled and several of which are significantly larger and better capitalized than we are. Several of these organizations also have substantially greater financial, technical, manufacturing and distribution resources than we have. Our future uranium production may also compete with uranium from secondary supplies, including the sale of uranium inventory held by the DoE. At the current time, DoE uranium sales have been suspended. In addition, there are numerous entities in the market that compete with us for properties and operate in-situ recovery (“ISR”) facilities. Western aims to possess a strategic advantage by completing the construction of its own uranium and vanadium mill during 2029. The Company will have its own mining teams, equipment and infrastructure, which will dramatically reduce its operational costs and increase margin. Moreover, by using Kinetic Separation, we expect the cost of production of uranium to be reduced by approximately 40%. With respect to sales of uranium, the Company competes primarily based on price. We will market uranium to utilities and commodity brokers. We are in direct competition with supplies available from various sources worldwide. We believe we compete with multiple operating uranium companies. With respect to sales of vanadium, the Company will compete primarily based upon availability and secondarily on price. There will be direct competition with primary production, secondary production, and co-production from various companies and processors worldwide as individual entities come online or increase production to address the supply deficit. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS AND PERMITTING United States Uranium extraction is predominantly regulated by the federal government and states, and, in some cases, by Native American tribes and counties. Compliance with such regulation has a material effect on the economics of our operations and the timing of project development. Our primary regulatory costs have been related to obtaining licenses and permits from federal and state agencies before the commencement of production activities. The environmental regulatory requirements for the ISR industry are well established. Many ISR projects have gone a full life cycle without any significant environmental impact. However, the process can make environmental permitting difficult and timing unpredictable. Western does not plan to utilize an ISR mining process on its properties. Mining Permits are disclosed on a per mine basis in the “Properties” section, below. Reclamation and Restoration Costs and Bonding Requirements At the conclusion of conventional mining, a site is decommissioned and reclaimed. Reclamation involves removing evidence of surface disturbance. The asset retirement obligations (“ARO”) of the U.S. mines are subject to legal and regulatory requirements. Estimates of the costs of reclamation are reviewed periodically by the applicable regulatory authorities. The asset retirement obligation liability represents the Company’s best estimate of the present value of future reclamation costs in connection with the mineral properties. The Company determined the gross asset retirement obligations as of December 31, 2025 of the mineral properties to be $1,187,553. The Company is required by state regulatory agencies to obtain financial surety relating to certain of its future restoration and reclamation obligations. The Company has provided performance bonds issued for the benefit of the Company in the amount of $1,187,553 to satisfy such regulatory requirements as of December 31, 2025. EMPLOYEES As of December 31, 2025, we had 16 full-time employees.   13 ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS Risks Related to Our Business Our business activities are subject to significant risks, including those described below. Every investor or potential investor in our securities should carefully consider these risks. If any of the described risks actually occurs, our business, financial position and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. Such risks are not the only ones we face and additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also affect our business. Our ability to become a successful operating mining company is contingent on whether we can continue to access adequate operating capital and can ultimately mine our properties and monetize the uranium and vanadium processed at our mill on a profitable basis, and can then leverage those proceeds to finance further mining activities and to acquire and finance additional reserves, all in spite of potentially significant fluctuations in the market prices of uranium and vanadium. We expect to generate operating losses for the next several years as we incur expenses to further expand our mining operations at our Sunday Mine Complex, including acquiring additional mining equipment, adding to the mining team and scaling up mining operations, as wells as the for the permitting and construction of our mineral processing facility. During the year ended December 31, 2025, we generated a net loss of $7,175,923. As of December 31, 2025, we had an accumulated deficit of $36,105,817 and working capital of $5,384,164. The Company’s ability to continue its planned operations and to pay its obligations when they become due is contingent upon the Company obtaining additional financing. Management’s plans include seeking to procure additional funds through debt and equity financings, to secure regulatory approval to fully utilize its Kinetic Separation technology, to scale up its mining operations at Sunday Mine Complex, to construct its own mineral processing mill that is expected to be licensed to utilize Kinetic Separation, and to initiate the processing of ore to generate operating cash flows. If we cannot access additional sources of private or public capital, partner with another company that has cash resources and/or find other means of generating revenue other than uranium or vanadium sales, we may not be able to fully realize our planned operations. Until we can produce and sell sufficient amounts of uranium and/or vanadium, we will have no way to generate adequate cash inflows except by monetizing certain of our assets, partnering with third parties that are better financed or obtaining additional financing of our own. We can provide no assurance that our properties will produce saleable production or that we will be able to continue to find, develop, acquire and finance additional mineral resources. If we cannot monetize certain existing assets, partner with another company that has cash resources, find other means of generating revenue other than uranium or vanadium production and/or access additional sources of private or public capital, we may not be able to remain in business and our shareholders may lose their entire investment. Our ability to function as an operating mining company will be dependent on our ability to mine our properties and permit, build and operate our mill at a profit sufficient to finance further mining activities and for the acquisition and development of additional properties. The volatility of uranium prices makes long-range planning uncertain and raising capital difficult. Our ability to operate on a positive cash flow basis will be dependent on mining sufficient quantities of uranium or vanadium at a profit sufficient to finance our operations, operate our mill profitably and for the acquisition and development of additional mining properties. Any profit will necessarily be dependent upon, and affected by, the long and short term market prices of uranium and vanadium, which are subject to significant fluctuation. Uranium prices have been and will continue to be affected by numerous factors beyond our control. These factors include the demand for nuclear power, political and economic conditions in uranium producing and consuming countries, uranium supply from secondary sources and uranium production levels and costs of production. A significant, sustained drop in uranium prices may make it impossible to operate our business at a level that will permit us to cover our fixed costs or to remain in operation.   14 Evaluating our future performance may be difficult since we have a limited financial and operating history, with significant negative cash flow and an accumulated deficit to date. Furthermore, there is no assurance that we will be successful in securing additional sources of capital sufficient to support our planned operations. As such, substantial doubt exists as to whether our cash resources and working capital will be sufficient to fund our planned operations over the next twelve months. Our long-term success will depend ultimately on our ability to raise additional capital, to achieve and maintain operational profitability and to develop positive cash flows from our mining activities. As more fully described within this annual report, we acquired our first mineral properties in November of 2014. To date, we have been acquiring additional mineral properties and raising capital. We hold uranium projects in various stages of exploration in the states of Colorado and Utah. In addition, in July 2023, we announced our plans to permit and develop a mill for the processing of uranium and vanadium. As more fully described under “Liquidity and Capital Resources” of Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Result of Operations”, we have a history of significant negative cash flows and net losses, with an accumulated deficit balance of $36,105,817 and $28,929,894 at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. We have been reliant on royalty revenues and equity financings from the sale of our common shares in order to fund our operations. We do not expect to achieve profitability or develop positive cash flows from operations in the near term. As a result of our limited financial and operating history, including our significant negative cash flows and net losses to date, it may be difficult to evaluate our future performance. At December 31, 2025 and 2024, we had working capital of $5,384,164 and $5,240,584, respectively. The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to obtain adequate additional financing. However, there is no assurance that we will be successful in securing any form of additional financing in the future; therefore, substantial doubt exists as to whether our cash resources and working capital will be sufficient to enable the Company to continue its operations over the next twelve months. The consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 were prepared assuming that the Company would continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. Our reliance on equity and debt financings is expected to continue for the foreseeable future. The availability of such funds whenever such additional financing is required, will be dependent on many factors beyond our control, including, but not limited to, the market price of uranium, the continuing public support of nuclear power as a viable source of electricity generation, the volatility in the global financial markets affecting our stock price and the status of the worldwide economy, any one of which may cause significant challenges in our ability to access additional financing, including access to the equity and credit markets. We may also be required to seek other forms of financing, such as asset divestitures or joint venture arrangements to continue advancing our uranium projects, which would depend entirely on finding a suitable third party willing to enter into such an arrangement, typically involving an assignment of a percentage interest in the mineral project. Our long-term success, including the recoverability of the carrying values of our assets, our ability to acquire additional uranium projects and continue with exploration and pre-extraction activities and mining activities on our existing uranium projects, will depend ultimately on our ability to achieve and maintain profitability, and positive cash flow from our operations by establishing ore bodies that contain commercially recoverable uranium and to develop these into profitable mining activities. The economic viability of our mining activities has many risks and uncertainties. These include, but are not limited to: (i) a significant, prolonged decrease in the market price of uranium; (ii) difficulty in marketing and/or selling uranium concentrates; (iii) significantly higher than expected capital costs to construct the mine and/or processing plant; (iv) significantly higher than expected extraction costs; (v) significantly lower than expected uranium extraction; (vi) significant delays, reductions or stoppages of uranium extraction activities; and (vi) the introduction of significantly more stringent regulatory laws and regulations. Our mining activities may change as a result of any one or more of these risks and uncertainties and there is no assurance that any ore body that we extract mineralized materials from will result in achieving and maintaining profitability and developing positive cash flow.   15 Our operations are capital intensive, and we will require significant additional financing to continue production at the Sunday Mine Complex, to permit and construct the ore processing mill, to continue exploration and begin pre-extraction activities on our other existing uranium/vanadium projects, and to acquire additional uranium/vanadium projects. Our operations are capital intensive and future capital expenditures are expected to be substantial. We will require significant additional financing to fund our operations, including continuing production at the Sunday Mine Complex, to permit and construct the ore processing mill, continuing exploration on our other existing projects and beginning pre-extraction activities on those projects, which include assaying, drilling, geological and geochemical analysis and mine construction costs, and acquiring additional uranium/vanadium projects. In the absence of such additional financing, we would not be able to fund our operations, which may result in delays, curtailment or abandonment of any one or all of our uranium projects. Uranium/vanadium exploration and pre-extraction programs and mining activities are inherently subject to numerous significant risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ significantly from expectations or anticipated amounts. Furthermore, exploration programs conducted on our uranium/vanadium projects may not result in the establishment of ore bodies that contain commercially recoverable uranium/vanadium. Uranium/vanadium exploration and pre-extraction programs and mining activities are inherently subject to numerous significant risks and uncertainties, many beyond our control, including, but not limited to: (i) unanticipated ground and water conditions and adverse claims to water rights; (ii) unusual or unexpected geological formations; (iii) metallurgical and other processing problems; (iv) the occurrence of unusual weather or operating conditions and other force majeure events; (v) lower than expected ore grades; (vi) industrial accidents; (vii) delays in the receipt of or failure to receive necessary government permits; (viii) delays in transportation; (ix) availability of contractors and labor; (x) government permit restrictions and regulation restrictions; (xi) unavailability of materials, equipment and milling facilities; and (xii) the failure of equipment or processes to operate in accordance with specifications or expectations. These risks and uncertainties could result in delays, reductions or stoppages in our mining activities; increased capital and/or extraction costs; damage to, or destruction of, our mineral projects, extraction facilities or other properties; personal injuries; environmental damage; monetary losses; and legal claims. Success in uranium/vanadium exploration is dependent on many factors, including, without limitation, the experience and capabilities of a company’s management, the availability of geological expertise and the availability of sufficient funds to conduct the exploration program. Even if an exploration program is successful and commercially recoverable uranium/vanadium is established, it may take a number of years from the initial phases of drilling and identification of the mineralization until extraction is possible, during which time the economic feasibility of extraction may change such that the uranium ceases to be economically recoverable. Uranium/vanadium exploration is frequently non-productive due, for example, to poor exploration results or the inability to establish ore bodies that contain commercially recoverable uranium, in which case the uranium project may be abandoned and written-off. Furthermore, we will not be able to benefit from our exploration efforts and recover the expenditures that we incur on our exploration programs if we do not establish ore bodies that contain commercially recoverable uranium/vanadium and develop these uranium/vanadium projects into profitable mining activities, and there is no assurance that we will be successful in doing so for any of our uranium/vanadium projects. Whether an ore body contains commercially recoverable uranium/vanadium depends on many factors including, without limitation: (i) the particular attributes, including material changes to those attributes, of the ore body such as size, grade, recovery rates and proximity to infrastructure; (ii) the market price of uranium, which may be volatile; and (iii) government regulations and regulatory requirements including, without limitation, those relating to environmental protection, permitting and land use, taxes, land tenure and transportation. We have established the existence of mineralized materials on our uranium properties. However, we have not established any measured, indicated or inferred mineral resources or any proven or probable reserves through the completion of a feasibility study for any of our uranium properties and we have no current plans to seek to do so, as it would not serve a business purpose at the present time. Furthermore, we have no current plans to establish proven or probable reserves for any of our uranium properties as it doesn’t serve a business purpose at the present time.   16 Because the number of mills permitted for processing of uranium and vanadium is very limited, it may be difficult for us to gain access to a mill on favorable terms, or at all, and this could negatively affect our ability to do business. In the event that there is not a buying program in place for uranium/vanadium ore, the Company would need to arrange with a third party for conventional milling services. Because the number of mills permitted for processing of uranium and vanadium is very limited, it may be difficult for us to gain access to a mill on favorable terms, or at all. This could result in increased costs and/or significant delays in, interruption of, or cessation of the Company’s business activities. The practice of selling uranium/vanadium ore without first processing into yellowcake (U3O8) or Vanadium Pentoxide (V2O5) would likely generate lower revenues. Because the number of mills permitted for processing of uranium and vanadium is very limited, we have determined that we will seek a permit and then construct our own uranium and vanadium ore processing facility. The capital required and risks involved in such an endeavor could negatively affect our ability to do business. The construction of facilities for the processing of uranium ore is both a capital-intensive and regulatory intensive endeavor. Obtaining a license to construct and operate a processing plant to mill uranium and vanadium is subject to a number of risks including local, state and national regulations, and political and environmental considerations. Furthermore, we must raise sufficient capital to fund the permitting efforts and construction of the mill. We are subject to the risks that adequate capital in general may not be available at the levels needed and risks that adequate capital may not be available for investments in the front-end of the nuclear fuel cycle. If we are not able to address these risks and build a processing plant/mill then, we would need to arrange with a third party for conventional milling services. It may be difficult for the Company to gain access to a third party’s mill on favorable terms, or at all. This could result in increased costs and/or significant delays in, interruption of, or cessation of the Company’s business activities. Our ability to realize anticipated benefits of the Kinetic Separation process is subject to uncertainties associated with that process. In order to utilize Kinetic Separation to process uranium/vanadium bearing ore, there are uncertainties that must be addressed. Currently, to utilize Kinetic Separation the Company plans to apply for its own milling license for a processing facility. If this is not practical or feasible the Company would need to arrange to utilize a third party’s mill. There are substantial costs and risks associated with both of these alternatives. The Company is open to continuing to seek an alternative path forward that would allow the use of Kinetic Separation either inside a uranium mine or on the surface outside of the underground workings to further reduce transportation costs. However, there is no assurance that such an alternative approach will be approved for Western or other companies with comparable processes pursuing regulatory remedies. In addition, although the Company has conducted initial tests of its Kinetic Separation technology with what appear to be positive results, those results have not been validated by a qualified person. We do not insure against all of the risks we face in our operations. In general, where coverage is available and not prohibitively expensive relative to the perceived risk, we will maintain insurance against such risk, subject to exclusions and limitations. We currently maintain insurance against certain risks including securities and general commercial liability claims and certain physical assets used in our operations, subject to exclusions and limitations; however, we do not maintain insurance to cover all of the potential risks and hazards associated with our operations. We may be subject to liability for environmental, pollution or other hazards associated with our exploration, pre-extraction and extraction activities, which we may not be insured against, which may exceed the limits of our insurance coverage or which we may elect not to insure against because of high premiums or other reasons. Furthermore, we cannot provide assurance that any insurance coverage we currently have will continue to be available at reasonable premiums or that such insurance will adequately cover any resulting liability. Our inability to obtain financial surety would threaten our ability to continue in business. Future financial surety requirements to comply with federal and state environmental and remediation requirements and to secure necessary licenses and approvals may increase significantly as future development and production occurs at certain of our sites in the United States. The amount of the financial surety for each producing property is subject to annual review and revision by regulators. We expect that the issuer of the financial surety instruments will require us to provide cash collateral for a significant amount of the face amount of the bond to secure the obligation. In the event we are not able to raise, secure or generate sufficient funds necessary to satisfy these requirements, we will be unable to develop our sites and bring them into production, which inability will have a material adverse impact on our business and may negatively affect our ability to continue to operate.   17 Acquisitions that we may make from time to time could have an adverse impact on us. From time to time, we examine opportunities to acquire additional mining assets and businesses. Any acquisition that we may choose to complete may be of a significant size, may change the scale of our business and operations, and may expose us to new geographic, political, operating, financial and geological risks. Our success in our acquisition activities depends on our ability to identify suitable acquisition candidates, negotiate acceptable terms for any such acquisition, and integrate the acquired operations successfully with those of our Company. Any acquisitions would be accompanied by risks which could have a material adverse effect on our business. For example, there may be a significant change in commodity prices after we have committed to complete the transaction and established the purchase price or exchange ratio; a material ore body may prove to be below expectations; we may have difficulty integrating and assimilating the operations and personnel of any acquired companies, realizing anticipated synergies and maximizing the financial and strategic position of the combined enterprise, and maintaining uniform standards, policies and controls across the organization; the integration of the acquired business or assets may disrupt our ongoing business and our relationships with employees, customers, suppliers and contractors; and the acquired business or assets may have unknown liabilities which may be significant. In the event that we choose to raise debt capital to finance any such acquisition, our leverage will be increased. If we choose to use equity as consideration for such acquisition, existing shareholders may suffer dilution. Alternatively, we may choose to finance any such acquisition with our existing resources. There can be no assurance that we would be successful in overcoming these risks or any other problems encountered in connection with such acquisitions. The uranium industry is subject to numerous stringent laws, regulations and standards, including environmental protection laws and regulations. If any changes occur that would make these laws, regulations and standards more stringent, it may require capital outlays in excess of those anticipated or cause substantial delays, which would have a material adverse effect on our operations. Uranium exploration and pre-extraction programs and mining activities are subject to numerous stringent laws, regulations and standards at the federal, state, and local levels governing permitting, pre-extraction, extraction, exports, taxes, labor standards, occupational health, waste disposal, protection and reclamation of the environment, protection of endangered and protected species, mine safety, hazardous substances and other matters. Our compliance with these requirements requires significant financial and personnel resources. The laws, regulations, policies or current administrative practices of any government body, organization or regulatory agency in the United States or any other applicable jurisdiction, may change or be applied or interpreted in a manner which may also have a material adverse effect on our operations. The actions, policies or regulations, or changes thereto, of any government body, by executive order or regulatory agency or special interest group, may also have a material adverse effect on our operations. Uranium exploration and pre-extraction programs and mining activities are subject to stringent environmental protection laws and regulations at the federal, state, and local levels. These laws and regulations, which include permitting and reclamation requirements, regulate emissions, water storage and discharges and disposal of hazardous wastes. Uranium mining activities are also subject to laws and regulations which seek to maintain health and safety standards by regulating the design and use of mining methods. Various permits from governmental and regulatory bodies are required for mining to commence or continue, and no assurance can be provided that required permits will be received in a timely manner. Our compliance costs including the posting of surety bonds associated with environmental protection laws and regulations and health and safety standards have been significant to date, and are expected to increase in scale and scope as we expand our operations in the future. Furthermore, environmental protection laws and regulations may become more stringent in the future, and compliance with such changes may require capital outlays in excess of those anticipated or cause substantial delays, which would have a material adverse effect on our operations. To the best of our knowledge, our operations are in compliance, in all material respects, with all applicable laws, regulations and standards. We may not be able or may elect not to insure against the risk of liability for violations of such laws, regulations and standards, due to high insurance premiums or other reasons. Where coverage is available and not prohibitively expensive relative to the perceived risk, we will maintain insurance against such risk, subject to exclusions and limitations. However, we cannot provide any assurance that such insurance will continue to be available at reasonable premiums or that such insurance will be adequate to cover any resulting liability.   18 We may not be able to obtain, maintain or amend rights, authorizations, licenses, permits or consents required for our operations. Our exploration mining and planned uranium and vanadium ore processing activities at the proposed company owned mill are dependent upon the grant of appropriate rights, authorizations, licenses, permits and consents, as well as continuation and amendment of these rights, authorizations, licenses, permits and consents already granted, which may be granted for a defined period of time, or may not be granted or may be withdrawn or made subject to limitations. There can be no assurance that all necessary rights, authorizations, licenses, permits and consents will be granted to us, or that authorizations, licenses, permits and consents already granted will not be withdrawn or made subject to limitations. Closure and remediation costs for environmental liabilities may exceed the provisions we have made. Natural resource companies are required to close their operations and rehabilitate the lands in accordance with a variety of environmental laws and regulations. Estimates of the total ultimate closure and rehabilitation costs for uranium operations are significant and based principally on current legal and regulatory requirements and closure plans that may change materially. Any underestimated or unanticipated rehabilitation costs could materially affect our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Environmental liabilities are accrued when they become known, are probable and can be reasonably estimated. Whenever a previously unrecognized remediation liability becomes known, or a previously estimated reclamation cost is increased, the amount of that liability and additional cost will be recorded at that time and could materially reduce our consolidated net income in the related period. The laws and regulations governing closure and remediation in a particular jurisdiction are subject to review at any time and may be amended to impose additional requirements and conditions which may cause our provisions for environmental liabilities to be underestimated and could materially affect our financial position or results of operations. Major nuclear incidents may have adverse effects on the nuclear and uranium industries. The nuclear incident that occurred in Japan in March 2011 had significant and adverse effects on both the nuclear and uranium industries. If another nuclear incident were to occur, it may have further adverse effects for both industries. Public opinion of nuclear power as a source of electricity generation may be adversely affected, which may cause governments of certain countries to further increase regulation for the nuclear industry, reduce or abandon current reliance on nuclear power or reduce or abandon existing plans for nuclear power expansion. Any one of these occurrences has the potential to reduce current and/or future demand for nuclear power, resulting in lower demand for uranium and lower market prices for uranium, adversely affecting the Company’s operations and prospects. Furthermore, the growth of the nuclear and uranium industries is dependent on continuing and growing public support of nuclear power as a viable source of electricity generation. The marketability of uranium concentrates will be affected by numerous factors beyond our control which may result in our inability to receive an adequate return on our invested capital. The marketability of uranium concentrates extracted by us will be affected by numerous factors beyond our control. These factors include macroeconomic factors, fluctuations in the market price of uranium, governmental regulations, land tenure and use, regulations concerning the importing and exporting of uranium and environmental protection regulations. The future effects of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but any one or a combination of these factors may result in our inability to receive an adequate return on our invested capital. The only significant market for uranium is nuclear power plants world-wide, and there are a limited number of customers. We are dependent on a limited number of electric utilities that buy uranium for nuclear power plants. Because of the limited market for uranium, a reduction in purchases of newly produced uranium by electric utilities for any reason (such as plant closings) would adversely affect the viability of our business. The price of alternative energy sources affects the demand for and price of uranium. The attractiveness of uranium as an alternative fuel to generate electricity may be dependent on the relative prices of oil, gas, wind, solar, coal and hydro-electricity and the possibility of developing other low-cost sources of energy. If the prices of alternative energy sources decrease or new low-cost alternative energy sources are developed, the demand for uranium could decrease, which may result in a decrease in the price of uranium.   