Item 1A. Risk Factors
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
An investment in our securities involves a
high degree of risk. You should consider carefully all of the risks described below before making a decision to invest in our Units.
If any of the following events occur, our business, financial condition and operating results may be materially adversely affected. In
that event, the trading price of our securities could decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment.
Risks Relating to Our Search for, and Consummation
of or Inability to Consummate, A Business Combination
Our Public Shareholders may not be afforded
an opportunity to vote on our proposed initial Business Combination, and even if we hold a vote, holders of our Founder Shares will participate
in such vote, which means we may complete our initial Business Combination even though a majority of our Public Shareholders do not support
such a combination.
We may choose not to hold
a shareholder vote to approve our initial Business Combination unless the Business Combination would require shareholder approval under
applicable law or stock exchange listing requirements. Except as required by applicable law or stock exchange requirements, the decision
as to whether we will seek shareholder approval of a proposed Business Combination or will allow shareholders to sell their shares to
us in a tender offer will be made by us, solely in our discretion, and will be based on a variety of factors, such as the timing of the
transaction and whether the terms of the transaction would otherwise require us to seek shareholder approval. Even if we seek shareholder
approval, the holders of our Founder Shares will participate in the vote on such approval. Accordingly, we may complete our initial Business
Combination even if holders of a majority of our ordinary shares do not approve of the business combination we complete. Please see the
section entitled “ Item 1. Business — Shareholders May Not Have the Ability to Approve Our Initial Business Combination ”
for additional information.
If we seek shareholder approval of our
initial Business Combination, our initial shareholders and management team have agreed to vote in favor of such initial Business Combination,
regardless of how our Public Shareholders vote.
Our initial shareholders
own 25% of our issued and outstanding ordinary shares. After taking into account the Private Placement Units issued to the Sponsor, our
initial shareholders own an aggregate of 8,081,667 ordinary shares, or approximately 26% of our issued and outstanding ordinary shares.
Our initial shareholders and management team also may from time to time purchase Class A Ordinary Shares prior to our initial Business
Combination. Our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association provides that, if we seek shareholder approval of an initial
Business Combination, such initial Business Combination will be approved if we receive an ordinary resolution under Cayman Islands law,
which requires the affirmative vote of a majority of our ordinary shares which are represented in person or by proxy and are voted at
a general meeting of the company, including the Founder Shares. As a result, in addition to our initial shareholders’ Founder Shares
and the Class A Ordinary Shares underlying the Private Placement Units, we would need 7,334,168, or 31.9%, of the 23,000,000 Public Shares
included in the Units sold in our Initial Public Offering to be voted in favor of an initial Business Combination in order to have our
initial Business Combination approved assuming all outstanding shares are voted. Assuming that only one-third of our issued and outstanding
ordinary shares, representing a quorum under our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association, are voted, we will not
need any Public Shares in addition to our Founder Shares to be voted in favor of an initial Business Combination in order to have an
initial Business Combination approved. However, if our initial Business Combination is structured as a statutory merger or consolidation
with another company under Cayman Islands law, the approval of our initial Business Combination will require a special resolution passed
by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of our ordinary shares which are represented in person or by proxy and are voted at a
general meeting of the company. Accordingly, if we seek shareholder approval of our initial Business Combination, the agreement by our
initial shareholders and management team to vote in favor of our initial Business Combination will increase the likelihood that we will
receive an ordinary resolution, being the requisite shareholder approval for such initial Business Combination.
23
Your only opportunity to effect your investment
decision regarding a potential Business Combination may be limited to the exercise of your right to redeem your shares from us for cash.
You will not be provided
with an opportunity to evaluate the specific merits or risks of our initial Business Combination. Since our board of directors may complete
a Business Combination without seeking shareholder approval, Public Shareholders may not have the right or opportunity to vote on the
Business Combination, unless we seek such shareholder vote. Accordingly, your only opportunity to effect your investment decision regarding
our initial Business Combination may be limited to exercising your redemption rights within the period of time (which will be at least
20 business days) set forth in our tender offer documents mailed to our Public Shareholders in which we describe our initial Business
Combination.
The ability of our Public Shareholders
to redeem their shares for cash may make our financial condition unattractive to potential Business Combination targets, which may make
it difficult for us to enter into a Business Combination with a target.
We may seek to enter into
a Business Combination transaction agreement with a minimum cash requirement for (i) cash consideration to be paid to the target
or its owners, (ii) cash for working capital or other general corporate purposes or (iii) the retention of cash to satisfy
other conditions. If too many Public Shareholders exercise their redemption rights, we would not be able to meet such closing condition
and, as a result, would not be able to proceed with the Business Combination and may instead search for an alternate Business Combination.
Prospective targets will be aware of these risks and, thus, may be reluctant to enter into a Business Combination transaction with us.
The ability of our Public Shareholders
to exercise redemption rights with respect to a large number of our shares and the amount of the deferred underwriting compensation may
not allow us to complete the most desirable Business Combination or optimize our capital structure, and may substantially dilute your
investment in us.
At the time we enter into
an agreement for our initial Business Combination, we will not know how many shareholders may exercise their redemption rights, and therefore
will need to structure the transaction based on our expectations as to the number of shares that will be submitted for redemption. If
our initial Business Combination agreement requires us to use a portion of the cash in the Trust Account to pay the purchase price, or
requires us to have a minimum amount of cash at closing, we will need to reserve a portion of the cash in the Trust Account to meet such
requirements, or arrange for third-party financing. In addition, if a larger number of shares are submitted for redemption than we initially
expected, we may need to restructure the transaction to reserve a greater portion of the cash in the Trust Account or arrange for third
party financing. Raising additional third-party financing may involve dilutive equity issuances or the incurrence of indebtedness at
higher than desirable levels. Furthermore, this dilution would increase to the extent that the anti-dilution provision of the Class B
ordinary shares results in the issuance of Class A Ordinary Shares on a greater than one-to-one basis upon conversion of the Class B
ordinary shares at the time of our initial Business Combination. In addition, the amount of the deferred underwriting commissions payable
to the Underwriters will not be adjusted for any shares that are redeemed in connection with an initial Business Combination. The per
share amount we will distribute to shareholders who properly exercise their redemption rights will not be reduced by the deferred underwriting
commission and after such redemptions, the amount held in trust will continue to reflect our obligation to pay the entire deferred underwriting
commissions. There are no redemption rights with respect to the warrants.
The ability of our Public Shareholders
to exercise redemption rights with respect to a large number of our shares could increase the probability that our initial Business Combination
would be unsuccessful and that you would have to wait for liquidation in order to redeem your shares.
If our initial Business Combination
agreement requires us to use a portion of the cash in the Trust Account to pay the purchase price, or requires us to have a minimum amount
of cash at closing, the probability that our initial Business Combination would be unsuccessful is increased. If our initial Business
Combination is unsuccessful, you would not receive your pro rata portion of the funds in the Trust Account until we liquidate the Trust
Account. If you are in need of immediate liquidity, you could attempt to sell your shares in the open market; however, at such time our
shares may trade at a discount to the pro rata amount per share in the Trust Account. In either situation, you may suffer a material
loss on your investment or lose the benefit of funds expected in connection with your exercise of redemption rights until we liquidate
or you are able to sell your shares in the open market.
24
The requirement that we complete our initial
Business Combination within the Completion Window may give potential target businesses leverage over us in negotiating a Business Combination
and may limit the time we have in which to conduct due diligence on potential Business Combination targets, in particular as we approach
our dissolution deadline, which could undermine our ability to complete our initial Business Combination on terms that would produce
value for our shareholders.
Any potential target business
with which we enter into negotiations concerning a Business Combination will be aware that we must complete our initial Business Combination
within the Completion Window. Consequently, such target business may obtain leverage over us in negotiating a Business Combination, knowing
that if we do not complete our initial Business Combination with that particular target business, we may be unable to complete our initial
Business Combination with any target business. This risk will increase as we get closer to the timeframe described above. In addition,
we may have limited time to conduct due diligence and may enter into our initial Business Combination on terms that we would have rejected
upon a more comprehensive investigation.
We may not be able to complete our initial
Business Combination within the Completion Window, in which case we would redeem our Public Shares.
We may not be able to find
a suitable target business and complete our initial Business Combination within the Completion Window. Our ability to complete our initial
Business Combination may be negatively impacted by general market conditions, volatility in the capital and debt markets and the other
risks described herein. If we have not completed our initial Business Combination within such time period, we will as promptly as reasonably
possible but not more than ten business days thereafter, redeem the Public Shares, at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal
to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust Account, including interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account (net of
taxes paid or payable (other than excise or similar taxes) and up to $100,000 of interest to pay dissolution expenses), divided by the
number of then issued and outstanding Public Shares, which redemption will constitute full and complete payment for the Public Shares
and completely extinguish Public Shareholders’ rights as shareholders (including the right to receive further liquidation or other
distributions, if any), subject to our obligations under Cayman Islands law to provide for claims of creditors and subject to the other
requirements of applicable law. Our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association provides that, if we wind up for any
other reason prior to the consummation of our initial Business Combination, we will follow the foregoing procedures with respect to the
liquidation of the Trust Account as promptly as reasonably possible but not more than ten business days thereafter, subject to applicable
Cayman Islands law. In either such case, our Public Shareholders may receive only $10.00 per Public Share, or less than $10.00 per Public
Share, on the redemption of their shares, and our warrants will expire worthless. See “ — If third parties bring claims
against us, the proceeds held in the Trust Account could be reduced and the per-share redemption amount received by shareholders may
be less than $10.00 per Public Share ” and other risk factors herein.
If we seek shareholder approval of our
initial Business Combination, our Sponsor, initial shareholders, directors, officers, advisors and their affiliates may elect to purchase
Public Shares or Public Warrants from Public Shareholders, which may influence a vote on a proposed Business Combination and reduce the
public “float” of our Class A Ordinary Shares or Public Warrants.
If we seek shareholder approval of our initial
Business Combination and we do not conduct redemptions in connection with our initial Business Combination pursuant to the tender offer
rules, our Sponsor, initial shareholders directors, officers, advisors and their affiliates may purchase Public Shares or Public Warrants
in privately negotiated transactions or in the open market either prior to or following the completion of our initial Business Combination.
Any such price per share may be different than the amount per share a Public Shareholder would receive if it elected to redeem its shares
in connection with our initial Business Combination. Such a purchase may include a contractual acknowledgment that such shareholder,
although still the record holder of our shares is no longer the beneficial owner thereof and therefore agrees not to exercise its redemption
rights. In the event that our Sponsor, initial shareholders, directors, officers, advisors and their affiliates purchase Public Shares
in privately negotiated transactions from Public Shareholders who have already elected to exercise their redemption rights, such selling
shareholders would be required to revoke their prior elections to redeem their shares. It is intended that, if Rule 10b-18 would
apply to purchases by Sponsor, initial shareholders, directors, officers, advisors and their affiliates, then such purchases will comply
with Rule 10b-18 under the Exchange Act, to the extent it applies, which provides a safe harbor for purchases made under certain
conditions, including with respect to timing, pricing and volume of purchases.
25
Additionally, at any time
at or prior to our initial Business Combination, subject to applicable securities laws (including with respect to material non-public
information), our Sponsor, initial shareholders, directors, officers, advisors and their affiliates may enter into transactions with
investors and others to provide them with incentives to acquire Public Shares, vote their Public Shares in favor of our initial Business
Combination or not redeem their Public Shares. However, they have no current commitments, plans or intentions to engage in such transactions
and have not formulated any terms or conditions for any such transactions. None of the funds in the Trust Account will be used to purchase
Public Shares or Public Warrants in such transactions.
The purpose of any such purchases
of shares could be to increase the likelihood of obtaining shareholder approval of the initial Business Combination or to satisfy a closing
condition in an agreement with a target that requires us to have a minimum net worth or a certain amount of cash at the closing of our
initial Business Combination, where it appears that such requirement would otherwise not be met. The purpose of any such purchases of
Public Warrants could be to reduce the number of Public Warrants outstanding or to vote such warrants on any matters submitted to the
warrant holders for approval in connection with our initial Business Combination. Any such purchases of our securities may result in
the completion of our initial Business Combination that may not otherwise have been possible. In addition, if such purchases are made,
the public “float” of our Class A ordinary shares or warrants may be reduced and the number of beneficial holders of
our securities may be reduced, which may make it difficult to maintain or obtain the quotation, listing or trading of our securities
on a national securities exchange.
In addition, if such purchases
are made, the public “float” of our Class A ordinary shares or Public Warrants may be reduced and the number of beneficial
holders of our securities may be reduced, which may make it difficult to maintain or obtain the quotation, listing or trading of our
securities on a national securities exchange. Any such purchases will be reported pursuant to Section 13 and Section 16 of
the Exchange Act to the extent such purchasers are subject to such reporting requirements. Additionally, in the event our Sponsor,
initial shareholders, directors, officers, advisors and their affiliates were to purchase Public Shares or Public Warrants from Public
Shareholders, such purchases would be structured in compliance with the requirements of Rule 14e-5 under the Exchange Act including,
in pertinent part, through adherence to the following:
● our registration
statement/proxy statement filed for our Business Combination transaction would disclose the
possibility that our Sponsor, initial shareholders, directors, officers, advisors and their
affiliates may purchase Public Shares or Public Warrants from Public Shareholders outside
the redemption process, along with the purpose of such purchases;
● if our Sponsor,
initial shareholders, directors, officers, advisors and their affiliates were to purchase
Public Shares or Public Warrants from Public Shareholders, they would do so at a price no
higher than the price offered through our redemption process;
● our registration
statement/proxy statement filed for our Business Combination transaction would include a
representation that any of our securities purchased by our Sponsor, initial shareholders,
directors, officers, advisors and their affiliates would not be voted in favor of approving
the Business Combination transaction;
● our Sponsor, initial
shareholders, directors, officers, advisors and their affiliates would not possess any redemption
rights with respect to our securities or, if they do acquire and possess redemption rights,
they would waive such rights; and
● we would disclose
in a Form 8-K, before our security holder meeting to approve the Business Combination
transaction, the following material items:
● the amount of
our securities purchased outside of the redemption offer by our Sponsor, initial shareholders,
directors, officers, advisors and their affiliates, along with the purchase price;
● the purpose of
the purchases by our Sponsor, initial shareholders, directors, officers, advisors and their
affiliates;
● the impact, if
any, of the purchases by our Sponsor, initial shareholders, directors, officers, advisors
and their affiliates on the likelihood that the Business Combination transaction will be
approved;
26
● the identities
of our security holders who sold to our Sponsor, initial shareholders, directors, officers,
advisors and their affiliates (if not purchased on the open market) or the nature of our
security holders (e.g., 5% security holders) who sold to our Sponsor, initial shareholders,
directors, officers, advisors and their affiliates; and
● the number of
our securities for which we have received redemption requests pursuant to our redemption
offer.
Please see “ Item
1. Business — Permitted Purchases of Our Securities ” for a description of how such persons will determine from
which shareholders to seek to acquire securities.
If a shareholder fails to receive notice
of our offer to redeem our Public Shares in connection with our initial Business Combination, or fails to comply with the procedures
for submitting or tendering its shares, such shares may not be redeemed.
We will comply with the proxy
rules or tender offer rules, as applicable, when conducting redemptions in connection with our initial Business Combination. Despite
our compliance with these rules, if a shareholder fails to receive our proxy materials or tender offer documents, as applicable, such
shareholder may not become aware of the opportunity to redeem its shares. In addition, proxy materials or tender offer documents, as
applicable, that we will furnish to holders of our Public Shares in connection with our initial Business Combination will describe the
various procedures that must be complied with in order to validly tender or submit Public Shares for redemption. For example, we intend
to require our Public Shareholders seeking to exercise their redemption rights, whether they are record holders or hold their shares
in “street name,” to, at the holder’s option, either deliver their share certificates to our transfer agent, or to
deliver their shares to our transfer agent electronically prior to the date set forth in the proxy materials or tender offer documents,
as applicable. In the case of proxy materials, this date may be up to two business days prior to the scheduled vote on the proposal
to approve the initial Business Combination. In addition, if we conduct redemptions in connection with a shareholder vote, we intend
to require a Public Shareholder seeking redemption of its Public Shares to also submit a written request for redemption to our transfer
agent two business days prior to the scheduled vote in which the name of the beneficial owner of such shares is included. In the
event that a shareholder fails to comply with these or any other procedures disclosed in the proxy or tender offer materials, as applicable,
its shares may not be redeemed. See the section entitled “ Item 1. Business – Effecting Our Initial Business Combination
- Delivering Share Certificates in Connection with the Exercise of Redemption Rights. ”
You will not be entitled to protections
normally afforded to investors of other blank check companies subject to Rule 419 of the Securities Act.
Since the net proceeds of
our Initial Public Offering and the sale of the Private Placement Units are intended to be used to complete one or more initial Business
Combinations with a target business or businesses that has not been selected, our company may be deemed to be a “blank check”
company under the United States securities laws. However, because we have net tangible assets in excess of $5,000,000 and have filed
a Current Report on Form 8-K including an audited balance sheet demonstrating this fact, we are exempt from rules promulgated by
the SEC to protect investors in blank check companies, such as Rule 419. Accordingly, investors will not be afforded the benefits
or protections of those rules. Among other things, this means our Units will be immediately tradable and we will have a longer period
of time to complete our respective initial Business Combinations than do companies subject to Rule 419. Moreover, if our Initial
Public Offering were subject to Rule 419, that rule would prohibit the release of any interest earned on funds held in the Trust
Account to us unless and until the funds in the Trust Account were released to us or in connection with our completion of an initial
Business Combination.
If we seek shareholder approval of our
initial Business Combination and we do not conduct redemptions pursuant to the tender offer rules, and if you or a “group”
of shareholders are deemed to hold in excess of 15% of our Class A ordinary shares, you will lose the ability to redeem all such
shares in excess of 15% of our Class A ordinary shares.
If we seek shareholder approval
of our initial Business Combination and we do not conduct redemptions in connection with our initial Business Combination pursuant to
the tender offer rules, our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association provides that a Public Shareholder, together
with any affiliate of such shareholder or any other person with whom such shareholder is acting in concert or as a “group”
(as defined under Section 13 of the Exchange Act), will be restricted from redeeming its shares with respect to more than an
aggregate of 15% of the shares included in the Units sold in our Initial Public Offering, which we refer to as the “Excess Shares,”
without our prior consent. However, we would not be restricting our shareholders’ ability to vote all of their shares (including
Excess Shares) for or against our initial Business Combination. Your inability to redeem the Excess Shares will reduce your influence
over our ability to complete our initial Business Combination and you could suffer a material loss on your investment in us if you sell
Excess Shares in open market transactions. Additionally, you will not receive redemption distributions with respect to the Excess Shares
if we complete our initial Business Combination. And as a result, you will continue to hold that number of shares exceeding 15% and,
in order to dispose of such shares, would be required to sell your shares in open market transactions, potentially at a loss.
