−Removed: We are a biopharmaceutical company with multiple peptide-based new chemical entities in different stages of development, all derived from the Company's proprietary technology platform.
−Removed: Our clinical programs address two broad categories of diseases;
+Added: We are a biopharmaceutical company with peptide-based new chemical entities rusfertide and JNJ-2113 (formerly known as PN-235) in different stages of development, all derived from our proprietary discovery technology platform.
+Added: Our clinical programs fall into two broad categories of diseases;
(i) hematology and blood disorders, and (ii) inflammatory and immunomodulatory diseases.
Our Product Pipeline
−Removed: Our most advanced clinical asset, rusfertide (generic name for PTG-300), is an injectable hepcidin mimetic in development for the potential treatment of erythrocytosis, iron overload and other blood disorders.
+Added: Our most advanced clinical asset, rusfertide (generic name for PTG-300), is an injectable hepcidin mimetic in development for the potential treatment of erythrocytosis, iron overload and other blood disorders and is wholly owned.
Hepcidin is a key hormone in regulating iron equilibrium and is critical to the proper development of red blood cells.
Rusfertide mimics the effect of the natural hormone hepcidin, but with greater potency, solubility and stability.
−Removed: We initiated REVIVE, a Phase 2 proof of concept (“POC”) study in the blood disorder polycythemia vera (“PV”), in the third quarter of 2019.
−Removed: We initiated a Phase 2 POC study in hereditary hemochromatosis (“HH”) in January 2020, which was completed during the fourth quarter of 2021.
−Removed: During the first quarter of 2021, we initiated PACIFIC, another Phase 2 study for rusfertide in up to 20 patients diagnosed with PV and with routinely elevated hematocrit levels (>48%).
−Removed: In June 2021, we presented updated Phase 2 data supporting the long-term efficacy of rusfertide in PV during an oral presentation at the European Hematology Association (“EHA”) 2021 Virtual Congress.
−Removed: A n abstract highlighting positive preliminary data from our Phase 2 study of rusfertide in HH was orally presented at The Liver Meeting® 2021, hosted by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (“AASLD”), which took place virtually in November 2021.
−Removed: In December 2021, two abstracts highlighting positive updated data from our REVIVE and PACIFIC Phase 2 studies of rusfertide in PV were orally presented at the American Society of Hematology (“ASH”) 2021 Annual Meeting, in addition to three poster presentations on rusfertide in PV and HH.
−Removed: These results provided evidence regarding the potential of rusfertide for managing hematocrit, reducing thrombotic risk and improving iron deficiency symptoms.
−Removed: Rusfertide has a unique mechanism of action in the potential treatment of PV, which may enable it to specifically decrease and maintain hematocrit levels within the range of recommended clinical guidelines without causing the iron deficiency that can occur with frequent phlebotomy.
−Removed: On September 16, 2021, the FDA placed a clinical hold on our rusfertide clinical studies following our submission to the FDA of findings in a 26-week rasH2 transgenic mouse carcinogenicity study.
+Added: Data from our rusfertide Phase 2 clinical trials presented at medical conferences in 2021 and 2022 provided evidence regarding the potential of rusfertide for managing hematocrit, reducing thrombotic risk and improving iron deficiency symptoms.
+Added: Rusfertide has a unique mechanism of action in the potential treatment of the blood disorder polycythemia vera (“PV”), which may enable it to specifically decrease and maintain hematocrit levels within the range of recommended clinical guidelines without causing the iron deficiency that can occur with frequent phlebotomy.
+Added: Our rusfertide Phase 2 clinical trials include the following:
+Added: ● REVIVE, a Phase 2 proof of concept (“POC”) trial, was initiated in the fourth quarter of 2019.
+Added: We completed enrollment of patients in the first quarter of 2022 with a target of approximately 50 patients to be enrolled through the end of the randomization portion of the trial, which was completed during the first quarter of 2023, and will continue in open label extension.
+Added: ● PACIFIC, another Phase 2 trial for rusfertide patients diagnosed with PV and with routinely elevated hematocrit levels (>48%), was initiated during the first quarter of 2021 and completion of the 52-week trial is expected during the second quarter of 2023.
+Added: At the June 2022 American Society of Clinical Oncology (“ASCO”) Annual Meeting, we presented updated interim results for REVIVE and PACIFIC demonstrating the effects of dosing interruption and resumption.
+Added: Rusfertide dosing interruption led to loss of effect, including increased phlebotomy rate and increases in hematocrit and red blood cells.
+Added: Rusfertide restart restored therapeutic benefits.
+Added: Following the brief clinical hold described below, over 90% of patients in the REVIVE trial provided reconsent and returned to rusfertide treatment after dosing interruption and reinitiation.
+Added: At the June 2022 European Hematology Association Congress, we presented interim data as of May 2022 showing that rusfertide treatment interruption reverses hematologic gains and re-initiation of treatment restores therapeutic benefits in patients with PV.
+Added: At the December 2022 American Society of Hematology (“ASH”) meeting, we presented data as of October 2022 related to rusfertide, including a subgroup of analyses of the adverse event profile from the REVIVE trial.
+Added: These preliminary results indicated that 84% of treatment-emergent adverse events (“TEAEs”) were Grade 2 or below.
+Added: 16% of patients experienced Grade 3 TEAEs and there were no Grade 4 TEAEs.
+Added: On March 15, 2023, we announced positive topline results from the blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal portion of the REVIVE trial.
+Added: Subjects receiving rusfertide achieved statistically significant improvements versus placebo in the trial’s primary endpoint.
+Added: The double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week randomized withdrawal portion was included as Part 2 of the REVIVE trial study to evaluate rusfertide in PV patients with frequent phlebotomy requirements.
+Added: In the REVIVE trial, subjects were initially enrolled in the 28-week open label dose-titration and efficacy evaluation Part 1 of the study, followed by 1:1 randomization of 53 subjects to placebo versus rusfertide therapy for a subsequent duration of 12 weeks.
+Added: More subjects receiving rusfertide during the blinded randomized withdrawal portion of the REVIVE trial were responders compared with placebo (69.2% versus 18.5%, p=0.0003).
+Added: A study subject was defined as a responder if the subject completed 12 weeks of double-blind treatment while maintaining hematocrit control without phlebotomy eligibility and without phlebotomy.
+Added: During the 12 weeks of the blinded randomized withdrawal, only 2 of 26 subjects on rusfertide were phlebotomized.
+Added: VERIFY, a global Phase 3 clinical trial of rusfertide in PV for approximately 250 patients, was initiated in the first quarter of 2022.
+Added: Significant efforts have been taken toward the goal of full enrollment and a high degree of interest has been observed from physicians and patient communities.
+Added: We expect enrollment completion in the fourth quarter of 2023.
+Added: On September 16, 2021, the U.S.
+Added: Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) placed a clinical hold on our then ongoing rusfertide clinical trials following our submission to the FDA of findings in a 26-week rasH2 transgenic mouse carcinogenicity study.
In October 2021, we submitted a Complete Response to the FDA related to the clinical hold, and the FDA removed the clinical hold on October 8, 2021.
−Removed: In our Complete Response, we provided the individual patient clinical safety reports the FDA requested for human
−Removed: cancers observed in rusfertide clinical trials, updated the investigator brochure and patient informed consent forms for ongoing rusfertide trials, proposed new safety and stopping rules in clinical study protocols of our ongoing rusfertide clinical trials, and performed a comprehensive review of our rusfertide safety database.
+Added: In our Complete Response, we provided the individual patient clinical safety reports the FDA requested for human cancers observed in rusfertide clinical trials, updated the investigator brochure and patient informed consent forms for ongoing rusfertide trials, proposed new safety and stopping rules in trial protocols for our ongoing rusfertide clinical trials, and performed a comprehensive review of our rusfertide safety database.
Dosing of patients and enrollment in ongoing clinical trials with rusfertide resumed in the fourth quarter of 2021.
−Removed: We enrolled 63 patients in the ongoing REVIVE Phase 2 clinical trial of rusfertide in PV prior to the clinical hold, and we are currently enrolling approximately 20 patients to target approximately 50 patients enrolled through the end of a three-year open label extension (“OLE”).
−Removed: Based on ongoing end of Phase 2 feedback provided by the FDA’s Division of Nonmalignant Hematology and written comments from the European Medicines Agency (“EMA”), we expect to initiate VERIFY, a global Phase 3 clinical trial of rusfertide in PV in the first quarter of 2022.
−Removed: Patient enrollment into VERIFY is expected to be completed in the first half of 2023.
−Removed: In addition, we completed our Phase 2 POC study in HH, our second indication, during the fourth quarter of 2021.
−Removed: To date we have received the following designations for rusfertide in PV:
−Removed: ● The FDA granted orphan drug designation for rusfertide for the treatment of PV in June 2020;
−Removed: ● The EMA granted orphan drug designation for rusfertide for the treatment of PV in October 2020;
−Removed: ● The FDA granted Fast Track designation for rusfertide for the treatment of PV in December 2020;
+Added: The FDA granted orphan drug designation for rusfertide for the treatment of PV in June 2020, and Fast Track designation for rusfertide for the treatment of PV in December 2020.
+Added: The EMA granted orphan drug designation for rusfertide for treatment of PV in October 2020.
The FDA granted Breakthrough Therapy Designation for rusfertide for the treatment of PV in June 2021.
−Removed: Our alpha-4-beta-7 (“α4β7”) antagonist PN-943 and our Interleukin-23 receptor (“IL-23R”) antagonist compound PN-235 are orally delivered investigational drugs that are designed to block biological pathways currently targeted by marketed injectable antibody drugs.
−Removed: Our orally stable peptide approach may offer a targeted therapeutic approach for GI and systemic compartments as needed.
−Removed: We believe that, compared to antibody drugs, these product candidates have the potential to provide improved safety due to minimal exposure in the blood, increased convenience and compliance due to oral delivery, and the opportunity for the earlier introduction of targeted oral therapy.
−Removed: PN-943 is an investigational, orally delivered, gut-restricted α4β7 specific integrin antagonist for inflammatory bowel disease (“IBD”).
−Removed: We submitted a U.S.
−Removed: Investigational New Drug (“IND”) application with the FDA for PN-943 in December 2019, which took effect in January 2020.
−Removed: During the second quarter of 2020 we initiated IDEAL, a 150 patient Phase 2 trial evaluating the safety, tolerability and efficacy of PN-943 in patients with moderate to severe UC.
−Removed: This trial includes a 12-week induction period and a 40-week open label extension.
−Removed: Patient enrollment in IDEAL was completed during the first quarter of 2022, and topline data from the study, including the 12-week induction period, is expected in the second quarter of 2022.
+Added: In April 2022, we received a letter from the FDA indicating the FDA’s intent to rescind Breakthrough Therapy Designation for rusfertide in PV.
+Added: In June 2022, we voluntarily withdrew our Breakthrough Therapy Designation following correspondence with FDA and based on our internal analysis of the relative utility of Breakthrough Therapy Designation for Phase 3 trials and beyond.
+Added: The FDA correspondence relating to the Breakthrough Therapy designation does not address the rusfertide Fast Track Designation, which remains active.
+Added: In keeping with our organizational prioritization of rusfertide in PV, plans to initiate trials of rusfertide in additional disease indications have been paused.
+Added: This decision was influenced in part by the enactment of the Inflation Reduction Act (“IRA”) in the United States and includes previously planned trials of rusfertide in the subset of hereditary hemochromatosis patients with chronic arthropathy.
+Added: JNJ-2113 (formerly known as PN-235)
+Added: Our partnered Interleukin-23 receptor (“IL-23R”) antagonist compound JNJ-2113 is an orally delivered investigational drug that is designed to block biological pathways currently targeted by marketed injectable antibody drugs.
+Added: Our orally stable peptide approach may offer a targeted therapeutic approach for gastrointestinal (“GI”) and systemic compartments as needed.
+Added: We believe that, compared to antibody drugs, JNJ-2113 has the potential to provide clinical improvement in an oral medication with increased convenience and compliance and the opportunity for the earlier introduction of targeted oral therapy.
In May 2017, we entered into a worldwide license and collaboration agreement with Janssen Biotech, Inc.
−Removed: (“Janssen”), a Johnson & Johnson company, to co-develop and co-detail our IL-23R antagonist compounds, including PTG-200 (JNJ-67864238) and certain related compounds for all indications, including IBD.
+Added: (“Janssen”), a Johnson & Johnson company, to co-develop and co-detail our IL-23R antagonist compounds, including PTG-200 (JNJ-67864238) and certain related compounds for all indications, including inflammatory bowel disease (“IBD”).
PTG-200 was a first-generation investigational, orally delivered, IL-23R antagonist for the treatment of IBD.
1 unchanged sentence
and in July 2021 to, among other things, enable Janssen to independently research and develop collaboration compounds for multiple indications in the IL-23 pathway and further align our financial interests.
−Removed: In October 2020, we and Janssen announced the selection of two second-generation IL23-R antagonists for advancement into clinical development, PN-232 (JNJ-75105186) and PN-235 (JNJ-77242113).
−Removed: During the fourth quarter of 2021, following a pre-specified interim analysis criteria, a portfolio decision was made by Janssen to stop further development of both PTG-200 and PN-232 favor of advancing PN-235, based on its superior potency and overall pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile.
−Removed: A PN-235 Phase 1 study was completed in Q4 2021.
−Removed: Janssen initiated FRONTIER 1, a Phase 2b clinical study of PN-235 in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, in early 2022, and is expected to initiate a separate Phase 2 study of PN-235 in IBD in the second half of 2022 .
−Removed: During the fourth quarter of 2021, we received a $7.5 million milestone payment from Janssen triggered by the completion of data collection for PN-235 Phase 1 activities.
−Removed: We expect to earn a $25.0 million milestone in connection with the dosing of a third patient in the first Phase 2 study of a second-generation candidate, and a $10.0 million
−Removed: milestone in connection with the dosing of a third patient in the second Phase 2 study of a second-generation candidate.
−Removed: We remain eligible for up to approximately $900.0 million in development-related milestone payments, in addition to the $87.5 million in milestones already received.
+Added: During the fourth quarter of 2021, following a pre-specified interim analysis criteria, a portfolio decision was made by Janssen to advance second-generation product candidate JNJ-2113 (JNJ-77242113) based on its superior potency and overall pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile.
+Added: A JNJ-2113 Phase 1 trial was completed in the fourth quarter of 2021.
+Added: In February 2022, Janssen initiated FRONTIER1, a 255-patient Phase 2b clinical trial of JNJ-2113 in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, which was completed in December 2022.
+Added: FRONTIER1 was a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study that evaluated three once-daily dosages and two twice-daily dosages of JNJ-2113 taken orally.
+Added: The primary endpoint of the study is the proportion of patients achieving PASI-75 (a 75% improvement in skin lesions as measured by the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) at 16 weeks.
+Added: In March 2023, we announced positive topline results from the trial.
