UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
☒
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2025
or
☐
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the transition period from _________ to _________
Commission
File Number 001-38308
Greenpro
Capital Corp.
(Exact
name of registrant issuer as specified in its charter)
Nevada
98-1146821
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
No.)
B-23A-02,
G-Vestor Tower ,
Pavilion
Embassy , 200 Jalan Ampang ,
50450
W.P. Kuala Lumpur , Malaysia
(Address
of principal executive offices, including zip code)
Registrant’s
phone number, including area code (60) 3 8408-1788
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title
of Each Class
Trading
Symbol(s)
Name
of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common
Stock, $0.0001 par value
GRNQ
NASDAQ
Capital Market
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
☒ No ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data
File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
twelve months (or shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
Yes
☒ No ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company”
or an “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
Accelerated Filer ☐
Accelerated
Filer ☐
Non-accelerated
Filer ☒
Smaller
reporting company ☒
Emerging
Growth Company ☐
If
an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying
with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
APPLICABLE
ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
As
of November 13, 2025, there were 8,375,813 shares, par value $ 0.0001 of the registrant’s common stock (“Common Stock”)
issued and outstanding.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Page
PART
I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
3
ITEM
1.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
3
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets - September 30, 2025 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2024 (Audited)
3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss (Unaudited) - Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025 and 2024
4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited) - Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025 and 2024
5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) - Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025 and 2024
6
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) - Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025 and 2024
7
ITEM
2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
26
ITEM
3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
37
ITEM
4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
37
PART
II
OTHER INFORMATION
38
ITEM
1
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
38
ITEM
2
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
53
ITEM
3
DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
53
ITEM
4
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
53
ITEM
5
OTHER INFORMATION
53
ITEM
6
EXHIBITS
53
SIGNATURES
54
2
PART
I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item
1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements .
GREENPRO
CAPITAL CORP.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS
OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2025 AND DECEMBER 31, 2024
(In
U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)
September 30, 2025
December 31, 2024
(Unaudited)
(Audited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents (including $ 64,259 and $ 77,239 of time deposits as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively)
$ 775,388
$ 1,124,818
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for credit losses of $ 6,528 and $ 2,883 as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively (including $ 219 and $ 41 of net accounts receivable from related parties as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively)
16,116
94,521
Prepaids and other current assets
429,358
450,458
Digital assets
236,165
192,398
Due from related parties
996,468
954,184
Deferred costs of revenue (including $ 6,250 and $ 18,750 to related parties as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively)
58,099
38,382
Total current assets
2,511,594
2,854,761
Property and equipment, net
2,185,725
2,226,888
Real estate investments:
Real estate held for sale
980,402
980,402
Real estate held for investment, net
367,003
352,854
Intangible assets, net
505
709
Goodwill
6,035
6,035
Other investments (including $ 12,073 of related party investments as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively)
12,073
12,073
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net
44,019
19,929
Finance lease right-of-use asset, net
16,803
20,272
TOTAL ASSETS
$ 6,124,159
$ 6,473,923
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
$ 935,602
$ 975,208
Due to related parties
118,460
57,497
Operating lease liabilities, current portion
44,019
19,929
Finance lease liabilities, current portion
4,210
3,766
Deferred revenue
683,873
213,000
Total current liabilities
1,786,164
1,269,400
Finance lease liabilities, non-current portion
7,685
10,235
Total liabilities
1,793,849
1,279,635
Commitments and contingencies
-
-
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $ 0.0001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding
-
-
Common Stock, $ 0.0001 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized; 8,275,813 and 7,575,813 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively
8,276
7,576
Additional paid in capital
43,509,131
42,749,831
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
( 237,163 )
( 336,115 )
Accumulated deficit
( 38,987,309 )
( 37,264,379 )
Total Greenpro Capital Corp. stockholders’ equity
4,292,935
5,156,913
Noncontrolling interests in consolidated subsidiary
37,375
37,375
Total stockholders’ equity
4,330,310
5,194,288
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
$ 6,124,159
$ 6,473,923
See
accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
GREENPRO
CAPITAL CORP.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
FOR
THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2025 AND 2024
(In
U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
2025
2024
2025
2024
Three months ended September 30,
Nine months ended September 30,
2025
2024
2025
2024
REVENUES:
Service revenue (including $ 12,639 and $ 108,485 of service revenue from related parties for the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and $ 45,992 and $ 347,570 of service revenue from related parties for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively)
$ 377,423
$ 521,765
$ 1,083,533
$ 1,498,187
Digital revenue
-
-
44,177
-
Rental revenue
15,805
17,934
45,365
61,085
Total revenue
393,228
539,699
1,173,075
1,559,272
COST OF REVENUES:
Cost of service revenue (including $ 6,120 and $ 534 of cost of revenue to related parties for the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and $ 14,640 and $ 4,586 of cost of revenue to related parties for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively)
( 125,135 )
( 138,404 )
( 295,411 )
( 249,112 )
Cost of digital revenue
-
-
( 1 )
-
Cost of rental revenue
( 4,032 )
( 6,235 )
( 11,201 )
( 19,125 )
Total cost of revenues
( 129,167 )
( 144,639 )
( 306,613 )
( 268,237 )
GROSS PROFIT
264,061
395,060
866,462
1,291,035
OPERATING EXPENSES:
General and administrative (including $ 37,711 and $ 39,365 of general and administrative expenses to related parties for the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and $ 98,210 and $ 122,127 of general and administrative expenses to related parties for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively)
( 784,610 )
( 868,333 )
( 2,677,605 )
( 2,839,641 )
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS
( 520,549 )
( 473,273 )
( 1,811,143 )
( 1,548,606 )
OTHER INCOME:
Other income (including $ 2,674 and $ 9,699 of other income from related parties for the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and $ 31,697 and $ 35,565 of other income from related parties for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively)
10,529
11,630
52,638
40,101
Interest income (including $ 1,408 and $ 1,363 of interest income from related party for the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively and $ 4,212 and $ 3,707 of interest income from related party for nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively)
2,408
3,979
7,085
16,828
Gain on disposal of investments (including $ 127,617 of related party investments for the three months ended September 30, 2024 and $ 39,800 and $ 324,917 of related party investments for the nine months ended September 30 2025 and 2024, respectively)
-
127,617
39,800
324,917
Reversal of impairment of investment (including $ 150 of related party investment for the nine months ended September 30, 2025)
-
-
150
-
Interest expense
( 214 )
( 273 )
( 680 )
( 817 )
Fair value gain (loss) on digital assets
1,426
-
( 3,444 )
-
Total other income
14,149
142,953
95,549
381,029
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAX
( 506,400 )
( 330,320 )
( 1,715,594 )
( 1,167,577 )
Income tax expense
( 6,826 )
-
( 7,336 )
( 1,406 )
NET LOSS
( 513,226 )
( 330,320 )
( 1,722,930 )
( 1,168,983 )
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest
-
-
-
10,543
NET LOSS
ATTRIBUTED TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS OF GREENPRO CAPITAL CORP.
( 513,226 )
( 330,320 )
( 1,722,930 )
( 1,158,440 )
Other comprehensive income:
- Foreign currency translation gain
27,609
150,786
98,952
88,647
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
$ ( 485,617 )
$ ( 179,534 )
$ ( 1,623,978 )
$ ( 1,069,793 )
NET LOSS PER SHARE, BASIC AND DILUTED
$ ( 0.07 )
$ ( 0.04 )
$ ( 0.22 )
$ ( 0.15 )
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON STOCK OUTSTANDING, BASIC AND DILUTED
7,708,778
7,575,813
7,856,032
7,575,813
See
accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
GREENPRO
CAPITAL CORP.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR
THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2025 AND 2024
(In
U.S. dollars, except share data)
(Unaudited)
Number of Shares
Amount
Paid-in
Capital
Comprehensive
Loss
Accumulated
Deficit
Controlling
Interests
Stockholders’
Equity
Three months ended September 30, 2025 (Unaudited)
Common Stock
Additional
Accumulated Other
Non-
Total
Number of Shares
Amount
Paid-in
Capital
Comprehensive
Loss
Accumulated
Deficit
Controlling
Interests
Stockholders’
Equity
Balance as of June 30, 2025 (Unaudited)
8,275,813
$ 8,276
$ 43,509,131
$ ( 264,772 )
$ ( 38,474,083 )
$ 37,375
$ 4,815,927
Foreign currency translation
-
-
-
27,609
-
-
27,609
Net loss
-
-
-
-
( 513,226 )
-
( 513,226 )
Balance as of September 30, 2025 (Unaudited)
8,275,813
$ 8,276
$ 43,509,131
$ ( 237,163 )
$ ( 38,987,309 )
$ 37,375
$ 4,330,310
Nine months ended September 30, 2025 (Unaudited)
Common Stock
Additional
Accumulated Other
Non-
Total
Number of Shares
Amount
Paid-in Capital
Comprehensive
Loss
Accumulated
Deficit
Controlling Interests
Stockholders’ Equity
Balance as of December 31, 2024
7,575,813
$ 7,576
$ 42,749,831
$ ( 336,115 )
$ ( 37,264,379 )
$ 37,375
$ 5,194,288
Common Stock sold in private placements
700,000
700
759,300
-
-
-
760,000
Foreign currency translation
-
-
-
98,952
-
-
98,952
Net loss
-
-
-
-
( 1,722,930 )
-
( 1,722,930 )
Balance as of September 30, 2025 (Unaudited)
8,275,813
$ 8,276
$ 43,509,131
$ ( 237,163 )
$ ( 38,987,309 )
$ 37,375
$ 4,330,310
Three months ended September 30, 2024 (Unaudited)
Common Stock
Additional
Accumulated Other
Non-
Total
Number of
Shares
Amount
Paid-in
Capital
Comprehensive
Loss
Accumulated
Deficit
Controlling
Interests
Stockholders’
Equity
Balance as of June 30, 2024 (Unaudited)
7,575,813
$ 7,576
$ 42,749,831
$ ( 372,308 )
$ ( 37,377,215 )
$ 37,375
$ 5,045,259
Foreign currency translation
-
-
-
150,786
-
-
150,786
Net loss
-
-
-
-
( 330,320 )
-
( 330,320 )
Balance as of September 30, 2024 (Unaudited)
7,575,813
$ 7,576
$ 42,749,831
$ ( 221,522 )
$ ( 37,707,535 )
$ 37,375
$ 4,865,725
Nine months ended September 30, 2024 (Unaudited)
Common Stock
Additional
Accumulated Other
Non-
Total
Number of
Shares
Amount
Paid-in
Capital
Comprehensive
Loss
Accumulated
Deficit
Controlling
Interests
Stockholders’
Equity
Balance as of December 31, 2023
7,575,813
$ 7,576
$ 42,897,029
$ ( 310,169 )
$ ( 36,549,095 )
$ 291,298
$ 6,336,639
Balance
7,575,813
$ 7,576
$ 42,897,029
$ ( 310,169 )
$ ( 36,549,095 )
$ 291,298
$ 6,336,639
Acquisition of noncontrolling interest’s shares in a subsidiary
-
-
( 147,198 )
-
-
( 243,380 )
( 390,578 )
Foreign currency translation
-
-
-
88,647
-
-
88,647
Net loss
-
-
-
-
( 1,158,440 )
( 10,543 )
( 1,168,983 )
Balance as of September 30, 2024 (Unaudited)
7,575,813
$ 7,576
$ 42,749,831
$ ( 221,522 )
$ ( 37,707,535 )
$ 37,375
$ 4,865,725
Balance
7,575,813
$ 7,576
$ 42,749,831
$ ( 221,522 )
$ ( 37,707,535 )
$ 37,375
$ 4,865,725
See
accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
GREENPRO
CAPITAL CORP.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2025 AND 2024
(In
U.S. dollars)
(Unaudited)
2025
2024
Nine months ended September 30,
2025
2024
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss
$ ( 1,722,930 )
$ ( 1,168,983 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation
103,167
109,621
Amortization of intangible assets
203
407
Amortization of operating lease right-of use assets
71,369
70,667
Amortization of finance lease right-of-use asset
4,610
4,321
Provision for credit losses
3,594
90,243
Fair value loss on digital assets
3,444
-
Gain on disposal of investments
( 39,800 )
( 324,917 )
Reversal of impairment of other investment-related party
( 150 )
-
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable
78,405
( 25,282 )
Prepaids and other current assets
21,100
190,523
Digital assets
( 43,767 )
-
Deferred costs of revenue
( 19,717 )
( 13,046 )
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
( 39,606 )
( 148,330 )
Operating lease liabilities
( 71,369 )
( 70,667 )
Income tax payable
-
( 292 )
Deferred revenue
470,873
93,861
Net cash used in operating activities
( 1,180,574 )
( 1,191,874 )
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment
( 1,299 )
( 5,095 )
Proceeds from disposal of other investments
39,950
322,820
Proceeds from real estate held for sale
-
15,632
Purchase of other investments
-
( 92 )
Net cash provided by investing activities
38,651
333,265
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from shares issued for cash
760,000
-
Principal payment of finance lease liabilities
( 2,901 )
( 2,539 )
Advances from (to) related parties
18,679
( 180,994 )
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
775,778
( 183,533 )
Effect of exchange rate changes in cash and cash equivalents
16,715
( 153,542 )
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
( 349,430 )
( 1,195,684 )
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD
1,124,818
2,223,197
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD
$ 775,388
$ 1,027,513
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid for income tax
$ 6,466
$ 1,694
Cash paid for interest
$ 680
$ 817
SUPPLEMENTAL NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Initial recognition of operating lease right-of-use assets and operating lease obligations by a lessee
$ 95,727
$ -
Distribution of real estate held for sale to a non-controlling interest for acquisition of noncontrolling interest’s shares in a subsidiary and settlement of noncontrolling interest’s loan
$ -
$ 678,085
See
accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
GREENPRO
CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2025 AND 2024
(In
U.S. dollars, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
NOTE
1 - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Greenpro
Capital Corp. (the “Company” or “GRNQ”) was incorporated on July 19, 2013, in the state of Nevada. The Company
provides a wide range of business consulting and corporate advisory services, including cross-border listing advisory services, tax planning,
advisory and transaction services, record management services, and accounting outsourcing services. Our focus is on companies located
in Asia and Southeast Asia, including Hong Kong, Malaysia, China, Thailand, and Singapore. As part of our business consulting and corporate
advisory business segment, our wholly owned subsidiary, Greenpro Venture Capital Limited (“GVCL”), provides a business incubator
for start-up companies and focuses on investments in select start-up and high-growth potential companies.
In
addition to our service business segment providing business consulting and corporate advisory services to clients, the Company operates
two other business segments, a digital business segment providing a digital platform and trading of digital assets via our wholly owned
subsidiary, Green-X Corp., in Labuan, Malaysia (“Green-X”), and a real estate business segment focusing on trading or leasing
real estate properties via another wholly owned subsidiaries, Forward Win International Limited in Hong Kong (“FWIL”) and
Greenpro Resources Sdn. Bhd. in Malaysia (“GRSB”), respectively.
Basis
of presentation and principles of consolidation
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024 have
been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) that permit reduced
disclosure for interim periods. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted.
In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation
have been included. Operating results for the period ended September 30, 2025 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may
be expected for the year ending December 31, 2025. The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet information as of December 31, 2024 was derived
from the Company’s audited Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2024 included in the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on April 9, 2025. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with that report.
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries
and majority-owned subsidiaries which the Company controls and entities for which the Company is the primary beneficiary. For those consolidated
subsidiaries where the Company’s ownership is less than 100%, the outside shareholders’ interests are shown as noncontrolling
interests in equity. Acquired businesses are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date on which control is transferred
to the Company. Subsidiaries are deconsolidated from the date that control ceases. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
Going
concern
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement
of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. During the nine months ended September 30, 2025, the Company incurred
a net loss of $ 1,722,930 and net cash used in operations of $ 1,180,574 , and as of September 30, 2025, the Company incurred an accumulated
deficit of $ 38,987,309 . These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within
one year of the date that the financial statements are issued. In addition, the Company’s independent registered public accounting
firm, in its report on the Company’s December 31, 2024 financial statements, has expressed substantial doubt about the Company’s
ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company
is unable to continue as a going concern.
The
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon improving its profitability and the continuing financial support
from its major shareholders. Management believes the existing shareholders or external financing will provide additional cash to meet
the Company’s obligations as they become due. Despite the amount of funds that we have raised in the past, no assurance can be
given that any future financing, if needed, will be available or, if available, that it will be on terms that are satisfactory to the
Company. Even if the Company can obtain additional financing, if needed, it may contain undue restrictions on its operations, in the
case of debt financing, or cause substantial dilution for its stockholders, in the case of equity financing.
Use
of estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial
statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant accounting estimates include certain
assumptions related to, among others, the allowance for credit losses, impairment analysis of real estate assets and other long-term
assets, including goodwill, valuation allowance on deferred income taxes, and the accrual of potential liabilities. Actual results may
differ from these estimates.
7
Credit
losses
The
Company estimates and records a provision for its expected credit losses related to its financial instruments, including its trade receivables.
Management considers historical collection rates, the current financial status of the Company’s customers, macroeconomic factors,
and other industry-specific factors when evaluating current expected credit losses. Forward-looking information is also considered in
the evaluation of current expected credit losses. However, because of the short time to the expected receipt of accounts receivable,
management believes that the carrying value, net of expected losses, approximates fair value and therefore, relies more on historical
and current analysis of such financial instruments, including its trade receivables.
To
determine the provision for credit losses for accounts receivable, the Company has disaggregated its accounts receivable by class of
customers at the business component level, as management determined that the risk profile of the Company’s customers is consistent
based on the type and industry in which they operate. Each business component is analyzed for estimated credit losses individually. In
doing so, the Company establishes a historical loss matrix, based on the previous collections of accounts receivable by the age of such
receivables, and evaluates the current and forecasted financial position of its customers, as available. Further, the Company considers
macroeconomic factors and the status of the relevant industry to estimate if there are current expected credit losses within its trade
receivables based on the trends of the Company’s expectation of the future status of such economic and industry-specific factors.
Also, specific allowance amounts are established based on a review of outstanding invoices to record the appropriate provision for customers
that have a higher probability of default.
Accounts
receivable at September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024 are net of allowances for credit losses of $ 6,528 and $ 2,883 , respectively. The
following table provides a roll-forward of the allowance for credit losses that is deducted from the amortized cost basis of accounts
receivable to present the net amount expected to be collected on September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024:
SCHEDULE OF ALLOWANCES FOR CREDIT LOSSES
As of
September 30, 2025
As of
December 31, 2024
(Unaudited)
(Audited)
Balance at beginning of period/year
$ 2,883
$ 610,599
Charged of operating expenses
3,594
90,223
Write-off of accounts receivable
-
( 557,622 )
Recovery of accounts receivable
-
( 39,000 )
Adjustments for credit losses
51
( 101,317 )
Balance at end of period/year
$ 6,528
$ 2,883
Revenue
recognition
The
Company follows the guidance of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers . ASC 606 creates
a five-step model that requires entities to exercise judgment when considering the terms of contracts, which includes (1) identifying
the contracts or agreements with a customer, (2) identifying our performance obligations in the contract or agreement, (3) determining
the transaction price, (4) allocating the transaction price to the separate performance obligations, and (5) recognizing revenue as each
performance obligation is satisfied. The Company only applies the five-step model to contracts when it is probable that the Company will
collect the consideration it is entitled to in exchange for the services it transfers to its clients (see Note 2).
Cash
and cash equivalents
Cash
consists of funds on hand and held in bank accounts. Cash equivalents include time deposits placed with banks or other financial institutions
and all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less, including money market funds.
On
September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, cash included funds held by employees of $ 41,076 and $ 0 , respectively, was to facilitate payment
of expenses in local currencies or to facilitate third-party online payment platforms for which the Company had not set up a corporate
account, such as WeChat Pay or Alipay.
SCHEDULE OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
As of
September 30, 2025
As of
December 31, 2024
(Unaudited)
(Audited)
Cash and cash equivalents
Denominated in United States Dollar
$ 228,844
$ 184,156
Denominated in Hong Kong Dollar
249,087
338,772
Denominated in Chinese Renminbi
261,067
521,168
Denominated in Malaysian Ringgit
35,946
80,294
Denominated in Singapore Dollar
444
428
Cash and cash equivalents
$ 775,388
$ 1,124,818
8
Digital
assets
In
recent years, the SEC and U.S. state securities regulators have stated that certain digital assets or digital asset products may be
classified as securities under U.S. federal and state securities laws, and in the case of the SEC, it has made public statements on
this topic; however, these statements are not binding or definitive guidance. Several enforcement actions and regulatory proceedings
have since been initiated against digital assets and digital asset products, as well as against trading platforms that support
digital assets. The SEC has characterized several crypto assets, products, and services as securities in these regulatory
proceedings and enforcement actions. The SEC has stated more recently that a crypto asset itself is not a security, but there is
uncertainty and inconsistency in the courts that have grappled with the issue of whether or how certain crypto asset transactions
could be deemed securities. Several foreign governments have also issued similar warnings, cautioning that digital assets may be
deemed to be securities or other similarly regulated financial instruments under the laws of their jurisdictions.
Crypto
assets held for operations
We
primarily receive crypto assets held for operations as payments for transaction revenue, blockchain rewards, custodial fee revenue, and
other subscriptions and services revenue. Our intent is to convert crypto assets received as a form of payment to cash or to use them
to fulfill expenses, primarily blockchain rewards, nearly immediately.
We
have established policies and practices to evaluate each crypto asset we consider for listing, delisting, or for custody. We also evaluate
all other products and services prior to launch under U.S. federal and applicable international securities laws.
During
times of instability in the crypto assets market, we may not be able to sell our crypto assets at reasonable prices or at all. As a result,
our crypto assets held for operations are considered as current assets but less liquid than our cash and cash equivalents and may not
be able to serve as a source of liquidity for us to the same extent as cash and cash equivalents (see Note 3).
For
the year ended December 31, 2024, t he Company
follow ed ASC 350-30, Intangibles—Goodwill
and Other—General Intangibles Other Than Goodwill , which requires crypto assets that meet the definition of an
indefinite-lived intangible asset to be recognized at cost and subsequently measured using the impairment model. That model only
reflects decreases, but not increases, in the fair value of crypto asset holdings until sold. T he Company considered the lowest price
of the subject crypto asset quoted on the active exchange at any time since acquiring the specific crypto held by the Company in determining
if an impairment has occurred.
