Contango Silver & Gold Inc. 10-K

Item 2. PROPERTIES Overview Information concerning the Company’s mining properties in this Form 10-K have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of S-K 1300. As used in this Form 10-K, the terms “mineral resource,” “measured mineral resource,” “indicated mineral resource,” “inferred mineral resource,” “mineral reserve,” “proven mineral reserve” and “probable mineral reserve” are defined and used in accordance with S-K 1300. Under S-K 1300, mineral resources may not be classified as “mineral reserves” unless the determination has been made by a qualified person (“Qualified Person”), as defined in S-K 1300, that the mineral resources can be the basis of an economically viable project. Readers are specifically cautioned not to assume that any part or all of the mineral deposits (including any mineral resources) in these categories will ever be converted into mineral reserves. If mineral reserves are established on the Company's project, there is no guarantee that mining of those mineral reserves will be economically viable for the Company. Readers are also cautioned that, except for that portion of mineral resources classified as mineral reserves, mineral resources do not have demonstrated economic value. Inferred mineral resources are estimates based on limited geological evidence and sampling and have a too high of a degree of uncertainty as to their existence to apply relevant technical and economic factors likely to influence the prospects of economic extraction in a manner useful for evaluation of economic viability. Estimates of inferred mineral resources may not be converted directly to a mineral reserve and it cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. A significant amount of exploration must be completed in order to determine whether an inferred mineral resource may be upgraded to a higher category. Therefore, readers are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource exists, that it can be the basis of an economically viable project, or that it will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Likewise, readers are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of measured or indicated mineral resources will ever be converted to mineral reserves. See “Part I. Item 1A Risk Factors” of this Form 10-K. The information that follows is derived, for the most part, from, and in some instances is an extract from, the Manh Choh TRS as of May 12, 2023, the Lucky Shot Technical Report Summary (“TRS”) as of May 26, 2023, and the Johnson Tract TRS as of May 12, 2025. The Manh Choh TRS, Lucky Shot TRS, and Johnson Tract TRS were prepared in compliance with the Item 601(b)(96) and S-K 1300. Portions of the following information are based on assumptions, qualifications and procedures that are not fully described herein. Reference should be made to the full text of the Manh Choh TRS, Lucky Shot TRS, and Johson Tract TRS, filed as Exhibits 96.1, 96.2 and 96.3, respectively, to this Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference. Property Summary On January 8, 2015, the Company and a subsidiary of Royal Gold, formed the Peak Gold JV and the Company contributed its leasehold interest in a mineral lease with the Native Village of Tetlin whose governmental entity is the Tetlin Tribal Council (“Tetlin Tribal Council”) for the exploration of minerals near Tok, Alaska on a currently estimated 675,000 acres (the “Tetlin Lease”) to the Peak Gold JV. In addition to the Tetlin Lease, the Peak Gold JV also holds 159 State of Alaska mining claims covering approximately 13,000 acres for the exploration of gold and associated minerals (together with the Tetlin Lease, the “Peak Gold JV Property”). As of December 31, 2025, the Company held a 30% membership interest, and KG Mining held a 70% membership interest in and manages the Peak Gold JV. The Peak Gold JV Property contains the Main and North Manh Choh deposits (the “Manh Choh Project”), which the Company currently considers its only material property. 17 The Company also separately controls the mineral rights to approximately 190,190 acres of State of Alaska and patented mining claims, upland leases, and fee simple leases for exploration through its wholly-owned subsidiaries LSA (consisting of the Lucky Shot Property), Contango Minerals (consisting of the Eagle/Hona, Triple Z, and Shamrock prospects and additional state mining claims in the Willow Mining District), Contango Mining Canada (consisting of Johnson Tract) and Avidian Alaska (consisting of the Golden Zone, Amanita and Amanita NE properties), and has begun allocating more annual resources to exploration of those properties and other new opportunities. Encumbrances on each property, such as royalties, are discussed within the property descriptions. The Company believes that it and the Peak Gold JV hold good title to their respective properties, in accordance with standards generally accepted in the mineral industry. As is customary in the mineral industry, the Company conducted only a preliminary title examination at the time it entered into the Tetlin Lease. The Peak Gold JV conducted a title examination prior to the assignment of the Tetlin Lease to the Peak Gold JV and performed certain curative title work. 18 The following table outlines the land ownership of the five legal entities that control mineral rights in Alaska: the Company's 30% ownership of the Peak Gold JV (through CORE Alaska); LSA; Contango Minerals; JT Mining, Inc., and Avidian Alaska; each as of December 31, 2025: Property Location Commodities Claims Estimated Acres Type Peak Gold JV (30% Interest): Tetlin Lease Eastern Interior Gold, Copper, Silver — 675,000 Lease Tok/Eagle Eastern Interior Gold, Copper, Silver 159 13,000 State Mining Claims 159 688,000 J T Mining (Leased from Cook Inlet Region, Inc.) (100% Interest): Johnson Tract South Central Gold, Silver, Lead, Zinc, Copper — 21,000 Lease 0 21,000 LSA (Leased from Alaska Hard Rock Inc.) (100% Interest): Lucky Shot South Central Gold 58 7,900 State Mining Claims Lucky Shot South Central Gold 46 700 Patented Mining Claims 104 8,600 Contango Minerals (100% Interest): Eagle/Hona Eastern Interior Gold, Copper, Silver 450 69,780 State Mining Claims Triple Z Eastern Interior Gold, Copper, Silver 95 14,850 State Mining Claims Shamrock Eastern Interior Gold, Copper, Silver 361 52,700 State Mining Claims Willow South Central Gold 69 8,000 State Mining Claims Amanita NE Interior Gold 1 1,030 State Upland Mining Lease Golden Zone Central Gold 69 10,850 68 State Mining Claims, 1 Upland mining Lease 1,045 157,210 Avidian Alaska (Leased from Tanya Stolz) (100% Interest): Amanita Interior Gold 55 3,380 54 State Mining Claims, 1 Upland Mining Lease 55 3,380 TOTALS: 1,363 878,190 Below is a map showing the location of the Peak Gold JV Property and the Contango Properties, including the ownership percentage for the rights associated with each property held by the Peak Gold JV or the Company, as applicable, and the nature of each interest: 19 Below are the coordinates of the Peak Gold JV Property and the Contango Properties: Property Latitude* Longitude* Shamrock 64.397 -146.532 Eagle/Hona 63.209 -143.440 Manh Choh 62.947 -142.627 Triple Z 63.364 -142.490 Lucky Shot 61.776 -149.411 Willow 61.802 -149.232 AmanitaNE 65.021 -147.168 Amanita 64.937 -147.424 Golden Zone 63.194 -149.667 Johnson Tract 60.123 -152.919 * Lat/Long (NAD83) Commercial Production at the Manh Choh Project began in the second half of 2024. The Contango Properties are all currently in the exploration stage and are not currently producing. Besides the Lucky Shot Project, which had historic production from late 1920s until 1942, none of the other Contango Properties have ever been commercially produced. Acquisition of Exploration and Mining Rights Exploration and mining rights in Alaska may be acquired in the following manners: public lands, private fee lands, unpatented Federal or State of Alaska mining claims, patented mining claims, and tribal lands. The primary sources for acquisition of these lands are the United States government, through the Bureau of Land Management and the United States 20 Forest Service, the Alaskan state government, tribal governments, and individuals or entities who currently hold title to or lease government and private lands. Tribal lands are those lands that are under control by sovereign Native American tribes. Areas that show promise for exploration and mining can be leased from or joint ventured with the tribe controlling the land, including land constituting the Tetlin Lease. The State of Alaska government owns public lands. Mineral resource exploration, development and production are administered primarily by the State of Alaska's State Department of Natural Resources. Ownership of the subsurface mineral estate, including alluvial and lode mineral rights, can be acquired by staking a 40-acre or 160-acre mining claim, which right is granted under Alaska Statute Sec. 38.05.185 to 38.05.275, as amended. The State of Alaska continues to own the surface estate, subject to certain rights of ingress and egress owned by the claimant, even though the subsurface can be controlled by a claimant with a right to extract through claim staking. A mining claim is subject to annual assessment work requirements, the payment of annual rental fees and royalties due to the State of Alaska after commencement of commercial production. Both private fee-land and unpatented mining claims and related rights, including rights to use the surface, are subject to permitting requirements of federal, state, tribal and local governments. Current Mining Activity The Peak Gold JV’s Manh Choh mine is now actively mining from an open pit. Ore is stockpiled depending on grade and oxide/sulfide content and transported to the Fort Knox mill for future processing. Other than the former-producing mines located on the Lucky Shot Property (described below), which are not currently in production, there are no existing mines on any of the other Contango Properties. At Lucky Shot, the Company is developing an underground mine by enhancing underground access for exploration and development drilling. At Johnson Tract, the Company is working to permit the underground exploration drift, along with performing baseline environmental and engineering work. The Company has not determined the type of mine that may be established in the future at its other exploration stage properties (Eagle-Hona, Triple Z, Shamrock, Amanita NE, Amanita and Golden Zone) in connection with any possible mineral production. Summary of Mineral Reserves and Resources A “mineral reserve" is an estimate of tonnage and grade or quality of indicated and measured mineral resources that, in the opinion of the qualified person, can be the basis of an economically viable project. More specifically, it is the economically mineable part of a measured or indicated mineral resource, which includes diluting materials and allowances for losses that may occur when the material is mined or extracted. The term “economically viable,” as used in the definition of reserve, means that the qualified person has analytically determined that extraction of the mineral reserve is economically viable under reasonable investment and market assumptions. The term “proven reserves” means the economically mineable part of a measured mineral resource and can only result from conversion of a measured mineral resource. The term “probable reserves” means reserves for which quantity and grade are computed from information similar to that used for proven reserves, but the sites for sampling are farther apart or are otherwise less closely spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower than that for proven reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of observation. Proven and probable reserves are based on extensive drilling, sampling, mine modeling and metallurgical testing from which we determined economic feasibility. The reference point for mineral reserves is the point of delivery to the process plant. Metal price assumptions, adjusted for our exchange rate assumption, are based on considering such factors as market forecasts, industry consensus and management estimates. The price sensitivity of reserves depends upon several factors including grade, metallurgical recovery, operating cost, waste-to-ore ratio and ore type. Metallurgical recovery rates vary depending on the metallurgical properties of each deposit and the production process used. The reserve tables below list the average metallurgical recovery rate for each deposit, which takes into account the relevant processing methods. The cut-off grade, or lowest grade of mineralization considered economic to process, varies between deposits depending upon prevailing economic conditions, mineability of the deposit, by-products, amenability of the ore to gold, copper, silver, lead, zinc or molybdenum extraction and type of milling or leaching facilities available. Reserve estimates may have non-material differences in comparison to our joint venture partners due to differences in classification and rounding methodology. A "mineral resource" is a concentration or occurrence of material of economic interest in or on the Earth's crust in such form, grade or quality, and quantity that there are reasonable prospects for economic extraction. A mineral resource is a reasonable estimate of mineralization, taking into account relevant factors such as cut-off grade, likely mining dimensions, location or continuity that, with the assumed and justifiable technical and economic conditions, is likely to, in whole or in part, become economically extractable. It is not merely an inventory of all mineralization drilled or sampled. 