Item 1A. Risk Factors
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Investing in our securities involves risks. Before you make a decision to buy our securities, in addition to the risks and uncertainties discussed above under “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” you should carefully consider the specific risks set forth herein. If any of these risks actually occur, it may materially harm our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations. As a result, the market price of our securities could decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment. Additionally, the risks and uncertainties described in this Report are not the only risks and uncertainties that we face. We may face additional risks and uncertainties that are not presently known to us, or that we currently deem immaterial, which may also impair our business, prospects, financial condition or operating results. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the financial statements of the Company and notes to the financial statements included herein.
13
Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this section to “we,” “us,” or “our” refers to the Company and its subsidiaries.
Risks Related to Our Business
We have a short operating history, which makes it difficult to evaluate our business and future prospects.
We have been in existence only since February of 2023. We have encountered, and will continue to encounter, risks and difficulties frequently experienced by growing companies in rapidly changing industries, including those related to:
● market acceptance of our current and future products and services;
● changing regulatory environments and costs associated with compliance in the helium supply chain;
● our ability to compete with other companies in the helium industry;
● our ability to effectively market our products and services and attract new customers;
● the amount and timing of expenses, particularly sales and marketing expenses, related to the maintenance and expansion of our business, operations and infrastructure;
● our ability to control costs, including our expenses;
● our ability to manage organic growth; and
● general economic conditions and events.
If we do not manage these risks successfully, our business and financial performance will be adversely affected.
We cannot assure the completed construction and commencement of operations of the Pecos Slope Plant, and even after such operations, we may not be able to generate adequate revenue to operate profitably and/or to continue as a going concern.
To date, we have provided natural gas from our reserves to a third-party processor to extract helium which does not currently generate revenue for NEH under existing contractual arrangements. Construction of the Pecos Slope Plant is currently underway, but there is no guarantee that such construction will be completed or that we can successfully commence operations. Furthermore, we cannot assure that we can achieve expected production rates and cost reductions even after the successful completion and operation of the Pecos Slope Plant. In the future, our capital expenses and operational expenses may increase due to expected increased sales, operational costs, and general and administrative costs and, therefore, our operating losses may continue or even increase after operations of the Pecos Slope Plant. Furthermore, to the extent that we are successful in increasing our customer base, we will also incur increased expenses because costs associated with generating and supporting agreements with customers are generally incurred up front, while revenue is generally recognized ratably over the term of the relationship. We may not reach profitability in the near future or at any specific time in the future. If and when our operations do become profitable, we may not be able to sustain profitability.
We cannot assure that we can raise enough capital to successfully develop our Pecos Slope Plant, which will adversely affect our ability to earn revenue and jeopardize our delivery of helium pursuant to existing contracts.
To successfully develop our Pecos Slope field, we will require estimated additional capital of $45.0 million. The current cost of building, installing and commissioning of our Pecos Slope Plant will be approximately $20 million, of which we have already advanced $3.7 million to start construction. Furthermore, we will need to install new trunk lines and a new gathering system in addition to upgrading portions of the gathering system that currently exists in the field at an estimated cost of $10.0 million. Production enhancement from existing wellbore workovers in addition to drilling new wells will help maximize throughput volumes to the Pecos Slope Plant with the company budgeting between $13.0 - $15.0 million for these expenditures.
There is no assurance that we will secure this capital, which could result in delays in realizing revenues from our helium production as well as eventually jeopardize our delivery of helium pursuant to our current helium off-take agreements.
14
The manner in which we secure this additional capital is uncertain. It may be in the form of (i) debt, which could create liens against the current assets of the Company, (ii) equity, which could create additional dilution for current and future shareholders of the Company or (iii) a combination of debt and equity, which could have the combined effects described above.
Scientific and technological changes may impact the demand for helium.
Science and technology are continuously and rapidly evolving. Helium has broad applications, including in the MRI, semiconductor, welding, aerospace and fiber optics sectors, amongst others. However, scientific and technological changes may affect end user demand for helium. For instance, the MRI field has been the leader in helium usage for a number of years, as helium is used for cooling superconducting magnets in MRI machines. However, the latest generation of MRI magnets consumes helium at markedly lower levels. We cannot control the pace of scientific and technological developments and subsequently the changes in demand for helium brought about by these developments. Technological advancement may drive down demand for helium amongst end users in certain industries that may not adequately be replaced by demand in other industries. For instance, electronics is expected to replace MRI as the leading of helium application, but there is no guarantee that the electronics sector’s demand for helium will adequately compensate for the MRI industry’s decline in helium demand. Furthermore, although helium has unique chemical properties that make it irreplaceable in many applications, additional substitutes for helium may be discovered, or existing substitutes for helium may become more prominent as scientific research develops. As science and technology continue to evolve, helium demand may drop in certain fields, which may decrease demand for helium and negatively impact our financial performance.
Global health crises or catastrophes and other unforeseen or unavoidable events or market conditions may dampen demand for helium and negatively impact our financial performance.
Historically, the global helium market has had periods of supply and demand imbalances brought on by a variety of unanticipated and unpredictable events. For instance, sales and demand for helium dropped significantly following the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, due to economic lockdown and supply chain disruptions. Similar global health crises may occur in the future which could drive down the demand for helium and may negatively affect our financial performance.
We cannot control global events or market factors which affect the demand for and supply of helium, which in turn affect the market prices for helium. Therefore, our financial performance may be negatively impacted by events which we may not foresee or adequately prepare for.
Helium demand in certain applications is somewhat elastic.
Helium demand is somewhat elastic, meaning that helium demand for certain applications is sensitive to increases in price. This elasticity manifests itself as substitution of other gases for helium, increase investment in helium recycling or technological change that reduces helium consumption. Therefore, significant increases in helium prices could adversely impact our financial performance over the longer term by reducing demand.
Increases in extraction and production costs or disruptions in our natural gas supplies could materially and adversely impact our business.
We may experience increases in extraction and production costs or an interruption in the supply of natural gas from our reserves. Any such increase or supply interruption could materially and negatively impact our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results by affecting the volume of helium we provide to our clients and subsequently sales. Various market conditions such as inflationary pressures could increase the costs in extraction and production of helium from our natural gas reserves and could adversely affect our business and operating results. Such price increases will also increase our operating costs, and could reduce our margins if we cannot recoup the increased costs through increased prices for our helium supply.