+Added: JNJ-2113 achieved the study's primary efficacy endpoint, with a statistically significant greater proportion of patients who received JNJ-2113 achieving PASI-75 responses compared to placebo at Week 16 in all five of the study’s treatment groups.
+Added: A clear dose response was observed across an eight-fold dose range.
+Added: Treatment was well tolerated, with no meaningful difference in frequency of adverse events across treatment groups versus placebo.
+Added: It is our expectation that JNJ-2113 will progress into a Phase 3 registrational study in plaque psoriasis on the strength of the FRONTIER1 data.
+Added: Advancement of JNJ-2113 into a Phase 3 study and meeting the primary endpoint in that study would qualify us for milestone payments of $50 million and $115 million, respectively.
+Added: Data will be presented from various pre-clinical and clinical studies on JNJ-2113 at medical conferences beginning in the second quarter of 2023.
+Added: Other Phase 2 studies of JNJ-2113 that Janssen has initiated include the SUMMIT study of JNJ-2113 for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis expected to be completed in the second quarter of 2023 and FRONTIER2, a long-term extension study.
+Added: A Phase 1 trial of an immediate release formulation of JNJ-2113 in healthy Japanese and Chinese adult participants is currently recruiting.
+Added: Following the completion of Phase 2 studies of JNJ-2113 in plaque psoriasis, we expect Janssen to initiate a separate Phase 2 trial of JNJ-2113 in a second indication.
+Added: Additional indications may include any or all of psoriatic arthritis, UC and CD.
+Added: During the fourth quarter of 2021, we received a $7.5 million milestone payment from Janssen triggered by the completion of data collection for JNJ-2113 Phase 1 activities.
+Added: In the second quarter of 2022, we received a $25.0 million milestone payment in connection with the dosing of a third patient in FRONTIER1 during the first quarter of 2022.
+Added: We will be eligible to receive a $10.0 million milestone payment in connection with the dosing of a third patient in the second Phase 2 trial of a second-generation candidate, a $50 million milestone payment upon dosing of a third patient in a Phase 3 trial for a second-generation compound for any indication, and a $115.0 million milestone payment upon a Phase 3 clinical trial for a second-generation compound for any indication meeting its primary clinical endpoint .
+Added: remain eligible for up to approximately $855.0 million in future development and sales milestone payments, in addition to the $112.5 million in nonrefundable payments from Janssen received to date.
+Added: We also remain eligible to receive tiered royalties on net product sales at percentages ranging from mid-single digits to ten percent.
+Added: PN-943 is a wholly owned, investigational, orally delivered, gut-restricted alpha 4 beta 7 (“α4β7”) specific integrin antagonist for IBD.
+Added: During the second quarter of 2020, we initiated IDEAL, a 159 patient Phase 2 trial evaluating the safety, tolerability and efficacy of PN-943 in patients with moderate to severe UC.
+Added: Enrollment in IDEAL was completed during the first quarter of 2022.
+Added: The trial includes a 12-week induction period, which has been completed, and a 40-week extended treatment period.
+Added: With the exception of completing the 40-week extended treatment period for eligible patients in the IDEAL trial, which is expected to be completed in the first quarter of 2023, we do not intend to dedicate further internal resources to clinical development or contract manufacturing activities for our PN-943 clinical program.
+Added: Discovery Platform
Our clinical assets are all derived from our proprietary discovery platform.
2 unchanged sentences
We continue to use our peptide technology platform to discover product candidates against targets in disease areas with significant unmet medical needs.
+Added: For example, we have a pre-clinical stage program to identify an orally active hepcidin mimetic, which we believe will be complementary to the injectable rusfertide for offering the best treatment options for PV, hereditary hemochromatosis and other potential erythropoietic and iron imbalance disorders.
AN INJECTABLE HEPCIDIN MIMETIC
4 unchanged sentences
In diseases of excessive RBCs, such as PV, the body consumes iron in the production of cells, leading to iron deficiency, which can be exacerbated by phlebotomy.
−Removed: In diseases of iron overload, such as HH, there may be insufficient hepcidin to maintain appropriate iron levels.
+Added: In diseases of iron overload, such as hereditary hemochromatosis, there may be insufficient hepcidin to maintain appropriate iron levels.
In other disorders, iron imbalance can benefit from increased levels of hepcidin-like activity to restore proper balance.
18 unchanged sentences
Cytoreductive therapies such as hydroxyurea, interferons and ruxolitinib can have challenging side effect profiles as they reduce all cell types, not just RBCs.
−Removed: Current treatments are effective in some patients but have limitations, such as cytopenia and cancer.
−Removed: We believe there are
−Removed: substantial PV patient groups that could benefit from a new non-cytoreductive therapeutic option which focuses on RBCs.
−Removed: PV affects approximately 100,000 patients living in the United States, with a similar prevalence in Europe, representing an estimated market opportunity of approximately $1.0 billion to $2.0 billion.
−Removed: Approximately 14,000 new patients have been diagnosed with PV annually each year since 2017.
+Added: Current treatments are effective in some patients but have distinct limitations, such as cytopenia and cancer.
+Added: We believe there are substantial PV patient groups that could benefit from a new non-cytoreductive therapeutic option which focuses on RBCs.
+Added: NCCN guidelines state that hematocrit levels should be maintained below 45% to reduce risk of cardiovascular and thrombotic events.
+Added: However, analysis of a large medical claims database indicated that 78% of patients were uncontrolled, with hematocrit test results above 45%.
+Added: This analysis reveals that current therapies do not offer adequate hematocrit control, indicating a significant unmet need in the United States alone where patients may have an elevated risk of cardiovascular and thrombotic events.
+Added: There are approximately 100,000 diagnosed and treated patients living in the United States, with a similar number in Europe, representing an estimated market opportunity of approximately $1.0 billion to $2.0 billion.
Patients are typically diagnosed between the ages of 50 and 70 and median survival is approximately 20 years.
1 unchanged sentence
Cytoreductive agents, such as hydroxyurea, are also commonly used to control blood count in PV patients.
−Removed: Although NCCN guidelines state that hematocrit levels should be maintained below 45% to reduce risk of cardiovascular and thrombotic events, less than 25% of patients in the large medical claims data set had all hematocrit test results under 45%.
−Removed: This analysis reveals that current therapies do not offer adequate hematocrit control, indicating a significant unmet need in the United States alone where patients may have an elevated risk of cardiovascular and thrombotic events.
+Added: Approximately 60% of PV patients are considered to have moderate treatment burden with treatments including frequent phlebotomy and hydroxyurea.
+Added: We believe rusfertide can potentially benefit a broad spectrum of patients both as a monotherapy or in combination across the continuum of care.
We believe that rusfertide has the potential to provide substantial benefit to patients by offering a treatment focused on managing hematocrit in a consistent and predictable manner, dramatically decreasing the need for phlebotomy.
4 unchanged sentences
Clinical Development of Rusfertide in PV
−Removed: In the fourth quarter of 2019, we initiated REVIVE, a Phase 2 study of rusfertide in PV designed to evaluate safety and preliminary efficacy in patients requiring phlebotomy.
+Added: In the fourth quarter of 2019, we initiated REVIVE, a Phase 2 study of rusfertide in PV designed to evaluate safety and preliminary efficacy in patients requiring phlebotomy (Figure 2).
The REVIVE study was expected to enroll approximately 60 patients and consisted of a 16-week open-label dose finding stage every 4 weeks from 10 mg to 80 mg and a 12-week maintenance period at doses which generate desired hematocrit levels, followed by a 12-week randomized and blinded withdrawal stage.
1 unchanged sentence
The endpoints of this clinical POC study include measurement of blood parameters (hematocrit and hemoglobin levels), reductions or delay in phlebotomy requirements, and improvements in quality-of-life symptoms.
+Added: Rusfertide Phase 2 PV Study Design
During the first quarter of 2021, we initiated PACIFIC, a Phase 2 study for rusfertide in up to 20 patients diagnosed with PV and with routinely elevated hematocrit levels (>48%).
1 unchanged sentence
Once the patient’s hematocrit was below 45%, dosing was adjusted and weekly dosing was maintained to control hematocrit without phlebotomy.
−Removed: To date we have received the following designations for rusfertide in PV:
+Added: We currently have the following designations for rusfertide in PV:
● The FDA granted orphan drug designation for rusfertide for the treatment of PV in June 2020;
1 unchanged sentence
● The FDA granted Fast Track designation for rusfertide for the treatment of PV in December 2020.
−Removed: ● The FDA granted Breakthrough Therapy Designation for rusfertide for the treatment of PV in June 2021.
In consultation with the FDA, we implemented new safety monitoring procedures, including cancer surveillance measures (augmented dermatological examinations) and new stopping rules following a prior 21-day clinical hold on the rusfertide clinical development program.
−Removed: Reenrollment continues with the target of 50 patients completing the full trial.
−Removed: In December 2021, we presented two oral presentations and two posters relating to rusfertide at the American Society for Hematology’s hybrid annual meeting, including updated interim Phase 2 results for the REVIVE and
−Removed: PACIFIC studies for rusfertide in PV.
−Removed: These preliminary results as of September 2021 demonstrated dramatic decreases in the need for therapeutic phlebotomy in patients with PV, while maintaining control over blood hematocrit levels.
−Removed: • We enrolled 63 patients in the ongoing REVIVE Phase 2 clinical trial of rusfertide in PV prior to the clinical hold and we are currently reenrolling approximately 20 additional patients to target approximately 50 patients enrolled through the end of a three-year open label extension.
−Removed: Of the 63 PV patients treated with rusfertide, the vast majority were able to eliminate therapeutic phlebotomies and maintain a target hematocrit level of less than 45 percent.
+Added: Following the brief clinical hold, over 92% of patients in the REVIVE trial provided reconsent and returned to rusfertide treatment after dosing interruption and re-initiation.
+Added: We enrolled 63 patients in the ongoing REVIVE Phase 2 clinical trial of rusfertide in PV prior to the clinical hold and we enrolled seven additional patients to target approximately 50 patients to complete the randomized withdrawal part of the study.
+Added: The vast majority of patients treated with rusfertide were able to eliminate therapeutic phlebotomies and maintain a target hematocrit level of less than 45 percent.
Treatment with rusfertide was also shown to reverse iron deficiency, an important side effect of regular therapeutic phlebotomies as a treatment for PV.
Early observations suggest a decreased symptom burden over time, including overall burden (myeloproliferative neoplasm total symptom score), as well as measurements specific to mental function, fatigue and itching.
−Removed: • Overall, rusfertide therapy resulted in rapid, sustained and durable hematocrit control without clinically meaningful changes in white blood cell and platelet counts.
−Removed: Subjects have been treated up to 1.5 years with the majority of subjects remaining essentially phlebotomy-free.
+Added: Preliminary results indicated that rusfertide therapy resulted in rapid, sustained and durable hematocrit control without clinically meaningful changes in white blood cell and platelet counts.
+Added: Subjects have been under treatment for a median of 1.5 years with the majority of subjects remaining essentially phlebotomy-free.
Rusfertide demonstrated similar efficacy in all categories of patients, independent of the PV patient risk category or concurrent therapy with hydroxyurea, interferon or ruxolitinib.
Study participation was halted in one patient due to asymptomatic thrombocytosis.
−Removed: One patient developed myeloproliferative neoplasm blast phase which was deemed not to be related to rusfertide.
−Removed: • Significant adverse events included syncope, peripheral artery aneurism, gastroenteritis, chest pain, AML, squamous cell carcinoma (skin), melanoma & basal cell carcinoma.
−Removed: Injection site reaction (“ISRs”) were most common and associated with 28.1% of injections.
−Removed: All ISRs were transient, and no patient discontinued due to ISR.
−Removed: • Results from the PACIFIC Phase 2 study in rusfertide for PV patients with high hematocrit levels presented at ASH 2021 demonstrated, post induction, weekly rusfertide treatment rapidly controlled hematocrit levels without the need for therapeutic phlebotomy.
+Added: One patient developed acute myelogenous leukemia (“AML”), which was deemed not to be related to
+Added: Significant adverse events included syncope, peripheral artery aneurysm, gastroenteritis, chest pain, AML, squamous cell carcinoma (skin), melanoma & basal cell carcinoma.
+Added: Injection site reaction (“ISRs”) were most common and associated with 28.1% of injections and are transient in nature.
+Added: At the June 2022 ASCO Annual Meeting, we presented updated interim results for REVIVE and PACIFIC demonstrating the effects of dosing interruption and resumption.
+Added: Rusfertide dosing interruption led to loss of effect, including increased phlebotomy rate and increases in hematocrit and red blood cells.
+Added: Rusfertide restart restored therapeutic benefits.
+Added: Following the brief clinical hold described above, over 90% of patients in the REVIVE trial provided reconsent and returned to rusfertide treatment after dosing interruption and reinitiation.
+Added: At the June 2022 European Hematology Association Congress, we presented interim data as of May 2022 showing that rusfertide treatment interruption reverses hematologic gains and re-initiation of treatment restores therapeutic benefits in patients with PV.
+Added: At the December 2022 ASH meeting, we presented data as of October 2022 related to rusfertide, including a subgroup of analyses of the adverse event profile from the REVIVE trial.
+Added: These preliminary results indicated that 84% of treatment-emergent adverse events (“TEAEs”) were Grade 2 or below.
+Added: 16% of patients experienced Grade 3 TEAEs and there were no Grade 4 TEAEs.
+Added: On March 15, 2023, we announced positive topline results from the blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal portion of the REVIVE trial.
+Added: Subjects receiving rusfertide achieved statistically significant improvements versus placebo in the trial’s primary endpoint.
+Added: The double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week randomized withdrawal portion was included as Part 2 of the REVIVE trial study to evaluate rusfertide in PV patients with frequent phlebotomy requirements.
+Added: In the REVIVE trial, subjects were initially enrolled in the 28-week open label dose-titration and efficacy evaluation Part 1 of the study, followed by 1:1 randomization of 53 subjects to placebo versus rusfertide therapy for a subsequent duration of 12 weeks.
+Added: More subjects receiving rusfertide during the blinded randomized withdrawal portion of the REVIVE trial were responders compared with placebo (69.2% versus 18.5%, p=0.0003).
+Added: A study subject was defined as a responder if the subject completed 12 weeks of double-blind treatment while maintaining hematocrit control without phlebotomy eligibility and without phlebotomy.
+Added: During the 12 weeks of the blinded randomized withdrawal, only 2 of 26 subjects on rusfertide were phlebotomized.
+Added: In addition, in subjects with moderate or severe Myeloproliferative Neoplasm-Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF) symptom scores at baseline, the change from baseline was statistically significant in fatigue, problems with concentration, inactivity and itching during the 28-week open label Part 1 of the trial.
+Added: Meaningful comparison of symptoms assessments in Part 2 are not possible since a majority of subjects randomized to placebo discontinued prior to the 12-week assessment of MPN-SAF symptoms.
+Added: Rusfertide continued to be generally well tolerated in the REVIVE trial, with localized injection site reactions comprising the majority of reported adverse events.