21 Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no guarantee that all or any part of the mineral resource will be converted into mineral reserves. Confidence in the estimate of inferred mineral resources is insufficient to allow the meaningful application of technical and economic parameters. Manh Choh Project The mineral reserves and resources at the Manh Choh Project are contained within two deposits: Manh Choh North and Manh Choh South. They were developed using a computer-based block model based on drill hole assay information and geologic interpretation of the mineralization boundaries. Mineral reserves and resources were estimated using the block model and open pit design software to establish the component of the deposit with reasonable prospects for economic extraction. The current reserve and resource statement reflects mineral additions due to additional drilling within the Manh Choh Project that has been completed over the last year, as well as depletion due to production during the same period. Monthly reconciliations from mining operations captured incremental ore blocks and waste blocks. The Mineral reserve and resource estimate was prepared by Kinross Technical Services (KTS) and reviewed by the Qualified Person. The tables below summarize the mineral reserve and resource estimates for the Manh Choh Project effective December 31, 2025 on both a: (i) Peak Gold, LLC 100% ownership basis and (ii) Contango ORE 30% attributable ownership basis. Peak Gold, LLC Reserves 100% Ownership Tonnage Grade Contained Metal Grade Contained Metal Category (000 t) (g/t Au) (000 oz Au) (g/t Ag) (000 oz Ag) Proven 525 4.0 68 11.8 199 Probable 2,379 7.4 566 11.3 1,061 Total Proven + Probable 2,904 6.8 634 11.4 1,260 Contango ORE Reserves 30% Attributable Ownership Tonnage Grade Contained Metal Grade Contained Metal Category (000 t) (g/t Au) (000 oz Au) (g/t Ag) (000 oz Ag) Proven 158 4.0 20 11.8 60 Probable 714 7.4 170 11.3 259 Total Proven + Probable 872 6.8 190 11.4 319 Notes: 1. The definitions for mineral reserves in S-K 1300 were followed for mineral reserves. 2. Mineral reserves were estimated at long term prices of $2,000/oz Au and $23.50/oz Ag. 3. Mineral reserves are reported at an economic cut-off that varies by process cost and metallurgical recovery, approximately equivalent to 2.50 g/t Au. 4. Mineral reserve estimates incorporate dilution built in during the re-blocking process and assume 100% mining recovery. 5. Mineral reserves are reported in dry metric tonnes. 6. Numbers may not total due to rounding. 7. Mineral reserves are reconciled and incorporate depletion from 2024 and 2025 production. The Qualified Person is not aware of any risk factors associated with, or changes to, any aspects of the modifying factors such as mining, metallurgical, infrastructure, permitting, or other relevant factors that could materially affect the mineral reserve estimate. 22 Peak Gold, LLC Resources 100% Ownership (Exclusive of Reserves) Tonnage Grade Contained Metal Grade Contained Metal Category (000 t) (g/t Au) (000 oz Au) (g/t Ag) (000 oz Ag) Measured 621 2.0 39 11.9 237 Indicated 382 2.1 26 6.6 81 Total Measured + Indicated 1,003 2.0 65 9.8 318 Contango Resources 30% Ownership (Exclusive of Reserves) Tonnage Grade Contained Metal Grade Contained Metal Category (000 t) (g/t Au) (000 oz Au) (g/t Ag) (000 oz Ag) Measured 186 2.0 12 11.9 71 Indicated 115 2.1 8 6.6 24 Total Measured + Indicated 301 2.0 20 9.8 95 Notes: 1. The definitions for mineral resources in S-K 1300 were followed for mineral resources. 2. Mineral resources are reported exclusive of mineral reserves. 3. Mineral resources are estimated using long term prices of $2,000/oz Au price and $23.53/oz Ag price. 4. Mineral resources are reported using un-diluted Au and Ag grades. 5. Mineral resources are reported within constraining pit shells. 6. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. 7. Mineral resources are reported in dry metric tonnes. 8. Numbers may not total due to rounding. 9. Mineral reserves are reconciled and incorporate depletion from 2024 and 2025 production. The estimates of mineral resources may be materially affected if mining, metallurgical, or infrastructure factors change from those currently anticipated at the Manh Choh Project. Although the Qualified Person had a reasonable expectation that the majority of inferred mineral resources could be upgraded to indicated or measured resources with continued exploration, estimates of inferred mineral resources have significant geological uncertainty and it should not be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will be converted to the measured or indicated categories. Lucky Shot Project The mineral resources at the Lucky Shot Project are contained within two deposits: Lucky Shot and Coleman. They were developed using a computer-based block model based on drill hole assay information and geologic interpretation of the mineralization boundaries. Mineral resources were estimated using the block model and underground shapes created in Leapfrog software using a 3.0 g/t Au cut off grade averaged over 3 meters to establish the areas of the deposit with reasonable prospects for economic extraction. The mineral resource block model and estimate were prepared by the Qualified Person. The model was based on validated drilling data available through February 2023. The tables below summarize the mineral resource estimates for the Lucky Shot Project effective as of May 26, 2023: Tonnage Grade Contained Metal Category (000 t) (g/t Au) (000 oz Au) Measured — — — Indicated 226 14.5 105 Total Measured + Indicated 226 14.5 105 Inferred 82 9.5 25 23 Notes: 1. The mineral resources were estimated as of May 26, 2023 by the Qualified Person, under the definitions for mineral resources in S-K 1300. 2. Mineral resources are estimated using long term prices of US$1,600/oz Au price. 3. Mineral resources are reported using un-diluted Au grades. 4. Mineral resources are reported as contained within 3.0 g/t Au underground shapes applying a 3.0m min. width at a 4.3 g/t COG 5. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. There are no mineral reserves for the Lucky Shot Project 6. Mineral resources are reported in dry metric tonnes. 7. Numbers may not total due to rounding. 8. Mineral resources are reported on a 100% ownership basis. Johnson Tract Project The mineral resources at the Johnson Tract Project are contained within one deposit. It was developed using a computer-based block model based on drill hole assay information and geologic interpretation of the mineralization boundaries. Mineral resources were estimated using the block model and underground shapes created in Leapfrog software using a 3.0 g/t Au cut off grade averaged over 3 meters to establish the areas of the deposit with reasonable prospects for economic extraction. The mineral resource block model and estimate were prepared by the Qualified Person. The model was based on validated drilling data available through May 2025. The tables below summarize the mineral resource estimates for the Johnson Tract Project effective as of May 12, 2025 Tonnage Grade Grade Cu Pb Zn AuEq Category (000 t) (g/t Au) (g/t Ag) (%) (%) (%) (g/t) Indicated 3,489 5.33 6.00 0.56 0.67 5.21 9.39 Inferred 706 1.36 9.10 0.59 0.30 4.18 4.76 Total Indicated + Inferred 4,195 6.69 15.10 1.15 0.97 9.39 14.15 Contained Metal Contained Metal Contained Metal Contained Metal Contained Metal Contained Metal Category (000 oz Au) (000 oz Ag) (M Lb Cu) (M Lb Pb) (M Lb Zn) (000 oz AuEq) Indicated 598 673 43.10 51.50 400 1,053 Inferred 31 207 9.20 4.70 65 108 Total Indicated + Inferred 629 880 52.30 56.20 465 1,161 Notes 1. Includes all drill holes completed at Johnson Tract Deposit, with drilling completed between 1982 and most recently as October 2021. 2. Assumed metal prices are US$1650/oz for gold (Au), US$20/oz for silver (Ag), US$3.50/lb copper (Cu), US$1/lb lead (Pb), and US$1.50/lb for zinc (Zn). Metal prices were established considering the review of three-year averages of published monthly values. 3. Gold Equivalent (AuEq) is based on assumed metal prices and payable metal recoveries of 97% for Au, 85% for Ag, 85% Cu, 72% Pb and 92% Zn from metallurgical testwork completed in 2022. 4. AuEq equals = Au g/t + Ag g/t × 0.01 + Cu% × 1.27 + Pb% × 0.31 + Zn% × 0.59. 5. An average bulk density value of 2.84 used as determined by conventional analytical methods for assay samples. 6. Capping applied to assays to restrict the impact of high-grade outliers. 24 7. Preliminary underground constrains were applied, including the elimination of isolated or scattered blocks above cut-off grade to define the “reasonable prospects of eventual economic extraction” for the Mineral Resource Estimate. 8. Mineral resources as reported are undiluted. 9. Mineral resource tonnages have been rounded to reflect the precision of the estimate. 10. Readers are cautioned that mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Peak Gold JV Property Location of and Access to the Peak Gold JV Property The Peak Gold JV Property is located in the Tetlin Hills and Mentasta Mountains of eastern interior Alaska, 200 miles (300 kilometers) southeast of the city of Fairbanks, 12 miles (20 kilometers) southeast of Tok, Alaska and 90 miles from the Alaska-Canada border. The Tetlin Lease covers an area of 675,000 acres measuring approximately 50 miles (80 kilometers) north-south by 37 miles (60 kilometers) east-west. In addition to the Tetlin Lease, the property includes nearly 13,000 acres of contiguous state claims on its northwestern border. There are many roads and ATV accessible trails within the property, though all are private. The property is bordered to the north and east by the Alaska Highway and the Tok Cutoff Highway along its western edge. The road-accessible Manh Choh deposit is located 9 miles (15 kilometers) south of the Alaska Highway in the northwestern portion of the Tetlin Lease, covering an area approximately 0.5 mile by 0.5 mile situated just north of VABM Tetlin (elev 3,345 feet ASL). The deposit is 250 miles (400 kilometers) from the Fort Knox Milling Complex. The Peak Gold JV Property is accessible via a new 18 mile secured mine access road connected to the Alaska Highway. The majority of our Peak Gold JV Property is accessible only via helicopter, although many winter trails exist in the Tetlin Hills and Mentasta Mountains in the northern and southwestern parts of the properties, respectively. Winter trails link Tetlin Village to the village of Old Tetlin and continue south to the Tetlin River airstrip, a 1,500 foot long unmaintained gravel strip located in the Tetlin River Valley. Winter trails also provide access to the Tuck Creek valley from the village of Mentasta on the Tok Cutoff Highway. The paved Alaska Highway passes near the northern edge of the Peak Gold JV Property as does the southern terminus of the Taylor Highway where it joins the Alaska Highway at Tetlin Junction. The 23-mile long Tetlin Village Road provides year-round access to the northern Tetlin Hills, linking Tetlin Village to the Alaska Highway. Buried electrical and fiber-optic communications cables follow this road corridor and link Tetlin Village to the Tok power and communications grid. The Tok public electric facility is capable of generating up to 2 megawatts of power, and the nearest high capacity public electric facilities to the Peak Gold JV Property are in Delta Junction, 107 miles northwest of the Peak Gold JV Property and Glennallen, 138 miles southwest of the Peak Gold JV Property. The Company does not have any plant or equipment at the Peak Gold JV Property, and relies on contractors for the Peak Gold JV to perform work. The Company does not believe the Peak Gold JV Property was explored for minerals prior to exploration activities