Item 1A. Risk Factors
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Except as set forth below, as of the date of this
Quarterly Report, there are no material changes to our risk factors as previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of the 10-K. The
risks described in this Quarterly Report and in the 10-K, among others, could materially and adversely affect our business, reputation,
financial condition, results of operations, and stock price.
We have licensed the
intellectual property for certain of our brands for use by state-licensed cannabis operators. While we do not engage in any cannabis-
(or “marijuana-”) related activity under the Controlled Substances Act (the “CSA”), changes in state regulations
of cannabis, changes in U.S. federal cannabis enforcement policy, or a failure of any licensee to comply with applicable state and local
laws and regulations could impair our Licensing Revenue we generate from any licensee and could also impair the value of our brands.
We do not cultivate, distribute
or dispense marijuana as that term is defined by the CSA. We have licensed the use of the intellectual property for certain of our brands
to be used in the cannabis industry under state law programs legalizing such activities through state-regulated licenses, although such
activities remain illegal under U.S. Federal law. While state regulation in certain U.S. states may take a permissive approach to medical
and/or adult-use of cannabis, the CSA may still be enforced by U.S. federal law enforcement officials against individuals and companies
operating in those states for activity that is legal under state law. In exchange for Licensing Revenue, we license our brands to be used
by a state licensed licensee whose operations, while compliant with state laws, are not permitted under federal law. A change in
U.S. federal policy on cannabis enforcement and strict enforcement of federal cannabis laws against any licensee could materially impair
the Licensing Revenue we receive, if the licensees’ ability to sell their products is materially impaired by such change. It may also
impair the value of the brands licensed to the cannabis industry and our operating results and/or financial condition.
We do not, and cannot, ensure
that licensees will conduct their business activities in a manner compliant with the applicable state and local laws, regulations and
other requirements. As a result, federal, state or local government authorities may seek to bring criminal, administrative or regulatory
enforcement actions against licensee(s), which could have a material adverse effect on our Licensing Revenue, which in turn could have an
adverse effect on our operating results or financial condition.
Licensees in the cannabis
industry face challenges unique to that industry that can impact their financial health and long-term viability. If licensees struggle
financially or do not remain viable, that can negatively impact our ability to generate Licensing Revenue. As a licensor of brands to cannabis
operators, we are not responsible for licensees’ compliance with applicable laws or regulations.
Because we do not control
licensees’ actions and we depend on licensees for a substantial portion of our earnings from operations, their conduct could harm
our business.
We license to licensees in the cannabis industry the rights to produce
and market certain products sold with our trademarks, and we do not exercise any operational or financial control over the licensees’
businesses. If the quality, focus, image or distribution of our licensed brands diminish, consumer acceptance of and demand for our brands
could decline. This could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations. Our Licensing Revenue constitutes
a substantial portion of our revenue. A decrease in customer demand for any of our licensed brands could have a material adverse effect
on our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, our inability to replace any existing licensee, if necessary, could
adversely affect our revenues and results of operations.
43
Protecting and defending
against intellectual property claims may have a material adverse effect on our business.
Our ability to compete depends,
in part, upon the successful protection of our intellectual property, including the core brands we own and license: Señorita,
Rythm, incredibles, Beboe, Dogwalkers, Doctor Solomon’s, &Shine, and Good Green . We seek to protect our proprietary and
intellectual property rights through trademark and patent applications, common law copyright and trademark laws, nondisclosure agreements,
and non-disclosure provisions within our licensing and distribution arrangements with reputable companies in our target markets. Even
with commercially reasonable enforcement of our intellectual property rights, there can be no assurance that we will have the resources
to undertake all necessary action to protect all of our intellectual property rights or that we will be successful in such enforcement.
Any infringement of our material intellectual property rights could require us to redirect resources to actions necessary to protect
same and could distract management from our underlying business operations. An infringement of our material intellectual property rights
and resulting actions could adversely affect our operations.