Effective
January 1, 2025, the Company adopts Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2023-08, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other—Crypto
Assets (Subtopic 350-60): Accounting for and Disclosure of Crypto Assets. This update requires the Company to subsequently remeasure
its crypto assets at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets and record gains and losses from remeasurement in net income (loss)
in the consolidated statements of operations.
The
Company determines the fair value of its crypto assets on a recurring basis in accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value
Measurements , based on quoted (unadjusted) prices on the exchange market. The Company performs an analysis each quarter to
identify whether events or changes in circumstances, principally a decrease in the quoted (unadjusted) prices on the active
exchange, indicate that it is more likely than not that any of the assets are impaired.
As
of September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, the crypto assets held for operation under digital assets were $ 236,165 and $ 192,398 , respectively
(see Note 3).
Since
the first quarter of 2025, the Company has adopted ASU 2023-08 (ASC 350-60) and recognized a fair value gain on digital assets of $ 1,426
and a fair value loss on digital assets of $ 3,444 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, respectively (see Note 3).
Other than these fair value changes, the adoption had no effect on our condensed consolidated financial statements based upon the nature
of the Company’s current operations.
As
of December 31, 2024, the Company determined there was no indicator of impairment of its digital assets.
9
Investments
Investments
in equity securities
The
Company accounts for its investments that represent less than 20% ownership, and for which the Company does not have the ability to exercise
significant influence, using ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments – Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities . The Company measures investments in equity securities without a readily determinable fair value using an alternative
measurement that measures these securities at the cost method minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable
price changes on a non-recurring basis. Gains and losses on these securities are recognized in other income and expenses.
On
September 30, 2025, the Company had a total of twenty (20) investments in equity securities without readily determinable fair values,
all of which were related party investments with an aggregate value of $ 12,073 , in which, eighteen (18) investments in equity securities
without readily determinable fair values were fully impaired and with $ nil value (see Note 4).
On
December 31, 2024, the Company had a total of twenty-one (21) investments in equity securities without readily determinable fair values,
all of which were related party investments with an aggregate value of $ 12,073 , in which, nineteen (19) investments in equity securities
without readily determinable fair values were fully impaired and with $ nil value (see Note 4).
Leases
The
Company determines if a contract is or contains a lease at the inception of the contract or modification of the contract. A contract
is or contains a lease if the contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period in exchange for consideration.
Control over the use of the identified asset means the lessee has both (a) the right to obtain substantially all the economic benefits
from the use of the asset and (b) the right to direct the use of the asset.
Finance
and operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and liabilities are recognized based on the present value of future minimum
lease payments over the expected lease term at the commencement date. As the implicit rate is not determinable in most of the Company’s
leases, management uses the Company’s incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the commencement date in
determining the present value of future payments. The expected lease term includes options to extend or terminate the lease when it is
reasonably certain the Company will exercise the option. Lease expense for minimum lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis
over the expected lease term.
The
Company’s lease arrangements have lease and non-lease components. Leases with an expected term of 12 months or less are not accounted
for on the balance sheet, and the related lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term.
The
Company’s lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.
See
Note 5 for more information regarding leases.
Net
income (loss) per share
Basic
net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share is calculated by dividing the net income (loss) by
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, adjusted for the dilutive effect of outstanding Common Stock equivalents.
10
Foreign
currency translation
The
reporting currency of the Company is United States Dollars (“US$”), and the accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements have been expressed in US$. In addition, the Company’s operating subsidiaries maintain their books and records in their
respective local currency, which consists of Malaysian Ringgit (“MYR”), Renminbi (“RMB”) and Hong Kong Dollars
(“HK$”), which is also the respective functional currency of subsidiaries.
In
general, for consolidation purposes, if a subsidiary’s functional currency is other than US$, its assets and liabilities are translated
into US$ using the exchange rate on the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated at the average rates prevailing during
the period. Any gains or losses resulting from the translation of financial statements of a foreign subsidiary are recorded as a separate
component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss within equity.
Translation
of amounts from the local currencies of the Company into US$ has been made at the following exchange rates for the respective periods:
SCHEDULE OF FOREIGN CURRENCIES TRANSLATION
2025
2024
As of and for the nine months ended
September 30,
2025
2024
Period-end MYR : US$1 exchange rate
4.21
4.13
Period-average MYR : US$1 exchange rate
4.32
4.60
Period-end RMB : US$1 exchange rate
7.12
7.02
Period-average RMB : US$1 exchange rate
7.21
7.18
Period-end HK$ : US$1 exchange rate
7.78
7.77
Period-average HK$ : US$1 exchange rate
7.80
7.81
Fair
value of financial instruments
The
Company follows the guidance of ASC 820-10, “ Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures ” (“ASC 820-10”),
with respect to financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value. ASC 820-10 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy
that prioritizes the input used in measuring fair value as follows:
●
Level
1 : Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;
●
Level
2 : Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and
●
Level
3 : Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.
The
Company believes the carrying amount reported in the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, prepaids and other
current assets, digital assets, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, income tax payable, deferred costs of revenue, deferred revenue,
and due from or due to related parties, approximate their fair values because of the short-term nature of these financial instruments.
11
Concentrations
of risks
For
the three months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, two customers accounted for 28 % ( 15 % and 13 %, respectively) and one customer accounted
for 11 % of revenues, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2025, no customer accounted for 10 % or more of revenues, while
for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, one customer accounted for 10 % of revenues.
Two
customers accounted for 36 % ( 25 % and 11 %, respectively), and one customer accounted for 85 % of net accounts receivable as of September
30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, respectively.
For
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, no vendor accounted for 10 % or more of the Company’s cost of revenues.
Two
vendors accounted for 51 % ( 40 % and 11 %, respectively), and two vendors accounted for 74 % ( 53 % and 21 %, respectively) of accounts payable
as of September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, respectively.
Exchange
rate risk
The
Company’s reporting currency is US$, but its major revenues and costs, and a significant portion of its assets and liabilities
are also denominated in MYR, RMB or HK$. As a result, the Company is exposed to a foreign exchange risk as its revenues and the results
of operations may be affected by fluctuations in the exchange rate between US$ and MYR, US$ and RMB or US$ and HK$. If MYR, RMB or HK$
depreciates against US$, the values of its revenues and assets in MYR, RMB or HK$ may decline accordingly when translated to the Company’s
reporting currency, as its financial statements are presented in US$. The Company does not hold any derivative or other financial instruments
that may expose it to substantial market risk.
Risks
and uncertainties
Substantially
all the Company’s services are conducted in Hong Kong, China, Malaysia, Thailand, Taiwan, and the Southeast Asia region. The Company’s
operations are subject to various political and economic risks, including the risks of restrictions on the transfer of funds, export
duties, quotas and embargoes, changing taxation policies, and political conditions and governmental regulations, and the adverse impact
of the coronavirus outbreak.
Recent
accounting pronouncements
The
Company has reviewed all recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting pronouncements and considers the applicability and impact
of all accounting standards updates (“ASUs”). Management periodically reviews new accounting standards that are issued.
12
Accounting
Standards Adopted during the Period
Accounting
Standards Update 2023-08, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Crypto Assets (Subtopic 350-60): Accounting for and Disclosure of
Crypto Assets Disclosures:
On
December 13, 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-08. ASU 2023-08 amends ASC 350-60, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other, to
provide guidance on the accounting for and disclosure of crypto assets and requires that the Company (i) subsequently remeasure crypto
assets at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets and record gains and losses from remeasurement in net income (loss) in the consolidated
statements of operations; (ii) present crypto assets separate from other intangible assets in the consolidated balance sheets; (iii)
present the gains and losses from remeasurement of crypto assets separately in the consolidated statements of operations; and (iv) provide
specific disclosures for crypto assets. For all entities, the ASU’s amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December
15, 2024, including interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted. If an entity adopts the amendments in an interim
period, it must adopt them as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period.
Since
the first quarter of 2025, we have adopted ASU 2023-08 (ASC 350-60), and the adoption had no effect on our condensed consolidated financial
statements based upon the nature of the Company’s current operations.
On
March 18, 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-02, which provided amendments to SEC paragraphs pursuant to Staff Accounting Bulletin 122. This
amendment removed text related to “Accounting for Obligations to Safeguard Crypto-Assets an Entity Holds for Its Platform Users,”
from ASU 405-10-S99-1, because Staff Accounting Bulletin 122 rescinded the topic.
Accounting
Standards Not Yet Adopted
Accounting
Standards Update 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures:
In
December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures. The new standard was issued
to improve transparency and decision usefulness of income tax disclosures by providing information that helps investors better understand
how an entity’s operations, tax risks, tax planning and operational opportunities affect its tax rate and prospects for future
cash flows. The amendments in this update primarily relate to requiring greater disaggregated disclosure of information in the rate reconciliation,
income taxes paid, income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax expense (benefit), and income tax expense (benefit) from
continuing operations. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024, and early adoption is permitted. The
standard can be applied prospectively or retrospectively.
The
Company is currently evaluating this guidance to determine the impact it may have on its condensed consolidated financial statements.
Accounting
Standards Update 2024-03, Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income – Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic
220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses:
In
November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses. The new standard requires entities to disclose
additional information about certain expenses, such as purchases of inventory, employee compensation, depreciation, intangible asset
amortization, as well as selling expenses included in commonly presented expense captions on the income statement. The FASB further clarified
the effective date in January 2025 with the issuance of ASU 2025-01, Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income –
Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Clarifying the Effective Date. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2026, and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027. Companies have the option to apply this guidance either
on a retrospective or prospective basis, and early adoption is permitted.
The
Company is currently evaluating this guidance to determine the impact it may have on its condensed consolidated financial statements
and related disclosures.
The
Company does not expect that any other recently issued accounting pronouncements will have a significant effect on its condensed consolidated
financial statements.
13
NOTE
2 - REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS
The
Company’s revenues consist of revenue from the provision of business consulting and corporate advisory services (“service
revenue”), revenue from the provision of digital platforms and trading of digital assets (“digital revenue”) and revenue
from leasing or trading of real estate properties (“real estate revenue”).
Revenue
from provision of business services
For
certain service contracts, we assist or provide advisory services to clients in capital market listings (“listing services”).
Our services provided to clients are considered as our performance obligations. Revenue and expenses are deferred until the performance
obligation is complete and collectability of the consideration is probable. For service contracts where the performance obligation has
not been completed, deferred cost of revenue is recorded as incurred and the deferred revenue is recorded for any payments received on
such yet to be completed performance obligations. On an ongoing basis, management monitors these contracts for profitability and, when
needed, may record a liability if a determination is made that costs will exceed revenue.
For
other services such as company secretarial, accounting, financial analysis, insurance brokerage services, and other related services
(“non-listing services”), upon our completion of such services, our performance obligations are satisfied, and hence, the
relevant revenue is recognized. For contracts in which we act as an agent, the Company reports revenue net of expenses paid.
The
Company offers no discounts, rebates, rights of return, or other allowances to clients which would result in the establishment of reserves
against service revenue. Additionally, to date, the Company has not incurred incremental costs in obtaining a client contract.
Revenue
from provision of digital platforms and trading of digital assets
Through
our subsidiary, Green-X Corp. in Labuan (“Green-X”), we operate a platform under the Labuan Financial Services and Securities
Act 2010 (LFSSA) whereby security token issuers (“Issuers”) offer their security tokens for subscription and trading by investors
(“Investors”) through the Green-X digital asset exchange (“Green-X DAX”) platform.
Revenue
from the provision of the digital platform represents the fees associated with the services for account opening, transactions and listing
at the Green-X DAX platform, respectively. We recognize revenues when services have been rendered to clients, that is, performance obligations
have been fulfilled.
Revenue
from the trading of digital assets represents the sales income of digital assets. We recognize revenues when risks and rewards of ownership
of the digital assets have been transferred to the buyers; that is, we lose control over the assets sold and the amount of sales revenue
can be reliably measured.
Since
December 2024, we have started to issue and sell our digital assets, GX Token, to other investors.
Revenue
from leasing real estate properties
Rental
revenue represents rental income from the Company’s tenants. The tenants pay in accordance with the terms in the lease agreements,
and the Company recognizes the income ratably over the lease term, as this is the most representative of the pattern in which the benefit
is expected to be derived from the underlying assets.
Revenue
from trading of real estate properties
The
Company follows the guidance of ASC 610-20, Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (“ASC
610-20”), which applies to sales or transfers to noncustomers of nonfinancial assets. Generally, the Company’s sales of real
estate properties are considered as a sale of a non-financial asset. Under ASC 610-20, the Company de-recognizes its assets and recognizes
a gain or loss on the sale of real estate when control of the underlying asset transfers to the buyer.
During
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, no real estate property was sold.
Cost
of revenues
Cost
of service revenue primarily consists of employee compensation and related payroll benefits, company formation costs, and other professional
fees directly attributable to the services rendered.
Cost
of digital revenue primarily consists of the cost of technical advisory and IT support to blockchain-based services, directly attributable
to the cost of digital platforms and digital assets.
Cost
of rental revenue primarily includes costs associated with repairs and maintenance, property management fees, insurance, depreciation,
and other related administrative costs. Utility expenses are paid directly by tenants.
Cost
of real estate property sold primarily consists of the purchase price of the property, legal fees, improvement costs to the building
structure, and other acquisition costs. Selling and advertising costs are expensed as incurred.
14
The
following table provides information about disaggregated revenue based on revenue by service lines and revenue by geographic area:
SCHEDULE OF DISAGGREGATED REVENUE
2025
2024
Three Months Ended September 30,
2025
2024
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
Revenue by service lines:
Corporate advisory - non-listing services
$ 272,401
$ 445,965
Corporate advisory - listing services
105,022
75,800
Provision of a digital platform and trading of digital assets
-
-
Rental of real estate properties
15,805
17,934
Total revenue
$ 393,228
$ 539,699
2025
2024
Three Months Ended September 30,
2025
2024
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
Revenue by geographic area:
Hong Kong
$ 240,136
$ 340,643
Malaysia
48,241
136,721
China
104,851
62,335
Total revenue
$ 393,228
$ 539,699
2025
2024
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2025
2024
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
Revenue by service lines:
Corporate advisory - non-listing services
$ 850,040
$ 1,276,687
Corporate advisory - listing services
233,493
221,500
Provision of a digital platform and trading of digital assets
44,177
-
Rental of real estate properties
45,365
61,085
Total revenue
$ 1,173,075
$ 1,559,272
2025
2024
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2025
2024
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
Revenue by geographic area:
Hong Kong
$ 725,519
$ 984,354
Malaysia
211,597
395,865
China
235,959
179,053
Total revenue
$ 1,173,075
$ 1,559,272
Deferred
cost of revenue
For
a service contract where the performance obligation has not been completed, deferred cost of revenue is recorded for any costs incurred
in advance before completion of the performance obligation.
Deferred
revenue
For
a service contract where the performance obligation has not been completed, the deferred revenue is recorded for any payments received
in advance before completion of the performance obligation.
As
of September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, deferred costs of revenue or deferred revenue are classified as current assets or current
liabilities, respectively:
SCHEDULE OF DEFERRED COST OF REVENUE OR DEFERRED REVENUE
As of
September 30, 2025
As of
December 31, 2024
(Unaudited)
(Audited)
Current assets
Deferred costs of revenue
$ 58,099
$ 38,382
Current liabilities
Deferred revenue
$ 683,873
$ 213,000
Changes
in deferred revenue during the nine months ended September 30, 2025 are as follows:
SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN DEFERRED REVENUE
Nine
Months Ended
September 30, 2025
(Unaudited)
Deferred
revenue, January 1, 2025
$
213,000
New
contract liabilities
704,366
Performance
obligations satisfied
( 233,493
)
Deferred
revenue, September 30, 2025
$
683,873
15
NOTE
3 - DIGITAL ASSETS
We
primarily receive crypto assets held for operations as payments for transaction revenue, blockchain rewards, custodial fee revenue, and
other subscriptions and services revenue. Our intent is to convert crypto assets received as a form of payment to cash or to use them
to fulfill expenses, primarily blockchain rewards, nearly immediately.
During
times of instability in the crypto assets market, we may not be able to sell our crypto assets at reasonable prices or at all. As a result,
our crypto assets held for operations are considered as current assets but less liquid than our cash and cash equivalents and may not
be able to serve as a source of liquidity for us to the same extent as cash and cash equivalents.
As
of September 30, 2025, the details of digital assets we held are as follows:
SCHEDULE OF DIGITAL ASSETS
Ticker Symbol
Digital
Assets
Number of
Tokens (1)
Value per
Token (1)
Total
Value (2)
2UT
Brighsun 2UT
8,451.810
$ 2.336
$ 19,747
BCH
Bitcoin Cash
0.022
559.910
12
BTC
Bitcoin
0.033
114,024.000
3,743
ETH
Ethereum
0.824
4,144.230
3,414
USDT
Tether
208,983.941
1.000
208,984
XRP
Ripple
93.363
2.840
265
$ 236,165
(1)
Number
of tokens and value per token were displayed up to 3 decimal places, respectively.
(2)
Total
value was rounded to the nearest dollar.
As
of December 31, 2024, the details of digital assets we held are as follows:
Ticker Symbol
Digital
Assets
Number of
Tokens (1)
Value per
Token (1)
Total
Value (2)
2UT
Brighsun 2UT
2,127.949
$ 4.451
$ 9,471
BCH
Bitcoin Cash
0.022
234.360
5
BTC
Bitcoin
0.004
85,045.455
318
ETH
Ethereum
0.815
3,285.560
2,677
USDT
Tether
179,933.792
1.000
179,885
XRP
Ripple
82.017
0.513
42
$ 192,398
(1)
Number
of tokens and value per token were displayed up to 3 decimal places, respectively.
(2)
Total
value was rounded to the nearest dollar.
The
following table sets forth a summary of the changes in the estimated fair value of our digital assets during the period ended September
30, 2025 and the year ended December 31, 2024, respectively:
SCHEDULE OF CHANGES IN CRYPTO ASSETS
As of
September 30, 2025
As of
December 31, 2024
(Unaudited)
(Audited)
Fair value at beginning of period / year
$ 192,398
$ -
Additions during the period / year
47,211
192,398
Change in fair value during the period
( 3,444 )
-
Fair value at end of period / year
$ 236,165
$ 192,398
The
estimated fair value of our digital assets was $ 236,165 and $ 192,398 as of September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, respectively.
For
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, we recognized a fair value gain on digital assets of $ 1,426 and a fair value loss
on digital assets of $ 3,444 , respectively.
During
2024, we issued 4,000,000 tokens of our digital assets, GX Token, in exchange for 5,000,000 tokens of Dignity Token, an asset-backed
crypto security token (“DiGau”). As of December 31, 2024, for the token exchange, DiGau was not recognized in our consolidated
balance sheet, as the transaction did not meet the criteria for asset recognition.
As
of the date of this report, we have not yet determined the value of DiGau and are still evaluating the fair value due to a lack of observable
market transactions and price information. As a result, the transaction was not disclosed in our condensed consolidated financial statements
for the period ended September 30, 2025.
16
NOTE
4 - OTHER INVESTMENTS
SCHEDULE OF OTHER INVESTMENTS
As of
September 30, 2025
As of
December 31, 2024
(Unaudited)
(Audited)
Investments in equity securities without readily determinable fair values of affiliates:
(1) Greenpro Trust Limited (a related party)
$ 11,981
$ 11,981
(2) Other related parties
92
92
Total
$ 12,073
$ 12,073
Investments
in equity securities without readily determinable fair values of affiliates (related parties):
Equity
securities without readily determinable fair values are investments in privately held companies without readily determinable market values.
The Company adopted the guidance of ASC 321, Investments - Equity Securities, which allows an entity to measure investments in equity
securities without a readily determinable fair value using a measurement alternative that measures these securities at cost minus impairment,
if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for identical or similar investment of
same issuer (the “Measurement Alternative”). The fair value of equity securities without readily determinable fair values
that have been remeasured due to impairments is classified within Level 3. Management assesses each of these investments on an individual
basis. Additionally, on a quarterly basis, management is required to make a qualitative assessment of whether the investment is impaired.
For
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, the Company recognized a reversal of impairment of investment of $ 0 and $ 150 , respectively.
For
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, the Company did no t recognize any impairment or reversal of impairment of investment.
During
the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company recognized an impairment of $ 87,425 for eight of its total investments in equity securities
without readily determinable fair values.
In
addition, the Company recorded its equity securities without readily determinable fair values at cost. For these cost method investments,
we recorded them as other investments in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. We reviewed all our cost-method investments quarterly
to determine if impairment indicators were present; however, we were not required to determine the fair value of these investments unless
impairment indicators existed. When impairment indicators exist, we generally adopt the valuation methods allowed under ASC 820 (Fair
Value Measurement) to evaluate the fair values of our cost-method investments, which approximated or exceeded their carrying values as
of September 30, 2025. Our cost-method investments had a carrying value of $ 12,073 as of September 30, 2025.
17
(a)
Jocom
Holdings Corp.:
On
June 2, 2021, our wholly owned subsidiary, Greenpro Venture Capital Limited (“GVCL”), entered into a subscription agreement
with Jocom Holdings Corp., a Nevada corporation, which operates a Malaysia-based m-commerce platform specializing in online grocery shopping
via smartphones (“Jocom”). Pursuant to the agreement, GVCL acquired 1,500,000 shares of common stock of Jocom at a price
of $ 150 or $ 0.0001 per share.
Upon
acquisition, the Company recorded the investment in Jocom at a historical cost of $ 150 under other investments.
For
the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company made a full impairment of $ 150 for the investment in Jocom due to its continuous losses
and stockholders’ deficit. As a result, our investment in Jocom was fully impaired with a nil value as of December 31, 2024.
On
January 24, 2025, GVCL sold all 1,500,000 shares of Jocom’s common stock to an unrelated party, Chu, Hon Pong, at a price of $ 39,950 .
As a result, GVCL recognized a gain on disposal of other investment of $ 39,800 and a reversal of impairment of investment of $ 150 for
the nine months ended September 30, 2025.
The
Company had cost-method investments without readily determinable fair values with a carrying value of $ 12,073 as of September 30, 2025,
and December 31, 2024, respectively.
On
September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, the carrying values of equity securities without readily determinable fair values are as follows:
SCHEDULE OF CARRYING VALUES OF EQUITY SECURITIES WITHOUT READILY DETERMINABLE FAIR VALUES
As of
September 30, 2025
As of
December 31, 2024
(Unaudited)
(Audited)
Original cost
Balance, beginning of period / year
$ 8,331,139
$ 8,331,964
Additions during the year
-
92
Disposals during the year
-
( 700 )
Disposal of impaired investment during the period / year
( 150 )
( 217 )
Balance, end of period / year
8,330,989
8,331,139
Accumulated impairment
Balance, beginning of period / year
( 8,319,066 )
( 8,231,858 )
Impairment during the year
-
( 87,425 )
Disposal of impaired investment during the period / year
150
217
Balance, end of period / year
( 8,318,916 )
( 8,319,066 )
Net carrying values of equity securities without readily determinable fair values
$ 12,073
$ 12,073
Accumulated
impairment of other investments
As
of September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, the accumulated impairment loss of other investments was $ 8,318,916 and $ 8,319,066 , respectively.