27
Because of our limited resources and the
significant competition for Business Combination opportunities, it may be more difficult for us to complete our initial Business Combination
and to negotiate attractive acquisition terms. If we have not consummated our initial Business Combination within the Completion Window,
our Public Shareholders may receive only their pro rata portion of the funds in the Trust Account that are available for distribution
to Public Shareholders, and our warrants will expire worthless.
We expect to encounter competition
from other entities having a business objective similar to ours, including private investors (which may be individuals or investment
partnerships), other blank check companies and other entities, domestic and international, competing for the types of businesses we intend
to acquire. Many of these individuals and entities are well-established and have extensive experience in identifying and effecting, directly
or indirectly, acquisitions of companies operating in or providing services to various industries. Many of these competitors possess
similar or greater technical, human and other resources to ours or more local industry knowledge than we do and our financial resources
will be relatively limited when contrasted with those of many of these competitors. While we believe there are numerous target businesses
we could potentially acquire with the net proceeds of our Initial Public Offering and the sale of the Private Placement Units, our ability
to compete with respect to the acquisition of certain target businesses that are sizable will be limited by our available financial resources.
This inherent competitive limitation gives others an advantage in pursuing the acquisition of certain target businesses, and may impact
the attractiveness of the terms we are able to negotiate.
Furthermore, we are obligated
to offer holders of our Public Shares the right to redeem their shares for cash at the time of our initial Business Combination in conjunction
with a shareholder vote or via a tender offer. Target companies will be aware that this may reduce the resources available to us for
our initial Business Combination. Any of these obligations may place us at a competitive disadvantage in successfully negotiating a Business
Combination. If we have not consummated our initial Business Combination within the Completion Window, our Public Shareholders may receive
only their pro rata portion of the funds in the Trust Account that are available for distribution to Public Shareholders, and our warrants
will expire worthless.
If the net proceeds of our Initial Public
Offering and the sale of the Private Placement Units not being held in the Trust Account are insufficient to allow us to operate for
at least the duration of the Completion Window, it could limit the amount available to fund our search for a target business or businesses
and our ability to complete our initial Business Combination, and we will depend on loans from our Sponsor, its affiliates or our management
team to fund our search and to complete our initial Business Combination.
Of the net proceeds of our
Initial Public Offering and the sale of the Private Placement Units, only $1,250,000 will be available to us initially outside the Trust
Account to fund our working capital requirements (net of any reimbursements from the Underwriters). We believe that the funds available
to us outside of the Trust Account, and funds available from loans from our Sponsor, its affiliates or our management team will be sufficient
to allow us to operate for at least the duration of the Completion Window; however, we cannot assure you that our estimate is accurate,
and our Sponsor, its affiliates or our management team are under no obligation to advance funds to us in such circumstances. Of the funds
available to us, we could use a portion of the funds available to us to pay fees to consultants to assist us with our search for a target
business. We could also use a portion of the funds as a down payment or to fund a “no-shop” provision (a provision in letters
of intent or merger agreements designed to keep target businesses from “shopping” around for transactions with other companies
or investors on terms more favorable to such target businesses) with respect to a particular proposed Business Combination, although
we do not have any current intention to do so. If we entered into a letter of intent or merger agreement where we paid for the right
to receive exclusivity from a target business and were subsequently required to forfeit such funds (whether as a result of our breach
or otherwise), we might not have sufficient funds to continue searching for, or conduct due diligence with respect to, a target business.
If we are required to seek
additional capital, we would need to borrow funds from our Sponsor, its affiliates, our management team or other third parties to operate
or may be forced to liquidate. Neither our Sponsor, members of our management team nor any of their affiliates is under any obligation
to advance funds to us in such circumstances. Any such advances would be repaid only from funds held outside the Trust Account or from
funds released to us upon completion of our initial Business Combination. Up to $1,500,000 of such loans may be convertible into Private
Placement Units of the post-Business Combination entity at a price of $10.00 per unit at the option of the lender. Such Units would be
identical to the Private Placement Units. Prior to the completion of our initial Business Combination, we do not expect to seek loans
from parties other than our Sponsor or an affiliate of our Sponsor as we do not believe third parties will be willing to loan such funds
and provide a waiver against any and all rights to seek access to funds in our Trust Account. If we have not consummated our initial
Business Combination within the Completion Window because we do not have sufficient funds available to us, we will be forced to cease
operations and liquidate the Trust Account. Consequently, our Public Shareholders may only receive an estimated $10.00 per Public Share,
or possibly less, on our redemption of our Public Shares, and our warrants will expire worthless. See “ If third parties bring
claims against us, the proceeds held in the Trust Account could be reduced and the per-share redemption amount received by shareholders
may be less than $10.00 per Public Share ” and other risk factors herein.
If third parties bring claims against us,
the proceeds held in the Trust Account could be reduced and the per-share redemption amount received by shareholders may be less than
$10.00 per Public Share.
Our placing of funds in the
Trust Account may not protect those funds from third-party claims against us. Although we will seek to have all vendors, service providers,
prospective target businesses and other entities with which we do business execute agreements with us waiving any right, title, interest
or claim of any kind in or to any monies held in the Trust Account for the benefit of our Public Shareholders, such parties may not execute
such agreements, or even if they execute such agreements they may not be prevented from bringing claims against the Trust Account, including,
but not limited to, fraudulent inducement, breach of fiduciary responsibility or other similar claims, as well as claims challenging
the enforceability of the waiver, in each case in order to gain advantage with respect to a claim against our assets, including the funds
held in the Trust Account. If any third party refuses to execute an agreement waiving such claims to the monies held in the Trust Account,
our management will consider whether competitive alternatives are reasonably available to us and will only enter into an agreement with
such third party if management believes that such third party’s engagement would be in the best interests of the company under
the circumstances. CBIZ CPAs P.C., our independent registered public accounting firm, and the Underwriters of our Initial Public Offering
will not execute agreements with us waiving such claims to the monies held in the Trust Account.
28
Examples of possible instances
where we may engage a third party that refuses to execute a waiver include the engagement of a third-party consultant whose particular
expertise or skills are believed by management to be significantly superior to those of other consultants that would agree to execute
a waiver or in cases where management is unable to find a service provider willing to execute a waiver. In addition, there is no guarantee
that such entities will agree to waive any claims they may have in the future as a result of, or arising out of, any negotiations, contracts
or agreements with us and will not seek recourse against the Trust Account for any reason. Upon redemption of our Public Shares, if we
are unable to complete our initial Business Combination within the prescribed timeframe, or upon the exercise of a redemption right in
connection with our initial Business Combination, we will be required to provide for payment of claims of creditors that were not waived
that may be brought against us within the 10 years following redemption. Accordingly, the per-share redemption amount received by
Public Shareholders could be less than the $10.00 per Public Share initially held in the Trust Account, due to claims of such creditors.
Pursuant to the letter agreement, our Sponsor has agreed that it will be liable to us if and to the extent any claims by a third party
for services rendered or products sold to us, or a prospective target business with which we have entered into a written letter of intent,
confidentiality or other similar agreement or business combination agreement (except for the Company’s independent auditors), reduce
the amount of funds in the Trust Account to below the lesser of (i) $10.00 per Public Share and (ii) the actual amount per
Public Share held in the Trust Account as of the date of the liquidation of the Trust Account, if less than $10.00 per Public Share due
to reductions in the value of the trust assets, less taxes paid or payable (other than excise or similar taxes) and up to $100,000 of
interest to pay dissolution expenses, provided that such liability will not apply to any claims by a third party or prospective target
business who executed a waiver of any and all rights to the monies held in the Trust Account (whether or not such waiver is enforceable)
nor will it apply to any claims under our indemnity of the Underwriters against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the
Securities Act. However, we have not asked our Sponsor to reserve for such indemnification obligations, nor have we independently verified
whether our Sponsor has sufficient funds to satisfy its indemnity obligations and we believe that our Sponsor’s only assets are
securities of our company. Therefore, we cannot assure you that our Sponsor would be able to satisfy those obligations. As a result,
if any such claims were successfully made against the Trust Account, the funds available for our initial Business Combination and redemptions
could be reduced to less than $10.00 per Public Share. In such event, we may not be able to complete our initial Business Combination,
and you would receive such lesser amount per share in connection with any redemption of your Public Shares. None of our officers or directors
will indemnify us for claims by third parties including, without limitation, claims by vendors and prospective target businesses.
Our directors may decide not to enforce
the indemnification obligations of our Sponsor, resulting in a reduction in the amount of funds in the Trust Account available for distribution
to our Public Shareholders.
In the event that the proceeds
in the Trust Account are reduced below the lesser of (i) $10.00 per Public Share and (ii) the actual amount per Public Share
held in the Trust Account as of the date of the liquidation of the Trust Account if less than $10.00 per Public Share due to reductions
in the value of the trust assets, in each case less taxes paid or payable (other than excise or similar taxes), and our Sponsor asserts
that it is unable to satisfy its obligations or that it has no indemnification obligations related to a particular claim, our independent
directors would determine whether to take legal action against our Sponsor to enforce its indemnification obligations. While we currently
expect that our independent directors would take legal action on our behalf against our Sponsor to enforce its indemnification obligations
to us, it is possible that our independent directors in exercising their business judgment and subject to their fiduciary duties may
choose not to do so in any particular instance if, for example, the cost of such legal action is deemed by the independent directors
to be too high relative to the amount recoverable or if the independent directors determine that a favorable outcome is not likely. If
our independent directors choose not to enforce these indemnification obligations, the amount of funds in the Trust Account available
for distribution to our Public Shareholders may be reduced below $10.00 per Public Share.
The securities in which we invest the funds
held in the Trust Account could bear a negative rate of interest, which could reduce the interest income available for payment of taxes
or reduce the value of the assets held in trust such that the per-share redemption amount received by Public Shareholders may be less
than $10.00 per Public Share.
The proceeds held in the
Trust Account will initially be invested only in U.S. government treasury obligations with a maturity of 185 days or less or
in money market funds meeting certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act which invest only in direct U.S. government
treasury obligations; the holding of these assets in this form is intended to be temporary and for the sole purpose of facilitating the
intended Business Combination and may at any time be held as cash or cash items, including in demand deposit accounts at a bank. While
short-term U.S. government treasury obligations currently yield a positive rate of interest, they have briefly yielded negative
interest rates in recent years. Central banks in Europe and Japan pursued interest rates below zero in recent years, and the
Open Market Committee of the Federal Reserve has not ruled out the possibility that it may in the future adopt similar policies in the
United States. In the event that we are unable to complete our initial Business Combination or make certain amendments to our Amended
and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association, our Public Shareholders are entitled to receive their pro-rata share of the proceeds
held in the Trust Account, plus any interest income (less taxes payable and up to $100,000 of interest to pay dissolution expenses).
Negative interest rates could reduce the value of the assets held in trust such that the per-share redemption amount received by Public
Shareholders may be less than $10.00 per Public Share.
29
If, after we distribute the proceeds in
the Trust Account to our Public Shareholders, we file a bankruptcy or winding-up petition or an involuntary bankruptcy or winding-up
petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, a bankruptcy or insolvency court may seek to recover such proceeds, and the members
of our board of directors may be viewed as having breached their fiduciary duties to our creditors, thereby exposing the members of our
board of directors and us to claims of punitive damages.
If, after we distribute the
proceeds in the Trust Account to our Public Shareholders, we file a bankruptcy or winding-up petition or an involuntary bankruptcy or
winding-up petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, any distributions received by shareholders could be viewed under applicable
debtor/creditor and/or bankruptcy or insolvency laws as either a “preferential transfer” or a “fraudulent conveyance.”
As a result, a bankruptcy or insolvency court could seek to recover some or all amounts received by our shareholders. In addition, our
board of directors may be viewed as having breached its fiduciary duty to our creditors and/or having acted in bad faith, thereby exposing
itself and us to claims of punitive damages, by paying Public Shareholders from the Trust Account prior to addressing the claims of creditors.
If, before distributing the proceeds in
the Trust Account to our Public Shareholders, we file a bankruptcy or winding-up petition or an involuntary bankruptcy or winding-up
petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, the claims of creditors in such proceeding may have priority over the claims of our
shareholders and the per-share amount that would otherwise be received by our shareholders in connection with our liquidation may be
reduced.
If, before distributing the
proceeds in the Trust Account to our Public Shareholders, we file a bankruptcy or winding-up petition or an involuntary bankruptcy or
winding-up petition is filed against us that is not dismissed, the proceeds held in the Trust Account could be subject to applicable
bankruptcy or insolvency law, and may be included in our bankruptcy estate and subject to the claims of third parties with priority over
the claims of our shareholders. To the extent any bankruptcy claims deplete the Trust Account, the per-share amount that would otherwise
be received by our shareholders in connection with our liquidation may be reduced.
If we are deemed to be an investment company
under the Investment Company Act, we may be required to institute burdensome compliance requirements and our activities may be restricted,
which may make it difficult for us to complete our initial Business Combination.
If we are deemed to be an investment company
under the Investment Company Act, our activities may be restricted, including:
● restrictions on
the nature of our investments; and
● restrictions on
the issuance of securities, each of which may make it difficult for us to complete our initial
Business Combination. In addition, we may have imposed upon us burdensome requirements, including:
● registration as
an investment company;
● adoption of a
specific form of corporate structure; and
● reporting, record
keeping, voting, proxy and disclosure requirements and other rules and regulations.
In order not to be regulated
as an investment company under the Investment Company Act, unless we can qualify for an exclusion, we must ensure that we are engaged
primarily in a business other than investing, reinvesting or trading of securities and that our activities do not include investing,
reinvesting, owning, holding or trading “investment securities” constituting more than 40% of our assets (exclusive of U.S. government
securities and cash items) on an unconsolidated basis. Our business will be to identify and complete a Business Combination and thereafter
to operate the post-transaction business or assets for the long term. We do not intend to spend a considerable amount of time actively
managing the assets in the Trust Account for the primary purpose of achieving investment returns. We do not plan to buy businesses or
assets with a view to resale or profit from their resale. We do not plan to buy unrelated businesses or assets or to be a passive investor.
We do not believe that our
anticipated principal activities will subject us to the Investment Company Act. To this end, the proceeds held in the Trust Account will
initially only be invested in U.S. “government securities” within the meaning of Section 2(a)(16) of the Investment
Company Act having a maturity of 185 days or less or in money market funds meeting certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 promulgated
under the Investment Company Act which invest only in direct U.S. government treasury obligations; the holding of these assets in
this form is intended to be temporary and for the sole purpose of facilitating the intended Business Combination and may at any time
be held as cash or cash items, including in demand deposit accounts at a bank. Pursuant to the trust agreement, the trustee is not permitted
to invest in other securities or assets. By restricting the investment of the proceeds to these instruments, and by having a business
plan targeted at acquiring and growing businesses for the long term (rather than on buying and selling businesses in the manner of a
merchant bank or private equity fund), we intend to avoid being deemed an “investment company” within the meaning of the
Investment Company Act. The Trust Account is intended as a holding place for funds pending the earliest to occur of: (i) the completion
of our initial Business Combination; (ii) the redemption of any Public Shares properly submitted in connection with a shareholder
vote to amend our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association (A) to modify the substance or timing of our obligation
to provide for the redemption of our Public Shares in connection with an initial Business Combination or to redeem 100% of our Public
Shares if we have not consummated our initial Business Combination within the Completion Window or (B) with respect to any other
provisions relating to shareholders’ rights or pre-initial Business Combination activity; or (iii) absent an initial Business
Combination within the Completion Window, our return of the funds held in the Trust Account to our Public Shareholders as part of our
redemption of the Public Shares. If we do not invest the proceeds as discussed above, we may be deemed to be subject to the Investment
Company Act.
30
Further, under the subjective
test of a “investment company” pursuant to Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Investment Company Act, even if the funds
deposited in the Trust Account were invested in the assets discussed above (U.S. government securities or money market funds registered
under the Investment Company Act), such assets, other than cash, are “securities” for purposes of the Investment Company
Act and, therefore, nevertheless, there is a risk that we could be deemed an unregistered investment company and subject to the Investment
Company Act at any time.
In the adopting release for
the 2024 SPAC Rules (as defined below), the SEC provided guidance that a SPAC’s potential status as an “investment company”
depends on a variety of factors, such as a SPAC’s duration, asset composition, business purpose and activities and “is a
question of facts and circumstances” requiring individualized analysis. If we were deemed to be an unregistered investment company
and subject to compliance with and regulation under the Investment Company Act, we would be subject to additional regulatory burdens
and expenses for which we have not allotted funds. If our facts and circumstances change over time, we will update our disclosure to
reflect how those changes impact the risk that we may be considered to be operating as an unregistered investment company. Unless we
are able to modify our activities so that we would not be deemed an investment company, we would either register as an investment company
or wind down and abandon our efforts to complete an initial Business Combination and instead liquidate the Company. As a result, our
Public Shareholders may only receive their pro rata portion of the funds in the Trust Account that are available for distribution to
Public Shareholders and would be unable to realize the potential benefits of an initial Business Combination, including the possible
appreciation of the combined company’s securities.
To mitigate the risk that we might be deemed
to be an investment company for purposes of the Investment Company Act, we may, at any time, instruct the trustee to liquidate the securities
held in the Trust Account and instead to hold the funds in the Trust Account in cash until the earlier of the consummation of our initial
Business Combination or our liquidation. As a result, following the liquidation of securities in the Trust Account, the interest earned
on the funds held in the Trust Account may be materially reduced, which would reduce the dollar amount our Public Shareholders would
receive upon any redemption or liquidation of the Company.
