Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”),
and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), provide a safe harbor for forward-looking
statements made by or on behalf of NextNRG, Inc. (“NextNRG,” “we,” “us,” “our,” or the
“Company”). The Company and its representatives may from time to time make written or oral statements that are “forward-looking,”
including statements contained in this report and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and in
our reports and presentations to stockholders or potential stockholders. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified
by words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “potential,”
“continue” or similar expressions. Such forward-looking statements include risks and uncertainties and there are important
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These
factors, risks and uncertainties can be found in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, as the same may be updated from time to time, including in Part II, Item 1A, “Risk
Factors,” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Although
we believe the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, it is not possible to
foresee or identify all factors that could have a material effect on the future financial performance of the Company. The forward-looking
statements in this report are made on the basis of management’s assumptions and analyses, as of the time the statements are made,
in light of their experience and perception of historical conditions, expected future developments and other factors believed to be appropriate
under the circumstances.
Except
as otherwise required by the federal securities laws, we disclaim any obligation or undertaking to publicly release any updates or revisions
to any forward-looking statement contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the information incorporated by reference in this
report to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any
statement is based.
The
following discussion and analysis provides information we believe is relevant to an assessment and understanding of our unaudited consolidated
operating results and financial condition. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial
statements for the three and six months ended September 30, 2025 and the notes thereto included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q,
as well as our other reports filed with the SEC from time to time, including, but not limited to, our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2024.
Overview
NextNRG
is Powering What’s Next by implementing artificial intelligence (“AI”) and machine learning (“ML”) into
renewable energy, next-generation energy infrastructure, battery storage, wireless electric vehicle (“EV”) charging and on-demand
mobile fuel delivery to create an integrated ecosystem.
At the core of NextNRG’s strategy is its utility operating system, which leverages AI and ML to help make existing utilities’
energy management as efficient as possible, and the deployment of NextNRG smart microgrids, which utilize AI-driven energy management
alongside solar power and battery storage to enhance energy efficiency, reduce costs and improve grid resiliency. These microgrids are
designed to serve commercial properties, schools, hospitals, nursing homes, parking garages, rural and tribal lands, recreational facilities
and government properties, expanding energy accessibility.
NextNRG
continues to expand its growing fleet of fuel delivery trucks and national footprint. NextNRG is also integrating sustainable energy
solutions into its mobile fueling operations. The company hopes to be an integral part of assisting its fleet customers in their transition
to EV, supporting more efficient fuel delivery while advancing clean energy adoption. The transition process is expected to include the
deployment of NextNRG’s innovative wireless EV charging solutions.
Revenue
Sources
Sale
of Electricity
Solar
Electricity
NextNRG
plans to derive its operating revenues principally from power purchase agreements, net metering credit agreements, solar renewable energy
credits, and performance-based incentives. A portion of NextNRG’s power sales revenues is expected to be earned through the sale
of energy (based on kilowatt hours) pursuant to the terms of Power Purchase Agreements (“PPAs”). NextNRG’s PPAs will
typically have fixed or floating rates and are expected to be generally invoiced monthly.
Wireless
EV Charging
NextNRG
plans to sell energy to its wireless EV charging customers.
NextNRG
also plans to sell its innovative solutions to property owners, parking facilities, municipalities, and government agencies, as well
as charge point operators, empowering the growth of sustainable transportation infrastructure.
NextNRG
plans to generate revenue from the deployment of solar and battery storage solutions where applicable to further take advantage of the
renewable energy industry. Energy pricing is based on peak/off-peak rates at any given charging location. NextNRG plans to negotiate
our own PPA accordingly. NextNRG is also planning to sell energy to electric vehicle owners via wireless EV charging.
3
SaaS
& Licensing
Software
as a Service (“SaaS”) Agreements
NextNRG
plans to generate revenue from the sale of its energy management software under SaaS agreements with utility companies; microgrid companies;
and renewable energy generation companies. Additionally, any traditional customers which would like to own their own energy generation
systems will have the option of entering a SaaS agreement to purchase rights to the technology.
Hardware
Licensing
NextNRG
plans to generate licensing revenues from competitors or ancillary business participants who desire to utilize or integrate NextNRG’s
intellectual property, hardware, or software solutions within their proprietary product.
Sale
of Hardware
NextNRG
plans to generate revenues from the sale of hardware, e.g. solar panels, battery storage solution equipment, wireless charging
pad or bumper and vehicle receiver technology.
Potential
Customers
Potential
customers include property owners, electrical supply companies, management companies, all levels of government, original equipment manufacturers,
tribal land, car manufacturers, EV charging companies, wholesale electricity providers, utilities, and fleet owners.
Mobile
Fueling
Mobile
Fuel Delivery
NextNRG’s
mobile fueling solution is an on-demand and subscription fuel delivery service that brings fuel directly to consumers, commercial fleets,
and specialty vehicles at homes, workplaces, and job sites. Leveraging digital technology and GPS-based systems, this service responds
to the increasing preference for home and workplace product deliveries. Particularly, our fleet services are experiencing significant
growth, providing a streamlined, efficient fueling option that allows commercial operators to optimize operations and reduce downtime.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and the year ended December 31, 2025, we derived all of our revenues from mobile fuel deliveries.
Recent
Developments
Share
Exchange with Next Holding
On
August 10, 2023, the Company, the members (the “Members”) of Next Charging LLC (“Next Charging”) and Michael
Farkas, as the representative of the Members, entered into an Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”), pursuant to
which the Company agreed to acquire from the Members 100% of the membership interests of Next Charging (the “Membership Interests”)
in exchange for up to 40,000,00 shares of common stock. Subsequently, Next Charging converted to a corporation organized in the State
of Nevada named NextNRG Holding Corp. (“Next Holding”) effective as of March 1, 2024 (the “Conversion”), which
Conversion continued the existence of the prior entity in the new corporate form and the prior members of Next Charging remained as shareholders
of Next Holding.
On
June 11, 2024, in order to reflect the Conversion, the Company, all of the shareholders of Next Holding and Mr. Farkas as the representative
of the Next Holding executed a second amended and restated agreement to replace the Exchange Agreement in its entirety (the “Second
Amended and Restated Exchange Agreement”). Pursuant to the Second Amended and Restated Exchange Agreement, the Company agreed to
acquire from the Next Holding 100% of the shares of Next Holding in exchange for the issuance by the Company to the Next Holding shareholders
of Company common stock.
4
On
September 25, 2024, the Company and Mr. Farkas entered into the second amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Exchange Agreement
(“Second Amendment”) to change the number of the Company’s common stock shares to be issued to the Next Holding shareholders
by the Company in exchange for 100% of the shares of Next Holding to 100,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.
The
Second Amendment also provided that in the event Next Holding completes the acquisition of STAT-EI, Inc. (“SEI” or “STAT”),
prior to the closing, then 50,000,000 shares will vest on the closing date, and the remaining 50,000,000 shares will be subject to vesting
or forfeiture (such shares subject to vesting or forfeiture, the “Restricted Shares”). Next Holding completed the acquisition
of SEI on January 19, 2024, and thus 50,000,000 vested on that closing date. The remaining 50,000,000 restricted shares are subject to
vesting or forfeiture. 25,000,000 of the 50,000,000 restricted shares will vest, if at all, upon the Company commercially deploying the
third solar, wireless electric vehicle charging, microgrid, and/or battery storage system (such systems as more specifically defined
under the Second Amended and Restated Exchange Agreement, as amended) and 25,000,000 of the 50,000,000 Restricted Shares will vest, if
at all, upon the Company either reaching annual revenues exceeding $100 million, the Company completing projects with deployment costs
greater than $100 million, or the Company completing a capital raise greater than $25 million.
Prior
to closing, the Company (i) increased the number of its authorized shares of common stock from 50,000,000 to 500,000,000, (ii) received
stockholder approval, (iii) received third-party consents, and (iv) ensured compliance with the rules and regulations of The Nasdaq Stock
Market.
On
February 13, 2025, the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Second Amended and Restated Exchange Agreement, as amended, was
completed. Pursuant to the terms of the Second Amended and Restated Exchange Agreement, as amended, the Company issued an aggregate of
100,000,000 shares of common stock in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding common stock of Next Holding, and Next Holding became
a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.
Officer
and Director Changes
On
February 14, 2025, in connection with the Next Closing, (i) Mr. Farkas was appointed Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman of
the Company; (ii) Yehuda Levy ceased to be the Company’s Interim Chief Executive Officer; and (iii) Joel Kleiner was appointed
Chief Financial Officer of the Company.
Firm
Commitment Underwritten Public Offering
On
February 18, 2025, the Company closed a public offering of 5,000,000 shares of common stock at a price to the public of $3.00 per share
(the “Offering Price”), for gross proceeds of $15,000,000, before deducting underwriting discounts and offering expenses.
In addition, the Company granted the underwriters a 45-day option to purchase up to an additional 750,000 shares of common stock to cover
over-allotments, if any.
On
February 13, 2025, the Company entered into an Underwriting Agreement (the “Underwriting Agreement”) with ThinkEquity LLC
(“Representative”), as representative of the underwriters (“Underwriters”) named on Schedule I thereto, relating
to the Company’s firm commitment underwritten public offering (the “Offering”) of common stock. Pursuant to the Underwriting
Agreement, the Company agreed to sell 5,000,000 shares of common stock to the Underwriters at the Offering Price, and granted the Representative
a 45-day over-allotment option to purchase up to 750,000 additional shares of common stock, equivalent to 15% of the shares of common
stock sold in the Offering (the “Option”), pursuant to the Company’s registration statement on Form S-1, as amended
(File No. 333-261984) (the “Registration Statement”), under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities
Act”).
5
The
closing of the Offering occurred on February 18, 2025. The net proceeds to the Company from the sale of the shares, after deducting the
underwriting discounts and commissions and other estimated offering expenses payable by the Company, was approximately $13.3 million.
The Company used the net proceeds from the Offering to expand its business, repay outstanding indebtedness, and general corporate purposes,
including working capital.
Upon
closing of the Offering, the Company issued the Representative warrants (the “Representative’s Warrants”) as compensation
to purchase up to 250,000 shares of common stock, representing 5% of the aggregate number of shares sold in the Offering. The Representative’s
Warrants are exercisable at a per share exercise price of $3.75, which represents 125% of the Offering Price. The Representative’s
Warrants are exercisable, in whole or in part, during the 4.5-year period commencing 180 days from the commencement of sales of the shares
in the Offering.