19 The title to our mineral property interests may be challenged. Although we have taken reasonable measures to ensure proper title to our interests in mineral properties and other assets, there is no guarantee that the title to any of such interests will not be challenged. No assurance can be given that we will be able to secure the grant or the renewal of existing mineral rights and tenures on terms satisfactory to us, or that governments in the jurisdictions in which we operate will not revoke or significantly alter such rights or tenures or that such rights or tenures will not be challenged or impugned by third parties, including local governments, aboriginal peoples or other claimants. Our mineral properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements, transfers or claims, and title may be affected by, among other things, undetected defects. A successful challenge to the precise area and location of our claims could result in us being unable to operate on our properties as permitted or being unable to enforce our rights with respect to our properties. Due to the nature of our business, we may be subject to legal proceedings which may divert management’s time and attention from our business and result in substantial damage awards. Due to the nature of our business, we may be subject to numerous regulatory investigations, securities claims, civil claims, lawsuits and other proceedings in the ordinary course of our business. The outcome of these lawsuits is uncertain and subject to inherent uncertainties, and the actual costs to be incurred will depend upon many unknown factors. We may be forced to expend significant resources in the defense of these suits, and we may not prevail. Defending against these and other lawsuits in the future may not only require us to incur significant legal fees and expenses, but may become time-consuming for us and detract from our ability to fully focus our internal resources on our business activities. The results of any legal proceeding cannot be predicted with certainty due to the uncertainty inherent in litigation, the difficulty of predicting decisions of regulators, judges and juries and the possibility that decisions may be reversed on appeal. There can be no assurances that these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or operating results. Competition from better-capitalized companies affects prices and our ability to acquire both properties and personnel. There is global competition for uranium/vanadium properties, ore processing mills, capital, customers and the employment and retention of qualified personnel. In the production and marketing of uranium and vanadium, there are a number of producing entities, some of which are government controlled and all of which are significantly larger and better capitalized than we are. Many of these organizations also have substantially greater financial, technical, manufacturing and distribution resources than we have. Our uranium production also competes with uranium recovered from the de-enrichment of highly enriched uranium obtained from the dismantling of United States and Russian nuclear weapons and imports to the United States of uranium from the former Soviet Union and from the sale of uranium inventory held by the DoE. In addition, there are numerous entities in the market that compete with us for properties and mills and are attempting to become licensed to operate ISR and/or underground mining facilities. If we are unable to successfully compete for properties, mills, capital, customers or employees or with alternative uranium sources, it could have a materially adverse effect on our results of operations. Because we have limited capital, inherent mining risks pose a significant threat to us compared with our larger competitors. Because we have limited capital, we may be unable to withstand significant losses that can result from inherent risks associated with mining, including environmental hazards, industrial accidents, flooding, earthquake, interruptions due to weather conditions and other acts of nature which larger competitors could withstand. Such risks could result in damage to or destruction of our infrastructure and production facilities, as well as to adjacent properties, personal injury, environmental damage and processing and production delays, causing monetary losses and possible legal liability. Our business could be harmed if we lose the services of our key personnel. Our business and mineral exploration programs depend upon our ability to employ the services of geologists, engineers and other experts. In operating our business and in order to continue our programs, we compete for the services of professionals with other mineral exploration companies and businesses. Our ability to maintain and expand our business and continue our exploration programs may be impaired if we are unable to continue to employ or engage those parties currently providing services and expertise to us or identify and engage other qualified personnel to do so in their place. To retain key personnel, we may face increased compensation costs, including potential new stock incentive grants and there can be no assurance that the incentive measures we implement will be successful in helping us retain our key personnel.   20 If we fail to maintain proper and effective internal controls, our ability to produce accurate and timely consolidated financial statements could be impaired, which could harm our operating results, our ability to operate our business and investors’ views of us. Ensuring that we have adequate internal financial and accounting controls and procedures in place so that we can produce accurate consolidated financial statements on a timely basis is a costly and time-consuming effort that will need to be evaluated frequently. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires public companies to conduct an annual review and evaluation of their internal controls. The Company is in the process of reviewing its internal control over financial reporting in the interest of complying with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Our failure to maintain the effectiveness of our internal controls in accordance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act could have a material adverse effect on our business. We could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which could have an adverse effect on the price of our common shares. The Company may be subject to certain tax consequences in its business, which may increase the cost of doing business. The Company may not be able to structure its acquisitions to result in tax-free treatment for the companies or their stockholders, which could deter third parties from entering into certain business combinations with the Company or result in being taxed on consideration received in a transaction. Cyber incidents or cyberattacks directed at us could result in information theft, data corruption, operational disruption and/or financial loss. We depend on digital technologies, including information systems, infrastructure and cloud applications and services, including those of third parties with which we may deal. Sophisticated and deliberate attacks on, or security breaches in, our systems or infrastructure, or the systems or infrastructure of third parties or the cloud, could lead to corruption or misappropriation of our assets, proprietary information and sensitive or confidential data. As an early stage company without significant investments in data security protection, we may not be sufficiently protected against such occurrences. We may not have sufficient resources to adequately protect against, or to investigate and remediate any vulnerability to, cyber incidents. It is possible that any of these occurrences, or a combination of them, could have adverse consequences on our business and lead to financial loss. Our business, financial condition and results of operations may be negatively affected by economic and other consequences from Russia’s military action against Ukraine and the international sanctions imposed in response to that action, as well as from other military conflicts in the Middle East and elsewhere. In late February 2022, Russia launched a large-scale military attack on Ukraine. The invasion significantly amplified already existing geopolitical tensions among Russia, Ukraine, Europe, NATO and the West, including the United States. In response to the military action by Russia, various countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom and European Union issued broad-ranging economic sanctions against Russia and its companies, institutions, officials and oligarchs. Additional sanctions have been and may be imposed in the future. Such sanctions (and any future sanctions) and other actions against Russia may adversely impact, among other things, the Russian economy and various sectors of the economy, including but not limited to, financial, energy, metals and mining, engineering and defense and defense-related materials sectors; result in a decline in the value and liquidity of Russian securities; result in boycotts, tariffs, and purchasing and financing restrictions on Russia’s government, companies and certain individuals; weaken the value of the ruble; downgrade the country’s credit rating; freeze Russian securities and/or funds invested in prohibited assets and impair the ability to trade in Russian securities and/or other assets; and have other adverse consequences on the Russian government, economy, companies and region. Further, several large corporations and U.S. states have announced plans to divest interests or otherwise curtail business dealings with certain Russian businesses. A conflict erupted in the Middle East that has resulted in interruptions to travel, shipping and logistics and creating escalated unrest in the region. Any continuation or escalation of this conflict is likely to result in further risks to the local and worldwide economy, not different from the interruptions discussed above related to the tensions between Russia and Ukraine.   21 The ramifications of the hostilities and sanctions discussed above may not be limited to Russia, Ukraine and the Middle East, as well as Russian, Ukrainian and Middle East based companies and may spill over to and negatively impact other regional and global economic markets (including Europe and the United States), companies in other countries (particularly those that have significant trade with Russia and Ukraine) and on various sectors, industries and markets for securities and commodities globally, such as oil and natural gas. Accordingly, the actions discussed above and the potential for a wider conflict could increase financial market volatility and cause severe negative effects on regional and global economic markets, industries, and companies. In addition, Russia may take retaliatory actions and other countermeasures, including cyberattacks and espionage against other countries and companies around the world, which may negatively impact such countries and companies. The extent and duration of the military action or future escalation of such hostilities, the extent and impact of existing and future sanctions, market disruptions and volatility, and the result of any diplomatic negotiations cannot be predicted. While we expect any direct impacts to our business to be limited, the indirect impacts on the economy, such as recession, and on the mining industry and other industries in general could negatively affect our business and may make it more difficult for us to raise equity or debt financing and/or impair global equity prices, including Western’s. In addition, the impact of other current macro-economic factors on our business, which may be exacerbated by the war in Ukraine – including inflation, supply chain constraints and geopolitical events – is uncertain. We are subject to global economic risks. In the event of a general economic downturn or a recession, there can be no assurance that our business, financial condition and results of operations would not be materially adversely affected. The occurrence of unforeseen or extended catastrophic events, including in particular the emergence of a future pandemic or other widespread health emergency (or concerns over the possibility of such an emergency) could create economic and financial disruptions. These types of challenges can impact commodity prices, including for uranium and vanadium, as well as currencies and global stock markets. In the case of a future pandemic or other widespread health emergency, quarantine or otherwise, requirements or circumstances may require the Company to change the way it conducts its business and operations, including requiring the Company to reduce or cease operations at some or all its facilities for an indeterminate period of time. Furthermore, our critical supply chains may similarly be disrupted for an indeterminate amount of time. All these factors could have a material impact on the Company’s business, operations, personnel and financial condition. These types of challenges may impact our ability to obtain equity, debt or other financing on terms commercially reasonable to us, or at all. Additionally, these types of factors, as well as other related factors, may cause decreases in asset values that are deemed to be other than temporary, which may result in impairment losses. If these types of challenges occur, or if there is a material deterioration in general business and economic conditions, our operations could be adversely impacted and the trading price of our securities could be adversely affected. In the event of the occurrence of these global risk events, our business could be severely impacted, including: ● interruption of key mining activities due to limitations on travel, gathering, or business operations imposed or recommended by federal or state governments, employers and others. ● limitations in employee resources, including because of sickness of employees or their families or the desire of employees to avoid contact with large groups of people. ● delays in financial reporting and filings due to the impact of mitigation efforts on staff and service providers ● changes in local regulations as part of a response to a pandemic outbreak which may require us to change the ways in which mining is conducted, which may result in unexpected costs. ● delays in necessary interactions with regulators and other important agencies and contractors due to limitations in employee resources or new procedures due to limitations otherwise imposed. ● reduction in the global demand for uranium and/or vanadium due to reduced primary applications of uranium (nuclear power generation) and vanadium (steelmaking).   22 Changing global and regional political and economic conditions, including changes in U.S. laws and policies regulating international trade, including the imposition of import tariffs, changes to regulations affecting cross-border trade and transactions, trade and other disputes between the United States and other jurisdictions could adversely impact our business. Recent political and economic shifts, both domestic and international, may create uncertainty and pose risks to our operations and business. Government policies related to protectionism, economic nationalism and attitudes toward multinational corporations have recently resulted in, and could result in additional, regulatory changes, trade barriers, or investment restrictions. Additionally, international trade disputes – including tariffs, counter-tariffs, export controls, sanctions and currency regulations – may increase costs, further disrupt supply chains, and have other negative impacts on our business and operating models. Furthermore, market volatility, driven by shifts in U.S. and foreign trade policies, fluctuating interest rates or currency controls, may affect commodity prices, capital availability and investor confidence. Even the perception of these risks could lead to reduced investment, higher production and operating costs, and other operational challenges. If such trends continue, they may have a material adverse effect on our business and financial performance. It is difficult to estimate the potential impact on our business. To the extent these conditions adversely affect our business as discussed, they may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks described in this Item 1A such as those relating to cyber-security, supply chain, inflationary and other volatility in prices of goods and materials, and the condition of the markets including as related to our ability to access additional capital, any of which could negatively affect our business. Risks Related to Our Stock If we are unable to raise additional capital, our business may fail and shareholders may lose their entire investment. We had $5,620,630 in cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2025. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional capital after we exhaust our current cash. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance of such securities would likely result in substantial dilution to existing shareholders. If we borrow money, we will have to pay interest and may also have to agree to restrictions that limit our operating flexibility. If additional capital is not available in sufficient amounts or on a timely basis, we will experience liquidity problems, and we could face the need to significantly curtail current operations, change our planned business strategies and pursue other remedial measures. Any curtailment of business operations would have a material negative effect on operating results, the value of our outstanding stock is likely to fall, and our business may fail, causing our shareholders to lose their entire investment. Shareholders could be diluted if we were to use common shares to raise capital. We may need to seek additional capital to carry our business plan. This financing could involve one or more types of securities including common shares, convertible debt or warrants to acquire common shares. These securities could be issued at or below the then prevailing market price for our common shares. Any issuance of additional common shares could be dilutive to existing shareholders and could adversely affect the market price of our common shares. The Company’s common shares may at times be traded in low volumes, which may negatively affect your ability to sell shares. The Company’s common shares may trade at times in low volumes on both the CSE and OTCQX, meaning that the number of persons interested in purchasing our common shares at or near bid prices at any given time may be relatively small. This situation may be attributable to a number of factors, including the fact that we are a small company that is relatively unknown to stock analysts, stock brokers, institutional investors and others in the investment community who can generate or influence sales volume, and that even if we came to the attention of such institutionally oriented persons, they tend to be risk-averse in this environment and would be reluctant to follow an early stage company such as ours or purchase or recommend the purchase of our shares until such time as we became more advanced and viable. As a consequence, there may be periods of several days or more when trading activity in the Company’s shares is minimal, as compared to a seasoned issuer which has a large and steady volume of trading activity that will generally support continuous sales without an adverse effect on share price. The Company cannot give you any assurance that a broader or more active public trading market for our common shares will develop or be sustained. Due to these conditions, we can give you no assurance that you will be able to sell your shares at or near bid prices or at all if you need money or otherwise desire to liquidate your shares. Further, certain institutional and other investors may have investment guidelines that restrict or prohibit investing in securities traded in the over-the-counter market. These factors may have an adverse impact on the trading and price of our securities and could result in the loss by investors of all or part of their investment.   23 The Company’s common share price may be volatile. The future trading price of the Company’s common shares may be volatile and may fluctuate substantially. The price of the common shares may be higher or lower than the price you pay for your shares, depending on many factors, some of which are beyond the Company’s control and may not be directly related to its operating performance. These factors include the following: ● price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from time to time; ● significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of securities of mineral exploration and mining companies; ● changes in government regulations or regulatory policies with respect to mineral exploration and mining companies or in the status of our regulatory approvals; ● actual or anticipated changes in earnings or fluctuations in operating results; ● announcements by us or by our competitors of acquisitions or of new products, commercial relationships or capital commitments; ● disruption to our operations or those of other contractors critical to our operations; ● the emergence of new competitors; ● commencement of, or our involvement in, litigation; ● dilutive issuances of our common shares or the incurrence of additional debt; ● adoption of new or different accounting standards; ● general economic conditions and trends and slow or negative growth of related markets; ● loss of a major funding source; or ● departures of key personnel. Due to the continued potential volatility of its stock price, the Company may be the target of securities litigation in the future. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources from the business. The sale of shares by our directors and officers may adversely affect the market price for our shares. Sales of significant amounts of common shares held by our officers and directors, or the prospect of these sales, could adversely affect the market price of our common shares. Management’s stock ownership may discourage a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us, which in turn could reduce our stock price or prevent our shareholders from realizing a premium over our stock price. We have never paid or declared any dividends on our common shares. We have never paid or declared any dividends on our common shares or preferred stock. Likewise, we do not anticipate paying dividends or distributions on our common shares. Any future dividends on common shares will be declared, if at all, at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend, among other things, on our earnings, our financial requirements for future operations and growth, and other facts as we may then deem appropriate.   24 Fluctuations in the market price of our common shares are often outside the control of the Company and could materially impact securityholders’ investments in the Company and the Company’s access to capital. Market sentiment and trading in an issuer’s shares can also be impacted by its inclusion in, or exclusion from, certain equity benchmarks and/or investable indices. For example, due to changes in an index’s eligibility requirements or falling below minimum thresholds, our common shares could be removed from an ETF or similar vehicles based upon that underlying index. This removal could have a negative impact on the market price of our common shares, as certain shareholders who allocate investments according to that underlying index could be required to sell our common shares for reasons that are unrelated to the Company’s operating results, underlying asset values or prospects. Our Chief Executive Officer is our largest shareholder, and as a result he may be able to exert control over us and may have actual or potential interests that may diverge from yours. George Glasier, our CEO, beneficially owns, in the aggregate, about 8.7% of our common shares. As a result, Mr. Glasier might be able to influence many matters requiring shareholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of mergers and other significant corporate transactions. This concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying, preventing or deterring a change in control, and could deprive our shareholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their common shares as part of a sale of our company and may affect the market price of our stock. Furthermore, Mr. Glasier may have interests that diverge from those of other holders of our common shares. As a result, Mr. Glasier may vote the shares he owns or controls or otherwise cause us to take actions that may conflict with your best interests as a shareholder, which could adversely affect our results of operations and the trading price of our common shares. Through this control, Mr. Glasier can exert influence over our management, affairs and all matters requiring shareholder approval, including the approval of significant corporate transactions, a sale of our company, decisions about our capital structure and the composition of our board of directors. Risks Related to Our Regulatory Environment The SEC’s adoption of the “Modernization of Property Disclosures for Mining Registrants,” as codified in S-K 1300, created new disclosure requirements for mineral reserves and mineral resources that create some ambiguity for issuers required to comply with both the requirements of S-K 1300 and NI 43-101 and may result in increased compliance costs. SEC Industry Guide 7 has been rescinded and replaced by S-K 1300, which requires that we disclose specific information related to our material mining operations, including with particularity any mineral resources and mineral reserves. Although we have established the existence of mineralized materials on our uranium properties, we have not established any measured mineral resources or any proven or probable reserves through the completion of a feasibility study for any of our uranium properties and we have no current plans to seek to do so, as it would not serve a business purpose at the present time. Nevertheless, if in the future we were to seek to identify any measured mineral resources or to establish any proven or probable reserves, we would be required to provide disclosure in that regard under both S-K 1300 and NI 43-101. While S-K 1300 is substantively similar to NI 43-101 (with the primary difference being between the format required for an S-K 1300 technical report summary and the format required for an NI 43-101 technical report), we would incur additional costs from having to comply with both sets of regulatory requirements, and since S-K 1300 is potentially subject to unknown interpretations, the Company could be required to incur substantial additional costs associated with compliance. We cannot predict the nature of any future enforcement, interpretation, or application of S-K 1300. Any further revisions to, or interpretations of, S-K 1300 or NI 43-101 could result our company incurring unforeseen costs associated with compliance with both of those disclosure regimes. ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS None   25 ITEM 1C. CYBERSECURITY We acknowledge the increasing importance of cybersecurity in today’s digital and interconnected world. Cybersecurity threats pose significant risks to the integrity of our systems and data, potentially impacting our business operations, financial condition and reputation. As a smaller reporting company, we currently do not have formalized cybersecurity measures, a dedicated cybersecurity team or specific protocols in place to manage cybersecurity risks. Our approach to cybersecurity is in the developmental stage, and we have not yet conducted comprehensive risk assessments, established an incident response plan or engaged with external cybersecurity consultants for assessments or services. We have not experienced any significant cybersecurity incidents to date. However, we recognize that the absence of a formalized cybersecurity framework may leave us vulnerable to cyberattacks, data breaches and other cybersecurity incidents. Such events could potentially lead to unauthorized access to, or disclosure of, sensitive information, disrupt our business operations, result in regulatory fines or litigation costs and negatively impact our reputation among investors, shareholders, customers and partners. We are in the process of evaluating our cybersecurity needs and developing appropriate measures to enhance our cybersecurity posture. This includes considering the engagement of external cybersecurity experts to advise on best practices, conducting vulnerability assessments and developing an incident response strategy. Our goal is to establish a cybersecurity framework that is commensurate with our size, complexity and the nature of our operations, thereby reducing our exposure to cybersecurity risks. In addition, our Board of Directors (the “Board”) will oversee any cybersecurity risk management framework and a dedicated committee of the Board or an officer appointed by the Board will review and approve any cybersecurity policies, strategies and risk management practices. Despite our efforts to improve our cybersecurity measures, there can be no assurance that our initiatives will fully mitigate the risks posed by cyber threats. The landscape of cybersecurity risks is constantly evolving, and we will continue to assess and update our cybersecurity measures in response to emerging threats. For a discussion of potential cybersecurity risks affecting us, please refer to the “Risk Factors” section of this Annual Report.   26 ITEM 2. PROPERTIES Company headquarters is maintained at 5 Church Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5E 1M2. An operations facility is rented at 31617 Hwy 90 Road, Nucla, Colorado, USA which houses the Kinetic Separation units and a shop office. In 2022, the rental of a new mining operations office was added at 31525 Hwy 90 Road, Nucla, Colorado, USA. The diagram below illustrates the location of the Company’s properties: 1. Sunday Mine Complex 2. San Rafael 3. Sage 4. Dunn 5. Van 4 6. Hansen/Taylor Ranch 7. Bullen Property (Weld County) 8. Maverick Minerals Mill Site (Emery County) 9. Mustang Mineral Mill Site (Montrose County) 10. Uranium Ridge Overview Western Uranium & Vanadium Corp is engaged in the business of exploring, developing, mining and production from its uranium and vanadium resource properties. On September 16, 2015, in connection with the Black Range Transaction, the Company acquired additional mineral properties. The mining assets acquired through Black Range included assets in the states of Colorado, Wyoming, and Alaska. None of these mining assets are operational at this time. As these properties have not formally established proven or probable reserves, there may be greater inherent uncertainty as to whether or not any mineralized material can be economically extracted as originally planned and anticipated.   27 The Company’s mining properties acquired on August 18, 2014 that the Company retains as of December 31, 2025, include: ● San Rafael Uranium Project located in Emery County, Utah ● The Sunday Mine Complex located in western San Miguel County, Colorado ● The Van 4 Mine located in western Montrose County, Colorado ● The Sage Mine project located in San Juan County, Utah and San Miguel County, Colorado ● Dunn Project located in San Juan County, Utah. The Company’s mining properties acquired on September 16, 2015 that the Company retains as of December 31, 2025, include: ● Hansen, North Hansen, High Park, and Hansen Picnic Tree, located in Fremont and Teller Counties, Colorado ● The Keota Uranium project acreage located in Weld County, Colorado ● Ferris Haggerty located in Carbon County, Wyoming The Company has a 100% interest in the Hansen/Taylor Ranch Project properties that it has elected to retain. Although we have established the existence of mineralized materials on our uranium properties, we have not established any measured, indicated or inferred mineral resources or any proven or probable reserves through the completion of a feasibility study for any of our uranium properties and we have no current plans to seek to do so, as it would not serve a business purpose at the present time. The near term plan for the Company’s resources is to initially mine at the Sunday Complex. The Sunday Mine Complex is an advanced stage property with a significant drilling and production history. Mining and drilling occurred contemporaneously from the 1950’s through the mid 1980’s. From the 1980’s to the present, mining and drilling occurred only sporadically, typically when uranium or vanadium prices were high. The last previous mining interval was from 2006 to 2009. Based on the available records, only in 2009 did any surface drilling take place since mid-1980. Past operators have generated abundant geologic and mining data, and there are open faces underground that show mineralized zones. Near term exploration is not needed because the underground infrastructure has been already developed. Mining Properties Set forth below are details regarding our mining properties operated by us, which have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of S-K 1300. 1. Sunday Mines Complex The Property The Sunday Mine Complex is located in western San Miguel County and is part of the Uravan Mineral Belt. The property is situated 25 miles north of Dove Creek, Colorado, on the north flank of Disappointment Valley and portions of Big Gypsum Valley. Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. (“EFR”) acquired the property in June 2012 from Denison Mines Corp. The complex consists of five individual mines with mine workings located along a two mile stretch of the southern side of Big Gypsum Valley, with underground workings extending generally south, with associated vents and surface facilities. The mines are, from east to west: Sunday, Carnation, Saint Jude, West Sunday, and Topaz. The mines were previously actively mined from 2007 to 2009, by a prior owner. In 2017, the mines were re-opening for a project involving exploration, development, and mining. The property consists of 221 unpatented claims on public land managed by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) Tres Rios Field Office, covering approximately 3,800 acres. The area covers parts of sections 10, 13, 14, 15, 23, 24, and 26 T44N R18W, and sections 18, 19, 20, and 30 T44N R17W. Total annual BLM claim maintenance fees are approximately $36,465 due September 1st each year. The property has access to grid power and has a natural underground source of water due to an aquifer. As a mine that has produced in the recent past, the Sunday Mine Complex has a robust infrastructure. The roads are all-weather, electric power is grid-tied, surface facility structures that meet Colorado State standards exist, and water is present. During 2019, Western restarted these mines and after pausing for COVID-19, these mines have reengaged in active mining operations.   