Our costs of operations may exceed estimates due to factors outside of our control, such as labor shortages or external price increases, and we may be unable to pass those costs to our customers, which would negatively impact our financial results.
We depend on our employees and operations teams to assist in distributing helium to our clients. We rely on access to a competitive, local labor supply, including skilled and unskilled positions, to operate our business consistently and reliably. Any labor shortage and/or any disruption in our ability to hire workers may negatively impact our operations and financial condition. If we experience a sustained labor shortage, we may need to increase wages to attract workers, which would increase our costs of production. Furthermore, if our operating costs increased, including due to inflationary pressures, we may be unable to pass those increased costs on to our customers. If we are unable to do so, our gross margin will decline, and our financial results will be negatively impacted.
15
A delayed commencement date or other events could result in an early termination of certain of our material contracts.
We have entered into the Contract for Sale and Purchase of Liquid Helium (the “Liquid Helium Agreement”), with Air Life Gases USA, Inc. (“AirLife”) that has a term of 10 years from the date on which the first container of liquid helium is filled at the tolling facility for the helium buyer (the “Liquid Helium Commencement Date”). We have also entered into the Helium Tolling Agreement (the “Helium Tolling Agreement”) with Keyes Helium Company (“KHC”) dated September 1, 2023, pursuant to which we would receive tolling services with respect to our crude helium and such crude helium would be purified and liquified by KHC into liquid helium and filled into containers. The Helium Tolling Agreement has a term of 5 years from the date on which we commence deliveries of gaseous helium to the third-party tolling facility (the “Tolling Commencement Date”).
If the Liquid Helium Commencement Date has not occurred by November 30, 2025, AirLife has the right to terminate the Liquid Helium Agreement. The Liquid Helium Agreement can also be terminated prior to the end of the term if helium deliveries are less than 6,000,000 standard cubic feet during any 12 consecutive month period, due to a force majeure event, a material breach of the agreement by either party, or financial insolvency. Similarly, because the Helium Tolling Commencement Date has not occurred by September 30, 2024 due to delays in securing financing for our purchase of the Pecos Slope Plant KHC has the right to terminate the Helium Tolling Agreement.
We also agreed to sell fifty percent (50%) of the gaseous helium generated monthly at the Pecos Slope Plant to Matheson, pursuant to the Gaseous Helium Agreement. If the Commencement Date as defined in the Gaseous Helium Agreement does not occur by July 1, 2025, Matheson Agreement has the right to terminate the Gaseous Helium Agreement.
The Commencement Date as defined in the Gaseous Helium Agreement depends on the completion and beginning of operations of our Pecos Slope Plant. Based on the current stage of the development and construction of its Pecos Slope Plant and the advice of the engineering consultants, NEH’s management believes that it is unlikely that we will be able to secure funding, complete construction of the helium extraction plant and commence helium deliveries prior to July 1, 2025, while management believes it is possible that it will occur prior to November 30, 2025. While it is possible that AirLife and KHC could terminate the abovementioned agreements in such situations, we believe that it is more likely that AirLife and KHC would try to renegotiate the agreement on terms that are less favorable for NEH. In the event of early termination, we would attempt to secure replacement agreements with price, terms and conditions reflecting then current market conditions. There is a possibility that we may not be able to secure replacement agreements or that that such replacement agreements will be on less favorable terms than the current agreements. If we are not able to develop an alternate production plan if our Pecos Slope Plant is not ready to operate by the required deadlines, or if we are not able to secure replacement agreements at attractive prices and conditions, our business and operating results could be adversely affected.
In addition, the Liquid Helium Agreement and the Gaseous Helium Agreement have a mechanism of price reopener negotiations, with a scheduled price reopener negotiation at the end of the fifth year, and an unscheduled price reopener negotiation that may be requested by either party, on one occasion each, at any time after the end of the third year. Depending on market conditions, the price reopener negotiation mechanism may result in prices that less advantageous to us, in which case our business and operating results could be adversely affected.
We have proved and probable reserves and areas that we decide to explore may not yield helium in commercial quantities or quality, or at all.
We have proved and probable reserves of helium. We have identified prospects based on available seismic and geological information that indicates the potential presence of helium. However, the areas we decide to explore may not yield helium in commercial quantities or quality, or at all. Most of our current prospects are in various stages of evaluation that will require substantial additional seismic data reprocessing and interpretation. Even when properly used and interpreted, two-dimensional and three-dimensional seismic data and visualization techniques are only tools used to assist geoscientists in identifying subsurface structures and helium indicators and do not enable the interpreter to know whether helium is, in fact, present in those structures. We do not know if any of our prospects will contain helium in sufficient quantities or quality to recover exploration costs or to be economically viable. Even if helium is found on our prospects in commercial quantities, construction costs of infrastructure, including pipelines and transportation costs may prevent the prospects from being economically viable.
We may terminate our extraction program for a prospect if data, information, studies and previous reports indicate that the possible development of our prospect is not commercially viable and, therefore, does not merit further investment. If a significant number of our prospects do not prove to be commercially viable, we will be materially adversely affected.
16
The Appraisal Report included in this Report involves a significant degree of uncertainty and are based on projections that may not prove to be accurate.
The Appraisal Report included in this Report includes projections that are based on assumptions and current expectations relating to future events and financial trends. The reserves were estimated using a combination of the production performance, volumetric and analogy methods, in each case as we considered to be appropriate and necessary. All reserve estimates represent our best judgment and the best judgment of MKM Engineering based on data available at the time of preparation and assumptions as to future economic and regulatory conditions. The process of estimated reserves is complex and requires significant judgment and decisions based on available geological, geophysical, engineering and economic data. These estimates may change substantially as additional data from ongoing development activities and production performance becomes available and as economic conditions impacting helium and gas prices and costs.