The
Underwriting Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants made by the Company. It also provides for customary
indemnification by each of the Company and the Underwriters, severally and not jointly, for losses or damages arising out of or in connection
with the Offering, including for liabilities under the Securities Act, other obligations of the parties and termination provisions. In
addition, pursuant to the terms of the Underwriting Agreement, each of the Company’s directors, executive officers and holders
of 5% or more of the shares have entered into “lock-up” agreements with the Representative that generally prohibit, without
the prior written consent of the Representative and subject to certain exceptions, the sale, transfer or other disposition of securities
of the Company for a period of six months (with respect to the Company’s directors and executive officers) and three months (with
respect to the holders of 5% or more of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock who are not directors and executive officers)
from February 13, 2025. Further, pursuant to the terms of the Underwriting Agreement, the Company has agreed for a period of three months
from February 13, 2025, subject to certain exceptions, not to (i) offer, pledge, sell, contract to sell, sell any option or contract
to purchase, purchase any option or contract to sell, grant any option, right or warrant to purchase, lend, or otherwise transfer or
dispose of, directly or indirectly, any shares of capital stock of the Company or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable
for shares of capital stock of the Company; (ii) file or cause the filing of any registration statement under the Securities Act with
respect to any shares of common stock or other capital stock or any securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for common
stock or other capital stock of the Company, other than a customary universal “shelf” registration statement, which the Company
will file within 30 days following the earlier of the expiration of such three month period or the date the Company becomes initially
eligible to file such registration statement; (iii) complete any offering of debt securities of the Company, other than entering into
a line of credit, term loan arrangement or other debt instrument with a traditional bank, or (iv) enter into any swap or other arrangement
that transfers to another, in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences of ownership of capital stock of the Company. In addition,
for a period of 24 months after February 13, 2025, the Company will not directly or indirectly enter into an agreement to engage in any
“at-the-market”, continuous equity or variable rate transaction without the prior written consent of the Representative.
For
a period of 36 months following February 18, 2025, the Representative will have an irrevocable right of first refusal to act as sole
investment banker, sole book-runner and/or sole placement agent, at the Representative’s sole discretion, for each and every future
public and private equity and debt offerings for the Company, or any successor to or any subsidiary of the Company, including all equity
linked financings, on terms customary to the Representative. The Representative will have the sole right to determine whether or not
any other broker-dealer will have the right to participate in any such offering and the economic terms of any such participation. The
Representative will not have more than one opportunity to waive or terminate the right of first refusal in consideration of any payment
or fee.
Redstone
Agreement
On
March 24, 2025, the Company entered into a Sale of Future Receipts Agreement (the “Redstone Agreement”) by and between the
Company and Redstone Advance Inc. (“Redstone”). Pursuant to the terms of the Redstone Agreement, the Company agreed to (i)
sell to Redstone proceeds of future sales made by the Company (collectively, the “Future Receipts”) in the amount of $3,217,700
(the “Purchased Amount”); and (ii) deliver 20% of the Future Receipts to Redstone in accordance with the terms of the Redstone
Agreement. As payment for the Purchased Amount, Redstone agreed to pay to the Company $2,300,000, minus $784,000 (representing fees and
amounts to satisfy prior balances), resulting in a net payment to the Company of $1,516,000.
6
Pursuant
to the terms of the Redstone Agreement, the Company authorized Redstone to debit $125,000 (the “Initial Periodic Amount”),
intended to represent 20% of the Company’s Future Receipts, or any updated periodic amount (the “Periodic Amount”)
from the Company’s specified account each business day. At any time, the Company or Redstone may obtain a reconciliation of the
Company’s actual revenue to adjust the Periodic Amount to more closely reflect the Company’s actual Future Receipts times
20%.
Michael
D. Farkas, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board of Directors and beneficial holder of a majority of the
Company’s outstanding common stock, personally guaranteed the Company’s obligations under the Redstone Agreement.
Mr.
Advance Agreement
On
March 25, 2025, the Company entered into a Future Receivables Sale and Purchase Agreement (the “Mr. Advance Agreement”) by
and between the Company and Funderzgroup LLC DBA Mr. Advance (“Mr. Advance”). Pursuant to the terms of the Mr. Advance Agreement,
the Company agreed to sell to Mr. Advance its right, title and interest in 7.54% of proceeds of Future Receipts until the Purchased Amount
has been delivered to Mr. Advance. As consideration, Mr. Advance agreed to pay to the Company $2,300,000, minus $784,035 representing
fees and amounts to satisfy prior balances, resulting in a net payment to the Company of $1,515,965.
Pursuant
to the terms of the Mr. Advance Agreement, the Company authorized Mr. Advance to debit $125,000 on a weekly basis (subject to modification
as set forth in the Mr. Advance Agreement), intended to represent 7.54% of the Company’s Future Receipts.
Mr.
Farkas, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board of Directors and beneficial holder of a majority of the Company’s
outstanding common stock, personally guaranteed the Company’s obligations under the Mr. Advance Agreement.
Fee
Agreement
Also
on March 25, 2025, the Company entered into a Fee Agreement (the “Fee Agreement”) with Mr. Farkas, the Company’s Chief
Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board of Directors and beneficial holder of a majority of the Company’s outstanding shares of
common stock. Pursuant to the terms of the Fee Agreement, in consideration of Mr. Farkas personally guaranteeing certain loans entered
into by the Company, the Company agreed to pay to Mr. Farkas a fee in the aggregate amount of 3% of the funds personally guaranteed by
Mr. Farkas on behalf of the Company. The Company agreed to pay such fee upon receipt of the loan funds by the Company.
WCG
Agreement
On
March 31, 2025, the Company entered into a Standard Merchant Cash Advance Agreement (the “WCG Agreement”) with Wynwood Capital
Group LLC (“WCG”). Pursuant to the terms of the WCG Agreement, the Company agreed to (i) sell to WCG all of its future accounts,
contract rights, and other obligations arising from or relating to the payment of monies from each of the Company’s customers and/or
other third party payors (collectively, the “Receivables”) in the amount of $699,500 (the “Receivables Purchased Amount”);
and (ii) deliver 9.72% of the Receivables to WCG in accordance with the terms of the WCG Agreement. As payment for the Receivables Purchased
Amount, WCG agreed to pay to the Company $500,000, minus a $15,000 origination fee.
Pursuant
to the terms of the WCG Agreement, the Company authorized WCG to debit $27,980 (the “Initial Estimated Payment”), intended
to approximate 9.72% of the Company’s Receivables on a weekly basis. The Company may request a reconciliation to ensure that the
amount collected by WCG equals 9.72% of the Receivables.
Michael
D. Farkas, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board of Directors and beneficial holder of a majority of the
Company’s outstanding common stock, personally guaranteed the Company’s obligations under the WCG Agreement.
7
Alcourt
Promissory Note
On
March 31, 2025, the Company issued a promissory note, in the principal sum of 1,000,000 (the “Alcourt Note”), in favor of
Alcourt LLC (“Alcourt”). The Alcourt Note bears interest at a rate of 15% per annum and has an original issue discount of
$150,000. The Alcourt Note matures on April 30, 2025; provided, however, if the Alcourt Note is not paid on April 30, 2025, the Company
will pay $150,000 to Alcourt and upon payment, the maturity date of the Alcourt Note will be extended to May 31, 2025. There is no prepayment
penalty.
During
2025, as part of the sale and leaseback of 34 vehicles to Yoshi, Inc., proceeds of $250,000 from the sale were paid to Alcourt as a partial
payment towards this note.
Promissory
Note, dated as of May 5, 2025
On
May 5, 2025, the Company and Michael D. Farkas entered into a promissory note (the “May 5 Note”) for the principal sum of
$600,000 to be used for the Company’s working capital needs. The unpaid principal balance of the May 5 Note has a fixed interest
rate of 12% per annum and matures on the earlier of (i) May 5, 2026 or (ii) the date the Company completes a cumulative capital raise
of at least $4,000,000 following the date of the May 5 Note. Further, the Note was issued with an original issue discount of $72,000.
Promissory
Note, dated May 9, 2025
On
May 9, 2025, the Company and Mr. Farkas entered into a promissory note (the “May 9 Note”) for the principal sum of $112,000
to be used for the Company’s working capital needs. The unpaid principal balance of the May 9 Note has a fixed interest rate of
12% per annum and matures on the earlier of (i) May 9, 2026 or (ii) the date the Company completes a cumulative capital raise of at least
$4,000,000 following the date of the May 9 Note. Further, the May 9 Note was issued with an original issue discount of $12,000.
Promissory
Note, dated as of May 19, 2025
On
May 19, 2025, the Company and Mr. Farkas entered into a promissory note (the “May 19 Note”) or the principal sum of $224,000
to be used for the Company’s working capital needs. The unpaid principal balance of the May 19 Note has a fixed interest rate of
12% per annum and matures on May 13, 2026. Further, the May 19 Note was issued with an original issue discount of $24,000.
Promissory
Note, dated as of May 20, 2025
On
May 20, 2025, the Company and Mr. Farkas entered into a promissory note (the “May 20 Note”) or the principal sum of $196,000
to be used for the Company’s working capital needs. The unpaid principal balance of the May 20 Note has a fixed interest rate of
12% per annum and matures on May 20, 2026. Further, the May 20 Note was issued with an original issue discount of $21,000.
8
Equify
Master Lease Agreement
On
June 9, 2025, the Company entered into a Master Lease Agreement (the “Master Lease”), dated as of May 29, 2025, with Equify
Financial, LLC (“Equify”). Pursuant to the terms of the Master Lease, Equify agreed to lease to the Company certain equipment
as set forth in lease schedules that may be entered into from time to time (each, a “Lease”). Each Lease will constitute
a separate lease or financing as indicated on such Lease Schedule of the equipment described on each Lease. The Master Lease is not a
commitment to enter into any Lease, or lease or finance any property unless expressly agreed in writing.
The
term of each Lease will continue for the number of months set forth in the Lease.
Pursuant
to the terms of the Master Lease, the Company agreed to pay to Equify all rent monthly in advance, and to pay all other amounts due under
each Lease as and when required under the Master Lease, as indicated in the Lease. If any rent or other amount due under a Lease is not
received when due, the Company will pay a late charge equal to 5% of the overdue amount, together with interest at the rate of 18% per
annum, provided that no late charge will exceed the maximum amount permitted by applicable law.