of the Company and the Peak Gold JV. 25 The maps below depicts the Peak Gold JV Property and the State of Alaska mining claims leased by the Company: Tetlin Lease JEX entered into the Tetlin Lease with the Tetlin Tribal Council, effective as of July 15, 2008. In November 2010, the Tetlin Lease was assigned to the Company and in January 2015, the Tetlin Lease was assigned to the Peak Gold JV. The Tetlin Lease’s current term extends to July 5, 2028, and for so long thereafter as the Peak Gold JV continues conducting exploration or mining operations on the Tetlin Lease. The Peak Gold JV was required to spend $350,000 per year annually until July 15, 2018 in exploration costs pursuant to the Tetlin Lease. Exploration expenditures to date under the Tetlin Lease have satisfied this work commitment requirement for the full lease term, through 2028, because exploration funds spent in any year in excess of $350,000 are credited toward future years’ exploration cost requirements. The Tetlin Lease also provides that the Peak Gold JV will pay the Tetlin Tribal Council a production royalty ranging from 3% to 5% should the Peak Gold JV deliver to a purchaser on a commercial basis precious or non-precious metals derived from the properties under the Tetlin Lease. The Company had previously paid the Tetlin Tribal Council $225,000 in exchange for reducing the production royalty payable to them by 0.75%. These payments lowered the production royalty to a range of 2.25% to 4.25%. The Tetlin Tribal Council had the option to increase its production royalty by (i) 0.25% by payment to the Peak Gold JV of $150,000, (ii) 0.50% by payment to the Peak Gold JV of $300,000, or (iii) 0.75% by payment to the Peak Gold JV of $450,000. The Tetlin Tribal Council exercised the option to increase its production royalty by 0.75% by payment to the Peak Gold JV of $450,000 on December 31, 2020. In lieu of a cash payment, the $450,000 will be credited against future production royalty and advance minimum royalty payments due by the Peak Gold JV to the Tetlin Tribal Council under the lease once production begins. Production commenced in July 2024 and the Peak Gold JV commenced paying the production royalty obligations pursuant to the terms of the Tetlin Lease. Additionally, the Peak Gold JV is paying RG Royalties, LLC a production royalty of 26 3% on commercial production of gold or derived from the Tetlin Lease and the 159 Peak Gold JV owned State of Alaska Mining Claims. RG Royalties, LLC holds a separate silver production royalty of 28% on a 3,931 acre portion of the Tetlin Lease, including the Manh Choh North and Manh Choh South deposits. The 159 mining claims will also be subject to taxes and royalties due to the State of Alaska on mineral production from state lands. Exploration & Development Overview In July 2022, the Peak Gold JV released a feasibility study and Kinross announced that it would proceed with development of the project. Aggregate capital expenditures for the Peak Gold JV to execute the development plan were forecast to be approximately $189 million, including $30 million for the purchase the highway ore transport fleet. The Manh Choh camp and road access to the mine site were completed and production commenced during the second half of 2024, with a mine plan that consisted of two small, open pits to be mined concurrently over 4.5 years. Mined ore from the Main and North Manh Choh deposits is being transported to and processed at the Kinross-owned Fort Knox mining and milling complex located 250 highway miles (400 kilometers) away. The feasibility study included an Average All-in Sustaining Costs (AISC) for the Company estimated at $1,116 per Au eq. oz. (which includes the Fort Knox Toll processing costs). The current estimated AISC for the remaining life of mine is projected to be between $1,700 to $1,800 per Au eq. oz (See Item 7 for gold production guidance estimates). As of December 31, 2025, the Company has contributed approximately $106.2 million to the Peak Gold JV. Geology The exploration effort on the Tetlin Lease for the Manh Choh Project identified two prospective mineral deposits (Main and North Manh Choh) and several other gold and copper prospects following drilling programs begun in 2011. While proven and probable mineral reserves have been reported for the Manh Choh Project, mineral reserves have not been reported on any of the other targets on the Peak Gold JV Property. There has been no recorded past placer or lode mining on Peak Gold JV Property, and the Company and the Peak Gold JV are the only entities known to have conducted drilling operations on the Peak Gold JV Property. The majority of the Peak Gold JV Property is hosted within the Yukon-Tanana Terrane (“YTT”), a regionally extensive package of metamorphic rocks. Rocks of the YTT on the Peak Gold JV Property consist primarily of more deformed, higher temperature metamorphic rocks on the northern third of the project and less deformed, lower temperature metamorphic rocks to the south. Country rocks on the Peak Gold JV Property are intruded by granitic rocks that have not been well mapped. Large-scale structural features within the Peak Gold JV Property are closely tied to movements along the Tintina-Kaltag and Denali-Farewell fault systems, two continental-scale faults between which are a series of district and prospect-scale northeast, northwest and east-west structures. Limited exposures in the northern half of the property make identification of these structures difficult. Prospect to hand-sample scale folding has been noted throughout the project area. Although alpine glaciation has affected elevations above 4,500 feet on the southern edge of the Peak Gold JV Property, most of the Peak Gold JV Property escaped Pleistocene continental glaciation. However, due to its proximity to continental glaciers to the north and east, the Peak Gold JV Property was covered by a variable thickness of wind-blown silt ranging up to 10 meters thick. This extremely fine-grained, metal-barren silt effectively masks the geochemical signature of underlying bedrock containing gold-copper-silver mineralization. Following deposition of this silt layer, the Peak Gold JV Property was subject to an extensive period of surface weathering, which now extends 200-300 feet below surface. From a regional perspective, the Peak Gold JV Property is located in the Tintina Gold Belt in rocks that are highly prospective for gold deposits as well as porphyry copper-molybdenum-gold deposits. These two genetically different types of mineralization overlap in eastern Interior Alaska and the western Yukon Territory and are host to dozens of known prospects, deposits and active mines. In addition, rocks on the southern edge of the Peak Gold JV Property are prospective for nickel-copper-platinum group element deposits. Prior to its discovery in 2009, the style of mineralization discovered on the Chief Danny prospect on the Peak Gold JV Property was unknown in Interior Alaska. Diamond drilling results have revealed the presence of a distinctive suite of elements and minerals at the Main Manh Choh, North Manh Choh and Discovery Zones that do not match the typical characteristics of gold deposits of the Tintina Gold Belt but do share several diagnostic characteristics of gold-copper-silver skarn deposits, possibly as part of a larger porphyry copper-molybdenum-gold system. “Skarn” is a term that refers to a distinctive class of mineral deposits formed where limestone-bearing rocks are intruded by hot, fluid-bearing granitic rocks. The Main Manh Choh and North Manh Choh Zones mineralization most closely resembles the gold-sulfide skarns mined at the Fortitude deposit in the Battle Mountain Mining District of central Nevada. 27 Exploration Activity and Targets Chief Danny Prospect Area . The Chief Danny Prospect Area currently is the most advanced exploration target on the Peak Gold JV Property and is comprised of several distinct mineralized areas: the Main Manh Choh Zone, Berg, Mohawk, Silverbell, Infrastructure Pad and SSS Zones. The Chief Danny prospect was discovered during rock, stream sediment and pan concentrate sampling in 2009 and since then has been explored using top of bedrock soil auger sampling, trenching, ground IP geophysics, airborne magnetic and resistivity surveys and core drilling. Results from this work indicate the presence of a zoned metal-bearing system consisting of a gold-copper-iron enriched core covering six square miles at Chief Danny. The Company has also conducted some environmental base line studies on the areas surrounding the Chief Danny prospect, as well as airborne magnetic and resistivity programs. From 2009 through December 31, 2025, the Company conducted field-related exploration work at the Chief Danny Prospect, including collecting the following samples: Stream Core Rock Soil Pan Con Silt Core IP/Geophysics Trenching Year Program Samples Samples Samples Samples Samples (feet) (kilometers) (feet) 2009 Chief Danny — 958 33 94 11 — — 2,330 2010 Chief Danny — 613 760 668 795 — 14 — 2011 Chief Danny 1,267 20 688 — — 8,057 3,957 — 2012 Chief Danny 5,223 82 1,029 — — 36,006 — — 2013 Chief Danny 8,970 14 1,406 85 278 47,081 2,414 — 2014 Chief Danny — — — — — — — — 2015 Chief Danny 8,352 133 — — — 46,128 — — 2016 Chief Danny 10,450 21 694 — — 67,336 24 — 2017 Chief Danny 11,864 112 975 408 408 59,347 48 — 2018 Chief Danny 2,973 402 63 45 9 20,307 80 — 2019 Chief Danny 1,575 839 1,563 18 — 10,079 1,049 — 2020 Chief Danny — — — — — 4,575 — — 2021 Chief Danny — — — — — 33,010 — — 2022 Chief Danny 1,260 493 1,681 — 584 8,983 — — 2023 Chief Danny — 27 313 — — 2,308 — 4,100 2024 Chief Danny 2,373 — — — — 15,665 — — 2025 Chief Danny 4,220 155 1,355 — — 24,051 — 1,500 Total 58,527 3,869 10,560 1,318 2,085 382,933 7,586 7,930 28 Drill locations for Chief Danny Area Initial drilling area focused on “near mine” exploration drilling approximately 2,970m focused on previously identified mineralized faults and skarn system mineralization on the NW end of Mohawk ridge and Silverbell. Drilling in this area focused on mineral systems hypothesizes and follow up testing of previously ID geophysics and surface Geochem anomalies. The second phase of drilling focused on the “Minex” program, drilling approximately 2,800m on the NW corner of the S. Pit wall. Drilling focused on incremental growth to current resources in the mining life of mine plan. The third drill phase, approximately 1540m, was generative in nature following up on prospective sites in Prospect Gully, Saddle, and west Silverbell. Additionally, two soil grids were completed – Access Rd area north of the current mine, and the Neldzeegn grid on the SW area of the property. 29 Community Affairs In April 2015, the Peak Gold JV entered into a Community Support Agreement (as amended, the “Support Agreement”) with the Tetlin Village for a one-year period, which has been extended multiple times. Under the most recent extension, dated January 1, 2024, the Peak Gold JV will provide payments to the Tetlin Village four times during the year for an aggregate amount of $100,000 per year through January 1, 2026. The Support Agreement defines agreed uses for the funds and auditing rights regarding use of funds. In addition, the Peak Gold JV supports the Tetlin Village in maintenance of the village access road, which is used by the Peak Gold JV in furtherance of the Manh Choh Project. In 2025, the Peak Gold JV spent approximately $2.4 million in the community, consistently employed over 100 local employees (including contractor local hires), and conducted approximately 6,100 stakeholder engagement activities. Lucky Shot Property Location of and Access to the Lucky Shot Property The Lucky Shot Property was acquired by the Company in 2021 through its acquisition of LSA. The Property covers three former producing gold mines in the Willow Mining District located in the southern Talkeetna Mountains of south central Alaska and covers an area of approximately 35 square kilometers. The three former mines include the Coleman, Lucky Shot and War Baby mines, located along a continuous low angle structural zone occupied by a series high-grade quartz vein hosting free gold and minor sulfide and telluride mineralization. The Lucky Shot Property consists of a mine site located 180 kilometers (112 miles) north of Anchorage, Alaska, and a processing site located about 48 kilometers (30 miles) west of the mine site, on the George Parks Highway. The Lucky Shot Property includes 725 acres of patented mining claims and 7,900 acres of State of Alaska mining claims leased from Alaska Hardrock Inc. The patented mining claims are subject to three separate royalties: a 0.5% NSR royalty due to Enserch Processing Partners, Ltd.; a 2.9% NSR royalty on the patented claims covering the Lucky Shot mineral resource and a 3.3% NSR royalty on other patented claims due to Daniel E. Renshaw; and a 2% NSR royalty due to Alaska Hardrock Inc. The State of Alaska mining claims are subject to a 4% NSR royalty due to Alaska Hardrock Inc. All state claims are also subject to taxes and royalties due to the State of Alaska on mineral production from state lands. The Lucky Shot Property covers three former producing gold mines in the Willow Mining District located in south central Alaska. The claim block is an irregular shape measuring approximately 10 miles east-west and up to 5 miles north-south. Elevations of the property range from approximately 2,600 feet ASL along Craigie Creek to peaks at Bullion Mountain (5,100 feet ASL) and Lucky Shot Ridge (4,880 feet ASL). Infrastructure in the area is excellent with road access between the mine site and plant site via unsealed secondary road, sealed two-lane highway, and the four-lane Parks Highway connecting Anchorage and Fairbanks. 