What changed in this filing

/stocks — the workspaceLOADING

Item 1. Business

2025-12-17 compared with 2024-12-17 · 934 added, 1368 removed, 42 unchanged (98% of the section changed)

are a medical technology company focused on (i) diagnostic, ablation and deep brain stimulation technology for brain related conditions

such as epilepsy and Parkinson’s disease;

We are a medical technology company focused on

(i) diagnostic, ablation and deep brain stimulation technology for brain related conditions such as epilepsy and Parkinson’s disease;

(ii) ablation and stimulation for pain management throughout the body;

and (iii) drug

delivery including diagnostic and stimulation capabilities.

are developing and commercializing thin film electrode technology for continuous electroencephalogram (“cEEG”) and stereoelectrocencephalography

(“sEEG”), spinal cord stimulation, brain stimulation, drug delivery and ablation solutions for patients suffering from epilepsy,

Parkinson’s disease, dystonia, essential tremors, chronic pain due to failed back surgeries and other pain-related neurological

The Company is also developing the capability to use its sEEG electrode technology to deliver drugs or gene therapy while

being able to record brain activity before, during, and after delivery.

Additionally, we are investigating the potential applications

of its technology associated with artificial intelligence.

have received 510(k) clearance for three of our devices from the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), including:

Evo cortical electrode technology for recording, monitoring, and stimulating brain tissue for up to 30 days, (ii) our Evo sEEG electrode

technology for temporary (less than 30 days) use with recording, monitoring, and stimulation equipment for the recording, monitoring,

and stimulation of electrical signals at the subsurface level of the brain, and (iii) our OneRF ablation system for creation of radiofrequency

lesions in nervous tissue for functional neurosurgical procedures.

We have a distribution agreement with Zimmer, Inc.

providing Zimmer with a license to commercialize and distribute these three products in the brain.

The Company’s other products

and indications are still under development.

are focused on developing thin film electrode technology for continuous electroencephalogram (“cEEG”) and stereoelectroencephalography

(“sEEG”) recording.

These cortical sheet and depth electrode technologies are crucial for diagnosing neurological disorders

such as epilepsy, Parkinson’s disease, dystonia, essential tremors, and other related conditions.

ablation and deep brain stimulation technology for brain related conditions such as epilepsy and Parkinson’s disease

This involves a continuous recording of the brain’s electrical activity to

identify irregularities.

The procedure requires a craniotomy, an invasive surgical method,

to access the brain.

cEEG is a continuous recording of the electrical activity of the brain

that identifies the location of irregular brain activity, which information is required for

proper treatment.

A less invasive technique where electrodes are placed in targeted brain areas

by drilling small holes through the skull.

Frequency (“RF”) Ablation :

This procedure uses radiofrequency to target and

destroy brain tissue.

The process involves delivering energy to the contacts, thereby heating

them, forming scar tissue (instead of tissue removal).

Known as brain lesioning, it causes

irreversible lesions.

We are also developing an ablation system for performing ablations in the face to treat debilitating facial pain

attributed to the trigeminal nerve.

We intend to submit this system for a 510(k) clearance in the first half of 2025.

Brain Stimulation (“DBS”), under development :

This therapy under our development

involves activating or inhibiting the brain with electrical impulses delivered by electrodes

placed on the surface or implanted deeper in the brain via depth electrodes.

Introduced in

1987, DBS is used to treat disorders like Parkinson’s disease, essential tremor, dystonia,

and chronic pain.

Unlike ablative technologies, DBS effects are reversible.

Medical Technologies Corporation

delivery including diagnostic and stimulation capabilities

neurological drugs delivery :

We are also researching and developing the capability to

use our sEEG electrode technology to deliver drugs or gene therapy while being able to record

brain activity before, during, and after delivery.

This future device is intended to deliver

neurological drugs or gene therapy that are FDA approved or that are currently planned for

clinical trials or in development to allow for monitoring, recording and stimulation and

drug delivery for less than 30 days.

In addition to having the capability of delivering a

drug through the center lumen, it will also be able to record brain activity before, during,

and after drug delivery.

FDA clearance is not required for clinical studies of our future

neurological drug delivery technology, but we are pursuing 510(k) clearance with the FDA

for use with an approved brain cancer drug.

and stimulation for pain management throughout the body

Cord Stimulation (“SCS”), under development :

This method under our development

addresses chronic back pain from failed back surgery syndrome (“FBSS”) by placing

electrodes in the spine connected to an implantable pulse generator.

FBSS is a debilitating

condition that affects patients who have undergone multiple unsuccessful back surgeries,

who experience chronic lower back and leg pain, reduced quality of life, and significant

functional limitations.

completed an initial animal implant of novel thin film paddle leads for SCS, intended for treating chronic back pain.

Our SCS system

utilizes thin-film paddle leads to deliver precise electrical stimulation to the spinal cord, blocking pain signals and providing relief

to patients with FBSS.

During the second fiscal quarter of 2023, we achieved a significant milestone with the initial animal implant

of these novel leads.

Additionally, we are developing a percutaneous delivery system for paddle leads, which has shown promising results

in bench testing.

we are pursuing the development of “ all-in-one solutions ”.

We intend to expand our product offerings to include less

invasive means and all-in-one solutions, thus providing both patients and physicians better options to treat epilepsy, Parkinson’s

disease, dystonia, essential tremors, chronic pain due to failed back surgeries and other pain-related neurological disorders.

believe that most of our future product development initiatives will involve unique and transformational next generation technology that

should drive further appeal of our products with both physicians and patients.

Market Opportunity

expect to initially target the diagnosis and treatment of epilepsy.

Epilepsy can be caused by a variety of conditions that affect a person’s

brain, some of which are:

stroke, brain tumor, traumatic brain injury and central nervous system infections.

According to the Centers

for Disease Control and Prevention (the “CDC”) and Citizens United for Research in Epilepsy (“CURE”), there are

approximately 3,000,000 patients annually suffering with epilepsy in the United States, with an additional 200,000 diagnosed every year.

The CDC and CURE also estimate that epilepsy costs the United States $15.5 billion per year.

Approximately 30-40% of these patients are

not receptive to pharmaceutical treatment and therefore are appropriate for surgical treatment of this disorder.

In addition to poor

quality of life, epilepsy also is associated with fairly high mortality rates.

Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy has an annual incidence

of approximately 1/1000 in epilepsy patients.

Despite the large market opportunity, it is estimated that there are only less than 5,000

epilepsy surgeries performed each year in the United States.

numbers represent an underpenetrated market due to the invasiveness of diagnostic procedures.

After the diagnostic procedure, a second

therapeutic procedure is required and at times even a third surgery if the seizures persist.

We believe patients are unwilling to proceed

due to the long diagnostic and treatment procedure times (one to four weeks in the hospital after a potential craniotomy for diagnosis).

As detailed above, after the diagnosis is completed, if successful, the patient must undergo an additional procedure to have the affected

area of brain tissue ablated or removed.

The average cost for the diagnostic technology per procedure could be >$10,000, with ablation

devices costing >$15,000.

We believe our technology, once developed, will offer an all-in-one solution with diagnostic and therapeutic

capabilities.

surgery in the United States:

Analysis of data from the National Association of Epilepsy

Centers 2015 Epilepsy Research.

Medical Technologies Corporation

leading neurologists believe that the limits of today’s current technologies are the reason the exact affected area of the brain

causing epileptic seizures is not well-determined.

We believe our technology provides a number of advantages over other commercially

available technologies, including the following:

proprietary thin film technology has a smaller footprint with many more electrodes.

expect that our technology will eventually be able to be implanted using a minimally invasive

procedure utilizing a dime sized burr hole rather than a full craniotomy.

technology provides more accurate detection of irregular brain activity over other currently

available technology.

Parkinson’s Disease Foundation estimates that as many as 1,000,000 patients in the United States live with Parkinson’s disease

with an additional 60,000 patients diagnosed per year.

Over 10,000,000 patients worldwide are living with Parkinson’s disease.

There have not been any drugs introduced that have been effective at treating all patients with Parkinson’s disease.

onset is over 60 years old, but some people have been diagnosed as young as 40 years old.

Parkinson’s is a disorder of the central

nervous system caused by loss of brain cells throughout various regions of the brain.

primary treatment for Parkinson’s disease involves medications that have not proven to be curative but rather ease symptoms.

of the potential treatments for Parkinson’s patients is DBS.

According to the Michael J.

Fox Parkinson’s Disease Research

Foundation website, patients that seem to do best with DBS are those that have had the disease for at least four years and have benefited

from taking medications prescribed to control the disease.

In addition, DBS seems to help with reducing the issues with motor functions

such as tremors, stiffness and slowness but not for balance issues.

tremors are thought to be due to electrical irregularities in the brain that send abnormal signals to the muscles.

It is a progressive

condition that worsens over time and is linked to genetic disorders that typically appear in people who are over 40.

Essential tremors

usually occur alone and without any other neurological symptoms or signs.

The tremors usually occur when the hands are raised and primarily

affect the hands.

Muscles in the trunk, face and neck may also experience symptoms.

Sometimes misdiagnosed as Parkinson’s disease,

essential tremors are an involuntary rhythmic shaking of the hands that is not present at rest.

It is apparent during activities such

as drinking, writing and eating.

Symptoms can worsen due to stress, anxiety, smoking, caffeine, fatigue, etc.

Genetics Home Reference

estimates that as many as 10,000,000 people in the United States are affected by the disease.

Treatments for the disease include medical

therapy and DBS.

DBS, which unlike other therapies, is reversible and programmable, helping to adjust the settings to maximize patient

Similar to Parkinson’s disease, the ability to detect this irregular brain activity before it causes a tremor is highly

is a neurological condition recognized as a motion disorder that involves over activity of a variety of different muscles simultaneously

that work against each other.

It presents itself in a variety of symptoms but typically involves repetitive, patterned and often twisting

involuntary muscle contractions resembling tremors.

According to the Dystonia Medical Research Foundation, over 300,000 people are affected

in the United States and Canada alone.

Dystonia is the third most common problem seen in movement disorder clinics.

Because it has many

different manifestations, it is often misdiagnosed.

In addition, similar to Parkinson’s disease, there are no specific tests that

can positively diagnose dystonia.

A doctor typically will evaluate patient and family history, potentially do genetic testing, electroencephalogram

(“EEG”) testing, blood and urine tests.

There are several treatment options (including medication and Botox) for patients

depending on the type of dystonia.

DBS may be also an alternative for certain patient sub-types.

Medical Technologies Corporation

Cord Stimulation

back pain is one of the most prevalent chronic conditions in the world.

and (iii) drug delivery including diagnostic and stimulation capabilities.

We have received 510(k) clearance for four of

our devices from the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), including:

(i) our Evo cortical electrode technology for temporary

(less than 30 days) recording, monitoring, and stimulation on the surface of the brain (“Evo Cortical”), (ii) our Evo sEEG

electrode technology for temporary (less than 30 days) use with recording, monitoring, and stimulation equipment for the recording, monitoring,

and stimulation of electrical signals at the subsurface level of the brain (“Evo sEEG”), (iii) our OneRF ablation system

for creation of radiofrequency lesions in nervous tissue for functional neurosurgical procedures (“OneRF Brain Ablation System”),

and (iv) our OneRF TN ablation system for use in procedures to create radiofrequency lesions for the treatment of pain, or for lesioning

nerve tissue for functional neurosurgical procedures (“OneRF TN Ablation System”).

We have a distribution agreement with

(“Zimmer”) providing Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.

with a license to commercialize and distribute the Evo Cortical,

Evo sEEG, and OneRF Brain Ablation System in the brain.

We initiated a limited market release of the OneRF TN Ablation System in December

The Company’s other products and indications are still under development.

We are focused on developing thin film electrode

technology for a variety of recording and therapeutic applications.

These cortical sheet and depth electrode technologies are crucial

for diagnosing neurological disorders such as epilepsy, Parkinson’s disease, dystonia, essential tremors, and other related conditions.

Commercialized Products

Evo ® Cortical :

Cortical or subdural electrodes are used in intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) surgeries to monitor, record and stimulate the surface of the brain for less than 30 days.

Our Evo cortical electrode portfolio consists of various contact configurations of strip and grid electrodes.

Evo® sEEG Electrode technology for temporary (less than 30 days) use with recording, monitoring, and stimulation equipment for the recording, monitoring, and stimulation of electrical signals at the subsurface level of the brain.

Federal (USA) law restricts this device to sale by or on the order of a physician.

Evo sEEG enhances the ability to identify the right foci zones to determine the best intervention for patients.

OneRF ® Brain Ablation System :

Our OneRF Brain Ablation System is indicated for creation of radiofrequency lesions in nervous tissue for functional neurosurgical procedures.

It provides bedside monitoring, mapping and ablation using the same device, giving physicians a less invasive, potentially safer way to gain improved bedside clarity of the therapeutic window for an epilepsy patient with the possibility of seizure reduction or freedom.

OneRF ® TN Ablation System :

Our OneRF® Trigeminal Nerve Ablation System is indicated for use in procedures to create radiofrequency lesions for the treatment of pain, or for lesioning nerve tissue for functional neurosurgical procedures.

Differentiated features of this system include a “first-of-its-kind” multi-contact RF probe that allows for both precise localization and tailored ablation of the pain-conducting nerve tissue – using the same RF probe, and under temperature-controlled conditions which enhance safety and accuracy.

This system may allow for reduced procedural time, improved patient comfort and improved patient safety.

NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation

Products in Development

Drug delivery including diagnostic and stimulation

We are also researching and developing the capability to create a new type of combination device based on our sEEG

electrode technology to deliver drugs or gene or cell therapies while having the ability to record brain activity before, during,

and after delivery.

This future device is intended to deliver neurological drugs or gene or cell therapies that are FDA approved or

that are currently planned for clinical trials or in development to allow for monitoring, recording and stimulation and drug

delivery for less than 30 days.

In addition to having the capability of delivering a drug through the center lumen, it will also be

able to record brain activity before, during, and after drug delivery.

FDA clearance is not required for pre-clinical studies although

we are pursuing a 510(k) clearance with the FDA for use with an approved brain cancer drug.

We also intend to offer drug delivery

devices for pre-clinical animal models.

Recording, Ablation and stimulation for pain

management throughout the body

Cord Stimulation (“SCS”) :

This system addresses chronic back pain (CBP) by placing electrodes in the spine connected

to an implantable pulse generator.

CBP is a debilitating condition that affects patients who experience chronic lower back and leg

pain, reduced quality of life, and significant functional limitations.

Our SCS solution utilizes a percutaneously-placed

thin-film paddle electrode to deliver precise electrical stimulation to the spinal cord, blocking pain signals and providing relief

This capability opens the use and implantation of paddle electrodes to pain management doctors, who

currently only implant traditional percutaneous electrodes but perform the majority of these procedures in the United

Current paddle electrodes are predominantly implanted by surgeons.

Basivertebral Nerve Ablation (“BVNA”) :

This system would target the basiverterbal nerve to address lower back pain and improve function.

Our solution would leverage our existing ablation technology while taking advantage of our multi-contact sEEG probes to increase placement flexibility.

These products in development are examples of

our interest to pursue development of less invasive “ all-in-one solutions ”.

We believe these technologies offer both

patients and physicians better options to treat epilepsy, Parkinson’s disease, dystonia, essential tremors, chronic pain due to

failed back surgeries and other pain-related neurological disorders.

Our Market Opportunity

Epilepsy Market

Our initial disease target has included the diagnosis

and treatment of epilepsy.

Epilepsy can be caused by a variety of conditions that affect a person’s brain, some of which are:

autoimmune responses, stroke, brain tumor, traumatic brain injury and central nervous system infections.

According to the Centers for

Disease Control and Prevention (the “CDC”) and Citizens United for Research in Epilepsy (“CURE”), there are approximately

3,000,000 patients annually suffering with epilepsy in the United States, with an additional 200,000 diagnosed every year.

CURE also estimate that epilepsy costs the United States $15.5 billion per year.

Approximately 30-40% of these patients are not receptive

to pharmaceutical treatment and may be candidates for surgical treatment of this disorder.

In addition to poor quality of life, epilepsy

also is associated with fairly high mortality rates.

Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy has an annual incidence of approximately 1/1000

in epilepsy patients.

Despite the large market opportunity, it is estimated only about 5,000 epilepsy surgeries performed each year in

the United States.

1 Epilepsy surgery in the United States:

Analysis of data from

the National Association of Epilepsy Centers 2015 Epilepsy Research.

NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation

These numbers represent an underpenetrated market

due to the invasiveness of diagnostic procedures.

After the diagnostic procedure, a second therapeutic procedure is required and at times

even a third surgery if the seizures persist.

We believe patients are unwilling to proceed due to the long diagnostic and treatment procedure

times (one to four weeks in the hospital after a potential craniotomy for diagnosis).

As detailed above, after the diagnosis is completed,

if successful, the patient must undergo an additional procedure to have the affected area of brain tissue ablated or removed.

cost for the diagnostic technology per procedure could be over $10,000, with ablation devices costing >$15,000.

We believe our technology,

once developed, will offer an all-in-one solution with diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities.

Many leading neurologists believe that the limits

of today’s current technologies are the reason the exact cause of epileptic seizures is not well-determined.

We believe our technology

provides a number of advantages over other commercially available technologies, including the following:

We expect that our technology may be implanted using a less invasive procedure utilizing a burr hole rather than a full craniotomy.

technology provides accurate detection of irregular brain activity and may be used for the treatment of the condition.

Trigeminal Neuralgia

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a sudden and

intense pain in the case that drives thousands of people to seek treatment each year.

TN related pain is described as a stabbing,

shooting, sharp or piercing sensation.