18
NOTE
5 - LEASES
As
of September 30, 2025, the Company has extended an operating lease agreement for one office space in Hong Kong, with a cancellable term
of one year commencing from March 15, 2025, to March 14, 2026, after a non-cancellable term of two years expired on March 14, 2025, and
has a finance lease for a motor vehicle in Malaysia, with a term of five years , respectively. Other than these leases, the Company does
not have any other leases over the term of one year. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance
sheet. The Company accounts for the lease and non-lease components of its leases as a single lease component. Lease expense is recognized
on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Operating
lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and liabilities are recognized at the commencement date based on the present value of lease
payments over the lease term. ROU assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term, and lease liabilities represent
our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Generally, the implicit rate of interest (“discount rate”)
in arrangements is not readily determinable, and the Company utilizes its incremental borrowing rate in determining the present value
of lease payments. The Company’s incremental borrowing rate is a hypothetical rate based on its understanding of what its credit
rating would be. The operating lease ROU asset includes any lease payments made and excludes lease incentives.
The
components of lease expense and supplemental cash flow information related to operating leases and finance leases for the periods are
as follows:
SCHEDULE OF COMPONENTS OF LEASE AND SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
2025
2024
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2025
2024
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
Lease costs
Operating lease costs:
Rental expenses (1)
$ 73,236
$ 73,165
Other rental expenses (2)
11,632
12,313
Total operating lease costs
84,868
85,478
Finance lease costs:
Interest expenses
$ 680
$ 817
Total finance lease costs
680
817
Total lease costs
$ 85,548
$ 86,295
Other information
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Rental payment - operating leases
$ 73,236
$ 73,165
Interest repayment - finance leases
680
817
Principal repayment - finance leases
2,901
2,539
Total cash paid
$ 76,817
$ 76,521
Non-cash activity:
Balance payment of ROU asset by finance lease liabilities
$ 11,895
$ 16,151
Weighted average remaining lease term (in years):
Operating leases
0.45
0.45
Finance leases
2.67
3.67
Weighted average discount rate:
Operating leases
4.0 %
4.0 %
Finance leases
6.9 %
6.9 %
(1)
Rental
expenses include amortization of $ 71,369 and $ 70,667 and interest expenses of $ 1,867 and $ 2,498 during the nine months ended September
30, 2025, and 2024, respectively.
(2)
Other
rental expenses represent those rental expenses for leases with a lease term within one year, and government rent and rates related
to the leases.
19
The
supplemental balance-sheet information related to leases for the periods is as follows:
SCHEDULE OF SUPPLEMENTAL BALANCE SHEET INFORMATION RELATED TO LEASES
As of
September 30, 2025
As of
December 31, 2024
(Unaudited)
(Audited)
Assets
Long-term operating lease ROU assets, net (1)
$ 44,019
$ 19,929
Long-term finance lease ROU asset, net (2)
16,803
20,272
Total ROU assets
$ 60,822
$ 40,201
Liabilities
Current portion of operating lease liabilities
$ 44,019
$ 19,929
Current portion of finance lease liabilities
4,210
3,766
Total current lease liabilities
48,229
23,695
Long-term finance lease liabilities
7,685
10,235
Total long-term lease liabilities
7,685
10,235
Total lease liabilities
$ 55,914
$ 33,930
(1)
Operating
lease ROU assets are measured at cost of $ 447,527 and $ 351,829 , net of accumulated amortization of $ 403,508 and $ 331,900 as of September
30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, respectively.
(2)
Finance
lease ROU assets are measured at cost of $ 28,898 , net of accumulated amortization of $ 12,095 and $ 8,626 as of September 30, 2025,
and December 31, 2024, respectively.
Maturities
of the Company’s lease liabilities as of September 30, 2025, are as follows:
SCHEDULE OF MATURITIES OF LEASE LIABILITIES
Operating leases
Finance leases
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
Year ending December 31,
2025 (remaining 3 months)
24,483
1,224
2026
20,007
4,895
2027
-
4,895
2028
-
2,035
Total future minimum lease payments
44,490
13,049
Less: Imputed interest/present value discount
( 471 )
( 1,154 )
Present value of lease liabilities
$ 44,019
$ 11,895
Lease obligations
Current lease obligations
$ 44,019
$ 4,210
Long-term lease obligations
-
7,685
Total lease obligations
$ 44,019
$ 11,895
For
the three months ended September 30, 2025, total lease costs were $ 28,562 , including operating lease costs of $ 28,348 and finance lease
costs of $ 214 . For the three months ended September 30, 2024, total lease costs were $ 28,871 , including operating lease costs of $ 28,598
and finance lease costs of $ 273 .
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2025, total lease costs were $ 85,548 , including operating lease costs of $ 84,868 and finance lease
costs of $ 680 . For the nine months ended September 30, 2024, total lease costs were $ 86,295 , including operating lease costs of $ 85,478
and finance lease costs of $ 817 .
20
NOTE
6 - STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
On
June 10, 2025, the Company entered into subscription agreements with five individual investors, providing for the private placement of
an aggregate of 500,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, par value $ 0.0001 , at a per share purchase price of $ 1.00 .
On
June 23, 2025, the Company entered into another subscription agreement with an individual investor, providing for the private placement
of 200,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, par value $ 0.0001 , at a per share purchase price of $ 1.30 .
For
the period ended September 30, 2025, the Company in the aggregate issued 700,000 shares of its Common Stock, for total proceeds of $ 760,000 .
The proceeds aim to fund the expansion of the Company’s operations.
Set
forth below is a listing of the June 2025 sale of shares of Common Stock:
SCHEDULE OF SALE OF SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
Name
Number of Shares
Poon Tsz Yu
50,000
Tan Lee Sha
125,000
Chui Sang Derek
50,000
Ho Tak Leung
20,000
Good Girl Environmental Plant Research Center Limited (1)
455,000
Total
700,000
Number of shares issued
700,000
(1)
The
Company issued 255,000 shares of its Common Stock at $ 1 per share and 200,000 shares of its Common Stock at $ 1.3 per share to Good
Girl Environmental Plant Research Center Limited on June 10 and June 23, 2025, respectively.
NOTE
7 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
SCHEDULE OF DUE FROM RELATED PARTIES
Accounts receivable from related parties:
September 30, 2025
December 31, 2024
(Unaudited)
(Audited)
Accounts receivable, net - related parties
- Related party A (net of allowance of $ 7 as of September 30, 2025)
$ 142
$ -
- Related party B (net of allowance of $ 4 as of September 30, 2025)
77
-
- Related party K (net of allowance of $ 2 as of December 31, 2024)
-
41
Total
$ 219
$ 41
Accounts receivable, net - related parties
$ 219
$ 41
Due from related parties:
September 30, 2025
December 31, 2024
(Unaudited)
(Audited)
Due from related parties
- Related party B
$ 178,117
$ 180,207
- Related party D
816,974
772,620
- Related party G
1,377
1,357
Total
$ 996,468
$ 954,184
Due from related parties
$ 996,468
$ 954,184
The
amounts due from related parties are interest-free, unsecured, and have no fixed terms of repayment.
SCHEDULE OF DUE TO RELATED PARTIES
Due to related parties:
September 30, 2025
December 31, 2024
(Unaudited)
(Audited)
Due to related parties
- Related party A
$ 107,140
$ 23,218
- Related party B
7,615
11,944
- Related party G
498
-
- Related party K
3,207
22,335
Total
$ 118,460
$ 57,497
Due to related parties
$ 118,460
$ 57,497
The
amounts due to related parties are interest-free, unsecured, and repayable on demand.
SCHEDULE OF INCOME FROM OR EXPENSES TO RELATED PARTIES
Deferred costs of revenue to related parties:
September 30, 2025
December 31, 2024
(Unaudited)
(Audited)
Deferred costs of revenue to related parties
- Related party A
$ 2,500
$ 7,500
- Related party F
3,750
11,250
Total
$ 6,250
$ 18,750
Deferred costs of revenue to related parties
$ 6,250
$ 18,750
Investments in a related party:
September 30, 2025
December 31, 2024
(Unaudited)
(Audited)
Investments in related party
- Related party B
$ 12,073
$ 12,073
Investments in related party
$ 12,073
$ 12,073
21
Income from or expenses to related parties:
2025
2024
For the nine months ended September 30,
Income from or expenses to related parties:
2025
2024
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
Service revenue from related parties
- Related party A
$ 3,027
$ 5,748
- Related party B
42,325
291,679
- Related party D
-
26,150
- Related party E
-
1,356
- Related party G
640
22,629
- Related party K
-
8
Total
$ 45,992
$ 347,570
Service revenue from related parties
$ 45,992
$ 347,570
Cost of revenues to related parties
- Related party A
$ 7,140
$ 4,586
- Related party F
7,500
-
Total
$ 14,640
$ 4,586
Cost of revenues to related parties
$ 14,640
$ 4,586
General and administrative expenses to related parties
- Related party A
$ 13,455
$ 40,293
- Related party D
63,947
59,886
- Related party I
10,428
10,426
- Related party K
10,380
11,522
Total
$ 98,210
$ 122,127
General and administrative expenses to related parties
$ 98,210
$ 122,127
Other income from related parties
- Related party B
$ 23,624
$ 26,578
- Related party D
8,073
8,987
Total
$ 31,697
$ 35,565
Other income from related parties
$ 31,697
$ 35,565
Interest income from a related party
- Related party B
$ 4,212
$ 3,707
Interest income from a related party
$ 4,212
$ 3,707
Gain on disposal of related party investments
- Related party B
$ 39,800
324,917
Gain on disposal of related party investments
$ 39,800
324,917
Reversal of impairment of a related party investment:
- Related party B
$ 150
$ -
Reversal of impairment of a related party investment
$ 150
$ -
Related
party A is under the common control of Mr. Loke, Che Chan Gilbert, the Company’s CFO, and a major shareholder.
Related
party B represents companies where the Company owns a respective percentage ranging from 1% to 18% interest in those companies.
Related
party C is controlled by a director of some wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company.
Related
party D represents companies that we have determined we can significantly influence based on our common business relationships.
Related
party E represents companies whose CEO is a consultant to the Company, and who is also a director of Aquarius Protection Fund and a shareholder
of the Company. Related party E is no longer our consultant and shareholder, and hence, our related party relationship came to an end
on August 29, 2024.
Related
party F represents a family member or members of Mr. Loke.
Related
party G is under the common control of Mr. Lee Chong Kuang, the Company’s CEO and a major shareholder.
Related
party H represents a company in which we currently have an approximate 48 % equity-method investment. On December 31, 2023, the Company
determined the amount due from related party H of $ 60,000 was impaired and recorded an impairment of other receivables of $ 60,000 for
the year ended December 31, 2023. During 2018, the Company acquired approximately 49 % of related party H for total consideration of $ 368,265 .
On December 31, 2018, the Company determined that its investments in related party H were impaired and recorded an impairment of other
investments of $ 368,265 .
Related
party I is controlled by a family member of Mr. Lee.
Related
party J represents a non-controlling interest in the Company’s subsidiary that owns its real estate held for sale. The amount due
to related party J is unsecured, bears no interest, is payable on demand, and is related to the initial acquisition of the real estate
held for sale. Related party J became no longer our related party since our acquisition of all its 40 % shareholdings in our subsidiary
on April 15, 2024.
Related
party K represents shareholders and directors of the Company. Due from related party K represents the amounts paid by the Company to
third parties on behalf of our shareholders or directors. On the other hand, due to related party K represents the amounts paid by the
shareholders or directors to third parties on behalf of the Company. The amounts due from or due to related party K are interest-free
and are due on demand.
22
NOTE
8 - SEGMENT INFORMATION
ASC
280, “Segment Reporting”, requires disclosure of significant segment expenses and other segment items on an interim and annual
basis and requires all annual disclosures about a reportable segment’s profit or loss and assets to be made on an interim basis.
The
Company’s reportable segments are consistent with its internal organization structure and are regularly reviewed by the Company’s
President and Chief Executive Officer (chief operating decision-maker or “CODM”) to allocate resources and assess performance
for the entire Company. The CODM does not evaluate performance or allocate resources based on other income or expenses, and, therefore,
such information is not allocated across its reportable segments. Other income or expenses which are not allocated to reportable segments
are presented in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income or loss.
Existing
guidance, which is based on a management approach to segment reporting, establishes requirements to report selected segment information
quarterly and to report annually entity-wide disclosures about products and services, major customers, and the countries in which the
entity holds material assets and reports revenue. All material operating units qualify for aggregation under “Segment Reporting”
due to their similar customer base and similarities in economic characteristics; nature of products and services; and procurement, manufacturing,
and distribution processes.
The
Company operates three reportable business segments:
●
Service
business – provision of corporate advisory and business solution services
●
Digital
business – provision of digital platform and trading of digital assets
●
Real
estate business – trading or leasing of commercial real estate properties in Hong Kong and Malaysia
The
Company had no inter-segment sales for the years presented. Pursuant to ASU 2023-07, “Segment Reporting (Topic 280) - Improvements
to Reportable Segment Disclosures”, the summarized financial information concerning the Company’s reportable segments is
shown as below:
(a)
By Categories
Currently,
the Company has three reportable segments that are based on the following business units: service business, digital business and real
estate business, respectively.
Service
business
The
changes in the performance results for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024 by reportable segment / business unit are as
follows:
SCHEDULE OF SUMMARIZED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
2025
2024
$
%
For the nine months ended
September 30,
Change
2025
2024
$
%
Revenues from external customers
$ 1,037,541
$ 1,150,617
( 113,076 )
( 10 )%
Revenues from related parties
45,992
347,570
( 301,578 )
( 87 )%
Cost of revenues
( 295,411 )
( 249,112 )
( 46,299 )
19 %
General and administrative expenses
( 2,387,420 )
( 2,804,343 )
416,923
( 15 )%
Loss from operations
$ ( 1,599,298 )
$ ( 1,555,268 )
( 44,030 )
3 %
The
changes in equity-method investments, total assets, and capital expenditures for long-lives assets for the period ended September 30,
2025, and 2024 by reportable segment / business unit are as follows:
2025
2024
$
%
As of and for the nine months ended
September 30,
Change
2025
2024
$
%
Investments in equity-method investees
$ 12,073
$ 99,598
( 87,525 )
(88 )%
Total assets
$ 4,392,248
$ 5,739,419
( 1,347,171 )
(23 )%
Expenditures for additions to long-lived assets
$ 1,299
$ 5,095
( 3,796 )
(75 )%
23
Digital
business
The
changes in the performance results for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024 by reportable segment / business unit are as
follows:
2025
2024
$
%
For the nine months ended
September 30,
Change
2025
2024
$
%
Revenues from external customers
$ 44,177
$ -
44,177
- %
Revenues from related parties
-
-
-
- %
Cost of revenues
( 1 )
-
( 1 )
- %
General and administrative expenses
( 281,408 )
-
( 281,408 )
- %
Loss from operations
$ ( 237,232 )
$ -
( 237,232 )
- %
The
changes in equity-method investments, total assets, and capital expenditures for long-lives assets for the period ended September 30,
2025, and 2024 by reportable segment / business unit are as follows:
2025
2024
$
%
As of and for the nine months ended
September 30,
Change
2025
2024
$
%
Investments in equity-method investees
$ -
$ -
-
- %
Total assets
$ 735,431
$ -
735,431
- %
Expenditures for additions to long-lived assets
$ -
$ -
-
- %
Real
estate business
The
changes in the performance results for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024 by reportable segment / business unit are as
follows:
2025
2024
$
%
For the nine months ended
September 30,
Change
2025
2024
$
%
Revenues from external customers
$ 45,365
$ 61,085
( 15,720 )
( 26 )%
Revenues from related parties
-
-
-
- %
Cost of revenues
( 11,201 )
( 19,125 )
7,924
( 41 )%
General and administrative expenses
( 8,777 )
( 35,298 )
26,521
( 75 )%
Income from operations
$ 25,387
$ 6,662
18,725
281 %
The
changes in equity-method investments, total assets, and capital expenditures for long-lives assets for the period ended September 30,
2025, and 2024 by reportable segment / business unit are as follows:
2025
2024
$
%
As of and for the nine months ended
September 30,
Change
2025
2024
$
%
Investments in equity-method investees
$ -
$ -
-
- %
Total assets
$ 996,480
$ 996,671
( 191 )
- %
Expenditures for additions to long-lived assets
$ -
$ -
-
- %
24
(b)
By Geography
The
Company principally operates in three regions, including Hong Kong, Malaysia and China.
The
distribution of revenues and significant expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 by region is as follows:
Hong Kong
Malaysia
China
Total
For the nine months ended September 30, 2025
Hong Kong
Malaysia
China
Total
Revenues from external customers
$ 704,843
$ 186,281
$ 235,959
$ 1,127,083
Revenues from related parties
20,676
25,316
-
45,992
Cost of revenues
( 148,459 )
( 93,111 )
( 65,043 )
( 306,613 )
Advertising and marketing expenses
( 77,162 )
-
( 19,752 )
( 96,914 )
Audit, legal and other professional fees
( 218,598 )
( 14,709 )
( 17,504 )
( 250,811 )
Consulting fees
( 51,455 )
( 92,932 )
-
( 144,387 )
Depreciation and amortization
( 76,528 )
( 26,020 )
( 76,801 )
( 179,349 )
Directors’ salaries and compensation
( 500,465 )
-
-
( 500,465 )
Staff costs including salaries and allowances, pensions, and other benefits
( 641,772 )
( 188,482 )
( 284,873 )
( 1,115,127 )
IT and computer expenses
( 7,404 )
( 103,095 )
( 2,023 )
( 112,522 )
Other general and administrative expenses
( 156,037 )
( 96,730 )
( 25,263 )
( 278,030 )
Loss from operations
$ ( 1,152,361 )
$ ( 403,482 )
$ ( 255,300 )
$ ( 1,811,143 )
The
distribution of investments in equity-method investees and total assets as of September 30, 2025, and expenditures for long-lived assets
for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, respectively, by region is as follows:
Hong Kong
Malaysia
China
Total
As of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2025
Hong Kong
Malaysia
China
Total
Investments in equity-method investments
$ 12,073
$ -
$ -
$ 12,073
Total assets
$ 2,563,509
$ 1,327,844
$ 2,232,806
$ 6,124,159
Expenditures for additions to long-lived assets
$ -
$ -
$ 1,299
$ 1,299
The
distribution of revenues and significant expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, by region is as follows:
Hong Kong
Malaysia
China
Total
For the nine months ended September 30, 2024
Hong Kong
Malaysia
China
Total
Revenues from external customers
$ 707,954
$ 324,695
$ 179,053
$ 1,211,702
Revenues from related parties
276,400
71,170
-
347,570
Cost of revenues
( 43,144 )
( 171,734 )
( 53,359 )
( 268,237 )
Advertising and marketing expenses
( 98,749 )
( 76,209 )
( 19,096 )
( 194,054 )
Audit, legal and other professional fees
( 212,979 )
( 10,038 )
-
( 223,017 )
Consulting fees
( 9,390 )
( 109,449 )
-
( 118,839 )
Depreciation and amortization
( 76,133 )
( 30,560 )
( 78,323 )
( 185,016 )
Directors’ salaries and compensation
( 503,611 )
-
-
( 503,611 )
Staff costs including salaries and allowances, pensions, and other benefits
( 635,634 )
( 220,061 )
( 277,589 )
( 1,133,284 )
IT and computer expenses
( 8,356 )
( 124,666 )
( 3,684 )
( 136,706 )
Other general and administrative expenses
( 222,993 )
( 94,026 )
( 28,095 )
( 345,114 )
Loss from operations
$ ( 826,635 )
$ ( 440,878 )
$ ( 281,093 )
$ ( 1,548,606 )
The
distribution of investments in equity-method investees and total assets as of September 30, 2024, and expenditures for long-lived assets
for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, respectively, by region is as follows:
Hong Kong
Malaysia
China
Total
As of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2024
Hong Kong
Malaysia
China
Total
Investments in equity-method investments
$ 99,598
$ -
$ -
$ 99,598
Total assets
$ 2,811,542
$ 1,458,644
$ 2,465,904
$ 6,736,090
Expenditures for additions to long-lived assets
$ -
$ 4,400
$ 695
$ 5,095
25
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The
information contained in this Form 10-Q is intended to update the information contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2024 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 9, 2025 (the “Form 10-K”) and presumes
that readers have access to, and will have read, the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations” and other information contained in such Form 10-K. The following discussion and analysis should also be read together
with our financial statements and the notes to the financial statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.
The
following discussion contains certain statements that may be deemed “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements appear in several places in this report, including, without limitation,
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” These statements are not guaranteed
of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and requirements that are difficult to predict or are beyond our control. Forward-looking
statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report. You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. We
strongly encourage investors to carefully read the factors described in our Form 10-K in the section entitled “Risk Factors”
for a description of certain risks that could, among other things, cause actual results to differ from these forward-looking statements.
We assume no responsibility to update the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The following should
also be read in conjunction with the unaudited Financial Statements and notes thereto that appear elsewhere in this report.
Company
Overview
Greenpro
Capital Corp. (the “Company” or “Greenpro”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on July 19, 2013. We provide
cross-border business solutions and accounting outsourcing services to small and medium-sized businesses located in Asia, with an initial
focus on Hong Kong, China and Malaysia. Greenpro provides a range of services as a package solution (the “Package Solution”)
to our clients, and we believe that our clients can reduce their business costs and improve their revenues.
In
addition to our business solution services, we also operate a venture capital business through Greenpro Venture Capital Limited, an Anguilla
corporation. One of our venture capital business segments focuses on (1) establishing a business incubator for start-up and high-growth
companies to support such companies during critical growth periods, which will include education and support services, and (2) searching
for investment opportunities in selected start-up and high-growth companies, which may generate significant returns to the Company. Our
venture capital business focuses on companies located in Southeast Asia and East Asia, including Hong Kong, China, Malaysia, Thailand,
and Singapore. Another venture capital business segment focuses on rental activities of commercial properties and the sale of investment
properties.