30 The map below depicts the Lucky Shot Property leased by the Company: Geology The Willow Creek Mining District straddles the margin of a granodiorite batholith that forms the Talkeetna Mountains and is bounded on the south by the Castle Mountain fault system. The Lucky Shot vein system was determined to be continuous from the War Baby to the Coleman across the project area – a distance of approximately 1.6 kilometers (1 mile), with two high-angle faults structures segmenting the vein into three blocks (i.e. the Coleman block, Lucky Shot block and War Baby block). A third fault structure further east was determined to separate the War Baby block from drilling that intersected the vein structure in what is known as the Murphy block – extending the known vein structure another 600 meters (approximately 2,000 feet) further east. Between the Coleman and War Baby mines the vertical and lateral offset is a few meters up to tens of meters which allowed historic mining to continue across faults in a near-continuous manner. This similar magnitude of vertical and lateral displacement is defined as an oblique-slip fault and is typical of a transpressional structural environment. District geologic mapping shows that the Castle Mountain fault is a major regional strike slip fault and that the Hatcher Pass Fault is a sympathetic fault that places a thick section of Cretaceous schists up against a rigid body made up of the late Cretaceous Willow Creek batholith. The Company believes the contact environment between these two disparate lithologies is an ideal location for low angle, listric fault-controlled quartz vein hosted gold deposits, characteristic of the Willow district. The three historic mines at the Coleman, Lucky Shot and War Baby properties are controlled by a continuous low angle, listric fault zone occupied by a series of quartz veins and sheared breccia zones from 1 meter wide up to several meters in width. The veins are hosted by a granodiorite composition intrusive rock which is part of the Willow Creek batholith described above. The quartz veins are central to a broader alteration zone that extends tens of meters adjacent to the veins and consists of sericite, chlorite, albite, leucoxene, and ankerite/siderite. The quartz veins contain native gold, pyrite, arsenopyrite, tetrahedrite-tennantite, sphalerite, galena, and various telluride minerals (coloradoite and nayagite have been identified). 31 The mines located in the Lucky Shot Property have historically produced minerals prior to their shut down in 1942 due to the World War II effort, after which little happened on the property until the 1980s when Enserch Exploration conducted an exploration program that included soil sampling, drilling, and underground exploration. The property was subsequently explored by several other entities before the Company acquired the property in 2021. Exploration Plan Lucky Shot exploration is planned as a four-phase program aimed at expanding mineral resource and increasing in-fill drill density to improve confidence, in support of a mineral resource update and feasibility study targeted for the first half of 2027. Phase 1 commenced in November 2025 with the mobilization of underground drill crews to site. This initial underground drilling program is testing the Lucky Shot vein system from existing underground development, with drill stations positioned on the footwall side of the structure. Phase 1 drilling is scheduled to conclude in May 2026. Phase 2 is expected to begin immediately following completion of Phase 1 and will focus on expanding underground exploration drifts to improve drill access and platform coverage, while also advancing development intended to connect the Lucky Shot workings with the Coleman development. Phase 3 is planned to commence in June 2026 and will consist of surface drilling targeting the Coleman system to test continuity and potential extensions from surface-based platforms. Phase 4 is planned to resume underground drilling from newly constructed underground development, with drill stations positioned from the north (hanging wall side) to target down-dip extensions of the Lucky Shot vein system. Phase 4 is currently anticipated to commence near the end of the third quarter of 2026. Johnson Tract Property Location of and Access to the Johnson Tract Property The Project is located 200 kilometers southwest of Anchorage, 15 kilometers inland from Cook Inlet and tidewater. A gravel airstrip 800 meters long and 30 meters wide allows for fixed wing aircraft to access the Project. Snow-free access is generally open from mid-June through to mid-October. Helicopter is used to access the JT Deposit and surrounding prospects. A gravel road links the airstrip to the Johnson Camp. 32 Land Status History The Johnson Tract is owned by Cook Inlet Region, Inc. (CIRI) and is situated within the broader Cook Inlet region. CIRI’s traditional lands encompass some of the most developed lands in Alaska. Consequently, the mechanism established by the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) in 1971 for Native land selections did not work in the region. Much of the land in the area was occupied by private ownership, municipalities, and boroughs, or had been prior selected by the State of Alaska. Much of what remained was mountaintops and glaciers. Seeking fair treatment, CIRI worked through the courts to remedy the lack of available selections of “customary and traditional lands”. A long negotiation process followed between the United States Department of Interior, the State of Alaska, and CIRI, culminating in the Cook Inlet Land Exchange, the largest land exchange agreement in American history. The Terms and Conditions for Land Consolidation and Management in the Cook Inlet Area (“the CIRI Agreement”) were enacted into federal law in January of 1976 (PL 94-204) and approved by the Alaska Legislature in March 1976. Among other things, the CIRI Agreement facilitated the creation of Lake Clark National Park and conveyance to CIRI of a well-known mineral prospect within Park boundaries. This prospect, known as Johnson Tract, was divided into two blocks of roughly equal size: The North Tract and the South Tract. CIRI received subsurface title to the North Tract, and both surface and subsurface title to the South Tract. In the North Tract, it was agreed that surface use for the purpose of exploration and extraction would occur pursuant to a surface use plan approved by the Department of Interior. The South Tract agreement was subject to a covenant that the surface estate could only be used for purposes incident to mining and mineral extraction. The North and South Tracts were conveyed to CIRI by the Bureau of Land Management on May 14th, 1979 and March 10th, 1982, respectively. 33 Enabled by the Cook Inlet Land Exchange, Congress formally established Lake Clark National Park and Preserve in 1980 pursuant to Section 201(7) of ANILCA, significantly expanding the land base as compared to the original Park proposal. The expansion was made possible because CIRI and its villages relinquished selections previously made under ANCSA for significantly less acreage in different, sometimes less desirable areas. The creation of the Park specifically excluded privately owned lands such as those held by CIRI. The surface lands of the North Tract are to be administered by the Park in a manner consistent with CIRI’s ownership of the subsurface estate. Details on the conveyance and restrictive covenants can be found in Sections I.D.(2) and (3) of the December 10th, 1975 Terms and Conditions for Land Consolidation and Management in the Cook Inlet Area agreed between CIRI and the Federal Government and ratified by Congress on January 2nd, 1976 by enactment of Section 12 of PL 94-204. Revenues CIRI receives from any commercial mineral production in the Johnson Tract will be subject to the 7(i) and 7(j) provisions of ANCSA which provides for the sharing of such revenues among other Alaska regional and village corporations. Johnson Tract Lease Agreement Contango Ore, through its wholly owned US subsidiary J T Mining Inc., holds a Lease Agreement with CIRI with an effective date of May 17th, 2019. The Lease Agreement is for the Lease Rights to the Project area totaling 20,942 acres, as defined in Section 4.1. The Lease Agreement is for an initial 10-year term (“Initial Term”), followed by a five-year term (“Development Term”) to achieve a mine construction decision, and a production term that will continue for so long as operations and commercial production are maintained. Terms of the Lease Agreement include annual lease payments of $ 75,000 for the first five (5) years, increasing to $150,000 for year six (6) and onward, until production is achieved. A pre-feasibility study or feasibility study of the Project must be completed by the tenth anniversary of the effective date of the Lease Agreement. A commitment of $10 million in expenditures is required within the Initial Term, including at least $ 7.5 million spent within the first six (6) years. The Company has met this commitment as of December 31, 2025. During the Development Term, a commitment of $2 million in expenditures per year is required until a mine construction decision is achieved. Certain accrual and carry-forward provisions for excess expenditures are included in both the Initial Term and Development Term. Upon completion of a feasibility study and a decision to construct a mine, CIRI has the one time right to back-in to the Project and participate to a maximum 25% interest. CIRI will also receive NSR royalties of 2% (pre-Payback) to 3% (post-Payback) on base metals and silver and a gold price adjusted NSR royalty of: 2.5% (<$1,250/oz Au); 3% (<$1,500/oz Au); 3.5% (<$2,000/oz Au); or 4% (>$2,000/oz). Geology The JT Project is hosted by the Talkeetna Formation of the Alaska Peninsular Terrane, a 1,000 - 2,500 meters thick assemblage of Early Jurassic, intermediate volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks (age based on the abundance of fossil megafauna, Detterman et al., 1996). Thrust onto the western edge of the Talkeetna Formation are plutonic rocks of the Alaska-Aleutian Range Batholith which are dominated locally by quartz diorite, quartz monzonite and tonalite phases with U-Pb zircon ages of 183 - 164 Ma (Rioux et al., 2007). These intrusive rocks are interpreted to be the contemporaneous, plutonic equivalent of the overlying Talkeetna Formation, and together they make up the uppermost part of the Talkeetna Arc. Within the Project area, the Talkeetna Formation and intrusive rocks to the west are divided by the north-south striking Bruin Bay fault, a regional, transpressional fault system which was likely active in Early Paleogene time (Betka et al., 2017), but may have been responsible for the unroofing of the Talkeetna Arc as early as the Middle-Late Jurassic (cf. Wartes et al., 2013). Most work on the Talkeetna Arc has focused on the section exposed northeast of Anchorage, in the Chugach and Talkeetna mountains, where geochemical and isotopic analysis of intermediate – felsic plutonic rocks suggest an intra-oceanic island arc setting (Clift et al., 2005, Rioux et al., 2007) with little to no input of continental crust material. However, a lack of evidence for mid-ocean ridge lavas, and thermobarometry requiring crustal thicknesses in excess of 30 kilometers (Hacker et al., 2008) suggest that the Talkeetna Arc was likely a ‘mature’ island arc. South of the Project area are Quaternary volcanics associated with the active Iliamna stratovolcano. 