5 unchanged sentences
District Court for the District of Massachusetts.
−Removed: The complaint alleges violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder on the basis of purportedly materially false and misleading statements and omissions concerning ADG20’s effectiveness against the Omicron variant of COVID-19.
−Removed: The complaint seeks, among other things, unspecified damages, attorneys’ fees, expert fees, and other costs.
+Added: The complaint alleged violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder on the basis of purportedly materially false and misleading statements and omissions concerning ADG20’s effectiveness against the Omicron variant of COVID-19.
+Added: The complaint sought, among other things, unspecified damages, attorneys’ fees, expert fees, and other costs.
The court appointed lead plaintiffs for the action on June 28, 2023.
−Removed: On August 23, 2023, the lead plaintiffs filed an amended complaint that makes allegations similar to those in the original complaint and asserts the same claims against the same defendants as the original complaint.
−Removed: On October 19, 2023, the parties filed a joint stipulation to advise the court that the lead plaintiffs intended to seek leave to file a second amended complaint, and on November 22, 2023, the lead plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint that makes allegations similar to those in the prior complaints and asserts the same claims against the same defendants as the prior complaints.
+Added: On August 23, 2023, the lead plaintiffs filed an amended complaint that made allegations similar to those in the original complaint and asserted the same claims against the same defendants as the original complaint.
+Added: On October 19, 2023, the parties filed a joint stipulation to advise the court that the lead plaintiffs intended to seek leave to file a second amended complaint, and on November 22, 2023, the lead plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint that made allegations similar to those in the prior complaints and asserted the same claims against the same defendants as the prior complaints.
On January 12, 2024, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the second amended complaint in its entirety.
The lead plaintiffs filed an opposition to the motion to dismiss on February 26, 2024, and the defendants filed a reply in further support of their motion to dismiss on March 27, 2024.
−Removed: The court heard oral arguments on the defendants’ motion to dismiss on May 10, 2024, and took the matter under advisement.
−Removed: We believe that we have strong defenses, and we intend to vigorously defend against this action.
−Removed: The lawsuit is in early stages, and, at this time, no assessment can be made as to the likely outcome or whether the outcome will be material to us.
+Added: The court heard oral arguments on the defendants’ motion to dismiss on May 10, 2024.
+Added: The court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss on September 18, 2024, dismissing the second amended complaint in its entirety, with prejudice and without leave to amend.
+Added: The plaintiffs did not appeal the court’s decision.
+Added: As such, we have concluded that this matter is closed.
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.