One
of our Labuan subsidiaries, Green-X Corp. (“Green-X”), was approved and compliant with all the requirements by Labuan Financial
Services Authority (Lembaga Perkhidmatan Kewangan Labuan) in 2022 to establish a platform under Part IX of the Labuan Financial Services
and Securities Act 2010 (LFSSA), pursuant to Section 134 of the LFSSA.
Green-X
is a platform operator licensed under the LFSSA whereby security token issuers (“Issuers”) offer their security tokens for
subscription and trading by investors (“Investors”) through the Green-X digital asset exchange (“Green-X DAX”)
platform. ISRA International Consulting Sdn. Bhd. (“ISRA Consulting” or “Shariah Adviser of the platform”) is
responsible for advising on and ensuring end-to-end Shariah compliance for the Green-X DAX platform’s operations.
ISRA
Consulting issued a Shariah pronouncement for the Green-X DAX platform (the “Pronouncement”) on June 22, 2023. The Pronouncement
was valid for one (1) renewable year from the signing date. Following the expiration of the Pronouncement, ISRA Consulting conducted
a Shariah review exercise in preparation for its renewal. The Shariah review followed a specific methodology and serves as the basis
for the renewal decision. Pursuant to the Shariah review, the Green-X DAX platform’s operations and related documents complied
with the principles of Shariah. The Pronouncement was renewed on September 20, 2024.
26
Results
of Operations
During
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, we operated in three regions: Hong Kong, China and Malaysia. We derived
revenues from the provision of business services, digital platform services and trading of digital assets, and leasing or trading of
our commercial properties, respectively.
Comparison
of the three months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024
Total
revenue
Total
revenue was $393,228 and $539,699 for the three months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, respectively. The decreased amount of $146,471
was primarily due to a decrease in service business revenue. We expect revenue from our service business to steadily improve in the following
months.
Service
business revenue
Revenue
from the provision of business services was $377,423 and $521,765 for the three months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, respectively.
It was derived principally from the provision of business consulting and advisory services, as well as company secretarial, accounting,
and financial analysis services. We experienced a decrease in service business revenue as fewer non-listing advisory services were rendered
during the three months ended September 30, 2025, as compared to the same period in 2024.
Digital
revenue
There
was no revenue generated from the digital platform and trading for the three months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, respectively.
Real
estate business
Rental
revenue
Revenue
from rentals was $15,805 and $17,934 for the three months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, respectively. It was derived from the leasing
properties in Malaysia and Hong Kong. We expect our rental income to be stable.
Sale
of properties
There
was no revenue generated from the sale of real estate properties for the three months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, respectively.
27
Total
operating costs and expenses
Total
operating costs and expenses were $913,777 and $1,012,972 for the three months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, respectively. They
consist of cost-of-service revenue, cost of digital revenue, cost of rental revenue and general and administrative (“G&A”)
expenses. The Company incurred G&A expenses of $784,610 and $868,333 for the three months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, respectively.
Loss
from operations for the three months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024 was $520,549 and $473,273, respectively.
Cost
of service business revenue
Cost
of revenue on the provision of services was $125,135 and $138,404 for the three months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, respectively.
It primarily consists of employee compensation and related payroll benefits, company formation costs, and other professional fees directly
attributable to costs related to the services rendered.
The
decrease in cost-of-service business revenue was mainly due to a decrease in other professional fees directly attributable to the provision
of services for the three months ended September 30, 2025.
Cost
of digital revenue
There
was no cost of revenue incurred for the provision of digital platform services and trading of digital assets for the three months ended
September 30, 2025, and 2024, respectively.
Cost
of rental revenue
Cost
of rental revenue was $4,032 and $6,235 for the three months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, respectively. It includes the costs
associated with governmental charges, repairs and maintenance, property management fees and insurance, depreciation, and other related
administrative costs. Utility expenses are borne and paid directly by individual tenants. A decrease in the cost of rental revenue was
mainly due to 40% of our Hong Kong subsidiary’s real estate properties being distributed to its non-controlling interest in April
2024. As a result, fewer property units were available for leasing and lower costs were incurred.
Cost
of real estate properties sold
During
the three months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, no real estate property was sold, and hence no cost was incurred.
General
and administrative expenses
General
and administrative (“G&A”) expenses were $784,610 and $868,333 for the three months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024,
respectively. For the three months ended September 30, 2025, G&A expenses primarily consisted of staff costs of $350,679, directors’
salaries and compensation of $166,650, advertising and marketing expenses of $30,330, consulting fees of $43,322, computer and IT expenses
of $4,495, legal service fees of $19,832, other professional fees of $38,891 and operating lease costs of $28,348. For the three months
ended September 30, 2024, G&A expenses primarily consisted of staff costs of $382,873, directors’ salaries and compensation
of $167,032, advertising and marketing expenses of $75,133, consulting fees of $4,166, computer and IT expenses of $49,949, legal service
fees of $33,760, other professional fees of $59,704 and operating lease costs of $28,598. The decreased G&A expense of $83,723 was
mainly derived from the decrease in staff costs of $32,194, advertising and marketing expenses of $44,803, and computer and IT expenses
of $45,454, offset by the increase in consulting fees of $39,156 during the same period in 2025. We expect our G&A expenses to slightly
increase as we are developing our digital platform business through our Labuan subsidiary, Green-X Corp., and the digital banking businesses
through Global Business Hub Limited, another Labuan subsidiary, which was acquired in 2024.
28
Other
income
Net
other income was $14,149 and $142,953 for the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. For the three months ended
September 30, 2025, net other income mainly consisted of related party other income of $2,674, interest income of $2,408 and fair value
gain on digital assets of $1,426. For the three months ended September 30, 2024, net other income mainly consisted of related party other
income of $9,699, gain on disposal of investment of $127,617 and interest income of $3,979.
Net
loss
Net
loss was $513,226 and $330,320 for the three months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, respectively. The increase in net loss was mainly
due to a decrease in service business revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2025.
Comparison
of the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024
Total
revenue
Total
revenue was $1,173,075 and $1,559,272 for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, respectively. The decrease of $386,197
was primarily due to a decrease in service business revenue. We expect revenue from our service business to recover slightly as we are
exploring new markets.
Service
business revenue
Revenue
from the provision of business services was $1,083,533 and $1,498,187 for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, respectively.
It was derived principally from the provision of business consulting and advisory services, as well as company secretarial, accounting,
and financial analysis services. We experienced a decrease in service business revenue as fewer non-listing advisory services were rendered
during the same period in 2025.
29
Digital
revenue
Revenue
from the digital platform and trading was $44,177 and $0 for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, respectively. It was
derived from the trading of digital assets of $43,425 and the sale of our digital assets, GX Token, of $752 during the nine months ended
September 30, 2025.
Real
estate business
Rental
revenue
Revenue
from rentals was $45,365 and $61,085 for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, respectively. It was derived from the leasing
properties in Malaysia and Hong Kong. We expect our rental income to be stable.
Sale
of properties
There
was no revenue generated from the sale of real estate properties for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, respectively.
Total
operating costs and expenses
Total
operating costs and expenses were $2,984,218 and $3,107,878 for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, respectively. They
consist of cost-of-service revenue, cost of digital revenue, cost of rental revenue and general and administrative (“G&A”)
expenses. The Company incurred $2,677,605 and $2,839,641 of G&A expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024,
respectively.
Loss
from operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024 was $1,811,143 and $1,548,606, respectively. An increase in the
loss from operations was mainly due to a decrease in service business revenue of $414,654, offset by a decrease in G&A of $162,036
for the nine months ended September 30, 2025.
Cost
of service business revenue
Cost
of revenue from the provision of services was $295,411 and $249,112 for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, respectively.
It primarily consists of employee compensation and related payroll benefits, company formation costs, and other professional fees, directly
attributable to costs related to the services rendered.
The
increase in the cost-of-service business revenue was mainly due to an increase in other professional fees directly attributable to the
provision of services for the nine months ended September 30, 2025.
Cost
of digital revenue
Cost
of revenue for the provision of digital platform services and trading of digital assets was $1 and $0 for the nine months ended September
30, 2025, and 2024, respectively. It primarily consists of the cost of technical advisory and IT support to blockchain-based services,
directly attributable to the cost of digital platforms and digital assets.
Cost
of rental revenue
Cost
of rental revenue was $11,201 and $19,125 for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, respectively. It includes the costs
associated with governmental charges, repairs and maintenance, property management fees and insurance, depreciation, and other related
administrative costs. Utility expenses are borne and paid directly by individual tenants. A decrease in the cost of rental revenue was
mainly due to 40% of our Hong Kong subsidiary’s real estate properties being distributed to its non-controlling interest in April
2024. As a result, fewer property units were available for leasing and lower costs were incurred.
Cost
of real estate properties sold
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, no real estate property was sold, and hence no cost was incurred.
General
and administrative expenses
G&A
expenses were $2,677,605 and $2,839,641 for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, respectively. For the nine months
ended September 30, 2025, G&A expenses consisted primarily of staff costs of $1,115,127, directors’ salaries and
compensation of $500,465, advertising and marketing expenses of $96,914, consulting fees of $144,387, computer and IT expenses of
$112,522, legal service fees of $113,350, other professional fees of $137,461, provision for credit losses of $3,594 and operating
lease costs of $84,868. For the nine months ended September 30, 2024, G&A expenses consisted primarily of staff costs of
$1,133,284, directors’ salaries and compensation of $503,611, advertising and marketing expenses of $194,054, consulting fees
of $118,839, computer and IT expenses of $136,706, legal service fees of $119,176, other professional fees of $103,841, provision
for credit losses of $90,243 and operating lease costs of $85,478. The decreased G&A expense of $162,036 was mainly derived from
the decrease in advertising and marketing expenses of $97,140 and provision for credit losses of $86,649, offset by an increase in
other professional fees of $33,620 during the same period in 2025. We expect our G&A expenses to slightly increase as we are
developing our digital platform business through our Labuan subsidiary, Green-X Corp., and the digital banking businesses through
Global Business Hub Limited, another Labuan subsidiary, which was acquired in 2024.
30
Other
income
Net
other income was $95,549 and $381,029 for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, respectively. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2025, net other income mainly consisted of related party other income of $31,697, gain on disposal of investment of $39,800
and interest income of $7,085. For the nine months ended September 30, 2024, net other income mainly consisted of related party other
income of $35,565, gain on disposal of investments of $324,917 and interest income of $16,828.
Net
loss
Net
loss was $1,722,930 and $1,168,983 for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, respectively. The increase in net loss was
mainly due to a decrease in service business revenue and gains on disposal of investments.
Net
loss attributable to non-controlling interest
The
Company recorded net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest in the consolidated statements of operations for a non-controlling
interest (the “NCI”) of a consolidated subsidiary, Forward Win International Limited (“FWIL”), which is principally
engaged in trading and leasing of properties in Hong Kong.
The
Company had been a 60% shareholder of FWIL since its inception.
On
April 15, 2024, the Company acquired the remaining 40% shares of FWIL from the NCI by the distribution of 40% of FWIL’s real
estate properties for consideration of its acquisition and settlement of a loan from the NCI (the
“Acquisition”).
After
the Acquisition, FWIL becomes the wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, and hence no profit or loss was attributable to the NCI thereafter.
The
Company recorded a net loss attributable to the NCI of $10,543 for the nine months ended September 30, 2024.
There
were no seasonal aspects that had a material effect on the financial condition or the results of operations of the Company.
Other
than as disclosed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report, we are not aware of any trends, uncertainties, demands, commitments or events for
the nine months ended September 30, 2025 that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, changes
in our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources, or that
would cause the disclosed financial information to be not necessarily indicative of future operating results or financial conditions.
31
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We
have no significant off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial
condition, changes in our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital
resources that are material to our stockholders as of September 30, 2025.
Contractual
Obligations
As
of September 30, 2025, one of our subsidiaries has an operating lease agreement for one office space in Hong Kong with a non-cancellable
term of two years from March 15, 2023, to March 14, 2025, and a cancellable term of one year from March 15, 2025, to March 14, 2026.
On
September 30, 2025, the future minimum rental payments under this lease in the aggregate are approximately $44,490 and are due as follows:
2025: $24,483 and 2026: $20,007, respectively.
In
June 2023, one of our subsidiaries in Malaysia purchased a motor vehicle, and the majority amount of the purchase, $18,957, was funded
by Maybank Islamic under a finance lease agreement with a term of five years commencing from June 3, 2023, to June 2, 2028. As of September
30, 2025, the future minimum lease payments under this lease in the aggregate are approximately $13,049 and are due as follows: 2025:
$1,224; 2026: $4,895; and 2027 and thereafter: $6,930.
Related
Party Transactions
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, related party service revenue totaled $45,992 and $347,570, respectively.
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2025, related party service revenue principally includes service revenue generated from SEATech Ventures
Corp. (“SEATech”) of $13,123 and Greenpro Trust Limited (“GTL”) of $11,639, representing approximately 54% of
the related party service revenue and 2% of the service revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2025.
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2024, related party service revenue principally includes service revenue generated from Celmonze
Wellness Corporation (“Celmonze”) of $149,030 and REBLOOD Biotech Corp. (“REBLOOD”) of $63,632, representing
approximately 61% of related party service revenue and 14% of service revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2024, respectively.
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, cost of service revenue to related parties was $14,640 and $4,586, respectively.
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2025, related party cost of service revenue includes cost of services paid to Falcon Management Limited
(“FML”) of $5,000, Falcon Consulting Limited (“FCL”) of $2,140, and Loke Yu (“Jimmy”) of $7,500,
respectively. FML is wholly owned by our Chief Financial Officer, Loke, Che Chan Gilbert (“Mr. Loke”), FCL is wholly owned
by Mr. Loke’s spouse, and Jimmy is Mr. Loke’s brother.
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2024, related party cost of service revenue includes cost of revenue paid to FML of $2,555 and FCL
of $2,031, respectively.
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, related party G&A expenses totaled $98,210 and $122,127, respectively.
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2025, related party G&A expenses included consulting fees paid to Ms. Yap, Pei Ling (“Ms.
Yap”), spouse of our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Lee, Chong Kuang, of $10,380, Ms. Yap’s wholly owned company, Bright Interlink
Sdn. Bhd. (“BISB”), of $10,428 and FML of $13,455, and management fees paid to Greenpro Global Capital Village Sdn. Bhd. (“GGCVSB”)
of $63,947, a Malaysian company jointly owned by Mr. Lee and Mr. Loke.
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2024, related party G&A expenses included consulting fees paid to Ms. Yap of $11,522, BISB of
$10,426 and FCL of $40,293, and management fees paid to GGCVSB of $59,886.
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, related party other income was $31,697 and $35,565, respectively.
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2025, related party other income includes other income generated from Acorn Finance Limited (“Acorn”)
of $8,073 and GTL of $23,624, respectively.
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2024, related party other income includes other income generated from Acorn of $8,987, GTL of $26,524,
and SEATech Ventures Corp. (“SEATech”) of $54.
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, related party interest income was $4,212 and $3,707, respectively.
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2025, related party interest income includes interest income generated from GTL of $849 and GTL’s
subsidiary, Greenpro Custodian Service Limited (“GCSL”), of $3,363, respectively.
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2024, related party interest income includes interest income generated from GTL of $720 and GCSL
of $2,987.
32
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, gain on disposal of related party investments was $39,800 and $324,917, respectively.
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2025, gain on disposal of related party investment generated from the sale of common stock of Jocom
Holdings Corp. (“Jocom”) of $39,800.
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2024, gain on disposal of related party investments includes the sale of common stock of Agape ATP
Corporation (“Agape”) of $307,597 and MU Global Holding Limited (“MUGH”) of $17,320.
A
reversal of impairment of related party investment represents the reversal of impairment of Jocom of $150 for the nine months ended September
30, 2025.
Net
accounts receivable from related parties was $219 and $41 as of September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, respectively.
As
of September 30, 2025, the net accounts receivable from related parties was due from Mr. Loke’s wholly owned company, Falcon Certified
Public Accountants Limited (“FCPA”), of $142 and GTL of $77.
As
of December 31, 2024, the net accounts receivable from a related party was due from Mr. Loke of $41.
Amounts
due from related parties were $996,468 and $954,184 as of September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, respectively. Amounts due to related
parties were $118,460 and $57,497 as of September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, respectively.
As
of September 30, 2025, amounts due from related parties mainly include amounts due from GGCVSB of $816,667, First Bullion Holdings Inc.
(“FBHI”) of $90,000 and GTL of $88,116, while the amounts due to related parties mainly include FCPA of $106,445.
As
of December 31, 2024, amounts due from related parties mainly include amounts due from GGCVSB of $772,311, GTL of $90,207 and FBHI of
$90,000, while the amounts due to related parties mainly include FCPA of $22,820 and Mr. Lee of $20,677, respectively.
Deferred
costs of revenue to related parties were $6,250 and $18,750 as of September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, respectively.
As
of September 30, 2025, deferred costs of revenue to related parties were $2,500 and $3,750 associated with FML and Jimmy, respectively.
As
of December 31, 2024, deferred costs of revenue to related parties were $7,500 and $11,250 associated with FML and Jimmy, respectively.
As
of September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, other investments in a related party were $12,073.
As
of September 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, related party investments mainly include an investment in GTL of $11,981.
Our
related parties primarily represent those companies where we own a certain percentage of their shares, and it is determined that we have
significant influence on those companies based on our common business relationships. Refer to Note 7 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional details regarding the related party transactions.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Use
of estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial
statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant accounting estimates include certain
assumptions related to, among others, the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, impairment analysis of real estate assets and other
long-term assets, including goodwill, valuation allowance on deferred income taxes, and the accrual of potential liabilities. Actual
results may differ from these estimates.
33
Revenue
recognition
The
Company follows the guidance of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 606, Revenue from Contracts . ASC 606 creates a five-step
model that requires entities to exercise judgment when considering the terms of contracts, which includes (1) identifying the contracts
or agreements with a customer, (2) identifying our performance obligations in the contract or agreement, (3) determining the transaction
price, (4) allocating the transaction price to the separate performance obligations, and (5) recognizing revenue as each performance
obligation is satisfied. The Company only applies the five-step model to contracts when it is probable that the Company will collect
the consideration it is entitled to in exchange for the services it transfers to its clients.
The
Company’s revenue consists of revenue from providing business consulting and corporate advisory services (“service revenue”),
revenue from the provision of digital platforms and trading of digital assets (“digital revenue”), revenue from the rental
of real estate properties, and the sale of real estate properties (“real estate revenue”).
Impairment
of long-lived assets
Long-lived
assets primarily include real estate held for investment, property and equipment, and intangible assets. In accordance with the provisions
of ASC 360, the Company generally conducts its annual impairment evaluation of its long-lived assets in the fourth quarter of each year,
or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist, such as a significant sustained change in the business climate. The recoverability
of long-lived assets is measured at the reporting unit level. If the total of the expected undiscounted future net cash flows is less
than the carrying amount of the asset, a loss is recognized for the difference between the fair value and the carrying amount of the
asset. In addition, for real estate held for sale, an impairment loss is the adjustment to fair value less estimated cost to dispose
of the asset.
Goodwill
Goodwill
is the excess of cost of an acquired entity over the fair value of amounts assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business
combination. Under the guidance of ASC 350, goodwill is not amortized; rather, it is tested for impairment annually and will be tested
for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would indicate the carrying amount may be impaired.
An impairment loss generally would be recognized when the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s net assets exceeds the estimated
fair value of the reporting unit and would be measured as the excess carrying value of goodwill over the derived fair value of goodwill.
The Company’s policy is to perform its annual impairment testing for its reporting units on December 31 of each fiscal year.
Derivative
financial instruments
Derivative
financial instruments consist of financial instruments that contain a notional amount and one or more underlying variables, such as interest
rate, security price, variable conversion rate or other variables, require no initial net investment and permit net settlement. The derivative
financial instruments may be free-standing or embedded in other financial instruments. The Company evaluates its financial instruments
to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. The Company follows the provision
of ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging, for derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities. The derivative instrument
is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the
statements of operations. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities
or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet
as current or non-current based on whether net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within 12 months of the
balance sheet date. At each reporting date, the Company reviews its convertible securities to determine that their classification is
appropriate.
Recent
accounting pronouncements
Refer
to Note 1 in the accompanying financial statements.
34
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Our
cash balance on September 30, 2025, was $775,388, as compared to $1,124,818 on December 31, 2024, a decrease of $349,430. We estimate
we may have sufficient cash available to meet our anticipated working capital for the next twelve months upon improving its profitability and the continuing financial support from
its major shareholders.
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement
of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. During the nine months ended September 30, 2025, the Company incurred
a net loss of $1,722,930 and net cash used in operations of $1,180,574, and as of September 30, 2025, the Company incurred an accumulated
deficit of $38,987,309. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within
one year of the date that the financial statements are issued. In addition, the Company’s independent registered public accounting
firm, in its report on the Company’s December 31, 2024 financial statements, has expressed substantial doubt about the Company’s
ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company
is unable to continue as a going concern.
The
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon improving its profitability and the continuing financial support
from its major shareholders. Management believes the existing shareholders or external financing will provide additional cash to meet
the Company’s obligations as they become due.
Despite
the amount of funds that the Company has raised in the past, no assurance can be given that any future financing, if needed, will be
available or, if available, that it will be on terms that are satisfactory to the Company. Even if the Company can obtain additional
financing, if needed, it may contain undue restrictions on its operations, in the case of debt financing, or cause substantial dilution
for its shareholders, in the case of equity financing.
Operating
activities
Net
cash used in operating activities was $1,180,574 and $1,191,874 for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, respectively.
The net cash used in operating activities in 2025 primarily consisted of an increase in digital assets of $43,767 and a net loss of $1,722,930,
offset by a decrease in net accounts receivable of $78,405, a decrease in prepaids and other current assets of $21,100 and an increase
in deferred revenue of $470,873. For the nine months ended September 30, 2025, non-cash adjustments totaled $146,437, which was primarily
comprised of non-cash expenses from depreciation and amortization of $179,349, offset by non-cash income from gain on disposal of investments
of $39,800.
The
net cash used in operating activities in 2024 primarily consisted of an increase in net accounts receivable of $25,282, a decrease in
accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $148,330 and a net loss of $1,168,983, offset by a decrease in prepaids and other current
assets of $190,523. For the nine months ended September 30, 2024, non-cash adjustments totaled $49,658. Noncash income, net, was comprised
of non-cash income from gain on disposal of investments of $324,917, offset by non-cash expenses from provision for credit losses of
$90,243 and depreciation and amortization of $185,016.
Investing
activities
Net
cash provided by investing activities was $38,651 and $333,265 for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, and 2024, respectively.