34 Regional Geology Map of the Johnson Tract Project Johnson Tract mineralization is hosted within southeast dipping volcanic and volcaniclastic rocks of the early Jurassic Talkeetna Formation, overlain by middle to late Jurassic sedimentary rocks of the Tuxedni, Chinitna and Naknek formations. To the west of the deposit, the regional west-dipping Bruin Bay Fault juxtaposes diorite to quartz monzonite intrusive rocks against Talkeetna formation host rocks. Schematic cross-section of the regional geology of the Johnson Tract Exploration Program No drilling activities were undertaken in 2025. The program focused on gathering data to advance conceptual engineering and to establish baseline environmental conditions required to support future permitting processes. Field crews started work in July 2025 and finalized the field program in mid-October. The Company intends to de-risk the current Johnson Tract Resource through underground drilling. To achieve this, construction of the permitted road from the Johnson Tract camp is planned. Underground access will be established once permitting has been completed for a tunnel and laydown site. Permitting for the road access between the Camp and the Tunnel 35 site has been completed, and permitting for the underground tunnel and water disposal system is currently progressing. Once the road is established and permitting for the tunnel and water disposal system is completed, underground mining operations are planned to drive the exploration tunnel towards the ore body to facilitate underground drilling of the ore body and completion of an appropriate feasibility study. Collection of information to support the design and permitting of a haul road along the coast, and a barge landing allowing for the eventual shipping of ore is ongoing. The project permitting timetable was officially placed onto the permitting dashboard of FAST-41 (a federal program under Title 41 of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act of 2015 that is designed to improve the timeliness, predictability, and transparency of environmental reviews for large, complex infrastructure projects) on January 30, 2026. The permitting timetable for Johnson Tract serves as a publicly visible contract between the federal government and the Company to ensure that development of the Johnson Tract Critical Metals Project stays on track and remains coordinated between all parties involved in the ongoing permitting process. Contango Minerals Early-Stage Exploration Properties Compared to the exploration activities conducted to date on the Peak Gold JV Property, Johnson Tract and the Lucky Shot Property, the Company, through its subsidiaries, has performed significantly less exploration work on the mining claims wholly owned by Contango Minerals, which includes the Triple Z, Eagle/Hona, Shamrock, Willow, Amanita NE and Golden Zone projects, all of which remain in the exploration stage. Triple Z Property The Triple Z claims were originally staked in 2009 and the claim block expanded in 2011, and again in 2019, with the claim block now covering an area of approximately 14,800 acres immediately adjacent to the Alaska Highway to the south and west, and the Taylor Highway to the north and east. The 95 State of Alaska mining claims that make up the Triple Z Prospect are subject to a 3% NSR royalty to RG Royalties, LLC on all mineral products, in addition to taxes and royalties due to the State of Alaska on mineral production from state lands. The center of the Triple Z claim block is located 15 miles northeast of the Manh Choh deposit and 5 miles northeast of Tetlin Junction, where the Taylor Highway intersects the Alaska Highway. The claims cover an area of 14,810 acres with elevations ranging from 2,000 to 3,200 feet ASL. The property, including prospects known locally as the Triple Z, Dennis, Ladue, Asarco and Tok, covers an irregular area measuring up to 4 miles north-south by 8 miles east-west. An ATV-accessible trail leads from the Taylor Highway to the center of the claim block where drilling was conducted in 2012. The area was identified as prospective for porphyry copper-gold-silver-molybdenum mineralization based on regional government sponsored stream sediment sampling. Surface rock (82 samples) and soil samples (115 samples) were collected in 2009. Follow up auger soil sampling completed between 2009 and 2011 identified a large-scale copper-gold-silver-molybdenum anomaly centered along a low-profile ridge with little to no outcrop. An airborne magnetic and resistivity survey conducted over the area in 2011 showed a coincident magnetic low and resistivity high (classic porphyry signatures) over the geochemically anomalous area. A follow up Induced Polarization (“IP”) survey conducted in 2019 across four orthogonal lines and outlined multiple IP anomalies broadly coincident with the soil and mag/resistivity anomalies. Drilling was completed in 2012 (before the IP survey) with six core holes drilled to depths ranging from 230 meters (755 feet) to 380 meters (1,246 feet). Holes 1202 and 1204 encountered several zones of anomalous copper, gold and silver. The Company has exploration targets that have not yet been drilled because the Company was waiting for a land transfer to be completed between the Bureau of Land Management and the State of Alaska, which included a highly prospective drill-ready target. As of January 18, 2024, the land transfer was completed, and all of the Triple Z property is now open to exploration. In 2025, the Company applied for and received exploration permits from the Alaska Department of Natural Resources. The Company is planning an exploration program for the 2026 field season to include up to 10 diamond drillholes with a depth up to 762 meters (2500 feet), and up to 5 trenches approximately 15 meters (50 feet) long. Eagle/Hona Property The Eagle/Hona property is located west of the Tok Cutoff Highway, approximately 15 miles northwest of the Manh Choh deposit. This block of 450 State of Alaska mining claims covers an area of 69,780 acres, measuring up to 17 miles north-south by up to 10 miles east-west. It includes prospects known by the names Hona, Noah, Natahona, Eagle and Mt. Neuberger. The 152 claims staked in 2012 and 2013 are subject to a 2% NSR royalty and the remaining 298 claims are subject to a 3% NSR on all mineral products due to RG Royalties, LLC, in addition to taxes and royalties due to the State of Alaska on mineral production from state lands. The property is currently accessible only via helicopter but portions of the claim block are less 36 than a mile from the State maintained all-season Tok Cutoff Highway, which leads to the Glenn Highway route to Anchorage, and about a mile south of the State maintained all-season Alaska Highway. The claim block elevations range from 1,800 to 6,742 feet above sea level, and includes VABM Lookout, the summit of Mt. Neuberger, and VABM Hona. During exploration and discovery of the Manh Choh deposit in 2012, it was recognized that the same stratigraphy that hosts the Manh Choh deposit likely exists west of the Tok River, with a left lateral offset along the Tok River fault. Staking of the first set of claims on the Eagle/Hona property ensued and the claim block was expanded over the next several years. Prior to Contango’s interest, there had been limited historic work in the area. Examination of reconnaissance stream sediment and pan concentrate samples collected by federal government agencies in the 1970s revealed widespread copper and arsenic (pathfinder elements for gold) anomalies within the area now covered by the Eagle claims. There was no gold analysis in the original government sampling. Kennecott Exploration staked and explored at the Hona prospect in 1997 and completed 3 core holes (885m of drilling) in 1998. Drill core from this program, now owned by Kinross, was borrowed in 2017 for relogging and handheld Niton XRF scanning. Two of the three drill holes showed mostly schist lithologies hosting detectable gold and anomalous elements indicative of Manh Choh style mineralization. The third drill hole showed mostly intrusive lithologies, also with anomalous gold. Contango’s exploration on the Eagle/Hona property began in 2013 with a reconnaissance-level stream sediment and pan concentrate sampling program conducted over most of the southern portion of the Eagle claims. This effort identified a large target area on the property of over 10 kilometers along a northwest corridor where every creek draining the northeast slope showed strongly anomalous gold and arsenic. Exploration of the Hona prospect began in 2015 when a rock sample collected from the Hona prospect returned 3.99 grams per tonne ("g/t") gold with anomalous silver, arsenic, bismuth, copper and cobalt. The mineralization was hosted in quartz mica schist with arsenopyrite veins composing up to 10% of the rock. This metal suite, Au-As-Bi-Co-Cu, is identical to the skarn assemblage at the Manh Choh and North Manh Choh deposits and suggests the Hona mineralization may be related to a system similar to that which generated the Manh Choh deposits. Additional follow-up and expanded sampling programs, geologic mapping, and geophysical surveys took place on the Eagle/Hona property in 2017, 2019, and 2021. To date, 2,823 rock samples (including 97 trench samples), 528 pan concentrate samples, and 640 stream sediment samples have been collected on the property and 1136.5 square kilometers of airborne geophysical data has been collected. In 2019, two core holes were drilled at the Hona 2 target for a total of 1,301 meters of drilling. Exploration efforts on the Eagle/Hona property have delineated three large areas with anomalous gold ± arsenic ± copper. Gold, arsenic and copper values in steam sediment samples range up to 377 ppb, 161 ppm and 412 ppm, respectively. Gold, arsenic and copper values in pan concentrates range up to 9,929 ppb, 803 ppm and 206 ppm, respectively. The first target area corresponds to the Hona prospect location and is distinguished by extremely high gold, arsenic and copper in pan concentrates and stream sediments, with pans showing anomalous values at locations where stream gradients are too high for alluvial gold accumulations, suggesting mineralization is nearby, in outcrop and at current weathering surface. The second target area lies west of the Hona prospect and includes much of the upper portion of Natohona Creek. Possibly continuous with the Hona mineralization, this area is characterized by anomalous arsenic and copper, with gold in pans located in low-gradient areas of streams, suggesting significant travel from source. The third target area is the largest on the Eagle/Hona property and is defined by extremely high arsenic with gold in pan concentrates running along a 10 kilometers northwest-southeast swath on the NE side of Mt. Neuberger, where every creek draining the northeast slope shows anomalous gold-arsenic signatures. Gold mineralization at Eagle/Hona is thought to be intrusive-related, although mineralization discovered in 2019 near the Hona prospect is largely hosted in calc-schist and greenstone peripheral to the Hona intrusive complex. Intrusive gold mineralization has been genetically linked to a series of Late Cretaceous granodiorite and granodiorite porphyry plugs and associated intrusive breccias, which on the adjacent Hona prospect returned argon 40/39 ages of 71 to 75 Ma, overlapping mineralization and intrusive ages from the Manh Choh area. Results from each of the previous exploration programs has shown positive results, though development of the Eagle/Hona property is still in the early stages. Follow-up geologic mapping and sampling is planned for 2026. 