Unless
otherwise stated in the Lease, the Company will pay to Equify, on or before the first rent payment date, two full payments, one to be
applied to the Company’s obligation to pay the first payment and the other to be applied to the last payment due under the Lease.
The
Company agreed to indemnify, hold harmless and defend Equify and its officers, directors, employees, successors and/or assigns against
any and all claims, demands, suits and legal proceedings, in any way arising out of or involving the equipment leased under the Master
Lease, the Master Lease and/or any Lease or other document entered into in connection with the Master Lease.
The
Master Lease contains representations, warranties and covenants that are customary for a transaction of this type.
Lease
No. 001 under Master Lease
On
June 9, 2025, the Company and Equify entered into Equipment Lease Schedule No. 001 under the Master Lease (“Lease No. 001”),
dated as of May 29, 2025, pursuant to which Equify agreed to lease to the Company certain equipment as set forth in Lease No. 001 for
a total equipment cost of $899,640 . Lease No. 001 has an initial term of 36 months. Pursuant to the terms of Lease No. 001, the Company
agreed to pay an initial rent payment of $27,886, followed by 35 rent payments, each in the amount of $27,790 beginning on August 1,
2025.
So
long as the Company is not in default or suffered an event that with notice or lapse of time could constitute an event of default under
Lease No. 001 and Lease No. 001 has not been previously terminated or cancelled, the Company may purchase all (but not less than all)
of Equify’s rights, title and interests with respect to the equipment leased thereunder upon expiration of the initial lease term
upon not more than 120 calendar days nor less than 90 calendar days prior written notice to Equify for a purchase price equal to: (a)
$179,928 (which amount is the parties’ true estimate of the fair market value of the equipment at the end of the initial lease
term), plus (b) applicable sales taxes and other amounts due or payable with respect to such sale; plus (c) any and all other amounts
due under Lease No. 001.
Promissory
Note, dated as of June 10, 2025
On
June 10, 2025, the Company and Mr. Farkas entered into a promissory note (the “June 10 Note”) or the principal sum of $436,000
to be used for the Company’s working capital needs. The unpaid principal balance of the June 10 Note has a fixed interest rate
of 12% per annum and matures on June 9, 2026. Further, the June 10 Note was issued with an original issue discount of $46,000.
Mr.
Farkas is the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board of Directors and beneficial holder of a majority of the
Company’s outstanding common stock.
Venture
Debt Agreement
On
June 27, 2025, the Company entered into a Future Receivables Sale and Purchase Agreement (the “Venture Debt Agreement”) by
and between the Company and Venture Debt, LLC (“Venture Debt”). Pursuant to the terms of the Venture Debt Agreement, the
Company agreed to (i) sell to Venture Debt proceeds of future sales made by the Company (collectively, the “Future Receipts”)
in the amount of $1,500,000 (the “Purchased Amount”); and (ii) deliver bi-weekly payments of the Future Receipts to Venture
Debt in accordance with the terms of the Venture Debt Agreement. As consideration, Venture Debt agreed to pay to the Company $1,500,000,
minus $75,000 representing fees, resulting in a net payment to the Company of $1,425,000.
9
Pursuant
to the terms of the Venture Debt Agreement, the Company authorized Venture Debt to debit $75,000 on a bi-weekly basis.
The
Venture Debt Agreement also included a flat-rate interest fee of $675,000, which was paid in shares of the Company’s common stock
at a price per share of $3.00.
Mr.
Farkas, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board of Directors and beneficial holder of a majority of the Company’s
outstanding common stock, personally guaranteed the Company’s obligations under the Venture Debt Agreement.
Funders
App Agreement
On
June 27, 2025, the Company entered into a Future Receivables Sale and Purchase Agreement (the “Funders App Agreement”) by
and between the Company and Funders App LLC (“Funders App”). Pursuant to the terms of the Funders App Agreement, the Company
agreed to (i) sell to Funders App proceeds of future sales made by the Company (collectively, the “Future Receipts”) in the
amount of $1,500,000 (the “Purchased Amount”); and (ii) deliver bi-weekly payments of the Future Receipts to Funders App
in accordance with the terms of the Funders App Agreement. As consideration, Funders App agreed to pay to the Company $1,500,000, minus
$75,000 representing fees, resulting in a net payment to the Company of $1,425,000.
Pursuant
to the terms of the Funders App Agreement, the Company authorized Funders App to debit $75,000 on a bi-weekly basis.
The
Funders App Agreement also included a flat-rate interest fee of $675,000, which was paid in shares of the Company’s common stock
at a price per share of $3.00.
Mr.
Farkas, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board of Directors and beneficial holder of a majority of the Company’s
outstanding common stock, personally guaranteed the Company’s obligations under the Venture Debt Agreement.
Financial
Overview
For
the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, we generated revenues of $22,860,041 and $6,985,963, respectively, and reported a
net loss of $14,974,993 and $10,618,576, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, we generated revenues of
$58,824,282 and $20,977,860, respectively, and reported a net loss of $60,046,267 and $18,840,928, respectively, and cash flows used
in operating activities of $15,168,347 and $8,331,359 , respectively. As noted in our unaudited consolidated financial statements,
as of September 30, 2025, we had an accumulated deficit of $127,173,896.
Results
of Operations
The
following table sets forth our results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024:
Three
Months Ended
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
September
30,
2025
2024
2025
2024
Revenues
$
22,860,041
$
6,985,963
$
58,824,282
$
20,977,860
Cost
of sales
20,418,074
6,379,138
54,294,530
19,361,923
Operating
expenses
10,906,663
3,191,826
48,224,935
7,887,726
Depreciation
and amortization
537,171
399,448
1,826,259
1,173,269
Operating
loss
(9,001,867
)
(2,894,449
)
(45,521,442
)
(7,445,058
)
Other
expense
(5,973,126
)
(4,731,086
)
(14,524,825
)
(8,492,829
)
Net
loss
$
(14,974,993
)
$
(7,715,535
)
$
(60,046,267
)
$
(15,937,887
)
For
the three months ended September 30, 2025 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2024
Revenues
Revenues
for the three months ended September 30, 2025 increased significantly compared to the three months ended September 30, 2024. This growth
was primarily attributable to a rise in gallons delivered as well as an uptick in the average price per gallon. Several factors contributed
to this performance:
1.
Expanded
Customer Base. The Company successfully grew its presence in existing markets while entering new regions, resulting in a higher
total volume of fuel delivered. This expansion was supported by focused sales efforts and brand-building initiatives that attracted
both new commercial and residential customers.
10
2.
Fleet
Partnerships. Strategic partnerships with commercial fleet operators continued to drive fueling volumes. These partnerships often
involve recurring, contracted deliveries that provide a stable, predictable revenue stream. As more fleet operators adopt on-demand
fueling to reduce downtime and optimize logistics, EzFill benefits from increased, repeat business.
3.
Enhanced
Technology & Marketing. Ongoing enhancements to the EzFill mobile application—including user interface improvements
and expanded scheduling features—improved the customer experience and streamlined order placement. Coupled with targeted marketing
campaigns, these tech and branding initiatives boosted visibility and encouraged higher consumer adoption rates, further lifting
revenues.
Cost
of Sales
Cost
of sales rose in the three months ended September 30, 2025, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2024, in line with the higher
sales volumes and expanded market coverage. Despite the increase in absolute costs, gross profit improved, reflecting disciplined pricing,
higher-margin sales, and operational efficiencies. Key factors influencing cost of sales included:
1.
Higher
Fuel Volume. As overall demand increased, the Company purchased and delivered a greater volume of fuel. Although this drove up
the total cost of sales, it remained proportionate to revenue growth, preserving gross margins.
2.
Fuel
Price Fluctuations. Commodity price swings can significantly affect fuel costs. However, the Company’s dynamic pricing
strategies and supplier relationships helped ensure that these fluctuations did not adversely impact overall profitability.
3.
Logistics
& Delivery Costs. Expansion into new geographic areas required additional delivery routes and staffing. While these investments
raised labor and transportation costs, they were essential for meeting growing customer demand. Improved driver efficiency and delivery
scheduling helped partially offset the impact of these higher costs, contributing to the year-over-year improvement in gross profit.
Operating
Expenses
We
incurred operating expenses of $10,906,663 during the three months ended September 30, 2025, compared to $3,191,826 during the prior
year, representing an increase of $7,714,837. This increase was primarily due to $7.0 million in stock-based compensation expenses from
issuances to employees and consultants during the three months ended September 30, 2025 and vesting of options and RSUs, as well as an
increase in other general and administrative expenses related to the continued growth of the Company.
Depreciation
and Amortization
Depreciation
and amortization expense saw an increase in the three months ended September 30, 2025, compared to the same period in 2024. This increase
was primarily driven by added depreciation related to the 99 trucks acquired in late 2024.
11
Other
Expense
Other
expense consisted of the following:
For
the Three Months Ended
September 30,
Period
over Period Changes
Increase
(Decrease)
2025
2024
$
Amount
%
Change
Interest
income
$ 10
$ 6
$ 4
66.67 %
Other
(expense) income
11,651
60,242
(48,591 )
(80.66 )%
Gain
(loss) on settlement
(1,592,837 )
(907,500 )
(685,337 )
75.12 %
Interest
expense (including amortization of debt discount)
(4,391,950 )
(6,786,885 )
2,499,679
36.83 %
Total
other expense - net
$ (5,973,126 )
$ (7,634,127 )
$ (1,661,001 )
21.76 %
The
Company’s other expense, net, decreased in the three months ended September 30, 2025, compared to the three months ended September
30, 2024. The primary drivers were a decrease in interest expense, partially offset by an increase in loss on debt extinguishment. Below
is a detailed breakdown of the major components.
Interest
Income
There
was very little change in interest income in the three months ended September 30, 2025, compared to the same period in 2024.
Other
(expense) income
Other
expense, including loss on settlement, decreased significantly in the three months ended September 30, 2025, compared to the three months
ended September 30, 2024, driven primarily by a decrease in interest expense, partially offset by the loss on settlement for the sale
of trucks to Equify at less than carrying value.
Interest
Expense (including amortization of debt discount)
Interest
expense increased in 2025, primarily due to:
1.
Amortization
of Debt Discount: The amortization of debt discount increased due to additional debt arrangements with original issue discounts.
Additionally, in connection with the conversion of debt converted to equity, related unamortized discounts were expensed at that
time.
