2 unchanged sentences
In the opinion of management, none of these matters are expected to have a material effect in the aggregate on the consolidated financial statements with the exception of the lawsuits described herein.
−Removed: Putative Securities Class Action Lawsuit
−Removed: In February 2020, two putative securities class action complaints were filed against Former Six Flags and certain of its former executive officers (collectively, the “defendants”) in the U.S.
−Removed: District Court for the Northern District of Texas.
−Removed: On March 2, 2020, the two cases were consolidated in an action captioned Electrical Workers Pension Fund Local 103 I.B.E.W.
−Removed: Six Flags Entertainment Corp., et al.
−Removed: 4:20-cv-00201-P (N.D.
−Removed: Tex.), and an amended complaint was filed on March 20, 2020.
−Removed: A consolidated compliant was filed on July 2, 2020.
−Removed: The consolidated complaint alleged, among other things, that the defendants made materially false or misleading statements or omissions regarding Former Six Flags' business, operations and growth prospects, specifically with respect to the development of Six Flags branded parks in China and the financial health of its former partner, Riverside Investment Group Co.
−Removed: Ltd., in violation of the federal securities laws.
−Removed: The consolidated complaint sought an unspecified amount of compensatory damages and other relief on behalf of a putative class of purchasers of Former Six Flags’ publicly traded common stock during the period between April 24, 2018 and February 19, 2020.
−Removed: Following the grant of defendants' motion to dismiss, its reversal on appeal to the U.S.
−Removed: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, the grant by the District Court of defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings and its reversal by the Fifth Circuit.
−Removed: On September 3, 2024, the parties entered into a settlement agreement, subject to court approval, resolving the claims.
−Removed: The Combined Company will pay $40.0 million to settle the claims, an amount that will be fully funded by the Combined Company’s insurance carriers.
−Removed: On January 28, 2025, the District Court entered its order and judgment of final approval of the settlement agreement.
+Added: Commissioner of Competition v.
+Added: Canada's Wonderland Company
+Added: Canada's Wonderland Company (“Canada’s Wonderland”) is respondent to an application filed by the Commissioner of Competition (the “Commissioner”) on May 5, 2025 with the Competition Tribunal of Canada.
+Added: In the application, the Commissioner alleges that Canada’s Wonderland is in violation of the Competition Act, RSC 1985, c C-34 (the “Act”) by engaging in a deceptive marketing practice (drip pricing) related to its processing fees for online transactions, by advertising ticket and product prices online that exclude mandatory processing fees.
+Added: The Commissioner seeks certain relief from the Competition Tribunal, including an order requiring payment of an unspecified administrative monetary penalty and an order requiring payment of an unspecified amount to be distributed among consumers.
+Added: On June 19, 2025, Canada’s Wonderland filed a response denying the allegations in the Commissioner’s application.
+Added: Canada’s Wonderland and the Commissioner will participate in a mediation relating to the claims alleged in the application in March 2026, and the Evidentiary Hearing is scheduled for September 2026, with Oral Argument scheduled for October 2026.
+Added: City of Livonia Employees' Retirement System v.
+Added: Six Flags Entertainment Corporation
+Added: On November 5, 2025, a putative federal securities class action complaint was filed against Six Flags Entertainment Corporation and certain current and former officers and directors in the U.S.
+Added: District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, captioned City of Livonia Employees’ Retirement System v.
+Added: Six Flags Entertainment Corp., et al ., No.
+Added: 3:25-cv-02394 (N.D.
+Added: The complaint asserts claims under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, and alleges, among other things, that the Company’s registration statement and prospectus issued in connection with the July 1, 2024 merger of Former Six Flags and Cedar Fair, L.P.
+Added: contained untrue statements of fact and/or was materially misleading because it failed to disclose that Former Six Flags had underinvested in its parks and operations and that, as a result, the financial plans in the registration statement were not
+Added: reasonably achievable or rooted in facts existing at the time of the July 1, 2024 merger.
+Added: The defendants have not yet responded to the complaint, but intend to defend the action vigorously.
There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A.
1 unchanged sentence
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.