+Added: No new safety signals were observed in safety data disclosed in connection with the Part 2 efficacy results, relative to the safety data from the REVIVE trial presented at the December 2022 ASH Annual Meeting.
+Added: Based on end of Phase 2 feedback provided by the FDA’s Division of Nonmalignant Hematology and written comments from the EMA, we activated sites and initiated patient screening for VERIFY, a global Phase 3 clinical trial of rusfertide in PV for approximately 250 patients, in the first quarter of 2022 (Figure 3).
+Added: Significant efforts have been taken toward the goal of full enrollment and a high degree of interest has been observed from physicians and patient communities.
+Added: We expect enrollment completion in the fourth quarter of of 2023.
Rusfertide Phase 3 PV Study Design
−Removed: Based on ongoing end of REVIVE and PACIFIC Phase 2 trials feedback provided by the FDA’s Division of Nonmalignant Hematology and written comments from the EMA, we expect to initiate screening in a global, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled Phase 3 clinical trial of rusfertide in approximately 250 PV patients in the first quarter of 2022 (Figure 2).
−Removed: Hereditary Hemochromatosis (“HH”)
−Removed: HH Overview and Market Opportunity
−Removed: HH is an inherited blood disorder characterized by excessive absorption of iron due to a deficiency or dysregulation in hepcidin.
−Removed: Approximately one million people in the United States have high iron Fe (“ HFE”) gene mutations consistent with type 1 HFE-related hemochromatosis, the most common form of HH.
−Removed: Of these, 10 to 15 percent develop clinical manifestations of iron overload.
−Removed: Onset of clinical symptoms in HH patients typically occurs between ages 40 and 60, after significant iron accumulation.
−Removed: If left untreated, iron may accumulate in major organs such as the liver, pancreas, heart, and bones, which may lead to complications including diabetes, cardiomyopathy, and cirrhosis.
−Removed: To prevent the development of these associated complications, the goal of treatment in HH patients is to reduce the amount of iron in the body.
−Removed: Per American College of Gastroenterology guidelines, patients with elevated serum ferritin above 200 ng/mL in females and 300 ng/mL in males, along with transferrin saturation (TSAT) above 45%, will require treatment, most commonly phlebotomy.
−Removed: The initial phase of treatment with phlebotomy, called the induction phase, typically requires weekly phlebotomy until serum ferritin levels decrease to the target range of 50 to 100 ng/ml.
−Removed: Once serum ferritin has reached its goal level, HH patients transition to the maintenance phase of therapy, in which they typically require phlebotomy 3-4 times per year to maintain normal serum ferritin levels and prevent iron accumulation in the organs.
−Removed: There is no approved medicine for the treatment of HH.
−Removed: Most HH patients who require treatment can be adequately managed with phlebotomy, which is effective in removing excess iron and preventing most of the complications associated with iron overload.
−Removed: There are small sub-populations of patients who require treatment for HH but who are intolerant or resistant to phlebotomy.
−Removed: HH patients who cannot be managed with phlebotomy are left at an increased risk of iron accumulation and associated complications, therefore, additional treatment options may be needed for these populations.
−Removed: Clinical Development of Rusfertide in HH
−Removed: In January 2020, we initiated a Phase 2 study of rusfertide in HH.
−Removed: This study was an open label, multicenter study designed to evaluate the effects of rusfertide in 16 adult patients over 24 weeks of treatment.
−Removed: Guidelines for HH focused on controlling baseline transferrin saturation (“TSAT”) and ferritin to prevent long-term complications.
−Removed: Given the TSAT reductions from rusfertide observed to date in both healthy volunteers and beta-thalassemia and PV patients, as well as regulation of organ iron content in a mouse model of HH, we believe that a significant reduction in phlebotomy is possible with rusfertide.
−Removed: The endpoints of this POC study included change in TSAT and serum iron levels, reductions in phlebotomy requirements and an assessment of participant-reported outcomes.
−Removed: We completed our Phase 2 POC study in HH during the fourth quarter of 2021.
−Removed: An abstract highlighting positive preliminary data our Phase 2 study of rusfertide in HH was orally presented at The Liver Meeting® 2021, hosted by the AASLD, which took place virtually in November 2021.
−Removed: In December 2021, we presented a poster on rusfertide in HH at the ASH 2021 Annual Meeting.
−Removed: These results from the Phase 2 study of rusfertide in HH demonstrated a significant reduction in the number of phlebotomies, lower serum iron and TSAT levels, and a reduction of liver iron content.
−Removed: Administration of rusfertide was generally well tolerated in patients with HH, with the most common adverse events being injection site reactions that were mild or moderate.
−Removed: Based on the data described above, we are exploring clinical studies in HH sub-populations.
−Removed: Additional studies are required to further characterize the safety, efficacy and long-term outcomes in rusfertide for HH patients.
−Removed: OVERVIEW OF INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE
+Added: OVERVIEW OF DISEASES DRIVEN BY THE IL-23 PATHWAY:
+Added: PSORIASIS AND INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE
+Added: IL-23 is a member of the IL-12 family of cytokines with pro-inflammatory and immune stimulatory properties.
+Added: Cytokines are cell signaling proteins that are released by cells and affect the behavior of other cells.
+Added: Binding of the IL-23 ligand to the IL-23R receptor leads to an expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines involved in the local tissue autocrine cascade that is an important pathway of many inflammatory diseases, including psoriasis and IBD.
+Added: The injectable antibody drug Stelara® (marketed for psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, UC and CD) is a p40 antagonist antibody that inhibits both the IL-23 and IL-12 pathways.
+Added: Next-generation antibody drugs, such as Tremfya® and Skyrizi®, target the p19 subunit of the IL-23 ligand and are specific inhibitors of the IL-23 pathway, which is believed to be the critical driver of local tissue pathology.
+Added: Tremfya® and Skyrizi® are approved in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (“PsA”) and are in Phase 3 clinical trials in UC and CD.
+Added: Eli Lilly and Company’s anti-IL-23 antibody mirikizumab has reported positive results from a Phase 3 program in UC.
+Added: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease of the skin that affects 130 million people worldwide and 8 million in the United States, translating to 2-3% of the adult population.
+Added: Psoriasis is associated with several comorbid conditions including cardiovascular disease, obesity, and 30% of psoriasis patients develop arthritic complications.
+Added: Psoriasis is also associated with significantly decreased quality of life for patients.
+Added: Plaque p soriasis is the most common form of psoriasis, which is recognized as the most prevalent immune-mediated inflammatory disease, involving skin and joints and associated with abnormalities of other systems.
+Added: Several factors, such as surface area covered and symptom burden, impact whether one’s psoriasis is considered mild, moderate, or severe.
+Added: Typically, 3-10% of affected body surface area is considered moderate psoriasis, and more than 10% is considered severe psoriasis.
+Added: Global market sales for psoriasis therapies in 2020 was $13.2 billion, with U.S.
+Added: market sales of $10.8 billion.
+Added: The global market forecast for 2030 anticipates $25.3 billion, with U.S.
+Added: market sales of $20.9 billion.
+Added: Identification of the IL-23/IL-17 axis as the key pathway driving psoriatic inflammation has led to the development of more effective and safer systemic therapies that inhibit IL-17 (e.g., Taltz®, Cosentyx®) and IL-23 (e.g., Tremfya®,
+Added: These biologics have revolutionized the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis, with superior efficacy and safety compared to conventional oral therapies (e.g., methotrexate, cyclosporin), and first-generation biologics (e.g., anti-TNFs, Stelara®).
+Added: The anti-IL-17 and anti-IL-23 classes are associated with Psoriasis Area Skin Index (“PASI”) 75 scores (75% improvement in skin inflammation) in 90% of patients, and complete clearance of the skin (PASI 100) in 30-40% of patients.
+Added: The anti-IL-17 class is ineffective in IBD, surprisingly showing overall worsening of disease in Phase 2 studies and is reflected in the product labels.
+Added: There is still unmet need for new therapies.
+Added: Only 25% of biologic eligible moderate to severe psoriasis patients are treated with a biologic.
+Added: The parenteral route of administration for these advanced biologics poses a patient level barrier to entry.
+Added: Two oral medicines have been approved in moderate to severe psoriasis.
+Added: Otezla® was approved in 2014.
+Added: It is the least effective of all drugs approved since 2004 with PASI 75 of approximately 30% but is used widely because of a perceived positive safety profile.
+Added: In 2022, the first TYK2 inhibitor, Sotyktu®, was approved.
+Added: In Phase 3 studies, it has demonstrated approximately 55% PASI 75 scores.
+Added: There is still significant need for safe and effective oral therapies in moderate to severe psoriasis.
+Added: Psoriatic Arthritis (“PsA”)
+Added: PsA is an inflammatory disease of the peripheral and axial joints that complicates psoriasis in up to 30% of patients.
+Added: Among the 8 million patients in the United States with psoriasis in 2022, it is estimated that approximately 1 million patients have PsA.
+Added: Many patients with active PsA may have mild psoriasis and many patients with severe psoriasis may have only mild PsA symptoms.
+Added: PsA is associated with several chronic conditions.
+Added: PsA may present even before skin symptoms in 10% to 15% of patients.
+Added: Cardiovascular comorbidities have a higher prevalence in PsA than psoriasis and can impact lifespan and quality of life.
+Added: Several new targeted therapies have been approved for use in PsA, with additional therapies in development.
+Added: These advances have improved outcomes, including reductions in musculoskeletal symptoms, skin manifestations and radiographic joint damage.
+Added: The same drugs approved in psoriasis are also approved in PsA.
+Added: One notable exception is that the JAK inhibitors, Xeljanz® and Rinvoq®, are approved in PsA without the respective label in psoriasis.
+Added: Inflammatory Bowel Disease (“IBD”)
IBD is a group of chronic autoimmune and inflammatory conditions of the colon and small intestine, consisting primarily of UC and CD.
3 unchanged sentences
CD complications may include strictures and fistula, which penetrate all layers of the intestine.
−Removed: usually diagnosed earlier than CD due to bleeding symptoms.
+Added: UC is usually diagnosed earlier than CD due to bleeding symptoms.
Patients with CD may initially present with abdominal pain, fatigue and anorexia, which can be misdiagnosed.
2 unchanged sentences
IBD prevalence is increasing worldwide and is correlated with the adoption of western diets and lifestyle, as well as genetic factors (5 to 20% of affected patients have a first degree relative with the disease).
−Removed: Market Overview
According to the Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation of America, there are more than 1.6 million IBD patients in the United States alone, an increase of approximately 200,000 patients since 2011.
7 unchanged sentences
Approximately one third of IBD patients do not respond to TNF-α antibody drugs and approximately another 30% to 40% become refractory within the first year of treatment.
−Removed: Additionally, TNF-α antibody drugs may predispose patients to an increased risk of serious infection and the development of anti-drug antibodies, which over time can cause loss of drug response.
+Added: Additionally, TNF-α antibody drugs may predispose patients to an increased risk of serious
+Added: infection and the development of anti-drug antibodies, which over time can cause loss of drug response.
More recently, antibody products focused on potentially safer mechanisms of action have been gaining market share.
3 unchanged sentences
Johnson & Johnson global sales of Stelara® (approved for psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, moderate-to-severe CD and UC) exceeded $9.2 billion in 2021.
−Removed: Current Standard of Care in IBD
−Removed: In recent years, treatment of IBD has evolved from a focus on successful symptom management to an emphasis on modifying the underlying disease to achieve long-term remission.
−Removed: While available treatments exist for moderate-to-severe IBD, there continues to be a significant medical need for novel, efficacious, safe and convenient treatments.
−Removed: New technologies and outcome measures have been developed to improve staging definitions and assessments of treatment benefit.
−Removed: Nonetheless, halting or reversing IBD progression has not yet been achieved with any single agent therapy, and attaining and maintaining long-term remission in most patients remains a significant unmet medical need.
−Removed: Biosimilar infliximab and other tumor necrosis factor (“TNF”) inhibitors are the first line standard of care in moderate-to-severe IBD.
−Removed: Anti-TNFs bind to and neutralize a central pro-inflammatory cytokine in the gut via systemic immunosuppression.
−Removed: As a result, they can be associated with infection and malignancy risk.
−Removed: Although the magnitude of these risks is relatively low, they are significant for the young IBD population who must continue on lifelong treatment.
−Removed: In addition, more than 10% of patients treated with anti-TNF agents lose response with each year of treatment.
−Removed: In 2014, a novel anti-trafficking mechanism launched with vedolizumab, marketed as Entyvio®, which blocks migration of leukocytes into the gut via α4β7 integrins.
−Removed: This mechanism remains the only true “gut selective” approach in the IBD market today, although formulation technologies can limit systemic exposure from orally delivered agents.
−Removed: Entyvio® has shown an excellent safety profile, although it requires intravenous administration.
−Removed: Entyvio® was followed by the launch of ustekinumab, marketed as Stelara®, in CD in 2016, which blocks inflammation produced through the IL-12 and IL-23 pathways, and tofacitinib, marketed as Xeljanz®, an orally delivered pan-Janus kinase (“JAK”) inhibitor approved in UC.
−Removed: A head-to-head trial called VARSITY comparing the long-term safety and efficacy of an anti-integrin and anti-TNFs has been completed.
−Removed: Entyvio® demonstrated superior rates of clinical remission and endoscopic improvement compared with Humira®, the market leader in the TNF inhibitor class.
−Removed: The first formal combination trials in IBD were
−Removed: initiated in the last year, adding new mechanisms such as integrin inhibitors or IL-23 inhibitors to anti-TNFs.
−Removed: Most IBD experts now believe that combining treatment classes with additive or synergistic mechanisms of action will be required to attain the disease-modifying effects and lasting remissions in a larger group of patients documented in other areas of immunology, such as psoriasis or rheumatoid arthritis.
−Removed: We believe the development of new, potent and targeted orally delivered therapies for IBD may offer safer and more effective treatment options, alone or in combination, for moderate-to-severe IBD patients.
−Removed: In addition, many clinicians continue to advocate for earlier introduction of targeted therapeutics in mild-to-moderate IBD in order to prevent disease progression and irreversible gastrointestinal damage.
−Removed: Orally delivered peptide drugs PN-943 and PN-235 work on the same specific validated targets as FDA-approved injectable antibodies and have the potential to offer improved safety and compliance and to minimize the risk of immunogenicity associated with antibodies.
−Removed: We believe that these product candidates, if approved, have the potential to be used more broadly, including treatment of mild-to-moderate IBD.
−Removed: Our IBD Solution:
−Removed: Orally Delivered Peptides as Targeted Therapies
−Removed: For the IBD targets of interest, the size and nature of our peptides are carefully selected and modified so as to acquire the desired potency and specificity, and also to largely restrict their presence to the GI and systemic tissue compartments as needed when administered orally.
−Removed: These features translate to orally delivered, selective and potent peptide drug candidates with specific advantages compared to antibody drugs:
−Removed: ● Oral administration .
−Removed: We are developing our peptide therapeutics in a convenient capsule or tablet form intended for oral administration, particularly in combination with other oral therapies.