It can occur anywhere between the jaw and forehead, including in the mouth.

compression of the trigeminal nerve root is a typical cause for TN.

Over 150,000 people live with TN in the US, and approximately

15,000 are diagnosed each year.

Back Pain – Spinal Cord Stimulation and

Chronic back pain is one of the most prevalent

chronic conditions in the world.

According to the CDC, “in 2016, an estimated 20.4% of U.S.

adults had chronic pain and 8.0% of U.S.

adults had chronic pain and 8.0% of

adults had high-impact chronic pain.

Chronic pain has been linked to numerous physical and mental

conditions and contributes to high health care costs and lost productivity”.

FBSS is one of leading causes for chronic lower back/leg

pain due to one or more failed back surgeries.

Typically, it is related to patients that suffer with pain after surgery of the lumbar

spine for degenerative disc disease.

Chronic pain has been linked to numerous physical and mental conditions and contributes to high

health care costs and lost productivity”.

FBSS is one of leading causes for chronic lower back/leg pain due to one or more failed

back surgeries.

Typically, it is related to patients that suffer with pain after surgery of the lumbar spine for degenerative disc disease.

Re-operations are usually not recommended for these patients due to low success rates.

These patients

experience greater levels of pain, a lower quality of life, varying levels of disability and higher rate of unemployment.

stimulation works by placing an electrode(s) in a targeted area of the spine which is then connected to an implantable pulse generator

that sends electrical stimulation to the electrode to block the pain signals from reaching the brain.

The global market for SCS is substantial,

with an estimated value of approximately $2.5 to $3 billion.

back pain market includes the following indications:

FBSS, Ischemic Limb Pain, and Complex Regional Pain Syndrome.

Over half of this

market is comprised of patients with FBSS.

Studies have indicated a benefit for some patients suffering from chronic back and lower limb

pain when they have been treated with electrical stimulation.

Prior to the patient receiving an implant, they undergo a trial period

that allows them to determine if they are receiving relief from the therapy while preventing a surgery to implant the pulse generator

that provides the stimulation.

If the trial period is successful, then the device is implanted in a follow-up procedure.

brain consists of approximately 100 billion nerve cells, which are small wires that pass electrical signals to control all of its functions.

There have been a number of successful clinical trials in which small metal wires, known as electrodes, are implanted in the brain to

correct nerve damage using wireless communication between implanted wires to simulate functional nerve cells.

In addition to correcting

damaged nerve cells, certain scientists have theorized that if millions of wires could be implanted in the brain, these electrodes could

present an opportunity to use artificial intelligence to create infrared sight, increase hearing or perfect memory recall.

However, there

currently is no commercially available manufacturing platform capable of making thousands of wires that can be placed within or on the

brain and work reliably for the lifetime of a subject, and are soft enough to match the tissue of the brain, that avoid damage to the

of Other Currently Available Therapies

are a limited number of currently available products for diagnosis and treatment for people with neurological disorders such as epilepsy.

Although the currently available systems provide diagnosis and treatment for patients, they have certain inherent limitations and shortcomings

that we believe limit their use and validate the need for improved technology in the market.

These patients experience greater levels of pain,

a lower quality of life, varying levels of disability and higher rate of unemployment.

Spinal cord stimulation works by placing an electrode(s)

in a targeted area of the spine which is then connected to an implantable pulse generator that sends electrical stimulation to the electrode

to block the pain signals from reaching the brain.

The global market for SCS is substantial, with an estimated value of approximately

$2.5 to $3 billion.

The chronic back pain market includes the following

FBSS, Ischemic Limb Pain, and Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (among others).

Over half of this market is comprised of patients

Studies have indicated a benefit for some patients suffering from chronic back and lower limb pain when they have been treated

with electrical stimulation.

Prior to the patient receiving an implant, they undergo a trial period that allows them to determine if they

are receiving relief from the therapy while preventing a surgery to implant the pulse generator that provides the stimulation.

trial period is successful, then the device is implanted in a follow-up procedure.

https://www.aans.org/patients/conditions-treatments/trigeminal-neuralgia/

NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation

Basivertebral Nerve Ablation (BVNA) includes adults

with chronic low back pain (CLBP) (≥6 months), specifically vertebrogenic pain from inflamed vertebral endplates (Modic Type 1 or 2

changes on MRI), who haven’t found relief from at least 6 months of conservative treatments like PT, meds, or injections, targeting pain

in the vertebral bodies.

We believe the total market for BVNA procedures currently performed in the United States is approximately $100

million per year (>10,000 procedures per year), and growing rapidly.

Drug Delivery

In the near term, our drug delivery system

in development has already been ordered by a large biopharmaceutical company planning to test NeuroOne’s system in preclinical

research, representing a completely new market for NeuroOne.

We believe the market for the preclinical research in drug development

is greater than $50 million.

Additionally, we are in early conversations with potential strategic partners related to the ongoing

development of specific drug delivery combinations.

We believe the full market commercial opportunity for this type of application

to be potentially over $1 billion.

Parkinson’s Disease

The Parkinson’s Disease Foundation estimates

that as many as 1,000,000 patients in the United States live with Parkinson’s disease with an additional 60,000 patients diagnosed

Over 10,000,000 patients worldwide are living with Parkinson’s disease.

The average onset is over 60 years old, but some

people have been diagnosed as young as 40 years old.

Today’s primary treatment for Parkinson’s

disease involves medications that have not proven to be curative but rather ease symptoms.

One of the potential treatments for Parkinson’s

patients is DBS.

According to the Michael J.

Fox Parkinson’s Disease Research Foundation website, patients that seem to do best

with DBS are those that have had the disease for at least four years and have benefited from taking medications prescribed to control

In addition, DBS seems to help with reducing the issues with motor functions such as tremors, stiffness and slowness but

not for balance issues.

Essential Tremors

Essential tremors are thought to be due to electrical

irregularities in the brain that send abnormal signals to the muscles.

It is a progressive condition that worsens over time and is linked

to genetic disorders that typically appear in people who are over 40.

Essential tremors usually occur alone and without any other neurological

symptoms or signs.

The tremors usually occur when the hands are raised and primarily affect the hands.

Muscles in the trunk, face and

neck may also experience symptoms.

Genetics Home Reference estimates that as many as 10,000,000 people in the United States are affected

by the disease.

Dystonia is a neurological condition recognized

as a motion disorder that involves over activity of a variety of different muscles simultaneously that work against each other.

itself in a variety of symptoms but typically involves repetitive, patterned and often twisting involuntary muscle contractions resembling

According to the Dystonia Medical Research Foundation, over 300,000 people are affected in the United States and Canada alone.

NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation

Limitations of Other Currently Available Therapies

There are a limited number of other currently

available products for diagnosis and treatment for people with neurological disorders.

Although the other currently available systems

provide diagnosis and treatment for patients, they have certain inherent limitations and shortcomings that we believe limit their use

and validate the need for improved technology in the market.

These limitations include:

diagnostic times :

It takes several months for patients to go through the various phases

of diagnostic methods, including imaging and non-invasive EEGs.

If the source of seizures

are still unknown, patients spend one to four weeks in the hospital after interventional

diagnostic procedures (cortical and/or sEEG implants) waiting to have seizures that will

allow doctors to determine where the seizures are occurring.

Historically, clinical electrode manufacturers primarily provided electrodes

that sample brain tissue at approximately centimeter spatial scales.

Advances in digital

EEG acquisition have made recordings at sub-millimeter spatial scales possible, but high-spatial

resolution EEG has been slow to impact clinical practice.

Existing, higher spatial scales

increase the potential for missing data that may be critical in the removal of brain tissue

causing the irregular activity.

to perform a full craniotomy (invasiveness) :

Currently available cortical electrode technology

is typically placed after a craniotomy, which may require removing the top part of the cranium

and is a very painful and invasive procedure.

Procedural times for a craniotomy can be as

high as eight hours.

A variety of complications can occur when a full craniotomy is performed,

including but not limited to:

stroke, bleeding, infection, seizures, swelling of the brain

(which may require a second craniotomy), nerve damage, which may cause muscle paralysis or

weakness, cerebrospinal fluid leak, which may require repair, loss of mental functions and

permanent brain damage with associated disabilities.

The invasiveness, procedural times and

possible surgical complications have limited the growth of surgical treatment of epilepsy.

Medical Technologies Corporation

● Requirement

for multiple devices for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures :

Today both interventional

diagnostic and treatment procedures may require different device implants, surgeries and

even hospitalizations for each procedure.

This causes significant patient inconvenience,

use of precious hospital resources and tremendous cost to the system.

number of contacts on an electrode :

Paddle electrodes currently are available in a variety

of sizes and number of contacts.

Physicians increasingly want to explore greater number of

contacts on the same electrode in order to be able to be more precise in stimulating targeted

a result of the inherent limitations and inconvenience of existing systems, we believe that there is a significant unmet need among people

with neurological disorders for cortical strip, grid and depth electrodes that provide diagnostic capabilities through cEEG and sEEG

recording in addition to therapeutic modalities, such as brain stimulation and ablation, offered as an all-in-one product.

In comparison

to other currently available technologies, we are continuing to develop applications of our strip, grid and depth electrodes with the

goal of providing the following expected advantages:

diagnostic and therapeutic technology solution :

Due to the expected recording and treatment

capabilities of some of our technology under development, we have received feedback from

physicians that they will attempt to perform the diagnosis and treatment in a single procedure,

thereby potentially eliminating the need for a second surgical procedure, reducing the likelihood

of patient infection, risks associated with surgical procedures and minimizing the diagnostic,

procedural and hospital costs.

As discussed under “Our Strategy” below, our initial

product offering offers diagnostic-only capabilities while we advance the development of

our all-in-one approach.

Currently, we are preparing a combination recording, stimulation

and RF ablation technology that will perform both diagnostic and therapeutic functions for

commercialization.

● Percutaneous

placement of spinal cord stimulation paddle electrodes with scalability options :

to the thin film nature of our electrode technology, we believe that it may allow for percutaneous

placement of “paddle” (flat) shaped electrodes, thereby preventing the need to

use more invasive surgical approaches to place the electrodes.

Minimally invasive and percutaneously

placed technologies have become almost a requirement for adoption with patients and physicians.

In addition, our technology in the future offers the ability to increase the number of contacts

on a film that traditionally offers fewer contacts.

Increasing the number of contacts may

allow for more precise stimulation in the spine, potentially improving the therapeutic outcomes.

accuracy of diagnostic technologies :

Because we believe our thin film technology is capable

of recording at higher fidelity than current technologies used in EEG recording, we believe

our technology may be able to more precisely determine the brain tissue causing seizures.

In December 2020, we announced the first human commercial use of our Evo cortical electrode

to perform recording, functional mapping, monitoring and stimulation of the brain.

procedure, performed at the Mayo Clinic, our electrodes were used to record evidence of pre-seizure

activity, which may be critical in developing treatments to prevent the onset of seizures.

Since then, several institutions around the country have successfully tried and adopted our

devices for diagnostic procedures.

manufacturing :

Our electrode technology is cost competitive to its competitors due to

the scalable, automated manufacturing process.

This also increases the reliability and consistency

of the manufacturing process, and allows for faster fulfillment of product.

Medical Technologies Corporation

goal is to be the global leader in cEEG and sEEG recording, monitoring, deep brain and peripheral stimulation and ablation, owning the

procedure from diagnosis through treatment.

Requirement for multiple devices for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures :

Today both interventional diagnostic and treatment procedures may require different device implants, surgeries and even hospitalizations for each procedure.

This causes significant patient inconvenience, use of precious hospital resources and tremendous cost to the system.

Limited number of contacts on an electrode :

SCS electrodes currently are available in a variety of sizes and number of contacts.

Physicians increasingly want to explore greater number of contacts on the same electrode in order to be able to be more precise in stimulating targeted areas.

This is also true for existing BVNA systems, which are limited to probes with only two contacts, requiring extremely precise placement of the probes and limiting flexibility.

No ability to record brain activity during drug delivery :

Currently available drug delivery devices do not have the ability to record brain activity before, during or after delivery of the drug with the same device.

More invasive :

All existing spinal cord paddle electrodes are more invasive than our SCS paddle electrodes under development, and the electrode itself is 20 times bigger than our proposed design.

In comparison to other currently available technologies,

our existing products and products in development all have the goal of providing the following advantages (and expected advantages):

All-in-one diagnostic and therapeutic technology solution :

Our OneRF Brain Ablation System, indicated for creation of radiofrequency lesions in nervous tissue for functional neurosurgical procedures, provides bedside monitoring, mapping and ablation, giving physicians a less invasive, potentially safer way to gain improved bedside clarity of the therapeutic window for an epilepsy patient with the possibility of seizure reduction or freedom.

It is the first and only FDA-cleared system capable of nervous tissue ablation using the same Evo® sEEG-RF Electrode for both diagnostic and therapeutic applications.

Multi-contact probe for OneRF TN :

With the OneRF TN Ablation System, surgeons could simplify the ablation process to a single decisive step.

The innovative multi-contact probe may enable stimulation/mapping and ablation in fewer cycles, and may significantly reduce patient discomfort and procedure complexity.

Percutaneous placement of spinal cord stimulation paddle electrode with scalability options :

Due to the thin film nature of our electrode technology, we believe that it may allow for percutaneous placement of “paddle” (flat) shaped electrodes, thereby preventing the need to use more invasive surgical approaches to place the electrodes.

Minimally invasive and percutaneously placed technologies have become almost a requirement for adoption with patients and physicians.

Increased contacts :

We believe that both our spinal cord stimulation electrode in development and our BBNA product in development will offer the ability to increase the number of contacts on a film that traditionally offers fewer contacts.

Increasing the number of contacts may allow for more precise stimulation in the spine, potentially improving the therapeutic outcomes.

NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation

Improved accuracy of diagnostic technologies :

The Evo sEEG is engineered for accuracy, enhancing the ability to identify the right foci zones to determine the best intervention for patients.

Ability to record during drug delivery :

Our drug delivery product in development is designed to be able to record brain tissue before, during or after delivery of the drug.

Automated manufacturing :

Our electrode technology is cost competitive to competitors due to the scalable, automated manufacturing process.

This also increases the reliability and consistency of the manufacturing process, and allows for faster fulfillment of product.

Our goal is to be the global leader in minimally

invasive all in one therapies for brain related and other neurological disorders that leverages our thin film electrode technology to

be used for recording, monitoring, deep brain and peripheral stimulation and ablation, drug delivery, owning the procedure from diagnosis

through treatment.

The key elements of our strategy include:

cortical strip and grid electrodes for the diagnosis of epilepsy in United States :

December 2019, we announced that we received FDA 510(k) clearance to market our thin film

cortical electrode technology for temporary (less than 30 days) recording, monitoring, and

stimulation on the surface of the brain.

In July 2020, we entered into a development relationship

with Zimmer, pursuant to which we granted Zimmer exclusive global rights to distribute the

cortical strip and grid electrodes (the “ Zimmer Distribution Agreement ”).

Expand the use of our Evo Cortical, Evo sEEG and OneRF Brain Ablation System in the United States and begin the process to commercialize expand into select international markets :

In July 2020, we entered into a development relationship with Zimmer, pursuant to which we granted Zimmer exclusive global rights to distribute our Evo Cortical, which was ultimately expanded to include rights to our Evo sEEG and OneRF Brain Ablation System (the “ Zimmer Distribution Agreement ”).

Zimmer actively promotes and sell these products.

Based on physician feedback, we believe

our technology is seen as a significant improvement for recording brain activity, particularly

in epilepsy, an underserved market with a quick commercialization path.

We are initially

targeting epilepsy as we believe this is a clinical area of great need and a market that

is underserved with a quick path to commercialization.

is our primary target due

to a large market, strong reimbursement, robust pricing, and physician enthusiasm.

several institutions have already adopted our technology for diagnostic procedures.

electrodes for sEEG recording :

On October 20, 2022, the Company received an FDA clearance

to market its Evo sEEG electrode technology for temporary (less than 30 days) use with recording,

monitoring, and stimulation equipment for the recording, monitoring, and stimulation of electrical

signals at the subsurface level of the brain.

Given the reluctance of patients to undergo

epilepsy surgery due to its invasiveness, a number of epilepsy centers have adopted the use

of depth electrodes, which are placed by drilling small holes into the patient’s cranium,

thereby avoiding a craniotomy.

We believe our technology offers advantages compared to current

depth electrode technology in the market and will also enable us to offer a therapeutic solution

using this same technology in the future.

As we continue to develop our technology, we plan

to release further information about the expected advantages of our technology over currently

available therapies.

This product is covered under the Zimmer Distribution Agreement, and

Zimmer actively promotes and commercializes our sEEG electrode technology.

our RF Ablation System :

The OneRF Ablation System is the only FDA cleared radiofrequency

ablation system in the United States for both diagnostic and therapeutic use.

used in a number of ablation cases since its limited launch in April 2024.

Cases were reported

as being successful using the same device to identify the brain tissue triggering seizure

activity and ablate the targeted tissue to reduce or eliminate brain-related seizure activity.

In addition, the technology has the potential to reduce hospital stays, number of surgeries

and adverse events while offering temperature control to enhance patient safety.

are initially placed in the operating room.

To date, all the ablations have been performed

at the patient’s bedside saving additional operating costs while allowing the patient

to be diagnosed and treated in one hospitalization instead of multiple visits.

2024, the Zimmer Distribution Agreement was expanded to include our OneRF Ablation System.

