What changed in this filing

/stocks — the workspaceLOADING

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

2020-11-12 compared with 2020-08-12 · 92 added, 62 removed, 38 unchanged (80% of the section changed)

4 unchanged sentences

related parties in Superior Court of the State of California - County of Los Angeles, General District in connection with the

acquisition of UGopherServices in September 2017.

The case number is 19STCV03320.

The lawsuit alleges breach of contract, among

other causes of action.

The Company answered the complaint and filed a cross-complaint against the plaintiffs in the case and

third parties on or around February 15, 2019.

acquisition of UGO in September 2017.

The case number is 19STCV03320 (the “Original Lawsuit”).

The complaint in the

Original Lawsuit alleges breach of contract, among other causes of action.

The Company answered the complaint and filed a cross-complaint

against the plaintiffs in the case and third parties on or around February 15, 2019.

On or about September 10, 2020, the Company

through its agent of service was “served”

with a complaint (the Company contested service) that was recently filed

against the Company and third parties by Robert Warren Jackson and Gregory Bauer in Los Angeles Superior Court Case No.:

(“Second Lawsuit”).

In the Original Lawsuit filed, the court rejected the plaintiff’s claims that they were

filing a purported quasi-derivative lawsuit.

As such, in this current litigation, the plaintiff is now again claiming the action

is a derivative lawsuit.

In the Original lawsuit, the Company filed a cross complaint against the plaintiff and other third parties.

Recently, the court has scheduled various hearings and a trial date set for December 27, 2021.

It was the Company’s intention

to dividend its holdings of its wholly owned subsidiary Ugopherservices Corp.

(“UGO”).

As UGO is the main dispute

in the litigations described above, the Company has elected to sell UGO to a third party effective July 1, 2020 (See Note 3).

On September 17, 2020, the Company terminated Greg Bauer as consultant (resulting from the sale of UGO), which he confirmed in

On or about October 13, 2020, one of the defendants filed a motion to remove the Second Lawsuit from the Los Angeles

Superior Court to Federal court.

The Company was not served per federal rule as required per the removal.

the sale of UGO (See Note 3), the Company noticed third parties (including SURG, via its asset manager) to wire the UGO funds

to its new bank account.

SURG never answered the notice.

The Company intends to take legal actions to resolve this issue.

December 3, 2018, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) with Discover Growth Fund,

LLC pursuant to which the Company issued a Senior Secured Redeemable Convertible Debenture (the “Debenture”) in the

aggregate face value of $8,340,000.

In connection with the issuance of the Debenture and pursuant to the terms of the SPA, the

Company issued a Common Stock Purchase Warrant to acquire up to 225,000 shares of common stock for a term of three years (the

LLC (the “Investor”) pursuant to which the Company issued a Senior Secured Redeemable Convertible Debenture (the “Debenture”)

in the aggregate face value of $8,340,000.

In connection with the issuance of the Debenture and pursuant to the terms of the SPA,

the Company issued a Common Stock Purchase Warrant to acquire up to 225,000 shares of common stock for a term of three years (the

“Warrant”) on a cash-only basis at an exercise price of $100.00 per share with respect to 50,000 Warrant Shares, $75.00

11 unchanged sentences

“Notice”).

On December 23, 2019, in the pending arbitration between the Company and the Investor, an Interim Award

was entered in favor of the Investor.

On January 31, 2020, the Company was informed that a final award was entered (the “Final

Award”).

The Final Award affirms that certain sections of the Senior Secured Redeemable Convertible Debenture (the “Debenture”) constitute

unenforceable liquidated damages penalties and were stricken.

Further, it was determined that the Investor was entitled to recovery

of their attorney’s fees.

Consequently, the arbitrator awarded Investor an award of $4,034,444 plus interest of 7.25% accrued

from May 15, 2019 and costs in the amount of $55,613.

February 18, 2020, the Company filed a motion with the United States District Court District of Nevada (the “Nevada Court”)

to confirm the Final Award and a motion to consolidate Discover’s application to confirm the Final Award filed in the U.S.

On December 23, 2019, in arbitration between the Company and the Investor, an Interim Award was entered

in favor of the Investor.

On January 31, 2020, the Company was informed that a final award was entered (the “Final Award”).

The Final Award affirms that certain sections of the Debenture constitute unenforceable liquidated damages penalties and

were stricken.

Further, it was determined that the Investor was entitled to recovery of their attorney’s fees.

Consequently,

the arbitrator awarded Investor an award of $4,034,444 plus interest of 7.25% accrued from May 15, 2019 and costs in the amount

On February 18, 2020, the Company filed a motion with the United States District Court District of Nevada (the “Nevada

Court”) to confirm the Final Award and a motion to consolidate Investor’s application to confirm the Final Award filed

District Court of the Virgin Islands (Case No:

3 :20-cv-00012-CVG-RM) (the “Virgin Island Court”).

On February 27,

2020, the Nevada Court denied the Company’s motion to confirm the Final Award and motion to consolidate and further decided

that the confirmation of the Final Award should be litigated in the Virgin Island Court.

As such, on February 27, 2020, the Company

filed a Notice of Entry of Order as well as a Motion to Confirm the Arbitration Award;

Address the Outstanding issue regarding

whether Discover’s rights are subordinated to other creditors and, thereafter, oversee a commercially reasonable foreclosure

sale (Case No:

February 27, 2020, the Nevada Court denied the Company’s motion to confirm the Final Award and motion to consolidate and

further decided that the confirmation of the Final Award should be litigated in the Virgin Island Court.

As such, on February

27, 2020, the Company filed a Notice of Entry of Order as well as a Motion to Confirm the Arbitration Award, address the outstanding

issues regarding whether Investor’s rights are subordinated to other creditors and, thereafter, oversee a commercially reasonable

foreclosure sale (Case No:

3 :20-cv-00012-CVG-RM).