We cannot assure you that the projections in the Appraisal Reports will prove to be accurate. These projections were prepared for the narrow purpose of illustrating, under certain limited and simplified assumptions, our resources and costs. In addition, because of the subjective judgments and inherent uncertainties of projections and because the projections are based on a number of assumptions that are subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies beyond our control, there can be no assurance that the projections or conclusions derived therefrom will be realized. The possibility of not finding reserves is an intrinsic risk of our business. Accordingly, you may lose some or all of your investment, particularly to the extent that these projections or conclusions are not ultimately realized.
We may need to raise capital in the future, which may not be available on favorable terms, if at all, and which may cause dilution to our stockholders, restrict our operations or adversely affect our ability to operate and continue our business. There is no guarantee that we will successfully raise capital.
We may need to raise capital in the future. We are in the process of securing a project financing arrangement to fund construction of the Pecos Slope Plant. The successful construction and commencement of the Pecos Slope Plant and therefore financing for the Pecos Slope Plant will have a significant impact on our future financial performance. Furthermore, we estimate that our capital requirements during 2025 to be approximately $40 million to $45 million. However, if we need to raise additional capital in the future for any reason, we cannot be certain that we will be able to obtain additional financing on favorable terms, if at all, and any additional financings may result in additional dilution to holders of the common stock. For instance, debt financing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions such as incurring additional debt, expending capital, or declaring dividends, or which impose financial covenants on us that limit our ability to achieve our business objectives. Additionally, if we enter into secured debt arrangements, we could be required to dispose of material assets or operations to meet our debt service and other obligations, which could negatively impact the business or cause the business to be discontinued. If we need additional capital and cannot raise it on acceptable terms, we may not be able to meet our business objectives, our stock price may fall and you may lose some or all of your investment.
We have a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, which, if left unremedied, could materially and adversely affect the market price of our stock.
As of the date of this Report, we have not maintained effective controls over the control environment, including our internal control over financial reporting. We are a small company with few employees in our accounting and finance department. Although we utilize third parties to assist in the performance of certain accounting and tax related functions, we may still lack the ability to have adequate segregation of duties in the financial statement preparation process. In addition, we have not adequately evaluated and tested controls over the control environment, including our disclosure controls and our internal controls over financial reporting. Since these entity level controls have a pervasive effect across the organization, management has determined that these circumstances constitute a material weakness. If we are unable to remediate this material weakness as a newly public company, our financial reporting may not be reliable, and the market price of our stock may be adversely affected.
Our performance may be negatively impacted by general and regional economic volatility or an economic downturn.
An overall decline in economic activity could adversely impact our business and financial results. For instance, the economic disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic significantly reduced the global demand for helium. Economic uncertainty may reduce end user spending on products which incorporate helium, and therefore reduce the demand for the helium we source and produce. Inadequate demand for our helium could result in decreased revenue and worsen our financial performance.
17
Our business may be adversely affected by the departure of members of our management team, Board of Directors, and key employees.
Our success depends, in large part, on the continued contributions of Will Gray, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, our Board of Directors, and other key personnel. Although we have employment agreements in place for our executive officers, we cannot assure you that they will remain with us for a specified period. Although we have additional personnel that contribute to our business, the loss of Mr. Gray, our Board of Directors, and other key personnel could harm our ability to implement our business strategy and respond to the rapidly changing market conditions in which we operate. Furthermore, the Company does not have key person life insurance policies in place and must bear sole financial risk of their departures.
If we are unable to attract, train and retain qualified personnel, we may not be able to effectively execute our business strategy.
Our future success depends on our ability to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel, including our management, operational, finance and administration personnel. We do not know whether we will be able to hire sufficient workers for these positions to meet our production goals or, if hired, retain all of these personnel as we continue to pursue our business strategy. Furthermore, we do not have key person life insurance policies on such individuals. The loss of the services of one or more of our key employees, or our inability to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
We may implement new lines of business or further diversify our revenue sources within existing lines of business, but we cannot assure that such diversification efforts will be successful.
As an early-stage company, we may implement new lines of business at any time. Aside from helium production, we currently plan on diversifying our resources through trading MPCs and pursuing energy transition opportunities. However, we cannot assure that such plans for diversification will ever materialize. Additionally, there are risks and uncertainties associated with implementing new lines of businesses to diversify our revenue sources. We may invest significant time and resources in our attempts to implement new lines of business or further diversify revenue sources, which may never generate returns or generate sufficient returns to yield a profit. As a result, our business, financial condition or results of operations may be adversely affected by such unsuccessful efforts.
Damage to our reputation could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our reputation is critical to our business and success in existing markets, and will be critical to our success as we continue to develop our business. Any incident that damages our credibility or reputation could damage our business. We may be adversely affected by any negative publicity, regardless of its accuracy. Also, there has been a marked increase in the use of social media platforms and similar devices, including blogs, social media websites and other forms of internet-based communications that provide individuals with access to a broad audience of interested persons. The availability of information on social media platforms is virtually immediate as is its impact. Information posted may be adverse to our interests or may be inaccurate, each of which may harm our performance, prospects or business. The harm may be immediate and may disseminate rapidly and broadly, without affording us an opportunity for redress or correction.
We operate within highly competitive industries, and cannot guarantee that we can or will maintain a robust financial position, relative to our competitors, in order to become profitable.
The helium exploration and production industry is highly competitive. We face competition with respect to the helium we source and produce, and will face competition with respect to participants who enter the same market in the future. Recent years have witnessed an unprecedented number of startup companies entering this market, and we believe there is an opportunity for acquisitions that would enable us to scale our business. We intend to participate in mergers and acquisitions activities after we develop a sufficient financial foundation, but there is no guarantee that we will be able to successfully enter into acquisition arrangements or successfully scale our business. A number of our competitors also have greater financial resources than we do. These third parties compete with us in securing clientele for their helium and gas. We cannot assure that we can successfully maintain a competitive position against these third parties, and if so, our financial performance will be negatively impacted.
Our business and operations may experience rapid growth. If we fail to manage our growth, our business and operating results could be adversely affected and we may have to incur significant expenditures to address the additional operational and control requirements of such growth.