We intend to submit a new 510(k) application for a facial pain ablation system which leverages the existing RF

ablation generator.

percutaneous placed electrodes for spinal cord and peripheral stimulation for pain management

with scalable contact configurations :

Given that many surgically placed technologies

have become less invasive due to patient and physician demands, we believe that our flexible

thin film technology will allow for percutaneous placement of “paddle” shaped

electrodes, thus potentially eliminating the need to make a more invasive surgical procedure.

Spinal cord clinical literature over the years have shown that “paddle” electrodes

(flat shaped) require less energy for stimulation (thus saving neurostimulator battery life)

and may be associated with lower revision rates over time.

Even then, “paddle”

shaped electrodes are used less often due to the more invasive surgical procedure that is

required for placement.

But we hope to change that paradigm by creating “paddle”

electrodes that can be implanted percutaneously (less invasively) through a “needle

hole incision”.

By leveraging our existing FDA cleared cortical electrode and sEEG

technology, we may also be able to offer the ability to improve precision of where the stimulation

is delivered.

NeuroOne’s platform thin film technology has the capability to increase

the number of contacts in a similar footprint that has fewer contacts.

approval for other brain or motor related disorders such as Parkinson’s with the therapeutic

technologies developed for epilepsy through partnership and collaborations with a strategic

organizations in the field :

While we are developing our technology for the diagnosis

and treatment of epilepsy, we believe that our technology has strong application and utilization

for other brain or motor related disorders such as Parkinson’s disease, dystonia, essential

tremors and facial pain as these diseases are currently treated with DBS if medications are

not effective.

As previously mentioned, we are actively evaluating the potential to offer

electrodes that can be implanted for long term stimulation applications, but such use will

require that we pursue additional approvals from the FDA and any international regulatory

bodies where we seek to commercialize our technology.

Medical Technologies Corporation

partnerships with other companies that leverage our core technology :

Given that our technology

enables, complements and/or competes with a number of companies that are in the market or

attempting to enter the market with diagnostic or therapeutic technologies to treat brain

related disorders, we believe there may be opportunities to establish mutually beneficial

relationships.

In addition, our technology may have application in cardiovascular, orthopedic

and pain related indications that could benefit from a high fidelity thin film electrode

product that can provide stimulation and/or ablation therapies.

● Facilitating

partnerships for drug delivery :

Partner with biotech, pharmaceutical or biopharma companies

to provide a drug delivery sEEG electrode capable of delivering the therapy and recording

before, during and after the therapy is delivered for up to 30 days.

● Investigate

the potential applications associated with artificial intelligence :

We have been informed

by some of our corporate advisors that the ability to offer scale-able electrode technology

that can provide thousands of electrodes in the brain may be helpful in treating medical

conditions that may benefit from using artificial intelligence.

The Company has formed an

advisory board that will provide guidance to the Company as we continue to explore the opportunities

in this exciting field.

Mapping and Monitoring

seizures occur when the neurons in the brain miscommunicate.

This miscommunication typically results in involuntary muscle seizure activities

and/or periods of perceptual disconnect where the individual appears frozen.

Modern medical science has advanced the treatment of epileptic

seizures by mapping the electrical communication activity of neurons and understanding their special orientation in the brain.

is accomplished by access to the cranium (through a craniotomy) and placing conductive contacts on the brain directly.

The craniotomy

procedure is very invasive, traumatic to the surrounding tissue, results in high patient down time, and increases the risk of infection.

seek to leverage scale-able technology and produce ultra-thin, or paper-thin electrodes that allow for high-resolution and high-definition

recordings, which would improve mapping resolution and signal acquisition.

If the Company is able to leverage scale-able technology,

it would mean that our technology would be able to incorporate smaller electrodes and thereby increase the number of electrodes on a

given surface area.

We expect that this would increase the imaging resolution so that brain activity is displayed in greater definition.

We also believe that the electrodes’ unique thinness and flexibility will provide a less invasive approach to electrode placement.

The electrodes would be able to be placed through a small quarter size hole instead of by an invasive full craniotomy procedure.

images under “Cortical Electrode,” from bottom to top, are images of our cortical electrode strip, our grid electrode, and

the placement of the grid electrode on the brain, respectively.

The images under “High Density Interconnect” are both images

of our product that connects our electrodes to the head box, which is a piece of hardware that connects to electrodes to acquire, amplify,

display, store and archive electrophysiological signals, and is integrated as part of our manufactured electrode product.

under “Head Box” and “Signal Monitoring and Mapping” are images of the device which processes information received

through the high density interconnect, and a sample output of data acquisition, respectively, neither of which is one of the Company’s

Medical Technologies Corporation

technology consists of three primary types of cortical electrodes:

grid electrodes, strip electrodes and dual-sided electrodes.

electrodes have a patented design that utilizes proprietary processing and materials technology, which we believe will allow the electrodes

to have improved features over the current industry standard recording electrodes.

sets our technology apart from others is the integration of state of the art design leveraging the latest in flexible printed circuit

We believe our patented designs will provide the surgeon a higher tactile perspective on electrode placement allowing for

ultra-precise neuron recording.

We expect the benefits of our electrode designs to include the ability to detect better defined margins

between healthy tissue and resect-able tissue, less immune-response from the brain and surrounding tissue, better signal acquisition

due to superior conformability of the electrode over the brain, improved flexibility that physicians have requested, which we expect

will enable a minimally invasive approach and the electrodes unique thinness that is unmatched by current products being used.

Future of Neurology Mapping with NeuroOne

seek to develop superior “scale-able” technology for future product system iterations in higher density contact placement.

This will open the doors to other brain related disease recording procedures by providing high fidelity, more accurate diagnostic capabilities

and also the ability to provide an all-in-one therapy capable of diagnosis, ablation and/or stimulation.

Beyond the brain, we believe

our technology under development has applications in other neurological signal recording disease states related to voluntary or involuntary

motor neuron abnormalities, understanding sensory neuro behavior (pain), limb prosthetics and degenerative muscle disease.

Development and Regulatory Pathway

Experience, Future Development and Clinical Trial Plans

sEEG Evo cortical electrode technology has received 510(k) clearance from the FDA in November 2019 for recording, monitoring, and stimulating

brain tissue for less than 30 days on the surface of the brain.

Our Evo sEEG electrode technology has received FDA 510(k) clearance from

the FDA for use (less than 30 days) with recording, monitoring, and stimulation equipment for the recording, monitoring, and stimulation

of electrical signals at the subsurface level of the brain.

On December 6, 2023, we received 510(k) FDA clearance to market our OneRF

Ablation System for creation of radiofrequency lesion in nervous tissue for functional neurosurgical procedures.

Our other products have

not received any clearance for commercialization by any U.S.

or foreign regulatory body.

In the future, we are planning on submitting

additional 510(k) clearance with the FDA for other ablation applications, as well as for neurological drug delivery.

date, the Company has performed a number of bench top (which includes feasibility testing) and pre-clinical tests (which include animal

testing of device placement, ergonomics, performance, ease of use, and other tests required by FDA regulations).

As described in “Government

Regulation” below, the Company will be required to perform additional testing of its technology in connection with seeking additional

regulatory clearances or approvals.

intend to expand our product offerings to include less invasive means and all-in-one solutions, thus providing both patients and physicians

better options to treat epilepsy, Parkinson’s disease, dystonia, essential tremors, drug delivery, chronic pain due to failed back

surgeries and other pain-related neurological disorders.

While we expect to make modifications to our initial system, we believe that

most of our future product development initiatives will involve unique and transformational next generation technology that should drive

further appeal of our products with both physicians and patients.

are utilizing a number of resources to develop these technologies as well as have hired additional employees with expertise in the respective

We license three critical patents from Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (“WARF”) that are the foundation of the

technology and we are developing and intend to commercialize and benefit from the thin film technology know-how of Mayo Clinic doctors

through our license and development agreement.

WARF, Mayo Clinic (cortical electrodes) and Cleveland Clinic (sEEG electrodes) have been

responsible for all pre-clinical studies of our technology under development to date.

See “WARF License” and “Mayo

Foundation for Medical Education and Research License and Development Agreement” below.

We announced in December 2020 that Mayo

Clinic doctors used our technology in the first human commercial application of our Evo cortical electrode technology to perform recording,

functional mapping and stimulation of the brain on a human patient.

In July 2022, we announced the first clinical case using the Evo

sEEG electrode was performed by Dr.

Robert Gross at Emory University.

Gross selected the Evo sEEG electrode for intraoperative brain

mapping at the subsurface level of the brain.

Medical Technologies Corporation

launched OneRF, demonstrating combined diagnostic and therapeutic technology for brain applications.

We have also performed bedside ablations,

which can offer savings in operating room time and additional hospitalizations.

the first half of 2025, we expect to submit a 510(k) clearance with the FDA for an additional applications leveraging our RF generator

for brain ablations.

are also developing a device for brain monitoring and drug delivery capabilities using the same product.

We have performed bench top

and animal experiments and successfully confirmed the proof of concept for this technology, which could be used to deliver drugs, genes,

or cell-based therapies to the brain.

We are pursuing a 510(k) clearance with the FDA for brain cancer.

we have summarized, for each component of our technology, the current stage of development or commercial production, the pre-clinical

testing done to date by WARF, the Cleveland Clinic or Mayo Clinic on such component, if any, our plans for further testing or clinical

trials and our expectations regarding the requirements for regulatory clearance or approval and timing of regulatory submissions.

of Development and Pre-Clinical

In fiscal 2025, we received product revenue from these products of approximately $9.1 million.

Launch our OneRF TN Ablation System :

In December 2025, we initiated a limited market release of our OneRF TN Ablation System.

The OneRF Trigeminal Nerve Ablation System features a minimally invasive surgical technology to treat severe, chronic facial pain.

The system delivers targeted RF energy to ablate trigeminal nerve fibers, interrupting pain signaling.

Differentiated features of this system include a “first-of-its-kind” multi-contact RF probe that allows for both precise localization and targeted ablation of the pain-conducting nerve tissue - using the same RF probe - and under temperature-controlled conditions, which enhances safety and accuracy.

This system may also allow for reduced procedural time, as well as improved patient comfort and safety.

Continue to develop percutaneous placed paddle electrodes for spinal cord and peripheral stimulation for pain management with scalable contact configurations :

We believe that our flexible thin film technology will allow for percutaneous placement of “paddle” shaped electrodes, thus potentially eliminating the need to make a more invasive surgical procedure.

Spinal cord clinical literature over the years have shown that “paddle” electrodes (flat shaped) require less energy for stimulation (thus saving neurostimulator battery life) and may be associated with lower revision rates over time.

Even then, “paddle” shaped electrodes are used less often due to the more invasive surgical procedure that is required for placement.

But we hope to change that paradigm by creating “paddle” electrodes that can be implanted percutaneously (less invasively) through a “needle hole incision”.

This capability opens the use and implantation of paddle electrodes to pain management doctors, who currently only implant traditional percutaneous electrodes.

Current paddle electrodes are predominantly implanted by surgeons.

By leveraging our existing FDA-cleared technologies, we may also be able to offer the ability to improve precision of where the stimulation is delivered.

NeuroOne’s platform thin film technology has the capability to increase the number of contacts in a similar footprint that has fewer contacts.

Facilitate partnerships for drug delivery :

Partner with biotech, pharmaceutical or biopharma companies to provide a drug delivery sEEG electrode capable of delivering the therapy and recording before, during and after the therapy is delivered for up to 30 days.

Develop BVNA System :

We intend to leverage our existing FDA-cleared technologies to develop a BVNA system, and using our multi-contact probes to increase placement flexibility compared to existing cleared BVNA systems.

We established an advisory board for our BVNA development program in October 2025.

Explore partnerships with other companies that leverage our core technology :

Given that our technology enables, complements and/or competes with a number of companies that are in the market or attempting to enter the market with diagnostic or therapeutic technologies to treat brain related disorders, we believe there may be opportunities to establish mutually beneficial relationships.

In addition, our technology may have application in cardiovascular, orthopedic and pain related indications that could benefit from a high-fidelity thin film electrode product that can provide stimulation and/or ablation therapies.

NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation

Clinical Development and Regulatory Pathway

for Products in Development

Clinical Experience, Future Development and

Clinical Trial Plans

Below we have summarized, for each of our products

in development, the current stage of development, our plans for further testing or clinical trials and our expectations regarding the

requirements for regulatory clearance or approval and timing of regulatory submissions.

Stage of Development and Pre-Clinical

Testing to Date

Expected Steps for Regulatory

Additional Expected Steps for Regulatory

Clearance or Approval

sEEG - Cortical strip and

grid electrodes for the diagnosis of epilepsy

The Company has finalized the design for the product and there are no further expected changes to the device (“design freeze”).

Pre-clinical testing and clinical testing on the final design has been conducted by Mayo Clinic and WARF (as described in “Mayo Clinic and University of Wisconsin-Madison Studies” below).

The product is in commercial production.

The Company received FDA 510(k) clearance in the fourth calendar quarter of 2019.

Commercial launch commenced utilizing Zimmer, our distribution partner.

sEEG - Depth electrodes for recording

(diagnostic) purposes

frozen this design and the product is in commercial production.

No clinical testing was required in order to obtain FDA clearance.

On October 20, 2022, the Company received an

FDA clearance to market its Evo sEEG Electrode technology for temporary (less than 30 days) use with recording, monitoring, and stimulation

equipment for the recording, monitoring, and stimulation of electrical signals at the subsurface level of the brain.

distributing this product in May 2023.

NeuroOne Medical

Technologies Corporation

Drug Delivery and monitoring electrode

Actively developing;

benchtop testing and

component sourcing complete

The Company is pursuing a 510(k) clearance

with the FDA for brain cancer drug delivery system.

OneRF Ablation System - Depth electrode

diagnostic and ablation devices

phase was completed at the end of 2022, the verification phase was completed in June 2023, and the transfer to manufacturing phase

began in July 2023.

Pre-clinical testing, including benchtop and animal testing, has been conducted on final designs.

Very early testing at the Cleveland Clinic was completed in the second calendar quarter of 2020.

Pre-clinical (animal) feasibility testing was conducted in September 2021 with representatives from Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia.

Additional pre-clinical animal testing of our final design was conducted at Emory University in April 2023 and invivo testing of our final design was conducted in May 2023.

The Company announced a partnership with RBC Medical Systems in August 2021 to develop an RF generator that will be used with the Company’s diagnostic and ablation electrode.

animal or human clinical testing is anticipated for FDA submission since 510K predicate devices did

not perform such clinical testing.

Company received 510(k) clearance from the FDA for creation of radiofrequency lesions in nervous tissue

for functional neurosurgical procedures on December 6, 2023.

Company is pursuing additional 510(k) clearance for additional applications leveraging our RF generator

for brain ablations

Conducted benchtop and animal studies.

The Company may pursue a 510(k) clearance with the FDA for brain cancer drug delivery system.

SCS - Spinal cord stim electrodes

design freeze.

performed pre-clinical in-house bench top testing in August 2020.

2021/early 2022, we performed bench top testing of prototypes to demonstrate chronic performance and

In 2023, we continued to refine our chronic spinal cord electrode design based on SCS customer feedback and completed additional pre-clinical bench and/or animal tests to further validate our value proposition.

In 2024, we completed the development of a percutaneous delivery system and conducted benchtop, animal and cadaver studies of both the percutaneous delivery system and various design iterations of paddle electrodes.

We completed the development of a percutaneous delivery system and conducted benchtop, animal and cadaver studies of both the percutaneous delivery system and various design iterations of paddle electrodes.

This device is in early stages of development.

3 unchanged sentences

To expedite market entry, we are actively seeking strategic partnerships and collaborations.

NeuroOne Medical

Technologies Corporation

Implantable stimulation

testing was successfully completed in 2021 and early 2022.

We announced the results of these studies in the first quarter of 2022.

this device is still in early development, we plan to collaborate with clinicians to refine our designs and continue testing in 2023.

a design freeze, we will be required to conduct additional pre-clinical testing, including additional benchtop or animal testing

to assess safety and performance.

Additionally, FDA-approved human clinical studies will likely be required.

The Company is pursuing

chronic animal studies and plan to follow up with a first-in-human test.

we have not yet sought or received FDA feedback on the specific clinical process for chronic stimulation, we anticipate that regulatory

approval may necessitate a more rigorous clinical process, potentially involving a pre-market approval (“PMA”) with human

clinical data.

As we have not yet met with the FDA, we cannot definitively determine the exact clinical data and testing requirements.

However, based on industry experience with similar technologies, we estimate that clinical trials will be necessary, requiring an

investment of over $2,000,000.

Collaborations

and Partnerships

Clinic and University of Wisconsin-Madison Studies

cortical technology for the diagnosis of epilepsy has been tested by doctors at Mayo Clinic in multiple pre-clinical tests conducted

from 2012 to 2017.

In pre-clinical models, doctors examined the biological impact on mammalian brains.

Polyimide substrate electrodes

(NeuroOne technology) were implanted on the pig’s brain for one week alongside standard competitive electrodes.

The tissue underneath

the two types of electrodes was removed, fixed, stained, and examined for immunological responses.

The results of a histological (evaluation

of brain tissue under a microscope) analysis showed reduced immunological reaction to prolonged polyimide substrate implants (NeuroOne

technology) compared to standard silicone substrate clinical electrodes.

Electrophysiological recordings showed data obtained from polyimide

electrodes which demonstrated the feasibility of high fidelity multi-scale electrophysiology while also displaying easier deployment

of polyimide electrodes (NeuroOne technology) through minimally invasive burr holes.

Additionally,

doctors implanted our polyimide thin film electrodes on five human patients who were undergoing surgery to remove brain tissue for drug

resistant epilepsy.

Electrophysiological recordings from the polyimide thin film technology displayed in each of these patients demonstrated

micro-seizure activity due to the high fidelity multi-scale electrophysiology.