We intend to initially hold
the funds in the Trust Account as cash, including in demand deposit accounts at a bank, or in U.S. government treasury obligations
with a maturity of 185 days or less or in money market funds investing solely in U.S. government treasury obligations and meeting
certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act. U.S. government treasury obligations are considered “securities”
for purposes of the Investment Company Act, while cash is not. As noted above, one of the factors the SEC identified as relevant to the
determination of whether a SPAC which holds securities could potentially be deemed an “investment company” under the Investment
Company Act is the SPAC’s duration. To mitigate the risk of us being deemed to be an unregistered investment company (including
under the subjective test of Section 3(a)(1)(A) of the Investment Company Act) and thus subject to regulation under the Investment
Company Act, we may, at any time, instruct Efficiency INC. (“Efficiency”), the trustee with respect to the Trust Account,
to liquidate the U.S. government treasury obligations or money market funds held in the Trust Account and thereafter to hold all
funds in the Trust Account in cash until the earlier of consummation of our initial Business Combination or liquidation of the Company.
Following such liquidation, the rate of interest we receive on the funds held in the Trust Account may be materially decreased. However,
interest previously earned on the funds held in the Trust Account still may be released to us to fund our taxes payable (other than excise
or similar taxes). As a result, any decision to liquidate the securities held in the Trust Account and thereafter to hold all funds in
the Trust Account in cash would reduce the dollar amount our Public Shareholders would receive upon any redemption or liquidation of
the Company.
31
Changes in laws or regulations (including
the adoption of policies by governing administrations), or a failure to comply with any laws and regulations, may adversely affect our
business, including our ability to negotiate and complete our initial Business Combination, and results of operations.
We are subject to laws and
regulations enacted by national, regional and local governments. These governing bodies may seek to change laws and regulations, as well
as adopt new policies, including tariffs and other economic policies, that could negatively impact us or target business with which we
seek to consummate an initial Business Combination. We will also be required to comply with certain SEC and other legal requirements.
Compliance with, and monitoring of, applicable laws and regulations may be difficult, time consuming and costly. Those laws and regulations
and their interpretation and application may also change from time to time and those changes could have a material adverse effect on
our business, investments and results of operations. In addition, a failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations, as interpreted
and applied, could have a material adverse effect on our business, including our ability to negotiate and complete our initial Business
Combination, and results of operations.
On January 24, 2024,
the SEC issued final rules (the “2024 SPAC Rules”), effective as of July 1, 2024, that formally adopted some of the
SEC’s proposed rules for SPACs that were released on March 30, 2022. The 2024 SPAC Rules, among other items, impose additional
disclosure requirements in initial public offerings by SPACs and business combination transactions involving SPACs and private operating
companies; amend the financial statement requirements applicable to business combination transactions involving such companies; update
and expand guidance regarding the general use of projections in SEC filings, as well as when projections are disclosed in connection
with proposed business combination transactions; increase the potential liability of certain participants in proposed business combination
transactions; and could impact the extent to which SPACs could become subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The 2024 SPAC Rules may materially adversely affect our business, including our ability to negotiate and complete, and the costs associated
with, our initial Business Combination, and results of operations.
If we are unable to consummate our initial
Business Combination within the Completion Window, our Public Shareholders may be forced to wait beyond such period before redemption
from our Trust Account.
If we are unable to consummate
our initial Business Combination within the Completion Window, the proceeds then on deposit in the Trust Account, including interest
earned on the funds held in the Trust Account (net of taxes paid or payable (other than excise or similar taxes) and up to $100,000 of
interest to pay dissolution expenses), will be used to fund the redemption of our Public Shares, as further described herein. Any redemption
of Public Shareholders from the Trust Account will be effected automatically by function of our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles
of Association prior to any voluntary winding up. If we are required to wind-up, liquidate the Trust Account and distribute such amount
therein, pro rata, to our Public Shareholders, as part of any liquidation process, such winding up, liquidation and distribution must
comply with the applicable provisions of the Companies Act. In that case, investors may be forced to wait beyond the duration of the
Completion Window before the redemption proceeds of our Trust Account become available to them, and they receive the return of their
pro rata portion of the proceeds from our Trust Account. We have no obligation to return funds to investors prior to the date of our
redemption or liquidation unless we consummate our initial Business Combination prior thereto and only then in cases where investors
have sought to redeem their Class A Ordinary Shares. Only upon our redemption or any liquidation will Public Shareholders be entitled
to distributions if we are unable to complete our initial Business Combination.
Our shareholders may be held liable for
claims by third parties against us to the extent of distributions received by them upon redemption of their shares.
If we are forced to enter
into an insolvent liquidation, any distributions received by shareholders could be viewed as an unlawful payment if it was proved that
immediately following the date on which the distribution was made, we were unable to pay our debts as they fall due in the ordinary course
of business. As a result, a liquidator could seek to recover some or all amounts received by our shareholders. Furthermore, our directors
may be viewed as having breached their fiduciary duties to us or our creditors and/or may have acted in bad faith, thereby exposing themselves
and our Company to claims, by paying Public Shareholders from the Trust Account prior to addressing the claims of creditors.
32
We cannot assure you that
claims will not be brought against us for these reasons. We and our directors and officers who knowingly and willfully authorized or
permitted any distribution to be paid out of our share premium account while we were unable to pay our debts as they fall due in the
ordinary course of business would be guilty of an offence and may be liable to a fine of approximately $18,293 and to imprisonment for
five years in the Cayman Islands.
We may not hold an annual general meeting
until after the consummation of our initial Business Combination.
In accordance with Nasdaq
corporate governance requirements, we are not required to hold an annual general meeting until no later than one year after our first
fiscal year end following our listing on Nasdaq. There is no requirement under the Companies Act for us to hold annual or general meetings
to appoint directors. Until we hold an annual general meeting, Public Shareholders may not be afforded the opportunity to discuss Company
affairs with management.
Because we are neither limited to evaluating
a target business in a particular industry sector nor have we selected any target businesses with which to pursue our initial Business
Combination, you will be unable to ascertain the merits or risks of any particular target business’s operations.
While we may pursue an initial
Business Combination target in any industry or geographic region, we intend to focus on companies in the global space economy, including
businesses in the technology and defense sectors. Our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association prohibits us from effectuating
a business combination solely with another blank check company or similar company with nominal operations. Because we have not yet selected
any specific target business with respect to a business combination, there is no basis to evaluate the possible merits or risks of any
particular target business’s operations, results of operations, cash flows, liquidity, financial condition or prospects. To the
extent we complete our initial Business Combination, we may be affected by numerous risks inherent in the business operations with which
we combine. For example, if we combine with a financially unstable business or an entity lacking an established record of sales or earnings,
we may be affected by the risks inherent in the business and operations of a financially unstable or a development stage entity. In recent years,
a number of target businesses have underperformed financially post-business combination. There are no assurances that the target business
with which we consummate our initial Business Combination will perform as anticipated. Although our officers and directors will endeavor
to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular target business, we cannot assure you that we will properly ascertain or assess all of
the significant risk factors or that we will have adequate time to complete due diligence. Furthermore, some of these risks may be outside
of our control and leave us with no ability to control or reduce the chances that those risks will adversely impact a target business.
We also cannot assure you that an investment in our Units will ultimately prove to be more favorable to investors than a direct investment,
if such opportunity were available, in a Business Combination target. Accordingly, any shareholders who choose to remain shareholders
following the Business Combination could suffer a reduction in the value of their Units. Such shareholders are unlikely to have a remedy
for such reduction in value unless they are able to successfully claim that the reduction was due to the breach by our officers or directors
of a duty of care or other fiduciary duty owed to them, or if they are able to successfully bring a private claim under securities laws
that the proxy solicitation or tender offer materials, as applicable, relating to the Business Combination contained an actionable material
misstatement or material omission.
We may seek Business Combination opportunities
in industries or sectors that may be outside of our management’s areas of expertise.
We will consider a Business
Combination outside of our management’s areas of expertise if a Business Combination candidate is presented to us and we determine
that such candidate offers an attractive Business Combination opportunity for our Company. Although our management will endeavor to evaluate
the risks inherent in any particular Business Combination candidate, we cannot assure you that we will adequately ascertain or assess
all of the significant risk factors. We also cannot assure you that an investment in our Units will not ultimately prove to be less favorable
to investors in our Initial Public Offering than a direct investment, if an opportunity were available, in a Business Combination candidate.
In the event we elect to pursue a Business Combination outside of the areas of our management’s expertise, our management’s
expertise may not be directly applicable to its evaluation or operation, and the information contained in our Initial Public Offering
registration statement regarding the areas of our management’s expertise would not be relevant to an understanding of the business
that we elect to acquire. As a result, our management may not be able to ascertain or assess adequately all of the relevant risk factors.
Accordingly, any holders who choose to retain their securities following our initial Business Combination could suffer a reduction in
the value of their securities. Such holders are unlikely to have a remedy for such reduction in value.
33
Although we have identified general criteria
and guidelines that we believe are important in evaluating prospective target businesses, we may enter into our initial Business Combination
with a target that does not meet such criteria and guidelines, and as a result, the target business with which we enter into our initial
Business Combination may not have attributes entirely consistent with our general criteria and guidelines.
Although we have identified
general criteria and guidelines for evaluating prospective target businesses, it is possible that a target business with which we enter
into our initial Business Combination will not have all of these positive attributes. If we complete our initial Business Combination
with a target that does not meet some or all of these guidelines, such combination may not be as successful as a combination with a business
that does meet all of our general criteria and guidelines. In addition, if we announce a prospective Business Combination with a target
that does not meet our general criteria and guidelines, a greater number of shareholders may exercise their redemption rights, which
may make it difficult for us to meet any closing condition with a target business that requires us to have a minimum net worth or a certain
amount of cash. In addition, if shareholder approval of the transaction is required by law, or we decide to obtain shareholder approval
for business or other reasons, it may be more difficult for us to attain shareholder approval of our initial Business Combination if
the target business does not meet our general criteria and guidelines. If we have not consummated our initial Business Combination within
the Completion Window, our Public Shareholders may only receive their pro rata portion of the funds in the Trust Account that are available
for distribution to Public Shareholders, and our warrants will expire worthless.
We may not be required to obtain an opinion
from an independent investment banking firm or from another independent entity that commonly renders valuation opinions, and consequently,
you may have no assurance from an independent source that the consideration we are paying for the business is fair to our Company from
a financial point of view.
Unless we complete our initial
Business Combination with an affiliated (as defined in our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association) entity or our
board of directors cannot independently determine the fair market value of the target business or businesses (including with the assistance
of financial advisors), we are not required to obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm which is a member of FINRA
or from another independent entity that commonly renders valuation opinions that the consideration we are paying is fair to our Company
from a financial point of view. If no opinion is obtained, our shareholders will be relying on the judgment of our board of directors,
who will determine fair market value based on standards generally accepted by the financial community. Such standards used will be disclosed
in our proxy materials or tender offer documents, as applicable, related to our initial Business Combination.
We may issue additional Class A Ordinary
Shares or preference shares to complete our initial Business Combination or under an employee incentive plan after completion of our
initial Business Combination. We may also issue Class A Ordinary Shares upon the conversion of the Founder Shares at a ratio greater
than one-to-one at the time of our initial Business Combination as a result of the anti-dilution provisions contained therein. Any such
issuances would dilute the interest of our shareholders and likely present other risks.
Our Amended and Restated Memorandum
and Articles of Association authorizes the issuance of up to 500,000,000 Class A Ordinary Shares, par value $0.0001 per share, 50,000,000
Class B ordinary shares, par value $0.0001 per share, and 5,000,000 preference shares, par value $0.0001 per share. There are 476,355,000
and 42,333,333 authorized but unissued Class A Ordinary Shares and Class B ordinary shares, respectively, available for issuance
which amount does not take into account shares issuable upon conversion of the Class B ordinary shares. The Class B ordinary
shares are automatically convertible into Class A Ordinary Shares immediately prior to, concurrently with or immediately following
the consummation of our initial Business Combination or earlier at the option of the holder, initially at a one-for-one ratio but subject
to adjustment as set forth herein and in our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association, including in certain circumstances
in which we issue Class A Ordinary Shares or equity-linked securities related to our initial Business Combination. There are no preference
shares issued and outstanding.
We may issue a substantial
number of additional Class A Ordinary Shares or preference shares to complete our initial Business Combination or under an employee
incentive plan after completion of our initial Business Combination. We may also issue Class A Ordinary Shares upon conversion of
the Class B ordinary shares at a ratio greater than one-to-one at the time of our initial Business Combination as a result of the
anti-dilution provisions as set forth therein.
34
However, our Amended and
Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association provides, among other things, that prior to our initial Business Combination, we may
not issue additional shares that would entitle the holders thereof to (i) receive funds from the Trust Account or (ii) vote
on any initial Business Combination. These provisions of our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association, like all provisions
of our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association, may be amended with a shareholder vote. The issuance of additional
ordinary or preference shares:
● may significantly
dilute the equity interest of investors, which dilution would increase if the anti-dilution
provisions in the Class B ordinary shares resulted in the issuance of Class A Ordinary
Shares on a greater than one-to-one basis upon conversion of the Class B ordinary shares;
● may subordinate
the rights of holders of Class A Ordinary Shares if preference shares are issued with
rights senior to those afforded our Class A ordinary shares;
● could cause a change
in control if a substantial number of Class A Ordinary Shares are issued, which may
affect, among other things, our ability to use our net operating loss carry forwards, if
any, and could result in the resignation or removal of our present officers and directors;
● may have the effect
of delaying or preventing a change of control of us by diluting the share ownership or voting
rights of a person seeking to obtain control of us; and
● may adversely affect
prevailing market prices for our Units, Class A Ordinary Shares and/or warrants.
Such potential dilutive issuances
of securities are likely to increase as the pro forma equity value of a prospective combined company increases.
Because each Unit contains one-third of
one warrant and only a whole warrant may be exercised, the Units may be worth less than Units of other special purpose acquisition companies.
Each Unit contains one-third
of one warrant. Pursuant to the warrant agreement, no fractional warrants will be issued upon separation of the Units, and only whole
Units will trade. If, upon exercise of the warrants, a holder would be entitled to receive a fractional interest in a share, we will,
upon exercise, round down to the nearest whole number the number of Class A Ordinary Shares to be issued to the warrant holder.
This is different from other companies similar to ours whose Units include one ordinary share and one warrant to purchase one whole share.
We have established the components of the Units in this way in order to reduce the dilutive effect of the warrants upon completion of
a Business Combination since the warrants will be exercisable in the aggregate for one-third of the number of shares compared to Units
that each contain a whole warrant to purchase one share, thus making us, we believe, a more attractive merger partner for target businesses.
Nevertheless, this unit structure may cause our Units to be worth less than if it included a whole warrant to purchase one share.
35
The post-Business Combination company may
issue shares to investors in connection with our initial Business Combination at a price which is less than $10.00 or the prevailing
market price of our shares at that time, which could dilute the interests of our existing shareholders and add costs.
In connection with our initial
Business Combination, the post-Business Combination company may issue shares to investors in private placement transactions (so-called
PIPE transactions) in order to complete an initial Business Combination and provide sufficient liquidity and capital to the post-Business
Combination entity. The price of the shares so issued in connection with an initial Business Combination may be less, and potentially
significantly less, than $10.00 per share or the market price for our shares at such time. Any such issuances of equity securities at
a price that is less than $10.00 or the prevailing market price of our shares at that time could be structured to ensure a return on
investment to the investors and could dilute the interests of our existing shareholders in a manner that would not ordinarily occur and
could result in both a reduction in the trading price of our shares to the price at which the post-Business Combination company issues
such equity securities and fluctuations in the net tangible book value per share of the combined company’s securities following
the completion of our initial Business Combination. The post-Business Combination company may also provide price protection or other
incentives, or issue convertible securities such as preferred equity or convertible debt, and the exercise or conversion price of those
securities may be fixed or adjustable, and may be less, and potentially significantly less, than $10.00 per share or the market price
for our shares at such time. Such issuances could also result in additional transaction costs related to our initial Business Combination,
including the placement fees associated with the engagement of a placement agent in connection with PIPE transactions. The issuance of
additional ordinary or preference shares may significantly dilute the equity interest of investors and are likely to increase as the
enterprise value of a prospective target company increases. Further, such dilution would even further increase if the anti-dilution provisions
in the Class B ordinary shares resulted in the issuance of Class A Ordinary Shares on a greater than one-to-one basis upon
conversion of the Class B ordinary shares. In order to facilitate our initial Business Combination or for any other reason determined
by our Sponsor in its sole discretion, our Sponsor, in accordance with the terms of the letter agreement, may (i) surrender or forfeit,
transfer or exchange, directly or indirectly, our Founder Shares, Private Placement Units or any of our other securities held by it,
including for no consideration, in connection with a PIPE financing or otherwise, (ii) subject any such securities to earn-outs
or other restrictions, and (iii) enter into any other arrangements with respect to any such securities.
Unlike some other similarly structured
special purpose acquisition companies, our initial shareholders will receive additional Class A Ordinary Shares if we issue certain
shares to consummate an initial Business Combination.
The Founder Shares will automatically
convert into Class A Ordinary Shares immediately prior to, concurrently with or immediately following the consummation of our initial
Business Combination or earlier at the option of the holder on a one-for-one basis, subject to adjustment for share sub-divisions, share
capitalizations, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like, and subject to further adjustment as provided herein. In the case that
additional Class A Ordinary Shares or equity-linked securities are issued or deemed issued in connection with our initial Business Combination,
the number of Class A Ordinary Shares issuable upon conversion of all Founder Shares will equal, in the aggregate, on an as-converted
basis, 25% of the total number of Class A Ordinary Shares outstanding after such conversion (excluding the private placement shares and
the ordinary shares underlying the Private Placement Warrants and after giving effect to any redemptions of Class A Ordinary Shares by
Public Shareholders), including the total number of Class A Ordinary Shares issued, or deemed issued or issuable upon conversion or exercise
of any equity-linked securities or rights issued or deemed issued, by the company in connection with or in relation to the consummation
of the initial Business Combination, excluding any Class A Ordinary Shares or equity-linked securities exercisable for or convertible
into Class A Ordinary Shares issued, or to be issued, to any seller in the initial Business Combination and any Private Placement Units
issued to our Sponsor, officers or directors upon conversion of working capital loans; provided that such conversion of Founder Shares
will never occur on a less than one-for-one basis.
36
Resources could be wasted in researching
Business Combinations that are not completed, which could materially adversely affect subsequent attempts to locate and acquire or merge
with another business. If we are unable to complete our initial Business Combination, our Public Shareholders may only receive their
pro rata portion of the funds in the Trust Account that are available for distribution to Public Shareholders, and the warrants will
expire worthless.