28 Claims for the Sunday Mine Complex carry a 1.0% royalty on all ore produced, also, in addition, the GMG, Sunshine, and Patsun claims (totaling twenty claims in the northeast portion of the property) carry a 12.5% royalty on all ore produced. Accessibility The property is best accessed from Colorado. Access from Colorado is via State Highway 141 east out of Naturita, CO for about 3.7 mi (6 km) until the 141/145 Highway junction, then about 22.4 mi (36 km) south on Hwy 141, then about 6.2 mi (10 km) northwest on County Road 20R (Gypsum Valley Road). The State Highway 141 is a paved all-weather road and the County Road 20R is a gravel road passable in all but the worst weather. History The Sunday Mine Complex consists of five different mines. These are the Topaz, West Sunday, Sunday, St. Jude, and Carnation. The mines have had a number of owners and operators. Maps and documents made available to the author show that the following companies have been involved in the all or parts of the property prior to WUC acquisition of the Sunday Mine Complex Uranium (“SMC”) in April 2014: Matterhorn Mining (1950’s-1960’s, Climax Uranium 1960’s, Union Carbide Corporation (UCC) 1970’s-1980’s, Atlas Minerals (1980’s), Energy Fuels Nuclear (early 1990’s), International Uranium Corp. (1990’s-2000’s), Denison Mines (USA) (2000’s), and Energy Fuels (2010’s). The documents are incomplete as so this list may be as well. Since UCC days, the ownership has been clear. In 1983 Union Carbide transferred its mineral interests to UMETCO, a wholly-owned subsidiary. For the sake of consistency, the name Union Carbide will be used even if technically the ownership was UMETCO at the time. Records made available by the Company and a search of public documents on-line indicates exploration drilling starting on the property in the early 1950’s. Two Defense Minerals Exploration Administration (DMEA) reports, one on the Sunday area and the other on the Topaz area, indicated some drilling and minor surface extraction had occurred by the mid 1950’s (DMEA, 1953 & 1956). Additionally, historic maps of the area show the Sunday mines in operation in the 1950’s (Denison Mines, 2008). The records & anecdotal evidence indicate that from the mid-1960’s until the early 1980’s, the SMC produced material from relatively steady ongoing mining operations. These ceased in 1984 when Union Carbide closed their Uravan mill. Since then, the property has been idle, with the exception of brief periods in the late 1980’s when UCC mined for a short time during a spike in vanadium prices, in the mid-1990’s with International Uranium Corporation and another one in 2006-2009 when Denison Mines extracted ore from the mine. During all three periods, the ore was processed at the White Mesa Mill located just south of Blanding, UT. Exploration and development drilling on the property was contemporaneous with the mining. The available database records show that at least 1,419 holes have been drilled on the property. This is an incomplete list, as an examination of the available maps and cross-sections show a number of holes that are not in the database. A best estimate for total distance drilled is about 850,100 ft (259,175 m). Anecdotal evidence and some maps also give evidence that underground long holes (test holes drilled from the mine workings anywhere from 50 ft (15 m) to 300 ft (91 m) long) were used extensively throughout the mined areas. The 2-D digitized mine workings, done by Denison Mines show extensive stopping and drifting within parts of the SMC. Generational mine maps indicate that more mine workings exist than are shown in the digital database. A very conservative rough estimate of the linear mine workings based on the digital database is in excess of 50,000 ft (15,244 m) with many stopes. Figure 6.2.1 shows the known drill hole and mine working locations. Based on the records and on field inspection, it is evident that the Property has a significant history of drill exploration and mine development. Anthony R. Adkins, P. Geol., LLC was commissioned by the Company to prepare a technical report compliant with NI 43-101 on the Sunday Mine Complex Uranium (SMC) Project (the “Sunday Mine Report”). The Sunday Mine Report was finalized on July 7, 2015 and filed on sedar.com on July 16, 2015. The Sunday Mine Report is an historic estimate of measured and indicated resources (not reserves) under NI 43-101. However, the Company is not treating the historical estimate as current mineral resources, and S-K 1300 does not permit such historic estimates to be disclosed in Form 10-K annual reports. There is no more recent data available on the Sunday Mine Complex project resource than that of the Sunday Mine Report. In order to disclose a resource estimate as current, the Company would need to engage a qualified person (as defined under 43-101 and S-K 1300) to, among other things, take account of any exploration or other work on the Sunday Mine Complex since the date of the historical estimate and produce a technical report compliant with NI 43-101 and a feasibility study compliant with S-K 1300. The Company currently does not intend to commission such a technical report or feasibility study.   29 Project Geology Geologically, the main hosts for uranium-vanadium mineralization in the Sunday Mine Complex are fluvial sandstone beds assigned to the upper part of the Salt Wash Member of the Jurassic Morrison Formation, with minor production coming from conglomeratic sandstones assigned to the lower portion of the Brushy Basin Member of the Morrison Formation. Mineralization from both members is present at the property, with the mine production coming from the Salt Wash Member. Beds generally strike NW-SE and dip SW, with some exceptions within fault bounded blocks adjacent to Big Gypsum Valley. Restoration and Reclamation Each of the mines are permitted separately with the DRMS. The mines and their permitted acres and financial warranties are, from east to west, the Sunday (60 acres, $523,126), Carnation (9.8 acres, $54,849), Saint Jude (9.8 acres, $108,830), West Sunday (12.1 acres, $126,940), and Topaz (30 acres, $173,529). Permitting Status The air permits for the site are currently being renewed with APCD. A Stormwater permit is in place with the WQCD and a Stormwater Management Plan is in effect. However, a mine water treatment plant may need to be permitted for treating mine water, as there is currently 55 million gallons of water in the lower portion of the mine where most of the remaining resource is located. This will require a discharge permit with the WQCD and revisions to the Plan of Operations, EPP, and one of the DRMS mine permits. Special Use Permits are also in place with San Miguel County, which mainly address road maintenance and transportation issues with some limitations in effect on when and how many trucks may be used for ore haulage to the mill. The Company has been working toward the completion of an updated Topaz Mine Plan of Operations (“Topaz Mine Plan”), which is a separate federal requirement of the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) for the conduct of mining activities on the federal land at the Topaz Mine. This is a prerequisite to re-permit the Topaz Mine with Colorado’s DRMS. In connection with the Topaz Mine Plan, an environmental assessment was prepared by an outside consultant and submitted to the BLM on June 24, 2024. The BLM issued a letter to the Company on August 2, 2024 advising that the application for the Topaz Mine Plan had run past the allowed evaluation period and was cancelled. Pursuant to the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023, the Company has a one year time limit for BLM reviews. Under the transitional rules, the Topaz project was not eligible for an extension due to its duration. However, the project can be resubmitted and be picked up where it was left off. The re-scoping process will need to be repeated to start the one year time clock. Consultants are conducting new work toward gathering additional inputs for the BLM resubmission, but have not yet restarted the BLM clock by making an amended submission. Major permits currently in place at the Sunday Complex include: ● Sunday 112d Mine Permit M-1977-285 (DRMS) ● St. Jude 110d Mine Permit M-1978-039-HR (DRMS) ● West Sunday 112d Mine Permit M-1981-021 (DRMS) ● Carnation 110d Mine Permit M-1977-416 (DRMS) ● Topaz 112d Mine Permit M-1980-055-HR (DRMS) ● West Sunday Plan of Operations COC 52049 (BLM) ● Sunday, St. Jude and Carnation Plan of Operations COC-53227 (BLM) ● Resolution #1997-18 Mine Permit (San Miguel County) ● Resolution 2007-34 Topaz and Sunday Expansion (San Miguel County) ● Resolution 2008-41 Increased Ore Haulage (San Miguel County) ● Road & Bridge Special Construction Permit (SCP) 06-14 (San Miguel County)   30 2. San Rafael The Property The San Rafael Uranium Project land position is comprised of a contiguous claim block covered by 136 BM unpatented federal lode mining claims and 10 Hollie unpatented federal lode mining claims. The San Rafael Project is located in the historic Tidwell District about 10 miles west of Green River, Utah. Most of the property is north of Interstate Highway 70 at the Hanksville exit. Energy Fuels became operator of the San Rafael Project when it acquired Magnum Minerals in June 2009. It consisted of two core uranium deposits, the Deep Gold and the Down Yonder. In January 2011, EFR acquired the 10 Hollie claims from Titan Uranium. These claims covered the eastern portion of the Deep Gold deposit, greatly increasing resources. WUC acquired the property from Energy Fuels and currently holds the 146 claims in the project area. The San Rafael Uranium Project is currently being held as a property that is exploratory in nature with no identified reserves. Exploration and mining plans have not been prepared for the project. The Company has not yet undertaken any development work at the property. Power and water sources have not yet been formally assessed. Magnum’s acquisition of the claims and some of the data Magnum purchased encumbers the claims. This includes a 2% Net Smelter Return royalty to Uranium One, successor to Energy Metals for claims acquired by Magnum as earn-in to a JV, and a 2% net sales price royalty to Kelly Dearth on the BM claims. There is no royalty on the Hollie claims. The unpatented claims are located on approximately 2,900 acres of land administered by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management in sections 13, 14, 23, 24, 25, 26, and 35, T21S, R14E, SLPM, Emery County, Utah. Holding cost $43,800 due to BLM for claim maintenance fees prior to September 1 each year. During 2024, the Company conducted work to make the San Rafael Uranium Project its second mining production center. Western has acquired an exploration permit which will allow the installation of monitor wells as a next step.   31 Accessibility The property is located on the eastern side of the San Rafael Swell in east-central Utah, approximately 140 air miles southeast of Salt Lake City. The little desert community of Green River, Utah is located about ten miles to the east. In a general sense the San Rafael Uranium Project property position lies within a wedge shaped area, roughly bound along its northeast edge by US Highway 6-50 and along its southeast edge by Interstate 70. Concerning additional local access features, U.S. Highway 6-50 crosses just north of the greater San Rafael Uranium Project area in a northwesterly direction and is roughly paralleled by the regional railroad line. Access to the property is generally good year around, except for periods of heavy snowstorms during December through February and increased monsoon rains and summer cloudburst storms during August through October. Access for drilling and other exploration activity is excellent, except during occasional heavy rainy periods which can create heavy flash flooding and roads mudding-up and becoming impassable. History The Deep Gold deposit was originally discovered by Continental Oil Company (Conoco) and Pioneer Uravan geologists in the late 1960s and 1970s to early 1980s, respectively. Exploration drilling was conducted just east of the core of the Tidwell Mineral Belt and north-northeast of the Acerson Mineral Belt. The area containing the deposits was considered to contain highly prospective paleo trunk stream channel trends. Some of the larger historic producing mines in the area were Atlas Minerals’ Snow, Probe, and Lucky Mines. The deposit in the San Rafael Project is an open concordant, channel-controlled, sandstone-hosted, trend type, with mineralization hosted in the upper sandstone sequence of the Salt Wash Member of the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation. In addition to Conoco, Pioneer Uravan, and Atlas Minerals, the US Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) and other companies (Union Carbide, Energy Fuels Nuclear, and others) conducted exploration drilling and mining in the area. Some of these companies performed historic resource estimates on the Deep Gold deposits, but they are not considered compliant with NI 43-101 standards. Depth to mineralization at the Deep Gold deposit in Section 23 averages 800 feet, with hole depths averaging approximately 1,000 feet. Magnum purchased and otherwise acquired most of the available historic exploration data produced by the previous operators. A 100 hole, 100,000 foot drilling program is warranted to discover and define additional uranium resources. Total cost for this work would be $US 1.3 million to $US 1.5 million, based on an all-inclusive cost of $US 15/foot. The Tidwell Mineral Belt and the San Rafael Uranium District have been the sites of considerable historic exploration drilling and production, with over 4 million pounds of uranium and 5.4 million pounds of vanadium produced. Production from the Snow, immediately up dip of the Deep Gold deposit, which produced for nine years, starting in March 1973 and ending in January, 1982 consisted of 650,292 pounds of U3O8 contained in 173,330 tons of material at an average grade of 0.188% U3O8 (Wilbanks, 1982). O. Jay Gatten, P. Geol., LLC was commissioned by the Company to prepare an independent technical report compliant with NI 43-101 on the San Rafael Uranium Project (including the: Deep Gold Uranium Deposit and the Down Yonder Uranium Deposit) (the “San Rafael Report”). The San Rafael Report was finalized on November 19, 2014 and filed on sedar.com on November 20, 2015. The San Rafael Report is an historic estimate of indicated and inferred uranium resources (not measured resources or reserves) under NI 43-101. However, the Company is not treating the historical estimate as current mineral resources, and S-K 1300 does not permit such historic estimates to be disclosed in Form 10-K annual reports. There is no more recent data available on the San Rafael Uranium Project property than that of the San Rafael Report. In order to disclose a resource estimate as current, the Company would need to engage a qualified person (as defined under 43-101 and S-K 1300) to produce a technical report compliant with NI 43-101 and a feasibility study compliant with S-K 1300. The Company currently does not intend to commission such a technical report or feasibility study. Project Geology Geologically, the main hosts for uranium-vanadium mineralization in the San Rafael Project are the fluvial sandstone beds assigned to the upper part of the Salt Wash Member of the Jurassic Morrison Formation. Restoration and Reclamation A financial warranty is posted with the State of Utah Division of Oil, Gas and Mining for the amount of $61,403 (2 acres). Permitting Status All exploration permits have been terminated and related bonding released. An EA was completed by BLM in 2008 for drilling up to 150 holes. A large area has been surveyed for cultural and paleontological resources which would expedite future exploration permits. No mine permitting activities have yet occurred.   32 Although the mine is permitted (E/015/0293) and bonded ($61,403) for exploration, it is not permitted for mining. Existing permits include: Exploration permit. 3. Sage The Property On July 1, 2014 PRM concluded a deal with EFR to acquire 44 contiguous unpatented mining claims on the Utah side of the Colorado-Utah state line at the head of Summit Canyon at the south end of the Uravan Mineral Belt. The 94 unpatented claims are located on approximately 1,942 acres land administered by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management in sections 34 and 35, T32S, R26E, SLPM, San Juan County, Utah and sections 25 and 26, T43N, R20W, NMPM, and sections 19, 29, 30, 31, and 32, T43N, R19W, NMPM San Miguel County, Colorado. Holding cost is $18,800 due to BLM for claim maintenance fees prior to September 1 each year. The property has access to grid power, however, no source of industrial water has yet been identified. The Sage Mine Project is currently being held as a property that is exploratory in nature with no identified reserves. Exploration and mining plans have not been prepared for the project. Western Uranium & Vanadium Corp. is currently evaluating conducting rehabilitation at the mine and is pursuing the next steps required. Western Uranium & Vanadium Corp has not yet undertaken any development work at the property.   33 Accessibility The Sage Plain Project property can be accessed from the north, south, and east on paved, all-weather county roads. The nearest towns with stores, restaurants, lodging, and small industrial supply retailers are Monticello, Utah, 26 road miles to the west, and Dove Creek, Colorado, 20 road miles to the southeast. Larger population centers with more supplies and services are available farther away at Moab, Utah (61 road miles to the north) and Cortez, Colorado (54 road miles to the southeast). U.S. Highway 491 connects Monticello, Utah to Dove Creek and Cortez, Colorado. There are two routes north from this highway to the project. At one mile west of the Colorado/Utah state line (16 miles east of Monticello or 10 miles west of Dove Creek), San Juan County Road 370 goes north for 10 miles to the Calliham Mine portal site drive way. The mine portal is one-half mile east of Road 370, on a private road. An alternate route is to turn north on Colorado Highway 141(2 miles west of Dove Creek) for 9.5 miles to Egnar, Colorado, then turn west on San Miguel County. Road H1 for 1.2 miles before intersecting San Juan County Road 370. Road 370 would be taken north for 4 miles to the Calliham Mine portal site driveway. Road H1 from Egnar would also be used if one was traveling to the project on Highway 141 from farther north in Colorado, such as Naturita, Colorado (a total of 62 miles away). History The property includes the historic producing Sage Mine and boarders the famous Deremo Mine and the Calliham Mine (combined historic production of over 8 million lbs of U3O8 and 70 million lbs of V 2 O 5 ). The uranium-vanadium deposits occur in the upper and middle sandstones of the Salt Wash Member of the Morrison Formation. WUC is in possession of historic mine and drill maps. About 200 historic holes were drilled on the claims at the Sage Mine. A considerable, but unknown amount of drilling occurred historically on the eastern (Colorado) part of the claims along the benches of Summit and Bishop Canyons. Historic production from several small mines occurred on the Colorado claims (Red Ant, Black Spider, etc.). The Sage Mine was developed, operated, and permitted by Atlas Minerals in the 1970s. It closed in 1982 and was ultimately sold and the permit transferred to Butt Mining Company under a Small Mine NOI. Jim Butt operated the mine for a short time in the early 1990s when vanadium prices were high; however, the mine has been idle since that time. In the fall of 2011, Colorado Plateau Partners drilled seven holes totaling 4,873 feet at the Sage Mine property to confirm historic map data and explore for a possible east-west channel connecting the mine to a mineralized body to the west. The drilling was successful in meeting the objectives of confirming the accuracy of the historic data and verifying a historically defined mineralized body. One hole exploring a possible mineralized trend connecting the mine to the western mineralized body intercepted 2.0 feet of 0.407% eU 3 O 8 . Another hole intercepted mineralization greater than 1.0 foot of 0.16% eU 3 O 8 . Prior to the Company’s acquisition of the Sage Mine property, Energy Fuels, Colorado Plateau Partners (a Joint Venture between Energy Fuels and Lynx-Royal) completed a NI 43-101 technical report on the Sage Plain Project (Technical Report on Colorado Plateau Partners LLC (Energy Fuel Resources Corporation/Lynx-Royal JV) Sage Plain Project, San Juan County, Utah and San Miguel County, Colorado by Douglas C. Peters, Certified Professional Geologist, Peters Geosciences Golden, Colorado December 16, 2011) (the “Sage Mine Energy Fuels Report”). The Sage Mine Energy Fuels Report resource is an historic estimate of mineral resources (not reserves) under NI 43-101. The Company is not treating the historical estimate as current mineral resources, and S-K 1300 does not permit such historic estimates to be disclosed in Form 10-K annual reports. Energy Fuels submitted an Exploration NOI to the BLM in March 2013 for the site thereby establishing a nominal permit for the facility. Permitting for mine expansion was started in 2012, but was discontinued due to other priorities. This work included installing 3 monitoring wells around a proposed portable water treatment plant (exploration permit E/037/0188; bond $16,020) and conducting baseline studies (archeology, biology, groundwater). Eight baseline groundwater sampling events have been completed, which will allow for submittal of a complete groundwater discharge permit application to DWQ. Other than offsetting some of the historic drill holes and use of gamma logs where available, no verification of the historical data has been conducted. No core is available at the present time from the earlier exploration or production work. There is no more recent data available on the Sage Mine project resource than that of the Sage Mine Energy Fuels Report. In order to disclose a resource estimate as current, the Company would need to engage a qualified person (as defined under 43-101 and S-K 1300) to produce a technical report compliant with NI 43-101 and a feasibility study compliant with S-K 1300. The Company currently does not intend to commission such a technical report or feasibility study.   34 Project Geology The Sage Plain and nearby Slick Rock and Dry Valley/East Canyon districts uranium vanadium deposits are a similar type to those elsewhere in the Uravan Mineral Belt. The location and shape of mineralized deposits are largely controlled by the permeability of the host sandstone. Most mineralization is in trends where Top Rim sandstones are thick, usually 40 feet or greater. The Sage Plain District appears to be a large channel of Top Rim sandstone which trends northeast, as one of the major trunk channels that is fanning into distributaries in the southern portion of the Uravan Mineral Belt. The Calliham/Crain/Skidmore (Calliham Mine) and Sage Mine deposits, as well as nearby Deremo and Wilson/Silverbell mines appear to be controlled by meandering within this main channel. The Morrison sediments accumulated as oxidized detritus in the fluvial environment. During early burial and diagenesis, the through-flowing ground water within the large, saturated pile of Salt Wash and Brushy Basin material remained oxidized, thereby transporting uranium in solution. When the uranium-rich waters encountered the zones of trapped reduced waters, the uranium precipitated. Vanadium may have been leached from the detrital iron-titanium mineral grains and subsequently deposited along with or prior to the uranium. The thickness, the gray color, and pyrite and carbon contents of sandstones, along with gray or green mudstone, were recognized by early workers as significant and still serve as exploration guides. Much of the Top Rim sandstone in the Sage Plain Project area exhibits these favorable features; therefore, portions of the property with only widely spaced drill holes hold potential. However, without the historic drill data, it cannot be determined where sedimentary facies are located (e.g., channel sandstones thin and pinch-out, or sandstone grades and interfingers into pink and red oxidized sandstone and overbank mudstones). Furthermore, locations of interface zones of the oxidized and reduced environments are hard to predict. Until more historic data are obtained and/or more drilling occurs on the property away from the historic mines, these outlying areas remain exploration targets. Restoration and Reclamation A financial warranty is posted with the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board for the amount of $63,819. Permitting Status Although the mine is permitted (S/037/0058) and bonded ($63,819) for reclamation it is not permitted for mining. Because of its location on BLM managed land, an Environmental Impact Assessment will need to be prepared for the site by a third-party contractor once a Plan of Operations is submitted for the mine operation. An amendment to the Small Mine Reclamation NOI will also be needed with Utah Division of Oil Gas and Mining to allow for mine expansion. Existing permits include: Small Mine Reclamation permit with the Utah Division of Oil Gas and Mining. Basis of Disclosure The scientific and technical information provided in this Form 10-K on the Sage Mine, as well all data and exploration information reported in this Form 10-K on the Sage Mine, is based on the information reported in the Sage Mine Energy Fuels Report. 4. Dunn The Property The 11 unpatented claims are located on approximately 220 acres of land administered by the BLM in sections 14 and 15, T32S, R25E, SLPM, San Juan County, Utah. Holding costs of the 11 claims will be $2,200 due to BLM before September 1 each year. The Dunn Project is currently being held as a property that is exploratory in nature with no identified reserves. Exploration and mining plans have not been prepared for the project. Western Uranium & Vanadium Corp. has not yet undertaken any development work at the property. Power and water sources have not yet been formally assessed.   35 Accessibility The property lies in Bear Trap Canyon, a tributary at the head of East Canyon. This is midway between the EFR Rim Mine and the Calliham/Sage mine area. Access to the Dunn project is from West Summit Road (San Juan County Road 313), 10.8 miles north of the junction with U.S. Highway 491. West Summit Road is a two-lane paved road that is well maintained year round. At 10.8 miles, a graveled Class D County Road (unnamed), spurs off of West Summit Road, passes through the leased lands and terminates at the Dunn Portal at approximately 2.1 miles from the spur. The nearest town to the Dunn project is Monticello, Utah which is approximately 65 miles away. The closest commercial airport facilities are located in Cortez, Colorado, approximately 65 miles to the southeast, and Moab, Utah approximately 65 miles to the northwest; both airports have daily commercial flights to-and-from Denver International Airport. History The first discovery of uranium-vanadium mineralization within close proximity to the Dunn project was by Homestake Mining Company in the late 1960s at what would eventually become the Wilson Mine 4 miles to the east. Mineralization associated with the Dunn mine was discovered by Gulf Oil Corporation in the late 1960s, which was subsequently acquired by Homestake, followed by Atlas Minerals in the 1970’s. Between 1975 and 1983 Atlas completed 243 drill holes at the Dunn project with an average total depth of 724 feet. By 1981, Atlas had delineated a resource that could justify the construction of a 3,825 foot decline. The decline successfully reached the perimeter of delineated mineralization, but before any production-mining, Atlas ceased operations in 1983 when faced with financial setbacks that required them to divert funds. In July 2013, Energy Fuels Resources acquired the Dunn Mine property from American Strategic Minerals Corporation and Kyle Kimmerle. Project Geology The Dunn project occurs on structurally unaffected terrain between the gently folded Boulder Knoll anticline to the southwest and the more prominent salt-cored Lisbon Valley anticline to the northeast. The strata beneath the project are relatively flat, and no major faults or folds are expected to disrupt bedding or unit contacts. Uranium-vanadium mineralization at the Dunn is hosted in the Salt Wash Member of the Jurassic Morrison formation which occurs at approximately 500 to 750 feet below the surface. The average depth to the mineralized sandstones within the Salt Wash Member is 650 feet from the surface. The primary uranium mineral is uraninite with minor amounts of coffinite. The primary vanadium mineral is Montroseite. Restoration and Reclamation. No liabilities currently exist. Permitting Status No permits currently exist. Basis of Disclosure The scientific and technical information provided in this Form 10-K on the Dunn Project American Strategic Mineral Corporation is based on information provided in a NI 43-101 technical report prepared by American Strategic Minerals Corporation (the previous owner of the Dunn Project) entitled Technical Report on American Strategic Minerals Corporation’s Dunn Project, San Juan County, Utah by Dr. David A. Gonzales, PhD, PG, Durango, Colorado March 23, 2012. Mr. Gonzales is a qualified person for purposes of NI 43-101. However, none of the data, other exploration information or other results reported in that report are being incorporated into this Form 10-K.   36 5. Van #4 The Property The Van#4 is located in the Uravan Mineral Belt on Monogram Mesa in Montrose County, Colorado. The property had been held by Denison and its predecessors for many years. The property consists of 47 unpatented mining claims covering the mine site and long-known deposit to the east, plus two large claim groups to the north, east, and south with exploration potential. The 80 unpatented claims are located on approximately 1,900 acres land administered by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management in sections 27, 28, 29, 33, and 34, T48N, R17W, NMPM, and some in section 3, T47N, R17W, Montrose County, Colorado. The Holding costs of the 80 claims will be $9,400 due to BLM before September 1 each year. There are no royalties encumbering these claims. The property includes the Van #4 shaft and associated surface facilities, which need renovation. The mine is connected to the Ura decline on claims in Bull Canyon to the southwest, not owned by WUC. It has been on standby for many years. Denison completed reclamation of two of the ventilation holes in 2008 and 2010. The property has access to grid power; however, no source of industrial water has been identified yet. The Van 4 mine is currently being held as a property that is exploratory in nature. Exploration and mining plans have not been prepared for the project. Western Uranium & Vanadium Corp. has not yet undertaken any development work at the property. Power and water sources have not yet been assessed. A prior owner of the Company’s Van 4 Mine had been granted a first Temporary Cessation from reclamation of the mine by the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board (“MLRB”) which was set to expire June 23, 2017. Prior to its expiration, PRM formally requested an extension through a second Temporary Cessation. PRM subsequently participated in a public process which culminated in a hearing on July 26, 2017. Prior to the hearing, three non-profit organizations who pursue environmental and conservation objectives filed a brief objecting to the extension. The MLRB board members voted to grant a second five-year Temporary Cessation for the Van 4 Mine. Thereafter, the three objecting parties filed a lawsuit on September 18, 2017. The MLRB was named as the defendant and PRM was named as a party to the case due to the Colorado law requirement that any lawsuit filed after a hearing must include all of the parties in the proceeding. The plaintiff organizations are seeking for the court to set aside the board order granting a second five-year Temporary Cessation period to PRM for the Van 4 Mine. The Colorado state Attorney General was defending this action in the Denver Colorado District Court. On May 8, 2018, the Denver Colorado District Court ruled in favor, whereby the additional five-year temporary cessation period was granted. The Plaintiffs appealed this ruling to the Colorado Court of Appeals and on July 25, 2019 the ruling was reversed, whereby the additional five-year temporary cessation period should not have been granted. Thereafter, the MLRB and the Colorado Attorney General advised Western that it will not make an additional appeal of the ruling. Further, the time period for an appeal has passed. The Judge has subsequently issued an instruction for the MLRB to issue an order revoking the permit and putting the Van 4 Mine into reclamation. On January 22, 2020, the MLRB held a hearing and afterward on March 2, 2020, the MLRB issued an order vacating the Van 4 Temporary Cessation, terminating mining operations and ordering commencement of final reclamation. The Company has five years to complete the reclamation of the Van 4 Mine. The reclamation commenced in the spring of 2020 and is fully covered by the reclamation bonds posted upon acquisition of the property. Western’s Operations team has completed the last of the reclamation work prior to the reclamation deadline. The Company submitted its Surety Reduction Request application to the CDRMS on January 7, 2026 for a reduction of the financial warranty based on current site conditions and consideration of reclamation activities completed thus far. On March 19, 2026, the CDRMS concluded its review and approved the Company’s request and reduced the financial warranty from $75,057 to $49,350. Accessibility The Van #4 mine is accessible via Montrose County Roads year-round. History The Van#4 was initially permitted in the late 1970s and early 1980s by Union Carbide as part of a number of small mines named the Thunderbolt Group. Energy Fuels Nuclear, Inc. (EFN) acquired the mine in 1984 and then transferred the mine and permits to International Uranium Corporation (IUC) in 1997. IUC re-permitted the mine with DRMS (then known as the Division of Minerals and Geology) in 1999 because the previous permit had included other mines in the area that were not acquired by IUC. Mine Permit M-1997-032 with DRMS is currently in good standing and bonded for $75,057. Amendment AM-1, which incorporated the approved EPP, was issued on May 30, 2012. The permit has been transferred over the years from IUC to Denison Mines (USA) Corp. to Energy Fuels Resources (USA) Inc. and now to WUC by way of PRM.   37 Project Geology The uranium-vanadium deposits occur in the upper and middle sandstones of the Salt Wash Member of the Morrison Formation. Deposits in this part of the Uravan Mineral Belt have a moderate V 2 O 5 : U3O8 ratio. The Company is in possession of much historic mine and drill data (former Union Carbide/Umetco property), as well as up-to-date mine maps. Denison drilled most recently (summer 2008) 21 wide-spaced exploration holes in sections 27 and 34. All have been reclaimed and the permit terminated. Restoration and Reclamation. There is a reclamation bond held by the Colorado DRMS for $75,057. Permitting Status Permit compliance is currently limited to an annual stormwater inspection; stormwater improvement work was completed in 2010 and 2012. The air permit with APCD was recently allowed to lapse, as the company does not have any immediate development or operation plans for the mine. The mine does not have EPA approval for radon emissions; however, this approval may not be needed to restart mining, as the life-of-mine production will likely be less than 100,000 tons. The DRMS mining permit was put into Temporary Cessation in February, 2014. Existing major permits at the mine include: ● BLM Plan of Operations COC-62522 (same as DRMS Permit M-97-032) ● DRMS 110d (Small Mine, DMO) Mine Permit M-97-032   38 6. Hansen/Taylor Ranch The Property Within the Project area, Black Range has mining agreements, owns fee minerals, holds options to purchase fee mineral rights, holds federal unpatented mining claims and mineral leases with the State of Colorado, and has in place surface access agreements, including: - 1 x private Mineral Lease - 1 x State Mineral Lease (UR3324) - 1 x option to purchase 100% of the Hansen and Picnic Tree Deposits - 108 Federal unpatented mining claims The Hansen/Taylor Ranch Project is currently being held as a property that is exploratory in nature with no identified reserves. Neither exploration plans nor a mining plan exist for the project. Black Range Minerals has not undertaken development work at the property since groundwater well installation in 2013. Power and water sources have not yet been formally assessed. The Company owned 49% of the resource property and had an option to purchase the remaining 51% of the resource property that the Company did not already own. In 2019 Western did not exercise the option and the option expired unexercised. Currently, Western still retains 49% of the resource land package. Accessibility The Project is located in Fremont County, in South Central Colorado approximately 30 miles northwest of the city of Canon City. Canon City is the closest population center and had a population of 16,400 in 2010. The largest metropolitan area in close proximity to the Project is Colorado Springs which is located approximately 46 miles northeast of Canon City and has a population of approximately 416,000. Figure 1 shows the locations of these population centers with respect to the Project. For ground travel, Canon City is best accessed from Denver/Colorado Springs via I-25 south to State Highway 115 which intersects Highway 50 just east of Canon City. For air travel, alternatives include the Colorado Springs Municipal Airport (COS), which is a 16-gate facility served by 14 airlines and Denver’s International Airport (DEN), which is 149 miles from Canon City. There is a small airport, Fremont County Airport (CNE), located in Canon City, which is open to private flights. The property has access to grid power; however, no source of industrial water has been identified yet. History Uranium mineralization was discovered in the Tallahassee Creek District in 1954 by two groups of prospectors. Between 1954 and 1972, 16 small open pit and underground mines were operated in the district. Discoveries, and most producing mines and production were in the Tallahassee Creek Conglomerate, with one mine, the Smaller Mine, producing from the Echo Park Formation. Exploration efforts were minimal until Rampart Exploration Company (Rampart), under contract to Cyprus, explored the Taylor Ranch area beginning in 1974 and discovered the Hansen Uranium Deposit along with other uranium deposits in the district. Cyprus took the Hansen and Picnic Tree deposits through a positive final feasibility analysis in 1980 for an open-pit mining and conventional uranium milling operation and secured all necessary operating permits in 1981. The collapse of the uranium market led to Cyprus abandoning the project which lay dormant until Black Range Minerals began activities in late 2006. Black Range Mineral’s Taylor Ranch Project, CO, consists of a combination of private, BLM and State Section minerals, and private, BLM and State Section surface rights. Ownership of the private minerals and surface has mainly been by local ranchers. Western Nuclear held a portion of the property briefly in 1968. Cyprus gained control of mineral and surface rights during the period 1975-1978.   