In December 2020, we announced the first human commercial

use of our Evo cortical electrode to perform recording, functional mapping and stimulation of the brain.

In the procedure, performed

at the Mayo Clinic, our electrodes were used to record evidence of pre-seizure activity which may be critical in developing treatments

to prevent the onset of seizures.

reached by the physicians at Mayo Clinic were that thin, flexible polyimide electrodes (NeuroOne technology) provided recordings similar

to standard clinical electrodes with reduced immunological response.

In addition, Mayo Clinic physicians observed that the flexibility

of polyimide electrodes may reduce pain and swelling associated with implantation of the device, and the single wire exiting the skull

may reduce infection risk.

The ability to record micro-seizure and single neuron brain activity may also provide additional useful clinical

Combined, these properties suggest that the replacement of current competitive silicone electrodes with polyimide substrate electrodes

(NeuroOne technology) for recording brain activity for epilepsy could provide enhanced clinical value with reduced cost, reduced infection

risk, and improved patient comfort.

addition, our thin film cortical implant technology has been tested by researchers at the University of Wisconsin-Madison in multiple

pre-clinical animal studies conducted from 2006 to 2016, which included mice, rats and primates.

In these studies, our technology was

able to record brain activity from different areas of the brain, was implanted in a minimally invasive fashion, electrically provided

brain stimulation and tissue ablation, and had increased flexibility compared to existing commercially available technology, which allowed

the grids to conform more easily to the brain surface (and may have reduced pain and swelling, compared to less flexible devices).

Medical Technologies Corporation

January 2020, we entered into an Amended and Restated Exclusive Start-Up Company License Agreement, dated as of January 21, 2020, as

amended on June 15, 2020 (the “WARF License”) with WARF, which amended and restated in full the Original WARF License.

to the WARF License, WARF has granted to us an exclusive license to make, use and sell, in the United States only, products that employ

certain licensed patents for a neural probe array or thin-film micro electrode array and method.

We have agreed to pay WARF a royalty

equal to a single-digit percentage of our product sales pursuant to the WARF License, with a minimum annual royalty payment of $50,000

for calendar year 2020, $100,000 for calendar year 2021 and $150,000 for calendar year 2022 and each calendar year thereafter that the

WARF License is in effect.

The minimum annual royalty payment for calendar year 2020 in the amount of $50,000 was paid in January 2021.

If we or any of our sublicensees contest the validity of any licensed patent, the royalty rate will be doubled during the pendency of

such contest and, if the contested patent is found to be valid and would be infringed by us if not for the WARF License, the royalty

rate will be tripled for the remaining term of the WARF License.

may terminate this license on 30 days’ written notice, if we default on the payments of amounts due to WARF or fail to timely submit

development reports, actively pursue our development plan or breach any other covenant in the WARF License and fail to remedy such default

in 90 days or in the event of certain bankruptcy events involving us.

WARF may also terminate the WARF License (i) on 90 days’

notice if we had failed to have commercial sales of one or more FDA-approved products under the WARF License by June 30, 2021 or (ii)

if, after royalties earned on sales begin to be paid, such earned royalties cease for more than four calendar quarters.

Actively developing;

Conducted benchtop and animal ex vivo studies.

The Company may pursue a 510(k) clearance with the FDA for its BVNA product in development.

Collaborations and Partnerships

Mayo Clinic and University of Wisconsin-Madison

In January 2020, we entered into an Amended and

Restated Exclusive Start-Up Company License Agreement, dated as of January 21, 2020, as amended on June 15, 2020 (the “WARF License”)

with WARF, which amended and restated in full the Original WARF License.

Pursuant to the WARF License, WARF has granted to us an exclusive

license to make, use and sell, in the United States only, products that employ certain licensed patents for a neural probe array or thin-film

micro electrode array and method.

We have agreed to pay WARF a royalty equal to a single-digit percentage of our product sales pursuant

to the WARF License, with a minimum annual royalty payment of $50,000 for calendar year 2020, $100,000 for calendar year 2021 and $150,000

for calendar year 2022 and each calendar year thereafter that the WARF License is in effect.

If we or any of our sublicensees contest

the validity of any licensed patent, the royalty rate will be doubled during the pendency of such contest and, if the contested patent

is found to be valid and would be infringed by us if not for the WARF License, the royalty rate will be tripled for the remaining term

of the WARF License.

NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation

WARF may terminate this license on 30

days’ written notice, if we default on the payments of amounts due to WARF or fail to timely submit development reports,

actively pursue our development plan or breach any other covenant in the WARF License and fail to remedy such default in 90 days or

in the event of certain bankruptcy events involving us.

WARF may also terminate the WARF License (i) on 90 days’ notice if we

had failed to have commercial sales of one or more FDA-approved products under the WARF License by June 30, 2021 or (ii) if, after

royalties earned on sales begin to be paid, such earned royalties cease for more than four calendar quarters.

The first commercial

sale occurred on December 7, 2020, prior to the June 30, 2021 deadline.

The WARF License otherwise expires by its terms on the date that

no valid claims on the patents licensed thereunder remain.

The WARF License otherwise expires by its terms on the date

that no valid claims on the patents licensed thereunder remain.

We expect the latest expiration of a licensed patent to occur in

addition, WARF reserves the right to grant non-profit research institutions and government agencies non-exclusive licenses to practice

and use the inventions of the licensed patents for non-commercial research purposes, and we grant WARF a non-exclusive, sub licensable,

royalty-free right and license for non-commercial research purposes to use improvements to the licensed patents.

In the event that we

discontinue use or commercialization of the licensed patents or improvements thereon, we must grant WARF an option to obtain a non-exclusive,

sub-licensable, royalty-bearing license to use the improvements for commercial purposes.

“Risk Factors-Risks Related to Our Business-We depend on intellectual property licensed from WARF for our technology, including

our technology under development, and the termination of this license would harm our business” for additional information regarding

the WARF License.

Foundation for Medical Education and Research License and Development Agreement

May 2017, we entered into an Amended and Restated License and Development Agreement, dated as of May 25, 2017 (the “Mayo Development

Agreement”), with Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research (“Mayo”) to license worldwide (i) certain know

how for the development and commercialization of products, methods and processes related to flexible circuit thin film technology for

the recording of tissue and (ii) the products developed therefrom, and to partner with Mayo to assist the Company in the investigation,

research application, development and improvement of such technology.

Mayo has agreed to assist us by providing access to certain individuals

at Mayo (the “Mayo Principal Investigators”), in developing our cortical thin film flexible circuit technology, including

prototype development, animal testing, protocol development for human and animal use, abstract development and presentation and access

to and license of any intellectual property that the Mayo Principal Investigators develop relating to the procedure.

have agreed to pay Mayo a royalty equal to a single-digit percentage of our product sales pursuant to the Mayo Development Agreement.

Mayo may purchase any developed products licensed under the Mayo Development Agreement at the best price offered by us to the end user

in the prior year.

The Mayo Development Agreement generally will expire in October 2034, unless the Mayo know-how and improvements under

the Mayo Development Agreement remain in use, and the Mayo Development Agreement may be terminated by Mayo for cause or under certain

circumstances.

Medical Technologies Corporation

additional information regarding the Mayo Development Agreement, see “Risk Factors-Risks Related to Our Business-We depend on our

partnership with Mayo to license certain know how for the development and commercialization of our technology.

Termination of this partnership

would harm our business, and even if this partnership continues, it may not be successful.”

Commercialization,

Sales and Marketing

Distribution Agreement

on the size and maturity of the U.S.

market and our initial commercial focus, on July 20, 2020, we entered into an exclusive development

and distribution agreement (the “Original Distribution Agreement”) with Zimmer, pursuant to which we granted Zimmer exclusive

global rights to distribute NeuroOne’s strip and grid cortical electrodes (the “Strip/Grid Products”) and electrode

cable assembly products (the “Electrode Cable Assembly Products”), including to approximately 188 Level 4 epilepsy centers.

Additionally, we granted Zimmer the exclusive right and license to distribute certain depth electrodes developed by the Company (the

“sEEG Products”).

The parties have agreed to collaborate with respect to development activities under the Distribution Agreement

through a joint development committee composed of an equal number of representatives of Zimmer and the Company.

to the Distribution Agreement, Zimmer made an upfront payment of $2.0 million to the Company in August 2020.

August 2022, we entered into an amendment to the Distribution Agreement with Zimmer that provided us with a $3.5 million accelerated

payment relating to certain milestone events.

In addition, Zimmer received a Warrant to purchase 350,000 shares of our common stock,

$0.001 par value, with an exercise price of $3.00 per share.

October 2024, we amended and restated our development and distribution agreement with Zimmer to grant exclusive right and license to

distribute also our OneRF Ablation System (the “OneRF Products”) for an upfront fee of $3 million dollars and up to an additional

$1 million dollars upon achievement of certain net sales milestone by Zimmer (as amended, the “Zimmer Distribution Agreement”).

the terms of the Distribution Agreement, we are responsible for all costs and expenses related to developing the Strip/Grid Products,

the Electrode Cable Assembly Products, the sEEG Products and the OneRF Products (collectively the “Products”), and Zimmer

is responsible for all costs and expenses related to the commercialization of the Products.

In addition to the Distribution Agreement,

Zimmer and the Company have entered into a Manufacturing and Supply Agreement (the “MS Agreement”) and a supplier quality

agreement (the “Quality Agreement”) with respect to the manufacturing and supply of the Products.

as otherwise provided in the Zimmer Distribution Agreement, we are responsible for performing all development activities, including non-clinical

and clinical studies directed at obtaining regulatory approval of each Product.

Zimmer has agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts

to promote, market and sell each Product following the “Product Availability Date” (as defined in the Zimmer Distribution

Agreement) for such Products.

Zimmer Distribution Agreement will expire on September 30, 2034, unless terminated earlier pursuant to its terms.

Either party may terminate

the Amended and Restated Distribution Agreement (x) with written notice for the other party’s material breach following a cure

period or (y) if the other party becomes subject to certain insolvency proceedings.

In addition, Zimmer may terminate the Zimmer Distribution

Agreement for any reason with 90 days’ written notice, and we may terminate the Zimmer Distribution Agreement if Zimmer acquires

or directly or indirectly owns a controlling interest in certain competitors of the Company.

Both Zimmer and the Company have agreed

to indemnify the other party against certain losses and expenses relating to the development or commercialization of a product by the

indemnifying party, the negligence or willful misconduct of the indemnifying party or its directors, officers, employees or agents or

a breach of the indemnifying party’s representations, warranties or covenants.

Medical Technologies Corporation

will investigate markets outside of the U.S.

with the assistance of Zimmer and formulate a plan to enter those markets with the support

more information regarding the Zimmer Distribution Agreement, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition

and Results of Operations-Financial Overview-Collaborations Revenue” and “Note 7-Zimmer Distribution Agreement” included

in “Item 8-Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Report.

Facility Agreement

August 2, 2024, we entered into a loan and security agreement (the “Debt Facility Agreement”) with Growth Opportunity Funding,

LLC, as the lender (the “Lender”), which provides for a delayed draw term loan facility in an aggregate principal amount

not to exceed $3.0 million (the “Debt Facility”).

We are permitted to borrow loans under the Debt Facility from time to time

(collectively, the “Loans”), for general corporate purposes and subject to certain specified conditions, until the earliest

(i) November 30, 2024, (ii) the occurrence of any monetization or change in control, or (iii) at the Lender’s option, upon

the occurrence and during the continuance of an event of default under the Debt Facility Agreement.

The Loan(s), upon issuance, will

be secured by substantially all of our assets, subject to certain exceptions set forth in the Debt Facility Agreement, and will be subject

to covenants.

Debt Facility matures on February 2, 2026.

The outstanding principal amount of any outstanding Loans will bear interest at a rate of

10% per annum, payable monthly in arrears and at the maturity date.

As of the closing date of the Debt Facility Agreement, no amounts

were drawn by us thereunder.

On November 7, 2024, we mutually agreed with the Lender to terminate the loan facility.

paid a one-time standby facility fee of $125,000 and on August 2, 2024, we issued 100,000 Lender Warrants to Lender to purchase shares

of the our Common Stock at exercise price of $0.66 per share.

The warrants are immediately exercisable and expire on August 2, 2029.

Lastly, a cash draw-fee of $50,000 is payable and a warrant draw-fee consisting of the issuance of an additional 50,000 warrants to the

Lender is required upon each additional funding tranche of $500,000 under the Debt Facility, for an aggregate potential issuance of 300,000

additional Lender Warrants.

The Lender Warrants issuable upon each future funding date will have an exercise price of $0.66 per share

and will have a five-year term.

Private Placement

August 1, 2024, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement which closed on August 2, 2024, with certain accredited investors (the

“Purchasers”), pursuant to which the we, in a private placement, agreed to issue and sell an aggregate of (i) 2,944,446 shares

of the our common stock, and (ii) warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,208,338 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $0.90

per unit, consisting of one share and a warrant to purchase 0.75 shares of common stock, resulting in total gross proceeds of approximately

$2.65 million before deducting estimated expenses (the “2024 Private Placement”).

In connection with the 2024 Private Placement,

we filed a registration statement with the SEC covering the resale of the securities issued in the 2024 Private Placement.

Minimum Bid Price Notification

July 11, 2024, we received a letter (the “Notice”) from the Listing Qualifications Department (the “Staff”) of

Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”) notifying that because the closing bid price of the our common stock was below $1.00 per share

for the prior 30 consecutive business days, we are not in compliance with the minimum bid price requirement for continued listing on

The Nasdaq Capital Market, as set forth in Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5550(a)(2) (the “Minimum Bid Price Requirement”).

In accordance

with Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5810(c)(3)(A), we have a period of 180 calendar days from July 11, 2024, or until January 7, 2025, to regain

compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Requirement.

If at any time before January 7, 2025, the closing bid price of our common stock closes

at or above $1.00 per share for a minimum of 10 consecutive business days (which number days may be extended by Nasdaq), Nasdaq will

provide written notification that we have achieved compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Requirement, and the matter would be resolved.

Medical Technologies Corporation

Reimbursement

in the United States

In addition, WARF reserves the right to grant

non-profit research institutions and government agencies non-exclusive licenses to practice and use the inventions of the licensed patents

for non-commercial research purposes, and we grant WARF a non-exclusive, sub licensable, royalty-free right and license for non-commercial

research purposes to use improvements to the licensed patents.

In the event that we discontinue use or commercialization of the licensed

patents or improvements thereon, we must grant WARF an option to obtain a non-exclusive, sub-licensable, royalty-bearing license to use

the improvements for commercial purposes.

See “Risk Factors-Risks Related to Our Business-We

depend on intellectual property licensed from WARF for our technology, including our technology under development, and the termination

of this license would harm our business” for additional information regarding the WARF License.

Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research

License and Development Agreement

In May 2017, we entered into an Amended and Restated

License and Development Agreement, dated as of May 25, 2017 (the “Mayo Development Agreement”), with Mayo Foundation for Medical

Education and Research (“Mayo”) to license worldwide (i) certain know how for the development and commercialization of products,

methods and processes related to flexible circuit thin film technology for the recording of tissue and (ii) the products developed therefrom,

and to partner with Mayo to assist the Company in the investigation, research application, development and improvement of such technology.

Mayo has agreed to assist us by providing access to certain individuals at Mayo (the “Mayo Principal Investigators”), in developing

our cortical thin film flexible circuit technology, including prototype development, animal testing, protocol development for human and

animal use, abstract development and presentation and access to and license of any intellectual property that the Mayo Principal Investigators

develop relating to the procedure.

We have agreed to pay Mayo a royalty equal to

a single-digit percentage of our product sales pursuant to the Mayo Development Agreement.

Mayo may purchase any developed products licensed

under the Mayo Development Agreement at the best price offered by us to the end user in the prior year.

The Mayo Development Agreement

generally will expire in October 2034, unless the Mayo know-how and improvements under the Mayo Development Agreement remain in use, and

the Mayo Development Agreement may be terminated by Mayo for cause or under certain circumstances.

For additional information regarding the Mayo

Development Agreement, see “Risk Factors-Risks Related to Our Business-We depend on our partnership with Mayo to license certain

know how for the development and commercialization of our technology.

Termination of this partnership would harm our business, and even

if this partnership continues, it may not be successful.”

Commercialization, Sales and Marketing

Zimmer Biomet Distribution Agreement

Based on the size and maturity of the U.S.

and our initial commercial focus, on July 20, 2020, we entered into an exclusive development and distribution agreement (the “Distribution

Agreement”) with Zimmer, pursuant to which we granted Zimmer exclusive global rights to distribute NeuroOne’s strip and grid

cortical electrodes (the “Strip/Grid Products”) and electrode cable assembly products (the “Electrode Cable Assembly

Products”), including to approximately 188 Level 4 epilepsy centers.

Additionally, we granted Zimmer the exclusive right and license

to distribute certain depth electrodes developed by the Company (the “sEEG Products”).

The parties have agreed to collaborate

with respect to development activities under the Distribution Agreement through a joint development committee composed of an equal number

of representatives of Zimmer and the Company.

NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation

Pursuant to the Distribution Agreement, Zimmer

made an upfront payment of $2.0 million to the Company in August 2020.

In August 2022, we entered into an amendment to

the Distribution Agreement with Zimmer that provided us with a $3.5 million accelerated payment relating to certain milestone events.

In addition, Zimmer received a Warrant to purchase 350,000 shares of our common stock, $0.001 par value, with an exercise price of $3.00

In October 2024, we amended and restated our development

and distribution agreement with Zimmer to grant exclusive right and license to distribute also our OneRF Ablation System (the “OneRF

Products”) for an upfront fee of $3 million dollars and up to an additional $1 million dollars upon achievement of certain net sales

milestone by Zimmer (as amended, the “Zimmer Distribution Agreement”).