We anticipate that the investigation
of each specific target business and the negotiation, drafting and execution of relevant agreements, disclosure documents and other instruments
will require substantial management time and attention and substantial costs for accountants, attorneys, consultants and others. If we
decide not to complete a specific initial Business Combination, the costs incurred up to that point for the proposed transaction likely
would not be recoverable. Furthermore, if we reach an agreement relating to a specific target business, we may fail to complete our initial
Business Combination for any number of reasons including those beyond our control. Any such event will result in a loss to us of the
related costs incurred which could materially adversely affect subsequent attempts to locate and acquire or merge with another business.
If we have not consummated our initial Business Combination within the Completion Window, our Public Shareholders may only receive their
pro rata portion of the funds in the Trust Account that are available for distribution to Public Shareholders, and the warrants will
expire worthless.
In recent years, the number of special
purpose acquisition companies that have been formed has increased substantially, potentially resulting in more competition for attractive
targets. This could increase the cost of our initial Business Combination and could even result in our inability to find a target or
to consummate an initial Business Combination.
In recent years, the
number of special purpose acquisition companies has increased substantially. Because there are more special purpose acquisition companies
seeking to enter into an initial Business Combination with available targets, the competition for available targets with attractive fundamentals
or business models may increase, which could cause targets companies to demand improved financial terms. Attractive deals could also
become scarcer for other reasons, such as economic or industry sector downturns, geopolitical tensions, or increases in the cost of additional
capital needed to close business combinations or operate targets post-business combination. This could increase the cost of, delay or
otherwise complicate or frustrate our ability to find and consummate an initial Business Combination, and may result in our inability
to consummate an initial Business Combination on terms favorable to our investors altogether.
We may engage in a Business Combination
with one or more target businesses that have relationships with entities that may be affiliated with our Sponsor, officers, directors
or existing holders which may raise potential conflicts of interest.
In light of the involvement
of our Sponsor, its managing members, and our officers and directors with other entities, we may decide to acquire one or more businesses
affiliated with or competitive with our Sponsor, officers, directors and their respective affiliates or existing holders. Our directors
also serve as officers and/or board members for other entities. Such entities may compete with us for business combination opportunities.
Our Sponsor, officers and directors are not currently aware of any specific opportunities for us to complete our initial Business Combination
with any entities with which they are affiliated, and there have been no substantive discussions concerning a business combination with
any such entity or entities. Although we will not be specifically focusing on, or targeting, any transaction with any affiliated entities,
we would pursue such a transaction if we determined that such affiliated entity met our criteria for a business combination as set forth
in “ Item 1. Business — Effecting our Initial Business Combination — Selection of a Target Business
and Structuring of Our Initial Business Combination ” and such transaction was approved by a majority of our independent and
disinterested directors. Despite our agreement to obtain an opinion from an independent investment banking firm which is a member of
FINRA or another independent entity that commonly renders valuation opinions regarding the fairness to our Company from a financial point
of view of a Business Combination with an affiliate (as defined in our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association) of
our Sponsor, officers or directors, potential conflicts of interest still may exist and, as a result, the terms of the Business Combination
may not be as advantageous to our Public Shareholders as they would be absent any conflicts of interest.
37
Since our Sponsor, officers and directors
will lose their entire investment in us if our initial Business Combination is not completed (other than with respect to Public Shares),
a conflict of interest may arise in determining whether a particular Business Combination target is appropriate for our initial Business
Combination.
On September 19, 2025,
our Sponsor paid $25,000, or approximately $0.003 per share, to cover certain of our offering and formation costs in exchange for 7,666,667
Founder Shares. In October 2025, our Sponsor transferred 25,000 Founder Shares to each of our independent directors (for an aggregate
of 75,000 Founder Shares) and 10,000 Founder Shares to each of our advisors (for an aggregate of 30,000 Founder Shares) at the same per-share
price that our Sponsor purchased such shares, or approximately $0.003 per share. Prior to the initial investment in the Company of $25,000
by the Sponsor, the Company had no assets, tangible or intangible. The purchase price of the Founder Shares was determined by dividing
the amount of cash contributed to the Company by the number of Founder Shares issued. The number of Founder Shares outstanding was determined
based on the expectation that the total size of our Initial Public Offering would be a maximum of 23,000,000 Units if the Underwriters’
over-allotment option was exercised in full, and therefore that such Founder Shares would represent 25% of the outstanding shares (excluding
the private placement shares and the ordinary shares underlying the Private Placement Warrants) after the Initial Public Offering.
The Founder Shares will be worthless if we do
not complete an initial Business Combination.
In addition, our Sponsor
and BTIG purchased an aggregate of 645,000 Private Placement Units, at a price of $10.00 per share ($6,450,000 in the aggregate), in
a private placement that closed simultaneously with the closing of the Initial Public Offering. Of those 645,000 Private Placement Units,
our Sponsor purchased 415,000 Private Placement Units and BTIG purchased 230,000 Private Placement Units. The Private Placement Warrants
will also be worthless if we do not complete our initial Business Combination. After taking into account the Private Placement Units
issued to the Sponsor, our initial shareholders own an aggregate of 8,081,667 ordinary shares, or approximately 26% of our issued and
outstanding ordinary shares. The personal and financial interests of our officers and directors may influence their motivation in identifying
and selecting a target Business Combination, completing an initial Business Combination and influencing the operation of the business
following the initial Business Combination. This risk may become more acute as the expiration of the Completion Window nears, which is
the deadline for our completion of an initial Business Combination.
We may issue notes or other
debt securities, or otherwise incur substantial debt, to complete a business combination, which may adversely affect our leverage and
financial condition and thus negatively impact the value of our shareholders’ investment in us.
Although we have no commitments
as of the date of this Form 10-K to issue any notes or other debt securities, or to otherwise incur outstanding debt, we may choose to
incur substantial debt to complete our initial Business Combination. The incurrence of debt could have a variety of negative effects,
including:
● default and foreclosure
on our assets if our operating revenues after an initial Business Combination are insufficient
to repay our debt obligations;
● acceleration of
our obligations to repay the indebtedness even if we make all principal and interest payments
when due if we breach certain covenants that require the maintenance of certain financial
ratios or reserves without a waiver or renegotiation of that covenant;
● our immediate payment
of all principal and accrued interest, if any, if the debt security is payable on demand;
● our inability to
obtain necessary additional financing if the debt security contains covenants restricting
our ability to obtain such financing while the debt security is outstanding;
38
● a substantial portion
of our cash flow to pay principal and interest on our debt, which will reduce the funds available
for expenses, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes;
● limitations on
our flexibility in planning for and reacting to changes in our business and in the industry
in which we operate;
● increased vulnerability
to adverse changes in general economic, industry and competitive conditions and adverse changes
in government regulation; and
● limitations on
our ability to borrow additional amounts for expenses, capital expenditures, acquisitions,
debt service requirements, execution of our strategy and other purposes and other disadvantages
compared to our competitors who have less debt.
We may only be able to complete one Business
Combination with the proceeds of our Initial Public Offering and the sale of the Private Placement Units, which will cause us to be solely
dependent on a single business which may have a limited number of products or services. This lack of diversification may negatively impact
our operations and profitability. The net proceeds from our Initial Public Offering and the private placement of shares will provide
us with $221,950,000 that we may use to complete our initial Business Combination (after taking into account the $8,050,000 of deferred
underwriting commissions being held in the Trust Account (assuming no redemptions) and excluding $1,250,000 held outside of the Trust
Account for working capital).
We may effectuate our initial
Business Combination with a single target business or multiple target businesses simultaneously or within a short period of time. However,
we may not be able to effectuate our initial Business Combination with more than one target business because of various factors, including
the existence of complex accounting issues and the requirement that we prepare and file pro forma financial statements with the SEC that
present operating results and the financial condition of several target businesses as if they had been operated on a combined basis.
By completing our initial Business Combination with only a single entity, our lack of diversification may subject us to numerous economic,
competitive and regulatory developments. Further, we would not be able to diversify our operations or benefit from the possible spreading
of risks or offsetting of losses, unlike other entities which may have the resources to complete several business combinations in different
industries or different areas of a single industry. Accordingly, the prospects for our success may be:
● solely dependent
upon the performance of a single business, property or asset, or
● dependent upon
the development or market acceptance of a single or limited number of products, processes
or services.
This lack of diversification
may subject us to numerous economic, competitive and regulatory risks, any or all of which may have a substantial adverse impact upon
the particular industry in which we may operate subsequent to our initial Business Combination.
39
We may attempt to simultaneously complete
business combinations with multiple prospective targets, which may hinder our ability to complete our initial Business Combination and
give rise to increased costs and risks that could negatively impact our operations and profitability.
If we determine to simultaneously
acquire several businesses that are owned by different sellers, we will need for each of such sellers to agree that our purchase of its
business is contingent on the simultaneous closings of the other business combinations, which may make it more difficult for us, and
delay our ability, to complete our initial Business Combination. With multiple business combinations, we could also face additional risks,
including additional burdens and costs with respect to possible multiple negotiations and due diligence investigations (if there are
multiple sellers) and the additional risks associated with the subsequent assimilation of the operations and services or products of
the acquired companies in a single operating business. If we are unable to adequately address these risks, it could negatively impact
our profitability and results of operations.
We may attempt to complete our initial
Business Combination with a private company about which little information is available, which may result in a Business Combination with
a company that is not as profitable as we suspected, if at all.
In pursuing our Business
Combination strategy, we may seek to effectuate our initial Business Combination with a privately held company. Very little public information
generally exists about private companies, and we could be required to make our decision on whether to pursue a potential initial Business
Combination on the basis of limited information, which may result in a business combination with a company that is not as profitable
as we suspected, if at all.
We do not have a specified maximum redemption
threshold. The absence of such a redemption threshold may make it possible for us to complete our initial Business Combination with which
a substantial majority of our shareholders do not agree.
Our Amended and Restated
Memorandum and Articles of Association does not provide a maximum redemption threshold. Our proposed initial Business Combination may
impose a minimum cash requirement for (i) cash consideration to be paid to the target or its owners, (ii) cash for working
capital or other general corporate purposes or (iii) the retention of cash to satisfy other conditions. As a result, we may be able
to complete our initial Business Combination even though a substantial majority of our Public Shareholders do not agree with the transaction
and have redeemed their shares or, if we seek shareholder approval of our initial Business Combination and do not conduct redemptions
in connection with our initial Business Combination pursuant to the tender offer rules, have entered into privately negotiated agreements
to sell their shares to our Sponsor, officers, directors, advisors or any of their affiliates. In the event the aggregate cash consideration
we would be required to pay for all Class A Ordinary Shares that are validly submitted for redemption plus any amount required to satisfy
cash conditions pursuant to the terms of the proposed Business Combination exceed the aggregate amount of cash available to us, we will
not complete the Business Combination or redeem any shares, all Class A Ordinary Shares submitted for redemption will be returned to
the holders thereof, and we instead may search for an alternate Business Combination.
40
In order to effectuate an initial Business
Combination, special purpose acquisition companies have, in the recent past, amended various provisions of their charters and other governing
instruments, including their warrant agreements. We cannot assure you that we will not seek to amend our Amended and Restated Memorandum
and Articles of Association or governing instruments in a manner that will make it easier for us to complete our initial Business Combination
that our shareholders may not support.
In order to effectuate a
Business Combination, special purpose acquisition companies have, in the recent past, amended various provisions of their charters and
governing instruments, including their warrant agreements. For example, special purpose acquisition companies have amended the definition
of Business Combination, increased redemption thresholds and extended the time to consummate an initial Business Combination and, with
respect to their warrants, amended their warrant agreements to require the warrants to be exchanged for cash and/or other securities.
Amending our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association requires a special resolution under Cayman Islands law, which
requires the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of our ordinary shares which are represented in person or by proxy and are voted
at a general meeting of the Company, and amending our warrant agreement requires a vote of holders of at least 50% of the Public Warrants
and, solely with respect to any amendment to the terms of the Private Placement Warrants or any provision of the warrant agreement with
respect to the Private Placement Warrants, 50% of the then outstanding Private Placement Warrants, provided that so long as BTIG holds
any Private Placement Warrants, the consent of BTIG will be required. In addition, our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of
Association requires us to provide our Public Shareholders with the opportunity to redeem their Public Shares for cash if we propose
an amendment to our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association (A) to modify the substance or timing of our obligation
to allow redemption in connection with our initial Business Combination or to redeem 100% of our Public Shares if we do not complete
an initial Business Combination within the Completion Window or (B) with respect to any other material provisions relating to shareholders’
rights or pre-initial Business Combination activity. To the extent any of such amendments would be deemed to fundamentally change the
nature of the securities, we would register, or seek an exemption from registration for, the affected securities. We cannot assure you
that we will not seek to amend our charter or governing instruments or extend the time to consummate an initial Business Combination
in order to effectuate our initial Business Combination.
The provisions of our Amended and Restated
Memorandum and Articles of Association that relate to our pre-business combination activity (and corresponding provisions of the agreement
governing the release of funds from our Trust Account) may be amended with the approval of holders of not less than two-thirds of our
ordinary shares which are represented in person or by proxy and are voted at a general meeting of the Company, which is a lower amendment
threshold than that of some other special purpose acquisition companies. It may be easier for us, therefore, to amend our Amended and
Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association to facilitate the completion of an initial Business Combination that some of our shareholders
may not support.
Our Amended and Restated
Memorandum and Articles of Association provides that any of its provisions related to pre- Business Combination activity (including the
requirement to deposit proceeds of our Initial Public Offering and the private placement of warrants into the Trust Account and not release
such amounts except in specified circumstances, and to provide redemption rights to Public Shareholders as described herein) and corresponding
provisions of the trust agreement governing the release of funds from our Trust Account may be amended if approved by special resolution,
under Cayman Islands law which requires the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of our ordinary shares which are represented in person
or by proxy and are voted at a general meeting of the company. Our initial shareholders, who collectively beneficially own 25% of our
Class A Ordinary Shares will participate in any vote to amend our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association and/or
trust agreement and will have the discretion to vote in any manner they choose. As a result, we may be able to amend the provisions of
our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association which govern our pre-Business Combination behavior more easily than some
other special purpose acquisition companies, and this may increase our ability to complete a business combination with which you do not
agree. Our shareholders may pursue remedies against us for any breach of our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association.
41
Our Sponsor, officers and
directors have agreed, pursuant to a written agreement with us, that they will not propose any amendment to our Amended and Restated
Memorandum and Articles of Association (A) to modify the substance or timing of our obligation to allow redemption in connection
with our initial Business Combination or to redeem 100% of our Public Shares if we do not complete our initial Business Combination within
the Completion Window or (B) with respect to any other material provisions relating to shareholders’ rights or pre-initial
Business Combination activity, unless we provide our Public Shareholders with the opportunity to redeem their Class A Ordinary Shares
upon approval of any such amendment at a per-share price, payable in cash, equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in the Trust
Account, including interest earned on the funds held in the Trust Account (net of taxes paid or payable (other than excise or similar
taxes)), divided by the number of then issued and outstanding Public Shares. Our shareholders are not parties to, or third-party beneficiaries
of, these agreements and, as a result, will not have the ability to pursue remedies against our Sponsor, officers or directors for any
breach of these agreements. As a result, in the event of a breach, our shareholders would need to pursue a shareholder derivative action,
subject to applicable law.
We may be unable to obtain additional financing
to complete our initial Business Combination or to fund the operations and growth of a target business, which could compel us to restructure
or abandon a particular Business Combination.
We have not selected any
specific Business Combination target but intend to target businesses with enterprise values that are greater than we could acquire with
the net proceeds of our Initial Public Offering and the sale of the Private Placement Units. As a result, if the cash portion of the
purchase price exceeds the amount available from the Trust Account, net of amounts needed to satisfy any redemption by Public Shareholders,
we may be required to seek additional financing to complete such proposed initial Business Combination. We cannot assure you that such
financing will be available on acceptable terms, if at all. To the extent that additional financing proves to be unavailable when needed
to complete our initial Business Combination, we would be compelled to either restructure the transaction or abandon that particular
business combination and seek an alternative target business candidate. Further, we may be required to obtain additional financing in
connection with the closing of our initial Business Combination for general corporate purposes, including for maintenance or expansion
of operations of the post-transaction businesses, the payment of principal or interest due on indebtedness incurred in completing our
initial Business Combination, or to fund the purchase of other companies. If we are unable to complete our initial Business Combination,
our Public Shareholders may only receive their pro rata portion of the funds in the Trust Account that are available for distribution
to Public Shareholders, and our warrants will expire worthless. In addition, even if we do not need additional financing to complete
our initial Business Combination, we may require such financing to fund the operations or growth of the target business. The failure
to secure additional financing could have a material adverse effect on the continued development or growth of the target business. None
of our officers, directors or shareholders is required to provide any financing to us in connection with or after our initial Business
Combination.
Our initial shareholders control a substantial
interest in us and thus may exert a substantial influence on actions requiring a shareholder vote, potentially in a manner that you do
not support.
Our initial shareholders
own 25% of our issued and outstanding ordinary shares (excluding the private placement shares and the ordinary shares underlying the
Private Placement Warrants). After taking into account the Private Placement Units issued to the Sponsor, our initial shareholders own
an aggregate 8,081,667 ordinary shares, or approximately 26% of our issued and outstanding ordinary shares. Accordingly, they may exert
a substantial influence on actions requiring a shareholder vote, potentially in a manner that you do not support, including amendments
to our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association. This potential concentration of influence could be disadvantageous
to other shareholders with interests different from those of our Sponsor. In addition, the Founder Shares, all of which are held by our
Sponsor, will entitle the holders to appoint all of our directors prior to the consummation of our initial Business Combination. Holders
of our Public Shares will have no right to vote on the appointment or removal of directors during such time. Further, prior to the closing
of our initial Business Combination, only holders of our Founder Shares will have the right to vote to continue the Company in a jurisdiction
outside the Cayman Islands (including any special resolution required to amend the constitutional documents of the Company or to adopt
new constitutional documents of the Company, in each case, as a result of the Company approving a transfer by way of continuation in
a jurisdiction outside the Cayman Islands). This provision of our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association may only
be amended by a special resolution passed by not less than 90% of our ordinary shares which are represented in person or by proxy and
are voted at our general meeting. As a result, you will not have any influence over our continuation in a jurisdiction outside the Cayman
Islands prior to our initial Business Combination.