Cash
provided by investing activities in 2025 was the proceeds from disposal of other investments of $39,950, offset by the purchase of
property and equipment of $1,299.
Financing
activities
Net
cash provided by financing activities was $775,778 for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, while net cash used in financing activities
was $183,533 for the nine months ended September 30, 2024.
Cash
provided by financing activities in 2025 was the proceeds from the sale of Common Stock in private placements of $760,000 and the advance
payments from related parties of $18,679, offset by the principal repayment of finance lease liabilities of $2,901.
35
Cybersecurity
Risk
management and strategy
We
recognize the critical importance of developing, implementing, and maintaining robust cybersecurity measures to safeguard our information
systems and protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of our data.
Managing
Material Risks & Integrated Overall Risk Management
We
have strategically integrated cybersecurity risk management into our broader risk management framework to promote a company-wide culture
of cybersecurity risk management. This integration ensures that cybersecurity considerations are an integral part of our decision-making
processes at every level. Our management team continuously evaluates and addresses cybersecurity risks in alignment with our business
objectives and operational needs.
Oversee
Third-Party Risk
Because
we are aware of the risks associated with third-party service providers, we have implemented stringent processes to oversee and manage
these risks. We conduct thorough security assessments of all third-party providers before engagement and maintain ongoing monitoring
to ensure compliance with our cybersecurity standards. The monitoring includes annual assessments of the system and organization controls
(SOC) reports of our providers and implementing complementary controls. This approach is designed to mitigate risks related to data breaches
or other security incidents originating from third parties.
Risks
from Cybersecurity Threats
We
have not encountered cybersecurity challenges that have materially impaired our operations or financial standing during the period ended
September 30, 2025. We will continue to monitor and assess our cybersecurity risk management program as well as invest in and seek to
improve such systems and processes as appropriate. If we were to experience a material cybersecurity incident in the future, such an
incident may have a material effect, including on our operations, business strategy, operating results, or financial condition.
Governance
Our
board of directors is responsible for monitoring and assessing strategic risk exposure. Our board of directors administers its cybersecurity
risk oversight function directly as a whole, as well as through the Audit Committee. Our executive management team informs our Audit
Committee on cybersecurity risks on a regular basis, at least once per year.
The
Audit Committee is primarily responsible for assisting our board of directors in fulfilling its ultimate oversight responsibilities relating
to risk assessment and management, including relating to cybersecurity and other information technology risks. The Audit Committee oversees
management’s implementation of our cybersecurity risk management program, including processes and policies for determining risk
tolerance, and reviews management’s strategies for adequately mitigating and managing identified risks, including risks relating
to cybersecurity threats.
Our
cybersecurity coordinator is responsible for assessing and managing our material risks from cybersecurity threats, in close collaboration
with our IT team and reports to our CEO. This ensures that senior management is kept abreast of the cybersecurity posture and potential
risks faced by our group.
36
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
As
a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company is not required
to provide the information under this item.
Item
4. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our
management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of
our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”). Based on such evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer
have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2025 to ensure that information required
to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time period specified in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) rules and forms, and to ensure
that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate, to
allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Inherent
Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
Our
management, including each of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, intends that our disclosure controls and
procedures and internal control over financial reporting are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives.
However, our management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting
will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not
absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact
that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the
inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and
instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the fact that judgments in decision-making can be
faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the
individual acts of some people, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the controls. The design of any
system of controls is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no
assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because
of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be
detected.
37
PART
II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal Proceedings.
On
August 24, 2021, Millennium Fine Art Inc. (“MFAI”) filed a complaint against the Company in the 8 th District Court
of Clark County, State of Nevada, captioned Millennium Fine Art Inc. v. Greenpro Capital Corp. (Case No. A-21-840033-B). MFAI alleges
that on or about April 21, 2021, MFAI and the Company entered into a contract (the “Contract”) pursuant to which MFAI agreed
to create approximately 7,700 non-fungible tokens (“NFTs”) in exchange for $16 million in shares of the Company’s common
stock. MFAI contends that the Company breached the Contract by refusing delivery of the NFTs and failing to issue the agreed-upon shares.
The complaint asserts causes of action for breach of contract, special damages, and promissory estoppel, and seeks approximately $66
million in damages, specific performance of the alleged Contract, and attorney’s fees and costs.
On
October 18, 2021, the Company filed a motion, denying all the material allegations of the complaint, and seeking to stay the litigation
and compel arbitration pursuant to the purported the Contract’s arbitration clause. The Company’s motion sought only to enforce
the arbitration provision and otherwise denied the existence of a valid and binding contract. Over MFAI’s opposition, the court
granted the Company’s motion and stayed the proceeding pending arbitration.
On
or about April 1, 2022, MFAI filed a Request for Arbitration with Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. (JAMS). The Company
subsequently filed its Statement of Answer, denying the material allegations and asserting that the claims are without merit. The arbitration
remains in the discovery phase, and the Company intends to vigorously defend this matter. A final arbitration hearing is currently scheduled
to be held in Las Vegas, Nevada, from January 12 through January 16, 2026.
The
Company is currently unable to reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any, that may result from this proceeding.
Management does not believe, based on information presently available, that the outcome of this matter will have a material adverse effect
on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations; however, an adverse determination could have such an effect.
Item
1A. Risk Factors.
Except
as set forth below, there have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2024. The following additional risk factors relate primarily to our subsidiary, Greenpro-X Corp. (“ Green-X”) ,
and its digital-asset exchange operations and reflect material developments in the blockchain and digital-asset industry since that filing.
Our
business is exposed to risks inherent in digital-asset markets, multi-jurisdiction financial regulation, reliance on a limited number
of liquidity providers and other third-party partners, and the security and resilience of our technology and safeguarding practices.
Many of the risks below are interrelated—market downturns or regulatory actions can reduce trading volumes and liquidity, affect
banking access, and increase compliance costs—which, individually or in the aggregate, could materially harm our revenue, liquidity,
and results of operations. (Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Results
of Operations — Digital Asset Segment” and “Notes — Concentrations of Risk.”)
Summary
of Risk Factors
Our
business, operations, and the market for our common stock are subject to numerous risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could
materially and adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, reputation, or the trading price of our securities.
The following summary highlights, in condensed form, the principal risks described in greater detail throughout this section. This summary
should be read together with the complete discussion below and does not contain all of the information that may be important to investors.
●
Volatile
Digital-Asset Markets – Prices and trading volumes of digital assets fluctuate dramatically and may decline for extended
periods. Sustained downturns can significantly reduce transaction activity and fee revenue on our platform.
●
Evolving
and Conflicting Regulatory Regimes – Global authorities continue to debate whether and when digital assets constitute securities,
commodities, or other regulated instruments. Inconsistent or changing interpretations may subject our activities to registration,
licensing, or enforcement risks.
●
Dependence
on Market Makers and Liquidity Providers – A limited number of institutional market participants account for a substantial
portion of trading volume. Loss or reduction of their participation could impair liquidity and revenue.
●
Cybersecurity
Threats and Technology Failures – Our systems, and those of our vendors and counterparties, are vulnerable to cyberattacks,
data breaches, distributed-denial-of-service incidents, and operational errors that could compromise customer assets or data.
●
Custody
and Safeguarding of Digital Assets – Loss or compromise of private keys, internal control failures, or third-party custodian
insolvency could result in the permanent loss of company or customer assets.
●
Reliance
on Third-Party Service Providers – We depend on banking partners, payment processors, cloud-hosting providers, and other
vendors. Disruption or termination of these relationships could materially affect operations and liquidity.
●
Cross-Border
Operational and Currency Risks – Our primary subsidiaries operate in Malaysia, Hong Kong, and other jurisdictions, exposing
us to foreign-exchange volatility, political and regulatory uncertainty, and data-privacy or capital-control restrictions.
●
Competition
and Technological Disruption – The digital-asset industry evolves rapidly. Decentralized-finance protocols, decentralized
exchanges, and AI-driven trading platforms may reduce the relevance of centralized exchanges like ours.
●
Financing
and Capital-Market Constraints – Our ability to raise capital depends on market conditions and investor confidence in the
digital-asset sector. Adverse trends may limit access to financing or increase dilution.
●
Reputation
and Brand Risks – Negative publicity, social-media criticism, or association with market failures at other exchanges could
harm our reputation and discourage users or partners.
●
Legal
Proceedings and Enforcement Actions – Regulatory inquiries or litigation, even if meritless, could result in substantial
costs, diversion of management time, and reputational damage.
●
Economic,
Political, and Global Events – Macroeconomic conditions, banking crises, or geopolitical conflicts could reduce investor
appetite for risk assets and limit trading volumes.
●
Internal-Control
and Governance Risks – Rapid business expansion and the integration of new technology increase the difficulty of maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls as required under Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15.
●
Forward-Looking
Uncertainties – Many of our plans and expectations involve assumptions regarding regulatory acceptance, technological change,
and market growth that may prove incorrect, leading to material differences in actual outcomes.
Investors
should carefully consider each of these risks, as well as the detailed discussion that follows, before making an investment or holding
decision regarding our securities.
38
Risks
Relating to Green-X and Its Business of Digital Asset Exchange
The
slowing or stopping of the development or acceptance of blockchain networks and blockchain-based assets could have a material adverse
effect on the successful development and adoption of our business.
Our
business depends on the continued growth, development, and acceptance of blockchain networks, digital assets, and related technologies,
which are subject to a high degree of uncertainty. Key factors influencing the further development of blockchain networks and digital
assets include the global adoption of digital assets and blockchain technology; regulatory and quasi-government restrictions on access
to and operation of blockchain networks; and the maintenance of open-source protocols that support blockchain networks. Additional factors,
such as shifts in consumer demographics and public preferences, the availability of alternative transaction methods, the potentially
speculative nature of digital assets, and economic conditions domestically and globally, also contribute to this uncertainty. If blockchain
adoption, acceptance, or functionality slows, halts, or changes in a way that diminishes our ability to grow our exchange and custody
businesses, our financial condition and growth prospects could be materially and adversely affected.
The
future development and growth of the digital asset industry is subject to a variety of factors that are difficult to predict and evaluate.
If
the market for digital assets declines or does not grow as we expect in terms of value, volume, or demand, our business, operating results,
and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. Further, the future growth and development of the digital asset ecosystem
is uncertain. Blockchain technology, digital assets, smart contracts, dApps, and DeFi are components of a new and evolving paradigm that
is subject to a variety of factors that are difficult to evaluate, including:
●
extreme
price volatility or “black swan” events (i.e., highly improbable, unexpected occurrences with significant consequences
that are extremely difficult to predict beforehand) with respect to different digital assets;
●
many
blockchain networks have limited operating histories and are still in the process of development, which will affect the design, supply,
issuance, functionality, and governance of their respective digital assets and underlying blockchain networks. Any of these factors
could adversely affect their respective digital assets;
●
many
blockchain networks are in the process of implementing software upgrades and other changes to their protocols, which could introduce
bugs, security risks, and adversely affect the associated digital assets;
●
technical
issues, such as bugs or vulnerabilities in protocols, have led to disabled functionalities, exposure of personal information, and
theft of users’ assets. These issues often require resolution by global miner, user, and developer communities, and their recurrence
could undermine trust in digital assets;
●
with
respect to hardware used in connection with wallets and blockchain networks generally, there are risks related to technological obsolescence,
the vulnerability of the global supply chain and difficulty in obtaining new hardware;
●
several
large networks, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana, are developing new features to address fundamental speed, scalability, and
energy usage issues. If these issues are not successfully addressed or are unable to achieve widespread adoption, they could adversely
affect the underlying digital assets;
●
many
digital assets and their underlying blockchain networks have identified security issues, bugs, and software errors, some of which
have been exploited by malicious actors. There are also inherent security weaknesses in some digital assets, e.g., when creators
of certain blockchain networks use procedures which could allow hackers to counterfeit tokens. Any weaknesses identified with a digital
asset could adversely affect its price, security, liquidity, and adoption. If a malicious actor or botnet (a volunteer or hacked
collection of computers controlled by networked software coordinating the actions of these computers) obtains a majority of the compute
or staking power on a blockchain network, the actor or botnet might be able to manipulate transactions, which could cause significant
financial losses to holders, damage the network’s reputation and security, and adversely affect its value;
●
the
development of new technologies for mining, such as improved application-specific integrated circuits, and changes in industry patterns,
such as the consolidation of mining power in a small number of large mining farms, could reduce the security of blockchain networks,
lead to increased liquid supply of digital assets, and reduce a digital asset’s price and attractiveness;
●
if
rewards and transaction fees for miners or validators on any particular blockchain network are not sufficiently high to attract and
retain miners or validators, a digital asset’s network security and speed may be adversely affected, increasing the likelihood
of a malicious attack;
●
many
digital assets have concentrated ownership or an admin key, allowing a small group of holders to have significant unilateral control
and influence over key decisions related to their blockchain networks or protocols, such as governance decisions and protocol changes,
as well as the market price of such digital assets;
●
the
governance of many decentralized blockchain networks and protocols is by voluntary consensus and open competition, and many developers
are not directly compensated for their contributions. As a result, there may be a lack of consensus or clarity on the governance
of any particular blockchain network or protocol, a lack of incentives for developers to maintain or develop the network or protocol,
and other unforeseen issues, any of which could result in unexpected or undesirable errors, bugs, or changes, or stymie such network
or protocol’s utility and ability to respond to challenges and grow;
●
many
blockchain networks and protocols are in the early stages of developing partnerships and collaborations, any one or more of which
may not succeed and adversely affect the usability and adoption of their respective digital assets;
●
digital
assets have only recently become selectively accepted as a means of payment by retail and commercial outlets, and the use of digital
assets by consumers to pay such retail and commercial outlets remains limited. Banks and other established financial institutions
may refuse to (i) process funds for digital asset transactions; (ii) process wire transfers to or from digital asset exchanges, digital
asset-related companies, and service providers; or (iii) maintain accounts for persons or entities transacting in crypto assets.
As a result, the prices of various digital assets are largely determined by speculators, miners and validators, thus contributing
to price volatility, which makes retailers less likely to accept digital assets as a form of payment in the future;
●
banks
may not provide or may cut off banking services to businesses that provide digital asset-related services or that accept digital
assets as payment, which could harm our banking infrastructure, limit us from operating in certain jurisdictions or limit product
or service offerings, dampen liquidity in the market, and damage public perception of digital assets generally or any one digital
asset in particular (such as bitcoin) and their or our utility as a payment system. These actions could decrease the price of crypto
assets generally or individually;
●
there
is a lack of liquid markets in certain digital assets, and these markets are subject to possible manipulation;
●
certain
digital assets have concentrated ownerships, and large sales or distributions by holders of such digital assets, or “whales,”
could have an adverse effect on the market price of such digital assets; and
●
the
characteristics of digital assets have been, and may in the future continue to be, exploited to facilitate illegal activity such
as fraud, money laundering, tax evasion, and ransomware scams.
Acceptance
and/or widespread use of digital assets are uncertain, and the prices of digital assets can be extremely volatile. For example, since
2023, the trading price of bitcoin has fluctuated from a low of approximately $16,000 to highs above $100,000. Our revenue is substantially
dependent on the prices of digital assets and the volume of digital asset transactions conducted on our platform. If such price or volume
declines, this will materially adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition.
39
Our
operating results have and will significantly fluctuate, due to inherent volatility associated with the digital asset industry, including,
but not limited to, the price of digital assets, regulatory scrutiny of certain digital assets or related products and services, or changes
in applicable laws.
Our
operating results are dependent on digital assets and the broader digital asset industry. Due to the highly volatile nature of the digital
asset industry and the prices of digital assets, which have experienced and continue to experience significant volatility, our operating
results have, and will continue to, fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter in accordance with market sentiments and movements
in the broader digital asset industry. Our operating results will continue to fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of factors,
many of which are unpredictable and in certain instances are outside of our control, including:
●
our
dependence on offerings that are, in turn, dependent on digital asset trading activity, including trading volume and the prevailing
trading prices for digital assets, whose trading prices and volume can be highly volatile;
●
our
ability to attract, maintain, and grow our user base and engage our users;
●
changes
in the legislative or regulatory environment, or actions by U.S. or foreign governments or regulators, including fines, orders, or
consent decrees;
●
regulatory
changes or scrutiny that impact our ability to offer certain products or services;
●
increased
regulatory certainty, which could lead to greater competition from traditional financial services firms and other competitors with
broader access to financial resources;
●
our
ability to continue to diversify and grow our revenue;
●
pricing
for or temporary suspensions of our products and services;
●
investments
we make in the development of products and services, as well as international expansion and sales and marketing;
●
adding
digital assets to, or removing them from, our platform;
●
our
ability to establish and maintain partnerships, collaborations, joint ventures, or strategic alliances with third parties;
●
market
conditions of, and overall sentiment towards, the digital asset industry;
●
macroeconomic
conditions, including interest rates, inflation, and instability in the global banking system;
●
adverse
legal proceedings or regulatory enforcement actions, judgments, settlements, or other legal proceedings and enforcement-related costs;
●
the
development and introduction of existing and new products and services by us or our competitors or the emergence of new competitors;
●
our
ability to control costs, including operating expenses incurred to grow and expand our operations and remain competitive;
●
system
failure, outages, or interruptions, including with respect to our digital asset platform and third-party digital asset networks,
which have occurred in the past and will likely occur in the future;
●
our
lack of control over decentralized or third-party blockchains and networks that may experience downtime, cyberattacks, critical failures,
errors, bugs, corrupted files, data losses, or other similar software failures, outages, breaches, and losses;
●
breaches
of security or privacy;
●
real
or perceived improper or unauthorized use of, disclosure of, or access to confidential, proprietary, personal, or sensitive data;
and
●
our
ability to attract and retain talent.
As
a result of these factors, it is difficult for us to forecast growth trends accurately, and our business and prospects are difficult
to evaluate. In view of the rapidly evolving nature of our business and the digital asset industry, period-to-period comparisons of our
operating results may not be meaningful, and you should not rely upon them as an indication of future performance. Quarterly and annual
expenses reflected in our financial statements may vary significantly from historical or projected rates, and our operating results in
one or more future quarters may fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors. As a result, the trading price of our
common stock may be volatile.
Our
total revenue is substantially dependent on the volume of digital asset transactions conducted on our platform, which is in turn significantly
affected by the prices of digital assets. If such prices or volumes decline, our business, operating results, and financial condition
would be adversely affected, and the price of our common stock could decline.
We
generate a large portion of our total revenue from transaction fees on our platform in connection with the purchase, sale, and trading
of digital assets by our users. The transaction price, represented by the trading fee, varies depending on the value of the transaction
and/or the user’s transaction volume processed over the previous thirty-day period. Instant orders also incur a convenience fee
that is typically calculated at a rate around 50 basis points above the market price. Declines in the volume of digital asset transactions,
the price of digital assets, or market liquidity for digital assets generally may result in lower total revenue to us.
The
price of digital assets and associated demand for buying, selling, and trading digital assets have historically been subject to significant
volatility. For instance, in 2017, the value of certain digital assets, including bitcoin, experienced steep increases in value. Value
increases of certain digital assets, including bitcoin, from 2016 to 2017, and then again in 2021, were followed by a steep decline in
2018 and again in 2022. While the value of digital assets, including bitcoin, increased significantly in 2024, if the value of digital
assets and transaction volume do not continue to increase or they experience a decline in the future, our ability to generate revenue
may suffer, and user demand for our products and services may decline. These factors could adversely affect our business, operating results,
and financial condition and cause the price of our common stock to decline. The price and trading volume of any digital asset are subject
to significant uncertainty and volatility, depending on several factors, including:
●
market
conditions of, and overall sentiment towards, digital assets and the digital asset industry, including, but not limited to, as a
result of actions taken by or developments of other participants in the digital asset industry;
●
changes
in liquidity, market-making volume, and trading activities;
●
trading
activities on other digital asset platforms worldwide, including platforms that may be impacted by manipulative trading activity;
●
investment
and trading activities of highly active consumer and institutional users, speculators, miners, validators, and investors;
●
the
speed and rate at which digital assets are able to gain adoption as a medium of exchange, utility, store of value, consumptive asset,
security instrument, or other financial assets worldwide, if at all;
●
the
ability or inability of the digital asset industry to develop and commercialize profitable near-term use cases for digital assets
and blockchain technology generally;
●
decreased
user and investor confidence in digital assets and crypto platforms;
●
negative
publicity and events relating to the digital asset industry;
●
unpredictable
social media coverage or “trending” of digital assets, or other rumors and market speculation regarding digital assets;
40
●
the
functionality and utility of digital assets and their associated ecosystems and networks, including digital assets designed for use
in various applications;
●
consumer
preferences and perceived value of digital assets and digital asset markets;
●
increased
competition from other payment services or other digital assets that exhibit better speed, security, scalability, or other characteristics;
●
adverse
legal proceedings or regulatory enforcement actions, judgments, or settlements impacting digital asset industry participants;
●
regulatory
or legislative changes, including a change in sentiment towards, and scrutiny and updates affecting the digital asset industry;
●
the
characterization of digital assets under the laws of various jurisdictions around the world, some of which could require technical
modifications to our platform that would be difficult and time-consuming to complete;
●
the
adoption of unfavorable taxation policies on digital asset investments by governmental entities;
●
the
maintenance, troubleshooting, and development of blockchain networks and associated digital assets, including by miners, validators,
and developers worldwide;
●
the
ability for blockchain networks to attract and retain miners or validators to secure and confirm transactions accurately and efficiently;
●
legal
and regulatory changes affecting the operations of miners and validators of blockchain networks, including limitations and prohibitions
on mining activities, or new legislative or regulatory requirements as a result of growing environmental concerns around the use
of energy in Bitcoin and other proof-of-work mining activities;
●
ongoing
technological viability and security of digital assets and their associated smart contracts, applications, and networks, including
vulnerabilities against hacks and scalability;
●
fees
and speed associated with processing digital asset transactions, including on the underlying blockchain networks and on digital asset
platforms;
●
financial
strength of market participants;
●
the
availability and cost of funding and capital;
●
liquidity
and credit risk of other digital asset platforms;
●
interruptions
or temporary suspensions or other compulsory restrictions in products or services from or failures of major digital asset platforms;
●
the
availability of an active derivatives market for various digital assets;
●
the
availability of banking and payment services to support digital asset-related projects;
●
instability
in the global banking system;
●
the
level of interest rates and inflation;
●
monetary
policies of governments, trade restrictions, and fiat currency devaluations; and
●
national
and international economic and political conditions.
There
is no assurance that any supported digital asset will maintain its value or that there will be meaningful levels of trading activities.
If the price of digital assets or the demand for trading digital assets declines, our business, operating results, and financial condition
would be adversely affected, and the price of our common stock could decline.