Under the terms of the Zimmer Distribution Agreement,

we are responsible for all costs and expenses related to developing the Strip/Grid Products, the Electrode Cable Assembly Products, the

sEEG Products and the OneRF Products (collectively the “Products”), and Zimmer is responsible for all costs and expenses related

to the commercialization of the Products.

In addition to the Zimmer Distribution Agreement, Zimmer and the Company have entered into a

Manufacturing and Supply Agreement (the “MS Agreement”) and a supplier quality agreement (the “Quality Agreement”)

with respect to the manufacturing and supply of the Products.

Except as otherwise provided in the Zimmer Distribution

Agreement, we are responsible for performing all development activities, including non-clinical and clinical studies directed at obtaining

regulatory approval of each Product.

Zimmer has agreed to use commercially reasonable efforts to promote, market and sell each Product

following the “Product Availability Date” (as defined in the Zimmer Distribution Agreement) for such Products.

The Zimmer Distribution Agreement will expire

on September 30, 2034, unless terminated earlier pursuant to its terms.

Either party may terminate the Zimmer Distribution Agreement (x)

with written notice for the other party’s material breach following a cure period or (y) if the other party becomes subject to certain

insolvency proceedings.

In addition, Zimmer may terminate the Zimmer Distribution Agreement for any reason with 90 days’ written

notice, and we may terminate the Zimmer Distribution Agreement if Zimmer acquires or directly or indirectly owns a controlling interest

in certain competitors of the Company.

Both Zimmer and the Company have agreed to indemnify the other party against certain losses and

expenses relating to the development or commercialization of a product by the indemnifying party, the negligence or willful misconduct

of the indemnifying party or its directors, officers, employees or agents or a breach of the indemnifying party’s representations,

warranties or covenants.

We will investigate markets outside of the U.S.

with the assistance of Zimmer and formulate a plan to enter those markets with the support of Zimmer.

For more information regarding the Zimmer Distribution

Agreement, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Financial Overview-Collaborations

Revenue” and “Note 7-Zimmer Distribution Agreement” included in “Item 8-Financial Statements and Supplementary

Data” in this Report.

2025 Financing

4, 2025, we entered into an underwriting agreement with Ladenburg Thalmann & Co.

as underwriter ( “Ladenburg”), relating

to the issuance and sale of 16,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, at a price to the public of $0.50 per share (the “April

2025 Financing”).

In addition, under the terms of the underwriting agreement, we granted Ladenburg an option, exercisable for 45

days, to purchase up to an additional 2,400,000 shares of common stock on the same terms as the offering, which was exercised in full.

Net proceeds to the Company were approximately $8.2 million.

NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation

Nasdaq Minimum Bid Price Notification

On May 6, 2025, we received a letter from the

Listing Qualifications Department of Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”) notifying that because the closing bid price of our common

stock was below $1.00 per share for the prior 30 consecutive business days, we are not in compliance with the minimum bid price requirement

for continued listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market, as set forth in Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5550(a)(2) (the “Minimum Bid Price

Requirement”).

In accordance with Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5810(c)(3)(A), we had a period of 180 calendar days, or until November

3, 2025, to regain compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Requirement.

On November 4, 2025, we received a letter from

Nasdaq notifying us that we have been granted a 180-day extension, until May 4, 2026, to regain compliance with the Minimum Bid Price

We will continue to monitor the closing bid price of our common stock and seek to regain compliance with the Minimum Bid

Price Requirement within the extension period.

If we do not regain compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Requirement within the extension

period, Nasdaq will provide written notification to us that our common stock will be subject to delisting, at which time we may appeal

Nasdaq’s delisting determination to a Nasdaq Hearing Panel.

There can be no assurance that, if we do need to appeal a Nasdaq delisting

determination to the Nasdaq Hearings Panel, that such appeal would be successful.

Reimbursement

from private third-party healthcare payors and, to a lesser extent, Medicare will be an important element of our success.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) and third-party payors have adopted coverage policies for our targeted

indications, there is no guarantee this will continue at the same levels or at all in the future.

Current Procedural Terminology, or

CPT, is a medical code set that is used to report medical, surgical and diagnostic procedures and services to entities such as physicians,

health insurance companies and accreditation organizations.

diagnostic CPT codes for mapping (diagnosing) the brain for diagnostic procedures are as follows:

Subdural implantation of strip electrodes through one or more burr or trephine (saw) hole(s)

for long term seizure monitoring;

Coverage in the United States

Reimbursement from private third-party healthcare

payors and, to a lesser extent, Medicare will be an important element of our success.

Although the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

(“CMS”) and third-party payors have adopted coverage policies for our targeted indications, there is no guarantee this will

continue at the same levels or at all in the future.

Current Procedural Terminology, or CPT, is a medical code set that is used to report

medical, surgical and diagnostic procedures and services to entities such as physicians, health insurance companies and accreditation

organizations.

Applicable diagnostic CPT codes for mapping (diagnosing)

the brain for diagnostic procedures are as follows:

● 61531 Subdural implantation of strip electrodes through one or more burr or trephine (saw) hole(s) for

long term seizure monitoring;

● 61533 Craniotomy with elevation of bone flap:

for subdural implantation of an electrode array,

for long term seizure monitoring;

for subdural implantation of an electrode array, for long

term seizure monitoring;

● 61535 Craniotomy with elevation of bone flap;

for removal of epidural or subdural electrode array,

without excision of cerebral tissue (separate procedure);

for removal of epidural or subdural electrode array, without

excision of cerebral tissue (separate procedure);

● 61760 Stereotactic implantation of depth electro1des into the cerebrum for long term seizure monitoring.

ICD-10 codes, the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition (ICD-10) is a clinical cataloging system that went into effect

healthcare industry on October 1, 2015, after a series of lengthy delays.

Accounting for modern advances in clinical treatment

and medical devices, ICD-10 codes offer many more classification options compared to those found in its predecessor, ICD-9.

healthcare industry, providers, coders, IT professionals, insurance carriers, government agencies and others use ICD codes to properly

note diseases on health records, to track epidemiological trends and to assist in medical reimbursement decisions.

codes for epilepsy are as follows:

Localization-related (focal) (partial) idiopathic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes with seizures

Regarding ICD-10 codes, the International Classification

of Diseases, Tenth Edition (ICD-10) is a clinical cataloging system that went into effect for the U.S.

healthcare industry on October

1, 2015, after a series of lengthy delays.

Accounting for modern advances in clinical treatment and medical devices, ICD-10 codes offer

many more classification options compared to those found in its predecessor, ICD-9.

Within the healthcare industry, providers, coders,

IT professionals, insurance carriers, government agencies and others use ICD codes to properly note diseases on health records, to track

epidemiological trends and to assist in medical reimbursement decisions.

ICD-10 codes for epilepsy are as follows:

● G40.0 Localization-related (focal) (partial) idiopathic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes with seizures

of localized onset;

Localization-related (focal) (partial) symptomatic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes with

simple partial seizures;

Localization-related (focal) (partial) symptomatic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes with

complex partial seizures;

Generalized idiopathic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes;

Absence epileptic syndrome;

Other generalized epilepsy and epileptic syndromes;

Epileptic seizures related to external causes, not intractable;

Other epilepsy;

Epileptic spasms.

Medical Technologies Corporation

believe that many of the indications we are pursuing with our technologies are currently reimbursed on a widespread basis by Medicare,

Medicaid and private insurance companies.

Medicaid, health maintenance organizations and other third-party payors are increasingly attempting to contain healthcare costs by limiting

both coverage and the level of reimbursement of new medical devices, and, as a result, their coverage policies may be restrictive, or

they may not cover or provide adequate payment for our products.

In order to obtain reimbursement arrangements, we may have to agree

to a net sales price lower than the net sales price we might charge in other sales channels.

Our revenue may be limited by the continuing

efforts of government and third-party payors to contain or reduce the costs of healthcare through various increasingly sophisticated

means, such as requiring prospective reimbursement and second opinions, purchasing in groups, or redesigning benefits.

Our future dependence

on the commercial success of our technologies makes us particularly susceptible to any cost containment or reduction efforts.

if government and other third-party payors do not provide adequate coverage and reimbursement for our products and the related insertion

and removal procedures, our financial performance will be negatively impacted.

Manufacturing,

Supply and Quality Assurance

currently outsource the supply and manufacture of all components of our prototypes of our technology under development.

We plan to continue

with an outsourced manufacturing arrangement for the foreseeable future.

Our third-party manufacturers are recognized in their field

for their competency to manufacture the respective portions of our system and have quality systems established that meet FDA requirements.

We believe at this time the manufacturers we currently utilize have sufficient capacity to meet our requirements.

We believe that as

we increase our demand in the future, our per-unit costs will decrease materially.

● G40.1 Localization-related (focal) (partial) symptomatic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes with simple

partial seizures;

NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation

● G40.2 Localization-related (focal) (partial) symptomatic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes with complex

partial seizures;

● G40.3 Generalized idiopathic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes;

● G40.A Absence epileptic syndrome;

● G40.4 Other generalized epilepsy and epileptic syndromes;

● G40.50 Epileptic seizures related to external causes, not intractable;

● G40.80 Other epilepsy;

● G40.82 Epileptic spasms.

For our OneRF Ablation System, we use ICD-10-PCScode

00503Z4 Destruction of Brain Using Stereoelectroencephalographic Radiofrequency Ablation, Percutaneous Approach.

This code allows hospital

reporting of inpatient procedures that are performed using the OneRF Ablation system,

For our OneRF TN Ablation System, the following

CPT Codes are available:

● 61790 Creation of lesion by stereotactic method,

percutaneous, by neurolytic agent (eg, alcohol, thermal, electrical, radiofrequency);

gasserian ganglion

● 61791 Creation of lesion by sterotactic method,

percutaneous, by neurolytic agent (eg, alcohol, thermal, electrical, radiofrequency);

trigeminal medullary tract

Medicare, Medicaid, health maintenance organizations

and other third-party payors are increasingly attempting to contain healthcare costs by limiting both coverage and the level of reimbursement

of new medical devices, and, as a result, their coverage policies may be restrictive, or they may not cover or provide adequate payment

for our products.

In order to obtain reimbursement arrangements, we may have to agree to a net sales price lower than the net sales price

we might charge in other sales channels.

Our revenue may be limited by the continuing efforts of government and third-party payors to

contain or reduce the costs of healthcare through various increasingly sophisticated means, such as requiring prospective reimbursement

and second opinions, purchasing in groups, or redesigning benefits.

Our future dependence on the commercial success of our technologies

makes us particularly susceptible to any cost containment or reduction efforts.

Accordingly, if government and other third-party payors

do not provide adequate coverage and reimbursement for our products and the related insertion and removal procedures, our financial performance

will be negatively impacted.

Manufacturing, Supply and Quality Assurance

We currently outsource the supply and manufacture

of all components of our prototypes of our technology under development.

We plan to continue with an outsourced manufacturing arrangement

for the foreseeable future.

Our third-party manufacturers are recognized in their field for their competency to manufacture the respective

portions of our system and have quality systems established that meet FDA requirements.

We believe at this time the manufacturers we currently

utilize have sufficient capacity to meet our requirements.

We believe that as we increase our demand in the future, our per-unit costs

will decrease materially.

As a medical device developer, the facilities

3 unchanged sentences

periodically to ensure conformity with the specifications, policies and procedures for our devices.

and Development

research and development team, which includes our Director of Electrode Development, utilizes advice from leading experts in the neurotech

field on our scientific advisory board and is focused on the development of thin film cortical grid and strip electrodes and depth electrodes

for recording, ablation and chronic stimulation for brain related disorders as well as stimulation for spinal cord stimulation for back

related pain.

Our research and development expenses were $5.1 million and $6.9 million for the years ended September 30, 2024 and 2023,

respectively.

the market for Epilepsy diagnosis, our cortical strip, grid and depth electrode technology will likely compete with Integra Life Science’s

Integra Epilepsy Strip, Grid and depth electrodes, which provide a similar function to our diagnostic technologies.

These products are

well established in the marketplace and Integra has greater resources than us, which could allow them to innovate faster.

Ad-Tech Medical

Instrument Corporation’s Epilepsy/LTM (subdural grid, strip and depth) electrodes, which have become the market leaders for diagnostic

mapping in epilepsy, and PMT’s Cortac Strips and grid electrodes and Depthalon depth electrodes are used for recording brain activity

similar to other competitive technologies.

In addition, Dixie Medical has launched a product line of depth electrodes and CorTec has

launched a cortical electrode product line called AirRay.

Today’s success rates for seizure free post-operative conditions remain

at 50%, which has limited patients’ willingness to undergo the currently highly invasive surgical procedure.

We will also compete

against other companies in early stages of development of thin film technologies.

Medical Technologies Corporation

the neuro-ablation market, we expect to compete with Medtronic’s Visualase guided-laser ablation technology and Monteris Medical’s

NeuroBlate technology, which use MRI guided laser surgical ablation for use to ablate, necrotize or coagulate soft tissue through interstitial

irradiation or thermal therapy in medicine and surgery in the discipline of neurosurgery with 1064 nm lasers.

Their website claims it

is used for ablation in the brain for soft tissue and tumors.

We believe there are other laser-based systems in development that will

compete with these technologies.

the neurostimulation market, we expect to compete with NeuroPace’s RNS system approved for epilepsy, Medtronic’s Activa system

approved for Parkinson’s disease, Boston Scientific Vercise (indicated for Parkinson’s, dystonia and essential tremors),

Jude Medical’s Infinity DBS system (approved for Parkinson’s disease and essential tremors), Liva Nova/Cyberonic’s

VNS therapy intended for patients suffering with epilepsy.

we will face potential competition from many different sources, we believe that our technology, knowledge, experience and scientific

resources will provide us with competitive advantages.

For a discussion of the key competitive factors that we believe will impact the

success of our cortical strip, grid electrodes under development, if successfully developed and approved, see “-Our Solution”

of the companies against which we may compete in the future have significantly greater financial resources and expertise in research

and development, manufacturing, preclinical testing, conducting clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approvals and marketing approved

products than we do.

Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and diagnostic industries may result in even more

resources being concentrated among a smaller number of our competitors.

Smaller or early-stage companies may also prove to be significant

competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies.

These competitors also compete with

us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel and establishing clinical trial sites and subject registration

for clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our development.

of our intellectual property is a strategic priority for our business.

We rely on a combination of patents, trademarks, copyrights, and

trade secrets as well as nondisclosure and assignment of invention agreements, material transfer agreements, confidentiality agreements

and other measures to protect our intellectual property and other proprietary rights.

of September 30, 2024, our patent estate consists of three issued United States patents licensed from WARF covering a neural probe array

and thin-film micro electrode array and method, a U.S.

patent issued in October 2022 relating to improved neural depth electrodes, a

patent issued in January 2024 and a pending U.S.

Research and Development

Our research and development team, which includes

our Vice President of Engineering, utilizes advice from leading experts in the neurotech field on our scientific advisory board and is

focused on the development of thin film cortical grid and strip electrodes and depth electrodes for recording, ablation and chronic stimulation

for brain related disorders as well as stimulation for spinal cord stimulation for back related pain.

Our research and development expenses

were $5.0 million and $5.1 million for the years ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

In the market for epilepsy diagnosis, our Evo

Cortical and Evo sEEG compete with Ad-Tech Medical Instrument Corporation, PMT Corporation and Dixi Medical seizure diagnostic products.

We will also compete against other companies in early stages of development of thin film technologies.

NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation

In the neuro-ablation market, our OneRF Brain

Ablation System competes with Medtronic, Monteris Medical and Clearpoint’s LITT technology, which use MRI guided laser surgical

ablation for use to ablate, necrotize or coagulate soft tissue.

There may be other products in development that will compete with us as

Trigeminal Neuralgia

In the market for treating trigeminal neuralgia,

we expect to compete with Boston Scientific and Avanos RF ablation systems, and various companies that use balloon compression for the

treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.

In BVNA, we expect to compete with Boston Scientific

and Stryker’s BVNA Systems.

Spinal Cord Stimulation

In spinal cord stimulation, we expect to compete

with Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott, Globus, and Biotronik spinal cord stimulator leads and systems.

Drug Delivery

In Drug Delivery, we expect to compete primarily

with Clearpoint and Sophysa’s (CED) drug delivery system.

Although we will face potential competition from

many different sources, we believe that our technology, knowledge, experience and scientific resources will provide us with competitive

For a discussion of the key competitive factors that we believe will impact the success of our cortical strip, grid electrodes

under development, if successfully developed and approved, see “—Our Solution” above.

Many of the companies against which we compete

have significantly greater financial resources and expertise in research and development, manufacturing, preclinical testing, conducting

clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approvals and marketing approved products than we do.

Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical,

biotechnology and diagnostic industries may result in even more resources being concentrated among a smaller number of our competitors.

Smaller or early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large

and established companies.

These competitors also compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel

and establishing clinical trial sites and subject registration for clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary

to, or necessary for, our development.

Intellectual Property

Protection of our intellectual property is a strategic

priority for our business.

We rely on a combination of patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets as well as nondisclosure and

assignment of invention agreements, material transfer agreements, confidentiality agreements and other measures to protect our intellectual

property and other proprietary rights.