−Removed: We also believe oral administration may reduce many of the problems and limitations associated with injections or infusions, including injection site pain and local reactions, inconvenience, anxiety, high rates of immunogenicity and potential safety risks.
−Removed: ● Potential for improved safety and tolerability compared to antibody drugs .
−Removed: ● Oral and GI-restricted delivery minimizes systemic exposure in the blood.
−Removed: Oral and GI-restricted delivery results in lower drug levels in the blood that may provide the potential for an enhanced safety profile over antibody drugs.
−Removed: ● Peptides can be cleared more quickly from systemic circulation.
−Removed: Small molecules and peptides below a size threshold can be rapidly cleared from blood circulation by kidney filtration and excretion.
−Removed: Rapid clearance may be beneficial especially if patients need to discontinue therapy.
−Removed: In contrast, antibody drugs, because of their long plasma half-life, may take months to clear from blood circulation, leaving patients exposed to continued or increased safety risk.
−Removed: ● The likelihood of much lower immunogenicity of small stable peptides compared to antibody drugs reduces the risk of loss of response.
−Removed: We believe that anti-drug antibodies are less likely to be elicited against constrained peptides, due to their small size, lack of epitope density, resistance to proteolysis, oral tolerance, and minimal systemic absorption.
−Removed: ● Potential for localized delivery to site of disease.
−Removed: We believe oral dosing of GI-restricted peptides results in substantially higher drug concentrations in the diseased GI tissue compartment compared to injectable antibody drugs.
−Removed: This targeted delivery to the site of action may lead to more immediate and significant target engagement at the site of active disease in the GI tissue compartment with the potential for improved efficacy.
−Removed: In chronic GI diseases such as IBD, we believe that our orally delivered, peptide product candidates may offer improved delivery and the potential for improved safety and tolerability that may provide an overall benefit to patients, payors, and physicians.
−Removed: AN ORALLY DELIVERED α4β7 INTEGRIN ANTAGONIST
−Removed: PN-943, a second-generation, orally delivered, gut-restricted α4β7 specific integrin antagonist, was discovered through our peptide technology platform and is being developed initially for patients with moderate-to-severe UC.
−Removed: Α4β7 integrin is considered to be one of the most GI-specific biological targets for IBD due to its binding to MAdCAM-1, an extracellular protein that resides mostly in the GI vasculature.
−Removed: Like Entyvio®, which is dosed as an infusion and as an injectable antibody drug, PN-943 specifically inhibits α4β7 integrin.
−Removed: We have leveraged the development and regulatory path of Entyvio® and other approved antibody drugs for IBD to help inform the design of our clinical development studies.
−Removed: Mechanism of Action and Rationale
−Removed: Integrins, such as α4β7, are transmembrane proteins that regulate cellular movement into extravascular tissue and play an important role in modulating the inflammatory reaction in the gut.
−Removed: The α4β7 integrin is expressed on the surface of T cells, immune cells that help defend against foreign and potentially harmful substances that enter the body.
−Removed: The development of IBD is driven by the migration of α4β7 T cells into the GI tissue compartment and their subsequent activation within the GI tissue compartment.
−Removed: The entry of α4β7 T cells into the GI tissue compartment is facilitated by the protein-protein interactions between the α4β7 integrin and its corresponding ligand, MAdCAM-1, which is primarily expressed in the GI tissue compartment.
−Removed: Hence, the binding of α4β7 to MAdCAM-1 can be categorized as a GI-specific interaction and has been identified as an IBD-specific targeted therapeutic approach.
−Removed: By blocking the binding of α4β7 integrin to MAdCAM-1, PN-943 may prevent trafficking and activation of T cells, thereby reducing the inflammation that leads to the clinical manifestations and long-term implications of UC.
−Removed: Α4β7 for IBD is targeted by Entyvio®, which has demonstrated safety and efficacy in patients with moderate-to-severe UC and CD.
−Removed: Since PN-943 targets the same biological pathway as Entyvio®, we utilized similar PD-based POC in our pre-clinical studies and Phase 1 clinical trial to inform and guide our Phase 2 development program.
−Removed: We sourced these PD biomarker assays from public scientific publications and do not maintain any contractual arrangement providing access to this information with the makers of these marketed products.
−Removed: PN-943 Pre-Clinical Proof-of-Concept Studies
−Removed: We have completed extensive pre-clinical studies of PN-943 in which we established pharmacodynamic target engagement POC, including effects on receptor occupancy, T cell trafficking and mucosal healing in rodents and monkeys.
−Removed: Pre-clinical data indicated that PN-943 may be a more potent α4β7 integrin antagonist compound than PTG-100, our first-generation α4β7 inhibitor, without sacrificing its other positive attributes, such as selectivity and tolerability.
−Removed: PTG-100 shares the same α4β7 integrin target as Entyvio® for the treatment of moderate-to-severe UC and CD.
−Removed: We completed extensive pre-clinical studies of PTG-100 in which we established pharmacological POC and completed a Phase 1 clinical trial in Australia in 2016.
−Removed: PN-943’s Phase 1 Clinical Trial Overview
−Removed: We completed a Phase 1 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of PN-943 in normal healthy male volunteers in Australia in 2019.
−Removed: The Phase 1 single ascending dose (“SAD”) and multiple ascending dose (“MAD”) components were conducted with a solution-based liquid formulation.
−Removed: In addition to determining the safety and tolerability and pharmacokinetics of PN-943, the SAD and MAD components of the trial evaluated PD-based POC through the assessment of α4β7 receptor occupancy and α4β7 target expression that indicate target engagement on peripheral blood memory T cells similar to what was done in the pre-clinical studies and in the Phase 1 trial with PTG-100.
−Removed: In the clinical trial, dose escalation proceeded from 100 mg up to 1,400 mg for the SAD portion and 1,000 mg for the MAD portion.
−Removed: The administration of PN-943 was well-tolerated in the Phase 1 study.
−Removed: We reported results of the SAD part of the study during the second quarter of 2019 and the MAD part of the study during the third quarter of 2019.
−Removed: The pharmacodynamic results of target engagement were supportive of the three-fold higher potency of PN-943 as compared to PTG-100 and saturation at 1000 mg.
−Removed: This is consistent with data from pre-clinical studies and confirmed by this Phase 1 pharmacodynamic data.
−Removed: We believe this links PN-943 to greater
−Removed: probability of success in a Phase 2 trial based on signs of clinical efficacy of PTG-100 in the Phase 2 PROPEL trial in UC patients.
−Removed: PN-943 Phase 2 Clinical Trial Overview
−Removed: We submitted a U.S.
−Removed: IND with the FDA for PN-943 in December 2019, which took effect in January 2020.
−Removed: During the second quarter of 2020, we initiated a global, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study called IDEAL evaluating the safety, tolerability and efficacy of PN-943 in approximately 150 patients with moderate-to-severe UC (Figure 3).
−Removed: Patient enrollment in IDEAL was completed during the first quarter of 2022, and topline data from the study, including the 12-week induction period, is expected in the second quarter of 2022.
−Removed: PN-943 Phase 2 UC Study Design
+Added: Three anti-IL-23 mAbs are in Phase 3 studies or beyond in IBD:
+Added: Tremfya®, Skyrizi® and Ely Lilly and Company’s mirikizumab.
+Added: The development of oral medicine has been an unmet need and priority in IBD.
+Added: The pan-JAK inhibitor Xeljanz® was approved in UC but not CD in 2018.
+Added: The label contains black box warnings for “an increased risk of serious heart-related events such as heart attack or stroke, cancer, blood clots, and death”.
+Added: The more selective JAK1/3 inhibitor Rinvoq® was approved in 2022 for UC and CD.
+Added: The label carries the same black box warnings.
+Added: The S1P1 modulator class of oral small molecules has also demonstrated efficacy in IBD, with Zeposia® approved in UC (but not CD) in 2021, and etrasimod completing a successful Phase 3 program in UC.
+Added: The S1P1 class is associated with immunosuppression, cardiac, pulmonary and ocular toxicities.
+Added: The development of new, potent and targeted orally delivered therapies for IBD may offer safer and more effective treatment options, alone or in combination, for moderate-to-severe IBD patients.
+Added: In addition, many clinicians continue to advocate for earlier introduction of targeted therapeutics in mild-to-moderate IBD to prevent disease progression and irreversible gastrointestinal damage.
+Added: Given that the most effective agents in IBD induce remission in no more than 30% of patients, there has been much recent interest in combination therapies to break through this “therapeutic ceiling”.
+Added: In 2022, Janssen reported results of the VEGA study, the first randomized double bind clinical trial to assess the combination of an anti-TNF (Simponi®) with and anti-IL-23 (Tremfya®) in moderate to severe UC.
+Added: In the Phase 2a proof-of-concept trial, investigators found 83.1% of patients in the treatment group achieved a clinical response and 36.6% of patients treated with the combination therapy achieved clinical remission.
+Added: The high rates of clinical response and remission are both higher than the response and remission rates of patients treated with guselkumab alone (74.6%;
+Added: 21.1%) and golimumab alone (61.1%;
+Added: Hence, the IL-23 inhibition mechanism is a potentially paradigm shifting combination strategy to improve remission rates in UC.
AN ORALLY DELIVERED IL-23R ANTAGONIST
3 unchanged sentences
and in July 2021 to, among other things, enable Janssen to independently research and develop collaboration compounds for multiple indications in the IL-23 pathway and further align our financial interests.
+Added: See Part II, “Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis – Overview” and Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.
−Removed: In October 2020, we and Janssen announced the selection of two second-generation IL23-R antagonists for advancement into clinical development, PN-232 and PN-235.
−Removed: During the fourth quarter of 2021, following a pre-specified interim analysis criteria, a portfolio decision was made by Janssen to stop further development of both PTG-200 and PN-232 in favor of advancing PN-235, based on its superior potency and overall pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile.
−Removed: A PN-235 Phase 1 study was completed in Q4 2021.
−Removed: Janssen initiated FRONTIER 1, a Phase 2b clinical study of PN-235 in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, in early 2022, and is expected to initiate a separate Phase 2 study of PN-235 in IBD in the second half of 2022 .
−Removed: Janssen is primarily responsible for the conduct of all Phase 2 trials and we were primarily responsible for the conduct of the second-generation Phase 1 studies.
−Removed: Mechanism of Action and Rationale
−Removed: IL-23 is a member of the IL-12 family of cytokines with pro-inflammatory and immune stimulatory properties.
−Removed: Cytokines are cell signaling proteins that are released by cells and affect the behavior of other cells.
−Removed: Binding of the IL-23
−Removed: ligand to the IL-23R receptor leads to an expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines involved in the mucosal autocrine cascade that is an important pathway of many inflammatory diseases, including IBD.
−Removed: Furthermore, genetic analyses of IBD patients have implicated IL-23R mutations as a risk factor associated with susceptibility to IBD.
−Removed: The infused antibody drug Stelara® (marketed for psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, UC and CD) is a p40 antagonist antibody that inhibits both the IL-23 and IL-12 pathways.
−Removed: Next-generation IBD antibody drugs, such as guselkumab, target the p19 subunit of the IL-23 ligand and are specific inhibitors of the IL-23 pathway, which is believed to be an important driver of local IBD pathology.
−Removed: IL-12 is believed to be important in immune surveillance against the development of infections and malignancies.
−Removed: We believe that our orally delivered IL-23R antagonist PN-235 may be a potent inhibitor of the IL-23 pathway for the treatment of IBD and non-IBD indications.
−Removed: By targeting IL-23R with PN-235, we believe PN-235 may restore proper immune function while minimizing the risk of systemic side effects.
−Removed: Several key cell types that reside in gut-associated lymphoid tissue (“GALT”), including T cells, innate lymphoid cells, and natural killer cells, increase their expression of IL-23R during the progression of IBD.
−Removed: Therefore, the high concentrations of PN-235 in GALT will facilitate access and binding to IL-23R expressed in the same tissue with the potential for concomitant efficacy benefits.
−Removed: First-Generation IL-23R Antagonist PTG-200
−Removed: PTG-200 was a first-generation investigational, orally delivered, IL-23R antagonist for the treatment of IBD.
−Removed: We completed a Phase 1 clinical trial of PTG-200 in Australia during the fourth quarter of 2018.
−Removed: The Phase 1 study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, SAD and MAD-escalation trial in 80 normal healthy volunteers.
−Removed: The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability.
−Removed: Secondary endpoints included the identification of the maximally tolerated dose and the evaluation of pharmacokinetic parameters.
−Removed: Results of the Phase 1 study demonstrated that administration of PTG-200 was well-tolerated.
−Removed: No serious adverse events or dose-limiting toxicities were observed.
−Removed: The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were consistent with the GI-restricted design of PTG-200.
−Removed: Janssen submitted an IND for PTG-200 in CD during the second quarter of 2019, which took effect in July 2019.
−Removed: Janssen initiated a Phase 2 clinical study of PTG-200 in CD called PRISM in the fourth quarter of 2019.
−Removed: The global, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 2 study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of oral administration of PTG-200 in 90 patients with moderate-to-severe CD.
−Removed: This study was discontinued during the fourth quarter of 2021 in favor of focusing on the development of second-generation antagonists.
−Removed: Second-Generation IL23-R Antagonist PN-235
−Removed: PN-235, an orally delivered IL-23R specific antagonist for the treatment of IBD and non-IBD indications, was discovered through our peptide technology platform.
+Added: Janssen is an experienced innovator in therapeutics targeting the IL-23 pathway.
+Added: Stelara® is a monoclonal antibody targeting IL-12 and IL-23 through their common p40 subunit is approved in psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, CD and UC.
+Added: Stelara® generated $9.1 billion in sales in 2021.
+Added: Tremfya® is a specific IL-23 monoclonal antibody.
+Added: It is approved in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, with Phase 3 study results in CD and UC expected in 2023.
+Added: Tremfya® generated $2.1 billion in sales in 2021.
+Added: In both psoriasis and IBD, there is an urgent need for safe and effective oral therapies.
+Added: It is notable that Stelara® loses patent exclusivity in 2023 with biosimilar competition expected.
+Added: JNJ-2113 (formerly known as PN-235), an orally delivered IL-23R specific antagonist for the potential treatment of psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and IBD indications, was discovered through our peptide technology platform.
IL-23, a member of the IL-12 family of pro-inflammatory cytokines, is a protein that regulates inflammatory and immune function and plays a key role in the development of IBD.
−Removed: By blocking IL-23R, we hope to improve disease symptoms while potentially minimizing the risk of systemic side effects.
−Removed: A Phase 1 study was initiated for PN-235 in December 2020.
−Removed: The Phase 1 for PN-235 study was designed to determine the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of PN-235 in 107 healthy volunteers.
+Added: By blocking IL-23R, we believe JNJ-2113 may improve disease symptoms while potentially minimizing the risk of systemic side effects.
+Added: During the fourth quarter of 2021, a portfolio decision was made by Janssen to advance development of our IL-R antagonist JNJ-2113.