We may experience rapid growth in our sales and operations, which may place significant demands on our management, operational, and financial infrastructure. If we fail to manage this growth, our reputation and operating results could be negatively impacted. Improvements to the Company’s operational, financial, and management controls, as well as its reporting systems and procedures, will
18
have to be implemented to manage such growth. However, these improvements may require significant capital expenditures and management resources, and we cannot ensure that monetary and human resources expended to manage growth will yield financial returns. Furthermore, if such improvements are not implemented successfully, our ability to manage potential growth could be impaired and additional expenditures may have to be made to address such impairments. Investors should consider the possibility of the Company’s rapid growth as well as the adverse impact that may result of such growth is not managed successfully.
Volatility in and disruption to the global economic environment, including the impact of an economic recession, trade protectionism and tariffs, and changes in the regulatory and business environments in which we operate may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Geopolitical risks, supply chain, labor and energy constraints and inflation have caused and may continue to cause volatility in and disruption to the global economic environment. Future changes in the regulatory and business environments in which we operate, including increased geopolitical risks, trade protectionism and tariffs, may adversely affect our ability to sell our products or source materials needed to produce our products.
Furthermore, financial instability or bankruptcy at any of our suppliers or customers could disrupt our ability to produce our products and impair our ability to collect receivables, any or all of which may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, some of our customers and suppliers may experience serious cash flow problems and, thus, may find it difficult to obtain financing, if financing is available at all. As a result, our customers’ need for and ability to purchase our products or services may decrease, and our suppliers may increase their prices, reduce their output or change their terms of sale. Any inability of customers to pay us for our products and services, or any demands by suppliers for different payment terms, may materially and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. Furthermore, our suppliers may not be successful in generating sufficient sales or securing alternate financing arrangements, and therefore may no longer be able to supply goods and services to us. In that event, we would need to find alternate sources for these goods and services, and there is no assurance we would be able to find such alternate sources on favorable terms, if at all. Any such disruption in our supply chain could adversely affect our ability to manufacture and deliver our products on a timely basis, and thereby affect our results of operations.
We are subject to cybersecurity risks to operational systems, security systems, or infrastructure owned by us or third-party vendors or suppliers.
We are at risk for interruptions, outages, and compromises to the confidentiality, integrity or availability of: (i) operational systems, including information technology, business, financial, accounting, product development, data processing, or manufacturing processes, owned by us or our third-party vendors or suppliers; (ii) facility security systems, owned by us or our third-party vendors, customers or suppliers; and/or (iii) vehicle propulsion control modules or other in-product technology, owned by us, our customers or our third-party vendors or suppliers. Such cyber incidents could materially disrupt operational systems (for example, through the deployment of ransomware); result in loss of intellectual property, trade secrets or other proprietary or competitively sensitive information; compromise personally identifiable information of employees, customers, suppliers, or others; jeopardize the security of our facilities; and/or affect the performance of vehicle propulsion control modules or other in-product technology. A cyber incident could be caused by malicious insiders or by third parties using sophisticated, targeted methods to circumvent firewalls, encryption, and other security defenses, including hacking, fraud, trickery, or other forms of deception, such as social engineering and phishing, or due to human or technological error, such as misconfigurations, “bugs,” or vulnerabilities in software or hardware used by us or others.
The techniques used by threat actors change frequently and may be difficult to detect for long periods of time. Cyberattacks are expected to accelerate on a global basis in frequency and magnitude as threat actors are increasingly using tools – including artificial intelligence – to evade detection and even remove forensic evidence. As a result, we may be unable to detect, investigate, remediate or recover from future cyberattacks or other incidents, or to avoid a materially adverse impact to our systems, information or business. In addition, remote or hybrid working arrangements at our Company, our customers and many third-party providers increase cybersecurity risks due to the challenges associated with managing remote computing assets and the nature of security vulnerabilities that are present in many non-corporate and home networks.
A significant cyber incident could impact our production capability, harm our reputation and business relationships, impact our competitive position (including compromising our intellectual property assets), and subject us to regulatory actions or litigation and fines and/or penalties, including pursuant to evolving global privacy and security regulations and laws, as well as significant investigative, restoration or remediation costs and/or increased compliance costs. Any of the foregoing could materially affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. There is no guarantee that our measures to prevent, detect and mitigate these threats, including employee and key third-party partner education, monitoring of networks and systems, and maintenance of backup and protective systems, will be successful in preventing or mitigating a cyber incident.
19
In addition, in many jurisdictions, we are subject to privacy and data protection laws and regulations. These laws and regulations are changing rapidly and becoming increasingly complex. The interpretation and application of data protection laws in the U.S., Europe, and elsewhere are uncertain, evolving and may be inconsistent across jurisdictions. Our failure to comply with these laws and regulations could result in legal liability, significant regulator penalties and fines, or impair our reputation in the marketplace.]
We operate in an intensely competitive business environment. We may not be as successful as our competitors incorporating artificial intelligence (“AI”) into our business or adapting to a rapidly changing marketplace.
Our competitors may be larger, more diversified, better funded, and have access to more advanced technology, including AI. These competitive advantages may enable our competition to innovate better and more quickly, to compete more effectively on quality and price, causing us to lose business and profitability. Burgeoning interest in AI may increase our competition and disrupt our business model. AI may lower barriers to entry in our industry and we may be unable to effectively compete with the products or services offered by new competitors. AI-related changes to the products and services on offer may affect our customers’ expectations, requirements, or tastes in ways we cannot adequately anticipate or adapt to, causing our business to lose sales, market share, or the ability to operate profitably and sustainably.
Risks Related to Regulatory Compliance
We face uncertainty and costly compliance with government regulations.
United States rules and regulations affecting the oil and gas industry and helium production, transportation, and processing is under constant review for amendment or expansion. Such rules include environmental, health and safety laws such as the Clean Air Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Safe Drinking Water Act, the Clean Water Act, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration rules, the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act, the Occupational Health and Safety Act, and the National Environmental Policy Act, amongst others (and their state counterparts). In addition, numerous departments, governmental entities, and agencies (federal, state, local, and tribunal) are authorized by statue to issue, and have issued, rules and regulations applicable to our industry. Such rules and regulations, among other things, require permits and may prevent certain activities or increase fees related to our industry. Compliance with applicable laws and any state or local statute is critical. Although we believe that we are in compliance with applicable statutes, there can be no assurance that, should the relevant regulatory authorities amend their guidelines or impose more stringent interpretations of current laws or regulations, we would be able to comply with these new guidelines. We are unable to predict the nature of such future laws, regulations, interpretations or applications, nor can we predict what effect additional governmental regulations or administrative orders, when and if promulgated, would have on our business in the future. These regulations could, however, require the reformation of our products to meet new standards, market withdrawal or discontinuation of certain products not able to be reformulated. Additionally, the adoption of new regulations or changes in the interpretations of existing regulations may result in significant compliance costs or diversion of resources from our revenue-generating activities, resulting in decreased profitability. Our failure to comply with these current and new regulations could lead to the imposition of significant penalties or claims, limit the production or marketing of any non-compliant products or advertising and could negatively impact our financial performance.