It is also possible that
our competitors could successfully design their brands and products around our protected intellectual property. Further, we cannot assure
shareholders that other parties will not challenge any trademarks or patents granted to us, or that courts or regulatory agencies will
hold our trademarks or patents to be valid, enforceable, and/or infringed. We cannot guarantee shareholders that we will be successful
in defending challenges made against our trademark and patent applications. Any successful third-party challenge or challenges to our
trademark or patent applications could result in the unenforceability or invalidity of such trademarks or patents, or such trademarks
or patents being interpreted narrowly and/or in a manner adverse to our interests. Our ability to establish or maintain a competitive
advantage in the market may be diminished because of these uncertainties. For these and other reasons, our intellectual property may not
provide us with any material competitive advantage.
To the extent our intellectual
property offers inadequate protection, or is found to be invalid or unenforceable, we would be exposed to a greater risk of direct or
indirect competition. If our intellectual property does not provide adequate coverage over our competitors’ products, our competitive
position could be adversely affected, as could our business .
Our success depends
in part upon our ability to protect our intellectual property.
Our success depends in part
upon our ability to protect our intellectual property. To establish and protect our proprietary rights, we rely on a combination of trademark,
copyright, patent, trade secret and unfair competition laws of the U.S. and other countries, as well as contract provisions, license agreements,
confidentiality procedures, non-disclosure agreements with third parties, employee disclosure and invention assignment agreements, and
other contractual rights, as well as procedures governing internet/domain name registrations. However, there can be no assurance that
these measures will be successful in any given case. We may be unable to prevent the misappropriation, infringement or violation of our
intellectual property rights, breach of any contractual obligations to us, or independent development of intellectual property that is
similar to ours, any of which could reduce or eliminate any competitive advantage we have developed, adversely affecting our revenues
or otherwise harming our business.
We generally control access
to and use of our proprietary technology and other confidential information through the use of internal and external controls, including
contractual protections with employees, contractors, customers, and partners, and our software is protected by U.S. copyright laws. Despite
these controls, there is no way to guarantee that unauthorized parties will not find a way to access or use this technology or information.
44
Companies frequently enter
into litigation based on allegations of infringement, misappropriation, or violations of intellectual property rights or other laws. From
time to time, we may face allegations that we have infringed the trademarks, copyrights, patents, trade secrets and other intellectual
property rights of third parties, including competitors. If it became necessary for us to resort to litigation to protect these rights,
any proceedings could be burdensome, costly and divert the attention of our personnel, and we may not prevail. In addition, any repeal
or weakening of laws or enforcement in the U.S. or internationally intended to protect intellectual property rights could make it more
difficult for us to adequately protect our intellectual property rights, negatively impacting their value and increasing the cost of enforcing
our rights.
We have obtained and applied
for U.S. trademark registrations and will continue to evaluate the registration of additional trademarks, as appropriate. We cannot guarantee
that any of our pending trademark applications will be approved by the applicable governmental authorities. Moreover, even if the trademark
applications are approved, third parties may seek to oppose or otherwise challenge these registrations. A failure to obtain registrations
for our trademarks could limit and impede our marketing efforts.
We may need to enter
into intellectual property license agreements in the future, and if we are unable to obtain these licenses, our business could be harmed.
We may need or may choose
to obtain licenses and/or acquire intellectual property rights from third parties in connection with our current or future products and
brands. We may fail to obtain any of these licenses or intellectual property rights on commercially reasonable terms. Even if we are able
to obtain a license, it may be non-exclusive, thereby giving our competitors access to the same intellectual property licensed to us.
In that event, we may be required to expend significant time and resources to develop or license new brands, products, or technology.
If we are unable to do so, we may be unable to develop or commercialize the affected products, which could materially harm our business
and the third parties owning such intellectual property rights could seek either an injunction prohibiting our sales, or, with respect
to our sales, an obligation on our part to pay licensing fees and/or other forms of compensation.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Text extracted from the filing as submitted to EDGAR. Formatting, tables and exhibits are simplified for reading; the original document is authoritative for anything you rely on.