+Added: For JNJ-2113,
+Added: Janssen is primarily responsible for the conduct of all further development, and we were primarily responsible for the discovery, IND-enabling studies and the initial Phase 1 study.
+Added: C linical Development of JNJ-2113
+Added: A Phase 1 study was initiated for JNJ-2113 in December 2020.
+Added: The Phase 1 study for JNJ-2113 was designed to determine the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of JNJ-2113 in 107 healthy volunteers.
The study was conducted in three parts:
3 unchanged sentences
The Phase 1 study was completed in September 2021.
−Removed: Results of the Phase 1 study demonstrated that administration of PN-235 was well-tolerated.
+Added: Results of the Phase 1 study demonstrated that administration of JNJ-2113 was well-tolerated.
No serious adverse events or dose-limiting toxicities were observed.
−Removed: The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of PN-235 were consistent with those predicted by preclinical studies.
−Removed: FRONTIER 1, a Phase 2b study in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, was initiated in early 2022, and a Phase 2 study in IBD is expected to initiate in the second half of 2022.
−Removed: Plaque p soriasis is the most common form of psoriasis, which is recognized as the most prevalent immune-mediated inflammatory disease, involving skin and joints and associated with abnormalities of other systems.
−Removed: Although the condition is not life-threatening, it is difficult to treat and response rates vary widely.
+Added: The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of JNJ-2113 were consistent with those predicted by pre-clinical studies.
+Added: FRONTIER1, a Phase 2b study in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, was initiated by Janssen in February 2022 and was completed in December 2022.
+Added: In February 2022, Janssen initiated FRONTIER1, a 255-patient Phase 2b clinical trial of JNJ-2113 in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, which was completed in December 2022.
+Added: FRONTIER1 was a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study that evaluated three once-daily dosages and two twice-daily dosages of JNJ-2113 taken orally.
+Added: The primary endpoint of the study is the proportion of patients achieving PASI-75 (a 75% improvement in skin lesions as measured by the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) at 16 weeks.
+Added: In March 2023, we announced positive topline results from the trial.
+Added: JNJ-2113 achieved the study's primary efficacy endpoint, with a statistically significant greater proportion of patients who received JNJ-2113 achieving PASI-75 responses compared to placebo at Week 16 in all five of the study’s treatment groups.
+Added: A clear dose response was observed across an eight-fold dose range.
+Added: Treatment was well tolerated, with no meaningful difference in frequency of adverse events across treatment groups versus placebo.
+Added: It is our expectation that JNJ-2113 will progress into a Phase 3 registrational study in plaque psoriasis on the strength of the FRONTIER1 data.
+Added: Advancement of JNJ-2113 into a Phase 3 study and meeting the primary endpoint in that study would qualify us for milestone payments of $50 million and $115 million, respectively.
+Added: Data will be presented from various pre-clinical and clinical studies on JNJ-2113 at medical conferences beginning in the second quarter of 2023.
+Added: Other studies of JNJ-2113 that Janssen has initiated include the SUMMIT study of JNJ-2113 for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis expected to be completed in the second quarter of 2023, and FRONTIER2, a long-term extension study.
+Added: A Phase 1 trial of an immediate release formulation of JNJ-2113 in healthy Japanese and Chinese adult participants is currently recruiting.
+Added: Following the completion of Phase 2 studies of JNJ-2113 in plaque psoriasis, we expect Janssen to initiate a separate Phase 2 trial of JNJ-2113 in a second indication.
OUR PEPTIDE TECHNOLOGY PLATFORM
7 unchanged sentences
The scaffolds identified form the basis of designing and constructing the first set of phage or chemical libraries.
−Removed: The initial hits are identified by either panning or screening such libraries, respectively.
+Added: The initial hits are identified by
+Added: either panning or screening such libraries, respectively.
When structural information is unavailable for a target, hits are identified by panning a set of 34 proprietary cluster-based phage libraries consisting of millions of constrained peptides.
4 unchanged sentences
Conjugation strategies are used to optimize the exposure of the injected peptide.
−Removed: For PN-943 and PN-235, phage display is tightly coupled to medicinal chemistry, structural biology and oral stability techniques to develop potent, selective and orally delivered molecules.
+Added: For JNJ-2113, phage display is tightly coupled to medicinal chemistry, structural biology and oral stability techniques to develop potent, selective and orally delivered molecules.
Oral stability is profiled in a series of in vitro and ex vivo assays that portray the chemical and metabolic barriers a peptide will encounter as it transits the GI and systemic compartments as needed.
10 unchanged sentences
We also intend to progress our platform to achieve systemic bioavailability and activity with oral peptides, macrocycles and peptidomimetics, thereby enabling us to address systemic diseases.
−Removed: Examples of this approach are our preclinical stage program to identify an orally active hepcidin mimetic, as was reported at the American Society for Hematology’s virtual annual meeting in December 2020, and the discovery and development of PN-235, our IL-23R antagonist in collaboration with Janssen.
−Removed: We believe the oral hepcidin mimetic will be complementary to the injectable rusfertide for offering the best treatment options for PV, HH and other potential erythropoietic and iron imbalance disorders.
+Added: Examples of this approach are our pre-clinical stage program to identify an orally active hepcidin mimetic, as was reported at the American Society for Hematology’s virtual annual meeting in December 2020, and the discovery and development of JNJ-2113, our IL-23R antagonist in collaboration with Janssen.
+Added: We believe the oral hepcidin mimetic will be complementary to the injectable rusfertide for offering the best treatment options for PV, hereditary hemochromatosis and other potential erythropoietic and iron imbalance disorders.
The biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are intensely competitive and subject to rapid and significant technological change.
While we believe that our product candidates, technology, knowledge and experience provide us with certain competitive advantages, we face competition from established and emerging pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, academic institutions, governmental agencies and public and private research institutions, among others.
−Removed: Ruxolitinib, marketed as Jakafi®, was approved in 2014 for the treatment of adults with polycythemia vera who have inadequate response to or are intolerant to HU.
+Added: Ruxolitinib, marketed as Jakafi®, was approved in 2014 for the treatment of adults with PV who have inadequate response to or are intolerant to HU.
Approximately 5,300 PV patients are treated with Jakafi® each year.
−Removed: Besremi®, a ropeginterferon alfa-2b product indicated for the treatment of adults with polycythemia vera, was approved with a black box warning in November 2021.
−Removed: Besremi is currently undergoing U.S.
−Removed: commercial launch with uncertain uptake at the present time.
−Removed: There are currently no approved orally delivered peptide-based α4β7 or IL-23R products for IBD.
−Removed: Our principal competition with similar mechanisms of action in the treatment of IBD will come from companies with injectable agents in the anti-integrin class and the anti-IL-23 class that are or will be approved by 2028, including:
−Removed: ● Takeda’s vedolizumab (Entyvio®) IV and SC;
−Removed: ● Abbvie’s risankizumab (Skyrizi®) SC (UC and CD Phase 3)
−Removed: ● Janssen’s guselkumab (Tremfya®) SC (UC and CD);
−Removed: ● Lilly’s mirikizumab (UC and CD).
+Added: Besremi®, a ropeginterferon alfa-2b product indicated for the treatment of adults with PV, was approved with a black box warning in November 2021.
+Added: We are aware of other investigational compounds under clinical development for treatment of PV, including short interfering RNA approaches aimed at modulating or increasing endogenous hepcidin levels.
+Added: In psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, competition will come from companies with approved injectable agents in the IL-17 and IL-12/23 pathway including Cosentyx®, Taltz®, Siliq®, Tremfya®, and Skyrizi®.
+Added: Bimekizumab (anti-IL-17A and F, UCB) has completed a positive Phase 3 program in psoriasis.
+Added: Otezla® (Amgen) was the first oral agent approved in both psoriasis and PsA.
+Added: The oral JAK inhibitors Xeljanz® (Pfizer) and Rinvoq® are approved in PsA but not psoriasis.
+Added: Several oral small molecules that inhibit the Janus kinase Tyk2 are advancing in development.
+Added: The Bristol Myers Squibb (“BMS”) TYK2 inhibitor, Sotyktu®, was approved for psoriasis in 2022.
+Added: Second generation allosteric TYK2 inhibitors from Nimbus Therapeutics (recently in-licensed by Takeda Pharmaceuticals) are moving into Phase 3 development, and a molecule from Ventyx Biosciences has initiated Phase 2.
+Added: Several small molecules that inhibit IL-17 have completed Phase 1 clinical development.
+Added: In IBD, competition will come from companies with injectable agents in the anti-integrin class (Entyvio®, Takeda®, approved) and the anti-IL-12/23 class that may be approved in the next several years, including Janssen’s Stelara® (approved in UC and CD), Abbvie’s risankizumab (Skyrizi®) (UC and CD Phase 3), Janssen’s guselkumab (Tremfya®) (UC and CD);
+Added: and Eli Lilly’s mirikizumab (UC and CD).
In addition, orally delivered agents with novel mechanisms of action that are approved for or in development and may be approved for UC and/or CD prior to or shortly after the launch of our product candidates can have significant impact in the competitive environment, including,
1 unchanged sentence
The pan-JAK tofacitinib (Xeljanz®) is approved in UC.
−Removed: next-generation selective JAK1/3 inhibitors, including Abbvie’s upadacitinib (Rinvoq®) (UC and CD) and Pfizer’s abrocitinib (Cibinqo®) (UC);
+Added: The next-generation selective JAK1/3 inhibitors, including Abbvie’s upadacitinib (Rinvoq®) was approved in UC and CD in 2022.
+Added: Pfizer’s selective JAK1/TEC inhibitor ritlecitinib is in Phase 2 development for UC and CD;
● S1P1 receptor modulators:
2 unchanged sentences
Morphic Therapeutics is developing MORF-057, an oral small molecule targeting α4β7 entering Phase 2 development in UC.
−Removed: Anti-IL-23 antibodies are also demonstrating positive data in IBD.
−Removed: Many other agents are in early- stage development in IBD, including injectable anti-TLIA antibodies by Pfizer and Prometheus.
−Removed: COVID-19 Business Update
−Removed: We are continuing to closely monitor the impact of the ongoing global COVID-19 pandemic on our business and have taken and continue to take proactive efforts designed to protect the health and safety of our patients, study investigators, clinical research staff and employees, and to maintain business continuity.
−Removed: Our laboratory facilities are open for research activities with heightened safety measures designed to minimize occupational exposure and reduce transmission of COVID-19 within our workplace.
−Removed: Our non-laboratory employees telecommute at least part-time.
−Removed: We have experienced relatively minor impacts on productivity overall, which were experienced primarily in as our personnel adjusted to working remotely in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.
−Removed: Enrollment in certain of our clinical studies has been adversely affected by the pandemic.
−Removed: It is possible the pandemic will have a more significant negative impact on our business in the future, depending on the depth of the effects and the duration of the crisis, including the development and spread of COVID-19 variants.
−Removed: We cannot predict whether these trends will continue or be exacerbated.
−Removed: For information regarding the current and potential impacts of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, see Item 1A Risk Factors and Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Overview” elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
+Added: Other oral small molecules targeting α4β7 from Gilead and EA Pharma are in early clinical development.
+Added: Many other agents are in early-stage development in IBD, including injectable anti-TLIA antibodies by Pfizer and Prometheus, which have both recently presented positive Phase 2 results in UC.
+Added: Both the psoriasis and IBD market will be impacted by the launch of biosimilars for Humira® and Stelara® in 2023.
Material Agreements
Janssen License and Collaboration Agreement
−Removed: On July 27, 2021, we entered into an amended and restated License and Collaboration Agreement (“Restated Agreement”) with Janssen.
−Removed: The Restated Agreement amends and restates the License and Collaboration Agreement, dated May 26, 2017, by and between us and Janssen (as amended by the First Amendment thereto, effective May 7, 2019, the “Original Agreement”).
+Added: On July 27, 2021, we entered into an amended and restated License and Collaboration Agreement (the “Restated Agreement”) with Janssen, which amended and restated the License and Collaboration Agreement effective July 13, 2017, by and between us and Janssen (the “Original Agreement”), as amended by the First Amendment thereto, effective May 7, 2019 (the “First Amendment”).
Janssen is a related party to us as Johnson & Johnson Innovation - JJDC, Inc., a significant stockholder of ours, and Janssen are both subsidiaries of Johnson & Johnson.
−Removed: The Original Agreement became effective on July 13, 2017.
Upon the effectiveness of the Original Agreement, we received a non-refundable, upfront cash payment of $50.0 million from Janssen.
Upon the effectiveness of the First Amendment in 2019, we received a $25.0 million payment from Janssen in 2019.
−Removed: We received a $5.0 million payment triggered by the successful nomination of a second-generation IL-23R antagonist development compound during the first quarter of 2020, and we received a $7.5 million payment for completion of data collection activities for the first Phase 1 clinical trial of a second-generation compound during the fourth quarter of 2021.
+Added: We received a $5.0 million payment triggered by the successful nomination of a second-generation IL-23R antagonist development compound during the first quarter of 2020, and we received a $7.5 million payment for completion of data collection
+Added: activities for the first Phase 1 clinical trial of a second-generation compound during the fourth quarter of 2021.
+Added: We received a $25.0 million payment during the second quarter of 2022 triggered by the dosing of a third patient in FRONTIER1.
+Added: See Part II, Item 7.
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis – Overview” and Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.
Research Collaboration and License Agreement with Zealand Pharma A/S
−Removed: In June 2012, we entered into a Research Collaboration and License Agreement with Zealand Pharma A/S (“Zealand”) to identify, optimize and develop novel disulfide-rich peptides to discover a hepcidin mimetic.
+Added: In June 2012, we entered into a Research Collaboration and License Agreement (the “Zealand Agreement”) with Zealand Pharma A/S (“Zealand”) to identify, optimize and develop novel disulfide-rich peptides to discover a hepcidin mimetic.
We amended this agreement on February 28, 2014, at which point Protagonist assumed responsibility for the development program.
+Added: See Part II, Item 7.
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis – Contractual Obligations and Other Commitments” and Note 7 and Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.
16 unchanged sentences
We possess substantial know-how and trade secrets relating to the discovery, development and commercialization of peptide based therapeutic products.
−Removed: Our proprietary intellectual property, including patent and non-patent intellectual property, is generally directed to, for example, peptide-based therapeutic compounds and compositions, methods of using these peptide-based therapeutic compounds and compositions to treat or prevent disease, methods of manufacturing peptide-based therapeutic compounds and compositions, and other
−Removed: proprietary technologies and processes related to our lead product development candidates.
+Added: Our proprietary intellectual property, including patent and non-patent intellectual property, is generally directed to, for example, peptide-based therapeutic compounds and compositions, methods of using these peptide-based therapeutic compounds and compositions to treat or prevent disease, methods of manufacturing peptide-based therapeutic compounds and compositions, and other proprietary technologies and processes related to our lead product development candidates.