A
significant amount of the trading volume on our platform is derived from a relatively small number of institutional market makers, and
the loss of these market makers, or a reduction in their trading volume, could have an adverse effect on our business, operating results,
and financial condition.
A
relatively small number of institutional market makers have historically accounted for around half of the total trading volume on our
platform. We expect significant trading volume and net revenue attributable to these market makers for the foreseeable future. As a result,
while our business is not materially dependent on any single user, a loss of these market makers, or a reduction in their trading volume,
and our inability to replace them, could have an adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial conditions.
Our
operating expenses may increase in the future, and absent corresponding revenues, we may not be able to achieve profitability or positive
cash flow from operations, which may cause our business, operating results, and financial condition to be adversely impacted.
Our
operating expenses may increase in the future as we continue to attract and retain talent, expand our sales and marketing efforts, develop
additional products and services, expand our international business, and incur regulatory or compliance expenses. While we consistently
evaluate opportunities to drive efficiency, we cannot guarantee that these efforts will be successful. Our operations may prove more
expensive than we currently anticipate, and we may not succeed in increasing our net revenue sufficiently to offset these higher expenses.
Our revenue growth may be further impacted by reduced demand for our offerings, increased competition, adverse macroeconomic conditions,
a decrease in the growth or size of the digital asset industry, regulatory uncertainty or scrutiny, or changes that impact our ability
to offer certain products or services, any failure to capitalize on growth opportunities, or failure of new products and services we
develop to gain traction in the market. We cannot be certain that we will be able to achieve profitability or achieve positive operating
cash flow in any period. If we are unable to effectively manage these risks and difficulties as we encounter them, our business, operating
results, and financial condition may suffer.
Adverse
economic conditions may adversely affect our business.
Our
performance is subject to general economic conditions and their effects on the digital asset markets and our users. The United States
and other key international economies have periodically experienced cyclical downturns in which economic activity declined, resulting
in lower consumption rates, restricted credit, reduced profitability, weaknesses in financial markets, bankruptcies, and overall heightened
economic uncertainty. Adverse general economic conditions have impacted digital assets, although the extent to which remains uncertain
and dependent on a variety of factors, including market adoption of digital assets, global trends in the digital asset industry, central
bank monetary policies, instability in the global banking system, and other events beyond our control. Geopolitical developments, such
as trade wars and foreign exchange limitations, can also increase the severity and levels of unpredictability globally and increase the
volatility of global financial and digital asset markets. For example, capital and credit markets have experienced extreme volatility
and disruptions in the past, leading to significant declines in the value of digital assets. To the extent general economic conditions
and digital assets markets materially deteriorate or the current decline continues for a prolonged period, our ability to generate revenue
and to attract and retain users could suffer, and our business, operating results, and financial condition could be adversely affected.
Moreover, even if general economic conditions improve, there is no guarantee that the digital asset industry will similarly improve.
Further,
in 2022, several blockchain protocols and digital asset financial firms, and in particular protocols and firms involving high levels
of financial leverage, such as high-yield lending products or derivatives trading, suffered from insolvency and liquidity crises, including
FTX, Celsius Networks, Voyager, and Three Arrows Capital. Some of these failures are alleged to have been held to be the result of fraudulent
activity by insiders, including misappropriation of user funds, illicit activity, and failures in internal controls. In connection with
these incidents, concerns were raised about the potential for a market condition where the failure of one company leads to the financial
distress of other companies. If such a market condition were to become widespread in the digital asset industry, we could suffer from
increased counterparty risk, including defaults or bankruptcies of major users or counterparties, which could lead to significantly reduced
activity on our platform and fewer available digital asset market opportunities in general. Further, forced selling of digital assets
by distressed companies could lead to lower digital asset prices and may lead to a reduction in our revenue. To the extent that conditions
in the general economic and digital asset markets were to materially deteriorate, our ability to attract and retain users may suffer.
41
Actual
events involving limited liquidity, defaults, non-performance, or other adverse developments that affect financial institutions, transactional
counterparties, or other companies in the financial services industry, or the financial services industry generally, or concerns or rumors
regarding such events or other similar risks, have in the past and may in the future lead to market-wide liquidity problems. For example,
in March 2023, Silvergate Capital Corp. announced it would wind down operations and liquidate Silvergate Bank. Soon after, the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) was appointed as receiver for Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank. As a result
of these developments and related issues with other financial institutions, the prices of fiat-backed stablecoins were temporarily impacted
and may be similarly impacted again in the future. Instability in the global banking system could have negative ramifications, such as
additional market-wide liquidity problems or impacted access to deposits and investments for users of affected banks and certain banking
partners. Our business, operating results, and financial condition could be adversely affected as a result.
Fluctuations
in currency exchange rates could harm our operating results and financial condition.
Revenue
generated and expenses incurred from our international operations are often denominated in the currencies of the local countries.
Accordingly, changes in the value of foreign currencies relative to the U.S. dollar can affect our operating results reflected in
our U.S. dollar-denominated financial statements. Our financial results are also subject to changes in exchange rates that impact
the settlement of transactions in non-functional currencies. As a result, it could be more difficult to detect underlying trends in
our business and operating results. To the extent that fluctuations in currency exchange rates cause our operating results to differ
from expectations of investors, the market price of our common stock could be adversely impacted. From time to time, we may engage
in currency hedging activities to limit the risk of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. To the extent we use hedging
instruments to hedge exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, the use of such hedging instruments may not offset
any or more than a portion of the adverse financial effects of unfavorable movements in foreign exchange rates over the limited time
the hedges are in place, and may introduce additional risks if we are unable to structure effective hedges with such
instruments.
Our
failure to safeguard and manage our and our users’ fiat currencies and digital assets could adversely impact our business,
operating results, and financial condition.
We
hold fiat currencies and safeguard digital assets on behalf of our users. Our expanding number of regulated entities will rely on an
increasing number of hot, MPC, and cold wallets, as well as an increasing number of omnibus bank accounts, which heightens the complexity
of our operations, including fiat and blockchain reconciliations and the maintenance of our internal ledger and related accounting procedures.
Subcustodial arrangements among our various regulated entities add to the operational complexity of our international operations. Delays,
errors, or failures in these operations could result in investigations, regulatory and enforcement actions, or litigation, and adversely
impact our reputation, business, operating results, and financial condition.
Our
ability to manage and accurately safeguard our users’ assets requires a high level of internal control. As our business continues
to grow and we expand our product and service offerings, we must continue to strengthen our associated internal controls and ensure that
our third-party service providers do the same. Our success and the success of our offerings require significant public confidence in
our ability to properly manage users’ balances and handle large and growing transaction volumes and amounts of user funds. Any
failure by us to maintain the necessary controls or to manage user digital assets and funds appropriately and in compliance with applicable
regulatory requirements could result in reputational harm or significant financial losses, lead users to discontinue or reduce their
use of our products, and result in significant penalties and fines and additional restrictions, which could adversely impact our business,
operating results, and financial condition.
We
deposit, transfer, and custody user cash and digital assets in multiple jurisdictions. In each instance, we are required to safeguard
users’ assets using bank-level security standards applicable to our hot and cold wallets and storage systems, as well as our financial
management systems related to such custodial functions. In general, most digital assets on our platform are held in cold storage. Our
security technology is designed to prevent, detect, and mitigate inappropriate access to our systems by internal or external threats.
We believe we have developed and maintained administrative, technical, and physical safeguards designed to comply with applicable legal
requirements and industry standards. However, it is nevertheless possible that hackers, employees, service providers, or others acting
contrary to our policies could circumvent these safeguards to improperly access our systems or documents, or the systems or documents
of our business partners, agents, or service providers, and improperly access, obtain, or misuse user digital assets and funds. The methods
used to obtain unauthorized access, disable, or degrade service or sabotage systems are also constantly changing and evolving, and may
be difficult to anticipate or detect for long periods of time.
We
also hold fiat currency and digital assets for administrative and operating purposes. We segregate such assets from our users’
assets by maintaining an internal ledger that distinguishes between customer assets, company assets, and those of affiliates or others.
We perform monthly reconciliations between this ledger and on-chain balances, maintain an audit trail of all ledgers and trading activity.
Despite these steps we take to segregate such assets from our user assets, any failure to properly safeguard, manage, or account for
these funds could result in financial losses, regulatory scrutiny, reputational harm, or legal liability.
The
loss or destruction of a private key required to access our or our users’ digital assets may be irreversible. If we are unable
to access our private keys or if we experience a hack or other data loss relating to the digital assets that we hold on behalf of
users, our users may be unable to access their digital assets, which could harm user trust in us and our products and services and
cause regulatory scrutiny.
To
own, transfer, and use a digital asset on an underlying blockchain network, a person must have a private and public key pair associated
with a blockchain address, commonly referred to as a “wallet.” Digital assets are generally controllable only by the possessor
of the unique private key relating to the wallet in which the digital assets are held. To the extent that any of the private keys or
other necessary credentials relating to our wallets containing digital assets held for our own account or for our users are lost, destroyed,
or otherwise compromised or unavailable, and no backup of the private key is accessible, we will be unable to access the digital assets
held in the related wallet. Any loss of private keys or other credentials relating to, or hack or other compromise of, digital wallets
used to store our users’ digital assets could adversely affect our users’ ability to access or sell their digital assets,
require us to reimburse our users for their losses, and subject us to significant financial losses in addition to losing user trust in
us and our products and services. As such, any loss of private keys or other digital wallet credentials due to a hack, employee or service
provider misconduct or error, or other compromise by third parties could negatively impact our brand and reputation, result in significant
losses, and adversely impact our business.
42
Cyberattacks
and security breaches—whether affecting our platform, our employees, our users, or third parties— could adversely impact
our brand and reputation, as well as our business, operating results, and financial condition.
Our
business involves the collecting, storing, transmitting, and processing of confidential information such as user, employee, service provider,
and other personal data, and information required to access user assets. We have built our reputation on the premise that our platform
offers users a secure way to purchase, store, and transact in digital assets. As a result, any actual or perceived security breach affecting
us or our third-party partners may:
●
harm
our reputation and brand;
●
result
in our systems, networks, or services being unavailable and interrupting our operations;
●
result
in improper disclosure of data and violations of applicable privacy and data protection laws;
●
result
in significant regulatory scrutiny, investigations, fines, penalties, and other legal, regulatory, and financial exposure;
●
cause
us to incur significant remediation costs;
●
lead
to theft or irretrievable loss of our or our users’ fiat currencies or digital assets;
●
reduce
user confidence in, or decreased use of, our products and services;
●
divert
the attention of management from the operation of our business;
●
result
in significant compensation or contractual penalties from us to our users or third parties as a result of losses to them or claims
by them; and
●
adversely
affect our business and operating results.
An
increasing number of organizations, including large merchants, businesses, technology companies, financial institutions, and government
institutions, have disclosed breaches of their information security systems and networks, some of which have involved sophisticated and
highly targeted attacks on their third-party service providers’ websites, mobile applications, and infrastructure. Any
actual or perceived breach or cybersecurity attack directed at other financial institutions or digital asset companies, whether or not
we are directly impacted, could lead to a general loss of user confidence in the digital asset industry or in the use of technology to
conduct financial transactions, which could negatively impact us and market perception of the effectiveness of our security measures
and technology infrastructure.
Attacks
upon systems and networks across a variety of industries, including the digital asset industry, are increasing in their frequency,
persistence, and sophistication, and, in many cases, are being conducted by sophisticated, well-funded, and organized groups and
individuals, which include state actors. The techniques used to obtain unauthorized, improper, or illegal access to systems and
information (including users’ personal data and digital assets), disable or degrade services, or sabotage systems are
constantly evolving, may be difficult to detect quickly, and often are not recognized or detected until after they have been
launched against a target. Such threats may see their frequency increased and effectiveness enhanced using artificial intelligence
(“AI”). Further, these risks may be heightened in connection with ongoing global conflicts such as Russia’s
invasion of Ukraine or the Israel-Hamas conflict. These attacks may occur on our systems and networks or those of our third-party
service providers or partners. Certain types of cyberattacks could harm us even if our systems and networks remain undisturbed.
Attacks may be designed to exploit operational vulnerabilities or other weaknesses in our processes or procedures, to deceive
employees and service providers into releasing control of our systems or networks, or to introduce computer viruses and malware into
our systems or networks with the intent of compromising confidential or proprietary data. Additionally, certain threats are designed
to remain dormant or undetectable until launched against a target, and we may not be able to implement adequate preventative
measures.
Although
we have not experienced a direct hack and we have developed systems and processes designed to protect the data we manage, prevent data
loss and other security breaches, effectively respond to known and potential risks, and expend significant resources to bolster these
protections, there can be no assurance that these security measures will provide absolute security or prevent breaches or attacks. We
may, from time to time, experience future breaches of our security measures. These breaches may be due to human error, malfeasance, insider
threats, system errors, system vulnerabilities and other irregularities. Unauthorized parties have attempted, and we expect that they
will continue to attempt, to gain access to our systems and networks, as well as those of our users, partners, and third-party service
providers, through various means, including hacking, social engineering, phishing, ransomware, denial-of-service attacks, and attempting
to fraudulently induce individuals (including employees, service providers, and our users) into disclosing usernames, passwords, payment
card information, and other sensitive information, which may in turn be used to access our information technology systems and users’
digital assets. Threats can come from a variety of sources, such as criminal hackers, hacktivists, state-sponsored intrusions, industrial
espionage, and insiders. Certain threat actors may be supported by significant financial and technological resources, making them even
more sophisticated and difficult to detect. We may also acquire other companies that expose us to unexpected security risks or increase
costs to improve the security posture of the acquired company. Further, there has been an increase in such threat actor activities because
of the increased prevalence of hybrid and remote working arrangements in recent years. As a result, our costs and the resources we devote
to protecting against these advanced threats and their consequences may continue to increase over time. Any perceived or actual security
breach—whether affecting our platform, our users, or third parties—may expose us to legal risk and potential liability, including
governmental or regulatory investigations and class action litigation.
While
we generally perform cybersecurity diligence on our key third-party service providers, we do not control our third-party service providers,
and our ability to monitor their cybersecurity measures is limited. Some of our third-party service providers may store or have access
to our data and may not have effective controls, processes, or practices to protect our information from data breaches or other cybersecurity
incidents. A vulnerability in a third-party service provider’s software or systems, a failure of our third-party service providers’
safeguards, policies, or procedures, or a breach of a third-party service provider’s software or systems could result in the compromise
of confidentiality, integrity, or availability of our systems or the data housed in our third-party solutions. Due to applicable laws
and regulations or contractual obligations, we may be held responsible for data breaches or other cybersecurity incidents attributed
to our service providers as they relate to the information we share with them. Such incidents could expose us to significant financial
and legal liabilities, including regulatory fines, penalties, litigation, and remediation costs.
Although
we maintain insurance coverage, it may be insufficient to protect us against all losses and costs stemming from security breaches, cyberattacks,
other types of unlawful activity, or resulting disruptions, data theft, and loss from such events. We cannot be certain that our insurance
coverage will continue to be available to us on economically reasonable terms, if at all, or that any insurer will not deny coverage
as to any future claims. Outages and disruptions of our platform, including any caused by cyberattacks, may harm our reputation and our
business, operating results, and financial condition.
43
Custody
services, and any blockchain technology on which they rely, may be the target of cyberattacks or may contain exploitable flaws in their
underlying code, which may result in security breaches and the loss or theft of digital assets that are held or deposited.
Custody
services, their structural foundation, and the software applications and other interfaces or applications upon which they rely (including
blockchain technology) are based on relatively new technologies, and there can be no assurances that custody services are or will be
fully secure, which may result in losses of users’ digital assets and an unwillingness of market participants to access, adopt,
and utilize digital assets or the custody services. Examples of the above include, but are not limited to:
●
a
cyberattack causing a user withdrawal instruction, or a withdrawal address being altered;
●
a
user receiving an incorrect blockchain address, or us sending digital assets to the wrong blockchain address;
●
hardware
failures delaying or preventing deposits and withdrawals;
●
the
tampering or spoofing of user instructions and materials;
●
deposit
addresses being incorrectly stored;
●
the
hacking or unavailability of user portals, rendering users unable to access their accounts;
●
vulnerabilities
within the applicable blockchain code arising from the blockchain being manipulated by a malicious actor;
●
attacks
on third-party technology supplier infrastructure, such as cloud providers;
●
a
cyberattack causing the individual to lose otherwise valid credentials;
●
the
tampering with laptop codes to cause withdrawals to incorrect withdrawal addresses; and
●
bad
acts by employees, third-party service providers, and others.
While
we will take steps to ensure security and protection against such incidents, no assurance can be given that our custody services are
or will be fully secure and protected from attack, and any failure in this regard could result in enforcement actions, litigation, significant
costs being incurred, fines, and other penalties, thereby adversely affecting our reputation, business, operating results, and financial
condition. The impact of such attacks could also negatively impact the utilization of digital assets and potentially result in a decline
in the broader market price of the affected digital assets.
Any
significant disruption to our products and services, information technology systems, or the blockchain networks we support could
result in a loss of users or funds and adversely impact our brand and reputation, as well as our business, operating results, and
financial condition.
Our
reputation and ability to attract and retain users and grow our business depend on our ability to operate our service at high levels
of reliability, scalability, and performance, including the ability to process and monitor a large number of transactions that occur
at high volume and frequencies across multiple systems daily. Our digital asset exchanges and the ability of our users to trade digital
assets are dependent on our ability to access the blockchain networks underlying the supported digital assets, for which access is
dependent on our systems’ ability to access the internet. Further, the successful and continued operations of such blockchain
networks will depend on a network of computers, miners, or validators, and their continued operations, all of which may be impacted
by service interruptions.
Our
systems, the systems of our third-party service providers and partners, and certain digital asset and blockchain networks have experienced,
from time to time, and may experience in the future, service interruptions or degradation. This can be due to hardware and software bugs,
defects, or malfunctions, distributed denial-of-service and other cyberattacks, insider threats, break-ins, sabotage, human error, vandalism,
earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, fires, and other natural disasters, power losses, disruptions in telecommunications services, fraud,
military or political conflicts, terrorist attacks, computer viruses or other malware, or other events. In addition, extraordinary trading
volumes or site usage could cause our computer systems to operate at an unacceptably slow speed or even fail. Some of our systems, including
systems of companies we have acquired, or the systems of our third-party service providers and partners, are not fully redundant, and
our or their disaster recovery planning may not be sufficient for all possible outcomes or events.
If
any of our systems or networks, or those of our third-party service providers, are disrupted for any reason, as has happened in the past,
our products and services may be interrupted or even fail, potentially resulting in unanticipated disruptions, slower response times
and delays in our users’ trade execution and processing, failed settlement of trades, delays in withdrawing stakes assets, incomplete
or inaccurate accounting, recording, or processing of trades, unauthorized trades, loss of user information, increased demand on limited
user support resources, user claims, complaints with regulatory organizations, lawsuits, or enforcement actions. A prolonged interruption
in the availability or reduction in the availability, speed, or functionality of our products and services could harm our operations,
including our exchange and custody businesses. Significant or persistent interruptions in our services could cause current or potential
users or partners to believe that our systems are unreliable, leading them to switch to our competitors or to avoid or reduce the use
of our products and services, and could permanently harm our reputation. Moreover, to the extent that any system failure or similar event
results in damage to our users or their business partners, these users or partners could seek significant compensation or contractual
penalties from us for their losses, and those claims, even if unsuccessful, would likely be time-consuming and costly for us to address.
Problems with the reliability or security of our systems would harm our reputation, and the cost of remedying these problems could negatively
affect our business, operating results, and financial condition.
Our
data processing systems, or other operating systems and facilities, and those of our third-party service providers, may stop operating
properly or become disabled or damaged because of a number of factors, including events that are wholly or partially beyond our and our
third-party service providers’ control. While we have business continuity, disaster recovery and other policies and procedures
designed to prevent or limit the effect of the failure, interruption, or security breach of our information systems, there can be no
assurance that any such failures, interruptions or security breaches will not occur or, if they do occur, that they will be adequately
covered or addressed by such policies and procedures. Furthermore, if such failures, interruptions, or security breaches are not detected
immediately, their effect could be compounded. Our risk and exposure to these matters remain heightened because of the evolving nature
of these threats and our use of third-party service providers with access to our systems and data.
Because
we are a regulated financial institution in certain jurisdictions, interruptions may result in regulatory scrutiny, and significant or
persistent interruptions could lead to significant fines and penalties, and mandatory and costly changes to our business practices, and
ultimately could cause us to lose existing licenses or banking relationships that we need to operate or prevent or delay us from obtaining
additional licenses that may be required for our business.
In
addition, we are continually improving and upgrading our information systems and technologies. Implementation of new systems and technologies
is complex, expensive, time-consuming, and may not be successful. If we fail to timely and successfully implement new information systems
and technologies, or improvements or upgrades to existing information systems and technologies, or if such systems and technologies do
not operate as intended, it could have an adverse impact on our business, internal controls (including internal controls over financial
reporting), operating results, and financial condition.
44
Our
platform may be exploited to facilitate illegal activity such as fraud, money laundering, terrorist financing, proliferation financing,
tax evasion, and scams. If any of our users use our platform to further such illegal activities, our business could be adversely affected.
Our
platform may be exploited to facilitate illegal activity, including fraud, money laundering, terrorist financing, proliferation financing,
tax evasion, and scams. The use of our platform for illegal or improper purposes could subject us to claims, individual and class action
lawsuits, government and regulatory investigations, prosecutions, enforcement actions, inquiries, or requests that could result in liability
and reputational harm for us. Moreover, certain activities that may be legal in one jurisdiction may be illegal in another jurisdiction,
and certain activities that are at one time legal may in the future be deemed illegal in the same jurisdiction. As a result, there is
significant uncertainty and cost associated with detecting and monitoring transactions for compliance with local laws. If a user is found
responsible for intentionally or inadvertently violating the laws in any jurisdiction, we may be subject to governmental inquiries, enforcement
actions, or prosecution, or otherwise held secondarily liable for aiding or facilitating such activities. Changes in law have also increased
the penalties for money transmitters for certain illegal activities, and government authorities may consider increased or additional
penalties from time to time. Owners of intellectual property rights or government authorities may seek to bring legal action against
money transmitters, including us, for involvement in the sale of infringing or allegedly infringing items. Any threatened or resulting
claims could result in reputational harm, and any resulting liabilities, loss of transaction volume, or increased costs could harm our
business.