As of December 17, 2025, our patent estate consists

of two issued United States patents licensed from WARF covering a neural probe array and thin-film micro electrode array and method,

patent issued in October 2022 relating to improved neural depth electrodes, a U.S.

patent issued in January 2024 and a pending

patent application relating to agent-delivering neural electrodes, a U.S.

issued in January 2024 and a pending European patent application published in 2020 relating to minimally invasive electrodes, a U.S.

patent issued in February 2024 and a pending European patent application published in 2021 relating to spinal cord stimulation systems

and devices, pending U.S.

and European patent applications published in 2022 relating to methods of making electrode probes, pending

and European patent applications published in 2023 relating to devices having temperature sensors, pending U.S.

and PCT patent applications

published in 2024 relating to deformable spinal cord stimulation devices, three pending U.S.

patent applications and a PCT application

filed or published in 2024 relating to spinal cord stimulation device implantation methods, and pending U.S.

and PCT patent applications

published in 2024 relating to ablation probe and temperature sensing device systems.

The licensed issued patents expire between 2025

and 2030, subject to any patent extensions that may be available for such patents.

The issued patents owned by NeuroOne expire between

2040 and 2041.

If a patent or patents are issued on our additional pending patent applications, the resulting patents are projected to

expire between 2040 and 2043.

Medical Technologies Corporation

patent applications may not result in issued patents, and any patents that have been issued or may be issued in the future may not protect

the commercially important aspects of our technology.

Furthermore, the validity and enforceability of our issued patents may be challenged

by third parties and our patents could be invalidated or modified by the issuing governmental authority.

Third parties may independently

develop technology that is not covered by our patents that is similar to, or competes with, our technology.

In addition, our intellectual

property may be infringed or misappropriated by third parties, particularly in foreign countries where the laws and governmental authorities

may not protect our proprietary rights as effectively as those in the United States.

medical device industry in general, and the recording, ablation and neurostimulation sector of this industry in particular, are characterized

by the existence of a large number of patents and frequent litigation based on assertions of patent infringement.

We are aware of numerous

patents issued to third parties that may relate to the technology used in our business, including the design and manufacture of electrodes

and pulse generators, as well as methods for device placement.

Each of these patents contains multiple claims, any one of which may be

independently asserted against us.

The owners of these patents may assert that the manufacture, use, sale or offer for sale of our cortical

strip and grid electrodes infringe one or more claims of their patents.

Furthermore, there may be additional patents issued to third

parties of which we are presently unaware that may relate to aspects of our technology that such third parties could assert against us

and materially and adversely affect our business.

In addition, because patent applications can take many years to issue, there may be

patent applications that are currently pending and unknown to us, which may later result in issued patents that third parties could assert

against us and materially and adversely affect our business.

adverse determination in litigations or post grant trial proceedings at the Patent Office relating to intellectual property to which

we are or may become a party could subject us to significant liabilities to third parties or require us to seek licenses from third parties,

and could result in the cancellation and/or invalidation of our intellectual property.

Furthermore, if a court finds that we have willfully

infringed a third party’s intellectual property, we could be required to pay treble damages and/or attorney fees for the prevailing

party, in addition to other penalties.

Although intellectual property disputes in the medical device area are often settled through licensing

or similar arrangements, costs associated with such arrangements can be substantial and often require ongoing royalty payments.

be unable to obtain necessary licenses on satisfactory terms, if at all.

If we do not obtain necessary licenses, we may not be able to

redesign our products to avoid infringement;

if we are able to redesign our products to avoid infringement, we may not receive FDA approval

in a timely manner.

Adverse determinations in a judicial or administrative proceeding or failure to obtain necessary licenses could prevent

us from manufacturing and selling our products, which could have a significant adverse impact on our business.

have registered U.S.

trademarks for the trademarks “NEUROONE” and “EVO.” We have a pending U.S.

trademark application

for the trademark OneRF.

We also have registered trademarks in the United Kingdom and the European Union for the trademark OneRF.

also rely on trade secrets, technical know-how and continuing innovation to develop and maintain our competitive position.

protect such intellectual property and proprietary information by generally requiring our employees, consultants, contractors, scientific

collaborators and other advisors to execute non-disclosure and assignment of invention agreements upon the commencement of their employment

or engagement as the case may be.

Our agreements with our employees prohibit them from providing us with any intellectual property or

proprietary information of third parties.

patent issued in January 2024 relating to minimally invasive

electrodes, a U.S.

patent issued in February 2024 and a European patent issued in October 2025 relating to spinal cord stimulation systems

and devices, a U.S.

patent issued in October 2025 and a pending European patent application published in 2022 relating to methods of

making electrode probes, pending U.S.

and European patent applications published in 2023 relating to devices having temperature sensors,

and PCT patent applications published in 2024 relating to deformable spinal cord stimulation devices, three pending U.S.

patent applications, a pending European application and two pending PCT applications filed or published in 2024 or 2025 relating to spinal

cord stimulation device implantation methods, pending U.S.

and European patent applications published in 2024 relating to ablation probe

and temperature sensing device systems, and pending U.S.

and PCT patent applications filed in 2025 relating to proximal connectors of

probe devices and related manufacturing methods.

The licensed issued patents expire between 2028 and 2030, subject to any patent extensions

that may be available for such patents.

The issued patents owned by NeuroOne expire between 2039 and 2041.

If a patent or patents are

issued on our additional pending patent applications, the resulting patents are projected to expire between 2040 and 2045.

NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation

Our patent applications may not result in issued

patents, and any patents that have been issued or may issue in the future may not protect the commercially important aspects of our technology.

Furthermore, the validity and enforceability of our issued patents may be challenged by third parties and our patents could be invalidated

or modified by the issuing governmental authority.

Third parties may independently develop technology that is not covered by our patents

that is similar to, or competes with, our technology.

In addition, our intellectual property may be infringed or misappropriated by third

parties, particularly in foreign countries where the laws and governmental authorities may not protect our proprietary rights as effectively

as those in the United States.

The medical device industry in general, and the

recording, ablation and neurostimulation sector of this industry in particular, are characterized by the existence of a large number of

patents and frequent litigation based on assertions of patent infringement.

We are aware of numerous patents issued to third parties that

may relate to the technology used in our business, including the design and manufacture of electrodes and pulse generators, as well as

methods for device placement.

Each of these patents contains multiple claims, any one of which may be independently asserted against us.

The owners of these patents may assert that the manufacture, use, sale or offer for sale of our cortical strip and grid electrodes infringe

one or more claims of their patents.

Furthermore, there may be additional patents issued to third parties of which we are presently unaware

that may relate to aspects of our technology that such third parties could assert against us and materially and adversely affect our business.

In addition, because patent applications can take many years to issue, there may be patent applications that are currently pending and

unknown to us, which may later result in issued patents that third parties could assert against us and materially and adversely affect

our business.

Any adverse determination in litigations or post

grant trial proceedings at the Patent Office relating to intellectual property to which we are or may become a party could subject us

to significant liabilities to third parties or require us to seek licenses from third parties, and could result in the cancellation and/or

invalidation of our intellectual property.

Furthermore, if a court finds that we have willfully infringed a third party’s intellectual

property, we could be required to pay treble damages and/or attorney fees for the prevailing party, in addition to other penalties.

intellectual property disputes in the medical device area are often settled through licensing or similar arrangements, costs associated

with such arrangements can be substantial and often require ongoing royalty payments.

We may be unable to obtain necessary licenses on

satisfactory terms, if at all.

If we do not obtain necessary licenses, we may not be able to redesign our products to avoid infringement;

if we are able to redesign our products to avoid infringement, we may not receive FDA approval in a timely manner.

Adverse determinations

in a judicial or administrative proceeding or failure to obtain necessary licenses could prevent us from manufacturing and selling our

products, which could have a significant adverse impact on our business.

We have registered U.S.

trademarks for the trademarks

“NEUROONE,” “EVO,” and “OneRF.” We also have registered trademarks in the United Kingdom and the European

Union for the trademark OneRF.

Trade Secrets

We also rely on trade secrets, technical

know-how and continuing innovation to develop and maintain our competitive position.

We seek to protect such intellectual property

and proprietary information by generally requiring our employees, consultants, contractors, scientific collaborators and other

advisors to execute non-disclosure and assignment of invention agreements upon the commencement of their employment or engagement as

the case may be.

Our agreements with our employees prohibit them from providing us with any intellectual property or proprietary

information of third parties.

We also generally require confidentiality agreements or material transfer agreements with third

parties that receive or have access to our confidential information, data or other materials.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, there can

be no assurance that our employees and third parties that have access to our confidential proprietary information will abide by the terms

of their agreements.

Despite the measures that we take to protect our intellectual property and confidential information, unauthorized

third parties may copy aspects of our products or obtain and use our proprietary information.

Medical Technologies Corporation

cortical strip, grid and depth electrodes are medical devices subject to extensive and ongoing regulation by the FDA and the U.S.

Regulations cover virtually every critical aspect of a medical device company’s business operations, including research activities,

product development, quality, manufacturing, supplier management, risk management, contracting, reimbursement, medical communications,

sales and marketing.

In the United States, the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”), and the implementing regulations

of the FDA (specifically, 21 Code of Federal Regulations (21 CFR Parts 801- labeling, 803 - medical device reporting, 807 - registration

and listing, subpart E premarket notification 510k, 812 - investigational device exemption, 814 - premarket approval and 820 - quality

system regulation) and applicable FDA issued guidance’s govern product design and development, pre-clinical and clinical testing,

premarket clearance or approval, risk management, product manufacturing, quality systems, import and export, product labeling, product

storage, recalls and field safety corrective actions, advertising and promotion, product sales and distribution, and post-market clinical

surveillance.

Our business is subject to federal, state, local and harmonized standards, such as ISO 13485, ISO 14971, and FDA’s

Quality System Regulation (“QSR”) contained in 21 CFR Part 820.

Framework in the United States

product is regulated as a medical device by the FDA if:

1) the product meets the definition of a medical device per Section 201(h) of

the FDCA and 2) an appropriate product classification exists.

classification

FDA characterizes medical devices into one of three classes, Class I, II, and III.

Regulatory control increases from Class I to Class

The device classification regulation defines the regulatory requirements for a general device type.

Most Class I devices are exempt

from Premarket Notification under 510(k);

most Class II devices require Premarket Notification under 510(k);

and most Class III devices

require Premarket Approval (“PMA”).

I devices are subject to general controls including labeling.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, there

can be no assurance that our employees and third parties that have access to our confidential proprietary information will abide by

the terms of their agreements.

Despite the measures that we take to protect our intellectual property and confidential information,

unauthorized third parties may copy aspects of our products or obtain and use our proprietary information.

NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation

Government Regulation (US)

Our cortical strip/grid electrode system, depth

electrode system and radiofrequency (RF) probes and RF generator ablation system are medical devices subject to extensive and ongoing

regulation by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the U.S.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).

Regulations cover

virtually every critical aspect of a medical device company’s business operations, including management responsibility, research

activities, product design and development, quality management system, manufacturing, supplier management, risk management, contracting,

reimbursement, medical communications, sales and marketing.

In the United States, the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”),

and the implementing regulations of the FDA (specifically, 21 Code of Federal Regulations (21 CFR Parts 801- labeling, 803 - medical device

reporting, 807 - registration and listing, subpart E premarket notification 510k, 812 - investigational device exemption, 814 - premarket

approval and 820 - quality system regulation) and applicable FDA issued guidance’s and regulations govern product design and development,

pre-clinical and clinical testing, premarket clearance or approval, risk management, electrical safety, cybersecurity, software, sterilization,

biocompatibility, product manufacturing, quality systems, import and export, product labeling, product storage, recalls and field safety

corrective actions, advertising and promotion, product sales and distribution, and post-market clinical surveillance.

Our business is

subject to federal, state, local and harmonized standards, such as ISO 13485, ISO 14971, and FDA’s Quality System Regulation (“QSR”)

contained in 21 CFR Part 820.

Regulatory Framework in the United States

A product is regulated as a medical device by

1) the product meets the definition of a medical device per Section 201(h) of the FDCA and 2) an appropriate product classification

Device classification

The FDA characterizes medical devices into one

of three classes, Class I, II, and III based on risks and regulatory controls necessary to provide a reasonable assurance of safety and

effectiveness.

Regulatory control increases from Class I to Class III.

The device classification regulation defines the regulatory requirements

for a general device type.

Most Class I devices are exempt from Premarket Notification under 510(k);

most Class II devices require Premarket

Notification under 510(k);

and most Class III devices require Premarket Approval (“PMA”).

Class I devices are subject to general controls

including labeling.

However, most such devices are exempt from pre-market notification.

a device is exempted from any of the general controls, such exemption is stated in the classification regulation for that device.

pertains to manufacturers’ FDA registration and device listing, methods and documentation of the design, testing, production, control

quality assurance, labeling, packaging, sterilization, storage, shipping of products and post market surveillance.

Class II devices are

subject to the same general controls but may be subject to special controls such as device specific performance standards, post-market

surveillance, FDA guidance, or particularized labeling, and may also require clinical testing prior to clearance.

Class III devices are

those for which insufficient information exists to assure safety and effectiveness solely through general or special controls, including

devices that support or sustain human life, are of substantial importance in preventing impairment of human health, present an unreasonable

risk of illness or injury, or are not well established and generally accepted as safe and effective.

Premarket Approval is required for

most Class III devices, unless the device is a preamendments device and the FDA has not called for a PMA.

Class I and Class II devices are exempted by regulation from the pre-market notification requirement under Section 510(k) of the FDCA,

also referred to as a 510(k) clearance, but must meet the requirement of compliance with substantially all of the QSR.

However, a PMA

application is required for devices deemed by the FDA to pose the greatest risk, such as life-sustaining, life-supporting or certain

implantable devices, or those that are “not substantially equivalent” either to a device previously cleared through the 510(k)

process or to a “preamendment” Class III device in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976 when PMA applications were

not required.

The PMA approval process is more comprehensive than the 510(k) clearance process and typically takes multiple years to

on FDA classifications, our diagnostic cortical strip, grid and depth electrode and RF ablation technology are categorized by the FDA

as Class II devices that do not require clinical testing and can be filed as a 510(k), similar to existing competitive technology.

Company expects that indications for treating epilepsy, Parkinson’s and other patients suffering from motor related neurological

deficiencies via a permanent implant for chronic treatment will require a PMA process to commercially distribute in the United States.

Medical Technologies Corporation

510(k) clearance process

the 510(k) clearance process, the manufacturer must submit to the FDA a premarket notification, demonstrating that the device is “substantially

equivalent” to a legally marketed predicate device.

A predicate device is a legally marketed device that was previously found substantially

equivalent through the 510(k) process.

To be “substantially equivalent,” the proposed device must have the same intended

use, indications for use as the predicate device, and either have the same technological characteristics as the predicate device or have

different technological characteristics and not raise different questions of safety or effectiveness than the predicate device.

data is sometimes required to support substantial equivalence.

October 1, 2023, a 510(k) premarket notification is submitted as an electronic submission using the FDA eStar program through the CDRH

The eStar Complete status needs to be observed for a successful submission.

eSTAR submissions are not anticipated to undergo a

refuse to accept (“RTA”) process.

However, the FDA intends to employ a virus scanning and technical screening process for

If the eSTAR does not pass technical screening (i.e., an eSTAR is provided where none of the attachments to a question are

relevant to the question, or if an inaccurate response is provided to any question), the submission may be put on an early Technical

Screening hold for 180 days, until a complete replacement eSTAR is submitted.

If it is accepted for filing, the FDA begins a substantive

The FDA goal is to complete its review of a 510(k) notification within 90 calendar days of receiving the 510(k) notification.

As a practical matter, clearance often takes longer, and clearance is never assured.

Although many 510(k) premarket notifications are

cleared without clinical data, the FDA may require further information, including clinical data, to make a determination regarding substantial

equivalence, which may significantly prolong the review process.

If the FDA agrees that the device is substantially equivalent, it will

grant clearance to commercially market the device.

the FDA determines that the device is not “substantially equivalent” to a predicate device, or if the device is automatically

classified into Class III, the device sponsor must then fulfill the more rigorous premarketing requirements of the PMA approval process,

or seek reclassification of the device through the De Novo process.

The De Novo request provides a marketing pathway to classify novel

medical devices for which general controls alone, or general and special controls, provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness

for the intended use, but for which there is no legally marketed predicate device.

De Novo classification is a risk-based classification

The De Novo classification process is an alternate pathway to classify medical devices that are automatically classified into

Class III but which are low to moderate risk.

A manufacturer can submit a Pre-submission for De Novo review if the manufacturer is unable

to identify an appropriate predicate device and the new device or new use of the device presents a moderate or low risk.

a device receives 510(k) clearance, any modification that could significantly affect its safety or effectiveness, or that would constitute

a new or major change in its intended use, will require a new 510(k) clearance or, depending on the modification, could require a De

Novo device application and potentially a PMA application.

The FDA requires each manufacturer to determine whether the proposed change

requires a new submission in the first instance, but the FDA can review any such decision and disagree with a manufacturer’s determination.

Many minor modifications are accomplished by a letter-to-file in which the manufacture documents the change in an internal letter-to-file

based on adherence to FDA guidance on changes to an existing 510(k) device.

The letter-to-file is in lieu of submitting a new 510(k)

to obtain clearance for such change.

If a device is exempted from any of the general

controls, such exemption is stated in the classification regulation for that device.

If an exemption is stated it may pertain to manufacturers’

FDA registration and device listing, methods and documentation of the design, testing, production, control quality assurance, labeling,

packaging, sterilization, storage, shipping of products and post market surveillance.

Class II devices are subject to the same general

controls but may be subject to special controls such as device specific performance standards, post-market surveillance, FDA guidance,

or particularized labeling, and may also require clinical testing prior to clearance.