2.
Existing
and New Borrowings: The interest expense recognized on outstanding debt instruments was lower than the three months ended September
30, 2024.
Net
Loss
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
Period-over-Period
Changes
Increase
(Decrease)
2025
2024
$
Amount
%
Change
Net
loss including non-controlling interest
$ (14,229,581 )
$ (10,618,576 )
$ (3,611,005 )
(34.01 )%
Our
net loss increased significantly in the three months ended September 30, 2025, as a result of the categories discussed above, most materially
by a large grant of stock-based compensation to employees and consultants for $7.0 million. Overall, the increase in revenues, driven
by both volume and pricing, showcased the Company’s successful market expansion and deepening fleet partnerships. While costs naturally
rose with higher delivery volumes, disciplined operational execution and strategic pricing helped improve gross profit. Ongoing cost-optimization
initiatives further reduced operating expenses, though the Company continues to invest in talent and technology to fuel long-term growth.
12
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2025 compared to nine six months ended September 30, 2024
Revenues
Revenues
for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 increased significantly compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2024. This growth
was primarily attributable to a rise in gallons delivered as well as an uptick in the average price per gallon. Several factors contributed
to this performance:
1.
Expanded
Customer Base. The Company successfully grew its presence in existing markets while entering new regions, resulting in a higher
total volume of fuel delivered. This expansion was supported by focused sales efforts and brand-building initiatives that attracted
both new commercial and residential customers.
2.
Fleet
Partnerships. Strategic partnerships with commercial fleet operators continued to drive fueling volumes. These partnerships often
involve recurring, contracted deliveries that provide a stable, predictable revenue stream. As more fleet operators adopt on-demand
fueling to reduce downtime and optimize logistics, EzFill benefits from increased, repeat business.
3.
Enhanced
Technology & Marketing. Ongoing enhancements to the EzFill mobile application—including user interface improvements
and expanded scheduling features—improved the customer experience and streamlined order placement. Coupled with targeted marketing
campaigns, these tech and branding initiatives boosted visibility and encouraged higher consumer adoption rates, further lifting
revenues.
Cost
of Sales
Cost
of sales rose in the nine months ended September 30, 2025, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2024, in line with the higher
sales volumes and expanded market coverage. Despite the increase in absolute costs, gross profit improved, reflecting disciplined pricing,
higher-margin sales, and operational efficiencies. Key factors influencing cost of sales included:
1.
Higher
Fuel Volume. As overall demand increased, the Company purchased and delivered a greater volume of fuel. Although this drove up
the total cost of sales, it remained proportionate to revenue growth, preserving gross margins.
2.
Fuel
Price Fluctuations. Commodity price swings can significantly affect fuel costs. However, the Company’s dynamic pricing
strategies and supplier relationships helped ensure that these fluctuations did not adversely impact overall profitability.
3.
Logistics
& Delivery Costs. Expansion into new geographic areas required additional delivery routes and staffing. While these investments
raised labor and transportation costs, they were essential for meeting growing customer demand. Improved driver efficiency and delivery
scheduling helped partially offset the impact of these higher costs, contributing to the year-over-year improvement in gross profit.
Depreciation
and Amortization
Depreciation
and amortization expense saw an increase in the nine months ended September 30, 2025, compared to the same period in 2024. This increase
was primarily driven by added depreciation related to the 99 trucks acquired in late 2024.
Operating
Expenses
We
incurred operating expenses of $48,224,935 during the nine months ended September 30, 2025, compared to $7,887,726 during the prior year,
representing an increase of $40,337,209. This increase was primarily due to $31.1 million in stock-based compensation expenses from issuances
to employees and consultants during the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and vesting of options and RSUs, as well as an increase
in other general and administrative expenses related to the continued growth of the Company.
13
Other
Income (Expense)
Other
income (expense) consisted of the following:
For
the Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Period
over Period Changes
Increase
(Decrease)
2025
2024
$
Amount
%
Change
Interest
income
$ 51
$ 6
$ 45
750.00 %
Gain
(loss) on settlement
(2,727,781 )
(907,500 )
(1,820,281 )
200.01 %
Other
(expense) income
237,283
184,503
52,780
28.61 %
Interest
expense (including amortization of debt discount)
(12,034,378 )
(10,672,879 )
(1,361,499 )
12.76 %
Total
other expense - net
$ (14,524,825 )
$ (11,395,870 )
$ (3,128,955 )
(27.46 ) %
The
Company’s other expense, net, increased in the nine months ended September 30, 2025, compared to the nine months ended September
30, 2024. The primary drivers were the increase in interest expense—particularly from default penalty interest and extension fees—and
the loss on debt extinguishment associated with related-party debt transactions. Below is a detailed breakdown of the major components.
Interest
Income
There
was very little change in interest income in the nine months ended September 30, 2025, compared to the same period in 2024.
Other
Expense
Other
expense, including loss on settlement, increased significantly in the nine months ended September 30, 2025, compared to the nine months
ended September 30, 2024, driven primarily by the loss on settlement for the purchase of trucks from Yoshi, Inc. at a purchase price
higher than fair value, the loss on settlement for the sale of trucks to Equify for less than carrying value, and the loss on settlement
of accounts payable.
Interest
Expense (including amortization of debt discount)
Interest
expense increased in 2025, primarily due to:
1.
Amortization
of Debt Discount: The amortization of debt discount increased in the nine months ended September 30, 2025 compared to the same period
in 2024. This reflects additional debt arrangements with original issue discounts. Additionally, in connection with the conversion
of debt converted to equity, related unamortized discounts were expensed at that time.
2.
Existing
and New Borrowings: Interest expense was recognized on outstanding debt instruments.
Net
Loss
Six
Months Ended
June
30,
Period-over-Period
Changes
Increase
(Decrease)
2025
2024
$
Amount
%
Change
Net
loss including non-controlling interest
$ (60,046,267 )
$ (18,840,928 )
$ (41,205,339 )
(68.62 )%
Our
net loss was the result of the categories discussed above, most materially by a large stock-based compensation expense during the nine
months ended September 30, 2025 of $31.1 million. Overall, the increase in revenues, driven by both volume and pricing, showcases the
Company’s successful market expansion and deepening fleet partnerships. While costs naturally rose with higher delivery volumes,
disciplined operational execution and strategic pricing helped improve gross profit. Ongoing cost-optimization initiatives further reduced
operating expenses, though the Company continues to invest in talent and technology to fuel long-term growth.
14
Non-GAAP
Financial Measures
Adjusted
EBITDA and average fuel margin per gallon are non-GAAP financial measures which we use in our financial performance analyses. These measures
should not be considered a substitute for GAAP-basis measures, nor should they be viewed as a substitute for operating results determined
in accordance with GAAP. We believe that the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure that excludes the impact of
net interest expense, taxes, depreciation, amortization, impairment of goodwill, other intangibles and fixed assets, and stock compensation
expense, provides useful supplemental information that is essential to a proper understanding of our financial results. We also believe
that the presentation of average fuel margin per gallon, a non-GAAP financial measure calculated by subtracting cost of sales specific
to fuel purchases and merchant fees from net sales and dividing it by the number of gallons delivered in the reporting period. Non-GAAP
measures are not formally defined by GAAP, and other entities may use calculation methods that differ from ours for the purposes of calculating
Adjusted EBITDA. As a complement to GAAP financial measures, we believe that Adjusted EBITDA assists investors who follow the practice
of some investment analysts who adjust GAAP financial measures to exclude items that may obscure underlying performance and distort comparability.
The
following is a reconciliation of net loss to the non-GAAP financial measure referred to as Adjusted EBITDA for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2025 and 2024:
Three
Months Ended
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
September
30,
2025
2024
2025
2024
Net
loss
$ (14,974,993 )
$ (10,618,576 )
$ (60,046,267 )
$ (18,840,928 )
Interest
expense
4,391,950
6,786,885
12,034,378
10,672,879
Depreciation
and amortization
537,171
399,448
1,826,259
1,173,269
Stock-based
compensation
7,030,741
205,301
31,054,210
456,635
Adjusted
EBITDA
$ (3,015,131 )
$ (3,226,942 )
$ (15,131,420 )
$ (6,538,145 )
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Liquidity
is the ability of an enterprise to generate adequate amounts of cash to meet its needs for cash requirements. We had cash of $653,869
and $911,558 as of September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
Cash
Flow Activities
Our
cash balances at September 30, 2025 and 2024 were as follows:
September
30,
Period-over-Period
Changes
Increase
(Decrease)
2025
2024
$
Amount
%
Change
Cash
and cash equivalents
$ 653,869
$ 911,558
$ (257,689 )
(28.27 )%
Cash
and cash equivalents decreased year over year. The primary drivers of this increase were the Company’s net loss from operations
and repayment of outstanding debt positions throughout the period.
15
Operating
Activities
Net
cash used in operating activities was $14,104,694 for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, which was made up primarily by the
net loss of $60,046,267 and offset by non-cash adjustments for a net amount of $45,941,573, most notably including an expense of
$32.5 million related to stock issued for services and prepaid stock to employees and consultants. Net cash used in operating
activities was $4,178,320 during the nine months ended September 30, 2024, which was made up primarily by the net loss of $18,840,928
and offset by non-cash adjustments for a net amount of $14,662,608.
Investing
Activities
During the nine
months ended September 30, 2025 net cash used by investing activities was $3,532,763. This includes cash received as part of the
sale of vehicles and the application of a deposit on assets to the purchase of such assets. Net cash provided by investing activities during the prior year was $(55,704) resulting from related party
advances and a deposit on future asset purchase.
Financing
Activities
We generated $19,613,683
of cash flows from financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2025, including net proceeds from offerings of $13,815,772
after cash paid for offering costs, as well as proceeds from notes of $18,648,546 offset by repayments of $22,703,992. We generated $4,124,321
of cash flows from financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2024, including $3,550,000 in proceeds from notes payable
offset by $825,679 in repayments.
Sources
of Capital
The Company has sustained
net losses since inception and does not have sufficient revenues and income to fully fund its operations. As a result, the Company has
relied on equity and debt financings to fund its activities to date. For the nine months ended September 30, 2025, the Company had a net
loss of $60,046,267. At September 30, 2025, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $127,173,896. The Company anticipates that it will
continue to generate operating losses and use cash in operations through the foreseeable future.
