4 unchanged sentences
any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive
−Removed: officers of the Company, threatened against or affecting the Company, our Common Stock, our officers or directors
−Removed: in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect, other than as set forth below.
−Removed: August 7, 2019, Viewbix Israel was named as a co-defendant in a civil lawsuit filed with the Jerusalem District Court (the “Jerusalem
−Removed: Court”) by three shareholders of Viewbix Israel (in this section, the “Shareholders”), alleging that they were
−Removed: entitled to receive certain preferred shares in Viewbix Israel, pursuant to a certain 2007 loan agreement by and between Viewbix
−Removed: Israel and the petitioning Shareholders, following the sale of Viewbix Israel shares to Algomizer (the “Conversion”).
−Removed: The Shareholders sought declaratory recourse from the Jerusalem Court, pursuant to which the Shareholders demanded, inter
−Removed: alia , shares in Algomizer on a post-Conversion basis or in a form of alternative compensation.
−Removed: On February 27, 2020,
−Removed: the parties presented their respective arguments before the Jerusalem Court, and the Jerusalem Court determined that the Company
−Removed: is entitled to file a motion for dismissal of the claims by the Shareholders by March 31, 2020.
−Removed: June 2017, a lawsuit was filed with the Tel Aviv District Court (the “Tel Aviv Court”) against Emerald Israel, and
−Removed: other defendants, claiming certain damages in the total amount of approximately $100,000, under the assertion of wrongful termination
−Removed: by Emerald Israel.
−Removed: The Registrant believes these claims to be unsubstantiated and wholly without merit and accordingly filed its
+Added: officers of the Company, threatened against or affecting the Company, our Common Stock, our officers or directors in their capacities
+Added: as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect, other than as set forth below.
+Added: August 7, 2019, Viewbix Ltd.
+Added: was named as a co-defendant in a civil lawsuit filed with the Jerusalem District Court (the “Jerusalem
+Added: Court”) by three shareholders of Viewbix Ltd.
+Added: (in this section, the “Shareholders”), alleging that they were
+Added: entitled to receive certain preferred shares in Viewbix Ltd., pursuant to a certain 2007 loan agreement by and between Viewbix
+Added: and the petitioning Shareholders, following the sale of Viewbix Ltd.
+Added: shares to Gix (the “Conversion”).
+Added: The Shareholders
+Added: sought declaratory recourse from the Jerusalem Court, pursuant to which the Shareholders demanded, inter alia , shares in
+Added: Gix on a post-Conversion basis or in an alternative form of compensation.
+Added: On February 27, 2020, the parties presented their respective
+Added: arguments before the Jerusalem Court, and the Jerusalem Court determined that the Company is entitled to file a motion for dismissal
+Added: of the claims by the Shareholders by March 31, 2020, which was subsequently postponed to August 9, 2020.
+Added: On September 24, 2020,
+Added: the parties submitted before the Jerusalem Court a settlement proposal, which was thereafter approved by the Jerusalem Court on
+Added: the same date (the “Settlement”).
+Added: The Settlement provided, inter alia , that in exchange for the voluntary waiver
+Added: of claims held by the Shareholders, Gix instructed the trustee holding the instant shares of Gix, which were issued by Gix as
+Added: part of the transaction where Gix acquired share capital of Viewbix in November 2018, to issue 63,350 shares of Common Stock owned
+Added: by Gix to the Shareholders, whereby the remaining shares in the trust account will be used to indemnify Gix for any expenses related
+Added: to the instant litigation.
+Added: Since the aforementioned compensation was provided in the form of shares of Common Stock
+Added: previously owned by Gix, the settlement has no effect on the Company’s financial statements.
+Added: June 2017, a lawsuit was filed with the Regional Labor Court in Tel Aviv (the “Tel Aviv Court”) against Emerald Israel,
+Added: and other defendants, claiming certain damages in the total amount of approximately $225,000, under the assertion of wrongful
+Added: termination by Emerald Israel.
+Added: We believe these claims to be unsubstantiated and wholly without merit and accordingly filed our
response with the Tel Aviv Court in October of 2017.
The dispute was initially heard by the Tel Aviv Court on February 13, 2020.
−Removed: and a supplemental hearing has been set for March 19, 2020.
−Removed: December 2017, a liquidation request was filed with the Tel Aviv Court by a group of former employees of Emerald Israel (the
−Removed: “Employees”), which included claims of insolvency and the failure to make timely payments to the
−Removed: On December 20, 2017, at a hearing before the Tel Aviv Court, Emerald Israel was ordered to settle its pension
−Removed: debts to the Employees under the applicable Israeli law within 21 days and settle its other debts with the Employees
−Removed: within 60 days, the failure of which would require the winding up of the Company.
−Removed: On May 2, 2018, the Tel Aviv Court
−Removed: gave an order to liquidate Emerald Israel and appointed a special executor for this purpose.
−Removed: The amounts claimed by the
−Removed: Employees is less than $96,000 and will be awarded by the special executor upon the sale of Emerald Israel’s
+Added: In a supplemental hearing on February 11, 2021, the plaintiff provided a certified confirmation of payment of approximately
+Added: $14,668 by the National Insurance Institute of Israel for one month’s prior notice of termination, redemption of 16.8 days
+Added: of vacation and severance pay.
+Added: The plaintiff’s summaries were filed on March 11, 2021, and the defendant’s summaries
+Added: will be filed within 30 days of receiving the plaintiff’s summaries.
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.