Class III devices are those for which insufficient

information exists to assure safety and effectiveness solely through general or special controls, including devices that support or sustain

human life, are of substantial importance in preventing impairment of human health, present an unreasonable risk of illness or injury,

or are not well established and generally accepted as safe and effective.

Premarket Approval is required for most Class III devices, unless

the device is a preamendments device and the FDA has not called for a PMA.

NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation

Some Class I and Class II devices are exempted

by regulation from the pre-market notification requirement under Section 510(k) of the FDCA, also referred to as a 510(k) clearance, but

must meet the requirement of compliance with substantially all of the QSR.

However, a PMA application is required for devices deemed by

the FDA to pose the greatest risk, such as life-sustaining, life-supporting or certain implantable devices, or those that are “not

substantially equivalent” either to a device previously cleared through the 510(k) process or to a “preamendment” Class

III device in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976 when PMA applications were not required.

The PMA approval process is more comprehensive

than the 510(k) clearance process and typically takes multiple years to complete.

Based on FDA classifications, our diagnostic cortical

strip/grid electrode system, depth electrode system and RF probes and RF generator diagnostic/therapeutic ablation system technology are

categorized by the FDA as Class II devices that do not require clinical testing and can be filed as a 510(k), similar to existing competitive

technology under the same product classification/product code.

The Company expects that indications for treating epilepsy, Parkinson’s

and other patients suffering from motor related neurological deficiencies via a permanent implant for chronic treatment will require a

PMA process to commercially distribute in the United States.

The 510(k) clearance process

Under the 510(k) clearance process, the manufacturer

must submit to the FDA a premarket notification, demonstrating that the device is “substantially equivalent” to a legally

marketed predicate device.

A predicate device is a legally marketed device that was previously found to be substantially equivalent through

the 510(k) process.

To be “substantially equivalent,” the proposed device must have the same intended use, indications for

use (product classification/code) as the predicate device, and either have the same technological characteristics as the predicate device

or have different technological characteristics and not raise different questions of safety or effectiveness than the predicate device.

Clinical data is sometimes required to support substantial equivalence.

Since October 1, 2023, a 510(k) premarket notification

has been submitted as an electronic submission using the FDA eStar program through the CDRH Portal.

The eStar Complete status needs to

be observed for a successful submission.

eSTAR submissions are not anticipated to undergo a refuse to accept (“RTA”) process.

However, the FDA intends to employ a virus scanning and technical screening process for an eSTAR.

If the eSTAR does not pass technical

screening (i.e., an eSTAR is provided where none of the attachments to a question are relevant to the question, or if an inaccurate response

is provided to any question), the submission may be put on an early Technical Screening hold for 180 days, until a complete replacement

eSTAR is submitted.

If it is accepted for filing, the FDA begins a substantive review.

The FDA goal is to complete its review of a 510(k)

notification within 90 calendar days of receiving the 510(k) notification.

As a practical matter, clearance often takes longer, and clearance

is never assured.

Although many 510(k) premarket notifications are cleared without clinical data, the FDA may require further information,

including clinical data, to make a determination regarding substantial equivalence, which may significantly prolong the review process.

If the FDA agrees that the device is substantially equivalent, it will grant clearance to commercially market the device.

If the FDA determines that the device is not “substantially

equivalent” to a predicate device, or if the device is automatically classified into Class III, the device sponsor must then fulfill

the more rigorous premarketing requirements of the PMA approval process or seek reclassification of the device through the De Novo process.

The De Novo request provides a marketing pathway to classify novel medical devices for which general controls alone, or general and special

controls, provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness for the intended use, but for which there is no legally marketed predicate

De Novo classification is a risk-based classification process.

The De Novo classification process is an alternate pathway to classify

medical devices that are automatically classified into Class III but which are low to moderate risk.

A manufacturer can submit a Pre-submission

for De Novo review if the manufacturer is unable to identify an appropriate predicate device and the new device or new use of the device

presents a moderate or low risk.

After a device receives 510(k) clearance, any

modification that could significantly affect its safety or effectiveness, or that would constitute a new or major change in its intended

use, will require a new 510(k) clearance or, depending on the modification, could require a De Novo device application and potentially

a PMA application.

The FDA requires each manufacturer to determine whether the proposed change requires a new submission in the first

instance, but the FDA can review any such decision and disagree with a manufacturer’s determination.

Many minor modifications are

accomplished by a letter-to-file in which the manufacture documents the change in an internal letter-to-file based on adherence to FDA

guidance on changes to an existing 510(k) device.

The letter-to-file is in lieu of submitting a new 510(k) to obtain clearance for such

The FDA can always review these letters to file in an inspection.

If the FDA disagrees with a manufacturer’s

determination regarding whether a new premarket submission is required for the modification of an existing 510(k)-cleared device, the

FDA can require the manufacturer to cease marketing and/or recall the modified device until 510(k) clearance or approval of a De Novo

or PMA application is obtained.

In addition, in these circumstances, the FDA can impose significant regulatory fines or penalties for

failure to submit the requisite application(s).

PMA approval process

receipt of a PMA application, the FDA conducts an administrative review to determine whether the application is sufficiently complete

to permit a substantive review.

If it is not, the agency will refuse to file the PMA.

If it is, the FDA will accept the application for

filing and begin its review.

The FDA has 180 days to review a filed PMA application, although the review of an application more often

occurs over a significantly longer period of time.

During this review period, the FDA may request additional information or clarification

of information already provided, and the FDA may issue a major deficiency letter to the applicant, requesting the applicant’s response

to deficiencies communicated by the FDA.

Medical Technologies Corporation

approving or denying a PMA, an FDA advisory committee may review the PMA at a public meeting and provide the FDA with the committee’s

recommendation on whether the FDA should approve the submission, approve it with specific conditions, or not approve it.

The FDA is not

bound by the recommendations of an advisory committee, but it considers such recommendations carefully when making decisions.

to approval of a PMA, the FDA may conduct inspections of the clinical trial data and clinical trial sites, as well as inspections of

the manufacturing facility and processes.

Overall, the FDA review of a PMA application generally takes between one and three years, but

may take significantly longer.

The FDA can delay, limit or deny approval of a PMA application for many reasons, including:

device may not be safe, effective, reliable or accurate to the FDA’s satisfaction;

data from pre-clinical studies and clinical trials may be insufficient to support approval;

manufacturing process or facilities may not meet applicable requirements;

in FDA approval policies or adoption of new regulations may require additional data.

an FDA evaluation of a PMA application is favorable, the FDA will either issue an approval letter, or approvable letter, which usually

contains a number of conditions that must be met in order to secure final approval of the PMA.

When and if those conditions have been

fulfilled to the satisfaction of the FDA, the agency will issue a PMA approval letter authorizing commercial marketing of a device, subject

to the conditions of approval and the limitations established in the approval letter.

If the FDA’s evaluation of a PMA application

or manufacturing facilities is not favorable, the FDA will deny approval of the PMA or issue a not approvable letter.

The FDA also may

determine that additional tests or clinical trials are necessary, in which case the PMA approval may be delayed for several months or

years while the trials are conducted and data is submitted in an amendment to the PMA under review.

The PMA process can be expensive,

uncertain and lengthy and a number of devices for which FDA approval has been sought by other companies have never been approved by the

FDA for marketing.

PMA applications or PMA supplements may be required for modifications to the manufacturing process, labeling, device specifications,

materials or design of a device that has been approved through the PMA process.

PMA supplements often require submission of the same

type of information as was presented in the initial PMA application, except that the supplement is limited to information needed to support

any changes from the device covered by the approved PMA application and may or may not require as extensive technical or clinical data

or the convening of an advisory panel.

trials are typically required to support a PMA application and are sometimes required for a 510(k) clearance.

These trials generally

require submission of an application for an Investigational Device Exemption (“IDE”), to the FDA.

The IDE application must

be supported by appropriate data, such as animal and laboratory testing results, showing that it is safe to test the device in humans

and that the testing protocol is scientifically sound.

The IDE application must be approved in advance by the FDA for a specified number

of patients, unless the product is deemed a non-significant risk device and eligible for abbreviated IDE requirements.

Generally, clinical

trials for a significant risk device may begin once the IDE application is approved by the FDA and the study protocol and informed consent

are approved by appropriate institutional review boards at the clinical trial sites.

The FDA’s approval of an IDE allows clinical

testing to go forward, but it does not bind the FDA to accept the results of the trial as sufficient to prove the product’s safety

and efficacy, even if the trial meets its intended success criteria.

All clinical trials performed in the United States must be conducted

in accordance with the FDA’s IDE regulations that govern investigational device labeling, prohibit promotion, and specify an array

of recordkeeping, reporting and monitoring responsibilities of study sponsors and study investigators.

Clinical trials must further comply

with the FDA’s regulations for institutional review board approval and for informed consent and other human subject protections.

Required records and reports are subject to inspection by the FDA.

The results of clinical testing may be unfavorable or, even if the

intended safety and efficacy success criteria are achieved, may not be considered sufficient for the FDA to grant approval or clearance

of a product.

Clinical trials must be entered into the clinical trials registry at clinicaltrials.gov.

Medical Technologies Corporation

commencement or completion of any clinical trial may be delayed or halted, or be inadequate to support approval of a PMA application,

for numerous reasons, including, but not limited to, the following:

FDA or other regulatory authorities do not approve a clinical trial protocol or a clinical

trial, or place a clinical trial on hold;

do not enroll in clinical trials at the rate expected;

sponsor (NeuroOne) or study sites do not comply with trial protocols;

follow-up is not at the rate expected;

experience unanticipated adverse event;

data safety monitoring board determines the study should be placed on hold;

die during a clinical trial, even though their death may not be related to the products that

If the FDA disagrees with a manufacturer’s determination

regarding whether a new premarket submission is required for the modification of an existing 510(k)-cleared device, the FDA can require

the manufacturer to cease marketing and/or recall the modified device until 510(k) clearance is obtained.

A De Novo grant or PMA application

approval may also be affected if changes to the initial grant/approval are not evaluated and documented in accordance with FDA regulations.

In addition, in these circumstances, the FDA can impose significant regulatory fines or penalties for failure to submit the requisite

application(s).

NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation

The PMA approval process

Following receipt of a PMA application, the FDA

conducts an administrative review to determine whether the application is sufficiently complete to permit a substantive review.

is not, the agency will refuse to file the PMA.

If it is, the FDA will accept the application for filing and begin its review.

has 180 days to review a filed PMA application, although the review of an application more often occurs over a significantly longer period

During this review period, the FDA may request additional information or clarification of information already provided, and the

FDA may issue a major deficiency letter to the applicant, requesting the applicant’s response to deficiencies communicated by the

Before approving or denying a PMA, an FDA advisory

committee may review the PMA at a public meeting and provide the FDA with the committee’s recommendation on whether the FDA should

approve the submission, approve it with specific conditions, or not approve it.

The FDA is not bound by the recommendations of an advisory

committee, but it considers such recommendations carefully when making decisions.

Prior to approval of a PMA, the FDA may conduct

inspections of the clinical trial data and clinical trial sites, as well as inspections of the manufacturing facility and processes.

the FDA review of a PMA application generally takes between one and three years but may take significantly longer.

The FDA can delay,

limit or deny approval of a PMA application for many reasons, including:

● the device may not be safe, effective, reliable or accurate

to the FDA’s satisfaction;

● the data from pre-clinical studies and clinical trials may

be insufficient to support approval;

● the manufacturing process or facilities may not meet applicable

requirements;

● changes in FDA approval policies or adoption of new regulations

may require additional data.

If an FDA evaluation of a PMA application is favorable,

the FDA will either issue an approval letter or an approvable letter, which usually contains a number of conditions that must be met in

order to secure final approval of the PMA.

When and if those conditions have been fulfilled to the satisfaction of the FDA, the agency

will issue a PMA approval letter authorizing commercial marketing of a device, subject to the conditions of approval and the limitations

established in the approval letter.

If the FDA’s evaluation of a PMA application or manufacturing facilities is not favorable, the

FDA will deny approval of the PMA or issue a not approvable letter.

The FDA also may determine that additional tests or clinical trials

are necessary, in which case the PMA approval may be delayed for several months or years while the trials are conducted and data is submitted

in an amendment to the PMA under review.

The PMA process can be expensive, uncertain and lengthy and a number of devices for which FDA

approval has been sought by other companies have never been approved by the FDA for marketing.

New PMA applications or PMA supplements may be

required for modifications to the manufacturing process, labeling, device specifications, materials or design of a device that has been

approved through the PMA process.

PMA supplements often require submission of the same type of information as was presented in the initial

PMA application, except that the supplement is limited to information needed to support any changes from the device covered by the approved

PMA application and may or may not require as extensive technical or clinical data or the convening of an advisory panel.

NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are typically required to support

a PMA application and are sometimes required for a 510(k) clearance.

These trials generally require submission of an application for an

Investigational Device Exemption (“IDE”), to the FDA.

The IDE application must be supported by appropriate data, such as animal

and laboratory testing results, showing that it is safe to test the device in humans and that the testing protocol is scientifically sound.

The IDE application must be approved in advance by the FDA for a specified number of patients, unless the product is deemed a non-significant

risk device and eligible for abbreviated IDE requirements.

Generally, clinical trials for a significant risk device may begin once the

IDE application is approved by the FDA and the study protocol and informed consent are approved by appropriate institutional review boards

at the clinical trial sites.

The FDA’s approval of an IDE allows clinical testing to go forward, but it does not bind the FDA to

accept the results of the trial as sufficient to prove the product’s safety and efficacy, even if the trial meets its intended success

All clinical trials performed in the United States must be conducted in accordance with the FDA’s IDE regulations that

govern investigational device labeling, prohibit promotion, and specify an array of recordkeeping, reporting and monitoring responsibilities

of study sponsors and study investigators.

Clinical trials must further comply with the FDA’s regulations for institutional review

board approval and for informed consent and other human subject protections.

Required records and reports are subject to inspection by

The results of clinical testing may be unfavorable or, even if the intended safety and efficacy success criteria are achieved,

may not be considered sufficient for the FDA to grant approval or clearance of a product.

Clinical trials must be entered into the clinical

trials registry at clinicaltrials.gov.

The commencement or completion of any clinical

trial may be delayed or halted, or be inadequate to support approval of a PMA application, for numerous reasons, including, but not limited

to, the following:

● the FDA or other regulatory authorities do not approve a clinical trial protocol or a clinical trial,

or place a clinical trial on hold;

● patients do not enroll in clinical trials at the rate expected;

● patients, sponsor (NeuroOne) or study sites do not comply with trial protocols;

● patient follow-up is not at the rate expected;

● patients experience unanticipated adverse event;

● the data safety monitoring board determines the study should be placed on hold;

● patients die during a clinical trial, even though their death may not be related to the products that

are part of our trial;

● institutional

review boards and third-party clinical investigators may delay or reject the trial protocol;

● third-party

clinical investigators decline to participate in a trial or do not perform a trial on the

anticipated schedule or consistent with the clinical trial protocol, good clinical practices

or other FDA requirements;

sponsor (NeuroOne) or third-party organizations do not perform data collection, monitoring

and analysis in a timely or accurate manner or consistent with the clinical trial protocol

or investigational or statistical plans;

● third-party

clinical investigators have significant financial interests related to the sponsor (NeuroOne)

or the study that the FDA deems to make the study results unreliable, or the Company or investigators

fail to disclose such interests;

inspections of our clinical trials or manufacturing facilities, which may, among other things,

● institutional review boards and third-party clinical investigators may delay or reject the trial protocol;

● third-party clinical investigators decline to participate in a trial or do not perform a trial on the

anticipated schedule or consistent with the clinical trial protocol, good clinical practices or other FDA requirements;

● the sponsor (NeuroOne) or third-party organizations do not perform data collection, monitoring and analysis

in a timely or accurate manner or consistent with the clinical trial protocol or investigational or statistical plans;

● third-party clinical investigators have significant financial interests related to the sponsor (NeuroOne)

or the study that the FDA deems to make the study results unreliable, or the Company or investigators fail to disclose such interests;

● regulatory inspections of our clinical trials or manufacturing facilities, which may, among other things,

require us to undertake corrective action or suspend or terminate our clinical trials;

in governmental regulations or administrative actions;

interim or final results of the clinical trial are inconclusive or unfavorable as to safety

FDA concludes that our trial design is inadequate to demonstrate safety and efficacy.

Regulatory Requirements

after a device receives clearance or approval and is placed in commercial distribution, numerous regulatory requirements apply.

● establishment

registration and device listing;

which requires manufacturers, including third party manufacturers, to follow stringent design,

testing, risk management, production control, supplier/contractor selection, complaint handling,

documentation and other quality assurance procedures during all aspects of the manufacturing

regulations that prohibit the promotion of products for uncleared, unapproved or “off-label”

● changes in governmental regulations or administrative actions;

● the interim or final results of the clinical trial are inconclusive or unfavorable as to safety or efficacy;

● the FDA concludes that our trial design is inadequate to demonstrate safety and efficacy.

NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation

Other Regulatory Requirements

Even after a device receives clearance or approval

and is placed in commercial distribution, numerous regulatory requirements apply.