39 In 1993, Cyprus sold their Tallahassee Creek holdings to Noah (Buddy) and Diane Taylor who had managed ranching activities on the property. The Taylors were not able to make the final payment to Cyprus and sold the southern portion of their holdings which included the Hansen and Picnic Tree deposits to New Mexico and Arizona Land (now NZ Minerals) in 1996 who, in 1998, sold the property to South T-Bar Ranch, a subsidiary of Colorado developer Land Properties, while reserving a 49% interest in the minerals. This part of Cyprus’ prior holdings was subdivided, mainly into 35-acre parcels. Beginning in December 2006, through various purchases, leases and option agreements, Black Range Minerals has obtained mineral rights to most of the original Cyprus holdings. Prior to the Hansen/Taylor Project being acquired by WUC, a mineral resource for the Hansen/Taylor Ranch Project for Black Range Minerals Limited. Black Range Reported a JORC compliant indicated uranium resources. This historic resource estimate was originally reported to Black Range Minerals Limited by Tetra Tech in four resource memos (collectively, the “Tetra Tech Reports”): 1) High Park Kriging Resources – Taylor Ranch Uranium Project, April 25, 2008; 2) North Hansen, Boyer Kriging Resources – Taylor Ranch Uranium Project, April 29, 2009; 3) Technical Memorandum – Boyer, Hansen and Picnic Tree Area Kriging Resources – Taylor Ranch Uranium Project, August 24, 2009; and 4) Technical Memorandum – Boyer, Hansen and Picnic Tree Area Kriging Resources – Taylor Ranch Uranium Project (Updated 2010), August 12, 2010. These memos were originally prepared by Rex Bryan of Tetra Tech, a qualified person under NI 43-101. The results reported in the Tetra Tech Reports are historical estimates under NI 43-101. However, the Company is not treating the historical estimate as current mineral resources, and S-K 1300 does not permit such historic estimates to be disclosed in Form 10-K annual reports. The historic Black Range Minerals resource reported in the Tetra Tech Reports uses JORC indicated and inferred resource categories and does not contain reserves. There is no more recent data available on the Hansen/Taylor Project resource than that of the Tetra Tech Reports. In order to disclose a resource estimate as current, the Company would need to engage a qualified person (as defined under 43-101 and S-K 1300) to produce a technical report compliant with NI 43-101 and a feasibility study compliant with S-K 1300. The Company currently does not intend to commission such a technical report or feasibility study. Project Geology The deposits that make up the Project are tabular sandstone deposits associated with redox interfaces. The mineralization is hosted in Tertiary sandstones and/or clay bearing conglomerates within an extinct braided stream, fluvial system or palaeochannel. Mineralization occurred post sediment deposition when oxygenated uraniferous groundwater moving through the host rocks came into contact with redox interfaces, the resultant chemical change caused the precipitation of uranium oxides. The most common cause of redox interfaces is the presence of carbonaceous material that was deposited simultaneously with the host sediments. In parts of the Project the palaeochannel has been covered by Tertiary volcanic rocks and throughout the Project basement consists of Pre-Cambrian plutonics and metamorphic rocks. The volcanic and Pre-Cambrian rocks are believed to be the source of the uranium. Restoration and Reclamation During the fourth quarter of 2021, the Company received notice from the State of Colorado that its surety release request on the Hansen Picnic Tree property had been approved, and as such, this property is no longer subject to reclamation treatment. As the property wasn’t a current development priority, Western completed reclamation on the property. The Company recorded a discontinuation of the Hansen Picnic Tree property’s present value of $44,793 during the fourth quarter of 2021. On December 29, 2021, the Company moved the $154,936 restricted cash deposit into its cash after receiving payment from the state of Colorado. Permitting Status The project’s exploration permit lapsed with the completion of reclamation.   40 Basis of Disclosure The scientific and technical information provided in this Form 10-K on the Hansen/Taylor Ranch Project, as well all data and exploration information reported in this Form 10-K on the Hansen/Taylor Ranch Project, is based on the information reported in the Tetra Tech Reports. 7. Bullen Property (Weld County) The Property The Bullen Property is a private land parcel located in Weld County Colorado and is inclusive of 139 surface acres and 160 mineral acres. The property location is Township 9 North, Range 60 West, 6 th P.M., Section 34:NW/4. Accessibility The Bullen Property is accessible via Weld County roads year-round. History The Bullen Property is an oil and gas property located in Weld County Colorado. The Company acquired this non-core property in 2015 in the Black Range Minerals Limited acquisition. Black Range purchased the property in 2008 for its Keota Uranium Project. This project ran from 2008 to 2013, and at its peak there were five strategic interests which comprised approximately 3,300 acres in the Keota Uranium District. After the project ceased, the Bullen Property was the only acreage retained in Weld County by virtue of its outright ownership. In 2017, the Company signed a three year oil and gas lease which in 2020 was extended for an additional three year term or the end of continuous operations. The consideration was in the form of upfront bonus payments and backend production royalty payments. Additional right-of-way easement agreements were signed which allowed for the development of a pipeline. The lease agreement allows the Company to retain property rights to vanadium, uranium, and other mineral resources.   41 In early 2020 Bison Oil & Gas (“Bison”) traded this lease to Mallard Exploration (“Mallard”), Mallard subsequently filed an application with the Colorado Oil & Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC) to update the permitting to create a new pooled unit. In late 2020 Mallard began development of the pooled unit. These DJ-Basin wells target the Niobrara formation. During 2021, the operator completed all well development stages and eight (8) wells commenced oil and gas production by August 2021. The first royalty payment was made in January 2022. During 2022, the operator completed all well development stages on a second set of eight (8) wells which commenced oil and gas production by August 2022. The first monthly royalty payment including production from the new wells was made in January 2023. Monthly royalty payments are ongoing. In January 2023, Mallard was acquired by Bison. Project Geology The Bullen Property is located within the Denver-Julesburg Basin (“D-J Basin”) which is inclusive of multiple oil and gas formations. Permitting Status Mallard’s application with the Colorado Oil & Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC) created a new order to establish a drilling and spacing unit and set the maximum number of horizontal wells that may be drilled. The field rules were approved on August 24, 2020 (COGCC Order No. 535-1325). This order pooled five adjoining parcels into a 3,200 acre pooled unit (“Unit”) and set the maximum number of wells at 24. A total of 16 wells have been permitted in the Unit. In 2021, the first set of 8 permitted wells were put into production. In 2022, the second set of 8 permitted wells were put into production. Thus all permitted wells in the pooled unit have been put into production and are paying monthly royalties. 8. Maverick Minerals Mill Site (Emery County, Utah) The Property The Maverick Minerals Mill Site land package was assembled through the purchase of three parcels on which to permit and construct mineral processing facilities. Engineering and design work, as well as site testing, was performed during 2024. In October 2024, Western acquired a second site (please see discussion of Mustang site below), which was larger, located closer to the Company’s Sunday Mine Complex and was a more advanced site for the permitting and construction of the Company’s initial mineral processing mill. The Maverick Minerals Mill Site is in close proximity to Western’s San Rafael project.   42 Accessibility The Maverick Minerals Mill Site is accessible by Utah public roads year round. Ownership The Maverick Minerals Mill Site is owned by Western. Permitting Status Western has collected certain environmental testing data to be utilized in connection with a future permit application. Baseline data collection was paused prior to commencing monitor well installation. Western is currently evaluating next steps and timing for this site. History The Maverick Minerals Mill Site acquisition was completed in 2023. Planned Operations and Maintenance Subsequent to the acquisition of the Mustang Mineral Mill Site, Western is evaluating the next steps for this site. Environmental Matters The Maverick Minerals Mill Site consists principally of an undeveloped parcel of land. There are no known environmental matters to report. Total Cost of Project Western is currently evaluating the expected use for this site and the related costs that will be incurred. The Company’s Planned Work There are no near term plans for operations at this site. 9. Mustang Mineral Mill Site (Montrose County, Colorado) The Property The Mustang Mineral Mill Site is an 880 acre parcel of land located in Montrose County, Colorado, situated approximately 50 road miles from Western’s Sunday Mine Complex. This is the second site acquired by Western for the permitting, development and construction of a mineral processing facility. The Mustang Mineral Mill site was purchased in October 2024, where a uranium processing mill was previously licensed, but never constructed. Western expects to benefit from the prior site owner’s completion of all phases of licensing and permitting of its mill project. Western’s mill is expected to have a cost of approximately $75 million and is planned to start up in 2029. When purchased, the Mustang Mineral Mill Site included certain infrastructure already in place, including nine monitoring wells and three production wells, meteorological data towers, electric power access and initial power infrastructure, paved roads and gravel roads. The 880 acre site provides abundant space for tailings disposal to support 40 years of continuous mill operations. Accessibility The site is accessible by public roads year around. Ownership The site is owned by Western.   43 Permitting Status Western has started permitting for the Mustang Mineral Mill Plant and the site was previously permitted for a uranium mill that was never constructed. Official baseline data collection at Mustang began in December 2024 for water monitoring and January 2025 for air monitoring. The required water monitoring data collections have been completed. As air monitoring equipment required repair, we will need to continue to collect air sample data beyond 1Q 2026, and into 2Q 2026. Results to date for both water and air quality have been consistent with prior data collected by the former owners. During 2025, Western sourced digital versions of the prior Pinon Ridge Mill license application and supporting data which will result in substantial savings in the compilation of the radioactive materials license application. The team will begin preparing the radioactive materials license application in 2Q 2026 with the goal of submitting the application during 4Q 2026. History The mill is under development by the Western team. However, under a prior owner it was fully licensed and thus provides leverage from past expenditures unique to this specific site supporting the permitting process. The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) has issued a license for this facility twice, underscoring the site’s compliance with stringent regulatory requirements. Environmental Matters None. The land was previously used for grazing land. A Cultural Study was conducted previously and it was determined that the facility will not affect properties of religious or cultural significance to any Indian tribe. There are no residual environmental issues. Total Cost of Project Western is expecting the mill to be constructed at a cost of approximately $75 million. Preliminary engineering designs from the Maverick Mill are applicable as well as engineering and licensing application work completed on this same site for the Pinon Ridge Mill. The Company’s Planned Work The Company’s plans are to develop and license a uranium and vanadium processing facility to process production from its resources in Colorado in addition to those in Utah. 10. Uranium Ridge Project The Property The Uranium Ridge is located on Bureau of Land Management (BLM) land in Montrose County, Colorado, situated approximately 10 road miles from Western’s Mustang Mineral Processing Plant. The property combines the historically drilled Baboon Basin and Sawtooth claims with newly acquired adjacent lode claims and serves as a key satellite deposit supplying feedstock for Western’s milling facilities. The property contains high-grade uranium and vanadium in the Salt Wash Member of the Morrison Formation and will present significant ore transportation cost savings. In addition to the acquired mining claims, Western staked an additional surrounding 38 mining claims, based upon the trend of the mineralization at the site. Accessibility The site is accessible by public roads year round, however, a portion of these roads will require repair. History The property was acquired in 1996 by two private partners (each owning 50% of the Property separately and not jointly) as an investment that leveraged their combined expertise as a geologist and a surveyor. The latter partner was notably from a prominent local uranium family. Over the course of ownership, the partners periodically made the Property available for sale during periods of strong uranium prices. Following the passing of one of the original partners in 2013, Western’s CEO George Glasier acquired that partner’s interest from his estate. As a result, the property has since been held by the remaining original partner and Mr. Glasier, each owning the separate but contiguous mining claim packages. Due to personal circumstances, the remaining original partner recently offered his interest to Mr. Glasier. However, due to high potential for added value to the Company, Mr. Glasier first presented this opportunity to Western. The Company determined that acquiring the drilled-out Claims represented a compelling opportunity when combined with the leveragability of the larger land package surrounding the property. To consolidate ownership, Mr. Glasier indicated his willingness to make his personal interest available to the Company on appropriate terms if the Company deemed it to be desirable. On October 14, 2025, Western acquired the package of unpatented mineral lode claims and secured a 50% ownership in the Uranium Ridge. In connection with Western’s purchase of its 50% interest in the Baboon Basin and Sawtooth claims, Western staked its 100% interest in an additional surrounding 38 mining claims.   44 The original owners of the Property, Nuclear Dynamics Inc., engaged Thamm, Mickel & Co. to prepare an independent ore reserve calculation; the report was issued August 14, 1980 (the “Thamm Report” or “Report”). The Report was compiled utilizing data from 175 drill holes drilled between 1977 and 1980, but did not utilize a superior calculation method, such as the Kriging calculation or the polygonal method. The Thamm Report was prepared approximately 20 years before National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects was adopted by the Canadian Securities Administrators. Therefore, the Thamm Report is not current or public. Accordingly, the Company is not presenting the findings of the Report. The property encompasses the previously drilled-out Baboon Basin/Sawtooth claims, as well as additional claims surrounding Baboon Basin/Sawtooth. Project Geology The property contains high-grade uranium and vanadium in the Salt Wash Member of the Morrison Formation. Permitting Status No permits currently exist. Restoration and Reclamation No liabilities currently exist. INFRASTRUCTURE The Company’s carrying value of mineral assets, equipment and kinetic separation intellectual property is as follows: The Company holds a license to use Kinetic Separation, a proven technology that we anticipate will improve the efficiency of extracting uranium and vanadium mineralization from the sandstone base material. No chemicals are added in the process, yet very high mineral recoveries can be achieved with considerable mass reduction; facilitating the separation of a high-value, high-grade ore product from a coarse-grained barren “clean sand” product. The Company holds a license to use this Kinetic mining process, although there are some uncertainties about whether the anticipated benefits will be realized. See Item 1, “Business – Corporate History” and “Business – Our Strategy – Uranium/Vanadium Production”. The Kinetic Separation Process.” Kinetic Separation is a low cost, purely physical method of uranium and vanadium ore extraction. Kinetic Separation has been initially tested in order to understand the hydro and mechanical separation processes. The Company used a pilot Kinetic Separation system to test several different samples of uranium ore from the Sunday Mine Complex and the Hansen/Taylor Ranch properties. In all cases, uranium ore that was entered into the Kinetic Separation pilot system appeared to concentrate most of the uranium into the post kinetically separated material consisting of a fraction of the original mass, leaving most of the post kinetically separated materials which did not contain any uranium. The results of these tests have not yet been validated by a qualified person. On December 1, 2016 a determination was made by the CDPHE considering the NRC Advisory Opinion, the Colorado public meeting process, and the CDPHE regulatory and evaluation framework. This determination stated that the proposed Kinetic Separation operations at the Sunday Mine by Black Range Minerals must be regulated by the CDPHE through a milling license. Previously, the Company was unable to deploy Kinetic Separation as it was without a regulatory framework, but as a result of this determination the Company is now able to deploy Kinetic Separation under a milling license. The Colorado milling license that Western is currently seeking will likely incorporate Kinetic Separation via an amendment to the initial license – as Western’s current plan is to submit a licensing application that is substantially identical to the application used previously for the Pinon Ridge Mill (which did not include the Company’s Kinetic Separation technology). The Company holds mineral properties as outlined below.   45 Pinon Ridge Properties On August 18, 2014, the Company purchased mining assets from Energy Fuels Holding Corp. in an arm’s length transaction. The mining assets include both owned and leased land in the states of Utah and Colorado. All of the mining assets represent properties which have previously been mined to different degrees for uranium. As some of the properties have not formally established proven or probable reserves, there may be greater inherent uncertainty as to whether or not any mineralized material can be economically extracted as originally planned and anticipated. Western has a 1% royalty obligation on the market value of the recovered uranium and vanadium owed to the previous property owner. The Company’s mining properties acquired on August 18, 2014 which the Company still retains as of December 31, 2025, include the San Rafael Uranium Project located in Emery County, Utah; the Sunday Mine Complex located in western San Miguel County, Colorado; the Van 4 Mine located in western Montrose County, Colorado; the Sage Mine project located in San Juan County, Utah; and the Dunn project located in San Juan and San Miguel counties, Colorado. Black Range Properties On September 16, 2015, in connection with the Black Range Transaction, the Company acquired additional mineral properties. The mining assets acquired through Black Range include leased land in the states of Colorado, Wyoming and Alaska. None of these mining assets were operational at the date of acquisition. As these properties have not formally established proven or probable reserves, there may be greater inherent uncertainty as to whether or not any mineralized material can be economically extracted as originally planned and anticipated. The Company’s mining properties acquired on September 16, 2015 which the Company still retains as of December 31, 2025, include Hansen, North Hansen, High Park, Hansen Picnic Tree, Taylor Ranch, located in Fremont County, Colorado. The Company also acquired Keota located in Weld County, Wyoming. As the properties are not in production, they are not covered by various types of insurance including property and casualty, liability and umbrella coverage. We have not experienced any material uninsured or under insured losses related to our properties in the past and believe our approach sufficient given the inactivity. ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS Other than described below, management is not aware of any material legal proceedings that are pending or that have been threatened against us or our subsidiaries or any of our respective properties, and none of our directors, officers, affiliates or record or beneficial owners of more than 5% of our common shares, or any associate of any such director, officer, affiliate or shareholder, is (i) a party adverse to us or any of our subsidiaries in any legal proceeding or (ii) has an adverse interest to us or any of our subsidiaries in any legal proceeding. The Company is subject to periodic inspection by certain regulatory agencies for the purpose of determining compliance by the Company with the conditions of its licenses. In the ordinary course of business, minor violations may occur; however, these are not expected to result in material expenditures or have any other material adverse effect on the Company. ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES For Western, safety is a core value, and we strive for superior performance. Our health and safety management system, which includes detailed standards and procedures for safe production, addresses topics such as employee training, risk management, workplace inspection, emergency response, accident investigation, and program auditing. In addition to strong leadership and involvement from all levels of the organization, these programs and procedures form the cornerstone of safety at Western, ensuring that employees are provided a safe and healthy environment and are intended to reduce workplace accidents, incidents and losses, comply with all mining-related regulations and provide support for both regulators and the industry to improve mine safety. The operation of our U.S. based mine is subject to regulation by the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the “Mine Act”). MSHA inspects our mine on a regular basis and issues various citations and orders when it believes a violation has occurred under the Mine Act Following passage of The Mine Improvement and New Emergency Response Act of 2006, MSHA significantly increased the number of citations and orders charged against mining operations. The dollar penalties assessed for citations issued has also increased in recent years. Western is required to report certain mine safety violations or other regulatory matters required by Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 104 of Regulation S-K, and that required information is included in Exhibit 95 and is incorporated by reference in this annual report.   46 PART II ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES Market Information Our common shares trade on the OTCQX Market under the “WSTRF” trading symbol. Our common shares are listed for trading in Canada on the CSE under the symbol “WUC”. Shareholders According to our transfer agent, as of April 14, 2026 there were approximately 3,332 holders of record of our common shares. Unregistered Sales of Securities On October 14, 2025, the Company closed a brokered private placement of 6,555,556 units at a price of $0.64 (CAD $0.90) per unit. The aggregate gross proceeds raised in the private placement amounted to $4,202,281 (CAD $5,900,000). Each unit is comprised of one common share of Western and one common share purchase warrant. Each warrant is exercisable into one common share at a price of $0.85 (CAD $1.20) per share for a period of 54 months following the closing date of the private placement. A total of 6,555,556 common shares and warrants to purchase 6,555,556 common shares were issued to investors and warrants to purchase 229,444 common shares were issued to broker dealers in connection with the private placement. A 7% cash commission and broker warrants equal to 3.5% of the number of units sold, each exercisable into one common share at the issue price for a period of 54 months following the closing date, will be issued to the sole underwriter in connection with the offering. On June 13, 2025, the Company closed a private placement of 5,911,786 units at a price of $0.63 (CAD $0.85) per unit. The aggregate gross proceeds raised in the private placement amounted to $3,693,424 (CAD $5,025,018) and proceeds net of issuance costs were $3,331,687 (CAD $4,532,939). Each unit is comprised of one common share of Western and one common share purchase warrant. Each warrant is exercisable into one common share at a price of $0.77 (CAD $1.05) per share for a period of four years following the closing date of the private placement. A total of 5,911,786 common shares and warrants to purchase 5,911,786 common shares were issued to investors and warrants to purchase 206,913 common shares were issued to broker dealers in connection with the private placement. Of the 5,911,786 common shares and warrants issued to investors, 117,647 were issued to Mr. Glasier for his participation in the private placement. For units sold in the United States, we relied on the private offering exemption from registration provided by Rule 506(b) of Regulation D under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “U.S. Securities Act”), based on the offers and sales having been made without any general solicitation or advertising solely to accredited investors who represented they purchased the units for their own account for investment and not for distribution. For units sold outside of the United States, we relied on Rule 903 of Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act based on our status as a foreign issuer with no substantial U.S. market interest and based on the offers and sales having been made in offshore transactions without any directed selling efforts. ITEM 6. [RESERVED] Not Applicable   47 ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Forward-Looking Statements The information disclosed in this annual report, and the information incorporated by reference herein, includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding our or our management’s expectations, hopes, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future. In addition, any statements that refer to projections, forecasts or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking statements. The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “possible,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “should,” “would” and similar expressions may identify forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking. The forward-looking statements contained or incorporated by reference in this annual report are based on our current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and their potential effects on us and speak only as of the date of each such statement. There can be no assurance that future developments affecting us will be those that we have anticipated. These forward-looking statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties (some of which are beyond our control) or other assumptions that may cause actual results or performance to be materially different from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those factors described in Item 1A, “Risk Factors” and this Item 7 of this annual report. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should any of our assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary in material respects from those projected in these forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required under applicable securities laws. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated annual financial statements and footnotes thereto contained in this annual report. Overview General Western Uranium & Vanadium Corp. (“Western” or the “Company”, formerly Western Uranium Corporation) was incorporated in December 2006 under the Ontario Business Corporations Act. On November 20, 2014, the Company completed a listing process on the Canadian Securities Exchange (“CSE”). As part of that process, the Company acquired 100% of the members’ interests of Pinon Ridge Mining LLC (“PRM”), a Delaware limited liability company. The transaction constituted a reverse takeover (“RTO”) of Western by PRM. Subsequent to obtaining appropriate shareholder approvals, the Company reconstituted its board of directors and senior management team. Western is a Canadian domestic issuer and Canadian reporting issuer. On August 18, 2014, the Company closed on the purchase of certain mining properties in Colorado and Utah from Energy Fuels Holding Corp. Assets purchased included both owned and leased lands in Utah and Colorado, and all represent properties that have been previously mined for uranium to varying degrees in the past. The acquisition included the purchase of the Sunday Mine Complex. The Sunday Mine Complex is located in western San Miguel County, Colorado. The complex consists of the following five individual mines: the Sunday mine, the Carnation mine, the St. Jude mine, the West Sunday mine and the Topaz Mine. The operation of each of these mines requires a separate permit, and all such permits have been obtained by Western and are currently valid. Notably, for the Topaz Mine, which at the present time is permitted and is scheduled for reclamation, the process is underway for it to be re-permitted. In addition, each of the mines has good access to a paved highway, electric power to existing declines, office/storage/shop and change buildings, and an extensive underground haulage development with several vent shafts complete with exhaust fans. The Sunday Mine Complex is the Company’s core resource property and in July 2021 was assigned “Active” status when mining operations were restarted.   