4 unchanged sentences
On May 10, 2024, the Company was the subject of a defamatory article / blog post.
−Removed: In connection with this post, one of the Company’s sell-side customers paused its connection to the Company while the allegations were investigated.
−Removed: This customer reconnected the Company on May 22, 2024 and sell-side volumes have resumed but not yet at the levels experienced prior to the pause in May 2024.
−Removed: The Company is actively working with its partners to achieve prior volume levels.
+Added: In connection with this post, one of the Company’s customers paused its connection to the Company while the allegations were investigated.
+Added: This customer reconnected the Company on May 22, 2024 and volumes had resumed but not yet at the levels experienced prior to the pause in May 2024 which has created a significant disruption in the Company's business.
+Added: During 2025, the Company worked with its partners to achieve prior volume levels but was unable to achieve historical volumes for the year.
In May 2024, the Company, as plaintiff, filed a lawsuit against the author of the defamatory article.
On March 5, 2025, the United States District Court for the District of Maryland denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss in its entirety.
−Removed: The Company has filed a motion to dismiss counterclaims which is currently pending.
+Added: On March 9, 2026, the Court granted the Company's motion to dismiss counterclaims but granted the defendant time to amend their counterclaim, which the defendant chose not to amend.
The Company will continue to vigorously pursue its claims and rights and any defenses against counterclaims.
7 unchanged sentences
The lead plaintiff has since appealed that dismissal and has filed an opening brief which was due to the court on November 3, 2025.
+Added: The Company filed a response brief on January 2, 2026.
+Added: The lead plaintiff filed a reply brief on February 6, 2026.
+Added: The Company now awaits the Court's decision about whether to set the case for oral argument.
The Company cannot make any predictions about the final outcome of this matter or the timing thereof but believes that plaintiffs’ claims lack merit and intends to vigorously defend these lawsuits.
Compared sentence by sentence after normalising whitespace, quotation marks, case and digits, so re-formatting and restated figures do not read as changed language. Wording changes appear as one removal and one addition. The current filing and the prior one are authoritative.