These include:

● establishment registration and device listing;

● Quality System Regulation (QSR), which requires manufacturers, including third party manufacturers, to

follow stringent design, testing, risk management, production control, supplier/contractor selection, complaint handling, documentation

and other quality assurance procedures during all aspects of the manufacturing process;

● labeling regulations that prohibit the promotion of products for uncleared, unapproved or “off-label”

uses, and impose other restrictions on labeling, advertising and promotion;

Medical Technologies Corporation

regulations, which require that manufacturers report to the FDA if their device may have

caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or malfunctioned in a way that would likely

cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if the malfunction were to recur;

and mandatory device recalls to address problems when a device is mislabeled or does not

meet specifications and could be a risk to health;

● corrections

and removals reporting regulations, which require that manufacturers report to the FDA field

corrections and product recalls or removals if undertaken to reduce a risk to health posed

by the device or to remedy a violation of the FDCA that may present a risk to health.

the FDA may require us to conduct post-market surveillance studies or establish and maintain a system for tracking our products through

the chain of distribution to the patient level.

The FDA enforces regulatory requirements by conducting periodic, unannounced inspections

and market surveillance.

Inspections may include the manufacturing facilities of our subcontractors.

to comply with applicable regulatory requirements can result in enforcement actions by the FDA and other regulatory agencies.

include any of the following sanctions or consequences:

letters or untitled letters that require corrective action;

and civil penalties;

● unanticipated

expenditures;

in approving or refusal to approve future products;

refusal to issue certificates to foreign governments needed to export products for sale in

other countries;

or withdrawal of FDA clearance or approval;

recall or seizure;

● Medical Device Reporting (MDR) regulations, which require that manufacturers report to the FDA if their

device may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury or malfunctioned in a way that would likely cause or contribute to

a death or serious injury if the malfunction were to recur;

● voluntary and mandatory device recalls to address problems when a device is mislabeled or does not meet

specifications and could be a risk to health;

● corrections and removals reporting regulations, which require that manufacturers report to the FDA field

corrections and product recalls or removals if undertaken to reduce a risk to health posed by the device or to remedy a violation of the

FDCA that may present a risk to health.

Also, the FDA may require us to conduct post-market

surveillance studies or establish and maintain a system for tracking our products through the chain of distribution to the patient level.

The FDA enforces regulatory requirements by conducting periodic, unannounced inspections and market surveillance.

Inspections may include

the manufacturing facilities of our subcontractors.

Failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements

can result in enforcement actions by the FDA and other regulatory agencies.

These may include any of the following sanctions or consequences:

● warning letters or untitled letters that require corrective action;

● fines and civil penalties;

● unanticipated expenditures;

● delays in approving or refusal to approve future products;

● FDA refusal to issue certificates to foreign governments needed to export products for sale in other countries;

● suspension or withdrawal of FDA clearance or approval;

● product recall or seizure;

interruption of production;

restrictions;

● operating restrictions;

● injunctions;

contract manufacturers, specification developers and some suppliers of components or device accessories, also are required to manufacture

our products in compliance with current good manufacturing practice requirements set forth in the QSR.

The QSR requires a quality system

for the design, risk management, manufacture, packaging, labeling, storage, installation and servicing of marketed devices, and it includes

extensive requirements with respect to quality management and organization, device design, buildings, equipment, purchase and handling

of components or services, production and process controls, packaging and labeling controls, device evaluation, distribution, installation,

complaint handling, servicing, and record keeping.

The FDA evaluates compliance with the QSR through periodic unannounced inspections

that may include the manufacturing facilities of our subcontractors.

If the FDA believes that any of our contract manufacturers or regulated

suppliers are not in compliance with these requirements, it can shut down such manufacturing operations, require a recall of our products,

refuse to approve new marketing applications, institute legal proceedings to detain or seize products, enjoin future violations or assess

civil and criminal penalties against us or our officers or other employees.

Medical Technologies Corporation

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) and Similar Foreign and State Laws and Regulations

Affecting the Transmission, Security and Privacy of Health Information

may also be subject to data privacy and security regulation by both the federal government and the states in which we conduct our business.

HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, or HITECH, and their respective implementing

regulations, imposes specified requirements relating to the privacy, security and transmission of individually identifiable health information.

Among other things, HITECH makes HIPAA’s security standards directly applicable to business associates, defined as service providers

of covered entities that create, receive, maintain or transmit protected health information in connection with providing a service for

or on behalf of a covered entity.

HITECH also created four new tiers of civil monetary penalties and gave state attorneys general new

authority to file civil actions for damages or injunctions in federal courts to enforce the federal HIPAA laws and seek attorneys’

fees and costs associated with pursuing federal civil actions.

In addition, many state laws govern the privacy and security of health

information in certain circumstances, many of which differ from HIPAA and each other in significant ways and may not have the same effect.

and Abuse Laws

addition to FDA restrictions, there are numerous U.S.

federal and state laws pertaining to healthcare fraud and abuse, including anti-kickback

laws and physician self-referral laws.

Our relationships with healthcare providers and other third parties are subject to scrutiny under

Violations of these laws are punishable by criminal and civil sanctions, including, in some instances, imprisonment and exclusion

from participation in federal and state healthcare programs, including the Medicare, Medicaid and Veterans Administration health programs.

Anti-Kickback and Self-Referral Laws

federal Anti-Kickback Statute (the “Anti-Kickback Statute”) prohibits persons from knowingly and willfully soliciting, receiving,

offering or providing remuneration (including any kickback, bribe or rebate), directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, to induce

either the referral of an individual, or the furnishing, recommending, or arranging of a good or service, for which payment may be made

under a federal healthcare program such as Medicare and Medicaid or other federal healthcare programs.

The term “remuneration”

has been broadly interpreted to include anything of value, including such items as gifts, discounts, the furnishing of supplies or equipment,

credit arrangements, waiver of payments and providing anything at less than its fair market value.

Although there are a number of statutory

exceptions and regulatory safe harbors protecting some common activities from prosecution, the exceptions and safe harbors are drawn

Practices that involve remuneration that may be alleged to be intended to induce prescribing, purchases or recommendations

may be subject to scrutiny if they do not qualify for an exception or safe harbor.

Failure to meet all of the requirements of a particular

applicable statutory exception or regulatory safe harbor does not make the conduct per se illegal under the Anti-Kickback Statute.

the legality of the arrangement will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis based on a review of all its relevant facts and circumstances.

Several courts have interpreted the statute’s intent requirement to mean that if any one purpose of an arrangement involving remuneration

is to induce referrals of (or purchases, or recommendations related to) federal healthcare covered business, the Anti-Kickback Statute

has been implicated and potentially violated.

penalties for violating the Anti-Kickback Statute include imprisonment for up to five years, fines of up to $25,000 per violation and

possible exclusion from federal healthcare programs such as Medicare and Medicaid.

Many states have adopted prohibitions similar to the

Anti-Kickback Statute, some of which do not have the same exceptions and apply to the referral of patients for healthcare services reimbursed

by any source, not only by the Medicare and Medicaid programs.

Further, the Anti-Kickback Statute was amended by the Patient Protection

and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”).

Specifically, as noted above, under the Anti-Kickback Statute, the government must prove

the defendant acted “knowingly” to prove a violation occurred.

The ACA added a provision to clarify that with respect to

violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute, “a person need not have actual knowledge” of the statute or specific intent to commit

a violation of the statute.

This change effectively overturns case law interpretations that set a higher standard under which prosecutors

had to prove the specific intent to violate the law.

In addition, the ACA codified case law that a claim including items or services

resulting from a violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the federal civil False

Claims Act (the “False Claims Act”).

Medical Technologies Corporation

plan to provide the initial training to providers and patients necessary for appropriate use of our technology either through our own

educators or by contracting with outside educators that have completed an appropriate training course.

Outside educators are reimbursed

for their services at fair market value.

Noncompliance

with the Anti-Kickback Statute could result in our exclusion from Medicare, Medicaid or other governmental programs, restrictions on

our ability to operate in certain jurisdictions, and civil and criminal penalties.

federal Physician Self-Referral Prohibition, commonly known as the “Stark Law,” prohibits a physician from ordering “designated

health services,” including durable medical equipment, for Medicare and Medicaid patients from entities with which the physician

(or an immediate family member) has a “financial relationship.” Financial relationships include both compensation arrangements

and investment and ownership interests.

Violation of the Stark Law could result in denial of payment, disgorgement of reimbursements

received under a noncompliant arrangement, civil penalties, and exclusion from Medicare, Medicaid or other governmental programs.

believe that we have structured our provider arrangements to comply with current Stark Law requirements.

Nevertheless,

a determination of liability under such laws could result in fines and penalties and restrictions on our ability to operate in these

jurisdictions.

Additionally,

as some of these laws are still evolving, we lack definitive guidance as to the application of certain key aspects of these laws as they

relate to our arrangements with providers with respect to patient training.

We cannot predict the final form that these regulations will

take or the effect that the final regulations will have on us.

As a result, our provider and training arrangements may ultimately be

found to be not in compliance with applicable federal law.

False Claims Act provides, in part, that the federal government may bring a lawsuit against any person whom it believes has knowingly

presented, or caused to be presented, a false or fraudulent request for payment from the federal government, or who has made a false

statement or used a false record to get a claim approved.

In addition, amendments in 1986 to the False Claims Act have made it easier

for private parties to bring “qui tam” whistleblower lawsuits against companies under the False Claims Act.

Penalties include

fines ranging from $5,500 to $11,000 for each false claim, plus three times the amount of damages that the federal government sustained

because of the act of that person.

Qui tam actions have increased significantly in recent years, causing greater numbers of healthcare

companies to have to defend a false claim action, pay fines or be excluded from Medicare, Medicaid or other federal or state healthcare

programs as a result of an investigation arising out of such action.

are other federal anti-fraud laws that prohibit, among other actions, knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a

scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program, including private third-party payors, knowingly and willfully embezzling or stealing

from a healthcare benefit program, willfully obstructing a criminal investigation of a healthcare offense, and knowingly and willfully

falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement in connection

with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services.

Additionally,

HIPAA established two federal crimes related to making false statements in relation to healthcare matters.

The healthcare fraud statute

prohibits knowingly and willfully executing a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program, including private payors.

of this statute is a felony and may result in fines, imprisonment or exclusion from government sponsored programs.

The false statements

statute prohibits knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false, fictitious

or fraudulent statement in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services.

A violation of this

statute is a felony and may result in fines or imprisonment.

Medical Technologies Corporation

Monetary Penalties Law

addition to the Anti-Kickback Statute and the False Claims Act, the federal government has the authority to seek civil monetary penalties,

or CMPs, assessments, and exclusion against an individual or entity based on a wide variety of prohibited conduct.

For example, the Civil

Monetary Penalties Law authorizes the imposition of substantial CMPs against an entity that engages in activities including, but not

(1) knowingly presenting or causing to be presented, a claim for services not provided as claimed or which is otherwise false

or fraudulent in any way;

(2) knowingly giving or causing to be given false or misleading information reasonably expected to influence

the decision to discharge a patient;

(3) offering or giving remuneration to any beneficiary of a federal health care program likely to

influence the receipt of reimbursable items or services;

(4) arranging for reimbursable services with an entity which is excluded from

participation from a federal health care program;

(5) knowingly or willfully soliciting or receiving remuneration for a referral of a

federal health care program beneficiary;

or (6) using a payment intended for a federal health care program beneficiary for another use.

The government is authorized to seek different amounts of CMPs and assessments based on underlying violation.

For false or fraudulent

claims, the government may seek a penalty of up to $10,000 for each item or service improperly claimed, and an assessment of up to three

times the amount improperly claimed.

For kickback violations, the government may seek a penalty of up to $50,000 for each improper act

and damages of up to three times the amount of remuneration at issue.

Fraud and Abuse Provisions

states have also adopted some form of anti-kickback and anti-referral laws and a false claims act.

We believe that we are in conformance

to such laws.

Nevertheless, a determination of liability under such laws could result in fines and penalties and restrictions on our

ability to operate in these jurisdictions.

Payment Sunshine Act

laws regarding payments or other items of value provided to healthcare providers and teaching hospitals may also impact our business

The federal Physician Payment Sunshine Act requires most medical device manufacturers to report annually to the Secretary

of Human Health Services financial arrangements, payments, or other transfers of value made by that entity to physicians and teaching

The payment information is made publicly available in a searchable format on a CMS website.

Over the next several years, we

will need to dedicate significant resources to establish and maintain systems and processes in order to comply with these regulations.

Failure to comply with the reporting requirements can result in significant civil monetary penalties.

Similar laws have been enacted

or are under consideration in foreign jurisdictions.

of September 30, 2024, we had 17 employees, all of whom are full-time, eight of whom are engaged in research and development activities,

and all of whom are located in the United States.

As of September 30, 2024, we also retained the services of approximately 8 regular

None of our employees are represented by a labor union or covered by a collective bargaining agreement.

We consider our

relationship with our employees to be good.

Overview and History of NeuroOne, Inc.

were originally incorporated as Original Source Entertainment, Inc.

● criminal prosecution.

Our contract manufacturers, specification developers

and some suppliers of components or device accessories, also are required to manufacture our products in compliance with current good

manufacturing practice requirements set forth in the QSR.

The QSR requires a quality system for the design, risk management, manufacture,

packaging, labeling, storage, installation and servicing of marketed devices, and it includes extensive requirements with respect to quality

management and organization, device design, buildings, equipment, purchase and handling of components or services, production and process

controls, packaging and labeling controls, device evaluation, distribution, installation, complaint handling, servicing, and record keeping.

The FDA evaluates compliance with the QSR through periodic unannounced inspections that may include the manufacturing facilities of our

subcontractors.

If the FDA believes that any of our contract manufacturers or regulated suppliers are not in compliance with these requirements,

it can shut down such manufacturing operations, require a recall of our products, refuse to approve new marketing applications, institute

legal proceedings to detain or seize products, enjoin future violations or assess civil and criminal penalties against us or our officers

or other employees.

NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation

State Fraud and Abuse Provisions

Many states have also adopted some form of anti-kickback

and anti-referral laws and a false claims act.

We believe that we are in conformance to such laws.

Nevertheless, a determination of liability

under such laws could result in fines and penalties and restrictions on our ability to operate in these jurisdictions.

Physician Payment Sunshine Act

Transparency laws regarding payments or other

items of value provided to healthcare providers and teaching hospitals may also impact our business practices.

The federal Physician Payment

Sunshine Act requires most medical device manufacturers to report annually to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) financial

arrangements, payments, or other transfers of value made by that entity to physicians and teaching hospitals.

The payment information is made publicly available

in a searchable format on the Open Payments database.

In the coming years, we will invest significant resources to develop and maintain

robust systems and processes that enhance compliance with these regulations.

Failure to comply with the reporting requirements can

result in significant monetary penalties.

Similar laws may have been enacted or are under consideration in foreign jurisdictions.

Human Capital

As of September 30, 2025, we had 18 employees,

all of whom are full-time, eight of whom are engaged in research and development activities, and all of whom are located in the United

As of September 30, 2025, we also retained the services of approximately 8 regular consultants.

None of our employees are represented

by a labor union or covered by a collective bargaining agreement.

We consider our relationship with our employees to be good.

Corporate Overview and History of NeuroOne,

We were originally incorporated as Original Source

Entertainment, Inc.

under the laws of the State of Nevada on August 20, 2009.

20, 2017, we acquired NeuroOne, Inc.

On July 20, 2017, we acquired NeuroOne, Inc.

(the “Acquisition”).

Immediately following the closing of the Acquisition, the business

of NeuroOne, Inc.

became our sole focus, and we changed our name to NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation and we reincorporated in

of our management team have held senior leadership positions at a number of medical technology and biopharmaceutical companies, including

Boston Scientific, St.

Jude Medical, Stryker Instruments, C.R.

Bard, A-Med Systems, Nuwellis, Inc., formerly known as Sunshine Heart,

Empi, Don-Joy and PMT.

the years, our cortical sheet electrode and depth electrode technology have been tested by both WARF, the owners of our licensed patents,

and Mayo Clinic located in Rochester, Minnesota, in both pre-clinical models as well as through an institutional review board (IRB) approval

at Mayo Clinic for clinical research.

In December 2020, we announced the first human commercial use of our Evo cortical electrode in

a procedure performed at the Mayo Clinic.

Regarding our ablation electrode, the Cleveland Clinic and representatives from Emory University

have performed testing in bench top models and pre-clinical (or animal testing) models.

These pre-clinical tests have demonstrated that

the technology is capable of recording, ablation and acute stimulation.

Medical Technologies Corporation

principal executive offices are located at 7599 Anagram Drive, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344, and our telephone number is 952-426-1383.

Our website address is www.nmtc1.com Information on our website is not part of this Annual Report.

Immediately following the closing of the Acquisition, the business of NeuroOne, Inc.

became our sole focus, and we changed our name to

NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation and we reincorporated in Delaware.

Members of our management team have held senior

leadership positions at a number of medical technology and biopharmaceutical companies, including Boston Scientific, St.

Jude Medical,

Stryker Instruments, C.R.

Bard, A-Med Systems, Nuwellis, Inc., formerly known as Sunshine Heart, Empi, Don-Joy and PMT.

Over the years, our cortical sheet electrode and

depth electrode technology have been tested by both WARF, the owners of our licensed patents, and Mayo Clinic located in Rochester, Minnesota,

in both pre-clinical models as well as through an institutional review board (IRB) approval at Mayo Clinic for clinical research.

2020, we announced the first human commercial use of our Evo cortical electrode in a procedure performed at the Mayo Clinic.

our ablation electrode, the Cleveland Clinic and representatives from Emory University have performed testing in bench top models and

pre-clinical (or animal testing) models.

These pre-clinical tests have demonstrated that the technology is capable of recording, ablation

and acute stimulation.

Corporate Information

Our principal executive offices are located at

7599 Anagram Drive, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344, and our telephone number is 952-426-1383.

Our website address is www.nmtc1.com Information

on our website is not part of this Annual Report.

NeuroOne Medical Technologies Corporation

Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.

What changed 10-K

Item 1. Business