It is the Company’s position that the Final Award must first be confirmed and all

questions regarding the rights of Discover relative to those of other creditors must be determined before any foreclosure sale

It is further the position of the Company that the previously disclosed foreclosure sale scheduled by Discover is

being conducted in a commercially unreasonable manner and that if Discover proceeded forward with the foreclosure sale it did

It was the Company’s position that the Final Award must first be confirmed

and all questions regarding the rights of Investor relative to those of other creditors must be determined before any foreclosure

sale can proceed.

It is further the position of the Company that the previously disclosed foreclosure sale scheduled by Investor

is being conducted in a commercially unreasonable manner and that if Discover proceeded forward with the foreclosure sale it did

so at its own risk.

Nevertheless, on February 28, 2020, Discover advised that it conducted a sale of the Company’s assets.

As the date of this report Discover failed to present a deed of sale for the alleged sale that allegedly took place as noticed.

The Company filed with Virgin Island Court the motions disputing the validity of said alleged sale.

July 28, 2020 Discover Growth Fund, LLC filed in the State of Nevada a motion for attorneys $48,844 and costs $716.

has not yet filed an answer.

Nevertheless, on February 28, 2020, Investor advised that it conducted a sale of the Company’s assets.

As the date of this report Investor failed to present a deed of sale for the alleged sale that allegedly took place as noticed.

The Company filed with Virgin Island Court the motions disputing the validity of the alleged sale.

On July 28, 2020, Investor

filed in the State of Nevada a motion for attorneys $48,844 and costs $716.

The Company filed an answer on August 11, 2020.

October 16, 2020, Investor motion for attorneys $48,844 and costs $716 was denied.

Technologies, S.A.

September 14, 2018, the Company entered into an Exclusive Intellectual Property License and Royalty Agreement (the “GBT

11 unchanged sentences

and dispose of products and devices utilizing the Digital Currently Technology.

the terms of the GBT License Agreement, the Company is entitled to receive a royalty payment of 2% of gross revenue of each licensed

product sold by GBT-CR during the period starting in which revenue is first generated using the licensed products and continuing

for five years thereafter.

Upon signing the GBT-CR License Agreement, GBT-CR paid the Company $300,000 which is nonrefundable.

The Company has recognized the $300,000 as revenue during the years ended December 31, 2018.

Upon GBT-CR making available for

sale (the “Commercial Event”) an ICO (Initial Coin Offering) (the “Coin”), GBT-CR will make a payment

to the Company in the amount of $5,000,000.

Further, upon the Commercial Event, GBT-CR will grant the Company the ability to acquire

30% of the Coin at a 30% discount of such offering price of the Coin.

The GBT License Agreement commenced as of the signing date

and, unless terminated in accordance with the termination provisions of the GBT License Agreement, shall remain in force until

the expiration of the patent pertaining to the Digital Currency Technology;

provided that the right to use trade secrets shall

survive the expiration of the GBT License Agreement provided the Company has not terminated.

Prior to the signing of the GBT License

Agreement, GBT-CR advanced $200,000 to the Company, which the parties have agreed will be applied toward the $5,000,000 fee when

it becomes due.

The $200,000 was recorded as unearned revenue at December 31, 2018 and reclassified to accrued expense at December

31, 2019 and June 30, 2020.

February 27, 2020 GBT Technologies, S.A., as successor in interest to Hermes Roll, LLC had notified the Company that it was in

default on its Amended and Restated Territorial License Agreement (“ARTLA”) dated June 15, 2015 and that the ARTLA

had been cancelled and rescinded.

Under the terms of the GBT License Agreement,

the Company is entitled to receive a royalty payment of 2% of gross revenue of each licensed product sold by GBT-CR during the

period starting in which revenue is first generated using the licensed products and continuing for five years thereafter.

signing the GBT-CR License Agreement, GBT-CR paid the Company $300,000 which is nonrefundable.

The Company has recognized the

$300,000 as revenue during the years ended December 31, 2018.

Upon GBT-CR making available for sale (the “Commercial Event”)

an ICO (Initial Coin Offering) (the “Coin”), GBT-CR will make a payment to the Company in the amount of $5,000,000.

Further, upon the Commercial Event, GBT-CR will grant the Company the ability to acquire 30% of the Coin at a 30% discount of

such offering price of the Coin.

The GBT License Agreement commenced as of the signing date and, unless terminated in accordance

with the termination provisions of the GBT License Agreement, shall remain in force until the expiration of the patent pertaining

to the Digital Currency Technology;

provided that the right to use trade secrets shall survive the expiration of the GBT License

Agreement provided the Company has not terminated.

Prior to the signing of the GBT License Agreement, GBT-CR advanced $200,000

to the Company, which the parties have agreed will be applied toward the $5,000,000 fee when it becomes due.

The $200,000 is recorded

as unearned revenue at December 31, 2018 and reclassified to accrued expense at December 31, 2019.

On February 27, 2020 GBT Technologies,

S.A., as successor in interest to Hermes Roll, LLC had notified the Company that it was in default on its Amended and Restated

Territorial License Agreement (“ARTLA”) dated June 15, 2015 and that the ARTLA had been cancelled and rescinded.

or about October 14, 2020, AltCorp together with Stanley filed a complaint against SURG and its transfer agent in District Court,

Clark county, Nevada.

The case number is A-20-823039-B.

The complaint seeking default cure, damages and appointment of a receiver

to SURG for default on SURG liabilities per contract (See Note 5 to the financial statements).

SURG and their transfer agent been

served with said lawsuit.

Risk Factors.

1 unchanged sentence

Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.

What changed 10-Q

Item 1. Legal Proceedings