Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
We may, from time to time, be subject to various claims and legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, including arbitrations, class actions and other litigation. We are also the subject of various actions, inquiries, investigations, and proceedings by regulatory and other governmental agencies. The outcomes of the legal and regulatory matters discussed below are inherently uncertain and some of these matters may result in adverse judgments or awards, including penalties, injunctions or other relief, and could materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows.
State Regulatory Investigations
In August 2019, the New York Department of Financial Services notified us that it and ten other state regulators (collectively, the “ States
”) were requesting information concerning our non-recourse
cash advance product as part of a broader investigation of companies offering nonrecourse advance and early wage access products. The investigation seeks to understand whether such products constitute activity subject to state licensure and consumer credit laws. In April 2020, we received a request for additional information and notice that an additional seven states had joined the broader inquiry. We have responded to all information requests and the States have not further engaged with us or communicated any conclusions or investigative findings.
46
Table of Contents
In December 2021, we entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) with the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (“CA DFPI”). The MOU requires us to provide the CA DFPI with certain information as requested by the CA DFPI and adhere to certain best practices in connection with our non-recourse
cash advance product (including certain disclosures related to us not being licensed by the CA DFPI).
We have received inquiries from various states related to our non-recourse
cash advance business and whether our activities are subject to each state’s consumer credit laws. We responded to all requests from these states and have received no further communications from them.
Class Action Lawsuit
On September 16, 2020, a class action lawsuit, Stoffers v. Dave Inc. was filed in Los Angeles Superior Court in connection with the data breach we experienced in June 2020. For more information about the data breach, see the section titled “ Risk Factors—Cyberattacks and other security breaches or disruptions suffered by us or third parties upon which we rely could have a materially adverse effect on our business, harm our reputation and expose us to public scrutiny and liability.
” Dave is in the process of settling this matter and estimates the settlement to be approximately $3.2 million, which is included with legal settlement expenses, net of insurance reimbursements, within the statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Other Legal Matters
Martinsek v. Dave Inc.
In January 2020, a former employee of the Company, Zachary Martinsek, filed a complaint in the California Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles against the Company and the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, asserting claims for, among other things, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, conversion, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The complaint alleges that the Company and the Chief Executive Officer misappropriated approximately 6.8 million shares (as adjusted for a 10:1 forward stock split in November 2020) by rescinding a stock option agreement and a restricted stock purchase agreement between the Company and Mr. Martinsek under which such shares were issued and repurchasing the shares. The Company rescinded the agreements for failure of consideration. The Company and the Chief Executive Officer answered, denying all claims and asserting defenses. Discovery has commenced, but no trial date has been set. The Company is vigorously defending against this claim.
Whalerock v. Dave Inc.
The Company and Whalerock Industries Holding Company, LLC (“Whalerock”) are engaged in litigation over the sublease entered into between the parties in May 2020. Under the sublease, the Company agreed to sublease certain office space from Whalerock in West Hollywood, California. This matter involves a dispute between the Company and Whalerock over when the 18-month
sublease commenced. The Company believes the lease commencement date was June 15th, 2021, when the California stay-at
home order was lifted and the Company was legally allowed to use the sublease premises. The total rent payments in dispute total approximately $1.8 million. The Company is actively litigating this matter and cannot reasonably estimate the most likely outcome at this time.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
47
Table of Contents
PART II
Text extracted from the filing as submitted to EDGAR. Formatting, tables and exhibits are simplified for reading; the original document is authoritative for anything you rely on.