Specific patents and patent applications are directed to compositions of α 4 β7 integrin peptides, IL-23R antagonist peptides, and hepcidin and enkephalin mimetics peptides, as well as methods of synthesizing and using these peptides to treat inflammatory disorders.
39 unchanged sentences
To date, our third-party manufacturers have met the manufacturing requirements for our product candidates.
−Removed: We expect third-party manufacturers to be capable of providing needed quantities of our product candidates to meet anticipated full-scale commercial demands, and we have selected CMOs that can manufacture our product candidates for our ongoing and planned clinical trials as well as commercial supplies.
+Added: We expect third-party manufacturers to be capable of providing supplies needed for our product candidates to meet anticipated full-scale
+Added: commercial demands, and we have selected CMOs that can manufacture our product candidates for our ongoing and planned clinical trials as well as commercial supplies.
We currently engage CMOs on a “fee for services” basis for our current development and clinical supplies.
19 unchanged sentences
Pre-clinical studies include laboratory evaluation of product chemistry, toxicity and formulation, as well as animal studies to assess potential safety and efficacy.
−Removed: An IND sponsor must submit the results of the pre-clinical tests, together with manufacturing information, analytical data and any available clinical data or literature, among other things, to the FDA as part of an IND.
+Added: These pre-clinical studies must comply with good laboratory practices (“GLP”).
+Added: An IND sponsor must submit the results of the pre-clinical tests, together with manufacturing information, analytical data and any available clinical data or literature to the FDA as part of an IND.
Some pre-clinical testing may continue even after the IND is submitted.
−Removed: An IND automatically becomes effective 30 days after receipt by the FDA, unless before that time the FDA raises concerns or questions related to one or more proposed clinical trials and places the clinical trial on a clinical hold.
−Removed: In such a case, the IND sponsor and the FDA must resolve any outstanding concerns before the clinical trial can begin.
+Added: An IND automatically becomes effective 30 days after receipt by the FDA, unless the FDA raises concerns or questions related to one or more proposed clinical trials and places the trial on a clinical hold.
+Added: In such case, the IND sponsor and the FDA must resolve any outstanding concerns before the clinical trial can begin.
As a result, submission of an IND may not result in the FDA allowing clinical trials to commence.
Clinical Trials
−Removed: Clinical trials involve the administration of the investigational new drug to human subjects under the supervision of qualified investigators in accordance with GCP requirements, which include the requirement that all research subjects provide their informed consent in writing before their participation in any clinical trial.
−Removed: Clinical trials are conducted under protocols detailing, among other things, the objectives of the trial, the parameters to be used in monitoring safety, and the effectiveness criteria to be evaluated.
−Removed: A protocol for each clinical trial and any subsequent protocol amendments must be submitted to the FDA as part of the IND (or equivalent submission ex-US).
−Removed: In addition, an IRB or ethics committee (“EC”) must review and approve the plan for any clinical trial at each institution participating in the clinical trial before it commences at that site.
−Removed: Information about certain clinical trials must be submitted within specific timeframes to the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”) for public dissemination on their www.clinicaltrials.gov website.
+Added: Clinical trials involve the administration of the investigational new drug to human subjects under the supervision of qualified investigators in accordance with GCP requirements.
+Added: GCP requirements mandate that all research subjects provide their informed consent in writing before their participation in any clinical trial.
+Added: Clinical trials are conducted under protocols detailing the objectives of the trial, the parameters to be used in monitoring safety, and the effectiveness criteria to be evaluated.
+Added: A protocol for each clinical trial and any subsequent protocol amendments must be submitted to the FDA as part of the IND (or equivalent international submission).
+Added: In addition, an IRB or ethics committee (“EC”) must review and approve the plan for any clinical trial at all institutions participating in the clinical trial before it commences at that site.
+Added: Information about certain clinical trials must be submitted within specific time frames to the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”) for public dissemination on www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Human clinical trials are typically conducted in three sequential phases, which may overlap or be combined:
−Removed: The drug is initially introduced into healthy human subjects or patients with the target disease or condition and tested for safety, dosage tolerance, absorption, metabolism, distribution, excretion and, if possible, to gain an early indication of its effectiveness.
−Removed: The drug is administered to a limited patient population to identify possible adverse effects and safety risks, to preliminarily evaluate the efficacy of the investigational drug product for specific targeted diseases and to determine dosage tolerance and optimal dosage.
−Removed: The drug is administered to an expanded patient population, generally at geographically dispersed clinical trial sites, in well-controlled clinical trials to generate enough data to statistically evaluate the efficacy and safety of the product for approval, to establish the overall risk-benefit profile of the product, and to provide adequate labeling information (labeling) for the safe and efficacious administration for the labeling of the product.
+Added: The drug is initially introduced into healthy human subjects or patients with the target disease or condition and is tested for safety, dosage tolerance, absorption, metabolism, distribution, excretion and, if possible, to gain an early indication of its effectiveness.
+Added: The drug is administered to a limited patient population to identify possible adverse effects and safety risks, and to preliminarily evaluate the efficacy of the investigational drug product for specific targeted diseases and to determine dosage tolerance and optimal dosage.
+Added: The drug is administered to an expanded patient population to establish the overall risk-benefit profile of the product, and to provide adequate labeling information (labeling) for the safe and efficacious administration for the labeling of the product.
Progress reports detailing the results of the clinical trials must be submitted at least annually to the FDA and more frequently if serious adverse events occur.
−Removed: Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical trials may not be completed successfully within any specified period, or at all.
Furthermore, the FDA or the sponsor may suspend or terminate a clinical trial at any time on various grounds, including a finding that the research subjects are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk.
1 unchanged sentence
Marketing Approval
−Removed: Assuming successful completion of the required clinical testing, the results of the pre-clinical and clinical studies, together with detailed information relating to the product’s chemistry, manufacture, controls and proposed labeling, among other things, are submitted to the FDA as part of an NDA requesting approval to market the product for one or more indications.
−Removed: In most cases, the submission of an NDA is subject to a substantial application user fee.
−Removed: Under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (“PDUFA”) guidelines that are currently in effect, the FDA has a goal of ten months from the date of “filing” of a standard NDA for a new molecular entity to review and act on the submission.
−Removed: This review typically takes twelve months from the date the NDA is submitted to FDA because the FDA has approximately two months to make a “filing” decision.
−Removed: In addition, under the Pediatric Research Equity Act of 2003 (“PREA”), as amended and reauthorized, certain NDAs or supplements to an NDA must contain data that are adequate to assess the safety and effectiveness of the drug for the claimed indications in all relevant pediatric subpopulations, and to support dosing and administration for each pediatric subpopulation for which the product is safe and effective.
+Added: Following successful completion of the required clinical testing, the results of the pre-clinical and clinical studies, together with detailed information relating to the product’s chemistry, manufacture, controls and proposed labeling, among other information, are submitted to the FDA as part of an NDA requesting approval to market the product for one or more indications.
+Added: In most cases, the submission of an NDA is subject to an application user fee.
+Added: Prescription Drug User Fee Act (“PDUFA”) guidelines, the FDA has a target of ten months from the date of “filing” of a standard NDA for a new molecular entity to review and act on the submission.
+Added: This review typically takes twelve months from the date the NDA is submitted to FDA.
+Added: In addition, under the Pediatric Research Equity Act of 2003 (“PREA”) certain NDAs or supplements to an NDA must contain data that are adequate to assess the safety and effectiveness of the drug for the claimed indications in all relevant pediatric subpopulations, and to support dosing and administration for each pediatric subpopulation for which the product is safe and effective.
The FDA may, on its own initiative or at the request of the applicant, grant deferrals for submission of some or all pediatric data until after approval of the product for use in adults, or full or partial waivers from the pediatric data requirements.
The FDA also may require submission of a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (“REMS”) plan to ensure that the benefits of the drug outweigh its risks.
−Removed: The REMS plan could include medication guides, physician communication plans, assessment plans, and/or elements to assure safe use, such as restricted distribution methods, patient registries, or other risk minimization tools.
+Added: REMS plans typically include medication guides, physician communication plans, assessment plans, and/or elements to assure safe use, such as restricted distribution methods, patient registries, or other risk minimization tools.
The FDA conducts a preliminary review of all NDAs within the first 60 days after submission, before accepting them for filing, to determine whether they are sufficiently complete to permit substantive review.
The FDA may request additional information rather than accept an NDA for filing.
−Removed: In this event, the application must be resubmitted with the additional information.
+Added: In this event, the application must be resubmitted with the requested information.
The resubmitted application is also subject to review before the FDA accepts it for filing.
−Removed: Once the submission is accepted for filing, the FDA begins an in-depth substantive review.
−Removed: The FDA reviews an NDA to determine, among other things, whether the drug is safe and effective and whether the facility in which it is manufactured, processed, packaged or held meets standards designed to assure the product’s continued safety, quality and purity.
+Added: After the submission is accepted for filing, the FDA begins a substantive review.
+Added: The FDA reviews an NDA to determine whether the drug is safe and effective and whether the facility in which it is manufactured, processed, packaged or held meets standards designed to assure the product’s continued safety, quality and purity.
The FDA may refer an application for a novel drug to an advisory committee.
4 unchanged sentences
Additionally, before approving an NDA, the FDA may inspect one or more clinical trial sites to assure compliance with GCP requirements.
−Removed: After evaluating the NDA and all related information, including the advisory committee recommendation, if any, and inspection reports regarding the manufacturing facilities and clinical trial sites, the FDA may issue an approval
−Removed: letter, or, in some cases, a complete response letter.
−Removed: A complete response letter generally contains a statement of specific conditions that must be met in order to secure final approval of the NDA and may require additional clinical or pre-clinical testing in order for FDA to reconsider the application.
−Removed: Even with submission of this additional information, the FDA ultimately may decide that the application does not satisfy the regulatory criteria for approval.
+Added: After evaluating the NDA and all related information, including the advisory committee recommendation, if any, and inspection reports regarding the manufacturing facilities and clinical trial sites, the FDA may issue an approval letter or a complete response letter.
+Added: A complete response letter generally contains a statement of specific conditions that must be met in order to secure final approval of the NDA and may require additional clinical or pre-clinical testing for the FDA to reconsider the application.
+Added: Even after submission of this additional information, the FDA may decide that the application does not satisfy the regulatory criteria for approval.
If and when those conditions have been met to the FDA’s satisfaction, the FDA will typically issue an approval letter.
An approval letter authorizes commercial marketing of the drug with specific prescribing information for specific indications.
−Removed: Even if the FDA approves a product, it may limit the approved indications for use of the product, require that contraindications, warnings or precautions be included in the product labeling, require that post-approval studies, including Phase 4 clinical trials, be conducted to further assess a drug’s safety after approval, require testing and surveillance programs to monitor the product after commercialization, or impose other conditions, including distribution and use restrictions or other risk management mechanisms under a REMS, which can materially affect the potential market and profitability of the product.
+Added: Even if the FDA approves a product, it may limit the approved indications for use of the product.
+Added: It may also require that contraindications, warnings or precautions be included in the product labeling or require that post-approval studies, including Phase 4 clinical trials, be conducted to further assess a drug’s safety after approval.
+Added: In addition, the FDA may mandate testing and surveillance programs to monitor the product after commercialization, or impose other conditions, including distribution and use restrictions or other risk management mechanisms under a REMS.
+Added: This can materially affect the potential market and profitability of the product.
The FDA may prevent or limit further marketing of a product based on the results of post-marketing studies or surveillance programs.
−Removed: After approval, some types of changes to the approved product, such as adding new indications, manufacturing changes and additional labeling claims, are subject to further testing requirements and FDA review and approval.
+Added: After approval, some types of
+Added: alterations, such as adding new indications, manufacturing changes and additional labeling claims, are subject to further testing requirements and FDA review and approval.
Fast Track Designation
−Removed: The FDA has various programs, including fast track designation, which are intended to expedite or simplify the process for the development and FDA review of drugs that are intended for the treatment of serious or life threatening diseases or conditions and demonstrate the potential to address unmet medical needs.
−Removed: The purpose of these programs is to provide important new drugs to patients earlier than under standard FDA review procedures.
−Removed: Under the fast track program, the sponsor of a new drug candidate may request that the FDA designate the drug candidate for a specific indication as a fast track drug concurrent with, or after, the filing of the IND for the drug candidate.
+Added: The FDA has various programs, such as fast track designation.
+Added: These programs are intended to expedite or simplify the process for the development and FDA review of drugs for the treatment of serious or life threatening diseases or conditions and demonstrate the potential to address unmet medical needs.
+Added: The purpose of these programs is to provide important new drugs to patients faster.
+Added: The sponsor of a new drug may request fast track designation concurrent with, or after, the filing of the IND.
To be eligible for a fast track designation, the FDA must determine, based on the request of a sponsor, that a product is intended to treat a serious or life threatening disease or condition and demonstrates the potential to address an unmet medical need.
−Removed: The FDA will determine that a product will fill an unmet medical need if it will provide a therapy where none exists or provide a therapy that may be potentially superior to existing therapy based on efficacy or safety factors.
+Added: A product will fill an unmet medical need if it will provide a therapy where none exists or provide a therapy that may be potentially superior to existing therapy based on efficacy or safety.
Fast track designation provides additional opportunities for interaction with the FDA’s review team and may allow for rolling review of NDA components before the completed application is submitted, if the sponsor provides a schedule for the submission of the sections of the NDA, the FDA agrees to accept sections of the NDA and determines that the schedule is acceptable, and the sponsor pays any required user fees upon submission of the first section of the NDA.
−Removed: However, the FDA’s time period goal for reviewing an application does not begin until the last section of the NDA is submitted.
+Added: However, the FDA’s time goal for reviewing an application does not begin until the last section of the NDA is submitted.
The FDA may decide to rescind the fast track designation if it determines that the qualifying criteria no longer apply.
−Removed: Breakthrough Therapy Designation
−Removed: A sponsor can request designation of a drug candidate as a “breakthrough therapy.” A breakthrough therapy is defined as a drug that is intended, alone or in combination with one or more other drugs, to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition, and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the drug may demonstrate substantial improvement over existing therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints, such as substantial treatment effects observed early in clinical development.
−Removed: Drugs designated as breakthrough therapies are also eligible for accelerated approval and priority review.
−Removed: The FDA must take certain actions, such as holding timely meetings and providing advice, intended to expedite the development and review of an application for approval of a breakthrough therapy.
−Removed: The FDA may decide to rescind the breakthrough designation if it determines that the qualifying criteria no longer apply.
Orphan Designation
−Removed: The FDA may grant orphan designation to drugs or biologics intended to treat a rare disease or condition that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States, or if it affects more than 200,000 individuals in the United States, and there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing and marketing the product for this type of disease or condition will be recovered from sales in the United States.
−Removed: Orphan designation must be requested before
−Removed: submitting an NDA or BLA.
+Added: The FDA may grant orphan designation to drugs or biologics intended to treat a rare disease or condition that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States.
+Added: The FDA may also grant the designation if the disease affects more than 200,000 individuals in the United States, and there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing and marketing the product for this type of disease or condition will be recovered from sales in the United States.
