21 unchanged sentences
After HCW and Armistice moved to dismiss Rekor’s counterclaims, Rekor filed amended counterclaims on October 1, 2024.
−Removed: Rekor seeks to recover damages from HCW and Armistice.
−Removed: HCW and Armistice have now moved to dismiss the amended counterclaims.
−Removed: Those motions are pending.
−Removed: Discovery is ongoing in the matter.
−Removed: The Company believes these claims are without merit.
−Removed: The Company intends to vigorously defend itself in this lawsuit.
+Added: In Q3 2025, Rekor resolved its claims with Armistice and came to a settlement agreement.
+Added: The proceeds from the settlement are presented as part of other expense (income) in the condensed consolidated statement of operations.
+Added: Rekor now seeks to recover damages from HCW and HCW moved to dismiss the amended counterclaims.
+Added: The Court granted HCW’s motion to dismiss Rekor’s counterclaims.
+Added: Rekor has filed a notice of appeal of that ruling.
+Added: The Company believes HCW's claims are without merit and intends to vigorously defend itself in this lawsuit.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration ( “ OSHA ” ) Claim
6 unchanged sentences
On January 4, 2024, the Office of Administrative Law Judges (“OALJ”) processed the appeals and issued its Notice of Docketing and Order of Consolidation.
−Removed: On February 28, 2024, the OALJ issued an Order setting forth a revised schedule governing the case with the start of the hearing scheduled for March 3, 2025.
−Removed: In advance of the March 3, 2025 hearing, the parties agreed to bifurcate the matter into two separate hearings.
−Removed: The first hearing from March 3-5, 2025 was set to address liability and the second from April 24-25, 2025 was set to address damages.
−Removed: The parties were able to settle the claim filed by one employee in advance of the March 3, 2025 hearing.
−Removed: The hearing did proceed for the claim filed by another employee.
−Removed: The Court did not make a finding on liability at the hearing.
−Removed: At the Court's request, the parties submitted post-hearing briefs in April 2025.
−Removed: The Company does not know when the Court will make its findings after the receipt of the briefs.
−Removed: The parties were next set to appear before the Court on April 24-25, 2025 to address damages.
−Removed: On April 22, 2025, the Court notified the parties that the April 24-25, 2025 damages hearing was cancelled.
−Removed: The Court indicated that it was going to review the briefs submitted on the liability phase and evidence in the matter and would reschedule a damages hearing, if necessary.
−Removed: We do not know when the Court will make a finding on the liability phase.
−Removed: The Company believes these claims are without merit.
−Removed: The Company intends to vigorously defend itself in this lawsuit.
+Added: The parties were able to settle the claim filed by one employee in advance of a March 3, 2025 hearing scheduled by the OALJ.
+Added: After the hearing, at the Court's request, the parties submitted post-hearing briefs in April 2025.
+Added: On September 30, 2025, the OALJ issued an Order in Rekor’s favor, dismissing all aspects of Claimant’s Complaint.
+Added: Claimant subsequently submitted a request for appellate review to the Appellate Review Board (“ARB”).
+Added: The ARB must accept Claimant’s request for appeal in order to conduct a review of the Order.
+Added: The ARB has not yet decided if it will accept Claimant’s request for appeal.
+Added: Generally, the decision to conduct a review must be made within thirty (30) days of the submission of the request.
+Added: This deadline is likely delayed/stayed by the government shutdown.
+Added: The Company believes these claims are without merit and intends to vigorously defend itself in this administrative proceeding.
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.