We operate on federal and state lands, which have rules and regulations related to our business and require us to pay royalties, which may adversely affect our operations.
The operation of our wells on federal and state lands are subject to additional regulations under the Bureau of Land Management, an agency within the United States Department of the Interior responsible for administering U.S. federal lands (the “BLM”), the New Mexico Oil Conservation Division, (the “NMOCD”), as well as the New Mexico State Land office(“NMSLO”). Although we are currently operating these leases on these lands and expect to be able to continue such production, additional delays, costs, and restrictions may be added to these leases in the future by these agencies. For example, we began legally operating eighteen State leases assigned to us by another entity in September of 2020. However, the NMSLO did not transfer these leases into our name initially. This finally occurred on February 1, 2023.
The Company is currently in negotiations with the BLM to determine the royalty rate at which the Company will compensate the BLM for helium produced on the BLM’s federal land. The U.S. government requires an established royalty rate prior to any helium production pursuant to the BLM’s arrangements with NEH. The BLM does not prohibit NEH from producing helium due to the U.S. Government’s stance on its involvement in helium as further defined in the Helium Stewardship Act of 2013, but does require an established royalty rate prior to any helium production. Based on discussions with the BLM and royalty rates applied to other helium producers, we estimate that the royalties that BLM will charge us will be approximately 12.5% of the gross proceeds for refined gaseous helium, or 10% for refined liquid helium gross proceeds from third-party sales, but we cannot assure you that the actual royalty rates charged from us will be those mentioned above.
20
In addition, we have had issues related to maintenance of roads and meter calibrations on our federal properties. In addition, the BLM requires bonds for rights-of-way, which could be of large amounts. There have been a number of executive and temporary orders and policy changes recently that address broad ranging issues on governmental lands including climate change, oil and gas activities, infrastructure requirements, and environmental justice initiatives. Many of these are in various stages of rulemaking process and may have the ability to add costs or limit or curtail our oil and gas (including helium) production on these properties.
Helium produced from wells leased on federal lands is owned by the federal government. Federal laws and guidance provide a process for negotiating a “Contract for Extraction and Sale of Federal Helium.” The federal government is in the process of revising the guidance. We cannot predict the form the new guidance will take. Although we expect a successful negotiation of a contract, we cannot guarantee it in the face of the coming new guidance, which has not yet been issued.
New regulations regarding greenhouse and other gases have increased in recent years, which may adversely affect the business.
Local, state, federal and international regulatory bodies have been issuing many rules regarding greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and climate change in recent years. Over the past three years we have seen the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, which imposes emission charges for certain oil and gas facilities that exceed certain emissions; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency rules relating to GHGs and volatile organic compounds from covered sources; and New Mexico’s recent ozone precursor rules that nearly eliminate any natural gas flaring and cover methane. In December 2023, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency issued its final rules for reducing emissions of methane and other harmful air pollution from oil and natural gas operations, which sets rigorous standards including in relation to eliminating routine flaring of natural from new oil wells and provides for stronger oversight by the agency. In addition, the EPA issued changes to the natural gas system rules with additional proposals in May 2024. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change will be meeting again in the fourth quarter of this year (COP30). New Mexico issued an executive order based on COP28 climate change agreements and others may be issued as COP continues. Regulations are currently in flux with the new administration in the U.S. The new administration has initiated the U.S.’s withdrawal from the Paris Agreement and signaled the aim to modify current regulations. We believe that we will be able to comply with the rules currently known and passed, there can be no assurance, however, that should the relevant regulatory authorities amend their guidelines or impose more stringent interpretations of the current laws or regulations, that we would be able to comply with these requirements. We are unable to predict the nature of such future laws, regulations, interpretations, or applications, nor can we predict what affect additional governmental regulations or administrative orders, when and if promulgated, would have on our business in the future.
If we are restricted or lack access to waste wells, we may be prevented from operating some or all of our wells, which generate the helium.
Our business is subject to many rules and regulations regarding the storage, handling, and disposal of waste and the remediation of environmental pollution. These laws, and their implementing rules, require minimization of pollution, monitoring, reporting, recordkeeping requirements, and other operational constraints. New Mexico has been particularly active in the regulation of produced water. Over the past two years, New Mexico has issued new regulations regarding permit conditions, oversight, and enforcement related to injection wells used for disposal of produced water. New Mexico also has a produced water research consortium looking at issues related to this area. In addition, new potential rules are expected in New Mexico on reuse and recycling and a website has been set up to monitor activity with regards to this. Seismic activity induced by injection wells also are limiting the amount of material that can be disposed of in the well or limiting the ability to obtain new wells. New Mexico placed stricter rules on injection wells after seismic activity in New Mexico. Currently, our liquid wastewater from our oil and gas wells is disposed of in an injection well on a site that we once operated. We have the contractual right to continue the use of that disposal well, the LL&E B Federal #5 API 30-005-63751, until June 30, 2025. Once this expiration date occurs, the company will work with the existing owner of the LL&# B to contract for the disposal of certain volumes at commercial rates. Additionally, other 3rd party disposal facilities exist within the Pecos Slope providing the company options as to its water disposal needs. Ideally, the company will work with certain regulatory agencies regarding the possibility of converting existing gas wells that are classified as non-economic due to reservoir depletion and convert the well for the purpose of disposing of produced water is one possible solution to add disposal capacity but there is no assurance that either State or Federal Regulatory Agencies would approve such a conversion. The inability to dispose of our produced wastewater at the existing site or at other sites in the future could limit or curtail our ability to operate our oil and gas wells, which produce the helium for our new helium facility.