+Added: Orphan designation must be requested before submitting an NDA or BLA.
After the FDA grants orphan designation, the identity of the therapeutic agent and its potential orphan use are disclosed publicly by the FDA.
1 unchanged sentence
In the United States, orphan designation entitles a party to financial incentives such as opportunities for grant funding towards clinical trial costs, tax advantages and user-fee waivers.
−Removed: In addition, if a product receives the first FDA approval for the indication for which it has orphan designation, the product is entitled to orphan exclusivity, which means the FDA may not approve any other application to market the same product for the same indication for a period of seven years, except in limited circumstances, such as a showing of clinical superiority over the product with orphan exclusivity or where the manufacturer with orphan exclusivity is unable to assure sufficient quantities of the approved orphan designated product.
+Added: In addition, if a product receives the first FDA approval for the indication for which it has orphan designation, the product is entitled to orphan exclusivity, which means the FDA may not approve any other application to market the same product for the same indication for a period of seven years, except in limited circumstances.
+Added: Such circumstances include a showing of clinical superiority over the product with orphan exclusivity or where the manufacturer with orphan exclusivity is unable to assure sufficient quantities of the approved orphan designated product.
Competitors, however, may receive approval of different products for the indication for which the orphan product has exclusivity or obtain approval for the same product but for a different indication for which the orphan product has exclusivity.
1 unchanged sentence
If a drug or biological product designated as an orphan product receives marketing approval for an indication broader than what is designated, it may not be entitled to orphan product exclusivity.
+Added: Breakthrough Therapy Designation
+Added: A sponsor can request designation of a drug candidate as a “breakthrough therapy.” A breakthrough therapy is defined as a drug that is intended, alone or in combination with one or more other drugs, to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition, and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the drug may demonstrate substantial improvement over existing therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints, such as substantial treatment effects observed early in clinical development.
+Added: Drugs designated as breakthrough therapies are also eligible for accelerated
+Added: approval and priority review.
+Added: The FDA must take certain actions, such as holding timely meetings and providing advice, intended to expedite the development and review of an application for approval of a breakthrough therapy.
+Added: The FDA may decide to rescind the breakthrough designation if it determines that the qualifying criteria no longer apply.
Post-Approval Requirements
−Removed: Drugs manufactured or distributed pursuant to FDA approvals are subject to pervasive and continuing regulation by the FDA, including, among other things, requirements relating to recordkeeping, periodic reporting, product sampling and distribution, advertising and promotion and reporting of adverse experiences with the product.
−Removed: After approval, most changes to the approved product, such as adding new indications or other labeling claims, are subject to prior FDA review and approval.
+Added: Drugs manufactured or distributed pursuant to FDA approvals are subject to pervasive and continuing regulation by the FDA.
+Added: These regulations include requirements relating to recordkeeping, periodic reporting, product sampling and distribution, advertising and promotion and reporting of adverse experiences with the product.
+Added: After approval, most changes to the approved product, such as adding new indications or other labeling claims, are subject to FDA review and approval.
There also are continuing, annual program user fee requirements for any marketed products.
1 unchanged sentence
For example, the FDA may require post-marketing testing, including Phase 4 clinical trials, and surveillance to further assess and monitor the product’s safety and effectiveness after commercialization.
−Removed: In addition, drug manufacturers and other entities involved in the manufacture and distribution of approved drugs are required to register their establishments with the FDA and state agencies and are subject to periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA and these state agencies for compliance with cGMP requirements.
+Added: In addition, drug manufacturers and other entities involved in the manufacture and distribution of approved drugs are required to register their establishments with the FDA and state agencies.
+Added: They are subject to periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA and state agencies for compliance with cGMP requirements.
Changes to the manufacturing process are strictly regulated and often require prior FDA approval before being implemented.
−Removed: FDA regulations also require investigation and correction of any deviations from cGMP requirements and impose reporting and documentation requirements upon the sponsor and any third-party manufacturers that the sponsor may decide to use.
+Added: FDA regulations require investigation and correction of any deviations from cGMP requirements and impose reporting and documentation requirements upon the sponsor and any third-party manufacturers.
Accordingly, manufacturers must continue to expend time, money, and effort in the area of production and quality control to maintain cGMP compliance.
Once an approval is granted, the FDA may withdraw the approval if compliance with regulatory requirements and standards is not maintained or if problems occur after the product reaches the market.
−Removed: Later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or with manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in mandatory revisions to the approved labeling to add new safety information;
−Removed: imposition of post-market studies or clinical trials to assess new safety risks;
−Removed: or imposition of distribution or other restrictions under an REMS program.
−Removed: Other potential consequences include, among other things:
+Added: Later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product, including adverse side effects of unanticipated severity or frequency, problems with manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in mandatory revisions to the approved labeling to add new safety information, imposition of post-market studies or clinical trials to assess new safety risks, or imposition of distribution or other restrictions under an REMS program.
+Added: Other potential consequences include:
● restrictions on the marketing or manufacturing of the product, complete withdrawal of the product from the market or product recalls;
5 unchanged sentences
Drugs may be promoted only for the approved indications and in accordance with the provisions of the approved prescribing information.
−Removed: The FDA and other agencies actively enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses, and a company that is found to have improperly promoted off-label uses may be subject to significant liability.
+Added: The FDA and other agencies enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses, and a company that is found to have improperly promoted off-label uses may be subject to significant liability.
Coverage and Reimbursement
Sales of our product candidates, if approved, will depend, in part, on the extent to which the cost of such products will be covered and adequately reimbursed by third-party payors, such as government healthcare programs, commercial insurance and managed health care organizations.
−Removed: These third-party payors are increasingly limiting coverage and/or reducing reimbursements for medical products and services by challenging the prices and examining the medical necessity and cost-effectiveness of medical products and services, in addition to their safety and efficacy.
+Added: These third-party payors are increasingly limiting coverage and reducing reimbursements for medical products and services by challenging the prices and examining the medical necessity and cost-effectiveness of medical products and services, in addition to their safety and efficacy.
If these third-party payors do not consider our products to be cost-effective compared to other therapies, they may not cover our products after approval as a benefit under their plans or, if they do, the level of payment may not be sufficient to allow us to sell our products on a profitable basis.
1 unchanged sentence
Therefore, coverage and reimbursement for drug products can differ significantly from payor to payor.
−Removed: The coverage determination process can be a time-consuming and costly process that may require us to provide scientific and clinical support for the use of our products to each payor separately, with no assurance that coverage and adequate reimbursement will be obtained or applied consistently.
−Removed: Even if reimbursement is provided, market acceptance of our products may be adversely affected if the amount of payment for our products proves to be unprofitable for health care providers or less profitable than alternative treatments, or if administrative burdens make our products less desirable to use.
+Added: Coverage determination can be a time-consuming and costly process that may require us to provide scientific and clinical support for the use of our products to each payor separately, with no assurance that coverage and adequate reimbursement will be obtained or applied consistently.
+Added: Even if reimbursement is provided, market acceptance of our products may be adversely affected if the amount of payment for our products proves to be unprofitable for health care providers or less profitable than alternative treatments, or due to administrative burdens.
In addition, the U.S.
1 unchanged sentence
Adoption of price controls and cost-containment measures, and adoption of more restrictive policies in jurisdictions with existing controls and measures, could further limit our net revenue and results.
−Removed: Decreases in third-party reimbursement for our product candidates or a decision by a third-party payor to not cover our product candidates could reduce physician usage of our products candidates, once approved, and have a material adverse effect on our sales, results of operations and financial condition.
+Added: Decreases in third-party reimbursement for our product candidates or a decision by a third-party payor to not cover our product candidates could reduce physician usage of our products candidates, once approved, and have a material adverse effect on our sales.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, collectively referred to as the ACA, enacted in March 2010, has had and is expected to continue to have a significant impact on the health care industry.
−Removed: The ACA, among other things, imposes a significant annual fee on certain companies that manufacture or import branded prescription drug products.
+Added: The ACA imposes a significant annual fee on certain companies that manufacture or import branded prescription drug products.
The ACA also increased the Medicaid rebate rate and expanded the rebate program to include Medicaid managed care organizations.
−Removed: It also contains substantial new provisions intended to broaden access to health insurance, reduce or constrain the growth of health care spending, enhance remedies against health care fraud and abuse, add new transparency requirements for the health care industry, impose new taxes and fees on pharmaceutical manufacturers, and impose additional health policy reforms, any or all of which may affect our business.
+Added: It also contains substantial new provisions intended to broaden access to health insurance, reduce the growth of health care spending, enhance remedies against health care fraud and abuse, add new transparency requirements for the health care industry, impose new taxes and fees on pharmaceutical manufacturers, and impose additional health policy reforms, any or all of which may affect our business.
There have been executive, judicial and Congressional challenges to certain aspects of the ACA.
−Removed: For example, President Trump signed several Executive Orders and other directives designed to delay the implementation of certain requirements mandated by the ACA or otherwise circumvent some of the requirements for health insurance mandated by the ACA.
+Added: For example, President Trump signed several Executive Orders and other directives designed to delay the implementation of certain ACA requirements or otherwise circumvent some of the health insurance mandates.
Concurrently, Congress considered legislation to repeal or repeal and replace all or part of the ACA.
While Congress has not passed comprehensive repeal legislation, several bills affecting the implementation of certain taxes under the ACA have been enacted.
−Removed: The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, or the Tax Act, included a provision repealing,
−Removed: effective January 1, 2019, the tax-based shared responsibility payment imposed by the ACA on certain individuals who fail to maintain qualifying health coverage for all or part of a year.
−Removed: Additionally, the 2020 federal spending package permanently eliminated, effective January 1, 2020, the ACA-mandated “Cadillac” tax on high-cost employer-sponsored health coverage and the medical device tax and, effective January 1, 2021, also eliminated the health insurance tax.
−Removed: Further, the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, or the BBA, among other things, amends the ACA, effective January 1, 2019, to close the coverage gap in most Medicare drug plans, commonly referred to as the “donut hole”, and increase from 50% to 70% the point-of-sale discount that is owed by pharmaceutical manufacturers who participate in the Medicare Part D program.
+Added: The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, or the Tax Act, included a provision repealing, effective January 1, 2019, the tax-based shared responsibility payment imposed by the ACA on some individuals who do not maintain qualifying health coverage for all or part of a year.
+Added: Additionally, the 2020 federal spending package permanently eliminated, effective January 1, 2020, the ACA-mandated “Cadillac” tax on high-cost employer-sponsored health coverage and the medical device tax, and also eliminated the health insurance tax.
+Added: The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 amends the ACA to close the coverage gap in most Medicare drug plans, commonly referred to as the “donut hole”, and increase from 50% to 70% the point-of-sale discount that is owed by pharmaceutical manufacturers who participate in the Medicare Part D program.
+Added: The IRA, enacted August 16, 2022, aims to control prescription drug prices in the upcoming years.
+Added: The IRA will allow the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) to cap out-of-pocket costs in 2025 and to negotiate prescription drug prices in 2026 for the first time.
+Added: Additionally, the IRA provides a new “inflation rebate” covering Medicare patients to take effect in 2023 to prevent rapid and arbitrary price increases in prescription drugs.
These and any other legislation or healthcare reform measures of the Biden administration may impact the ACA and our business.
−Removed: There may also be further challenges to the ACA, and new laws may also result in additional reductions in Medicare and other health care funding.
+Added: There may also be
+Added: further challenges to the ACA, and new laws may also result in additional reductions in Medicare and other health care funding.
Further, there has been heightened governmental scrutiny over the manner in which manufacturers set prices for their marketed products.
−Removed: Such scrutiny has resulted in several recent Congressional inquiries and proposed and enacted federal and state legislation designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to product pricing, review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient programs, and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for products.
−Removed: At the federal level, the Trump administration used several means to propose or implement drug pricing reform, including through federal budget proposals, executive orders and policy initiatives.
+Added: This scrutiny has resulted in several Congressional inquiries and proposed and enacted federal and state legislation designed to bring more transparency to product pricing, review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient programs, and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for products.
+Added: At the federal level, the Trump administration implemented drug pricing reform through federal budget proposals, executive orders and policy initiatives.
For example, on July 24, 2020 and September 13, 2020, the Trump administration announced several executive orders related to prescription drug pricing that attempt to implement several of the administration’s proposals The FDA also released a final rule, effective November 30, 2020, implementing a portion of the importation executive order providing guidance for states to build and submit importation plans for drugs from Canada.
Further, on November 20, 2020, HHS finalized a regulation removing safe harbor protection for price reductions from pharmaceutical manufacturers to plan sponsors under Part D, either directly or through pharmacy benefit managers, unless the price reduction is required by law.
−Removed: The implementation of the rule has been delayed by the Biden administration from January 1, 2022 to January 1, 2023 in response to ongoing litigation.
−Removed: The rule also creates a new safe harbor for price reductions reflected at the point-of-sale, as well as a new safe harbor for certain fixed fee arrangements between pharmacy benefit managers and manufacturers.
−Removed: On November 20, 2020, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) issued an interim final rule implementing President Trump’s Most Favored Nation executive order, which would tie Medicare Part B payments for certain physician-administered drugs to the lowest price paid in other economically advanced countries, effective January 1, 2021.
−Removed: On December 28, 2020, the United States District Court in Northern California issued a nationwide preliminary injunction against implementation of the interim final rule, and in August 2021, the Biden administration issued an interim rule that would rescind the most favored nation drug pricing rule.
−Removed: At the state level, legislatures have become increasingly aggressive in passing legislation and implementing regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing.
−Removed: We expect that additional state and federal healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, particularly in light of the new presidential administration, any of which could limit the amounts that federal and state governments will pay for healthcare therapies.
+Added: The implementation of the rule was delayed by the Biden administration from January 1, 2022 to January 1, 2023 in response to ongoing litigation.
+Added: The rule also creates a safe harbor for price reductions reflected at the point-of-sale, as well as a safe harbor for certain fixed fee arrangements between pharmacy benefit managers and manufacturers.
+Added: Federal and state legislatures have become increasingly aggressive in passing legislation and implementing regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing.
+Added: We expect that additional state and federal healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, any of which could limit the amounts that federal and state governments will pay for healthcare therapies.
Further, it is possible that additional governmental action is taken in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
−Removed: It is uncertain whether and how future legislation, whether domestic or foreign, could affect prospects for our product candidates or what actions foreign, federal, state, or private payors for health care treatment and services may take in response to any such health care reform proposals or legislation.
+Added: It is uncertain whether and how future legislation, whether domestic or foreign, could affect prospects for our product candidates or what actions payors for health care treatment and services may take in response to such health care reform proposals or legislation.
Adoption of price controls and other cost-containment measures, and adoption of more restrictive policies in jurisdictions with existing controls and measures reforms may prevent or limit our ability to generate revenue, attain profitability or commercialize our product candidates.
Other Health Care Laws and Compliance Requirements
−Removed: We will also be subject to health care regulation and enforcement by the federal government and the states and foreign governments in which we will conduct our business once our products are approved.