48 On September 16, 2015, Western completed its acquisition of Black Range, an Australian company that was listed on the Australian Securities Exchange until the acquisition was completed. The acquisition terms were pursuant to a definitive Merger Implementation Agreement entered into between Western and Black Range. Pursuant to the agreement, Western acquired all of the issued shares of Black Range by way of Scheme of Arrangement (“the Scheme”) under the Australian Corporation Act 2001 (Cth) (the “Black Range Transaction”), with Black Range shareholders being issued common shares of Western on a 1 for 750 basis. On August 25, 2015, the Scheme was approved by the shareholders of Black Range, and on September 4, 2015, Black Range received approval by the Federal Court of Australia. In addition, Western issued options to purchase Western common shares to certain employees, directors, and consultants. Such stock options were intended to replace Black Range stock options outstanding prior to the Black Range Transaction on the same 1 for 750 basis. Under United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) rules, the Black Range transaction triggered the Company being deemed a United States domestic issuer and losing its foreign private issuer exemption. On April 29, 2016, the Company filed a Form 10 registration statement with the Commission after shifting its basis of accounting from IFRS to U.S. GAAP. On June 28, 2016, the Company’s registration statement became effective and Western became a United States reporting issuer. On June 30, 2023, Western re-qualified as a foreign private issuer as that term is defined in Rule 3b-4(c) promulgated under the Exchange Act. As a result, the Company may now utilize certain accommodations made to foreign private issuers, including (1) an exemption from complying with the Commission’s proxy rules, (2) an exemption from the Company’s insiders having to comply with the reporting and short-swing trading liability provisions of Section 16 under the Exchange Act, (3) the ability to make periodic filings with the Commission on the Form 20-F and Form 6-K foreign issuer forms, and (4) the ability to offer and sell unrestricted securities outside of the United States pursuant to Rule 903 of Regulation S. The Company plans to take advantage of these accommodations. However, the Company currently has decided to voluntarily continue to file periodic reports with the Commission using domestic issuer forms including filing annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K. As of the subsequent measurement date, June 30, 2024, Western reconfirmed its qualification as a foreign private issuer for periods ended through December 31, 2025. The Company has registered offices at 5 Church Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5E 1M2, and its common shares are listed on the CSE under the symbol “WUC” and are traded on the OTCQX Best Market under the symbol “WSTRF”. Its principal business activity is the acquisition and development of uranium and vanadium resource properties in the states of Utah and Colorado in the United States of America (“United States”). Recent Developments Uranium Markets and Western Strategy Between July 2024 and August 2025, the uranium term price was in the $80.00 to $81.50 range until its rise to $83/lb in September 2025 and $85/lb in October 2025. The uranium spot market has experienced more volatility, peaking at $106/lb in January 2024, and declining into a 2025 trading range of $64/lb to $78/lb through August 2025. In September 2025 and October 2025 spot prices rallied above $80/lb, before declining back into the 2025 trading range in November 2025. This Fall 2025 rally was ignited in mid-September by President Trump and DOE Secretary Wright touting U.S. nuclear power and the U.S. domestic fuel cycle, which rallied uranium equity markets. In January 2026, uranium spot prices spiked closing above $100/lb for 2 days and above $90/lb for 5 days. After this short lived rally was over spot prices declined and settled into the $80/lb range. The uranium price trend is strong. Over the five year period from 2020 to 2025, both spot and term prices have moved up from the $30/lb range to the $80/lb range. In 2024, Western responded to favorable market conditions by aggressively ramping up operations and expanding production capacity primarily at its 100% owned Sunday Mine Complex. While uranium spot prices weakened in late 2024, we had anticipated a recovery in 2025, supported by the U.S. ban on Russian uranium (effective 2028) and the Trump administration’s strong backing of nuclear energy and domestic mining. The Company’s interpretation of market signals was that uranium markets would stabilize at replacement price levels. However, given recent turbulence in global commodity and financial markets, along with geopolitical uncertainties, we have shifted to a more conservative stance, increasingly focusing on cost control and strategic discipline. We continued to observe capital market volatility fueled by political and trade uncertainties related to the tariff situation initiated by the current U.S. Administration and more recently the war in Iran. This conservative approach has been adopted to reduce operational spending in the near-term. The intent is to focus on the initiatives that bring long-term value to the Company: constructing the proposed Mustang mill and the development of nearby mines to supply this mill. Western’s team remains confident that uranium prices will become reflective of replacement cost levels and strong underlying market fundamentals. While we are focusing on preparing more of our mineral properties for active mining operations, we intend to utilize this conservative approach until there is a significant and sustainable recovery in uranium markets.   49 Uranium Ridge Project On October 8, 2025, Western, through its wholly owned subsidiary, PRM, closed on the acquisition of a package of unpatented mineral lode claims (the “Claims”). The Company paid $250,000 for the acquisition, securing a 50% ownership interest in the area covered by historic drilling. The Claims encompass a drilled-out uranium-vanadium deposit situated on ~240 acres that is located on BLM land in Montrose County, Colorado. As part of the acquisition strategy, Western has also staked additional claims surrounding the property, adding 500 acres with significant exploration potential to expand the historical resource. The Company has named this resource property the Uranium Ridge Project (“Uranium Ridge”), which is a combination of the acquired claims and the newly staked claims. The 50% of mineral claims that are not owned by PRM continue to be owned by Mr. George Glasier, the Company’s CEO. Mr. Glasier has indicated his willingness to make his personal interest available to the Company on appropriate terms if the Company deems it to be desirable. Uranium Ridge is located in close proximity to Western’s proposed Mustang mineral processing plant site, which is being advanced as a key regional processing hub. By securing nearby resources, Western expects to reduce haulage costs, streamline logistics, and capture significant processing efficiencies, directly translating into increased value for shareholders. The team has begun the requisite permitting process, as we wait for the ground to firm-up post-winter. Uranium Ridge is targeted for a confirmation and exploration drill program. The objectives are to confirm the historic drilled-out resources and expand the resource to the newly added 785 acres of claims acquired by staking. Mustang Mineral Processing Plant We are prioritizing the development of the Mustang Mineral Processing Plant (Mustang) in Colorado due to its close proximity to the SMC and lower hauling costs in comparison to the Maverick Minerals Processing Plant in Utah. In preparing the new licensing and permitting application, Western expects to benefit from the prior site owner’s completion of all phases of licensing and permitting of their Pinon Ridge Mill project. This facility will be designed to recover uranium and vanadium both from conventional materials mined from Company mines and materials produced by other mining companies. After permitting and construction, and subject to available financing, the processing of uranium and vanadium materials is targeted to commence in 2029. The Colorado milling license that Western is currently seeking will incorporate Kinetic Separation via an amendment to the initial license – as Western’s current plan is to submit a licensing application that is substantially identical to the application that was used previously for the Pinon Ridge Mill (which did not include the Company’s Kinetic Separation technology). Official baseline data collection at Mustang began in December 2024 for water monitoring and January 2025 for air monitoring. The required water monitoring data collection has been completed and hydrology reporting is being prepared. As the air monitoring equipment required repair, we will need to continue to collect air sample data into 2Q 2026. Results to date for both water and air quality is consistent with data collected by the former owners. During 2025, Western sourced digital versions of the prior Pinon Ridge Mill license application and supporting data. This will result in substantial savings in the compilation of the radioactive materials license application. The team will begin preparing the radioactive materials license application in 2Q 2026 targeting submission by October 2026. Mustang’s completion is critical for in-house yellowcake production. Mustang Mineral Mill Site Acquisition On October 1, 2024, Western, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Western Utah, executed a binding stock purchase agreement to purchase 100% of the shares of PRC from a private investor group and thereby acquire Mustang, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of PRC. Mustang owns an 880-acre property located in Montrose County, Colorado, where a uranium processing mill was previously licensed but never constructed. The transaction was accounted for as a purchase of an asset. The Company assumed an obligation to an unrelated third party to remit a royalty based on the volume of minerals processed through any mineral processing plant located on the property. The acquisition becomes the second property that Western has acquired, in addition to the Maverick site in Utah. It also becomes part of Western’s plans for developing and licensing one or more uranium and vanadium processing facilities to process production from its resource properties in Colorado and Utah. George Glasier, the President, CEO and a director of Western, and his wife Kathleen owned 50% of the shares of PRC and Andrew Wilder, a director of Western, indirectly owned 3% of the shares of PRC, and so the transaction was considered a related party transaction. The Company’s Board of Directors established an independent committee of the Board comprised of directors who were not considered to have an interest in the transaction. The independent committee supervised the negotiation of and approved Western’s entry into the PRC agreement. The total purchase price of PRC was $1.98 million, which consisted of an aggregate of $829,167 in payments to former PRC shareholders for their equity interests and outstanding loans made to PRC and related accrued interest and a $1,148,125 payment for principal and interest to a third party in satisfaction of an assumed liability of Mustang. For the 53% ownership of PRC, $414,584 was paid to George Glasier and $24,875 was paid to an affiliate of Andrew Wilder.   50 Sunday Mine Complex Project In response to elevated uranium prices during early 2024, Western spent 2024 ramping up operations to achieve its annualized production target of 1 million pounds of uranium and 6 million pounds of vanadium. Following the expansion of infrastructure deeper into the West Sunday Mine, the mining teams commenced driving a drift to the Leonard & Clark deposit and the drilling teams continued to define additional mining areas utilizing underground horizontal drilling. During the third quarter of 2024, the operations team moved to an area of the Sunday Mine where the last operator ceased production. Existing underground workings were rehabilitated and utilities were installed in a large stope area close to the former production face. With uranium pricing still at suppressed levels, there has been a corresponding reduction in mining operations in 2025. The development of the Sunday Mine Complex became a secondary focus after the first quarter of 2025 as the mining team alternated between mine development and hauling / delivery activities related to the Ore Purchase Agreement. During 2025, Western extended work in three areas of the GMG deposit and advanced the Leonard & Clark decline. Underground operations were placed on temporary standby during Q1 2026, and equipment was secured and prepared for storage. The mining operations team is continuing the completion of aboveground surface projects. When we next receive market signals to scale-up operations, the next underground projects will focus on the development of new additional Sunday Mine Complex areas which have indicated defined uranium mineralization to further expand capacity. Sunday Mine Complex Drilling Program The first phase of the horizontal underground drilling program was successfully completed. The program employed rigorous quality control, including twinning holes, assaying, and drilling core samples. The program included 20,366 feet of drilling plus an additional 1,655 feet of core drilling. Half of these core holes targeted mineralized faces identified during underground development, while the other half confirmed previously identified ore zones. Geotechnical and geological logging also mapped major faults and weak ground conditions. The program confirmed five mineralized pockets in the GMG drift and outlined the deposit’s overall shape and trend. The horizontal drilling program defined mineralized deposits but did not establish deposit thickness. A second program phase would necessitate surface/vertical drilling to capture thickness data to update geologic resource estimates. Having successfully completed the initiatives at the Sunday Mine Complex, we gradually reduced staffing through attrition, consultant cutbacks, selective layoffs, and redeployment. These efficiency measures have been taken to align the workforce with Company capitalization levels. During mine development activities, we have attempted to drift around mineralization, leaving the seam faces for quick access during the next period of full production. Additional Projects To Expand Production Capacity Looking forward, we are considering opportunities across our property portfolio to increase production capacity that are less capital intensive. These include re-permitting the Topaz Mine, rehabilitating the Sage Mine, reassessing the Van 4 Mine for decline/portal access rather than utilizing the previously reclaimed shaft, and additional development of the Rimrock JV mines. The project to advance permitting of the San Rafael Project is included in this group, and discussed in more detail below. Progress has been made on each of these initiatives. At the Topaz Mine, a new monitor well has been drilled and is actively being flushed in preparation for the delivery of new monitoring equipment. Once installed, we will commence the water quality sampling program. At the Sage Mine, we have now received both state and BLM approvals to commence limited work at this mine. For the Van 4, the team is preparing a vertical drill rig to begin a drilling program with both development and exploration/ resource expansion objectives. San Rafael The San Rafael Uranium Project, located in Emery County, Utah, is being developed as the Company’s second production facility. During the second quarter 2024, Western submitted a Notice of Intent to the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) that was approved for a mineral and groundwater exploration project. During the third quarter of 2024, Utah’s Division of Oil, Gas & Mining gave its approval of the exploration permit application and the Company posted a $61,403 financial guarantee of reclamation costs with the BLM. Currently all permits have been received that are needed for the drilling of monitor wells and the sinking of a mine shaft. When site work commences, following the completion of repairs to access roads, the phase 1 drilling program can begin. Initially, groundwater monitoring wells will be installed at five drilling locations, reaching depths of approximately 1,000 feet. During the borehole completion process, mineralization will also be assessed and confirmed against historical drill data. This project will provide the baseline data needed for permitting application submission.   51 Ore Purchase Agreement On April 8, 2025, PRM entered into an Ore Purchase Agreement (the “Ore Purchase Agreement”) with subsidiaries of Energy Fuels Inc. (“Purchaser”). The Ore Purchase Agreement is for a one year period and provides for the delivery of up to 25,000 short tons of uranium bearing ore to the White Mesa Mill in Blanding, Utah. PRM shall make deliveries at its own cost and the purchase price per ton will be based upon the average grade of uranium of each lot, and other qualifying conditions. Within 30 days after each lot is closed, Purchaser shall pay to PRM an 85% provisional payment (“Provisional Payment”) calculated based upon the sampled grade and an agreed upon pricing schedule. Within 30 days after each lot is fed to processing, the Purchaser shall pay to PRM a final settlement payment calculated based upon the assayed grade and the agreed upon pricing schedule, net of a royalty, pursuant to a previously existing royalty agreement with the Purchaser. During April and May 2025, the Company focused on the operational preparations required to begin hauling material. Also during this period, an additional ore pad was constructed, equipment and vehicles were prepared, and new equipment was purchased. The Company commenced deliveries in late June 2025 and during this period through September, Western delivered approximately 1,600 tons of mined material from the Sunday Mine Complex to the White Mesa Mill. Hauling capacity proved a limiting factor as all deliveries were completed by Western employees, alternating driving duties, utilizing a single Company truck to make ~20 ton deliveries. Most of the uranium-bearing feedstock utilized to make deliveries under the Ore Purchase Agreement originated from underground stockpiled materials from historical work projects. which was supplemented by a small amount of new production from the Sunday Mine Complex. During the year ended December 31, 2025, we recognized revenue from the sale of ore, net of royalty, of $297,285. As of December 31, 2025, included within other current assets on the consolidated balance sheet were receivables in the amount of $45,503 due from Purchaser. At the end of September 2025, Western made the decision to pause additional future deliveries in favor of focusing the mining staff on development projects that can increase future feedstock quantities for the Mustang Mineral Processing Plant. Infrastructure Western expanded its fleet of mining equipment and vehicles in 2023/2024 by purchasing discounted used equipment and reconditioning it with an in-house team of mechanics. This approach has the advantage of putting equipment into reliable high-volume usage condition at a fraction of the cost, while mitigating supply chain issues. The Company has sought cost savings in this area by limiting new purchases in 2025 and opting to rehabilitate the remainder of the fleet over a longer duration. Most purchases made in 2025 were required for hauling uranium-bearing material to the White Mesa Mill. Maverick Minerals Processing Plant The development of the Maverick Minerals Processing Plant in Green River, Utah, has advanced since the land package acquisition was completed in 2023. Subsequently, a full team of consulting firms was chosen and engaged for their expertise in engineering / mill design, permit preparation, environmental, hydrology, and air quality. The project design and permitting activities include site evaluation work, compilation of a preliminary plant and property site plan, baseline data collection, plant and animal studies and a cultural survey. Additional consulting commitments were made to advance the licensing and development with Precision Systems Engineering (“PSE”), a leading engineering and design consulting firm headquartered in Sandy, Utah. The next steps were for PSE to complete a preliminary engineering design and cost estimate for a 500 ton per day mill and the installation of monitor wells. However, additional work has been deferred for Western to reassess its design strategy now that it has purchased a previously licensed mill site in Colorado (Mustang Mineral Processing Plant, formerly the Pinon Ridge Mill). As processing facility development efforts have been shifted, some of the Maverick site infrastructure has been relocated to the Mustang site, and notably the preliminary engineering work is also transferable. The Maverick site is located in close proximity (approximately 4 miles) to the San Rafael Uranium Project; however, it is approximately 170 miles from the Sunday Mine Complex. We are prioritizing development of the Mustang site, given its close proximity to the Sunday Mine Complex, lower hauling costs, and past licensing advances over the Maverick site. Bullen Property (Weld County) In 2017, the Company entered into an oil and gas lease that became effective with respect to minerals and mineral rights owned by the Company of approximately 160 surface acres of the Company’s mining property in Colorado. As consideration for entering into the lease, the lessee has agreed to pay the Company a royalty from the lessee’s revenue attributed to oil and gas produced, saved, and sold attributable to the net mineral interest. The Company has also received cash payments from the lessee related to the easement that the Company is recognizing incrementally over the eight year term of the easement. On June 23, 2020, the operator elected to extend the oil and gas lease easement for three additional years through July 2023. This was done to provide additional time in order to complete well construction and commence oil and gas production. During 2021, the operator completed a first set of eight (8) wells which commenced oil and gas production by August 2021. During 2022, the operator completed a second set of eight (8) wells which commenced oil and gas production by August 2022. All sixteen (16) wells remain in production and monthly royalty payments will be ongoing in perpetuity as long as oil and/or gas are produced from the pooled unit containing these sixteen (16) wells. During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, we recognized aggregate revenue of $128,163 and $183,803, respectively, under these oil and gas lease arrangements. For the year ended December 31, 2025, oil and gas royalties declined due to lower volumes attributable to production decline curves.   52 Kinetic Separation Licensing On December 1, 2016 a determination was made by the CDPHE considering the NRC Advisory Opinion, the Colorado public meeting process, and the CDPHE regulatory and evaluation framework. This determination stated that the proposed Kinetic Separation operations at the Sunday Mine by Black Range Minerals must be regulated by the CDPHE through a milling license. Previously, the Company was unable to deploy Kinetic Separation as it was without a regulatory framework, but as a result of this determination the Company is now able to deploy Kinetic Separation under a milling license. During 2025 there was a large development for Kinetic Separation which affects its process deployment. In September 2025, the NRC approved a license for the owner of the Ablation patents that allows the application of their version of Ablation technology for uranium mine waste remediation and issued a first-of-its-kind multi-site Service Provider License. This option is available to Western, should we choose to pursue it. The Colorado milling license that Western is currently seeking will likely incorporate Kinetic Separation via an amendment to the initial license – as Western’s current plan is to submit a licensing application that is substantially identical to the application that was used previously for the Pinon Ridge Mill (which did not include the Company’s Kinetic Separation technology). Biden-Harris, Trump 1.0 and Trump 2.0 Administration Initiatives During the first Trump Administration, the U.S. government focused on market distortions caused by foreign state-owned enterprises and the economic and geopolitical influence lost by allowing Russia and China to take the global lead in nuclear power. In support of the world’s largest civilian nuclear reactor fleet, the U.S. has implemented some of the recommendations of the Nuclear Fuel Working Group which followed the uranium Section 232 investigation. This led to the implementation of the Uranium Reserve Program and the American Assured Fuel Supply program. Subsequently, the Russia/Ukraine war has highlighted the nuclear fuel supply chain risks and the geopolitical risks of dependence on the direct and indirect sourcing of nuclear fuel from state owned enterprises in Russia and former Soviet Union republics. Upon taking office, the Biden-Harris Administration team immediately rejoined the Paris Climate Accord, reversed a number of pro-fossil fuel energy policies, and gave all agencies climate change initiatives. The Administration worked to advance a national clean energy standard. In August 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act was signed into law authorizing governmental investments of approximately $369 billion in climate and energy, a portion of which would benefit the U.S. domestic nuclear industry and battery technologies. In November 2024, the United States held a highly contested Presidential election between Republicans (Trump-Vance) and Democrats (Harris-Walz). The Trump-Vance Republican ticket won, returning former President Donald Trump to the Presidency. Republicans also achieved Congressional majorities in both the Senate and House of Representatives. Nuclear energy now enjoys bipartisan support. However, with the change in Presidential Administrations, the Biden emphasis on climate change and clean energy initiatives was replaced by Trump pro-energy initiatives. In his first day in office, President Trump signed Executive Orders declaring a National Energy Emergency and a U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement for a second time. The new administration is seeking a reduction in the federal government’s size and regulatory power; we believe this is likely to expedite the permitting and development of energy resource projects. The Trump Administration has put forth multiple measures that are very positive for U.S. domestic energy and mining and for Western. On February 14, 2025, President Trump signed an Executive Order creating the National Energy Dominance Council. On March 20, 2025, to boost domestic production of critical minerals and reduce reliance on foreign imports, President Trump signed an Executive Order titled “Immediate Measures to Increase American Mineral Production.” On April 9, 2025, President Trump signed an Executive Order entitled “Zero-based Regulatory Budgeting to Unleash American Energy” to reduce costs on energy production by requiring conditional sunset dates for regulations. Then on April 15, 2025, an Executive Order was released entitled “Ensuring National Security and Economic Resilience through Section 232 Actions on Processed Critical Minerals and Derivative Products”. The Department of the Interior followed on April 23, 2025, by implementing emergency permitting procedures to strengthen domestic energy supply. In April / May 2025, in response to President Trump’s earlier March 20, 2025 Executive Order, the Federal Permitting Improvement Steering Council announced the first two waves of critical mineral production projects selected to benefit from expedited permitting; the second included two uranium projects. On May 23, 2025, President Trump signed four Executive Orders specific to boosting the U.S. domestic nuclear fuel cycle. This incited a strong uranium mining stock rally the following day. Since taking office, President Trump has signed no fewer than 10 Executive Orders to boost the energy sector that we believe to be directly or indirectly beneficial to nuclear and/or uranium mining industries. On November 7, 2025 the U.S. Geological Survey published the final 2025 List of Critical Minerals, and uranium was added to the list. The Trump administration is expanding the list amid efforts to boost domestic mining and cut reliance on imports for those minerals it deems essential for the U.S. economy and national security. As a result, uranium projects qualify increasingly for federal incentives, national stockpiling, and priority research. During August 2025, DOE’s Office of Nuclear Energy established the Defense Production Act (DPA) Consortium that will seek participation by U.S. companies through voluntary agreements. It was announced that “Under the DPA Consortium, voluntary agreements will allow industry consultation to develop plans of action to ensure that the nuclear fuel supply chain capacity for mining and milling, conversion, enrichment, deconversion, fabrication, recycling and reprocessing is available to enable the continued reliable operation of the nation’s reactors.” The first meeting of the DPA Consortium was held on October 23, 2025 and the process is ongoing. The DOE Office of Nuclear Energy has organized industry-specific committees to focus on developing action plans to increase domestic capacity for mining, conversion, and enrichment to reduce reliance on foreign fuel sources. Western is a member of the Mining & Milling Committee.   