37 The map below depicts the location of the two core holes drilled at the Hona 2 target along with rock chip sampling results and surface geology. Significant Drill Intercepts from the 2019 Program. Sample intervals are calculated using 0.5 g/t lower cut off for gold with no internal waste less than cutoff grade that is greater than 3 meters in thickness. Intercepts shown are drill intercept lengths. True width of mineralization is unknown. The grade cutoff for gold (Au) is 0.5 g/t; for silver (Ag) is 10 g/t; and for copper (Cu) is 0.1%. The following table summarizes the significant drilling results obtained for the complete 2019 Program: DrillHole Zone From (meters) To (meters) Interval (meters) Au_g/t Au_opt Ag_g/t Cu % HN19001 Hona 2 32.00 35.05 3.05 1.01 0.029 1.4 0.027 HN19001 Hona 2 436.17 440.89 4.72 0.80 0.023 — 0.025 HN19001 Hona 2 452.78 460.71 7.93 0.88 0.026 0.4 0.034 HN19002 Hona 2 224.33 227.38 3.05 0.59 0.017 — 0.012 HN19002 Hona 2 339.09 342.29 3.20 1.23 0.036 1.3 0.046 HN19002 Hona 2 369.27 373.56 4.29 0.55 0.016 — 0.028 HN19002 Hona 2 396.85 399.04 2.19 0.93 0.027 1.7 0.024 HN19002 Hona 2 445.24 446.53 1.29 3.05 0.089 0.8 0.029 HN19002 Hona 2 612.65 629.67 17.02 0.41 0.012 5.4 0.333 Shamrock Property In early 2021, the Company staked 361 State of Alaska mining claims over the Shamrock Property in the Richardson Mining District located in central Alaska along the Alaska Highway corridor. These claims lie in the heart of the Richardson Mining District, located in central interior Alaska. Several exploration targets are located within the claim block, including the Shamrock, Banner Dikes, Hilltop, Gold Run and First Chance prospects. These claims are not subject to any royalties other than taxes and royalties due to the State of Alaska on mineral production from state lands. The mining claims cover 38 approximately 52,700 acres with elevations ranging from approximately 1,000 feet ASL to 3,023 feet ASL at VABM Buck. The claim block is an irregular shape measuring up to 15 miles east-west and up to 6.2 miles north-south. The location of the Shamrock claims is approximately 50 miles south of Fairbanks, Alaska along the Richardson Highway. The property can be accessed via two unpaved roads off the Richardson Highway at milepost 292.5 and milepost 314. The project area is cut by several unpaved roads and ATV trails, providing access to the interior of the property. The Shamrock claims are located 62 miles from Pogo and 75 miles from Fort Knox with outstanding infrastructure and access, including a high-voltage power line running along the north and south boundaries, as well as the Alaska Pipeline corridor trending ESE and WNW along the northern boundary. The property includes a total of 361 Alaska state mining claims covering approximately 52,700 acres and gives the Company a dominant land position in the Richardson district (see the map below). The property has excellent infrastructure being right along the Alaska Highway and adjacent to the Trans Alaska Pipeline with several gravel roads and ATV trails providing good access to entire property. In addition, a high-voltage power line traverses along the southern property boundary. This electrical grid provides power to the Pogo gold mine operated by Northern Star Resources Limited which produced approximately 175,000 ounces of gold in 2020 and is located approximately 50 miles to the northeast of the Shamrock property. During the 2021 field season, field crews collected 835 soil samples using a power auger and 75 surface rock chip samples. During the 2025 field season, field crews improved the ATV-accessible trails to the “Buck” State Claim group and collected 372 soil samples from shovel pits. Expansion of surface sample grids including soils, rocks and trenches in the Shamrock, Banner Dikes and First Chance areas is planned for 2026. The Shamrock prospect was previously owned by Coeur Mining, who inherited the property as a result of acquiring Northern Empire Resource, which also owned the Sterling Gold Project located in Nevada. The Richardson property (as it was referred to by Coeur Mining) was non-core, and the claims were dropped in 2020. Based on historic activity, there are a number of well-defined soil anomalies with limited drilling that remain under-explored. The map below shows the location of the Shamrock Prospect: 39 Placer gold was discovered in the Richardson District on Tenderfoot Creek in 1905 and alluvial mining has continued intermittently until as recently as 2010. The Richardson District produced over 119,528 ounces of gold since the early 1900s. The Richardson District is characterized by gentle slopes and broad, alluvium-filled valleys. The area is unglaciated but largely overlain by windblown loess, generally a few meters in thickness but locally up to 50 meters thick. The Shamrock prospect is underlain by a series of medium to high-grade schists and gneisses that make up the Lake George Subterrane of the more broadly distributed Yukon Tanana Terrane across interior Alaska and the Yukon, which is host to a number of large gold deposits. Peak metamorphism occurred around 110 million years ago. Retrograde metamorphism resulted in cooling, gneiss dome formation and a transition from ductile deformation of the metamorphic fabric to brittle deformation, as well as a series of low-angle shears across the region. Mid- Cretaceous extension resulted in regional uplift and denudation of the metamorphic gneiss domes. Post-uplift plutonic activity often occurs along the margins of these domes where zones of extreme thinning are common. Intrusive activity is dated from 105 to 85 Ma (generally considered as two separate intrusive events). Mid-Cretaceous and younger intrusive rocks are genetically related to lode gold mineralization. There are at least three distinctly different types of intrusive-related gold systems that the Company plans to explore for on the Shamrock property: (1) Proximal schist and/or gneiss-hosted gold mineralization similar to the Pogo deposit; (2) Proximal intrusive-hosted gold mineralization; and (3) Distal, plutonic-related boron enriched silver-tin-polymetallic intrusive-hosted gold mineralization which occurs in the Democrat, Banner Dikes and Shamrock areas of the property. Willow Prospect The Willow claim block was staked by the Company in August of 2021. The claims are located 168 kilometers (104.5 miles) north of Anchorage, Alaska, with a processing site located about 60 kilometers (37 miles) west of the claim block, on the Parks Highway. The property includes 69 State of Alaska mining claims covering 8,000 acres, surrounding and including many historic gold mines and prospects. These claims are not subject to any royalties other than taxes and royalties due to the State of Alaska on mineral production from state lands. The claim block is an irregular shape measuring up to 5.5 miles east-west and up to 4.3 miles north-south. Elevations in the claim block range from about 2,000 feet ASL along Archangel Creek to 5,440 feet ASL at Murphy Ridge and The Pinnacle. The Willow claims can be accessed from the Willow Fishhook Road via Archangel Road, along the eastern side of the claim block, and Gold Chord Road on the west side. Infrastructure in the area is excellent with road access between the claim block and plant site via unsealed secondary road, sealed two-lane highway, and the four-lane Parks Highway connecting Anchorage and Fairbanks. The Willow claims cover a number of historically active mines in the Willow Mining District that were all mandated to shut down as a result of the War Act in 1942. Very little exploration work has occurred since that time. The Company plans to conduct geologic mapping, geochemical sampling and geophysical surveys to identify potential exploration drill targets to find additional gold resources. Given the Willow claims’ location adjacent to the Lucky Shot Property, the Company treats these claims as an addition to, and expansion of, the Lucky Shot Property for purposes of its planned exploration activities. 40 The map below shows the location of the Willow Prospect: Amanita NE Prospect The Amanita NE State of Alaska Upland Mining Lease, covering 1021 acres, was acquired by the Company in August of 2024, through the Company’s acquisition of Avidian Gold Alaska, Inc. This prospect is located 20 miles northeast of Fairbanks, immediately below the freshwater dam for the Fort Knox Gold Mine operated by an affiliate of Kinross Gold Corporation and is accessible by public roads and RS2477 trails . The upland mining lease is subject to a 1% NSR royalty on lode gold and a 5% NSR royalty on placer gold due to Keltic Enterprises Inc., as well as taxes and royalties due to the State of Alaska on mineral production from state lands. Amanita NE is located within lower to middle Paleozoic metavolcanic and metasedimentary rocks of the Cleary Sequence and Fairbanks Schist which contain commercially viable mineralization elsewhere in the Fairbanks Mining District. It is located along Fish Creek, which was mined extensively for alluvial gold in the past. Kinross’ Gil-Sourdough gold deposit is immediately northeast of Amanita NE and the Fort Knox gold deposit is located 3 miles upstream from the prospect. Limited exploration conducted between 1992 and 2003 did not reveal significant bedrock exposures of mineralization however, more extensive and closer spaced placer gold drilling conducted in 2004 indicated the presence of commercially attractive placer gold accumulations. Two reverse circulation drill holes targeting lode gold were also drilled in 2004, with mixed results, partially due to drilling technique. In 2013, 4 diamond core holes and 3 placer RC holes were drilled. A full data set of data is not available for these holes, however, granodiorite with disseminated sulfides in stockwork veining with elevated gold and silver values was noted. Further drilling of geophysical targets was recommended at that time. Amanita Prospect A lease with option to purchase for the Amanita State of Alaska Mining Claims and Upland Mining Lease was acquired by the Company in August of 2024, through the Company’s acquisition of Avidian Gold Alaska, Inc. The Amanita Prospect consists of 54 State of Alaska mining claims and leasehold locations and one 1320 acre Upland Mining Lease. The property 41 is subject to a 3% NSR royalty due to Tanya Stolz (lessor) and a 0.2% NSR due to Keltic Enterprises Inc., as well as taxes and royalties due to the State of Alaska on mineral production from state lands. The property lies 15 kilometers northeast of Fairbanks and covers an area of 3,379 acres. It is road accessible, including well maintained trails within the property. The Amanita Claim Group flanks the Gilmore Dome stock, which is composed of granodiorite. Rock units encountered in excavated trenches on the Amanita prospect consist of quartzite, quartz mica schist, amphibolite, phyllite, graphitic schist, and gneiss; all assigned to the Fairbanks schist of Proterozoic-Paleozoic age. Exploration of this prospect began in 1996 by Kinross successor, Cyprus Gold. After finding gold mineralization with associated Bismuth, arsenic and antimony, Kinross Gold conducted a property-wide soil and rock sampling program and subsequently drilled 39 reverse circulation drill holes in 1999 and 2000. Thirty of the thirty-nine Kinross drill holes intersected more than 1.0 g/t Au over at least 1.5 m, and visible gold was noted in several holes. This drilling helped delineate the “Tonsina Trend” a structural corridor trending northeast-southwest, directly in line with the Fort Knox pluton 5 kilometers to the northeast (see map below). In 2016, after Avidian Gold Alaska’s acquisition of the prospect, a 10 day prospecting and soil and rock sample collection program was carried out. Thirteen rock samples contained over 1.0 ppm gold, with the highest grade sample containing 103 ppm gold. Three of the quartz vein/breccia rock samples contained visible gold ± tellurides as well as anomalous silver, bismuth, and tungsten. The bulk of the anomalous samples were found within the Tonsina Trend, but samples containing 14.4 and 26.4 ppm gold were collected from a newly discovered mineralized zone on Rex Ridge in the northeastern portion of the Property. These discoveries led to a 2019 trenching program, consisting of 7 trenches (1,721m total length), which identified three types of hydrothermal mineralization on the property: 1) quartz vein +/- sulfide mineralization; 2) quartz-iron oxide (FeOx) mineralization; and 3) Iron oxide (FeOx) only mineralization. In 2020, 444 line kilometers, drone-based magnetic survey was flown over the prospect. Two main structures were identified; the northeast-trending Saddle Fault and the northwest-trending Rex Fault. The Saddle Fault follows Ruby Creek and the Rex Fault corresponds with Rex Creek. Several smaller structures are apparent in the data as well. Also in 2020, a helicopter-borne LiDAR survey was performed, which show the Saddle and Rex faults well (see below images). 42 In 2020, 9 diamond holes (1945m) were drilled south of the Saddle Fault guided by results from previous surface work and a high-resolution UAV magnetics and LiDAR. A series of mineralized sheeted iron-oxide bearing quartz veins running sub-parallel and perpendicular to foliation were identified in the schist package. Six of the 9 drill holes had significant intercepts over 4 meters in length with gold grades of 1.1ppm to 2.6ppm, including 33.89 meters with a gold grade of 2.56ppm in drillhole AM20-02. The map below shows the area of focus for the 2020 drill program. Exploration permitting is currently underway for a 2026 reverse circulation drill program on the Amanita Prospect. This drill program is designed to build on the 2020 drill results and further test the mineralization seen in northeast-trending Saddle Fault and the northwest-trending Rex Fault. With the appropriate permits from the Alaska Department of Natural Resources in hand, the Company intends to drill and 35 RC drillholes to a depth of up to 150 meters. Reclamation of all drill sites will be carried out in 2026, to include all drill pads/roads used in 2026, and an additional 7 drill pads left open after the 2020 drill program. 