If we own, operate, or acquire lands which release materials into the environment, we may be required to remediate such lands, which can be extremely costly.
We will be operating properties, such as oil and gas wells, compression units and pipelines, that have the potential to release regulated materials into the environment. New Mexico passed rules clarifying the prohibitions on releases and remediation in 2021. Although we are not aware of any remediation for which we may be responsible at this time and we implement spill prevention plans, it is possible with future operation or with the acquisition of new lands, compressors, wells, and pipelines may have had releases subject to
21
such requirements and subject to costly remediation. Regulations also require the pugging and abandonment of wells, removal of production facilities, and other restorative actions by current former operators, including corporate successors of former operations. We are actively involved in plugging a few of our wells. The cost of future abandonment and plugging will depend on well activity and authorizations and cannot be predicted at this time.
If our operations affect waters of the United States or endangered species, additional permits or authorizations may be needed, which could delay, hinder, or prevent new activities.
We currently do not expect to operate in areas impacting waters of the United States (WOTUS), which would increase regulation, reporting, and potential need for permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The definition of WOTUS has been in flux since the definition was vacated by the federal district court in 2021. In 2023, the Supreme Court ruled on this issue. In response, the Environmental Protection Agency amended its definition to comport with the ruling. It is using the new definition in some states (New Mexico is included) and using the old definition in others. We currently believe that this new rule will not impact our operations, but the acquisition of new properties could be impacted, and it also is not yet known how this rule will be used in practice because it is so new.
The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service has rescinded, revised, or reinstated a number of wildlife-related regulations that relate to protection of endangered species and their habitats. Last year, regulations were proposed that make it harder to remove species, increase protection for threatened species, and remove the use of economic assessments when determining whether to list a species. We currently do not expect these rules will have an effect on our operations, but we cannot predict the impact on our operations in the future (such as areas and land that we subsequent acquire) or the addition of species and what impact potential changes in these rules will have on our operations. Potential impacts could be costly, delay, and prevent some operations.
We will need to obtain permits for construction and operation of the Pecos Slope Plant. The cost, time, and outcome of seeking such permits is uncertain and could result in additional costs, delays and the inability to obtain the authorizations needed for the Pecos Slope Plant.
We will need to obtain permits and authorizations for the Pecos Slope Plant. A New Mexico minor General Construction Air Permit (GCP) must be prepared, submitted, and approved prior to any beginning any physical construction at the site. A New Mexico/U.S. Environmental Protection Agency stormwater Construction General Permit, including a stormwater pollution prevention plan, threatened and endangered species review, and historic properties review is required prior to commencing any site activities. Registration and compliance with expected hazardous waste generation, and other environmental matters is required as discussed above. Although we believe we will be able to secure and be in compliance with the necessary authorizations and will implement an environmental compliance system to track these issues, we cannot guarantee the time, anticipated cost, or outcome of these requirements. If we fail to obtain a required permit, we will not be able to construct or operate the Pecos Slope Plant.
Legislation, regulation, and other government actions and shifting customer and consumer preferences and other private efforts related to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and climate change could continue to increase our operational costs and reduce demand for our helium products, resulting in a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition. We have experienced and may be further challenged by increases in the impacts of international and domestic legislation, regulation, or other government actions relating to GHG emissions (e.g., carbon dioxide and methane) and climate change. International agreements and national, regional, and state legislation and regulatory measures that aim to directly or indirectly limit or reduce GHG emissions are in various stages of implementation.
Legislation, regulation, and other government actions related to GHG emissions and climate change could reduce demand for our helium products and/or continue to increase our operational costs and reduce its return on investment. The Paris Agreement went into effect in November 2016, and a number of countries have adopted and may adopt additional policies intended to meet their Paris Agreement goals. Globally, multiple jurisdictions are considering adopting or are in the process of implementing laws or regulations to directly regulate GHG emissions through a carbon tax, a cap-and-trade program, performance standards or other mechanisms, or to attempt to indirectly advance reduction of GHG emissions through restrictive permitting, procurement standards, trade barriers, minimum renewable usage requirements, financing standards, standards or requirements for environmental benefit claims, increased GHG reporting and climate-related disclosure requirements, or tax advantages or other incentives to promote the use of alternative energy, fuel sources or lower-carbon technologies.
Similar to any significant changes in the regulatory environment, climate change-related legislation, regulation, or other government actions may curtail profitability in oil & gas, helium and lower carbon businesses, as well as render the extraction of our helium resources economically infeasible. In particular, GHG emissions-related legislation, regulations, and other government actions, and shifting customer and consumer preferences and other private efforts aimed at reducing GHG emissions may result in increased and substantial capital, compliance, operating, and maintenance costs and could, among other things, reduce demand for hydrocarbons and
22
our helium products; increase demand for lower carbon products and alternative energy sources; make the Company’s products more expensive; adversely affect the economic feasibility of the Company’s resources; impact or limit our business plans; and adversely affect the Company’s sales volumes, revenues, margins and reputation. For example, some jurisdictions are in various stages of design, adoption, and implementation of policies and programs that cap emissions and/or require short-, medium-, and long-term GHG reductions by operators at the asset or facility level, which may not be technologically feasible, or which could require significant capital expenditure, increase costs of or limit production, result in impairment of assets and limit our ability to cost-effectively reduce GHG emissions across its global portfolio.
The ultimate effect of international agreements; national, regional, and state legislation and regulation; and government and private actions related to GHG emissions and climate change on the company’s financial performance, and the timing of these effects, will depend on a number of factors. Such factors include, among others, the sectors covered, the GHG emissions reductions required, standardized carbon accounting, the extent to which we would be able to receive, generate, or purchase credits, the price and availability of credits and the extent to which we are able to recover, or continue to recover, the costs incurred through the pricing of our products in the competitive marketplace. Further, the ultimate impact of GHG emissions and climate change-related agreements, legislation, regulation, and government actions on our financial performance is highly uncertain because the Company is unable to predict with certainty, for a multitude of individual jurisdictions, the outcome of political decision-making processes, including the actual laws and regulations enacted, the variables and trade-offs that inevitably occur in connection with such processes, and market conditions, including the responses of consumers to such changes.