42
If our initial shareholders
purchase any Units in our Initial Public Offering or if our initial shareholders purchase any additional Class A Ordinary Shares in the
aftermarket or in privately negotiated transactions, this would increase their control. Neither our initial shareholders nor, to our
knowledge, any of our officers or directors, have any current intention to purchase additional securities, other than as disclosed in
the Initial Public Offering registration statement. Factors that would be considered in making such additional purchases would include
consideration of the current trading price of our Class A Ordinary Shares. In addition, our board of directors, whose members were appointed
by our Sponsor, is divided into three classes, each of which will generally serve for a term for three years with only one class
of directors being appointed in each year. We may not hold an annual or extraordinary general meeting to appoint new directors prior
to the completion of our initial Business Combination, in which case all of the current directors will continue in office until at least
the completion of the Business Combination. If there is an annual general meeting, as a consequence of our “staggered” board
of directors, only a minority of the board of directors will be considered for appointment and our initial shareholders, because of their
ownership position, will have considerable influence regarding the outcome. Accordingly, our initial shareholders will continue to exert
control at least until the completion of our initial Business Combination. In addition, we have agreed not to enter into a definitive
agreement regarding an initial Business Combination without the prior consent of our Sponsor.
Our ability to complete a Business Combination
with a U.S. target company may be impacted if such Business Combination is subject to U.S. foreign investment regulations and review
by a U.S. government entity, such as the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”), and ultimately prohibited.
Our ability to complete an
initial Business Combination with a U.S. target company may be impacted if such Business Combination is subject to U.S. foreign investment
regulations and review by a U.S. government entity, such as the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”),
and ultimately prohibited.
Our initial Business Combination
may be subject to regulatory review and approval requirements by governmental entities, or ultimately prohibited. For example, CFIUS
has authority to review certain direct or indirect foreign investments in U.S. companies. Among other things, CFIUS is empowered to require
mandatory filings related to certain foreign investments, to charge filing fees related to such filings, and to self-initiate national
security reviews of foreign direct and indirect investments in U.S. companies if the parties choose not to file voluntarily. If CFIUS
determines that an investment subject to its jurisdiction threatens national security, CFIUS has the power to impose restrictions on
the investment or recommend that the President prohibit it or order divestment. Whether CFIUS has jurisdiction to review an acquisition
or investment transaction depends on, among other factors, the nature and structure of the transaction, the nationality of the parties,
the level of beneficial ownership interest and the nature of any information or governance rights involved.
We are organized in the Cayman
Islands. Our Sponsor is ultimately jointly owned and controlled by three individuals, two of whom are U.S. citizens and one of whom is
a foreign national (a Brazilian and German citizen). As such, an initial Business Combination with a U.S. business or a foreign business
with U.S. operations that we may wish to pursue may be subject to CFIUS review. If a particular proposed Business Combination with a
U.S. business falls within CFIUS’s jurisdiction, the parties may determine that they are required to make a mandatory filing or
that they will submit to CFIUS review on a voluntary basis, or to proceed with the transaction without notifying CFIUS and risk CFIUS
intervention, before or after closing the transaction. In such circumstances, CFIUS may decide to delay the proposed Business Combination,
require conditions to mitigate national security concerns with respect to such business combination or recommend that the President of
the United States block the initial Business Combination or order us to divest all or a portion of the U.S. business of the combined
company, which may limit the attractiveness of, or delay or prevent us from pursuing, certain target companies that we believe would
otherwise be beneficial to us and our shareholders. In addition, certain types of U.S. businesses may be subject to rules or regulations
that limit or impose requirements with respect to foreign ownership. As a result, the pool of potential targets with which we could complete
an initial Business Combination may be impacted, and it may be adversely affected in terms of competing with other special purpose acquisition
companies which do not have similar foreign ownership issues.
43
The process of government
review, whether by CFIUS or otherwise, could be lengthy. Because we have only a limited time to complete our initial Business Combination,
our failure to obtain any required approvals within the requisite time period may require us to liquidate. If we are unable to consummate
our initial Business Combination within the Completion Window, including as a result of extended regulatory review, we will redeem the
Public Shares for a pro rata portion of the funds held in the Trust Account, subject to our obligations under Cayman Islands law to provide
for claims of creditors and the requirements of other applicable law. In such event, our shareholders will miss the opportunity to benefit
from an investment in a target company and the potential appreciation in value of such investment. There will be no liquidating distributions
from our Trust Account with respect to our warrants.
Because we must furnish our shareholders
with target business financial statements, we may lose the ability to complete an otherwise advantageous initial Business Combination
with some prospective target businesses.
The federal proxy rules require
that the proxy statement with respect to the vote on an initial Business Combination include historical and pro forma financial statement
disclosure. We will include the same financial statement disclosure in connection with our tender offer documents, whether or not they
are required under the tender offer rules. These financial statements may be required to be prepared in accordance with, or be reconciled
to, accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) or international financial reporting
standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IFRS”) depending on the circumstances and the historical
financial statements may be required to be audited in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States) (“PCAOB”). These financial statement requirements may limit the pool of potential target businesses
we may acquire because some targets may be unable to provide such financial statements in time for us to disclose such statements in
accordance with federal proxy rules and complete our initial Business Combination within the prescribed time frame.
Compliance obligations under the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act may make it more difficult for us to effectuate our initial Business Combination, require substantial financial and management resources,
and increase the time and costs of completing an initial Business Combination.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act requires that we evaluate and report on our system of internal controls beginning with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ending December 31, 2027. Only in the event we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer or an accelerated filer, and no longer
qualify as an emerging growth company, will we be required to comply with the independent registered public accounting firm attestation
requirement on our internal control over financial reporting. Further, for as long as we remain an emerging growth company, we will not
be required to comply with the independent registered public accounting firm attestation requirement on our internal control over financial
reporting. The fact that we are a blank check company makes compliance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act particularly burdensome
on us as compared to other public companies because a target business with which we seek to complete our initial Business Combination
may not be in compliance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act regarding adequacy of its internal controls. The development of
the internal control of any such entity to achieve compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may increase the time and costs necessary to
complete any such Business Combination.
44
Our search for a Business Combination,
and any target business with which we ultimately consummate a Business Combination, may be materially adversely affected by events that
are outside of our control, such as increased geopolitical unrest, pandemic outbreaks (such as COVID-19) and volatility in the debt and
equity markets.
On February 24, 2022,
Russian military forces launched a military action in Ukraine, and sustained conflict and disruption in the region is ongoing. In addition,
on October 7, 2023, Hamas launched a terrorist attack in Israel that has resulted in a significant action by the Israeli military
in Gaza. This has been accompanied by additional terrorist activities that have, among other things, disrupted shipping in the Red Sea.
Although the length, impact and outcome of these ongoing military conflicts is highly unpredictable, these conflicts could lead to significant
market and other disruptions, including significant volatility in the commodity prices and supple of energy resources, instability in
financial markets, supply chain interruptions, political and social instability, changes in consumer or purchaser preferences as well
as an increase in cyberattacks and espionage.
The situation is constantly
evolving as a result of these conflicts. The United States, the European Union, the United Kingdom and other countries have and
may implement additional sanctions, export controls or other measures against Russia, Belarus and other countries, regions, officials,
individuals or industries in the respective territories. Additionally, the evolving conflicts may expand to other countries and markets.
Such sanctions and other measures, as well as the potential for expanded military activities, could adversely affect the global economy
and financial markets and could adversely affect our ability to search for a Business Combination or finance such Business Combination,
and the business, financial condition and results of operations of any target business with which we ultimately consummate a Business
Combination may be materially adversely affected.
Similarly other events outside
of our control, including natural disasters, climate-related events, pandemics or health crises (such as the COVID-19 pandemic) may arise
from time to time, and such events may cause significant volatility and declines in the global markets, disproportionate impacts to certain
industries or sectors, disruptions to commerce (including to economic activity, travel and supply chain), loss of life or property damage,
and may adversely affect the global economy or capital markets, and the business of any potential target business with which we may consummate
a Business Combination and could be materially adversely affected. In addition, our ability to consummate a transaction may be dependent
on the ability to raise equity or debt financing which may be impacted by these and other events, including as a result of increased
market volatility, decreased market liquidity and third-party financing being unavailable on terms acceptable or at all.
Risks Relating to The Post-Business Combination
Company
Subsequent to our completion of our initial
Business Combination, we may be required to take write-downs or write-offs, restructuring and impairment or other charges that could
have a significant negative effect on our financial condition, results of operations and the price of our securities, which could cause
you to lose some or all of your investment.
Even if we conduct due diligence
on a target business with which we combine, we cannot assure you that this diligence will identify all material issues that may be present
within a particular target business, that it would be possible to uncover all material issues through a customary amount of due diligence,
or that factors outside of the target business and outside of our control will not later arise. As a result of these factors, we may
be forced to later write-down or write-off assets, restructure our operations, or incur impairment or other charges that could result
in our reporting losses. Even if our due diligence successfully identifies certain risks, unexpected risks may arise and previously known
risks may materialize in a manner not consistent with our preliminary risk analysis. Even though these charges may be non-cash items
and not have an immediate impact on our liquidity, the fact that we report charges of this nature could contribute to negative market
perceptions about us or our securities. In addition, charges of this nature may cause us to violate net worth or other covenants to which
we may be subject as a result of assuming pre-existing debt held by a target business or by virtue of our obtaining debt financing to
partially finance the initial Business Combination or thereafter. Accordingly, any holders who choose to retain their securities following
the Business Combination could suffer a reduction in the value of their securities. Such shareholders are unlikely to have a remedy for
such reduction in value unless they are able to successfully claim that the reduction was due to the breach by our officers or directors
of a duty of care or other fiduciary duty owed to them, or if they are able to successfully bring a private claim under securities laws
that the proxy solicitation or tender offer materials, as applicable, relating to the business combination contained an actionable material
misstatement or material omission.
45
The officers and directors of an acquisition
candidate may resign upon completion of our initial Business Combination. The loss of a Business Combination target’s key personnel
could negatively impact the operations and profitability of our post-combination business.
The role of an acquisition
candidate’s key personnel upon the completion of our initial Business Combination cannot be ascertained at this time. Although
we contemplate that certain members of an acquisition candidate’s management team will remain associated with the acquisition candidate
following our initial Business Combination, it is possible that members of the management of an acquisition candidate will not wish to
remain in place.
Our management may not be able to maintain
control of a target business after our initial Business Combination. We cannot provide assurance that, upon loss of control of a target
business, new management will possess the skills, qualifications or abilities necessary to profitably operate such business.
We may structure our initial
Business Combination so that the post-transaction company in which our Public Shareholders own shares will own less than 100% of the
equity interests or assets of a target business, but we will only complete such Business Combination if the post-transaction company
owns or acquires 50% or more of the outstanding voting securities of the target or otherwise acquires a controlling interest in the target
sufficient for us not to be required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act. We will not consider any
transaction that does not meet such criteria. Even if the post-transaction company owns 50% or more of the voting securities of the target,
our shareholders prior to the Business Combination may collectively own a minority interest in the post-Business Combination company,
depending on valuations ascribed to the target and us in the Business Combination. For example, we could pursue a transaction in which
we issue a substantial number of new Class A Ordinary Shares in exchange for all of the outstanding capital stock, shares or other equity
interests of a target.
In this case, we would acquire
a 100% interest in the target. However, as a result of the issuance of a substantial number of new Class A Ordinary Shares, our shareholders
immediately prior to such transaction could own less than a majority of our issued and outstanding Class A Ordinary Shares subsequent
to such transaction. In addition, other minority shareholders may subsequently combine their holdings resulting in a single person or
group obtaining a larger share of the company’s shares than we initially acquired. Accordingly, this may make it more likely that
our management will not be able to maintain control of the target business.
We may have a limited ability to assess
the management of a prospective target business and, as a result, may effect our initial Business Combination with a target business
whose management may not have the skills, qualifications or abilities to manage a public company.
When evaluating the desirability
of effecting our initial Business Combination with a prospective target business, our ability to assess the target business’s management
may be limited due to a lack of time, resources or information. Our assessment of the capabilities of the target business’s management,
therefore, may prove to be incorrect and such management may lack the skills, qualifications or abilities we suspected. Should the target
business’s management not possess the skills, qualifications or abilities necessary to manage a public company, the operations
and profitability of the post-combination business may be negatively impacted. Accordingly, any shareholders who choose to remain shareholders
following the Business Combination could suffer a reduction in the value of their shares. Such shareholders are unlikely to have a remedy
for such reduction in value unless they are able to successfully claim that the reduction was due to the breach by our officers or directors
of a duty of care or other fiduciary duty owed to them, or if they are able to successfully bring a private claim under securities laws
that the proxy solicitation or tender offer materials, as applicable, relating to the Business Combination contained an actionable material
misstatement or material omission.
46
We may seek Business Combination opportunities
with a high degree of complexity that require significant operational improvements, which could delay or prevent us from achieving our
desired results.
We may seek Business Combination
opportunities with large, highly complex companies that we believe would benefit from operational improvements. While we intend to implement
such improvements, to the extent that our efforts are delayed or we are unable to achieve the desired improvements, the Business Combination
may not be as successful as we anticipate.
To the extent we complete
our initial Business Combination with a large complex business or entity with a complex operating structure, we may also be affected
by numerous risks inherent in the operations of the business with which we combine, which could delay or prevent us from implementing
our strategy. Although our management team will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular target business and its operations,
we may not be able to properly ascertain or assess all of the significant risk factors until we complete our Business Combination. If
we are not able to achieve our desired operational improvements, or the improvements take longer to implement than anticipated, we may
not achieve the gains that we anticipate. Furthermore, some of these risks and complexities may be outside of our control and leave us
with no ability to control or reduce the chances that those risks and complexities will adversely impact a target business. Such combination
may not be as successful as a combination with a smaller, less complex organization.
Risks Relating to Acquiring and Operating
A Business in Foreign Countries
If we effect our initial Business Combination
with a company located outside of the United States, we would be subject to a variety of additional risks that may adversely affect
us.
If we pursue a target company
with operations or opportunities outside of the United States for our initial Business Combination, we may face additional burdens
in connection with investigating, agreeing to and completing such initial Business Combination, and if we effect such initial Business
Combination, we would be subject to a variety of additional risks that may negatively impact our operations.
If we pursue a target a company
with operations or opportunities outside of the United States for our initial Business Combination, we would be subject to risks
associated with cross-border business combinations, including in connection with investigating, agreeing to and completing our initial
Business Combination, conducting due diligence in a foreign jurisdiction, having such transaction approved by any local governments,
regulators or agencies and changes in the purchase price based on fluctuations in foreign exchange rates.
If we effect our initial
Business Combination with such a company, we would be subject to any special considerations or risks associated with companies operating
in an international setting, including any of the following:
● costs and difficulties
inherent in managing cross-border business operations;
● rules and regulations
regarding currency redemption;
● complex corporate
withholding taxes on individuals;
● Laws governing
the manner in which future business combinations may be effected;
● exchange listing
and/or delisting requirements;
● tariffs and trade
barriers;
● regulations related
to customs and import/export matters;
● local or regional
economic policies and market conditions;
● unexpected changes
in regulatory requirements;
● challenges in managing
and staffing international operations;
● longer payment
cycles;
● tax issues, such
as tax law changes and variations in tax laws as compared to the United States;
● currency fluctuations
and exchange controls;
● rates of inflation;
47
● challenges in collecting
accounts receivable;
● cultural and language
differences;
● employment regulations;
● underdeveloped
or unpredictable legal or regulatory systems;
● corruption;
● protection of intellectual
property;
● social unrest,
crime, strikes, riots and civil disturbances;
● regime changes
and political upheaval;
● terrorist attacks,
natural disasters, widespread health emergencies and wars; and
● deterioration of
political relations with the United States.
We may not be able to adequately address these
additional risks. If we were unable to do so, we may be unable to complete such initial Business Combination, or, if we complete such
initial Business Combination, our operations might suffer, either of which may adversely impact our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
We may reincorporate in another jurisdiction,
which may result in taxes imposed on shareholders or warrant holders.
We may, in connection with
our initial Business Combination or otherwise and, to the extent applicable, subject to requisite shareholder approval by special resolution
under the Companies Act (with respect to which only holders of Class B ordinary shares will be entitled to vote), reincorporate
in the jurisdiction in which the target company or business is located or in another jurisdiction. The transaction may require a shareholder
or warrant holder to recognize taxable income in the jurisdiction in which the shareholder or warrant holder is a tax resident or in
which its members are resident if it is a tax transparent entity. We do not intend to make any cash distributions to shareholders or
warrant holders to pay such taxes. Shareholders or warrant holders may be subject to withholding taxes or other taxes with respect to
their ownership of our Class A Ordinary Shares or warrants after the reincorporation.
We may reincorporate in another jurisdiction
in connection with our initial Business Combination or otherwise, and the laws of such jurisdiction may govern some or all of our future
material agreements and we may not be able to enforce our legal rights.
In connection with our initial
Business Combination or otherwise, we may relocate the home jurisdiction of our business from the Cayman Islands to another jurisdiction.
If we determine to do this, the laws of such jurisdiction may govern some or all of our future material agreements. The system of laws
and the enforcement of existing laws in such jurisdiction may not be as certain in implementation and interpretation as in the United States.
The inability to enforce or obtain a remedy under any of our future agreements could result in a significant loss of business, business
opportunities or capital.
We are subject to changing law and regulations
regarding regulatory matters, corporate governance and public disclosure that have increased both our costs and the risk of non-compliance.
We are subject to rules and
regulations by various governing bodies, including, for example, the SEC, which are charged with the protection of investors and the
oversight of companies whose securities are publicly traded, and to new and evolving regulatory measures under applicable law. Our efforts
to comply with new and changing laws and regulations have resulted in, and are likely to continue to result in, increased general and
administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities.
48
Moreover, because these laws,
regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance
becomes available. This evolution may result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and additional costs necessitated
by ongoing revisions to our disclosure and governance practices. If we fail to address and comply with these regulations and any subsequent
changes, we may be subject to penalty and our business may be harmed.
If our management following our initial
Business Combination is unfamiliar with United States securities laws, they may have to expend time and resources becoming familiar
with such laws, which could lead to various regulatory issues.
Following our initial Business
Combination, our management may resign from their positions as officers or directors of the company and the management of the target
business at the time of the Business Combination will remain in place. Management of the target business may not be familiar with United States
securities laws. If new management is unfamiliar with United States securities laws, they may have to expend time and resources
becoming familiar with such laws. This could be expensive and time-consuming and could lead to various regulatory issues which may adversely
affect our operations.
Exchange rate fluctuations and currency
policies may cause a target business’ ability to succeed in the international markets to be diminished.
