Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Arbitration
In April 2008, Venezuela revoked the Brisas Project Authorization to Affect. In October 2009, in response to the revocation, the Company filed a Request for Arbitration under the Additional Facility Rules of ICSID of the World Bank, in Washington D.C. seeking compensation for the losses caused to the Company as a result of Venezuelas violations of the Canada Venezuela Treaty relating to the Company and its investments in the Brisas Project and the Choco 5 property.
The Canada Venezuela Treaty requires as a precondition to bringing an arbitration claim under the Treaty that an investor and any enterprise the investor owns directly or indirectly that has suffered losses that form the basis of a claim by the investor to "waive[ ] its right to initiate or continue any other proceedings in relation to the measure that is alleged to be in breach of [the Treaty] before the courts or tribunals of the Contracting Party concerned or in a dispute settlement procedure of any kind." As a result, the Company and its relevant subsidiaries waived their right to commence or continue with other legal or administrative challenges to the conduct that forms the basis of the ICSID claim, including the revocation of the Permit and the denial of the extension of the Brisas Alluvial and El Pauji Concessions.
In November 2009 ICSID registered our Request for Arbitration and in April 2010, the first Session of the Tribunal was held that established procedural matters and the calendar for the briefings. In compliance with the schedule established by the ICSID Tribunal, we filed the Memorial on September 24, 2010, seeking compensation of US$1.928 billion for all of the loss and damage resulting from Venezuelas wrongful conduct, which includes the full market value of the legal rights to develop the Brisas Project.
As presently directed by the Tribunal, Venezuelas Counter-Memorial is due April 14, 2011; Gold Reserves Reply is due July 15, 2011, Venezuelas Rejoinder is due October 17, 2011, and the hearing date is scheduled for February 6, 2012. A decision by the Tribunal may be issued by late 2012 or early 2013.
Refer to www.goldreserveinc.com/international arbitration for additional information regarding the procedural status of the Companys arbitration against the Republic of Venezuela (the Respondent). The information located on our website is not incorporated by reference to this annual report and has not been filed or furnished to the SEC.
Litigation
On December 15, 2008, Rusoro Mining Ltd. (Rusoro) commenced an unsolicited offer to acquire all of the outstanding shares and equity units of the Company in consideration for three shares of Rusoro for each Company share or equity unit. On December 16, 2008, the Company filed an action in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice against Rusoro and Rusoros financial advisor Endeavour Financial International Corporation (Endeavour) seeking an injunction restraining Rusoro and Endeavour from proceeding with Rusoros unsolicited offer, significant monetary damages, and various other items. Endeavour was the Companys financial advisor from 2004 until shortly after the commencement of Rusoros offer.
- 12 -
On February 10, 2009, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice granted an interlocutory injunction restraining Rusoro from proceeding with any hostile takeover bid to acquire the shares of the Company until the conclusion and disposition at trial of the action commenced by the Company. The injunction was granted by the Court following a motion by the Company on the basis that Rusoro had access to or benefited from the use of the Companys confidential information as a result of Rusoros relationship with Endeavour. The Court also issued an interlocutory injunction restraining Endeavour from having any involvement with a hostile takeover bid for the Company. The Court further required that Rusoro, Endeavour and their agents return to the Company both all the confidential information of the Company and also anything produced from that confidential information and pay the court costs. Following the issuance of the interlocutory injunctions, Rusoro withdrew its unsolicited offer to acquire the outstanding shares and equity units of the Company.
On February 15, 2009, Rusoro and Endeavour both served a motion with the Ontario Superior Court of Justice seeking permission to appeal to the Divisional Court the February 10, 2009 order that was granted against them. The Company opposed these motions which were heard in Toronto on April 2, 2009. On April 6, 2009 the permission to appeal was denied. Rusoro has filed a counterclaim against the Company for, among other things, damages of Cdn $102.5 million allegedly arising from the Companys successful motion for an interlocutory injunction. Endeavour has filed a $0.5 million counter claim against the Company relating to the lost opportunity to earn a success fee from the successful completion of the Rusoro offer. During 2010 the Company developed its strategy for the execution of this action, added two additional defendants, amended the claim for monetary damages and collected all its relevant documents, including electronically stored information and is in the process of proceeding to depositions.
Item 4.
(Removed and Reserved)
PART II
Text extracted from the filing as submitted to EDGAR. Formatting, tables and exhibits are simplified for reading; the original document is authoritative for anything you rely on.