Moreover,
while fiat currencies can be used to facilitate illegal activities, digital assets are relatively new and, in many jurisdictions, may
be lightly regulated or largely unregulated. Many types of digital assets have characteristics, such as the speed with which digital
currency transactions can be conducted, the ability to conduct transactions without the involvement of regulated intermediaries, the
ability to engage in transactions across multiple jurisdictions, the irreversible nature of certain digital asset transactions, and encryption
technology that anonymizes these transactions, that make digital assets susceptible to use in illegal activity. U.S. federal and state
and foreign regulatory authorities and law enforcement agencies, such as the Department of Justice, SEC, Commodity Futures Trading Commission
(the “CFTC”), the FTC, or the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), and various state securities and financial regulators
have taken and continue to take legal action against persons and entities alleged to be engaged in fraudulent schemes or other illicit
activity involving digital assets. We also support digital assets that incorporate privacy-enhancing features and may, from time to time,
support additional digital assets with similar functionalities. These privacy-enhancing digital assets obscure the identities of sender
and receiver and may prevent law enforcement officials from tracing the source of funds on the blockchain. Facilitating transactions
in these digital assets may cause us to be at increased risk of liability arising out of anti-money laundering (“AML”) and
economic sanctions laws and regulations.
While
we believe that our risk management and compliance framework is designed to detect significant illicit activities conducted by our potential
or existing users, we cannot ensure that we will be able to detect all illegal activity on our platform. Illegal activity, the appearance
of illegal activity, or government inquiries into the potential for illegal activity may have an adverse impact on our business, operating
results, and financial condition. Further, any efforts to identify and remedy such illegal or fraudulent activity may be costly, time-consuming,
and ultimately may not be successful. If any of our users use our platform to further such illegal activities, our business and reputation
could be materially and adversely affected.
From
time to time, we may encounter technical issues in connection with the integration of supported digital assets and changes and upgrades
to their underlying networks, which could adversely affect our business.
To
support any supported digital asset, a variety of front and back-end technical and development work is required to implement our wallet,
custody, trading, staking and other solutions for our users, and to integrate such supported digital assets with our existing technical
infrastructure. Some digital assets require extensive development work, and there is no guarantee that we will be able to integrate successfully
with any existing or future digital assets. In addition, such integration may introduce software errors or weaknesses into our cryptocurrency
exchange, including our existing infrastructure. Even if such integration is initially successful, any number of technical changes, software
upgrades, soft or hard forks, cybersecurity incidents, or other changes to the underlying blockchain network may occur from time to time,
causing incompatibility, technical issues, disruptions, or security weaknesses to our digital asset exchanges. If we are unable to identify,
troubleshoot and resolve any such issues successfully, we may be forced to stop supporting the affected digital asset. This could result
in frozen or lost user assets, compromised wallet security, and disruptions to our digital asset exchange and technical infrastructure,
all of which could adversely impact our business.
Relatedly,
as new product features or additional supported assets are made available by our digital asset exchanges, the various system components
and supporting function systems may not integrate properly, and the new product features may not be sufficient to meet the needs of our
users. Such potential technical limitations may limit our ability to effectively respond to industry and regulatory changes, market demands,
or user needs.
Our
insurance coverage is limited, may not cover all losses, and could be hard to maintain in the future.
We
rely on insurance carriers to insure losses resulting from a breach of our physical security or cybersecurity measures, or by employee
or third-party theft. Our insurance coverage for such malfeasance is limited and may not cover the extent of loss nor the nature of such
loss, in which case we may be liable for the full amount of losses suffered, which could be greater than all our assets. Our ability
to maintain such insurance is subject to the insurance carriers’ ongoing underwriting criteria. Our inability to obtain and maintain
appropriate insurance coverage could result in substantial business disruption, adverse reputational impact, inability to compete with
our competitors, and regulatory scrutiny. Any loss of a user’s fiat currency or digital assets could result in a subsequent lapse
in insurance coverage, which could adversely impact our business, operating results, and financial condition.
We
operate in a highly competitive industry and compete against unregulated or less-regulated companies. We also face competition from DEXs
and DAOs, which may be able to innovate faster and offer products and services that we do not offer. We also compete against companies
with greater financial and other resources. Our business, operating results, and financial condition may be adversely affected if we
are unable to respond to competition effectively.
The
digital asset industry is highly innovative, rapidly evolving, characterized by competition, experimentation, changing user needs, frequent
introductions of new products and services, and uncertain and evolving industry and regulatory requirements. We expect competition across
our products and services to further intensify in the future as existing and new competitors introduce new products and services or enhance
existing products and services. We compete against a number of companies operating globally, including those that focus on traditional
financial services and those that focus on digital asset-based services.
45
Our
current and contemplated competition falls into the following categories:
●
other
highly regulated digital asset custodians and exchanges globally;
●
certain
foreign digital asset custodians and exchanges that are either unregulated or subject to significantly less stringent or onerous
regulation, some of whom are potentially able to more quickly adapt to trends, support a greater number of digital assets, and develop
new digital asset-based products and services due to less stringent or onerous regulatory scrutiny;
●
DEXs,
DAOs, and DApps;
●
other
stablecoin issuers, both in the U.S. and other jurisdictions;
●
traditional
financial technology and brokerage firms that have entered, or may enter, the digital asset market to offer overlapping features
targeted at our users; and
Historically,
a major source of competition has been from companies, in particular those located outside the U.S., who at times are and may in the
future be subject to significantly less stringent regulatory and compliance requirements in their local jurisdictions. Their business
models benefit from being unregulated or only regulated in a small number of jurisdictions with less onerous regulations than the U.S.,
while also offering their products in highly regulated jurisdictions, including the United States, without necessarily complying with
the relevant regulatory requirements in such jurisdictions. Our ability to compete with these companies is limited. Since we hold licenses
in several jurisdictions with developed regulatory regimes, we have not been able to offer products and services that some users may
desire, including products and services that our unregulated or less regulated competitors offer to our users.
We
also compete against an increasing number of DeFi and noncustodial platforms, including DEXs and DAOs. On these platforms, users can
interact directly with a market-making smart contract or onchain trading mechanism to exchange one type of digital asset for another
without any centralized intermediary.
These
platforms are typically not as easy to use as our platform, and some lack the speed and liquidity of centralized platforms, but various
innovative models and incentives have been designed to bridge the gap. In addition, such platforms have low startup and entry costs as
market entrants often remain unregulated and have minimal operating and regulatory costs. Many decentralized platforms have been developed
and released on Ethereum, Tron, Polkadot, Solana, and other platforms, many of which have experienced significant growth and adoption.
Concerns about the security of assets following incidents on centralized exchanges, such as the Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing of FTX and
convictions for fraud and mismanagement of funds of its founder and former CEO, may increase adoption of decentralized and noncustodial
platforms. Decentralized exchanges may also not require their users to fill out Know Your Customer (“KYC”) forms, offering
an additional layer of privacy to users. We expect interest in decentralized and non-custodial platforms to grow further as the industry
develops. If our users move to these decentralized exchanges, our revenue may decline, and our business, operating results, and financial
condition will be adversely affected.
We
have expended significant managerial, operational, and compliance costs to meet the legal and regulatory requirements applicable to us
in the United States and other jurisdictions in which we operate, and expect to continue to incur significant costs to comply with these
requirements, which these unregulated or less regulated competitors, particularly those structured as DEXs and DAOs, have not had and
may not have to incur.
Additionally,
given the broad scope of our products and services, we also compete with digital and mobile payment companies and anticipate increasing
competition from traditional financial services companies. Many innovative startup companies and larger companies have made, and continue
to make, significant investments in research and development, and we expect these companies to continue to develop similar or superior
products and technologies that compete with our products. Further, more traditional financial and non-financial services businesses may
choose to offer digital asset-based services in the future as the industry gains adoption. Our current and potential competitors may
establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties that may further enhance their resources.
Our
current and potential competitors possess various competitive advantages over us, including:
●
the
ability to trade digital assets and offer products and services that we do not support or offer on our platform (due to constraints
from regulatory authorities, our banking partners, and other factors), such as tokens that constitute securities or derivative instruments
under U.S. or foreign laws;
●
greater
name recognition, longer operating histories, larger user bases, and larger market shares;
●
larger
sales and marketing budgets and organizations;
●
more
established marketing, banking, and compliance relationships;
●
greater
user support resources;
●
greater
resources to make acquisitions;
●
lower
labor, compliance, risk mitigation, and research and development costs as a percentage of revenues;
●
larger
and more mature intellectual property portfolios;
●
greater
number of applicable licenses or similar authorizations;
●
established
core business models outside of the trading of digital assets, allowing them to operate on lower margins or at a loss;
●
operations
in certain jurisdictions with lower compliance costs and greater flexibility to explore new product offerings; and
●
substantially
greater financial, technical, and other resources.
If
we are unable to compete successfully, or if competing successfully requires us to take costly actions in response to the actions of
our competitors, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be adversely affected.
If
we cannot keep pace with rapid industry changes to provide new and innovative products and services, the use of our products and
services, and consequently our net revenue, could decline, which could adversely impact our business, operating results, and
financial condition.
Our
industry has been characterized by many rapid, significant, and disruptive products and services in recent years. These include dApps,
DeFi, yield farming, NFTs, play-to-earn games, lending, staking, liquid staking and restaking, token wrapping, governance tokens, innovative
programs to attract users such as transaction fee mining programs, initiatives to attract traders such as trading competitions, airdrops
and giveaways, staking reward programs, Layer 2 blockchain networks, and novel cryptocurrency fundraising and distribution schemes, such
as initial coin offerings. We expect new services and technologies to continue to emerge and evolve, which may be superior to, or render
obsolete, the products and services that we currently provide. For example, disruptive technologies such as generative AI may fundamentally
alter the use of our products or services in unpredictable ways. We cannot predict the effects of new services and technologies on our
business. However, our ability to grow our user base and net revenue will depend heavily on our ability to innovate and create successful
new products and services, both independently and in conjunction with third-party developers. Developing and incorporating new products
and services into our business may require substantial expenditure, take considerable time, and ultimately may not be successful. Any
new products or services could fail to attract users, generate revenue, or perform or integrate well with third-party applications and
platforms. In addition, our ability to adapt and compete with new products and services may be inhibited by regulatory requirements and
general uncertainty in the law, constraints by our banking partners and payment processors, third-party intellectual property rights,
or other factors. Moreover, we must continue to enhance our technical infrastructure and other technology offerings to remain competitive
and maintain a platform that has the required functionality, performance, capacity, security, and speed to attract and retain users,
including large, institutional, high-frequency, and high-volume traders. As a result, we expect to incur significant costs and expenses
to develop and upgrade our technical infrastructure to meet the evolving needs of the industry. Our success will depend on our ability
to develop and incorporate new offerings and adapt to technological changes and evolving industry practices. If we are unable to do so
in a timely or cost-effective manner, our business and our ability to successfully compete, to retain existing users, and to attract
new users may be adversely affected.
46
If
we do not effectively scale our business or are unable to maintain and improve our systems and processes, our operating results could
be adversely affected.
We
have experienced a period of significant growth in recent months, both in terms of employee headcount, international footprint, and
user growth. As our business changes, it becomes increasingly complex. To effectively manage and capitalize on our growth periods,
we need to manage headcount, capital and processes efficiently while making investments such as expanding our information technology
and financial, operating, and administrative systems and controls. Growth and scaling back initiatives could strain our existing
resources, and we could experience ongoing operating difficulties in managing our business as it expands across numerous
jurisdictions, including difficulties in hiring, training, managing, and retaining a partially remote and evolving employee base. If
we do not adapt or scale to meet these evolving challenges, we may experience erosion to our brand, the quality of our products and
services may suffer, and our company culture may be harmed. Moreover, the failure of our systems and processes could undermine our
ability to provide accurate, timely, and reliable reports on our financial and operating results, and could impact the effectiveness
of our internal controls over financial reporting. In addition, our systems and processes may not prevent or detect all errors,
omissions, or fraud. Any of the foregoing operational failures could lead to non-compliance with laws, loss of operating licenses or
other authorizations, or loss of bank relationships that could substantially impair or even suspend company operations.
Successful
implementation of our growth strategy will also require significant expenditures before any substantial associated revenue is generated,
and we cannot guarantee that these increased investments will result in corresponding and offsetting revenue growth. Because we have
a limited history of operating our business at its current scale, it is difficult to evaluate our current business and prospects, including
our ability to plan for and model future growth. Our limited operating experience at this scale, combined with the rapidly evolving nature
of the digital asset market in which we operate, substantial uncertainty concerning how these markets may develop, and other economic
factors beyond our control, reduces our ability to accurately forecast quarterly or annual revenue.
Additionally,
from time to time, we realign our resources and talent to implement stage-appropriate business strategies, including furloughs, layoffs,
and reductions in force. As a result of our reduction in workforce, we also lost institutional knowledge. Failure to manage any growth
or any scaling back of our operations could have an adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.
Because
our long-term success depends, in part, on our ability to expand our services to users globally, our business is susceptible to risks
associated with international operations.
We
currently have subsidiaries in Malaysia. We plan to enter or increase our presence in additional markets around the world. We have a
limited operating history outside of Malaysia, and our ability to manage our business and conduct our operations internationally requires
considerable management attention and resources and is subject to challenges of supporting a growing business in an environment of diverse
cultures, languages, customs, tax regimes, legal systems, alternative dispute systems, and regulatory systems. As we continue to expand
our business and user base outside Malaysia, we will be increasingly susceptible to risks associated with international operations. These
risks and challenges include:
●
difficulty
establishing and managing international operations and the increased operations, travel, infrastructure, including establishment
of local user service operations, local infrastructure to manage supported cryptocurrency or other financial instruments and corresponding
books and records, and legal and regulatory compliance costs associated with different jurisdictions;
●
the
potential need to vary pricing and margins to effectively compete in international markets;
●
the
need to adapt and localize our products and services for specific countries, including offering services and support in local languages;
●
compliance
with multiple, potentially conflicting and changing governmental laws and regulations across different jurisdictions;
●
compliance
with U.S. and foreign laws designed to combat money laundering and the financing of terrorist activities, as well as economic and
trade sanctions;
●
the
need to comply with a greater set of law enforcement inquiries;
●
compliance
with the extraterritorial reach of any U.S. regulatory rules, including those imposed by the CFTC, SEC, the Financial Crimes Enforcement
Network (“FinCEN”), or other U.S.-based regulators;
●
compliance
with anti-bribery laws, including compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the U.K. Bribery Act 2010, and other local anti-corruption
laws;
●
difficulties
obtaining and maintaining required licensing from regulators in foreign jurisdictions;
●
competition
with companies that have greater experience in the local markets or pre-existing relationships with users in these markets or that
are subject to fewer regulatory requirements in local jurisdictions;
●
varying
levels of payments and blockchain technology adoption and infrastructure, and increased network, payment processing, banking, and
other costs;
●
difficulties
collecting in foreign currencies and associated foreign currency exposure;
●
difficulties
holding, repatriating, and transferring funds held in offshore bank accounts;
●
difficulties
adapting to foreign customary commercial practices, enforcing contracts and collecting accounts receivable, longer payment cycles
and other collection difficulties;
●
restrictions
on digital asset trading;
●
stringent
local labor laws and regulations;
●
potentially
adverse tax developments and consequences;
●
antitrust
and competition regulations; and
●
regional
economic and political conditions.
We
have limited experience with most international regulatory environments and market practices, and may not be able to penetrate or
successfully operate in the markets we choose to enter. In addition, we may incur significant expenses because of our international
expansion, and we may not be successful. We may face limited brand recognition in certain parts of the world, which could lead to
non-acceptance or delayed acceptance of our products and services by users in new markets. We may also face challenges in complying
with local laws and regulations. For example, we may be subject to regulatory frameworks that are evolving, have not undergone
extensive rulemaking, and could result in uncertain outcomes for our users and/or our ability to offer competitive products or
services in the broader digital asset industry. Our failure to successfully manage these risks could harm our international
operations and have an adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition.
47
Our
strategy and focus on delivering high-quality, compliant, easy-to-use, and secure crypto-related financial services may not maximize
short-term or medium-term financial results.
We
have taken, and expect to continue to take, actions that we believe are in the best interests of our users and the long-term interests
of our business, even if those actions do not necessarily maximize short-term or medium-term results. These include extending significant
managerial, technical, and legal efforts to comply with laws and regulations that are applicable to our products and services and ensuring
that our products are secure. We also focus on engaging in long-term engagement with our users through innovation and developing new
industry-leading products and technologies. These decisions may not be consistent with the short-term and medium-term expectations of
our stockholders and may not produce the long-term benefits that we expect, which could have an adverse effect on our business, operating
results, and financial condition.
If
we fail to retain existing users or add new users, or if our users decrease their level of engagement with our products, services, and
platform, our business, operating results, and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected.
Our
success depends on our ability to retain existing users and attract new users to increase engagement with our products, services, and
platform. To do so, we must continue to offer leading technologies and ensure that our products and services are secure, reliable, and
engaging. We must also expand our products and services and offer competitive prices in an increasingly crowded, price-sensitive, and
competitive market. There is no assurance that we will be able to competitively innovate or offer better prices, that we will be able
to retain our current users or attract new users, or keep our users engaged. Any number of factors can negatively affect user retention,
growth, and engagement, including:
●
user
demand shifting to other products and services, including those that we are unable to offer due to regulatory reasons;
●
our
failure to introduce new and improved products and services that are favorably received;
●
our
failure to support new and in-demand asset classes, or if we elect to support certain asset classes with negative reputations;
●
changes
in user sentiment about the quality or usefulness of our products and services, including concerns related to privacy, security,
regulatory compliance, or other factors;
●
adverse
changes in our products and services that are mandated by legislation, regulatory authorities, or litigation in Malaysia or other
jurisdictions in which we operate;
●
restrictions
on our ability to access markets in certain jurisdictions due to legislation, regulatory requirements, or interventions by regulatory
authorities;
●
negative
user perception regarding the digital assets on our platform;
●
technical
or other problems preventing us from delivering our products and services with the speed, functionality, security, and reliability
that our users expect;
●
cybersecurity
incidents, employee or service provider misconduct, or other unforeseen activities causing losses to us or our users, including losses
to assets held by us on behalf of our users;
●
modifications
to our pricing model or modifications by competitors to their pricing models;
●
our
failure to provide adequate user service; or
●
adverse
media reports or other negative publicity relating to our business, competitors, or the industry.
From
time to time, certain of these factors have negatively affected, and may continue to negatively affect in the future, user retention,
growth, and engagement to varying degrees. Any decrease in user retention, growth, or engagement could render our products and services
less attractive to users and may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial conditions.
In
addition, to retain existing users and attract new users, we must continue to enhance our technical infrastructure and other technology
offerings to remain competitive and maintain a platform that has the required functionality, performance, capacity, security, and speed
to attract and retain users. As a result, we have historically, and expect to continue to, incur significant costs and expenses to develop
and upgrade our technical infrastructure to meet the evolving needs of the industry. Our success will depend on our ability to develop
and incorporate new offerings and adapt to technological changes and evolving industry practices, and to do so in a timely and cost-effective
manner. If we fail to innovate and deliver products and services or fail to do so quickly compared to our competitors, our business and
our ability to successfully compete, to retain existing users, and to attract new users may be materially and adversely affected .
Disputes
with our users could adversely impact our brand, reputation, and business, as well as our operating results and financial
condition.
From
time to time, we have been subject to claims and disputes with our users with respect to our products and services, such as claims and
disputes arising from allegedly fraudulent or unauthorized transactions and account takeovers. In the future, we are likely to face similar
claims, possibly even involving the execution and settlement of digital asset trades, problems with the deposit and withdrawal
of digital assets, failures or malfunctions of our systems and services, or other issues related to our products and services. The ingenuity
of criminal fraudsters, combined with many users’ failure to adopt best practices, including the use of hardware security keys
(e.g., YubiKeys), will likely cause our users to continue to be subject to account takeovers and other identity fraud issues. While we
have taken measures to detect and reduce the risk of fraud, there is no guarantee that they will be successful, and, in any case, to
be effective, they require continuous improvement and optimization for continually evolving forms of fraud. There can be no guarantee
that we will be successful in detecting and resolving these disputes or defending ourselves in any of these matters, and any failure
may result in impaired relationships with our users, damage to our brand and reputation, and substantial fines and damages. In some cases,
the measures we have implemented to detect and deter fraud have led to poor user experiences, including indefinite account inaccessibility
for some of our users, which increases our user support costs and can compound damages. We could incur significant costs in compensating
our users, such as if a transaction was unauthorized, erroneous, or fraudulent. We could also incur significant legal expenses resolving
and defending claims, even those without merit. To the extent we are found to have failed to fulfill our regulatory obligations, we could
also lose our authorizations or licenses or become subject to conditions that could make future operations more costly, impair our ability
to grow, and adversely impact our operating results.
48
If
we fail to develop, maintain, and enhance our brand and reputation, our business, operating results, and financial condition may be adversely
affected.
Our
brand and reputation are key assets and a competitive advantage. Maintaining, protecting, and enhancing our brand depends largely on
the success of our marketing efforts, our ability to provide consistent, high-quality, and secure products, services, features, and support,
and our ability to successfully secure, maintain, and defend our rights to use the “Green-X” mark and other trademarks important
to our brand. We believe that the importance of our brand will increase as competition further intensifies. Our brand and reputation
could be harmed if we fail to achieve these objectives or if our public image were to be tarnished by negative publicity, unexpected
events, or actions by third parties. Unfavorable publicity about us, including our products, services, technology, data privacy and cybersecurity
practices, user service, personnel, and digital assets or digital asset platforms generally could diminish confidence in, and the use
of, our products and services. Moreover, to the extent that we acquire a company and maintain that acquired company’s separate
brand, we could experience brand dilution or fail to retain positive impressions of our own brand to the extent such impressions are
instead attributed to the acquired company’s brand.
We
have in the past, and may in the future, enter into partnerships, collaborations, joint ventures, or strategic alliances with third parties.
If we are unsuccessful in establishing or maintaining strategic relationships with these third parties or if these third parties fail
to deliver certain operational services, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be adversely affected.