Historical
Operating Performance and Financing
Since
inception, the Company has incurred net losses and has not generated sufficient revenues or positive operating income to independently
fund our operations. Consequently, we have depended on equity and debt financings—including those from related parties—to
finance our activities and support our growth initiatives. This reliance on external funding has been critical for maintaining day-to-day
operations, expanding our service capacity, and investing in technology and assets. However, it has also introduced risks related to
interest expense, equity dilution, and dependency on the availability of future financing.
Current
Liquidity Position
Our
liquidity position primarily reflects a combination of cash on hand and available debt arrangements.
Despite
recent improvements in cash balances due to targeted financing activities, we continue to face challenges in achieving sustainable cash
flow from operations. The timing of expenditures and capital outlays, coupled with the inherent volatility in revenue generation in our
industry, adds to the uncertainty of our liquidity profile.
Debt
Obligations and Capital Expenditures
A
significant portion of our near-term cash outflows is attributable to scheduled debt repayments and interest expense, including higher
financing costs incurred from default penalty interest and increased debt discount amortization. Additionally, as we invest in capital
expenditures—such as the purchase of new delivery vehicles and technology enhancements—to support expansion into new markets,
our cash requirements remain elevated. These commitments, while essential for long-term growth, further strain our liquidity in the short
term.
16
Reliance
on External Financing
Given
the current financial dynamics, we have continually relied on external sources of capital. Our funding strategies have included:
●
Equity
Issuances: Raising capital through the sale of common or preferred shares, including convertible securities from related parties.
●
Debt
Financings: Securing loans and other debt instruments, often under terms that include default penalty interest or other onerous conditions,
which have contributed to higher financing costs.
●
Related-Party
Transactions: Engaging with supportive investors and related parties who have provided additional funds, albeit at terms that may
affect our overall capital structure.
Outlook
and Mitigating Actions
In
light of these challenges, we continue to closely monitor our liquidity position and are exploring multiple avenues to secure additional
funding. These include:
●
Negotiating
more favorable terms on existing and future debt.
●
Identifying
new equity partners or investors.
●
Optimizing
working capital through tighter control of receivables, payables, and inventory management.
While
these efforts are underway, our ability to meet operational and financial obligations over the next 12 months remains subject to significant
uncertainty. Investors and stakeholders should be aware of the risks associated with our current liquidity and capital structure, and
the potential need for additional financing that could result in further dilution or increased debt service obligations.
Going
Concern Qualification
As
reflected in the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements, for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, the Company
had:
●
Net
loss available to common stockholders of $59,464,757; and
●
Net
cash used in operations was $14,104,694.
Additionally,
at September 30, 2025, the Company had:
●
Accumulated
deficit of 127,173,896;
●
Stockholders’
deficit of $17,269,661; and
●
Working
capital deficit of $29,972,856.
17
The
Company anticipates that it will need to raise additional capital immediately in order to continue to fund its operations. The Company
has relied on related parties for the debt-based funding of its operations. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain
funds on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. There is also no assurance that the amount of funds the Company might raise will enable
the Company to complete its initiatives or attain profitable operations.
The
Company’s operating needs include the planned costs to operate its business, including amounts required to fund working capital
and capital expenditures. The Company’s future capital requirements and the adequacy of its available funds will depend on many
factors, including the Company’s ability to successfully expand to new markets, competition, and the need to enter into collaborations
with other companies or acquire other companies to enhance or complement its product and service offerings.
There
can be no assurances that financing will be available on terms which are favorable, or at all. If the Company is unable to raise additional
funding to meet its working capital needs in the future, it will be forced to delay, reduce, or cease its operations.
We
manage liquidity risk by reviewing, on an ongoing basis, our sources of liquidity and capital requirements. The Company had cash on hand
of $653,869 at September 30, 2025.
The
Company has historically incurred significant losses since inception and has not demonstrated an ability to generate sufficient revenues
from the sales of its products and services to achieve profitable operations. In making this assessment, we performed a comprehensive
analysis of our current circumstances including our financial position, our cash flows and cash usage forecasts for the twelve months
ended December 31, 2025, and our current capital structure including equity-based instruments and our obligations and debts.
These
factors create substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within the twelve-month period subsequent
to the date that these financial statements are issued.
The
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going
concern. Accordingly, the financial statements have been prepared on a basis that assumes the Company will continue as a going concern
and which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the ordinary course of business.
Management
is actively pursuing strategies to enhance revenue generation, improve operational efficiencies, and secure additional financing on more
sustainable terms. We are evaluating various initiatives, including cost-containment measures, operational improvements, and strategic
partnerships, with the aim of transitioning to positive cash flow from operations. However, there remains a risk that these strategies
may not yield the desired outcomes in the near term. Management’s strategic plans include the following:
●
Expand
into new and existing markets (commercial and residential);
●
Obtain
additional debt and/or equity based financing for growth;
●
Closed
our transaction with Next Holding (occurred February 13, 2025);
●
Collaborations
with other operating businesses for strategic opportunities; and
●
Acquire
other businesses to enhance or complement our current business model while accelerating our growth.
Off-Balance
Sheet Financing Arrangements
We
have no obligations, assets or liabilities which would be considered off-balance sheet arrangements. We do not participate in transactions
that create relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, often referred to as variable interest entities, which
would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements. We have not entered into any off-balance
sheet financing arrangements, established any special purpose entities, guaranteed any debt or commitments of other entities, or purchased
any non-financial assets.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management’s
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements, which
were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The preparation of these consolidated
financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions for the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses.
Our estimates are based on our historical experience and on various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances,
the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent
from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions, and those differences may
be material.
18
While
our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of
the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we believe the following discussion
addresses our most critical accounting policies, which are those that are most important to our financial condition and results of operations
and which require our most difficult, subjective and complex judgments.
Principles
of Consolidation
The
consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and include the accounts of the Company and its wholly
owned subsidiaries. The Company consolidates entities where it has a controlling financial interest, as defined by the Financial Accounting
Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 810, “Consolidation”.
In
accordance with ASC 810-10, consolidation applies to:
●
Entities
with more than 50% voting interest, unless control is not with the Company; and
●
Variable
Interest Entities (VIEs), where the Company is the primary beneficiary, possessing both (i) power over significant activities and
(ii) the obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits.
All
intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation per ASC 810-10-45. The Company continuously evaluates its investments
and relationships to assess consolidation requirements.
Business
Combinations, Asset Acquisitions, and Reverse Acquisitions
The
Company accounts for acquisitions in accordance with ASC 805, “Business Combinations,” and applicable SEC reporting requirements
under Regulation S-X, Rule 3-05 and Regulation S-K, Items 101 and 303. Transactions qualifying as business combinations are accounted
for under the acquisition method, while those classified as asset acquisitions follow the guidance in ASC 805-50. Additionally, the Company
evaluates whether a transaction qualifies as a reverse acquisition under ASC 805-40 and applies the appropriate accounting and disclosure
requirements.
Business
Combinations
For
transactions classified as business combinations, the Company:
●
Recognizes
and measures identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and noncontrolling interests at their fair values at the acquisition
date (ASC 805-20-25-1).
●
Records
goodwill as the excess of the fair value of consideration transferred over the fair value of net assets acquired, including any previously
held equity interests (ASC 805-30-30-1).
●
Expenses
acquisition-related costs as incurred, per ASC 805-10-25-23.
●
Uses
preliminary purchase price allocations, with adjustments permitted within the measurement period (not exceeding one year) per ASC
805-10-25-13. Adjustments beyond the measurement period are recorded in earnings.
Significant
judgments in fair value determinations include:
●
Intangible
asset valuations, based on estimates of future cash flows and discount rates.
●
Useful
life assessments, impacting amortization and financial results.
●
Contingent
consideration, which is remeasured at fair value through earnings per ASC 805-30-35-1.
For
SEC registrants, Regulation S-X, Rule 3-05 may require audited financial statements of the acquired business if the acquisition is significant.
The determination of significance follows Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X, which considers investment, asset, and income tests.
19
Asset
Acquisitions
For
transactions classified as asset acquisitions under ASC 805-50, the Company:
●
Applies
the “screen test” to determine whether substantially all of the fair value of gross assets acquired is concentrated in
a single identifiable asset or group of similar assets (ASC 805-10-55-3A).
●
Allocates
the purchase price using a cost accumulation model, assigning costs to acquired assets based on their relative fair values (ASC 805-50-30-3);
And
●
Capitalizes
direct acquisition costs as part of the asset’s cost, unlike business combinations where such costs are expensed (ASC 805-50-25-1).
The
classification between business combinations and asset acquisitions requires significant judgment, particularly when applying the screen
test. Incorrect classification can materially impact:
●
The
recognition of goodwill (only in business combinations).
●
The
measurement and presentation of acquired assets and assumed liabilities; and
●
The
Company’s financial position and results of operations.
Regulatory
and Financial Reporting Considerations
For
SEC registrants, acquisitions may trigger additional disclosure and reporting requirements:
●
Regulation
S-X, Rule 3-05: Requires separate financial statements of the acquired business if it meets significance thresholds under Rule 1-02(w).
●
Regulation
S-K, Item 101: Requires disclosure of the impact of material acquisitions on the Company’s business operations.
●
Regulation
S-K, Item 303: Mandates discussion of the impact of acquisitions on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations
in Management’s Discussion and Analysis.
●
Regulation
S-X, Article 11: Requires pro forma financial statements if the acquisition is significant.
●
Form
8-K, Item 2.01: Immediate reporting requirements for material acquisitions, including reverse mergers.
20
The
Company continuously evaluates acquisitions, including reverse acquisitions, to ensure proper classification and compliance with ASC
805, SEC reporting requirements, and regulatory guidance.
Segment
Reporting
The
Company follows ASC 280, Segment Reporting, which requires public entities to report financial and descriptive information about their
reportable operating segments.
ASC
280-10-50-1 states that an operating segment is a component of a public entity that:
●
Engages
in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses;
●
Has
operating results that are regularly reviewed by the Company’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”), which is
our Chief Executive Officer to make decisions about resource allocation and performance assessment; and
●
Has
discrete financial information available.
Under
ASC 280-10-50-5, a public entity is required to report separately only those operating segments that meet certain quantitative thresholds.
However, as specified in ASC 280-10-50-11, if a company’s business activities are managed as a single operating segment and reviewed
on a consolidated basis, the company may report as a single segment. The Company has determined that it operates as two reportable segments,
as its CODM reviews the business as a whole rather than by distinct business components.