43 Golden Zone Property Location of and Access to the Golden Zone Property The Golden Zone Property (the "Golden Zone"), consists of 68 State of Alaska mining claims and one 2,929 acre Upland Mining Lease, covering 10,690 acres. The property was acquired in August of 2024, through the Company’s acquisition of Avidian Gold Alaska, Inc. and much of the property, including the Upland Mining Lease, is subject to three separate royalties: a 1% NSR royalty due to Mines Trust Company Inc.; a 2% NSR royalty due to Chulitna Mining Company; and a 1% NSR royalty on only the Upland Lease due to Hidefield Gold Limited Alaska. A nearby, non-contiguous, 40-acre Mill Site Lease is used as a staging area. The Golden Zone is 16 kilometers west of the main transportation corridor between Anchorage and Fairbanks, including a major highway, a railroad and an electric power transmission line. Road access is from the George Parks Highway at Mile 187.5 onto the Colorado-Bull River road, which leads to the Millsite staging area. Beyond the staging area, 17 kilometers (including 2 river crossings) of project-maintained road leads to the camp facilities and other project locations. Golden Zone can also be accessed by air using a 340 meters landing strip 1 kilometer from the camp. Geology The Golden Zone property is in the “Chulitna Block” at the northwestern end of the Wrangellia Terrane, which extends from western Canada through the eastern Alaska Range into the Property area. The central part of the Golden Zone is dominated by interlayered sediments and lesser mafic volcanics of Devonian to Triassic age, which have been intruded by isolated plugs and dikes of monzodiorite and granite of late Cretaceous and Early Tertiary age. The sediments consist of siltstones, sandstones and conglomerate, intermixed with red bed sandstone and conglomerate and minor argillite. In the eastern part of the Property these rocks are separated from Wrangellia volcanic and sedimentary rocks of Upper Paleozoic age by a graben filled with Jurassic sandstone and argillite. 44 Polymetallic, gold-dominated showings are contained in three fault-bounded belts or corridors on the Golden Zone, named from northwest to southeast, the Golden Zone, Long Creek and Silver Dikes corridors. The Golden Zone corridor is separated from the Long Creek corridor by the pre-mineral Bryn Mawr Fault. The Silver Dikes corridor is contained within the graben filled with Jurassic clastic rocks. Gold2 bearing showings within the Golden Zone corridor include i) quartz-arsenopyrite-sulfide veins at the Riverside prospect; ii) similar veins and skarn mineralization at Banner; iii) veins and shears at the GAS, Lupine, Bunkhouse, Mayflower and BLT prospects; iv) highly mineralized breccia and mineralized porphyry at the Golden Zone Breccia Pipe deposit; v) Breccia Pipe West-a mineralized breccia discovered by Avidian; vi) pyrite-rich gossans in the JJ Zone; vii) polymetallic veins and pods at the MJ Zone (discovered in 2019); and viii) sulfide replacement mineralization discovered by Avidian in conglomerates at the Mayflower Extension Zone. This corridor is typified by the characteristic elements Au-Ag-As-Cu-Bi ± Zn and Pb; mineralization (>5 g/t Au) occurs over a strike length of at least 13 kilometers. Map of Golden Zone Prospects 45 Mineralization in the >3 kilometer long Long Creek Corridor includes skarns, replacement mineralization in conglomerate, and probable porphyry mineralization associated with a quartz-eye porphyritic granite. Hosts are carbonate-rich volcaniclastic sediments. The corridor is typified by the elements Ag-Cu-Au-Bi. Mineral occurrences in the poorly understood Silver Dikes Corridor are veins and shear zones associated with granitic dikes. Characteristic elements are Ag-Bi-Pb-Zn and possibly Sn. On a property-wide scale, mineralization is known to occur from the NE end to the SW corner, a distance of greater than 19 kilometers. Much of this mineralization has received very little exploration attention. Exploration Activity and Target Avidian conducted its first real exploration program on the Golden Zone in 2017; this consisted of reconnaissance to detailed geological mapping, prospecting, 43 line kilometers of IP surveying, minor soil geochemistry, trenching and the drilling of 11 holes totaling 2,579 meters. Hydrothermal alteration was documented via the use of a Terraspec instrument. 46 Avidian continued exploration on the property in 2018, completing prospecting, 46 line kilometers of CSAMT surveys, 16 trenches, and an additional ten drill holes (2,839 meters). The surveys were successful in highlighting near-surface resistivity highs which may be intrusions into overlying sediments. Several resistivity highs form elongated pinnacle features with flanking resistivity lows; these are interpreted to be highly prospective areas for gold and copper mineralization. In 2019, Avidian completed detailed sampling at the JJ Zone, helicopter-supported prospecting in the south part of the Property, a soil/biogeochemical survey, and minor core relogging. In 2020 Avidian commissioned a LiDAR survey of the Property and a drone-based magnetic survey of the northern 14 km2. In 2021, Avidian expanded the drone-based magnetic survey by approximately 1,275 line kilometers, and drilled 3,288 meters in 27 reverse circulation holes. The mag survey expansion identified several major structures trending north-northeast to northeast are apparent in the data. Several more subtle west-northwest structures are also evident. Because of the detailed data resolution, many small-scale structures were also seen in small offsets in the trends of linear magnetic anomalies. The boundaries between the different mineralized corridors, particularly the western edge of the Silver Dikes corridor, are manifested as changes in magnetic domains in several locations. The magnetic lows may represent buried intrusions, including an oval-shaped low at Copper King. Surface Sampling Avidian has collected on the order of 2,500 surface samples (grabs and trench samples) on the Golden Zone from 2016 to 2021, mainly on and close to historically known prospects. Collectively, the surface assays have results up to 177.5 g/t Au, 2550 g/t Ag, 9.54% Cu, 14.3% Pb, 7.17% Zn and 26.9% As (different grab samples). Avidian's sampling in the Golden Zone and Long Creek corridors defines an area with anomalous (>1 g/t) gold samples over a 15 kilometers strike length and up to 4 kilometers width. Gold values are highest in the Golden Zone Corridor, but high gold also occurs locally within the Long Creek Corridor. High silver values occur in all prospects, with the highest values occurring in arsenopyrite-rich veins of the South Long Creek prospect, Long Creek Corridor. High grade silver is also a feature of veins proximal to the Breccia Pipe. All prospects on the Golden Zone contain very high arsenic, with values typically increasing proportionally with increasing gold. Significant copper grades (>0.25%) are not as widespread, but do occur in many prospects over the length of the Property and are abundant at Copper King to Long Creek. Noteworthy lead and zinc values are more restricted than copper or precious metals. The highest lead values occur in veins near the Breccia Pipe and Breccia Pipe West, and at South Long Creek. Significant zinc also occurs at these localities, and locally at Copper King. Molybdenum values are generally very low, except for the Copper King area, where small quantities of molybdenite were noted in quartz veins and in the quartz porphyritic intrusion. Bismuth generally occurs at higher levels in the Golden Zone Corridor, but is also locally anomalous within the Long Creek Corridor. Drilling Avidian drilled 2,579 meters in 13 HQ diamond drill holes on the Golden Zone in 2017, and 10 holes totaling 2,821 meters in 2018. All diamond drilling was completed by Foraco Corp. of Kamloops, BC. Holes were logged at Avidian’s logging facility on site. The core was photographed, and the core recovery and RQD were measured for each core run. Magnetic susceptibility was measured every 1 meter, and terraspec analyses were performed from 2 to 5 meters intervals in 2017. Hole orientation was measured approximately every 50 meters with an Easy Shot camera. Individual vein orientations were measured, in some cases with respect to the core axis and in other instances with respect to an oriented line on the core. 47 Location and Targets of Golden Zone Diamond Drill Holes in 2017/2018 In 2021 Avidian commissioned Midnight Sun Drilling Inc. of Whitehorse, Yukon Territory to drill 27 reverse circulation drill holes (3,286 meters) at Mayflower Extension Zone, Copper King and Long Creek. The holes were assayed in five foot intervals; magnetic susceptibility and Terraspec information was collected in a similar fashion to earlier diamond drill holes. Location and Targets of Golden Zone RC Drill Holes in 2021 48 In 2026, The Company plans to continue maintenance of the camp facilities on the property with regard to safety and weather protection. In addition, reclamation will be carried out to address remaining areas of disturbance from prior exploration programs. Environmental Regulation and Permitting Peak Gold JV Property The Company believes that it and the Peak Gold JV are currently operating in compliance with all environmental regulations. Peak Gold LLC holds a bond with the State of Alaska in the amount of $65,976,000 to provide reclamation of the site to the original environmental functionality. Major Permits include: 1. Alaska Mining Permit Application (APMA)#2626 covering exploration drilling activities on the Tetlin Lease. This permit now extends through December 31, 2025. 2. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CWA §404 Wetlands Permit (POA-2013-00286) issued September 2, 2022 (expiration September 30, 2027) with accompanying Alaska Department of Conservation CWA §401 Water Quality Certification issued August 29, 2022 (expiration September 30, 2027). 3. Alaska Department of Natural Resources (ADNR) Reclamation and Closure Plan Approval (F20232626RPA) issued May 15, 2023 (expiration May 15, 2028). 4. Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) Waste Management Permit (2023DB0001) issued May 15, 2023 (expiration May 15, 2028). 5. Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) Air Emissions Title 1 Minor Air Permit (AQ1616MSS01 Rev.1) issued July 12, 2022 (no expiration date). Lucky Shot Property Hard Rock Exploration Permits and Temporary Water Use Permits covering planned activities on the Lucky Shot Property were issued by the Alaska Department of Natural Resources to the Company and consist of the following multi-year permits: 1. Alaska Hard Rock Exploration and Reclamation Permit #3003 covering exploration drilling activities on the Lucky Shot Property. This permit is effective through December 31, 2026. Each year during the term of the permit, the Company will submit a reclamation statement detailing reclamation actions taken and a letter of intent to do reclamation for the following year. 2. Alaska Temporary Water Use Permit F2021-118. The permit expires December 31, 2026. These water use authorizations are specific to Alaska Hard Rock Exploration permit #3003. 3. Driveway Permit #27495 issued by the State of Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities. Johnson Tract Property Permits and approvals in hand authorize activities associated with surface exploration drilling on the South and North Tracts. Authorization of the construction of a road and airstrip on the South Tract to support future underground exploration is via a United States Corps of Engineers wetlands permit and state Reclamation Plan Approval. Major Permits include: 1. Right of Way Certificate of Access (RWCA LACL-21-001) allows surface exploration activities on the North Tract, where the National Parks Service has surface rights (expires Oct 31, 2028). A performance bond of $145,547 USD is in place for this work. 2. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CWA §404 Wetlands Permit (POA-2023-00115) issued September 10, 2024 (expiration August 31, 2029) with accompanying Alaska Department of Conservation CWA §401 Water Quality Certification issued October 20, 2023. 3. Alaska Department of Natural Resources (ADNR) Reclamation and Closure Plan Approval (F20243253RPA) issued April 26, 2024 (expiration April 26, 2029). 49 4. Transportation and Easement Deeds, conveyed to CIRI from the National Parks Service on January 16, 2025. These easements authorize initial activities to plan for transportation of minerals from the Johnson Tract. Minor Permits include: 1. Reclamation approval is provided by the state through Alaska Hard Rock Exploration #3253. 