In the event we acquire a
non-U.S. target, all revenues and income would likely be received in a foreign currency, and the dollar equivalent of our net assets
and distributions, if any, could be adversely affected by reductions in the value of the local currency. The value of the currencies
in our target regions fluctuate and are affected by, among other things, changes in political and economic conditions. Any change in
the relative value of such currency against our reporting currency may affect the attractiveness of any target business or, following
consummation of our initial Business Combination, our financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, if a currency appreciates
in value against the dollar prior to the consummation of our initial Business Combination, the cost of a target business as measured
in dollars will increase, which may make it less likely that we are able to consummate such transaction.
After our initial Business Combination,
substantially all of our assets may be located in a foreign country and substantially all of our revenue will be derived from our operations
in such country. Accordingly, our results of operations and prospects will be subject, to a significant extent, to the economic, political
and legal policies, developments and conditions in the country in which we operate.
The economic, political and
social conditions, as well as government policies, of the country in which our operations are located could affect our business. Economic
growth could be uneven, both geographically and among various sectors of the economy and such growth may not be sustained in the future.
If in the future such country’s economy experiences a downturn or grows at a slower rate than expected, there may be less demand
for spending in certain industries. A decrease in demand for spending in certain industries could materially and adversely affect our
ability to find an attractive target business with which to consummate our initial Business Combination and if we effect our initial
Business Combination, the ability of that target business to become profitable.
49
Risks Relating to Our Management Team
We are dependent upon our officers and
directors and their loss, or a reduction in the amount of time they can dedicate to our initial Business Combination, could adversely
affect our ability to operate.
Our operations are dependent
upon a relatively small group of individuals and, in particular, our officers and directors. We believe that our success depends on the
continued service of our officers and directors, at least until we have completed our initial Business Combination. In addition, our
officers and directors are not required to commit any specified amount of time to our affairs and, accordingly, will have conflicts of
interest in allocating their time among various business activities, including identifying potential Business Combinations and monitoring
the related due diligence. We do not have an employment agreement with, or key-man insurance on the life of, any of our directors or
officers. The unexpected loss of the services of one or more of our directors or officers could have a detrimental effect on us.
Our ability to successfully effect our
initial Business Combination and to be successful thereafter will be dependent upon the efforts of our key personnel, some of whom may
join us following our initial Business Combination. The loss of key personnel could negatively impact the operations and profitability
of our post-combination business.
Our ability to successfully
effect our initial Business Combination is dependent upon the efforts of our key personnel. The role of our key personnel in the target
business, however, cannot presently be ascertained. Although some of our key personnel may remain with the target business in senior
management or advisory positions following our initial
Business Combination, it
is likely that some or all of the management of the target business will remain in place. While we intend to closely scrutinize any individuals
we engage after our initial Business Combination, we cannot assure you that our assessment of these individuals will prove to be correct.
These individuals may be unfamiliar with the requirements of operating a company regulated by the SEC, which could cause us to have to
expend time and resources helping them become familiar with such requirements.
Our key personnel may negotiate employment
or consulting agreements with a target business in connection with a particular Business Combination, and a particular Business Combination
may be conditioned on the retention or resignation of such key personnel. These agreements may provide for them to receive compensation
following our initial Business Combination and as a result, may cause them to have conflicts of interest in determining whether a particular
Business Combination is the most advantageous.
Our key personnel may be
able to remain with our Company after the completion of our initial Business Combination only if they are able to negotiate employment
or consulting agreements in connection with the Business Combination. Such negotiations would take place simultaneously with the negotiation
of the Business Combination and could provide for such individuals to receive compensation in the form of cash payments and/or our securities
for services they would render to us after the completion of the Business Combination. Such negotiations also could make such key personnel’s
retention or resignation a condition to any such agreement. The personal and financial interests of such individuals may influence their
motivation in identifying and selecting a target business, subject to their fiduciary duties under Cayman Islands law.
50
Our officers and directors will allocate
their time to other businesses thereby causing conflicts of interest in their determination as to how much time to devote to our affairs.
This conflict of interest could have a negative impact on our ability to complete our initial Business Combination.
Our officers and directors
are not required to, and will not, commit their full time to our affairs, which may result in a conflict of interest in allocating their
time between our operations and our search for a Business Combination and their other businesses. We do not intend to have any full-time
employees prior to the completion of our initial Business Combination. Each of our officers is engaged in other business endeavors for
which he may be entitled to substantial compensation, and our officers are not obligated to contribute any specific number of hours
per week to our affairs. Our independent directors also serve as officers and board members for other entities. If our officers’
and directors’ other business affairs require them to devote substantial amounts of time to such affairs in excess of their current
commitment levels, it could limit their ability to devote time to our affairs which may have a negative impact on our ability to complete
our initial Business Combination.
Our officers and directors presently have,
and any of them in the future may have additional, fiduciary or contractual obligations to other entities, including other blank check
companies, and, accordingly, may have conflicts of interest in allocating their time and in determining to which entity a particular
business opportunity should be presented.
Until we consummate our initial
Business Combination, we intend to engage in the business of identifying and combining with one or more businesses. Our Sponsor, its
managing members, and our officers and directors are, or may in the future become, affiliated with entities (such as operating companies
or investment vehicles) that are engaged in a similar business. We do not have employment contracts with our officers and directors that
will limit their ability to work at other businesses. Each of our officers and directors presently has, and any of them in the future
may have, additional fiduciary or contractual obligations to other entities pursuant to which such officer or director is or will be
required to present a Business Combination opportunity to such entities. Accordingly, they may have conflicts of interest in determining
to which entity a particular business opportunity should be presented. These conflicts may not be resolved in our favor and a potential
target business may be presented to such other blank check companies prior to its presentation to us, subject to their fiduciary duties
under Cayman Islands law. Our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association provides that, to the fullest extent permitted
by applicable law: (i) no individual serving as a director or an officer shall have any duty, except and to the extent expressly
assumed by contract, to refrain from engaging directly or indirectly in the same or similar business activities or lines of business
as us; and (ii) we renounce any interest or expectancy in, or in being offered an opportunity to participate in, any potential transaction
or matter which may be a corporate opportunity for any director or officer, on the one hand, and us, on the other.
In addition, our Sponsor
and our officers and directors may Sponsor or form other special purpose acquisition companies similar to ours or may pursue other business
or investment ventures during the period in which we are seeking an initial Business Combination. As a result, our Sponsor, officers
and directors could have conflicts of interest in determining whether to present Business Combination opportunities to us or to any other
special purpose acquisition company with which they may become involved. Any such companies, businesses or investments may present additional
conflicts of interest in pursuing an initial Business Combination target. In particular, certain of our officers and directors are also
officers and directors of (i) RAAQ, a special purpose acquisition company that consummated its initial public offering in April 2025,
and (ii) DAAQ, a special purpose acquisition company that consummated its initial public offering in April 2025. RAAQ may pursue
an initial Business Combination target in any businesses or industries, but expects to target opportunities and companies that are that
are in the sectors underpinned by real assets including metals and mining, real estate, infrastructure and adjacent sectors. Similarly,
DAAQ, although it may pursue an initial Business Combination in any sector or industry, is expected to complete its initial Business
Combination with a target company in the global space economy, including business in the technology and defense sectors. Any such companies,
businesses or investments may present additional conflicts of interest in pursuing an initial Business Combination. On January 13, 2026,
DAAQ entered into a business combination agreement with Old Glory Holding Company. In addition, on February 22, 2026, RAAQ entered into
a business combination agreement with IQM Finland Oy. Because each of DAAQ and RAAQ have entered into a definitive written agreement
for an initial business combination and are currently in the process of consummating their initial business combinations, we do not expect
such entities to pose a conflict with us.
51
Our officers, directors, security holders
and their respective affiliates may have competitive pecuniary interests that conflict with our interests.
We have not adopted a policy
that expressly prohibits our directors, officers, security holders or affiliates from having a direct or indirect pecuniary or financial
interest in any investment to be acquired or disposed of by us or in any transaction to which we are a party or have an interest. In
fact, we may enter into a Business Combination with a target business that is affiliated with our Sponsor, our directors or officers,
although we do not intend to do so. Nor do we have a policy that expressly prohibits any such persons from engaging for their own account
in business activities of the types conducted by us. Accordingly, such persons or entities may have a conflict between their interests
and ours.
The personal and financial
interests of our directors and officers may influence their motivation in timely identifying and selecting a target business and completing
a Business Combination. Consequently, our directors’ and officers’ discretion in identifying and selecting a suitable target
business may result in a conflict of interest when determining whether the terms, conditions and timing of a particular Business Combination
are appropriate and in our shareholders’ best interest. If this were the case, it would be a breach of their fiduciary duties to
us as a matter of Cayman Islands law and we or our shareholders might have a claim against such individuals for infringing on our shareholders’
rights. However, we might not ultimately be successful in any claim we may make against them for such reason.
We may not have sufficient funds to satisfy
indemnification claims of our directors and officers.
We have agreed to indemnify
our officers and directors to the fullest extent permitted by law. However, our officers and directors have agreed to waive any right,
title, interest or claim of any kind in or to any monies in the Trust Account and to not seek recourse against the Trust Account for
any reason whatsoever (except to the extent they are entitled to funds from the Trust Account due to their ownership of Public Shares).
Accordingly, any indemnification provided will be able to be satisfied by us only if (i) we have sufficient funds outside of the
Trust Account or (ii) we consummate an initial Business Combination. Our obligation to indemnify our officers and directors may
discourage shareholders from bringing a lawsuit against our officers or directors for breach of their fiduciary duty. These provisions
also may have the effect of reducing the likelihood of derivative litigation against our officers and directors, even though such an
action, if successful, might otherwise benefit us and our shareholders. Furthermore, a shareholder’s investment may be adversely
affected to the extent we pay the costs of settlement and damage awards against our officers and directors pursuant to these indemnification
provisions.
Members of our management team and board
of directors have significant experience as board members, officers or executives of other companies. As a result, certain of those persons
have been, may be, or may become, involved in proceedings, investigations and litigation relating to the business affairs of the companies
with which they were, are, or may in the future be, affiliated. This may have an adverse effect on us, which may impede our ability to
consummate an initial Business Combination.
During the course of their
careers, members of our management team and board of directors have had significant experience as board members, officers or executives
of other companies. As a result of their involvement and positions in these companies, certain persons were, are now, or may in the future
become, involved in litigation, investigations or other proceedings relating to the business affairs of such companies or transactions
entered into by such companies. For example, Jeff Tuder, our Chief Financial Officer, and Peter Ort, our Principal Executive Officer,
are currently co-defendants in an ongoing class action lawsuit filed against Messrs. Tuder and Ort and other members of the board of
directors of Concord Acquisition Corp. (“Concord I”) regarding Concord I’s handling of a break-up fee paid
to Concord I following its terminated business combination with Circle Internet Financial. Any such litigation, investigations or
other proceedings may divert our management team’s and board’s attention and resources away from identifying and selecting
a target business or businesses for our initial Business Combination and may negatively affect our reputation, which may impede our ability
to complete an initial Business Combination.
52
Members of our management team and affiliated
companies may have been, and may in the future be, involved in civil disputes or governmental investigations unrelated to our business.
Members of our management
team have been (and intend to be) involved in a wide variety of businesses. Such involvement has, and may lead to, media coverage and
public awareness. As a result, members of our management team and affiliated companies may have been, and may in the future be, involved
in civil disputes or governmental investigations unrelated to our business. Any such claims or investigations may be detrimental to our
reputation and could negatively affect our ability to identify and complete an initial Business Combination and may have an adverse effect
on the price of our securities.
Our letter agreement with our Sponsor,
officers and directors may be amended without shareholder approval.
Our letter agreement with
our Sponsor, officers and directors contains provisions relating to transfer restrictions of our Founder Shares and Private Placement
Units (including the securities comprising such Units), indemnification of the Trust Account, waiver of redemption rights and participation
in liquidating distributions from the Trust Account. The letter agreement may be amended without shareholder approval (although releasing
the parties from the restriction not to transfer the Founder Shares for 180 days following the date of the final prospectus for
our Initial Public Offering will require the prior written consent of the Underwriters). While we do not expect our board to approve
any amendment to the letter agreement prior to our initial Business Combination, it may be possible that our board, in exercising its
business judgment and subject to its fiduciary duties, chooses to approve one or more amendments to the letter agreement. Any such amendments
to the letter agreement would not require approval from our shareholders and may have an adverse effect on the value of an investment
in our securities.
We may approve an amendment or waiver of
the letter agreement that would allow our Sponsor to directly, or members of our Sponsor to indirectly, transfer Founder Shares and Private
Placement Units or membership interests in our Sponsor in a transaction in which the Sponsor removes itself as our Sponsor before identifying
a business combination, which may deprive us of key personnel.
Pursuant to the letter agreement,
indirect transfers of the Founder Shares and Private Placement Units held by our Sponsor are restricted to the same extent as direct
transfers. The securities held by the Sponsor are expected to only be distributed directly to the members of the Sponsor in connection
with or following the consummation of our initial Business Combination, provided that such distributions comply with the transfer restrictions
on the Founder Shares and Private Placement Units and that such members agree to become subject to the applicable transfer restrictions
with respect to such securities. Indirect transfers of the securities held by the Sponsor, such as to another member of the Sponsor or
their affiliate or a new member of the Sponsor, may be permitted with the consent of the managing members of our Sponsor, so long as
such transfer complies with the applicable transfer restrictions with respect to such securities to the same extent as the party originally
subject to such restrictions. While there is no current intention to do so, we may approve an amendment or waiver of the letter agreement
that would allow the Sponsor to directly, or members of our Sponsor to indirectly, transfer Founder Shares and Private Placement Units
(including the securities comprising such Units) or membership interests in our Sponsor in a transaction in which the Sponsor removes
itself as our Sponsor before identifying a Business Combination. As a result, there is a risk that our Sponsor and our officers and directors
may divest their ownership or economic interests in us or in our Sponsor, which would likely result in our loss of certain key personnel,
including Peter Ort, our Principal Executive Officer, Jeff Tuder, our Chief Financial Officer, and Raphael Roettgen, our Chairman. There
can be no assurance that any replacement Sponsor or key personnel will successfully identify a Business Combination target for us, or,
even if one is so identified, successfully complete such Business Combination.
53
Risks Relating to Our Securities
You will not have any rights or interests
in funds from the Trust Account, except under certain limited circumstances. Therefore, to liquidate your investment, you may be forced
to sell your Public Shares or warrants, potentially at a loss.
Our Public Shareholders will
be entitled to receive funds from the Trust Account only upon the earliest to occur of: (i) our completion of an initial Business
Combination, and then only in connection with those Class A Ordinary Shares that such shareholder properly elected to redeem, subject
to the limitations and on the conditions described herein, (ii) the redemption of any Public Shares properly submitted in connection
with a shareholder vote to amend our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association (A) to modify the substance or
timing of our obligation to allow redemption in connection with our initial Business Combination or to redeem 100% of our Public Shares
if we do not complete our initial Business Combination within the Completion Window or (B) with respect to any other material provisions
relating to shareholders’ rights or pre-initial Business Combination activity, and (iii) the redemption of our Public Shares
if we are unable to complete an initial Business Combination within the Completion Window, subject to applicable law and as further described
herein. In no other circumstances will a Public Shareholder have any right or interest of any kind in the Trust Account. There are no
redemption rights with respect to the warrants. Accordingly, to liquidate your investment, you may be forced to sell your Public Shares
or warrants, potentially at a loss.
Nasdaq may delist our securities from trading
on its exchange, which could limit investors’ ability to make transactions in our securities and subject us to additional trading
restrictions.
Our Units, Class A Ordinary
Shares and warrants are listed on Nasdaq. We cannot assure you that our securities will continue to be listed on Nasdaq in the future
or prior to our initial Business Combination. In order to continue listing our securities on Nasdaq prior to our initial Business Combination,
we must maintain certain financial, distribution and share price levels. Generally, we must maintain a minimum market value of our listed
securities of $50,000,000 and a minimum number of holders of our securities (300 public holders). Additionally, in connection with our
initial Business Combination, we will be required to demonstrate compliance with Nasdaq’s initial listing requirements, which are
more rigorous than Nasdaq’s continued listing requirements, in order to continue to maintain the listing of our securities on Nasdaq.
For instance, unless we decide to list on a different Nasdaq tier such as the Nasdaq Capital Market which has different initial listing
requirements, our share price would generally be required to be at least $4.00 per share, the market value of our listed securities would
be required to be at least $75,000,000, the market value of our unrestricted publicly held shares would be required to be at least $20,000,000
and we would be required to have a minimum of 400 round lot holders of our securities, with at least 50% of such round lot holders holding
securities with a market value of at least $2,500. We cannot assure you that we will be able to meet those initial listing requirements
at that time.
If Nasdaq delists our securities
from trading on its exchange and we are not able to list our securities on another national securities exchange, we expect our securities
could be quoted on an over-the-counter market. If this were to occur, we could face significant material adverse consequences, including:
● a limited availability
of market quotations for our securities;
● reduced liquidity
for our securities;
● a determination
that our Class A Ordinary Shares are a “penny stock” which will require brokers
trading in our Class A Ordinary Shares to adhere to more stringent rules and possibly result
in a reduced level of trading activity in the secondary trading market for our securities;
● a limited amount
of news and analyst coverage; and
● a decreased ability
to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future.
54
The National Securities Markets
Improvement Act of 1996, which is a federal statute, prevents or preempts the states from regulating the sale of certain securities,
which are referred to as “covered securities.” Because our Units, Class A Ordinary Shares and warrants are listed on Nasdaq,
our Units, Class A Ordinary Shares and warrants will qualify as covered securities under the statute. Although the states are preempted
from regulating the sale of our securities, the federal statute does allow the states to investigate companies if there is a suspicion
of fraud, and, if there is a finding of fraudulent activity, then the states can regulate or bar the sale of covered securities in a
particular case. While we are not aware of a state having used these powers to prohibit or restrict the sale of securities issued by
blank check companies, other than the State of Idaho, certain state securities regulators view blank check companies unfavorably and
might use these powers, or threaten to use these powers, to hinder the sale of securities of blank check companies in their states. Further,
if we were no longer listed on Nasdaq, our securities would not qualify as covered securities under the statute and we would be subject
to regulation in each state in which we offer our securities.
The nominal purchase price paid by our
Sponsor for the Founder Shares may significantly dilute the implied value of your Public Shares in the event we consummate an initial
Business Combination, and our Sponsor is likely to make a substantial profit on its investment in us in the event we consummate an initial
Business Combination, even if the business combination causes the trading price of our ordinary shares to materially decline.