Application
of ASU 2023-07 – Segment Reporting
In
October 2023, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements
to Reportable Segment Disclosures , which enhances segment disclosures by requiring public entities to disclose significant segment
expenses that are regularly provided to the CODM and used in assessing segment performance and resource allocation.
The
adoption of ASU 2023-07 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Use
of Estimates and Assumptions
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements, and the recognition of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may
differ from these estimates, and such differences could be material.
In
accordance with ASC 250-10-50-4, changes in estimates are recorded in the period in which they become known and are accounted for prospectively.
The Company bases its estimates on historical experience, industry trends, and other relevant factors, incorporating both quantitative
and qualitative assessments that it believes are reasonable under the circumstances.
Significant
estimates for the years ended December 31, 2024, and 2023, respectively, include:
●
Allowance
for doubtful accounts and other receivables
●
Inventory
reserves and classifications
●
Valuation
of loss contingencies
●
Valuation
of stock-based compensation
●
Estimated
useful lives of property and equipment
●
Impairment
of intangible assets
●
Implicit
interest rate in right-of-use operating leases
●
Uncertain
tax positions
●
Valuation
allowance on deferred tax assets
Risks
and Uncertainties
The
Company operates in a highly competitive industry that is subject to intense market dynamics, shifting consumer demand, and economic
fluctuations. The Company’s operations are exposed to significant financial, operational, and strategic risks, including potential
business disruptions, supply chain constraints, and liquidity challenges.
In
accordance with ASC 275, “Risks and Uncertainties,” the Company evaluates and discloses risks that could materially affect
its financial condition, results of operations, and business outlook. Key factors contributing to variability in sales and earnings include:
1.
Industry
Cyclicality (ASC 275-10-50-6) – The Company’s financial performance is affected by industry trends, seasonality, and
shifts in market demand.
2.
Macroeconomic
Conditions (ASC 275-10-50-8) – Economic downturns, inflationary pressures, interest rate changes, and geopolitical risks may
impact consumer purchasing behavior and the Company’s revenue streams.
3.
Pricing
Volatility (ASC 275-10-50-4) – The cost and availability of raw materials, supply chain disruptions, and competitive pricing
pressures can lead to fluctuations in gross margins and profitability.
Given
these uncertainties, the Company faces challenges in accurately forecasting financial performance and may experience material risks affecting
liquidity, business continuity, and long-term strategic growth. The Company continuously assesses these risks and implements measures
to mitigate their potential impact.
21
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The
Company accounts for financial instruments in accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements, which establishes a framework for measuring
fair value and requires related disclosures. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer
a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value measurement is based on the
Company’s principal market or, if none exists, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability.
Fair
Value Hierarchy
ASC
820 requires the use of observable inputs whenever available and establishes a three-tier hierarchy for measuring fair value:
●
Level
1 – Quoted market prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
●
Level
2 – Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities
or inputs that are directly or indirectly observable.
●
Level
3 – Unobservable inputs that require significant judgment, including management assumptions and estimates based on available
market data.
The
classification of an asset or liability within the hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value
measurement. Level 3 valuations generally require more judgment and complexity, often involving a combination of cost, market, or income
approaches, as well as assumptions about market conditions, pricing, and other factors.
Fair
Value Determination and Use of External Advisors
The
Company assesses the fair value of its financial instruments and, where appropriate, may engage external valuation specialists to assist
in determining fair value. While management believes that recorded fair values are reasonable, they may not necessarily reflect net realizable
values or future fair values.
Financial
Instruments Carried at Historical Cost
The
Company’s financial instruments—including cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued expenses (including related
party balances)—are recorded at historical cost. As of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively, the carrying amounts
of these instruments approximated their fair values due to their short-term maturities.
Fair
Value Option Under ASC 825
ASC
825-10, Financial Instruments, permits entities to elect the fair value option for certain financial assets and liabilities. This election
is made on an instrument-by-instrument basis and is irrevocable unless a new election date occurs. If elected, unrealized gains and losses
are recognized in earnings at each reporting date. The Company has not elected the fair value option for any of its outstanding financial
instruments.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents and Concentration of Credit Risk
For
purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months
or less at the purchase date and money market accounts to be cash equivalents.
Investments
The
Company accounts for available-for-sale (“AFS”) debt securities in accordance with FASB ASC 320, Investments—Debt and
Equity Securities. These securities are recorded at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses recognized as a component of other comprehensive
income (OCI) unless deemed other-than-temporary, per ASC 320-10-35-1.
Recognition
of Gains, Losses, and Amortization
●
Realized
gains and losses, including impairments, are recorded in net income in accordance with ASC 320-10-35-25.
●
Cost
basis for sales is determined using the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method, per ASC 320-10-35-4.
●
Premiums
and discounts on AFS debt securities are amortized using the straight-line method over the security’s life, in accordance with
ASC 320-10-35-10.
Impairment
Assessment
The
Company evaluates AFS debt securities for other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) in accordance with ASC 320-10-35-33 to
35. The assessment considers:
●
The
extent and duration of declines in fair value below amortized cost,
●
The
financial condition and creditworthiness of the issuer, and
●
The
Company’s intent and ability to hold the security until recovery.
22
If
an OTTI is identified, the impairment loss is recognized in earnings as the difference between the amortized cost and the fair value
of the security, per ASC 320-10-35-34. The new fair value becomes the adjusted cost basis, and subsequent recoveries are not recognized
in earnings (ASC 320-10-35-35).
Accounts
Receivable
The
Company accounts for accounts receivable in accordance with FASB ASC 310, Receivables. Receivables are recorded at their net realizable
value, which represents the amount management expects to collect from outstanding customer balances (ASC 310-10-35-7).
The
Company extends credit to customers based on an evaluation of their financial condition and other factors. The Company does not require
collateral, and interest is not accrued on overdue accounts receivable (ASC 310-10-45-4).
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
Management
periodically assesses the collectability of accounts receivable and establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts as needed. The allowance
is determined based on:
●
A
review of outstanding accounts;
●
Historical
collection experience; and
●
Current
economic conditions (ASC 310-10-35-9).
Accounts
deemed uncollectible are written off against the allowance when determined to be uncollectible (ASC 310-10-35-10).
Applicability
of ASC 326
The
Company has assessed the applicability of ASC 326, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses, which requires an expected credit loss
model for financial assets measured at amortized cost. However, ASC 326 primarily applies to financial institutions and entities with
long-term financing receivables.
Since
the Company’s accounts receivable are short-term trade receivables that do not meet the scope requirements of ASC 326-20-15-2,
it continues to apply the incurred loss model under ASC 310 for estimating credit losses.
Inventory
The
Company accounts for inventory in accordance with FASB ASC 330, Inventory. Inventory consists solely of fuel and is stated at the lower
of cost or net realizable value (“LCNRV”) using the FIFO method, as required by ASC 330-10-35-1.
Inventory
Valuation and Reserve Assessment
Management
assesses the recoverability of inventory each reporting period and establishes reserves for potential inventory write-downs when necessary.
The Company evaluates factors such as:
●
Market
conditions affecting fuel prices,
●
Net
realizable value based on estimated selling price, and
●
Inventory
turnover trends (ASC 330-10-35-2).
Concentrations
The
Company evaluates and discloses significant concentrations of risk in accordance with FASB ASC 275-10, Risks and Uncertainties. These
risks may arise from customer concentrations, vendor reliance, geographic dependence, or other economic factors that could materially
impact the Company’s financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
23
A
concentration exists when a single customer, supplier, or market accounts for a significant portion (typically greater than 10%) of the
Company’s total revenues, accounts receivable, or vendor purchases (ASC 275-10-50-16).
Customer
and Sales Concentrations
The
Company’s revenue stream may be dependent on a limited number of key customers. A loss of any significant customer, a decline in
demand from such customers, or a deterioration in their financial condition could negatively impact the Company’s future revenues
and profitability.
Accounts
Receivable Concentrations
The
Company extends credit to customers based on their financial strength, payment history, and other relevant factors. A significant concentration
of accounts receivable from a limited number of customers could expose the Company to credit risk and potential collection issues. The
Company regularly evaluates the creditworthiness of its customers and may require advance payments, letters of credit, or other credit
enhancements to mitigate risks.
Vendor
and Supplier Concentrations
The
Company relies on a limited number of vendors for certain key materials or services. A disruption in supply, changes in pricing, or financial
instability of a major supplier could materially impact the Company’s ability to procure necessary materials, leading to increased
costs, delays in production, or operational disruptions. The Company continuously assesses vendor relationships and explores alternative
suppliers when necessary to mitigate supply chain risks.
Property
and Equipment
Property
and equipment are recorded at cost, net of accumulated depreciation, in accordance with ASC 360, “Property, Plant, and Equipment.”
Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.
Repairs
and maintenance expenditures that do not materially extend the useful life of an asset are expensed as incurred. Significant improvements
or upgrades that increase the asset’s productivity, efficiency, or useful life are capitalized.
Upon
disposal or sale of property and equipment, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any resulting
gain or loss is recognized in the statement of operations, in accordance with ASC 360-10-40-5.
The
Company evaluates the carrying value of property and equipment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset may
be impaired. If impairment indicators exist, the Company assesses recoverability based on the undiscounted future cash flows expected
from the use and disposition of the asset. If the carrying amount exceeds the estimated recoverable amount, an impairment loss is recognized
in accordance with ASC 360-10-35-17.
Impairment
of Long-lived Assets including Internal Use Capitalized Software Costs
The
Company evaluates the recoverability of long-lived assets, including identifiable intangible assets and internal-use capitalized software
costs, in accordance with FASB ASC 360-10-35-15, Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.
An
impairment review is triggered when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset group may not be recoverable.
Factors considered include, but are not limited to:
●
Significant
changes in expected performance compared to prior forecasts;
●
Changes
in asset utilization, including discontinued or modified use;
●
Negative
industry or economic trends that impact asset value; and
●
Strategic
shifts in the Company’s business operations (ASC 360-10-35-21).
24
Impairment
Assessment Process
When
impairment indicators exist, the Company performs a recoverability test by comparing the undiscounted future cash flows expected to be
generated from the use and ultimate disposition of the asset group to its carrying amount (ASC 360-10-35-17).
●
If
the undiscounted cash flows exceed the carrying amount, no impairment is recognized.