Risks Relating to the Ownership of our Securities.
The price of our securities may be volatile.
Fluctuations in the price of our securities could contribute to the loss of all or part of your investment. If an active market for our securities develops and continues, the trading price of our securities following could be volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control. Any of the factors listed below could have a material adverse effect on your investment in our securities, which may trade at prices significantly below the price you paid for them. In such circumstances, the trading price of our securities may not recover and may experience a further decline.
Factors affecting the trading price of our securities may include:
● actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly financial results or the quarterly financial results of companies perceived to be similar to us;
● changes in the market’s expectations about our operating results;
● success of competitors;
● operating results failing to meet the expectations of securities analysts or investors in a particular period;
● changes in financial estimates and recommendations by securities analysts concerning us or the industry in which we operate in general;
● operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors deem comparable to us;
● ability to market new and enhanced products and services on a timely basis;
● changes in laws and regulations affecting our business;
● commencement of, or involvement in, litigation involving us;
● changes in our capital structure, such as future issuances of securities or the incurrence of additional debt;
● the volume of shares of our common stock available for public sale;
● any major change in the Board or management;
23
● sales of substantial amounts of our common stock by our directors, executive officers or significant stockholders or the perception that such sales could occur; and
● general economic and political conditions such as recessions, changes in interest rates, changes in fuel prices, international currency fluctuations and acts of war or terrorism.
Broad market and industry factors may materially harm the market price of our securities irrespective of our operating performance. The stock market in general, and Nasdaq specifically, have experienced extreme volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. As a result of this volatility, you may not be able to sell your securities at or above the price at which they were acquired. A loss of investor confidence in the market for the stocks of other companies which investors perceive to be similar to us could depress our stock price regardless of our business, prospects, financial conditions or results of operations. A decline in the market price of our securities also could adversely affect our ability to issue additional securities and our ability to obtain additional financing in the future.
Future resales of common stock may cause the market price of our securities to drop significantly, even if our business is doing well.
There are certain stockholders that have trading restrictions from December 6, 2024 and ending six months following that date; provided, that if (i) the closing price of the our Common Stock equals or exceeds $15.00 per share (as adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, reorganizations and recapitalizations) for any 20 trading days within any 30-trading day period beginning 75 days following December 6, 2024 and (ii) all shares of Common Stock issued in certain transaction financing investments have been registered for resale pursuant to an effective registration statement or are otherwise freely tradeable, then twenty-five percent (25%) of the shares shall be released from the lock-up.
Following the expiration of such lockups, the stockholders will not be restricted from selling shares of our Common Stock other than by applicable securities laws. As such, sales of a substantial number of shares of Common Stock in the public market could occur at any time. These sales, or the perception in the market that the holders of a large number of shares intend to sell shares, could have the effect of increasing the volatility in the market price for the Common Stock or the market price of the Common Stock could decline if the holders of currently restricted shares sell them or are perceived by the market as intending to sell them.
If we fail to maintain proper and effective internal controls over financial reporting, our ability to produce accurate and timely financial statements could be impaired, investors may lose confidence in our financial reporting and the trading price of the Common Stock may decline.
Effective internal controls over financial reporting are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and, together with adequate disclosure controls and procedures, are designed to prevent fraud. Any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation could cause us to fail to meet its reporting obligations. In addition, any testing by us conducted in connection with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (“Section 404”) or any subsequent testing by our independent registered public accounting firm, may reveal deficiencies in our internal controls over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses or that may require prospective or retroactive changes to our financial statements or identify other areas for further attention or improvement. Inferior internal controls could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our stock.
For as long as we are an emerging growth company, our independent registered public accounting firm will not be required to attest to the effectiveness of its internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404. An independent assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting could detect problems that our management’s assessment might not detect. Undetected material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting could lead to restatements of our consolidated financial statements and require us to incur the expense of remediation.
If we are not able to comply with the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner or we are unable to maintain proper and effective internal controls over financial reporting may not be able to produce timely and accurate consolidated financial statements. As a result, our investors could lose confidence in its reported financial information, the market price of our stock could decline and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities.
We may not be able to continue to satisfy listing requirements of Nasdaq to maintain a listing of our common stock.
Our common stock is currently listed on Nasdaq and we must meet certain financial and liquidity criteria to maintain such listing. If we violate the maintenance requirements for continued listing of our common stock, our common stock may be delisted.
24
On March 4, 2025, we received a letter from Nasdaq (the “Notice”) which notified us that, for 30 consecutive business days, the Company’s market value of listed securities (“MVLS”) closed below the $50,000,000 MVLS threshold required for continued listing on the Nasdaq Global Market under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5450(b)(2)(A) (the “MVLS Rule”).
In accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(C), the Company has 180 calendar days, or until September 2, 2025 (the “MVLS Compliance Period”), to regain compliance with the MVLS Rule. The Notice notes that, to regain compliance, the Company’s MVLS must close at or above $50,000,000 for a minimum of ten consecutive business days during the MVLS Compliance Period. The Notice further notes that if the Company is unable to satisfy the MVLS requirement prior to such date, the Company may be eligible to transfer the listing of its securities to The Nasdaq Capital Market (provided that the Company then satisfies the requirements for continued listing on that market). If the Company does not regain compliance by the end of the MVLS Compliance Period, Nasdaq staff will provide written notice to the Company that its securities are subject to delisting. At that time, the Company may appeal any such delisting determination to a hearings panel. The Notice has no immediate effect on the listing or trading of the Company’s common stock on the Nasdaq Global Market.
The Company intends to actively monitor the Company’s MVLS between now and September 2, 2025, and may, if appropriate, evaluate available options to resolve the deficiencies and regain compliance with the MVLS Rule. While the Company is exercising diligent efforts to maintain the listing of its securities on Nasdaq, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to regain or maintain compliance with Nasdaq listing standards.
If securities analysts do not publish research or reports about us, or if they issue unfavorable commentary about us or our industry or downgrade our common stock, the price of our common stock could decline.