While we are offering our
Units at an offering price of $10.00 per unit and the amount in our Trust Account is initially anticipated to be $10.00 per Public Share,
implying an initial value of $10.00 per Public Share, our Sponsor paid only a nominal aggregate purchase price of $25,000 for the Founder
Shares, or approximately $0.003 per share. As a result, the value of your Public Shares may be significantly diluted in the event we
consummate an initial Business Combination. For example, the following table shows the Public Shareholders’ and Sponsor’s
investment per share and how that compares to the implied value of one of our shares upon the consummation of our initial Business Combination
if at that time we were valued at $221,950,000 (following payment of $8,050,000 of deferred underwriting commissions), which is the amount
we would have for our initial Business Combination in the Trust Account, assuming no interest is earned on the funds held in the Trust
Account, and no Public Shares are redeemed in connection with our initial Business Combination. At such valuation, each of our ordinary
shares would have an implied value of $7.09 per share, which is a 29.1% decrease as compared to the initial implied value per Public
Share of $10.00.
Public shares
23,000,000
Founder shares
7,666,667
Private Placement Units
645,000
Total shares
31,311,667
Total funds in trust available
for initial Business Combination (1)
$ 221,950,000
Implied value per share (1)(2)
$ 7.09
Public shareholders’
investment per share (3)
$ 10.00
Sponsor’s investment per share (4)
$ 0.55
(1) Does not take into account other potential impacts
on our valuation at the time of the business combination, such as the trading price of our
Public Shares, the terms of the Business Combination transaction (including any equity issued
to or retained by, or cash or other consideration paid to, the target’s shareholder
or other third parties), the Business Combination transaction costs, or the target’s
business itself, including its assets, liabilities, management and prospects. For instance,
the potential dilution experienced by holders of our ordinary shares may be mitigated if
the Business Combination agreement is structured such that the potential dilutive impact
of the Founder Shares is borne by all shareholders in the pro forma company.
(2) Note that redemptions of our Public Shares in connection
with our initial Business Combination would further reduce the implied value of our ordinary
shares. For instance, in this example, if 50% of the Public Shares were redeemed in connection
with our initial Business Combination, the implied value per ordinary share would be $5.40.
(3) While the Public Shareholders’ investment is
in both the Public Shares and the warrants, for purposes of this table the full investment
amount is ascribed to the Public Shares only.
(4) The Sponsor’s total investment in the equity
of the company, inclusive of the Founder Shares and the Sponsor’s $4,150,000 investment
in the Private Placement Units, is $4,175,000.
55
While the implied value of
our Public Shares may be diluted, the implied value of $7.09 per share in the example above would represent a significant implied profit
for our Sponsor relative to the initial purchase price of the Founder Shares. Our Sponsor invested an aggregate of $4,175,000 in us in
connection with the Initial Public Offering, comprised of the $25,000 purchase price for the Founder Shares and the $4,150,000 purchase
price for the Private Placement Units. At $7.09 per share, the 7,561,667 Founder Shares would have an aggregate implied value of approximately
$53,612,219. As a result, even if the trading price of our ordinary shares significantly declines (whether because of a substantial amount
of redemptions of our Public Shares or for any other reason), our Sponsor will stand to make significant profit on its investment in
us. In addition, our Sponsor could potentially recoup its entire investment in us even if the trading price of our ordinary shares was
as low as $0.55 and even if the private placement shares and Private Placement Warrants are worthless. As a result, our Sponsor is likely
to make a substantial profit on its investment in us even if we select and consummate an initial Business Combination that causes the
trading price of our ordinary shares to decline, while our Public Shareholders who purchased their Units could lose significant value
in their Public Shares. Our Sponsor may therefore be economically incentivized to consummate an initial Business Combination with a riskier,
weaker-performing or less-established target business than would be the case if our Sponsor had paid the same per share price for the
Founder Shares as our Public Shareholders paid for their Public Shares.
Because we are incorporated under the laws
of the Cayman Islands, you may face difficulties in protecting your interests, and your ability to protect your rights through the U.S. Federal
courts may be limited.
We are an exempted company
incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands. As a result, it may be difficult for investors to effect service of process within
the United States upon our directors or officers, or enforce judgments obtained in the United States courts against our directors
or officers.
Our corporate affairs are
governed by our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association, the Companies Act (as the same may be supplemented or amended
from time to time) and the common law of the Cayman Islands. We will also be subject to the federal securities laws of the United States.
The rights of shareholders to take action against the directors, actions by minority shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities
of our directors to us under Cayman Islands law are to a large extent governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The common law
of the Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent in the Cayman Islands as well as from English
common law, the decisions of whose courts are of persuasive authority, but are not binding on a court in the Cayman Islands. The rights
of our shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors under Cayman Islands law are different from what they would be
under statutes or judicial precedent in some jurisdictions in the United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands has a different
body of securities laws as compared to the United States, and certain states, such as Delaware, may have more fully developed and
judicially interpreted bodies of corporate law. In addition, Cayman Islands companies may not have standing to initiate a shareholders
derivative action in a Federal court of the United States.
56
We have been advised by Conyers
Dill & Pearman LLP, our Cayman Islands legal counsel, that the courts of the Cayman Islands are unlikely (i) to recognize
or enforce against us judgments of courts of the United States predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities
laws of the United States or any state; and (ii) in original actions brought in the Cayman Islands, to impose liabilities against
us predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States or any state, so far as the
liabilities imposed by those provisions are penal in nature. In those circumstances, although there is no statutory enforcement in the
Cayman Islands of judgments obtained in the United States, the courts of the Cayman Islands will recognize and enforce a foreign
money judgment of a foreign court of competent jurisdiction without retrial on the merits based on the principle that a judgment of a
competent foreign court imposes upon the judgment debtor an obligation to pay the sum for which judgment has been given provided certain
conditions are met. For a foreign judgment to be enforced in the Cayman Islands, such judgment must be final and conclusive and for a
liquidated sum, and must not be in respect of taxes or a fine or penalty, inconsistent with a Cayman Islands judgment in respect of the
same matter, impeachable on the grounds of fraud or obtained in a manner, or be of a kind the enforcement of which is, contrary to natural
justice or the public policy of the Cayman Islands (awards of punitive or multiple damages may well be held to be contrary to public
policy). A Cayman Islands Court may stay enforcement proceedings if concurrent proceedings are being brought elsewhere.
As a result of all of the
above, Public Shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions taken by management, members
of the board of directors or controlling shareholders than they would as Public Shareholders of a United States company.
After our initial Business Combination,
it is possible that a majority of our directors and officers will live outside the United States and all of our assets will be located
outside the United States; therefore, investors may not be able to enforce federal securities laws or their other legal rights.
It is possible that after
our initial Business Combination, a majority of our directors and officers will reside outside of the United States and all of our
assets will be located outside of the United States. As a result, it may be difficult, or in some cases not possible, for investors
in the United States to enforce their legal rights, to effect service of process upon all of our directors or officers or to enforce
judgments of United States courts predicated upon civil liabilities and criminal penalties on our directors and officers under United States
laws.
We may amend the terms of the warrants
in a manner that may be adverse to holders of Public Warrants with the approval by the holders of at least 50% of the then outstanding
Public Warrants. As a result, the exercise price of your warrants could be increased, the exercise period could be shortened and the
number of Class A Ordinary Shares purchasable upon exercise of a warrant could be decreased, all without your approval.
Our warrants are issued in
registered form under a warrant agreement between Efficiency, as warrant agent, and us. The warrant agreement provides that the terms
of the warrants may be amended without the consent of any holder for the purpose of (i) curing any ambiguity or to correct any defective
provision or mistake, including to conform the provisions of the warrant agreement to the description of the terms of the warrants and
the warrant agreement set forth in our prospectus, (ii) adjusting the provisions relating to cash dividends on ordinary shares as
contemplated by and in accordance with the warrant agreement or (iii) adding or changing any provisions with respect to matters
or questions arising under the warrant agreement as the parties to the warrant agreement may deem necessary or desirable and that the
parties deem to not adversely affect the rights of the registered holders of the warrants, provided that the approval by the holders
of at least 50% of the then-outstanding Public Warrants is required to make any change that adversely affects the interests of the registered
holders of Public Warrants. Accordingly, we may amend the terms of the Public Warrants in a manner adverse to a holder of Public Warrants
if holders of at least 50% of the then outstanding Public Warrants approve of such amendment. Although our ability to amend the terms
of the Public Warrants with the consent of at least 50% of the then outstanding Public Warrants is unlimited, examples of such amendments
could be amendments to, among other things, increase the exercise price of the warrants, convert the warrants into cash or shares, shorten
the exercise period or decrease the number of Class A Ordinary Shares purchasable upon exercise of a warrant.
57
Our warrant agreement designates the courts
of the State of New York or the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York as the sole and exclusive
forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by holders of our warrants, which could limit the ability of
warrant holders to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with our Company.
Our warrant agreement provides
that, subject to applicable law, (i) any action, proceeding or claim against us arising out of or relating in any way to the warrant
agreement, including under the Securities Act, will be brought and enforced in the courts of the State of New York or the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York, and (ii) that we irrevocably submit to such jurisdiction, which jurisdiction
shall be the exclusive forum for any such action, proceeding or claim. We will waive any objection to such exclusive jurisdiction and
that such courts represent an inconvenient forum. With respect to any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities
Act or the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, we note, however, that there is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce
this provision. Investors cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. Section 22
of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for state and federal courts over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability
created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder.
Notwithstanding the foregoing,
these provisions of the warrant agreement will not apply to suits brought to enforce any liability or duty created by the Exchange Act
or any other claim for which the federal district courts of the United States of America are the sole and exclusive forum. Any person
or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in any of our warrants shall be deemed to have notice of and to have consented
to the forum provisions in our warrant agreement. If any action, the subject matter of which is within the scope the forum provisions
of the warrant agreement, is filed in a court other than a court of the State of New York or the United States District Court
for the Southern District of New York (a “foreign action”) in the name of any holder of our warrants, such holder shall
be deemed to have consented to: (x) the personal jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located in the State of New York
in connection with any action brought in any such court to enforce the forum provisions (an “enforcement action”), and (y) having
service of process made upon such warrant holder in any such enforcement action by service upon such warrant holder’s counsel in
the foreign action as agent for such warrant holder.
This choice-of-forum provision
may limit a warrant holder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with our Company,
which may discourage such lawsuits. Alternatively, if a court were to find this provision of our warrant agreement inapplicable or unenforceable
with respect to one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving
such matters in other jurisdictions, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations
and result in a diversion of the time and resources of our management and board of directors.
58
We may redeem your unexpired warrants prior
to their exercise at a time that is disadvantageous to you, thereby making your warrants worthless.
We have the ability to redeem
outstanding warrants at any time after they become exercisable and prior to their expiration, at a price of $0.01 per warrant, provided
that the closing price of our Class A Ordinary Shares equals or exceeds $18.00 per share (as adjusted for share sub-divisions, share
capitalizations, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) for any 20 trading days within a 30 trading-day period ending
on the third trading day prior to the date on which we give proper notice of such redemption to the warrants holders and provided
certain other conditions are met. We will not redeem the warrants unless an effective registration statement under the Securities Act
covering the Class A Ordinary Shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants is effective and a current prospectus relating to those Class
A Ordinary Shares is available throughout the 30-day redemption period, except if the warrants may be exercised on a cashless basis and
such cashless exercise is exempt from registration under the Securities Act. If and when the warrants become redeemable by us, we may
exercise our redemption right even if we are unable to register or qualify the underlying securities for sale under all applicable state
securities laws. Redemption of the outstanding warrants could force you to (i) exercise your warrants and pay the exercise price
therefor at a time when it may be disadvantageous for you to do so, (ii) sell your warrants at the then-current market price when
you might otherwise wish to hold your warrants or (iii) accept the nominal redemption price which, at the time the outstanding warrants
are called for redemption, is likely to be substantially less than the market value of your warrants. None of the Private Placement Warrants
will be redeemable by us. Because we may redeem the outstanding warrants held by public warrant holders and the Private Placement Warrants
held by the Sponsor are not redeemable by us and are exercisable on a cashless basis, the Sponsor may profit at times when an unaffiliated
security holder cannot profit, such as when the Public Warrants are called for redemption or if the Sponsor chooses to utilize the cashless
exercise option under circumstances where the public warrant holders cannot exercise on a cashless basis. Accordingly, there may be actual
or potential material conflicts of interest between our Sponsor on the one hand, and the public warrant holders on the other hand.
Our warrants may have an adverse effect
on the market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares and make it more difficult to effectuate our initial Business Combination.
We issued warrants to purchase
7,666,667 of our Class A Ordinary Shares as part of the Units offered in our Initial Public Offering and we issued in a private placement
an aggregate of 215,000 Private Placement Warrants. In addition, if the Sponsor makes any working capital loans, it may convert up to
$1,500,000 of those loans into additional Private Placement Units, at the price of $10.00 per unit. To the extent we issue ordinary shares
to effectuate a Business Combination, the potential for the issuance of a substantial number of additional Class A Ordinary Shares upon
exercise of these warrants could make us a less attractive acquisition vehicle to a target business. Such warrants, when exercised, will
increase the number of issued and outstanding Class A Ordinary Shares and reduce the value of the Class A Ordinary Shares issued to complete
the Business Combination. Therefore, our warrants may make it more difficult to effectuate a Business Combination or increase the cost
of acquiring the target business.
Because each Unit contains one-third of
one warrant and only a whole warrant may be exercised, the Units may be worth less than Units of other special purpose acquisition companies.
Each Unit contains one-third
of one warrant. Pursuant to the warrant agreement, no fractional warrants will be issued upon separation of the Units, and only whole
Units will trade. If, upon exercise of the warrants, a holder would be entitled to receive a fractional interest in a share, we will,
upon exercise, round down to the nearest whole number the number of Class A Ordinary Shares to be issued to the warrant holder. This
is different from other companies similar to ours whose Units include one ordinary share and one warrant to purchase one whole share.
We have established the components of the Units in this way in order to reduce the dilutive effect of the warrants upon completion of
a Business Combination since the warrants will be exercisable in the aggregate for one-third of the number of shares compared to Units
that each contain a whole warrant to purchase one share, thus making us, we believe, a more attractive merger partner for target businesses.
Nevertheless, this unit structure may cause our Units to be worth less than if it included a whole warrant to purchase one share.
59
The grant of registration rights to our
initial shareholders and holders of our Private Placement Units may make it more difficult to complete our initial Business Combination,
and the future exercise of such rights may adversely affect the market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares.
Pursuant to a
registration rights agreement, our initial shareholders, the holders of our Private Placement Units, and the holders of Private
Placement Units that may be issued upon conversion of working capital loans and their permitted transferees can demand that we
register the Class A Ordinary Shares into which Founder Shares are convertible and the securities included in the Private Placement
Units (including any Private Placement Units that may be issued upon conversion of working capital loans), such as the private
placement shares, the Private Placement Warrants, the Class A Ordinary Shares issuable upon exercise of the Private Placement
Warrants and the warrants, and any other securities of the company acquired by them prior to the consummation of our initial
Business Combination. We will bear the cost of registering these securities. The registration and availability of such a significant
number of securities for trading in the public market may have an adverse effect on the market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares.
In addition, the existence of the registration rights may make our initial Business Combination more costly or difficult to
conclude. This is because the shareholders of the target business may increase the equity stake they seek in the combined entity or
ask for more cash consideration to offset the negative impact on the market price of our Class A Ordinary Shares that is expected
when the ordinary shares owned by our initial shareholders, holders of our Private Placement Units or holders of our working capital
loans, or their respective permitted transferees are registered.
Provisions in our Amended and Restated
Memorandum and Articles of Association may inhibit a takeover of us, which could limit the price investors might be willing to pay in
the future for our Class A Ordinary Shares and could entrench management.
Our Amended and Restated
Memorandum and Articles of Association contain provisions that may discourage unsolicited takeover proposals that shareholders may consider
to be in their best interests. These provisions include a staggered board of directors and the ability of the board of directors to designate
the terms of and issue new series of preference shares, which may make the removal of management more difficult and may discourage transactions
that otherwise could involve payment of a premium over prevailing market prices for our securities.
Our initial Business Combination and our
structure thereafter may not be tax-efficient to our shareholders and warrant holders. As a result of our Business Combination, our tax
obligations may be more complex, burdensome and uncertain.
Although we will attempt
to structure our initial Business Combination in a tax-efficient manner, tax structuring considerations are complex, the relevant facts
and law are uncertain and may change, and we may prioritize commercial and other considerations over tax considerations. For example,
in connection with our initial Business Combination and subject to any requisite shareholder approval, we may structure our Business
Combination in a manner that requires shareholders and/or warrant holders to recognize gain or income for tax purposes, effect a business
combination with a target company in another jurisdiction or reincorporate in a different jurisdiction (including, but not limited to,
the jurisdiction in which the target company or business is located). We do not intend to make any cash distributions to shareholders
and/or warrant holders to pay taxes in connection with our Business Combination or thereafter. Accordingly, a shareholder or a warrant
holder may need to satisfy any liability resulting from our initial Business Combination with cash from its own funds or by selling all
or a portion of the shares or warrants received. In addition, shareholders and warrant holders may also be subject to additional income,
withholding or other taxes with respect to their ownership of us after our initial Business Combination.
60
In addition, we may effect
a Business Combination with a target company that has business operations outside of the United States, and possibly, business operations
in multiple jurisdictions. If we effect such a Business Combination , we could be subject to significant income, withholding and other
tax obligations in a number of jurisdictions with respect to income, operations and subsidiaries related to those jurisdictions. Due
to the complexity of tax obligations and filings in other jurisdictions, we may have a heightened risk related to audits or examinations
by United States federal, state, local and non-United States taxing authorities. This additional complexity and risk could
have an adverse effect on our after-tax profitability and financial condition.
Holders of Class A Ordinary Shares will
not be entitled to vote on the appointment of directors and certain other matters prior to our initial Business Combination.
As holders of our Class A
Ordinary Shares, our Public Shareholders will not have the right to vote on the appointment of directors until after the consummation
of our initial Business Combination. In addition, prior to our initial Business Combination, holders of a majority of our Founder Shares
may remove a member of the board of directors for any reason. Accordingly, you may not have any say in the management of our company
prior to the consummation of an initial Business Combination. In addition, prior to the closing of our initial Business Combination,
only holders of Class B ordinary shares will have the right to vote on continuing the company in a jurisdiction outside of the Cayman
Islands (including any special resolution required to amend the constitutional documents of the Company or to adopt new constitutional
documents of the Company, in each case, as a result of the Company approving a transfer by way of continuation in a jurisdiction outside
of the Cayman Islands).