●
If
the undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized, measured as the excess of the carrying
amount over the fair value of the asset (ASC 360-10-35-18).
Internal-Use
Software Considerations
For
internal-use capitalized software, impairment is assessed under ASC 350-40-35, which requires evaluation when:
Impairment
Results
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, the Company did not record any impairment losses.
Original
Issue Discounts (“OIDs”) and Other Debt Discounts
The
Company accounts for OIDs and other debt discounts in accordance with FASB ASC 835-30, Interest—Imputation of Interest. These discounts
are recorded as a reduction of the carrying amount of the related debt and are amortized to interest expense over the term of the debt
using the effective interest method, unless the straight-line method is materially similar (ASC 835-30-35-2).
OIDs
For
certain notes issued, the Company may provide the debt holder with an OID, which is recorded as a debt discount, reducing the face value
of the note. The discount is amortized to interest expense over the term of the debt in the unaudited consolidated statements of operations.
Stock
and Other Equity Issued with Debt
The
Company may issue common stock or other equity instruments in connection with debt issuance. When stock is issued, it is recorded at
fair value and treated as a debt discount, reducing the carrying amount of the note. These discounts are amortized to interest expense
over the life of the debt (ASC 470-20-25-2).
The
combined debt discounts, including OID and stock-related discounts, cannot exceed the face amount of the debt (ASU 2020-06).
Debt
Issuance Costs
Debt
issuance costs, including fees paid to lenders or third parties, are capitalized as a debt discount and amortized to interest expense
over the life of the debt in accordance with ASC 835-30-45-1. These costs are presented as a direct deduction from the carrying amount
of the debt liability rather than as a separate asset (ASC 835-30-45-3).
Right
of Use Assets and Lease Obligations
The
Company accounts for ROU assets and lease liabilities in accordance with FASB ASC 842, Leases. These amounts reflect the present value
of the Company’s estimated future minimum lease payments over the lease term, including any reasonably certain renewal options,
discounted using a collateralized incremental borrowing rate (ASC 842-20-30-1).
The
Company classifies its leases as either operating or finance leases based on the criteria outlined in ASC 842-10-25-2. The Company’s
leases primarily consist of operating leases, which are included as ROU assets and operating lease liabilities on the consolidated balance
sheet.
Short-Term
Leases
The
Company has elected the short-term lease exemption allowed under ASC 842-20-25-2, whereby leases with a term of 12 months or less are
not recorded on the balance sheet. Instead, lease payments are expensed on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
25
Lease
Term and Renewal Options
In
determining the lease term, the Company evaluates whether renewal options are reasonably certain to be exercised, as required by ASC
842-10-30-1. Factors considered include:
●
The
useful life of leasehold improvements relative to the lease term;
●
The
economic performance of the business at the leased location;
●
The
comparative cost of renewal rates versus market rates; and
●
The
presence of any significant economic penalties for non-renewal (ASC 842-10-55-26).
If
a renewal option is deemed reasonably certain to be exercised, the ROU asset and lease liability reflect those additional future lease
payments. The Company’s operating leases contain renewal options with no residual value guarantees. Currently, management does
not expect to exercise any renewal options, which are therefore excluded in the measurement of lease obligations.
Discount
Rate and Lease Liability Measurement
Since
the implicit rate in the leases is not readily determinable, the Company applies an incremental borrowing rate that represents the rate
it would incur to borrow on a collateralized basis over a similar term and currency environment (ASC 842-20-30-3).
Lease
Impairment
In
accordance with ASC 360-10-35, the Company evaluates ROU assets for impairment indicators whenever events or changes in circumstances
suggest the carrying amount may not be recoverable. No impairments of ROU assets were recognized for the years ended December 31, 2024,
and 2023.
See
Note 7 for details on third-party and related-party operating leases.
The
Company recognizes revenue in accordance with FASB ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, as amended by ASU 2014-09. Under ASC
606, revenue is recognized when control of the promised goods or services is transferred to the customer in an amount that reflects the
consideration the Company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services.
The
Company generates revenue from mobile fuel sales, which can be purchased as a one-time transaction or through a monthly membership. Revenue
from fuel sales is recognized at the time of delivery, and membership revenue is recognized at the end of each month, reflecting the
satisfaction of the performance obligation over time within a one-month membership cycle.
The
Company follows the five-step revenue recognition model outlined in ASC 606-10-05-4:
1.
Identify
the Contract with a Customer
A
contract exists when the following criteria are met, per ASC 606-10-25-1:
●
The
contract creates enforceable rights and obligations between the Company and the customer.
●
The
contract has commercial substance (i.e., it affects the Company’s cash flows).
●
The
payment terms are identified, and the consideration is determinable.
●
It
is probable that the Company will collect the consideration in exchange for the goods or services transferred.
Contracts
for mobile fuel sales and memberships meet these criteria. Collectability is assessed based on historical customer payment trends and
credit risk in accordance with ASC 606-10-25-5.
2.
Identify
the Performance Obligations in the Contract
A
performance obligation is a distinct good or service promised in the contract that is both capable of being distinct and distinct in
the context of the contract, per ASC 606-10-25-19.
26
The
Company has determined that its contracts, based on sales type, contain two distinct performance obligations:
●
Fuel
Sales – The delivery of fuel to a customer, with revenue recognized at the point of delivery.
●
Membership
Fees – Monthly membership services, with revenue recognized over time within a one-month membership cycle, as the customer
benefits from access to services throughout the period.
These
performance obligations are not bundled or combined, as each service is separately identifiable, in accordance with ASC 606-10-25-22.
3.
Determine
the Transaction Price
The
transaction price is the amount of consideration the Company expects to receive in exchange for transferring goods or services to the
customer, per ASC 606-10-32-2.
The
Company’s transaction price considerations include:
●
Fixed
consideration – Prices are clearly stated and do not vary based on performance.
●
No
variable consideration – The Company does not formally offer refunds, rebates, or pricing incentives. During the years ended
December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, the Company granted insignificant discounts of less than 1% of total revenues.
●
No
financing component – Payments are made upon fuel delivery or at the end of the monthly membership cycle, per ASC 606-10-32-15.
4.
Allocate
the Transaction Price to Performance Obligations
For
contracts with a single performance obligation, the entire transaction price is allocated to that obligation, per ASC 606-10-32-40.
If
a contract included multiple performance obligations, the transaction price would be allocated based on relative standalone selling prices
(“SSP”) as required by ASC 606-10-32-28. The standalone selling price is determined based on observable sales data.
The
Company’s fuel sales and memberships each have a distinct standalone selling price, eliminating the need for allocation adjustments.
5.
Recognize
Revenue When (or As) Performance Obligations Are Satisfied
Revenue
is recognized at the point in time when control over a product or service is transferred to the customer, in accordance with ASC 606-10-25-30.
●
Fuel
Sales: Control transfers at the time of fuel delivery, at which point revenue is recognized.
●
Membership
Fees: Revenue is recognized over time within a one-month cycle, as customers receive continuous access to fuel delivery services
throughout the month.
The
Company does not recognize revenue based on customer invoicing dates; instead, it ensures revenue recognition aligns with the actual
satisfaction of performance obligations per ASC 606-10-25-31.
Principal
vs. Agent Considerations
In
evaluating whether the Company acts as a principal or an agent in its fuel sales transactions, the Company applies the guidance in ASC
606-10-55-36 through 55-40. The Company has determined that it is the principal in these transactions based on the following factors:
●
The
Company controls the fuel before it is transferred to the customer.
●
The
Company has discretion in pricing, as it sets the selling price of fuel.
●
The
Company is responsible for fulfilling the obligation of delivering fuel to the customer.
●
The
Company is exposed to inventory risk, as it procures and holds fuel before sale.
27
Based
on these factors, the Company recognizes revenue on a gross basis, as it is the principal in fuel sales transactions in accordance with
ASC 606-10-55-37A.
Summary
of Compliance with ASC 606 and ASU Updates
Revenue
Stream
Performance
Obligation
Recognition
Timing
Consideration
Type
Fuel
Sales
Fuel
Delivery
At
time of delivery
Fixed
price per gallon
Membership
Fees
Monthly
access to fuel services
Over
time (one-month cycle)
Fixed
monthly subscription
Contract
Liabilities (Deferred Revenue)
Contract
liabilities represent amounts received from customers before the satisfaction of performance obligations, which are subsequently recognized
as revenue upon fulfillment.
Under
ASC 606-10-45-2, the Company discloses contract balances related to deferred revenue when applicable. Any prepayments received for fuel
deliveries or memberships are classified as contract liabilities until revenue recognition criteria are met.
Cost
of Sales
Cost
of sales consists of direct expenses incurred in the delivery of the Company’s products and services. These costs primarily include:
●
Fuel
Costs – The cost of procuring fuel for resale, including fluctuations in market pricing, supplier agreements, and transportation
expenses.
●
Driver
Wages and Benefits – Compensation, payroll taxes, and employee benefits associated with the Company’s delivery personnel.
Cost
of sales is recognized in the same period as the related revenue in accordance with FASB ASC 705, Cost of Sales and Services. The Company
regularly evaluates its cost structure to ensure efficient fuel procurement and operational cost management.
Fuel
costs include all costs incurred to acquire fuel, including supporting transportation costs prior to delivery to customers. Fuel costs
do not include any depreciation of property and equipment as there are no significant amounts that could be attributed to fuel costs.
Accordingly, depreciation and amortization are separately classified in the consolidated statements of operations and are not recorded
in cost of sales.
Income
Taxes
The
Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method prescribed by FASB ASC 740, Income Taxes. Under this method, deferred
tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences of differences between the financial reporting and tax bases
of assets and liabilities. These amounts are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply in the periods when temporary differences
reverse (ASC 740-10-30-8).
The
effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax balances is recognized as income or expense in the period that includes the enactment
date (ASC 740-10-45-4).
Uncertain
Tax Positions
The
Company evaluates uncertain tax positions in accordance with ASC 740-10-25, which requires that a tax position be recognized in the financial
statements only if it is more likely than not (greater than 50% likelihood) to be sustained upon examination by tax authorities.
As
of December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, the Company had no uncertain tax positions that qualified for recognition or disclosure
in the financial statements (ASC 740-10-50-15).
The
Company also recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in other expense in the consolidated statement of operations
(ASC 740-10-45-25). No interest and penalties were recorded for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023.