53 United States Ban of Russian Uranium due to Russian Invasion of Ukraine In response to Russia’s war in Ukraine, the U.S. legislature passed the Prohibiting Russian Uranium Imports Act (H.R. 1042) to ban Russian uranium imports into the United States. Unanimous passage in April 2024 by the U.S. Senate followed the U.S. House of Representatives’ passage of the bill in December 2023. Subsequently, on May 13, 2024, President Biden signed this legislation into law. The ban became effective 90 days after its enactment on August 11, 2024 and is being phased in under Department of Energy conditional waivers before becoming a complete ban on January 1, 2028. Importantly, the enactment of a Russian ban releases funding to support the American nuclear supply chain. This funding was deployed by the DOE under a new program called the Low-Enriched Uranium (LEU) – Enrichment Acquisition. The United States has the world’s largest civilian nuclear reactor fleet, and it has now taken steps to reduce its reliance on state-sponsored Russian nuclear fuel. In November 2024, in response to the U.S. ban on Russian uranium imports, Russia imposed a counter restriction on the export of enriched uranium to the United States. This was designed to create maximum uncertainty through its implementation on a shipment-by-shipment basis. Also in December 2024, Russia’s national nuclear company sold a 49% minority stake in a joint venture in a Kazakhstan uranium mine to a Chinese state-owned company. It was reported that this was done because of difficulties selling uranium to European or North American buyers due to sanctions recently imposed upon Russia. The war in Ukraine is ongoing and it is unclear at this time when and how it will end but the parties have commenced negotiations under the guidance of the Trump Administration. In the early days of the new administration, President Trump appeared to be more open toward Russia’s interests, which caused concern from traditional European allies. Recently, the Trump’s Administration position regarding the war in Ukraine has become more balanced. The earlier embrace of Russia negatively impacted the prices of uranium equities and physical uranium commodities during much of 2025. Nuclear Fuel and Uranium Market Conditions The uranium term price was in the $80.00 to $81.50 range between July 2024 and August 2025, until its rise to $83/lb in September 2025 and $85/lb in October 2025. The uranium spot market has experienced more volatility, peaking at $106/lb in January 2024, and declining into a 2025 trading range of $64/lb to $78/lb through August 2025. In September 2025 and October 2025 spot prices rallied above $80/lb, before declining back into the 2025 trading range in November 2025. In January 2026, uranium spot prices spiked closing above $100/lb for 2 days and above $90/lb for 5 days. After this short lived rally was over spot prices declined and settled into the $80/lb range. The uranium price trend is strong. Over the five year period from 2020 to 2025, both spot and term prices have moved up from the $30/lb range to the $80/lb range. In 2023/2024, spot uranium prices reacted to supply/demand constraints and geopolitical risks. Positive catalysts across multiple levels of the nuclear fuel and uranium markets have set in motion uranium market and nuclear fuel opportunities for the next decade and beyond. Underlying fundamentals are the strongest in decades. This is attributable to multiple factors, including climate change, energy security, supply chain and energy scarcity initiatives. The supply/demand imbalance has flipped from a market with excess supply into a market with excess future demand. With the reduced availability of secondary supplies, utilities have begun adding multi-year contracts with mining companies for primary supply. The drivers expanding the demand for nuclear fuel include non-nuclear nations adding nuclear power generation, nuclear nations expanding fleets and/or extending lives of existing reactors, idled nuclear reactors being redeployed, the reversal of phase-outs and shutdowns, and the deployment of advanced reactors / SMRs. However, the challenge is in meeting increasing demand simultaneously with supply constraints from the world’s largest suppliers. In spite of all these favorable attributes, spot uranium prices have declined in 2025 versus 2024 levels, as have the equities of junior uranium miners. We anticipate that both will rebound to reflect the underlying positive fundamentals in the nuclear/uranium sector. Multiple market analysts have flagged low availability of mobile secondary inventories. We believe the continued draw down of inventories to be a market catalyst for uranium prices. Positive nuclear energy news has continued to highlight the global growth of future nuclear electricity generation which will drive increased nuclear fuel demand. However, due to the lead time needed for future uranium production, we are entering a phase where the supply-demand fundamentals are in a deep multi-year structural supply deficit. The future is not clear as we believe some miners, like ourselves, with available near-term production are waiting for higher price levels and/or project funding before making full start-up commitments. Utilities have also deferred contracting to understand how regulations and geopolitics will modify their future access to Russian uranium, conversion and enrichment services. In the second quarter of 2024, investors began purchasing nuclear and uranium equities as a means to create long exposure for their positive view on Artificial Intelligence (AI), due to the vast energy requirements of data centers. Many of those investors reversed their positions and began to sell these nuclear and uranium equities in the fourth quarter of 2024 and in the first quarter of 2025, and the nuclear and uranium equities that initially benefited saw a price reversal. In 2025 this investment thesis increased investment in nuclear and uranium. With the agreements signed between tech companies that sponsor AI data centers and the nuclear industry, these vast power requirements have become viewed by the market as a significant new long-term demand driver for nuclear power as the best source of stable/reliable baseload power. Nuclear Fuel Supply Chain Concentration Risks Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the ensuing global energy crisis has focused attention on security of supply and supply chain risks. This has caused most of the world to re-evaluate their dependence upon nuclear fuel exported by Russia. In spite of the dominant market position of Rosatom, future deliveries potentially could be at risk due to sanctions, legislation, or a Russian embargo. Customer dependence upon the Russian supply of uranium, conversion and enrichment are being addressed slowly by governments as alternative suppliers are not currently available. Both Urenco and Orano have announced that they will invest to expand their uranium enrichment capacity respectively in the United States and France, which represents a shift away from Russia. Utilities are demonstrating their desire for increased security of their nuclear fuel supply chains. Kazakhstan is also a concern because the world’s largest uranium producing country has an unguarded and the second longest continuous land border in the world shared with Russia. The potential exists for Russia to exert influence over Kazakhstan. Additionally, Kazatomprom has put large long-term contracts in place with China. This supply is needed for China to fulfill its 15 year plan to deploy 150 new nuclear reactors. China National Nuclear Corp. (CNNC) has recently opened a uranium trading hub and warehouse facility, on the China / Kazakhstan border, with the capacity to store 60 million pounds of uranium. It has become evident that the nuclear fuel supply chain has become increasingly concentrated and interconnected in this very small area of the world. Expanding Kazakhstan uranium exports to Russia and China significantly reduces future supply for Western nuclear fuel buyers.   54 In July 2023, the government of Niger was overthrown by its military. This is significant because the new regime is opposed to Western interests and this landlocked West African country holds the 7th largest uranium resource in the world and was producing about 5% of global production. The conflict has an anti-French sentiment, and the Junta has initiated multiple actions that are counter to French interests. Most importantly, Niger’s Junta has threatened the export of uranium to France which has serious implications because France acquires 20% of its natural uranium from Niger. In addition to the French evacuating/ being expelled from Niger, the U.S. military also departed the country. The Junta is utilizing Russian military support as a replacement. In addition, the Niger government has revoked operating permits from foreign uranium companies, including Orano in June 2024 and Goviex in July 2024. In November 2024, Orano further reported that it had lost operational control, to authorities in Niger, of another of its uranium mines. This mine was in production, but had been impacted by export restrictions imposed by the Junta. During October 2023, geopolitical instabilities spread further to the Middle East after a Hamas attack on Israel triggered a counterattack by Israel on the Gaza Strip. This additional hot spot further increases volatility in the world and destabilizes the Middle East region that is highly influential on global energy prices. The Israel-Hamas hostilities have escalated over the Summer of 2024 and then spread to other countries in the Middle East. At the beginning of 2025, Israel and Hamas agreed to a ceasefire which ended in March 2025; the hostilities resumed in March and it is not clear when and if the combatants will be able to negotiate a new ceasefire or an end to military actions. In August 2025, the Israeli Prime Minister spoke of Israel’s intention to take control of the entire Gaza Strip and said that he will be seeking backing from Israeli government ministers. On June 13, 2025, Israel attacked key nuclear and military facilities in Iran with Iranian military responding with attacks on Israel soon after. The conflict escalated quickly, which raised significant concerns for the stability of the region, and oil prices increased sharply in the first days of the war. On June 22, 2025, the United States military bombed a number of Iranian nuclear sites in a move to force Iranian authorities to negotiate a nuclear treaty and end the hostilities. Subsequently, both Israel and Iran began to abide by a ceasefire, which appears to be holding. U.S. President Trump presented a 20-point Gaza ceasefire plan and pressured both sides forcing Israel and Palestinians into indirect negotiations and a ceasefire resulted. This resulted in a hostage-prisoner exchange in October 2025, when the remaining living Israeli hostages were released and exchanged for almost 2,000 Palestinian prisoners and detainees held by Israel. The hope is for a post-war governance plan that will result in a lasting ceasefire; negotiations are ongoing. After failed diplomatic negotiations, on February 28, 2026, the United States and Israel launched a joint operation on Iran which extended to neighboring Gulf countries. This new conflict has caused shipping disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz which are increasing energy prices and having a negative effect on world markets overall. A large portion of the Middle East daily oil production is transported through the Strait of Hormuz. This had further implications for energy-importing nations as their uranium buyers are more focused on domestic security and away from regional logistical risks. Among those at risk of an Iranian strike in Central Asia is Kazakhstan, the largest producer of uranium. Private Placements On October 14, 2025, the Company closed a brokered private placement of 6,555,556 units at a price of $0.64 (CAD $0.90) per unit (the “October 2025 PP”). The aggregate gross proceeds raised in the private placement amounted to $4,202,281 (CAD $5,900,000). Each unit is comprised of one common share of Western and one common share purchase warrant. Each warrant is exercisable into one common share at a price of $0.85 (CAD $1.20) per share for a period of 54 months following the closing date of the private placement. A total of 6,555,556 common shares and warrants to purchase 6,555,556 common shares were issued to investors and warrants to purchase 229,444 common shares were issued to broker dealers in connection with the private placement. A 7% cash commission and broker warrants equal to 3.5% of the number of units sold, each exercisable into one common share at the issue price for a period of 54 months following the closing date, will be issued to the sole underwriter in connection with the offering. The units under the October 2025 PP were issued to certain purchasers pursuant to the listed issuer financing exemption (“LIFE”) under Part 5A of National Instrument 45-106– Prospectus Exemptions , as amended by the Coordinated Blanket Order 45-935Exemptions from Certain Conditions of the Listed Issuer Financing Exemption . In connection with the LIFE offering, the Company filed with the applicable securities regulators a Second Amended and Restated Offering Document dated October 14, 2025 (the “LIFE Offering Document”) whereby, among other things, the Company described the intended use of its available funds after closing of the LIFE offering. As of the date hereof, the Company used the funds largely as described in the LIFE Offering Document, but the Company is planning to delay the drilling, monitoring and permitting work at the San Rafael Uranium Project and to slow down the mine development and maintenance at the Sage Mine, the Van 4 Mine and the Sunday Mine Complex . Currently, the Company’s focus with its available funds is to advance the permitting of the Mustang Mineral Processing Plant and to perform exploratory drilling at the Uranium Ridge project. Although the Company currently intends to use its cash resources as described herein, there may be circumstances where a reallocation of funds may be deemed prudent or necessary, which may result in actual expenses varying materially from projections. Such a reallocation could be done in light of a number of factors, including the Company’s ability to execute its business plan, market conditions and results achieved from previous expenditures. For a more detailed discussion on the Company’s plans, see Item 1: Business and Item 1A: Risk Factors . Share Repurchase Program, NCIB On December 19, 2025, the Company implemented a normal course issuer bid (“NCIB”) to allow it to purchase up to 6,672,291 of its common shares representing approximately 10% of the Company’s “public float” as of December 17, 2025, as defined under the policies of the CSE. The Company may purchase shares under the NCIB over a 12-month period beginning on December 19, 2025 and ending on December 18, 2026. Shares repurchased under the NCIB shall be purchased on the open market through the facilities of the CSE or Canadian alternative trading systems at the prevailing market price of the shares at the time of purchase and in accordance with the policies of the CSE and applicable Canadian securities laws. All shares purchased under the NCIB are required to be cancelled. The Company will fund any such purchases of shares under the NCIB with cash on hand.   55 The exact timing and amount of purchases of shares pursuant to the NCIB, if any, will depend on market conditions, the Company’s priorities for the use of our cash to fund the licensing and development of the Mustang Mineral Processing Plant, development of its mining properties, working capital considerations and other factors. The Company has no obligation to acquire any shares under the NCIB and may suspend or discontinue purchases under the NCIB at any time. Notably the NCIB program was established due to an index methodology change which resulted in the disposition, by sale into the public markets during December 2025, of the Company’s shares held by an investment fund who was a shareholder of the Company. During the year ended December 31, 2025, no shares were repurchased under the NCIB. On June 13, 2025, the Company closed a private placement of 5,911,786 units at a price of $0.63 (CAD $0.85) per unit. The aggregate gross proceeds raised in the private placement amounted to $3,693,424 (CAD $5,025,018) and proceeds net of issuance costs were $3,331,687 (CAD $4,532,939). Each unit is comprised of one common share of Western and one common share purchase warrant. Each warrant is exercisable into one common share at a price of $0.77 (CAD $1.05) per share for a period of four years following the closing date of the private placement. A total of 5,911,786 common shares and warrants to purchase 5,911,786 common shares were issued to investors and warrants to purchase 206,913 common shares were issued to broker dealers in connection with the private placement. Of the 5,911,786 common shares and warrants issued to investors, 117,647 were issued to Mr. Glasier for his participation in the private placement. Results of Operations Year Ended December 31, 2025 as Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2024 The following table presents the Company’s financial results for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. For the Years Ended December 31, 2025 2024 Revenues $ 425,448 $ 183,803 Expenses Mining expenditures 4,447,119 5,285,140 Professional fees 581,224 613,403 General and administrative 2,283,333 3,599,460 Consulting fees 399,696 1,020,577 Total operating expenses 7,711,372 10,518,580 Operating loss (7,285,924 ) (10,334,777 ) Interest income, net 106,207 224,738 Other income (expense), net 3,794 (1,998 ) Net loss (7,175,923 ) (10,112,037 ) Other comprehensive loss Foreign currency translation adjustment (35,259 ) (159,862 ) Comprehensive loss $ (7,211,182 ) $ (10,271,899 ) Summary: Our consolidated net loss for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 was $7,175,923 and $10,112,037, respectively. The principal components of these year over year changes are discussed below. Our comprehensive loss for the years ended Decembers 31, 2025 and 2024 was $7,211,182 and $10,271,899, respectively. Revenues Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2025 were $425,448 as compared to $183,803 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The increase in revenues of $241,645, or 131%, was primarily related to $297,285 of revenue from the sale of uranium bearing material during the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to receiving only oil and gas royalties during the year ended December 31, 2024. Mining Expenditures Mining expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2025 were $4,447,119 as compared to $5,285,140 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The decrease in mining expenditures of $838,021, or 16%, was principally attributable to a decrease in mining, drilling, and explosive supplies, reduced Rimrock joint venture costs and lower non-cash stock-based compensation expense. These decreases were principally offset by an increase in depreciation expense from additional equipment, facilities being placed in service during 2025, and an increase in reclamation expenditures due to the first quarter 2025 completion of the Van 4 reclamation.   56 Professional Fees Professional fees for the year ended December 31, 2025 were $581,224 as compared to $613,403 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The decrease in professional fees of $32,179, or 5%, was primarily due to higher professional fees during the year ended December 31, 2024 in connection with an elevated level of business, mining and acquisition activities, which has since reduced during the 2025 period. General and Administrative General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2025 were $2,283,333 as compared to $3,599,460 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The decrease in general and administrative expenses of $1,316,127, or 37%, was primarily due to a reduction in payroll and benefits expenses due to a decrease in staff size, and to a decrease in non-cash stock-based compensation expense. Consulting Fees Consulting fees for the year ended December 31, 2025 were $399,696 as compared to $1,020,577 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The decrease in consulting fees of $620,881, or 61%, was due to a spending shift in the mineral processing plant licensing efforts. The current period was comprised of lower baseline data collection costs at the Mustang site, whereas the prior period was comprised predominantly of higher engineering costs at the Maverick site. Interest Income, Net Interest income, net for the year ended December 31, 2025 was $106,207 as compared to $224,738 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The decrease in interest income, net of $118,531, or 53%, was principally attributable to a decrease in interest earned due to lower interest rates and lower cash balances during the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. Other Income (Expense), Net Other income (expense), net for the year ended December 31, 2025 was income of $3,794 as compared to expense of $1,998 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The change in other income (expense), net of $5,792 was attributable to a gain on the disposal of equipment during the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to a loss on disposal of equipment incurred during the year ended December 31, 2024. Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment Foreign currency translation adjustment for the year ended December 31, 2025 was a loss of $35,259 as compared to a loss of $159,862 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The lower foreign currency translation adjustment loss for the year ended December 31, 2025 was principally attributable to a narrowing of the exchange rate exposure, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. Liquidity and Capital Resources Our cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash balance as of December 31, 2025 was $6,858,183. Our cash position is highly dependent on our ability to raise capital through the issuance of debt and equity and our management of expenditures for mining and for the development of our mineral processing mill and for the fulfillment of our public company reporting responsibilities. Our management believes that in order to finance the development and mining operations of the mining properties, to construct our Kinetic Separation equipment and operations and to secure regulatory licenses for and to construct our uranium and vanadium minerals processing facilities, we will be required to raise additional capital by way of debt and/or equity. We will also require additional working capital to continue to scale-up our mining operations at the Sunday Mine Complex. This outlook is based on our current financial position and is subject to change if opportunities become available based on current exploration program results and/or external opportunities. Net Cash Used In Operating Activities Net cash used in operating activities was $5,775,735 for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared with $8,297,043 used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2024. The decrease of $2,521,308 in cash used in operating activities was principally driven by a decrease in net loss of $2,936,114 as cost cuts were phased-in during the year and an increase of $209,155 in depreciation expense, offset by a decrease of $584,320 in stock-based compensation.   57 Net Cash Used In Investing Activities Net cash used in investing activities was $765,449 for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared with $3,391,888 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The decrease in cash used in investing activities of $2,626,439 was principally due to reduced purchases of mining equipment and vehicles in the current period. We have shifted emphasis from new acquisitions to refurbishing our previously acquired vehicles and equipment. Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities Net cash provided by financing activities was $7,137,957 for the year ended December 31, 2025, as compared with $8,152,328 for the year ended December 31, 2024. The decrease in cash provided by financing activities of $1,014,371 was principally due to a $3,591,087 increase in proceeds from private placements during 2025 offset by proceeds of $4,605,458 from warrant exercises during 2024. There was no corresponding warrant exercises during 2025. Asset Retirement Obligations Our mines are subject to certain AROs, which we have recorded as liabilities. The AROs of the United States mines are subject to legal and regulatory requirements and estimates of the costs of asset retirement obligations are reviewed periodically by the applicable regulatory authorities. The ARO represents our best estimate of the present value of future reclamation costs in connection with the mineral properties. During the year ended December 31, 2025, in connection with our Sage Mine, we incurred additional gross and discounted asset retirement obligations of $24,396 and $6,713, respectively. We determined the gross ARO of the mineral properties to be $1,187,553 and $1,163,978, as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The portion of the asset retirement obligation related to the Van 4 Mine, which is in reclamation as of December 31, 2025, and its related restricted cash are included in current liabilities and current assets, respectively, at a value of $75,057. During the year ended December 31, 2025, our internal mining operations team has been performing the Van 4 Mine reclamation work. We submitted our Surety Reduction Request application to the CDRMS on January 7, 2026 for a reduction of the financial warranty based on current site conditions and consideration of reclamation activities completed thus far. On March 19, 2026, the CDRMS concluded its review and approved the Company’s request and reduced the financial warranty from $75,057 to $49,350. The asset retirement obligations represent the Company’s estimate of the present value of future reclamation costs, discounted using a credit adjusted risk-free interest rates of 5.4% as of December 31, 2025 and 2024. The net discounted aggregated values as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 were $415,164 and $410,098, respectively. On March 13, 2025 and July 31, 2025, the Company remitted $351,131 and $24,489, respectively, in connection with the reevaluation of reclamation costs for existing mining properties. The gross AROs as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 are secured by financial warranties in the amount of $1,187,553 and $812,993, respectively. Oil and Gas Lease and Easement We entered into an oil and gas lease that became effective with respect to minerals and mineral rights owned by us on approximately 160 surface acres of our property in Colorado. As consideration for entering into the lease, the lessee has agreed to pay us a royalty from the lessee’s revenue attributed to oil and gas produced, saved, and sold attributable to the net mineral interest. We have also received cash payments from the lessee related to the easement that we are recognizing incrementally over the eight year term of the easement. On June 23, 2020, the same entity as discussed above elected to extend the oil and gas lease easement for three additional years, commencing on the date the lease would have previously expired. During 2021, the operator completed a first set of eight (8) wells which commenced oil and gas production by August 2021. During 2022, the operator completed a second set of eight (8) wells which commenced oil and gas production by August 2022. All sixteen (16) wells remain in production and monthly royalty payments will be ongoing in perpetuity as long as oil and/or gas are produced from the pooled unit containing these sixteen (16) wells. Under the oil and gas lease and easement arrangements, during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, we recognized aggregate revenue of $128,163 and $183,803, respectively, under these oil and gas lease arrangements.   58 Related Party Transactions We have transacted with related parties pursuant to service arrangements in the ordinary course of business, as follows: Prior to the acquisition of Black Range, Mr. George Glasier, the Company’s CEO, who is also a director of the Company (“Seller”), transferred his interest in a former joint venture with Ablation Technologies, LLC to Black Range. In connection with the transfer, Black Range issued 25 million shares of Black Range common stock to Seller and committed to pay $333,349 (AUD $500,000) to Seller within 60 days of the first commercial application of the Kinetic Separation technology. We assumed this contingent payment obligation in connection with the acquisition of Black Range. At the date of the acquisition of Black Range, this contingent obligation was determined to be probable. Since the deferred contingent consideration obligation is probable and the amount is estimable, we recorded the deferred contingent consideration as an assumed liability in the amount of $333,349 and $309,138 as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. On October 1, 2024, Western, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Western Utah, executed a binding stock purchase agreement (the “PRC Agreement”) to purchase 100% of the shares of PRC from a private investor group and thereby acquire an 880 acre property located in Montrose County, Colorado, where a uranium processing plant was previously licensed but never constructed. George Glasier, the President, CEO and a director of Western, and his wife Kathleen owned 50% of the shares of PRC, and Andrew Wilder, a director of Western, indirectly owned 3% of the shares of PRC. Therefore, this transaction constitutes a related party transaction. The Company’s Board of Directors established an independent committee of the Board, comprised of directors who are not considered to have an interest in the transaction. The independent committee supervised the negotiation of and approved Western’s entry into the PRC Agreement. Of the total cash paid to the sellers, $414,584 was paid to George Glasier and $24,875 was paid to an affiliate of Andrew Wilder. We have multiple lease arrangements with Silver Hawk Ltd., an entity which is owned by George Glasier and his wife Kathleen Glasier. These leases, which are all on a month-to-month basis, are for the rental of office, workshop, warehouse and employee housing facilities. In connection with these arrangements, we incurred rent expense of $108,546 and $106,500 for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. We are obligated to pay Mr. Glasier for reimbursable expenses in the amount of $74,063 and $83,554, included within accounts payable and accrued liabilities, as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2024, we purchased equipment from Silver Hawk Ltd. for $9,000. There were no purchases from Silver Hawk Ltd. during the year ended December 31, 2025. In connection with the Company’s June 13, 2025 private placement, of the 5,911,786 common shares and warrants issued to investors, 117,647 were issued to Mr. Glasier for his participation in the private placement. In December 2025, Mr. Glasier acquired an aggregate of 100,000 common shares of the Company at a price of $0.35 (CAD $0.48 as of December 31, 2025). Going Concern With the exception of the quarter ended June 30, 2022, we had incurred losses from our operations and as of December 31, 2025, had an accumulated deficit of $36,105,817 and working capital of $5,384,164. Since inception, we have met our liquidity requirements principally through the issuance of notes, the sale of our common shares and from limited revenue sources. On October 14, 2025, the Company closed a brokered private placement of 6,555,556 units at a price of $0.64 (CAD $0.90) per unit. The aggregate gross proceeds raised in the private placement amounted to $4,202,281 (CAD $5,900,000) and proceeds net of issuance costs were $3,806,270 (CAD $5,344,010). On June 13, 2025, we closed a brokered private placement of 5,911,786 units at a price of $0.63 (CAD $0.85) per unit. The aggregate gross proceeds raised in the private placement amounted to $3,693,424 (CAD $5,025,018) and proceeds net of issuance costs were $3,331,687 (CAD $4,532,939). Of the 5,911,786 common shares and warrants issued to investors, 117,647 were issued to Mr. Glasier for his participation in the private placement. During November 2024, we closed a private placement of 4,142,906 units at a price of $0.94 (CAD $1.32) per unit. The aggregate gross proceeds raised in the private placement amounted to $3,897,166 (CAD $5,468,636) and proceeds net of issuance costs were $3,546,870 (CAD $4,975,966). During year ended December 31, 2024, we received $4,605,458 (CAD $6,238,248) in proceeds from the exercise of common share warrants to purchase 5,198,540 common shares.   59 Our ability to continue our operations and to pay our obligations when they become due is contingent upon us obtaining additional financing. Management’s plans include seeking to procure additional funds through debt and equity financings, to secure regulatory approval licenses to fully utilize Kinetic Separation and to permit and construct the Mustang Minerals Processing Plant for the processing of uranium and vanadium to generate operating cash flows. We will also require capital to fund the ongoing in-house mining operations at the Sunday Mine Complex and other portfolio projects. There are no assurances that we will be able to raise capital on terms acceptable to us or at all, or that cash flows generated from our operations will be sufficient to meet our current operating costs and required debt service. If we are unable to obtain sufficient amounts of additional capital, we may be required to reduce the scope of our planned product development, which could harm our financial condition and operating results, or we may not be able to continue to fund our ongoing operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern to sustain operations for at least one year from the issuance of the accompanying financial statements. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties. Off Balance Sheet Arrangements As of December 31, 2025, there were no off-balance sheet transactions. We have not entered into any specialized financial agreements to minimize our investment risk, currency risk or commodity risk. Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Significant assumptions about the future and other sources of estimation uncertainty that management has made at the end of the reporting period, that could result in a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities, in the event that actual results differ from assumptions made, include, but are not limited to, the following: fair value of transactions involving common shares, assessment of the useful life and evaluation for impairment of intangible assets, valuation and impairment assessments of mineral properties and equipment, deferred contingent consideration, asset retirement obligations, valuation of stock-based compensation, and HST. Other areas requiring estimates include allocations of expenditures, depletion and amortization of mineral rights and properties. ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK Not applicable. ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA This information appears following Item 16 of this report and is included herein by reference. ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE Not applicable. ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures As of the end of the period covered by this report, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)). Based on their evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2025, to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (a) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (b) accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.   60 Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that during the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective, due to our identified material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting. As of December 31, 2025, our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, or COSO, in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013). Based on this assessment, management, under the supervision and with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, concluded that, as of December 31, 2025, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective based on those criteria. Based upon its assessment, as of December 31, 2025, management has identified the following material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting, inclusive of the control weakness related to disclosure controls and procedures: 1. The lack of sufficient dedicated accounting personnel, resulting in delays around the timely collection of inputs and the preparation and review of financial reporting, as well as the inability to provide for effective segregation of duties, and 2. The lack of formal documentation of the design of the control environment and the related control processes and procedures. Remediation Efforts to Address Material Weaknesses We have identified and implemented, and continue to implement, certain remediation efforts to improve the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. These remediation efforts are ongoing and include the following measures to address the material weaknesses identified: ● We have engaged additional accounting resources from our consultants. These additional resources have enabled us to improve the timeliness and initial recording of inputs as well as for the preparation of account reconciliations. ● We have engaged a new member of the management team into our cash disbursement function, thus providing an improvement in segregating duties for incompatible roles. ● We have implemented additional procedures in connection with our monthly accounting closing process. While we believe the steps taken to date will improve the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, we have not yet completed all of our planned remediation efforts. Attestation Report This annual report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to a provision under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act that grants a permanent exemption for non-accelerated filers from complying with Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 under the Exchange Act that occurred during the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION. None. ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS. None .   61 PART III ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE The following table sets forth information regarding the members of our board of directors (the “Board”) and our executive officers. Name Age Position(s) George Glasier 82 President, Chief Executive Officer and Director Robert Klein 60 Chief Financial Officer Michael Rutter 49 Chief Operating Officer Bryan Murphy 57 Director, Chairman Andrew Wilder 55 Director Michael Skutezky 78 Director Executive Officers George Glasier, J.D ., founded Western Uranium & Vanadium Corp. and has served as a Director and as President and Chief Executive Officer since 2014. He has over thirty years’ experience in the uranium industry in the United States, with extensive experience in sales and marketing; project development and permitting uranium processing facilities. He is the founder of Energy Fuels Inc. (Volcanic Metals Exploration Inc.) and served as its Chief Executive Officer and President from January 2006 to March 2010. He was responsible for assembling a first-class management team, acquiring a portfolio of uranium projects, and leading the successful permitting process that culminated in the licensing of the Piñon Ridge uranium mill; originally planned for construction in Western Montrose County, Colorado. He began his career in the uranium industry in the late 1970’s with Energy Fuels Nuclear, which built and operated the White Mesa Mill near Blanding, Utah, becoming the largest uranium producer in the United States. Robert Klein has served as Chief Financial Officer of Western Uranium & Vanadium Corp since 2016. He is in charge of accounting and finance, and is closely involved in capital markets activities, corporate transactions, investor relations, public relations, and legal, and compliance. Formerly, Mr. Klein served as Vice President Finance and had leading roles in reporting, corporate transactions, and Western’s public listings on the CSE and OTCQX. Mr. Klein was formerly the Chief Operating Officer of Cross River Group and began his association with Western on an Operating Partner basis after the formation of Western’s predecessor company, Pinon Ridge Mining, LLC. Previously, Mr. Klein was a Managing Director at Analytical Research, an alternative investments research firm. He has a broad financial background derived from senior operating and investment roles with asset managers and through Exeter Analytics, a consulting firm he founded. Mr. Klein was formerly the CFO of Five Points Capital, a hedge fund spin-out from Soros Fund Management. After having begun his career in public accounting, Mr. Klein worked for Lehman Brothers, an investment bank, and William E. Simon & Sons, a merchant bank and private investment firm. Rob earned the Chartered Financial Analyst designation, received an M.B.A. from the Robert H. Smith School of Business at the University of Maryland and a B.S. in Accounting from George Mason University. Michael Rutter has served as the Chief Operating Officer (“COO”) of Western Uranium & Vanadium since January 30, 2024. As COO, Mr. Rutter is in charge of Western’s mining and milling operations; all operations teams report to Mr. Rutter. Mr. Rutter hires staff, procures equipment and is responsible for the maintenance and scaling-up of activities at Western’s resource properties. Beginning in 2016 and until he was appointed COO, Mr. Rutter served as Western’s Vice President of Operations, serving part-time until 2022 and then full-time since. In his role as Vice President of Operations, Mr. Rutter was in charge of overseeing resource properties and the advancement of Kinetic Separation. He was the project coordinator for the development of all of Western’s resource properties and spearheaded efforts at the Sunday Mine Complex, and certain reclamation projects. During the prior period from 2014 to 2016, Mr. Rutter provided services to Western as a consultant on a part-time basis. Mr. Rutter’s experience also included working for Veolia Nuclear Solutions Federal Services during 2014 through 2022, where Mr. Rutter oversaw electrical and mechanical operations at the Paradox Valley Unit of the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program and working for Energy Fuels Inc. from 2007 through 2014 as Maintenance and Operations Superintendent in uranium production in Utah, Colorado and Arizona.   62 Non-Employee Directors Andrew Wilder serves as a Director and the Chairman of the Audit Committee for Western Uranium & Vanadium Corporation, positions he has held since 2014, and as a member of the Governance, Nominating & Compensation Committee. He is the Founder and the Chief Executive Officer of Cross River Infrastructure Partners, a platform designed to accelerate global sustainability through the development and construction of infrastructure projects deploying transformative industrial technologies. Areas of focus include capturing and sequestering carbon emissions, generating green hydrogen and ammonia, generating clean power with advanced small modular nuclear reactors, and up cycling bio-waste into renewable natural gas. Mr. Wilder is also currently a Board Member for Bedford 2030, a community-based climate action non-profit organization for the Township of Bedford, New York. In 2011, prior to launching Cross River Infrastructure Partners, Mr. Wilder founded and managed the Cross River Group, an advisory business providing capital and business development services to alternative asset managers and institutions. In 2001, Mr. Wilder co-founded and served as Chief Operating and Chief Financial Officer for North Sound Capital LLC, an equity hedge fund manager with $3 billion peak assets under management. Mr. Wilder’s prior career included serving as a Manager in the audit group of Deloitte. Mr. Wilder received the Chartered Accountant (Canada) designation, holds the CFA designation, and received an MBA from the University of Toronto and a BA from the University of Western Ontario. Our board of directors believe that Mr. Wilder’s extensive experience in financial management and in the energy industry qualifies him to serve on our board of directors. Bryan Murphy has served as a Director of Western Uranium & Vanadium Corp. since 2018 and serves on both the Audit Committee and the Governance, Nominating & Compensation Committee. He is the founder of Magellan Limited, an advisory firm focusing on providing strategic, M&A, and financial advisory services and currently serves as CFO and Head of Finance for Biome Renewables Inc., an early stage renewable energy innovation and industrial design company. Formerly, Mr. Murphy was Co-Founder and Managing Partner of Quest Partners, a boutique investment bank that focuses on the provision of M&A, corporate finance, and business strategy services. In these capacities, Mr. Murphy has developed extensive international experience and relationships advising high-growth businesses across North America, Europe, and the Middle East. In the prior dozen years, Mr. Murphy held senior management roles at Canadian Tire Corporation overseeing divisions and business lines. Additionally, Mr. Murphy was formerly a board member of Covenant House Toronto, one of Canada’s largest homeless youth agencies. Bryan has an Honours Bachelor of Arts in Business Administration majoring in Finance and an MBA with Distinction from the University of Western Ontario Richard Ivey School of Business. Bryan earned the ICD.D designation from the Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto and the Institute of Corporate Directors. Our board of directors believe that Mr. Murphy’s extensive experience in strategic and other advisory and executive leadership qualifies him to serve on our board of directors. Michael Skutezky was elected to the Board of Directors in June 2024 and serves as the Chairman of the Governance, Nominating & Compensation Committee and as a member of the Audit Committee. He brings over 40 years of experience as an officer, counsel, and director in the financial sector in Canada. His career includes serving as Assistant General Counsel at Royal Bank of Canada, where he specialized in international and Canadian project financing, and as Senior Vice President, Personal Trust at National Trust. Currently, Mr. Skutezky is the Chairman and sole shareholder of Rhodes Capital Corporation, a firm that provides alternative financing solutions for small to mid-sized businesses and startups. The Company specializes in business financing strategies designed to enhance working capital and cash flow. Since 2019, Mr. Skutezky has served as Secretary and Senior Legal Counsel for Voyager Metals Inc. He has also been a Director of New Break Resources Ltd. since April 2014, where he previously held the role of Corporate Secretary until stepping down in October 2021. However, he continues to serve as a Director. Additionally, he has been a Director of Green Shift Commodities Ltd. since June 2022. Mr. Skutezky holds a B.A. in Business from Bishop’s University and an LL.B. from Dalhousie Law School. He is a member of the Canadian and International Bar Associations and a non-practicing member of the Law Society of Ontario. Our board of directors believe that Mr. Skutezky’s extensive legal, financial and uranium industry experience qualifies him to serve on our board of directors.   63 Involvement of Officers and Directors in Certain Legal Proceedings During the past ten years, none of the persons serving as our executive officers and/or directors have been the subject of any of the following legal proceedings that are required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 401(f) of Regulation S-K, including: (a) any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time; (b) any criminal convictions or any criminal proceedings in which the person is a named subject (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses); (c) any order, judgment, or decree permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; (d) any finding by a court, the SEC or the CFTC to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies, or any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud in connection with any business entity; or (e) any sanction or order of any self-regulatory organization, any registered entity, or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or other organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member. Further, no such legal proceedings are believed to be contemplated by governmental authorities against any director or executive officer. Family Relationships There are no family relationships among our directors and executive officers. Code of Ethics We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to our officers, directors, employees and consultants. A copy of the code of ethics will be sent, free of charge, to any person who sends a written request for a copy to Western Uranium & Vanadium Corp., 5 Church Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5E 1M2. Insider Trading Policy and Procedures We have adopted a Disclosure, Confidentiality and Insider Trading Policy that includes insider trading policies and procedures that we believe are reasonably designed to promote compliance with applicable insider trading laws, rules and regulations and the CSE’s continued listing standards. Audit Committee Western has established a separately designated audit committee of the Board comprised of Andrew Wilder, Bryan Murphy, and Michael Skutezky. Our audit committee is responsible for oversight of audits, corporate governance, board nominations, and executive compensation. The Board has determined that one of its members, Andrew Wilder, who has previously served as Western’s Chief Financial Officer, qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert”. We have also determined that Mr. Wilder, Mr. Murphy, and Mr. Skutezky are independent directors as defined in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(a)(2). Governance, Nominating & Compensation Committee Western has established a separately designated Governance, Nominating & Compensation Committee of the Board comprised of Michael Skutezky (Chair of the Governance, Nominating & Compensation Committee), Andrew Wilder, and Bryan Murphy. Our Governance, Nominating & Compensation Committee is responsible to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to establishing corporate governance policies, evaluating the effectiveness and independence of the directors of the Company planning Board composition, overseeing director education, and developing a management continuity plan along with a competitive compensation strategy to enhance the Company’s sustainable profitability and growth.   64 ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Summary Compensation Table The following table sets forth information regarding compensation earned by our named executive officers: Name and Principal Position Year Salary ($) Bonus ($) Stock Awards ($) Option Awards ($) All Other Compensation ($) TOTAL ($) George Glasier (1) 2025 300,000 - - - 15,000 315,000 President and Chief Executive Officer 2024 300,000 31,500 - 102,667 15,000 449,167 Robert Klein (2) 2025 200,000 - - - 15,000 215,000 Chief Financial Officer 2024 200,000 21,500 - 102,667 15,000 339,167 Michael Rutter (3) 2025 185,000 - - - - 185,000 Chief Operating Officer 2024 185,000 18,500 - 89,833 - 293,333 (1) On November 24, 2024, Mr. Glasier was granted a non-qualified option to purchase 200,000 of our common shares at an exercise price of $0.94 (CAD $1.32) per share which expires five years from each of the respective vesting dates. This option will vest in three installments: one-third on January 31, 2025, one-third on July 31, 2025 and one-third on January 31, 2026. For each of the years December 31, 2025 and 2024, Mr. Glasier received a reimbursement of $15,000 in lieu of participation in Western’s health plan, which was initiated in 2023. (2) On November 24, 2024, Mr. Klein was granted a non-qualified option to purchase 200,000 of our common shares at an exercise price of $0.94 (CAD $1.32) per share which expires five years from each of the respective vesting dates. This option will vest in three installments: one-third on January 31, 2025, one-third on July 31, 2025 and one-third on January 31, 2026. For each of the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, Mr. Klein received a reimbursement of $15,000 in lieu of participation in Western’s health plan, which was initiated in 2023. (3) Mr. Rutter became an executive officer on January 30, 2024. On November 24, 2024, Mr. Rutter was granted a non-qualified option to purchase 175,000 of our common shares at an exercise price of $0.94 (CAD $1.32) per share which expires five years from each of the respective vesting dates. This option will vest in three installments: one-third on January 31, 2025, one-third on July 31, 2025 and one-third on January 31, 2026. Employment Agreements George Glasier On February 8, 2017, the Company entered into an employment agreement with George Glasier, its Chief Executive Officer. The employment agreement automatically renews each year unless either party provides a 90-day advance written notice of their desire to not renew the agreement. The employment agreement provides for a base salary of $180,000 per year, the amount of which is subject to review by the board of directors at least annually. The agreement also provides for a discretionary annual cash bonus to be determined by the Board. On May 30, 2019, the Board approved an addendum to Mr. Glasier’s employment agreement, increasing his annual base salary from $180,000 to $220,000. In December 2021, the Board approved an increase to Mr. Glasier’s base salary from $220,000 to $250,000. In January 2024, the Board approved an increase to Mr. Glasier’s base salary from $250,000 to $300,000. Pursuant to the employment agreement, if the Company terminates the employment agreement without cause, or if a change of control occurs, the Company is required to pay to Mr. Glasier a lump sum payment equal to two and one-half times his annual base salary. Robert Klein On November 12, 2020, the Company entered into a new employment agreement with Robert Klein, its Chief Financial Officer. The agreement was effective as of October 1, 2020 and has an initial term that ends on September 30, 2021. The agreement will automatically renew for successive annual terms unless either party provides a 90-day advance written notice of their intention not to renew. The agreement provides for a base salary of $150,000 per year, the amount of which is subject to review by the board of directors at least annually. Under the agreement, Mr. Klein is eligible to receive bonuses after the end of each calendar year or earlier in the discretion of the Board, and a bonus will also be considered upon the closing of a strategic transaction by the Company. In January 2024, the Board approved an increase to Mr. Klein’s base salary from $150,000 to $200,000. The agreement provides that Mr. Klein is eligible to participate generally in any employee benefit plan of the Company or its affiliates and to receive annual stock option grants under the Company’s incentive stock option plan in amounts to be determined and approved by the Board.   65 Outstanding Equity Awards Table The following table sets forth unexercised options, unvested stock and equity incentive plan awards outstanding for our named executive officers as of December 31, 2025. Outstanding Option Awards at December 31, 2025 Name Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#) exercisable Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#) unexercisable Option exercise price ($ CAD) Option expiration date George Glasier 66,667 - 1.76 02/09/2027 66,666 - 1.76 04/01/2027 66,667 - 1.76 07/01/2027 150,000 - 1.60 10/31/2027 150,000 - 1.60 04/30/2028 83,333 - 1.60 01/31/2029 83,333 - 1.60 07/31/2029 83,334 - 1.60 01/31/2030 66,666 - 1.32 1/31/2030 66,666 - 1.32 7/31/2030 - 66,668 1.32 1/31/2031 Robert Klein 66,667 - 1.76 02/09/2027 66,666 - 1.76 04/01/2027 66,667 - 1.76 07/01/2027 150,000 - 1.60 10/31/2027 150,000 - 1.60 04/30/2028 83,333 - 1.60 01/31/2029 83,333 - 1.60 07/31/2029 83,334 - 1.60 01/31/2030 66,666 - 1.32 1/31/2030 66,666 - 1.32 7/31/2030 - 66,668 1.32 1/31/2031 Michael Rutter 33,333 - 1.76 2/9/2027 33,334 - 1.76 4/1/2027 33,333 - 1.76 7/1/2027 75,000 - 1.60 10/31/2027 75,000 - 1.60 4/30/2028 75,000 - 1.60 1/31/2029 75,000 - 1.60 7/31/2029 75,000 - 1.60 1/31/2030 58,333 - 1.32 1/31/2030 58,333 - 1.32 7/31/2030 - 58,334 1.32 1/31/2031 Outstanding Stock Awards at Fiscal Year-End for 2025 None.   66 Director Compensation The following table sets forth a summary of the compensation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025 earned by each director who is not a named executive officer and who served on the Board during the year. Name Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) Stock Awards ($) Option Awards ($) Total ($) Andrew Wilder (1) 42,941 - - 42,941 Bryan Murphy (2) 68,705 - - 68,705 Michael Skutezky (3) 42,941 - - 42,941 (1) During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company incurred $42,941 in director fees for Mr. Wilder’s services as a Director. (2) During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company incurred $68,705 in director fees for Mr. Murphy’s services as a Director. (3) During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company incurred $42,941 in director fees for Mr. Skutezky’s services as a Director. ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our class of common shares as of April 14, 2026 by: ● each person, or group of affiliated persons, known to us to beneficially own more than 5% of our outstanding common shares; ● each of our directors and executive officers; and ● all of our directors and executive officers as a group. The amounts and percentages of common shares beneficially owned are reported on the basis of regulations of the SEC governing the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. The information relating to our 5% beneficial owners is based on information we received from such holders and information that is publicly available in Schedule 13Ds and Schedule 13Gs filed with the SEC. Under the rules of the SEC, a person is deemed to be a “beneficial owner” of a security if that person has or shares voting power, which includes the power to vote or direct the voting of a security, or investment power, which includes the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of a security. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities of which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. Securities that can be so acquired are deemed to be outstanding for purposes of computing such person’s ownership percentage, but not for purposes of computing any other person’s percentage. Under these rules, more than one person may be deemed a beneficial owner of the same securities and a person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of securities as to which such person has no economic interest.   67 Except as otherwise set forth in the footnotes to the table below, the address of persons listed below is c/o Western Uranium & Vanadium Corp., 5 Church Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5E 1M2. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes, each of the beneficial owners listed has, to our knowledge, sole voting and investment power with respect to the indicated common shares. Title of Class Name of Beneficial Owner Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership Percent of class (1) 5% or Greater Shareholders: Common shares George Glasier, CEO 6,362,829 (2) 8.7 % Common shares MMCAP International Inc. SPC 6,044,567 (3) 8.0 % Directors and Named Executive Officers: Common shares George Glasier, CEO 6,362,829 (2) 8.7 % Common shares Robert Klein, CFO 1,062,508 (4) 1.5 % Common shares Michael Rutter, COO 721,654 (5) 1.0 % Common shares Andrew Wilder 1,027,784 (6) 1.4 % Common shares Bryan Murphy 1,135,338 (7) 1.6 % Common shares Michael Skutezky 403,453 (8) 0.6 % All executive officers and directors as a group (6 persons) 10,713,566 13.9 % (1) Based on 71,853,888 common shares outstanding on April 14, 2026 and, with respect to each individual holder, rights to acquire our common shares exercisable within 60 days of April 14, 2026. (2) Consists of 5,028,516 common shares, 1,016,666 common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options held by Mr. Glasier, and 117,647 common shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants held by Mr. Glasier. Also includes 200,000 common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options held by Mr. Glasier’s spouse, the beneficial ownership of which Mr. Glasier disclaims. (3) Consists of 2,516,366 common shares and 3,528,201 common shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants beneficially owned by MMCAP International Inc. SPC. The address for MMCAP International Inc. SPC is 161 Bay Street, TD Canada Trust Tower Suite 2240, Toronto, Ontario, M5J 2S1, Canada. (4) Consists of 45,842 common shares and 1,016,666 common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options held by Mr. Klein. (5) Consists of 13,321 common shares and 708,333 common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options held by Mr. Rutter. (6) Consists of 11,118 common shares and 1,016,666 common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options held by Mr. Wilder. (7) Consists of 56,172 common shares owned directly, 62,500 common shares beneficially owned indirectly through Magellan Limited, and 1,016,666 common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options held by Mr. Murphy. (8) Consists of 10,000 common shares beneficially owned indirectly through Rhodes Capital Corporation, 20,000 common shares owned directly by Mr. Skutezky, 6,787 common shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants beneficially owned indirectly through Rhodes Capital Corporation, and 366,666 common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options held by Mr. Skutezky.   68 Equity Compensation Plan Information The Company maintains the Plan that permits the granting of stock options as incentive compensation. Shareholders of the Company approved the Plan on June 30, 2008 and amendments to the Plan on June 20, 2013. The board of directors approved additional changes to the Plan on September 12, 2015. On October 1, 2021, the Company further amended the Plan. On May 24, 2023, the Board of Directors approved and on June 29, 2023 the shareholders approved an amendment to the Plan. The purpose of the Plan is to attract, retain and motivate directors, management, staff and consultants by providing them with the opportunity, through stock options, to acquire a proprietary interest in the Company and benefit from its growth. The Plan is to be administered by the Board in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations, including the policies of any stock exchange, over-the-counter marketplace, or quotation/system service upon which the Company’s securities are listed or traded. The Board is authorized, subject to the provisions of the Plan, to adopt such rules and regulations as it deems consistent with the Plan’s provisions and, in its sole discretion, to designate options to purchase shares of the Company pursuant to the Plan. The Board may delegate to a committee the authority to exercise any or all power and authority of the Board under the Plan, including the authority with respect to option grants and/or exercises, all to the extent stipulated by the Board when so delegated. The Board may authorize one or more individuals of the Company to execute, deliver and receive documents on behalf of the Board. At December 31, 2025, a total of 5,348,332 stock options issued under the Plan were outstanding. The Plan provides that the aggregate number of common shares for which stock options may be granted will not exceed 10% of the issued and outstanding common shares at the time stock options are granted. As of December 31, 2025, a total of 71,853,888 common shares were outstanding. As of December 31, 2025, the maximum number of stock options eligible to be issued under the Plan would be 7,185,388, and net of 5,348,332 options outstanding as of December 31, 2025, there remain 1,837,056 stock options available to be issued under the Plan. The Plan provides that if an optionee’s employment is terminated for any reason, or if the service of a director, senior executive or consultant of the Company who is an optionee is terminated, any vested stock option of such optionee may be exercised during a period of ninety (90) days following the date of termination of such employment or service, as the case may be. In the case of an optionee’s death, any vested stock option of such optionee at the time of death may be exercised by his or her personal representative, heirs or legatees or their liquidator during a period of one year following such optionee’s death. The total number of common shares issuable to any one person during a 12-month period may not exceed ten percent (10%) of the total number of common shares issued and outstanding. Also, in any 12-month period, no options exercisable for more than 2% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares may be awarded to consultants. The Plan provides that where options are cancelled or lapse under the Plan, the associated common shares become available again and new options may be granted in respect thereof in accordance with the provisions of the Plan. The Board may make any amendment to the Plan, without shareholder approval, except an increase in the number of common shares reserved for issue under the Plan or a reduction of an option exercise price. The terms of any existing option may not be altered, suspended or discontinued without the consent in writing of the Optionee. Equity Compensation Plan Information As of December 31, 2025 Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights Weighted- average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) Plan Category (a) (b) (c) Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders 5,348,332 $ 1.16 1,837,056 Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders - n/a - Total 5,348,332 $ 1.16 1,837,056   69 ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE Transactions with Related Persons We have transacted with related parties pursuant to service arrangements in the ordinary course of business, as follows: Prior to the acquisition of Black Range, Mr. George Glasier, the Company’s CEO, who is also a director of the Company (“Seller”), transferred his interest in a former joint venture with Ablation Technologies, LLC to Black Range. In connection with the transfer, Black Range issued 25 million shares of Black Range common stock to Seller and committed to pay $333,349 (AUD $500,000) to Seller within 60 days of the first commercial application of the Kinetic Separation technology. The Company assumed this contingent payment obligation in connection with the acquisition of Black Range. At the date of the acquisition of Black Range, this contingent obligation was determined to be probable. Since the deferred contingent consideration obligation is probable and the amount is estimable, the Company recorded the deferred contingent consideration as an assumed liability in the amount of $333,349 and $309,138 as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. George Glasier, the President, CEO and a director of Western, and his wife, Kathleen, owned 50% of the shares of PRC, and Andrew Wilder, a director of Western, indirectly owned 3% of the shares of PRC, and so the transaction was considered a related party transaction. The Company’s Board of Directors established an independent committee of the Board comprised of directors who were not considered to have an interest in the transaction. The independent committee supervised the negotiation of and approved Western’s entry into the PRC agreement. Of the total cash paid to the sellers, $414,584 was paid to George Glasier and $24,875 was paid to an affiliate of Andrew Wilder. We have multiple lease arrangements with Silver Hawk Ltd., an entity which is owned by George Glasier and his wife Kathleen Glasier. These leases, which are all on a month-to-month basis, are for the rental of office, workshop, warehouse and employee housing facilities. In connection with these arrangements, we incurred rent expense of $108,546 and $106,500 for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. We are obligated to pay Mr. Glasier for reimbursable expenses in the amount of $74,063 and $83,554, included within accounts payable and accrued liabilities, as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. During the yeas ended December 31, 2024, we purchased equipment from Silver Hawk Ltd. for $9,000, respectively. There were no purchases from Silver Hawk Ltd. during the year ended December 31, 2025. In connection with the Company’s June 13, 2025 private placement, of the 5,911,786 common shares and warrants issued to investors, 117,647 were issued to Mr. Glasier for his participation in the private placement. In December 2025, Mr. Glasier acquired an aggregate of 100,000 common shares of the Company at a price of $0.35 (CAD $0.48 as of December 31, 2025). Director Independence The Board of Directors facilitates its exercise of independent supervision over management by ensuring representation on the Board by directors who are independent of management and by promoting frequent interaction and feedback. Directors are considered to be independent if they have no direct or indirect material relationship with the Company. A “material relationship” is a relationship which could, in the view of the Board, be reasonably expected to interfere with the exercise of a director’s independent judgment.   70 The Company’s Board currently consists of three directors. Currently, Andrew Wilder, Bryan Murphy and Michael Skutezky are independent directors based upon the tests for independence set forth in National Instrument 52-110 Audit Committees . SEC rules require a separate determination of independence of the Company’s directors based on the definition of independence of a U.S. national securities exchange or inter-dealer quotation system which has requirements that a majority of the board of directors be independent. Because the Company’s common shares are not currently listed on a national securities exchange, we currently use the definition in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(a)(2) for determining director independence. Under that definition, Andrew Wilder, Bryan Murphy and Michael Skutezky would be considered independent directors. Mr. Wilder, Mr. Murphy and Michael Skutezky would also be considered independent directors under Rule 5605(c)(2)’s provisions relating to audit committee composition. ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed by MNP LLP (“MNP”), our independent registered accounting firm for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. These fees are categorized as audit fees, audit-related fees, tax fees, and all other fees. The nature of the services provided in each category is described in the table below. 2025 2024 Audit fees $ 130,181 $ 127,354 Audit-related fees - - Tax fees 20,755 15,836 All other fees - - Total fees $ 150,936 $ 143,190 Audit fees: Consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of the consolidated financial statements and review of the quarterly interim consolidated financial statements. These fees also include the review of registration statements and the delivery of consents in connection with registration statements. Audit-related fees: There were no fees billed by MNP for professional services rendered for audit-related services for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. Tax fees: Consists of fees incurred for the Company’s U.S. and Canadian tax preparation fees and tax consulting fees. All other fees: There were no fees billed by MNP for professional services rendered for other compliance purposes for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. The Company’s Board of Directors has established pre-approval policies and procedures, pursuant to which the Board approved the foregoing audit and tax services provided by MNP in 2025 and 2024 consistent with the Board’s responsibility for engaging Western’s independent auditors. The Board also considered whether the non-audit services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm are compatible with an auditor maintaining independence. The Board has determined that the rendering of such services is compatible with MNP maintaining its independence.   