−Removed: The laws that may affect
−Removed: our ability to operate include, but are not limited to, the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, which governs the conduct of certain electronic health care transactions and protects the security and privacy of protected health information;
+Added: We will also be subject to health care regulation and enforcement by the federal and state government and foreign governments in which we will conduct our business once our products are approved.
+Added: The laws that may affect our ability to operate include the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, which governs the conduct of certain electronic health care transactions and protects the security and privacy of protected health information;
the criminal health care fraud statutes under HIPAA also prohibits persons and entities from knowingly and willfully executing a scheme to defraud any health care benefit program, including private payors, or knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement in connection with the delivery of or payment for health care benefits, items or services;
−Removed: the federal health care programs’ Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things, persons from knowingly and willfully soliciting, receiving, offering or paying remuneration, directly or indirectly, in exchange for or to induce either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase, order or recommendation of, any good or service for which payment may be made under federal health care programs such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs;
−Removed: federal false claims laws and civil monetary penalties laws that prohibit, among other things, any person or entity from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, a false claim for payment to the federal government, or knowingly making, or causing to be made, a false statement to have a false claim paid;
−Removed: and the Physician Payments Sunshine Act, which requires certain manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics, and medical supplies for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid, or Children’s Health Insurance Program to report annually to the HHS information related to payments and other transfers of value made to physicians (defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and chiropractors) and teaching hospitals, and ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members and, beginning in 2022, applicable manufacturers also will be required to report such information regarding payments and transfers of value provided during the previous year to physician assistants, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, anesthesiologist assistants, certified nurse anesthetists and certified nurse-midwives.
−Removed: The majority of states also have statutes or regulations similar to the aforementioned federal anti-kickback and false claims laws, which apply to items and services reimbursed under Medicaid and other state programs, or, in several states, apply regardless of the payor.
+Added: the Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits persons from knowingly and willfully soliciting, receiving, offering or paying remuneration, directly or indirectly, in exchange for or to induce either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase, order or recommendation of, any good or service for which payment may be made under federal health care programs such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs;
+Added: federal false claims laws and civil monetary penalties laws that prohibit any person or entity from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, a false claim for payment to the federal government, or knowingly making, or causing to be made, a false statement to have a false claim paid;
+Added: and the Physician Payments Sunshine Act, which requires certain manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics, and medical supplies for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid, or Children’s Health Insurance Program to report annually to the HHS information related to
+Added: payments and other transfers of value made to various healthcare professionals including physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners and teaching hospitals, and ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members.
+Added: The majority of states also have statutes or regulations similar to the federal anti-kickback and false claims laws, which apply to items and services reimbursed under Medicaid and other state programs, or, in several states, apply regardless of the payor.
We may be subject to state laws governing the privacy and security of health information in certain circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and often are not preempted by HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts.
2 unchanged sentences
Because of the breadth of these laws and the narrowness of available statutory and regulatory exceptions, it is possible that some of our business activities could be subject to challenge under one or more of such laws.
−Removed: If we or our operations are found to be in violation of any of the laws described above or any other governmental regulations that apply to us, we may be subject to penalties, including significant administrative, civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines, imprisonment, disgorgement, additional reporting requirements and oversight if we become subject to a corporate integrity agreement or similar agreement to resolve allegations of non-compliance with these laws, exclusion of products from reimbursement under U.S.
+Added: If we are found to be in violation of any of the laws described above or any other governmental regulations that apply to us, we may be subject to penalties, including significant administrative, civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines, imprisonment, disgorgement, additional reporting requirements and oversight if we become subject to a corporate integrity agreement or similar agreement to resolve allegations of non-compliance with these laws, exclusion of products from reimbursement under U.S.
federal or state health care programs, and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations.
Government Regulation Outside of the United States
−Removed: In addition to regulations in the United States, we will be subject to a variety of regulations in other jurisdictions governing, among other things, clinical studies and any commercial sales and distribution of our products.
−Removed: Whether or not we obtain FDA approval for a product, we must obtain the requisite approvals from regulatory authorities in foreign countries prior to the commencement of clinical studies or marketing of the product in those countries.
−Removed: Certain countries outside of the United States have a similar process that requires the submission and approval of a clinical trial application much like the IND but specific to a clinical trial prior to the commencement of the human clinical study.
−Removed: The requirements and process governing the conduct of clinical studies, the protection of personal data, product licensing, pricing and reimbursement vary from country to country.
−Removed: If we fail to comply with applicable foreign
−Removed: regulatory requirements, we may be subject to, among other things, fines, suspension or withdrawal of regulatory approvals, product recalls, seizure of products, operating restrictions and criminal prosecution.
+Added: In addition to regulations in the United States, we will be subject to a variety of regulations in other jurisdictions governing clinical studies and any commercial sales and distribution of our products.
+Added: Drug and Biologic Development Process in the European Union (“EU”)
+Added: All clinical trials included in applications for marketing authorization for human medicines in the EU must be carried out in accordance with EU regulations.
+Added: This means that such clinical trials must comply with EU clinical trial legislation, as well as ethical principles equivalent to those set out in the EEA, including adhering to international good clinical practice and the Declaration of Helsinki.
+Added: The conduct of clinical trials in the EU is governed by the EU Clinical Trials Regulation (EU) No.
+Added: 536/2014 (“CTR”) which entered into force on January 31, 2022.
+Added: Under the CTR, a sponsor may submit a single application for approval of a clinical trial through a centralized EU clinical trials portal.
+Added: One national regulatory authority (the reporting EU Member State proposed by the applicant) will take the lead in validating and evaluating the application consult and coordinate with the other concerned Member States.
+Added: If an application is rejected, it may be amended and resubmitted through the EU clinical trials portal.
+Added: If an approval is issued, the sponsor may start the clinical trial in all concerned Member States.
+Added: However, a concerned EU Member State may in limited circumstances declare an “opt-out” from an approval and prevent the clinical trial from being conducted in such Member State.
+Added: The CTR also aims to streamline and simplify the rules on safety reporting, and introduces enhanced transparency requirements such as mandatory submission of a summary of the clinical trial results to the EU Database.
+Added: National laws, regulations, and the applicable GCP and Good Laboratory Practice standards must also be respected during the conduct of the trials, including the International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (“ICH”) guidelines on Good Clinical Practice and the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki.
+Added: Drug Marketing Authorization
+Added: In the EU and in Iceland, Norway and Liechtenstein (together, the European Economic Area or “EEA”), after completion of all required clinical testing, pharmaceutical products may only be placed on the market after obtaining a Marketing Authorization (“MA”).
+Added: To obtain an MA of a drug under EU regulatory systems, an applicant can submit a Marketing Authorization Application (“MAA”) through, amongst others, a centralized or decentralized procedure.
+Added: The centralized procedure provides for the grant of a single MA that is issued by the European Commission (“EC”) following the scientific assessment of the application by the EMA that is valid for all EU Member States as well as in the three additional EEA Member States.
+Added: The centralized procedure is compulsory for specific medicinal products, including for medicines developed by means of certain biotechnological processes, products designated as orphan medicinal products, advanced therapy medicinal products (“ATMP”) and medicinal products with a new active substance indicated for the treatment of certain diseases (AIDS, cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, diabetes, autoimmune and viral diseases).
+Added: For medicinal products containing a new active substance not yet authorized in the EEA before May 20, 2004 and indicated for the treatment of other diseases, medicinal products that constitute significant therapeutic, scientific or technical innovations or for which the grant of a MA through the centralized procedure would be in the interest of public health at EU level, an applicant may voluntarily submit an application for a marketing authorization through the centralized procedure.
+Added: Under the centralized procedure, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (“CHMP”), established at the EMA, is responsible for conducting the initial assessment of a drug.
+Added: The timeframe for the evaluation of an MAA by the CHMP is, in principle, 210 days from receipt of a valid MAA.
+Added: However, this timeline excludes clock stops, when additional written or oral information is to be provided by the applicant in response to questions asked by the CHMP, so the overall process typically takes a year or more, unless the application is eligible for an accelerated assessment.
+Added: Accelerated evaluation might be granted by the CHMP in exceptional cases, when a medicinal product is expected to be of a major public health interest, particularly from the point of view of therapeutic innovation.
+Added: Upon request, the CHMP can reduce the time frame to 150 days if the applicant provides sufficient justification for an accelerated assessment.
+Added: The CHMP will provide a positive opinion regarding the application only if it meets certain quality, safety and efficacy requirements.
+Added: This opinion is then transmitted to the EC, which has the ultimate authority for granting MA within 67 days after receipt of the CHMP opinion.
+Added: Medicines that fall outside the mandatory scope of the centralized procedure have three routes to authorization:
+Added: (i) they can be authorized under the centralized procedure if they concern a significant therapeutic, scientific or technical innovation, or if their authorization would be in the interest of public health;
+Added: (ii) they can be authorized under a decentralized procedure where an applicant applies for simultaneous authorization in more than one EU Member State;
+Added: or (iii) they can be authorized in an EU Member State in accordance with that state’s national procedures and then be authorized in other EU countries by a procedure whereby the countries concerned agree to recognize the validity of the original, national marketing authorization (mutual recognition procedure).
+Added: The decentralized procedure permits companies to file identical MA applications for a medicinal product to the competent authorities in various EU Member States simultaneously if such medicinal product has not received marketing approval in any EU Member State before.
+Added: The competent authority of a single EU Member State, known as the reference EU Member State, is appointed to review the application and provide an assessment report.
+Added: Under this procedure, an applicant submits an application based on identical dossiers and related materials, including a draft summary of product characteristics, and draft labeling and package leaflet, to the reference EU Member State and concerned EU Member States.
+Added: The reference EU Member State prepares a draft assessment report and drafts of the related materials within 120 days after receipt of a valid application.
+Added: Subsequently, each concerned EU Member State must decide whether to approve the assessment report and related materials.
+Added: If an EU Member State cannot approve the assessment report and related materials on the grounds of potential serious risk to public health, the disputed points are subject to a dispute resolution mechanism and may eventually be referred to the EC, whose decision is binding for all EU Member States.
+Added: All new MAAs must include a Risk Management Plan (“RMP”), describing the risk management system that the company will put in place and documenting measures to prevent or minimize the risks associated with the product.
+Added: RMPs are continually modified and updated throughout the lifetime of the medicine as new information becomes available.
+Added: The regulatory authorities may also impose specific obligations as a condition of the MA.
+Added: Marketing Authorizations have an initial duration of five years.
+Added: After these five years, the authorization may subsequently be renewed on the basis of a reevaluation of the risk-benefit balance.
+Added: Once renewed, the MA is valid for an unlimited period unless the EC or the national competent authority decides, on justified grounds relating to pharmacovigilance, to proceed with only one additional five-year renewal.
+Added: Applications for renewal must be made to the EMA at least nine months before the five-year period expires.
+Added: European Data Protection Laws
+Added: The collection and use of personal health data and other personal data in the EU is governed by the provisions of the European General Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (“GDPR”).
+Added: The GDPR imposes strict requirements on the processing of personal data, including the legal basis for the processing, the information that has to be provided to individuals before their data is processed, notification obligations to national data protection authorities, and the technical and organization measures to ensure the security and confidentiality of the personal data.
+Added: EU Member States may also have additional requirements for health, genetic, and biometric data through their national legislation.
+Added: The GDPR also imposes restrictions on the transfer of personal data to countries outside of the EU that do not provide an adequate level of data protection.
+Added: To enable such transfers, appropriate safeguards, such as standard contractual clauses (“SCCs”), must be in place.
+Added: Environmental, Social, Governance and Human Capital Disclosures
+Added: Governance and Leadership
+Added: Our commitment to integrating sustainability across our organization begins with our board of directors, which has oversight of strategy and risk management related to Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”).
+Added: Business Ethics
+Added: We are committed to creating an environment where we are able to excel in our business while maintaining the highest standards of business conduct and ethics.
+Added: Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (“Code of Conduct”) reflects the business practices and principles of behavior that supports this commitment, including our policies on bribery, corruption, conflicts of interest, insider trading, and our whistleblower program.
+Added: We expect all of our directors, officers, and employees to read, understand, and comply with the Code of Conduct and its application to the performance of his or her business responsibilities.
+Added: Environmental Commitment
+Added: We are committed to protecting the environment and attempt to mitigate any negative impact of our operations, promoting reuse and recycling and conserving resources, where feasible.
+Added: We have safety protocols in place for handling biohazardous waste in our operations, including in our clinical trials, and we use third-party vendors for biohazardous waste and chemical disposal.
+Added: Social Responsibility
+Added: We are committed to providing patients with access to our investigational therapies, to the extent appropriate at the development stage.
+Added: We are currently focused on our clinical programs and getting our therapies through the approval process and approved as rapidly as possible provided they are shown to be safe and effective.
+Added: We provide access to our investigational therapies through our clinical trials, including in some cases long-term extensions of those trials that provide access to our therapies for up to several years.
+Added: We also support educational efforts related to therapeutic areas in focus for our company, and life sciences education more broadly.
+Added: In addition to financial support of continuing
+Added: education, we are active sponsors, mentors, and hosts for students seeking to broaden their understanding of life sciences in the interest of advancing human health.
Human Capital
−Removed: As of December 31, 2021, we had 118 full-time equivalent employees, 92 of whom were in research and development, of which four hold an M.D.
+Added: As of December 31, 2022, we had 105 full-time equivalent employees, 82 of whom were in research and development, of which 3 hold an M.D.
and 24 hold Ph.D.
8 unchanged sentences
Attracting, developing and retaining talented employees to support the growth of our business is an integral part of our human capital strategy and critical to our long-term success.
−Removed: We continue to seek additions to our staff, although the competition in our industry and in the San Francisco Bay Area where our headquarters is located is significant.
+Added: We continue to seek targeted additions to our staff, although the competition in our industry and in the San Francisco Bay Area where our headquarters is located is significant.
The principal purpose of our equity incentive and annual bonus programs is to attract, retain and motivate personnel through the granting of stock-based compensation awards and cash-based performance bonus awards.
12 unchanged sentences
Corporate and Other Information
−Removed: Our principal executive offices are located at 7707 Gateway Boulevard, Suite 140, Newark, California 94560.
−Removed: Our telephone number is (510) 474-0170.
Our website address is www.protagonist-inc.com.
1 unchanged sentence
We make available, free of charge on our corporate website, copies of our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, Proxy Statements, and all amendments to these reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”).
−Removed: We also show detail about stock trading by corporate insiders by providing access to SEC Forms 3, 4
−Removed: This information may also be obtained from the SEC’s on-line database, which is located at www.sec.gov.
−Removed: Our common stock is traded on The Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC under the symbol “PTGX.”
−Removed: Prior to December 31, 2021, we were an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012.
−Removed: As such, we were eligible for exemptions from various reporting requirements applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation.
−Removed: As of December 31, 2021, we are no longer an emerging growth company and are no longer exempt from such reporting requirements.
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.