LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
−Removed: On July 23, 2021, a
−Removed: wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, Paltalk Holdings, Inc., filed a patent infringement lawsuit against WebEx Communications, Inc.,
−Removed: Cisco WebEx LLC, and Cisco Systems, Inc.
+Added: Cisco WebEx Litigation
+Added: On July 23, 2021, a wholly
+Added: owned subsidiary of the Company, Paltalk Holdings, filed a patent infringement lawsuit (the “ Lawsuit ”) against
+Added: WebEx Communications, Inc., Cisco WebEx LLC, and Cisco Systems, Inc.
(collectively, “ Cisco ”), in the U.S.
−Removed: District Court for the Western District of
−Removed: Texas (the “Court”).
−Removed: The Company alleges that certain of Cisco’s products have infringed U.S.
−Removed: and that the Company is entitled to damages.
−Removed: A Markman hearing took
−Removed: place on February 24, 2022.
−Removed: On September 7, 2022, the United States Patent Office issued a reexamination of U.S.
−Removed: and on January 19, 2023, the Examiner issued an Ex Parte Reexamination Certificate, ending the reexamination and confirming the patentability
−Removed: of claims 1-10 of U.S.
−Removed: On June 29, 2023, the Court held a pretrial conference with the parties and denied Cisco’s
−Removed: motion for summary judgment.
−Removed: The trial is expected to be held in April of 2024.
−Removed: If the Company receives a jury verdict in its favor or receives settlement
−Removed: proceeds in connection with the foregoing litigation, the exact amount of such proceeds to be received by the Company will be determined
−Removed: based on a number of factors and will reflect the deduction of significant litigation-related expenses, including legal fees.
−Removed: Consequently,
−Removed: the Company will not receive the majority of any gross proceeds resulting from any potential verdict or settlement.
−Removed: For the foregoing
−Removed: reasons, we are unable to predict the outcome of this litigation and its ultimate cost.
+Added: Court for the Western District of Texas (the “ Court ”).
+Added: The Company alleged that certain of Cisco’s products
+Added: have infringed U.S.
+Added: 6,683,858, and that the Company was entitled to damages.
+Added: On August 29, 2024, the
+Added: jury awarded the Company $65.7 million (the “ Award ”) in a jury verdict in connection with the Lawsuit.
+Added: 8, 2024, an order granting a motion for final judgment was entered into in the Court in connection with the Lawsuit.
+Added: The final judgment
+Added: was entered in the Company’s favor in the amount of the Award and started the time for filing any post-trial motions or appeal.
+Added: The exact amount of the
+Added: Award proceeds to be received by the Company will be determined based on a number of factors and will reflect the deduction of significant
+Added: litigation-related expenses, including legal fees.
+Added: Consequently, the Company estimates that it would receive no more than one third of
+Added: the gross proceeds in connection with the Award, which Award is subject to post-trial proceedings (including any potential appellate proceedings
+Added: Cisco ManyCam Litigation
+Added: On March 7, 2025, Cisco Systems, Inc.
+Added: and Cisco Technology, Inc.
+Added: a complaint against the Company in the U.S.
+Added: District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging that the Company’s ManyCam software
+Added: has infringed U.S.
+Added: 8,830,293 and 8,941,708 and seeking damages and injunctive relief.
+Added: The Company intends to vigorously defend
+Added: itself against these claims.
+Added: The Company has not recorded any liability for this matter as it does not believe a loss is probable, and
+Added: it cannot estimate any reasonably possible loss or range of possible loss.
+Added: It is possible that an unfavorable resolution to this matter
+Added: could have an adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
To our knowledge, other
3 unchanged sentences
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.