11 unchanged sentences
adverse effect on the Company.
−Removed: A prior owner of the Van 4 Mine had been
−Removed: granted a first Temporary Cessation from reclamation of the mine by the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board (“MLRB”)
−Removed: which was set to expire June 23, 2017.
−Removed: Prior to its expiration, PRM formally requested an extension through a second Temporary
−Removed: PRM subsequently participated in a public process which culminated in a hearing on July 26, 2017.
−Removed: Prior to the hearing,
−Removed: three non-profit organizations who pursue environmental and conservation objectives filed a brief objecting to the extension.
−Removed: MLRB board members voted to grant a second five-year Temporary Cessation for the Van 4 Mine.
−Removed: Thereafter, the three objecting parties
−Removed: filed a lawsuit on September 18, 2017.
−Removed: The MLRB was named as the defendant and PRM was named as a party to the case due to the
−Removed: Colorado law requirement that any lawsuit filed after a hearing must include all of the parties in the proceeding.
−Removed: The plaintiff
−Removed: organizations are seeking for the court to set aside the board order granting a second five-year Temporary Cessation period to PRM
−Removed: for the Van 4 Mine.
−Removed: The Colorado state Attorney General
−Removed: was defending this action in the Denver Colorado District Court.
−Removed: On May 8, 2018, the Denver Colorado District Court ruled in favor,
−Removed: whereby the additional five-year temporary cessation period was granted.
−Removed: The Plaintiffs appealed this ruling to the Colorado Court
−Removed: of Appeals and on July 25, 2019 the ruling was reversed, ruling that the additional five-year temporary cessation period should not
−Removed: have been granted.
−Removed: The MLRB and the Colorado Attorney General advised
−Removed: Western that it will not make an additional appeal of the ruling.
−Removed: Further, the time period for an appeal has passed.
−Removed: The Judge has subsequently
−Removed: issued an instruction for the MLRB to issue an order revoking the permit and putting the Van 4 Mine into reclamation.
−Removed: On January 22, 2020,
−Removed: the MLRB held a hearing and on March 2, 2020, the MLRB issued an order vacating the Van 4 Temporary Cessation, revoking the permit and
−Removed: ordered commencement of final reclamation, which must be completed within five (5) years.
−Removed: The Company commenced reclamation of the Van
−Removed: 4 Mine but progress has been delayed both by COVID-19 restrictions and countywide fire and open flame restrictions.
−Removed: The reclamation cost
−Removed: is fully covered by the reclamation bonds posted upon acquisition of the property.
−Removed: On February 4, 2020,
−Removed: the Colorado DRMS sent a Notice of Hearing to Declare Termination of Mining Operations related to the status of the mining permits issued
−Removed: by the state of Colorado for the Sunday Mine Complex.
−Removed: At issue is the application of an unchallenged Colorado Court of Appeals Opinion
−Removed: for a separate mine (Van 4) with very different facts that are retroactively modifying DRMS rules and regulations.
−Removed: The Company maintains
−Removed: that it was timely in meeting existing rules and regulations.
−Removed: The hearing wa s scheduled to be held
−Removed: during several monthly MLRB Board meetings, but this matter has been delayed several times.
−Removed: The permit hearing was held during MLRB Board
−Removed: monthly meeting on July 22, 2020.
−Removed: At issue was the status of the five existing permits which comprise the Sunday Mine Complex.
−Removed: COVID restrictions, the hearing took place utilizing a virtual-only format.
−Removed: The Company prevailed in a 3 to 1 decision which acknowledged
−Removed: that the work completed at the Sunday Mines under DRMS oversight was timely and sufficient for Western to maintain these permits.
−Removed: subsequent July 30, 2020 letter, the DRMS notified the Company that the status of the five permits (Sunday, West Sunday, St.
−Removed: Jude, Carnation,
−Removed: and Topaz) had been changed to Active status effective June 10, 2019, the original date on which the change of the status was approved.
−Removed: On August 23, 2020, the Company initiated a request for temporary cessation status for the Sunday Mine Complex as the mines had not been
−Removed: restarted within a 180-day window due to the direct and indirect impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.
−Removed: Accordingly, a permit hearing was scheduled
−Removed: for October 21, 2020 to determine temporary cessation status.
−Removed: In a unanimous vote, the MLRB approved temporary cessation status for each
−Removed: of the five Sunday Mine Complex permits (Sunday, West Sunday, St.
−Removed: Jude, Carnation, and Topaz).
−Removed: On October 9, 2020, the MLRB issued a board
−Removed: order which finalized the findings of the July 22, 2020 permit hearing.
−Removed: On November 10, 2020, the MLRB issued a board order which finalized
−Removed: the findings of the October 21, 2020 permit hearing.
−Removed: On November 6, 2020, the MLRB signed an order placing the five Sunday Mine Complex
−Removed: mine permits into Temporary Cessation.
−Removed: On November 12, 2020, a coalition of environmental groups (the “Plaintiffs”) filed
−Removed: a complaint against the MLRB seeking a partial appeal of the July 22, 2020 decision by requesting termination of the Topaz Mine permit.
−Removed: On December 15, 2020, the same coalition of
−Removed: environmental groups amended their complaint against the MLRB seeking a partial appeal of the October 21, 2020 decision requesting
−Removed: termination of the Topaz Mine permit.
−Removed: The Company has joined with the MLRB in defense of their July 22, 2020 and October 21, 2020
−Removed: On May 5, 2021, the Plaintiff in the Topaz Appeal filed an opening brief with the Denver District Court seeking to
−Removed: overturn the July 22, 2020 and October 21, 2020 MLRB permit hearing decisions on the Topaz Mine permit.
−Removed: The MLRB and the Company
−Removed: were to respond with an answer brief within 35 days on or before June 9, 2021, but instead sought a settlement.
−Removed: The judicial review
−Removed: process was delayed as extensions were put in place until August 20, 2021.
−Removed: A settlement was not reached and the MLRB and the Company
−Removed: submitted answer briefs on August 20, 2021.
−Removed: The Plaintiff submitted a reply brief on September 10, 2021.
−Removed: On March 1, 2022, the
−Removed: Denver District Court reversed the MLRB’s orders regarding the Topaz Mine and remanded the case back to MLRB for further
−Removed: proceedings consistent with its order.
−Removed: The Company and the MRLB had until April 19, 2022 to appeal the Denver District Court’s
−Removed: Neither the Company nor the MLRB appealed the Denver District Court ruling.
−Removed: Subsequently on March 20, 2023, the MLRB issued
−Removed: a board order for the Company to commence final reclamation, which upon completion will terminate mining operations at the Topaz
−Removed: Reclamation is to commence immediately at the Topaz Mine and is to be completed within five years by March 2028.
−Removed: is currently working toward the completion of an updated Topaz Mine Plan of Operations which is a separate federal requirement of
−Removed: the BLM for the conduct of mining activities on the federal land at the Topaz Mine and needed to re-permit the Topaz Mine with
−Removed: Colorado’s DRMS .
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
20 unchanged sentences
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.