3 unchanged sentences
These provisions are based on current information and legal advice and may be adjusted from time to time according to developments.
−Removed: The following three parties have filed claims against Hammer Fiber Optics Investments Ltd and are not secured:
−Removed: Cross River Fiber
−Removed: Calvi Electric
−Removed: Horizon Blue Cross
−Removed: The following party have filed claims against Open Data Centers, LLC and this agreement was secured by a security deposit.
−Removed: No other security was provided:
−Removed: 15 Corporate Place South, LLC
−Removed: During the period the company settled several claims against the company, including the following:
−Removed: Crown Castle Fiber FKA Lightower
−Removed: Zayo Group, LLC
−Removed: Foley Incorporated
−Removed: Ventnor Loan, LLC
−Removed: The company settled the matter with Crown Castle Fiber FKA Lightower for a one-time payment of $65,000.
−Removed: The company settled the matter with Zayo Group on behalf of Open Data Centers, LLC and Hammer Fiber Optics Investments Ltd for a one-time payment of $90,000.
−Removed: The company settled the matter with Foley Incorporated on behalf of Open Data Centers, LLC for a one-time payment of $2,000.
−Removed: The company settled the matter with Ventor Loan on behalf of Hammer Fiber Optics Investments Ltd for a one-time payment of $2,000.
−Removed: The company resolved the claims of Iron Mountain Data Centers, LLC and Bank of America against Hammer Fiber Investments Ltd.
−Removed: In the opinion of the Company, Iron Mountain failed to meet its obligations under the agreement and the Company is now pursuing the matter against Iron Mountain Data Centers, LLC.
−Removed: 1stPoint Communications has settled its matter with Shannon Walchuk for $160,000 and the payments have been made in full and the matter is closed.
−Removed: MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
−Removed: We do not engage in mining operations and accordingly have no information to disclose concerning mine safety.
+Added: The following parties have filed claims against Hammer Fiber Optics Investments Ltd and are not secured:
+Added: Calvi Electric v.
+Added: Hammer Fiber Optics Inv, Ltd.
+Added: Horizon Blue Cross v.
+Added: Hammer Fiber Optics Inv, Ltd.
+Added: Cross River Fiber v.
+Added: Hammer Fiber Optics Inv, Ltd.
+Added: The matter of 15 Corporate Place, LLC v.
+Added: Open Data Centers, LLC settled for $25,000 plus acceptance of the security deposit which has already been written down in assumption of this outcome.
+Added: The final settlement was less than the $35,000 originally offered.
+Added: Cross River Fiber has advanced its claim against Hammer Fiber Optics Investments, Ltd.
+Added: Cross River Fiber has expanded its claim to include Hammer Fiber Optics Holdings Corp, 1stPoint Communications, LLC, Endstream Communications, LLC, Open Data Centers, LLC, Manhattan Carrier Company, LLC, Erik Levitt personally, Local Telecommunications Services – FL, LLC, Local Telecommunications Services – NY, LLC, American Network Inc and Hammer Wireless Corporation.
+Added: There never was, nor has there ever been, a contract between any of these entities or Mr.
+Added: Levitt personally and Cross River Fiber, nor is there any security under the agreement between Cross River Fiber and Hammer Fiber Optics Investments, Ltd.
+Added: After discovery in the claim against Hammer Fiber Optics Holdings Corp and its subsidiaries, Hammer has made a motion for Summary Judgement to dismiss the claim on the basis of the lack of evidence that any entity other than Hammer Fiber Optics Investments, Ltd.
+Added: was a party to the claim.
+Added: The claims in this matter are similar to those made by Zayo Group and Crown Castle Fiber, which were both settled.
+Added: As all of these matters are either not advancing, nor do we expect an unfavorable outcome of any of these matters, we have not made any further accruals or adjustments to our assets, liabilities, equity or expense as a result of these claims.
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.