2. Alaska Temporary Water Use Permits F2023-065 and F2022-094 support exploration activities. The permits expire December 31, 2027 and September 20, 2026, respectively. These water use authorizations are specific to Alaska Hard Rock Exploration #3253. 3. Alaska Department of Fish & Game (ADF&G), Habitat Division issued Fish Habitat Permits FH22-II-0099, FH23-II-051, - 052 and -054 for minor instream activities. The Fish Habitat Permits expire on December 31, 2026, and September 30 2027, respectively 4. Various camp-operations permits have been secured from the state authorizing potable water (Public Water System, PWSID#249261), domestic wastewater (PA-29073), and a landfill (Solid Waste Permit SW3CAMPA091-28). 5. Nation Wide Permit (NWP) verification letters (POA-2025-0036, issued August 14, 2025, and POA-2025-0076, issued August 7, 2025), issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The NWPs allow for the installation of equipment to collect baseline information in the marine environment. 6. Temporary Land Use Permits (LAS 35655 and LAS 35659), issued by ADNR, allowing for the installation of equipment to collect baseline information in the marine environment. The project permitting timetable was officially placed onto the FAST-41 Dashboard on January 30, 2026. The permitting timetable for Johnson Tract serves as a publicly visible contract between the federal government and the Company to ensure that development of the Johnson Tract Critical Metals Project stays on track and remains coordinated between all parties involved in the ongoing permitting process. Shamrock Prospect Hard Rock Exploration Permits and Temporary Water Use Permits covering planned activities on the Shamrock Prospect were issued by the Alaska Department of Natural Resources to the Company and consist of the following multi-year permits: 1. Alaska Hard Rock Exploration and Reclamation Permit #2849 covering exploration drilling activities on the Buck State Mining Claims. This permit now extends through December 31, 2025. Each year during the term of the permit, the Company will submit a reclamation statement detailing reclamation actions taken and a letter of intent to do reclamation for the following year. 2. Alaska Temporary Water Use Permit F2021-083, allowing a seasonal average water use of 21,600 gallons per day during the period June 1 to October 31. The permit expires December 31, 2025. These water use authorizations are specific to Alaska Hard Rock Exploration permit #2849. 3. Alaska Department of Fish & Game (ADF&G), Habitat Division issued the Fish Habitat Permit FH21-III-0147 for activities associated with F212849 on June 16, 2021. The Fish Habitat Permit will expire on December 31, 2025. Triple Z Prospect Hard Rock Exploration Permit covering some planned activities on the Triple Z Property was issued by the Alaska Department of Natural Resources to the Company and consists of the following multi-year permits: 1. Alaska Hard Rock Exploration and Reclamation Permit #2246 covering exploration some drilling activities on the Triple Z Property. The permit is in the process of being amended to include additional lands made available for exploration as a result of the land transfer. This permit is currently not in effect, but will be in place before 2025 field work begins. Each year during the term of the permit, the Company will submit a reclamation statement detailing reclamation actions taken and a letter of intent to do reclamation for the following year. 2. Alaska Department of Fish & Game (ADF&G), Habitat Division issued the Fish Habitat Permit FH20-III-0063 for activities associated with F212849 on June 16, 2021. The Fish Habitat Permit will expire on December 31, 2025. 50 The state permits were issued to Contango Minerals Alaska, LLC to cover its access road, drill pad and core drilling impacts. Reclamation of surface disturbance, if any, associated with our exploration activities is conducted concurrently where required. Amanita Prospect This Hard Rock Exploration Permit covering planned activities on the Amanita Prospect was issued by the Alaska Department of Natural Resources to Avidian Gold Alaska and consists of the following multi-year permit: 1. Alaska Hard Rock Exploration and Reclamation Permit #2238 covers exploration and drilling activities on the Amanita State Mining Claims and Upland Lease. The permit extends through December 31, 2025. Each year during the term of the permit, the Company will submit a reclamation statement detailing reclamation actions taken and a letter of intent to do reclamation for the following year. Golden Zone Prospect The Hard Rock Exploration Permit, Temporary Water Use Permits, and Fish Habitat Permit covering planned activities on the Golden Zone Project were issued by the Alaska Department of Natural Resources to Avidian Gold Alaska and consist of the following multi-year permits: 1. Alaska Hard Rock Exploration and Reclamation Permit #5661 covers exploration and drilling activities on the Amanita State Mining Claims and Upland Lease. The permit extends through December 31, 2025. Each year during the term of the permit, the Company will submit a reclamation statement detailing reclamation actions taken and a letter of intent to conduct reclamation actions for the following year. 2. Alaska Temporary Water Use Permit TWUA F2021-046, allowing a seasonal average water use of a combined maximum withdrawal of 10,560 gpd at a maximum combined pump withdrawal rate of 8 gpm (0.017cfs) for up to 22 hours per day for no more than 165 days per season from three (3) streams. Withdrawal activities are to be conducted May 1 to October 15 of each authorized year. These water use authorizations are specific to Alaska Hard Rock Exploration permit #5661. The permit expires December 31, 2025. 3. Alaska Temporary Water Use Permit TWUA F2021-097, allowing a seasonal average water use of a combined maximum withdrawal of 10,560 gpd at a maximum combined pump withdrawal rate of 8 gpm (0.017cfs) for up to 22 hours per day for no more than 165 days per season from three (3) streams. Withdrawal activities are to be conducted from May 1 to October 15 of each authorized year. These water use authorizations are specific to Alaska Hard Rock Exploration permit #5661. The permit expires December 31, 2025. 4. Alaska Department of Fish & Game (ADF&G), Habitat Division issued the Fish Habitat Permit FH21-IV-0283 for activities associated with fording the Bull River and West Fork of the Chulitna River and for water withdrawal from West Fork of the Chulitna River, Bryn Mawr Creek, Long Creek and six additional unnamed streams to support mining operations. The Fish Habitat Permit will expire on December 31, 2025. Additional Permit Conditions Any future mining operations undertaken by the Company or the Peak Gold JV are subject to local, state, tribal, and federal regulation governing environmental quality and pollution control, including air quality standards, greenhouse gas, waste management, reclamation and restoration of properties, plant and wildlife protection, cultural resource protection, handling and disposal of radioactive substances, and employee health and safety. Extraction of mineral ore is subject to stringent environmental, health, and safety regulation by state and federal authorities, including the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), and may also be subject to additional regulation of local and tribal authorities. Such regulation can increase the cost of planning, designing, constructing, installing and operating mining facilities or otherwise delay, limit or prohibit planned operations. Significant fines and penalties may be imposed for failure to comply with environmental laws. Some environmental laws provide for joint and several strict liability for remediation of releases of hazardous substances. In addition, the Company and the Peak Gold JV may be subject to claims alleging personal injury or property damages as a result of alleged exposure to hazardous substances or other environmental impacts. The Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 and regulations promulgated thereunder, and the State of Alaska Department of Labor and Workforce Development, impose a variety of health and safety standards on numerous aspects of employee working conditions related to mineral extraction and processing operations, including the training of personnel, operating procedures and operating equipment. In addition, the Company and the Peak Gold JV may be subject to additional 51 state and local mining standards. The Company believes that it and the Peak Gold JV currently are in compliance with applicable mining standards; however, the Company cannot predict whether changes in standards or the interpretation or enforcement thereof will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s or the Peak Gold JV’s business, financial condition or otherwise impose restrictions on its ability to conduct mining operations. A typical time frame for baseline environmental studies and permitting for a gold mine in Alaska may take more than a decade. There are numerous state and federal permits and authorizations required from many different state and federal agencies. Federal legislation and regulations adopted and administered by the EPA and other governmental or tribal authorities, Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, Mine Safety and Health Administration, and other federal agencies, legislation such as the CWA, Safe Drinking Water Act, CAA, National Environmental Policy Act, Migratory Bird Treaty Act, Endangered Species Act, RCRA and CERCLA and various laws and regulations administered by the State of Alaska including the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities and the Alaska Department of Natural Resources, have a direct bearing on exploration and mining operations conducted in Alaska. The scope, breadth and complexity of these regulations make the process for preparing and obtaining approval of a plan of operations much more time-consuming, expensive, and uncertain. The Alaska Department of Natural Resources coordinates the permitting of mining operations in the State of Alaska, has developed a process to integrate federal, state and local government requirements to obtain mine permits, and also provides an opportunity for public comment. Plans of operation will be required to include detailed baseline environmental information and address how detailed reclamation performance standards will be met. In addition, all activities for which plans of operation are required will be subject to a new standard of review by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, which must make a finding that the conditions, practices or activities do not cause substantial irreparable harm to significant scientific, cultural, or environmental resource values that cannot be effectively mitigated. CERCLA, also known as the “superfund” law, and analogous state laws impose liability, regardless of fault or the legality of the original conduct, on certain classes of persons that contributed to the release of a “hazardous substance” into the environment. These persons include the current or previous owner and operator of a site where a hazardous substance has been disposed and persons who disposed or arranged for the disposal of a hazardous substance at a site, or transported a hazardous substance to a site for disposal. CERCLA also authorizes the EPA and, in some cases, private parties to take actions in response to threats to the public health or the environment and to seek recovery from such responsible classes of persons of the costs of such an action. The Company’s and the Peak Gold JV’s mining operations may generate wastes that fall within CERCLA’s definition of “Hazardous Substances”, and, thus, subject the Company or the Peak Gold JV to CERCLA liability. Finally, environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) goals and programs, which typically include extralegal targets related to environmental stewardship, social responsibility, and corporate governance, have become an increasing focus of investors, stockholders and activists across many industries. While reporting on ESG metrics remains voluntary, access to capital and investors is likely to favor companies with robust ESG programs in place. In addition, if ESG metrics and/or reporting become mandatory, the Company’s and the Peak Gold JV’s costs of planning, designing, constructing, operating, and maintaining their mining facilities and associated operations and the costs of their compliance obligations in connection with those facilities and operations could increase.