We
have in the past, and may in the future, enter into partnerships, collaborations, joint ventures, or strategic alliances with third
parties in connection with the development, operation, and enhancements to our platform and products and the provision of our
services. Identifying strategic relationships with third parties and negotiating and documenting them may be time-consuming and
complex and may distract management. Moreover, we may be delayed or not be successful in achieving the objectives that we anticipate
as a result of such strategic relationships. In evaluating counterparties in connection with partnerships, collaborations, joint
ventures, or strategic alliances, we consider a wide range of economic, legal, and regulatory criteria depending on the nature of
such relationship, including the counterparties’ reputation, operating results, and financial condition, operational ability
to satisfy our and our users’ needs in a timely manner, efficiency and reliability of systems, certification costs to us or to
our users, and licensure and compliance status. Despite this evaluation, third parties may still not meet our or our users’
needs, which may adversely affect our ability to deliver products and services to users, and which may adversely impact our
business, operating results, and financial condition. Counterparties to any strategic relationship may have economic or business
interests or goals that are, or that may become, inconsistent with our business interests or goals, and may subject us to additional
risks to the extent such third-party becomes the subject of negative publicity, faces its own litigation or regulatory challenges,
or faces other adverse circumstances. Conflicts may arise with our strategic partners, such as the interpretation of significant
terms under any agreement, which may result in litigation or arbitration, which would increase our expenses and divert the attention
of our management. If we are unsuccessful in establishing or maintaining strategic relationships with third parties, our ability to
compete in the marketplace or to grow our revenue could be impaired, and our business, operating results, and financial condition
could be adversely affected.
We
currently rely on third-party service providers for certain aspects of our operations, and any interruptions in services provided by
these third parties may impair our ability to support our users.
We
rely on third parties for various aspects of our business, including payment processors and banks; cloud services and data centers for
infrastructure, smart contract development, and website functionality; and external providers for user support, compliance, and product
development. Many or all of these third-party service providers are critical of our operations. Because we rely on third parties to provide
these services and to facilitate certain of our business activities, we face increased operational risks. We do not directly manage the
operation of any of these third parties. These third parties may be subject to financial, legal, regulatory, and labor issues, cybersecurity
incidents, data theft or loss, break-ins, computer viruses or vulnerabilities in their code, denial-of-service attacks, sabotage, acts
of vandalism, loss, disruption, or instability of third-party banking relationships, privacy breaches, service terminations, disruptions,
interruptions, and other misconduct. They are also vulnerable to damage or interruption from human error, power loss, telecommunications
failures, fires, floods, earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, pandemics, and similar events. In addition, these third parties may breach
their agreements with us, disagree with our interpretation of contract terms or applicable laws and regulations, refuse to continue or
renew these agreements on commercially reasonable terms or at all, fail or refuse to process transactions or provide other services adequately,
take actions that degrade the functionality of our products and services, impose additional costs or requirements on us or our users,
or give preferential treatment to competitors. There can be no assurance that third parties that provide services to us or to our users
on our behalf will continue to do so on acceptable terms, or at all. If any third parties do not adequately or appropriately provide
their services or perform their responsibilities to us or our users on our behalf, such as if third-party service providers close their
data center facilities without adequate notice, are unable to restore operations and data, fail to perform as expected, or experience
other unanticipated problems, we may be unable to procure alternatives in a timely and efficient manner and on acceptable terms, or at
all, and we may be subject to business disruptions, losses, or costs to remediate any of the deficiencies, user dissatisfaction, reputational
damage, legal or regulatory proceedings, or other adverse consequences which could harm our business.
Due
to unfamiliarity and some negative publicity associated with digital asset platforms, existing and potential users may lose confidence
in digital asset platforms.
Unlike
securities or other traditional asset exchanges and financial services providers, digital asset platforms are relatively new and, in
some jurisdictions, unregulated. While many prominent digital asset platforms provide the public with significant information regarding
their ownership structure, management teams, corporate practices, and regulatory compliance, many digital asset platforms do not provide
this information, which could result in users making uninformed investment decisions. As a result, the marketplace may lose confidence
in digital asset platforms, including prominent platforms that handle a significant volume of digital asset trading. Additionally, digital
assets may be more vulnerable than other types of assets to market or price manipulation and other fraudulent practices, due to the lack
of regulation globally. Any actual or perceived false trading in trading platforms or any other fraudulent or manipulative acts and practices,
and any associated negative publicity, could adversely affect the value of digital assets and/or negatively affect the market perception
of such digital assets and, by extension, other digital asset markets and platforms, including our platform. Larger platforms like ours
are more appealing targets for hackers and malware. Such attacks could cause users to lose confidence in digital asset platforms.
Additionally,
numerous digital asset platforms have been sued, investigated, or shut down due to fraud, manipulative practices, business failure, and
security breaches. In many of these instances, users of these platforms were not compensated or made whole for their losses. For example,
in November 2022, FTX, a crypto exchange, filed for bankruptcy, and a year later, in November 2023, FTX’s CEO was found guilty
of fraud. On March 27, 2023, the CFTC announced the filing of a civil enforcement action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern
District of Illinois charging, among others, various entities that operate the Binance platform and Binance’s co-founder and CEO
with numerous violations of the U.S. Commodities Exchange Act of 1936 (the “CEA”) and CFTC regulations. Furthermore, on June
5, 2023, the SEC filed a civil complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against Binance and other related entities,
as well as its co-founder and CEO. The complaint consisted of thirteen charges, including misleading investors and operating as an unregistered
securities exchange, broker and clearing agency in violation of U.S. securities laws. While on May 29, 2025, the SEC dismissed its civil
lawsuit, on November 21, 2023, Binance and its CEO pled guilty to federal criminal charges that Binance violated and caused a financial
institution to violate the BSA, with Binance entering into a $4.3 billion settlement with the U.S. Justice Department, in addition to
the confiscation of certain assets and its CEO resigning and accepting an individual fine of $50 million. Binance also settled with the
CFTC on November 21, 2023.
49
The
outcome and results of these and other enforcement actions against digital asset platforms, to the extent not already resolved or dismissed,
may have a significant negative impact on the adoption and use of digital assets both globally and within the United States and could
negatively impact the liquidity, volatility, and value of such assets. In addition, there have been reports that a significant amount
of digital asset trading volume on digital asset platforms is fabricated and false in nature. Such reports may indicate that the market
for digital asset platform activities is significantly smaller than otherwise understood.
Negative
perception, a lack of stability and standardized regulation in the digital asset industry, and the closure or temporary shutdown of digital
asset platforms due to fraud, business failure, hackers or malware, or government mandated regulation, as well as any associated losses
suffered by users, may reduce confidence in digital assets and result in greater volatility of the prices of digital assets, including
significant depreciation in their value. Any of these events could have a material effect on our business, operating results, and financial
condition.
Our
users may deposit and withdraw digital assets into and from our platform, and errors that occur with respect to such deposits and withdrawals
could result in loss of some or all of a user’s assets, user disputes, and other liabilities, which could adversely impact our
business, operating results, and financial condition.
Digital
assets are controllable only by the possessor of both the unique blockchain address and the controlling private key relating to the local
or online digital wallet in which such a digital asset is held. In order to deposit digital assets held by a user into our crypto exchange
or custody platforms, a user must “sign” a transaction that consists of the private key of the wallet from which the user
is transferring digital assets, direct the deposit using the blockchain address of a wallet that we control and which we provide to the
user, and broadcast the deposit transaction onto the underlying blockchain network. Similarly, to withdraw digital assets from our digital
asset exchanges or custody platforms, a user must provide us with the blockchain address of the wallet that the digital assets are to
be transferred to, and a party with access to the private keys of a wallet holding the digital asset to be withdrawn is required to “sign”
a transaction authorizing the transfer. In addition, some blockchain networks might require additional information to be provided in
connection with any transfer of digital assets into or out of our platforms and wallets. Several errors could occur in the process of
depositing or withdrawing digital assets into or from our platform, such as typos, mistakes, or failure to include the information required
by the blockchain network. For instance, a user may incorrectly enter our wallet’s blockchain address or the desired recipient’s
blockchain address when depositing and withdrawing from our platforms, respectively. Alternatively, a user may transfer digital assets
to a wallet address that the user does not own, control, or hold private keys to. In addition, each wallet address is only compatible
with the underlying blockchain network on which it is created. For instance, a Bitcoin wallet address can only be used to send and receive
Bitcoin. If any other or other digital assets are sent to a Bitcoin wallet address, or if any of the foregoing errors occur, such digital
assets could be permanently and irretrievably lost with no means of recovery. Such incidents could result in user disputes, damage to
our brand and reputation, legal claims against us, and financial liabilities, any of which could adversely affect our business, operating
results, and financial condition.
A
temporary or permanent blockchain fork to any supported digital asset could adversely affect our business.
Most
blockchain protocols, including Bitcoin and Ethereum, are open source. Any user can download the software, modify it, and then propose
that Bitcoin, Ethereum, or other blockchain protocols users, miners or validators adopt the modification. When a modification is introduced
and a substantial majority of users and miners or validators consent to the modification, the change is implemented, and the Bitcoin,
Ethereum, or other blockchain protocol networks, as applicable, remain uninterrupted. However, if less than a substantial majority of
users and miners or validators consent to the proposed modification, and the modification is not compatible with the software prior to
its modification, the consequence would be what is known as a “fork” (i.e., split) of the impacted blockchain protocol network
and respective blockchain, with one prong running the pre-modified software and the other running the modified software. The effect of
such a fork would be the existence of two parallel versions of the Bitcoin, Ethereum, or other blockchain protocol network, as applicable,
running simultaneously, but with each split network’s digital asset lacking interchangeability with the other.
We
do not guarantee that we will support any fork or provide the benefit of any forked digital asset to our users. However, we have in the
past and may in the future continue to be subject to claims by users arguing that they are entitled to receive certain forked or airdropped
digital assets by virtue of digital assets that they hold with us. If any users succeed in a claim that they are entitled to receive
the benefits of a forked or airdropped digital asset that we do not or are unable to support, we may be required to pay significant damages,
fines, or other fees to compensate users for their losses.
A fork may also disrupt networks and our information technology systems, leading to cybersecurity attacks, replay
attacks, or security weaknesses, any of which can result in the temporary or even permanent loss of our users’ assets. Such disruption and loss could
cause us to be exposed to liability, even in circumstances where we have no intention of supporting an asset compromised by a fork.
We
currently support, and expect to continue to support, certain smart contract-based digital assets. If the underlying smart contracts
for these digital assets do not operate as expected, or if the fundamental premise of smart contract acceptance or function shifts, our
business could be adversely affected.
We
currently support, and expect to continue to support, various digital assets that represent units of value on smart contracts deployed
on a third-party blockchain. Smart contracts are programs that can store, automatically execute and transfer value, or conduct other
operations when certain conditions are met. Since smart contracts typically cannot be stopped or reversed, vulnerabilities in their programming
and design can have damaging effects. For instance, in April 2018, a batch overflow bug was found in many Ethereum-based ERC-20-compatible
smart contract tokens that allowed hackers to create many smart contract tokens, causing multiple digital asset platforms worldwide to
shut down ERC-20 compatible token trading. Similarly, in March 2020, a design flaw in the MakerDAO smart contract caused forced liquidations
of digital assets at significantly discounted prices, resulting in millions of dollars of losses to users who had deposited digital assets
into the smart contract. If any such vulnerabilities or flaws come to fruition, smart contract-based digital assets, including those
held by our users on our digital asset exchanges, may suffer negative publicity, be exposed to security vulnerabilities, decline significantly
in value, or lose liquidity over a short period of time.
50
In
some cases, smart contracts can be controlled by one or more admin keys or users with special privileges, or
“super-users.” These users can unilaterally make changes to the smart contract, enable or disable features on the smart
contract, change how the smart contract receives external inputs and data, and make other changes to the smart contract. For smart
contracts that hold a pool of reserves, these users may also be able to extract funds from the pool, liquidate assets held in the
pool, or take other actions that decrease the value of the assets held by the smart contract in reserves. Even for digital assets
that have adopted a decentralized governance mechanism, such as smart contracts that are governed by the holders of a governance
token, such governance tokens can be concentrated in the hands of a small group of core community members, who would be able to make
similar changes unilaterally to the smart contract. If any such super-user or group of core members unilaterally makes adverse
changes to a smart contract, the design, functionality, features and value of the smart contract and its related digital assets may
be harmed. In addition, digital assets held by the smart contract in reserves may be stolen, misused, burnt, locked up, or otherwise
become unusable or irrecoverable. These super-users can also become targets of hackers and malicious attackers. If an attacker is
able to access or obtain the super-user privileges of a smart contract, or if a smart contract’s super users or core community
members take actions that adversely affect the smart contract, our users who hold and transact in the affected digital assets may
experience decreased functionality and value of the applicable digital assets, up to and including a total loss of the value of such
digital assets. Although we do not control these smart contracts, any such events could cause users to seek damages against us for
their losses, result in reputational damage to us, or in other ways adversely impact our business.
Failure
to maintain adequate recordkeeping of electronic communications could expose the Company to regulatory risks and operational liabilities
and reduce our ability to address legal actions.
Failure
to maintain comprehensive records of written communications, especially those conducted off- channel (e.g., personal phones, private
email accounts, or other devices), poses significant risks to us. Inadequate recordkeeping violates regulatory requirements set
forth by the SEC. The inability to produce complete and accurate records during examinations can result in enforcement actions,
fines, or even revocation of registration. Also, without proper documentation, we may face legal challenges. In the event of
disputes, investigations, or litigation, the absence of records can weaken our legal position and hinder effective defense. Failing
to capture texts, emails, instant messages, and other off-channel communications also creates operational vulnerabilities. These gaps
may lead to misunderstandings, misrepresentations, or unauthorized actions that may cause harm to our brand or harm to our clients.
Finally, personal devices used for off-channel communications may lack the same security protocols as firm-managed systems. This
increases the risk of data breaches, leaks, or unauthorized access.
If
miners or validators of any supported digital asset demand high transaction fees, our operating results may be adversely affected.
We
charge dynamic withdrawal fees when a user sends certain digital assets from their Green-X account to a non-Green-X account. We estimate
the blockchain network fee based on the cost that we will incur to process the withdrawal transaction on the underlying blockchain network.
In addition, we also pay blockchain network fees when we move digital assets for various operational purposes, such as when we transfer
digital assets between our hot and cold wallets, for which we do not charge our users. However, fees can be unpredictable and, if miners
or validators demand higher transaction fees for recording transactions in the underlying blockchain network, the cost of using the applicable
digital asset may increase, and the marketplace may be reluctant to accept such a digital asset as a means of payment. Alternatively,
miners or validators could collude in an anti-competitive manner to reject low transaction fees and force users to pay higher fees. While
we do not expect such behavior, higher transaction confirmation fees may adversely affect our business. Although we generally attempt
to pass blockchain network fees relating to user withdrawals through to our users, if we must pay higher blockchain network fees relating
to user withdrawals, we could incur losses associated with the payment of blockchain network fees more than what we currently charge
for our services, resulting in adverse impacts on our operating results.
Risks
Relating to Regulatory and Legal Matters
The
digital asset industry is still novel. As a result, many policymakers are just beginning to consider what a regulatory regime for digital
assets would look like and the elements that would serve as the foundation for such a regime. This less developed consideration of digital
assets may harm our ability to effectively react to proposed legislation and regulation of digital assets or digital asset platforms
adverse to our business.
As
digital assets have grown in both popularity and market size, local and foreign governmental organizations, consumer agencies and public
advocacy groups have been examining the operations of blockchain networks, users and platforms, with a focus on how digital assets can
be used to launder the proceeds of illegal activities, fund criminal or terrorist enterprises, and the safety and soundness of platforms
and other service providers that hold digital assets for users. Many of these entities have called for heightened regulatory oversight
and have issued consumer advisories describing the risks posed by digital assets to users and investors.
Competitors,
including traditional financial services, have spent years cultivating professional relationships with relevant policymakers on behalf
of their industry so that those policymakers may understand that industry, the current legal landscape affecting that industry, and the
specific policy proposals that could be implemented to responsibly develop that industry. The lobbyists working for these competitors
have similarly spent years developing and working to implement strategies to advance these industries. Members of the digital asset space
have engaged policymakers directly and with the help of external advisors and lobbyists. New laws and regulations may be proposed and
adopted in the United States and internationally, or existing laws and regulations may be interpreted in new ways that harm the digital
asset space or digital asset platforms, which could adversely impact our business. Additionally, our political activities to further
our mission may be perceived unfavorably by investors and the public and have an adverse impact on our brand and reputation.
The
2024 U.S. presidential election and change of administration could have a significant impact on the digital asset industry, which will
depend on the approach the new administration takes with respect to the industry. Although it appears that the current Chair of the SEC
is taking a different approach to digital assets than was undertaken by the previous Chair, including with respect to rulemaking, formal
and informal guidance, and enforcement decisions, there can be no assurance that the current Chair or the current administration will
ultimately enact rules or regulations that take a more favorable or significantly different approach toward the digital asset industry
than the previous administration.
51
It
may be illegal now, or in the future, to acquire, own, hold, sell, or use bitcoin or other digital assets, participate in blockchains
or utilize similar digital assets in one or more countries, which would adversely affect our business operations.
As
digital assets have grown in both popularity and market size, governments around the world have reacted differently to digital assets;
certain governments have deemed them illegal, and others have allowed their use and trade without restriction, while in some jurisdictions,
such as in the United States, they are subject to evolving regulatory requirements. As digital assets have grown in popularity and market
size, the U.S. Congress, U.S. financial regulators, and certain U.S. agencies have begun to examine digital assets in greater detail.
One
or more countries, including but not limited to China, which have taken harsh regulatory action in the past, may take future regulatory
actions that could severely restrict the right to acquire, own, hold, sell, or use these digital assets or to exchange them for fiat
currency. In many nations, particularly in China, it is illegal to accept payment in cryptocurrencies for consumer transactions, and
banking institutions are barred from accepting deposits of digital assets. Such restrictions may adversely affect us, as the large-scale
use of digital assets as a means of exchange is presently confined to certain regions globally.
A
particular digital asset, digital asset transaction, or product or service offering status as a security or sold as part of a securities
transaction in any relevant jurisdiction is subject to a high degree of uncertainty. If we incorrectly conclude that a digital asset,
digital asset transaction, or product or service offering is not offered and sold as a security or securities transaction, we may be
subject to regulatory scrutiny, inquiries, investigations, fines, and other penalties, which may adversely affect our business, operating
results, and financial condition.
Several
jurisdictions have taken a broad-based approach to classifying digital assets transactions, products, and services as securities or subject
to their securities laws, while other jurisdictions have adopted a narrower approach. As a result, certain digital asset transactions,
products or services may be deemed to be a security or securities transaction under the laws of some jurisdictions but not others. Determining
whether any given digital asset is offered and sold in a securities transaction is a highly complex, fact-driven analysis, the outcome
of which is difficult to predict and may evolve over time based on changes in a particular crypto asset and the way in which it is offered
and sold. Different parties may reach different conclusions about the outcome of this analysis based on the same facts. For example,
the SEC and its staff have previously taken the position that transactions involving many digital assets fall within the definition of
a security under the U.S. federal securities laws. Alternatively, SEC officials have also indicated or implied through various media
that it does not consider transactions in bitcoin or ether to be offered and sold in securities transactions. More recently, the SEC’s
Division of Corporation Finance has published statements that it does not consider, under certain circumstances, “meme coins”
or some stablecoins to be securities. However, such statements may be withdrawn at any time without notice and comment by the Division
of Corporation Finance at the SEC or the SEC itself. In addition, the current Chairman of the SEC has stated he believes most digital
assets are not securities; however, this is not an official statement by the SEC, may not represent the agency’s views, and does
not bind it. As a result, there is little certainty under applicable legal tests whether certain digital assets are or are not offered
and sold in securities transactions, and any such determination has wide-ranging implications for the regulatory obligations that flow
from the offer, sale, trading, and clearing of such assets, including licensing, registration, and qualification requirements.
We
have policies and procedures to analyze whether transactions in each digital asset on our platform, as well as our products and services,
could be deemed to be a security under applicable laws. Although we perform ongoing monitoring of digital assets supported on our platform
and we maintain a listing and delisting policy, our policies and procedures do not constitute a legal standard but rather represent our
company-developed assessment regarding the likelihood that a particular digital asset transaction, product, or service should be deemed
a security or securities transaction under applicable laws. In the event that we determine that a supported digital asset has been ultimately
determined to be a security or that the continued offering or sale of a digital asset presents a significant risk to us or our users,
we aim to take prompt action to discontinue the trading of the digital asset. Regardless of our conclusions or actions, we could be subject
to legal or regulatory action in the event the SEC, state regulators, a foreign regulatory authority, or a court were to determine that
a digital asset transaction, product, or service currently or previously offered, sold, or traded on our platform is a securities transaction
under applicable laws. In addition, such policies and procedures may not be sufficient to mitigate and address all risks.
A
determination by a regulatory authority or court that transactions in a digital asset that we currently support on our platform constitute
securities transactions may also result in us determining that it is advisable to remove such digital asset from our platform, as well
as digital assets that have similar characteristics to such digital asset that was determined to be a security.
Investors
should carefully consider the foregoing risks together with the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, including our condensed consolidated financial statements and the
related notes appearing elsewhere herein.
52
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
On
June 10, 2025, the Company entered into subscription agreements with five individual investors, providing for the private placement of
an aggregate of 500,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, par value $0.0001, at a per share purchase price of $1.00.
On
June 23, 2025, the Company entered into another subscription agreement with an individual investor, providing for the private placement
of 200,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, par value $0.0001, at a per share purchase price of $1.30.
For
the period ended September 30, 2025, the Company issued 700,000 shares of its Common Stock for total proceeds of $760,000. The proceeds
aim to fund the expansion of the Company’s operations.
On
October 1, 2025, the Company entered into subscription agreements with four individual investors, providing for the private placement
of an aggregate of 100,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, par value $0.0001, at a per share purchase price of $1.30.
After
September 30, 2025, and as of the date of this report, the Company issued an additional 100,000 shares of its Common Stock for total
proceeds of $130,000. The proceeds aim to fund the expansion of the Company’s operations.
Item
3. Defaults upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item
4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not
applicable.
Item
5. Other Information.
None.
Item
6. Exhibits
Exhibit
No.
Description
31.1
Rule 13(a)-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification of principal executive officer
31.2
Rule 13(a)-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification of principal financial officer
32.1
Section 1350 Certification of principal executive officer
32.2
Section 1350 Certification of principal financial officer and principal accounting officer
101.
INS*
Inline
XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH*
Inline
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL*
Inline
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF*
Inline
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB*
Inline
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
101.PRE*
Inline
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
104*
Cover
Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101).
53
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Greenpro
Capital Corp.
Date:
November 13, 2025
By:
/s/
Lee Chong Kuang
Lee
Chong Kuang
President
and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal
Executive Officer)
Date:
November 13, 2025
By:
/s/
Loke Che Chan, Gilbert
Loke
Che Chan, Gilbert
Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
54
Text extracted from the filing as submitted to EDGAR. Formatting, tables and exhibits are simplified for reading; the original document is authoritative for anything you rely on.