You will not be permitted to exercise your
warrants unless we register and qualify the underlying Class A Ordinary Shares or certain exemptions are available.
If the issuance of the Class
A Ordinary Shares upon exercise of the warrants is not registered, qualified or exempt from registration or qualification under the Securities
Act and applicable state securities laws, holders of warrants will not be entitled to exercise such warrants and such warrants may have
no value and expire worthless. In such event, holders who acquired their warrants as part of a purchase of Units will have paid the full
unit purchase price solely for the Class A Ordinary Shares included in the Units.
We have agreed that, as soon
as practicable, but in no event later than 20 business days, after the closing of our initial Business Combination, we will use
commercially reasonable efforts to file with the SEC a post-effective amendment to the registration statement we filed for our Initial
Public Offering or a new registration statement covering the registration, under the Securities Act, of the Class A Ordinary Shares issuable
upon exercise of the warrants and thereafter will use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the same to become effective within 60 business
days following our initial Business Combination and to maintain a current prospectus relating to the Class A Ordinary Shares issuable
upon exercise of the warrants until the expiration of the warrants in accordance with the provisions of the warrant agreement. We cannot
assure you that we will be able to do so if, for example, any facts or events arise which represent a fundamental change in the information
set forth in the registration statement or prospectus, the financial statements contained or incorporated by reference therein are not
current or correct or the SEC issues a stop order.
If the Class A Ordinary Shares
issuable upon exercise of the warrants are not registered under the Securities Act, under the terms of the warrant agreement, holders
of warrants who seek to exercise their warrants will not be permitted to do so for cash and, instead, will be required to do so on a
“cashless basis” in accordance with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act or another exemption.
In no event will warrants
be exercisable for cash or on a cashless basis, and we will not be obligated to issue any shares to holders seeking to exercise their
warrants, unless the issuance of the shares upon such exercise is registered or qualified under the securities laws of the state of the
exercising holder, or an exemption from registration or qualification is available.
If our Class A Ordinary Shares
are at the time of any exercise of a warrant not listed on a national securities exchange such that they satisfy the definition of “covered
securities” under Section 18(b)(1) of the Securities Act, we may, at our option, not permit holders of warrants who seek
to exercise their warrants to do so for cash and, instead, require them to do so on a “cashless basis” in accordance with
Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act; in the event we so elect, we will not be required to file or maintain in effect a registration
statement or register or qualify the shares underlying the warrants under applicable state securities laws, and in the event we do not
so elect, we will use commercially reasonable efforts to register or qualify the shares underlying the warrants under applicable state
securities laws to the extent an exemption is not available.
61
In no event will we be required
to net cash settle any warrant, or issue securities (other than upon a cashless exercise as described above) or other compensation in
exchange for the warrants in the event that we are unable to register or qualify the shares underlying the warrants under the Securities
Act or applicable state securities laws.
You may only be able to exercise your Public
Warrants on a “cashless basis” under certain circumstances, and if you do so, you will receive fewer Class A Ordinary Shares
from such exercise than if you were to exercise such warrants for cash.
The warrant agreement provides
that in the following circumstances holders of warrants who seek to exercise their warrants will not be permitted to do for cash and
will, instead, be required to do so on a cashless basis in accordance with Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act: (i) if
the Class A Ordinary Shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants are not registered under the Securities Act in accordance with the
terms of the warrant agreement; (ii) if we have so elected and the Class A Ordinary Shares are at the time of any exercise of a
warrant not listed on a national securities exchange such that they satisfy the definition of “covered securities” under
Section 18(b)(1) of the Securities Act; and (iii) if we have so elected and we call the Public Warrants for redemption.
If you exercise your Public Warrants on a cashless basis, you would pay the warrant exercise price by surrendering the warrants for that
number of Class A Ordinary Shares equal to the quotient obtained by dividing (x) the product of the number of Class A Ordinary Shares
underlying the warrants, multiplied by the excess of the “fair market value” of our Class A Ordinary Shares (as defined in
the next sentence) over the exercise price of the warrants by (y) the fair market value. The “fair market value” is
the average reported closing price of the Class A Ordinary Shares for the 10 trading days ending on the third trading day prior
to the date on which the notice of exercise is received by the warrant agent or on which the notice of redemption is sent to the holders
of warrants, as applicable. As a result, you would receive fewer Class A Ordinary Shares from such exercise than if you were to exercise
such warrants for cash.
A provision of our warrant agreement may
make it more difficult for us to consummate an initial Business Combination.
Unlike most blank check companies, if:
(i) we issue additional
ordinary shares or equity-linked securities for capital raising purposes in connection with
the closing of our initial Business Combination at a Newly Issued Price of less than $9.20
per share;
(ii) the aggregate gross
proceeds from such issuances represent more than 60% of the total equity proceeds, and interest
thereon, available for the funding of our initial Business Combination on the date of the
consummation of our initial Business Combination (net of redemptions); and
(iii) the Market Value
is below $9.20 per share;
then the exercise price of
the warrants will be adjusted (to the nearest cent) to be equal to 115% of the higher of the Market Value and the Newly Issued Price,
and the $18.00 per share redemption trigger price will be adjusted (to the nearest cent) to be equal to 180% of the higher of the Market
Value and the Newly Issued Price. This may make it more difficult for us to consummate an initial Business Combination with a target
business.
General Risk Factors
We are a recently incorporated company
with no operating history and no revenues, and you have no basis on which to evaluate our ability to achieve our business objective.
We are a recently incorporated company under
the laws of the Cayman Islands with no operating results. Because we lack an operating history, you have no basis upon which to evaluate
our ability to achieve our business objective of completing our initial Business Combination. We have no plans, arrangements or understandings
with any prospective target business concerning a business combination and may be unable to complete our initial Business Combination.
If we fail to complete our initial Business Combination, we will never generate any operating revenues.
62
Past performance by our management team
or their respective affiliates may not be indicative of future performance of an investment in us.
Information regarding performance
by, or businesses associated with, our management team or businesses associated with them is presented for informational purposes only.
Past performance by our management team is not a guarantee either (i) of success with respect to any business combination we may
consummate or (ii) that we will be able to locate a suitable candidate for our initial Business Combination. You should not rely
on the historical record of the performance of our management team’s or businesses associated with them as indicative of our future
performance of an investment in us or the returns we will, or is likely to, generate going forward.
Cyber incidents or attacks directed at
us could result in information theft, data corruption, operational disruption and/or financial loss.
We depend on digital technologies,
including information systems, infrastructure and cloud applications and services, including those of third parties with which we may
deal. Sophisticated and deliberate attacks on, or security breaches in, our systems or infrastructure, or the systems or infrastructure
of third parties or the cloud, could lead to corruption or misappropriation of our assets, proprietary information and sensitive or confidential
data. As an early stage company without significant investments in data security protection, we may not be sufficiently protected against
such occurrences. We may not have sufficient resources to adequately protect against, or to investigate and remediate any vulnerability
to, cyber incidents. It is possible that any of these occurrences, or a combination of them, could have adverse consequences on our business
and lead to financial loss.
We may be a passive foreign investment
company, or “PFIC,” which could result in adverse United States federal income tax consequences to U.S. investors.
If we are a PFIC for any
taxable year (or portion thereof) that is included in the holding period of a U.S. Holder (as defined in the section of our Initial
Public Offering registration statement captioned “ Taxation — United States Federal Income Tax Considerations — U.S. Holders ”)
of our Class A Ordinary Shares or warrants, the U.S. Holder may be subject to adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences
and may be subject to additional reporting requirements. Our PFIC status for our current and subsequent taxable years may depend
on whether we qualify for the PFIC start-up exception (see the section of our Initial Public Offering registration statement captioned
“ Taxation — United States Federal Income Tax Considerations — U.S. Holders — Passive
Foreign Investment Company Rules ”). Depending on the particular circumstances, the application of the start-up exception may
be subject to uncertainty, and there cannot be any assurance that we will qualify for the start-up exception. Accordingly, there can
be no assurances with respect to our status as a PFIC for our current taxable year or any subsequent taxable year. Our actual PFIC status
for any taxable year, however, will not be determinable until after the end of any taxable year. Moreover, if we determine we are a PFIC
for any taxable year, upon written request, we will endeavor to provide to a U.S. Holder such information as the IRS may require,
including a PFIC annual information statement, in order to enable the U.S. Holder to make and maintain a “qualified electing
fund” election, but there can be no assurance that we will timely provide such required information, and such election would be
unavailable with respect to our warrants in all cases. We urge U.S. investors to consult their own tax advisors regarding the possible
application of the PFIC rules. For a more detailed explanation of the tax consequences of PFIC classification to U.S. Holders, see
the section of our Initial Public Offering registration statement captioned “ Taxation — United States Federal
Income Tax Considerations — U.S. Holders — Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules. ”
63
A 1% U.S. federal excise tax on stock
buybacks could be imposed on redemptions of our stock if we were to become a “covered corporation” in the future.
The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022,
among other things, generally imposes a 1% U.S. federal excise tax (the “Excise Tax”) on certain repurchases of stock
by “covered corporations” (which include publicly traded domestic (i.e., U.S.) corporations and certain domestic subsidiaries
of publicly traded foreign (i.e., non-U.S.) corporations) occurring on or after January 1, 2023. The Excise Tax is imposed on the
repurchasing corporation itself, not its shareholders from which the stock is repurchased. The amount of the Excise Tax is generally
1% of the fair market value of the shares repurchased at the time of the repurchase. However, for purposes of calculating the Excise
Tax, repurchasing corporations are permitted to net the fair market value of certain new stock issuances against the fair market value
of stock repurchases during the same taxable year. In addition, certain exceptions apply to the Excise Tax. The U.S. Department
of the Treasury (the “Treasury”) has authority to provide regulations and other guidance to carry out, and prevent the abuse
or avoidance of, the Excise Tax. In December of 2022, the Treasury issued a notice that provides interim operating rules for the Excise
Tax, including rules governing the calculation and reporting of the Excise Tax. In April of 2024, the Treasury and the IRS issued proposed
Treasury regulations that provide proposed operating rules for the Excise Tax, including rules governing the computation of the Excise
Tax, on which taxpayers may rely until the proposed Treasury regulations are finalized, and in June of 2024, the Treasury and IRS issued
final Treasury regulations on the reporting and payment (but not the computation) of the Excise Tax. In the proposed Treasury regulations,
the Treasury exempts from the Excise Tax any distributions by a covered corporation in the same year it completely liquidates within
the meaning of either Section 331 or Section 332(a) (but not both) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the “Code”), which includes distributions that occur in connection with redemptions. Under the proposed Treasury
regulations, the Excise Tax may be applicable to redemptions by a covered corporation in connection with (i) a liquidation that
is not a “complete liquidation” within the meaning of either Section 331 or Section 332(a) of the Code, (ii) an
extension, depending on the timing of the extension relative to when the covered corporation consummates an initial Business Combination
or liquidates and (iii) an initial Business Combination, depending on the structure of the initial Business Combination. Although
the proposed Treasury regulations clarify certain aspects of the Excise Tax, the interpretation and operation of other aspects of the
Excise Tax remain unclear. In addition, although taxpayers generally may rely on the proposed Treasury regulations until they are finalized,
there is no assurance that the proposed Treasury regulations will be finalized in their current form, and therefore, the Excise Tax might
apply to a future transaction undertaken by us (including after a business combination) in a manner that is different than described
in the proposed Treasury regulations.
We are currently not a “covered
corporation” for purposes of the Excise Tax. If we were to become a “covered corporation” in the future, whether in
connection with the consummation of our initial Business Combination with a U.S. company (including if we were to redomicile as
a U.S. corporation in connection therewith) or otherwise, whether and to what extent we would be subject to the Excise Tax on a
redemption of our stock would depend on a number of factors, including (i) whether the redemption is treated as a repurchase of
stock for purposes of the Excise Tax, (ii) the fair market value of the redemption treated as a repurchase of stock, (iii) the
structure of our initial Business Combination, (iv) the nature and amount of any “PIPE” or other equity issuances (whether
in connection with our initial Business Combination or otherwise) issued within the same taxable year of a redemption treated as a repurchase
of stock and (v) the content of final regulations and other guidance from the Treasury. As noted above, the Excise Tax would be
payable by the repurchasing corporation, and not by the redeeming holder. The imposition of the Excise Tax on us as a result of redemptions
by us could, however, reduce the amount of cash available to pay redemptions or reduce the cash available to the target business in connection
with our initial Business Combination, which could cause investors in our securities who do not redeem or the other shareholders of the
combined company to economically bear the impact of such Excise Tax. However, we will not use the proceeds placed in the Trust Account,
or the interest earned on the proceeds placed in the Trust Account, to pay for possible excise tax or any other fees or taxes that may
be levied on the Company on any redemptions or share buybacks by the Company pursuant to any current, pending or future rules or laws,
including without limitation any Excise Tax, prior to the release of such funds from the Trust Account following our initial Business
Combination.
We are an emerging growth company and a
smaller reporting company within the meaning of the Securities Act, and if we take advantage of certain exemptions from disclosure requirements
available to emerging growth companies or smaller reporting companies, this could make our securities less attractive to investors and
may make it more difficult to compare our performance with other public companies.
We are an “emerging
growth company” within the meaning of the Securities Act, as modified by the JOBS Act, and we may take advantage of certain exemptions
from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including,
but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor internal controls attestation requirements of Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and
exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden
parachute payments not previously approved. As a result, our shareholders may not have access to certain information they may deem important.
We could be an emerging growth company for up to five years, although circumstances could cause us to lose that status earlier,
including if the market value of our Class A Ordinary Shares held by non-affiliates exceeds $700,000,000 as of any June 30 before
that time, in which case we would no longer be an emerging growth company as of the following December 31. We cannot predict whether
investors will find our securities less attractive because we will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our securities less
attractive as a result of our reliance on these exemptions, the trading prices of our securities may be lower than they otherwise would
be, there may be a less active trading market for our securities and the trading prices of our securities may be more volatile.
64
Further, Section 102(b)(1) of
the JOBS Act exempts emerging growth companies from being required to comply with new or revised financial accounting standards until
private companies (that is, those that have not had a Securities Act registration statement declared effective or do not have a class
of securities registered under the Exchange Act) are required to comply with the new or revised financial accounting standards.
The JOBS Act provides that a company can elect to opt out of the extended transition period and comply with the requirements that apply
to non-emerging growth companies but any such an election to opt out is irrevocable. We have elected not to opt out of such extended
transition period which means that when a standard is issued or revised and it has different application dates for public or private
companies, we, as an emerging growth company, can adopt the new or revised standard at the time private companies adopt the new or revised
standard. This may make comparison of our financial statements with another public company which is neither an emerging growth company
nor an emerging growth company which has opted out of using the extended transition period difficult or impossible because of the potential
differences in accounting standards used.
Additionally, we are a “smaller
reporting company” as defined in Item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K. Smaller reporting companies may take advantage
of certain reduced disclosure obligations, including, among other things, providing only two years of audited financial statements.
We will remain a smaller reporting company until the last day of the fiscal year in which (1) the market value of our ordinary
shares held by non-affiliates is equal to or exceeds $250,000,000 as of the prior June 30, or (2) our annual revenues equaled
or exceeded $100,000,000 during such completed fiscal year and the market value of our ordinary shares held by non-affiliates is equal
to or exceeds $700,000,000 as of the prior June 30.
If we no longer qualify as
an emerging growth company, we may still be subject to reduced reporting requirements so long as we qualify as a smaller reporting company.
We employ a mail forwarding service, which
may delay or disrupt our ability to receive mail in a timely manner
Mail addressed to the Company
and received at its registered office will be forwarded unopened to the forwarding address supplied by us. None of the company, its directors,
officers, advisors or service providers (including the organization which provides registered office services in the Cayman Islands)
will bear any responsibility for any delay howsoever caused in mail reaching the forwarding address, which may impair your ability to
communicate with us.
Our Amended and Restated Memorandum and
Articles of Association provides that the courts of the Cayman Islands will be the exclusive forums for certain disputes between us and
our shareholders, which could limit our shareholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for complaints against us or
our directors, officers or employees.
Our Amended and Restated
Memorandum and Articles of Association provides that unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the courts
of the Cayman Islands shall have exclusive jurisdiction over any claim or dispute arising out of or in connection with our Amended and
Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association or otherwise related in any way to each shareholder’s shareholding in us, including
but not limited to (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach
of any fiduciary or other duty owed by any of our current or former director, officer or other employee to us or our shareholders, (iii) any
action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the Companies Act or our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of
Association, or (iv) any action asserting a claim against us governed by the internal affairs doctrine (as such concept is recognized
under the laws of the United States of America) and that each shareholder irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of the
courts of the Cayman Islands over all such claims or disputes. The forum selection provision in our Amended and Restated Memorandum and
Articles of Association will not apply to actions or suits brought to enforce any liability or duty created by the Securities Act, Exchange Act
or any claim for which the federal district courts of the United States of America are, as a matter of the laws of the United States
of America, the sole and exclusive forum for determination of such a claim.
65
Our Amended and Restated
Memorandum and Articles of Association also provide that, without prejudice to any other rights or remedies that we may have, each of
our shareholders acknowledges that damages alone would not be an adequate remedy for any breach of the selection of the courts of the
Cayman Islands as exclusive forum and that accordingly we shall be entitled, without proof of special damages, to the remedies of injunction,
specific performance or other equitable relief for any threatened or actual breach of the selection of the courts of the Cayman Islands
as exclusive forum.
This choice of forum provision may increase a
shareholder’s cost and limit the shareholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes
with us or our directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and other
employees. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any of our shares or other securities, whether by transfer, sale, operation
of law or otherwise, shall be deemed to have notice of and have irrevocably agreed and consented to these provisions. There is uncertainty
as to whether a court would enforce such provisions, and the enforceability of similar choice of forum provisions in other companies’
charter documents has been challenged in legal proceedings. It is possible that a court could find this type of provisions to be inapplicable
or unenforceable, and if a court were to find this provision in our Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association to be
inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving the dispute in other jurisdictions,
which could have adverse effect on our business and financial performance.
Text extracted from the filing as submitted to EDGAR. Formatting, tables and exhibits are simplified for reading; the original document is authoritative for anything you rely on.