The trading market for our common stock will depend in part on the research and reports that third-party securities analysts publish about us and the industries in which we operate. We may be unable or slow to attract research coverage and if one or more analysts cease coverage of us, the price and trading volume of our securities would likely be negatively impacted. If any of the analysts that may cover us change their recommendation regarding our securities adversely, or provide more favorable relative recommendations about our competitors, the price of our securities would likely decline. If any analyst that may cover us ceases covering us or fails to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause the price or trading volume of our securities to decline. Moreover, if one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrades our common stock, or if our reporting results do not meet their expectations, the market price of our common stock could decline.
All of our outstanding warrants will become exercisable for Common Stock, which would increase the number of shares eligible for future resale in the public market and result in dilution to our stockholders.
Our outstanding warrants will become exercisable in accordance with the terms of the respective warrant agreements governing those securities. To the extent such warrants are exercised, additional shares of Common Stock will be issued, which will result in dilution to the holders of Common Stock and increase the number of shares eligible for resale in the public market. Sales of substantial numbers of such shares in the public market or the fact that such warrants may be exercised could adversely affect the market price of Common Stock.
All agreements governing our outstanding warrants contain exclusive forum clauses, which could limit a warrant holder’s ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes arising under the applicable warrant agreement.
The warrant agreement for the Tradeable Warrants provides that, subject to applicable law, (i) any action, proceeding or claim against us or the warrant agent arising out of or relating in any way to the Warrant Agreement, including under the Securities Act, will be brought and enforced in the courts of the State of New York or the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and (ii) that we irrevocably submit to such jurisdiction, which jurisdiction shall be the exclusive forum for any such action, proceeding or claim. We will waive any objection to such exclusive jurisdiction and that such courts represent an inconvenient forum.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, these provisions of the Warrant Agreement will not apply to suits brought to enforce any liability or duty created by the Exchange Act or any other claim for which the federal district courts of the United States of America are the sole and exclusive forum. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in any of the warrants shall be deemed to have notice of and to have consented to the forum provisions in the Warrant Agreement. If any action, the subject matter of which is within the scope of the forum provisions of the Warrant Agreement, is filed in a court other than a court of the State of New York or the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (a “foreign action”) in the name of any holder of the warrants, such holder shall be deemed to have consented to: (x) the personal jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located in the State of New York in connection with any action brought in any such court to enforce the forum provisions (an “enforcement action”), and (y) having service of process made upon such warrant holder in any such enforcement action by service upon such warrant holder’s counsel in the foreign action as agent for such warrant holder.
25
Similarly, the Warrants contain provisions stating that the construction, validity, interpretation and performance of the Warrants are governed by the laws of the State of Nevada and that the Company submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of the state and federal courts sitting in Clark County, Nevada, or the adjudication of any dispute under the Warrants or in connection with any transaction contemplated by the Warrants.
These choice of forum provisions may limit a warrant holder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us, which may discourage such lawsuits. Alternatively, if a court were to find these provisions inapplicable or unenforceable with respect to one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and result in a diversion of the time and resources of our management and Board.
Your unexpired Tradeable Warrants may be redeemed prior to their exercise at a time that may be disadvantageous to you, thereby making your warrants worthless.
We have the ability to redeem outstanding Tradeable Warrants at any time after they become exercisable and prior to their expiration, at a price of $0.01 per Tradeable Warrant, provided that the last reported sales price of the Common Stock equals or exceeds $18.00 per share (as adjusted for share splits, share dividends, rights issuances, subdivisions, reorganizations, recapitalizations and the like) on each of twenty (20) trading days within any thirty (30) trading day period commencing after the warrants become exercisable and ending on the third trading day prior to the date on which notice of redemption is given and provided that there is an effective registration statement covering the shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Tradeable Warrants, and a current prospectus relating thereto, available throughout the 30-day redemption we have elected to require the exercise of the Tradeable Warrants on a cashless basis. If and when the Tradeable Warrants become redeemable, we may not exercise such redemption right if the issuance of shares of the Common Stock upon exercise of the Tradeable Warrants is not exempt from registration or qualification under applicable state blue sky laws or we are unable to effect such registration or qualification. Redemption of the outstanding Tradeable Warrants could force you to: (i) exercise your Tradeable Warrants and pay the exercise price therefor at a time when it may be disadvantageous for you to do so; (ii) sell your warrants at the then-current market price when you might otherwise wish to hold your Tradeable Warrants; or (iii) accept the nominal redemption price which, at the time the outstanding warrants are called for redemption, is likely to be substantially less than the market value of your Tradeable Warrants.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
None.
Item 1C. Cybersecurity.
Risk Management and Strategy
The Company relies heavily on its information systems, and the availability and integrity of these systems is essential to conducting its business and operations. As a producer of oil and natural gas, the Company faces various security threats, including cybersecurity threats, to gain unauthorized access to its sensitive information or to render its information or systems unusable, and threats to the security of its facilities and infrastructure or third-party facilities and infrastructure, such as gathering and processing and other facilities, and pipelines. This risk may be heightened as a result of an increased remote working environment, similar to the one created by the COVID-19 outbreak in 2020. The potential for such security threats subjects its operations to increased risks that could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
As the Company implements various procedures and controls to monitor and mitigate such security threats and to increase security for its information, systems, facilities and infrastructure it may result in increased costs. Moreover, there can be no assurance that such procedures and controls will be sufficient to prevent security breaches from occurring. If any of these security breaches were to occur, they could lead to losses of, or damage to, sensitive information or facilities, infrastructure and systems essential to its business and operations, as well as data corruption, communication interruptions or other disruptions to its operations, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
The Company is in the process of developing an information security program to address risks from cybersecurity threats. Management plans to engage a reputable third party with the appropriate expertise in IT and cybersecurity to develop these programs.
The Company may not be able to fully, continuously, and effectively implement appropriate security controls as intended. In addition, security controls, no matter how well designed or implemented, may only mitigate and not fully eliminate risks. And events, when detected by security tools or third parties, may not always be immediately understood or acted upon.
26
Governance
Our Board is responsible for the oversight of cybersecurity risk management. The Board may assign this oversight a committee of the Board.
The Company’s senior leadership is responsible for developing appropriate cybersecurity programs, including as may be required by applicable law or regulation. During this process, these individuals may utilize third parties with the appropriate expertise in IT and cybersecurity to develop these programs .