71 PART IV ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES Documents Filed as Part of This Report. (a) The following financial statements are being filed as part of this Annual Report. Consolidated Financial Statements of Western Uranium & Vanadium Corp. and Subsidiaries Page No. Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) ID: 1930 ) F-1 Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 F-2 Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 F-3 Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 F-4 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 F-5 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F-6   72 (b) The following exhibits are being provided as required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K. Exhibit No. Description 2.1 (1) Share Exchange Agreement between Pinon Ridge Mining LLC, Homeland Uranium Inc., Homeland Uranium (Utah), et al., dated November 6, 2014. 2.2 (1) Merger Implementation Agreement between Black Range Minerals Limited and Western Uranium Corporation, dated March 20, 2015. 2.3 (1) Credit Facility between Western Uranium Corporation and Black Range Minerals Limited, dated March 20, 2015. 2.4 (2) Termination and Liquidation Agreement between Ablation Technologies LLC, Black Range Minerals Ablation Holdings Inc. and Mineral Ablation, LLC dated March 17, 2015 3.1 (1) Certificate of Incorporation, as amended. 3.2 (1) Amended and Restated By-laws. 4.1 (8) Description of Capital Stock 10.1 (3) Call Option Agreement 10.2 (2) Technology License Agreement between Ablation Technologies LLC and Black Range Mineral Ablation Holdings Inc. dated as of March 17, 2015 10.3 (9) Incentive Stock Option Plan (Rolling 10%), as amended 10.4 (4) Employment Agreement between George Glasier and Western Uranium & Vanadium Corporation dated February 8, 2017 10.5 (4) Employment Agreement between Robert Klein and Western Uranium & Vanadium Corporation dated May 12, 2017 10.6 (5) Employment Agreement between Robert Klein and Western Uranium & Vanadium Corporation dated November 13, 2017 10.7 (6) Addendum to Employment Agreement between George Glasier and Western Uranium & Vanadium Corporation dated May 30, 2019 10.8 (7) Employment Agreement, dated November 12, 2020, by and between Robert Klein and Western Uranium and Vanadium Corp. 14.1 (10) The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics 19.1 (10) Disclosure, confidentiality and Insider Trading Policy 21.1* List of Subsidiaries 23.1* Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 31.1* Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer 31.2* Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer 32.1* Section 1350 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer 95* Mine Safety Disclosure Exhibit 101.INS Inline XBRL Instance Document.* 101.SCH Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.* 101.CAL Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.* 101.DEF Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.* 101.LAB Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.* 101.PRE Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.* 104 Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101).* + Schedules and exhibits omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. The Company agrees to furnish a copy of the omitted schedules and exhibits to the SEC upon request. * Filed herewith (1) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10 filed on April 29, 2016 (2) Previously filed as an exhibit with Amendment No. 2 to the Company’s Form 10 filed on July 22, 2016 (3) Previously filed as an exhibit with Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Form 10 filed on June 22, 2016 (4) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on May 15, 2017 (5) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on April 2, 2018 (6) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2019 (7) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on November 16, 2020 (8) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on April 15, 2022 (9) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Proxy filed on May 31, 2023 (10) Previously filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on April 15, 2025 ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY None   73 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. WESTERN URANIUM & VANADIUM CORP. Date: April 15, 2026 By: /s/ George Glasier George Glasier Chief Executive Officer and President Date: April 15, 2026 By: /s/ Robert Klein Robert Klein Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Dated: April 15, 2026 By: /s/ George Glasier George Glasier Chief Executive Officer, President and Director (Principal Executive Officer) Dated: April 15, 2026 By: /s/ Robert Klein Robert Klein Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) Dated: April 15, 2026 By: /s/ Bryan Murphy Bryan Murphy Director Dated: April 15, 2026 By: /s/ Andrew Wilder Andrew Wilder Director Dated: April 15, 2026 By: /s/ Michael Skutezky Michael Skutezky Director   74 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Western Uranium & Vanadium Corp. Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Western Uranium & Vanadium Corp. and subsidiaries (the “Company") as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the related consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive loss, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the results of its consolidated operations and its consolidated cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2025, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has incurred losses from operations and is dependent upon future sources of equity or debt financing in order to fund its operations, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. Basis for Opinion These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. Chartered Professional Accountants Licensed Public Accountants We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2015. Mississauga, Canada April 15, 2026 F- 1 WESTERN URANIUM & VANADIUM CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Stated in USD) As of December 31, 2025 2024 Assets Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 5,620,630 $ 5,482,631 Restricted cash, current portion 75,057 75,057 Prepaid expenses 262,941 352,058 Other current assets 188,019 77,936 Total current assets 6,146,647 5,987,682 Restricted cash, net of current portion 1,162,496 737,936 Property, plant & equipment and mineral properties, net 17,649,747 17,702,569 Kinetic separation intellectual property 9,488,051 9,488,051 Total assets $ 34,446,941 $ 33,916,238 Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity Liabilities Current liabilities: Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $ 687,426 $ 672,041 Asset retirement obligations, current portion 75,057 75,057 Total current liabilities 762,483 747,098 Asset retirement obligations, net of current portion 340,107 335,041 Deferred tax liability 2,708,887 2,708,887 Deferred contingent consideration 333,349 309,138 Total liabilities 4,144,826 4,100,164 Commitments and Contingencies (Note 4) Shareholders’ Equity Common shares, no par value, unlimited authorized shares, 71,854,194 and 59,383,002 shares issued as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and 71,853,888 and 59,382,696 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively 66,677,062 58,979,839 Treasury shares, 306 shares held in treasury as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 - - Accumulated deficit ( 36,105,817 ) ( 28,929,894 ) Accumulated other comprehensive loss ( 269,130 ) ( 233,871 ) Total shareholders’ equity 30,302,115 29,816,074 Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $ 34,446,941 $ 33,916,238 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. F- 2 WESTERN URANIUM & VANADIUM CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (Stated in USD) For the Years Ended December 31, 2025 2024 Revenues $ 425,448 $ 183,803 Expenses Mining expenditures 4,447,119 5,285,140 Professional fees 581,224 613,403 General and administrative 2,283,333 3,599,460 Consulting fees 399,696 1,020,577 Total operating expenses 7,711,372 10,518,580 Operating loss ( 7,285,924 ) ( 10,334,777 ) Interest income, net 106,207 224,738 Other income (expense), net 3,794 ( 1,998 ) Net loss ( 7,175,923 ) ( 10,112,037 ) Other comprehensive loss Foreign currency translation adjustment ( 35,259 ) ( 159,862 ) Comprehensive loss $ ( 7,211,182 ) $ ( 10,271,899 ) Net loss per share - basic and diluted $ ( 0.11 ) $ ( 0.18 ) Weighted average shares outstanding - basic and diluted 64,055,465 55,084,225 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. F- 3 WESTERN URANIUM & VANADIUM CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Stated in USD) Common Shares Treasury Shares Accumulated Accumulated Other Comprehensive Shares Amount Shares Amount Deficit Loss Total Balance as of January 1, 2024 50,002,089 $ 49,661,910 306 $ - $ ( 18,817,857 ) $ ( 74,009 ) $ 30,770,044 Private placement - November 2024, net of offering costs 4,142,906 3,546,870 - - - - 3,546,870 Proceeds from the exercise of warrants 5,198,540 4,605,458 - - - - 4,605,458 Cashless exercise of stock options 39,161 - - - - - - Stock based compensation - stock options - 1,165,601 - - - - 1,165,601 Foreign currency translation adjustment - - - - - ( 159,862 ) ( 159,862 ) Net loss - - - - ( 10,112,037 ) - ( 10,112,037 ) Balance as of December 31, 2024 59,382,696 $ 58,979,839 306 $ - $ ( 28,929,894 ) $ ( 233,871 ) $ 29,816,074 Private placement - June 2025, net of offering costs 5,911,786 3,331,687 - - - - 3,331,687 Private placement - October 2025, net of offering costs 6,555,556 3,806,270 - - - - 3,806,270 Cashless exercise of stock options 3,850 - - - - - - Stock-based compensation expense - 559,266 - - - - 559,266 Foreign currency translation adjustment - - - - - ( 35,259 ) ( 35,259 ) Net loss - - - - ( 7,175,923 ) - ( 7,175,923 ) Balance as of December 31, 2025 71,853,888 $ 66,677,062 306 $ - $ ( 36,105,817 ) $ ( 269,130 ) $ 30,302,115 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. F- 4 WESTERN URANIUM & VANADIUM CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Stated in USD) For the Years Ended December 31, 2025 2024 Cash Flows Used In Operating Activities: Net loss $ ( 7,175,923 ) $ ( 10,112,037 ) Reconciliation of net loss to cash used in operating activities: Depreciation 822,765 613,610 (Gain) loss on the sale of equipment ( 4,494 ) 1,998 Accretion of asset retirement obligations 5,066 12,971 Stock-based compensation 558,221 1,142,541 Change in marketable securities - 385 Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Prepaid expenses and other current assets ( 20,966 ) 83,575 Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 15,385 ( 89,082 ) Asset retirement obligations - 80,508 Contingent consideration 24,211 ( 31,512 ) Net cash used in operating activities ( 5,775,735 ) ( 8,297,043 ) Cash Flows Used In Investing Activities Purchase of property, plant & equipment and mineral properties ( 795,618 ) ( 3,395,888 ) Proceeds from sale of equipment 30,169 4,000 Net cash used in investing activities ( 765,449 ) ( 3,391,888 ) Cash Flows Provided By Financing Activities Proceeds from private placement, net 7,137,957 3,546,870 Proceeds from warrant exercises - 4,605,458 Net cash provided by financing activities 7,137,957 8,152,328 Effect of foreign exchange rate on cash ( 34,214 ) ( 136,802 ) Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash 562,559 ( 3,673,405 ) Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash - beginning 6,295,624 9,969,029 Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash - ending $ 6,858,183 $ 6,295,624 Cash and cash equivalents $ 5,620,630 $ 5,482,631 Restricted cash, current portion 75,057 75,057 Restricted cash, noncurrent 1,162,496 737,936 Total cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash $ 6,858,183 $ 6,295,624 Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: Cash paid during the period for: Interest $ - $ 7,879 Income taxes $ - $ - The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. F- 5 WESTERN URANIUM & VANADIUM CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Stated in USD) NOTE 1 – BUSINESS Nature of Operations Western Uranium & Vanadium Corp. (“Western” or the “Company”) was incorporated in December 2006 under the Ontario Business Corporations Act. On November 20, 2014, the Company completed a listing process on the Canadian Securities Exchange (“CSE”). As part of that process, the Company acquired 100 % of the members’ interests of Pinon Ridge Mining LLC (“PRM”), a Delaware limited liability company. The transaction constituted a reverse takeover (“RTO”) of Western by PRM. Subsequent to obtaining appropriate shareholder approvals, the Company reconstituted its Board of Directors and senior management team. Western is a Canadian domestic issuer and Canadian reporting issuer. The Company’s registered office is located at 5 Church Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5E 1M2, and its common shares are listed on the CSE under the symbol “WUC.” On April 22, 2016, the Company’s common shares began trading on the OTC Pink Open Market, and on May 23, 2016, the Company’s common shares were approved for trading on the OTCQX Best Market under the symbol “WSTRF”. The Company’s principal business activity is the acquisition and development of uranium and vanadium resource properties in the states of Utah and Colorado in the United States of America (“United States”). On September 16, 2015, Western completed its acquisition of Black Range Minerals Limited (“Black Range”). Under United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) rules, this transaction triggered the Company being deemed a United States domestic issuer and losing its foreign private issuer exemption. On April 29, 2016, the Company filed a Form 10 registration statement with the Commission after converting its basis of accounting from International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”). On June 28, 2016, the Company’s registration statement became effective and Western became a United States reporting issuer. On June 30, 2023, Western re-qualified as a foreign private issuer as that term is defined in Rule 3b-4(c) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). As a result, the Company may now utilize certain accommodations made to foreign private issuers, including (1) an exemption from complying with the Commission’s proxy rules, (2) an exemption from the Company’s insiders having to comply with the reporting and short-swing trading liability provisions of Section 16 under the Exchange Act, (3) the ability to make periodic filings with the Commission on the Form 20-F and Form 6-K foreign issuer forms, and (4) the ability to offer and sell unrestricted securities outside of the United States pursuant to Rule 903 of Regulation S. The Company intends to take advantage of these accommodations. However, the Company currently has decided to voluntarily continue to file periodic reports with the Commission using domestic issuer forms including filing annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K. As of the subsequent measurement date June 30, 2024, Western reconfirmed its qualification as a foreign private issuer for periods ended through December 31, 2025. F- 6 WESTERN URANIUM & VANADIUM CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Stated in USD) Note 2 – Liquidity and going concern With the exception of the quarter ended June 30, 2022, the Company has incurred losses from its operations. During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company generated net losses of $ 7,175,923 and $ 10,112,037 , respectively. The Company expects to generate operating losses for the foreseeable future as it incurs expenses to bring its mineral processing facilities online and further expands its mining operations. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $ 36,105,817 and $ 28,929,894 , respectively, and working capital of $ 5,384,164 and $ 5,240,584 , respectively. Since inception, the Company has met its liquidity requirements principally through the issuance of notes, the sale of its common shares and from limited revenue sources. On October 14, 2025, the Company closed a brokered private placement of 6,555,556 units at a price of $ 0.64 (CAD $ 0.90 ) per unit. The aggregate gross proceeds raised in the private placement amounted to $ 4,202,281 (CAD $ 5,900,000 ) and proceeds net of issuance costs were $ 3,806,270 (CAD $ 5,344,010 ). On June 13, 2025, the Company closed a brokered private placement of 5,911,786 units at a price of $ 0.63 (CAD $ 0.85 ) per unit. The aggregate gross proceeds raised in the private placement amounted to $ 3,693,424 (CAD $ 5,025,018 ) and proceeds net of issuance costs were $ 3,331,687 (CAD $ 4,532,939 ). Of the 5,911,786 common shares and warrants issued to investors, 117,647 were issued to Mr. Glasier for his participation in the private placement (see Note 8). During November 2024, the Company closed a private placement of 4,142,906 units at a price of $ 0.94 (CAD $ 1.32 ) per unit. The aggregate gross proceeds raised in the private placement amounted to $ 3,897,166 (CAD $ 5,468,636 ) and proceeds net of issuance costs were $ 3,546,870 (CAD $ 4,975,966 ). During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company received $ 4,605,458 (CAD $ 6,238,248 ) in proceeds from the exercise of common share warrants to purchase 5,198,540 common shares. The Company’s ability to continue its planned operations and to pay its obligations when they become due is contingent upon the Company obtaining additional financing. Management’s plans include seeking to procure additional funds through debt and equity financing, to secure regulatory approval to fully utilize its kinetic separation (“Kinetic Separation”) technology, and to initiate the processing of mineral resources to generate operating cash flows. There are no assurances that the Company will be able to raise capital on terms acceptable to the Company or at all, or that cash flows generated from its operations will be sufficient to meet its current operating costs. If the Company is unable to obtain sufficient amounts of additional capital, it may be required to reduce the scope of its planned product development, which could harm its financial condition and operating results, or it may not be able to continue to fund its ongoing operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern to sustain operations for at least one year from the issuance of these consolidated financial statements. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties. F- 7 WESTERN URANIUM & VANADIUM CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Stated in USD) NOTE 3 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation These consolidated financial statements are presented in United States dollars and have been prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“U.S. GAAP”). The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Western and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Western Uranium Corporation (Utah) (“Western Utah”), PRM, Black Range, Black Range Copper Inc., Ranger Resources Inc., Black Range Minerals Inc., Black Range Minerals Colorado LLC, Black Range Minerals Wyoming LLC, Haggerty Resources LLC, Ranger Alaska LLC, Black Range Minerals Utah LLC, Black Range Minerals Ablation Holdings Inc., Black Range Development Utah LLC, Maverick Strategic Minerals Corp (“Maverick”), Pinon Ridge Corporation (“PRC”) and Mustang Mineral Processing Inc. (“Mustang”). All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated upon consolidation. The Company has established the existence of mineralized materials for certain uranium projects. The Company has not established proven or probable reserves, as defined by the Commission, through the completion of a “final” or “bankable” feasibility study for any of its uranium projects. Segment Information In accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 280, Segment Reporting , operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise for which separate discrete information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance (the “CODM”). For the Company, its CODM is its Chief Executive Officer . The Company views its operations and manages its business as one operating and reporting segment. This single segment reflects the Company’s core business, which is the production of uranium minerals. The Company’s CODM regularly reviews the segment net income (loss) that also is reported on the statement of operations and other comprehensive loss as net income (loss). The measure of segment assets is reported on the balance sheet as total consolidated assets. F- 8 WESTERN URANIUM & VANADIUM CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Stated in USD) Note 3 – SUMMARY OF Significant Accounting Policies, CONTINUED Exploration Stage and Mineral Properties In accordance with U.S. GAAP, expenditures relating to the acquisition of mineral rights are initially capitalized as incurred while exploration and pre-extraction expenditures are expensed as incurred until such time the Company exits the exploration stage by establishing proven or probable reserves. Expenditures relating to exploration activities, such as drill programs to search for additional mineralized materials, are expensed as incurred. Expenditures relating to pre-extraction activities, such as the construction of mine wellfields, ion exchange facilities, disposal wells, and mine development, are expensed as incurred until such time proven or probable reserves are established for that uranium project, after which subsequent expenditures relating to development activities for that particular project are capitalized as incurred. Expenditures relating to mining and production while the Company is in the exploration stage and while the mined material is stockpiled underground are expensed as incurred. Production stage issuers, as defined in subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K, having engaged in material extraction of established mineral reserves on at least one material property, typically capitalize expenditures relating to ongoing development activities, with corresponding depletion calculated over proven and probable reserves using the units-of-production method and allocated to future reporting periods to inventory and, as that inventory is sold, to cost of goods sold. The Company is an exploration stage issuer, which has resulted in the Company reporting larger losses than if it had been in the production stage due to the expensing, instead of capitalizing, of expenditures relating to ongoing mine development and extraction activities. Additionally, there would be no corresponding amortization allocated to future reporting periods of the Company since those costs would have been expensed previously, resulting in both lower inventory costs and cost of goods sold and results of operations with higher gross profits and lower losses than if the Company had been in the production stage. Any capitalized costs, such as expenditures relating to the acquisition of mineral rights, are depleted over the estimated extraction life using the straight-line method. As a result, the Company’s consolidated financial statements may not be directly comparable to the financial statements of companies in the production stage. Western will not be eligible to become a production stage issuer, and will remain an exploration stage issuer, until such time as mineral reserves are established on at least one material property. Use of Estimates The preparation of these consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and revenues and expenses during the periods reported. By their nature, these estimates are subject to measurement uncertainty, and the effects on the consolidated financial statements of changes in such estimates in future periods could be significant. Significant areas requiring management’s estimates and assumptions include the determination of the fair value of transactions involving common shares, assessment of the useful life and evaluation for impairment of Kinetic Separation intellectual property, valuation and impairment assessments of mineral properties and equipment, valuation of deferred contingent consideration, valuation of the reclamation liability and valuation of stock-based compensation. Other areas requiring estimates include allocations of expenditures, depletion, and amortization of mineral rights and properties. Actual results could differ from those estimates. F- 9 WESTERN URANIUM & VANADIUM CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Stated in USD) Note 3 – SUMMARY OF Significant Accounting Policies, CONTINUED Foreign Currency Translation The reporting currency of the Company, including its subsidiaries, is the United States dollar. The financial statements of subsidiaries located outside of the U.S. are measured in their functional currency, which is the local currency. The functional currency of the parent (Western Uranium & Vanadium Corp. (Ontario)) is the Canadian dollar. The functional currencies of the subsidiaries is the United States dollar. Monetary assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries are translated at the exchange rates at the balance sheet date. Transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are recorded based on the exchange rates at the time of the transaction. Income and expense items are translated using average monthly exchange rates. Non-monetary assets are translated at their historical exchange rates. Translation adjustments are included in “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” in the consolidated balance sheets. Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly-liquid instruments with an original maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents. There were no cash equivalents at December 31, 2025 and 2024. Restricted Cash Certain cash balances are restricted as they relate to deposits with banks that have been assigned to state reclamation authorities in the United States to secure various reclamation guarantees with respect to mineral properties in Utah and Colorado. As these funds are not available for general corporate purposes and secure the long term asset retirement obligation (“ARO”) (see Note 4), they have been separately disclosed and classified as long-term for the majority of the Company’s mines. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company has determined that the Van 4 Mine is considered to be in reclamation. The Company reflects the Van 4 Mine’s asset retirement obligation and its restricted cash in full on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as current (see Note 4). Property, Plant & Equipment and Mineral Properties, Net Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method. Revenue Recognition The Company leases certain of its mineral properties for the exploration and production of oil and gas reserves. The Company accounts for lease revenue in accordance with the FASB ASC 842, Leases . Lease payments received in advance are deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the related lease term associated with the prepayment. Royalty receipts are recognized as revenues based upon production (see Note 4). Fair Values of Financial Instruments The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash – current portion, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments. A portion of the Company’s operating and financing activities are conducted in Canadian dollars, and as a result, the Company is subject to exposure to market risks from changes in foreign currency rates. The carrying amount of restricted cash – net of current portion, approximates fair value as the accounts earn interest at market rates. The Company is exposed to credit risk through its cash and restricted cash but mitigates this risk by keeping these deposits at major financial institutions. F- 10 WESTERN URANIUM & VANADIUM CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Stated in USD) Note 3 – SUMMARY OF Significant Accounting Policies, CONTINUED Impairment of Long-Lived Assets The Company reviews and evaluates its long-lived assets and Kinetic Separation technology for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Mineral properties are monitored for impairment based on factors such as mineral prices, direct and indirect costs, mineral grades, mining capabilities, equipment and manpower capacity constraints, and government regulation, the Company’s continued right to explore the area, mine development findings and its continued plans to fund its mining and development programs along with the development of its planned Mustang Mineral Processing Mill. Impairment is considered to exist if the total estimated future cash flows on an undiscounted basis are less than the carrying amount of the assets. An impairment loss is measured and recorded based on discounted estimated future cash flows or upon an estimate of fair value that may be received in an exchange transaction. Future cash flows are estimated based on estimated quantities of recoverable minerals, expected uranium and vanadium prices (considering current and historical prices, trends, and related factors), production levels and fixed and variable operating costs of production. The Company’s long-lived assets (which principally include its mineral assets and Kinetic Separation intellectual property) were acquired during the end of 2014 and in 2015 in arms-length transactions. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company acquired a parcel of land upon which it intends to develop and construct a facility for the processing of mineral resources (see Note 4). As of December 31, 2025, the Company evaluated the total estimated future cash flows on an undiscounted basis for its mineral properties and Kinetic Separation intellectual property and determined that no impairment was deemed to exist. The Company’s estimates of future cash flows are based on numerous assumptions, and it is possible that actual future cash flows will be significantly different than the estimates, as future quantities of recoverable minerals, uranium and vanadium prices, production levels, costs and capital are each subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Changes in these estimates and assumptions could result in the impairment of the Company’s long-lived assets. In estimating future cash flows, assets are grouped at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of future cash flows from other asset groups. Income Taxes The Company utilizes an asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting for income taxes. The provision for income taxes is based upon income or loss after adjustment for those permanent items that are not considered in the determination of taxable income. Deferred income taxes represent the tax effects of differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities at the enacted tax rates in effect for the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. The Company evaluates the recoverability of deferred tax assets and establishes a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged in an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary. Tax benefits are recognized only for tax positions that are more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is more than 50 percent likely to be realized upon settlement. A liability for unrecognized tax benefits is recorded for any tax benefits claimed in the Company’s tax returns that do not meet these recognition and measurement standards. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, no liability for unrecognized tax benefits was required to be reported. The Company’s policy for recording interest and penalties associated with tax audits is to record such items as a component of general and administrative expense. There were no amounts accrued for penalties and interest for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024. The Company does not expect its uncertain tax position to change during the next twelve months. Management is currently unaware of any issues under review that could result in significant payments, accruals, or material deviations from its position. The Company has identified its federal Canadian and United States tax jurisdictions and its state tax jurisdictions in Colorado and Utah as its “major” tax jurisdictions, and such returns for the years 2019 through 2024 remain subject to examination. F- 11 WESTERN URANIUM & VANADIUM CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Stated in USD) Note 3 – SUMMARY OF Significant Accounting Policies, CONTINUED Asset Retirement Obligations Various federal and state mining laws and regulations require the Company to reclaim the surface areas and restore underground water quality for its mine projects to the pre-existing mine area average quality after the completion of mining. When an asset will require future reclamation and remediation costs, which include extraction equipment removal and environmental remediation, an ARO is accrued at the end of each period based on management’s best estimate of the costs expected to be incurred for each project. Such estimates are determined by the Company’s engineering studies which consider the costs of future surface and groundwater activities, current regulations, actual expenses incurred, and technology and industry standards. In accordance with the FASB ASC 410, Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations , the Company capitalizes the measured fair value of asset retirement obligations to mineral properties. The estimated fair value of the asset retirement obligation is based on the current cost escalated at an inflation rate and discounted at a credit adjusted risk-free rate. The asset retirement obligations are accreted to an undiscounted value until the time at which they are expected to be settled. The accretion expense is charged to earnings and the actual retirement costs are recorded against the asset retirement obligations when incurred. Any difference between the recorded asset retirement obligations and the actual retirement costs incurred will be recorded as a gain or loss in the period of settlement. At each reporting period, the Company reviews the assumptions used to estimate the expected cash flows required to settle the asset retirement obligations, including changes in estimated probabilities, amounts and timing of the settlement of the asset retirement obligations, as well as changes in the legal obligation requirements at each of its mineral properties. Changes in any one or more of these assumptions may cause revision of asset retirement obligations for the corresponding assets