Valuation
of Deferred Tax Assets
The
Company’s deferred tax assets include certain future tax benefits, such as net operating losses (NOLs), tax credits, and deductible
temporary differences. Under ASC 740-10-30-5, a valuation allowance is required if it is more likely than not that some portion, or all,
of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
The
Company reviews the realizability of deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis, or more frequently if circumstances warrant, considering
both positive and negative evidence (ASC 740-10-30-16).
28
Factors
Considered in Valuation Allowance Assessment
The
Company evaluates multiple factors in determining whether a valuation allowance is necessary, including:
●
Historical
earnings trends (cumulative pre-tax income or losses in the most recent three-year period)
●
Future
financial projections, including expected taxable income based on long-term estimates of business performance and market conditions
●
Statutory
carryforward periods for net operating losses and other deferred tax assets
●
Prudent
and feasible tax planning strategies that could impact the realization of deferred tax assets
●
Nature
and predictability of temporary differences and the timing of their reversal
●
Sensitivity
of financial forecasts to external factors such as commodity prices, market demand, and operational risks
While
cumulative three-year losses are a strong indicator that a valuation allowance may be needed, ASC 740-10-30-23 states that a valuation
allowance determination is not solely based on past losses—all available positive and negative evidence must be considered.
Valuation
Allowance Determination
At
December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively, the Company recorded a full valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets, resulting
in a net carrying amount of $0. This determination was based on cumulative losses in recent years and the lack of sufficient positive
evidence to support the realization of deferred tax assets in the near term (ASC 740-10-30-24).
The
Company will continue to evaluate its valuation allowance each reporting period and will recognize deferred tax assets in the future
if sufficient positive evidence emerges to support their realization.
Advertising
Costs
Advertising
costs are expensed as incurred, in accordance with ASC 720-35, “Advertising Costs.” These costs are recognized as operating
expenses in the period in which they are incurred and are classified within general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements
of operations.
The
Company does not capitalize direct-response advertising costs, as they do not meet the criteria for deferral under ASC 720-35-25-1.
Stock-Based
Compensation
The
Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, “Compensation – Stock Compensation,” using
the fair value-based method. Under this guidance, compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award
and is recognized over the requisite service period, typically the vesting period.
ASC
718 establishes accounting standards for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. It also
applies to transactions where an entity incurs liabilities based on the fair value of its equity instruments or liabilities that may
be settled using equity instruments.
In
compliance with ASU 2018-07, the Company applies the fair value method for equity instruments granted to both employees and non-employees,
aligning non-employee share-based payment accounting with that of employees. The fair value of stock-based compensation is determined
as of the grant date or the measurement date (i.e., when the performance obligation is completed) and is recognized over the vesting
period in accordance with ASC 718.
The
Company determines the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, considering the following key assumptions:
●
Exercise
price – The agreed-upon price at which the option can be exercised.
●
Expected
dividends – The anticipated dividend yield over the expected life of the option.
●
Expected
volatility – Based on historical stock price fluctuations.
●
Risk-free
interest rate – Derived from U.S. Treasury securities with similar maturities.
●
Expected
life of the option – Estimated based on historical exercise patterns and contractual terms.
Additionally,
the Company follows the guidance under ASU 2016-09, which introduced amendments to simplify certain accounting aspects of share-based
compensation, including:
●
The
treatment of tax benefits and tax deficiencies in income tax reporting.
●
The
option to recognize forfeitures as they occur rather than estimating them upfront.
●
Cash
flow classification for certain tax-related transactions.
29
The
Company continues to evaluate and apply the latest Accounting Standards Updates (ASUs) and interpretive releases related to stock-based
compensation to ensure compliance with evolving financial reporting requirements.
Stock
Warrants
In
connection with certain financing transactions (debt or equity), consulting arrangements, or strategic partnerships, the Company may
issue warrants to purchase shares of its common stock. These standalone warrants are not puttable or mandatorily redeemable by the holder
and are classified as equity instruments in accordance with ASC 480, “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity.”
The
fair value of warrants issued for compensation purposes is measured using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, consistent with the
guidance in ASC 718-10-30. However, if warrants meet the definition of derivative liabilities under ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging,”
fair value is determined using a binomial pricing model or other appropriate valuation techniques, as required by ASC 815-40-15.
Accounting
Treatment of Warrants
●
Warrants
issued in conjunction with common stock issuance are initially recorded at fair value as a reduction in Additional Paid-In Capital
(APIC), in accordance with ASC 815-40-25.
●
Warrants
issued for services are recorded at fair value and expensed over the requisite service period or immediately upon issuance if no
service period exists, as per ASC 718-10-25.
●
Warrants
classified as liabilities due to settlement features or pricing adjustments are remeasured at fair value each reporting period, with
changes recognized in earnings, following ASC 815-40-35.
Basic
and Diluted Earnings (Loss) per Share and Reverse Stock Split
The
Company computes earnings per share (“EPS”) in accordance with ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share.” The calculation
of basic EPS follows the two-class method and is determined by dividing net earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding, including certain other shares committed to be issued.
Basic
Earnings Per Share (EPS)
Basic
EPS is calculated using the two-class method, as prescribed by ASC 260-10-45-60, and is computed as follows:
●
Net
earnings available to common shareholders represent net earnings to common shareholders, adjusted for the allocation of earnings
to participating securities.
●
Losses
are not allocated to participating securities in accordance with ASC 260-10-45-61.
●
The
denominator includes common shares outstanding and certain other shares committed to be issued, such as restricted stock and restricted
stock units (“RSUs”), for which no future service is required.
Diluted
Earnings Per Share (EPS)
Diluted
EPS is calculated under both the two-class method and the treasury stock method, and the more dilutive result is reported, as required
by ASC 260-10-45-45.
●
Diluted
EPS is computed by taking the sum of:
○
Net
earnings available to common shareholders
○
Dividends
on preferred shares
○
Dividends
on dilutive mandatorily redeemable convertible preferred shares
○
Divided
by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and certain other shares committed to be issued, plus all dilutive common
stock equivalents during the period, such as:
■
Stock
options
■
Warrants
■
Convertible
preferred stock
■
Convertible
debt
●
Preferred
shares and unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid
or unpaid) qualify as participating securities under the two-class method, per ASC 260-10-45-62.
Net
Loss Per Share Considerations
In
computing net loss per share, unvested shares of common stock are excluded from the denominator, as required by ASC 260-10-45-48.
Participating
Securities & Share-Based Compensation
Restricted
stock and RSUs granted as part of share-based compensation contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends and dividend equivalents, respectively.
Therefore:
●
Before
the requisite service is rendered for the right to retain the award, these instruments meet the definition of a participating security
under ASC 260-10-45-59.
●
RSUs
granted under an executive compensation plan, however, are not considered participating securities because the rights to dividend
equivalents are forfeitable (ASC 718-10-25).
30
Related
Parties
The
Company defines related parties in accordance with ASC 850, “Related Party Disclosures,” and SEC Regulation S-X, Rule 4-08(k).
Related parties include entities and individuals that, directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, control, are controlled
by, or are under common control with the Company.
Related
parties include, but are not limited to:
●
Principal
owners of the Company.
●
Members
of management (including directors, executive officers, and key employees).
●
Immediate
family members of principal owners and members of management.
●
Entities
affiliated with principal owners or management through direct or indirect ownership.
●
Entities
with which the Company has significant transactions, where one party has the ability to exercise control or significant influence
over the management or operating policies of the other.
A
party is considered related if it has the ability to control or significantly influence the management or operating policies of the Company
in a manner that could prevent either party from fully pursuing its own separate economic interests.
The
Company discloses all material related party transactions, including:
●
The
nature of the relationship between the parties.
●
A
description of the transaction(s), including terms and amounts involved.
●
Any
amounts due to or from related parties as of the reporting date.
●
Any
other elements necessary for a clear understanding of the transactions’ effects on the financial statements.
Disclosures
are made in accordance with ASC 850-10-50-1 through 50-6 and SEC Regulation S-X, Rule 4-08(k), which requires registrants to disclose
material related party transactions and their effects on the financial position and results of operations.
●
See
Note 1, which discusses the common control merger between the Company and Next Holding, on February 13, 2025.
●
See
Note 4 which includes accrued liabilities – related parties.
●
See
Notes 5 and 12 for a discussion of related party debt.
●
See
Note 7 regarding right-of-use operating lease with the Company’s Chief Technology Officer.
●
See
Note 8 for a discussion of equity transactions with certain officers and directors.
Recent
Accounting Standards
ASU
2022-02 – Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures
In
March 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2022-02, which:
●
Eliminates
the troubled debt restructuring (TDR) model for creditors under ASC 310, “Receivables.”
●
Requires
enhanced vintage disclosures related to credit losses, including gross write-offs by year of origination.
●
Updates
the accounting guidance under ASC 326, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses,” to enhance disclosures regarding
loan refinancings and restructurings for borrowers experiencing financial difficulty.
The
Company adopted ASU 2022-02 on January 1, 2023. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
ASU
2023-07 – Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures
31
In
November 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-07, which enhances disclosure requirements for reportable segments by:
●
Requiring
enhanced disclosures of significant segment expenses.
●
Aligning
segment reporting requirements with information regularly reviewed by management.
The
Company adopted ASU 2023-07 on January 1, 2024. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted
ASU
2023-09 – Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures
In
December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, which enhances income tax disclosure requirements by:
●
Standardizing
and disaggregating rate reconciliation categories.
●
Requiring
disclosure of income taxes paid by jurisdiction.
This
ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024, and may be applied on a prospective or retrospective basis. Early
adoption is permitted.
The
Company is currently assessing the impact of ASU 2023-09 on its income tax disclosures and reporting requirements.
In
November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures
(Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses (“ASU 2024-03”). This standard requires additional disclosures
of certain expenses, including purchases of inventory, employee compensation, depreciation, intangible asset amortization, and other
specific expense categories. This standard also requires disclosure of the total amount of selling expenses and the Company’s definition
of selling expenses. This update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the impact this update will have on our annual disclosures;
however, it will not impact our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
Other
Accounting Standards Updates
The
FASB has issued various technical corrections and industry-specific updates that are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s
consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. These reclassifications had no impact on the Company’s consolidated
results of operations, stockholders’ equity, or cash flows.
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Not
applicable.
Text extracted from the filing as submitted to EDGAR. Formatting, tables and exhibits are simplified for reading; the original document is authoritative for anything you rely on.